HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 71-06 Fallon Crossing Mitigated Neg Dec
RESOLUTION NO. 71 - 06
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
.... * * **** 11: 11: *** 1t *... ** *. ft* **
ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, STATEMENT OF
OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND MITIGA nON MONITORING PLAN
FOR THE FALLON CROSSING PROJECT
PA 04-016
WHEREAS, Standard Pacific Homes has requested annexation to the City and DSRSD, and
approval of a Planned Development prezoning and related Stage 1 Development Plan on a vacant 67 8
acre site known as the Mission Peak property and located northeast ofthe intersection of Tassajara Road
and Fallon Road. The residential project consists of 103 single-family detached homes on 19.5 acres of
the site and a I-acre linear park. The annexation and prezoning request also includes the 6 17 acre
Fredrich property The annexation and prezoning requests are collectively referred to as the "Project" or
"Fallon Crossing project", and
WHEREAS, the Project site is located north of the Pinn Brothers/Silveria Ranch residential
subdivision on the east side of Tassajllra Road, which is currently under construction, and southeast of the
Dublin Ranch West/Wallis residential project on the west side of Tassajara Road. Other surrounding land
uses include vacant agricultural land to the north, west and east; and
WHEREAS, the Project site is in Eastern Dublin for which the City adopted the 1993 Eastern
Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan to provide a comprehensive planning framework for
future development in the area. In connection with this approval, the City certified a program EIR
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15168 (SCH No. 91103064, Resolution 51-93, hereafter "Eastern
Dublin EIR") that is available for review in the City Community Development Department and is
incorporated herein by reference. The Eastern Dublin ElR was integral to the planning process and
examined the direct and indirect effects, cumulative impacts, broad policy alternatives, and areawide
mitigation measures for developing Eastern Dublin. The Eastern Dublin EIR identified significant
unavoidable impacts from development of Eastern Dublin, some of which would apply to the Project.
Pursuant to the Communities for a Better Environment case, any Council approval of the project must be
supported by a new Statement of Overriding Considerations with respect to these previously identified
impacts; and
WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin EIR identified potentially significant environmental impacts and
related mitigation measures, which the City adopted together WIth mitigation findings and a Mitigation
Monitoring Program (Resolution 53-93) The mitigation measures and monitoring program continue to
apply to development in Eastern Dublin, and
WHEREAS, the City prepared an Initial Study dated February 9, 2006 for the Project consistent
with CEQA Guidelines section 15162 to determine if additional environmental review would be required
beyond the previously adopted Eastern Dublin EIR. Based on the Initial Study, the City prepared a
Mitigated Negative Declaration dated February 14,2006 ("Draft MND"). The Draft MND is a separately
bound document available at the Dublin Community Development Department and is incorporated herein
by reference, and
Reso No. 71-06, Adopted 5/176/06, Item 6.1
Page 1 of4
WHEREAS, the Draft MND was circulated for public review from February 14, 2006 to March
16,2006 The City received two letters commenting on the Draft MND; one additional letter was
received after the close of the public comment period. Although not required by CEQA, the City
prepared written responses to the comments. The comment letters and related responses are attached as
E;lhibit A, and incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, the Draft MND, the three comment letters and related responses collectively
comprise the Mitigated Negative Declaration ("Mitigated Negative Declaration") for the Project; and
WHEREAS, a staff report, dated April 25, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference, described
and analyzed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Project for the Planmng Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the staff report and the Mitigated Negative
Declaration at a noticed public hearing on April 25, 2006, at which time all interested parties had the
opportunity to be heard, and approved Resolution 06.11 recommending adoption of the Mitigated
Negative Declaration, which resolution is incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, a staff report dated May 16, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference, described
and analyzed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Project for the City Council, and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the staff report and the Mitigated Negative Declaration at
a noticed public hearing on May 16, 2006, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be
heard, and
WHEREAS, the location and custodian of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and other
documents that constitute the record of proceedings for the Project is the City of Dublin Community
Development Department, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, CA 94568, file P A 04-016
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and
made a part of this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Mitigated Negative Declaration consists of the Draft
MND dated February 14, 2006, and the three comment letters and related responses, attached as Exhibit
A.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the City Council hereby finds as follows.
A. The City Council reviewed and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to approving
the Project.
B. The Eastern Dublin ElR and the Mitigated Negative Declaration adequately describe the impacts
of the Project. Project specific environmental effects have been analyzed in the Initial
StudyIMitigated Negative Declaration which determined that the Project will not have a
significant effect on the environment with the application of mitigation measures identified in the
Eastern Dublin EIR and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. There is no substantial evidence in
light of the whole record before the City that the Project as mitigated will have a significant effect
upon the environment.
C The Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the CEQA
Guidelines and the City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines.
Reso No. 71-0fi, Adopted 5/176/06, Item 6.1
Page 2 of 4
D The Mitigated Negative DeclaratIon is complete and adequate and reflects the City's independent
judgment and analysis as to the environmental effects of the proposed annexation and prezoning
Proj ect
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that based on the above findings, the City Council adopts the
Mitigated Negative Declaration for PA 04-016, as described above, including the mitigation measures
identified therein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOL VED that the City Council adopts the following Statement of
Overriding Considerations for significant unavoidable impacts identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR that
apply to the Project.
Statement of Overriding Considerations
1. General. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15093, the City Council of the City of Dublin adopted
a Statement of Overriding Considerations for those impacts identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR as
significant and unavoidable. (Resolution 53-93, May 10, 1993) The City Council carefully considered
each impact in its decision to approve urbanization of Eastern Dublin through approval of the Eastern
Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan project. The City Council is currently considering the
Mission Peak and Fredrich annexation and prezoning project, PA 04-016. Although the City Council
adopted a Statement ofOveniding Considerations with the original land use approvals for urbanization of
Eastern Dublin, pursuant to a recent court decision, the City Council hereby adopts specific overriding
considerations for the Project. I
The City Council believes that many of the unavoidable environmental effects identified in the Eastern
Dublin EIR that are applicable to the Project will be substantially lessened by mitigation measures
adopted with the original approval and by mitigation measures adopted through the Project. Even with
mitigation, the City Council recognizes that the implementation of the project carries with it unavoidable
adverse environmental effects as identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR. The City Council specifically finds
that to the extent that the identified adverse or potentially adverse impacts for the Project have not been
mitigated to acceptable levels, there are specific economic, social, environmental, land use, and other
considerations that support approval of the Project.
2. Unavoidable Sienificant Adverse Imnacts. The following unavoidable significant environmental
impacts identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR for future development of Eastern Dublin apply to the
annexation and prezoning project.
Land Use Impact 3 IfF Cumulative Loss of Agricultural and Open Space Lands; Visual Impacts 3 8/B,
Alteration ofRuraVOpen Space Character and 3 8!F, Alteration of Visual Character of Flatlands. Future
development of the vacant Project site will contribute to the cumulative loss of open space land.
Traffic and Circulation Impacts 3.3/B, 33!F 1-580 Freeway, Cumulative Freeway Impacts: Future
development of the Project will contribute to the unavoidable freeway impacts identified in the Eastern
Dublin EIR.
Community Services and Facilities Impact 3 4/S. Consumption of Non-Renewable Natural Resources and
Sewer, Water; and Storm Drainage Impact 3. 5!F, H, U Increases in Energy Usage Through Increased
1" . public officials must still go on the record and explain specifically why they am arllrovlng the later project despite its significant
unavoidable impacts.' (emphasis anginaL) Communities for a Belter Environment v. California Resources ArJerm 103 CeLApp. 4~ 98,_
(2002).
ResoNo. 71-06, Adopted 51176/06, ltem6.1
Page 3 of4
Water Treatment, Disposal and Operation of Water Distribution System: Future development of the
Project will contribute to increased energy consumption.
Soils, Geology, and Seismicity Impact 3 6/B Earthquake Ground Shaking, Primary Effects: Even with
seismic design, future development on the Project site could be subject to damage from large earthquakes.
Air Quality Impacts 3 IliA, B, C, E. Future development of the Project will contribute to cumulative
dust deposition, construction equipment emissions, mobile and stationary source emissions.
3. Overridinl! Considerations. The City Council previously balanced the benefits of the Eastern
Dublin project approvals against the significant and potentially significant adverse impacts identified in
the Eastern Dublin EIR. The City Council now balances those unavoidable impacts that apply to future
development on the Project site against its benefits, and hereby determines that such unavoidable impacts
are outweighed by the benefits of the Project as further set forth below
The Mission Peak portion of the Project would result in construction of housing, thereby increasing the
City's housing opportunities as envIsioned 10 the General Plan and its Housing Element, and also
providing construction jobs. The Mission Peak design accounts for sensitive topographic and biological
resources on the site by locating the residences in flatter areas near Tassajara Road and retaining
approximately two-thirds of the site in open space. Annexation and prezoning of the Fredrich site is
consistent with the goals of the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan for future development
based on City and urban level services.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council adopts a Mitigation Monitoring Plan dated
April 2006, attached as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 2006 by the following vote'
AYES: Councilmembers Hildenbrand, McCormick, Oravetz and Zika, and Mayor Lockhart
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
,---
ATTEST
~~u.~~
'City Clerk
Reso No. 71-1l6, Adopted 5/176106, Item 6.1
Page 4 of 4
'''p
~ o;-~
'i:-"~ -4<>'\
,
,
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
951 TumerCourt, Room 100
Hayward, CA 94545 -26Y8
(5101670-6601
FAX (510) 670-5269
March 21, 2006
Janet Harbin
Senior Planner
Community Development Department
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA <)4568
Dear Ms. Harbin:
Subject: Fallon Crossing/Standard Pacdic Homes - Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated
Negative Declaration
Reference is made to your transmittal of February 14, 2006, of the Notice of Intent to Adopt a
Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fallon Crossing Development Project, located on
approximately 67.R acres ofland on the east side of Tassajara Road and 7.9 acres ofland on
the west side of Tassajara Road, south of the Alameda-Contra Costa COWlty line in
Wlincorporated Alameda County
We have revicwcd the submitted document and offer the following comments:
From this, and other proposed development projects along Tassajara Road it appears that
the entire length ofTassajara Road within Alameda COWlty is to be annexed by the City of
Dublin. V crifY that annexation will not leave short sections of T assajara Road in the
unincorporated County area.
2. Restoration/repair of County roadways due to damage caused by construction traffic will
be required. Truck haul routes need to be designated.
3. Although the project site is located in Zone 7, runoff ultimately drains to the Alameda
Creek Federal Project in western Alameda County This flood control facility is
maintained by the Alameda COWlty Flood Control District. The District is concerned with
augmentation in runoff from the site that may impact flow capacity in the Federal Project
and in the watercourses between the site and the Federal Project, as well as the potential
for runoff wm the project to increase the rate of erosion along those same watercourses
that could cause localized damage and result in deposition of silt in the Federal Project.
There should be no augmentation in runoff quantity or duration from the project site that
RECEIVED
MAR 2 3 Z006
TO SERVE AND PRESERVE OUR COMMUNITY Efh'ItntX'!'IG
Ms. Janet Harbm
2
March 21, 2006
will adversely impact downstream drainage facilities. The District should be involved in
the review of the project hydrologic and hydraulic models, including the design of any
detention ponds that may be necessary
Thank you for the opportunity to review the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative
Declaration for this project. If you have any questions, please call Andrew Otsuka at (510)
670-6613 .
Very truly yours,
Stanley Fung
Deputy Director
Development Services Department
SF.AO
cc: Hank Ackerman, Flood Program
John Fenstermacher, Real Estate Division
James Chu, Road Department
Arthur Carrera, Traffic Engineering
Tom Hinderlie, Maintenance & Operations
Fred Wolin, Envirorunental Services
Robert Hale, Clean Water Division
Gary Moore, Permi!.s Section
--'"
ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
_,'.I..",~,r._._.~_~~~
1 00 NORTH CANYONS PARKWAY, LIVERMORE, CA 94501 ; PHONE (925) 454-5000
March 7, 2006
Ms. Janet Harbin, Senior Planner
City of Dublin
Department of Community Development
100 CiVIC Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Re: Initial Study (IS) & Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for
PA 04-016 Fallol1 Crossings/Standard Pacific Home.' and Allnexation of the Fredrich Property
Dear Ms. Harbin:
Zone 7 has reviewed the rcfcrenced CEQA document in the context of Zonc Ts mission to provide
drinkmg water, non-potable water for agriculture and irrigated turf, flood protection, and groundwater and
stream management within the Livermore.Amador Valley Ollr comments arc as follows.
Therc is an inconsIstency in the Hydrology and Water Quality section ofthe IS/MND between the
dcten11ination that the projcct may have an either direct or mdirect physical impact un hydrology and
water quality and the level of significance of the impaDt. Per item 3 under the Evaluation of
Environmcntal Impacts on the suggested CEQA Environmental Checklist Form (see Appendix G of the
CEQA Guidelines), it states the following:
"3/ Once thl? ll?ad agmcv has determined thaI a particular physical impact may occur then the
checklist answers must indicated whether the ImpaCI Is potentlallcv significant, less than
significant with mltlgutlon. or less than slgn.ificant
Therefore, a "No hnpact" determination demonstrates that the project will not have an either direct 01'
indin;ct physical impact to the enVIronment, in this case on hydrology and water quality, and would not
require mitigation. In thIS section ofthe enviromnental checklist, the "No hnpact" hox was checked for
all items. TIm is inconsistent with the detailed analYSIS provided in the ISIMND as some ik'TI1S have
mitigation measures associatcd with them indicating that there is an impact that rcgenres mitigation.
As an example, on page 93, under item (d), it states that "the project would reqUlrc l,'tading that would
change and alter existmg drainage pattenlS on the sIte and would increase thc amount and rate of surface
water runoff that could result in flooding on and off-site" The project proposes installing a detention
basin to minimize the potential for downstream flooding and to meet the water quality requirements of the
Alameda CountYWIde Clean Water Program s NPDES permit. Without this detention basin, the proposed
project will have a potentially sil,'TIificant impact on items (a), (c), (d), (el, and If) on the checklist.
Therefore, the detention basin IS also a mitigation measure, in addition to the mitigation measures listed in
the IS/MND, that would potentiall~ change the impact from potentially significant to "less than
sigmficant with mitigation incorporated"
Thoughout the ISIMND, a description ofthe proposed size and intended function of both the detention
basin and outfall structure is provided. In the last paragraph on page 93, it states that the detention basin
will dIscharge into the ummmed tributary via the outfall at the samc rate as the existing pre-proj ect
discharge rate. It further states that the downstreanl facilities including Tassajara Creek and proposed
RECEIVED
MAR 0 9 2006
OUBUN PLANNING
Ms. Janet Harbin
CIty of Dublin
Department uf Community Development
March 7, 2006
Page 2
Zone 7 projects adequately handle the existing rate; therefore, there is "No Impact." 111e ISIMND does
not provide supporting information such as, but not limited to the following: how much water and under
what storm conditions thc basm and outfall are designed for li.e. 2., 50-, or 100-year storms); the existing
discharge rate; when and under what conditions discharges will OCCUT; and flow of the unnamed tributary
under a I OO.year storm event. The IS/MND does not provide the supporting hydrolugylhydraulic
documentation for the design and fun chon uf the detention basin and outfall structure that leads to the
"Nu Impact" determination or even a "less than significant with mihgatlOn incorporated" determination.
The Developer should be required to submit proposed plans and supporting reports, data, and infommtion
for aU its flood and storm water relatcd improvements for Zone 7 review and approval.
The validity of any existing hydrologylhydraulic or dramage studies performed as part ofthe Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan, may require additional assessment. Since the adoption ofthe Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan, Zone 7 has been working On the Stream Management Master Plan (SMill), which is an
update to Zone 7's 1966 Flood Control Master Plan. Recent findings in the development of :Zone 7's
SMMP indicate the need for consideration and analysis ofthe impacts of development to the regional
flood control system and the identification of appropriate mitigations. Developers may need to provide
hydrologic and hydraulic studies to study the cffects of increased 11ll10ff in the larger euntext of Zone 7' s
regional floud cuntrol system and plan for regional water storage. Therefore, during the interim period,
before full implementation of the regional wat~']" storage plan contemplated by the SMMP, the Developer
should consult with Zone 7 prior tu undertaking the impact and mitigation analySIS. Future improvements
tu thc flood control system are planned, thus, it is imperative that thc Dcveloper provide a technical
analysis to identifY any impacts to the regiolJal fluud cuntrul system that may OCCUT dOWllslrcam of
proposed project in the interim penod.
