Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAttmt 5 - Exhibit A Braddock and Logan Properties at Fallon Village . October 2005 ( I Biological Mitigation for BRADDOCK AND LOGAN PROPERTIES AT FALLON VILLAGE 1. Background The 2002 SEIR states that prior to submitting a Stage 2 development plan, the developer should submit a report to the City describing how it will comply with certain of these mitigation measures. Braddock & Logan, the applicant for the Stage 2 PD approval under consideration in the 2005 DSElR, previously submitted a written report describing how they would comply with the mitigation measures. This report updates the previous report by reflecting new and/or revised mitigation measures from the 2005 Fallon Village Draft SEIR. Specific biological mitigation measures for the Braddock & Logan-Fallon Village project can be summarized as follows: II. Summary of Relevant Mitigation Measures The following 2002 SEIR and 2005 SEIR mitigation measures would apply to species and habitats found on the Braddock & Logan properties: Special-Status Plant Species: If present as determined by surveys, avoid to the extent feasible. Mitigate unavoidable impacts at 1: 1 ratio on an individual basis (and no less than 0.5: 1 acreage ratio on the basis of occupied habitat) by either permanently preserving land containing the species in question, or by permanently preserving land suitable for the species and seeding such land with seeds collected on site or within the Tri- Valley area. (SM-BIO-2 through SM- BIO-4 of2002 SEIR, SSM-BIO-l of2005 DSEIR) San Joaquin Kit Foxes: Although the San Joaquin kit fox is not expected to occur in the Project area, preconstruction surveys and precautionary construction measures to avoid impacts to individuals will be implemented. (SM-BIO-9 and SM-BIO-IO of 2002 SEIR) Nesting Raptors: If work cannot be performed outside the breeding season, conduct preconstruction surveys and, if a nest is detected, maintain a disturbance- !Tee buffer of at least 200 feet around the nest while it is active. (SM-BIO-20 through SM-BIO-26 of2002 SElR) Golden Eagles: Within the territory of the pair of Golden Eagles nesting northwest of the site, homesites shall be located in valley bottoms adjacent to existing or planned residential development, agricultural uses shall be limited to grazing, and rodent control shall be prohibited. (SM-BlO-27 of2002 SEIR) Burrowing Owls: Conduct a breeding-season survey prior to construction to determine whether (and how many) owls breed on the site. Conduct ~5 Page I . Biologic,,1 Mitigation 1': I') I ~'J"l1icl·S!lbll1iltllls SWge ~ Ilio \ !;ligaliol1 I'n~ IK \·,'r';,'" ~- III II 1 rl"\ ~ -()(" ¡ (WI 1< :11(1' d", Braddock and Logan Properties at Fallon Village . October 2005 preconstruction surveys for owls in and within 500 feet of impact areas. If owls are present during the nonbreeding season, relocate the owls to avoid impacts. If owls are present during the breeding season, maintain a disturbance-free buffer of at least 250 feet around active nests. Mitigate for the loss of burrows found to be occupied during the breeding-season surveys, or the preconstruction surveys, by preserving and managing at least 6.5 acres/pair or unpaired owl, and enhancing or creating burrows at a 2: 1 ratio, either on-site or on suitable off-site lands. (SM- BlO-28 through SM-BIO-37 of2002 SElR, SSM-BIO-2 through SSM-BIO-5 of 2005 DSEIR) Special-Status Passerines: If work cannot be performed outside the breeding season, conduct preconstruction surveys for nests of special-status passerines and, if a nest is detected, maintain a disturbance- free buffer (the radius to be determined by a qualified biologist) around the nest while it is active. (SM-BIO- 38 through SM-BIO-42 of 2002 SElR) Special-Status Bats: Pre-demolition surveys will be conducted prior to removal of trees or structures that provide potential bat roosting habitat. If a bat roost is found, the roosting season of the colony shall be determined, and removal of the roost site shall be conducted when the colony is using an alternate roost. (SM- BIO-43 through SM-BIO-45 of2002 SEIR) Botanicallv Sensitive Habitats: Avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the United States to the extent feasible. Mitigate the fill ofwetIands, intermittent streams and other waters at a 2: I acreage ratio, and mitigate loss of riparian habitat at a 3: 1 acreage ratio, through creation, restoration or enhancement within the Project area if feasible. Otherwise, mitigate at these ratios at an offsite location. (SM-BIO-5 through SM-BlO-7 of2002 SEIR, SSM-BIO-l of2005 DSElR) California Red-legged Frog: To the extent feasible, avoid development of areas identified as suitable red-legged frog aquatic and dispersal habitat. Implement construction-related avoidance and protection measures. Mitigate unavoidable impacts to red-legged frog essential aquatic habitat and associated upland habitat within 100 m of essential aquatic habitat at a 3: 1 acreage ratio. Mitigate unavoidable impacts to red-legged frog dispersal habitat by preservation at a 1.5: I ratio; this latter mitigation requirement may be reduced up to 50% if additional essential aquatic habitat is provided. (SM-BIO-ll through SM-BIO-15 of2002 SEIR, SM-BIO-2 of2005 DSEIR) Special-Status Invertebrates: If vernal pool habitats are occupied by special status invertebrates as determined by surveys, mitigate any loss of such habitat through preservation (at a 2: I acreage ratio if buying credits from an approved mitigation bank, or at a 3: I acreage ratio on-site or off-site) and creation (at a I: I acreage ratio if buying credits from an approved mitigation bank, or at a 2: I acreage ratio on-site or oft~site). (SM-BIO-16 and SM-BIO-17 of2002 SEIR). 1': 191~'J"llícc SuhmillJb Sl;I~" 2 IIi,) \li!i~"I¡"11 I'D: 1\(' \'c"'¡!