HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-22-1983 Adopted CC MinutesREGULAR MEETING - AUGUST 22, 1983
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Dublin was held on
Monday, August 22, 1983 in the meeting room of the Dublin Library. The
meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Snyder
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Burton, Hegarty, Jeffery, Moffatt and Mayor Snyder.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Mayor led the Council, Staff and those present in the pledge of
allegiance to the flag.
CONSENTCALENDAR
On motion of Cm. BurtOn, seconded by Cm. Hegarty, and by unanimous vote, the
Council approved minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 13, and the Adjourned
Regular Meeting of June 15, 1983; Warrant Register in the amount of
$135,089 52; Financial Report for Period Ending July 31, 1983 (Pro-Forma);
adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 42-83
RELATED TO THE USE OF 4R
INTERSTATE FUNDS FOR STATE ROUTE 17;
considered written communication from the Dublin San Ramon Services District
regarding a joint meeting; adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 43-83
AUTHORIZING MAYOR TO EXECUTE CONTRACT
FOR PARATRANSIT SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1983-84
(Cm. Jeffery questioned when paratransit audit would be available); adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 44-83
CONCERNING FEDERAL CABLE TELEVISION LEGISLATURE
SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN - AREA 5 (Taken Out of Order)
Warren Richard Weavie, one of the owners of property in Area 3 of the San
Ramon Road Specific Plan addressed the Council.
Mayor Snyder indicated that the Council had already acted with decisions on
Area 3. Mr. Weavie indicated he understood this and he requested no
additional decisions, but rather wanted to make comments.
CM-2-143
Regular Meeting August 22, 1983
Mr. Weavie indicated the element in the Specific Plan that he specifically
wished to address was that which prohibits any service use such as financial
organization, beauty shop, optometrist, etc. They feel very strongly that
while it is not their intention to have a substantial amount of such usage in
their center, it is imperative that they have some flexibility in order not
to have to come back to the Council every time there is a tenant who wishes
to lease some space. Mr. Weavie felt the solution to both their problem and
the Council's problem would be for the Council to designate a % of the total
square footage as being permissable for these types of uses. Mr. Leavie
indicated that even though this prohibition may well have been documented,
for some reason it was not communicated to them in a fashion that they
perceived what was happening. They have written a letter to the Planning
Director and expect to eventually approach the Planning Commission and City
Council with a specific request and concept.
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
The City Manager indicated the City has received communication from Barratt,
who presently has a pending application which will be affected by the zoning
on the area. Barratt has requested consideration of this particular area be
continued by the City Council until their meeting of September 26, 1983.
Michael Huss, Castillian Road addressed the Council and asked the Planning
Director if the Staff recommendation for this parcel was indeed multi-family
residential at 13-18 dwelling units per acre. He asked if a lesser density
could be considered.
On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Hegarty, and by'unanimous vote, the
Council agreed to continue to the September 26, 1983 meeting.
STONERIDGE QUARRY
Last year the City experienced problems with trucks from the Stoneridge
Quarry traveling on San Ramon Road. Staff met with the owners of the quarry
to discuss the problem. The owners were very cooperative and agreed to re-
route trucks onto the freeway for northbound travel.
The City has recently received a letter from Mr. John Wyro on behalf of the
quarry requesting that the City consider sending correspondence to the County
indicating that the quarry has been cooperative with the City and further
stated that the City has no objection to the renewal of the quarry's permit
which will expire in the fall of 1984.
On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Hegarty, and by unanimous vote, the
Council authorized the City Manager to draft a letter to Alameda County
indicating the City's position.
CM-2-144
Regular Meeting August 22, 1983
REPORT FROM PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
In accordance with City Council direction in March 1983, a group of citizens
appointed by the individual members of the City Council, met as a Parks &
Recreation Advisory Committee to identify the recreational needs in the City
of Dublin which were not presently being met; identify various alternatives
in meeting those needs and the associated cost of each alternative; and
recommend an alternative to the City Council and a suggested timeline for
accomplishing that alternative.
Cm. Hegarty suggested that because of the volume of this report, a special
meeting be held to discuss the Committee's recommendations.