The remaining comments are clarification commcnts un the remaining IS/MND document.
Throughout the ISIMND, nomenclature of the basin alternatcs bctwcen detention and retention basin. As
an example, in the last paragraph on page 2, a detention basin is proposed. Howcver, th.e following
sentences go on tu describe the basin as a retention basin. There is an inconsistency between description
of the basin's function and the terminology used. A detention hasin is used to hold water for release at a
later pcnod; whereas a rct~'llhon basin keeps all water onsile. Based On the description of how the basin
t\.mctions, this hasin is a detention basin and this term shuuld be utilized throughout the ISIMND
On page 89, the last sentence of the second paragraph states that "Zune 7 of the Alameda County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District is presently finalizing plans to store treated wastewater within
thc aquif~']" during winter months, which would be pumped out and used for landscape irrigation during
dry, summer months." Zone 7 does not have any plans to store treated wastewater within the aquifn
This statement is incorrect and must bc delct.cd.
The first sentence on page 90 and Mitigation Measures 64 and 65 on page 91 states the project shall meet
the water quality requirements of the City of Dublin NPDES permit and the Alameda County Urhan
Runoff Clean Water Program. The water quality requirements that the project must mcct are that of the
Alamcda CountyWIde Clean Water Program NPDES Municipal Stonnwatcr Permit, in which the City of
Dublin ;s a co-permittee. It is recommend that the first scnt.cnce on page 90 and two mitigation measures
be combined to reflect this clarification.
M.s. Janet Harbin
City of Dublin
Department of Community Dcvelopment
March 7, 2006
Page 3
On page 91, last para~'faph under item (b), it states that the project developer would be requircd by
DSRSD to pay drainage and flood control fees as a mihgation for groundwater recharge Impacts of the
project. Thc proposed project will be suhject to Zone Ts Special Area Drainage 7-1 (SDA 7-1) fees that
are asscssed by Zone 7, not DSRSD The SDA 7-1 fees are meant to mitigate for creation of impervious
surfacc arca only The SDA 7-1 fee does not does not mitigate groundwater recharge impacts; therefore,
this paragraph is incurrect and must be delcted.
On page 92, Mitigation Measure 66 states that "The project develuper shall submit a preliminary creek
alignment plan to the resource agencies for the realignment of Tassajara Creek prior to approval of the
project by the City" Developer shall be required to submit proposed plans and supporting reports, data,
and infonnation for this realignment plan and similar plans for Zone 7 review and approval in addition w
the appropnate Federal and State regulatory agencies with jurisdiction.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this ducument. If you have any questions or comments, please
feel free to contact me at (925) 454-5036 at yuur earliest convenience.
,
ervices Program Manager
CC' Karla Ncmcth, Environmental & Public Atfairs Manager, Zone 7
Joe Seto, Senior Engineer, Zone 7
Jeff Tang, Associate Engineer, Zonc 7
~f,
DUBLIN
SAN RAMON
SERVICES
DISTRICT
...;p;~.;,.\\:~
~.f"~ON~~~;:;~..
~'" y:~",
;:l "...
'~ r; j'
.p \) -'"'j
,,:;fllfl~J' tAe. -( '.:i;r!:,!I~l:;~;I, /
\'., ,~E l'l>~:''' ;,
__,~=;.,'~:c;"f.
7051. n,Jblin Boulevard
Dll. blin I Culifornia 94568
Phone::: 925 828 0515
FAX: ens 8291180
www,d!;re;cl.m:l:l:l
March 22, 2006
Ms. Jeri Ram
Community Development Director
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
SUBlliCT
Tract 7586 of Fallon Village Plan Arca
SB221 Verification of Sufficient Water Supply
Dear J eri.
This letter provides SB221 verification of sufficient water supply from the Dublin San Ramon
Service~ Di~trict roSRSD) for service to Tract 7586 in Fallon Village.
The Project is induded in the Distnct's Urban Water Managcment Plan and Water Master Plan.
DSRSD does have thc capability to provide water service to Tract 7586 in Fallon ViUagc. The
providing of services is contingent on installation of water and sewer infrastructure, payment of
fees, and satisfaction of all requirements contamed in the District Codc and implementing
DIstrict Master Plans, policies, and ordinances.
The District's 2005 Urban Water Managcment Plan Update (UWMP), which was adoptcd by our
Board at its May 17, 2005 meeting, includes detailed 'Water servicc analysis for Tract 7586 of the
Fallon Village Development Project. Thc vcrification of sufficient water supply included in the
lJWMP meets the reqUIrements of SB221 The District's water supply IS documented in Section
4.0 of the UWMP. Historical and projected demands arc documented in Section 6.0 Water
supply and demand comparisons were conducted in Section 7.0. The comparisons include
supply and demands for normal, dry, and multiple dry years. The UWMP indicates that the
projected water supply is sufficient for Tract 7586 in Fallon Village. The District can providc
service to the project without significantly and adversely affecting the reliability of watcr service
to the DIstrict's cxisting customers. The UWMP was distrihuted to the City of Duhlin, City of
Livermore, Citizens for Balanced Growth, and othcr parties associated with the "Agreement to
Settle Water Litigation By and Between Zone 7 Water Agency, Dublin San Ramon Services
District, et. al." The District has received no opposition to the UWMP
'r.c~ DubJi[l &= RNn"D :'::"rv:i','1.'8 DYf.t~d i~ .. Pl.lb1;" F."l!i!y
RECEIVED
MAR 2 S ZOGo
DUBLIN PLANNING
... ..Ms. Jeri Ram
March 22, 2006
Page 2 of 2
This transmittal satisfies the SB221 verification of sufficient water supply for Tract 7586 in
Fallon Village. If ypu havc any questions, please call me at your convenience at (925) 875-2255
Si.,= 'yu ;tcJ'f-
ODORA N BIAGT AN
Senior Civil Engineer
RNB/cs
cc: Bert Michalczyk
Davld A. Requa
David Behrens
ChrolllFlk: 23rF04 FlIlI0n Vill~t<
n:I,[!NGDEI"I\I"ERMITS\Dt:..~k,1~nt\FulIoIl Villaae. EDPO\SB221 Ve.rifit:lI.li....n.DOC
Responses to Comment Letters
Responses to Alameda Connty Flood Control and Water Conservation District -
Letter dated March 7, 2006
Responsc to first three paragraphs:
As noted by the DlstTlCt, the "No hnpact" boxes are checkcd in Sechon VIII
Hydrology and Water Quality of the Initial Study Checklist whereas the boxes
"Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" sh(luld have been checked
for items a), c), and d). Pages 89 to 95 of the Mihgated Negative Declaration
idcntify hydrology and water quality llllpaCts for Items a), c), and d). Mitigation
measures 56 to 68 are hsted to reduce the lD1paCtS to less than significant levels.
Pages 89 to 95 adequately Identify and evaluate the potential hydrology and \\'ater
quahty effects of the project and mitigation mcasurcs arc provided accordmgly to
reduce the impacts to less than significant.
Response to the fourth paragraph:
Thc detcntion basin is part of the project and described in the projcct descriptIOn
on pages 2 and 5 of the Mihgated Negative Declaration. The dctcntion basin is
not a rmtlgatlOn measure, but part of the project. Thc dctcntion basin is proposed
by the project applicant as part of the project in respOllse to a potential water
quantity and quality impact and does not need to be IdentIfied separatcly as a
mitigation measure.
Response to the fifth paragraph.
The proposcd detcotion basin meets the standard of the Eastern Dublin Spccific
Plan, which is to control peak mnoff discharge rates. The detention basin mects
thc standard of no net flo", or lllcrease in surface water discharge from the sile
beyond the amount quantity evaluated in the Eastcrn Dublin SpeCIfic Plan ErR.
Per MihgatlOn Measure 58 of the MND, the projcct dcvcloper will be reqUired to
submit a Master Drainage Plan to thc City Engineer for approval prior to the
Issuance of a grading pcrmit.
Responsc to the sixth paragraph.
As a standard condition of approval, the Dublin Public Works Department will
require the project developer to consult with Zone 7 regarding effccts of nmoff
from the project sIte to downstream flood control facilities associated with the
SMMP
Response to the seventh paragraph (first paragraph under headmg "The remammg
comments are clarification "):
The comment is correct that the project developer proposes a detention baslll and
not a retention basin. All reference in the MND to a retention basin is hereby
clarified. This does not change thc analysis or conclusions of the MND
Response to the eighth paragraph.
The comment noting the statement on page 89 that Zone 7 does not have plans to
store treated wastewater within the aquifer is noted and the MND statement IS
hereby deleted.
Response to the ninth paragraph.
Thc commcnt to clarify the project must meet water quality rcquircmcots of thc
Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program NPDES Municipal Stormwater
Penmt IS noted and clanfied as stated III the comment.
Response to thc tenth paragraph.
Thc comment that SDA 7-1 fees are assessed by Zone 7, not D$RSD, and meant
to mitigate due to the creatJon of ImpervIOUS surfaces and not groundwater
recharge IS noted and herehy clarified III the MND
The last scntcncc on page 91 and top of pagc 92 is dclctcd as suggestcd. Thc
effect of the project on groundwater recharge IS addressed III the first paragraph
under b) on page 91 of the MND Because the project will generate less surface
water runoff than anticipated by the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, thc statement at
the top of pagc 92 that the project would havc no impact to groundwater rechargc
remains correct.
Rcsponse to the eleventh paragraph:
The comment IS noted and as required by MitigatIOn Measure 66 of the MND, the
City will rcquire thc projcct developcr to submit a prcliminary crcck alignmcnt
plan to the resource agenCies, mcluding Zone 7, pnor t(l the approval of the
project hy the City
Responses to Department of Transportation - Letter dated March 2, 2006
Response:
The comment is noted that work with the State's right-of-way affecting State
facilities will reqUIre an encroachment permIt from the State. The proposed
project improvements to Tassajara Road will not require a State encroachment
permit because it is not a State roadway
Responses to County of Alameda Public Works Agency - Lctter dated March 21,
2006
Response to 1:
The length of Tassajara Road from the northern project boundary to the Alameda
County line will remain in the County by the project. However, thiS remaining
County portion of Tassajara Road will he annexed mto the City of Dublin as part
of thc Moller, Vargas, and Tipper development application that is currently m
revicw in the City Tf the Moller, Vargas, and Tipper dcvclopment 1S approved,
the remaining County section of Tassajara Road will be annexcd into Dubhn.
Responsc to 2:
As a standard City practicc, th~ project developer w1l1 be conditioncd by thc
Public Works Dcpartment to restore all County roads damagcd during proje~t
construction \() County standards. The City will also condition the developer to
identify tru~k haul routes during construction prior to the issuan~e of grading and
conslructlOn permits.
Response to 3
The project proposcs a detention basin to control surface water runoff from the
site. As stated in section d) on page 93, the project would not incrcase the rate or amount
of surface water generated from the sitc grcater than analyzed III the Eastern Dublin E1R.
The mcorporation of mitigation measures 56, 61, 67, and 68 will reduce potential
downstream erosion and flooding by the project. Mitigation McaslUc 58 oflhe MND
requires the projcct developer to submit a hydrology report and dctcntion baSin des1gn
plans to Zone 7 ofthe Alameda County Flood Control & Wator Conservahon Dlstnct
prior to thc issuance of a storm drain building permit. The project will not Illcrease the
intensity of surface water runoff compared to existing conditions.
FALLON CROSSING-PA 04-016
MJTIGATlON MONITORING PLAN
Prq;rnd f<r
The City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, California 94568
(925) 833-6620
Prq;rnd 0/
Phil MartIn & AssOcIates, Inc.
1990 W. Corporate Way
Anaheim, California 92801
(714) 490-1519
APRIL 2006
E~\b~+- e
LO MITIGATION MONITORING PIAN
Ll Introduction
Section 15097 of the Calitornia Environmental Qoality Act (CEQA) requires all stale and local
agencies to establish monitorin~ or reporting programs for projects approved by a public agency
whenever approval involve..", the adoption of either a \~mitigated negative declaration" or specjfied
rnvirunm~ntal finding..;; related to environmental -impact reports.
This is the Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP) for Fallon Crossing project. It has been prepal'ed
pursuant to the requirements of Public Resource; Code 921081.6 which, llJUoug other things, states
. that when a governmental agency adopts or certifies a CEQA document that. contains the
environmental review of a proposed proiect, "The public a~erlCy shall lldopl II reporting or
monit.oring program for the:: chang-c.r,; made to the project or conditions of project approval~ adopted
in order to mitigate or avoid signifiCl:lJ.lt effects on the environment. The reporting or munituring
program shall be designed to ensure ""mp!i""ce doring proj,,,,t implementation."
The following Mitigation Monitoring Plan includes a dc::scription of the requirements of the
California Envil'Onmental Qoality Act and a compliance checklist. The project as approved includes
mitigation nleasures. The intent of the: Plan is to prescribe: and enforce a means for properly and
successfully implementing the mitigation me.1sures as identified within the Environmental tmpll"t
Report for this project. Unless otherwise noted, the projec1: developer .< prescribed hy this Plan
shall fund the cog! of implementing the mitigation measures.
L2 Compliance Cheekli.t
The Mitigation Monitoring Plan contained herein is intended to smisfy the requirements of CH)A
as they relate to the EnvironmeJllllllmpllct Report for lhe Fallon Crossing project prepared h, the
City of D ub!in. This MMP will be u.sed hy City staff and mitigation monitoring per'Sonnello ensure
compliance with the mitigat.ion measures during project implementation. Mitigation me"d."iurc:s
ident.ified in this MMP were developed in the Mitiga.ted Negative Declaration prepared for the
ptupu~d project.
The Fallon Crossing pl'Oject presents a detailed set of mitigation mellsures lhllt will be implemented
throughout the lifetune of lhe project. Miligation is defined by CEQA "" a measure which.
. Avoids the impact altogether hy not t.aking a certain action ur parts ufan actiun;
. Minimize impacts by limiting the degree 01' magnitude of the act.io11 and its
implementation;
. Rect.ifies the impact by repairing~ rehabilitating., or restoring the: impacted t.'1Wlronmcnt:
. Reduces or eliminated t.he impact. over time b) preservation and maintenance opcration~
durin~ the life of the pmject;
T"lg~ 1
. Compensation for the impact by replacing or providing suhstitute resources or
environments.
The intem of the MMP is to ensure the effeclive implementation and enforcement of adopted
mitigation tnd8Sun::s and permit conditions. Th~ Mrv1P '\.AIilJ provide for monitoring of construction
activitie..... a... necessary and in-thfAidd identification and resolution of environmental concerns.
Monitoring and documenting the implementatiun of mitigation measures win he coordinated hy the
City of Dublin. The table attaohed tu this repurt identifies the mitigation measure, the monitoring
action tor the mitigation mea"tures, the responsihle party tor the monitoring action~ and timing of
the monitoring actiun. The respective project developer win be responsible for fully understanding
and effectivEly implementing the mitigation rnea<;;ures contained within the MMP The City of
Dublin will be responsible for ensuring compliance.
During construction of the Fallun Crossing pruject, the City will assigo an inspector who will he
re~"Pons:ible for fidd monitoring of mitigation mea'\ure complimlCe. The inspectur will report to the
City's Conununity Development Department and be thoroughly familiar with permit conditions and
the Ml\1.P In addition, the inspector will be familiar with constructiun uuntract requirements,
constl'uction schedulesl standard construction practices, and mitigation techniques, 111 order to traek
the statuS of mitigation mea....ure imp lcmcntation, field-monitoring activities wilt be du{;umented on
compliance munitoring report worksheets. The time commitment of the inspector will vary
depending on tht: intrnsity i:IJ1d location of construction. Aided by the attached table, the inspector
will be responsible for the following activities:
. On-site day-to-day monitoring of constructjon activities;
. Review construction plans and equipment staging! access plans to ensure confurmance
with adopled mitigation measures;
. Ensuring contractor knowledge of and compliance with the MMP;
. Verifying thc accuracy and adequacy of contract wording;
.. Having the authority to require correction of activities that violate mitigation measures.
The inspector shall have the ability and authority to secure compliance with the Ml\1P;
.. AJ.::ting in the TOle of contact for propt:rty OWJlers or any uther affected persons who
wish to register observations of violations of project pewit conditions or mitigation.
