Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.3 EDub Annex Detach CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 10, 1994 SUBJECT: Public Hearing PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin Annexation/Detachment and Prezone #1 REPORT PREPARED BY: Carol R. Cirelli,�ior Planner EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Exhibit A: Resolution regarding Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report and Addendum dated August 22, 1994 Exhibit B: /Resolution regarding Planned Development Prezone Exhibit C: /Resolution regarding Annexation/Detachment No. 10 Exhibit D: Resolution regarding Exchange of Property Tax Revenue Exhibit E: Concurrent Resolution between the Dublin City Council and the Board of Directors of the Dublin San Ramon Services District regarding the Eastern Dublin Annexation° Exhibit F: zResolution Approving Annexation Agreement with the Lin Family Exhibit G: //Braft Ordinance for PD Prezoning Background Attachments Attachment 1: /7icinity Map Attachment 2: /Planning Commission meeting minutes of September 6, 1994 Attachment 3: /Eastern Dublin EIR Addendum dated August 22, 1994 Attachment 4: Fiscal Study for PA 94-030 Eastern 4: Dublin COPIES TO: Agenda/General File Applicants Property Owners DUSD LVJUSD DSRSD LARPD - COPIES TO: ITEM NO , 6• -- CITY CLERK - FILE I -16-W �0 RECOMMENDATION: 1) Open public hearing and hear staff presentation. 2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public 3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public. �(,� 4) Close public hearing and deliberate. 5) Adopt the following: • Exhibit A - Resolution finding the project within the Scope of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report and Addendum dated August 22, 1994; • Exhibit B - Resolution approving the Planned Development Prezoning- • Exhibit C - Resolution approving the application for annexation and detachment to ` ( the LAFCo; • Exhibit D - Resolution approving the exchange - of property tax revenue; • Exhibit E - Resolution approving the concurrent resolution between the City of. Dublin and the Dublin San Ramon Services District. • Exhibit F - Resolution approving the annexation agreement with the Lin Family; and 6) Waive the reading and introduce the Ordinance (Exhibit G) approving the Planned Development Prezoning; and 7) Continue the item to the October 24, 1994 City Council meeting for the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance. FINANCIAL STATEMENT:, A. fiscal study for the annexation has been finalized and the major project proponent (The Lin Family) will be required to enter into an annexation agreement with the City to ensure that the annexation will be revenue neutral. (See discussion in Staff Report) . INTRODUCTION On June 27, 1994, the City Council initiated a zoning ordinance amendment study request for initially prezoning a portion of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan planning area, generally located north of I-580 between Tassajara and Fallon roads, to a Planned Development (PD) District Overlay Zone (see Attachment 1) . On September 6, 1994, the Planning. Commission held a public hearing and recommended City Council approval of the Eastern Dublin Annexation and Prezone #1 (PA 94- 030) project, with no modifications to the project or resolutions. The minutes to this public hearing are included as Attachment 2. Ted Fairfield, representing property owner Jennifer Lin, and Clyde Casterson have formally submitted annexation/detachment and prezoning applications. Property owners within the project site were informed of 2 - ~ ~ this annexation/detachment and prezoning request. Out of eleven owners, six concur with the project and two oppose the project. not received responses from the remaining three property owners. owners controlling the majority (70%) of the project site concur request. property staff has Property with this The proposed annexation and detachment request involves annexing the 1,538 acre site to the city of Dublin, annexing 1,542 acres to the Dublin San Ramon Services District (extra 4 acres includes the federal government owned land, see Exhibit C), and detaching a 1,029 acre site from the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District. The prezone request involves prezoning the project site to a PD District Overlay Zone with underlying residential and commercial land use designations. PREZONE The prezoning request is consistent with the adopted Eastern Dublin Specific Plan land use policies and land use map (see Draft Resolution, Exhibit B). Action Program 4C of the specific plan requires that the entire Eastern Dublin planning area shall have a PD District overlay zoning designation. Property owners desiring to develop their land would need to comply with the city's PD District review process. This will help ensure that the underlying intent of the Eastern Dublin specific Plan is implemented. section 8-31.16 of the Zoning Ordinance allows the separate processing of the PD District zoning. The initial PD District zoning, or prezoning (a PD District zoning without a Land Use and Development Plan), can be established with land use provisions sufficiently detailed to be found consistent with the policies of the Dublin General Plan. The second level of the PD District zoning, or rezoning, would occur with a Land Use and Development Plan that contains provisions regulating use, improvement and maintenance of property within the boundaries'of the, plan. Property owners are not able to develop their land without both an approved PD District rezoning and Land Use and Development Plan. This excludes development allowed under the Interim Agricultural Designation (see discussion below). The draft PD District provisions (Exhibit B) specify the underlying land use designations, and each land use designation's intent, intensity of use, permitted uses and conditional uses. These land use designations include: Rural Residential/Agricultural; single Family; Medium Density; Medium High Density; High Density; General Commercial; Neighborhood Commercial; Campus Office; Open Space; and Future Study Area: Rural Residential/Agricultural. All proposed provisions are consistent with the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan land use polices. The proposed provisions are also similar and generally consistent with the city's existing residential and commercial zoning district provisions. A portion of the project site (approximately 10-15 acres) lies outside the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area,' but within the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment area. The underlying land use designation for this area is Rural Residential/Agricultural. According to the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment policies, a specific planes) will be required before any development is approved in the Eastern Extended Planning Area, or before approval of a Land Use and Development Plan. This requirement has been included as a general provision in the PD District prezoning. - 3 - Interim Agricultural Designation The Interim Agricultural land use designation allows the existing residential and agricultural uses approved under Alameda County's Zoning Ordinance to remain and allows new residential and agricultural uses approved under this proposed ordinance to be established until such time the affected property owners apply for a PD District rezoning and a Land Use and Development Plan approval. The regulations and standards governing this land use designation shall be. the Agricultural Districts (A Districts) provisions of the Alameda County Zoning Ordinance. Also, following annexation, all City of Dublin zoning provisions relating to legal non- conforming uses and buildings shall apply to these properties. School Facilities Condition The PD District provisions also include a school facilities impact mitigation condition. The condition assures that appropriate school services will be available prior to any development occurring in the Eastern Dublin planning area, exclusive of development allowed under the Interim Agricultural Designation. This condition is consistent with the Specific Plan. For example, prior to City Council approval of a PD District rezoning and a Land Use and Development Plan, all property developers shall enter into a written mitigation agreement with the affected school district and the City of Dublin. This agreement shall establish the method and manner of financing and/or constructing school facilities necessary to serve the student population generated by the development. The city's role is to ensure uniformity among the different property owners and appropriate land use planning. The Dublin Unified School District and Livermore Valley. Joint Unified School District, including their legal counsels reviewed and support the condition. Consistency with the Alameda County Airport Land Use Policy Plan The Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan received a Conditional Determination of Consistency from the Airport Land Use Commission of Alameda County (ALUC) in June, 1993 . A condition required that the residential designations within the Airport Protection Area (APA) be changed to Future Study Area/Agriculture or other non-residential land use designation. Portions of the project site (approximately 10 acres) lie within the ALUC's APA boundary. This prezoning request designates the former residential designation of Medium Density within the APA as Future Study Area: Rural Residential/Agricultural. The intent of this land use designation is to provide a future opportunity for studying other appropriate land use designations for this site. On August 26, 1994, the ALUC found this prezoning request to be consistent with the Alameda County Airport Land Use Policy Plan. This zoning also complies with the city's adopted Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan, which states that "if, at the time of prezoning, the residential designations are inconsistent with the APA, the residential designations will convert to 'Future Study Area' with an underlying rural residential/agriculture designation. " - - 4 - ~ ANNEXATION The project site is currently'within the unincorporated portion of Alameda County. In order for the site to come under the jurisdictions of the city of Dublin and Dublin San Ramon Services District, the site must be prezoned and annexed. The Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) prefers that a city prezone an area proposed for annexation, with zoning that is consistent with the adopted general plans and specific plans for the area. Staff concurs with the LAFCo and recommends that prezoning for this project site be adopted prior to final annexation so that the city of Dublin zoning is in place at the time the project site becomes part of the city. The City council would then adopt a resolution for an application to the LAFCo for annexation (see Exhibit C). The LAFCo then determines whether to approve the annexation. Following this will be a ' separate annexation process involving the city Council. LAFCo and state law also requires an agreement between the City and the other affected taxing entities regarding the exchange of property tax revenues following annexation. The City and Alameda county are parties to an agreement which provides that the City will receive 25.4% of the property tax revenues from the area proposed to be annexed. The city council and Board of supervisors merely need to adopt resolutions agreeing formally to the transfer of these property taxes to the city following annexation (see Exhibit D). The proposed annexation request is appropriate because it is contiguous to the existing city limits and would allow the city to provide the necessary levels of urban services. The affected property owners and local public service and utility agencies have reviewed the annexation proposal. The local service agencies (i.e., Dougherty Regional Fire Authority, Dublin San Ramon Services District, Alameda County Flood Control Zone 7, East Bay Regional Park District, P.G. & E., Viacom and the Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority) have indicated that they would be able to provide services to the project site at a level commensurate to the levels of service that are currently provided within the existing city l'imits. Attachment C of Exhibit C is the "Plan for Municipal services" document that describes the timing and availability of services for the proposed annexation area. The Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) has been actively planning to provide water and wastewater services to the annexation area. DSRSD will be obtaining {ill water supplies for the annexation area from the Zone 7 of the Alameda county Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Zone 7). Zone 7's "Water and Supply Planning Report" dated November 1993 indicates that in its planning efforts, Zone 7 has taken into account the water needs of the future development in the Eastern Dublin planning area. DSRSD has recently re-negotiated its Water Supply Contract with Zone 7. It obligates Zone 7 to supply all the water requested by DSRSD subject to its availability. DSRSD's current allotted capacity in the Livermore Amador Valley Wastewater Management Authority (LAVWMA) and Eastern Bay Dischargers Authority (EDBA) systems is not sufficient for planned and approved ..-c__J~,eye19Plll_~t_Yl:i,_thi!:l_P~;RSD_~~xi sti.ng area and not__sufllc_ienLL_o---..SeJ:;-ve-------- development within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area, which would require an average total daily export capacity of 4.3 MGD-ADWF (million gallons per day - average dry weather flow). An expansion of the LAVWMA - 5 - system was an alternative identified and is an option currently being pursued. In this alternative, a contract for increased effluent capacity would be signed with EBDA and the current LAVWMA export line would be expanded. DSRSD is a member of LAVWMA and LAVWMA is pursuing additional capacity, up to 12 .7 MGD as joint use facilities with concurrence of all LAVWMA members. Alternately, LAVWMA may pursue sole use facilities up to 5.4 MGD for DSRSD exclusively. Negotiations have been occurring with EBDA for the purchase of such capacity. All members of EBDA have indicated 'a willingness to approve a capacity of 12 .7 MGD, once the terms of payment for such capacity are worked out. Out of this 12 .7 MGD, DSRSD is expected to have 5.4 MGD. An additional form of wastewater disposal currently planned for the Eastern Dublin planning area will be through reclamation and reuse through ground water recharge with demineralized water available and surface irrigation. It is DSRSD's goal to have this type of disposal capacity if such capacity has not been provided by the expansion of LAVWMA facilities within 3 years of the effective date of this annexation. With the annexation, all new development could receive water service from DSRSD. Wastewater services would not be available at the actual time of annexation of the project area. DSRSD will need to prepare planning and engineering studies for water and sewer infrastructure required to service the annexation area. DSRSD will enter into Area-Wide Facility Agreements with each property owner within the annexation project area that would obligate each property owner to fund the preparation of the planning and engineering studies. It also provides that the District will annex the area while assuming no obligation to provide services, due to the current limitations on the DSRSD's wastewater export capacity. The execution of these agreements will be a condition of the provision of services when and if capacity becomes available. The proposed annexation would be effective October 1, , 1995. State law allows the City to select an effective date. The October 1st date will provide adequate time for the City and other service providers to hire additional staff and purchase necessary equipment to serve the area. Agreement With Lin Family Goals and policies of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan require annexation and new development to be revenue neutral. A fiscal analysis of the annexation has been prepared (see Attachment 4) . The major project proponent (the Lin Family) will be required to enter into an annexation agreement with the City (see Exhibit F) . Prezoning shall not take effect until the annexation agreement is signed and the financial security is provided to the City's satisfaction. Under the agreement, if the costs of providing services to the proposed annexation area exceed excess revenues generated within incorporated portions of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area, the Lin Family is required to fund the difference. The city will prepare annual fiscal studies (funded, by the Lin Family)to determine the amount of the shortfall each year. If, by April 1998, the cost of providing services still exceeds revenues, the agreement requires the Lin Family to meet with the City to negotiate a way of terminating or reducing the Lin Family's obligation to fund the shortfall, including detachment of the area from the city. The Lin Family's obligation will continue, however, until the revenues exceed the costs or some other way to address the shortfall has been reached. - 6 - The projection that costs will exceed revenues initially is consistent with the specific Plan's fiscal analysis which also shows that, over time, revenues will exceed costs. The approval of the annexation is, thus, consistent with the Specific Plan, and the provisions of the Annexation Agreement assure that there will be no shortfall even if development does not occur as anticipated. Concurrent Resolution with Dublin San Ramon Services District The city has been requested to adopt a resolution of application to LAFCo for annexing property on behalf of both the City and DSRSD. It was previously determined by LAFCo that the City and DSRSD should have coterminus boundaries. Both DSRSD and the city have worked cooperatively in partnership to prepare a plan showing how municipal services, in particular, water, wastewater, and recycled water services will be provided to the annexing property. Through this resolution, the city and DSRSD acknowledge that DSRSD will be the exclusive provider of water, wastewater, and recycled water services to the annexing property and that it will invest considerable expertise and resources to provide these services. As long as DSRSD makes reasonable efforts to provide these services to the annexing property, the city will not take any action that would conflict with DSRSD's exclusive provision of these services, or otherwise interfere with DSRSD's study and planning efforts. DETACHMENT As mentioned previously, 1,029 acres of the total 1,538 acre site is proposed for detachment from the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District (LARPD) (see Exhibit C). This is consistent with the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan policies that indicate jurisdictional lines should be revised so that the City of Dublin Recreation Department and other city departments have jurisdiction over all park land within the Dublin Sphere of Influence, which includes the project site. In addition, the city recently adopted the Park and Recreation Master Plan that addresses the necessary park facilities, including facility financing and operating methods, for the project site and the rest of the Eastern Dublin planning area. Unless the jurisdictional boundaries are revised, LARPD would acquire, develop and maintain new park and recreation facilities in the Eastern Dublin area. LARPD's goals could conflict with the Park and Recreation Master Plan policies and programs related to park planning, financing and operations. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff reviewed the prezoning and annexation through an Initial Study and concluded the previously certified Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (which includes the May 4, 1993 Addendum) with the Addendum to the EIR dated August 22, 1994, adequately covers the significant environmental effects, and alternatives and mitigation measures related to each significant effect of this project. The August 22, 1994 Addendum (see Attachment 3) provides an update of the city and Dublin San Ramon Services District's plans to provide wastewater service to development in the Eastern Dublin planning area. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS ,,_.........._ , , , ' , ._.._.".,., ...._" '.." ". ,." ,.. ,...."" "," "r" .. ,," , ..... , -. -_..'- .---'. --,_..~".. ^^ ----staf'i^-ancf^--Ehe--plilnniriij--c-oiiiiilI ssi6il-found--thEi--proj ec-f--to be -consi stent with the amended General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan land use designations and policies, and recommend City Council approval of 1) - 7 - Exhibit A finding the project with the scope of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report and Addendum dated August 22, 1994; 2) Exhibit B approving the Planned Development Prezoning; 3) Exhibit C :approving the application for annexation and detachment to the LAFCo; 4) Exhibit D approving the exchange of property tax revenue; 5) Exhibit E approving the concurrent resolution between-the City of Dublin and the Dublin San.Ramon. Services District; and 6) Exhibit F approving the annexation agreement with the Lin Family. Staff also recommends City Council waive the reading and introduce the Ordinance (Exhibit G) approving the Planned Development Prezoning. - - 8 - --..� i i< ,;r---4- 2cnwe1d V :3 * q x , ��0£Ob611° - :wx . HOXVM . • :ysayyi . :NIVISRV . :ssoN :SHAY ' '' 66T 'aegogop ;o Lep ggoi sTgq aamaoav arm aamomadY 'aassv •douab' ppaT agq SP AgTO. agq pup. TTounoO AqT0 eqq ;o quawbpnC quapuadapuT aqq goal;aa squawnoop aseql. gEqq spur; puE 2jisd aqq ggTM wnpuappv 't66T ''Zz gsnbni aqq paaapTsuoo pup paMaTAaa spq TTounoo 'qTO aqy ' ' -lima agg ;o adoos ago. uTggTM axe uoTquxauuE pup buTuozaad aim pup goaCoad uTTgna uaagapa ago. ao; glad aqq uT passaappE you aaaM gvgg uozgpxauuE pup buTUOZaad agg ao; paaTnbaa aq P1noM saanspaw -uoTgpbT;TW Mau ou pup an000 pinoo sgoa33a MaU ou gpgq spur TTOUnoO ATM aqq SVH1 aaAiossa 1I as 'amoaa2j3H1 'MOH •2jisd auq uT papnTouT SE TTounoO AgTO aqq Aq paaaptsuoo pre paaEdaad uaaq sEg („wnpueppv.) '66T 'ZZ_gsnbnv peep 'Jima egq. og wnpueppv,uNi •S • 'UT Ha agq ;o adoos aqq uTq TM aaE uozgpxauuE pup buTuozaad agq gEgq puE goaCoad uzTgnQ uaagsEa agq ao; 2jiaa alp. UT pessaappE qou aaai ;egg uozgpxauuE pup buTuozaad agq ao; paaTnbaa eq pTnoM saanspew uoTgpbT;TW . Mau ou pup an000 P1noo sl.oa;;a Mau ou gEqq peUTwaagap spq TTouno3 'qT3 agy •v • („uozgpxauuE pup buTuozaad„ agq SP uTaaag oq paaaa;aa Tip) goTagsTQ Napa puE uoTgEaaoag Eaag aaowaeAT'j aqq woa; (saaot 6Z0'I) saaop 8£S'T aqg ;o uoTgaod E ;O quawgoEgep pup goTagSTQ SaoTAaag uoWE2j.ups uzTgnQ agq Oq Saaou TEUOTgTpPE i7 pup AgTO egg oq uoTgEXauuE pup EaaE uETd 3TJTOeds uTTgna uaagsES atm. uTggTM puET ;o Saaoa 8£S'T ;o .UOTgEXeuUE puE bUTUOZaad 20; paTTddu anpq uosaagsEO epcTO pup UT'i ae;Tuuar °£ •£661 'Z'aagweAoN uo SueTd aqq panoadde saagoA uzTgnQ egg PUP uETd oT;Toads pup quawpuewv uETd TEaaueo uzTgnQ uaagsva agq peAoaddE TTounO3 AgTO ctn. '£6-£5 •orj uoTgnTosag Aq '£661 '01 'TEW uO 'Z •douabp ppaT alp. SP 'qTO agg puE TTounoO 'igTO atm. ;o quawbpnC guepuedepuT ag4 buTgoe-;aa ae pup seuTTepTno re;uewuoaTAus s,uTTgna ;o A4TO agq pup Hbso ggTM aouETTdwo3 UT pu.e . 'pwenbape 'agaTdwoo buTeq sE (goTagsTQ axed pre uozo.Eaaoag Eaag aaowaaAT'i alp woa; quewgopgep puE 'goTagsTQ saoTAaeg uowpg ups uzTgnQ exp. pile ' TO aqq oq uozgpxauuE 'buzuozaad 'sabupgo aouenT;uT ;o aaagds 'uETd oT;Toads 'quewpuewi uETd TEaauee agq buTpnTouT) goeCoad uTTgna uaagsva aqq ao; „gis3„ egg sE og paaaa;aa aaggaboq (£661 'v dpw pagpp wnpueppE up gmTM aaggaboq) gaodag goudwi TEquawuoaTAUa TEUT,j agq-paT;Tgaao TTounoO A T3 ago. '£6-T5 'ow uoTgnTosag Aq '£661 '01 AEw u0 •1 sTegtoaH . HI3 'IHNId d0 HdO3S NIHIIM I# 3NOZS2jd arm 1Nams3v1Ha/NOIWxaNNFi NIZSf1Q NmS1sYa 0£0-i76 Kd JNIQNIa NOI1fl'IOSaH v . miasma d0 x1I3 HHy dO '113N1103 x113 3H1 d0 NOIIflaosam EI t6 - ON NOIyrrIOsaa RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 028 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING AND ESTABLISHING FINDINGS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD). PREZONING #1 CONCERNING PA 94-030 EASTERN DUBLIN WHEREAS, the City of Dublin adopted the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan on May 10, 1993 and the Dublin voters approved the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan on November 2, 1993; and WHEREAS, the adopted Eastern Dublin Specific Plan contains an implementation measure (Action Program 4C) that requires the planning area to be placed into a Planned.Development (PD) District Overlay Zone; and WHEREAS, on June 27, 1994, the City Council initiated a Zoning Ordinance Amendment Study for the initial prezone of a portion of the Eastern Dublin project area to the PD District Overlay Zone; and WHEREAS, Ted Fairfield, representing property owner Jennifer Lin, and Clyde Casterson have submitted a Planned Development (PD) Prezoning, Annexation and Detachment request for prezoning a 1,538 acre site, annexing the 1,538 acres to the City of Dublin and the 1,538 acres plus 4 additional acres to the Dublin San Ramon Services District and detaching 1,029 acres from the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District located within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area generally located northeast of I-580 and Tassajara Road Interchange; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the request on September 6, 1994; and WHEREAS, proper notice of this public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended City Council approval of the PD Prezoning and application for Annexation/Detachment subject to conditions prepared by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing to consider this request on October 3 , 1994 and October 10, 1994; and WHEREAS, proper public notice of this request was given in all respects as required by law for the City Council hearings; and WHEREAS, no new effects could occur and no new mitigation measures would be required for the prezoning and annexation that were not addressed in the Final ,Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern PA 94-030(PC Reso#94-028) ?^.i' — 1 - 10 V ~ Dublin project, and the prezoning and annexation are within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report; and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending city council approval of the Planned Development Prezoning subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the city council heard and considered all said reports, recommendations written and oral testimony submitted at the pUblic hearing as herein above set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE city council does hereby find: 1. The proposed PD prezoning , as conditioned, is consistent with the city General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; and 2. The prezoning, as conditioned, is appropriate for the subject property in terms of being compatible with existing land uses in the area, and will not overburden public services; and 3. The prezoning will not have substantial adverse effects on health or safety, or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare, or be injurious to property or public improvements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the city council hereby approves PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin PD Prezoning #1 subject to the general provisions listed below: GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Purpose This approval is for a Planned Development (PD) Prezoning #1 for PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin. A PD District Overlay Zone is established for the 1,538 acre site as shown on Attachment 1 in conformity with Action Program 4C of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The PD District overlay Zone allows the flexibility needed to encourage innovative development while ensuring that the goals, policies and action programs of the General Plan and Eastern Dublin specific Plan are met. More particularly, the PD Overlay Zone is intended to ensure the following policies: 1. Allow and encourage mixed use residential and commercial development in order to meet specific housing and employment needs, reduce vehicular trips, and foster pedestrian access to shopping and employment areas. 2. Concentrate development on less environmentally and visually sensitive or constrained portions of the plan area and p:J::"_~~e:J::":y_~__~_~g!lificant open ~ace areas aDd natural _~:nd____,,_____ PA 94-030 (PC Reso # 94-028) - 2 - topographic landscape features with minimum alteration of land forms. 3 . Encourage innovative approaches to site planning, building design and construction to create housing .products for all segments of the community, including commercial and office structures. 4. Encourage higher intensity development near transit corridors. 5. Create an attractive, efficient and safe environment. 6. Develop an environment that encourages social interaction and the use of common open areas for neighborhood or community activities and other amenities. 7. Create an environment that decreases dependence on the - private automobile. B. Land Use and Development Plans Regulations and standards governing the PD District Overlay Zone, in addition to land use and intensity of use, shall be established in conjunction with the Land Use and Development Plans which are required , to be submitted in accordance with Title 8, Chapter 2, Section 8-31. 0 through 8-31. 19 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Applicants for Land Use and Development Plans or other Land Use approvals in the Specific Plan area shall pay their pro rata share of all costs associated with the preparation, adoption and administration of the Specific Plan and costs of mitigation monitoring pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 53-93. Said costs shall be paid prior to processing the Land Use and Development Plans or other land use approvals. No development, other than that allowed by the Interim Agricultural Designation, shall occur for any property within the prezoned project area until such a Plan has been adopted by the City. The site development standards included within a Land Use and Development Plan are intended to ensure that the Purpose of the PD District Overlay Zone, as detailed in the introductory section of this ordinance, is met. The Land Use and Development Plan must conform to the adopted Eastern Dublin Specific Plan design guidelines. C. General Plan Amendment Policies Portions of the prezoned project area lie outside the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area and within the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment area. In compliance with the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment policies, a specific plan(s) shall be required before approval of a Land Use and Development Plan within the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment area. PA 94-030(PC Reso#94-028) - 3 - D. Dublin Zoning Ordinance - Applicable Requirements Except as specifically modified by the provisions of the PD District, all applicable and general requirements of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance shall be applied to this PD District. E. PD District Overlay Zone - Land Use Designations - General Provisions 1. PD - Rural Residential/Agricultural Intent: Rural Residential/Agriculture land use designations are established to accommodate agricultural activities and other open space uses, such as range and watershed management. They are also established to provide space for and encourage such uses in places where more intensive development is not desirable or necessary, for the general welfare. Intensity of Use: . 01 dwelling unit per acre Permitted Uses: a. One-family dwellings and farm employee housing for persons employed on the premises.. Not more than one dwelling unit, other than farm employee housing, shall be permitted on each site; b. Home occupations conducted in accordance with the regulations prescribed in Section 8-60.22 of the Zoning Ordinance; c. Crop, vine or tree farm, truck garden, plant nursery,. greenhouse, apiary, aviary, -hatchery, horticulture; d. Raising or keeping of poultry, fowl, rabbits, sheep or goats or similar animals; e. Grazing, breeding or training of horses or cattle; f. Winery; g. Public or private riding or hiking trails; h. Accessory structures and uses located on the same site with a permitted use, including barns, stables, coops, tank houses, storage tanks, windmills, other farm outbuildings, private garages and carports, storehouses, garden structures, greenhouses, recreation rooms and hobby shops, and storage of petroleum products for the use of persons residing on the site; i. Administrative offices for on-site and off-site' agricultural activities which are clearly ancillary to the agricultural pursuits taking place on the site; j . Small family day care homes. PA 94-030(PC Reso#94028) - 4 - :- Conditional Uses: a. Agricultural clustering program; b. outdoor recreation facility; c. Animal hospital, kennel; d. Killing and dressing of livestock, except when accessory as specified in section 25.4; e. Public or private hunting of wildlife or fishing, and public or private hunting clubs and accessory structures; f. Packing house for fruit or vegetables, but not including a cannery, or a plant for food processing or freezing; g. Flight strip when accessory or incidental to a permitted or conditional use; h. Cemetery, crematory, or other facility for the disposal of the human dead, Pet Cemetery; i. Hog ranch; j. Drilling for and removal of oil, gas or other hydrocarbon substances; k. Radio and television transmission facilities; 1. Public utility building or uses, excluding such uses as a business office, storage garage, repair shop or corporation yard; m. Boarding stables and riding academies; n. Sanitary Land Fill not to include processing salvaged material; o. Occupancy of one mobile home by persons directly related to an on-site agricultural pursuit on a parcel containing a minimum of 100 acres where there is no single family dwelling or on a parcel containing a minimum of 200 acres where it can be demonstrated that security cannot be obtained by existing single family dwelling occupancy; provided, however, that no such conditional use permit shall be issued for a period to exceed three (3) years; p. Privately operated Wind-Electric generators; q. Community Facility; r. Large family day care homes. 2. PD - single Familv Intent: single Family land use designations are established to: a) reserve appropriately located areas for family living at reasonable population densities consistent with sound standards of public health and safety; b) ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling; c) provide space for semi-public facilities needed to complement urban residential areas and for institutions that require a residential environment; and d) accommodate single familY~_l!<?~sing!._~~91u-.,::li!1g ~__~~de ran~l::..._~f units PA 94-030 (pC Raso # 94-028) - 5 - from small-lot and zero-lot line units to large- lot estate units. Intensity of Use: .9 - 6.0 dwelling units per acre - Permitted Uses: a. One-family dwellings; ' b. Field crop, orchard, garden; c. Accessory structures located on the same site with a permitted use, including private garages and carports, storehouse, - garden structures, greenhouses, recreation rooms and hobby areas , within an enclosed structure; d. Home occupations conducted in accordance with the regulations prescribed in Section 8-60.22 of the Zoning Ordinance; e. Small family day care homes. Conditional Uses: a. Public and semi-public facilities; b.. Community facilities; c. Community clubhouse; d.. Parking lot, only when established to fulfill the residential parking requirements of this chapter for a use on an abutting lot or lots: e. Plant nursery or greenhouse used only for the cultivation and wholesale of plant material (wholesale only) ; - f. Medical or residential care facility '(7 or more clients) . g. Large family day care homes; h. Second Units. 3. PD - Medium Density Intent: Medium Density land use designations are - established to: a) reserve appropriately located areas for family living in a variety of types of dwellings at a reasonable range of population densities consistent with sound standards of public health and safety; b) preserve as many as possible of the desirable characteristics of the one-family residential district while permitting higher population densities; c) ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling unit; d) minimize traffic congestion and avoid the overloading of utilities by preventing the construction of buildings of excessive size in relation to the land around them; e) provide necessary space for off-street parking of automobiles and, where appropriate, for off-street loading of trucks; and f) protect residential PA 94-030(PC Reso#94-028) — 6 - properties from the hazards, noise and congestion created by commercial and industrial traffic. Intensity: 6. 1 - , 14. 0 dwelling units per zcre Permitted. Uses: a. One-family dwellings; b. Multi-family dwellings; c. Combinations of attached or detached dwellings, zero-lot line units, duplexes, townhouses, multi- family dwellings; d. Nursing homes for not more than three patients; e. Accessory structures and uses located on the same site as a permitted use. Conditional Uses: a. Public and semi-public facilities; b. Community facilities; c. Community Clubhouse; d. Parking Lot, as regulated in Section 8-26. 3 (c) of the Zoning Ordinance; e. Plant nursery or greenhouse used only for the cultivation of plant materials (wholesale only) ; f. Medical or Residential Care Facility (7 or more) ; g. Hospital in Districts requiring not more than fifteen hundred (1,500) square feet of Building Site area per Dwelling Unit; h. Accessory structures and uses located on the same site as a conditional use; i.. Home occupations conducted in accordance with the regulations prescribed in Section 8-60.22 of the Zoning Ordinance; j . Large family day care homes; k. Bed and Breakfast Inns; 1. Mobilehome Parks, as regulated by Article 5 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. PD - Medium High Density Intent: Medium High Density land use designations are established to: a) reserve appropriately located areas for family living in a= variety of types of dwellings at a reasonable range of population densities consistent with sound standards of public health and safety; b) preserve as many as possible of the desirable characteristics of the one-family residential district while permitting higher population densities; c) ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open. space for each dwelling unit; d) minimize traffic congestion and avoid the overloading of utilities by preventing the construction of buildings of excessive size in PA 94-030(PC Reso#94-028) 7 - ~ properties from the hazards, noise and congestion created by commercial and industrial traffic. Intensity: 6.1 - 14.0 dwelling units per 'acre Permitted Uses: a. One-family dwellings; b. Multi-family dwellings; c. Combinations of attached or detached dwellings, zero-lot line units, duplexes, townhouses, multi- family dwellings; d. Nursing homes for not more than three patients; e. Accessory structures and uses locate~ on the same site as a permitted use. Conditional Uses: a. Public and semi-public facilities; b. Community facilities; c. community Clubhouse; d. Parking Lot, as regulated in section 8-26.3(c) of the zoning Ordinance; e. Plant nursery or greenhouse used only for the cultivation of plant materials (wholesale only); f. Medical or Residential Care Facility (7 or more); g. Hospital in Districts requiring not more than fifteen hundred (1,500) square feet of Building site area per Dwelling Unit; h. Accessory structures and uses located on the same site as a conditional use; i. Home occupations conducted in accordance with the regulations prescribed in section 8-60.22 of the Zoning Ordinance; j. Large family day care homes; k. Bed and Breakfast Inns; I. Mobilehome Parks, as regulated by Article 5 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. PD - Medium Hiqh Densitv Intent: Medium High Density land use designations are established to: a) reserve appropriately located areas for family living in a variety of types of dwellings at a reasonable range of population densities consistent with sound standards of public health and safety; b) preserve as many as possible of the desirable characteristics of the one-family residential district while permitting higher population densities; c) ensure adequate light, air, privacy and -open space for each dwelling unit; d) minimize traffic congestion and avoid the overloading of utilities by preventing the cq~~truct~_~~_:>f~~~~~ings of excessive size in PA 94-030 (PC Reso # 94-028) - 7 - relation to the land around them; e) provide necessary space for off-street parking of automobiles and, where appropriate, for off-street loading of trucks; and f) protect residential properties from the hazards, noise and congestion created by commercial and industrial traffic. Intensity of Use: 14.1 - 25.0 dwelling units per acre Permitted Uses: a. Multi-family dwellings; b. Combination of apartments, condominiums, townhouses; c. Nursing homes for not more than three patients; d. Accessory structures and uses located on the same site as a permitted- use. Conditional Use: a. Public and semi-public facilities; b. Community facilities; c. Community Clubhouse; d. Parking Lot, as regulated in Section 8-26.3 (c) of the Zoning Ordinance; e. Plant nursery or greenhouse used only for the cultivation of plant materials (wholesale only) ; f. Medical or Residential Care Facility (7 or more) ; g. Hospital in Districts requiring not more than fifteen hundred (1,500) square feet of Building Site area per Dwelling- Unit; h. Accessory structures and uses located on the same site as a conditional use; i. Home occupations conducted in accordance with the regulations prescribed in Section 8-60.22 of the Zoning .Ordinance; j . Large family day care homes; k. Bed and Breakfast Inns; 1. Mobilehome Parks, as regulated by Article 5 of the Zoning Ordinance. 