HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 190-05 ExpendPlanAmendmt
RESOLUTION NO. 190 - 05
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
* * . * * . . * . . . . * * * . * * * * * *
AUTHORIZING THE APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO.1
TO THE ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
EXPENDITURE PLAN, DATED AUGUST 1986
WHEREAS, in 1986, the voters of Alameda County approved Measure B, a half-cent sales tax to
pay for transportation projects as described in the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan
(Expenditure Plan), dated August 1986, and to be administered by the Alameda County Transportation
Authority (ACTA); and
WHEREAS, the Measure B projects and programs in the Expenditure Plan in North County and
East County have been delivered and ACTA is currently working towards completing the delivery of the
remaining projects in South County; and
WHEREAS, the Route 238 and Route 84 Project, sponsored by the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans), was one of the ten capital projects in the Expenditure Plan; and
WHEREAS, Caltrans developed the Route 238 Hayward Bypass Project as "a six lane rreeway/
expressway along Foothill and Mission Boulevards to lndustrial Parkway" as part of the Route 238 and
Route 84 Project specified in the Expenditure Plan; and
WHEREAS, court decisions in 2002 specified that Measure B funds could not be utilized to
deliver the Route 238 Hayward Bypass Project as proposed by Caltrans without amending the Expenditure
Plan; and
WHEREAS, Caltrans has relinquished sponsorship of the Route 238 Hayward Bypass portion of
the Route 238 and Route 84 Project in the Expenditure Plan; and
WHEREAS, on March 1,2005, the City Council of Hayward passed a resolution submitting the
Route 238 Corridor Improvement Project to the ACT A as the proposed replacement for the Route 238
Hayward Bypass Project in regional planning documents and the Expenditure Plan; and
WHEREAS, the ACTA Board approved the concept of the proposed Amendment No. I to the
Expenditure Plan on April 28, 2005, and the specific language of Amendment No. 1 to the Expenditure
Plan on May 26, 2005; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. I to the Expenditure Plan was transmitted on June I, 2005 to the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for review and approval and the MTC approved said
amendment on September 21,2005; and
G:\Çç.MTGS\l005-qtr4\QotIIO-04-<J5\R""o 190-05 M""""", B AmendmenLdoc (1'=3.4)
PaJl;e lof2
WHEREAS, the Mayors' Conference at their meeting on July 13, 2005, endorsed the proposed
Amendment No.1 to the Expenditure Plan by a unanimous vote of those in attendance.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Dublin hereby approves Amendment
No. I to the Expenditure Plan as defined in Exhibit "A." attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of October, 2005,
AYES: Councilmembers Hildenbrand, McCormick and Oravetz, and Mayor Lockhart
NOES: None
ABSENT: Vice Mayor Zika
ABSTAIN: None
A:tT:
I'IU~
~ City Clerk Fawn Holman
G:\Çç.MTGR\2005-qtr4\00t\10·04·05\Rew 190-05 M........ B Ameodment,doc (Item 3,4)
Pa~e 2 on
·
3 Db 12.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO.1 TO THE 1986 EXPENDITURE PLAN
Thus, pursuant to the enabling legislation of Measure B, under Public Utility Code Sections
131304 and 131050, which allows for the Authority to add, delete a project, or to make changes
of major significance, it is proposed that an amendment to the 1986 Expenditure Plan be
approved to reflect the following;
1. Delete references to the Route 238 Project currently in the project description in the
Expenditure Plan's Essential Transportation Project List as follows;
Proiect:
Cost:
Sponsor:
Route 238 and Route 84
$77 million Sales tax contribution; $67 million
Caltrans
Description:
Route 238 (Mission Boulevard) will be built as a six lane roadway from
Industrial Parkway to Route 84 near Decoto Road, existing Mission
Boulevard will be widened to six lanes to existing Route 84 will then be built
along a previously adopted alignment where right of way have been acquired
to intersect with 880.