Upon receiving any complaints, the inspector shaH immediately contact the constructjon
represen.tative, The inspector shall be l'esponsihle for verifying any sllch observations
and for developing any necessary currective actiuns in consultatiol1 with the construction
representative and the City of Duhlin;
Page 2
. Obtaining assistance as necessary from technical experts In order 10 develop sito,specific
procedures for implementing the mitigation me.a....uTCs;
. Maintaining a. log of all significant interactions, violations of permit conditiuns ur
rnitiJdltion measures; and necessary corrective mea..';;ures.
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
The fnllowing table lndicaleS the mitigatiun measure number; the impact the me.sure i, designed to
addressl the mea.';;ure text, the: monitoring agency, implementation schedule) and an area for sjgn-off
indicating compliance.
f>~gL: 3
1 lUitigatiD"-
i
Numb-er
1.
2.
3.
4.
Impact
The project W~lUL:I h;:we aesthetic
impacts <lue to the development 0 f
\'acant land and grrding of hillsides.
The project \\'nuld have aesthetic
impocts due to tile de\'elopment of
vacant J3I1d and grading of hillsides.
The project .....i..ould ha'i.'e aesthetic
impacts due to the de'i:e!opment of
I "i!acant land and gr<lding (J f hillsides.
TABLE I
FALLOl\ CROSSING - ....nTlGATlON MONITORIN G PL4N
Jlfitigafion ,,.f.easures
:\titigalLon 1'leaS\ue 1. The City shall ensure implementation of the
Specific Plan,' (l enernl Plan land u-se plan. whicll "'l'33 dCi!e1oped to
retain predominant natural features 3ml a ~nse r)f openness. l Ea3tem
Dublm General Plan .AmendmerH:.' Spec-iflC Plan y.,'Jitigation Me3Stue
J.&! 2.0)
ltfmJ(crmg
4~1(}'
Oty of Dublin
Community
Development
Department -
Planrling Di-..'isim1
i\.:titigation f',..leasure 2_ The project shall reduce the -,,'isual impact of ~ City of Dw lin
extens.ive grading through sensitive engineering des.ign that uses Community
gradual transitp::ms from grooed arei:t3 to natural slopes and D e'i,:elopmeut
re"ege~[on. r Eastern Dublin G enerat Plan Atm:tldm~ntl Speci fie Plan Department -
i\,.:litigation Measure .3-.814.0) Planning DivisJon
1I..titigation Measure 3_ The fmal gradrngplan shall minimize alterati::llls
to exist~lg natura! oonwurs. rEa.<;tem Dublin General Plan
Amendmen'''' 'i'ecific Plan Mitigation Measure 3.&. 4.1)
! The project ~~uuld have aesthetic :\titigat[on Measure 4. The fmal grading plan shan a....oid extensL-,,'e
~ impacts due to the de'i.'elopment of I areas of flat deyelopment. r Eastern Dublin Genern1 Plan
1 'i.'acant!and alld graiing 0 r hills.ides. I ..o\mendmenV Specific- Plan 1V'litigatil)rt jl,.1easure 3.814.21
I
I
: :
Ujv of Dublin
Communi,y
D e'ilelopment
Department -
Planning Division
Cijv of Dublin
Community
D e':elopment
Department -
Planning D i....ision
InpunerlJ&m
Sd1<<Me
Prior to 3pp!{],val of a
Stage 2 DeYelopment
Plan
Prior [(I apprm'al of a
Stage 2 D e''elopment
Plan
Prior to is~ance of a
grnding permit.
Prior to is!llaflce of a
grading permiL
,
I SigJ
lUff
P,!!,,4
j j
The proiect "\~;ould have aesthf:'lk:
imp.acts due to the de~;elopment 0 f
.'acanl fand and gra:iing of l1illside~_
6.
The project ....,:uulll ha....e .aesthetic
impact~ due to lhe development of
.....acant land and grading l) f hillsides.
7
The p-m jxt ....wuld ha....e aesthetic
impacts due to !he development of
.....acant land and grading 0 r hjl]sides.
s.
The p-mject .......,ould ha....e aesthetic
impacts due to ~he de....eJopment of
.....acan t laIJd and grading of hillsides.
:\1itigatiofi 1\.1easure 'i. The design of the res.mential units shall
conform to natural landfunns as mnclt as pfI 55j"'le, (E astern DlI'hlin
General Plan .\mendmentl Specwc Plcm Y.-:litigarion :\1ea..~e 3.&14J.l
~.titigati[m J\..teasure ft. tJ..i1 graded sJlJpes. shall be recunwured to
resemble ex.isting landfflrms in the immediate area. {Ea:::tem Dublin
r. enenl Plan Amendmentl Specific Plan f',.'1itlgBtiDn f',.'1e1tillre 3.&/4.4 l
1\'1itigation Measure 7 Tile hcight of cLrt :and fIIl slopes shall be
minirl1 ized as much as possible. (E a..q-em D ub-lin General Plan
b..mendmentl SpecifLC Plan Mitigation )..teasure 3,8/ 4_51
"[I.'litigation \teasure~. De'>'ell)pment on the main ridgeline shall be
pmllibited to minimize ".;sual imp-octs and ensure that de\.elopment on
f-o-regrllouml hills meet certain standards. rE:::lstern Dublin General Plan
il.me"dmOl1t-' Spo;;ific Plan Mitigation M""'-'re J .&' 5.~)
The project Vil(lU ld hil"''!: aestheHC" I :\iitlgatlOn Measure ':>" 'Sm1ctures shall be located 00 they do !lOt
impacts due to the de'i!eJopment of obstruct scemc V!e't'r'S or C1ppear to extend abo,"e an Identified -scenic
vacant land and gnding of hillsldes. bm:kdrup when ....'il;;'wed fwm a designated sr.;:enic wute, l E astern
Dublm G enernl Plan b..mendment: Specific Plan :\fLtigation Measure
JS.' 5.21
~.
!
,
I
,
110.
t
!
I
The pr-ojed ....'i.'() uld ha\'e aes.thetic
.imp.oc:ts due to the d-e....elopment 0 f
....'ill.:cml kimd and groomg (If hill-sKl-e:i.
Mitigation Measure [11, ResidefltLal unns on the hillsides that appear to
project abolie m;;UoT ridgelines shall be prohibited_ (Eastern Dublm
G erJer:ll Plan ..o\mendrnentl Spectfic Pl<m }..titigation }l,.tea.<:tJre 3.&/ 5.2)
City u f Dublin
Com munit'r'
De.....e[(Ipment
Department -
PlannirlgDi....is.iu1l
Prior to appro...':il1 (J f a
Stage 1 De'r'el(lpment
Plan
City of Dublin i Prior to- apprnival of a ,
Communitv II Stage 2 Development [
Development P!an
D eparunent -
P lann:ing Division I
City (I f Dublin I Prior t{J appruva.l (I f a
Community Stage 2 De....-e1opment
D e....e1opment j P!an
Department 4 .
Planning Division
City 0 f Duhliu
Conununuv
De>.'.efopment
Department -
P1allning D r-..ision
City of Dublin
Community
Deo..'eklp-ment
Department ~
Planning Dh.ision
Cit:., of Dublin
Community
De-..'elopmeut
Department -
Planning D ivisicm
Poor to appro,,--al (l f a l
Stage 2 De'r'elopment i
Piau
Prio r to approval.., f a
Stage 2 De....e!opment
Piau
Poor to appro....al of a
Stage 2 De~.eklpment
Piau
i
i
Page 5
, ,
, ]1. ; Tile project ""'i.nuld have aesthelie .f\'1itigatlon Measure II. \' ie\~' of desLgnated open space shall be City of Dublin Poor f(l appmo;,.-aI.of a
;
impacts due to the () e.....-elopment of presen:ed. (Eastern Dublin G ~rteral Plan AmendmenU SfJecillc P.larl C omillunity Stage 2 D e,'elopment
I vacant land and grading.;) f hiUsi::i-es.. 1\.'1itigatioI11Ieasure 3.8,' 7.~ll D evelopmen[ Plan
I D epanmetl[ -
i
: Planning D i\~slon
u.
]2. I The project "''Qu1d ha\'e aesthetic r....1itigatioll Measure 12, A ....'i5UaI survey shall be prepared of the project City of Dub-lin, Pror to apprm.al of a
,
I irnpllcts due to the de~'elopmellt of area to identi.fv and map ....ie\v sheds of $J.."':et]ic ',istas. (E astern Dublin Communn"r' Stage 2 D e,.-elopment
'i.'Bc::mt lan() and grading of hilliOCies-. Geneml Plan t...me1ldmentl Specific Plan 1'r1.itigation y..,'1easure 3_8,' 7 11 De..-...elopment ! Plan
Department -
I Planning Di'i.~sion
13. The projed ",'(Iuld h av""e aesthetic! ;'1itigation I\.leasure 13. A detailed '1itisual analysis shall be robmitted City of Dublin Prior to apprm'al of a
irnp:ilct<:: due ~o the de~'elopmellt of I.......'ith de'r'elopmem project BJl"plicaticms.. (Eastern Dubun General Plan Community I Stage 2 Development
....acant lan<l and grading ofhill-3ides, 1 Amrndment/ Specific Pfan 1'r1itigat[on Measure 3J::.. !i:.l~ De\'elopment I Plan
Department - I
Planning D h~sion .
]4. Cl;.tlsinlo;::l inn I;:li;lhities. illC]udill11 l....Titigatioll .f',.'1easure 14. Rmuirc consttU:::tirm (,0Jl1ra:.:wJs In ')rater ur City of Dllblm - On-going during
IrI ooin'l}. ""'llulU h.a~'e th-t: IlnteTltia! to ((.....'cr s:tO<:::1q'~lN of d~bm. suiJ sand or (!tllcr materials tl1at can he Public Works projoct CDns.tmction
-
crose- significant impacts IT laterl 10 (l1l:;t blO'.....]l1J.'.,th.e.......md. Department I
and P[l.hl emis:tions~
]5. lnm;fructif)l! ::.:::tivtties... illclllJm~ f',.'litigat ion -""k:asure ]5. Rqllife o:..ll)~1n-'tctklll ~m tr..ld0G to s...-eW City of Dublin On-going during
:;rooiJl~ ',l.o(l\lld ]u~'_e tJl~j~H't'r1ti(l1 to d aih ~ oreferabN ...." it 11 ,\ f.ltcr swewers ~ an paved .a.:~o;. roxl p.arki11~ Communitr project constru-ction
c;n& significant irl1p.acts relaLed lu .ju,~t ilIe:i~ ::mil <:t IDn l?" Rf-t'il:S at ...:..nstructirw s1tes. D e,,"elopment
:;md P\-110 emi.ss.ions. D epartmen!
Building and
Safety Divisicm
and Public Works
]". ~[jl)l1 act[--..-ities.. iIld!JQi!J.& Mitigat ion Meac:.ure 16. R~ltlu-e' ...:mlsfru:::t.lon ;:(lntrncron to ilJ.iUJJ City of Dubliu - On-going during
Q.i..~~..~:5;HllLha~.e the R1ill'lltiiolLto ~db3g5~or ,.H~~0Si('lJ] ~.ntl~r(tl measure~ to r>re\-f'llt.rilL~ Public Works pwjoct wnstruction
(:inn;_SLgtlificant impacts related t(' rlu<::t public-rm:;.:l",-avs. i Departmen'
i'iilHJ P\f'Qemiss.ions~ i I
Page 6
117 Thcvroi~cE c{l-uld-.inlb2ld five weciaj .f',.'1itigatio-n l'r.-1ea.c:ure 17 Sr_tWg~n~ _~tJ~Jl ~Qk_~9JllJ'1~~tQL~w.Jar Cily of Dut>lin Prior to issuance of a
I q.a111~, D];mt ::-;~-..::ies thatn.b ~_\:~__ _tJ~E' plant ]ar~. flowered fiddlene,k d iamoi1d l'mled C3Iif.a-1l1i.a nqnm:, Communnv grading or buikHn g
! Lh1Lt'11~ill to ....";.:CU~ on HIe site, including l-L'::'Ldili"lll'S tar plant :and rmmd-]eiwed Ware-<:' orjl)r to the st:Jrt-.\1f D e.....elopmenr permit, .."mellever ~
,
, lllitJar rlElTlt klt.te-fk..~,,-(:red fJddlellx"- .gLaiint:: ;:If CUl1struct il.'n. The resu]t3 uf tbe PaL'..n.::. slJ<ill...2e [)wvid~ D epartlllent - issued flI's~
, i
di8mo:ld l)::tCUt:1l CaljflJmlil WDL'J~ , tf) the: L-illif'ilfIliJ U:;:pill1.mqJ~ 9LFr.s..und G3me .and the City of 1 Planning D i ~'bion i I
;
C1,mis,'DllS tar plan~ and mund-lea.....d Dublin ~t le;.J2t ] (J di!.'i:;; !lao-.U..... the start IJ f GJn4m:L0n. If L he .'-Un e\." I i
tlta-r.:e. st4~Jh.Jt pJal}!::::. are present :alld \\.ill Ice disturbed d Ut'= to '!lIod;i?~ r" ! I
co:n:;.tmct;Qr! the pr-0Ect devekme'f sb...'lll r,mt cct Cof rdl}cate the VbJ] [I S I i ,
as [e<1uireJ bv the re:mectii'e resource 3q-en_C)'. Copies f'f the S"..!r.-~ r I
;:mJ 1nf'<i:;:J.Lr;;;-s tc nr(ltec! Of remci?ile ul.ants ;t:; nXHlj-;-t'ti b~' tb~ [t'S:J.HJfl:e
!l~jlC"'" shall 'be submi1t-:xl t('l the- eit', pnl}r tu the '5.StI::l'lce of -;} ~Jjn!! ! I
l)fr..!Jild;!l~]J::nnit <...hkb{"',.cr i~ j~ '.ved flI..::t.
18. _TIJ~_:rFl iec.L..2J-1!.ld inWr-Ict the- r--:Zlif(l{lli a Mitigation Measure I~. If requEre.J b\. tl!e ('alif(lnufI DCilTItmeRt of City of Dublin &..t least fi(I O-Ef'!.'S prLOT
red-Ie!!'~d fr{lg. California tiger Fj~h. .:3,mLG~lxL~Al;L.4 to.e. v~s. fish lInd Wikllif e 5er~'fce. sur.'e-\.'S fr.,r tae Community to the start of grading
sa)(ILUander "__ _",,,4 thot "'tsl.::::rn f'DflC raljf-i ~fI!ia ti.g~:L<:.rIhJll fmder CaUfur!1)rl fed.k~ frog.. ;T~d the '.".-esefr, De'i.'elopment or constructicm,
nutk. :JOlla t llrtk shaH be COllQllcteJ at lea...o:;t 01.10 d.;l'."3 ~rior tO~lh.Ls:l:arL~:.t Dep-artment - 'r'tTIlche....er uc-curs first
(l'~I~t(l,!Ctj~'J~ at both ponds. Plannmg Dh.'ision
-.
j~ Tbe projrct could impact the California 'M.itigatkm Measure 19 li..1he Lfllifom La tiuer s:jlmnander is f-cmld City of Dublin At least -60 days prior
red-Iegge<l frog. CalifDrnia tiger l'.-~thit1: the area P'fOO('l;:;:oo tor Qradinil anrl (\1 lJ":tructo 11 Of UJ dust; o..mmunlly to the ,Iart of
salamander, and the \l.'e~em pond ;::r'D':.trnit>;i to till,,' C1)[1s1ructioB arra and co~kt i~tl;Jl;:' 1"'rini..Jn uf the De\'e-lopmellt romrructio-n
turtle. rcwU1('(' acr-ncv be [mn-acted. . CaIltomi:1 [jg..:L __~;~J<u m1~ldt'-r Dep-artment -
ma\lill!..:ille:JJL phm shaH be J1L~I;'J b', the pm ie-a ie~'-~Jc.pe~ 3ml Plannm g Di.....ision
<lprn ~\ ed l1v tne (::lif" Lllf.a D 51o-l'ostnoCt\t (If FL~h ::ma v-<!m-e and t~e
L'.S- F L~h and \\'lkilife Ser'r"K:::' mio-r to the- <:.l:;lt of X1IlSmKtlon. Tnt'
~hm _~han detall J10'.'.' the C'alif-o-mL:!i tf!2t'r sah:Jn31IJ~r wilU'1-'nuan~J$!l
:;'eflXe and dllrin~ t.:-I}n~-ITuct:.o(!jl octivjHe-s ::m~:L _:;;;]l,lH IrLdtlGt' t~e
I fl)!I\I}~ir:-.g:
31 Install::Jllon of a temDOfaf'io herrf'tcllw.ric::tl ft'Tl;::.t' n-ri(lf to am' . Formatted: Bullets and Numbering:
wourld d(~tUrbd.lll,):;'- around the ecljre _de~-e]Prmfflt fc.drrirr1
I -or rhe are~ de2Qflated b-.;.' the- ~esomce ~LKiep-,-1J'llit,:LL:JJi:ln
IJIe....ent tho lalif-iJl1lia ti~'eT salcJ1ll~dcr from enterin~ the
I vnn ~rru "ti0~ ~[e RlH"i :=;11:'111 remair, in Dla:::i: \1fltiJ j) Derma'le!l~
fruce Of b:::lrricr iillP!P~Tti bv (he resource ;]~e~cit-s isjn;JiIR~~
\ .nL:'IfJltermr't.:t:' ~c!l>;d.I.4I~ t!:~f_Jho::__ml}f1i.1L.;-m' feIlc~5haa he
J p-l11\;ded.