5. PD - High Density Intent: High Density land use designations are established to: a) reserve appropriately located areas for family living in a variety of types of dwellings at a reasonable range of population densities consistent with sound standards of public health and safety; b) preserve as many as possible of the desirable characteristics of the one-family residential district while permitting higher population densities; c) ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling unit; 4) minimize traffic congestion and avoid the PA 94-030(PC Reso#94-028) - 8 - ~ overloading of utilities by preventing the construction of buildings of excessive size in relation to the land around them; e) provide necessary space for off-street parking of automobiles and, where appropriate, for off-street loading of trucks; and f) protect residential properties from the hazards, noise and congestion created by commercial and industrial traffic. Intensity of Use: 25.1+ dwelling units per acre Permitted Uses: a. MUlti-family dwellings; b. Combination of apartments and condominiums; c. Nursing homes for not more than three patients; d. Accessory structures and uses located on the same site as a permitted use. Conditional Uses: a. Public and semi-public facilities; b. community facilities; c. Community Clubhouse; d. Parking Lot, as regulated in section 8-26.3(c) of the zoning Ordinance; e. Plant nursery or greenhouse used only for the cultivation of plant materials (wholesale only); f. Medical or Residential Care Facility (7 or more); g. Hospital in Districts requiring not more than fifteen hundred (1,500) square feet of Building site area per Dwelling unit; h. Accessory structures and uses located on the same site as a conditional use; i. Home occupations conducted in accordance with the regulations prescribed in section 8-60.22 of the zoning ordinance; j. Large family day care homes; k. Bed and Breakfast Inns; 1. Mobilehome Parks, as regulated by Article 5 of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. PO - General commercial Intent: General Commercial land use designations are established to: a) accommodate a range of regional-serving and community-serving retail and mixed use projects incorporating retail, service and/or office uses with residential uses when location and design ensure compatibility; b) provide appropriately located areas for retail stores, offices, service establishments, amusement establishments, and wholesale businesses, offering CQ):l)JJlogj;t,t~~~nd f?_~rvic~.s.__r~guir,edb~_r..e.s.idents of PA 94-030 (pC Reso # 94-028) - 9 - the city and its surrounding market, area; c) provide opportunities for retail stores, offices, service establishments, amusement establishments, and wholesale businesses to concentrate for the convenience of the public and in mutually beneficial relationship to each other; d) provide space for community facilities and institutions that appropriately may be located in commercial areas; d) provide adequate space to meet the needs of modern commercial development, including off- street parking and truck loading areas; and e) minimize traffic congestion and to avoid overloading of utilities by preventing the construction of buildings of excessive size in relation to the amount of land around them. Intensity of Use: .20 - . 60 Floor Area Ratio Permitted Uses: a. Community-serving retail uses including, but not limited to: 1. General Merchandise Store 2 . Discount/Warehouse Retail Store 3 . Clothing/Fashion Store 4. Shoe Store 5. Home Furnishing Store 6. Office Supply .Store 7. Home Appliance/Electronics . Store 8. Home Improvement/Hardware Store 9. Music Store 10. Hobby/Special Interest Store 11. Gifts/Specialty Store 12 . Jewelry and Cosmetic Store 13 . Drug Store 14 . Auto Parts Store 15. Toy Store 16. Book Store 17. Pet Supplies Store 18. Sporting Goods Store - 19. Grocery/Food Store b. Regionally-oriented, high volume, retail uses including, but not limited to: 1) Discount centers; 2) Promotional centers; 3) Home improvement centers; 4) Factory stores; 5) Furniture outlets. c. Office and service establishments including, but not limited to: PA 94-030(PC Reso#94-028) — 10 — 1) Bank/Savings and Loan 2) Real Estate/Title Office 3) Travel Agent 4) Legal 5) Accounting 6) Medical and Dental 7) Optometrist 8) Architect 9) Employment Agency 10) Hair/Beauty Salon 11) Cleaner and Dryer 12) Shoe Repair 13) Key Shop 14) Tailor 15) Athletic Club 16) Formal Wear/Rental 17) Other Administrative and Professional Office 18) Technology Access Center 19) Tele-Commuting Center d) Hotels and Motels; e) Recreational and Cultural Facilities; f) Eating, Drinking and Entertainment establishments, including, but not limited to: 1) Restaurant 2) Delicatessen 3) Specialty Food 4) Bakery 5) Ice Cream Shop 6) Sandwich Shop 7) Video Rentals Conditional Uses: a. Attached and detached dwellings at densities established for the Medium, Medium High and High density land use designations; b. Auto Malls; c. Hospital; d. Animal Hospital, Kennel; e. Mortuary; f. Public and semi-public facilities; g. Community Facility; h. Service. Station, Type A and Type B; i. Automobile, camper, boat and trailer sales, storage or rental lot; j . Plant nursery including the sale of landscaping materials, excluding wet-mix concrete sales, providing all equipment, supplies and merchandise PA 94-030(PC Reso#94-028) — 11 - , :- other than plant materials are kept within a completely enclosed building; k. Adult Entertainment Activity, provided however, that no Adult Entertainment Activity shall be located closer than 1,000 feet to the boundary of any residential zone or closer than 1,000 feet to any other Adult Entertainment activity; I. In-patient and out-patient health facilities as licensed by the Sate Department of Health Services; m. wine or liquor bar with on-sale liquor license n. Micro-brewery o. Nightclub p. Indoor movie theater q. Video Arcade r Drive-thru Facilities, including restaurants s. other uses that could possibly meet the intent of the General Commercial land use designation. 7. PD - Neiqhborhood commeroial Intent: Neighborhood Commercial land use designations are established to: a) provide for the creation of community-oriented and neighborhood-oriented commercial centers to serve local retail, service and entertainment needs; and b) provide for mixed- use projects incorporating combinations of commercial, service, office and/or residential uses. Intensity of Use: .25 - .60 Floor Area Ratio Permitted Uses: a. Office and Service establishments identified as permitted uses under the General Commercial zoning designation; b. community-Serving retail uses identified as permitted uses under the General Commercial zoning designation and typically in shopping centers with less than 300,000 square feet of gross leasable area; c. Eating, drinking and entertainment establishments identified as permitted uses under the General Commercial zoning designation; d. Recreational and cultural facilities. Conditional Uses: a.. Attached and detached dwellings at established for the Medium, Medium density land use designations; b. Hotels and Bed and Breakfast Inns; ,.,_,C,~,___u12Yl:>1 ic._~~nd semi -p-gJ~J"ic fa<;::Jli ties; densities High and High - ._d"'/' PA 94-030 (pC Reso # 94-028) - 12 - :- d. Community facilities; e. Animal Hospital, Kennel; f. Service station, Type A, or a facility retailing automotive parts and supplies which are installed and serviced on the site but does not include engine, transmission or differential rebuilding or body repair; g. Plant nursery including the sale of landscaping materials, excluding wet-mix concrete sales providing all equipment supplies, and merchandise other than plant materials are kept within a completely enclosed building; h. Massage Establishment; i. Recycling Centers, when operated in conjunction with a Permitted Use on the same premisesi j. In-patient and out-patient health facilities as licensed by the State Department of Health Services; k. Fortunetelling; I. Other uses that could possible meet the intent of the Neighborhood Commercial land use designation. 8. PD - Campus Office Intent: Campus Office land use designations are established to provide an attractive, campus-like setting for office and other non-retail commercial uses that do not generate nuisances related to emissions, noise, odors or outdoor storage and operations. Under certain circumstances, they are also established to allow residential uses as part of a master-planned mixed use development where a mixed-use development would decrease potential traffic generation and/or contribute to greater social interaction and more vital live/work environment. Intensity of Use: .35 - .60 Floor Area Ratio Permitted Uses: a~ Professional and Administrative offices; b. Administrative headquarters; c. Research and development d. Business and commercial servicesi e. Limited light manufacturing, assembly, warehousing and distribution activities; f. Ancillary uses which provide support services to businesses and employees including, but not limited to, restaurants, gas stations, convenience shopping, copying services, blueprinting, printing and branch banks. Conditional Uses~ PA 94-030 (PC Reso # 94-028) - 13 - :;- a. Attached and detached dwellings at densities established for the Medium, Medium High and High density land use designations. Residential development shall not be permitted to occupy more than fifty perpent (50%) of the developed area; b. Public and semi-public facilities; c. other uses that could possibly meet the intent of this campus office land use' designation. 9. PD - Future study Area: Rural Residential/Aqricultural Intent: The Rural Residential/Agricultural land use designation is established to accommodate uses permitted under the Rural Residential/Agricultural and Open Space land use designations and also provides for the future study of land use designations to determine the most appropriate use for these lands prior to future PD rezoning of the property. Intensity of Use: .01 dwelling unit per acre Permitted Uses: All permitted uses listed under the Rural Residential/Agricultural land use designation. Conditional Uses: All conditionally permitted uses listed under the Rural Residential/Agricultural land use designation. F. Interim Aqricultural Desiqnation Intent: Interim agricultural designations shall be established for the entire PA 94-030 project area. This interim land use designation allows the existing residential and agricultural uses approved under Alameda county's Zoning Ordinance to remain and allows new residential and agricultural uses approved under this Ordinance to be established until such time the landowners of these parcels apply for a PD rezoning, accompanied with a Land Use and Development Plan in accordance with sections 8-31.0 through 8-31.19 of the Zoning Ordinance. Regulations and standards Governing the Interim Agricultural Zoning Designation: a. As specifically provided by the Interim Agricultural Designation, all applicable and general requirements of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance shall be applied to this land use designation. PA 94.030 (PC Reso # 94-028) - 14 - b. The Agricultural Districts (A Districts) provisions of the Alameda County Zoning Ordinance (Attachment 2) shall apply to properties with the Interim Agricultural land use designation. c. All properties with the Interim Agricultural land use designation shall conform to sections 8-62.0 through 8-62.9 of the zoning Ordinance relating to legal non-conforming uses and buildings. G. School Facilities Impact Mitiqation Because fees authorized under State Law may be inadequate to mitigate the effects of new development on the Dublin Unified School District and the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District, the city council intends to require all future development within the boundaries of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area to mitigate impacts on affected school districts required to serve student population generated by new development. No development, other than that allowed by the Interim Agricultural Designation, shall be approved on any property subject to this pre-zoning until after legislative review and approval by the City council of a Land Use and Development Plan and Planned Development District rezoning covering that property, in accordance with Section 8-31.16 of the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Prior to Council approval of a Land Use and Development Plan and Planned Development District rezoning, all developer(s) of property subject to the Land Use and Development Plan shall enter into a written mitigation agreement with the affected school district and the City. The mitigation agreement shall establish the method and manner of financing and/or constructing school facilities necessary to serve the stUdent-population generated by the development. Themitigation agreement shall address the level of mitigation necessary, the amount of any school impact fees, the time of payment of any such fees and similar matters. The city shall be a party to any such agreement only for the purposes of assuring uniformity with respect to different property owners and appropriate land use planning. H. Fiscal Impacts Related to the Annexation Goals and policies of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan require annexation and new development to be revenue neutral. Prior to the effective date of the prezoning, the proponents of the prezoning and annexation shall enter into an agreement with the city that will guarantee that the financing goals and policies of the Specific Plan are met. Prezoning shall not take effect until the annexation agreement is signed and the financial security is provided to the city's satisfaction. P A 94-030 (pC Reso # 94-028) - 15 - ~ PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of october, 1994 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: city Clerk c:\planning\carol\94030cc3 PA 94-030 (PC Reso # 94-028) Mayor - 16 - • p°�� • trom'"ZONING DISTRICTS GaNiMo °" • Legend _.. 'V �' • SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY Roods � ' ; ;• '' PD Rurol Residential/ .01 D,UJAc. , I Agriculture EEEM PD Single Family 0.0.0.0 D.U./Ac. CJ'�\p, N•• 1 i'?'z.5,. PD Medium Density 0.1.14.0 D.UJA0. <14;•...� ���•••• 1 ,, •• I ®PD Med•11 Density 14.1.26.0 D.UJAc. 4fl e1 •• SUMMARY OF PRE-ZONING DESIGNATIONS OM PD High Density 26,1e D.UJAo. ` �' N 1 . ®PD General Commercial • ' 1 PRE-ZONING BOUNDARY Ieeer 5'A'rFnnRY ACHES•®PD Neighborhood Commercial 1 '•. .1.'.' 1 .Cps' •• PD Furore Study iloi/A Rural rim Residential/AgdcWlure 153. X° PD Cam i1 1 I . ...;• '•.: ' '•.' '•.•••••••••••••••••• . • PD Rural Residential/Agriculture Ihrre 207Am Campus Office ; .•..'. PD Single Family �� 387.9. • I 1 PD .Open Space 1 %'.'.' %•..'.'.'.'. PD Mediurr)Density 378.7• 1 1 PD Medium High Density 352• PUBLIC LAND USES* ` z ,� �,� i .; �_� FD High Density 36.6" 4 G) �)try' '1',V14,. PD General Commerdal 146.6 a''f Isbk �' .41:•f PD Neighborhood Commercial • 39.510 P PublleJeeml•Publlc , -1ti, �ry ¢,r • t f:�*1 laP, +-Fj Ca(r }�} PD Gmpus Office 76.1 EL Elementary School I� (FG'd d` r p .1 PD Open Space 212.7 • JR Junior High School • / }', : �t ("sf t, t d ,/ r '{ n s 1 Undeelpneted(Cellreru) ]].Q NP y °x i , r ' v!)F,*• i 4 {t 1"J' • TOTAL r•530 Acres HS High School I s t J f • 5 y }.';':'.\ ..NS Neighborhood Square I iP R 141.-q4441" } ' �� k, { Notes. NP. • Neighborhood Park I t'^t'� 1 J I ' a S 1) Includes 32.9 acres oJPo.e.ioe Recreation land uses. ,W30< - N .\ '�. g !1:40114z. 21 Includes 31.9 acres ofSchooland 53 acre of Parks and Recreation land uses. 0P Community Park x K`t NP l }y, •„S d t� Jl InrluAa 31.9 aneof5chroland 879 acres oJPorka and Rmmllan land••The actual zoning for these mite.I.ee 1 '' <t ,,e. • >' I ^?'?.I �t'E r uses. f shown on the coning mop.All uses are g y 4f i 1 t I 4) Includes 10.0 arm o School land uses. conditionally allowed uses within their I 7 g.. "a' r- i?'" �-A ,!�, 5) Includes 3.0 earn of Parks and Recreal Ian land uses. respective tuning districts rt e a g a # i�},tfiJ� s `1 It t.,,,i d -,,c,dn 61 includes 7.98 acrd ofPU8R/Semi PU811e land uses. • x j h 1 .A (r f I .tp ♦ l�'4 1 k i.CAE 13 Vitt 8/1 �r i'� 47s. �y,8e<. __ SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY i di, .W'f` a ° t;. ", 14.40,•,„, t €- _-__�_ x :*nl^ r �' za ��?,� DARY .!s*V si,* c _,t 4 d ,,,'' f y'u�, 'Sti k a iii ( st� vx'cx��" v �` �•°rk �n� BR 4r q Vi,,, "' >> h ,` 1 PRE-ZONING BOUNDARY x ,I$�. , : .'? .r.is vow •• :1� {l.Pti 4a .<' :" ;aSfo' iiYr'ti'x>:''�:: .:g .x xx.> s I o / =::::E::':::::K :':%€3i:[.:15:A:;lk \v ;.t'`s. '4' •[le 1.3 SPECIFIC PLAN IB_OUNDARY ffIll,t IA Ira < '���''' is r5 'Y•£'`i�' < iiiii•iiiiiii %i%� � NORTH j ei ii�• R E C E I V E D ' �•O •:Iii.;Mii•• � PRE-ZONING BOUNDARY a sera MP •.or 5 199/1 INTERSTATE 580 1 1 INTERSTATE 580 aaarala em1W M1.aP 1 * General Commercial may be permitted '1IBLIN PLANNING by a Planned Development Zoning Process i :- AUG 26 '94 08:57 PLANNJNG NORTH P.1/4 R-~ Districts 8~29.Q Four-Fatily Dwelling Districts a-29.1 ?erlitted Uses: R-3 Di$tricts a-29.2 Conditional U~es: R-3 Districts 8-29.3 Density Li;itations~ R-3 nistr~cts 9-29.4 B~ildinq Site: R-3 Districts 6-29.5 Yards~ R-3 Districts 8-19.6 Height of Buildin~s: R-3 Oistricts 8-29.S Other. Regulations: R-3 Oistricts g-30.Q S-SQ. t B-30.2 8-30.3 8-30.4 8-30.5 8-30.6 g-30.7 8-30.8 6-30.9 e-30,10 8-31.0 g-31.2 g- 31.3 B-31. 4 8-31.5 8- 31. 7 8-31. S 8-31. It 9-3l.t2 8-31.15 S-3L tb B-31.17 8-31. 18 8-31.19 . R-~ Districts Multiple Residence or R-4 Districts~ Cnhnt Peraitted Uges; R-4 Di5tfi~ts Conditional Uses: R-4 Gistricts Density Lisitaticns: R-4 Distri,ts Suildiog Sita; R-4 &istricts Yards: R-4 Oistricts Height of Building: R-+ Di5tri~ts Lot Co\maq~: R-4 Di s!tids Density and Coyeraqe Ex,~ption: R-4 DIstricts Other ?aqulations: R-4 Districts Other Regulations: R-4 Districts PD Districts IICIIVID AUG 2 6 1994 Planned Develop.ent Distri,ts: tnt~nt Change in ZoninQ District Required Prelilinary Plan--Application ?relisinary Plan--?Tot~$5ional Services Requir~d Prelilin~ry Plan--!nforlation R~uired ?relilinary ?lan--Notit:e to the Public Prelisinary ?lin--A~tiQn by the Planning COllissian Land Use and Deyelop.ent Plan-Persons Authori;:ed to Prepare land Use and Develop.ent Plan--!nrar.ation Required COI;Or. Areas~-rrovision, a~ner5hip and "alntena~ce Land Use and Dev!loplent ?lan--~ction bv th~ 91annln9 CO~sis5ion and the 80ard cf Supervisors Land US& Shall Coni or; Stru~tuT2S NDt Indicated on the land Use a~~ Oeveiap!ent Plan Deposit to Caver Cost of Inspections; Un~e' De~:~:ti Over Oeposit DUBLIN PlANNING A DISTRiCTS 8-25.0 ~qricultutil Distri~ts: Intent Agricultural Oistdctsl hereinaHer desiqnahd. ~s -;, fii:.ttids, are i!shbli~ned to pro.ote itpleilent1ltion OT SSlleraL PLan land lIse Ilrcposal <; for oigricul tural ind other ltGtl-LlfOan uses I to con$er~e and protect existing aQritultural uses, and to provide space for ann encourage such u5@$ in places where lara intensive dev~lapient is not desirahla.ot Qec:5sary for t~e general kelfate. .(Aten-ded-b'ts-ec;+,--OriL72-29l.... . 11 ..--....-.-...-..........--.... AlAftEDA COUNTY ORDINANCE cone - JUMt, 1~a9 AtIacInnt tl- E1-.H\BIJ {3 ;;:- , AUG 26 '94 08: 58 PLANNH1G NORTH P.2/4 8-25.1 h.p O~signation: A Districts Eyery ~artel designated on the Zoning Ka~ as b~ing in an A-2 District shall hereafter be subject to those regulations for an A District. All ;~ch parcels are her~by declared to oe in an A Oi ;.trict and shall be so designated !.l.pon any ''''fised Zoning ~ap. 8-25.2 Per.itted Uses; A Districts The following Ptinci91e Uses are perlitted in an A District: ill On il bui1din~ site~ one cne-ia.-iiy dwelling Of cne-faaily lobilenol!! either constructed aHer Sept2iloer is, 19711 arid i s5ued an insigni a of appr~\"al by the California Depaftaen~ of Housing and CC~lunitf Develaplent and per.anently located on a perAanent foundation systeA, or c.onstructed after July 1St 1914, and issued a.n insiqllia. of allproval by the U.S. Oepartlent of Housing aCId Urban Developaent and Ilerianentl'f located 011 . foundabon systeli. 0) CraPI ville or tree far~l truck garden, plant nursery! qr~enhollse apiary, aviarYI hatcherYr horticultur~. ,) Raising or ~eepin9 OT pou!trY1 fe_I, rabbitsf sheep or goats cr siAilaf anila.ls. dl Gra:ingf breedinq or training of horses ar cattle. 2) Winery. fJ Fish hatcheries and rearing ponds. 9) 'Public or private riding or hiking trails. (A~ended hy ~ec. if Ord. 72-29i a~ended by sec. 1, Ord. eO-102l. 8-25.S Conditional Uses: ~ Districts In addition to the uses listed in Section g-cO.aO and a-cLO, til~ following are conditiolli'll usss and shall be per;itted in an A District only tt avproved by the Zonin9 Adailli$tratcr, as provicieo in Section 8-94.0 and 8-25.0: .1)' f'lddi tional dnllings Tor persons slplDyed in the a.gdculhral use at subject propert'y aoll the, fal1ilies of those ~erSons, :'Hld/or living quarters far farll libarers, llhan found hy the' Zonin~ Adlinistrator to ae neee~sary to the far~inq aperation. b) D~tdQor Recreation Facility. c} Anital Hospital, kennel. d} Killing and dre$sing of liY~stock, e~cevt when.accessory as s~acifil!d in Section 25.4. ~) Puhlic or private hunting Ot _i!dlif~ or fisking, and public or private ~unting clubs and accessory structures. f} Packin<t house 10r fruit or 'fegetablesl but !lot including Ii cannery, or it phnt for food processin~ or fre~~in9. I "" _co ...___, . ... . ~.. ALAKEDA COUNTY' OR~IHANCE CnDe ~ JUNE, 1~e9 :;- . AUG 26 '94 08:58 PLANNING NORTH P.3/4 gl Fli ght s,tri P llhen accesstlry at' inci dental to a perlti tted or condi I::i anal use. hi Cesetery, crelatory, or other facility for the disposal of the hUlan daadr ~et Cesetery. i ) ftoq Ranch ji Drilling far and re.oval of oil, gas or other hydrocarbon substances. id Radio and teleYisioll translission facilities. ,1) Puclic utility huilding or u~$, e~cludinq such uses ,as a tu;ineS5 oftic~l ~torage qiragel repair shop or corporation yard. ~) Boarding stahles and riding acadesies. nl S40itary land fill not to include processing salvaqed JAterial. 0) ildlinistrati'le offices il.ccessory to tile Principal use all the presistls includinq ac!ivi:il1s by the tale occupancy which are not related to the Princi?al use ~rQviding such activities oot so relate~ are accessory to the adJinistrativ& orfice 4~tivity. pl Occupancy of one ~cbile n042 hy persons directly related t~ an on-site iq(icultur~l pursuit on a parc~l containin~ a .inilUl of 100 acres where tnere is no ~ingle faaily dwelling or on a parcel containin9 a. lioi.t.:~ of 200 acres lIhere it can be desonsuabd that sacurity cannot ae obtai ned by e;d stinq si nqh f a~il r dwell i'nq occi.lpancYi provided, nawe'fer, tha~ no such conditional use pertit $hall be issued far a period to e~ceed thre~ i31.yeirs. ql Adlini5trati~~ support and service facilities of a Public Regional R~creation District. rl Privately o~ed Wind-Electric gene(atcr~. !t\Aendeo by S6C. 5, Ord. 69-23, iillMded by sec. 2, Orc. o9~B3j aaended by set:. 1, Ord. 70-~5; a.ended ~y sse. ;, Ord. 70-57;aaended by sec. 21 Ord. 70-70; ilIended by !ie,.. 1 Ura. 72-6; allended by ~e'. 1, arc. 72-29j iUflded by S6C. it Ord. 76-22; aaellded by sec. 1 T Ord. 70-46; a$ended by m:. It 01'0. Sl-19l 8-25.4 Accessory Uses: A ~i!ltricts When located in an A fristri~tt and subordinate tD a la.tul U~e, the follo~ing Accessory Use~t in addition to thosa norlilly acces~ory ta a n.ellinq are perlitted: al Far. building~l inclUding stahle, bArn, penj c~rrAl, or 'cap; al Building or rool Tor packinq or,handling products ralse4 on the 9rells2s; cl Killing and dressing of poultrYl rabbits and other 5~aU livestod r~i$ed ell the prali~es! but not including dn abattoir for sbE~! cattle ar bogs; ~} Stand fer the sale at retail of jtass produ,ed or raised on thi preli5es ha~ing a qround coveraq~ not in ex,e55 af four hundred (400) square feet; e} Ac~e5sory BU$iness Sign! not exceedinq an aqgregete area of twenty (2Q} square feet; having no ~o.in9 parts or illu&inatiao; , ..."....--.,_..,,,,,....__.._---,-,--_.,-,.,.....,._,} ...,'.' ALA~EDA COUNTY OROlNANCE CODE - JUNE, 1989 ' AUG 25 '94 08:59 PLANNING NORTH P.4/4 f) Administrative office, maintenance building, when accessory to a Principal Use persitted by subparagraph Eh) of Section 81-25.3. 8.25.5 Building Site: A Districts ' Every use in an A District shall be on a Building Site having an area not less than one hundred (100) acres. :Amended ny sec, 5, Ord. 70-57; aeended oy sec. I, Ord. 72-29) B-25.6 Yards; A Districts The Yard requirements in an A District are as follows, subject to the general provisions of Section 8-60.33: Depth of front yard - not less than thirty (301 feet. Depth of rear yard - not less than ten (101 feet. . width of side yards - not less than ten (103 feet.. (Amended by sec. 1, Ord. 72-29) • 8-25.7 . Signs: A District No sign in an A District shall be illuminated. No sore than two (2) Sale or Cease signs.shall be placed an any lot, and no such sign shall have an area in excess of twenty-four (24) square feet, except in conformance with Section 8-60.58 and 8-60.59 (Subdivision). In other respects, Section 8-60.1 shall control. (Based on sec. 2, Ord. 72-29) • R-1 Districts • 8-26.0 Single Fa 'ly Residence Districts; Intent Single family Residence ;•rtricts, hereinafter designated as R-1 Districts, are established to provide for and protect established neighborhoods of one asily Dwellings, and to provide space in suitable locations for additi.-•1 development of this nd, together with .appropriate community facilities and allowance for petsitted intern cultivation of the soil compatible with such lox-density residential development. 8-26.1 Map Designations: R-1 Distric- Every parcel designated on the Zoning ap as b.•ng in the R-E District, as well as every parcel designated as being in a R-1 Di: rict, shall .e subject to these regulations for a Single Fanily Residence District, and shall be .esignated R-1 up•• any revised Ioning Nap. 8-26.2 Periitted Uses: '-1 Districts The following Principal 'ses are permitted in an R-I Distric • a) One One-Fasil Dwelling; • ALAMEDA COUNTY DRDIJNANCE CODE - JUNE, 1989 ;;;- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN -----------------------------------------------------------------~--- RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION (PA 94-030 EASTERN DUBLIN REORGANIZATION) ANNEXATION NO. 10 Recitals 1. Pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (the "Act") (Government Code Section 56000 et seq.) an affected city and affected district, as therein defined, may by resolution adopted by its legislative body make a proposal for a "reorganization", as defined in Section 56073 and request initiation of proceedings thereon; 2. The city of Dublin is an affected city, and the Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) and Livermore Area Recreation and Park District (LARPD) are affected districts for a reorganization proposal which contains territory proposed to be annexed to said city and to the DSRSD and LARPD territory proposed to be detached from said city. 3. The City of Dublin is an affected local agency for this reorganization proposal. 4. The reorganization proposal is made pursuant to the Act. The proposal would annex 1,538 acres to the City of Dublin and 1,542 acres to the Dublin San Ramon Services District, and detach 1,029 acres from the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District as described in Attachment A. 5. The territory described in Attachment A is inhabited territory within the meaning of Government Code Section 56046. , 6. The exterior boundaries of the territory described in Attachment A are shown on Attachments B1 through B3 hereto. 7. This reorganization is proposed at the request of landowners owning approximately 70% of the land within the territory to be annexed. The reorganization would implement the City of Dublin's Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. 8. It is proposed that the proposed reorganization would be conditional upon detachment of the territory described in Attachment A from the Livermore Area Recreation arid Park District. 9. The plan for services for the territory to be annexed is set forth in Attachment C. 10. This proposal is consistent with the City of Dublin and DSRSD's sphere of influence. 1 liT c ;;:- 11. If determined appropriate by the LAFCo, the City Council consents to act as the conducting authority for the proposed reorganization. 12. The City Council determined that no new effects could occur and no new mitigation measures would be required for the reorganization that were not addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin project (including the Addenda dated May 4, 1993 and August 22, 1994), and that the reorganization is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: A. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. B. The City Council of the City of Dublin, as the legislative body for an affected local agency, does hereby adopt the foregoing recitals and makes a proposal for a reorganization, as described herein, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Cortese-Knox Act, and does hereby request that proceedings be taken pursuant t6 said Act. C. This proposal is consistent with the sphere of influence of the City of Dublin. D. This proposal is made subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The description in Attachment A and the maps on Attachments Bl through B3 are preliminary and are subject to more detailed description(s) and map(s) to be prepared and submitted to the LAFCo. Adjustments to the description of the territory (Attachment A) are to be made as deemed necessary by the County Surveyor. 2. The effective date of this reorganization shall be October 1, 1995, or nine (9) months after the date of the election in which a majority vote in favor of the reorganization, whichever is earlier. 3. An agreement for payment of service costs satisfactory to the City shall be executed by Jennifer Lin, one of the project proponents. 4. All terms and conditions specified in DSRSD's Reso. No. regarding this proposal are hereby incorporated into this resolution by reference. E. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Executive Officer of the LAFCo. 2 ;- PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 10th day of October, 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: city Clerk c:planning\carol\94030res - ------- -~._-.----------~----_._----- .......-..-------..-- ------ 3 Mayor EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXATION NO. 10 (EASTERN DUBLIN) TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN All that certain real property situated in the County of Alameda, State of California, described as follows: Parcel A as shown on the map of Annexation No. 10 (Eastern Dublin) to the City of Dublin by Resolution No. adopted by the City of Dublin on , 1994; said map was signed by the County Surveyor on . Containing 1538 acres, more or less. This description conforms to the requirements of the Local Agency Formation Commission. Donald J. LaBelle - Director of Public Works Ousama H. Kawar - County Surveyor RC.E. 18499, Expires 6/30/97 By: Reid Penland, Deputy County Surveyor L.S. 5726, Expires 12/31/95 Atta.. ~J 1.2V:1l , L'I L._/ .........' .......--....-..--..""..-........-(5.."fV7TD .,...., ~ 16034DesJT609Exhibit 1/63 N . EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT ANNEXATION NO. 94-1 TO THE DUBLIN SANRAMON SERVICES DISTRICT All that certain real property situated in the County of Alameda, State of California, described as follows: Parcel A as shown on the map of Dublin San Ramon Services DistriCt Annexation No. 94-1 to the Dublin San Ramon Services District by Resolution No. adopted by the Dublin San Ramon Services District on 1994; said map was signed by the County Surveyor on Containing 1542 acres, more or less. This description conforms to the requirements of the Local Agency Formation Commission. Donald J. LaBelle - Director of Public Works Ousama H. Kawar - County Surveyor RC.E. 18499, Expires 6/30/97 By: Reid Penland, Deputy County Surveyor L.S. 5726, Expires 12/31/95 AtIacIIDInt ~ E1<rIf bff--c:-------- 16034DcsJT609Exhibit 1/63 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF DETACHMENT NO. 94-1 FROM LIVERMORE AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT All that certain real property situated in the County of Alameda, State of California, described as follows: Parcel A as shown on the map of Detachment No. 94-1 from the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District by Resolution No. adopted by the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District on , 1994; said map was signed by the County Surveyor on • Containing 1029 acres, more or less. This description conforms to the requirements of the•Local Agency Formation Commission. Donald J. LaBelle - Director of Public Works Ousama H. Kawar - County Surveyor R.C.E. 18499,Expires 6/30/97 By:. Reid Penland, Deputy County Surveyor L.S. 5726, Expires 12/31/95 Attiring C 16034DesJT609Exhibit 1/63 • . I • ///// Th le map oomforms to the requirements of the Local S ERIESA,ANN H.TRUST REDO WICK CND.82 CONSTRUCTION CO. DOOLAN WEST 86-OCLITES Agency Formation Commission of Alameda County, • SERIES NO.64.248246 SERIES NO.82.091706 SERIES NO.136-31II2I Calllamle.• 'OBERT J.NIELSEN / • • SERIES N0,8l-021836 1 ACp9N11•i Donald LaBelle-Director of Public Works • .I LOM"COG U1/11'I 191E )l mama H.KRwar-County Surveyor ✓wyfDA. R.C.E.18499,Expires 6/30/97 SCOTT6 AZEVEDO SERIES NO.90-317195 • II �• SERIES NO.90215717 I .�•�•' By. Reid Penland,Deputy County Sursyeor '• \ LS.5728,Registration,Expires 12/31/95 MICHAEL KOBOLD ==- LIN LIN •�'�• �{� � ,� p SERIES NO.91.128046 SERIES NO.00-246111 SERIES NO.90-215061 •" B.xm / \�,.4'arni APN 940.330.3. APN 818.30/3.2.16 i 9 ""r \\„• This map when filed, was accompanied by a MICHAEL KOBOLD I DUBLIN \\:;6 certificate of completion and certified copy of the ek' boundary description delineated hereon,as required SERIES/90.91.1280/6 '::::;:.#C.' by Section 57803 of the Government Code,which LIN - FSeO certificate of completion and boundary description are CIES NO..82.ON R T.8 EILEEN SPERFSLAGE- 9 9 4 records In Series No. 01.Official SERIES N0.82.001786 SERIES NO. BOUNDARY AS SHOWN ON THE MAP ENTITLED SERIES NO.86.234313 BOOK 8192 O.R.PO. `� 90-248111 'RECORD OF SURVEY RIB NO. 1006' DATED 1 ( pf" Records of Alameda County,California. • _• SERIES NO.86.234314 U.S.A.(CAMP PARKS) PH 916650.' OCTOBER 1996,RECORDED IN BOOK 15,PAGE U. i ! _ Steve Staley-Executive Officer • SERIES NO. PLEASANTON•• Local Agency Formation Commission GYGI 441E1 ; /\ of Alameda County,Cellfamla • SERIES 9/3.8300-170009 " A I • EAST BAY REGIONAL 9 //-�� LIN LIN VICINITY MAP ©II�IIIII By: Donald K.Grail �• /CITY OF PLEASANTON 378021 PARK DISTRICT I- 1 -r/ SERIES NO. SERIES NO. Xf1 Administrative Analyst,LAFCO Staff SERIES NO.77-021354 x, SERIES 8-1 40-71W21 • APR 940-1040-f-a 02-058018 92-II58918 Flied at the request of APH 910.500.1.1 APN 9913.38/0.2-0 APN 998-]013.2.7 B<_minute9 pest_M,on the day of EAST BAY REGIONAL / Records of Alameda under Series Na. PARK DISTRICT R • FALLON ENTERPRISES,INC. SERIES NO.79.220123 ADAMS, • R' SERIES NO.92376222 County,Caillomle. APN 940.90x2.1 WALKER& bb SERIES NO.91.344396 Patrick O'Connell-Coon Recorder KOLLER 23 LIN REEL 2658 IMAGE 332 County SERIES NO.90-215062 LIN LIN SERIES NOS. # SERIES NO.81-066863 By: 93.392123 APN 910.1010.31 SERIES NO. SERIES NO. • Deputy County Recorder r &92.428142 ¢E¢a 92-056918 92-058918 • APN 916600.2•! W APN 99B•304509 APH 810.304x22 • ' • T9 . This map was prepared by me or under my direction -- 66'WIDE r- LIN Z SERIES NO.92-089219 LIN SERIES NO.BB-079781 .-LOWELL A.JORDAN TRUST 1 -3d APN 940.1040 _t APN 998.20367 - SERIES ND.74.160635 By: I. LIN SERIES NO.82.061343 Robert Chan LS.No.5412,Exp.9/30/98 • [ SERIES NO: ANNEXATION NO.10(EASTERN DUBLIN) �' f'`' 90-215062 50'WIDE NOTE: CASTERSON J APN 948-1010.2 PARCEL A SERIES N09.01-039684 TOTAL ANNEXATION AREA: 1538 ACRES ( LOWELL A.JORDAN TRUST 1' THE uMMAR1100 USED TO AALCULATE TOE AREA WAS BY OR PARCEL • &80-229805 I I SERIES NO. 74-160635 MAP AREAS. • APN 91660U•3 SERIES NO.82-061343 • I I 9. AS A DRAFTING CONVENTION,THE SMALL SEPARATIONS 11:1• LIN I BETWEEN PORTIONS OF THE LINEWORK AROUND THE ]. SERIES NO.69-079781 I' BOUNDARY OF THIS ANNEXATION WERE PROVIDED TO Q n APN fB6]076d I ALLOW MULTIPLE DESCRIPTIONS TO BE PLACED ON g WHAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE A SINGLE LINE:THESE ' •ANNEXATION NO. 2 BOUNDARY OF TERRITORY ¢O It.r I' LINES ARE TO BE CONSIDERED COINCIDENT EXCEPT ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN,CALIFORNIA- 0 0 00 7 • I. - WHERE NOTED. ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN BY DUBLIN CITY ?oo 0 ,,,AAA - CENTERLINE OF COUNCIL RESOLUTION HO.110.03 A MAP OF WHICH .8 f.I d FALLON ROAD '.' TERRITORY WAS FILED DECEMBER 21, 1935 IN F¢A O (ROAD NO.71372) _ . BOOK 151 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 37 (663233141, yQ0 a ------ • -- RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY,CALIFORNIA. J PAOYEH LIN PAOYEH LIN - i °� WM.&JEAN MAYNARD 3 2 SERIES NO. - SERIES NO. LIN 1 SERIES NO.72-174841• '0' TON' 1600 2400' 'L m 91-148798 91-146788 SERIES NOS.BB-144753 I OUBLINiOWN LTD. - - Q= 7 APN 990.3025.1 APN 998-3020.2 .&88.144749 SERIES'NO.W-245554 - $171' f] - APN 9063W0.1 ORAPH1C SCALE:t-.500' • x' BOUNDARY As SHOWN ON THE MAP .WM.&JEAN MAYNARD ENTITLED'RECORD OF SURVEY RIS SERIES NO.85.100554 _� EXHIBIT'A' NO.1005'DATED OCTOBER 1990, _ APH iy B-]0763 ANNTIAINDH FUME RECORDED M BOOK IS,PAGE 57.. NORTHERLY RIGHT-0F•WAY b ANNEXATION NO.10(EASTERN DUBLIN) • OF CALTRANS PROPERTY DUBLIN LAND COMPANY' cm BUMN(80.03-102778 MAY DEVANY ' LEGEND AiS BOB O.83-11.2 SERIES NO.73-073270 CITY OF DUBLIN • APH 9911-80263.1 CALTRANS • -. EXISTING CITY OF DUBLIN nEealmnN In DATE Ci ADWTxJH _■ BOUNDARY BOUNDARY LINE OF CITY OF DATE REV1exN1 DATE ANNEXATION NO 52 BOUNDARY LINE OF TERRITORY INTERSTATE 580 DUBLIN ANNEXATION - " //99 ,I ANNEXED LEASAN TO THE UNC OF PLEASANTON BY CITY.OF PLEASANTON R �E I V E ADOPTED NO CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 5/5, -.•� EXISTING CITY OF PLEASANTON I 50008 WWI N0. OF ADOPTED NOVEMBER 3, 1971, IN-MAP BOOK 73 AT COUNTY OF ALAMEDA BOUNDARY "CT . PAGE 7(71.152333) RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, SERIES NO.AF•064493 1 1 L V 11 CALIFORNIA. 9x0]4-o }SE 1 �.,aa.�,,.,. Att�ch�tte "a 1UBLIN PLANNING DOt:i i~MI .. ;~ gel gej III ..... a: Lgt III !;cn= Zen: .. i":~ ... ~ ~= :; ~ l\l! ..0 j!:Z ~ -I ~ ~l z!!~ 00:0 !Eg s;; i~; =!ii 1-0 ~!;i N" .. ~ 8: 0:00: 1Il~ . ~~j ..",.. ctm 00" ~cii ZuO zilD_ if8 "'z. :;gg! ~ffi! ....if' >a: 1Il1ll.. Eii: I-IIl III III z 0" .... :; 1" ~J -.. '51 U ~~ ~" l!j ._5:~ ~B . ~" :i 1~1 i 0.... aI B ~~E U~ r-- ~~. \i, \~ ! II.. ~ ..n J ;;~g ~ o..~ ~ " :fU>"o 1, li~' t.i _:J8 'i S~ ilj~ ,~ ~JI fll-:I 5 l!~ ..~ 1- ~ .s~ ill il 'g I ~ if; C:.. a: if; i ~ ll- III ",oJ ~~ "i! .gaS a:.l ~~ ;: U !i ~i 5~ I?D ..I =~ 8&.; i!'t:; I;c Ui ~ii b z " II cili tl- 8~ II "~ Ie: cf~ i~ '" I~ 8t g B.~E ~ ~~,~ !..i" Ui ;;- irr;; ,d ~!oi a:, _:lr.s ~ ~ lh! ~hihl! ill.9o ~ij;U! g ~ '6 t I !; f1 ]; I K II j< fl- E ~ -fi ~ a: t B ~ lS ~ .,;~~!:l ~22~ .......i ~~illl ...."'(fill: i!i~i5li! ::Ir,oC(jct: ll: hg ~it! a: ., "li~ "'(fi(fi ,;;1-0: iffiw scoCQ if; ! e is ~- ~l?! ~= !;;~' 1ll,., ~l \ z:: ~~'11 ~i i;. 01 -I tr ~~ it;;~g~ g:;: .~&?~~ ". ~~~ e~ ~~ ~~.~ ~!i1 ~!i1~ 1ll!i1 1ll!i1 ~o~ls' I- b II g~~ ~I ~I ~! ~. !sn: I .~~._ ~ ; CQCO ~2 .. :6. ~'!. ~ >-~~ > Q 'l';:; a: 'i;g....~"i:i ~ ~i :!l~i~ ::J! Iii~gi Iii ~ g. oh:l: a: ~....... ~... ! i~~~ :J ~~ ~ ::J ~CQ_~~ a= 2 ffi :x:W~~ a fi:co ommm ~ ~ '" " o o II ~i ~I ~ a: .. ~. -"' z~l;:; -0 "'z d a: III co ~~ l!:~ :z:' ~~ "'~ a:(fi !\!ffi lil,., ~~! ...gi ::J.. ii: UI .. ~!!!OZ.... I::....O:u:; iI!~~e~= C6~tW"" !:ff.,!~ ::Ill!li!.~o U;I?U ~!s~c~ :i1U;1~.=-i ~j!:"ii!";; . il!;!~ii5 I_CWO ~i!~fi:l !fi~59'~e !l:"ti~"!i! fiiS~!l:i:i.. c'~9tmffi ll!i.d!i .; !iilll~ ~~1ii ~it~ ~~~ ~(fil3 ~ffiit . gU)UJ ~ .. Ji :;~: :! a: III co ! gj:i: u 0\. 5>0 i:l<:Z ffiz ~S U j?;jti .~~ 015 ~ ~ ~ ~ I .~. ~ 01 ;l ~. ~ ~ S 5 x >< w ~ z ::; '" '" o ... oll ~ 5 ~ 5 ~ ~ B b ~ zi! e ~~!i~ ! :~ g~ ~ :lj~: Ii. ~~!l1~ 0 iri :;~~ 5)- G- li:~~ a:i !g ili= ~~ ;! 8~~ fig ... .a::oc MUD . Iii ~lli .~~ i!i! !l~ ...... .. Cl :c ~~ n i~in ~i: li!~ ~m~~~ tGiC i!i ~1lJ ' I ! I "Ii C> .. co ;!il;l "' '!~=Ii II) !l1~ ~ ~~15~ ~ w .. ::5... ;;;:j i5".oC ~ """" .0.. "-!;; : I~:t ~~I 'I( 15~ z ... t; ~i ::i~;:;: ..~J w. a: Z" if' 1j1!<liE Cl i: w .... oC ~ U" III 5~il ;ml 2!: a: III ~~~ a: .. ~ gll! III z . ' :J ~ :'!" :2: ... wen.: >- !!:!_ICII ocr.;." :.= 01 > z z " '~'., ::i o'''il; Z -I' ffi (I) $.( .> ILl ....1: ~ ii ;S' ...co awo.. ywvrv.lVJ. ~O-"ilNmlil.1N;iIO , 8UZ:81-t8 'ON S;III13S ANVdnoo ON't'1 Nnsno h"" oy) n YO '11ft tBlZ "ON aYOY) O~ YIIVtySSYJ. ii~~~: UJU::U_I&.UI :I: C1.I&.I~ ...aoECt; !z"':aO ;~~~:= OxccO: C ii~=:gD :lclAlzcb ~~~~~~ C"""'o(-IIII ~~~:o:~: OZ<CCOWOl m..L........ z :i /Xl ::l Q IL o ~ (3 ~ - !I _ i li ~ J 1IiC' z o ~ z 'I( (I) 'I( W -' Q. IL o >- ~ (3 ..,. en ~ G z Z ~ Z ::J ID l' IDO "'~C"J .U'o.. ~ r- :~'l~ !~ ~I .... IIU0x..... ! ~ ~ - E c .!l oiit-oom:; I l8 ::.:i~~6 0 :/" ;:oQg%U ~~t; ~ ~\) ~ -~ ~ ~: :z~l1"'~ !I -.. ~ Iii ~liliio c '6 ~~ c& j.u... ~ I cr~ ;~. r -I 'lii Id~ -2 ~ l: ilf:!ii ~ Iii ODe ~ in ~ ~~ ii , E_ ,,- ~ I ~= ~~I!.;~ '":c ~ ~.li !>C/:,~ - Zle.!!! 8 _zE c~:i~ ~o ~:;E~IIS E 0 8~ .ce-g .!! iSB& ... €lil.!! a: I ~; 1~~:!8 1& ~ il~.8 ~ r~ :s g'i~ I l; l!i~,zcril i::~~i3 1!1i5 I ti -j&'~ .b" L ~ :l!~t -2 il ~.~ .Ii ~ z'~:l~::~ Q 'i ~.as 0 5 ..n~~ _ 1~8 ~ .g. ~~ I ~ ~~ -e 56z8 =~ JO ~ 1Ua:1U- W 1 a: i W ~~i=n ;,8 ~ i 0:0 1i -CIl Ed . 0 e" ;lj~ ~ c~ e~ )( Op- EC CD U }~-g ia't-o o~ g .3 II .. IOceDL7U w ~ - . ...il! d a ~OI .... 8~!~g~ z o.g 3 ~~ 8~ ~ tll':~ l;l C E~ ~~il i~ ::I ." iii Co co.5~ ~ t 1Il ~~~i9:~ ~~ "' ~ ~1~ ....5 ..i! I:: " 8.. d itJi cE 3 .g'u; 8~.; 5 a.LL cd .. aJ.!'