Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.04 Annex Hatfield Investment "",'l. .....~ .. "- .....) . . CITY OF DUBLIN' ~$'1'1\~ CITY CXl\.JtCILMl!:E:rOO OATE:August ll, 1986 StJBJEX:T : l'A a5-0~5 Hattield-:tnve$te(':.lU1nel(ation t>lO. 4 and NO. '5' . ~-\:SJ;: EXHIBITS A'1'1'1\CIlEO: A. 'Resol\#on elrCII.lring' Annexation No. 4 B.Resolutionordering Annexation No. 5 Attachments: 1. LAFCO Resolution No. 86-18 ~TION: ft~2' LAFCO Resolution No. 86-19 . . Adqlt' ReSOlutionsorderin9 tlV! .lU1nel(ation of approximately 46 ac:res to the City of OIlblin. FINAtdAL' $'1'1\TIMl:NT: None. 0F.SCRIl?'1'XCX4': 'lhisitem iSf~.pCptionof t:helinal-I'eIlOlutionsordillring the annexaUon of the Hatfield-Ihvestec property loe.tiadw$t 'Of the City ~~. . . Ih AuguSt, 1985, tlV! CitY,CoQljcil adopted a resol1ltiond.U-ectin9$tsff to file' an annexationappli~ationWi1:h LAFCO and,sn ot'dinance prezoning the Hatfield- Ihvestec Inc. property (l'A 85-035) to 1'0 (Planned Dc;welopnent). Ih January, 1986, the City council, adopted a reSOlution approving'the property tax exchange for the proposed annexation and in April, 1986, the City Council adopted another set 'Of :resolutions amending theprevious:rel!Olutions as directed by LAFCO ta reflect the non contiguous natUre of the property proposed for aMeXation. As directed by the City Council, Staff sul:xnitted the>~tionapplieation packets to LAFCO in May, 1986. . LAFCO held a public hearing lU'l4apprOVllli ~tic>nNo.4 andNo.5on Jgly 17, 1966, au1:ho.tizinciJ the9.i~t:o~ witl'1 the. annex.tion ~1:ll9Ut holding a public hearing', and~ingAAY c:orrEaCti.on ~ the map and (Ifilseription as may be requi:red by the DirElCtor of ~lie Wo1\"~. .' \. _ r Staff rec...lll...nds aCkJptlon of. the attached draft :resolutions ordering the annexation 'Of the t'liO annexation parcels to, the, City of0llb1in. ) ,.. -----------------------~---------------------------------~-------------------- ITEM'NO. ~ "~ . '~ --d,"'"" "..."'Oi>"j;.......". . :,' -. ''''?'~''''''C COPIES TO: Property owners l'A FILE85-0~5.4 & .5 Hatfie1d~Ihve$tec , ",-: '':~~'~V$:~~~F~',~_~:! ~ RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ----------------------------------------------------------------- ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 11.65 ACRES TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN ANNEXATION No. 4 HATFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION-INVESTEC INC. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 35-86, the City Council of the City of Dublin made application to the Local Agency Formation Commlssion of Alameda County (LAFCO) requesting initiation of proceedings to annex that certain uninhabited territory designated as PA 85-035 Hatfield Development-Investec Inc. Annexation No.4, 11.65 acres; and WHEREAS, all landowners in said territory have consented to such annexation; and WHEREAS, LAFCO found that the City of Dublin has completed all applicable environmental reviews and that the annexation to the City of Dublin is required to provide for consistent and orderly development and to insure that the full range of essential municipal services necessary for the development of the privately owned property within the boundaries of said territory; and WHEREAS, on the basis of such findings and by Resolution No. 86-18, LAFCO conditionally approved said application on July 17, 1986, and, upon satisfaction of said conditions, authorized the City to proceed with the annexation of said territory without notice, or hearing. A copy of said resolution setting forth the conditions of approval is on file in the City of Dublin Planning Department; and WHEREAS, the conditions imposed by the aforesaid LAFCO Resolution No. 86-18 have been fully satisfied, or will be satisfied; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby order the annexation of that certain property approved by LAFCO as ANNEXATION OF NO. 4 HATFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION-INVESTEC INC. TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN and designated by the City of Dublin as PA 85-035. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of August, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk EXHIBIT A ..,,~. ";''''-'''-'-~'' -~" . "~'.;'-. '-'-~;"~':-::.~..-- RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 36.35 ACRES TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN ANNEXATION No. 5 HATFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION-INVESTEC INC. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 35-86, the City Council of the City of Dublin made application to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Alameda County (LAFCO) requesting initiation of proceedings to annex that certain uninhabited territory designated as PA 85-035 Hatfield Development-Investec Inc. Annexation No.5, 36.35 acres; and WHEREAS, all landowners in said territory have consented to such annexation; and WHEREAS, LAFCO found that the City of Dublin has completed all applicable environmental reviews and that the annexation to the City of Dublin is required to provide for consistent and orderly development and to insure that the full range of essential municipal services necessary for the development of the privately owned property within the boundaries of said territory; and WHEREAS, on the basis of such findings and by Resolution No. 86-19, LAFCO conditionally approved said application on July 17, 1986, and, upon satisfaction of said conditions, authorized the City to proceed with the annexation of said territory without notice, or hearing. A copy of said resolution setting forth the conditions of approval is on file in the City of Dublin Planning Department; and WHEREAS, the conditions imposed by the aforesaid LAFCO Resolution No. 86-19 have been fully satisfied, or will be satisfied; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby order the annexation of that certain property approved by LAFCO as ANNEXATION OF NO. 5 HATFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION-INVESTEC INC. TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN and designated by the City of Dublin as PA 85-035. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of August, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk EXHIBIT~ "'.,.' ., ....",- 0...:. ._;::t%i~i'~~~i~.:~_~~ __~-...c;..,_.2~:1;'_<.o__~... . ...... .... r- ( ;F.CEIVEO JUl 3 0 1986. DUBLIN PLANNING LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF ALAMEDA COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 86-18 WHEREAS, a resolution of application for Annexation No.4 to the City of Dublin was heretofore filed with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission; and " WHEREAS, said Executive Officer has reviewed said application and prepared a report, including his recommendations thereon, noting that a Negative Declaration has been prepared, and said application and Negative Declaration have been considered by this Commission; and WHEREAS, the City and the County have agreed on the property tax distribution, CEQA requirements have been met, and the City has approved a Negative Declaration as part of its prezoning process; and WHEREAS, the area is uninhabited and not within an agricultural preserve; it is within the Sphere of Influence of the City of Dublin; the owners of the property have agreed to the annexation; and WHEREAS, at the hearing on July 17, 1986, the Local Agency Formation Commission heard and received all oral and written protests, objections and evidence which were made, presented or filed, and all persons present were given an opportunity to appear and be heard in respect to any matter relating to said application and report; and WHEREAS, this Commission did find as follows; 1. The proposed annexation is consistent with the procedures and policies previously adopted by the Commission; 2. The annexation of the subject area is necessary to provide for consistent and orderly development and to insure that essential municipal services are provided; , 3. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative Declaration has been prepared by the City of Dublin as the lead agency, and said Negative Declaration has been considered by the Commission; and 4. No significant impacts or mitigation measure of concern to this Commission as a responsible agency were identified in the Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED THAT: Annexation No.4. to the City of Dublin be approved subject to the following terms: 1. Correction of the map and description as may be required by the Director of Public Works, ex officio County Surveyor; and 2. The City be authorized to proceed without notice or hearing. I CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING IS A CORRECT COpy OF A RESOLUTION A- DOPTED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY FOR. iA!-. T:ON COf.'.!.\:S!i'C: I OF ALAMEDA July 17, 1986 #, R ;,:~~(};~j:~;:.: '.: ;fr~ .__._.-~.- ATTACHMENI I BY: lIRUCE KERN, LAKO Staff .:~'fj'" 'i::~; ::-;,::?, '~.~~:'_"'~~:;;-',:,;}")', . ..,~,. If;';~ .,...,~.";.':~~~~"\:-,,,-,,, '. _ 3';7:~;~~~~~~l~ft~.:~_.,.... "",,,_ .' .~_;~J'~~t~. (1.ft~~f~l~i;=l~_: REceIVED JUL 3 0 1986. DUBLIN PLANNJ~G o \~.}:' ladys Houst~ Depu y County Counsel LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF ALAMEDA COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 86-19 WHEREAS, .a .resolutlon ,of appl1catlon for Annexation No.5 to the City of Dublln was heretofore fl1ed wlth the Executlve Offlcer of the Local Agency Formatlon Commlsslon; and , WHEREAS, sald Executive Offlcer has revlewed sald appllcatlon and .' prepared a report, lncludlng hls recommendatlons thereon, notlng that a Negative Declaratlon has been prepared, and sald appllcatlon and Negatlve Declaratlon have been consldered by thls Commlsslon; and I WHEREAS, the Clty and the County have agreed on the property tax dlstrlbutlon, CEQA requlrements have been met, and the Clty has approved a Negatlve Declaratlon as part of lts prezonlng process; and WHEREAS, the area ls unlnhablted and not wlthln an agrlcultural preserve; lt ls wlthln ~he Sphere of Influence of the Clty of Dublln; and the owners of the property have agreed to the annexatlon; and WHEREAS, at the hearlng on July 17, 1986, the Local Agency Formatlon Commlsslon heard and recelved all oral and wrltten protests, objectlons and evldence whlch were made, presented or fl1ed, and all persons present were glven an opportunlty to appear and be heard ln respect to any matter relatlng to said appllcatlon and report; WHEREAS, thls Commlsslon dld flnd as follows: 1. The proposed annexatlon ls conslstent wlth the procedures and pollcles prevlously adopted by the Commlsslon; 2. The annexatlon of the subject area ls necessary to provide for conslstent and orderly development and to lnsure that essentlal munlclpal servlces are provlded; 3. Pursuant to the Callfornla Envlronmental Quallty Act, a Negatlve Declaratlon has been prepared by the Clty of Dublln as the lead agency, and sald Negatlve Declaratlon has been consldered by the Commlsslon; and 4. No slgnlflcant lmpacts or mltlgatlon measures of concern to thls Commlsslon as a responslble agency were ldentlfled 1n the Negat1ve Declarat10n. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED THAT; Annexatlon No.5 to the C1ty of Dubl1n be approved subject to the followlng terms: 1. Correct10n of the map and descr1ptlon as may be requlred by the Director of Publlc Works, ex offlclo County Surveyor; and 2. The Clty be author1zed to proceed wlthout notlce or hear1ng. I CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING IS I> CORREa COpy OF A RESOLUTION k DO?TED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY FOP.- MATlON COf.'-WSS'O:'~ OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALifORN1A 7117/86 ATTEST 7/..) if/Yb . ::llH~IV~~ /' BRUCE KERN, Ifaff. -- AUACHMENT ~ . ~-~~'~;',/~~;'~.l~:f;~:!;;.t~lt~~l~g~il:r';:,~y '. ".C" ,...."0"...Ji!1\i!t:l;,,,,;.>; .'" . ,_:.~ '~:;';/?~:.f~~?f:~~:;;*t>!!!:'r~:~f.~~:<":'~~~~', ,~~,;,,?-,:~~::?-':':"~-:-:.{ll'~,,~;;";;":'~1.f.~~tJal ~ ~",,1Y.:;:;'~~_":":~