I
bl A tf'\'1pjn~ a,!lG reklc-aicm plan ~lall 0" .pJ."Ih",ed tn.;;:t dt1~d::;
Page 7
~ll)~' a~sfu~ltiLi.,gJ={!hti-wj.~.Jjg..e~. _S:al.Jcl;,lf~ger. iw:H ~ idu"2!ls will be I
, adt'u IlJitt'h T eluc:31 w from th.::, J~""ek:-r.-meLlt fnujp....!:lJl t atllj_.~_lt..Q
pe.nD<!,!.le;l~lysuit;:iblf' i'!E:.sti".crtK!u h-abit1'lt. I
.~_.f-,-;;ch,siorlarY b~roer... ~hi:!1l be_ !n ~~k-d_ .f'r~_Ll\! _Hl!;~__""JJ:s;E"t of I j
.'\'TIt.ef ral113 th 8Ut~Tl ul&t' ('",Iifomia t i.:..~r ~I nander !o mo ~'e ,
I
!:Q hee~L~nds, A rl('l1c:'?im ~'1aU lTlGnttof the illstallatilJll of
i.tL~_J::1l!I!;:rs 19_ ~f!S1J.J.e t~eJ' are .properly. bsrdleQ.
<iL 'he harrier f~n:::in~ s1l1'lU b, m::'lrntp,lue.:~rt tJ',C',-jt.ored
I ~QntiJ1ll.owJ}' t9_T tll.;: d l1J7.ti0n D f uroi"ert cp.m~ructicn t(! ensure
durt P,l.igr',j):j~UL&l.(L di:;ot:rsitlg...C ;;cliJ:.11 t1l.a ti~f ;::.Jbclamlers do
llQ1.r~_-:h..IJJ:~r lhe oun-structi'ln "'=
1;'1__...TIl-;:: _...~,\Cr.J;;;;j9lL t~ncjpCf maH [('m::un~-I'.Jace until ,he
co1l-~tmch(ln of the omied if ';':limp leted.
, n A tdoJc.2ist sbltlJ be t'lt'"e-Se11t duriTl!:! 2fsJlTl~ and =und
d is! urbcll;;t: .L.:Qus!.r:-~i;~k'n _~..::tp;';tje5, tc _ensuf.e th~fe.Js tW t?ke fif
('W:jf()miatio;re:rs::hlffi.alld~,
0r~ling and ,"eg:etl:Jll.ln clt'""drifl<r ~',i~ hill 7St) f~t:t uf jhi: ('~[j rl)miCl tirer
sarullilmkr hr~i in!;! [K,r:IIJ st....3U 1h,t b1;;" u inducted dUri.t!Cf tn.;o hreed.ifl~
i .and lnim'j}til1g sea;:;91LGi9Skn.lb~[~J;h1f1
2ll. The pmject could impact the California ! I...litigation I\'leasure 20. A t"Ierm::1rler.;[ hecn~l,ILIMC::Jl ft1l-:.'::e or h:'l"'1""if'i" Cit,. of Dublin Prior to the issuance
ced-Iegged frog, CIDifom;a tiger "hall be ;l1stalled ;n-.J.lJ.md the rmrth. =t ""d :>cuthern ac"" of the Cummunity (If the first occupancy
sa1amander, and th, "estern p<>nd re~i:i":-Ilti31 fi-..o1print fa 110" -in~ cun :;tH.!9_i~L_ac(;... it$~.L...hLnr.e' ~! Deo;..elopment permit
lurtle. Lnc-""i. ~ment 0 f the ( ~ limn' j.ll; tieer ";;'I i~m.;mder ;nhl the d'~"rf'iopoo 21re:L Department -
Planning Di'risi:ln
Page g
21
The proje.;;:t -cnuld impact tbe CaliRI mla
red-le,gged frog. f'alifomil'l tiger i
salamander. arnl the 1.',.eslcrn pond
j turtle.
22.
RaD1l'n; art' h~ll",::l t(l nes~ (Ill the site
b;3scd_...Q]LJne -r-L-e~er.ce- -of S1Jit<ful~
llii_f:.jtat- Qthcr ffij1tor_s: lXIuld: nesi ,m the
sit~addihv!l tb-~ _ the 1';:u-tai! Ivl"....k
The projt'ct could ha.....e a signifIcant
impad to raptcors...
23.
Th~ Calif{"J rI] [,1 lKlrneJ Inrk 11m.... alw
frCCUf Oil ,he IlftllltTi\", If presffit
during gradin~ and construction, the
l"'alifQrnia norned lark and IJther ground
nestrllg birds could be impacred.
24.
Tlle om ied OJ uld im~::Jd
~,..,~~;5. ifpf~ent 9nJ.h~ si~e
Miti-g:a.tiklTI Mea"Ure 21. CCllifl'mm tl!..':er s.:JmuLlIH1:;:r !ill:b.1..l -sur"'...e......:: sh.::t.ll
be conducted ill the Illlnil!1l00 tri[::.utj][~' {IfO(losed tor tue :::tl.,;'rrQ~lq
(luff,,]] ;odor tc the stan Df ~IIEtrudi\'f1 tQ dcterrllTIe if the-
;:;aIHrn;)nd::or i;<: IJS;11!.: f.h ~ area for bn:'edinll. j f it :is d etcrmjr!cd that the
CalitDfJJ La t [gel" .saJarnmlder ~es_th~_!"-[~:~_-RfL't)l)sed fL)( the l1"utfal~ <.G a
breedm2" locati.QQ.J;he_J:":al uc.rnia _1~T saJama-'lder mi':tl <lb!ement n~all
;]ucl! he nodi flBrl tJ lnducl~ .anp-I"(lu riato;:- t!1e&mre~ dtlrio 0- constlUctioo
(If the outfaU to u-rotcct kn('1Wfl ('If [)Nrnti~ bret'rlina sir~'5 within Eh_e
UtUH:lllle<l creek and _~dl~LRry.t<<-j ur rell)aJte rnw Califrmli<l ti7'ef
s::J121JnaJJ.;t'tr.Lf-h~Lm-e- Jlft:-SCllt in d1e urrnamed t.:ret:K :5Ire.1t 2::'l imnr(n.-ed
u ~ t~c Cllii fomia D epmment uf FISh and n :'Ime -:md liS f[5h mld
~J U t~ -Sen-i..."'e.
['...lttigatjlJo[l; y..-1easure 22. Aue-consrriJI:.:tl'iY!LS!-!Jln. sh3ll be- com:k:c~ed
for llestill:; r<.rtor::; ~uil)~ to th eo -start of madi!1!Z M c0mtructi'i)ll ''rithil1
10lJ.. fktLQf -an'.' knov.n nesti-'...,~ tree. ] f reQu ircl~LL:!~"4Q."L~H"'~.:~~ shr-lJ ~~
~rf-:Jrmed Door to Jml'Jaf"'i"- to idelltrf~' allY Putejllliltn-t'~t~lg!L~---1![0l.
~bJ'T'.tL tbl1:~~gg;~ _ _ -.On...:.... ~~. h;~-..:e- been lam.. a buffer Sb8~ b~
es!ablisrle~l ffi't'Ulld t~e nest tree- find t1~e srte- nwteded Ilntil .';u~u~t 1
I 'iJr llnlHltJ~_l~UlJ~~~&l:;:rJ. n~e buffer :5f13~f l;):;_~~
(l uaMied biolo :list i ac;: det;:"m~jll d b\' rhe (:it\.~. ve8.;;::-1trt:K.'11' an{l tree
remu \'.11. shall -occur L"lJtside of the raptl}r ~breedin'l!: :ie~rm f F eh-lU~n-
Au !!U 5t I :as much 85 Nat.""1ical.
I Miti.@ltlilll 1.1ertmre 23. A pre-comtmclirm ~w.-e--..' ~~~811 be CDttduwxt
i t"b r nestin-g California hom-ed lark and .....tller gmwld nestint: brrds -prior
t(l the _st;jrt \.11" ~rudi.JJf! or l.;J nsim.::Liun. It present.. .a huffer ",ith
i p-rotecHve fencing shall be p-ro'i..;ded awund the nesting area ao;;;
! determined by a qualified biologist. The- fencing shaU not he removed
until the yu.unl;!; have fledge:l as ddenninoo hy.a qualified btolo gist.
-tl!..!m.".\.il\~ ro...1itigation "lea~re 24, A [)re~L:Un~(luc1itln s.l1n :::\- shiH be- rnn-ducred
b--...' a (l'.isiified bio lo'llisL fm bUlT\Jl}j~g owl-=: 1ll1or to :'I1"lV ~'l"'1I1
drn!)rban'i:e bem~ffi &[)tember J and JmlLlafV :'1. jf :"lITIund
; ,j L..-:turb.;:mc-t i~ dda\ ed [)r'" .~usre[!ded fj,r mmc t hilfl 3Li da\ 3 after...ll1S'
.~I.JT",.e-y tbe- sit.;; ~l~(ln be re-_~lLn.e-'lr'ed. If 110 o-...-er.:-_r~.bJ.:;:'IjlH.:_ birds me
present bu-n:.Co",'.s sh-\11 be r-emL", e.J ..Rrn.1L.tJL the f!estinV se.lS(I-tl. If
I 0."''''';'''''"''''' b;d,"" .1'",,"]1 ,to d'''"m~'ce <hJlI o"u, "ithj" li(!
I f~1 _I.,.f l ,t::cul)~ied Q-L1TTD",...~. J f uwts mu st he m ::P..<:'d -;p,l,oaV [mnl th~
,
Lity of Dublin
Commun.ity
D-e....e-lopment
Dep-mment .
Planning Dj,,'lsion
City of Dublin
Community
De.....e[opment
Department -
pranllmg D r.~sion
City of Dublin
C-Ommunih'
DE"'r.elorment
Department -
Planning D [vision
City of OuhJin
C-Ommwutv
D e.....clopment
D eparrment -
Planning Di vision
At least 6(J dayspri'iJr
to the start of
construction of the
outfall
At least 60 da"r'S prilJor
to the start uf grading
or oonsbuction.,
whichever oc:curs first
I At least f;O da't'S prior
to the start of grading
I or ronsrructlun,
....~1richever occurs fIrst
I
I
130 dil}'S c-L"KJT to an\' I
~Fc-und df~t1Jri:J;m.Jd:;!
that occurs. b-eh-'reer! I
~te-mhcr ~ I
]alU<lD-' ~l,
Page 9
25
The project mule! impact
owb-, if present on the site.
26.
The project could impact
o\lt1s., if present on the sHe.
27
! .d.l~t.'-lrtL:3J~~~~_~_dUJLng:J1Jjs---per:"\'d ll.:lSSr. E' re]ocatjc,ri: measures shail
, be ~ed __and impkmented h"..~I.n!ill~_tQ_Q.!w~'!lLJ:&lij-omi~
I llt;:~mm~nt of Yi:5ll..?J]j fL:::l1ne @.IT..'-)\"""'c.n'1 rn'i.-i ~!Jilelincs..JW.f-:rL'ved h.
I th~ D?:p3 rtme~lt ;:mct c0M:11cted mlm to wn ~truct:iD-n.
hurrov.ing i J',.'1ittgation MefL<:;ure 25 If '..Dllslrnctiln i:.=; scr,er.!t.1]cl durinwe nt'stin;g
I se::lW>l fFebruar.... 1- "SeDterTlber 1"1 :l Drec{ln~rudinn. ,UJ,'e'r' <:.hal! he
. -\."iJntlucted ,,,ithi,, 3j~ dm:s vrr.r.r to o:rlo:rtructjon i)r irrr'lln(l di:=::tumallce.
A m~limum Do-rout b~1Ter sh.a11 be ma~ntaitled durilli2 the Ilreedini2
serJ:.>t1t) re-ouud a,:-ti\'e b [In\J wi rill (0 ",,1 m::stin I: ~i~es ldt'lltified En C're-
i ~'':'.IIlstmcti:JlL slJne....'S to a'.'-0ID dirE.Ct b5S L)[Utrl:~'jduilk
burro........ing I
;
,
;
f',.'1iHgaLill'tl Measure 26_ r Cde~tm-::tioJ L of I,,'ccvpied burr..r.....5 9urU1f
ei Lhe~ b[ t.e<.En u ur [K'n-l:>reedjLl~ se.a5On Of arr,.' burrows that "''ere
fj.~I,LJld_ tQ--.';'1~_QG~i_~_ dll!1ng _pr~'f1st~CL iL,'!1.:lnfi_e.):~ is. \!IJ~_"-oIJ"j~l@J~~ 8
_~~:l'r' -...-..ill be devd'-1j1o:l j{l r-enbce- "SLl::h !:lUHO\'_'5 h.- e-nl1m:J{:jn~
e.\istiIlIT bmT,-11,1,.-S L'r creating: mfficir'll hirrow<:, at ;"1 "l-: I rat~ OI~
pe!lmm ~Il t 1\' pWleCEed la'1.:!." adiacent tu ov.:.upied blJrrowin 7 ('\'.--] ;
hf1b~tflL :md -...~ iJ! indud ~ rernuiI' e[lt C1~L)te>;...1:itl tI (l f a mfni'llUTIl (,[ f>.5 I
acrt:~ of hLlrn~\"\iJl~ L,,-,i hahjt~t rer rair ::-r unpa;r-e<l teSJdent nwL A i
W-IML:113U b~_prepared r.v the {lfCI iect deo-:doper and aopfClwd bl.- j
Calif-::rrnja Del)l.lrtment of ri::;h and Game desc-ribm,: creatK)ll m"
ctlh::U1;CeJUe~t of burr;] \.\.'i. ma~T1tcrlance of bumJ;_""~ and man::'l,cre-mocrlt of
fr,rrl'1ing habhaL mOflJk!rmg orocedmes. and 31'Jtlnlcatlt criteria
Lund ~l1Z__<f..::.sl!r:.l..'''K'1;;' [lnnua! f~rtillt:! fX':quirwm!:l<:: to C aJifoJmia
Dqrnrtmenr of Fish an;i v;:m,e. ~K1_Jio-ntb~C'r' and remedi:;rtiC'f!
n~~..
In!;' ___project ..:ould nave ~JJtiat
iHll.'<!K..i~------.:!:u s:p:;,ci:a1 st::t u::; plallts: and
;l"lUrn..Js.
J.,iitigation Measure 27 The proied devd-:':T::-r -'ih ~Jl [Irenare a
H:ge[;:U j,""ln e!lr.:lnCCPl~lt,; m:::lrl:l:~:m ent pl;AfI foOr .'lll (In~n ;:;r}M'f: Mea::;
\~ iLh the inknllo ell.h::mct" (lw hjl)IDgic pu1 entja: of th~ -area as ......ildfi1e-
i b~lbFt,l.L_iI~8-"-!.em DubmJ G efieral Plan Ameli.:lmed: SPeQ[K Ptru]
Crr;' of Dublin
Community
De\'eloprnent
Department -
Plannmg D i"lslon
City ot" Dublin
COlmmmity
Development
D epmtment -
Planning Di,,'is-inn
City 0 f Dublin
Community
Development
Department -
(f cc-naruction_..:is
s;lle.d_ul~d dmin9. the
nestul1l
sea'>Oll
( Februa.rv L u --
Se[ltelnber 1 I a
meO:..1:n:::truc! lon
sun'I3.' ~h8f1 hi:
conducted 'l.\itbin 51J
da...'S prior fO
(l"Ifl.%T1Jctlon ur
ID::Q.lJJ;l-d dEstu...-baw.:.e;,
",tJicl1e>.-'er occurs
first
Prior to issuance of a
grading permit
Prior to issuance of
srnding pcrmit
""ge 10
lB.
The project oould ha\'e potential
impacts l.;l special .status plants .and
animals.