~.2Ql 0 8~ "'E .. ;; a. ~ g-! c a: a:..J E!J"1i5!1E iO...'O ~ I E ll. C ~ a:..J rill "''' ~"ll iJ o-l ~ Z "" J!i"'Ca: C ~l!:.'ii ;:. ~~)(I)~g~ ~ 0:11 I .ii- ~ j- ~Ii oC~I~!c!'1 ::E ~ !I cO CD ....3 ~8!a: Iii :!....i:l ~ 0 i b 6 ~ i Z ,: ol ~~ '" e c .... '" .. ffiL .. ~lt .. 2:01- C ..IZZ III ~:~ .... oCl E ~~i :~~ ~ !:& ~:ti ~ ..:!! h~ ~tD ~5c u~ i"_li Ie!;! ~I ~~ ~~:5t; =5~!iiS =~ 5:)CDC ~~~ o .. MILle Olr RO ...... t- 11I1::0 l:Ie ... ~ ~l!i8:! ~ii a: ~~ IL ",~~!l ~i~ <;1; ~ J I Ue~ ~ III ~~ ~8! l:i! ~ ~~ ~C?;~ ~h ~~~ g:ll!;;~ :/lilc" -a~ <- i . hi ill "..lI: 9~co ~ii ~l3 ~~. i~ i ::1r1l if~ ~~ lU~~~ .,g~ III ~mlll ~i <zlll ~l.lJLO-, imm ~Bl! U ;m ~~~~ 8 ~I:! I I Ii ~i5 il!i . z 9 .. m ~ I I .. :IE"' ~ I ~ == I I I Lli!I 0 :1"=1; co !!is! !: Itl n E ~ E~=i w ;;;~ '!..~ 5_0a. ~ ~~~ Ji i~! ~l!i8= ~ l5i -'Zll: ~ d.:t z .... ~Id ~m ::i~~: 0:: ~~ g.." :li; w m ~Bl;! z-~ IUI&1iE zBl= Bl'" Bl"~ il~~ .... W -'-~lI: ~ '" ::i-l\li 5 -~ if "'.. I::=: a: .. lll"~ W ~ ,I '" '" .. <5 ....'" ~~:ie"'::i ::O~~cj!:~ ..:s....l5.. ~)oi~..~i '" " .. ..~....:!..; "'US " !I'" ~eti~o~ ~;:!~u~~ :::5sllo)o~ .. _z )o'!Ez.-o ~St;~i!" ~gbiffi~ 1l~;~Ei8 z " :; g :In! ::c ..~ ~~;I: ~m;f ~ .. z ~ :;d..* %z~~ w8];. >i:";': ~~;;f ~ .. >- Z <.. :IE.." 812~ Q~2 ~glll -''''''' WL z-.. -'" m'" ~ o z ~ z 01( rt) 01( W -J Q. lI- o ~ .c~CJY)aYOI.s (_'ON _ _WVI"ISRJ. ~ C3 e Il a.Cl-fII :I"UIIl o:li:~ ,~:i! ~~ll!ll ;1:0 i~i~ :/;':; " 0 ,,"j: C~~a i!:l'j.. 8l<..t; ....lre ~~! :If.. ~~!E l'ii~~ ~ffi~~ g:lli :9i1" ..t; $ ,..P:o ~..gh !~ffi! ~53~ al9 " Z 1IIi(\ Z ... ClO ~ ~t'l UQ'""- Z III W E . ,.If Sewage Collection and Treatment N/A Refuse Collection Street Lighting Street Maintenance -<:::'.;;......_... and Sweeping CaJrIty of Alarreda Flood Control Zcre 7 Parks and Recrea tion Lt.Rill, EffiFD Library Services Camt;y of' A1an:rla Electrici ty FGffi Cable Television Transit LAVI:\. WRT' Other N!.A SERVICES Police Protection Fire Protection Water Distribution ,fA .94:9;30 EASIERN l1JPilN ~oN/ . . reT.tI(}M;Nl' AID IRE2Dffi #1 PIAN FCR s:RVICES CURRENT AGENCY PROPOSED AGENCY AJ.an:rla Cmnty s-eriff Alareda Ccunty Fire Patrol Citv of I:llhLin IhJe}-e-ty Ree;imal Fire lutl-ority N/A llililin San Ran:n S:Tvices District llililin San Farm Services District Citv of llililin City of Diilin City of Diilin 7~ 7/C:itqr of nlhlin Citv of llililin. EffiFD Ccuntv of Alareda FGffi r'T'T'Y nF Tl1Pl'TN FRA\T1-rfC:Fn OffRA'ICR RAm' T AvrA , N/A L It f AttachnEnt C 'e"Klflf311 G PLAN FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES INTRODUCTION Timing of Annexation Ever since the incorporation of Dublin, Eastern Dublin has been envisioned as someday being part of the City. It is called out as the Eastern Extended Planning Area in Dublin's original general plan(1985). For the past seven years the City has been constantly involved in planning the area. With the adoption of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan and conclusion of a referendum on those two plans, some property owners in the annexation area are now showing an interest in developing their properties. Considerable time is being spent by City staff working with these owners to implement the provisions of the plans. Because of this, the City would like to see annexation of these properties occur in a timely manner.(by 1995) so the responsibilities and obligations of these property owners under the terms of the Specific Plan can be formalized and the City's investment of time and money better protected. Additionally, although approximately one fifth of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area is currently within the City of Dublin(the 700 acre County owned Santa Rita Property), it would not be feasible to build out this area without concurrent development in the annexation area. This is because of the tremendous cost of extending infrastructure through the Santa Rita site. Concurrent development of the annexation area would provide the critical mass necessary to make the financing of infrastructure in both areas practical. For this reason the City is interested in seeing development start in the annexation area as soon as possible. Annexation to the City is the first step in the development process. Once the annexation becomes effective, the major landowner of the annexation area intends to submit a rezoning request and a Land Use and Development Plan. Before development in Eastern Dublin can commence, a large number of intervening actions must be accomplished. They are set forth in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and EIR and the mitigation monitoring program prepared for the EIR. In addition to annexation to the City and Dublin San Ramon Services District(DSRSD) some of these action include preparation of: a visual survey, acoustical study, grazing management plan, wildfire management plan,parks implementation plan, solid waste management plan, construction impact reduction plan, utilities and public facilities master plans, school impact mitigation agreement, vegetation management plan, earthquake preparedness plan, energy conservation plan, energy conservation demonstration 1 Attachmwit _ G Ex813iT G ;;:- project, stream corridor restoration plan and sedimentation control ordinance in addition to the Land Use and Development Plan and tentative map required to secure detailed City zoning on property in the annexation area. The preparation of virtually all of the studies, plans, agreements, etc. listed above will require the joint participation of City staff, landowners and professional consultants who are experts in the various fields involved. As a result the costs to prepare these studies will total hundreds of thousands of dollars. According to requirements of the Specific Plan, these costs will have to be born by the owners or developers of the property in the Eastern Dublin area. These owners and developers are willing to incur such a tremendous obligation provided their properties are officially part of the jurisdiction in which development will take place. Conversely, the City is willing to make the required commitment of City resources to undertake the substantial task of coordinating this work provided the property is subject to City jurisdiction. For this reason annexation to the City of Dublin is be!lg sought at this time rather than after completion of the documents required by the Specific Plan. Availability of Services As shown in this Plan for Services the agencies responsible for providing services to the annexation area are known at this time. DSRSD is responsible for wastewater collection and treatment but it must expand its capacity tp dispose of the sewage from the annexation area and from a portion of the planned growth within its current service area. This situation is currently the subject of negotiations between the Livermore Amador Valley Wastewater Management Agency (LA VWMA) and the East Bay Dischargers Authority (EBDA). These negotiations not only involve future development within the City of Dublin and DSRSD Sphere of Influence but also the spheres of Livermore and Pleasanton. Over the past six months proposals and counter- proposals have been made between LA VWMA and EBDA concerning the costs arid terms of expanding capacity through EBDA. All negotiations include sufficient capacity to serve the annexation area. Capacity to provide all other services to the annexation area either currently exists, is scheduled through contract to be provided in the future, or will be available as soon as funding from the developers is provided. Because of the magnitude ofthe studies and plans required by the Specific Plan, it is quite possible that the sewage disposal question will have been answered before those studies are completed. No building permits can be issued until a sewage disposal solution is found. 2 ;;- Annexation Justification The following reasons justify the size and configuration of this proposed annexation. First, the proposed annexation is large enough to support the financing of planning engineering studies for determining the appropriate infrastructure systems, such as water and sewer that are necessary to service the area. Property owners within the annexation area are required to fund these studies and they need land use assurances before they are willing to do so. This annexation assures property owners of the land use and development potential and provides for the orderly development of the area. Second, once developed, this area will contain enough housing and commercial base to support the financing and implementation of infrastructure systems. Third, sixty-eight percent of the proposed annexation area is owned by one land owner who, with another land owner, has requested this annexation. Annexing just this major land owner's property would result in creating islands or unincorporated corridors. Fourth, this proposed annexation configuration follows existing property lines, and is a logica~ contiguous extension of the existing Dublin city limits. Fifth, this proposed annexation incorporates two freeway interchanges (at Tassajara and Fallon roads), and two north and south arterials, Tassajara Road and a portion of Fallon Road, providing proper access to the annexation area. Sixth, the proposed annexation of 1,542 acres to DSRSD is consistent with the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. Seventh, the proposed detachment of 1,029 acres from the LARPD is consistent with the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. SERVICES The Eastern Dublin Specific Phm and EIR were prepared with the knowledge that they would be used for the annexation to the City of Dublin and the DSRSD and detachment from the Livermore Area Park and Recreation District (LARPD). Special care was taken during the preparation of these documents to insure that the analysis of service provided therein ~ould be thorough and thereby satisfy the requirements of the Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) for these actions. Both documents were referred to, reviewed by and commented upon by LAFCO staff and those comments were incorporated into the final drafts of the Plan and EIR. DSRSD reviewed the documents to ensure that they would support the future discretionary action of the District to annex Eastern Dublin properties. The District stated the draft EIR presented a thorough analysis of the impacts of the project on water and wastewater services keeping in mind the District's master plan models for, water, wastewater and recycled water would need to be 3 ;- updated as soon as possible after adoption of the Specific Plan. This task is required by Mitigation Measures 3.5/2.0, 13.0 and 35.0 of the EIR and has now been accomplished through completion of the report titled Eastern Dublin Facilities Plan Final Report (G.S. Dodson a~d Associates, December, 1993). The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and EIR represent, in effect, a "Plan for Services" for the entire Eastern Dublin area of which the area to be annexed under this application constitutes slightly less than one-half Infrastructure will be extended through the annexation area in phases, basically from West to East and from South to North. DSRSD would provide water, recycled water and wastewater services to the annexation area. As a condition of annexation to the District, DSRSD has required Eastern Dublin property owners to enter into Area-Wide Facility Agreements that will lead to studies which will provide the next level of detail for phasing of water, wastewater and recycled water facilities. Preliminary data on water, wastewater and storm drainage facilities needed to serve the annexation area are shown in Attachment 1. Since no development approvals are sought by virtue ofthis annexation application, no final approval of water and sewerage facilities is granted. The final approval of the water and sewerage facilities needed to ultimately serve the annexation area may only be granted by DSRSD. The City of Dublin and Zone 7 of the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District are responsible for the final approval of storm water drainage facilities. WATER Potable Water DSRSD has been actively planning to provide water service to Eastern Dublin. To update the information contained in the Final Specific Plan and provide a basis for future infrastructure planning efforts throughout the Eastern Dublin area, DSRSD has prepared the "EASTERN DUBLIN FACILITIES PLAN FINAL REPORT", (G.S. Dodson and Associates, December, 1993). The attached Figure 2 of this Report (Attachment 2) illustrates the required potable water pipelines, turnouts, pumps and storage facilities. DSRSD has prepared updated water demand estimates for the proposed annexation area (see Attachment 3). Potable water system cost estimates are shown in Table 7 (Attachment 4). 4 No water service is currently provided to the annexation area by DSRSD.. The few residences and other land uses in the area currently use well water. With annexation, all new development could receive water service.from DSRSD. Existing homes can remain on wells unless a parcel is proposed for subdivision. All subdivision development shall be provided with public (DSRSD) water as provided by County Health regulations. DSRSD currently obtains all of its water supplies from Zone 7 which wholesales treated local surface water, groundwater and imported water to various Livermore/Amador Valley water agencies. Zone 7 has stated in its "Water Supply Planning Report" dated November, 1993 that it has sufficient water to serve the Valleyffor:5_to 11 years assuming an annual growth rate of 2%to 3%. This period could be lengthened to between 16 to 25 years depending on such factors as water conservation, through the implementation of Best Management Practices, and completion of certain already approved State Water Project facilities. Ultimately, however, an additional 25,000 AFY will be needed by year 2020-to-satisfy "prospective" Valley general plans at the 2°/0 - 3% growth rate. Zone 7 has identified-in the "Water Supply Planning Report" a number of - diverse and feasible options that it can:pursue.for_.additional water, such as water marketing/transfers; additional storage; or recycled water. These three sources have the potential to make an additional 59,300 AFY available to the Zone 7 area. Zone 7 has prepared a report addressing the necessary increases-to its-connection fees to fund the effort to serve additional supplies and construct necessary facilities to deliver it to retailers such as DSRSD. Zone 7 has increased its connection charge in accordance with this report to provide the funding for the development of the necessary waterresources and the construction of the needed infrastructure: DSRSD has recently renegotiated.its Water Supply Contract with Zone 7. The renewed contract will be for a term of 30 years and is renewable-upon expiration. It obligates Zone 7 to supply all the water requested by DSRSD subject to its availability. The Agreement also provides DSRSD with the ability to seek and secure alternative sources of supply through mechanisms such as water transfers, to construct wells and.;pump.from the groundwater basin which Zone 7 manages and to recycle water within its servieearea. As a source of additional water for.Ilimited applications such as landscaping, recycled water has been studied by several Valley service providers,including DSRSD, the City of Livermore, and Zone 7. DSRSD and the East Bay Municipal Utility District recently agreed to share the cost of a $110,000 study to determine the feasibility of using 3.3 mgd of treated wastewater to.irrigate landscaped areas in Dublin and San Ramon.- If implemented, this would make a limited volume of potable water available for other use liiithin Dublin. ;;:- Recycled Water Recycled water from the DSRSD Wastewater Treatment Plant will serve as an additional supply of water in addition to that provided by Zone 7 or other potential potable sources. Non-potable recycled water used for landscaped areas provides better protection of landscaping during times of extended drought or other water shortage emergencies, when potable water would otherwise be withheld from non-essential uses. The use of recycled water for such non-critical uses can actually protect propertyownersl substantial investments in landscaping, while also decreasing the total potable water demand. Resolution 42-92 of the DSRSD Board of Directors established a Recycled Water Policy which sets out policies and priorities for the provision of recycled water. It provides that in certain zones, recycled water would be a required addition to the potable source for specified acceptable uses. The zones within which this provision will govern will be created by DSRSD after completion of ongoing studies. It is envisioned that significant portions of the Eastern Dublin Phase 1 annexation will require recycled water facilities including dual piping and pumping and storage facilities. The attached Figure 4 ofthe G.S. Dodson Facilities Plan (Attachment 5) illustrates the required recycled water pipelines, pumps and storage facilities. The recycled water system cost estimates are described in Table 9 (Attachment 6). Recycled water demand is estimated for the annexation area on the attached "Estimated Recycled Water Demand" table (Attachment 7). W ASTEW ATER Wastewater services for the annexation area will be provided by DSRSD. The District has been actively planning to provide sewage collection, storage, treatment and disposal services to Eastern Dublin. To update the information contained in the Final Specific Plan and to provide a basis for future infrastructure planning efforts throughout the Eastern Dublin area, DSRSD has prepared the "EASTERN DUBLIN FACILITIES FINAL REPORT" (G.S. Dodson and Associates, December, 1993). Average wastewater flows for the annexation area are estimated on the attached "Estimated Wastewater Flows" table (Attachment 8). Wastewater Collection All development within the annexation area will be connected to the DSRSD collection system. Currently the few land uses in the area are on septic tanks. Existing homes will be required to 6 connect to DSRSD mains when they are within 200 feet of the property line, or when any subdivision of land is approved, in accordance with the County Health Department regulations. In general, the wastewater collection system will flow from north to south through the area then west parallel to I-580 to existing collection facilities west of Hacienda Drive. The backbone system for the entire Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area is shown in the attached Figure 3"from the G.S. Dodson Facilities Plan(Attachment 9). Wasewater collection system cost estimates are described in Table 8 (Attachment 10). Wastewater Storage Wastewater storage for diurnal peak flows and peak wet weather flows will be required because it may not be cost-effective to enlarge wastewater treatment and disposal facilities to the maximum size needed to accommodate all peak flows. DSRSD is currently studying where the required storage might best be located. Options include additional storage facilities at the wastewater treatment plant or at some location along the trunk sewer system either within or outside the Eastern Dublin area: Wastewater Treatment It is currently contemplated that treatment for sewage generated by development in the annexation area will be provided by the DSRSD Wastewater Treatment Plant located south of Stoneridge Drive in Pleasanton. The plant is owned and operated by DSRSD and presently serves both the cities of Dublin and Pleasanton. It has a current average dry weather flow of 11.5 mgd. Expansion of the plant has been master planned to be in four increments up to 36 mgd. Wastewater Disposal Disposal of treated wastewater from the DSRSD plant is through export to San Francisco Bay via the Livermore Amador Valley Wastewater Management Authority(LAVWMA) and East Bay Dischargers Authority(EBDA) systems. DSRSD's current allotted capacity in the LAVWMA and EBDA systems is not sufficient for planned and approved development within DSRSD's existing area nor is it sufficient to serve development within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area, which would require an average total daily export capacity of 4.3 MGD-ADWF. Ongoing planning efforts for the increase of disposal capacity have been investigated by two local agencies, 7 the Tri-Valley Wastewater Authority(TWA) and LAVWMA. TWA approved a Final EIR which identified several alternatives for the increase of disposal capacity. At the time of the preparation of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan EIR, the preferred alternative consisted of transporting up to 40 mgd of untreated wastewater to the Central Contra Costa County Sanitary District plant in Martinez for treatment and disposal in Suisun Bay: An expansion of the LAVWMA system was another alternative identified and is currently the option being pursued. In this alternative, a contract for increased effluent capacity would be signed with EBDA and the current LAVWMA export line would be expanded. DSRSD is a member of LAVWMA. LAVWMA is to pursuing such additional capacity, up to 12.7 MGD as joint use facilities with concurrence of all LAVMWA members. Alternately,LAVWMA may pursue sole use facilities up to 5.4 MGD for DSRSD exclusively. Negotiations have been occurring with EBDA for the purchase of such capacity. All members of EBDA have indicated a willingness to approve the 12.7 MGD, once the terms of payment of such capacity are worked out. Out of this 12.7 MGD, DSRSD is expected to have 5.4 MGD (see attachment 11,Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan EIR Addendum dated August 22, 1994 for more information). However, DSRSD plans to continue the active pursuit of an increase to wastewater disposal capacity on all possible fronts. An additional form of wastewater disposal currently planned for eastern Dublin will be through reclamation and reuse. Zone 7 in partnership with DSRSD and Livermore commissioned a water recycling study by Brown and Caldwell titled "Livermore Amador Valley Water Recycling Study" dated May, 1992, which shows it would be possible to reuse up to 25,000 AFY in the Livermore/Amador Valley through groundwater recharge.and surface irrigation. The report established the technical feasibility of use of demineralized recycled water for groundwater recharge. The Brown and Caldwell study identified potential alternative recycled water projects valley-wide, including alternative "W-4", which concerned the use of up to 4,000 acre feet per year (3.6MGD) demineralized recycled water on the westside of the Valley, for groundwater recharge. DSRSD has since taken several steps toward implementation of this disposal alternative. DSRSD's current Capital Improvement Program includes and provides funding for the preparation of a Demineralized Recycled Water Study necessary to plan for the construction of facilities at the existing Wastewater Treatment plan to produce demineralized recycled water, as well as an Effluent Disposal Master Plan which will identify and optimize alternative disposal techniques. It 8 • is the goal of DSRSD to have additional disposal capacity via groundwater recharge with demineralized water available, if such capacity has not been provided by the expansion of LAVWMA facilities, within 3 years of the effective date of annexation. As noted in the "Water" section of the Plan for Services, recycled water piping and facilities will be required for major portions of the Phase 1 annexation, as determined by policy of the DSRSD Board of Directors. STORM DRAINAGE Zone 7 will be responsible for large drainage channels in the annexation area. The City of Dublin will be responsible for local storm drains which connect to the Zone 7 channels. Conceptual backbone storm drainage facilities for the Eastern Dublin area are shown in Figure 9.4 (see Attachment 12). POLICE PROTECTION Currently police protection for the annexation area and the entire Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area is provided by the Alameda County Sheriffs Department and the California Highway Patrol. Once the area is annexed, police responsibilities will shift to the Dublin Police Department. The Dublin Police Department, which operates out of a central facility in the Dublin Civic Center, currently has 28 sworn officers and 3 civilian staff. This is a police officer-to-resident ratio of 1.2/1000. Employing this same ratio, 44 additional officers may be required for the entire Eastern Dublin area. The City's police department is a division of the Alameda County Sheriffs Department and is funded by the City through a contractual agreement with the County. Dublin owns the department's facilities and equipment but the personnel are employed by the County Sheriffs Department. The City's police department is a full service operation except for dispatch which is provided through the County Sheriffs dispatch office in San Leandro. - FIRE PROTECTION At the present time fire protection services to the annexation area are provided by the Alameda County Fire Department and the California Division of Forestry. With annexation and development of the area, the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority(DRFA),;would become 9 ;;- responsible for fire services. DRF A provides fire protection services for the cities of Dublin and San Ramon. DRF A has 45 line fire-fighters and four officers based at two fire stations, one station is located in Dublin and the other in San Ramon. DRFA operates under a standard ofa 1.5 mile response zone for each station in order to maintain a response time within 5 minutes. Retention ofthis standard will require the construction of 2 new fire stations in the Eastern Dublin area. The first. of these stations will be located just to the west of the annexation area in the vicinity of Gleason Drive and is required to be completed prior to completion of the initial development in the Eastern Dublin planning area. The second would be generally located east of Fallon Road. SOLID WASTE Coordination of solid waster management activities in Alameda County is a joint responsibility of the County's Waste Management Authority and local jurisdictions. The City of Dublin presently contracts with a private company for residential and commercial garbage collection within city limits. This disposal service company does riot see any problems in providing service to the annexation area once it is developed. PARKS AND RECREATION Portions of the annexation area are currently within the jurisdictions of the Livermore Area Parks and Recreation Department (LARPD) and the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) although because his virtually undeveloped, no park facilities exist in the area. Once annexati'on takes place EBRPD will continue to provide regional park services to the area but part of the application for reorganization is to detach the annexation area from LARPD. Dublin has a policy in its General Plan to revise jurisdictional boundaries so City of Dublin departments have control over all park land within the Dublin Sphere of Influence. The City of Dublin plans to provide local and community park and recreation services to the area. Dublin recently adopted a parks and recreation master plan which shows 3 community and 7 neighborhood parks in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area. This corresponds to the number, type and location of those facilities shown in the Specific Plan. Five of these facilities (3 neighborhood and 2 community parks) are within the annexation area. 10 ;- UTILITIES Electricity and natural gas will be supplied to the annexation area by P. G. & E. Maintenance of street lighting will be by the City of Dublin. Existing electrical service to the area includes distribution lines to homes along Tassajara Road. No natural gas lines are currently in the area. PG & Ehas indicated it has capacity to expand its facilities to provide power and gas to supply the area as planned. Telephone service is provided by Pacific Bell. Service is currently available to the area and Pacific Bell is able to expand that service to the degree necessary to accommodate the planned development of the annexation area. STREET MAlNTENANCE Street maintenance and sweeping services will be provided to the annexation area by the City of Dublin. These services in the annexation area are currently the responsibility of the County of Alameda. LffiRARY The annexation area is served by the Alameda County Library system and will continue to be after annexation. While this service will initially be provided by the existing branch library located on Amador Valley Blvd., the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan calls for a new branch in the specific plan area,.probably in the Town Center portion of that area. CABLE TELEVISION Cable television service to the annexation area will be provided by the City of Dublin through franchised operators. Currently there is no cable television service to the area. TRANSIT There are currently no transit lines which directly serve the annexation area. The Livermore IAmador Transit Authority (LA VTA.) and BART express bus service both serve Dublin and at 11 ;- least the former will probably be extended to the subject area after annexation. Once BART is extended to east Dublin in 1995 it will provide convenient service to the annexation area but there will then be no need for the express bus service. FINANCING Because Eastern Dublin and the area to be annexed are, for the most part, currently undeveloped rural land and full urban services are being proposed, extensive public improvements will be required for its development. The financing of these improvements is described in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. Table 10-1 (Attachment 13) indicates the total cost of these improvements for the entire Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area will be $532.5 million. Of this total approximately $136 million will be needed for streets, highway interchanges and mass grading; $235 million for water and sewage treatment and storage facilities; and over $160 million will be necessary for schools, parks and public buildings. Payment of these costs will be the responsibility of the landowners in the area as they develop their properties. The funding mechanisms used for this purpose will probably be a combination of impact fees and assessment and/or capital facilities districts. Park, school, fire and utility impact fees and Mello-Roos, Marks-Roos and special assessment districts are all described in the Plan. Tables 10-2 and 10-3 show how those fees and bond proceeds could be phased over a 17 year period. Table 10-3 indicates a bond 'debt service to residential value ratio well within established guidelines for repayment. Table III-9 (Attachment 14) is a cash flow analysis for Eastern Dublin over a 20 year time span and shows a cumulative net surplus to the City of Dublin of $49 million at the end of that period. All of this indicates that the development of Eastern Dublin (and the annexation area) as planned is very practical from a financial staridpoint. A fiscal analysis of the service costs of the annexation area and revenues to be generated from the area over the next 5 years was prepared. This analysis projects that costs will exceed revenues over the next several years. This projection is consistent with the Specific Plan's analysis (Attachment 14) which shows costs exceeding revenues in early years. However, the Specific Plan shows that revenues will exceed costs over the long term. The city will enter into an agreement with the major proponent of the annexation to cover the anticipated short fall during the initial years in order to assure the annexation's consistency with the Specific Plan. c:\planning\caroI\plantxt 12 Estimated Potable Water Demand For Eastern Dublin Annexation No. 1 (1 ) Land Use I Gross Unit Density Persons Per Average Day Average Year I Average Day Designation Acreage (2) Factor (3) Unit (4) Demand, GPD (5) Demand, AF/Yr (6)•Demand, MGD (7) Residential Rural 170.5 0.01 3.16 125/person 1 0.00 Single Family 310.6 4 3.16 125/person 550 0.49 Medium Density 268.9 10 2.58 125/person 971 0.87 Medium-High Density 25.2 20 2.00 125/person 141 0.13 High Density 33.6 35 2.00 125/person 329 0.29 :::.::<.>::.>:.:.:::.:::::::g.:ta;al.::M:.:::.::::::._.4:::.1:::;.:g.::soma.{:..gi:.:..::::.:Maa :.:e ::.............................................. .. Commercial/Industrial General Commercial 150.8 N/A N/A 1950/acre 329 0.29 • Neighborhood Commercial I 31.51- N/A N/A 1950/acre j 69 0.06 Campus Office 76.11 N/A N/A I 1950/acre I 166 0.15 Public/Semi-Public 8.0 I N/A N/A I 3800/acre l 341_,... 0.03 ::::::.:::.::: :::::::: ::::: a:: ::::.:::::::.g::::::::..:...:......265.4...:.:: :: . : :::. .:.:k.: : : : : .:. . :.::::. :. ..:..............................................................5. .. ........................... Parks and Open Space Parks and Neighborhood Squares 129.1 N/A N/A 3400/acre 492 0.44 Freeway Landscaping 11.0 N/A N/A 3400/acre 42 0.04 Open Space 212.7 N/A N/A N/A 0 0.00 . . ............. <.;:.;:.::;:�:�>:.;:.;:.:;.:;:.:;:.>;:.:<.;:.::.;:«.:;:.;.:: ... ......................X34.................................. ... . :«:.::.:.::.:. :. :.:. :::. :t;offl::::: .:: :.::.�:::::::.::1::::.:::. 352.�3:.:::: .:.:.:.�::.:::::: ...:. ....................................................................... .....,................................................................ #u Schools - igras Schools 113.9 N/A N/A 3000/acre 383 0.34 "``F Mr .;:;:;.:.;:«:;.:;: .:.Gr..an.d..:.T:ot a 1.;:.;;:.;:<::;::.:.::.;i:.::.. :::..<:.::1. 4 i.9.,::::::.::::::.::::::.::::.:::.:...::::. :::::::::. ::.:. :...:.................................. ...... ........ ....... ... . ?< 3 1 F:\['P D['OOLIEDANN hl\['W EDA N\l.t\k3/8 W R Less:;R:e:ayc 1 ed:;W ater.:p.em:a6.d$?::(4)3:.;:.;:.;;:«.;::.:;.;::•::.::•;:::.::.:.::.;:...00:<:.;;:<::;:;.;:;.;:.:;.;:.;:;.;:.;:•;:>:.:.;:.:....�... g^- Ne.t:;:f'otabfe::tlNater..:Demands:::::: >:: :::<:::::<::::?::::»::::>::>:::<:>::::...... ,V v NOTES: (1) Planning level estimates; subject to re-evaluation as more detailed information becomes available. (2) Per City of Dublin Prezone Application PA 94-030,8-1-94; and Table 1, E. Dublin Facil,Plan, GS Dodson, Dec., 1993. (3) Units per acre,from Final Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, May 10, 1993. (4) From U.S.Census, 1990,City of Dublin. • . (5) From Eastern Dublin Facilities Plan, GS Dodson,Dec., 1993; Peak Day Potable Demand=2 times Av.Day Demand; • Peak Day Irrigation Demand=2.7 times Av. Day Demand; GPD=gallons per day. (6) AF/Yr=acre feet per year. (7) MGD• million gallons per day. (8) From"Estimated Recycled Water Demand for Eastern Dublin Annexation No.1",August 30, 1994. . Dublin San Ramon Services District August 30, 1994 Attachment 4 • TABLE 7 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM COST ESTIMATE Item Quantity Unit Costa Total Costb 10-inch pipe 93,756 If $85/If` $ 8.0 million 12 7inch pipe 38,446 If $100/If $ 3.8 million 14-inch pipe 7,530 If $115/If $ 0.9 million 16-inch pipe 16,085 If $125/1f° $ 2.0 million 18-inch pipe 19,135 If $135/If` $ 2.6 million 10 mgd pump station 2 ea $2.1 million per each $ 4.2 million 1 .3 mgd pump station 2 ea $450,000 per each $ 0.9 million 4.9 mg reservoir 2 ea $2 per gallon $19.6 million . 4.2 mg reservoir 2 ea $2 per gallon $16.8 million 1 .5 mg reservoir 1 ea $2 per gallon $ 3.0 million TOTAL POTABLE WATER SYSTEM $61.8 million a Costs include construction, contingencies (30 percent), and engineering and administration (20 percent). b Costs are based on an ENR Cost Index of 6295 (January 1993). Pipeline costs are for installation in existing streets. I-: g:\...\#2504\report December 21, 1993 X G.S.DODSON&ASSOCIATES - 4 - . • • . . • .. .. . . • . . • ' •• ,.. .•',.. .• '., • . .. ...- . . . ... , . . . • . . • i . . . : •• . • ! • • • .. • ,. •••• -0 Attachment 2 .. • • 00.• • • • . . . . • . . • . • • .1 . .• ....•„............:: ,,,.. _ ...GpIA t -vtvii\oc_ok , ,i, ,,,,,, % ., ., i..• ..).....:::::,....). •::.:-.;,, P •" ':*::"R3.: :-.....Boo ....'. • ...'. ••.' ')'•• 1• .,.;.7a::,•1-.0" ... , j,..-,,,:•••:•••' ..-.•••• :: ,...• : . 1.5 M9‘. I • • , •• •• . . . . . . —PSI— • ••• 7°°'. 1-.....%:-'-' /..' '. ..... ......:' • MAXIMUM DAY DEMANDS 12 I 10 (42 . . . . .. :. : Ao° , •• '.. ••• ZONE 1: 6,337 GPM 14 62Ab 00• ••• • ••• • • • '•• . ..' . .1 :... ..• ZONE 2: 4,053 GPM • •• . ... ... ... ZONE 3: 615 GPM : ••■s ' • : ..% ., • TOTAL 11,005 GPM ' . • . .-., . .-..".. ..•' • ' • . . • • . • ... :• 1 ' . '...' .•'.. I 1.).... ''...., ....• •. ; . . . . . coo ••.. ..• i . . • .'''''' 1 :i: law ,.I )...., , .,.. , ..,.. ) •,•,':. - ::. ':"-..... :.- • I.,.:. 4.. i .,..1 , •••"....; ''''. , '''' ...''. '''...'-,..........6>00.,/ ....., MILAN. '', ‘. i,.' , i ..,.. ,f ,.... 1:::: ..,........o_0..., °o. .'' CANYON N 16 '.• i''-• •%*. I ql t's f.' \ '• •i i . si 1. 1 •"••• !'... ': .1 ••"•.... :•••••:. '.•.. .::'.:....., r... •••• ''' ;':•:i R ... (I.2 MG)'.' - ''.. ...-, i 1.. ''''•••..... .."',. s••••••... .1•••... '. : t ..• ,: , ..: .:• 1.6130: 1 1%; ZONE 1 • • •••,.. ••• ;5,1 '•i 1.----- %.. I '.1 . ' I Illri••• h AtTFAACT.T14 "-...';; •''' ...:' .) j..',..11.<4.9i:A.G) 10 16 • . Ii (.......• 4. • • !," ..• . .. . , .•.: ..... ... ! • 17- . ...... • ........ . ...., 1.- 401. • II 14- f< I c'... ''.."%.,....." / '••• f', ....Iod. ,.•' ............./... 12 12'. ,' \ c• .1 10" op 18- .....• ),_ 04.3....... ....... .....: ...... I . I GLEASON 12" 16? 10 %. ..• . "4::... • •• • •A......... :...! f' .... 10 .. .......... / '.....000.........; LEGEND . I • :. " \ .. 0" 10"‘,. - i'•i:, IV II .': .: 12 • ' ..........:ri i, — PIPELINE 1 • ••••• ' 10" 18. 10-\ . „Q:3:07...,. •.. - ..... 12 • R1A 1 • . • 10" i8K I _ _. .. . : . 0 RESERVOIR I ••• • TRANSIT 10 (3 PUMP STAllON . 1 I • 1 . ......"‹._12.. IV\ 12'. " 18" 10" ••-- 10 10 41 --...iO/YE-'..2...... 11 18" 20W-I--•--.....•........•., I _D-4._.. VALVE. ZONE BOUNDARY •. . .... DUBLIN .,......12 16 16••. ... 16 '•• 16" , 10' ....••••.. •,...............• •• FUTURE BART §I .0. .‘..•••' ......." 16" 10" ". PARKING LOT .1 10" •P 10 10" ..:10"..2 10" • • 10" 10" I 10"' 10" 10" 10" •. 1 . ' • • .••• 18" - 18" 18" • ... • lo" . .."' " 10 lir 10- i 0- 10- . :1 • I ..10- __ , .. " 0 I '.' _ . FRONTAGE .. ROAD 18 • 1 TURNOUT . .• .• ZONE 7 0 . 1,750 3,500 FT { ■■-1 a . (5,502 GPM) • (5TURNOU ,502 GPM)T 1 ".& ; . FIGURE NUMBER 1 - • ...iri t N\IY/Alt.1, DUBLIN SAN RAMON EASTERN DUBLIN POTABLE WATER DISTRIBUTION 2 5 1 . - 041111,111.1.0:2VEI4fAIOAN10. •.-.......z..-.• CONSULTING ENGINEE S SERVICES DISTRICT FACILITIES N PIPELINE SIZES JOB NO. 2504 t R les.q1/ • • • • • co�N�{. -- o .6D0 '. . ... •. •c9 Attachment 5 0OO P--.70,_'0 1 \ • eoD 9 N — — ,' i 8.. • •..: DEMANDS MAXIMUM DAY DEMA 8 ZONE.1: 2.030 GPM - ........ :....900': : .... • ZONE 2 1 364 GPM sue'• . 2 .• .. - .. TOTAL 3.394 GPM ' ....'.....:'..' bpi ..., :. '• H• f�.�;:' '..600 1:6 MG � - o•.. • • 72"' .. .:,.. •. �,.. CANYON • : ieoo' 2 E - I .`• ' I ' :', ioD':''•.. • SANTA RITA -'........ I •:" JAIL FACILITY 8 .. - - — - - i;1 12" :. ,• 1.... • . .....:... .:• 1. :...". ...:.... '.....'"•..:.--I.:: ' GLEASON \ 8^ \- 8 •.. ". .. .. , ROAD ez, 600^ y� �.............: Soo.... 1 EGEND •....-....�so. 10" 12" 8" . PIPELINE ■• 8.. 8" — — 8' `.•,ioa` •:•10" I — RIA mANSIr v:' 12".. RESERVOIR• • 10" 12" — — R2 7 PUMP STAT1ON :. •._ ............................. :g" —LONE° ...-•: 14" (1.5 MG): � ' .. • 10"ZONE T ( ) I �_ ZONE BOUNDARY DUBLIN •....•--�•�,• 8" -...... 14 — • VALVE B a ..............."'..--.....8n. ! BOULEVARD ••�.�..=1— .'..loo-.'" :• FUTURE BART 91 b 12" —— — ZONE BOUNDARY PARKING I OT a 10» .--..-..., 14" ,•, ,•. `x 8" • 14" :"'14" ••. 14" 14.. 8" • FROM WWTP —3 . .(3,394 GPM) - FRONTAGE — — ROAD, — • —— — — S 0 1,750 3,500 FT NOTE A,BOOSTER PUMP STATION AND RESERVOIR ARE REQUIRED OFF—SITE AS PART OF/11-1E SUPPLY SYSTEM. • °u \ DUBLIN SAN RAMON EASTERN DUBLIN RECYCLED WATER DISTRIBUTION FIGURE NUMBER 1 CO#��f t!Mt,TAti I�rE � S 4 as• ' JOB NO. 2504 R • Attachment 6 I ,. TABLE 9 n f::'i . . RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM COST ESTIMATE ~ I.. Item I Quantity I Unit CostA Total Costb ! 8-inch pipe 57,585 If $80/W $4.6 million 10-inch pipe 13,308 If $85/W $1.1 million 12-inch pipe 21,490 If $100/W $2.1 million 14-inch pipe 18,523 If $115/W $2.1 million 6 mgd pump station 1 ea $1.6 million per each $1.6 million 1.5 mg reservoir 1 ea $ 2 per gallon $3.0 million 1 .6 mg reservoir 1 ea $2 per gallon $3.2 million TOTAL RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM $17.7 million i . . , . t: .l : !] a Costs include construction, contingencies{30 percent), and engineering and administration (20 percent). b Costs are based on an ENR Cost Index of 6295 (January 1993). C Pipeline costs are for installation in existing streets. .. . ~ , , i L.: ! ; , .: u u q u g :\...\#2504\report December 21, 1993 xii I' n 1,1 U C.5. DODSON & ASSOCIATES r:::: >-~ (tl0 00 (U~ - 01 t1:l'O ~ '- c "-'" (U (tl ~E ~ (U 0 0 ~ Z '- '- (tl>- (U__ e: >-u.. (U<( 0 01- .- (tl'O ~ '- c (U (tl >< ~ E Q) (l) ---P e: Ii) e: :;:;. '- < ct. 0_ e: '';:; u.. (tl .- 01'0 - .;: c .0 .:: co ~ E Cl (U 0 e: (U ~ ~ ~ (l) O1t1:l 01-' .;:: (U en '- '- -u ctl Ol<( UJ Z '0 ~ ;a~ 0 ...J"::" u.. '- ~ 0 .0- "C ctl U O1ctl C ._ u.. ... ctl ... E Q) elM (l) ctl-":: ell '- Cl ... 0 u _ <( u ~ _ (tl (l) ellu.. ~ z t:! ~ ~ ~ "C o ctl ... ell o '- (l) u - <( () ~ () (l) cr: "C c ell 0 Q) V)+: ::l (tl ~ '0 g c .- E (tl V) ...Jell .~ 0 LU ~~~~&q5.: ~~g~l:.~: 00000:[& 0,0: . ... jj::~.::.~~~:::~::~ :r.il.lil!. .'.:. .. [\~~l:[ I I ilililfEI- ~~~;I I'll (I ~~11 ~~~~l~~~~ ;'I:'ll\[ !!':!~I~ 00 -i-i CO'<t Noi '..'," ~ m ~ ::~ I . _J~I ~~ml ~~~~. 00 :.t.. ...-.'........ ...- ~,.- ~!,......... ~q ..- o 0 0 0 i ... .,.....- ~1.~~~~.~~.~ H< 'Ii ,,~ zzz~ ~~~I---~m:t :%.:%.:%. zzz ~ c.q C1! C\! c.q ::&'j ~ ~ ~ o:=!::~ ------;::: q ~ ::b, ooco~cry::';:..:: o~coco.:;;"); en~N::\.l~ I'- ~ (0 N cry 'o'! l{) cry I'- I:w N ~ .... ;:\0: ~ cry N ::CO:I .... !;~ .... N;:~ I i I ...., I:::::::::' ...., '.",".-.". ~1~[~:~~~ I.. " ! ~ ~ ~'o ro U; 0- :;, (/) '0 C C (U :::::. 0- 'O~<l>EICa ~ 00 0 ~j~~ ~~li~~i.r:.:.,:i:...;i:.'.:..>!:;,~. 2(UE ]~.O~_ ~ Ei<l>:~ ~ it} 8~:: ~ ~i1 rr;; () z (\l .... ,"" ~ ~ ~:II:.l:i~.l. :\I'l'],i .1::lj:l: ;:[::t ~g~!