Note; Although the new Route 84 will likely intersect Route 238 somewhere
north of Peralta Avenue, the six lane conventional road is intended to extend
to Peralta Avenue. The remaining $10 million to complete the Route will
come from other sources: i.e., local assessment districts, thus providing
leveraging for the sales tax funds. The project is contingent upon receipt of
the $10 million. If!t is not forthcoming, the project will not be built. (2)
Note (2)
Cost break-out is as follows;
C) Engineering/Design
,
15M
55M
7M
77M ¡
A) Rte. 238 through Union City
Widening existing Mission Blvd_ to 6 lanes
B) Rte 84 - 4 lane freeway
Total
Page 3
~q~"M
l-\ '2èX2..
2. Add the City of Hayward's Proposed Route 238/Mission-Foothill-Jackson Corridor
Improvemeut Project as follows:
Route 238/Mission-Foothill-Jachon Corridor Improvement Project In
Hayward
$91.5 million ACTA Measure B Sales tux contribution: $80.0 million
(inclusive of $1.5 mil/jon for project definition)
Project:
Cost:
Sponsor:
City o/Hayward
Description:
i
""",~$õ.lIt~~ '_·,,,~
~t..
.-""
</>'
§
~
£
'\ .
! 'I tMTlllIIiWfI'
K!~/' /""" J'"
,'\:~
'!I¡,- .,.
.""I} .
"
"'~
""
,I'
~
.
"'t \
.... ..¡-OJMt.....
..(\J,.:ìmeda . C(l\~ntl~
','
~C#~~
t
..'Int\,
Route 238/Mission-Foothill-Jackson Corridor Improvements in Haywurd will
include capaä(y und operational a8 well uS pede8trian and bicycle
improvement8 on Foothill and Missian Boulevards between Mal/ox Road und
Industrial Parkway. Between Mal/ox Road and A Street, Foothill Boulevard
will generally accommodate three northbound and three 8outhbound lanes plus
the conver8ion of the exi8ting parking lune to a through trufjic lane in each
direction during peak periods only. Between A Street and Jachon Street, the
project will convert some existing street8 to a new one-way street system as
follows: A Street will become a one -way street with jive we8tbound lane8.
joining Mission Boulevard as a one-way 8treet with .five southbound lanes, and
meeting a grade 8eparation at the intersection at Foothi/l! Mission/Jackson
From the grade separation, Foothill Boulevard will be reconfigured to U one·
way 8treet with six northbound lanes to A Street. Between the grade
separation and Indu8trial Parkway, Mi88irm Boulevard will accommodate two
lanes northbound and southbound plus a conversion of the existing parking
lane to a through trafjic lane in each direction during peak periods, Several
intersections along Foothill and Mission Boulevards will also be improved,
including, but not limited to, the Carl08 Bee Boulevard/Mission Boulevard
inter8ection. The final 8cope of the project will be determined by the
environmental clearance proce8S.
Page 4
50b\"'"L
Cost and fUnding break-out and proposed schedule are as follows,'
Cost
($ x 1 million)
1.5
1.5
8.0
12.5
68.0
Total 91.5
Tentative Cost Breakdown (Subject tQ Change):
Scoping
Environmental/Preliminary Engineering
Design
Right-of-Way Support and Capital
Construction Support and Capital
Funding:
$80.0 million - ACTA Measure B
$11.5 million Citv ofHavward
$91.5 mülion - Total
Tentative Schedule:
Scoping
Environmental!
Preliminary Engineering
Design
Right-of-Way Support and Capital
Construction Support and Capital
Page 5
Bellin
Spring 2003
Summer 2005
Summer 2006
Summer 2006
Fall 2008
End
Spring 2005
Winter 2006
Spring 2008
Winter 2008
Summer 2011
(j) è'Ö I¿~--
3. Add the 1-580lRedwood Road Interchange Project in Castro Valley as supplemental
improvements 10 the Hayward Route 238 Corridor Improvement Project as follows;
Project:
Cost:
Sponsor:
¡-580/Redwood Road Interchange Improvements Project in Castro Valley
$29 million ACTA Measure B Sall'.\· tax contribution: $15 million
Alameda County Transportation Improveml'nt Authority (ACT/A)
Description:
I.'!,~I!¥!V:
'\b'1~.,.
_t.
Q
~.
¡
"
\
,I
~
f
",/:1 ~
",~,'
,
/
·\.,I~':"\I¡:
{
,
n
.......