29.
The pmje-ct could ha1;.'E: rotentiaJ
impacts ~(l 5pecia~ status plants and
animals.
3n
The p-mject 01 uld ha'i:e potentiaJ
imp<:lcts w special ;'5t.atu~ plants .and
animals.
31
The :project CQuld ha ~'e PQlentiffi
impacts to special status. plants and
animals.
t.titi!!3tiOLl :\1e3~mE' \'7, l.CI\, This shall be included in the Stage 2 PlanTlillgDi....;sion
Planned D e\.elopment standards as a tentati.....e map rondition.
I jI,.:litigat;('1n Measure 28. The rmed ceveklDer sh f!Il1 DT"1la.re a detaikd
, Fi--eQCtatiQ...'iL...:restorat;o~'11a'l for 3ll disturl::: ~ 1-"lfea5 th<l't are to remain
l1n_-d-:::y~l(>r_~__~EfI~~~m DllbLn (j{"n~J.1-J Plan ,o\m"'J1dm~t: ;Seccitk
PI:m ~.fiL;~r1tjl~n ~'k;L;Llre .1.7: 3.(.1). Thi; shall be included in tbe Stage
2 Planned Development standards as a tentath't' IDClp condition.
fI,..titigation t\.feasure 29 r he nmiect de....eb"~ shall rl'er.-2!l'~ rm (J ['Ien
~:acl,.': j\.i::m-l-"';0:'ment Pla~l fc-r the -4f.,_ 8-:?Icrc 0 ow wax are<J: j[1 tb~ ea:.1:
PillJipn_.!!f l.h.c}!\..e. The Plan shaH i'llso bch.1d1:" mjlla~nellt ll'f the
hat itat fUT special ::::t<<tll:': spe~es t~at 111 !r',.' be- present and !jti liz:: the
(Juen SIJac:e. Th.;:: Pbm 'S.h::lll 3lso inc-lt!de Dwfe.:...1J';'ll rr:eli::ure~ such as
feJlCU1;]l s-,rmao-o;" TvjU'~W or indirect b~lr net :xllltml me-JSllres :and
har.itat f.IllJlllt....'nn l:: and reolJ~ in~ Thi~ cI.."L.<1 shall k ::ltJ[:IJO ~'ed tv the
fal(f(lmia Der:JT1 me:lt iJ f Fi":JL:3JJ~LQ l3I!:L~ HltL~!o.S-,_.x.i"-h.1!-!1d Wil!illi'~
~j:::e Tnil'[ to t_nt' :-..i(lrt of om~! rnetiGn. Th~- .EP-.nr:..~~Lf l1n sfJ8H IJs:
Ntn.lilt~U.Qj:lli'~iU:-nrio r to ~he is5!.tan.;::-e of a grad in~ uf b-lIi!ding
.ll_elllllL}~i1j~)~}J~L ~s. ~5-~t;~ fif'St.
1\-1itigation Measure 31). A (I)]::Ililied bjoh'-'ist fas idellt!fLed b... the l if'.i~
~h:::l8 m,"'nit{ll" aU c-omtructll1f1. activit;., tt' en:'>llre that (Ill rron':::ti,:e
rrzr.ij~~Q:..lJ.tL{!LbJ:Jj~Ll.illifi1!ili;J D-t"nillL~llLQf Fish andj]..m..:us;:
~ld L. s.. F:sn [md \\- iJdlif-e :l;en--ice are iflmlemellt-td arId. mai~tillned
li_.:!='. ii_no;:iV1Li;;,:_ jm L<;illed. r1 Up~lt]' mid tlH'i[1Jtilill_c.-Q, _pr..<:;jIT~'~A_~tr_e;3_L -!Ire
ll-flt .--Ijst:.J'rb~. etc.}, fhe- tdl'}:Jgical ml'"it'1r ",hall hs\:;,: tbe ::mthl'@,t(l
i ~d_..>!'!ll:...::m~l~tmcti<!fi r~"'1i\.it';., if Dn~tdjvc- nlC;l;:;'!]re::;...m
nN ol"ol::'ert>.' fo&. ~~w ani. or if a-.:ti,'itLCS [lUst' .m ~nmeir.ate flUE-at to
rre~~':XI ~Il ~ith:e TesnUTi::e~. The b:{1 kl ..>leal mmtitoT shall a]SD hlf\'e
L he 8U thorit..... t'l crmt:2:ct H"lc r l:Ili fr.mia [)Cf.laITm ent n f F'i~h .and ~ I ;-we
and. (IT U.s. H;::h ami \\i(dlif:::: Se-fVf.;::e to r~x]-ft ;m'.' mort2!Lit..., of n3ted
~t"1e('if'<:' ti'l rill') ('I)'ldn ~Mk.n
J\.fitigation Me8Stlre 31. \l!.. pwjeCJ_SPII~ntc:tE_[j ernpk,ee-s :alld
per~N11le] sbill] :R'<~-eive i:'IJl eJ uatiL~nat trJUlIn1? p.m~ar,l that inc-lurre<::
inti:1mBti0n on -<:ensiIi\.'e species. iil :;:nt;ffoL"ation (lrHi t h<':it ootf'llt;al
h ab-it3t. LillN:),.-eJ mJi2:Jtiofl measure:>. fl.'r tho;:: r.-r,! ~t ::md a;,..i ions
I
City of Dublin
Commun [ty
De.....elopment
Department - I
Pla:nn:ingDi.'is;un I
,
City of D ublin ~ Prior to isSll3DCe -of
C-Ommunity I grading or build ing
De.....elopment . permit, \~1riche.....e.r is
Department -I issued flTst
Plannin-g D i'i,.;sicm
City of D ubJin
Conununitv
De-.'el(Jpment
Department -
Phmning D L..is!on
City of Dublin
Omummity
De't'ekJpment
D~artment -
Prior to issuance of
gradin g permit
On-going during
project o;mstructiQU I
,
i
I
I
,
Prior to the start of
grading
I
PlIge II
32.
The project rould ha.....e potentia~ II'
iTnp-octs. to special status plants alld
animals-..
I
I
J3.
The pro.ie.ct L.:ould have potential
impact3 tu special :;.t~tllS plants. and
animals.
34.
I
!
I
I
,
i 'J'IIe rrui-:;;....:Ll2I.Q.fOse5~mtnJ.:::t all
l!u~f;<j II jrr.1u.e un tl8!.1;l'ea sLream to 8Ih~".\
the dis-char~ L'Lwoied stlff::H.:e "'}Iter.
"nle c~p.stmd"Jn of" rhe 0lilfaU ',....'Oilk!
fJ;..1;';ui::rc tbe rem(l'o";:U_ :ft!Jd destruct i\111 of
';DariJrl hat. [tat, .......,hich is iI ~gojficant
impacL
I ~rr!liliJ}_"t'e_'! should ~ ;'!kt" if g $t1l~it i\-'~ Sflecies is. e-ncC1!J[l~ert':d.
}",Utigat:ion Meastlre 32. Ib_~lJflJ)~f1~_~lj;;J'J:::.rs\" ~~reaTll cnrridof shall
~~ ~~~::'_~re:'",~t~[L'~dJL mth 'e_f1 h'1t .:;peci.es J.Q..~nbilllIT Eheir l1J:tLi't at
C!j)(Lear<.m:ce am! improve hahft8( '.aIL!~ t.f:'l~f_.em Dublin G_efI.s:rnJ_PJM
Arn~lrl1.1llnt.' :3Dec;{lc P hill i\.tih~t ion \teaR're 3 ._:L~-.Q too
;\1itigation J\.'leasure 33.. _All ,.".aJil1!..!: I'!i.ih-ilie:<: sball c;:::-cu.r dtlrill[l" the
dt"'J ~...J:;;;tl[l Ia:; mu.;::h as I1ri:1l.ticr:n ::.bc>: j11:::- Calif(lmi3 red Ie2crd frO:,I
~\'ill be less likeh: in be pre~t ! n UD land m eA"-.
f\.1jtigatKlll 1\..1ea<:ure 34. Tbe r~tl lwburlt L~mll' ~J, r.y the TIr<L~
stL1!lll-:::-W1<'1ccd 1)', the -cr-.:-.ation ,-'f U{:,;\; tioaria!11 h.:Jbif,1t ,.~t f.i l.,J n~tiL'
l."Icrea,J.t:: (rea~ed, acreac:e rell]Q~ed\ subiecl tu tho;: ;J[l[)ff);.'al of I
Ca-l~L!mi", D eparL ;ll~t l! r Fish ilml {r arne and the ejtv. The urqL~t
de'~do!ler 511 all -devekro and implement 2l R~D.ari<JfI H 8bitat r-,.hi:!lat~'1n
.3llJ Moniturin ~ IJI-M to fu Us 99J1lr el L5(jLe for unna.:ts to n[IGria]1
h~b It<:lL. itJ;lLlf.lill~ h~mL~ tr!:'es.. Tile rin lrioo -an:-a diq limed durin!;!
~"'fI n::.fru;,:tion fJ f the- ou tfall shail be resto~-ed_,::lO:J.lrd it: ~ k1 tlle RipmiaJ I
H ~bita( Jo,.'litjeatto 11 :and Mmlitor~H~ Platl :atld induded in tile- ~~ I mrio
The. RI.,r:IDian Hab-itat 1'.Jitiimh,l1 :;>nn [l.tnnit('lr~!() Plim ~hall incl'Jde the
n1ITjg[';)1l desk'll. ri]lJfjan stJc--.:-ies p]anti!l~ d:::-~i~ ~ mili:zi:"y fiAtiv'"
.~r.oecies found ill T 3:-,,-~iara (u'ek f S(llJTces tr.r "Lmt m:lt-critJ k
filsi:ntena.n:e mnbods. iirldlldjll~ itrigaE-iim ~t~ti(m <mrL\3j::_w
mmlm~ement l. ]llollitonno:r NocedurE'S ar.:-d rer:ll-'IIIl)Jltt cri! ~J
reJltirtiJl~ r~U1t~l)_e'!.J15, _m~-''.lntirJg-~lCY m~a::lLrf~ ill ca5.e of
mitivtinu fujfure: rho;:: 9roifct de-..'ekln-er ;111..o11L,Jll:"cnide- a secure
D.llldine- soW~.;l1"J.d:U,sJl~ctQnlt:rJJ...~.~mt} fur Ihe imr!l;:mer,~mi.."'n n(
th~ nliLigJtinrr plan and I.:mg-te>JHTlarntenance aud mr.njto~~
mltj~'Rti(lu 3rta. Jb~ creJ!:ted miti p;::;ti!)11 area 11 Lillt be p~c.erved in
p-..."Tpetllity l :::;uch ;'!~ 1 kwu Ph ;'l nam..'iill-ent con:;;~r~)Jh!-..lll -l"a.;;ern!:'t't or
(Jther s.imilar measurel. Th~ mea~'j~ within tiLe Ri(l3rian HLlbitM
!\-fjlt.!;;"dl iD.lC'ind. "..t(~n;~{Inn~ Plan ffia1I t.e COTI,,-igent ....-ith the Ea:;tt'ftL
[) u hlin C.oIT1p-n::l1-t::n~i, e ~re3m R5tI'r71t;(lf] Prom-am ;:u1-d the Dubli11
Ranch T ~",'>,1rara Creek n m;';f':ITati0 n .-'\r.e:a~ H~itat Ma.ia~'~"m:::nt P bn
The Ri~tian H <1td~~t \i;tj~tj''''ll .lmd !'..ll n itf)tin C Pmn ~haJl be
Planning Di....i.sio-n
City of Dublin
Community
De\'elopment
Department -
P!8IlIling Division
Cit" of Dublin -
Public Works
Department
City (] f Dublin
CommLmHY
D e'\o'elopment
Department -
Planning D [',.'is.ion
i
Prior to iS3l.!anCe -of
the fLrst occupancy
permit
o n.going during
projoct grading
Prior to Lssuance of
the first occup-anc;y
perm"
f
I
Page 12
35.
31>.
37
i3R.
TlJe .j,IT(I iecl .~.1IJ J~I~~!h~~ pl[lcemeflt
Dr up tL.' ~ ::UhfL" ----.dlfris.Qf fill llli3teria.l
([(iCJ..: riunv anti o::ljr f.'lbLKI into n,(XJ..
;]crec:. (If il<rL~_HL.:tirJlL:l.l ",.;) li;'!nJs/ ~,ill ers
8sa1~ial-;g_ vi:j{h the InsflllaE i(m of _~
&-o-rm Willer lH.d f.aU structare.
The project t.:uuld impact the San
Joaquin Kit Fox, if present em the s.ite.
l3eC8U ~e thr. c:,ire h.lS not been su [\-e,):'d:3
bv .il re",s{et t'J m -ch.aeufp-riY,------Uf.k:
hl:';[IHic TeSl1IJLG.~-.l11;.nl_J2~:o1...Q1Lt~
I ~itE' ::md if Ji5tuTbeJ illJTin ~~cu~m~ ann
c-onstrnctiou th~rf_~i:'~ a ~;gwflcallt
!JII_l!.:i'~..t.
!
! Because tb-.;': <:.if,;:: h3c:. lW[ been Sllr,~~ I
b.:;' <t f~gJ2t~:~:1_::udl;}ettlo-Di:u_.._J,:!J:~ I
bj~vrk r~0urces 111.[':Y be preseJll\.'ll th t::
I
~ite aIJd...:iLd.~!l+}ci.i duriJll'.--W"J~d,'n!! (!HU
i o.'n5tlUc!k1l:) Uler-e C'Uutd be::L 5Hmific:mt I
I bmad _.-- I
,
~}IJQ~_t:G__~}.J:JJ-;- C;j_~(9))Jl<1.I,l_e:p~:l!t'll~.QU..l'f fish am.:E Game ar.:..d thee 1
Cilhj)[J[l-f to the i8"iuance of;] l7adi n i.:: JK:l1Tut. Th ~ Rip:ni::m H :<Ihitat ;
J\ ti~i e;:;;tie';-t; and ~J"-I tHtorin.;r Plan sh2:U rn:;:mjr~ lit.s~IS_ pf ~t1'P-tl Itont1J;: j
g[I..J~iWlmal rru(lJts -shall be submitted w dl-e Cir.~. alld C..a!ik'mia
I Dq.artme'ilt d Fish .and (,ame
Mitigatiotl i\tea~ure 35. fll-e nm leet rl-e",.e1ot"1e shall; ,kW"l all re(1uir-od
n~m]j~~. t,:e-r~i-n~atiorSr' iilg:~:~jll~JJt~ fInm CaHomil!. [~~-arLlT!~Il~ nf
Fish and G8m~. R.-.:-ciollaJ 1Varer OU.,1U(V CJIltrul &.::rrd and li.5. l'l~h
nHd \VikJ lite- ST.:0;: nn-..,r '.f! Ih-:;> f~S!Jance of <l llTIld1t1 Q: (If :..:o'lstwction
OcrTlut ',....hichc.....er 13 i5~cd Hrsr. lhe d~'elol}Cr shalJj}[~..,ide txcmf of
:l1e -permits. Ct'rtlncati0r-:s' a-groXwents- r,iL.tlJ~__f'jtv I)tlm i~:::llJ-llc-= {lof
ill ~\" D..wnit~
J...:litigation t'leasure 'l;6, fhe ND ~---t shall romply with the Eastern
Dublitl San J('I~ujtl K it Fox Protection Plan.
y.".litigatiOl1 I\..teasur~ 17 1'lechanfcal and.' or h.md subsurface testing on
all Io-cations (If prehistoric resources to- dete11l1.ine the presence (If
absence uf m[dden depo::l sits shall be conducted p-ric,t to the start of
grad ing fE astern Dub tin G menu Plan iunendmelltl Specific Plan
~-1itigatiL\n Meao:;;ure 3.'9: 1.(1).
f',..litigation Mea.c:ure 3.R. All lrlcations. con~aining e~ther midden
rumpr.'neflts or amcentmtLons of CLEltural materials IHcated (In the
surf.oce shall be- reoorded on State- of Californi3 sue !'iU....:ey fcorms
j Eas.tern D LEr..1in Gencral Plan Amefldment.' 'Specific Plan .t...iitigation
y..'1easure .3 9/ 2.1)1.
City of Dublin
Community
Development
Department ~
Planning D ivlslon
and Public W1Jfks
Department
City of Dublin
Community
De-;.'elopment
De()artment -
Plarmm g Dh.ision
and Public \Vmks
Department
City of Dublin
Cummunity
De-.;elDpme11t
Department -
PI;mning Di'vision
City of Dublin
Commun1lY
De'i-'dopment
Department .