~ 'I. ij~~~~i~~l :':';':':', :~1m;~~ :~*~*~ <l:<l:<1: ZZZ i ~ ~~~: ;.:.:.:.:. I :ill:1 .....;,.: l'\li.i ~\illll'l ;1111111:1 ~~1~l~~[~~ <l:<1:<1: -- -- -- zzz .~ ~ AttacbnInt ;;; .:.......: II ci !~ 'ri1i ~ ;~~~~~ e: ::::::::: M lw@ :..: I ~ ~1~li ..; x *~~::: ~ '\j*~j; 0 Ul :.;.:.:.: ~ ~ ;'lfi. ;;#.' ~ co 1~ i~ -r x. M Z z fii ~m < Cl :::::=::: :::::::::; Ul .:;{:~{: ~~~~m~ ::i '::::::~: 0 .:::::~: 'II 0 ;illlli c. Cl c. '" ::~:~~:~ ;:~:~~~~ lot: 0 ~tI :;::::*: -i ::::::~:: iiiji[ :~i~j! 1IIIi .:.;.;.:.; 1\lli i~*~~j~\ ;::::::::: lj~~ ;:;:,::;::: :::~::::: .:-:.:.;.: ,':':':':' :-:.;.;.:; .... iF- [:!9. r-.: co I ':0' :.t;C. :,N i1:';\ :3~~~~~~~ :~:;:~:: ~:~;~;~;j ~ .::;:::::: 11111 co ~~~~l ci ~i~f:~;~ ~~~~~ :;:::::::; :::::::::: ':::::~:: i;1j\: :;~~~j~~~ ~::~::: :~:~:::: :;:::~::: ~:::::::: 0 !:I\II ~~t 01 ci lllillli I ;t:~~~~ :~:~:~s~ ~~~~~ en \iti f@. l"i ::;.:.:+ .... ::~: ::.m; .... I :'~ ::~ .:~: .:::::.::;: :~::::q.: .......... :::::::;:: .:~:::::: ~~~~~~~~~ :~~~~~l~ ~~~~;~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ::*::~: :j~~ ::~:::::; ::.:~*: ::~:~:E: .:;::::::: III; ';~~l~{~ f~f~~ 11; '.;.:.:.:. l!l en ~@~ 0 '0 ::~;. 0 0 rg .c: .!:: () 0 :1 (J) (fJ R~ :fa: :lj:l!! ~r:~~;~~~~ w!jjj: ~~~l~~~~ ::::::~~: :;~~1l .~-;::::: .::~:~:: li~l~ "::::::::: 7 t"l en OJ U <l> o c:- o '" '0 o C (fJ <.'J r:.- III a: '0 <ll ~lJ.. :0 r:. III = ::::.D <ll ~ iUo ",ui CD _ EM o <l> g:o oi .D~ (;i .2 -g . ~ (;i Ol ~ ~ ~ ..; .2 ~ o OJ r.l 0 'Emu ~ .-....'0 0: j]~ ~ <l> cn.c 3: ~~o 0.. "- .. \j Q) 00 r:. C E8 ltl ~ ~ I -g 010 r:. or; e.f E .2 <( 0; g."E .~ a.. ~ 0- ~ r:. ltl en ~ -oO)-gQ) S ~.2 ~ ~ o~tti..s 3- .!..1:tE'~- :>. .g<1:e..~ ltl 0Q)Q.l~~ "0 u;co>"""._"':Qi ~~~~~~Ck (Q~oQ)~~~ .Ell.<1:Ckr:.<l>0 a; & ~.;.,g =~ <l>.Do>ltl<l>cn Q,;:J"""Q)":a.>c >C<.'J'OCk~o ~ooo~og Ol>.r:.cealE .!:~ooollll ." ~().~'U Ck~C ~~~~e~1J..CD '0 CkCklJ..lJ..UJ<1:2 zcg~~!!1~E "<t 0) 0) .,... o C"') - l/l ::l '0) ::l <( - () ";: - .~ o l/l ell .~ ~ (U (J) C o E (\l 0: c ctl (/) c :c :;, o Estimated Wastewater Flows For Eastern Dublin Annexation No. 1 (1 ) Land Use Gross Density Persons Per Average Dry Weather Average Dry Weather Designation Acreage (2) Factor (3) Unit (4) Flow, GPD (5) Flow, MGD (6) Residential Rural 170.5 0.01 3.16 80/person 0.0004 Single Family 310.6 4 3.16 80/person 0.31 Medium Density 268.9 10 2.58 80/person 0.56 Medium-High Density 25.21 20 2.00 80/person 0.08 High Density 33.61 35 2.00 80/person 0.19 Commercial/Industrial 1 Floor Area, SF X 1,000 (7) General Commercial 150.81 0.25 1642 . 0.1 /SF 0.16 Neighborhood Commercial 31.51 0.31 4121 0.1 /SF 0.04 Campus Office 76.11 0.35 11601 0.1 /SF 0.12 Public/Semi-Public I 8.01 0.25} 871 0.1 /SF 0.01 Parks and Open Space Parks and Neighborhood Squares 129.1 N/A N/A N/A 0.00 11( Freeway Landscaping 11.0 i N/A N/A N/A 0.00 Open Space. 212.71 N/A N/A - N/A 0.00 gffillangaggnagiliiiiiII:::::::::::::$11:10:iiiii leingeM4#21016.011:iiiii;;;;MINSIMBRiiiiiiii:ii:::;;;;:iiiii:iii; ii;: ;:3:<::;'.,;5 :i:::::::'i}.;ii.;.EN:n:::y ':: ::E: :: ::`: ii:?:::i>M>3 :ii:::...... Schools ' Schools 113.9 N/A N/A 2000/acre 0.23 J ::::r:::s5:>:•,:;:;::i:::'r,$;r,5;::;:; .�lii:iiiiii:iiiiiii:i::i<>•: ;::ii:::i::: iii'i 'il.�'a�% 'ii> S >3s< isii ' ? l1> .%iii= i �??yi% ' yi `?'y'<>?i # i? :::. .3 F;\P I'DI'OOL\EDANNXI\WWEDANXI.WK3/13WW Notes: (1) Planning level estimates;subject to re-evaluation as more detailed information becomes available. • 1 N (2)Per City of Dublin Prezone Application PA 94-030,August 1, 1994; and Table 2, E. Dublin Facil.Plan,GS Dodson, Dec., 1993. (3) Units Per Acre (residential) and Floor Area Ratio (commercial/industrial)from Final Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, May 10, 1993. . (4) From U.S.Census, 1990, City of Dublin. (5) From Eastern Dublin Facilities Plan, GS Dodson, Dec., 1993; GPD=gallons per day. (6) MGD=million gallons per day. (7) Net floor area in 1,000's square feet. Dublin San Ramon Services District _ August 30, 1994 0> - c: d) E .c: o ('0 - =;: w t:;: z w a is 0 "<t- o 0:: z !!: F III w I"') 0 a Il. < lD It) Il. ~ Iii 8 I"i :::;: N ii: ::l F Il. ::Ii Z 15 l/) ::Ii 10 W d S< ::> Z z W Il. en 0:: ~ Q ::l lD I 0 '-' Q D ~ III [i: I': a. ............ ",.. i";1 ...... , .' ............ J~::.~.... . '. ~ 0,' :..... .. .............. ...... " ..... :~.......... ~ ....: ......... ~ ; ..... : ; , " ~.{.... : ", ,.::..,~"'::.,:) r,,~: ;......: :~: :'::i .... .g . ..... . . .... \.. .... j ''-.. /'" ~~.,<J>'.':' ..'; :,..,~,~\, ~:, """. , ", :"'~' ",,' '0 .- ~ .: ~,~ ."",. '. '1:>< <> r ;'~~'" ..... ". \~:::,) :' ....: : > ......,..:',{..,,\ , ....... :......... '.'1><5" i " .., ,',? '" ~ ;;q, I , '" ""'" -.. :...11 ',..., J " I" ;.... " :. ..... ":. co .... ....... " .- rr,.~', .'~'_.: ,':1; b5;~~l"o (, >. \' '''':'''. "":: l " ....., ....... ',' '.. \ " , ..~.;::. ............:.k I I ~ .:,,,,,.,J~,,,.. ~ 4 "'''''' is , CD : -. ~ ", ,,~"... . ;.,',. . co. 0, "::':,<::::::\ i.......... .., I .., I ; I . ..f< ~../ . '. S!.,.-: %,\, .'1:>"'.'. ' \ \ \'. -:::,' .....~. ~& "'6\6,.., ,'~ft ,. . .'. ~~.d~'--. ,,"'", /1,,..... 5 ,." o ':.''''''"".,,'.', \ \ ":::':': \. " .. ", " ~ !0,- N .......... ....., \. ::.~r .......b............ ~ ~ .., 'b '" . .., co . 'b III '" YHVrVSS'I'J. ...... .... ':..:' f"" z: b 16 ~ . to') 5 ": "'1:>"" ........ " \..:' ""-600::,,#_') " . \ 8 '", \' 1.. ....~....~.~::.\... CO; ,<> I I 'I .::;;'" .'f'0N3IOYH /';1 L ,~~_ · ___~_~ (- - ----;.,,; r O1ONllV g hli ....... '..:" "': :.......- I ----F--Z 1 o z o 1= u(/) ~~ 0- u(/) I..Ll O::z ~:J <(W 3=9:: ~a. (/) ~ Zz :J<( m....J ::la. o(/) ZW 0::1= ~....J (/)u <(<( wlJ.. Z.- Ou ===- <(0:: cr:1- l/) ZC <( (/)(/) LaJ zu ::is: alo:: ::::>LaJ Ot/) '" M W W % " x " % Attachment 10 TABLE 8 fi I . WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM COST ESTIMATE ,.. j I Item I Quantity I Unit Cost" ! TotalCostb ! 6-inch FM 1, 1 00 If $ 63/W $ 69,300 8e-inch 55 63,800 If $103/W $6,571,400 10-inch 55 17,600 If $11 4/W $2,006,400 12-inch 55 4,150 If $136/W $ 564,400 15-inch 55 1,200 If $146/W $ 175,200 18-inch 55 2,750 If $190/W $ 522,500 21-inch 55 1,300 If $206/W $ 267,800 24-inch 55 2,250 If $239/W $ 537,750 30-inch 55 4,650 If $288/W $1,339,200 33-inch 5S 1 ,700 If $309/W $ 525,300 100 gpm pump station 1 ea $210,000 per each $ 210,000 TOTAL WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM $12.8 million I l . II Costs include construction, contingencies (30 percent), and engineering and administration (20 percent). b Costs are based on an ENR Cost Index of 6295 (January 1993). C Pipeline costs are for installation in existing streets. ! " t. ! "--' 9 :\.. .\#2504\report December 21, 1993 xi ! . ~ ' 1 ' 1 ' ... ~.;, It I. I I I . I \ , G5. DODSON &AS5OC1ATES I ATTACHMENT 11 ADDENDUM TO THE EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTj SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENT AL IMP ACT REPORT Update of Plans to Provide Sewer Service S'eE' A lTlfCff f1/l E fJT 3 () -F /0 -Iv -q 4 CITy Co u ,vc.x L 5'T4F/::::' ~EPOK'-I ~ .... c: Q) E .s::. (,) CU .... < (1) c: o .c ~ 0(1) CUC'l aJctI _c: ctI'- ::l~ b. CI :g ~E~ c: ....- 000 uCi)J: "ii' c C to .c () OJ c C to .c () OJ c C to .c ... () "0 . ~ ~~ .~ D: w OJ c, C to .c () c ., 0. o ... .6 . ~ OJ <( 0. 0 0: tJ) '<t 0) 11 I I (]) "- :J OJ u: 1:' .. "0 C :J o III c .. 0: .9 15 Q) 0- en -g"C ~ ._,~ to:rcG "6.. '~:l~a1U -g tOg.~c.iiG)co .6 u to tn"O..Qi3 ~ g~<(-8~ E u to . C >10 E ~,g~ n.g E~ioEro.!: "'E-O E 8;~ ~~~~fS~ b. ~ i a.!! E Xl g~.85.~8~ 8n~\~~~-g Z~o'l ~ ~ ~ Ct B ~ [ ~ ....... G)'u>.f:o~Q)'- .= ~ ~ tl D..~ c.'~ -l:'l c :l ;; " c o (J J1 c ., ::2 >- .., ., c c .. l.: z a:Z W- ......J Cl)aJ <C::J we "C "C o l- oll ~L .8 ~~~ &. !I:: CD ~!~o o afi01lgJ ~ ~j~i ~ ~~~~ I . . I ~ '\ V, 1.'/'''0'''--'' ./," 'I. -" f ' \ ' ",i ___) ,,\\. ,1\. 'i:. <~.:'l L_ , "~ " ..,." t,,' '. '. \ ) Ii (J(/I'-., " J" l ,-" " . ,. 1'0 ;..', ,.1.1.> ?",) ,--,..., ,_....:; "-- ..,; ~. 11 ( ~ "':.. ~/: ~:: : '\ " ...... .~ /- ( > ~. - '", ~'~"0~;:=,,- \..-:::l \:, ::.::'J . :..>' ,-, ' 5' ,J' \/) ,: ;; 1\ : ~ . \ '1 \ \<\ \/1"--- .<!.') (. -\ /,\ "_"''''-' ' ! ( ~/ ,./ \ '/~ I;; f J I 0 ~ . I / -... -"'\. Do'vX2:\=~, '\ l.. ';'~ "'-"\./// / ' , " I"" \1,'. \.'. ~J -. ,./0 1 V '-0." '- ",S \. ("'''\ ., \ ("--- -' J ,--''--' !i '-oj t.~ ,-'^- 1-" :' "--- /I 0.. " , (~ ,,: ~ ( '''--. ) r--..... ,--........... \ . .-.j ,_J'/ I ......._ \ ". . I, \ ~..... \".', <:- - ) --......r-\]Oo "\.:,. / /__1 ,-.....- 1 d;' .............1 ~)) 1': .) ~~~~~:::-'---~~~<;.::J~"~,::~~ v ~)>.~;~~',; \.." J! ~'--/") __ .;;~,C) J'" " (g ,F) . '", i / -........~ '--) }. ('--- rf:.f-': <- r \,. ...-; \ ( .' I ! ~I ') * ",) J( \ \ <':" /J ,-,) l! I / 'V 8 l c', ~ " r '. ,'" -..;;' r"') ( . \' )) . \..". (,", : , ",; - , \ c~--/ ) / ! / / ' / J' "Iv j r---r-~ j / ~ I \ \ ) (. '') (' >__1\ ; (' ~/ -1 . \ ~ (' r ("\ 'b r~ / ",.--, ..... ""- ... r~L; '\ -41 '"" 2/ (\ .-,- ,~: ''''''j f'J \: Po, ~\ \ ') \' . ._ L; ~), \ __',. ~! -'GDs '----..-" \ 4.. J .I ,- ---~""-" , \; , " -. . "\. ({ \:, . . ....'~ .:.~ J "\J""" \ v"........, -........) M. ~ .r..-.."" ~ _'. h \ -, ~~/ r~.--.._..~.. ~ ':", : ,....--~' ,. /\...)" ""'-, (~")' ~ \ " I, / 1 V'.\ ".,-- l ' r-- . 0' 'It, / t · r. "- ' '- .... "-..., "", ) \. /1 c', 'I".,:J '.', \: " "\,.' ", \' / ) f-/ ,> '> 1 !) ....., . to' , " ,-, ).1 _"o'/'~/> J>/O: '\ t. ,_.",'-", ",/ '" ' : ,/ (,/-',! ~c \ "I ""'---'l_,\ ...,-::-"-",, ,~, ,> \' \ "j; ':::l ! .--Do. (' ", '.\ Jfo' "/~ . -'1 l /. l... ...... ) g t . 011 ' ,,' ~~ 1--1 "\ ' ,/ ,/' ~ ) Ii' t-. ~ \. /" ,--,\. \' ( ,_,': " . " %. \ ." .1" , ........ . " "" ..........., ? ?;;\ ~'Ii 0 '\ I I>,' / '" ': ,-J '--.';;' '?---,\ '\ 1, 'I't /) l ( \ \ '\:~, JI ~-1 <.. "~ ~/1/ l ~t; "'1)~~, ", {'--"-- l, L;-;: \ '\./---' ~,' "-/~ .) , l r----../7 ) -.....; j .'il ,,;( , 1f~ / ,\ / .~: '(0\. ~.. ,. . \:-.../ . \ ( '\ .....v--.\.< ".../Tt, -"\"":: 1,( '~~.::::=~:,.,,' -"""1') r--_/.J ~_......----; .... .,.) \ r/ J"l '--'-, Jl....-.... Yf\V,~} ~::::...... ~_..,~ .., ,,-'- 1/--"" ' '-__,\, \ Ii '---- __' _______ 'V \,,- , ') ;2 . '----... ~ .../ rrv ''-'''\./''''l> ,.... --- ..../ ~ ~\-- :> ~ \ j "-; L ,-../ \ 'J '\. '(:: rJ ~ .....'--"'~ "'/'" " ~ '1,' 00'>'" \..' I..... i. ...- , " r-. c <(Iii OJ: <n(J , \ ..... ~'!JIl.. ,." ..' ~'."':: ~ (\" ("" /j " c; ) CJ "WI 8 ------ ------- ,~ ' -..... ~~? )~'-"-':'\ ~~ o ! $ €)o Em " ...- .., I'>c <(16 c.c <nU &-0 aU!1 A TT ACHMENT 13 FISCAL ANALYSIS " ~ ...~ u ~ ,.t:: Q) - 0\ V") V) o~_Uv")\OC""l('l ~ <is.~ a 00_ 0\_ C""l_ 0_ o i:?Cl ~ ~ ~ :::; ::; ==<t;i::i:?~ ~~ ~"'Q) ~:::E 0 E i3= ~ 8 - ~ ~ "5 :~~a =-~ ..... tIl Q) .... ;:: -:::E 0 ~ '~ E ~....~ ~ '0 &. c:.o!:t.. =0= c:s 1).- u ~o~'gc.-;l O&;E - \ \ ~ z - o ~ tI. o tr.l t:a U 8 tr.l o ~ ~ o u ~ z .~ ~~ 0= ~.s ~~ :S.a -0 ~.g _tI.. ~~ _U8 O~E ';;OQ) ~~.~ tI &:3 2S8~1 @~ ~~ u:: E . ~ -~ tr.l ~~ E5 0;:... ~ ~ g o E en - -::; 13 i ~..... ~c.-;l~ i~~ -~?X~ ggt-~("'l r-: -q--.-<....- N~-. ..- ~ '~~ N ~ ..... ~ ~~?X ~N~ C""lt-~ t- oO -q-- .-< _ Vl- O~--M - ~~- ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~~ z;, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .a 5 g; .c ::E '0 E ~ ~.e.o g: ~ r~ g;'.S E:E ol."l'-'88';,'g ~~~o.....l."lc.-;l p., c:.o!4 E B ~ ~ 'o::"-..-::<-Q)~Q) e::::C:'t:lg?...~ ....::!'t:l c:::._OJ:I.<~ ~ a tIl ~ >''0 :::: E-'~~el~~S S::~~~~~S <t; .... - = r!;< .:= .c uv.ien_........enb5 ~~ss -('l0 ~~fi O~Q CJ:.C""l\O ~-r-: t-- ~- ~ Vl 0 t- - ('l 0\ 00- ('l- Vl ('l ~- ~ ~-~ ~l~t t-~~~ ~~~~ ... ~ Q) ~ .~ '0 .... t:. Q) = Q) 4) Q) c:.o tIl ~.~ ~ ~ ~ r:/.) t:c ~.a -; 'g~~cs~ c.-;l ~ 4) ~ C<$t 1-c""'...c.... ~ i3=~ i3=~ 0 S c.-;l -.0 i3= CZlb5 ~:lgg~~ ~co_~ -_ M~ ~ S ~ ~ 8~~~~ ~ qO\_ ~ ~~ ~ 8 - M- ~ 8 N 0\- ~ V) gg N- - ~ 8SS~V'l~0\ -.:1"_ -_ 0\_ ~_ 0-.&1 ~~~~G ..... ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ .... c.-;l p., '0 = .!<:t:::. M tIl ... ~ -- a ~ 0 .... a !Q.= '0';:: =.s:::t.s.t;; = .:::l 4) :s! q) =:::l tIlenS.-<l.I~::S a ~ g.~ & E ';; = .-...... 0 ::s co...... ._tI..g;':=Q)g;:c :s! '0 4) .0'- .... ::s .- = 0 ;:l.....l o..p.. .atll_~=E_ ......4)o...__tIl ouo~~~- :::::=.:=.:=........9 .0 0 Qo-tIl tIl.o ~~en ~~b5 ~- ,- ~ ~., t- N - 00:: .0", s- ::s 8 ..;z~ B u 'O'O~~8~ =... N_17l tIl Cl) t.l _ _ _ '0 -.o'ON_- I: &:3 ~ ::s tIl 'O~ci5 ::s ::s S 'uZ I: ~ >< S~~-:5~.~~~ ~""8~~~-- 88.:=.....'0 ~~ 0..':= Q 23. I: .5?;5~o.s '0 'g .~ :; .~tIl......:= 0 =...~ c.-;l"'0'O is: .8 - = . ~o V) Vl - t<l.= '0::' . . . ]~~--.'~Z;;~~~ "- ~ Q) 8 .... ~ ~ tI...........=~'O ~ot::lQ = ~...o~ .s .....s~:o _u 0'0 \O~t)- -5 ~~ E ~ = i:)' c-: :2; ~ = :!l r.r.l.5 ~ 8 f-.-=.c ~ s-= 1;:5 0=>,. t<l8 ;- ~ 13 ~ i::. 13'Oo~ _::S_ E t<l'UtIl4) ~.s13Q) :>e:'Ot- ~ ~ 'g &:3 ~= '0 0"~;;2 ~ ~ una ..s ~~'~ N B ~ co V'l \0 V'l f! ..; B u ... <l.I ~ <l.I rn '0 = C<l ... co ~ ~ ... <8 ~ V'l ~ ~ ~ "'<t ~ 8 - M ~ V) ~ - ~ ~ N M V) ~ tI Z c i o u g f:-< ~ o z &:3 co ~ ~ 8- .= c:: t7l co t-: Co:! 00:::/ ~ ...C::~~~M g,"~ ~~~ ...... 0 ~~ -5M C<l'O co c::: = 0 0.0 ._ 0.. ==g ~~ @)~ ~~ o .. ._ 0 ~.~ 00\ ....- r.:::irl -q-O tl '0 ::l 'U .S ~ u 0;; ;S&:3 - 'c.-;l @"g -~ ~ 8<t; ~ ~.:= .e- ..... B o ~a3 ~ ~ &:3 ~ -~ ... tIl!3 Q) 8. 0 .- ... . . - E uxc:.o"'o tIlC:Sco= Ro~'::: 0 C:S N c.-;l &-~ -- 6h "" ~ ~~~@~ ~,....tIl_ ':::I1S ~ -q- = ~u~:5,g t)=:::.~:E C<lco<n 'u t-Et)~Y.i ~COtllO".:.:; ::t.g;:;:~c::: ,... .... =~ ~ .....0 0..'- ~ ~ ~4) >. O;;':::'O@)1S 8 0 - ~ .:::1. = 0- .9~ug= '8 t:'~ 8 C<l o...$.;::,~ enc.-;len.:= =;::_c.-;l"'" 'O~~t7l~o~g~!{ E'O.=~13 co ~._ c.-;l ~ ~ :E~ ~ ~ Ci ~ .~ :::t.!Qlgt:::~ ~ Cl ~ .... ::s ~ 1.,,;.: ~ &:3jOOO ....-N"'<t U -< • Table 10-2 INFRASTRUCTURE PHASING PROGRAM/1 Pastern Dublin Fiscal Analysis-Specific Plan Area (In Thousands of Constant 1992 Dollars) Total Capital Improvements Costs 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Streets and Mass Grading $27,081 0 0 0 0 3,840 3,840 7,680 0 0 0 Intersection Improvements $4,775 0 0 0 0 0 0 675 675 675 675 Freeway Overcrossings $11,468 0 0 0 0 0 2,867 2,867 . 0 0 0 Share of Freeway Improvements $11,220 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water Service $28,940 0 0 0 0 0 7,868 1,063 . 638 1,063 744 Wastewater Service $7,390 0 0 0 0 0 2,492 337 202 337 236 Storm Drainage $17,640 0 0 0 0 0 2,731 369 221 369 258 Police and Fire Stations $200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 0 School Development $83,050 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,733 0 Other Public Buildings $4,950 0 0 0 0 495 495 495 495 495 .. 495 Park Improvements $28,944 0 0 0 0 0 6,756 4,932 468 0 0 TOTAL $225;658 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,335 $27,049 $18,418 $2,699 $7,873 $2,408 CUMULATIVE TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,335 $31,384 $49,802 , $52,501 $60,374 $62,782 Assumptions: %of Commercial Uses Absorbed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6% 10% 6% 10% Cum,%of Commercial Uses Absorbed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6% 16% 22% 32% %of Residential Units Absorbed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 2% Cum.%of Residential Units Absorbed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 6% 10% 15% Note:/1 Phasing for roads,sewer and water is based on the next year's percent absorption of commercial uses. This phasing schedule is based on WRT team discussion. Source: Economics Research Associates c:\123r22\9047`spbond3 05/19/92 Table 10-2 • INFRASTRUCTURE PHASING PROGRAM Eastern Dublin Fiscal Analysis-Specific Plan Area (In Thousands of Constant 1992 Dollars) Capital Improvements 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20100 Streets and Mass Grading 0 0' 0 3,859 3,859 0 0 2,002 2,002 0 Intersection Improvements 675 0 0 400 400 0 0 0 600 0 0 Freeway Overcrossings 0 0 0 2,867 2,867 0 0 0 0 0 0 Share of Freeway Improvements - 0 0 0 5,610 5,610 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water Service 1,276 532 851 3,245 730 584 1,314 4,669 2,043 2,043 0 Wastewater Service 404 168 269 937 211 169 379 ,594 260 260 ' 0 Storm Drainage 443 185 "- 295 4,765 1,071 .857 1,929 2,069 905 905 0 Police and Fire Stations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 School Development -4,733 0 4,733 16,782 4,733 16,352 4,733 . 16,782 4,733 0 4,733 Other Public Buildings 495 495 495 495 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park Improvements 0 0 0 14,940 540 0 0 708 360 0 0 TOTAL $8,026 $1,380 $6,644 $53,900 $20,021 $17,961 $8,355 $26,823 $10,903 $3,208 $4,733 CUMULATIVE TOTAL $62,782 $64,162 $70,805 $124,706 $144,727 $162,688 $171,043 $197,866 $208,769 $211,977 $216,710 Assumptions: %of Commercial Uses Absorbed 7% 12% 5% ' 8% 4% 5% 4% 9% 3% 1% 1% Cum.%of Commercial Uses Absorber . 39% 51% " 55% 63% 67% 73% 77% 86% 88% 90% 91% %of Residential Units Absorbed 2% 3% 3% 8% 8% . 8% . 8% 7% 8% 8% 7% Cutn.%of Residential Units Absorbef 22% 29% 36% 44% 52% 60% 68% 75% 83% 91% 98% Note:/1 Phasing for roads,sewer and water is based on the next year's percent absorption of commercial uses. This phasing schedule is based on WRT team discussion. Source: Economics Research Associates c:\123r22\90477spbond3 05/19/92 . • .. 1 .. . .. • . .. . . .. ..-:...2' .,. is r.. , :I a.........R G.....4 ~ ~I~ - - V) V)lo t- ;l;@:q" ,~ * ~<=>"T cq c:;n:~ "<t t- 5 ~ t-t-NooO- 00 ~:;00~8 - - ~ ~ ~ \0- ...;- t-- (<)~ (<) ~ d ~~~~~ ~- - N (<)00 t- ~(<)~ ~l~~~.~ ~ ~I~ ~~ 12~l":q,g: ~ !;;. ~ fJ.'~ t- "<t V) '<t \0 Il"l \0 ~ 0\ t- 0\ V) \O-"';-~fg~~ ~~ - frigsgN~ t- N- ~t- ~I~ ~ g V1 Chit=! ~ R~"~l' ~ " [g ~ 1~ C"'t \ON (<)\0 \0 V)ooChN ~ Vl ooll"lO 0\ ~ .......t ... ... .... V)- ('f') ~~ ~- gg ~- ...; ~~'~~~ ~~ N (<)V) 8- \0 _ N(<) 0 ~ <:) ~l 00 N N V)\OIN N ~~~Hl.~j~ * g~Jl.,~ 0 ":::l --8~t-81l"l r-:: >. "<t\O Il"l N ~ .0 ~ ... .... .... .... ... oo-N (<)N Il"l (<) Il"l "<t t- t- - ~~~~~ ..0 _ N\O \ONc::l~ g N"<t ... :0 V"l10\ t- (<) ~ VlIN g ~~'<=>~~1~' ~ <=> <=> " ,V; I./") g ~C5~C5 Ch~N q Nt-O\ 06 t:: .......t .... ... .... .... .... \O~t- M- ~N(<) ~~ (<)N \Ot-"<t - ~ -~~ _.....M (<) M t.:: .2 "<t1V"l 0\ ~ _ "'yo 00 ~g<=><=>l'" ~ <=> <=> <=> ~1~ t- s ~(<)t- 00(<).....- ~(<) ~:; g (<)(<) _"<t"<t .... !:3 "l'"""'1 .... .... .... ~~ d '<t Irllrl 0\0\ ~ Nr'l NN (<) M ... <:) ~I 00 0 0 010 0 o 0 <=> 0 l~ ~ <=> <=> <=> ~1~ 5~ :;:; ~ ~~~ d .~O\ 0\ 0\ U- NN 'c if:) NN C"'lM <;;0 ~IOOOOOIOO 000 <=>~j~ ~ <=> <=> <=> ~1~ 0 ... ~ t:: d <:) ~~ 0\ 0\ E Nr'l NN C"'lM ~ ~M ~IO 0 0 0 010 0 o OOO~j~ ~ <=>0 <=> ~1~ 'g ...] ~~ d 0\ 0\ Oc.. r'lr'l ~~ NN MM ~100000100 o 0 0 0 Il"lllrl ~ OOO'~ ~~ i1~~ ~~ ~~ d 0\ 0\ r'lN _N NN MM -- CJJ __ ~I~~~~~~~~t g 1..) ~~~~~~~G ... ~ ..c:: ... a~~'<tt-~ ~o\"":;N d~~ ~ r:;.E t- ..... t:: ..-: ~ _A... t.:: UU"""" t:: .2~ l.l::ItZ ~l~ 0 12 :B ~ <'OS 0 """"t:: -0 ~'g UlZl8 A... 8 >'0 1i ~ <:) 5~ _ 'E 55 ;:l O.~~ .S 8'E o. ~. ~ ;:l - =.E~'E .~~ ;:l :;( ~ > .s..c:: Z~..... l:5~ .... !:3~ ~~~ .g ...1:) ~--.s <:) -1:)~ <:) 'E - '-~.o Ees!:3~ ;:l s ~ ~ ~ ~ 'EE~ S,.E! S ~~ <:) ~~~~S.s~ S~~.3.5> O-E ;:l ..... ~ ~..'::: ~ <:)C!:: ~.~8 ~_ <r.l l:5 o '08.s~E 0 '8'0 ~- Ot::,.E! ~~ ~ -... <:)- .- .... <:) 'E..c:: 0 ~ ~ ~~..c:: ~ ~' * 2.> tI.tI...... 'E~a:> .~~'E &!U"'~ ~::t 1:: ;:S 0:=0 .... S~-~ Z~S..c:::=..... ~ g~~..c::'E& ~tI..1i'~S <:) -0 .- .@ .::~.5-g~ '0 -lZl .El.l::I 0 r"" ~.~ 5 .5 e t:: t:: lZlZt:: 8 - 0 ~~ 0 J: ~~ 6~8~ ;:l;:l~& !Ut::~ 8 ~-~'-:5!U >~8ir..::>~ ~...t:: .... <:) 0 1:) "0.- 'E ~ .::! tI. .E e .9~&~~~~'O::r: C:::2=~8:5~ce ....~~c.....c Co6-f~~.IoI-fQ .... ...... ~ '0 ~ e~ $ ~ "0 :;;~~~ ~~ooo> ~ 0000 0 ::;l .. ~i~~~'E~~ _"O<l)!U<:)_ <l)<:)!U<:)_ <:) ~g<:)S.gE:gE~ '08 ;S fl ~- .E .E .E !9 ... 0.E!.E.E.E!9 ,.E! t:: ... ~ ~S ~~~~>>~ 8 -:;:I &_a~Jas~a (i:.>~>>{3. -> ~.s~~5~~z< ~~ 01 ('f') '<t" M 0\ 001 t'- .:... ...-<M_Moo-.:T-N Ot'-'<t"on _0\0\ N - - - '<t" In~ ~I~j~ ~ g ~1~_8_ '~M '<t"1n t'- N ~I~J~ ~-~ ~I~_~ o _ MO _ _t'- N 5lsl ~_ Et~ ~I~~_ ~\ONM . Mt'- N "Mon . N ~I~j~ ~ ~ ~I~_~- 00 OM _N N Inl- N - t'- -IN ('f') ~ ~J~, 2t ~ ~ ~J;li_ Nt'-.-<N NM _ N- N ~Ig-~-~~ ~I~_~- '~~ - N ~r~ - 81 ~~t 28_ 8. ~I~_ ~ N("l-.:T\O_.Jlt'-1rl In \0\0 - ~I~_~~E~I~_~ \0 0000 0\ "'-<81g ~ ~ ~ !,fl~ ~ N~-- t'-_N_ - -~ \ \ ~ ~E -p.. u,g~ ~l~ C)(/)8 o'~~ z ~...-< S~~ S-~ & g ~,~8 ~0 -e v~ tt.l:t....... i'3~ v::l"O o,s~ -go~ ~'E;~8 cn:o'g -8-'8i'3t:"Ol=Q ~rn8 ~ ::I Bi~o.gS.~ ~~So P::5~~S~-~ v:<vt: ~~_C:::::"O~::I ~~~tS ~:s~!~~~~ ~l~ 81 ("l s;s V::l~ ~ ~O_t'-~-Nq1.t"l.. 00 Sgg 8 8 >< ~ 01 c;: _.-<;':;('0") N -.q- r.: M- (1') . r-: N"'-<"'-<"'-< N ...-< - c-f N g( ~ >< In ~~gs. * 1nt'-~5M~ 00 (1') \IS ~-....In 6 0 N- -.:T ..-< o _- N- ;;l;S:~~~~M Nl:7)ooMt'-~ M- \0- ~- ......-< N N- -.:TNt- 00 ~ ~.... on t! 8 ~ M~~ gg\O..-<t'-~..... ~-~-~-~~ ~- -- ~ SQ ~ ~ ~ al M (::l\O_InN~ 0-.- (1') ~ - .... -.:T1 s:::f - .-< 1:7) '<t" V'll \IS "1"'"'1.... ..."",,'." ~~-~-~~~~ ooN~NO- .-<.-< V'lt'-~ ~ -- ~ V) 0\ ~ >< ('O")~ ('Ij ~~\Ol?)&5!:; \0- .... 0-.- c-f - ~ __OIrlO\V) .-< C'l ~ ~ t'- Vl >< >< V'll V) ~S;':;l?)~~ :iggf;f~ S- o-. N~ - ~ ...-< >< >< ('O")! ('Ij "<t81:7);r;&5~ 00- \IS N- c-f ('0") ~- NIn('O") t'- .-< !,f ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ t'-'<t"'<t"MOO\O r.:1n-@-~~g ~~ ~ ~ es!e>\ Vl ('0") .-< N-Vl 0\ r.: Irl- 0\- ~ ~ ~ ~ .......\0 c o t :B o ~c :: s t:lo ,;gS't: o~ c't;:<I)'g 'p::s .g ~ ~ 1:) :i3--3 ,- ~.o e: es~ ~ :i3.bQ-s's:i3 08'O~,S]E '':::tl88-g..c.$ ~Zjg :i3..c'Z~ -(/)E-zlao 8 ~ _ .$ '_''':: v .t;:~,S""'tI..-'.E ~ -=................co:l ~ vOoo> _'Ovvv- .bS'-.E.E.2S 8~~~~~tS ..;...~ * 00 o >< fiS ~ ~~&; ~OM""'~ ('Ij- -:i r;<) "<t vi ~oo"'" ~ N N g ~J3J~~;_ ~OO_Mr-- Vl'<t"_r-- 00 00 ~ C'l- * o ~ g ~ ~~~ eoV)('Ij~C'l 9iSr ~i2 pj- 0:5 eo r-- ,...i N * o 8 R ~ ~~..... ....1Xt'-00~ ~~gS;~~ ,...i N ~ 0\ o ~~~P1I~_ !::: ~ ~ ~1~ trlt"- M ,...i C'i ~ o ~~~~I~- ~~~~~ ,...i N ~ 0\ o ~- ~- ~ ~l~- 8~~~~ .....\0 .....0\ ....; .,..; * 00 o ~~~~~l~ S~~~~ O\V) c:4~ ..... * t- o ~ ~ ~ ~l~ ~~ ~- &:f g s;;- t"-V) .....-.:t ..... ~ t"- o ~.S~'<t"i~ "<l'_Moot"- @~~~ ~: ..... * 00 o s;; ~ ~ ~~ _\ON......... a\' 0- \0- t'- t.r ~~("')c::l~ - :i3 ~.-g ~ .....t)C ~ 'ge: 8. ~.E S'@ES.s~ '883'2-- ~. "O.c::c -;;:i3;:-<,g-E~ .2E~'2l.l:lg. ~~8u::5i ~ ...................~ oooOQ g g g g as. O........-...-~.....,c...... t.~~~~tS V ::I ~ ..... o * :Q S 'E ~ ~ t"- o ..... V) o ..... ..... o ..... o o ..... V) o ..... o o ..... o o ,..., 0- o .... ~ "<l' .... Vl -.:f .... "<l' C'i ..... ~~~~~~es~ 88~5'; S~\O t-=o\......C'i o~~ t"- - ;;<7 ~ ~ ..... ;:) :J ~ c;; ~~ '0'2 g ~ * 2..~ g[l.~~Sv W.. ~-g !!l~: ~~.3 g .9c2&;~~~~'O:r: '0 ...... ~ '0 ~ e>: ~ ~ g , gl ~ v S .g E:S s e ~ ~1~~~:5~~~~ -g ~ ~ ~ &. o ~ "0 >-. .0 >. ~ ... :0 ~ :::: ~ l.l:l .8 o - .;!J ~ ... v .c:: o U 't:: :i!3 ~~ v- Ei?l ~o ~~ ....'0 0;:: ~-& ~~ ~~ ..c<;::l "'-OM ::IN 0- I-I~ ..c(,) - 8 c ~ t::1 .811 U ':::-5 s.... ~~ ~p:: ~ ~ t'E t:lo o ;:: ~~ ::I .. 'Us C... -::I ~bS t"l - ~ l:f.l :;:I ~ ...:I >< == l:f.l~ Z o ~ t.l o ...:I ~ t o t.l t> ;2 t .... t:l ~ ~ ~ l:f.l l:f.l e: ~.;!! l:f.l"'-o l:f.l04) <e: ~ 'g O~ l:f.ltt': o e: 0= ~.g ~'O oOe: .......:1.... ~~~ ~::a~ ~m~~~~~~~~OOO e g <X!. <X!. \0_ t-_ t-: ...... ~_ "'- c 0;:: ;1; :g ;1; ~ ~~ ~ ::: s...::.1t'-t"'l1:""-t:"'\O"'I:t"O f.J - - -- ;>~=~ ""'"'" O"'~ 0'::; 'Vc-~OO,.....l~ONOOO :5 ~~~~~~~~ -= .>CI ~ ~ M V1- ~ ~- ~ r-: ~~;~~~~~~~ -o-~ . ,::; - t""lt-~;g:-2<<l~\OOOO ~ .., ~~~t-_O:l_~~~ 0.. 0/- t- s: s:::! s: t- ..... - US EO- ~~~~o_~$,..... 'O,.....~N\Q"'""'"'~ ~ Q\...-t\OO-'...-t...otnOOO ~r-.~OOM'!"'"'l'COOO VV')'VOO\nO\V1 ul CO. ...; ~ r-: .....- .,,- r-: N' .- V) ..... 0 0 t- '" N ~~ -C'!t""l..N CI) t:; o u G -g ~~l;t-t-gs~gsooo .... o___~;g&lV>\O<<l 0:: of: 0;;\ ~..n r-: M c..- ~' <~f ~ t:; .80\O~:::g;~N~ ::: ell 0:: ~- _- ...< ...< ~ .(3 ~ ~ Z t"lV>_t"lc..\O\Ot""lOOO "'" _gc:;~~q;n:::~te t3 0; -;;1 00. M ...; ..0 .... N' ..0 00. ~ c~t::~;::S~8~~ ~ ~ 0:: ",-...< .,r .,r ~ ...< c-i l:f.l OJ ~ < 0:: 0:: ~~~r::~~~~;'q~~ o r~\ONt-.....t-_Ot-M<"l1:"- CI) .r:; -;;; '" as 0 ':i..o "</"- 0-.- ~' <"l- \0- g 6 O-!'!!'e:+~~M~~~~ ~o~ 0:r:<J....,~ _.- 0:: ON :::....\0 6 ~ O\O_<"lc..~N""''''t-N .....r:; 1t-....,....,V)V)O<'lo\O<'l~ ~.!'!!'r~"d;.c:o..t-:~~ _~"'-"d;.\O.. ~_- co....,<<lt-co~.".....~oco ....-7 ~~;~;P:;;~S::05~~<"lco~l; ~1l~~N' .....-...<N' N-....r-: E:;~~-~ - ~ o -~8~e~te~~~~ ~Sr!s:.....I:"-NN\O<"lNI:"-MCO o ::l';; '" 6~6co-~0-r-:...;o6.,r 0::- V>\O\OOooCOMt-O\NV) <: 1l l3 - ~ 0_ "'- "'- co, t-, \0. t-: "'- t-_ :r::::Eo...b~""NNeN\O ~M;::; u ~ O.....s:Mt-.....~;1;Mt-O en ~~0:l~~805co~gg~ ;:J ~ ~~., e<'>.N-"</"'r-:"'---O:)-~~-N~ t:l.3 i3 .1 ~ ~ ~::t ~ ~ ~- .....- ~ ~ Z OMM ........"..,_<'l M....t'- < ~ M ....l m~,.....cM5::'~~Vcx)C"lcor--.\n 0; ~ ~ ~J;; ~~~~ ~ \0 ~~~_ ...."'....."</" MMCOMV> ""'MM ::l-oti-.~ '" .... 0:: -;;; . "'0 ~ ~OOOOOCOOOOO c:"''''~ '" 0 c..~. Ol:f.l6 51"' "'"' "'c::lW~c::l-oSS U .::-.::-.::-.9-;:J ;:J :;) :;) ::= Q.. Q.. u: -= -= .!:1 -= 0 Cl Cl 0 "ti.l:) l:) 04)S .= l3 '" -os"'>> c::"' (f}e:4)~<<I .9c:..5 ~oi;o1i~ 8 '(;..,""~ E:la.~~ 1:OJ~8'5'" "''''SolI., "'OI)..,g-lXlE >:E-~~~~ce'::- t.) ~ c>Oo~.....slI.,~~> -goo~t:..!:!"'-o..,.o~ S",O=>>",,,-, "';:::<=000. ...."'!<"'.r:;l:f.l~....."'_"'-os --~~l:f.l"""'sC)o...."" 5~~C)~.!:C;;w,,~o~~ "-.:r-f ==oo.c:_~ e<l).5tI-;S~~~"'-o~o"'-o .~ . .... N' '" o ~ o t- - r-: M \0 \0- ~ N t-- ~ ",- M '" V) \0 o. N M, - M ..... ..... as N ..... t-' ..... - i r-: N '" N <"l 00- ~ c::l co ...., o M- 8 ...; M .... .... 0:> .,r ~ .,,- '" ~ r-: \0 I:"- 0:>- V> ~ .... co- '" o 't:l '" -0 c:: o t:.. "' 0; 8 ~ Q.. e m ~ ;:::c:!. - -a- ~ ~c:!. '" "" .,,~ ~q N-~ ~ 8~ <'Ie<'> "".0 ;:::* _-a ....0 vi .... "'* ~.... .....0 ;:g~ or- \n-~ .... ~~ .......... "".0, :::* <'l- r-- 0\ .... o:)~ ~o:) .....0 :::* M- t-- 0\ .... 0:)* ~o:) .....0 ~~ "'''' of""; ....- $~ t-O ......; ~~ ce<'l ~-.o .... ... .... M~ ;:;.Q"l ":0 .... ~~ "'. ~ctJ .... o:)~ ~t-:: "';-c .... 00* ~~ .,raO N .... ~~ _ r- N-.o .... 00* ~o-. -.::1'.....;- N .... ~~. -~ M.o .... 0* ....0 .0 O~ ....0 .0 - -- U ::l 0; -> .c '0 =2~ '" ., ~'" - -au $~ c> ..,.... 8 0 5~ ~~ ~c:: _OJ :;; 8 .., :l >'U -.:l'" .!:!< co 8-': - '" .Jj ~ ~8 ss Q.. -- Ue:! (;c; ~~ r:t'q~r--:~80'~O~~ o....,ocr-. M 0:) _.....e _ 0 C\ - ..... - ~~~t'1~8.0~o~e; ["'-oV')V'loV} ~ ~ ,-IN _ ,0. ~ - 'l"""4 t"""- ~oo V> ~ "'q;;:;t-::~80":0"'8 ~""'t-ot-' ~ COco _'t"""C _ _0 'P""'4 _ .... ~ <'l <'I~ .... 00ggt-~8o.OOO~ ~~o_o....o ,..; .-40_ M CO o - .... ~q:::"'S8oqo-:~ 00 e<'>C..... M <'10 ,'" _ 0. r- _ _ _ 0 M 0:) .... "'0~"""'o.OOO0:)8 ("""; ....... - \0 .0 . ~ t-0....00:). M r- ...\1; _ _0 ,.... ... (f") eo....c- ('l")0 t- 0:) .... ["'-oO~"""V')M.eo'\(1OOa::l8 -c:r' .~N~ ....... . ~('I"};;r;ON .v,N.-t......c _ _ 0 .r-. ~ t- \0 "., r- ~ ~0.....COO:)NQ\V>".,~8 M 0"" ot-<'I'" .0 0 f't'"-oOO....-f ~V1Noof"'oo _ _.0. _<'1_ N '" ~ -O_V> - ~ .... ....cOOO'!""'f~caO\vV\8 0\ ...... .C\"I:l'~"CO . ~_~~"-<c:tO~N~~ _ "'l:t' CO oo::r N. ~\(")\(") ..... - ~ M .... .....Oo.O.....V>\O~-O-'~ ~_g ~.-: ~ci ~.C'"i ~.. ~ i?5_ ~ M ~ .... t-\08 M M .... ~OOO....."'....~<'l\O~ o~~ ~ C"i""'t'c; ..... 0 S - 8 V> .... o.qcqO:gOC'!OO~ o -- . ~ 0 _ 0. _ 8 t- ~ C' '" c:: 8 ta!l ::l ~ ::lC: t 1-01 8.'; c. __ o _ .2: c c:::: 0'.1: C::J _ CJ ~ .., ., <:;"- a t::::. g o;wgc~ ~ ~ .;--atec. C;; ~ ';' 0":;) "":9 a c > _.:: ~ c::ctIl 0 .., ~c:,,~ =~~9w= ~ lI.,;:J c:: C:::-O'O O.;!! ., <= '0 ::l B,;:J u:;; 0 g E. :::E .9... t:;:: 04)~ 9':=-;;: 0..,.., <<i .., 0..1:"'..s 0 - ~ co "'-0 "" ell ..,.0.._=_0_:;_"'''' 080..S"'S,gSo..s~t ~zES~~~~~~~-<~ ~ - -- VI o t""l -0 o c:: 1l.8 r: 0.. Os ~ ........ ~g -o~ g~ ~~ ~~ '" .., ::l -0 c:: .::! 0; ..: .; g c -c: ".;:: u c ::l ~.8 ..~ ~.5s51 _::J C e:s ~~ s.~- .E 0: e. g s tJ ('g(j~~ = CJ- CD.... ~ ~~ ~ <J - OJ ~.g g c:: ~E~~ :ig-e 8-- ~ 0 ~~~E <8:::Etii ~s::?t:! <; "0 Z <; ~ ::> o en ATTACHMENT 14 CASH FLOW ANALYSIS - ... c<$ Il,) >-- ~ AU: c::.... c<$ 0 - co 0.. C '0 '2 lE e II ~ Il,) N- g:O _...... ..0 - e:- C'lS ::s c:: C'lS -. ;.:., 1: &. o ... ~ .~ c:x: 5 c:: C'lS tf.) V c:: :c ::s Q .... ~.!J -~ Do; ..~ ~- OM fiu. :r:: .9 . cn- <.0 5:U6 ~~e -u~ .Qtf.)<n ~u:~ ~ - 08~0~-~V""~ - I.t") ~ .... 0000000000 ~ ~ - i - ~ _0<:::l00000000 0- ~ - - c:: 50000000000 <f.l C 8 c:: - '-" (<"I g: - N g: - 0000000000 - ~ - 0000000000 ~ - 0000000000 '0 C ::s tt. c; c; c; -; c; c; c; c; .., ~ ... - ... .... .... ..... ..... .... ...., ...... 1I,)4,)1I,)1I,)1l,)1I,)4,)il,);::E- cc::c::ccc::cc'C;", II,) II,) il,) II,) II,) il,) il,) il,) ... C'lS OOOOOOOOE-O OJ ~ ~ OJ tf.) Z OJ ~ X OJ ~ OJ ~ Z UJ > OJ c:x: C .!a - 4,) ~ ~ C'lS E- Q ~ >. S ~ g ~ ...~ . ~::s il,) C3~~g E <I') e,~~o ~ ~ U).E ..,E-~=~.sll,)il,)u.~ cn4,)~>'il,)~U.O:::Eil,)~ UJ ~ ::> 5 ~ ~ 1:: E il,) 8'0 ~I ::> '0 Cl.c C'lS Q 8= il,) ~ '" zt'ce~.~ >O:::ooC'lS w 4,) .('lS 0.. _ .c:: ... ~... u > Cl.c~-~ g il,) ~ 4,)~~ UJe(;~oe-==-=05 o:::o..tf.)~:r::u.o-o>tf.) Il,) - C'lS t;5 V N N \oOOI.t")-\OCOMOOO Irl_NN_Irl"'M - 00 o 000000000 o 000000000 o 000000000 o o 0 0 0,0 0 0 0 0 o 000000000 o 000000000 '" '0 C ::s lJ,. '" Il,) (.) c:: .- II,) - C:s c~ Il,)o. /ZlIl,)E ==- tf.)o UJEII,) ~ ~Q~ C:X:CIQ.Q c<$c::~~.!: :Jt~ tf.)o-Q- '- > _ (.)._ Q II,) .. 0 .~ :: -..J >. ~ -::E .QC'lS-?' Q 0 ::s 1: ~ c: _'L z_e.o ~OIl,)::S"l;,/ .., e.5 II,) ... 0..... ~ .c:: .....Il,)"o(.) 1I,)",::s1:O- ~c::- II,) C-E(; X Il,) - := .:: -= e "3 0 () UJo,53~lJ,.OE-Uu:r: - :< II,) ::s = II,) > Il,) c:x: C'lS ~ '" co - c o o o o c - Il,) c.o "0 ::l c.:l c.o C c<$ ... Il,) 0.. o 0; ~ ........ ....... - - \0 \0 0\ 0'\ ......, '-' c o .- ..... o c o c ..... ~ o o ~ :: v 3 Il,) .... ;:;. t- \C 8 - -- N N .... M N - -:-: u N 0'\ -- o o N -- .- ~ F=' U u: OJ Q ~ o ......, tf.) :J ...J ~ ~ :J tf.) ...J ~ U tf.) u: ...J -< :J Z Z -< E u u: Ul Q ~ o '-' '" :.> CZl :J ...J 0.. ~ :J CI) ...J < U CZl u: Ul > ~ ...J :J ~ :J U v o '" -< v .... :.3 Vl :.> ct. II'> .~ ~ ~ U t.:J u v .... ::l :/l Table 111-9 FISCAL CASH FLOW: City-of Dublin ` Eastern Dublin Fiscal Analysis <Santa Rita Property:January 16, 1992 Proposed Plan> [Date = Begining of Fiscal Year] - REVENUE &EXPENSE BALANCE Fund 1997 1998 1999 • 2000 • 2001 2002 2003 • REVENUES • (In Constant 1990-91 $1000s) Property Taxes (Incl.Home.Relief) General 241 598 830 1,117. 1,322 1,474 1,572 Sales and Use Taxes - General 1,621 1,721 3,242 3,342 3,951 4,051 4,051 Real Property Transfer Tax General 129 ' 50 62 44 • 33 21 5 Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax General 0 0 0 327 327 327 327 Franchise Taxes General 42 63 - 89 • 111 134 • 154 157 Other Court Fines General . 2 3 5 6 7 8. 8 Intergovern.Revenue-State 'General 78 124 174 227 277 325 325 Other Revenues General 10 15 - 21 27 32 37.. 38 Vehicle Code Fines • Traffic . 2 3 . 5 6 7 8 - 8 State Gas Taxes 1 ,Gas Tax 26 • 42 59 77 S 94 110 110 • Total Revenue -All Funds 2,153 2,620 4,486 5,284 6,184 6,515 6,601 EXPENDITURES _ • General Government 136 204 287 360 - 433 498 509 - Building Management 44 66 93 . 116 140 161 164 Police 301 .450 634 795 957 1,100 1,124• Fire 757 - 740 . 690 654 924 . . 924 924 , ° .11 Other Public Safety ' 38 57 80 . 101 121 139 142 Transportation 139 208 . 293 367 442 508 519 Culture & Leisure Services 128 191 270 • 338 407 : 468 478 Community Development 92 137 193 • 242 . 292 335 343 Health &Welfare 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 Total Operating Budget . 1,635 2,053 2,541 2,974 3,714 4,133 . .4,204- ANNUAL FISCAL SURPLUS (OR DEFICIT) 518 567 • 1,945 2,310 2,470 2,382 . 2,397 CUMULATIVE FISCAL SURPLUS (OR DEFICIT) (443) 123 2,069 4,379 . 6,848 9,231 11,628 Source: Economics Research Associates 01/21/92 c:\123r22\10367\srnew4.wkl r• .. -- ... ell ~ >' - ~ <Il u: ..... o OIl c: '2 '00 ~~ ell E: II "OB ie. o ... c.... N ~ - ..a - \ \ i:' ell =- c: ell ~ >. - ... &. o ... c.... ;g C2 ;g c: C!l CIl V c: :0 ::: o ..... o .~ ~~ uC;; .. < ~- i~ :I: c: f/}::: <.0 o--u= ..1.~Cl =<e ~uS .oCll'" ~ti:U1 0 o-r-- t- o 0\ VlVo--O C"l C"lO:>O\~C"lV)OO~O l"'l 0 t- - ~_ S:l~ N 0:> NV - t- coo:>ooN\OO\-.:rO\ 00 0\ -.:r 0 ~ - ~ - 0\ Irl _ <'!,O\ - V'l. V) l"'l \O~ N V"l N -~ ..a ..... -.:r N 00 N 8 N N__r--COO\VlMO\O o\N-Nt- N~ - r--_-~ ("""l- ("""l - -~ eo 8 N Irl_Or--VlO\VlN 0\ 0 VN_Nr-- N~ - r--- ("""l- ~ - ...;~ t- 8 N .-.. ~N-O\ 80N _r-- V')...;~ - 0\ ~ - _M-O:> C::\ON ell\O- U;"':-.:i' c::: 8 c::: - - t-ooO\Irl-O\O N\O N'<r - ~.... ("""l - r-_O\Vl-o\O Nr-- NV - ~- ~ - 8 N Irl 8 N ~r:::r--~~OO~~O\~ \0- ~.... ("""l - ...;~ 8 N V_("""lt-_OOlrlo\OOO O\NVlN\O N("""l - "1.....~("""ll""l- l""l - -~ "0 c::: ::l u... tIJ U Z <( ...J <( ~ tIJ CIl Z t.Ll c:... >< tIJ ~ tIJ ::> z tIJ > tIJ c:G c;-;c;c;-;c;c;-; ~ ........................t)~ ~4)~4)4)4)~~t.:r c:::c::.c:c:::c::c::c:::c:::-;'" 4) ~ ~ ~ ~ 4) 4) ~ ... .ell oooooooo~o c- .2 ~ ~ l< ~ ~g ... 2... ~ ::l ~ U ~ ~ ~ ." g ~ .5::.lellO ~~ c::: -e- ~ ." c::: > ." .- ." ." c- c- c::: ~ .- ~ U u... U ~~>-4)l<u...ex::::~>< <Zl l< <I:l 1::';;; ell 1:: . c::: "t:l ell ~~:J &.;E;;::l~ ~8.t: Z ~..g e~:a8 ~~~O tIJ c..> ell ~ _ t) ... OIl'" ~ ., >Q..,.,,-~c:::4)"'~ "" tIJo.2:Soell-=S-=~~ o::Q:~O:::I:U:O.=O>Vi U - ~ ton .u e o :t V'l N 0\ ..a C"l t- oo. \0 \O\OC"lN-eo-eoO t-cot-C"l\Ooo-:roo Vl_N.oo-V'lV'll""l - VlNO\V"lOOt---O \Ooo~ooV'lt-C"loo Irl_('too-V'lv)l"'l - V'l N eo \0. '<rO\V)~V'l\O-l"'lO V'lt-NNV'l\ONt- Irl"'" N.O\ - V'l V'll"'l - o C() t- ..a l""lV'l0-.:t NV'lO\O 0 '<rt-ONV'lV'l-\O 1rl_~0\""V'lV'lC"l .... - -.:t t- ..a N N\O"<:l"O'I.C"lO 0\0 l""lr-t-N-:r"<:l"OV) 1rl__.0'I_V'lV'lC"l - r- C5. t- _eo__\ONO-O N\OV'lV'l-:r~O\V'l Irl .... _. 00' - V'l -.:t ~ - '" "0 c:: ::l u.. ~ '" 8 c:: .- U - ~ s c:::~ uc.. U >.. <Zl 0 CIl ~s u .... U UJ;;;u ~ ...u... O::Cc.I) ,~c::~~.;g :J t ~ v,._ 0 - E- > ell .::.gj >..~ _0:;E -ell ;> 00 .g-':::~'2"'6 z_oo 0..00::l Ul~'=4> ...c....s-C: ~"Oo llJ<Il::l .::: o..c::::::=~.cc.:::Sell X 4> ::l 0.= - ~::l 0 ~ u.lO~o..u..OE-uu:r: 4> ::l c:: 4> > 4> ex: - ell ~ t- "<1' V'l '<r C() r- l"'l N 0- N V'l -:r \0 0\ "<1'. "<1' V'l N ~. -:r ~ V'l l"'l '<r c - <'!, ~ r; eJl "0 ::l CO ell r:: - ell ... ~ c.. o ;g o E- t- V) N~ \0 N ~ "<1' l"'l N 0\ r- eo. ~ N 00 N r, N Irl l""l Vl.. N V'l V'l l""l N t- O N. 0'1 - - oX ;l: -:r ;l: :,) r:: ... ;;:;. r- \0 n o - -- N N ... n N t- eo l"'l N N Irl CO~ \0 - t- l""l ,eo N '<r \0 '<r. '<r .... .... -- U N ~ .... c:: o E u Lt. u.l a 0:: o '-" <Zl :J ..J c- o:: :J <Zl ..J <: u <Zl U. ~ :J Z Z <: E=' u u. u.l Q 0:: o '-' CIl ::; ...J c- o:: :J Cfl ...J <: u ton E UJ > ~ ...J :J ::E ::; u - cI5 Vl ~ <"l 'u o Vl < - u ... ~ ~ Vl ~ 0:: Vl .~ S o r:: o u u.J o u ... Table 111-9 FISCAL CASH FLOW: City of Dublin Eastern Dublin Fiscal Analysis <Eastern Dublin Area: Jatnuary 16, 1992 Proposed Plan> [Date = Begining of Fiscal Year] REVENUE &EXPENSE BALANCE Fund 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 REVENUES (In Constant 1990-91 $1000s) Property Taxes (Incl.Home.Relief) General 2,229 • 2,837 3,461 .4,032 4,702 5,245 5,756 Sales and Use Taxes General 3,600 3,800 4,000 5,700 • 5,900 6,100 6,238• Real Property Transfer Tax General 614 135 124 145 118 111 110 Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax , , General 327 327 327 327 • 327 327 327 Franchise Taxes General 189 234 279 329 372 415 • 458 Other Court Fines General 10 12 14 17 19 21 23 Intergovern.Revenue - State General 435 556 676 796 917 1,037 1,158 Other Revenues General 46 57 67 79 90 100 - 111 Vehicle Code Fines ,Traffic 10 12 14 ' 17 19 22 24 State Gas Taxes Gas Tax 147 188 229 270 310 351 392 • Total Revenue -All Funds 7,606 8,158 9,192 11,712 12,775 13,730 14,597 EXPENDITURES General Government 611 758 903 1,063 1,206 1,344 1,481 Building Management 197 245 291 343 389 434 478 Police '1,350' 1,676 1,995 2,350 2,664 2,970 • 3,273 .1. •• ,�` Fire 997 1,848 1,848 1,848 1,887 1,940 2,772 Other Public Safety 171 212 253 298 337 376 415 Transportation 624 774 922 1,086 1,231 1,372 . 1,512 Culture &Leisure Services 574 712 848 999 .1,133 1,263 1,392 Community Development 412 511 608 717 812 906 998. Health & Welfare 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Operating Budget 4,935 6,737 7,669 8,704 9,660 10,604"- " "" 12,321 " ANNUAL FISCAL SURPLUS (OR DEFICIT) 2,672• , 1,421 1,522 3,008 3,115 3,126 2,276 CUMULATIVE FISCAL SURPLUS (OR DEFICIT) 5,998 7,420 . 8,942 11,950 15,065 18,190 20,466 Source: Economics Research Associates 01/21/92 c:\123r22\10367\ednew4.wkl Table 11I-9 FISCAL CASH FLOW: City of Dublin Eastern Dublin Fiscal Analysis <Eastern Dublin Area: January 16, 1992 Proposed Plan> [Date = Begining of.Fiscal Year] REVENUE &EXPENSE BALANCE Fund 1997 1998 , 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 REVENUES - (In Constant 1990-91 $1000s) Property Taxes(Incl.Home.Relief) General 46 193 296. 527 782 1,209 1,516 Sales and Use Taxes General 100 100 200 200. • 1,800 1,800 • 3,400. Real Property Transfer Tax General 42 22 50 55 • 93 66 154 Hotel Transient Occupancy Tax General - 0 0 0 327 327 327 327 Franchise Taxes General 9 16 30 46 72 93 143 Other Court Fines General 0 1 2 2 4 5 7 Intergovern.Revenue -State General - 13 24 55 92 143 194 315 Other Revenues General 2 4 7 11 17 2J • 35 Vehicle Code Fines Traffic 0 1 2 2 4 5 7 State GasTaxes ' Gas Tax 4 8 19 31 48 66 106 Total Revenue -All Funds 218 369 660 1,295 3,289 3,788 6,011 EXPENDITURES General Government 30 51 97 149 233 301 464 Building Management , 10 16 31 48 75 97 ' . 150 Police •. 66 112 215 329' 515 666 • 1,024 ; . • Fire 167 184 234 270 924 924 924 Other Public Safety 8 14 27 42 65 84 130 Transportation 31. 52 99 152 238 308 473, Culture & Leisure Services • 28 48 • 91 140 219 - 283 436 Community Development 20 34 65 100 157 203 312 Health & Welfare 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . • Total Operating Budget • 361 511 . 860 • 1,230 2,427 • 2,867 ° " `- 3;912 ' ANNUAL FISCAL SURPLUS (OR DEFICIT) (143) (142) (200) 65 862 921 2,099 CUMULATIVE FISCAL SURPLUS (OR DEFICIT) (279) (421) (621) (555) 307 1,228 3,327 Source: Economics Research Associates 01/21/92 c:\123r22\10367\ednew4.wkl Table I11-9 FISCAL CASH FLOW: City of Dublin Eastern Dublin Fiscal Analysis <Eastern Dublin Area:January 16, 1992 Proposed Plan> • [Date = Begining of Fiscal Year]. REVENUE &EXPENSE BALANCE Fund 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 REVENUES (In Constant 1990-91 S1000s) Property Taxes (Incl. Home. Relief) General 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sales and Use Taxes General 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Real Property Transfer Tax • General 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Hotel.Transient Occupancy Tax General 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Franchise Taxes General 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Other Court Fines General '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intergovern.Revenue -State General 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Revenues General 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Vehicle Code Fines Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 State Gas Taxes ' Gas Tax 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue -All Funds 0 0 0 0 0. 0 13 EXPENDITURES • General Government 0 0 0 0 0 0 Building Management 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 Police 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Fire 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 "!j 'FISCAL CASH FLOWS: REMAINDER EASTERN DUBLIN t RESOLUTION NO. - 94 A' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN A RESOLUTION RELATING TO EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE FOR PA 94-030 EASTERN DUBLIN REORGANIZATION Recitals 1. WHEREAS, Section 99 of the. Revenue and Taxation code provides, among other things, that no local agency jurisdictional change can be completed without the agencies affected by such change first having agreed upon an exchange of property tax revenue between and among the affected agencies; 2 . WHEREAS, there is presently pending an application for a reorganization by the City of Dublin entitled PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin Reorganization to annex territory to the City. of Dublin and to the Dublin San Ramon Services District and to detach certain territory from the Livermore Area Park and Recreation District; 3 . WHEREAS, the territory subject to the PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin Reorganization application is within "Eastern Dublin" as that area is defined in the "Agreement Between County of Alameda, Surplus Property Authority and City of Dublin Regarding Transfer of Property Tax Revenues Upon Annexation, Provision of Services and Other. Matters" ("Agreement") , dated May 4, 1993 ; 4. WHEREAS, paragraph 2 of the Agreement sets forth the agreement of the City Council of the City of Dublin and the Board. of Supervisors of the County of Alameda on the method for distributing property tax revenue for annexations including the PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin Reorganization; and 5. WHEREAS, paragraph 14 (e) of:the Agreement provides that there will be no adjustment ,to the appropriations limit of either the City of Dublin or Alameda County by virtue of the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED as follows: Section 1. That for the PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin Reorganization, the Auditor-Controller of the County of Alameda shall be directed to cause an exchange of property tax revenues pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 2 of the Agreement, to wit: the City of Dublin shall receive 25.4% of the full one percent ad valorem property tax and/or possessory interest tax from the property annexed to the City of Dublin as part of the PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin Reorganization. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 10th day of October, 1994. AYES: NOES: ' ABSENT: ' ABSTAIN: ' MAYOR ATTEST: , CITY CLERK4. f `. D /resos-aals/94030tax f'7g ;;:- RESOLUTION NO. - 94 CITY OF DUBLIN ********* RESOLUTION NO. DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT ********* A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT REGARDING EASTERN DUBLIN ANNEXATION WHEREAS, on May 10, 1993, the City Council of the City of Dublin ("Ci ty") adopted the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, pursuant to its Resolution 53-93; and WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and the Final Environmental Impact Report state that the Dublin San Ramon Services District ("District") will provide water, wastewater, and recycled water services to the Specific Plan area; and WHEREAS, the Specific Plan Implementation Program calls for the City to adopt prezoning for the Specific Plan Area, and for annexation of portions of the Specific Plan Area into the City and the District; and WHEREAS, several property owners have requested that City prezone the properties described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Annexing Property"); and WHEREAS, said property owners have also requested that City and District annex the Annexing Property; and WHEREAS, City has been requested to adopt a resolution of application to LAFCO to annex the Annexing Property on behalf of both the City and the District; and WHEREAS, the proposed prezoning and annexation are referred to as the "Eastern Dublin Annexation;" and WHEREAS, it has been previously determined by LAFCO that the City and the District shall have coterminus boundaries; and WHEREAS, the District and City have worked cooperatively in partnership to prepare a plan to show how municipal services, including water, wastewater, and recycled water services will be provided to the Annexing Property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City acknowledges that District will be the exc~usive provider of wat~r, wastewater, and recycled water services to the Annexing Properties.' Ci ty further acknowledges that District will invest considera llre~tise ;- and resources to plan and provide for water, wastewater, and recycled water services to the Annexing Properties, and, therefore, so long as District makes reasonable and good faith efforts and continues to invest efforts, expertise, and resources in that regard, City will not take any action, or cause or influence others to take any action, which would conflict with District's exclusive provision of such services or otherwise interfere with District's studying and planning thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City and District will support and cooperate with each other in a united and coordinated effort to provide municipal services to the Annexing Property which are necessary to implement the Plan for Services and the Specific Plan. * * * * CITY OF DUBLIN PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of October, 1994. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk * * * * DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of Dublin San Ramon Services District at its special meeting being held on the 12th day of October, 1994, and passed by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Georgean M. Vonheeder, President ATTEST: Nancy Gamble, Secretary a:resoedub.agenda#15 • _:.:_:1.)t.ice_.,. ..,. ..' .' �•" ..._. ... .. .... .... ._. ._ .�__, _. .. _. .. ..... .. .. ....... .. ...... ..... _._. ..._ .. • •7 lisle mop comforme to the requirements of the Local /7 SILVERIA,ANN H.TRUST REDOWICK CONSTRUCTION CO. DOOIAN WEST ASSOCIATES Agency Formation Commission of Alameda County. I SERIES NO.84.246248 SERIES NO.82.094708 SERIES N0,86.321121 California. • OBERTJ.NIELSEN Donald LaBelle-Dlreciorol Public World • 554168 NO.94.024636 � 1 AC01. gAOi U DLe6m13 H KBwer-County Surveyor �1pA�O R.C.E.18499,Expires 6/30/97 55(1Td AZEVEDO .SERIES 1/0.90417195 1 •i•�•/ By Rold Penland,Deputy County Surryeor .. SERIES NO.90.215717 I • y. '• ' .` L.5.5720.Registration.Expires 12/31/95•MICHAEL KOBOf.D LIN LIN �•�• (`''+ ;.i{ .• .. SERV N0.91428046 SERIES NO.00.248111 SERIES NO.00-215061 i` a ,,,�,,, / :`;�;, This map when.flied, was accompanied by e a AIM 9154504. ApN 11913-!0454.15 I t DUBLIN p '" t:\''. certificate of completion and certified copy of Iho • MICHAEL KOBOLD 9 AC ";:;:k; 1 boundary description delineated hereon,as required' • SERIES NO 91.128046 ' ' . ;C 'FleO by Section 57603 of the Government Code,which .. • LIN- , •s 3-.•...••. certifcate of completion and boundary description are CHANG SU.0 LIN i i I records In Series No. of.Official • • SERIES N0.82.001756 .-�•�d EILEEN SPEAFS(AGE• v SERIES • NO s0900 AnY As SHOWN ON THE MAP ENTITLED ' ` a Records of Alameda County,California. SERIES 140.B6 @31313 BOOK 8192 O.R.PG.215 00-248111- 'RECORD OF SURVEY R/e No. 100!" DATED I 7 . SERIES NO.86.234314 U.S.A.(CAMP PARKS) PH 9156551 OCTOBER 1990,RECORDED IN BOOK 14,PAGE 37, I Slave Staley Executive Officer • SERIES N. PLEASANTON Local Agency Formation Commission•+ of Alameda County,Calllomla GvGI iii `s • /.:\ • SERIES NO.6 0-1.2 03 ,L qq I B APH 9155051.2 (-1∎'� 4R, LIN 'LIN VICINITY MAP ©11111111 Y 88 Donald K.Graff • EAST BAY REGIONAL CITY OF PLEASANTON MA Adminlslrellve Analyst,LAFCO SIeH PARK DISTRICT 9ERIE9 NO.02-378021 SERIES NO. SERIE9 NO. SERIES 140.77-021354 APN 915-1010-f-4 02-058910 92-058918 Filed el the request of • APN 945500.1.1 91 APN 99/3404524 APN,99B-20452-7 '01_minutes past__M.on the day of EAST BAY REGIONAL FALCON ENTERPRISES,INC. ,19_,under Series No. PARK DISTRICT • SERIES NO,92;376222 Records of Alameda County,California. .. SERIES HO.76-220123 ADAMS, �. &.0 SERIES NO.91.344396 y Patrick O'Connell-faun Recorder APN 1114-500-i-1 WALKER& Z S LIN REEL 2658 IMAGE 332 -County KOLLER J SERIES NO.90-215062 LIN LIN By: • SERIES 109. SERIES NO.81-066883 SERIES NO. SERIES NO. Deputy County Recorder 93-342113 -/& APN 9/5104534 • I APO B910.50044 APN 901340462.9 APN 2990]01524 ' This map was prepared by me or under my direction 55'WIDE LIN z 9ERIE3 NO. 132-089219 LIN SERIES NO.88.079781 LOWELL A.JORDAN TRUST APN 9/51010.4-2-' APN 9913-303134-1, - SERIES 140.71-160635 BYE • I SERIES NO.82.061343 Robed Chan • . LIN / ' - L.S.No.5412,Exp.9/30/98 - SERIES NO: ANNEXATION NO.10((EASTERN DUBLIN) �/' . ' • • 90.210062 PARCEL A r 60'WIDE ' NOTE: . CASTERSON t,APH 91510/52 I 1, THE METHOD USED TO CALCULATE THE AREA WAS BY SERIES NOS.01-039684 TOTAL ANNEXATION AREA: 1538 ACRES I LOWELL A.JORDAN TRUST SUMMARY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY A9SE9SOR PARCEL . • &80-229805 I I SERIES AO.74 160639 MAP AREAS. • APN 915400.4 •" I SERIES 140.82061313 2. A6 A DRAFTING CONVENTION,THE SMALL SEPARATIONS BETWEEN PORTIONS OF THE LINEWORK AROUND THE ' c LIN I BOUNDARY OF THIS ANNEXATION WERE PROVIDED TO• < ' SERIES NO,g8-079781 I 0 y > 11 ALLOW MULTIPLE OTHERWISE TO BE PLACED ON• ¢ m_ Z APN 998-4046-0 I WHAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE A SINGLE LINE. THESE a n LINES ARE TO BE CONSIDERED COINCIDENT EXCEPT I 'ANNEXATION' N0, 2 BOUNDARY OF TERRITORY lid. ,�? I1 ANNEXED TO ICE CITY OF DUBLIN,CALIFORNIA" WHERE NOTED, r1 • • ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN BY DUBLIN CITY O' o ����yyy CENTERLINE OF • COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.110.44,A MAP OF WHICH f5p U fi FALCON ROAD �� TERRITORY WAS FILED DECEMBER ]l, 1064 IN cc 5 ❑ 4A1 (ROAD N0,7872( •� - BOOK 141 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 57 056-3250141, Z 0 S RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY,CALIFORNIA. g PAOYEH LIN PAOYEH LIN -WM.&JEAN MAYNARD 'a Y E SERIES 140, SERIES NO. '• SERIES NO.7 2-174 8 41, '0' Doe 1000 2100 IL =II 91-148796 91-110796 SERIES NOS.BB-144753 • .- DUSLINTOWN LTD. -� '5554222+ APH 99 94 0 2 5-1 A1,119119-30213-2. ,&88.144748 SERIES NO 83.245554 ❑ APN 90 B40051 .Tit` GRAPHIC SCALE:1".)100' • • a BOUNDARY As SHOWN off THE MAP - WM.&JEAN MAYNARD �� EXHIBIT'A' • ENTITLED"RECORD OF SURVEY 6/9 SERIES NO.05-100054 • NO.1000"DATED OCTOBER 1000, APN 996-3030.5 ANNk2A1NX1 NAME RECORDED IN BOOK 10,PAGE 37,. , NORTHERLY IIIGIIT•OF-WAY . • €6 of cALTgAHS PnoPEnn ANNEXATION NO. (EASTERN DUBLIN) DUBLIN LAND COMPANY MAY DEVANY LES3EHR em• SERI IS 140.83-162778 CITY OF DUBLIN NN 99850051-2 SERIES 140.73-073270 ��� APN 091540254-1 CALTRANS ----- EXISTING CITY OF DUBLIN RESOLUTION NO. --- rrrrrtrtrtrt��l BOUNDARY �- • ` - BOUNDARY LINE OF CITY OF oaf REVISION DAIS • ANNEXATION NO.42 BOUNDARY LINE OF TERRITORY INTERSTATE 580 DUBLIN ANNEXATION 1 IZ �I a V E D ANNEXED PLEASANTON NO THE CINC OF PLEASANTON 4. CITY OF PLEASANTON EXISTING CITY OF PLEASANTON I •••111777{LLLFAAA"' PLEA9ANTOH CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ale, BOUNDARY Ls WM NO. OF ADOPTED NOVEMBER 4, 1971, IN MAP BOON 73 AT • COUNTY OF ALAMEDA _ 1 1 i] p �J PAGE 7(71•1625641 RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, COUNTY NO.ALAME A 1' 0Jj00 {^y �/ St 2 O „4,7,.m�,,,,.c,Co...190q CALIFORNIA. LJIr /1 erl i-(741 r//\ 1111621-e L7 In(,.,ra a.,.,..••■ - E (,,,.FIUr 7 rlai A/J// C :.~:g~ ~~ 1). c 0 ,go ~i:: g:::: ;:." ,",.', l ~e " .::0 ~ ~;~fo '5 2- c ':ii' ~"r'; ~ ~:;l 0 -E ~- h "'1' ~J! i'ii ~ ~ t- "'~ 0= e III ~ E liE.. ~ oZ E ~ b-~ g~~~~ ~ 5~~ .s.,g a: co. ~ ~ 8~- ::'i ij~l5 :-g~~B ~ la'ii ~~~ -E ~ ~,g l~~ of 0 if; :~';"E 0 ~ ~ 0 ~. '" .D o.f! '1;;'02-8= cZ 5 an ~~- Ip ~ a: ~ ,3:;; ~i _ ~8 'il ~lgo~:<; '''-8 ~7ii i'i ~ t i!. .. " ~~~:~r~~l }'g IG ~i! ~~~ E 8 ~ ~~ ~ 3;i i~ 0 0- oC M~8(t)1G "'< E ;; r ~ j = :l:oepln_c:< n~ . ~u.i 0.11)"0 gO-o: cE -=1: 0 ;; 0- a:.J Efi~~j~~ "'""'0. 8~ ;; I 11 .. 0 .. E .!!~gU):e8~ ~ a: 8 ;:. ~ ;:. U:c &: '" t=. t;.8,li'3 fa: '" ~ H ~8 ~ ~i ~ ~E .2 C ClI :g ~~ ~ ~E ~ !: i .!E is ~8 III ~~ ~ ~~ ~ fd-~~ 8 Ei!o. j9C>~ F~(j \" ~~ ..\\ \\~, t !!!- :s~ 15- gjl;l ",:!l ~~. ",ifj ~ffi o '" "'~ g~ ~liI ~.~ "'", ~~ G'" fil 0: ~~ e:~ i~ ~5! s'" 0:", ~ii: -,'" ",'" m ~ -~ ~;i: z .~ -011 , -'z: .,f ..... ;;: ... ., ~i :z~; ::;;gi :n.. 0: ... ., ..~ r;\ \t\ ,"'-=- -~2J.-= - -' - ----- -=- -~ :...-~ iZ~ g~~ Q~ Q~ ~~ ~t:.~ 5c... c:re ~~ ~~~ ~~ e~ ~~ "5!5! liJ~ liJ~' ~ID ~~~ ~~ ~i '~~ (f)m~ s:m s~ e ~~ I; ti i;:...,CDo:\i <n~~~ ~,,;~ g:lil;;;~ h5!:g tuu,<I)~ ~~~lli ....c.o"-loa: ;:: me;; ~~f5 ~Q~ "'~~ O:.g~ ;.....~ !!log ",x.. :z:!!i:. ca:C ~~8 ii~~ :~i .. - a:ca: "a:.. 00." xoc 2~g " ~ g :2 fl! ::11): -' !! ~.,. 0: ... ~ W 0.% ., " .. '. 0 !i :2; z en::~ ~ ~~! ~ CIt~' % 0;;; ...'" :i~i w' e(::: ~o~ :z:~ ~:! >0: ...... 0" ~5 ",<oN N9~ %l!:;;~ -oo~ -Izz.. .,.,f ........ ita: UlW ...'" )( ~~f ~~~5! ~~!im .... i5~~ffio. t:. Q ~:;; -<~ :::~-~ a: ~ ~:tc~.~!... ~~_ ~g ",8 'em >_'i'.:. > c ..... c:Gl. ">g. 111~~~ ~ ~ *,!N !2M Cl..f ...a:o","!"'So' :z~;;6 ". Q)ct Q) - ::;g~~ !!!<I( c(g" I c( Q. z~ ~~=:8 ffi w...Jffi<l( W ~ CDC i5!5!5! <II ~ffi a ~ ~mm~ ~0. ffi = omm~ ~ a: ;:. .. ~~"it,!!es5S ;, 'r!~~~~~;I!::; ~ .c:: ., A.w..JQ ~= :t~~ID~U ~~ ~~~gg5 UI ' COw au 5;. ~3~~<m as :illlci:~ffi 5~ ~~m5>>:i 00 1!'l';'iii:J~3" "'1 5: to., 10 W ~~ 8g~~g:: ~:s. g~~59~~ o IWl fA.:>>ooo5wo ~r:~ =ffi!i:E~~z :1: ~~~~~:ffi ~ I'il :!=!!d5~ o % .: -, ,:',,".,;;..: ~ 1;1 ll- W eN ~- G~ :g~ 0'" "'..1 '- ~~~ "'~~ ~~o;o, ~~~ ~[1~ ~ffiffi gu,u> '- ~~~ f!;g~ "'-:-8 CSit:: ~5!~ ~~~ tdCi:a: "~~~ Jjl I I I I I I I I ,I -_ J E i- -~--T~~-- --==::: ~C7 , 9: ~ ~ U) :i U t;: l-Il ... ,EZ ;S P<: g !ii 15 ~ m 6 ~ ,ffi ill:;: ~ CtJ UO'I u >d~~ ",;,z P<: ffl ..J < or::~o ~~~~ Z2 ~ ;;5< Z '" ... '" ~ o '" ., w 0: W ., :J '" ;:J 0, ...l ;5 !2 z ::J .. m ~ )j ::Jgg .Z .," ..... ;;: w ., ~ - '41 ~ '\:1,- ~~:; 1'\ ~' ~~ '-l ~ it .~, ~ ~ 2 ~ i ~ ~ l- iD :E >< w b Z :::; .. is "- ~ 0 2 ~ (3 I ~ I! ~ a g ~ .. x x z!;i: ~ ~~ ~~ ~ :~ ~~ 3 ;iQ~: : !:f: ~~ 0 ~E ;J~s 5:>>00 :: ~=~ o~ ..:z:o ~X)( =0 ~~ g~~ ~g ....., m=.c: w>> ! II .;i! . 0 .. co reS .. 1&1:;.....1; It) ... ~~ ~ i:~~~ w ~ li:)"C '" I- "'~ .:gj .,CL >~- ~l';8:! c:( l!;~ ~~i I- z ......, gi:i18 en ~ffJ :;~;;;: >>gtooG c: ~ffi :z:m x :l~~i: C~g W A I- 0'" .,..... ,>>& I D ~:n! ... ~~~I ~ 0: :EO: W ... ." 8 .0 ., ci5~~ % " . - 0 .ft ..0 ",:;:~ ffi fI);Z >- !! _CIO ~.ffi ;f c.., .. % 0 I- > :z % c:( en c.... c:( :EN W om~ ~~j ..J 0... %0 lI- :5,"': 0 %:If >- ..0 a: 01'" I- ~., 0 C 50 mi'. :r:E~i ~ !! ;:~' o c:: ~% <<( UJ Dc. C. <II .. .., 9UZ9~~ 'ON S31113S ANYdWOO ONYl 11I1800 ;~~~~; ~U~t;~= "'~oiia:S fiz"':cao z04J')UZIO ~~S~cS ~~~=WIO ~~~%~~ ~~~~~li CI&IC.c:.,... ~t:~~. ~.: :;"~a:;:z:IlCa:.. OZCCOWClt ml&lA.~u..... aYOH WYYf'VSSY.1 110 ilNrni3.UBO h.5OH ov) << ''1t.O UK (ifK: 'ON OYC>>:I) aYOH VY'lt'rYSS't.L :z :J III ::l C lI- o ~~:~i o ~ Z ~% '~6 a:gg~o I' ~z Dc '11L~~g~ :3~~~ !o.Ei::Ec ..J a:;XIL t:~O:o c :!t:"" ~::~=~ goS.g =~~:~ ~:5~~ ~"'ggE~ .....0:;:0 p;: i S:~t:g i i~~g~~ #'" ...."'Qu L z III m z , "-:2: ~~~,~j~~ffi~"R~ '~ o • r RESOLUTION NO. -94 ' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE LINS An agreement .between- the City of Dublin and the Lins, entitled "Annexation Agreement Between the City ' of Dublin and the Lins" , a copy of which is attached, has been presented to this Council . The City Council is familiar with the contents therefor. The City Manager has recommended the approval of said agreement. NOW, .THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Dublin that: - Said agreement is hereby. approved and execution thereof by the ' Mayor of Dublin is hereby authorized. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS day of AYES : NOES : ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK C:\planning\carol\resolin • r', . F Recording Requested by: City of Dublin When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OP DUBLIN AND THE LINE THIS AGREEMENT dated for identification this 10th day of October, 1994, is entered into by and among the City of Dublin, a municipal corporation, ("the City") and Jennifer Lin (also known as Chang Su-O-Lin) , Frederic Lin (also known as Fredrich Lin and Hong Lien Lin) and Hong Yao Lin (also known as Kevin Lin) (collectively, "the Lins") . Recitals 1. On May 10, 1993, by Resolution No. 53-93, the City Council of the City adopted the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan ("the Specific Plan") , which provides a planning framework for the future growth and development of approximately 3,300 acres, all but approximately 700 acres of which is outside the City's boundaries to the east of the City (collectively, "the Specific Plan Area") . Resolution No. 53-93 became effective on November 3, 1993 following voter approval. By law, all land use actions 1 r) 4 .Fq' t t mo ? approved by the city concerning the Specific Plan Area must be consistent with the Specific Plan. 2. The Specific Plan and the City's General Plan include goals and policies to prevent development within the Specific Plan Area from drawing upon and diluting the fiscal base of the remainder of the city. 3. The Specific Plan also has goals and policies calling for certain community services, including fire and police services, to be provided within portions of the Specific Plan Area that have been incorporated into the City at a level that is consistent with standards maintained in the rest of the City. The city is only responsible for providing such services to portions of the Specific Plan area within the City's boundaries. 4. The Lins own certain property ("the Lin Property") within the Specific Plan Area described more particularly in Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by reference. 5. On July 22 and July 14, 1994, the Lins and Clyde Casterson, respectively, filed applications with the City to prezone and annex to the City the Lin Property and certain other land within the Specific Plan Area (collectively, "the Annexation Area"), all of which is shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. The Lins and Clyde Casterson did not submit any development plans with these applications. 6. Absent new development within incorporated portions of the Specific Plan Area, it is estimated that the cost of 2 ;;- providing public services to the Annexation Area at a level consistent with services provided within the city would exceed revenues generated to the City from property within incorporated portions of the Specific Plan Area. specifically, it is estimated that the annual cost of such services to be funded by the city's general fund would exceed revenues generated within the Annexation Area by approximately $80,000 per year, plus an additional one-time cost the first year of approximately $24,300 to purchase a new police car and related equipment. The additional police car would be necessary to provide a level of police service to the Annexation Area consistent with the level of police services currently provided within the city. 7. In addition to the above costs which would be funded out of the City's general fund, certain one-time capital improvements would be necessary to provide fire services to the Annexation Area at a level commensurate with fire services currently being provided to the remainder of the City. Dublin is served by the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority (IIDRFAlI), which serves primarily urban areas. Annexation of the Annexation Area would introduce large areas of rural land into DRFA's service area, which DRFA currently does not have the equipment to serve satisfactorily. In particular, DRFA will need a "Type 3 Engine," which is designed to accommodate incident responses in non- urbanized areas where the road network is limited and there is an exposure of people and property to wildland fires. The cost of a Type 3 Engine is estimated at $250,590. However, DRFA is due 3 soon to replace one of its "Patrol" units, at a cost of approximately $170,000. In lieu of replacing a Patrol unit with another Patrol unit, DRFA can instead replace the Patrol unit with a Type 3 Engine, resulting in an incremental added cost to DRFA of approximately $80,590 attributable to the proposed annexation. DRFA will impose an impact fee on new development within the Specific Plan Area to cover the costs of fire capital infrastructure facilities necessary to serve such development, and the $80,590 amount is properly deemed a component of such fire capital infrastructure facilities costs. 8. If new development occurs within the Specific Plan Area as anticipated, it is expected to generate revenues to the City which will reduce and, in the near future, eliminate the above- described shortfalls. However, even with development, shortfalls are nonetheless anticipated in early years. If development within the Specific Plan Area does not occur as anticipated, the shortfalls will be much greater than anticipated. 9. The City is willing to process the Lin's application to annex the Annexation Area and to consider adopting a resolution of application to LAFCO to annex the Annexation Area, if the City is provided reasonable assurances that funds will be available to it to provide the level of services to the Annexation Area required by the Specific Plan consistent with the Specific Plan's and the General Plan's goals and policies that development within the Specific Plan Area must not draw upon or dilute the fiscal base of the remainder of the City. 4 ;c- 10. The specific Plan and the city's General Plan include goals and policies providing for reimbursements from any other benefiting areas for costs that Specific Plan Area owners are required to advance, and should provide a fair allocation of costs among land uses. 11. The City's resolution of application to LAFCO to annex the Annexation Area will ask that LAFCO establish an effective date of the annexation of October 1, 1995. AGREEMENT NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and conditions contained herein, the Parties agree as follows: section I. Coveraqe of General Fund Shortfalls A. The Lins' Payment obligations; Definitions. Pursuant to the terms outlined in this section I of this Agreement, the Lins shall pay the City the amount of the Annexation Area Public Service Costs which exceed Incorporated Plan Area Revenues. "Annexation Area Public Service Costs" is defined as the cost of providing public services to the Annexation Area (at a level consistent with services provided within the incorporated area of the City prior to the annexation) incurred by the City's general fund. "Incorporated Plan Area Revenues" is defined as revenues generated to the city's general fund from property and inhabitants within portions of the Specific Plan Area which have been incorporated into the City, but excluding revenues generated outside the Annexation Area used for the benefit of incorporated portions of the Specific Plan Area outside the Annexation Area. 5 B. Annual Pisoal .Analyses.. By April 1, 1995, and annually by every April 1 thereafter, the City shall conduct, and. the Line shall fund, a fiscal analysis to estimate the amount by which the Annexation Area Public Service. Costs during the next fiscal year (which runs from July 1 through the following June 30) will exceed Incorporated Plan Area Revenues generated during that fiscal year. The April 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998 fiscal analyses will include an estimate of the amount by which the Annexation Area Public Service Costs exceed Incorporated Plan Area Revenues for each fiscal year through June 30,' 1999. At the option of the Lins, the Lins may fund, and the City. shall conduct, additional fiscal analyses at other times during the fiscal year to re-estimate the amount by which Annexation Area Public Service Costs during that fiscal year exceed and/or will exceed Incorporated Plan Area Revenues during that fiscal year. C. Payments to the City. No later than the beginning of each quarter of each fiscal year (i.e. July 1, October 1, January 1, April 1) , the Lins shall pay the City one quarter of the amount by which the Annexation Area Public Service Costs will exceed Incorporated Plan Area Revenues for that fiscal year, as estimated in the most recent fiscal analysis prepared pursuant to. Section 1(B) of this Agreement. However, payments due from the Lino pursuant to this Section shall be adjusted each fiscal year as early as possible to make up any difference between what was paid by the Line pursuant to this Section 1(C) in the prior 6 fiscal year and the actual amount by which Annexation Area Public Service Costs differed from Incorporated Plan Area Revenues during the prior fiscal year (due, for example, to overestimates or underestimates in the fiscal analysis prepared pursuant to Section I(B) for the prior fiscal year) . D. Security for Payment. contemporaneous with the execution of this Agreement, the Line will provide the City with a letter of credit or comparable instrument of security satisfactory to City Manager, to become effective if the annexation is approved by LAFCO and the conducting authority, in the amount of Three Hundred Fifty Five Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Six Dollars ($355,846) to secure payment to the City of the shortfall between Annexation Area Public Service Costs and Incorporated Plan Area Revenues for the first four fiscal years or portion thereof following annexation (1995-1999) . The letter of credit (or comparable security) may have an effective date of October 1, 1995, .and may be replaced with a letter of credit or letters of credit in the amount of the shortfall for 1995-1999 as modified by the fiscal analyses to be done each April pursuant to Section I(B) . B. Duration of Payment Obligations. The Lins' obligations under this Section I of this Agreement shall terminate once the amount of the Incorporated Plan Area Revenues actually exceed Annexation Area Public service Costs for a fiscal year as shown by the annual fiscal analysis. If, by April, 1998, the 7 ;;- Annexation Area Public Service Costs are still estimated to exceed Incorporated Plan Area Revenues, the City and the Lins shall meet and confer in good faith to negotiate a way of terminating or reducing the Lins' obligations under this Section I of this Agreement in a manner consistent with the City's obligations under its General Plan and the specific Plan, whether through an application for detachment of the Annexation Area, an agreement similar to this Agreement with other owners of property within the Specific Plan Area, or some other means. In no event shall the Lins' obligations under this section I of this Agreement terminate until the City and the Lins reach a new agreement in one of the ways specified in the preceding sentence, or until Incorporated Plan Area Revenues exceed Annexation Area Public Service Costs. F. Reimbursement From other Property Owners. The city shall in the future consider fair and appropriate ways of reimbursing the Lins some of the amounts they are required to pay under this Section I of this Agreement from other ,owners of property within the Annexation Area. To the extent permitted by law, the City shall require owners of property within the Annexation Area who seek City approval of development entitlements for such property to pay a fair and proportionate share of the amount by which Annexation Area Public service Costs exceed Incorporated Plan Area Revenues during periods following the city's approval of such entitlements. 8 ;:- section II. Payment for Fire caDital Improvements The Lins shall pay to DRFA $80,590 to cover the amount by which the cost of a Type 3 Engine necessary to serve the Annexation Area exceeds the cost of a Patrol unit which DRFA . would otherwise purchase. Upon execution of this Agreement, the Lins will provide a letter of credit or comparable instrument of security satisfactory to the City Manager to secure this payment which letter of credit (or comparable security) may have an effective date of February 1, 1995. The Lins shall pay this $80,590 amount by July 1, 1995, or by such later date as is mutually acceptable to the Lins and the city. The City finds that access to a Type 3 Engine benefits all property within the Specific Plan Area to be served by the city and that there is a reasonable relationship between development of the Specific Plan Area and the need for a Type 3 Engine. Thus, the Lins shall be entitled to credits and/or reimbursements for this $80,590 amount against impact fees for fire capital infrastructure facilities assessed by DRFA against development on property owned by the Lins within the Annexation Area. The timing of such credits and/or reimbursements shall be negotiated between the Lins, the City, and DRFA after more specific development plans are prepared and submitted for approval. section III. ADDroval of Annexation This Agreement shall take effect only if the City adopts a resolution of application to annex the Annexation Area, with or without conditions. Upon adoption of such resolution, the City 9 shall take reasonable steps to facilitate..annexat'ion of. the Annexation Area effective October 1, 1995. This Agreement shall become ineffective, however, if the annexation is not approved by LAFCO or the voters or does not become effective for any other reason. Section IV. Negotiation of Development Agreement . In processing any applications for development entitlements submitted by the Lins for the Lin Property, the City will negotiate in good faith with the Lins to enter into a development agreement. Section V. Additional Provisions A. Correctness of the Recitals. The Recitals set forth in this Agreement are true and correct and are a part hereof.-- B. Further Assurances. The Parties shall execute,.. acknowledge, and deliver such additional dOcuments 'or instruments as may be necessary to carry out the intent of this Agreement, - including but not limited to, those expressly referred to in this Agreement. C. Construction by California Law. This Agreement is entered into in the State of. California. and shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with its laws. D. Representation of Comprehension of Document. In . entering into this Agreement, the Parties represent that they have relied upon the legal advice of their attorneys who are the attorneys of their choice. The Parties further represent that 10 ;;- the terms of this Agreement have been completely read by and explained to them by their attorneys, and that they fully understand and voluntarily accept those terms. E. Authorship. Each Party and counsel for each Party has reviewed and revised this Agreement, and accordingly, the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement or any amendment of it. F. Authority to Execute. Each of the Parties represents and warrants that each has full power to enter into this Agreement. G. Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Parties with regard to the matters set forth. There are no additional written or oral agreements or promises between the Parties concerning these matters which are not expressly set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by an agreement in writing executed in the same manner as this Agreement. H. Attorneys Fees. In the event a Party to this Agreement is found in a court of law to have breached this Agreement, said Party shall pay the opposing Party's reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred in litigating the breach of contract action. x. Notices. All notices shall be by certified mail or hand delivered to the Parties as follows: 1.1 ~ To the city: city Clerk City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza P. O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 To the Lins: c/o Ted C. Fairfield 550 Sunol Blvd P.o. Box 1148 Pleasanton, CA 94566 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. CITY OF DUBLIN THE LINS Jennifer Lin, Frederic Lin, & Hang Yao Lin Mayor Approved as to form: By City Attorney Title Name 114\agree\eastdub\annex.agr 12 PTR-2 Order No. 590192 Page No. 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY in the Unincorporated Area, County of Alameda, State of California, described as follows: Portion of the North half of Section 3, Township 3 South, Range 1 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the center line of Fallon Road County Road 892,with a width of 60 feet, as said Road is described in the indenture to the County of Alameda, recorded July 31, 1941, in Book 4115 of Official Records at Page 57, with the North line of aforesaid Section 3, T. 3 S. R. 1 E., M. D. B. M., said point of beginning being located at a point on the arc of a curve having a radius of 400.00 feet, the center line of which curve bears South 62° 31' 12" West; thence from point of beginning Southeasterly along said center line of Fallon Road, along the arc of said curve having a radius of 400.00 feet through a central angle of 29° 34' 44" an arc distance of 206.50 feet; thence tangent to said curve, South 2° 05' 56" West, 1,457.31 feet to a point on the Northerly line of State Freeway 580, as described in the indenture to the State of California, recorded July 7, 1967 in Book 1995 of Official Records at Page 347; thence along said Northerly line of State Freeway 580, as follows: North 87° 53' 36" West , 42.00 feet; thence South 2° 06' 44" West, 454.49 feet; thence . . South 50° 42' 39" West, 296.33 feet; thence along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 950.00 feet through a central angle of 39° 35' 21", an arc distance of 656.41 feet; thence tangent to said curve North 89° 42' 00" West, 1,394.66 feet; thence North 88° 29' 26" West, 419.15 feet to a point on the West line of said Section 3, T. 3 S., R. 1 E.; thence along said West line of Section 3, North 0° 33' 03" East, 2,561.92 feet to the Northwest corner of said Section 3; thence along the North line of said Section.3, South 88°31' 10" East, 2,693.05 feet to the point of beginning. . A.P. No. 099B-3036-001 ***** EXHIBIT A • • • EXHIBIT.' FIRST AMERICAN TITLE :- PTR-2 Order No. 590193 Page No. 5 to an iron monument; thence Northeasterly, Northerly and Northwesterly on the arc of a curve to the left, tangent to last said course, the radius of which is 200 feet" a distance on said arc of 176.39 feet; thence North 280 56' 46" West, 2354 feet to an iron monument on the South line of the North half of Section 34 in Township 2 South, Range 1 East" Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, distant thereon South 890 20' West" 2,649.63 feet from the intersection of fences at or near the Southeast comer of said North half of section 34. AP. Nos. 99B-3036-07 99B-3036:-08 ***.* EXHIBIT A FIRST AMERICAN TITLE EXHIBITLl- PJ:i.9 e ,:2. ;;- - PTR-2 Order No. 590193 Page No. 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY in the Unincorporated Area, County of Alameda, State of California, descnoed as follows: Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 in Section 34, Township 2 South, Range 1 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, and a portion of the Rancho Santa Rita, descnbed as follows: Beginning at the Northwestern comer of that certain piece of parcel of land descrIbed in that certain Deed to Owen P. Sutton, dated April 29, 1862, and recorded in Book "M" of Deeds, Page 266, Alameda County Records; running thence North 0030' West42 chains, 69 links, to the quarter section corner between Sections. 33 and 34, Township 2 South, Range 1 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian; thence North 880 40' East, 81 chains, 38 links, to the quarter section comer between Sections 34 and 35 in said Township and Range; thence South 44 ch~ 68 links to a point on the Northern boundary line of said parcel of land descnoed in said Deed to Sutton; thence West along said last named line, 80 chains, 79 links to the point of beginning. Excepting therefrom that portion lying East to the following descnoed line: Commencing at an iron monument on the Northerly right of way line of the State Highway leading from Santa Rita to livermore, as said right of way 66 feet in width, existed prior to June 18, 1915, distant thereon 2,674.36 feet Easterly from the intersection thereof with the fence line marking the Westerly boundary line of that certain 320 acre piece or parcel of land conveyed to James M. McCoy by Judicial Decree dated December 4, 1936 and recorded in liber 3441 of Official Records at Page 53 thereof, records of Alameda County, California, said.point of commencement being also, measured along said Northerly right of way line, North 890 20' West, 2,621.17 feet from the intersection thereof with the center line of Crock Road, as said Road now exists by that certain Deed from Henrietta Farrelly to the County of Alameda, dated October 6, 1917 and recorded in Liber 2612 of Deeds at Page, 352 thereof, records of Alameda County, California (the bearing of the Northerly right of way line of said State Highway being taken as North 890 20' Wet for the purpose of making this description and' all bearings herein contained are referred thereto); thence from said point of commencement No,rth 10 20' East 2,40433 feet to an iron monument; thence Northwesterly on the arc of a curve to the left, tangent to last said course, the radius of which curve is 400 feet, a distance of said arc of 279.22 feet to an iron monument; thence North 380 39' 45" West, 423.51 feet to an iron monument; thence Northwesterly, Northerly and Northeasterly on the arc of a curve to the right, tangent to last said course, the radius of which curve is 400 feet, a distance on said arc of 308.57 feet to an iron monument; thence North 50 32' 15" East, 1,321.63 feet to an iron monument; thence Northeasterly on the arc of a curve to the right, tangent to last said course, the radius of which curve is 800 feet, a distance of said arc of 224.10 feet to an iron monument; thence North 21035' 15" East, 500.08 feet FIRST AMERICAN TITLE EXHIBIT~9( 3 ~ PTR.2 Order No. 590194 Page No. 5 PARCEL 1WO: The land conveyed to Chang Su-O Un, et al, by Quitclaim Deed recorded September 21,1989, Series No. 89-258018, Official Records. Excepting therefrom that portion thereof lying northerly of the north line and the westerly extension of the north line of Parcel One above. PARCEL 11IREE: That portion of the south 112 of Section 27 and the north 112 of Section 34 lying westerly of the line descnbed in the Quitclaim Deed to Chang Su-O LiD, et aI. recorded December 27, 1991, Series No. 91-344397, Official Records, which is not included in Parcel One above. Excepting therefrom that. portion thereof lying northerly of the north line and the easterly extension of the north line of Parcel One above. A. P. No.'s 99B-3046-2-6 -2-7 -2-8 -2-9 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE EY~IBIT~I~~ ;- :>TR.2 Order No. 590194 Page No. 4 LEGAL DESCRlPTION REAL PROPERTY in the Unincorporated Area, County of Alameda, State of California, descnbed as follows: PARCEL ONE: Those portions of the south 112 of Section 27 and the north 112 of Section 34, all in Township 2 South, Range 1 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, descnbed as follows: Beginning at the northerly terminus of the center of Fallon Road in the southern boundary of the Fallon Ranch; thence along the center of an existing roadway; North 18 degrees 40 minutes West, 63.33 feet, North 34 degrees 59 minutes 21 seconds West, 100.06 feet, North 21 degrees 15 minutes West, 100.00 feet; North 3 degrees 00 minutes West, 100.00 feet and North 1 degree 00 minutes East, 100.00 feet; thence leaving said center of said roadway, and running aIong a tangent 170.00 feet radius curve to the left through a central angle of 40 degrees 20 minutes for an arc distance of 119.67 feet to a point of reverse curvature in an existing fence line in the westerly line of the westerly fork in said roadway; thence along said westerly line of said roadway and said fence line on a 500.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 35 degrees 45 minutes for an arc distance of 311.98 feet to a comer in said fence line; thence leaving said line of said roadway and continuing along said fence line and its westerly prolongation, North 82 degrees 40 minutes West, 200.00 feet; thence North 15 degrees 51 minutes 43 seconds West, 272.48 feet; thence North 13 degrees 30 minutes East, 45359 feet; thence East 470.00 feet to the hereinabove said westerly line of said roadway; thence along said line of said roadway on the following courses: North 37 degrees 40 minutes East 177.15 feet; North 27 degrees 15 minutes East, 182.90 feet, North 7 degrees 00 minutes West 100.00 feet, and North 11 degrees 00 minutes West, 130.00 feet; thence on the following courses: From a tangent bearing North 68 degrees 00 minutes West, running along a 160.00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 55 degrees 00 minutes for an arc distance of 153.59 feet to a point of reverse curvature; thence along a 100.00 foot radius curve to the left through a central angle of 15 degrees 20 minutes for an arc distance of 26.76 feet to a point of reverse curvature; thence aIong a 400.00 foot radiUs curve to the right through a central angle of 34 degrees 15 minutes for an arc distance of 239.11 feet to a point of reverse curvature; thence along a 170 foot radius curve to the left through a central angle of 34 degrees 35 minutes for an arc distance of 102.61 feet; thence North 28 degrees 40 minutes West 200.00 feet; thence along a tangent 165.00 feet radius curve to the right through a central angle of 34 degrees 53 minutes 33 seconds for an arc distance of 100.48 feet; thence west, 2432.15 feet to a point on a line connecting to the northwesterly and southwesterly fence corner of the Fallon Ranch; thence along said connecting line, South 0 degrees 50 minutes 33 seconds West 2830.10 feet to said southwesterly fence comer; thence. along the line of an existing fence line, East 2570.15 feet to the point of beginning. Excepting therefrom that portion thereof descnbed in the Quitclaim Deed to Fallon Enterprises recorded December 27, 1991, Series No. 91-344396, Official Records. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE EXHIBIT it r-9f!.. 6- PTR-2 , Order,No. 590195 Page No. 5 Thence leaving the aforesaid common line and along the South line of the said Chang Su—O Lin, et al parcel North 89° 52' 31" West, 2432.35 feet to the Southwest corner of the said Chang Su—O Lin, et al parcel, from which point a fence corner post found for the Southwest corner of that certain parcel. of land conveyed to Fredric Lin, et al, recorded.in Official Series No. 89-192776, Official Records of A lameda County, California, bears South 00° 50' 53" West, 2830.07 feet; thence along the West line of the said Chang Su—O Lin, et al parcel North 00°:56' 53" East, 2423.02 feet to the point of beginning. Bearings contained herein conform to the California Coordinate System Zone 3. . PARCEL TWO: The easement for ingress and egress granted in the deed to Corporation "A", recorded July 21, 1970, Reel 2658 OR, Image 337, Series No. 77341 as follows: Beginning at the Northerly terminus of the center of Fallon Road in the Southern boundary of the Fallon Ranch; thence East 31.66 feet along an existing fence line; thence leaving said fence line and North 18° 40' West, 63.33 feet; thence parallel with said fence line,West 31.66 feet; thence South 18° 40' East 63.33 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL THREE: An easement and right of way consistently 55 feet in width and at all points parallel with, adjacent to and immediately Westerly of the Easterly boundary of the real property described in the Deed from Corporation "A" to Land Research Concent by Deed recorded July 21, 1970 in Reel 2658, Image 340, Alameda County, which easement and right of way is appurtenant to and for the benefit of the Eastern 70 acres of the hereinbefore described Parcel 1,.(the Western line of said 70 acres being measured at a right angle to the Southern line of said Parcel 1), which easement and right of way is for roadway purposes only. - A.P. No. 99B-3046-2-15 • FIRST AMERICAN TITLE E 1BIT QCi �lo PTR-2 , Order No. 590195 Page No. 