~~~+j, "~' l
11 ,1.,
. '..,
' ",~, "Ç>
, ',~~~,~~~.~-º,,[t{!~R(Hðti~EINr~.Y.i\Il~
Nar'1¿,¡j,1
Ct,)jnt.l'.
l·
;
1II1III'C¡h' \
'''''1101'<...·'·''"'''''·"'"'.''''_'~n'~~''''
The project is comprised of the following elements (subject to definition in the
environmental document):
· Construct a nl'W westbound off-ramp ji-om 1-580 to Redwood Road:
· Construct a new eastbound on-ramp ji-om Redwood ROQd to 1-580;
· Replaæ the existing eastbound 1-580 oj}ramp to Center Street with a new
ofFramp to Grove Way; and
· Remove the existing westbound (m-rampfrom Castro Valley Boulevard to
1·580.
Cost break-out and proposed schedule are asfollows:
Tentative Cost Breakdown:
Cost
($ x 1 million)
0,7
0.7
2.1
8.5
17.0
29.0
Scoping
EnvironmentQI/p,.eliminary Engineering
Design
Right-of-Way Support and Capital
Construction Support and Capital
Total
Page 6
Funding:
$15.0 million -ACTA Measure B
$J J.3 million-ACTIA Measure B
$2.7 million - Local
$29.0 million. Total
Tentative Schedule:
Scoping
Environmental/Preliminary Engineering
Design
Right-of Way Support and Capital
Construction Suppol1 and Capital
Page 7
Beein
Spring 2003
Summer 2004
Summer2005
Summer 2005
Spring 2007
76(;;/2-
End
Summer 2004
Fall 2006
Spring 2007
Spring 2007
Fall 2009
B C6'-L
4. Add tbe Central Alameda County Freeway System Operational Analysis as follows:
I
Description:
,
I
L
Central Alameda Count' Freewa S stem 0 erationol Analy";,,
$5 million _ ACTj Measure B Sales tax contribution.' $5 million
Alameda COUl¡~y Transportation Improvement Authority (ACT/A) and
.Alameda County Con estion Mana ement A ency (ACCMA)
&
1I1!II.1~"
!\to;rI!l4,..
.i
~'
o
g
~
.
./
øe.T~-uI1
.
~f
"
~
""'1..,1
--
l
AJa"'ed"
(0'""-1
~
I ..' '....
.1"Jo>'Þ., ~
U~,_Wtm FREWð.YSY$l'1M~~_ANN.1SIS
. : ...."In No.I~~~I'td~"'~q.1"
The transportation planning study will document the long and short ran~~l
, plan jor State highway improvements in the 1-880, 1-580 ami 1-238
Corridors, in Central Alameda County. The study shall include planning
level traffic operations analysis, traj)ic congestion and operational
problem/dejiciency ident~jication, henefit-cost analysis, project
implementation strateg;" and technical report. The Central County area
includes the Cities o[ Hayward, San Leandro and unincorporated areas of
Alameda County, The suggested limits for the corridors 10 be studied are:
1-880 from Whipple Road to Davis Street; 1-580 from Crow Canyon to I-
238; and 1-238 from I-580 to 1-880, Specific projects to be considered in
this planning study will include, but will not be limited to those in ¡he
Alameda Countywide Transportation Plan and ¡he ACTIA Measure B
Expenditure Plan, as well as those that already have approved Project Study
Reports. Other roadway improvements may he added a.' appropriate.
':E
The purpose and objective o[the study involves the development ofa
technical report that addresses the long-range plan and the sequencing of'
. improvements that will be required to achieve the most practiœl traffic
reliefin the 1-880, I-580 and 1-238 Corridors. The technical report will
summarize the various project scopes, schedules and costs; funding
avoilability; recommended project sequencing; and an implementation
strateg;1 that will provide the improvements that are most cost effective and
consistent with the transportation needs in the area. The technical report I
could he also used [or I!!.eparation o[programming documents (Ca/trans .---J
Page 8
qC?J ¡L
Project Study Report) for possible State fundingfrom the State
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), State Highway Operation
and Protection Program (SHOPP), and/or proceeds from the sales of excess I
right-or-wav pursuant to the SB 509 Statute.