Phmnmg Divis[Oll
Prior to tssuan-ce of a
grading or
ruml'nldton permit,
....vhiche.....er is issued
first
Prior to issuance of a
grad ing or
ronstruction permit,
........i1ichever is. issued
first
Prior C:o the start uf
grrdillg or
C("InstruCtiOfl,
........11iche....er oo;;urs first
Prior Eo the start of
groomg or
con:=rtrucr ion,
whichever nccurs first
Page 13
,
CllY of ])ublin ~ Prior to the start of
Conrrnwiliy I ~dmg
D E:velopment ! mns~ruc-t1on,
D epartmen t - ~ ~.~:hic-he....er (I~CUTS first
Planning Dh';SKlTI
39.
1;3_:::g'lJ!~i;_jht;:-,<;i+E: f..::lli_n;~!....been sun-~9_
b::-:. ..-i:l c.:::gi~tered ar-:::h.a-etllo ~st. J)'re-
blst()rjf_r~_f[:1l_J:'::~ m;r..' b-e Lm'so;::Jlt l~n tb,=,
site ::m,d if d i~turbrj JUJu Ii; gn'ldjl~g..lI.nd
..: ::mslmctl(llUh.yr-:: CIJ'U Id he a sr!2rljEcant
jmoact
.Mitigation Meamre ].9, E.....'aluath.e testing shall be required if the
pn tpoosed de'-'elo pml;::llt wuuki dL:rec:tly or indirectly impact ra::orded
and mapped Io.c~ticms of Terources (Eaortem DubliTI General Plan
.\mendmentl Spocifu:: Pbm t\'fitigation I\.teasure 3.1,1,' 3.(1).
or
40.
&::21USt' the ::.ii~ !iLlS not veen suneved
b~. .it feli~[erffi arthaeolo-ll'I3t m'l;'"-
i1i:.J.t}r~;:: r:::sr~Un:.:es m::r...- b~ 1}f~~L-"":fIt on the
site Rnd j f di~uJb ed J L'nn(< ~mJiJlll and
C()rlstlU;~ti0j} tiler..:': :"'iJ U Id be a si...."Illfical1t
.lli:!lli!<;.t
~'fitigaticm Measure 40, 1\ qualified archaoologist sluill develop a
pm tection pm gram for "significant" reso~ \vhose cllttdition ,...mlld
he altered by the p-[{I.P'U~ de'r'-elopment (Eastem D uhlin G enernl
P J::m ..!Iunendmentl Sp-ecmc Plan .f',.'1itigation !v1eamre 3.9'.. 4JY).
City of Dublin
Communil:y
De\'eit.'pment
DejJ3rtment -
Planning Division
Prior to the start of
gradmg or
construction.,
'r'tiricbe-....'eT occurs first
41.
:&>...::l.llse Ih-: s-it~ has ]]<"1t tJ-Xll su.r...e'i-ed
b'y a Te0.:::term '?-..J"'"t!l<lW lo....-ist t1Ilt-
hjs~(J ric n.':sc-urc~.s: rfL)_ll'~J!I'~jdlt i}11 the: I
sik_atld.if-o.i~urb...:d d~!ritl,.,. ~r.adi~ !
i
''':9L}j.n..~:;;liQDjh..err mu Id he a .<<j l::"TItfK\1!lt I
IDJoa('~. i
~~!:u_x tk sit~ hCls fJ'A been Sllf\n{ij ! IYlitigati:m 1I..ka9Jre 42. .0\5 part () f the de....elopment spp lKmion process
h" a n:-m:::tcrm .a.rchaeulogi~:i1 pre-: .sLep~ shall be taken t('l ensure that cuJruralrerour-ces are not impocted:
l1istQrh.: resolJrc13.rf!4Y b~ pl'e~-llt;:m tb::- 1 D' ~ h ."~ b" . .~ ill 'fiied I' "
sit::;: ani! if distu rh~~JJ.I:in ~ '00 ;n aud I a et~e Vril~t e: I.Irt: ::l.l 1Xt me. h etltL . as 1aVIne-
-, ,.,t;'.)~ the -. ld 1.~ ~. .;. t I prehLstonc or ht>"10rIC resources. TV"Itentiall..... bcated on It ba3ed on
~Ltl~ reL:{IoU l"t"iiStlmlliC.:m : r~ .
.im.r~t. . -- i the- fust st~cre -cultural re5{lUfCe ~["i.'e-y of tbe area.
b. Determine the le't'ci (If archarobgical or hi:::toric.al signifrcance- in
Lhe seoond Ieo.-el (I f detailed researcn and field reconnaissance for
~ITes ........1th potential re5(l-urces,
c. Devebp a mitigation plan col1sistent \'i.lth Jl'fI ncies. in the Specific
Plan and current f:E Q A Guidelines. concerning CfI1rural
resources for site -oontaining signifLcant re::;.ources- rEastern
Dublin General Plan Amendment.. Specific Plan Mitigation
Measure 3.9/ fi.lJl.
t.'1irjgati:m Mo::.asure 41. Grndillg and cunstrudkm shall cease in th~
e\'ent that historic or prehistoric remains are discmered during ~ch
a:::t:i"ities (Ea:;tem Dur..oo General Plan ~~mendmelltl S'pecUlC Plan
~.~tigm.m Meas",,: 3.9/ S.UI.
Cit}, of Dublin
Community
D~'e:l()pment
Department -
Planning Di".ision
On-going during
project grnding and
rorutruction
42.
eny of Dublin
Commuflity
De\re-lopment
Departmeflt -
Planning Division
Prior to <lJIPro.....ai of a
St::ige- 2 Develo-pmt:nt
Plan
Poge 14
t 43.
Development act~\;ilies are If potentially
significant impact [(1 ll,d::':Hntolot.~c--!;1
[9;}ur-ces,
44.
"The "~eCl'nda"""" effect:::: (!f ca'1IHlU aJ..::('
-gf(lund ~imJ..iIJ2 u.xluck- oo.s~ibk
seismicall'r' indu-ced IGnd;-.ljdin!L
dift:tr.enti.1.l rompaction: ,Hid. ur
seI1f..:nl!~nt, which are :)[Incjdcred
potC'1ri-aU," ~ j!:TI]uk-JUt impat.:ts~
45.
The secundm-y effects oil f earthqu ake
ground shaking indude P'O ssible
:<:eismic~U'r' inrlu-ced landsUding,
differential com paction, and.' or
settlement, ,,,hich are romidcred
potenHillly signifi-cant impacts.
46.
The secondary effects oil f earthqu ake
ground shaking include JKI ssible
seisrnicaUy induced huldsUding,
differential compaction, andl or
setUe:mE'tlt, ".hich are mnsidcred
potentially signift-cant impacts.
47
The -secondar'r' effects (If earthquake
-ground shaking indude possible
seismic811v induced landslkhng,
differential compaction. and' ur
settlement, ",.-hich are considered
I'otenlially signifLcant impacts.
Mitigaticm 'VIea~ure 4.1 The muiect de ~C'k'rJer ~h;:!U rrcra;:e a
pale;.!ntok!'!:!ica! 3llT\'~J .;-<f the :'-.1tt" mior tlJ m~ i~<::IJ:mct'- of .a F;.iIif]i.1
pemJjt tQ. d-etemlme if palecm!uJu meal reso u roe5 :2r~ pCe-Jf'nL If
pre::a1t. anj:_Tf'SQmce~ that wouJd be iUWacteJ by the-pwiect ~hali b~
protxted in [Ilaee. etan:ated and rekcated:....~!c. as rE"oommende-d h-... a
P-,jt~Jl1Qklgi_~ and JPpro ~'W by t~c Cit-,i,
Mitigation Measure 44. The project developer shaU be required to
pm.'ide the apprnprime grading and d~gn to completely rell1Q'-\<e
unstable and potential~: unstilb 1e materials in hitlside area<; v;.TIere
development may require !'UbSfantial gnrlmg (Eastern Dublin G enernl
Plan Amendment' Sp,cilk Plffi1 ~'Utlgation M""""e 3.~' J.Ot
:\tit~lll'.'leasure 45. All engineew.:i retentk1n structures and :::urfa;e
and subswfa:::e drainage imprcn.'ements shan be used as i1f'pwpriate to
impnwe the stablliL y of me hill fills m1d puteflth!lIy un~abfe ml!teria(s.
partK::ukrrIy rollu...i'.im, not entirely removed hy grn:jing (Eastern DLI'hoo
(] ,"era! Plan Amendment' Specific Plan Mitigation ~leasure 3.~' 4.01.
:\titigation lI.fea:::ure 4fl, All sei5micaUy induced fill settlement shall be
reduced by requiring proper]... designed fills with keyways and
subsurface drainage, and whlch are adequatel..... compacted (j.e.
minimum 91 r-'n relative romp action ~ (Eastern Dub lin General Plan
Amendment' Specific Plan ~~t;g.tion Measure 3.D.' 5.l11.
:\litigarion Me'lSUIe 47 All roads.. structural foundations. and
underground u!ilities. shall be designed tlJ accommodate estimated
sett lemeu( -..~'jthl)ut failure, e:.-,x:d:all~1 acrQSS transitiuns beh\'een fIlls
and cuts, IDld to remove or reronstmct potETl tially umt-ahle stock
pr.ond em b-an kme'llt:;;; in developed area<; ~ Eastern D uhlill General Plan
i\mendmentl Specific P Ian Mitigation Meac;;ure 3.-fi,' f;.U~.
City of Dublin -
Public Work.~
Department
City of Dublin -
J>ublic Works
Department
Citv of Dublin -
J>ubUc Works
Departmellt
City of Dublin -
J>ui>lic Works
Department
Gt..... of D ublffi -
Public \\'000
Department
Prior to Issuance of a
grading pennft
PrP::H to issuance of a
grnding pennft
Prior lo issuance of a
grading pennft
Prior to issu:mce of a
gradingpernrit
Prior to issmmce of a
gr-a:ling permit
Page 15
! 48.
!
The secondaT)' effeds r..f earthqual-e
ground sLaking include pl\ssible
_~ei:=:mK::ally induced lanl:lsliding,
differential oompaction, andJ or
settlement. ,,,,,1lidl are considered
potentially signifi-cant impacl!i..
49
The seoondan' effect.s l tf earthquake
ground shaki.ng include pos..'\ible
seismically induL"l:~d !and.'iMing..
diflerential .;;(Impaction, aIull or
settlem~t, which are crmsidered
pf)tentially signifLcaJlt impact-s.
so.
Rc-k.j':Jll.'lil Imldsi.ide Ul::n'o[)UL (< b..... d L-." l5
ti-eoJr::.~cLll Sur.'c-l,.- rJ'\Lls-en I-lJ75}
shu\.\-ed ,'i.e'.'er.'-!LJdJK1.~lide< {In fb~ d~
in c! LlJinf; till ~ injh~_!:l!';JLQf t h~(:llITent
~'~-1}1');]~1~l:l@JJl The tf.lt~t'
t:'er.tjile'l)Ll1IJQslid~:;m;: ~-i~en tll.u~
Jes.;':!JlairJ n ~ A. H. :mJd C.
51.
Regionallafldslide mapping by the V,s.
G eological ~rYe'r' (N ilscn, 19-75~
sho'r'i-ro -se-'....eral lalld_~1 ides o-n the s.ite,
induding three in tne area ..,.fthe current
proposed development_ The three
pertinent land slides are gi....'erl the letter
designations A, B, and C.
52.
I RegioruU landsfide mapping by the l S.
,Geological 8tm-e-,' (Io-i1s,", 1 'Y'51
n~tlUc-t tile sGr-e ""itb en;,inee-'!"L'ri fill a k.e....~,~1'r,., and subdrain
for Lmld3lid~ Sftl;:8t:::d ~t ur Llear the 2T;i:iin~ lirrAts~
City Llf Dublin
Publ ic \Vorks
Department
City of Dublin
Community
Dc-.....ef.opment
Department
Building and
Safety Division
City of Dublin -
Public 'Vooo
Department
City of Dublin -
Poblic Wooo
Department
City of Dublin -
Public Works
Departrru:nt
Prior to issuance of a
~ing or
crmstmcticm pennit,
whicheo..<er is. issued
flTSt
Prior to 1.-ssuance ("If
the first (IccupanC)'
permit
Prior to the issuan-ce
{I f the first building
permn
Prior to the issu.:mce
of the first building
permit
P rlor to the is:su.an<:e
uf !he first building
permit
Page 16
53. The unstable S{]-il amdLtirms. and seismic .f',.'1itigation ),{ea.qJre 53. 'Site Preparation and gr;rling City Df D LEblffi - Prior to i~ce..,f ~
induced landslides '....,ould hiwe a rerommelldations numbers I through 15 on pages II - 13 of the Public Works grading permit
p..tentiall'r' signifie.ant impad to the geotechnical in \digattoTlI for the site shaU he inC1Jrpn-rated into the- Department
project. : grading pIan.
- ,
54. T11e Eastern D uhlin Speciftc Plan E IR J...fl[igat:io-n Mea~l!re 54_ !n tegrnte ftre trail:;;; .and :firebreaks into the City of Dublin Prior to i3suance of a
iden tifted ~tentia! \\'ildland ftIe impacts open space trail s....'Etem_ lI..leet fire district standards for .acces:; mads C omrnunitv grading permit
\'I;ith de'i:elopment in the sped fie plan in the '"'pen space trail S"i'Stem '....'hile minimizing eln:rro nmentaJ D E"elopment ,
area, ,...-hich include<: the project site. imp3Cts. (Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment.' Specific Plan Department ,
- i
\trtigattoll 1\..Teasure 1.4/ Il.O} Planning Division I
and Alameda
County Fire
Department
5;. The Eastern D uhtin ~ecific Plan EIR :\:titigat[on Mea.~re 55_ t... \Vf1d fire l\.'fanagement Plan shall be Cit:y of Dublin Prior to issuance of a
identified potential ........ildlaud fire impacts prepared for the project to reduce the risk of impacts related to Commun ity grading permit
with de'i.'ektpment in the specific plan wildland fire. The Wild fire Man'gement Plan shall be 'PPw'.ed prior De\.elopment
area, \,hicl1.indl;Jdes the project ,~ite. torl the issuance of:3 grading penni~. lEa...~ern Dublin General Plan Department
Amendment! Specific Plan l\1:itLgaLion 1\..1easuTe 3.4.' 12.ot Planning Di"ision
and Moonedi:'!
County Fire
D epartmen t
50. The runoff generated by the project Mitigation f,.'1easure 56. Drainage fucilitjes shaU be pro....ided that Cit'r' of Dublin - Prior to issu::m-ce of a
<ll.lrirl~ OOtlstruclion ,r><! p<Jst- W{lU ld miniInize any increased potential fnr ewsion or flooding Publ", \Vorks grading permit
construction L:oukf impact ........':3ler Quality. r Eastern Dublin Genent Plan Amendment.' "Specific Plan 1fitigat[on Department
Sediment and c:omtruction debr~s aton~ r-..'feasure 3.5,. M.m.
.....~th urban pollutillits including oil,
grease, fertilizers: pe~ wa<ite, and other
-chemicals from surfa:::e streets, lavr"l"!s,
-Iffid open spClce could be discharged
~ intfl the I.mnamer.:l tributary along the
northwe~t pmject boundary and I
eventually in~o T HSSajara Creek.. ThiS is I
a .rotentiatlv sign..dlcallt impact. i
!
P~ge 17
I The runoff generated by the project j
! dunng construction and post~ 1
i L'Qus-trucHu-n ctmld impac.t water quality. :
1 Sediment and constmction -debris along 1
I v.ith urban pt~llu{ants including oil. l
j 1rrease. ft:rtilizen" pef waste~ and other l
~ '..:heJ.ukR'Is from surface. streets., lawn.--", l
I 3tl:d npen space oould be. discharged I
l ~nt!J the unnamed. trIDulary along the. !
i northwest project boundary and:
r e\'eutnaUy into T assajam Creek This is l
; a potentially signific.'Ult impocL l
, ,
j lhe runoff generated by lhe pro}:ct j
I during ron~ruction ood pnst-:
I crm.<;lruction could irnp'3l.-i .water -quality. :
i &diluent and C(lnstrudim~ deb-Ii..:; along :
! v.,jth urban pollutants including oil, I
grease, fertilllers., pet .waste, and otbeJ J
I chemicals from surface s!:rects, lawns, I
: and open t;pace could he dischari,'ed' ;
I into the unnamed mnutary along the- l
I m..1rt.hwest pmje-et boundar)' and J
I e\,entuaUy into Ta<:sajara Oeek. This is l
I a potentialty signm':a!lt impact l
-" I
I The runoff generatoo by tbe p-w.lcct !