Cm. Moffatt suggested Staff advise Murray School District that the City would
like to study this issue further, but may be interested in the Fallon School
site. We have 60 days to respond with an indication of interest.
Staff indicated the City would still have sufficient time to respond after
the special meeting.
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by unanimous vote, the
Council agreed to have a special meeting on September 21, 1983 for purposes
of discussing the Park & Recreation Advisory Committee report. Staff will
determine location of meeting.
REVIEW OF ZONING INVESTIGATION
7177 ROSITA COURT, GRISON
There was concern raised at the last Council meeting with respect to the way
in which the zoning investigation was handled on this incident. Larry Tong
presented Staff report. Mr. Tong explained that Staff has been performing
zoning investigations under two situations: a) when an official complaint is
filed; b) when a planning, building permit, or other application for City
approval is filed.
The Zoning Ordinance (Section 8-60.21) does not permit the repair,
dismantling, or painting of motor vehicles or the storage of equipment, or
materials in the front yard (includes driveway) of any residential district.
Restoration of vehicles has typically been considered a use prohibited in the
front yard of residential neighborhoods. The intent of the Zoning Ordinance
is to maintain front yards free and clear of auto repair and restoration, to
keep the yards neat and orderly, and to protect the neighborhood character of
the residential districts.
The Zoning Ordinance (Sections 8-63.1, 8-63.2) requires a property owner to
provide parking spaces and to keep the required parking spaces accessible.
The Zoning Ordinance does not permit the storage of any goods, including an
inoperable auto frame, in the driveway.
CM-2-145
Regular Meeting August 22, 1983
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by majority vote, the
Council agreed to: 1) maintain the existing Zoning Ordinance provisions that
prohibit restoration of vehicles in the front yard of residential districts;
2) maintain the existing zoning ordinance provisions that require clear
access to required parking spaces; 3) request Mr. Grison to comply with the
zoning ordinance within three weeks (by September 12, 1983); 4) maintain
zoning investigation program on same basis as currently exists. Voting no on
this motion was Cm. Moffatt.
Cm. Hegarty indicated he would like to see the City go on record that this
ordinance is in effect and the City will start strict enforcement in 6
months. Cm. Jeffery questioned if he desired money allocated for this strict
enforcement. Staff suggested this issue would be a good item to include in a
City Newsletter in the future.
On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous vote, the
Council directed Staff to investigate and report back to the Council within
the next 2 months, how other cities enforce their zoning ordinances. Cm.
Jeffery also asked that Staff request information related to how other cities
control auto repairs in residential garages.
ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS
SIERRA LANE AND COURT
At its meeting of August 8, 1983, the City Council introduced an ordinance
changing the prima facie speed limit of 25 mph to 30 mph on Sierra Lane and
on Sierra Court from Dublin Boulevard to Trinity Court.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Hegarty, and by unanimous vote, the
Council waived the reading and adopted
ORDINANCE NO. 10-83
ESTABLISHING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS - SPEED LIMITS
ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PASSENGER LOADING ZONE
DUBLIN BOULEVARD @ REGIONAL STREET
At its meeting of August 8, 1983, the City Council introduced an ordinance
which would establish a passenger loading zone on Dublin Boulevard at
Regional Street. This zone was requested by the U. S. Post Office in order
that a mailbox could be installed at that location. The establishment of
this zone would result in the elimination of two (2) off-street parking
spaces in front of Homestead Savings.
CM-2-146
Regular Meeting August 22, 1983
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous vote, the
Council waived the reading and adopted
ORDINANCE NO. 11-83
ESTABLISHING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS - PASSENGER LOADING ZONE
STREET SWEEPING SERVICES CONTRACT
On July 26, 1982, the City Council awarded a bid to Marc Sweeping Service to
provide street sweeping 'service to the City of Dublin. The effective date of
the contract with Marc Sweeping Services was O'ctober 1, 1982 with an
expiration date of October 1, 1983. The contract did provide that the City
and Contractor could mutually agree to extend the contract for an additional
one year period.
Staff has monitored the street sweeping service, and believes that the
overall quality of service has been quite good. Several positive comments
regarding sweeping have been received at the office. The Contractor has
responded quickly when complaints have been received, and has made an effort
to contact the complainant in addition to remedying the complaint. The
Contractor has also been innovative in his approach to sweeping to keep costs
down, and has further agreed to provide additional service related to litter
control and pick up when requested by the City.