Cost break-out and proposed schedule are as follows:
Cost: Costs for the technical studies and subsequent Project Study Reports
will be identified at the initiation of this project.
Funding:
· $5 million -ACTA Measure B.
· No other funding source identified at this time. However, there is
potential fUnding from sale of state owned right-of-way associated with
Route 238 Bypass Project pursuant to the SB 509 Statute.
.
Tentative Schedule:
· Technical studies identifying a list of potential projects - 6 months after
Expenditure Plan Amendment approval.
· Project Study Reports for selected projects - 5 years after Expenditure
Plan Amendment approval.
Page 9
10 (it· ./7_
j
5. Add the Castro Valley Local Traffic Circulation Improvement Project as follows;
I Pro'ectlStud: ._ Castro Valley Local Area Traffic Circulation Improve~~-;'t Project
Co~·t: =to, $5 million _.. ACTA Measure B §ales tax contribution: $5 mil/ion
Sponsor: ,I Alameda County Public Works Agency
I
!\1~I"'"
~!",I
..!..
Description:
-" ~~ , . ,.
j
,
!
.,
\
,/
'"
~
"
"
~,
. I,
.~,
~
\11".",
~¡;t",,,
/.
'~ '':1':'
.....
r~ .,
..'~,~
CASIKO vAJ.J1:v
~..u JIWfI( (, R(:UL~TION &MPRC::¥M!t¥!...~.
'f' 1IIIItII'.'" '. ""...~"..¡:,a~I,,,,,."œr,",,...,....,,,,,,,
;el~;:m a Studv In order to identify and prIOritize transporlatum proj':~tsl
and Implement projects that advance safe and efjicient multi-modal
, I trans/~~:ation objectives. _ I
~round: ---i
The Route 238 Bypass and the accompanying ramps ¡rom 1-580 to the Route
238 Bypass would have provided congestion relief and reduced regionlll
bypass Ilnd cut through traffic on numerous Ilrterial, collector Ilnd local
roads in the Baywood area of Unincorporated Alameda County The
proposed Hllyward Route 238 Corridor Improvement Project does nOI
provide these same benefits. The Baywood area of Unincorporated
Alllmedll County is bounded hy Castro Valley Boulevard. A Street and
Foothill Boulevard.
'I I, .,~ ·,.1
- f '.~(,? 'All" 'i
".. ~
} ,"", J
!\lc1mt:dd
CrJlJ(!LI.!
.
I I
L........._~~.___ '
Descrivtion:
The Alamedll County Public Works Agency (ACPWA) will develop a list of
projectsfor the potential U~'e of these ACTAjimds that will pro II/de
çonge.<tion relief and potentially increased capacity, and may Ilddress the
regional bypass and cut through traffic that the Baywood area is presently
experiencing. These projects will be evaluated against a set of crite<ria
developed by ACPWA which may include, but not limited to, congestion
reduction, capacity enhancement, regional bypass and cut through traffic
Illleviation, cost-benefit, community acceptance, political acceptllnce,
project relldiness and confidence in project i'!lplementation. AC~WA wilL.1
Page 10
J /rfO /2..
develop a list of projects to be pursued with the Measure B funds and I
present them to the Board of Supervisors for their review and, if I
appropriate, approval. Project information will be shared with the City of
Hayward on an ongoing basis for review and comment.
All phases of project development (preliminary 'engineering, environmental,
design, right-of-way engineering and acquisition, and construction capital
and support) are eligible for use of these funds.
It should be noted that the list of projects developed by the ACPWA may not
be included presently in any County transpol1ation programming docurmmt.
However, the needfor theseproject$ has been known by ACPWA staff and
voiced by the Baywood area constituency for some time.
Cost break-out and proposed schedule are as follows:
Cost: Cost for the various project development phases to be developed with
the list of projects by ACPWA.
Funding: $5 million
Tentative Schedule: Completion of List of Projects, Evaluation of Projects
and Approval of List of Project by the Board of Supervisors - 6 months after
Expenditure Plan Amendment approval.
Implementation of List of Projects with Measure B Funds - 5 years after
Expenditure Plan Amendment approval.
Page 11