I dudng construction and po&!:- ~
! construction ('.O~lld impact \"mer quality. l
i Sediment and construction dehds along l
1 with urban pollutants induding oil, ;
I grease, fertilizers, pe-.{ waste, and other I
j dle1nk-als "from 'SUrruce streets, ta-.ms, I
j and open space could he discharged ,
: into the unnamed h.iliutmy along the !
l fiorthv.est proja:t houndaJ')' and I
! eventually into Ta..<!.Sa.jara (reek.. This is !
I a P'Vtentially <;ignific-ant impact. I
, ,
Mitigation Measure.':;7 Any chro:met impJ"c-vements to the unnamed.
{nbui:ary akmg the nI.}rthwe.t:J projeo;;t bcmn-dar)' shaU cousist of a
nH{um{ creek bottom and side slopes ,villi natural. vegetattt1-fi \\nere
possible tEastern DubUn General Plau .l\m-eudm-ent' ~ecific Plan
MtHgation ~'leasure 35/453)).
l\1itigat ~n tvkasure 58. A Master Drninage Plan shall he prepared aud
S\.tbm~tted tQ the City Engineer for ap.proval-poor to the issl.laru.:e ofa
gradiHg permit (Eastern Dublin General Plan AmendmenJfSpecifk
Pian J\.litigation Measure 3.5.146,0}",--.-ULRill!jtk~D:....lkp.tQj~_dmgM&i::
~ll~I!L~l~?U~p.t'J~.Jd~~JKf.wY.illL-1]~11~Vg_9:rMJY$.-.L~1~3%_ ttlrp...Y.giUM
pl~iec!_ ~ltLJj~Z-kJ~ 9i-9l..11Jl<tJH~
~Ajtigntion ?\'!easure ";9, The projec.t shall be required to provide
facili~if'S' to aUe...iate potential: oo\'t'fJstream flooding due to the pt"Ojet."t
(Easlern Dublin General Plan "",endmwL' Spe<ifu: Plan Mrtigafun
Mea.<>ure 3.5,'470).
Cd)' of Dublin -
Public Works
Departn1ent
Prior to the issuance
ofa gradingpennSt
ctly of Dublin -
Public V{orks
Department
I
!
I
I
I
i
Poor to the issuance- I
of a grading permit I
,
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
City of Dublin -.
Pub1ic \Vorb;
Depar1ment
Prior to the issuance
of a gradmg penmr
I
I
,
I
Poge 18
",~~ I
,~'l ,"ater qu;tlity_ I
~.""u and ool1mmctlon dehris along:
i with urban pollutants in.c:tu.ding oi~ !
! greao;;e, fertiti:zen;. pel ~"'me, and otner I
I .chemicals from surface streets, bwns, :
\ and vpen space couM be discharged l
! In10 the unnamed tributary .along the !
lnorth't't"est project boundary and I
! eventually into-l~ Creek. This isl
l a. potentially signifh:ant impact I
--1--
1 The- runoff generated by the pro~t j
I during oon1!.tru-ctlnn and post- 1
! roustmction could tmpact 'i\-ater quality. I
1 Sediwf."Ilt aJ.ld c.onstruc.tiQn debris along I
1 'with urban poUufants- including oil, 1
I grease) fertilizers, pet "\.~tie, and other :
, ,
I chemicals Hum surface st.reets, ~vms\ i
1 and (lop-en space- oouId be- discharged I
: into l,he. unnamN tnbUlary akmg the l
! n.ortbwe-st project boundary and l
: e'~entuany into T.as.<>aj<\fil Creek. This i~ 1
l '8 potentially significant imp-act. ~
, ,
i \
I The runoff generated by the project I
\ "during constructioN and pOSl- l
II construction could nl1pact "\.....-mer qualit't'. l
\ Sediment and construction debris along:
I -wlth urban ptJUutants mcluding- oil, 1
1\ wea-~, fer1Hizers, pet \\""8Ste, and I>ther :
chemicah from surface slre.eJs., l.crn-ns, :
! and open space could be discharged J
\ RHo the unnamed tributary along the l
I norHnvt::.>1: project boundary and!
: e'~ntualJy in," T llSSaj.ml Creek fhis is :
! a }NtentiaUy significant impact. :
~ ,
_.' jvteasure (it]. lID)' backbone dr~mC!bo;e facilities required by
the project Shalt be consistent \\'Ith the Slorm Dram Ma...<<ter P'hm
(Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/ Specific Phm. Mitigrokm
~.teasure ]5; 48.0J.
City of Dubun ~.
Public Works
Department
Prior to the. ~ce
of a Oln.structiou
permit for S'tQffil
drain COrl5tmctIDn
Prior to appmvat of a
srnge 2 DC"re'.IDpment
Plan
.Pr~r 10 approval of a
Stage 2 DevetDpmem I
PIa" I
I
,\-1itigation Mea.."Ure 61 All ~io-rm drain faciHlies and management eil)' (If Dublin ~
practices shalt protoct and enhance 'WIDer quality {Eastern Dublin I Puhlic \Vorkt:.
General Plnn Amendmenv Sredne PIan Mitigntion M~ure I Department
3.5i 49.0}. I
I
Miligation M""""re 62 A """,ifi",,~ter qtt3lity invesl,gation shall be I Ci'y of Dublin --
submitted to demonstrate existing water quality and h-upacts that f Public WurJ..:s
urbau nmofl' of tbe project v,,"Ould have .on that ","vater qu.aJity. Thlj I Department
'\.ater quality investigation shall address. the qU<Jn1Ily of run.ntf and the I
erreds from discharged poIlu1ants from surface runoff into the {l-n~SRe
-retention hasin and unnamed tributary (Eastern Dublm General Plan
Amendmen!/ Specifrc Plan Jl-iitigation hka;;ure 35/ .51.0k
I
Pag<: 19
; The runoff generated by the pmject
I dur.ing co;struction and post-
oonstruction could imp8ct .,'ater quality.
Sed.iment and {:{In sLructiOTl dehris .along
........ith urban po Ilutants. including oil,
grease, fertilizer.s, pet "i3S'te. and other
chemic.als from su:rface street-s, la'L'i,'tlS,
and open spm.:e o;;.ouki be discharged
int~l the 111lIlarned tributary' along lhe
Tl(lrtflwe:-t pm jr..."'ct ooWld arv and
e-...'ernuallv intL~ T us..c::ajara Creek, ~ This is !
a pnten-ti~ly significant impact. :
TIle HmoIT generated r..y the project! l\..1itLQatk"n Measure 64. The proj~cl shall meet the wi::Iter quality
during -oomtructiou and plJ's.t- i requirements of the Cit}' of Dublin NPDES pennrt (Eastern Dublin
construdion CI)U ld Lmp.act .........ater quality. General Plan ...\men-dment.' Specific Plan [I..1jt1gation 1Vtel'tSUIe
Sediment and cOIls.tru-ctiLttl debri~ along 3.5.' 54m.
,...itll urban pullutants illcluding oil
grease, fertiliz:ers., pet ~"\'a:,"1e, and other
chemicals from surface streets, m'i.llS,
and open space c-ould be disdlaf"ged
into the unnamed trLbutaf)' along the I
north west proiec~ boundar)' and
e.....entually int.... T :'Is5<'ljar.a Creek. This is
a pc-tentially signil1cant impact,
f &3.
1
64.
65.
The runoff ge!l~mted by (he project
during constructLon and J:H.l st-
construction oould impact '.'rater quality,
SOO went and construction -debris along
wiLh urban pollutants including oil,
grease, fertilizers, pet Vi.mte, and other
chemica!:; fmm ~urf-OCe streets, Ia.......ns,
and open space Cfi uld be discharged
intC1 the unnamed ttibutro)' akJ.ng the
north'J."\<est pTJ:lject boundar)' and
e',entuan'r' intn TE'lssYilfa Creek Ihis is
{I po!entiall"r' SignifiCiIDt impad,
1Vlitigation l\-'lea.:,.-me 63, The -pmject shall meet all applicable
requtrements (If [he City of Dublin "Best Management Practi.;;es" to
mitigate storm w~tcr pn lilJtion (E:astem Dublin Geneml Plall
~.!uncrJdmentl Specific Plan Mj[ igation ~k:asure 3.5.' 53.0)_
Mitigatil}ll Measure- 1';5_ The project sh:ill meet the water quality
requirements of the Alameda Counn-' Urban Runoff Clean 'Vater
Program fE astern Dublin Genera! Plan Amendment.' SpecifiL: Pfarr
11itigatilln l\-leasure 35/ 54,f)),
City clf Dublin -
Public \Vorks
Department
City of D ublm -
Public- 'Vorks.
Department
Ptior to the iSSllance
('If a -gra::Hllg ur
construction pl;:'rmit,
v;.tJiche-...'er is issued
first
Poor to the issuance
of -II grading or
cc.mstruction permit,
"'hiche.....er .is is::,-"ued
first
Page 2H
66.
T1le outfall and re~entjl)n bas.in
pmposed b'r' the pro jed could ha.....e a
significant impact on [he road alignment
of T assajara R0ad.
"7
TIle project '.""ould require grading that
l,l,ontlld change and :alter existing drainage I
patterns on the site and im.:re.ase the
amoullt and rate of surfdct' water runoff
that oould result in flo....ding fin :arJd off-
:;i(e.
6g.
The project '......auld require gra::ling tha~
"t\'Ou [d change and alte..- e:-; istin g drainage
patterns em the s.ite and increase the
amount and mte of surff:lce \'i.'.ater runoff
that could result in floodmg on and {tff-
site.
0<).
! Ute pro ja.-i 'w u l-Ux:.j:.~pQ,.-~-:I to n_'iJ.i'i:;'
fTr.JJ}J3S--wilLk~l'att:.r tll3l1 n(l~m
C\ t' 1. \....~Uc!l c(l\lld e"\1 ~~~ _r~ident\ IT.
tmm-c m:rise-. exceeding city ~~C11l~ <'1[_1.1 ~: _
10.
The homes adjacent to the pmpl)sed
open space ""Duld be required to
comply v.'ith the \':ild fire :fI.'lansgement
J...1irigatiot1 Measure n6. The project de'io'eklper shaU submit a
preliminary creek alig:runent plan to the resource agencies [or the
realignment ofT.assajara Creek prior to approvalDf the proied by the
I Cil)',
,
y..'1itigatiDf] Measure fi7 The proiect de"'ell)per shall be required to
rj) btain propd" appro....-als f(]T !>tnIT/l clramage (Eastem Dublin General
P!an iunendment/ Spedfic Plan Action Progrum Number 9W)
11.itigatio-n 1\.-i~ure 68-. The siting of tne storm drainage infrastructure
shall be collSl.::;knt "'~1th the Resource lI.'bnagement Policies- uf the-
Spectfic Pian lEaslE'l11 Dublin General p~ .i\mendmentl Spt:cific
Plan Action Pr(l gmm 1\ 0_ YX t.
y.".1rtrg:;1tion Measure fl9_ A~~ study shall be pJel',lre.i fl~r till:
'~'-*i.ir:.ffit rnil)f {O the L!J)(}ru\-a! ~f the P!annerl De,--clQpment-State
2 Lle.....ebpment Plan to sho\'j.' compliance v.ith the interior and _exterior
- nois-i standards. Th~ THfi;o:;e ~Lud\, .c,hal~ t".,thmr~ lUKUllDaLts [.,J tr,jfJ;;
(In 1~<.!,;,,-~3m:r3: R0;1rl on tb.;-' -~l:D'ie~t_ 1 he mtelll}r ll(rLoo::e ;E"f-=:~ shilll b
bf('U-mt to 45 dBA Qr les:; 9!liL~Jffi!.}r mli~ te'\.'eL:'i to 6D~
Io\~'er 1, L,ise m1ra<...--ts !!eL,er(Jt~i_b" meo..:-hanicID e.::pir~mf:n 5LL~h as air
~ \mJiti~rt'l:r~. roo i pump& etc. shall be- mill i'1l~led Aj So:J und.J:twi?-~
amf mjti~t:i0 n m{:3;:-,L1Te~ reC-;:'~l~e~lded in th~ 10j~e 5tLrdy :shall b.;o-
il~Ci H"])I '>::Itm tnto tl1e hn-pr0 ~'emcrJt p;an s jf-l r dt1,- d\)f1'f!lt1Jt Df .;:act. --=ite
Ad,jjtk'lnlt\.-. an a:":l~u~~ital ('1)!1S'Jlbnt ~h<l[ 3i~ th~ (:on:;truction f.Jla:1~
11.itigation [I.'leasure in. The... projed sh;:;ll [;:;mrh~ Vrir~_ thE C.)ty (IX
Dublin fV.~flfe 1'r'1alla",oement Plan and ~_stalla!_Eo~ of an automatic fire
City of Dublin
Communit~
D e\'eJopment
Depoartment
PlannLng and
Building
Di.....tstolls. and
l'ublic Wo,ks I
Department j
City uf Dublin -
Public Wurks
Department
Cll)' of Dublio -
Public \Vorks
Department
<;it>~_ ~f Du~1in
Cl}mrnuniry
De\.e-Iopment
Department
Plarmrn g Di\oisioTl
City of Dublio
COmmunit-y
De.....-eklpment
Prior to appmval of a
Stage 2 D e....--elopment
Plan
Prior !(] the issuance
of a groomg or
ronstruction pennil,
\'i.'hichever is- issued
first
I
Prior to appr[)"at (]f a II
Stage 2 D e.....elopment
Ph",
I
Prior to .appn~~'~_oLa
Stage 2 Development
Plan
Prior to the issum1:::e
ofllbui1dingp~ -"
;
i
, ":'":__u_____
! Delered: I
! Delei~~ acoootca[
Deleted: ~mili "Ix: impacted b~'
, ----.
j Deleted: 00 T&Sajara Rim
! Deleted: wldeninli:
i Deleted, aM
i,"!"d:t
.-------
- -: Deleted: o:'mpLiaJ:~ ::of tbe
~m
Deleted:
Page 21
1
'I
'ml
1
1
1
1
'I
71.
72_
73.
74.
75.
i6.
I P Ian to pw~ect tho se rE:~ences from
wil~land fire. l,',-h!&tt cm.l:;J imp8::'t tlJ~
. lL-11='.JGC-.l.
The homes adjavent to the proposed
open space \'iiDLdd be required to i
compl..... 1,',--it 11 the Wildfrre J',.'1anagemellr
Pfarr toll protect thlJose residences from
\l,-ildkmd fLreL I',hidl ;,);Julll irnDRc~ the
mi..,ject.
The students generated tJ'r' rhe project
rou [d impa..:-t !he capacity, of the schools
, in the Dublin Lnified School District
: that ser\.e tne proiecL
The students. gt'nerated by the project
could .impacl the capacITY of tile scl11..H.J'ls
in the Dublin Unified School District
that seT\'e the project.
The students generated by the project
CDuld impacr the capa:::ity of the schools
in the Dublin Unified S:::hool D L..:;trict
that sen,'e the project.
sprinkler sys.tem in E:<K:n Te5(dence~
.rvUtj:gatil)!1 Measure 71. T1h:: umie\:t de--,'-c10f1IT $h3]1 t.....'l... t]ll:': Fir~
P.,_'teCli!>1l Fe.e- anC'r 10 r::S.J3.11C"C of lJJniUingr.II::nllit to offset the CIlst
n f provtding fITe seni.ces for tbe de1:dopment,
:\titigation Mea<iure 72. t...deq uate capacity sball be PW'i..jded for jun iOT
high .school age students fEastem Dublin General Plan
.\mendment.' Specific- P!::Ul1'.litigation Measure 3 4/ 14.(lt
.fI.'litigation Measure 74. Ade:::juate school facilities ~hall be a.....ailable
prior to de\.elopment in the project areas to the extent pennitted by
law l E a.qern Dublin General: Plan Amendment' Specific Plan
l\.'1itigati(m Meao;;,ure .~.4/ 17.1 ~l.
The students genenrLro by the project' 1 .Mitigation Measure 75_ The development of flev... school facilitEes shall
could impact the c:apaclty of the schools be pro.....ided for through the rlcdicatio n l.'f schoof sites and/ or
in the Dublin lJnif.oo &TI(l(ll District payment Df rlevel(lpment fees by der.'elopers, ur b~' any Dilier mean
!lIa1 sef1r"t' the pro je<:t I permitted by lim' (Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendmentl Spedf[C
PI;m t.'1itEgaUon :\tea"llre 3.4, 1 R_m.