\1\ N-lol II [11 re\:'()( 'I ()B - {21J()_'d,,," Page 2 . Biological Mitigation Braddock and Logan Properties at Fallon Village . October 2005 California Tiger Salamander: If avoidance is not feasible, mitigate loss of aquatic habitat by creating or enlarging suitable breeding ponds at a 2: I acreage ratio, and mitigate loss of upland habitat by preserving occupied upland habitat at a I: 1 acreage ratio, either on-site or off-site. The latter mitigation requirement may be reduced up to 50% if additional aquatic breeding habitat is provided. (SM-BIO- 18 and SM-BIO-19 of2002 SEIR, SSM-BIO-3 and SSM-BIO-4 of2005 DSEIR) Western Pond Turtles: Conduct preconstruction surveys for work performed within suitable western pond turtle habitat, and relocate individuals detected within impact areas. (SM-BIO-15 of2002 SEIR, applied to western pond turtles as well as California red-legged /Togs) III. Impact Summary and Mitigation Requirements for Braddock & Logan properties As required by the 2002 SElR, the City of Dublin developed a Resource Management Plan (RMP) for the entire East Dublin Properties area. In the process of developing the RMP, the City considered the biological suitability, and the development feasibility, ofa variety of on-site avoidance alternatives. The RMP then set forth a recommended approach to biological resource avoidance and mitigation. Braddock & Logan's land plan for its two parcels is consistent with the RMP. The resulting unavoidable impacts, and the consequent mitigation obligations pursuant to the mitigation measures described above, are as follows: Biolol!ical Resource ImDact Mitigation Requirement Special-status plant species Three populations of San To the extent feasible, seed Joaquin spearscale shall be collected and comprising approximately subsequently distributed in 785 individuals suitable soils within the Conservation Area on-site, or at an off-site location. Burrowing Owl Breeding-season and pre- Impacted owl burrows will construction surveys will be mitigated through be conducted prior to enhancement or creation of construction to determine burrows at a 2: 1 ratio, and the number of impacted owl habitat will be pairs/individuals impacted preserved at a ratio of 6.5 ac by development per pair (or unpaired individual) impacted, either in on-site preservation areas or suitable off-site lands. Botanically sensitive habitats Approximately 4,600 Mitigation for impacts will linear feet of unvegetated be provided at an off-site waters (i.e., intermittent location. streams) and 0.56 acres of waters of the U.S. 1',- I ') I ~'!nnìrc Sul:>nlillal, Sl"gc 2 Bio \liligalion I'D2 II( ,',";011 ,~·I (I I I IlIlrn ~-I JC II JI\¡I~~II{ 'd,,( Page 3 . Biological Mitigation Braddock and Logan Properties at Fallon Village . October 2005 California red-legged frog Approximately 0.69 acres Mitigation will be provided of "associated upland at an off-site location in the habitat" and 187 ac form of breeding pond dispersal habitat creation/enhancement and preservation/management of such pond(s), associated upland habitat, and foraging/dispersal habitat. Unimpacted and temporarily impacted potential breeding, foraging, and dispersal habitat on-site will be preserved and managed for use by CRLF and CTS. Special status invertebrates None detected during None required focused surveys California tiger salamander Approximately 231 ac Mitigation will be provided aestivation habitat at an off-site location in the form of breeding pond creation/enhancement and preservation/management of such pond(s) and adjacent aestivation habitat. The main breeding pond on-site, and unimpacted and temporarily impacted aestivation habitat on-site, will be preserved and managed for use by CRLF and CTS. In addition to the impacts and mitigation measures outlined in the table above, several other potential impacts mayor may not occur, depending on whether certain special- status species are present in or near impact areas during construction. Preconstruction or pre-demolition surveys and other impact avoidance measures will be implemented, as necessary, for the San Joaquin kit fox, Burrowing Owl, other nesting raptors, nesting special-status passerines, special-status bats, and western pond turtles, as outlined above under "Summary of Relevant Mitigation Measures". Activities within the open space/rural residential-agriculture areas in the northern portions of the Bankhead and Mandeville parcels will conform to the restrictions imposed for the protection of habitat for the nesting pair of Golden Eagles located off-site to the northwest. I' ]<II~') "nke,S"hn¡juab\SI"s':: ~Hi" \ i\i~"li"l\ I'D:'. H{- \-c'r_'¡"" ~-llll 111)1 IC\:'.-( )(T()H¡:R21J( ~_d"e Page 4 . Biological Mitigation Braddock and Logan Properties at Fallon Village . October 2005 IV. Plan for Mitigation of Biological Impacts A. On-Site Consistent with the RMP, the upper portions of the Bankhead and Mandeville properties will be set aside as part of the Conservation Area, including the broad Conservation Corridor along both sides of Drainage C I. These areas support some of the best biological resources on site that shall be preserved and enhanced by changes in land use management. B. Off-site As described above, it is not feasible to avoid all impacts. Consequently, consistent with the SEIR, such unavoidable impacts will be mitigated off-site. Braddock & Logan has evaluated at least five specific off-site properties for potential use as mitigation for the impacts described above. It is now focusing on one particular property with very high biological resource values which would more than satisfy the mitigation requirements detailed above. Braddock & Logan is currently in discussions with the owner of that property. V. Supplemental Development-level Impacts. With the implementation of the above mitigation measures the Project will be consistent with the requirements of the Program level mitigation measures of this 2005 SEIR and there will be no additional supplemental development-level impacts to biological resources. 1'- )<)¡~'roftiù' SlIl>ln;II;lI, St"~L ~ Bin \lili~"li"n >Dê I\{ \-,",;"" X-IIII III) rc" ".( )CT!mIICIIO:i.dnc Page 5 . Hiological Mitigation