The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem 6.1 HueningPD&SDR PA85-020 AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 28, 1985 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING PA 85-020, Tom Huening Planned Development Rezoning and Site Development Review at 6767 Dublin Boulevard EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Exhibit A - Draft Ordinance Amending Zoning Ordinance Background Attachment RECOMMENDATION:~\S~ Resolution establishing Findings and General Provisions for a Planned Development Rezoning concerning PA 85-020, Tom Huening commercial development at 6767 Dublin Bouelvard 1 - Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation ±{ 2 - Take testimony from applicant and public 3 - Question Staff, applicant and the public 4 - Close public hearing and deliberate 5 - Waive second reading and adopt ordinance FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None I I DESCRIPTION: On Hay 13, 1985, the City Council adopted a Resolution approving the Tom Huening Planned Rezoning and introduced an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance. The City Council also adopted a Resolution which approved a Site Development Review to construct a 4,485 sq. ft. building at 6767 Dublin Bouelvard. At this time, Staff recommends that the City Council waive the second reading and adopt the ordinance. / ----------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM NO. 0./ --~-~ COPIES TO: Ãpplicant-- --------------. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT THE REZONING OF REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF DUBLIN The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Dublin Ordinance Code is hereby amended in the following manner: Two parcels are affected by this rezoning: Parcel 1: APN 941- 205-4-2 to be rezoned from M-1 to a PD with C-2 uses ; Parcel 2 : APN 941-205-1-21 to be rezoned from a PD with M-1 and C-2 uses to a PD with C-2 uses . A map depicting the two parcels is listed below. The findings , conditions , and General Provisions contained in Exhibits A (Negative Declaration) , Exhibit B (PD) Exhibit C (SDR) and Exhibit D (Plans) for PA 85-020 are hereby adopted as the regulations for the use, improvements, and maintenance of property within this District. 04.0011 A r � 111@ N • C 17 prr rS DUBI'N � rOQ•r 1 SPORTS GROUNDS • L1M11 \ ' _.. --------1! _ SECTION 2 . This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30 ) days from and after the date of its passage. Before the expiration of fifteen ( 15) days after its passage, it shall be published once with the name of the Council members voting for and against the same in the Tri-Valley Herald, a newspaper published in Alameda County and available in the City of Dublin. 1 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Dublin on this th day of , 1985, by the following votes : AYES : NOES : ABSENT : Mayor ATTEST: C ;„ty Clerk / 7 BHIBff RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL - OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING AND ESTABLISHING FINDINGS .AND GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING CONCERNING PA 85-020, TOM HUENING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, Tom Huening filed an application for a PD RRezoning on two parcels (APN 941-205-4-2 , 6,720 sq. ft. and APN 941-205-1-21, 1. 5 acres) located on the north side of Dublin Boulevard south of Sierra Court; and . WHEREAS, the existing commercial site located immediately to the east is to be rezoned from a PD with C-2 - M-1 uses to a PD with C-2 uses as part of this application; and • WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this application; and / WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on said applications on April 15, 1985 and recommended approval ; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hold a public hearing on said applications on 5/13/85 ; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted recommending that . the applications be conditionally approved; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and consider all . .. said reports , recommendations, and testimony as herein set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City Council does hereby find that: 1) The PD is consistent with the policies of the Dublin General Plan 2) The PD will net have a significant effect on the environment 3 ) The PD is appropriate for the subject property in terms of being compatible to existing land uses in the area, will be visually attractive, and will not overburden public services. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council does ; hereby approve the PD subject to the following conditions: 1) Development on the site shall be consistent with materials labeled Exhibit "A" on file in the Dublin Planning - Department titled Dublin Business Center II , Huening . Investment Corporation by Burns/Nettle, sheets 1 and 2, dated 4/1/85 , and as amended by these provisions. 2 ) The conditions imposed on the SDR are incorporated by reference into the PD . . 3 ) Any changes or modifications of these plans shall be processed according to Section 8-31. 18 of the Zoning Ordinance . 4 ) Approval of this Planned Development is subject to review at j the expiration of two ( 2 ) years from the effective date Pf the PD as is specified in Section 8-31 .2 (b) of the Zoning - Ordinance . DP 83-20 5) Both parcels are to be rezoned to a PD with C-2 uses and regulations, as specified in Section 8-49 .1 and 8-49.2 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance as amended by this PD and Site Development Review. 6) These findings, conditions, and general provisions are hereby adopted as the regulations for the use, improvements and maintenance of property within this District. 7 ) The previous PD is hereby rescinded and replaced with this PD. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of May, 1935 . AYES : NOES : ABSENT: • Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk DP 83-20 .......",~. ,.. .r·4....;..__·~._:"O~;,·....··· .,'-. '.'. '....-..".~.." . ~ r , CiTY OF DUBLIN Development Services P.O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 July 18, 1985 P!anning/Zonit\g 829.<\916 Bui1dÎn~ & S;:¡felY 829·0822 Engineering/Public Works 8~9-4916 Mr. Tom Huening 451 cornell San Mateo, California 94402 ..~ Re: ~~A 85-020 HUENING PD REZONING Dear Tom: Based upon our review of the construction drawings submitteà to the Building Department and the conditions of approval for PÞ. 85-020, we have the following comments: 1) The landscape and irrigation plan, which needs to be stamped by a registered landscape architect, does not show the existing pine trees to remain. The pine trees were required to be incorporated into the final landscape plan. 2 ) ~'¡alkways or stepping stones need to be existing planter between the parking building. provided across area anà the the new 3 ) The elevations need to be clarifieè. block is being proposed? Ttlhai: type being proposed on the elevations? materials board needs to be submitted approval. What tVDe of concrete of band~ or reveal is A final color sand for our revie'''; and 4 ) The new trash enclosure should be relocated to the exist1na commercial site where it is not along a store front. -A; access and mai~tenance agreement will be required. I I 5 ) A parking and access ease~ent anè a maintenance easement for the north and ',..¡est walls need to be drafted for the revie'.... and aP9roval of the City Attorney. 6) A sign program neeès to be de',,'eloped for our revie'''; and approval. ------"-" , Hr. Tom Huening July 18, 1985 Page Two (~ ,- Please be advised that these comments are related to Planning only. The Building Department, City Engineer and other agencies will likely have their own co~ments. If you have any questions, please call me. TPO/j Sincerely, C.Ei>/" ThoQas P. DeLuca Associate Planner