,
The project res.idents oould D:npact' 1I..1itigatioll Mea3ure 7(,. The City shall ensure that :an assessment
recreat:ional facilities in the city. district, homeowners association, or some nther mochanism is in place
~hat 'hill pmvide regular Iong~tcrm maintenatu.:e fif the urbani Dpen
II Department
Building and
r Safe1.v Di vision
, and ~ AJ:3meda
Cuunty Fire
Department
Citv of Dublin
Commu~
De't'elopmellt
Department -
Buikhn I; ami
Safety Divlsion
Dtlblm Unified
&hoo [ D [S~rict
,
i
I
Dublli, lTnifled
School Distric!
Dublin UnifEed
Scnool District
City 0 f Dublin
('...om munity
De,,:dopmenr
Prieor to the rssuance
of a buildmg perm it
Prior to the issu:mce
of a building permit
Prior to the issuance
of a building permit
Prior to the issuance
-of a grading permit
for the p.ark
P~22
space intenace prior to ihe issuance a grad mg peml it for the park Department i i
, f Ea.c:tern Dublin t i-eneral Plan ...'\mendment/ Spedfic P!an Acfion Plal1I1ing Dhision ~ I
Progrnm No. .RI). and Public ,"'i/orks t i
Department
.-.
'7 The project res:iden(s oould impact :\1itigarion I\.feasure 77 The City shall ensure that eacl1 new City of Dublin Poor to <wpro'i.'aI of a
recreational facilities in the city. development reserves t he open space and parkfand designated in the CLtmmunity Stage 2 De\.dopmen!
Plau fEastf:'m Dublin Genf:'ral Plan lunendmeull Specific Plan De~'eIopment Plan
l'-litlgat:ion ~'leasure 3.4/ 29.m. Department -
PlromingDi1.ision
7R. The pr-ojed residents amid imp.act t\..titigatjon .f',.'leasure 78-. The City shall calculate and assess En lte"u park City of Dublin Poor to appro.....21( I}f a
! recreational facilities in the city. fo;:".eS based on Dublin's parkland and dedication ordinance (E astern Community Stage 2 De"'eIopruent
Dublin Gener.a1 Plan .\meoomerrU Specific Pian lV'litigation Mea:::ure De...ektpment Plan
1 3.4.. J L~1. Department -
Building ""d
Safety Dh is~JIl
--
79 The Dl}ugherty Road.. Dublm l\-1itrgation Measure 79, 1 he project developer shall ad.....anre to the City of Dubliu Prior to thE: issuance
Bou1e"J.'ard .intersecrion w'Ouki operate at Cit't' 'l'p~""'1e llKHtles fur acquisition of rjght-{lf-",'ay aud Commullity of the first occup.anC'r"
W S E [y,' c=1 t93) durinl;l: lbe p.m. peak con stmction of [he impro\:ements C1ssumed in this study for the De'..el(lpment permir
ho:lUT under Build ou' Conditions :intersectkln of irnpro....'ements assumed in the Septem her 28, 21:1115 Department -
l indudmg the pro.iect}. TIlis IDS TKJ[I.'1 Traffic Study for the Proposed Fallon Cmssings De.....elopment Building and
represents a significant cumumti....e for the :in~ersectioJl of Dublm &lUlev.ardl Dou gherty RoC1d. The Safet). Di\-ision
.impact am"runt L,f mo:lnry ad \'a!lced to the eitv shall be based on the
de....eloper s fair share of the deficit (spreaJ o.....er those projects which
are required to make up tbe defidt ~ bet ween funds a......ailab Ie- to the I
City from CmQPl' 2 EfNem f}uNin Trqffic lnpn Fre funds and the
estimaled cost of acquiring the right-of....vlt''{ and cc-nstructing the I
:impro.....f:'ments. The City shaH p ro...'ide -credit for Caugrv 2 E aslJn
Dub/in Traffic Iflr-n1 F:a: to the de....eloper fm any a:h.'artce of monies
made for the impm':-ements planne<i for the Dublin
B::mlev.;mj/ D-oughf:'rt)' Rvad 1ntersectLoUll.
80. The Santa Rita" l-oSO EB ramps. },.1itigatIOll Me3sure 8-0. The pro iect developer shall mntrib\lte a pm- City of Dublin Prior to ~he issuance
intersection ","uu!d operate at LOS E rata snare of the Cl}st t(l :impro....e the intersection 0 f &mta Rita Cmrummity of -the first occupancy
(vJ c=f).95-l during the p.m. peak I1m.l.- Rnad.. l~ 58( I ~stb()Lm-d off-ramps'! P imlicu Drhe to include .a thrrd left De\'e-lopment permit
under BuDd out C~mdi lions. \:indudmg rum lane [I}r the eastbound off-ramp approach at this intersection. Department -
the pwjectL This LO S represents a Building ""d
Page 23
significant cWllul:3ti.....e LrnJl<d. Safet".-' Di.....isKIll
8l. \\'ith a pm jected LOS F fin variOtlS \-litigation :\1ea....ure 81. The projec~ -dewloper sh811 pay the Tri-Valle',' City fif Dub-tin Prior to the .issuance
segments of 1~5gl1 ami )-<\.,0. project Transp-onation De'i.'f'lupmellt rrVTD) fee for its proportionate share Commtmit'r' of:3 building permit
! I trips- ","uuld be adding to an already of 1-580 and 1-6&U imprn....ements, induding HOV lanes., :3u.:ciliaJY De-'r'dopment
,
! deficient condition. These specillc lanes, and interchange .impn:r\'ements... The pT(lject shall ah:J pay its 1 Departmetlt -
; segments ......,:ould Hu t meet the ACCi\tA proportionate share tm~:ard pllblf.::' tran~"rtatio[t imprm'eTIlents l e.g, I BuiIding and
ffitlnitlJring standard (J f LO S E during ''''est Dublin BART Stal ion and Express. Bus Service from Li.....ernioon: I Safety Di,.ision !
tne ::I,m. or p.m. pel!k hour_ This is to East Dublin B.I\RT Station) by P-3}1Tlffit of the TVTD F re.
considered a sigl'lific..:mt cumulati...-e
impacl
82. The SL\ rt'~:identjal llJo[s proposed 1'litigl!l ion Measure 8-2. n~e nwiect 8o[lllcan1 shall le"'r!Se the pruje:c~ City of Dllblm Prio.- tn l!pp-rm.<Jl of a
adiK-ent to the east side ot Ta5saiam enb"'dfi(:~ <It l;!'.,.";<;E1;,!!Ta Ro-ld to the .::atisfuct.iofl 0fthe- eil,' [!1g!llttT l\l' Community Stage 2 D e"elopment
R{1;.;,J ;"''fiuL1 restri...."1 th~ ~i~ht JisLanct' J L~i ,,\. ITJe:lt~ ~i~~l d i5tclllce to tbe nurth. Dev--elopment Plan
along T :;l-;5:>"lur<l: Roal to the north for i Department - I
"JO-">rL<[' "itin.-1!<< ~t, and h",.e a I Planning Di....ision
significant impact. and Public \Vorks
Department
83. The J1'roject would be required (a Mitigation Measure 83_ The project shall ccmtlect l{l the pub lk: s::'J.....er City of Dublm - Prior to the issuance-
construct nO'", ",...or and .......astewater {E astern Dublin General Plan Amendmrntl 'Spedfic Plan .r....litigatiOll J>uhfic \Vorks of an frCcupancy
lines {I-n the site to distribute .......ater to 11earore 3-.5/ 1m. Department and permit
project residents ami rolled '"iastevi:ater. DSRSD
re::pecti....e~.
84. The project "lolJld be reqnired to ~titjgatiJn 1\,.feasure 84_ Tne project de~'eJopcr shall provide tile City a Cit~ of D ublio Prim to the .issuance
L.:Un5truct new \li1'lfer and .......astew-ate.- '"".-111 serve.... w1lStet'i.mer letter from DSRSD -prim to issuance I)f a Community of a grading permit
Ilin,s on the ,ite to distnbute ",ater to grading permit (Ea:;tem Dub-Un General Plan Amendment! Specllic- DC'r'ekrpmetlt
project residenls and collect ","'aStev.-ater P lall lI:lirigation f,..leasure 3.5/ 4.1)). Department -
! respectively. Planning Di.....isKJ-tl
and Public Works
S5. Th, pm ject ....'i.'{tuld be reqlJired to t..-1itigat ion ,f',.'1easure 85. The design and construction of all ","1'lste\""1'lter City of Dublin Prior fo !he issuance
ronstruct new wate.- and 1,l,oastewater ~"'Stems ,hall be in accordance with D$RS[) service JKIlicie5.:, Community' I uf a construclioll
lines on the site to distribute u,'<'Iter tu pro-cooures, design and comtructKm standards aJ1d masfer plans D e...--elopment I permit for wa:s1:e'J,liater
pmject residents .and coRed wastewater, (Eastern Dublin Genernl Plan .\mendment.' Specifte Plan Iv1iti.gaticm Department and I fadlities
respective-Iv_ 1'leasure 3.5/ 5.01 D SRSD i
Poge 14
~6.
&7
88.
89
9{1.
91.
The project ,,,,ul.lkl be required to
construct new '",,--ater and \'i.astewa1er
l.ines on ~he s!te to distrmute ""-ater 1:('1
project residents. and collect wllStewater,
! respecti....el}'
i
" The pf{lject ......,ould be requITed to I
construct lle'>'i.' \...-ater and w1t'itev.lIIter
lines. (1TI the site to distribute .......'atef" tn
project reside!l(;s and collect \1j.'E.ste'"'ater,
respecth--el'r'_ i
The project ","uuld bE: required to
construcl nev,.' ",'Ster and ...."\'3Ste\"rater
lines on tht: s.ite t(l dtstribure 'tvater 10
pmject residents and w Uect "'astewater,
re:;pectj...ely.
The pmjoct ,"'Ould be required to
OOllSrruct new water and Vr"dStewater
lines {I-n the site to distriliute ""1'Iter Lo
I project residents. and cnllect wa<:tev.-mer,
~ respect ivel}'.
I The pm ject ......,ould be requITed to
i construct ne-..v .......'ate. and ,,,.astev.'8ter
lines- on the site to dislribute wate-r to
project residents and coRed \vaste'L\rater,
TeSJl'E'Cti.....eh'.
The project 'I,l,\)uld be required to
construd new ...,...~ter and ....\"a3te"...ater
Mitigatkln Measure 86. The pmject de......eloper shall prepare a detailed
""asfet"<lter capacity in....e~tigation, includ.ing means to minimize
wastof:'r'i.ater flows. t(J -supp-lement the informatiofl in [he Specnrc Plan
(E astern Dublin General Plan iunendment/-speciflc r!.an r...:!itigaticlll
[I.''Eeasure 351 7j It
~:1itLg;:rticm fI,'leasure 87 The projxt shall be consistent l,l,oTth
-"''i.'a::::te'''":3ter tteatment plant expansion as set forth in DSRSD s ma<:ter
plan {Dublin General Plan Amendmt:ntl SpecifK' PLan f',..fitigati("Jll
Measure 3.5,' 9.01.
11itig:atkln l\..leasure 8K The project sh,dl be required ~o use rec>rded
"'<Iter for landscape irrigation in accordance with D SRSD 's Re.;..')'Cled
\Vater Pone'r' per AR III p3ge 811 (Eastcrn Dublin General Plan
Amendment.' 'Specific Plan .f\.1itigatilJn l\{easure 35l (2m.
\1Ltigation \teasure 89. lhe rec'\oded "'ater treatment S)'Stem shall be
planned, des[gnoo, and constructed for energy efficicrt-cy .in operatt.iJn
{E 8S~em Duhtin G enernl Plan lunendmeml specmc Plan Miti-g:di<lTI
Measure 3.5l16.U}.
Mitilffition Measure 00. The ccmstruct[{}n (] f tne r-eC\-ded "...ater
distribution system shall be ill accordance wi!h an apr licable St::rte and
local regulations (Easfern Dubrin Gener-ill p~ Amendmen ti ~eciftc
Plan Mitigation Measure 3.51 2(..01.
t1itigation Mea.~Lrre 9! _ \,.ater conser':atio-n measures sh.all be
design ed mto the pmject (E CIstern DubLirl General Pkm
CitT' of Dublin
Public Works
Department and
DSRSD
City of Dublin
Public 'Vorks
D epartrnent and
DSRSD
Citv of Dublin
C ommun[ty
Development
Department
Building and
Safety Division,
Dublin Public
\Vooo
Department, and
D SRSD
eit". of Dublin
C(tmmuni~r
De-.'e1opment
Department and
D SRSD
City of Dublin
CcmtmlJnity
De\'eJnp-ment
Department and
DSRSD
Cily of Dublin
CCJmmunity
Prior to tile .issuance
of a ronsrTuctio-n
pennit fur ","'aStevr'a1er
facilities
P rloT to approval oil f a
Stage 2 De-.....elopment
Pian
Prior to the jSSllaJlCe
of a construction
permit for fec'rded
'r'tatt:rfacilities
Prior to tbe- issuance
of a runstmction
pennit for fe-C'vc-led
'.'rc:Jter fa;::ilitie-s
Prior to the issuance
of a ;::onstructton
permit [or recyded
water fuc-iJ[t!es
Prior t(l the issuance
of .a construction
Page 25
lines. Cln the site itl dislnbLtte \'i.'ate.- tu mUt:ndmentl Specific Plan },.:titigatiCln Mea.<:tJre 35/ 26m. De\'~kJpment permit
project residents and rollect "ia.';;;tewater, Department and
re:5]J'E:>Ctively. D SRSD
,
~2. The project .......'Quld be required to 1fitLgatirm Measllr~ 92. A recycled .......'3ter distrLhution sy.:;tem !'ihall be D SRSD PrKJr to the issu.ance
c:.cln::;truct new .....oater and waste~....ater incorporated into the project (E.astem Dubllil General PI,," of a construction
lines on the sHe torl distnbute water to 4mendment.' SpecifK: Plan 11itigatL(lTI Mt'3Smt: ).5l2"7.1~l. permit for water
pro.iect TC3idents i:md 'C(I Uect J,l..astel,l,oBter, facilil Le5
respect1veh.
9J. , The pr-oject wlluld be required to l'r.-1iljWJ1:1on Mearore "Y'3_ Tne design and C1Jnslruction of the water DSRSD Prior tD the issuance
C{lllStruct new ""mer am! ,,,.a...tewata- !i-'r'Stem facility Ullfl[(l vements shall be in .accordance Vrith D SRSD of a oonstructio n
; lines on the site to dismlJute water to standards (E astt:rn Dublin G enerm P tan .Amendment! Specific Plan penllLt for water
I project residt:nts aml L,:l-,Rect "'L'i.mtev.a1:er, \titigatton Meas.ure 3.5.. 37 0). i facilitie~
respecti~'e1v. i I
,
j
\14. The project v.nuki bo required t" J...1jtjg:ation 1v:[ea51.lre 94. Tile project developer shall rIm.ide the Citya Cit~ of Dublin Prior to the issuance
construct ne'J-V ,....':3tcr and ...."'ao:::tevratcr I '\\ill 5.er'.-e" ~''I'lter letter from DSR SD prior to the lSSU.ance of a O:nnmunfty ora gradmgpermit
lines on the site t(l distribute wOlte.- to i gradm:g permit (Eas~ern Dublin General Plan Amendmentl 'Specific De'i.'elopm ent
project residents.:and collect '''aste\l,01rter, Plan Mitigatil)n 1\,.fea.c:tlre 3.5/ 38,1Jl. Dep-artmen~ -
resp-ecth:ely. Planning Dh~slon
-.1-- -
9,. Th, project would b, required to t..1itigatiorl Meao:;ure ":)5_ The ,~.ater dfutrLbutlon sYstem shall be D SRSD Prior to tbe issuance
I construct ne"l water and ,,,.-ast-e'i:\'3ter phmnexl, designed, and construct~ for energy efficient operation of a construction
f lines on the site to di5tribute ""mer to (Eastern Dublin General P!an ..:\mendmenf/ Specific- Plan y...litigatjO!l I permLt for ,,"'er
I pmject residen', and collect ,,,.rt",,"',,. Measure 3.5.. 40.0). I facilities
respect....oelv. !
..
PE'lge26