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY in the Unincorporated Area,.County of Alameda, State of.C'-21ifornia, described as follows: PARCEL ONE: Land description of a parcel of land to represent the current metes and bounds after that certain boundary adjustment approved by the Planning Department of Alameda County of January 2, 1992 - Certificate of Compliance and Boundary Adjustment, BA91-25 between that parcel of land conveyed to Chang Su-O Lin, et al, recorded in Official Series No.'s 81-078548 and No. 91-189062 of Official Records of Alameda County, California and that parcel of land conveyed to Fallon Enterprises Inc.. recorded in Official Series No. 70-077339 of Official Records of Alameda County, California; for the common boundary between above said parcels reference quitclaim deeds recorded in Official Series Number 91-34396 and.91-344397 of Official Records of Alameda County, California. LAND DESCRIPTION: Real Property in the South half of Section 27, Township 2 South, Range 1 East, M.D.M. and situate in the County of Alameda, State of California.. Beginning at a fence corner post found for the Northwest corner of the said Chang Su-O Lin, et al parcel; thence along the North line of the said Chang Su-O Lin, et al parcel North 89° 50'.49"East, 3710.28 feet to the newly created common North corner between the said Chang Su-O Lin parcel and the aid Fallon Enterprises, Inc. parcel, from which point a fence corner post found for the Northeast corner of the said Fallon Enterprises, Inc. parcel bears North 89° 50' 49" East, 1485.71 feet; thence along the common line between the said Chang Su-O Lin parcel and the said Fallon Enterprises, Inc. parcel the following eight (8) courses: 1) . South 00° 09' 11" East, 223.53 feet; 2) South 48° 46' 28" West, 1910.79 feet;, 3) South 00° 06'21" West, 300.00 feet to a 1 inch diameter iron pipe found with plastic plug stamped LS. 4233; 4) South 22° 53' 39" East, 21839 feet to a 1 inch iron pipe found with plastic plug stamped LS. 4233 to a point on a curve,from which point the center bears South 41°34'58" East; 5) in a Northeast direction 103.66 feet along the arc of the said non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 180.00 feet, through a central angle of 32° 59' 45" to a 1 inch diameter iron pipe found with plastic plug.stamped LS. 4233; 6) South 14° 39' 29" East, 253.60 feet to a 1 inch diameter iron pipe found with plastic plug stamped LS. 4233; 7) South 28° 26' 21" West, 217.82 feet to a 1 inch diameter iron pipe found with plastic plug stamped LS. 4233 for the beginning of a tangent curve to the left; 8) in a Southerly direction 63.67 feet along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 165.00 feet, through a central angle"of 22° 06' 27" to the Southeast corner of the said Chang Su-O Lin, et al parcel; FIRST AMERICAN TITLE EXHIBI-T 19 7 ;- F'TR.2 Order No. 590197 Page No. 6 LEGAL DESCRlmON REAL PROPERTY in the Unincorporated Area, County of Alameda, State of California, descnbed as follows: PARCEL 1: Lots 3 and 4, and the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 28, Township 2 South, Range 1 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian. PARCEL 2: Portion of the land descri1;>ed in the Deed to Frank Silva, dated October 11, 1904, Book 1015 of Deeds, Page 28, Alameda County Records, descnbed as follows: Beginning at a point on the Eastern line of County Road Survey No. 2568, distant thereon North 20 30' East 45.77 cbains from the Southern line of Plat 13, according to the "Map of the Property of the Estate of Elizabeth A. Dougherty", etc., filed May 11, 1891, Map Book 8, Page 75, Alameda County Records, and thence along said Eastern line North 20 30' East 8.91 chains to a point in the Northern boundary line of the said land descnbed in said Deed to Frank Silva; thence aIong the last named line North 540 30' East 6.52 chains; thence South sr 30' East 6.92 ch,ains to the most Northeastern comer of said Parcel of land descnbed in said Deed to Frank Silva; thence along the Eastern line of said Parcel of land; South 00 30' West 13.06 chains; thence North 860 50' West 12.54 chains to the point of beginning. AP. Nos. 946-680-3 (Affects Parcel 1) 946-680-4 (Affects Parcel 2) ..... EXHIBIT A FIRST AMERICAN TITLE EXHIBIT ~1't.'- ~< ~- rTR.2 Order No. 590196 Page No. 6 PARCEL TWO: That certain triangular portion of the Rancho San Ramon lying between the southerly line of Plot 13, as said plot is shown on that certain Map entitled, "Map of the property of the Estate of Elizabeth A Dougherty, (deceased), in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties", filed May 11, 1891, Map Book 8, Page 75, Alameda County Records, and the northerly line, and its direct extension westerly, of that certain tract of land containing 50 acres descnbed in the Deed made to Rasmus H. Carstenson, recorded November 7, 1874 in Book 98 of Deeds, Page 309, Alameda County Records. Excepting therefrom, that portion thereof which lies within the lines of County Road No. 2568, also known as Tassajara Road. Also excepting therefrom all that portion lying westerly of the West line of Tassajara Road, also known as County Road 2568. PARCEL 11IREE: Lots I and II, also known as Lots 1 and 2, and the East 112 of the northeast 114 and Lots III and IV, also known as Lots 3 and 4; of the southeast 1/4; Section 33, Township 2 South, Range 1 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian. PARCEL FOUR: Beginning at the point of intersection of the eastern line of County Road 2568 with the southern line of Lot 13,.as said lot is shown on the map of the property of the Estate of Elizabeth A. Dougherty, flied in the office of the County Recorder of said Alameda County on May 11, 1891 and of record in Map Book 8, Page 75; thence along said eastern line of County Road No. 2568, North 20 30' East 45.77 chains; thence leaving said eastern line of said County Road No. 2568, South 86050' East 12.54 chains to a point in the eastern line of that certain piece or parcel of land conveyed to Frank Silva, by Deed dated October 11, 1904 and recorded in Book 1015 of Deeds, Page 28; thence along the eastern line of said piece of land conveyed to Frank Silva, and said line extended South 0030' West 44.54 chains to the southeastern comer of said Lot 13; thence South 880 West along said southern line of Lot 13, 14 chains, more or less, to the point of beginning. Excepting from Parcels ThIee and Four above the land conveyed to the City of Pleasanton by Deed recorded November 20, 1992, Series No. 92-378021, Official Records. A. P. No. 946-1040-1-2 946-1040-2 946-1040-3-2 , , FIRST AMERICAN TITLE EY~IBIT~1~'? 17TR•2 . Order No. 590196 Page No. 5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY in the Township of Pleasanton, County of Alameda,State of California, described as follows: PARCEL ONE: Beginning at a point on the easterly line of Rancho San Ramon, distant thereon northerly 63.81 chains from a point in the center line of the State Highway formerly County Road from Dublin to Livermore, which last mentioned point is distant 78 links South from the southeasterly corner of said Rancho San Ramon; thence westerly along the northerly boundary line of that certain tract of land containing 800 acres described in the Deed made by Friederich Schweer, recorded June 25, 1869, Book 42, Page 264, Alameda County Records; a distance of 33.17 chains; thence northerly along the easterly boundary line of said tract of land containing 800 acres, a distance of 15.10 chains; thence easterly and parallel with said northerly boundary line of said 800 acre tract of land a distance of 33.17 chains to said easterly line of Rancho San Ramon; thence southerly along said easterly line of Rancho San Ramon, a distance of 15.10 chains to the point of beginning. Being a portion of said Rancho San Ramon. Excepting therefrom, that portion thereof which lies within the lines of County Road No. 2568, also known as Tassajara Road. Also excepting therefrom, that portion thereof included in the Final Decree of Condemnation made July 21, 1947 by the United States District Court, Northern District of California, Southern Division, in that certain Action No. 22352—R entitled "United States of America, Plaintiff vs.3396 acre of land, Ada Clement, et al., Defendants, a certified copy of which was recorded August 1, 1947 in Book 5132, Page 1, Alameda County Records, described as follows: • Beginning at the intersection of the western line of County Road No.2568, known as Tassajara Road, with the northern line' of the 800 acre tract of land described in the Deed to Friederich Schweer, recorded June 25, 1869, Book 42 of Deeds, Page 264, Alameda County Records; thence along said line of Tassajara Road, North 0° 30' East 313.15 feet to the line of the 3636.1222 acre tract of land described in the Amended Decree made June 4, 1945 from the District Court of the United States in and for the Northern District of California, Southern Division, Case No. 22352—R, United States of America, Plaintiff vs.3396 acres of land, etc.,Defendants, a certified copy whereof was recorded June 8, 1945 in Book 4721, Page.14, at the eastern extremity of the course shown therein as South 88°56' East 1191.25 feet; thence along the line of said 3636.1222 acre tract of land North 88° 56' West 1191.25. feet to the eastern line of said 800 acre tract of land; thence along the last mentioned line South 0° 30' West 319.73 feet to said northern line of the 800 acre tract of land; and thence along the last mentioned line South 89° 15' East 1191.20 feet to the point of beginning. Also excepting therefrom all that portion lying westerly of the West line of Tassajara Road, also known as County Road No. 2568. EXHIBIT Lger/6 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE ~- ~ - H lGe~.J:Cliii '0 I ~iii "WOZIU~ ~ >-.=~i!G2 ~ c =::"-0"'0. 0 :g 0.... IlIW -'5 ~ :~t~.15 Il ~~~~~: z ~ a ~<; .~ l<~ 0 2 ~ 25 .! Q,tot"CI'I:_ c S <0: :g~~~;: i= ~ ~ oi ; 8 <<1.8 : 0 0 I. · ~ ~ "0 ~ ~ .!!E 0 ~N .. ;; 0:. ~:::~~ e( r . c~ :i5 =- ~'g ge" I" ~i.! iii <. X set = ... co. Ol.: f CD i?:' - 8 ~ ~ !!:. ;gt1oE= w .. ~ ,..! ~~~~~ ~ ..~E a: -. Z !o '0 'C'Q. o8g .. .sill.!! .. ~; :~.~:~8 ~ z !~ la gon 'De:! 1ii ::S a'~~ f 0 ~ 0 u" :-g~~.8 c..: ~g~ 0 :-ozo(Q 1- e( ~ ~g :i~ ::. " ~ ~ ~" ....""'-0 iIoI . ~ 0 ~ m ~o-g .?:- . " .~ == ::iw=:~=n5 in z 2"E :~~ ,.. 10 c ,.. Uo :; 0 ~ ~o .r:=" ta Cl 5 ~ ~= '" g. :;iU 2i:~i::~ :i: -E 0-" :;i~=~Z8 .;8 0 w 0'" wag =< _ :18 ~ a: 1 W u< ~~~~~a x c:l ~ .'" ." 0 .0 ~~ ii ,.. eN 00 W ::l -,; ~a! ::''Q..,gc.!!:es ;-g<; a~ 0 ], ~!f c Ec 'il ~ ~.g.a ~;~ ~ .- ~~~:~~ '" Cig . " .0" .0 illl I' 0 .c;;l; 0< LL Ee -' ~~ "i~=~~~~ N "'. "'-" 0 u Q. U. "'J ~~:~o~ ::J " a~ 1Il< E ~~ ~ ,.. ;~ ~-c' Co 0 " 80 '" ~g~ '5 ~ g~.i' ~~~~~: ::> .8 " ~$"CI5~-o cE .c - .. . .gc6 1: 0 ~~~ 'Qcri 0" .ce 0 ;; & .. ~ .. a:...J E~~~~-E~ Cii's'6 0< i J -E II. e a:...J ,,>-< oCzct:lOrr U 0 ~ E 0 NO:" ~:~~):o( ~ ~~j~t~~ "l: 8 "<0: ~ :i1~~, ;:. ;:. ;:. " ;:. :i:e_. :~g~~~ g ..<u "' "' ~1i t! .. .. .. Iii ,,:>L <:; .. ;:~~ o(mG<):~ ~ 0 ~ % .: .; 0 " ~ L g " " 0 ~ ~ ii >- ~ = u 0 ~ L L 0 " 0 I' .... >- ;;; >- ~~fo'! N U I;::!i:! G~ >- ~~~~ 0< '" ~ :e~~ < .., e g~~ ~z U)~.!;!"otoj. C ~= :; ~~;~ ~~~ 0 "'. ~g g : ~;:O;~ "'- <~ >- r:J ~~~ <. %.... ~ .... %; :t2: ~- ~g~1ll ~~~ ::~ 0 g~ ~~1.I,l ,...~ f :z: <';' ~;:; ::i~g t:{~ 1.UU)<'I')...... gCl')$o') ~~~ ::E~ s:~ w :e~':!!'-.I ~~! . ~ "ill ~~~~ ~~~ ~d 2~ ~ ~~ ~~~ wv;::: 5 ;:: WZ 3; ~~.~ -,'" -'" ,.", ~~~. w ~':!! .~':!::' "0: ciS .W ~ g~ ~ffi~ "W '" :;:0> 0 ::E'" 3: Cl :9C1), 3: I S >:~ 2~ g~ E:~ ~g '" >C"' ~~ 1il c: w I ;j u .5.1 ... .... ~ ~co":' %~~~ -"'-= .Jg~; ffi"~ 0: w "' i~;~ w", ft :'>l:1Il 1-1::1010 %~.c:::.o( Ooll)~... iog: 00 '" ;;ggg u~. :~~,~ ,... I 0 C!:a.,.w ~~gg z.""-o g~dg cwz:.cr 0 eB '" ~~ III -'- """< ~ W ~~ I- ~~":- <I; /::'" ~~i 1- ~i;' C/) cl:: ~o:i a: ~ ~'=' w z: I- """z ~2~ ~ w ., 0" Z ;; ZQ)CO :J~9 ~ ~ .. ~ '" ~ o " ::z" ::ig 0> W 0: w III '" ~~ ~~ z":~ -Oc -'z: [:~ c:< w "' '" .W it w "' Cl> M III .... 0" "'_ zen: _ w.... ...lir9 wN Ill'" g= 5 ~- ~ 0: . WN '" '" % ::; <t <i w a: e( z. o i= <I; X W Z 5 d.o * Zeg ~ ~;! o ILl"'" % : II) C'I ~ ~~ ,... i~~ )' I ~ <>;~ i c. og~ I u.. ~~~~ '~ .JW f () ",Ill E >->- "N " r:c:<~ ~::~~ :1' ~i=~~ "'twOc: ll.~O=1/J ~;~~~ ::Q.o~< ... C:::ZIl. ~tiO-.o < ~;:n e,..u-9 ~5g ~~ wUa::= ~~~:it; o u~! :to >ICI 1-%0'" . go~~;~ SE~~:~ %%lIJoe... %=...0<0( ,.oe:Q.CQ.t.,) ...J ~~ e:~ ::s::~ ,,~ :;;g- s"", ~~ ~"' iO'" % ~N %0" <::h ",..., <(N: "''''0 ig! "-... 0"''' >ffi~ 1-" ti I~.... ~~ o~ ;:~ 0; z" 1:]< 0: w III %" . ::i 0 0::: '" ~o ffi ~ ~~ >- c: ";"- ow -= < 4') CJlo~ 0.. () a: <t i: :':g,,:, NOft ,0";'0 Z~~2 ~gg! ...." ww" iE-= WW ..Ill o ~~ %o:~ :J~ : -" .... W < 0: W ., <I; -I. <I; 1- o 1- % :3 '\ 1 \ \ z,-.."01rOt..1'K Hd'f ~90!n~1l6"ON S:31!l3S NI1 . ft o NO z;; g2 - w_.; -l c: ~: w 0_ en ao~ C-~~" NdV 9LaS~-t:2"'ON S3I~3S AN1fdI'lO:> awn Nnaoo f- ~ ~~ 0....... ~ ~~~ Cl~ Cl~ ::~ og:: g~ -'0 ",MN "'.,. :.t~~ 0- 0- :;'''' >co, >co, "'''' ~gg .:g .:g 0", \g~ 0"'''' 0;", 5~ u~~ ts~ "'c:c: ~$ $lffi "'''' "'''' '" '" -~ ~~~~ ~ffi~g~rei ~ ~::;5;:;;!! -< El:-t')cn_ 'I I <::::r::w.cnt(lii:: "<"'" ~_.~" < ~~ ~ I ffi~~~ -f .J ~o ~~ C? < ... c( M .... ~~ ~ffi ~"~'2~~~2~~ i5~ ~~ ;.;.ffi~2~g~~i -08 ~ o:~ a:O).......tC~........ ;;jo => >-ot,...i5ot,...oo$ oz. < =; <~%; ~! m~31~ CDa:ffi~ ffi ti:ffi ~C:ffi fin < V) oct en '" W H.~ o..rt"a 't:l'O tA1i r '.9S: 'OH OVOtr) OYO~ YtiYrY$SY J. >.>::::...: U~!~~~ ;!c:::-~ o~~:l~:;~ ,..=Z<OIllU ~~~!~:g :::: C-lU :;) :;)lIo. -g...o gO~gCtor;() >>-Q -oC ~5~a;:5~ g~~~:=~ SO~:~OIL i=,""l>-c:~;;;o :~~~g-~ ~~~&~gg . <cu....IlG::: '-avo:.I:fI'N$S'Y J.;IC) A.VM":ICr-~ J.'ti:t.LSiM: " Iii %l!: 0011).,. Ul":,,gg c: 0.01 "'I' ~3~! U'J'ZC:OZ <ID.e~ 0- 0: W " :l:M. ~",;:;;:; ::'g~~ C~.o<o ~'lQ,""Q) "'ggg ~f3~:Z tierCEl? "''''''' "''''''' C. ..:roz ffi~~ "':T- ~ ",G' l'i: ~S ::::; !.: Q J.ll > EXHIBIT~ J.ll U J.ll ~ • ORDINANCE NO. - 94 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN AMENDING THE-ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT THE PREZONING OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED GENERALLY NORTH OF I-580 BETWEEN TASSAJARA AND FALLON ROADS WITHIN THE EASTERN DUBLIN EXTENDED PLANNING AREA The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows: Section 1. Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Dublin Ordinance Code is hereby amended •in the following manner: Approximately 1,538 acres consisting of lands within the.Eastern Dublin Extended Planning Area and located generally north of I-580 between Tassajara And Fallon Roads, more specifically described as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 946-1040-1-2, 946-1040-2, 946- 1040-3-2, 946-680-3, 946-680-4, 99B-3036-1, 99B-3036-7, 99B-3036-8, 99B-3046-2-2(por) , 99B-3046-2-6, 99B-3046-2-7, 99B-3046-2-8, 99B-3046-2-9, 99B-3046-2-15, 99B-3036-NA, 946- 500-3, 946-1040-3-3, 99B-3026-3-1, 99B-3005-1-2, 99B-3005-1-3, 946-500-1-1, 946-500-2-1, 946-500-1-2, 946-500-2-2, 99B-3026-1, 99B-3026-2, 99B-3036-5, are prezoned to a PD Planned Development District, PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin, as shown on Exhibit A (Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and Addendum to FEIR dated August 22, 1994) and Exhibit B (Approval, Findings and General Provisions of the PD, Planning Development Prezoning), on file with the City of Dublin Planning Department, are hereby adopted as regulations for the future use, improvement, and maintenance of the property within this District. A map depicting the prezoning area is outlined below: 011•, - PRO YEGT w o ouatm an was DUBLIN i= ;SITE'-' o - 0 1.580 • Qo. e •PLEASANTON . r n Sectio 2. VICINITY MAP -• This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days after its adoption. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California. • PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City council of the City of Dublin, on this day of October, 1994. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk <� S /resos-aals/94-030ard xrf � 3.�; %'µ } ".. . (/l ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ;..c. ~ ""- 9 " .. ".. .".".- .. .. -- co\j~\'{.. ~ OS\ J:l.. .. .".".- ~ r\~~ C " ... ~'{ \..\~ CO~ .. ~ ". CO'U\" ..'" t-~'C.\)f:o. ~\..t'" ci 0: >- t- o: UJ ~ ::> o Q 1.580 .PLEASANTON VICINITY MAP N.T.S. It Aua.t , Regular Meeting - September 6, 1994 A regular meeting of the city of Dublin Planning commission was held on September 6, 1994, in the Dublin civic Center council Chamber. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Commissioner North. * * * * * * * * * * ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Burnham, North, Rafanelli and zikai Laurence L. Tong, Planning Directori Carol cirelli, Senior Planneri and Fawn Holman, Recording Secretary. * * * * * * * * * * PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Cm. North led the commission, staff, and those present in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. * * * * * * * * * * ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA The minutes of the August 15, 1994, meeting were approved as submitted. * * * * * * * * * * ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None * * * * * * * * * * WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None * * * * * * * * * * PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin Annexation/Detachment and Prezone #1 request for prezoninq a 1,538 acre site, annexinq the 1,538 acres to the city of Dublin and 4 additional acres to Dublin San Ramon Services District and detachinq 1,029 acres from the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District located within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan planning area. Cm. North opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Ms. Carol cirelli, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, indicating that Staff recommended the Planning commission find the pre zoning to be consistent with the city's amended General Plan and --------------------------~------------------------------------------- Regular Meeting [9-6minJ PCM-1994-98 September 6, 1994 AttacIInBIt . ~ . Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and recommend city council approval of the prezone request. Staff also recommended that the Planning Commission support the annexation request and recommend City Council adoption of a resolution of application to the Alameda County Local Agency Formation Committee (LAFCo). Cm. Zika referred to page 2 of the staff report, and asked Staff for clarification as to the meaning of "a majority of the property owners who contacted the city concurred with the project." Ms. Cirelli responded that a property owners' meeting was held during the beginning stages of the project processing; although, few of the property owners attended. However, a majority of those property owners who attended concurred with the prezoning request. Cm. Zika asked exactly how many property owners attended the meeting. Ms. Cirelli indicated that 3 of 11 property owners showed up; 2 out of the 3 concurred with the application request. Cm. North asked if only 3 of 11 property owners had been contacted. Ms. Cirelli indicated that Staff had communicated with all 11 property owners through a letter which explained the project and how it would affect their property. The letter not only announced the meeting date, but indicated that individual meetings could also be arranged. Two property owners who could not attend the meeting, met individually with Staff at a later date. Ms. Cirelli further indicated that a second letter, in the form of a questionnaire, was sent out the previous week, asking property owners to indicate whether or not they concurred with the annexation and prezone request. Three responses had been received to date; two consenting, one dissenting. Cm. North asked what percentage of the 11 property owners had responded. Ms. Cirelli indicated that a percentage had not been computed. Mr. Tong pointed out that 3 of the 11 property owners were public entities: East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD), CalTrans and the City of Pleasanton. Cm. North referred to a portion of page 2 of the staff report which read, "However, property owners controlling the majority of the project site concur with this request." He asked what percentage of annexation property did the consenting property owners represent. Ms. Cirelli responded that the Jennifer Lin family, one of the Applicant's, owned 70% of the total project area. Cm. North felt the statement on page 4 of the staff report which read, "Several of the property owners have consented to the annexation, II was unclear as to what percentage of the property owners had consented. --------------------------~------------------------------------------- Regular Meeting [9-6minJ PCM-1994-99 September 6, 1994 Cm. Zika also felt the statement was unclear. Ms. Cirelli indicated that the statement may be ambiguous because not all of the property owners had responded to the initial request for comments. This lack of response necessitated the questionnaire being sent out as a second request for comments. Cm. Zika suggested that Staff present the Commission with specific numbers in future staff reports, or more clear explanations. Cm. North agreed with the suggestion. Cm. Zika asked if a dissenting property owner could be automatically annexed to the City. Ms. Cirelli indicated yes. Mr. Tong reiterated that some difficulty had arisen because several property owners had not responded to either of the two Staff communications. Cm. North invited public comment, reminding the speakers to keep their comments to a 5-minute limit. Martin Inderbitzen, representing Jennifer Lin, referred to page 46 of 62 of the staff report and identified the parcels by property ownership to provide clarification as to which owners concurred, to his knowledge, with the application: Casterson (agreed) ; Koller (agreed) ; EBRPD (agreed) ; Gygi (disagreed) ; Jennifer Lin (agreed) ; Dublin Land Co. (disagreed) ; Paoyeh Lin (neutral) ; Devany (no response) ; CalTrans (no response) ; and Maynard (no response) . He felt there was clear predominance of property ownership in support in support of the application. Mr. Inderbitzen further indicated his client, Jennifer Lin, concurred with Staff ' s conclusion that combining their application with surrounding property owners would result in a logical and contiguous annexation request to LAFCo. They also concurred with the draft resolution for prezoning which included the provisions for a school mitigation agreement. They agreed with Staff 's analysis of environmental impacts and, as a result, believed that the application generated no new policy issues. He pointed out that the application represented a first phase annexation in Eastern Dublin, and indicated that development would also be phased. Before any development occurred, property owners would be required to submit detailed development plans which would require Planning Commission and City Council approval. Mr. Inderbitzen ended his presentation by pledging to work cooperatively with the City, Alameda County and other property owners regarding development issues. He indicted that they had already begun to work proactively with the City and the school districts on issues affecting school facilities. Robert Thurbin, representing Livermore School District, indicated that Livermore School District, as well as Dublin School District, had r Regular Meeting PCM-1994-100 September 6, 1994 [9-6min] previously raised concerns about the impact the project would have on the school districts. After meeting with city staff and the Applicants, which resulted in the inclusion of Item F of Draft Resolution, Exhibit B (School Facilities Impact Mitigation), Livermore School District formally confirmed. their satisfaction with the conditions of approval. Doug Abbot, 8206 Rhoda Avenue, felt the process was premature in that it was his understanding that the city council would be reconsidering its approval of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan during their next meeting. Cm. North responded that if an area was to be prezoned, the only purpose of the Planning commission was to make a recommendation, if appropriate, to the Council that they consider the application. Therefore, final action was also taken by the City Council. To his knowledge, the Council would not be reviewing this application next week; although, they might be reviewing some other matter regarding Eastern Dublin. Mr. Abbott thanked Commissioner North for his explanation. Art Dunkley, representing co-Applicant Clyde Casterson, ,concurred with Mr. Inderbitzen's statement regarding no new policies being generated by the application. Marjorie Koller, owner of Yarra-Yarra Ranch on Tassajara Road, concurred with the Applicants' statementsj however, expressed concern for the safety of her ranch's licensed water district. Cm. North indicated that the fact that she had a water district was included in the staff report, and asked Staff how Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) would handle the matter. Ms. Cirelli responded that Ms. Koller's l,200-foot deep well may be affected if and when she applied for subdivision of her property. Cm. North recommended that Ms. Koller work with DSRSD to resolve the matter, indicating that Staff could provide her with a contact person at DSRSD. John DiManto, Dublin Land Company, requested to go on record as opposing the annexation and also opposing their property being included in the application. He felt the application lacked binding, recordable development agreements with the city, DSRSD and other governmental agencies. Hearing no further comments from the public, Cm. North closed the public hearing. Cm. Burnham asked Staff how binding the agreements were with the other governmental agencies (City of Pleasanton, CalTrans and EBRPD) involved, and questioned what would happen if one of the agencies backed out. --------------------------~------------------------------------------- Regular Meeting [9-6min] PCM-1994-101 September 6, 1994 Mr. Tong indicated that those entities did not have to concur and typically do not respond or take a formal position. EBRPD had indicated that they supported the application, although neither the City of Pleasanton nor CalTrans had responded to the application. Cm. Zika asked if the school district would be determined at the County or State Board of Education level. Cm. North responded that the Board of Education usually required schools to be in the district of the city in which the school would reside. Mr. Tong indicated that the school district determination was beyond the scope of LAFCo. Cm. Zika asked if park districts were subject to LAFCo. Mr. Tong indicated yes. Cm. North suggested that, if the Commission decided to recommend City Council approval, Mr. DiManto's (Dublin Land Company) opposition to the annexation be forwarded to the Council. On motion by Cm. Zika, seconded by Cm. Rafanelli, and with a vote of 4-0, the Planning Commission adopted RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 027 A RESOLUTION FINDING PA 94-030 EASTERN DUBLIN ANNEXATION/DETACHMENT AND PREZONE #1 WITHIN SCOPE OF FINAL EIR RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 028 RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR ESTABLISHING FINDINGS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) PREZONING #1 CONCERNING PA 94-030 EASTERN DUBLIN RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 029 RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DIRECT CITY OF DUBLIN STAFF TO MAKE AN APPLICATION TO THE ALAMEDA COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCo) FOR ANNEXING 1, 538 ACRES LOCATED WITHIN THE EASTERN DUBLIN PLANNING AREA TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND 4 ADDITIONAL ACRES TO DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT AND DETACHING 1, 029 ACRES FROM LIVERMORE AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT AND INVOLVED IN THE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT (PD) PREZONING REQUEST FILED UNDER PA 94-030 EASTERN DUBLIN ANNEXATION/DETACHMENT AND PREZONE #1 * * * * * * * * * * NEW OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS Mr. Tong indicated that on September 12th, the City Council would review the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) issue and consider an Regular Meeting PCM-1994-102 September 6, 1994 [9-6min] AUGUST 22, 1994 ADDENDUM TO THE EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/ SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Update of Plans to Provide Sewer Service On May 10, 1993 , the City Council for the City `of Dublin certified the Environmental Impact Report. (EIR) for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan (the Plan) . The EIR assesses the potential environmental effects of implementation of the Plan in the Eastern Dublin area over the next 20 to 30 years. This addendum serves as an update of the plans of the City and of the Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) to provide sewer _ service to development in Eastern Dublin. Summary of Information in the EIR on Sewage Treatment and Disposal Chapter 3 .5 of Part 1 of the EIR discusses potential impacts and mitigation measures relating to sewer service, including collection, treatment, and disposal. As the EIR explained, DSRSD is actively planning to provide wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal service to Eastern Dublin. DSRSD currently collects and treats wastewater from Dublin, and then pumps it to wastewater export facilities owned and operated by the Livermore Amador Valley Water Management Agency (LAVWMA) . LAVWMA then pumps the treated wastewater ,. to a disposal facility operated by the East Bay Dischargers Authority (EBDA) , which in turn discharges the treated wastewater to the San Francisco Bay. Impact Nos. 3 .5/D and 3 .5/E of the EIR, as revised in. Response to • Comments Numbers 32-21 through 32-23 , identify DSRSD's limited treatment and disposal capacity as a potentially significant impact. It is unlikely that the current capacity of DSRSD's treatment plant will be sufficient to treat substantial wastewater from development within Eastern Dublin. Impact No. 3 .5/G of the EIR identifies the limited export capacity of LAVWMA as a potentially significant impact. LAVWMA' s current allocation of export capacity from EBDA would not be sufficient to serve development within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area, which would require an average total daily export capacity of 4 . 3 MGD-ADWF (million gallons per day-average dry weather flow) . A key mitigation to the above impacts relied on the efforts of the Tri-Valley Wastewater Authority (TWA) . At the time the EIR was certified, TWA was in the process of planning construction of a wastewater disposal system to handle flows in excess of the LAVWMA system. TWA certified an EIR analyzing three alternatives sufficient to provide such capacity. The alternative which was then favored by TWA called for pumping raw (i.e. untreated) wastewater north to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) for treatment and disposal. One of the other alternatives involved purchase of additional capacity from EBDA for discharging treated wastewater to the San Francisco Bay. /eiradden 3 1 - AduneV If- theme--CCCSD alternative were adopted, there would be no need to expand the DSRSD Treatment Plant, since DSRSD would be allowed to discharge untreated water. However, if TWA were to adopt an alternative calling for export of treated water, such as the EBDA alternative, .DSRSD would have to expand its treatment plant. The schedule for such expansion was set forth in Mitigation .Measure No. 3 .5/-9-0, as ..revised in Response_ to Comment No. 32-23-. ;:Mitigation Measure No. 3.5/11.0 called for the City to support TWA 'in ±ts•°ef-forts to implement a new wastewater export pipeline system. Mitigation Measures 3 .5/4. 0 and 3 .5/7 . 1 required "will-serve" letters of developers from DSRSD as a condition of the issuance of a grading permit. Update to Information in the EIR on Sewage Treatment and Disposal .,,_ :. The above information summarized from the EIR should be updated as follows: 1. `BAs reflected in the attached update letter from DSRSD dated July 1994 (attached) , TWA has formally transferred to LAVWMA its ':status as "lead agency" for the development of a wastewater disposal system to handle flows in excess of LAVWMA's current -system. LAVWMA has accepted this transfer and will now take TWA' s place in securing adequate wastewater pipeline capacity. DSRSD, a member of LAVWMA, is authorized to pursue such .2.'additional capacity, up to 5.4 MGD, with or without the ';participation of LAVWMA's other members. (See "Second ;`'1Glod�ification to LAVWMA Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement" , . attached) . Thus, Mitigation Measure 3.5/11. 0 should be revised as .follows: "Support -TWA LAVWMA and DSRSD in its their current efforts - . to implement a new wastewater export pipeline system, which ., would also.. serve Eastern Dublin." 2 . :Thepreferred`.-disposal alternative is now export of treated 4 - •-wart-ewater through EBDA, rather than export of untreated wastewater through CCCSD. Negotiations are underway with EBDA forthe purchase of such capacity. All members of EBDA -have indicated a willingness to approve the 12 .7 MGD, once the terms of payment for such capacity are worked out. Out of this 12 .7 MGD, DSRSD is expected to have 5.4 MGD. With the implementation of this alternative, DSRSD will have to expand its treatment facilities, as set forth in the EIR. With these minor technical amendments and additions, the EIR will continuea:to adequately address sewage treatment and disposal issues in Eastern ,Dublin. /eiradden -'2 SAN ., DUBLIN Vp�o`.t 7051 Dublin Boulevard r��JCx` SAN RAc'Yi O N "' • Dublin.California 9'.o8 N : n;.,:°} yY F ," :.-C.310 829 1150 SERVICES ,,..4•Y�4 v2 ° os DISTRICT r?�ES��/ 510 823 0515 July 19, 1994 Ms. Carol Cirelli, Senior Planner City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Subject: Information Related to TWA and LAVWMA Dear Carol: As you have requested, I have enclosed copies of information provided by the Tri-Valley Wastewater Agency (TWA) and the Livermore-Amador Valley Water Management Agency (LAVWMA) related to the transition of responsibility for implementing a wastewater export project. With the actions on the part of both of those agencies, it is our opinion that no further significant environmental issues related to sewage export are now present beyond those identified in the Eastern Dublin and TWA FEIR's. I am not sending a copy of the TWA FEIR certified by that agency as I understand you have that report. As you will see, the TWA FEIR treated all options including the option now currently favored (export of treated wastewater to the west and discharged through the EBDA system) equally. It was our intent in commenting on the Eastern Dublin Specific PIan and Environmental Impact Report that the significant issues related to wastewater were not associated with which agency implemented the project but rather with the physical facilities which would be needed to implement a project. With the transition from TWA to LAVWMA, there has been no change in the nature of the physical facilities contemplated. We, thus, believe there are no new significant issues. If you have any further questions on this matter, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Sincerely, ‘/-M; BERT MICHALCZYK Technical Services Manager BLM:sjc Enclosure The Dobhn San Ramon Son1r Dt,trxt tea Public Entity F:\usc r\c onley\wp51\mic halcz\later\c irclli.ltr .- DES:dfr 8/10/93 (001/35) RES 0 L UTI 0 N TWA NO. 93-1 RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING LEAD AGENCY STATUS FOR IMPLEMENTING HEREIN DESCRIBED WASTEWATER MANAGE- MENT PLAN FOR THE LIVERMORE-AMADOR VALLEY AND, UPON ACCEPTANCE THEREOF, PROVIDING FOR COOPERA- TIVE EFFORTS PERTAINING THEP~TO WHEREAS, the Tri-Valley Wastewater Authority ("TWA") has carried out the duties. and responsibilities of . "Lead Agency" under the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Res. Code ~21000 et seq.; "CEQA") with respect to a .proposed Long-Range Wastewater Management Plan for the Livermore-Amador Valley (the "Wastewater Plan"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution TWA No. 92-3, entitled, "Resolution Certifying the Subsequent Final Environmental Impact Report for _ the Long-Range Wastewater Management Plan for the Livermore-Amador Valley", adopted Oc,!=ober 22, 1992, this Board certified the Subsequent Final Environmental Impact Report ("SEIR") for the Wastewater Plan; and WHEREAS, the final SEIR consists of (1) the draft SEIR dated Janu~ry 31, 1992, (including technical appendices contained in a separate companion volume); (2) a separate document dated August, 1992, containing (i) all comments received on the draft SEIR during the public review period, (ii) a list of persons, organizations and public agencies commenting on the draft SEIR, (iii) the proposed. responses of TWA thereto, and (iv) revisions to the text, tables and figures of the draft SEIR; and (3) errata sheet dated October 15, 1992 ("SEIRII as used herein includes all of said documents); and I : ~ DES:df~ 8/10/93 (001/35) WHEREAS, subsequent to the certification of the SEIR, this Board has assessed the feasibility of proceeding with the various alternatives described in the SEIR for - implementation of the -Wastewater Plan; and WHEREAS, asa result of said assessment, it has become apparent to this Board that, at the current time, the most feasible proj ect alternative is that. designated, "Alternative West 2" in the SEIR, which provides for treatment of wastewater within the Livermore-Amador Valley area with disposal thereof in the San Francisco Bay via the existing outfall facilities of the East Bay Dischargers Authority ("EBDA"); and WHEREAS, further review of the proposed Wastewater Plan also indicates that a proj ect providing for not more than 12.7 mgd (millions of gallons per day) average dry weather flow ("ADWF") utilizing the EBDA outfall facilities is that which is currently most feasible; and 1VHEREAS, the Livermore-Amador Valley Water Management Agency C'LAVWt-fA") is a public entity established and existing by joint exercise of powers agreement entered into by and among the Cities of Livermore andPleasanton, California, and the Dublin San Ramon Services District, which cities and District are also member agencies of the TWA; and 1VHEREAS, LAVWMA currently owns, operates and maintains wastewater pumping and transmission facilities which transport treated wastewater from the Livermore-Amador Valley through the EBDA outfall facilities into San Francisco Bay; and ~ : -;;;.. 2 ;- DES:dfr 8/10/93 (001/35) WHEREAS, for purposes of economy and consistency in governmental operations, the Cities of Pleasanton and Livermore, California, and the Dublin San Ramon Services District propose to 'implement the Wastewater Plan as a LAVWMA project not to exceed 12.7 mgd ADWF in conjunction with EBDA; and WHEREAS, in pursuance thereof, TWA desires to transfer Lead Agency status under CEQA for the Wastewater Plan (as described above) to LAVWMA in order that that agency shall have the benefit of "prior work performed by TWA as Lead Agency and to authorize LAVWMA to implement the above-described proj ect independently of TWA's interests; NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TRI-VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY, as follows: 1. Lead Agency status for implementation of the Wastewater Plan consisting of a proj ect not to exceed 1"2.7 mgd ADWF, is hereby transferred from TWA to LAVWMA and, upon acceptance thereof, LAVWMA shall assume said status pursuant to CEQA. "2. Upon acknowledgement by LAVWMA that it has accepted the Lead Agency status under CEQA for implementation of the above-described not-to-exceed 12.7 mgd ADWF project in conjunction with EBDA, the manager of this Authority is hereby authorized and directed to transmit the SEIR together with a certified copy of Resolution TWA 92-3 to LAVWMA and, further, to meet and confer with the Hariager of LAVWMA to ascertain what further documentation and other assistance may be provided by TWA ! : 3 ;- DES:dfr B/IUjYj (OUl/jj) to assist LAVWMA in carrying out its role as Lead Agency. 3. Upon acceptance by LAVWMA aforesaid, this Board does hereby offer to provide such other cooperative efforts as may be ,necessary or convenient to LAVWMA in carrying out its Lead Agency role. * * * ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Tri-Valley 'Ylastewater Authority, a public entity, at its regular meeting held on the 18th day of Auqust 19931 and passed by the following vote: DIRECTOR NUMBER OF VOTES AYES: Cathie Brown Joseph Covello Jeffrey Hansen Dorothy Scribner John Stein Ben Tarver 1 1 1 1 1 1 NOS: Edward Campbell 2 CHAl ABSENT: None ATTEST: I I I .;:.. 4 • Approved as corrected:9/15/93 TRI-VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY MINUTES BOARD OF DIRECTORS AUGUST 18, 1993 The meeting was held in the City Hall Council Chambers of the City of Pleasanton. Directors Present: Cathie Brown, Edward Campbell, Joe Covello, Jeffrey Hansen, Dorothy Scribner, John Stein, Ben Tarver Directors Absent: None Staff Present: Robert Whitley, David Schricker, Chris McGill Others Present: Hank Ackerman, Bill Adams, Bob Anderson, Marian Breitbart, Deborah Crowe, John Hines, Clarence Hoenig, Garry Lee, Peter MacDonald, Bob Okamura, Chuck Weir and others 1. CALL TO ORDER With a quorum present, the regular monthly meeting of the Board of Directors of the Tri-Valley Wastewater Authority (TWA) was called-to order by Chairperson Covello at 7:45 p.m. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR A motion to approve the consent calendar was made by Director Brown and seconded by Director Stein. The consent calendar item for approval of the minutes of the regular meeting held July 28, 1993, and the Accounts Payable Report were approved unanimously. Actions: 1. Approved minutes of the regular meeting held on July 28, 1993. 2. Approved payment of $4,001.53 to individuals; consultants, contractors and vendors listed on the Accounts Payable Report dated August 18, 1993. (Please see Item 4, Manager's Report, for related action.) Page1 - ~- TWA Board Minutes August 18, 1993 3. TRANSFER PROJECT LEAD AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES TO LA VWMA Chairperson Covello suggested that adoption of Resolution 93-1 be referred to the September meeting. Directors Tarver and Scribner proposed TWA adopt the resolution on the condition that lead agency status be accepted by LAVWMA. Director Campbell expressed the opinion that transfer of lead agency was a "back door method" of destroying TWA, that the resolution as proposed subverted the JPA and that it was questionable whether it met CEQA requirements. He stated that, if the proposal passed, it would be contrary to the JPA on investments and contributions by the Member Agencies. Everyone who put the JPA together was aware of how to pay into it and how the money would be reimbursed as the project proceeded or capacity allocations were voted upon. He stated for the record that if the resolution passed, Alameda County intended to protect its interests. Director Campbefl added that, in his opinion, LA VWMA would not meet the requirements of the City of Hayward's resolution. The next point made by Director Campbell was that, if the Board voted to adopt Resolution 93-1, it was in essence giving notice that they no longer intended to participate in a project with TWA. Director Covello responded that, from the point of view of DSRSD, that was not true. The course of action may be to do something different, but TWA's JPA clearly speaks about a variety of projects. Director Campbell stated that he didn't know how DSRSD intended to vote on the resolution, but if DSRSD voted to change the lead agency for a project that was identified and paid for by the member agencies of TWA, it would appear that it no longer wished to participate in a project of TWA. Director Covello stated that DSRSD would, be voting only to transfer the lead agency status. Director Tarver added that if transfer to LA VWMA passed, TW A would still be in existence. Director Stein added that 'the JP A specifically speaks of a five-year time period for withdrawal from TW A and that would require a separate motion. Director Campbell reiterated that, since there are three agencips that might have a desire to pursue a project and transfer it to another agency, giving it the lead agency designation on a project that has been worked on by TWA for eight years, it would appear that the desire would be to not participate in' a project in TWA. Director CoveJlo reinforced Mr. Tarver's comment that TWA would still exist even if LAVWMA became the lead agency, that the wording of the resolution was clear and there was nothing else intended or implied. 