Marc Sweeping Service is requesting a 3 year extension to the existing
contract, and provided rates for a 3 year period.
A motion was made by Cm. Burton and seconded by Cm. Moffatt to offer a 3 year
contract extension to Marc Sweeping Service. A cancellation clause should
also be added. The City Manager clarified that the City has a 30 day
cancellation clause. This motion was defeated due to NO votes cast by Cm.
Jeffery, Hegarty and Mayor Snyder.
A motion was made by Cm. Moffatt and seconded by Cm. Burton to extend 1 year
with an additional 1 year renewal. After discussion, Cm. Moffatt withdrew
his motion and Cm. Burton withdrew his second on this motion.
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous vote, the
Council authorized Staff to negotiate a one (1) year extension to the City's
existing agreement with Marc Sweeping Service which would include the
following elements: 1) a 5% increase effective October 1, 1983 for sweeping
service provided within the City; 2) the Contractor would continue to provide
parkway and median litter pickup at the existing rate of $38.44/hour; 3) the
Contractor would continue to provide street-side pickup for City trash
receptacle at the existing rate of $1.15/receptacle/pickup.
CM-2-147
Regular Meeting August 22, 1983
GUMPERT RANCH, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, DRAFT EIR
The Planning Director explained that this project involves an amendment to
the General Plan of Contra Costa County for the San Ramon Valley Area. The
site covers 2,300 acres and is located north of Camp Parks, east of Dougherty
Road.
On August 15, 1983, the Planning Commission reviewed the Draft EIR and
recommended comments for City Council consideration: 1) the traffic impacts
on Dougherty Road and other streets in Dublin, such as Amador Valley
Boulevard, need to be further investigated; 2) the impacts related to
extending DSRSD services to the project site need to be clarified; 3) the
school system needs to be carefully planned for the projects.
Cm. Jeffery felt that if the Dublin San Ramon Services District annexes this
property, it could have a great impact on the City.
Cm. Burton felt the sewer capacity is precious to us, and suggested
recommending they go with sewage north to Contra Costa Central Sanitation in
that we don't want to jeopardize our sewer capacity.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by cm. Burton, and by unanimous vote, the
Council directed Staff to forward the above comments, along with the Planning
Commission comments to the Contra Costa County Planning Department.
OTHER BUSINESS
Dues Increase - League of CA Cities
Cm. Moffatt reported that it appears that the East Bay Division is the only
holdout in the League of California Cities related to increasing the dues.
Cm. Burton clarified that we simply didn't want to give them a Carte Blanche
10% per year increase and further felt the 40% increase in one year was too
much. Cm. Moffatt reported an upcoming dinner meeting on September 23rd at
the Alameda Naval Air Station Officer's Club. They are trying to get Willie
Brown as speaker.
Cm. Jeffery reported she will be attending League policy meetings in
Sacramento on August 31st and will make appointments to see legislators.
Mayor Snyder indicated he had spoken with Bill Baker who advised that he will
be available on August 31st and September 1st to meet with representatives
from the various cities.
Signs
Cm. Jeffery indicated a concern regarding signs being tacked on telephone
poles and signs in medians. She felt that since campaign time is
approaching, we should crack down on enforcing our ordinance related to the
placement of these signs.
CM-2-148
Regular Meeting August 22, 1983
Housing Commission
Cm. Hegarty reported there will be a grand opening sometime in September of
the 38 units in Emeryville.
Chamber of Commerce Cocktail Party
Cm. Burton reminded the Council of the Chamber month end cocktail party on
Thursday, August 25th at the Heritage Center.
Dublin's Proposed Planning Area
Cm. Burton indicated he had received a call from Grace Poulson from the
Palomares Area Landowner's Association indicating the people who were at the
meeting were not residents within the planning area. She will send a list of
the people who are in the planning area, and felt we should send them a card
that can be returned in order to get more of a balanced viewpoint.
RECESS TO EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 10:00 p.m., the Council recessed to closed session.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, at 10:25 p.m.
the meeting was adjourned.
ATTEST:
CM-2-149
Regular Meeting August 22, 1983