't : Page 2' ;- TWA Board Minutes August 18, 1993 Motion to adopt Resolution 93-1 was made by Director Scribner, seconded by Director Brown. Motion carried with two dissenting votes from Director Campbell. Action: Adopted Resolution 93-1: Resolution Transferring Lead Agency Status for Implementing Herein Described Wastewater Management Plan for the Livermore-Amador Valley and, Upon Acceptance Thereof, Providing for Cooperative Efforts Pertaining Thereto 4. RESCIND REQUEST TO EBDA FOR POSSIBLE DISPOSAL CAPACITY Chairperson Covello noted that this item related to a letter from the EBDA General Manager in which EBDA postponed discussions about use of the existing outfall until TWA and LAVWMA resolved the issue of which agency would proceed with the request. Director Campbell repeated that this reinforced his conclusion that TWA was not participating in a project by rescinding the request which laid om very blatantly that TWA members had no desire to participate in a project with TWA. Director Tarver responded that the resolution spoke to LA VWMA being the lead agency to clear up any confusion so EBDA would be willing to discuss a possible project. Director Campbell responded that the action precluded a member agency of TWA from pursuing a project by designating a lead agency and then withdrawing a request for consideration for capacity in a project. Director Covello stated that the motion was a rescission of a previous letter. Motion to rescind request to EBDA for possible disposal capacity was made by Director Tarver, seconded by Director Stein. Motion carried with two dissenting votes from Director Campbell. Action: Passed motion to withdraw request to EBDA for possible disposal capacity. 5. MANAGER'S REPORT ) Mr. Whitley directed the Board's attention to the memorandum regarding general liability and errors and omissions insurance [Please note that !he memorandum is incorrectly dated March 4, 1993 and should be dated August 18, 1993}. He explained that the Authority is required to have liability insurance under the provisions of the JP A. TWA has historically carried two major policies: general liability and errors and omissions. These policies run from Augu$t to August; the current policy expired on August 15, 1993. Be.cause of recent state law which requires the signing of acceptance of the fact that the insurance carrier is not an admitted carrier in the state of California, Mr. Whitley felt it was inappropriate to bind the renewal of the policies without the consent of the Board.: The quotes received for both polides were from Page S TWA Board Minutes August 18, 1993 carriers who are not admitted carriers in California. The memo (attached) summarized the two policies. The carrier for the general liability policy has been Nautilus Insurance Company. They quoted a premium of $2,552.64. Nautilus is a non- admitted insurer and Mr. Whitley had been unable to obtain other quotes to submit to the Board for consideration. The insurer for the errors and omissions policy in prior years was American Empire Surplus Line, a non-admitted insurer. They provided a quote of $3,767.25. An alternate quote from International Insurance Co. (a California admitted insurer) is $3,827.00. Mr. Whitley's recommendation, which required a special added item to the agenda, was to authorize the issuance of general liability to Nautilus for the premium amount of $2,552.64 and to change carriers for E&O to International Insurance at the higher premium of $3,827.00. Mr. Schricker recommended addressing the item in two stages: first to add the matter of consideration of insurance to the agenda (a 5/7ths vote was needed) and second consider the issue of insurance. Director Stein moved and Director Hansen seconded that the issue of insurance be added to the agenda. Motion carried unanimously.. Mr. Schricker explained the distinction between an;admitted and non-admitted carrier: Essentially the difference is that under the California insurance code, the admitted carriers are licensed in California and participate in the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA). Consequently, in the event of financial instability or dissolution or the inability of an admitted carrier to provide coverage, coverage is provided to the degree available from funds from CIGA. Therefore, the issue is one of financial backing of an admitted carrier. Generally, admitted carriers are recommended over non-admitted carriers. In fact, the insurance code requires surplus line brokers to exhaust all reasonable efforts to place insurance with an admitted carrier in favor of non-admitted carriers. The insureds under law are placed on notice. That is why TWA received a notice that the initial proposal was to place insurance with a non-admitted carrier. Director Hansen added that CIGA will only respond to claims that were admitted to insurers that are bankrupt. The statutory limit is $500,000 plus a deductible per claim—$1 million each occurrence and a $1 million aggregate under the Nautilus policy. Mr. Schricker added that in selecting a non-admitted carrier their • financial rating should be taken into consideration. • Motion to engage Nautilus Insurance Company for general liability insurance and i International Insurance Co. for errors and omissions insurance was made by Director Page 4- .- TWA Board Minutes August 18, 1993 Hansen, seconded by Director Stein. Motion passed with two dissenting votes by Director Campbell. Director Hansen expressed the opinion that the insurance agent should be directed to look into admitted California insurance carriers. Actions: 1. Approved the addition of the issue of insurance to the TWA Agenda. 2. Approved Nautilus Insurance as the insurance carrier for general ' liability insurance and International Insurance Co. as the insurance carrier for errors and omissions insurance. A Supplemental Accounts Payable Report for payment of insurance premiums of $6,379.64 was approved. 6. COMMENTS FROM BOARD MEMBERS Director Stein asked jf there was any input as to whether San Leandro had considered theEBDA letter and what action, if any, was taken. Mr. Whitley reported that he had not yet received a report. Chuck Weir of EBDA added that the letter was scheduled to be on their agenda on Monday evening, but he had not heard what had happened. 7. ADJOURNMENT TO SEPTEMBER 15, 1993 The meeting adjourned at 8:10p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting to be held Wednesday, September 15, 1993, at the City Hall of Pleasanton. Respectfully submitted, /2 ;;' i 1 r Ir ~'ro e" / . ,~ i - r/ I v ~t~. -L/.~t--.. S Robert D. Whitley ) f ! Page 5 . LHE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE. THANK YOU. • LAVWMA October 13 , 1993 Item No. 5 TO: LAVWMA Board FROM: Craig R. Lawson SUBJECT: Expansion Planning- for 12.7-mgd of .ADWF Capacity Approve Amendments to JPA, Assume Half Participation in EBDA Outfall Capacity Study, -Status Report of EBDA Negotiations, and Expansion Schedule At the last Board meeting of September 15, 1993, the Board considered the attached letter from DSRSD dated September 15, , 1993 as well as the amendments to the JPA which were approved by each member agency earlier that month. The Board directed that these attached amendments be placed on the october . 20, 1993 LAVWMA agenda for final approval, and also adopted the . following staff recommendations:. 1. Accept the lead agency - role from-TWA . for 12.7-mgd of ADWF expansion in accordance with TWA's proposal and action of August 18, 1993 ; 2 . Accept CEQA work from TWA for expansion planning in accordance with TWA's proposal and action of August 18, 1993-; • 3 . Request negotiations with EBDA for use of 12 .7-mgd of ADWF outfall capacity, and authorize Committee and Staff to execute same; - . 4. Authorize funding of $30, 000 for Whitley, Burchett Associates to provide engineering services for expansion planning; and 5. Request cash advances of $50,000 from member agencies for expansion planning, including $12, 205 from ,._.. ... ._..... Livermore-,-.,..$16,535 ,..from_ Pleasanton and--$21,260".from,the, _:,. District. Approve Amendments to JPA The attached amendments, have been approved by each member agency and contain all revisions adopted by the`Board 'over the past four months. DSRSD requested that the Board consider approval of the final language of these amendments this month and noted . in their letter of September 15, 1993 a- "slight variation" between - a "WHEREAS" clause and Section XXXIII B3. DSRSD points out that V 6.W 1.-".". • • electorate in each -ity's jurisdiction, but tl- -t Section XXXIII B3 could be consti . to permit a representat, .. from Pleasanton • • Craig R. Lawson. U. M. C. I'lon--- Jul 18 94 12:27 PAGE 3/13 Oi/11!/94 1l:5i FA.'!. 510 41!4 1!2JI5 . l'LJ::A.SA.NTU~ ~ UUVU12 Ll\. VWM.A october lJ, 1993 Item No. ~ (cant.) or Livermore voting contrary to thtl vote of the electorate. DSRSD ft'lrtnp.r not'.?d that this is: hot a DSRSD ie:S:\le but c.imply wished to bring this matter to the attention ot the cities should thQY view it as: a pot<<:ntio.l pro:plem. The cities and LAV'\o.i'K~ Counsel have expressed Tln l=.l.lch concern, and LAVw"MA Counsel believes that any such }Jroblem is very remote and does not warrant anothQr revision and reoirculation for npproval of the sublect amendments. It is, therefore, recommp.nrlp.d that the Board give finnl approval to the attached a.lllenUmtlnL::; so they maybe circulated fnr ~xecution by thQ parties thereto. Asswne Ha.lf poa.r-t:icipat.ion in EBDA Out.filll capacii:y St.uQ.y ~VWMA'3 EBDA Committee met on Septenw8r 23, 1993 wlth staff to prQparQ r'or nogotio.t:.ichO with nDD.?I.'~ I..:.,iI,.VWM.A COlnl111ttt'<>': ,..,'t. .., meeting held on Septembe.r 29, 1993. possible U$8 ur TriA contri'lr.r.ors was discuss::oc to m(')~t. ~fficicnt1y co",plc.t~ tho. preliminary planning and CEQA process with no such tasks needed (:13rrpnt'1 y. \0](',\"1"''1.--; "'-I'''''"''J'rQ~~ t.1~= :=.1.'::0 d.i.couccod u.ith c~:no bcd..n3 only TWA I shalf pa.:r:tl.clp<:ltlon with EBDA in an outfall capacity ~tudy being. prQpared by Brown and Caldwell for 0. fee of ~25/000. Because this is work-in-progress whj ch 'In.:lY np.nl?fit LAVW"M.4., the Conrnd t.tee recommends that LlW1ft1'!A aSSUllJ8 Lhll:5 participation from TWA with .:l nC1t.-to-.;.~ceed cost of $12,500, including $S,368.49 to be reiml:1Ul:~tltl to TWA for expenses already paid to EBDA by TWA and $$4,131.51 payable to EBDA. Att~ched are related correspondence between EBDAand TWA. statu~ of EB~ Negotiations LAVWM.i\ I E: EBDA Com:mittee (1. e., Chair stein and Di:!:8ctO:t:~ Cuvello and. Tarver) met wit.h EBDh's LA"IlW'MA CommitteQ on September 29, 1993 to discu~~ EBDA1s terms and conditions as set rortn in the attached letter dated scpt~mber 16, 199~. This meeting w~s very prOductive and much WnS n(:(:nmplished as set forth in LA'Vw"MA IS respon~e to EBDA dated O~Luber 13, 1993 as authorized by LAVWM-~'S REDA. Committee. This response if:: to bc considered bv the EDDA commission on October 21,-1993 and by the Cjty of H;yvard City Council on October 19, 199::l after which it is. <lIlLl~lp<:1 ted that business negotiations will commence. by thQ and of Octcber. Expansion SchedulG lJl.'\.l'W"MA f:;; EBDA Committee directed that t118 att.<:1~hed expansion .. ...." ".... ..~. ...... _._,..,,, ~.Fl?,.~ 9:yI.~(...<., n ~~....J p. _ v"d);_~J ~._..~.9";::I!!.!.... .!?'.!_~.p';:.~,p..~.;: ~.cL_.~ ~~i:L'-!;lf9..~g9_i3.-J",_9J~~'._M'..'" ..w_."..._"".... . , comple.tlng' all tasks 'required for' advisory elect.ions ,on June. 7, 199-1 for the citicG of Livermore and Pleasanton. As ShOW11, tl1tl immediate critical t~SKl=. ar~ r'.?aching a concQptual mQIDorandum of understanding with BBDA and for LAVWMA to develop policies tor 07/1S/S1,l 12:52 MNRS&W FAIS).' 'id 82j6 --FAX NO. 510 351 4481 PLEASAXION P. 02/ i 1 ~vv... , JUL~19-94 rUE 10:42 .' "_0' '-' SECOND MonIF~CATION TO LAVWHA JO~h~ Z~~RCISE OF POw~s AGRE~ This second modification agreement is entered into this 20th c.ay of Oclobe~ I 1993, by and ~et~een the CIT!ES 0]' LIVERMORE and PLlJABAm'ON and the DU:BLIH SA..~ RA..l!Olr aBR~CZ8 P~STRICT. WHEREAS r en June 18,. 1974, the parties hereto t?xecui:.~d a ,joint po':.:ers Agrept!1!;mt ("JPA") creating the LIVERMORE A.'iADOR V1\LLEY WAT:.:R 1'lANAGEMENT AGENCY (1TL..~V'liM.1..It} fe::' 'the purpose of establishing'a water quality manaqe~~nt,program pur5uan~ to Resolution 71-3 of the R~gion31 Water Quality Control Board, san Francisco Bay Region; a~d WHEREASr thB JPA vas first ~odified on Mav 31. 1977i and WHEREAS, ~he JPA provides that before ce::,t~in Project~ c~n be u.~dertaken, the Proj ect lllust be approved by t.i.e vot~'t"S and approvl.!;d ~"1anbous.ly by t.....a LAVWMA Board; ~r.d 1'1'"HE...'tEAS, the LAYWrI'-'; Board has been dlscussiflg its sponsor~hip of a projp.r.t ~hich, if approved, would increase the sewage capacity of L~vn:L; by ~n ~mount not to exceed ~2.7 ~illion gallons (:P:rerage Dry Weather FlOW) per day j and lffl::::::F.:th..S I the L,A"y-)'7.&'\ Board "Would lik<~ thG!. op~ortunity to proceed on such a Projec~ witnout the rule of unanL~ity which currl3.ntly exists for projects'under the. JPA; and WliE.R1:..::"S 1 if such an a:::nend1nent to the JPA wera madQ.r th~ Board would int.e.nd that such Project :be t:irs't SUbmitted to the "."yoters."cf.,Pleasanton. a::d .LivQrlUOre a.ndtha't the UVHMA Directors ., '. . . ~ ,_. '. , ,.~'~.. _' '" "'....~.....,._,~, .__.,'~"'" ~." "'~y;.''',,,, ~~~ ~_...... ._ _~''"<1.'".>A._~,_"h~'''.''',,,",''''''''''''' './"..... '._,.........-......'.'.".",.~_.,........._...'t.......'''''...-....".'''.'.~ - 1 - f It," O'j 118/9.1 12:53 MNRS&W FAA 51' 1-1 82.36 -FAX NO. 510 351 4481 PLEASA.. 'rT01\ P.03/11 ~VVv JUL-19-94 rUE 10:42 ",--. ''-.-J fxom thoze two X~~bcr Ager.ci~~ ~ould vote to participate O~ not participate in such a ?roject depending on the vote of the - electorat9 in each Menner's jur1sdiction; and WHEREAS, the Eoard would also intend that DSRSD not be 'rQquire.d to sUbmit the Project to th~ voters vithin DSRSl;l but that the LAVWMA Directors f~o~ tha~ HambQr Agoncy ~ould vote to participate in such a project it a majority of the DSRSD Soard so approved, and WHEREAS, the Boare also wishes to proyide th~t if this Projp.ct is approvad by cne or more Memb~r ~genciesl that all the Me.....wer Agencies 'r;lu:::;t '~.e.;:i:t.ously a~oe p:t"ior to such :?roj ect serving any unincorporated area of Alameda county which is 5o~th of Intersta.te sa 0 or .in the 'North T!iv~rmore Vall~y; ar:.d WHEREAS, to uccomplish the sponsorship of such Q P~oject az provided above, the Boa~i ~ust amend the JPA. NOW, THEREFORE I the :9arties ~g-::eeto modify further t.~e ::i:i?J... as follows: 1. A new paragra~h is hereby added to the Agree]lent to read.. as follOws; 11 XXIII . .Er..Q..i..e.ct Net to E~ceed Additional Canacit.v 01: 12.7 r~vcrace Dr' W~a~~Qr Flow p~r na...._ Notwith~tanding any otnet provisions in this Agreement to the contrary, with ~eRpect to a proje~t Which, i~ approved, would incre~se ~ewnge capacity i~ ~n a~Q~nt not eo exceed 12.7 ~illio~ gallons (ADWF) p€r day, the fOllowing provisions shall app~y. ',......" .-, ""..'......."........,'""'...'..,.... ---~ '.(. ,,',~"..?,.'''....'~._..-... ... ,_ _ ;~.. _ '.n....' ......., ," ,_ .. ),";." .. . ......., , ,_ <,w..,..,~ '''~'''~ . ~:....._ .~~~' _ ~....~-.... 0<". ~.. .~__..'__"...,._.,...".....f1.."",.I/'_.~/l.1I-~;.~, ~.",' J, . " ,.^-"'': ",~.."~,,, .1j.1~' .,A--... ~-"~':'''''''. -"'~"."-,....-~.' - :2 - / / /, JUL-19-94 TUE 10:43 MNRS&W FAX NO 510 351' 4481 P. 04/11 o7/16:91 12:5.1 F. 510 '4 8236 Pi��S VlU:v z • • • A. pef initions. 1. 'Capacity Rights' means the right to use wastewater treatment, transmission, disposal, reclamation and/or reuse capacity of any one or more oZ the Agency's Facilities Gxpre ssed as wastewater volume in millions of gallons per day (red) , biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) in pounds per day (lbs/day) and total suspended solids (T55) in pounds per day, as appropriate for the Facility to which the Capacity Rights may pertain. Capacity Rights initially are acquired for use cr a particular Facility in the same proportion as the ownership rights in the Facility of each Participating Mew.bor of the Project for which the Facility was acquired and/or constructed. Notwithstanding the £o_accina, Capacity Rights may be transferred pursuant to section F Of this paragraph XXIII. A transfer or conveyance of Capacity Rights does not transfer or convey any right, title, or interest in or to the Facility, ' or any portion thereof, to which such Capacity Frights pertain unless expressly so provided in a written agreement between the Participating Members of the Project for which the Facility was acquired and/or constru ctad_ 2 . 'Capital Expenditures 1 means those ex'tenditures or any part thereof made to study, plan, design, acquire and construct a Facility or Facilities for a Project or Projects. - 3 • JUL-19-94 TUE 10:44 MNRSP FAX NO, 510.°q1 4481 P, 05/11 07/18/94 12:54 FAI 511 . C4 bzso ri naaiivl 3 , 'Facility/ or 'FacilitiesT means any real property, building, words or improvement acquired or constructed by the Agency for a Project or Projects. 4 . 'Joint Use Facility' or 'Facilitictl& means any Facility or Facilities acquired and/or constructed by the Agency for the use of any two cr more Participating Members for a Project. 5_ 1Operation and Maintenance Costs' means all . costs directly associated with the operation, maintenance, improvement, ' repair and replacement of a Facility cr Facilities including costs of labor, materials, supplies, power, chemicals, utilities, processional and other contractual services, research and monitoring, tools and equipment, and other expenses necessary to keep such Facility yr Facilitic in proper operating condition and to maintain its or their useful_ life or lives, together with • allocated Administrative Overhead •costs attributable .to operation and maintenance activities. 6. 1Project' means the studying, planning, designing, financing, acquisition and construction of a Facility or Facilities by the Agency in furtherance of the purposes of this Agreement for the treatment, transmission, disposal, reclamation or reuse of wastewater emanating from any one or more of the respective jurisdictions of the Parties. A Project or Projects may be studied, planned, designed, acquired, constructed, operated and maintained as separate and distinct . ... " -Prof acts 'or in -phases or stagesr as. the_Agency.. shall_.determi e... _......,_ . .,__.., - 4 - • - JUL-19-94 TUE 10:44 MNRS&W =FAX NO, 510 351 4481 P, 06/11 07/18/94 12:55 FAX 51r 14 8236 PLEAS NTON • -- 7. 'Sole Use Facility' or 'Facilities' means any Facility or Facilities the Capital Costs and Maintenance and Oneraticns costs for which are funded solely by a Single Party. B. Approval, • I. A Project for a Joint-Use Facility' may be proposed to the Board for approval by any t',:o (2) or core participating IPmners as they may agree. A Project for a Sale- Use Facility. may be proposed to the Board for approval by the • Party for whose use the Facility is intended. For each and every - proposed Project, including Projects for Sole-Use Facilities, each Party must definitively avidonce its intenticn to beccre a Participating Member or not to become Participating member, as the case may be, which intent shall he evidenced by resolution of the governing body of each Party. 2 , A Party may elect to become' a Participating Member in a Project (including a Project for an initially proposed Sole-Use Facility) with respect to which it initially was not a Participating Member, and a Party may elect not to continue as a Participating Member in a Project (including a project for an initially proposed Sole-use Facility) with respect to which it initially was a Participating Member Upon evidencing such intent as aforesaid at any time prior to the approval by the Board cf an agreement or other authorization for preparation of plans and specifications for the construction of the Project or, if applicable, prior to the issuance of bonds or other evidences whichever ovRnt occurs first__.. In , _... .-_._..._. - 5 -- • • . - JUL":19-94 rUE 10:45 Oi/18/94 12:55 MNRSR.l.I F.n 5lC4 8236 FAX NO. 510 ~rl 4481 PLEASA.."'TU:< -- P,07/11 "t::1VV r ....-" '-..,./ th~ event a Party 50 ~lQcts to PQco~e a ~~rticipating HembQr, the capital Expenditures theretofore incur~ed by all other participating M~mber~ for 5tudi~S, plans, or other such expenditu~es directly ~elated to the PrQject shall be adj~s~ed to reflect the inclusion of L~e later-electing participating Memb~r and ~hB latter shall pay its propo~~iQna~e share of such costs <including a fair distribution of interest earnings.torgone by t:.he prior - pa.rticipati.ng Members on their 1"'espective proporticnate Cf11,ital Expenditures by 'rRr..son Qf their p.l:1.rlier participating in the ?roject} in such aroount calculated as if it had initially been a Par-t.!.cipating- lie::nbe~ .or the Project. In ~he event a purty elects not to con~inue as a par~icipating ~ember in a Proj~c~ it ~hal1 nevc~~~eless pay its proportionate share of such Capital Expenditures ihcur~eQ to the date of its election, but shall not be obligated to pay turther such expencitures, and th~ =~ma~ning Participating Members shall bear such furth~ capital Expenditures in proportionate shares reflecting the exclusion of the prier participating Member. 3. For any Project ~hich includes, a~ Participating MemberSf the cities of Pleasantcn and Livermore, the quQs~ion of approval of such participation shall ba submitt~d to the electors of those Me~ers, respectively, prier to approval of the Project ~y the Agency. A Project shal~ be approved by the Board only by ununimous vote o~ all Dir~=~o~n repre~cnting the ~ar~icipa~1ng Memners Ior sucn ~roject. ~very ulrector o~ ~ .' Particip.a~ing. M~mber'.Rhall"vote"on-.t.heque.stion-of"'approval",'ih---..,- ..--"" , ,. ....,. - 6 - I ( - JUL~19-94 rUE 10:46 07/18/94 12:56 MNRS~ I.J F.U 51\ )4 82.>6 -FAX NO. 510 0Cl 4481 P LE.-\S 6;';TU;,( P. 08/11 "t:..: v....J ~_.' .........., accordance with thg vote of ~ha governing body of t~a Member whicn he cr she represents. The project: shall be deemed f'inally approved upon approval of an agr~~ment, or other authorizatioh, for preparation of plans and specificatiQns far the ~roject, or, if applicable, upon approval of the issuance of bonds or other evidences of indQbtedness by the Agency, ~hichever occurs =ir~t. 4.. If a project ~or a Sole use or qoint nse Facility is approved as provided by this section Br all the ~~~r Agencies ~~st ~~ani=ously agree prier to ~uch Project serving any unincorporated area of Al~eda County which is ~ithe~ south of InterstatQ ;80 or in the Horth Live~or~ Vall~y. c. Capital ::xpenditures: capital Expenditures :Lara Project shall be allocated between the Participating Members b~5ed upon their prc?c~icnute allocaticn~ of CaFacity Rights in the p~ojec~. The calculation and allocation of Capital Expenditur~s for each Projp.ct shall be SQt forth in L~e capital Eudge~ for each such ?roject, D. Operation and Maintenance Costs~ Operation and Maintenance Cc~tz for a projecb sh~ll be allocated a~cng th~ participa~ing Members based upon their actual use of ~~e Facility or Facilities constructed for tha Pr.oj~ct det~inGd by measured or estimated volurr,es of .astewater flow for trans~ission or disposal Facilities, and su~~ floW and/or oth~r para~aters of pollution, inClUding, ~ut not li~itad to, ~iochc~ic~l o~7~e~ demand and total suspen~ed solids, tor Facili~ies not related -solely to trans1lli.::;sionar .di.spo~aL .."Rachof ..the afar~aid ..~ .,., u,_ .' .'d~' ..... .... - 7 - I I : • JUL-19-94 TUE 10:47 hNRS&W "FAX N0. 510 'Fl 4481 P. 09/l1 07/18/94 12:56 FAX 51( ;4 8236 PLEASATVTON ZOOS, factors reflecting actual use shall he given Such weight in determining Operation and Maintenance Costs as the Participating Mew srs shall agree. operation and Maintenance Costs shall be calculated and set forth in the General Budget fOr each Fiscal • Year. Further, from and after such time as each Party has beco=c a Participating Member in one or more Projects (irrespective of Whether all Parties are Participating Members in any one Project) and Operation and Maintenance Costs have been allocated among all Parties, Administrative cverneaci Casts of the Authority likewise shall be allocated in the sate proportion as Operation and Maintenance Costs as provided in this Agreement. E, Ownership: Each Party shall own an undivided portion of any Project or Projects with respect to which it is a Participating Member equal to the percentage of the Capital Expenditures for such Project or Projects either (i) paid bor by • it or (ii) paid for by state or-federal grant monies allocated to it. F. Capacity Rights; Each Party shall own and possess Capacity Rights in a Facility or a Project with respect to which it iS a Participating Maher proportionately equivalent to its y espcctive Ownership interest in such Project or Projects. Any Member in a Project may transfer to any Party any portion of its Capacity Rights with respect to such Project a.ti.such Participating Member and Party may agree; provided, however, that the Participating Member proposing to transfer such capacity _ - .---Rights- or any portion •tze•reof, :mustTfirst •offer. on-t e- sawe-terms , 8 - JUL-19-94 TUE 10:47 MNRS J FAX N0. 510 ?�1 4481 P. 10i 11 . 07/18/94 12:51 FAX 510 ; 8ZJ8 PLBASAN?01 8010 • and conditions said rights to all Participating Members of such Project in proportion to each Participating Member's respective proportionate ownership share of such Project. In the event that on or more Participating Members elect not to accept such offer, then the ?ember proposing to transfer such Capacity Rights may offer such rights to any Party or any other Participating Member in such amount or propu -Lions as they may agree. Upon transfer of Capacity Rights as aforesaid, the Capacity Rights of the transferor and the transferme or transferees With respect to such Project shall be adjusted to reflect the .transfers, Such transfers shall be evidenced by written agreement executed 'between the agreeing Pa?ties, . a certified copy or Which together - with a certified copy of the resolution of the governing body of each Party to such Agrec.:.ent evidencing approval thereof shall be moiled with the Authority." 9 .r • JUL~19-94 rUE 10:48 MNRS&W 07/18/94 12:57 F}J 510 i 82J6 -fAX NO, 510 3t;1 4481 PLEASA.:\'TO:i P,11/11 !il Ol~..._ -;: .......... '"--,, Except ~9 e~~ressly nodified herein all provisions of the June l87 1974 joint powers agreement, ah ~mended on May 31, 1977, shall rema.in in full foZ"c::e and eff~ct. Dated as of October 20 , 1993. ApE.-t:..Qved as to Form: (/~) 4 /;jJ ~ j- (:;7.vr,4~~I::2::(v.7 To~ Curr.i ( C:I. ty /1I.ttoL.ney CITY OF L:rVERHOro: By: du4"~g~~ ~athie Brown, Mayor " APproved a:;; to Form ~ !) 1~\)"~ ii1?,J( M~chael H. Roush ' city J..ttorney CI~Y OP PL~S~~ON ~ ??~ Hayer Approved as to rorm: / - ,/ /./. d' '</':do ./~/ ' ~ bSZ;~; /4:11..'-; _2b.~.. David Ss:::h:eicke.:::- coun~el fer DSRSD ".... ... . ", , .. -... Approv~d as to Fo~; _ 7Ull~.~L/ fI--Uc~~j~ \" M'ichaei H. Roush General Co"UnsQl LlvmtHORE-AH.A:oOR "U\LLIlY 'iA'l'ER 1WlAG~" AGENCY " , By: .~ /~~ Jo~steJ.n, C..a::!.::' . . ~l!vi s!l':l 1V2J93 , (l a'^-"t\a . em::!) ., . ,,"'" ...., ... ,,-, .. ~.. . - . - 10 - ",; r: I RECEIVED El23 Economics Research Associates OCT 6 1994 Affiliated with Drivers Jonas CITY OF DUBLIN MEMORANDUM REPORT DATE: October 5, 1994 Project# 11247 • TO: Richard C. Ambrose,City Manager, City of Dublin - - FROM: Economics Research Associates (ERA) RE:' The Fiscal Impact of Annexing Eastern Dublin under the No Development Scenario• SUMMARY - ERA has evaluated the fiscal impacts resulting from the proposed annexation of approximately 1,530 acres in the eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area under a worst case scenario where the area remains undeveloped in the next five years. The results of ERA's assessment are summarized in Table ES-1. The City of Dublin is projected to accrue revenues primarily from property taxes, augmented by a little revenue from state subventions. Total on-going revenues range from $62,110 in FY 1995-96 to $65,650 in FY 1998-99. The City will also accrue expenses, the major sources of which include the provision of public works maintenance, fire/emergency services, and police services. One time cost is estimated at $109,050 (expressed in 1995 dollars) which includes a replacement fire engine at a cost of$80,590;one police vehicle for$24,300, and public works repairs and speed studies of $4,160. Annual operating costs range from $97,500 in FY ' 1995-96 to $146,220 in FY 1998-99. Since the City of Dublin will provide services starting in October 1, 1995 but not receive property tax and state subvention revenues until FY 1996-97,- the City is estimated to accrue a net deficit of $206,540 during the first year of annexation. In subsequent years, revenues are projected to remain lower than costs, resulting in annual deficits ranging from $73,000 to $80,600. . The City is'working with- the proponents to reach an agreement on how to cover the • potential shortfall. The proponents have agreed in principle to some form of advance deposit or other financial guarantee which will ensure the proposed annexation will not impose any burden on existing Dublin taxpayers in the event that development or :land transactions (and reassessments) do not occur for some time. • 388 Market Street,Suite 1580,San Francisco,California 94111 •(415)956-8152 Telex:340890(ECON RES SF0) Fax:(415)956-5274 D hi •W Los Angeles•San Francisco•San Diego•Chicago Washington,D. •Londo - �t�ament :- " Table ES-l SUM:MARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES, FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 TO 1998-99 Eastern Dublin Annexation Area (In Current Dollars) RevenuelExoense Items FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 97-98 FY 98-99 Property Tax Revenue $ - $ 60.714 $ 62.882 $ 64,140 State Subventions Revenue $ - $ L401 $ 1.457 $ L515 Total On-going Revenues $ - $ 62,115 $ 64.339 $ 65,655 Public Works $ 13,136 $ 18,215 $ 18.944 $ 19,702 Fire Services $ 234 $ 324 $ 337 $ 351 Police Services $ 84.121 $ 116.648 $ 121.314 $ 126.167 Total On-going Expenses $ 97,491 $ 135,188 $ 140.596 $ 146.219 Net On-going Revenue (Expense) $ (97,491) $ (73.073) $ (76,257) $ (80.565) Less One-Time Cost $ (109.050) $ - $ - $ - Total Revenue (Exoense) $ (206,541) $ (73.073) $ (76,257) $ (80,565) Source: City of Dublin; ERA INTRODUCTION The City of Dublin commissioned Economics Research Associates (ERA) to evaluate the fiscal impacts of annexing approximately 1,530 acres in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area. The City would like to determine the degree of potential fiscal liability the City is taking on in the - worst case scenario, where the property is annexed but remains undeveloped for many years. ERA has reviewed and confirmed data gathered by the landowners and their representatives as well as information submitted by the city's service providers. An analysis of revenues, costs, and the resulting surpluses or deficits likely to be experienced by the City of Dublin over the next five years is discussed in more detail .below. Additional fees to"the landowners resulting from annexation is also summarized. - ESTIMATION OF REVENUES The City of Dublin will accrue revenues from two sources: property tax revenue and state subventions.The subject area is comprised of 22 parcels. Sixteen parcels are assessed assuming a 2 percent valuation increase per year. Table 1 presents the actual 1993 and projected 1994 valuation and revenue data for the 16 parcels. Note that tax revenue estimates include the 1 percent property tax rate plus other special assessments and fees. The remaining six parcels are assessed under the California Land Conservation Act (Williamson Act), which restricts property valuation based on the income generated through agricultural use. However, these parcels have been placed under the nonrenewed status in 1987 or 1988 and are scheduled to be assessed at 100 percent of market value by 1996 or 1997. Table 2 presents the projected assessment and revenue generation for properties under the Williamson"Act. The Alameda County Assessors office provided the estimation procedure noted at the top of the table. The assessed valuation from Tables 1 and 2 are combined in Table 3. Total property valuation ranges from $21.5 million in 1993 to $25.8 million in 1999.(expressed in current dollars). The City of Dublin will receive 25.4 percent of the 1 percent property tax levied on these amounts, ranging from $60,710 in FY 1996-97 to $64,140 in FY 1998-99. The City will also receive minor revenues from the following state subventions fund: motor vehicle in-lieu-tax, off-highway vehicle in-lieu-tax, vehicle abatement fund, and the state gas tax funds (2105, 2106, and 2107). Estimated on a per capita basis, the City is projected to receive amounts ranging from $1,400 in FY 1996-97 to 1,510 in FY 1998-99. With property tax revenues and state subventions combined, the City of Dublin is projected to accrue revenues ranging from $62,110 in FY 1996- 97 to $65,670 in FY 1998-99 as indicated at the bottom of Table 3. 2 • • ESTIMATION OF COSTS Three of the City's service providers will be impacted by the proposed annexation: public works, fire protection and emergency services, and police protection services. Estimates of one- time and on-going operating expenses from each department are attached as appendices to this report. Note that the City does'not anticipate any significant additional general government expense to be incurred by the annexation action. Increases in government services required by planning and development activities will be offset by development fees. Table 4 contains a summary of estimated public service costs.-Note that the cost estimates provided by the City's service providers have been inflated by 4 percent, except for the cost of police and fire vehicles. In addition, the costs for FY 1995-96 have been pro-rated to reflect the official annexation date of October 1, 1995. Based on the existing undeveloped status of the properties, the City's Public Works Department estimates an annual cost of$16,841 for scheduled right-of-way maintenance (including weed control, street patching and striping); drainage facility , . cleaning; new City Limit signs and sign repair; and litter pick-up. Public Works also estimates a' one time cost of$4,000-to cover immediate repairs and speed radar studies. Compliance to the County's NPDES, which will cost $10,637, has been excluded in the estimate of City expenses since either the City or the County is expected to impose fees to cover the NPDES costs. . Another projected City expense concerns the provision of fire protection services. The Dougherty Regional Fire Authority (DRFA) has determined that no additional manpower is needed - provided that no new development occurs concurrent with annexation. However,. DFRA's existing fleet does not include a Type 3 engine that is designed to serve agricultural zoned areas where the road network is limited and wildland fire is a danger. To acquire the necessary Type 3 engine, DFRA proposes either of two options: the annexation proponents to purchase a Type 3 engine for which $250,000 should be set aside or DFRA could modify its existing fleet by upgrading one of its Patrol engines to a Type 3 engine at the time of replacement. This latter approach would cost $80,590 as indicated in Table 4. DFRA also'estimates annual operating expenses of$300 for dispatch expenses. ERA researched the possibility of contracting fire protection services out to the current • --providerrthe Alameda-County-Fire..District.(ACFD), and.found this.option.to,be.infeasible following reasons: (1) the property owners would be paying twice, supporting DFRA through . their property tax bill and ACFD through an additional contract fee; (2) the current cost of serving this area to ACFD is difficult to quantify; and (3) ACFD's Fire Chief believes that 3 -- contracting out services would only be realistic if Dublin were to consider doing so for the entire city. He beliyves that there should only be one service provider to minimize competition and facilitate coordination and smooth operations. The City's Police Department will be the most significantly impacted public service by the proposed annexation. Internal estimates made by the Police Department forecast the need for one additional officer each for the swing and night shifts, in order to cover the significant distance from the existing city to the eaStern annexation area without reducing the level of service to existing. Dublin residents or creating safety problems for the officers. In a concession to the perceived reasonableness of requiring two full-time personnel for an increment of only 24 new residents, only 61 percent of the time for these two new officers is allocated to the cost of the annexation, based on the expected daily time required to patrol the annexation area and respond to service calls. The internal estimates are included in the appendix. There is also a one-time expense of acquiring a new vehicle for $24,300. Table 4 presents the total one-time and on-going costs from FY 1995-96 to FY 1998-99. One-time expenses amount to $109,050. On-going operating expenses are projected to range from $206,540 in FY 1995-96 to $80,565 in FY 1998-99. COMPARISON OF REVENUES AND COSTS Will revenues be sufficient to cover costs? Table 5 summarizes the revenue and expense projections over the next five years. The one time cost of $109,050 plus an initial years operating losses will produce a net deficit of nearly $206,540 in FY 1995-96. In subsequent years, projected revenues will remain lower than costs with an estimated annual deficit of $73,000 to $80,600. The City is working with the proponents to reach an agreement on how to cover the potential shortfall. The proponents have agreed in principle to some Jorm of advance deposit or other financial guarantee which will ensure the proposed annexation will not impose any burden on existing Dublin taxpayers in the event development or land transactions (and reassessments) do not occur for some time. ~~ ....,. ," .~~,~ .......~.... ..............' . ............. ....~.~~..,.....'1- .~ ~...-... ...<..,..... ....... ..... ..,_." ,4." '.""".'(', . 'h~":""'. ~. .......!.. ;. ,,",' '.. l".... .."....' .......",..~ . ..... ," . ,".' "" ......:' ."..,...... '.' ',' "'.~..""'...."...... ..., ...._~ ," ...... .,. -:->'" .,~.,' .- ....-..'.-.. "..~' ~'''''''-'''' """'- .,.~. -,~.~"",,"...- .,fov .....-. ..,~,. ,~.._...., I. ',-'.", '". n'" .-..- 4 .- OTHER ASSESSMENTS & FEES ERA reviewed the research conducted by MacKay and Somps in regards to additional assessments and fees which are likely to be levied on the eastern Dublin property owners upon annexation (attached as part of the appendices). The following fees/assessments are applicable: . Street lighting fees: Single family lot with residence Single family zoned vacant lot Commercial lot with building Commercial lot with building $19.60/year 9.80/year 98.00/acre/year 49.00/acre/year . NPDES fees: Single family lot with residence Single family zoned vacant lot Commercial lot with building Commercial lot with building $ 14.50/year 7.25/year 101.50/acre/year 50.75/acre/year . Residential Garbage Service Fee $11O.00/dwellinglyear . DRFA Paramedic Fee $ 3.00/dwellinglyear '.. .J'.,.:.-:.....,. "..~. ...~ .... .... .."'......... :,'." ..",' .,............ vl.'.~,,,,, .....-"....,..... 'i.' .''':- ,..-:- ...-.........--I.'-~;_n~~~".i'.~~-'.:.~._...V'~'~.. ~~....."....~~ "';'I'''''~ .......J>j;o;...<"OH "":-J"~.w~....~......~ .'''''~''''''''' ".........".,.... .~.._...,.. _'",';'",._"."_.' ...,.~ .,....,'~ ..w........ ~"......\.'._..,........ ',' '.' .,-., ...........,.__..~.,...w_... ".' 5 • Table 1 VALUATION AND TAX REVENUE DATA FOR PARCELS NOT UNDER THE WILLIAMSON ACT East Dublin Annexation Area i .. Effective Actual FY 1992-1993 Projected for FY 1993-94 /2 Tax Total 1993 Tax Total 1994 Tax APN# ? Location Owner Acreage Rate/1 Valuation Revenue/3 Valuation Revenue/3 99B-3005-1-2 Tassajara Road Dublin Land Company 1.22 1.21% $ 42,514 $ • 514 $ 43,364 $ 524 . 99B-3005-1-3 US Hwy 50 West Dublin Land Company 80.14 1.20% $ 2,825,726 $ 33,785 $ 2,882,241 $ 34,461 r I-580 Caltrans ', 11.00 $ - $ - $ - - $ - , 946-500-1-2 5868 Tassajara Road Gygi Anne H 1.00 1.10% $ 233,687 $ 2,574 $ 238,361 $ 2,626 99B-3026-3-1 US Hwy 50 West Delvany,May K 0.10 5.63% $ 141 $ 8 $ 144 $ 8 646-500-1-1 Tassajara Road East Bay Reg.Park District 0.70 $ - $ - $ - $ - 946-500-2-1 Tassajara Road East Bay Reg.Park District . 3.83 $ - $ - $ - $ - 99B-3036-1 3924 Fallon Road Lin Chang &Jennifer&Frederic 153.61 1.19% $ 7,245,953 $ 86,585 $ 7,390,872 $ 88,317 99B-3046-2-6 Fallon Road Lin Chang S &Frederic&Hang Y 40.00 1.20% $ 465,165 $ 5,589 $. 474,468 $ 5,700 99B-3046-2-7. Fallon Road Lin Chang S &Frederic&Hang Y 40.00 1.20% $ 373,889 $ 4,498 $ 381,367 $ 4,588 - 99B-3046-2-8 Fallon Road Lin Chang S&Frederic&Hang Y - 37.41 1.20% $ 347,878 $ 4,188 $ 354,836 $ 4,271 • 99B-3046-2-9 Fallon Road Lin Chang S&Frederic&Hang Y 40.00 1.20% $ 465,165 $ 5,589 $ 474,468 $ 5,700 • 946-1040-1-2 5020 Tassajara Road Lin Chang S &H Y&Hong L - 64.29 1.21% $ 239,907 $ 2,900 $ 244,705 $ ' 2,958 . 946-1040-3-3 Tassajara Road City of Pleasanton ' 6.31 0.00% $ 33,388 $ - $ 34,056 $ - 946-1040-2 ' Tassajara Road. • Lin Chang S &H Y&Hong L 22.62 1.24% $ 84,395 $ 1,045 " $ 86,083 $ 1,065 ,) 946-1040-3-2 Tassajara Road Lin Chang S &H Y&Hong L . 163.12 1.20% $ 608,785 $ 7,302 $ 620,961 $ 7,448 99B-3046-2-15 5220 Fallon Road Lin Chang S &H Y&Hong L' 158.20 1.20% , $ 343,981 $ 4,141 $ 350,861 $ 4,224 99B-3026-1 US Hwy 50 West Lin Paoyeh&Bihyu 152.29 1.21% $ 209,900 $ 2,539 $ 214,098 $ 2,590 ,• 99B-3026-2 US Hwy 50 West . Lin Paoyeh&Bihyu • 153.75 1.21% $ , 209,500 $ 2,535 $ 213,690 $ 2,585 99B-3036-5 US Hwy 50 West Maynard,William L&Jean S ' 1.25 1.36%• $ ' 3,677 $ 50 $ 3,751 $ 51 TOTAL 1,130.84, 1.19% $ 13,733,651 $ 163,841 _ $ 14,008,324 $ 167,117 /1 Effective tax rate may be subject to change according to future voter-approved initiatives. . /2 Valuation and tax revenue data projected for 1994 by increasing assessed valuation by 2%per County Assessor's Office. • /3 Includes special assessments and fees. . . Source:. County of Alameda Assessors Office;ERA , . "" u <: z o Vl .... "" ;:S ...J = ?:: f::l t::: =.: \;l;l Q Z ;:; Vl ...J ~ U >0:: <: i:. =.: ~ ~ ;:; Z ~ > ~ >< ~ Q Z <: z 9 "" ~ <:< :3 .~ <: <0 > >< 10< g o~ ~ .~ ~ "'~8 .!:! ~~~ E-\;l;l"-l ,;- ~~~8~~~~~~'~~~2~~~=~i~i~~;~!~~~~~~~~;~~i~~~~ ~=~~~~~o_~~~O~~OO~N~~M~.~~~N!~~~~OM~~-N~~~~~ ~~M~~~~~~~~~~~~=~~~~~~~i~g~~i~=~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~ ~ <""= _>0 5",0:: ~ ~ ~ II ~ E- ""..:;:-= ",_~~~~~_~",~~_~~O~~N~~.~ftO~ON$~O.-~ON$.i~M~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~S~~~~~N~~~~~$~-~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~d~~~~~~i~g~d~~~~~~6~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'~ ~~~~~==~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~S~8~~~g~~~=~~~~ v-)1.t'\\Qr:-:r:-:r-:oe ...:~.,...:....;...;....; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~M~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~=~~$S$$$$$~8~~~~~~~8-~~~~~~8~~~~~Q~~~~~~ 2 _Oft~~o~~."'.....N.N"'N"'Nft ftftftftft~ft~~~~~~-~~~~~ ,,"j~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~MMMMMMM~~~~~~~g~gggggM~MMMM~ I ~ ...l ::> oU"" >0 > ~~~~~~~~M~~~~~~~0~~~~M~~K~MM~~~~MM~~~~~~~~ "" d ., 0 0 .g .€ ~ w ~> ;:!:; ~~~~~O~~~~~ON~_~~~~OM~O~~~~~~NM~~~M~O-~~O~ ~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~=~~~~~8;~~~~~g~~~~~~8~~~~~ Md~~~~~~~~~d~M~~M~~~d~~~~~d~~d~~~~~6g~~~~~ ~~~~~S2M~~.~~~;~~~~~~~~~~~:~~a~~~~g~_2=~~~ vi' -n "15' r-: r-: r: r-: ..: ...; ..: ~ ...: .".: ... 25(::! -?; I~c;.s u t) g Ol3"" ;:!:; ~M~~~,~~M~~M~~M~~MM~M~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~SO_~~~~.~00~000~.00~OOO~00~~~0~~~~.~.80_.0~~~OOOO .,,,.. ~N_~~~O~N-~~~O~N-~ oo~~ 8o~~~~~8 ~~~~ ~~~~5~8~~~~5~8~g~~ 8~~~ o~~~~5~c dodd __dodo~~~dddo~~~oood~~~doo 'ddd~~~~ J; ""'''' ]5~ -S;:g> e U ~~~~~~~~~g~~~$$~N~~~~~;~$~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ M~M~~~OM~~~_~~~~~~M~~~~~~~~_~~~N~~O~~~~~~M ~~oNi&~~~~~O":~o":~~~~O~~~~~O~~M~~~~~~M~~":M~ ~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g====~~~ ~r:r-=r-:~r:r:-:..:..:~...;"";"':-= ~~M~~~M~~~~M~~~~*~~~~~~~~~~~~~M~~~~~~~~~~~ =<:== "U 0 ~ ::> 00"" "'" > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~M~MnMMM S~~gg8g~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~8~=~~~~~~"~~~~~~-~~~~~ ~~~~~~~N~~N~N~N~N~~NM~~~~~~~ONooodoN~NNNMN _______ N~NNNNN~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~M~~~~~~~~M~~~~~*~~~~ ., '" ::> VJ E ta ~ 0 > <~~ >0 a~a~~e~i;Ea~i~i;lii~a~~!i~ii~l~aa~I~~5i~~~ ~8888=~~~gi~~~~i~g~~~~g~i~g~~8g~~8~i~~~~~~ ~_~_~__ ~~~~~~~~N~~~~O~NNNN~M~------ r:r-.:r=r-:r-=c-:oO~"';"';-"';":""; ~M~~~~~M~~M~~~~~~~~*~~~M~~~~~~~~~M~~M~~M~M M~~~~~~M~~~~~~M~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~M~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "" ~ .~ ~>-] ~~ ]~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ....: :!; ~ ~ ..,. ~ -i U o '" "... D d o t ~ ~8 .~ ., '" ., tt O<l Vl Ol) a e .5 ...l .8 o '" J: O<l CI:l OIl a ... U d :J .5 ...:: d .;; ., ::.: ~ "g o '" ~ .~ ~ ~ <.l 'J:: o '" o tt .S ...J =.: ., .c o .i :::a ] "0 ::.:: '" ~ ~ .. l;J .~ .~ ~ <00 g f:j ...l~ 'i o ~ " lil .~ ~ . ~ ""' '^ "'"" ~ ~ 8 ~ '" . '" -,. ('t'\" o ~ ~ '" . '" ..,. .... ... '.' o ~ ~ ..0 . '" '" .. ~ ~ "" u.. '" ~ 0:: g ::;j u.. "8 ~ .. l;J ! "8 =.: .. ~ .~ ~ ~ -." ",.. M o M :Q ~ '" ~ ,....c., ""' o ft :Q 0... '" ... ft ..8 z~ .....,. <'" .~ o .:; g u .a " > <: u tl ~ ... ~ :a ., .:; ., .Y e 1;\ I: .Y .: .:; .~ II a .;: l;J ., c o -5 .5 ~ " g ~ "'0 0 g 45 ~ ~ ~ g o ~ ~ i 8 ~ ~ "~ .g :s c5.;s:5 d > ~ ;J; >-,..... - Cl: t: 0 = ~ g.~ ~ o ~ . ~ -50~-g -5 "... <l .... ... 0 ~ ~ e ] 5 ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ '.5 .s ;; ~ 11 .:; ;J; .:l 5 C E] .( v'y ~ ~u~~.g ~ 5 ~ .~ i ~ ~ ~ l:~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~,] a5~~ ~ .:: <( -;;; 'i:i 0 ~ IJ'l :z:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~._ ~ ~ 3 n e <" -~ .~ ~ i ~ ~ ~c':;-5~8 v '0::= g ~ _ u ,s ~ " .~ .~ .g -E ~ ~ .~ ~.s ~_~ :; ._~ :=.... ...~ g ;t ""~ -5 .i .g -<'" -;f_~~.g~o > .~::E V) ~ ~ :::~f=~~:ta .; e o -5 ~ .sa o ~ u e -=-8 ~ .~ 8 g ::2;; ]~ -=u ~d uM <8: ". .~ ~ " w 0\ 0\ 0\ ~ 00 0\ 0\ ~ .s \0 0\ I Ir) 0\ 0\ ~ ~ -< ~ ~ -< u C/'] ~ ~ r,s ~ ::I Z ~ ~ ~~ ~ g -< '.':.'I U ~. C/']~::<t s==~ ~~~ 050 ~;""Q '-'..0.... ,,:=== ~g~ r _f-lBU .g C/'] ~ == E-<~u:lC 0\ 0\ t 00 0\ >- (.L. NN! N N (<") V'l v$ov$ '00\V'l ..,-Nl:- .,)"0.,)" .....-N V'7 V'7 V'7 00 0\ I l:- 0\ >- p:". ~l:-r- "'-0 r- 00 ~oO"'" '000V'l .....ON .no.n ..........N V'7 V'7 Eo':l r- 0\ t '0 0\ >- (.L. \000"'- ..,-Nr- r-O\\O .nov$ \0 0\ V'l 00 00 r- ";-0\";- ..... N V'7 V'7 V'7 \0 0\ I V') 0\ >- (.L. OMM 'ONOO C'l0\..... ";-oO~ r-C'l0 V') M 0\ ..;-o\~ ..... C'l V'7 Eo':l Eo':l V') 0\ t ..,- 0\ >- (.L. ..... M"'- 0\ C'l ..... "'-'0- oO";-~ 0000\ C'l l:- 0\ ";-oOc-S ..... C'l V'7Eo':lV'7 ..-;.~ >....... .-< ~ $U ~,~ (ll == ....l............ ~ .~ U -< ~ IOO\.oC-<"a ~ '..:::l .g U > ~~S\.o"e =c"a....~~ >o"een ~"e5S~ ~~ .'-:'.< ~~>:>:e ~ ~ -< -< & ~ -<ee.o " ~e&&o:: g.&8~S 10080..""'0 ~o.. f-< 00 ..... \I") c-S :Q V'7 C; \I") ~ V'7 C'l (<") o 0\ M N V'7 V'7 V'7 >: -< '" ~ >< en :::l o 'S: ~ ...... o ~ ..... ~ -5 .9 ~ := == ~ ;)@.I ~ .S x_ ~.g ,. ~Q t::..... &0 o .?; .... ,- o..U @! ~ f-< ~.. "[ 8 0.. o ..,- ..... i ..., N 00 00 c-S \0 V'7 ..,- ..... r- o \0 Eo':l ..., ~ ~ '<t: V') N 0\ 0\ I 00 0\ >- "'" 00 0\ t r- 0\ >- u... r- 0\ I \0 0\ :>< .(.L. \0 0\ I V') 0\ >- "'" V') 0\ . ..,- 0\ >- (.L. ~ .... (ll ~ Vi ~ ~ c ~ > ~ =' III c .2 .... c ~ > -S ci.i ~ ~ rJ.J .- V'l00 00 C'l 0\ ~~V'7 ~O~ 0\ ~~~ -00\ ..... ..... 0\ ~~~ I I I ~V'7~ I I I ~~V'7 ~ -a 2 0.. ~ V')NO .l:) ~ :3 :; ~~~ V'lJ~~~ 0;-. \0 00 ..,- 00 '..... 0\ 00 0\ ..... ~~V'7 4~ en ~ -5 == o == .8 .... ~ ::; c.. o 0.. 'r.::l B" ~ S '.':.'1 en W ~~~ .....-C'l ~...,~ 100\V'l V'l-- ~....-fiN ~ ..., ~ O..,-r- V') ..... 0 -.....C"l ~~~ I I I V'7 V'7 Eo':l I I I ~ V'7 V'7 ~~~ V')..t~ Eo':l V'7 V'7 00 r- V'l ;');g~ v-)...:-r ..,-.....0 ..... ..... N ~ V'7 Eo':l g g en :, I ~. .S ,~ a3 ..... 'r.::l C "'i' :::l == == ~ == I ~ := :> -==S(.L. ..0 ~";,B~ := .- ~ 15 E-< V') '0 r- CIj ..o~..... 000 ~ .~~ ~ c3 '~ N~' a .9 ffi .~ ~ S ol:::::-5~ ::;Eo>,)) ~ V') ..... V'l Eo':l r- V') -.:t;. - ~ ..... o ..,- ..... ..., V'7 ~ V'l V') ":. trl '0 Eo':l 0\ M M i (,It trl ..... ..... N \0 ..., ..., ..., .5 ;:Q :: Q .... o .... o ~ .... .s ~ :: ,. a:l > ~ "'" - ~ 'g ~'""0 ....l U -; ~ .....:. ~ u ~ == u:: ..... o Ol) == '..:::l ~ 0.. ~ Q cd U ~ -5 == o .t: == o '.':.'I ~ :; c.. o c.. 'r.::l B ~ ,::: .:::1 Vi <:.l ~i2 ::l0 u~ ~ -5 .9 tl] "0 :::l c:: c.. :::l 0 (J) 0.. .::: >. t: .-;:: g,u 2~ 0..0 .... - 2.s U"O a '-' ~~ '-' ;. """0 5 ~ "" '-' > _ 2 ~ - trl^ :; :,. ^ "0 . II u :; ~ II ==' ~.~ 5 ;; ~ ....., t - _ ~ ::; -:l:; ':,.I ".Ii 2 ":q 'r.::l ~ 'g <:.l "0 ... <oS ~ :0 ~ <:.l <:.l CIj ....... u -< c:: o en S :E ~ "-'" u -< ,.2 _.~ c; <U en c:: o U "0 c:: ~ ....l .::g E <oS e~ eo) :r. -5 ~ 9 :: zj .~ ~ .... ;; ... - ~ - C"J ~ 2 2 :; -oJ .I ~>..c~_ ..t. ?:' .~...g '.' ~ ~ == :: _ 4.; .J'; - C. :.1:" < _ ~ <"". f"#"". -r -.... - --- ....... ........ -< fi3 e; u 8 o ~ o (J) en ~ (J) en -< >. = :::l o U :<l "0 ~ ~ < trl 0\ I ..,- 0\ 0\ - G= ..... .?1 0.. ~ .-~ "a '0 c ~ c ~ "0 ~ .... ~ Ol) '0 :::l p:, ~ c ~g ~ ..... ...... :0 :::l Q '- o C o @ :::l o CIj Table-4 ESTIMATE OF FISCAL EXPENSES,FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 TO 1998-99 Eastern Dublin Annexation Area (In Current Dollars)/3 Public Services FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 97-98 FY 98-99 Public Works/1 One-time cost: immediate repairs $ 3,120 speed studies $ 1,040 • . NPDES/2 $ Annual Cost: right-of-way maint. $ 13,136 $ 18,215 $ 18,944 $ 19,702 • Fire Services/1 One-time cost: fire eng.replacement $ 80,590 Annual Cost: dispatch expenses $ 234 $ 324 $ 337 "$ 351 Police Services/1 One-time cost: 1-vehicle $ 24,300 . Annual Cost 61%of two new officers $ 84.121 $ 116.648 $ 121.314 $ 126.167 Total One-time Cost $ 109,050 $ - $ $ - Total Annual Cost $ 97,491 $ 135,188 $ 140,596 $ 146,219 Total Cost $ 206,541 $ 135,188 $ 140,596 $ 146,219 /1 See attachments. Costs provided in FY 1994-95 have been inflated by 4 percent:' ` • /2 Refers to the National Pollution Discharge&Elimination System. Public Works projected cost is$10,637 which is likely to be paid for by the creation of a special assessment district. /3 Inflation rate applied= 4% Source:'City of Dublin Police Services;Dougherty Regional Fire Authority; City of Dublin Police Services;ERA. • 0\ 0\ I 00 0\ .0\ !""4 o ~ '.:l 0\ .n 0\ 0\ !""4 ~ < ~ ,..J < U rJi )oool ~ vi ~ rJi Z ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Z < ~ <.Ii ~ ~< ::l I:: Z 0 ~ .;:: '" > ~ s w Q) ~ Q:;2~ ': ~<$ '" o d '0 ~ ......:.:::0 .... ~.o..... :.< <8'g" ~ ' ~ ~ E::l S .::::;~~U ~ ~::l~1:: ~ E-<rJir.ac Q:; 0"1 0"1 I 00 0"1 >-- ~ OjV"l '<T-V"l - \0 i-~ ~ ~ C'l j 0"1 00 <""l "'<.""1 (<l-;:O ~ ~ 00 0"1 I t- 0"1 >-- ~ t- 0"1 I \0 0- G: '<TjV"l - - t"-;. '<T -~ O-C'l \0 \0 ~ ~ \0 0"1 I V"l 0- >-- ~ ~l Q) '" ::l ~ I:: ::I Q) ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~<Jl~ ;3 S et) ...... .;:: c ~ d '0 Eo-< ~. 0/:.... ~.g5 ...CI)_ &~!i ~ 5 0 r;l..CI)E-! C'l_~0"I OV"l - t;, <""l - C'l~ 0"1 \0 _ C'l '<:t - - ~~ EI7 '<Tt-~\O '<T<""l-O"I 0"1 <""l V"l 00 c::S - C'l '<:t - ~~ ~ V"l'<T~00 - C'l 00 C'l<""l - 00 v) _ - <""l - - ~~ ~ \O'<T~- <""l <""l C'l 0"1 -C'l-'<T c..) '<T r-: _ 0- ~~ EI7 '" ~ ",' - ....,... ..".~ " ~ C. :.< W e.o ~ .5 t'3 en u 0 .-e: 8.- e.o '~'5'~ ..~/. J:JCZl8<; ..o~;':="'" cfu::8;~ --- V) \0 V) c::S 00 '-' EI7 ..-.. t- V) N 'lS C EI7 ..-.. <""l t- q <""l t- '-' EI7 ..-.. - 0"1 '<T r-: ~ EI7 ~ ~ ~ c. :.< e .. " Q,l .... .,. ::I C Q,l > Q,l Q:; e.o c '0 E-< ." e.o"'" ...1 . :: ~ o 0 en <Jl Q) ....:l .... Q,l z ~ --- t- III <'j, '.:l t ~ ~ ..-.. o V) o 8 - '-' EI7 ..-.. Q,l "...~ Q,l ;:::. :.< e ..... en o U Q) .s ~ ::I C q,) M'~ ,. Q:; .- ..-.. III '.:l III ~ 00 '-' ~ ~ ..-.. f"l t- ~ f"l t- '-' ~ ..-.. ...... ...,. III 'lS ~ t:! ~ "; .... o ~ ~. r.a .s - .0 ::l o ..... o .~ ".".'.u........ ~ g ::l o CI) . .... ",' ,~...,~;.".........,. ~~.' ".....,.......,_..'"-~.,.-".".,.:,..,.,..... ..,.,.... ......"...' '. ~ ; ..... .",.,'" ,.....~ . ,., "'_ y...... ,...... .:, ~.,.,... ~_.', ," "." ,." " '.~' ~"<. ,.' ~. ',.' ~. _.__ ,. ~,' ,N,... '. '~_' ~.' _.;_"'_ ,~.', .,......., CITY OF DUBLIN MEMORANDUM ftcCEIVED AU 6 1 6 1994 . '''''''J DI AI\INI~I!' DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: August 15, 1994 Carol Cirelli, Senior Planner Lee Thompson, Public WorkSDirecto~ \ I 1 Service Cost for Current Application' j Eastern Planning Area Annexation The following is our estimated for the additional Public Works annual cost based on the existing undeveloped status of the properties: Scheduled right-of-way maintenance, including weed control, street patching and striping, drainage facility cleaning, new City Limit signs and sign repair, and litter pickup: 2) Needed immediate repairs: 1) $16,841.00 Placement of base rock along roadway shoulders at vertical edges: Speed studies for radar enforcement: $ 3,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $10.637.00 3) 4) NPDES (County General Program): TOTAL: $31,478.00 The first three items will affect us as soon as annexation occurs, Item 1 being an annualized cost. Item #4 will be levied against us beginning in 1995-96, assuming the annexation takes place before then. It is hoped that Dublin can modify its NPDES fees beginning in 1995-96 to cover these additional costs, and that the annexed area will pay for Dublin I s added costs. We will also need to make changes for the 1995-96 spread of the City-Wide Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment District to fairly assess (or not assess) the newly annexed areas, which will have no street lights. Please let me know if you have any questions. LST / gr cc: Rich Ambrose, City Manager a:(9495) \augustI15svc$ ","'J"'" _ . ,~.,.'. ._".. ~ 'n ..'~ ...., . . ~ ....' ,',. "'..,,_.......~..~ "".~..... ",.'." ''''''~~'.""'-'''' "'~', .....i... ~.."~ ~!_..., ...... .... {,...._..._. '-;"'~,,',""".'" ....- .."......, ,..., .. . .~~.. ~.-~'* .'.'" .~ ",,,,,0",,,,'1-,..<... .......'.., '." ..~'r"""'_'~' "' ,.....""~'c. .h, ...... '" ......<.....'...:,... '~".'-.. ..~.-- ..~."" ,....>'..i~...._....,'.'".'-' -..... .', City of Dublin Public Work\' . 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin CA 94568. (510) 833-6630 •...AUG-10-1994 09: 13 MCE CORPORATION 1 510 837 5515 F.04 STRIPING SNGLUrAD • CITY OF DUBLIN 10-Aug-94 FY 1334-95 PROPOSED•STREET WORK PROGRAM AND BUDGET AREA D7 - EAST.DUBLIN ANNEXATION • LEVEL ANNUAL HOURS TOTAL INVENTORY OF SERVICE WORK QUANTITY PER MAN UNIT TOTAL ACTIVITY # UNIT QUANTITY UNIT QUANTITY UNIT UNIT HOURS COST COST A1-01 SPILL CLEAN-UP 3.10 RD MILE 1,873 HR 5.81 HR 1.000 5.81 32,31 187.60 A1-02 .NOM-SPILL CALLOUTS 3.10 RD MILE 1.171 HR 3.63 HR 1.000 3.63 30.81 111,84 • :SUBTOTALS: 9.44' 23144 • A2-01 MECH. CATCH BASIN CLEAN 2.00 C.BASIN 0.005 C.BASIN 0.01 C.BAS 0.000 0,00 50.00 0.50 82--02 'MECH. DRAIN FLUSHING 3.10 RD MILE 0.015 CR HAS 0,05 CR HR 0,000 0.00 160.00 7.44 • SUBTOTALS: 0.00 7.54 A3-01 TREE/BRUSH CUTTING 3.10 RD MILE 8.063 HR 25.00 HR 1.000 83.00 88.83 720.61 A6-01 LITTER PICKUP (SPOT) 6.20 PASS MI 8.100 HR 50.22 HR 1.000 50.22 43.24 2171.51 A6-02 LITTTER PICKUP (FULL) 6.20 PASS MI TIMES 0.00 PASS 0.947 0.00 23.83 0.00 A6-80 .ILLEGAL SIGNS/HAZARDS 1,00 SYSTEM 10.000 HR 10.00 HR 1.000 10,00 31.55 315.50 A6-90 GRAFFITI 1,00 SYSTEM 10,000 HR 10.00 HR 1.000 10.00 34.89 348,90 A6-99 OTHER BEAUTIFICATION 1.00 SYSTEM 12.000 HR 12,00 HR 1.000 12.00 2:.66 255.92 SUBTOTALS: 82.22 3.191.83 A7-01 TEMPORARY PATCHING 3.10 RD MILE 2.341 HR 7.26 HR 1.000 7,26 30.33 223.74 A7-09 :OTHER PAVEMENT REPAIRS 3.10 RD MILE 3,000 HR 9.30 HR 1.001 3.30 84.82 788.83 SUBTOTALS: 16.55 1012,56 • D1-01 CATCH BASIN INSP. 2.00 CB 1,000 TIMES 2.00 CB 0.138 0.28 23.09 6.37 D1-02 ,CATCH BASIN CLEANING 2,00 CB 0.298 CB . 0.60 CB 0.340 0,20 25,07 5,08 D1-03 :STORM DRAIN FLUSHING 3,10 RD MILE 0.187 HR 0.58 HR 1.000 0,58 31.33 16.16 D1-04 DITCH CLEANING 2.00 DITCH MI 500.000 LF 1000.00 LF 0.019 13.00 24.12 458.25 D1-05 OTHER DRAINAGE MAINT. 3.10 RD MILE 4.000 HR 12.40 HR 1.000 12.40 2.24 450,62 • SUBTOTALS:- 32.46 338.51 D2-01 STORM PATROL INSP/CLEAN 3.10 RD MILE 5.000 HR 15.50 HR 1.000 15.50 30.26 469.03 D2-02 STORM PAT DEER REM/CLNUP 3.10 RD MILE 0.936 HR 2.90 HR 1.000 2,90 32.61 95.20 • SUBTOTALS: • 18.40 564.22 • • . .......D3-02A&R CURB & BUTTER 0.20 C&G MILES • HR •. .-0.00 HR " 0.00 0:0U D3-04 *OTHER CONCRETE REPAIR SW MILES 0.260 HR 0.00 HR 1.000 0.00 .2.78 0.00 SUBTOTALS .. . . .. . 0.00 • - 0.00 • • PUG-10-1994 09:13 MCE CORPORATION 1 510 837 9516 P.05 CITY OF DUBLIN 10-Aug-94 FY 1994-95 PROPOSED STREET WORK PROGRAM AND BUDGET AREA D7 - EAST DUBLIN ANNEXATION LEVEL ANNURL HOURS TOTAL INVENTORY OF SERVICE WORK QUANTITY PER MAN UNIT TOTAL ACTIVITY g " UNIT QUANTITY UNIT QUANTITY UNIT UNIT HOURS COST COST 04-01 INSTALL NEW SIGNS 65,00 SIGNS 0.028 SIGNS 1.82 SIGNS 1.615 2.94 53.47 157.16 D4-02 REPLACE SIGNS 65.00 SIGNS 0.030 SIGNS 1.35 SIGNS 2,183 4.26 50.07 213.14 04-03 REPAIR SIGNS 65.00 SIGNS 0.052 SIGNS 3.38 SIGN 1.427 4.82 33.08 159.55 04-99 OTHER SIGNS 1.00 SYSTEM 1.500 HR 1.50 HR 1,000 1.50 32.87 49.31 SUBTOTALS: 13.52 • 579.16 D5-01 CURS'PAINTING 40.00 LF 0.250 TIMES 10,00 LF 0.014 0.14 27.25 3.82 D5-02 INSTALL PAVE MARK 2250,00 EA 0.100 REF 25.00 EA 0.240 6.00 32.06 19E.36 D5-03 NEW MARKING SYSTEM 0,000 YR 0.00 YR 0.000 0.00 1100.00 0,00 05-04 EMERGENCY RESTRIPE SYSTEM 1.000 YR 0.00 YR 0.000 0.00 1100,00 0.00 D5-09 OTHER MARKING 3.10 RD MILE 0.144 HR 0.45 HR 1.000 0.45 322.08 14.31 D5-10 4" BROKEN LINE 2.65 VLF 1,000 TIMES 2.65 MLF 1.000 2.65 50.00 132,50 D5-11 4" SOLID LINE 24.73 MLF 1.000 TIMES 24.73 MLF 1.000 24.73 65.00 1607.58 D5-13 8" SOLID LINE 0.10 MI_F 1.000 TIMES 0.10 MLF 1.000 0.10 110.00 11.00 D5-14 12" DOUBLE LINE 4.22 MLF 1.000 TIKES 4.22 MLF 1.000 4.22 175.00 738.50 SUBTOTALS: 38.23 2700.07 07-01 NON-TURF CHEM.WEED CONT. 1.2,12 AC UN IM 2.000 TIMES 24.24 AC 0.000 0.00 200.00 4848.00 D7-02 SPOT'SPRAY 0.20 CIG MILE 0.340 EA 0.07 MI 0.000 0.00 124.37 8.46 D7-03 MECH. WEED ABATEMENT 12.12 AC UNIM. 5.236 HR 63.46 HR 1.000 63,46 31.04 1969.61 SUBTOTALS: 63.46 6126.27 GRAND TOTALS: 299.34 16840,63 • • %OWIIIF -.1. . *41'41' • •. - . DOUGHERTY REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY te s:a!F> 9399 Fircrest Lane • San Ramon, Ca 94583 �Dgiit'' Office: (510) 803-8600 • Fax: (510) 803-8630 SERVING DUBLIN 8 SAN RAMON RECEIVED August .15, 1994 AUG 1 1994 • PI ANNINr City. of Dublin Planning Department P.O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 . Attention: Carol R. Cirelli, Senior Planner Regarding: PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin Annexation/Detachment and Pre zone #1 Dear Ms . Cirelli: With regard to my August 4, 1994 . letter I have reviewed the possible methods of acquiring the Type 3 Engine necessary ,for serving the area proposed to be annexed. Amongst the possible choices two stand out . In the first instance the Authority would acquire a Type 3 Engine and expand its fleet by that one unit . The second choice would have the Authority modify its vehicle replacement program so that the existing Patrols (brush units) are replaced by the Type 3 Engines . To accommodate the first choice of purchasing 'a Type" 3 `Engine the annexation proponents should be responsible for the purchase of the New r Type' 3 Engine since the proposed service area would be the primary ' beneficiary. For this purchase an amount. of $250, 000 should be set aside by the responsible parties and if the purchase price does not reach that amount than funds could be returned. To accommodate the second choice of modifying the existing fleet by upgrading a Patrol to a Type 3 Engine at time of replacement would cause the annexation proponents to be responsible. for the incremental costs of $80, 590 for the upgrade ($169,410 value of Patrol vs. $250, 000 value of the Type 3 Engine) :.. - In this choice the ability to refund if the purchase is less than $250,.000 would be more difficult since it would be less clear where any savings occurred (Patrol specs. or Type 3 -Engine specs. ) . In either instance the Authority should be. in a position to place the order no later than January or February 1995 . .If - service is to be provided concurrent with the annexation. I -believe that the choice of modifying the vehicle replacement schedule will best serve all parties and I am prepared to recommend that choice to the Authority Management Committee and Board of Directors .. The Board of Directors will have to agree to modify the current vehicle replacement schedule to-accommodate-this `recommendation;_Mk ; • . . -- '. ~ r Carol R. Cirelli August 15, 1994 Page Two Operating expenses which are affected by this proposal would be dispatch expenses and 9-1-1 transfer. Dispatch expenses are based upon incident volume which will amount to a few calls for service per year. The dollar cost increase would be something less than $300.00 per year based upon the small number of known incidents. The only other expense I am aware of which is related to this project will be the transfer of the 9-1-1 files to a new provider (City vs. Connty). The expenses for this project should be small and applicable to both police and fire. Police should be better able to identify this expense since they are affiliated with the Sheriffs' Office. Please let me know if I can provide additional information. Sincerely, ~ KARL D DIEKMAN Fire Chief cc: Richard Ambrose, CEO Herb Moniz, City' Manager KDD/vj c:\pa94030 ... . ".. . '. . ,._ '. '. ,r. . > ,......-.., ~ _ r."" . .... ." ,.. ...."........ . ~.. .-. .......,. ~ ...' ~ ... ,. . .~'........."';!~~,_ ...... ....... <__.' . ,.'''_ '.' "... ._'L.", '..~... -. "".~-...., ,~",.&"",,,h ~^ '<.~' .'.. ~,,~,~,~""""" ".'" ..' ,.., ".-, . . ........-....: '\.. . "'I:" . ," ....~... ... '.~, .....-...." ~....... '.' ....~... "-.. ... . '. . '- '. ~."" . .~, "...... .',' -<' .;., ....., '. . .... '.-,.~. .."......... .... "":<'.1. ','" ..... ~ .....,. ".~.' _ ~ ..,., <::' ," '.... .~. ~"'''''''~'''i'''' ~- ". ....~......,,<.; ,-....~ ..-..,.",.......-....~;,.V(.....;...."" ..".....,.~_~....;.'~'...i ................_,.,:...."".~.... ..~. "-..~. ~,,_. ,....."""......~ ............,..- ""'" ....... ~.,.........'",._."".: :......... .....,."....."......I_".....".."..;.J'.....',..~ ,".'-;" ...."..;~... .I :' r' . ... DOUGHERTY REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY 9399 Fircrest Lane'. San Ramon, Ca 94583 Office: (510) 803-8600 · Fax: (510) 803-8630 . SERVING DUBLIN & SAN RAMON August 4, 1994 Carol R. Cirelli Senior Planner City of Dublin P. O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA94568 Re: PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin Annexation/Detachment and Prezone *1 Dear Ms. Cirelli: The principle function of the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority (DRFA) within the City of Dublin is to provide all fire protection services and first responder emergency medical responses as a component of the Alameda County Emergency Medical Services System. With the transfer of responsibility for services of this property to the City of Dublin, the most significant change will be the transfer of wildland fire response from the California Department of Forestry (State service area) to the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority (local service area) . . Operationally, the annexation will cause a shift in responders in the following manner: TYPe Response CUrrent First ~esponde:t: Current Responsible Aqencv New First New Responsible Responder Aaencv Building Wildland Fire Other Fire' Medical Response Other Incident .'. Alameda Cty Fire Alameda Cty Fire Alameda.Cty Fire Alameda Cty Fire Alameda CtyFire Alameda Cty Fire Calif. Dept. Forestry Alameda Cty Fire Alameda Cty EMS Alameda Cty Fire DRFA DRFA DRFA DRFA DRFA DRFA DRFA DRFA Alameda Cty EMS DRFA NOTES: 1. Alameda County Fire is' located on 8th St. in Livermore. . 2. California Department of Forestry is located in Sunol:.:...... ..,... . ......... _.H' 3 ~ DRFA I s, closest fire. station is located on Donahue in'Dublin. . . . . ........_........'~:...R. E (; E I' V E 'D"':'~~""""""'" ....-. ....... .,.... .~..:.~.,....,,~ .._.:....i~..;........ v.... ~.-........-......._....:._..~..,",.~ ,,,..-...,..... ".<-....~..."......"""~..-..w.....:..,;.,... ....."'.._.-..........,..,.......~: ""W'''~--'' .,.'~,""'" AUG 0 8 1994 .~~ lnllN PlANNINt:: r f'~ (, Carol R. Cirelli, Senior Planner August 41, 1994 Page Two 4 . Alameda County EMS is located in Dublin and Livermore. In addition to incident responses, development related duties which are performed by the fire agency will shift from Alameda County Fire to DRFA. ISSUES RAISED BY ANNEXATION: There are no fundamental changes in fire protection levels of service, response time or ability (from an operational point of view) to provide service to this area created by the proposed annexation and transfer of service provider provided there is no new development con~urrent with the annexation. Because of the nature of existing properties, DRFA's existing fleet is deficient because we do not have a Type 3 Engine available within our fleet. A Type 3 Engine is designed to accommodate incident responses in non-urbanized areas (agricultural zones) where the road network is limited and there is an exposure of people and property to wildland fires. To take on the additional service demands, DRFA would require one (1) Type 3 Engine and the associated equipment. Prices today for a Type 3 Engine and its necessary equipment range from $200,000 to $250,000. It should not be anticipated that the annexation would add sufficient incident volume so as to require additional staffing. ISSUES RAISED BY DEVELOPMENT OF THE ANNEXED AREA: When.the ~u~exed area begins development, it will be necessary to consi~er the construction and operation of a full service fire station. DRFA's current developer fees are adequate to support the cost of equipment and facilities given the development plans cited in item 6.B. of the LAFCO questionnaire. The timing of facility placement is important given the exposure to fire and accident 'during the development process. The current fees do not consider the need to have facilities in place before development occurs. . '. . ..... .. .... .... <.When.new."development..takes,~pl~c~.py~r.~cu+.,~e~t.~n.q~g..P~.:!::Jo.g....9J.,. ~"......".." .,. time, DRFA will need to consider the requirement of funding the . . operations of a fire facility during the early stages of development when the tax base has not been fully developed. A rule~of-thumb price for all operating requirements of a fire . ..... ..........".... "'''''-'station.''-service,...area~,"in;,.a~.suburban-"environment.,.:would..be..",in .~th~_'~I..,.._u>~w,...^_",",... . I 1"-.1. t') . ,- . Carol- R. Cirelli, Senior Planner August 4, ~994 Page Three range of $~ mi~lion to $l.2S million per year. Under current codes, all new construction which occurs in the newly annexed area will require fire sprinkler systems if built before a fire station is in place and operational. This requirement will extend to existing buildings if modifications are proposed. Please let me know if I can provide additional information. Sincerely, 4~~ KARL D. DIEKMAN, Fire Chief KDD/liw c:\admin\chief\ccirelli.sr cc: Herb Moniz Richard Ambrose >". .~.{,,.........~ ....... "","',~. ",....."'. "'.>..._,,,,_ ",v~._","'.'_~""" ._'....;.. '''''''. "..." .p'" .,.. ..."-.".' "', '.'_ ," ....... ~~ ..-," ......,"'...~1.: ~....~, 'l:-:-''';-~'....., .......: 'C,,'" . ~,~ . .' '~'_ _~ ," ~... '. .~ ':-, .. ,..... ~'h.. ~ .,~ .. ">"",,,,,.' . .~. ~ .. ..... ".,_~. "1'-..... ...... ..,,...,...."'....,... ...,;...,.,..r. '~""~""'1''1'''' ~.~'.,J" ",~''''",,,,';r,,,!,~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\"","....;....,..;....,.l,'''''''''''''''.v.#''i'':';;:~'''' "...,....~...,.......l....,f,..('f......'~.........-'...__..n.j..~"..,~,...........I..!'.Mr."'..'",.....;;:.~...~.Zi\.........;...,~l..'-~'ftt:...,..~;-4.t:c,:.ct~..~.~.......<;.".~.;<t~J~....~...:;;...,..-'\.;;,,,...,,.................~....l':'J.~.'lt..,,:'U<'....{~,,.,.,,.~.:;._,..;..,.,.,.....1t...'_W<.'I~-N._':>,,oitP-~..-?jl>()o.'g. . . I ;',.tt ,- '" ~-.. . ," t"~i..';~,..;~ .:t"'!~~:-':'''''{.''':' >~s;,~ )I 3';:~., .~'x~;() .;.,.~.!c;! "t ,-__...) ':.'~"".. ~'::J;" POLICE SERVICES Date: August 30; 1994 Ci~~ James W. Rose, Chief of POlicel(( 'Richard Ambrose, City Manager FROM: TO: SUBJECT: ANNEXATION OF EAST pnt.1N PROPER'l"l - POLICE RI!~YESTS The City is ourrently addressing the possibility of annex.ins' an additional 2.4 miles to the city of Dublin. This property is located at the east end of the current city bourldaries. 'rhe addition of this property will increase the size of the City to approximately 11.41 miles. Presently, DUblin Police Services is responsible for an a:~ec approximately 9.01 square miles. Of this area, primary slarvices are focused on an area of approximately 4 square miles. This area is primarily the urban developed portion of the city. The remaining 5 square miles is mainly undeveloped and rural in nature. The developed portion of the city has three mair., north/sC:'lltt and three' main east/west arteries ~ as well as I nox:oth/south arHl east/west freeways. The main arteries are spaced such that they can be rapidly accessed from any area of the city allo~ing quick police response to emergencies. This configuration also allows for the quick response of "cover unitstt to other officer's locations. The ability to move quickly to any area of thl~ city enables patrol un! ts to focus their attention on problem ilreas within the oity, while maintaining a steady level of service in all other areas. The general layout of the' urban portior' of the city allows police Services to accomplish more with few~ officers, due to the flexibility previously mentioned. The city recently annexed approximately 5 square miles. This area has remained mostly undeveloped and is patrolled on a spo~adic basis. as there are few calls for service. The main focus has been traffic enforcement. There has been no staff increase to -deal with the additional area which has caused a noticeab:'..e decrease in our ability to address specific traffic concerns .... --..."wi th1nthe. ,developed.. area...of,.the.~Ci ty .-p",:'The'^pending~..incre;l.se ..in.... ............_... ..". the size of the city will further erode our ability to cO:ltinue the level of service the citizens are now accustomed to receiving. ......,.(,<:...~-,4......"".,1 ,<,..., _~""-.,",,...~,""N:,'~.~!!;;"...~'~.~:/c:.';"N~:""!JII'oIf.,].~~'~~>Y:Jot..~~....,....~:r..~.~'l\.~....:.,.N-"I<'!A:l>.....~;,..'"',I!i..~....>iJ'I;;~~f'Ol~..~.,.~.";.~~"'.~...\Io:....".'1,j"J"'i-"'~'~"'~''''' :jI.,;..~.'../'n<.';''''''''''''''.t;...~-'''':'"\.,,,;..~.'Ol"...;.'....,....~..o:'';''''''''''~__'''''';':-'''''~'''''''''f4oI!':":''(..,[l:"';~"'t"".""'l"""';"';ct.""'<<':'f,,,,,,::.,'~~""""""Q(~""""'''''''''-''''~'''.,'''''''''''! - - ANNEXATION OF EAST DUBLIN PROPERTY-POLICE REQUESTS August 30, 1994 Page Two COH~ Ii: is difficult. to compare the existing area with the pr'::'J?os.ed area as they are presently two diverse types of problems. The majority of area currently serviced, by the police is predl:>mi- nantly urban and lends itself to urban style policing. The newly annexed ~rea and the additional area being proposed for annexation revolves aro~nd agriculture and livestock. It also contains a major transportation route -Tassajara Road. ~Ilis road is a main connector for commuters traveling from the Oanville/ Blackhawk area and it is also the feeder road for all people traveling to the County Jail facility. The Tassajara Road speed survey, conducted in AUgust 1991, indicated the 85th percentile speed on the road was 5S.73mph. The posted speed limit on this road is currently 50 mph. A traffic count conducted in February 1994, indicated that 4,897 vehicles used the road during an average day. Peak commu~e hours reflected approximately 500 vehicles per hour using the r,:>ad. The speed survey indicates that traffic enforcement is under-enforced on this road. AS traffic continues to incl:"sase due to development in the Tassajara Valley one can only assume that the volume of traffic, along with the associated pro~)lems increased traffic generates, 'Will bring an increase in calls for service from the residents on Tassajara Road who now have a local agency responding to their needs. The proposed annex area will create a new challenge for t!.le criminal patrol function. This area will not only increa'!;e calls for service but will also create a mix of urban and rural problems. At the present time, officers do not deal wi~h livestock problems such as rustling, strays on the roadway, trespass hunters, etc. Residents of the annexed area will expect the same level of service currently being provided to Dublin residents. In order to provide this service, response time will increase, and due to the nature of many of the calls, the length of time to complete a call will increase (currently 22 minutes per call). . currently, this area is serviced by the California Highwa~t Patrol (CHP) for traffic problems and the Alameda County Sheriffls Department (ACSD) for criminal activity. The area is gen*rally ..,'". .... . <.... .. '. .treated'.'as'.'" on '"call' "-wi th~"minilnal''"contact:'-'unless .~'there'~"isr"'a'''''''"''~'''''''''''--'"-''"~''''''' problem. It is felt this situation will change as the residants will expect a faster response and higher level of service wh~n they are aware that they have, their own localpolice'serv~;ce:3' available. ~ '. ." .. ~'_..."" ",'''.~ ".;.;-,,,,,. '..'.... . ~... ...~.._.. "........ 'J~, :..',,:.~' '~.",'A,~"",,,,,,,,,,,,,-;,,,,,,,',,_,,"","''''''''''',_'i*~'~''~''' jt..H'.,...."l.'-........~.i. ~ .v~,~ ~,......~1<0..;{> "f~~,....~.>~.,...'....u .",~.I..~..."io...".:!''' .....,e..,.."''''''''''~.....~....:-_~~~m.'''''''....~.....,-~t,~>J;'..._'''.:.. 7'"~\!'_oA-~_...~.~.,...~.,:il.........~~,.t.,.~\io~,foil."'"~..."..._~..tl<>..._..-i<'...,.,.,..,~........".,....,,;..,..,(<~ .- .' ~ -. ANNE~TION OF. EAST OUBLIN PROPERTY-POLICE REQUESTS August 30, 1994 P&qe Three Anot.her situat.ion that. must be addressed is the demand en services due to the location of the proposed annex area. Current.ly CHP and ACSD service the area with a TWO JIAM m:ru. during the swing -midnight shifts (3:00 p.m. to 7:30 a.m.) This is done due to the remote location of the area and the nE-!ed for officer safety on all calls. In order for DUblin Police Services to meet this need, two units would be required to respond. to all "in progresstt calls for service and to cover any unit making a traffic stop. This will be a requirement whether an increase in staff is approved or not. This will affeot. the level of service for all citizens of Dublin. There will be an increase in response time for all calls for service as unit.s will have to respond from a greater dist.:tnce. It will also create a situation where there will not be a.;ny unit available for service in the current city whenever there is a call for service in the proposed annex area during the midni.ght shift.. There are only two patrol units active during the midnight shift and both will be required to respond to all calls and/or traffic stops. We are currently experiencing the same crime trends as the rest of the valley. i.e., an increase in non-residents coming into the community to commit crimes. our auto, residential and cOlmnercial burglaries have increased for 1994. With the annexation of the proposed property; the city will experience an island of developed property that will become an invitin9 target for the criminal element if police presence is not readily visiblB. Existing staff will not afford Dublin Police Services the ability to maintain the level of visibility currently received by the citizens and business community of the city. LEVEL OF SERVICE. With current st.affing all areas of the City receive a patcol cheek at a minimum of three times per sbift. as units overlap and crisscross the city. This minimum is obviOUSlY much qrelrter on the main arteries and business community. An estimate wO'lld place the level of service near three times per b~ t.. Cu::~rently the Dublin Boulevard extension is receiving three(3) patrol checks per shitt. Demands on the Traffic Unit for servic';l to this area are on an increase, which creates an effect to (;itizen ..... ...ooncerns.,.for...traff 1c .,.. enforcement .'.in ...the"rest"'of~the'"ci ty ;'c"'-'_""~""_"',^'........m_.."~",......,...,,,... DUblin Police Services has taken test drives into the pro~~sed area to estimate some of the times required to provide servi:e. It currently takes approximately twenty seven nnutes to (:!omplete ..,,_...~._.~..~-,- -"C' one" pa trol-v.check<..of.~.the',.a-re.a.';-.,."Trris.~ref1:ects ~'11or1ba..r-dr'iYrrig'^..tTni'Ef''''''''''--.,._...''''''''''.~ .- ~ . ANNEXATION OF EAST DUBLIN PROPERTY-POLICE REQUES~S August 30, 1994 paqe four from Dublin Blvd. @ Tassajara Rd. This does not allow fer any stops, calls for service, or any other delays that may occur. The following is a breakdown or the anticipated daily 24 hour workload indicators for the proposed annex area~ ALL ~IMES ARE BASED ON AVERAGES Roving patrol checks of area - 9 x 27 min. = 4 hr. 05 ruin. (9.2 mile round trip) citizen generated calls - .29 x 60 min. = 17 mi.n. Officer initiated observation - 5 x 22 mi.n. ",. 1 hr. 50 nino (car stops, abandoned vehiches, etc. ) Dedicated traffic enforcement - 2 hr. == 2 hr. Meals, breaks, tl1usters = 1 hr. 15 m.i.n... TOTAL "'" 9 HR. 27 }1IN . The numbers convert to 65 hours 6 minutes during a seven day work week. Present staffing is set at a 40 hour workweek fo~ one deputy FTE. In order to meet the anticipated BtBIMOK WO~ ~ for the proposed annex area and keep the current level of service in place, Dublin police Services will need a minimum of~ officers (80 hours). It should be noted that this is a nlinimum staffing threshold and relies on the theory of, one call - one officer. Included is a chart which reflects CALLS FOR SE.'RVICE for tte first six m.onths of 1994. The first numbers on the chart reflect the percentage of calls received by g(lch ~hift. The secl:mc. set of numbers reflect the number of calls received by each :shift where t:fIIO un! t:s were reqJlired to respond. 'I'he third section reflects response time to all Calls for service. priority 1 and 2 are emergency calls requiring immediate response. They ill> not necessarily mean life threatening or "Code Threett respor"se. It should be noted that all of these statistics reflect Calls for Service received for the current developed portion of the city. . Also""t;here. at::e....~.HPpo~tstaff functions that will take plac~ but are not being calculated at this' time"~'(super"isionrinv{Jstl-".. _......~..... .-. ..p....... qations, crime prevention, records, dispatoh services, HtC.). ...,..~;..._,....\""".,,,..I'-"'~"".,..""_~~~...,.',,,._,,?~..;';'j"""..t"";:J;,tlf.'....."~..".,.~~Jo'~'P<.~i;lPo,.~.......,....-....."""'-~.~,.~\~.....ft,..,,,..\.........>f':1itt:;t""""'I'?l-b,...,1.r..;o;,?"'.........'l.o...r..":O".....,.';f-,o.J-y.i~"',..,..~.....\IO.~<I!~~.~..u:,A.....t4"'~<;:~~~.JQo<,_~~,I,~\..~~"<~~--r-,:,!I'<''''''....''.;...:or.-;..-...~.'o!.'''I.t<.,'It1~\~~~~i'l''--~,,~......,,:~\......,.:;''O .- ,., ANNEXATION OP EAST DUBLIN-POLICE REQUESTS August 30, 1994 Page Five If the request for additional staffing is accep~ed, it is proposed that one position would be assigned to the midninl'ht. shift and one ~sition would overlap day/swing shift. to cover what is determ1ned to be the most productive time frame. If the request for additional staffing is denied, DUblin Police services will be unable to maintain its current level of H:ervice .to the citizen~ and it will create an environment whereby officer safety will be of great concern. SUMMARY OF HOUllS DEDlCATIID '1..'Q ~ AREA NORMAL HOURS WORKED - ONE OFFICER Product.ive work hours 6 hrs 45 JIlin -. 405 min (does not include meals, breaks, musters) AHHEX AREA - ONE OFFICER productive work hours 4 hrs 6 min ~ 246 min 61% (246 - 4D5 min) " OF' TIHB DEDICATED TO ANHBX AREA SmlMARY OX COSTS W ~ ~ Cost of gn& officer (total per year = $77,500) 61' = $ 47,275 cost of tKQ officers S 94,550 Maintenance of vehicles ~ ~ 13,298* SUB TOTAL "'" $:L07,848 Plus one time vehicle purchase ~ $ 24,300 GRAND TOTAL = $132,148 *HOTB : Maintenance of vehicle costs based on mileage dedicated to annex area Wi!- Estimated to be 30,222 miles annually x .44 per ~ile. I If' I can be of any further assista.nce in this l!latter pleai>e feel free to contact me. JWR:mjg '." co:'-- ~c1iarlEis' 'c ~U" PI. u.mmer";....Sher i'ff":--"'-- -". ~,,".,.,.~.. .......,0.. ..,,,".- ._-""_"".'.~."~"",,'_'_""'_'_".AM'_'M"'''''''_'',,_ curtis L. watson, Undersheriff 0' ,_ " ')" ~ ", ,. . ...... .'" ~, - "'.0'; . . .' . ....~ '.' "" .... '. '," ',. ", ....",.~."""'""_.~~.....".........._.,,"'::<""...A"~~....~_1:;,........,;..,~'_.....-<(;."'....,..-..:o_...........,.~-.-..............~~~"."'''':''_.....~..-.tr,.~.,.,.'''''..~.P,....._''''':'~'''''~~...~,;.lI.".._<l,)><..~........\o....,}."',.";..fi....~,~.....~~....~~~........_;.>?>~p~,O(,......~.~....s,,..~~~_~'4~~"'''"",'H'-"~~~..;lo... . . ..4 . LOGGED ACTIVITY BY SHIFT January 1 thru June 30, 1994 SHIFT Pl1;RCENTAGE TOTAL 11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. 28.5 5,153 7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. 31.2 5,658 3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. 40.7 7,345 LOGGED ACTtV~ REOUItuBG 1x...? OR MORE UNITS January 1 thru June 30, 1994 SHIFT PERCENTAGE . TOTAL 11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. 37.2* 1,915* 7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. 19.8 1,123 3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. 10.9 1,979 1rIncludes all traffic stops due to nature of stops AVERAGE DISPATCH ~ ARRIVAL TIME PR!ORI1Y 1 ~ESJ?ONSE ~IME 5 minutes 2 5 minutes 15 seconds Non-Emergency Overall 15 minutes 3 seconds 6 minutes 54 seconds These are acceptable times for effective police service t~ the . communi ty . .......... .''''".+ ....'.',~,',' ... ",' ,'" ~ . """, ........., ~ ,.",. ... __ .~.~...,._..:,'"...,_...... '~.,''''',I _~...."'. '.....-.'.. "'''''' \.... .'t" ".. ....". ..."_ .....,......"~","".:, _ ...~-...,..... ,~ ...~..-........,~.;.....;I"u ............~ ~.",...............":....'~'.... .~,,"',......_,' ~.,..,;: ",,_-,":,:,~ ,"~"~~ -.......iJ:...~...... .""'..l....~'....,~..,....._,."'''"''.. ,~., .".$<_..... :.~.........~ ........... ,~<"".. ~.........' ................-"~..."...~., ..- " "'..: '-. '. " -"_......."....~..,.""".....,... .___,..;,.~......:'t....'_~...."~~.-:::......._...."';o'.'......~~""'..._.._.:"~'T..............,....;r......~'\'.'.-~_i;"..~~...'~"........".....,Ilo<~.....t......,.,..~~. \".....~_......::"""'~~"I..~~.....'l1A"I~.......~^"'";:q..~.~.~.:.-..........l>...~~~...#......~),v.o':..."!-"4~~.Sojo..,."...-z..',..~~..'" ~..e".:--~."'..........;.;~.l......~_o:rJ.~"""1'>f!V~'.........I'f.._~...,;.~