Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 139-06 Street Light AD 99-1 Engineers Report RESOLUTION NO. 139.06 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN .. * 'II #; 'II; * '* APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT CITY OF DUBLIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH AND TRACT 7067) WHEREAS, by its Resolution No_ 047-06, a Resolution Directrng Preparation of Annual Report for City of Dublin Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment D1Stnct No_ 99-1 (the "DiStrict"), this Council designated the Public Works Director as EngIneer of Work and ordered said Engmeer to make and file a report m writing in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, said report was made and filed with the City Clerk and duly consIdered by this Council and found to be sufficient in every particular, whereupon it was determined that said report should stand a~ Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to the aforeswd Resolution and that July 18,2006, at 7'00 p,m, III the Council Chambers, Dublin Civic Center, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California, was appointed as the time and place for a heanng by the Council on the question of the levy of the proposed assessment, nouce of which hearing was mailed, published and posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954,6, and WHEREAS, at the appointed time and place, said heanngs were held, and all persons interested desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard, and all matters pertaining to said levy were heard and considered by this Council, and this Council thereby acqUIred jurisdiction to order said levy and confirmation of diagram and assessment prepared by and made a part of the report of said engineer to pay the cost and expenses thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby approve that: (a) The property owners ownmg more than fifty percent of the area of assessable land WIthin the District had not, at the conclusion of said hearing, filed written protests against the said proposed levy, or against the Engineer's Estimate of costs and expenses, or against the maps and description, or agwnst the diagram or the assessment to pay for the costs and expenses thereof; (b) The public interest, convenience, and necessity require that said levy be made; (c) The District benefited by said improvements and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and the exterior boundanes thereof, are as shown by a map thereof filed in the office of the City Clerk, which map is made a part hereof bv reference thereto, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of July, 2006, by the following vote: AYES, NOES' ABSENT ABSTAIN: Councilmembers Hildenbrand, Oravetz and Zika, and Mayor Lockhart None Councilmember McCormick None Am~,-~ City e k CITY OF DUBLIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH AREA AND TRACT 7067) FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 ENGINEER'S REPORT TASLE OF CONTENTS 1 ENGINEER'S LETTER...ttt.............'''....,.......................................................~.~......... 3 2 ESTIMA TE OF COSTS.....................................................................................................5 3 MEmOD OF APPORTIONMENT ........................................................... 6 4 PARCEL LISTING.................."'.....~......................................................."..""............ 7 5 CERTIFICATIONS"............."...................................................""..........................8 G:\A$SESSMllNT OlSTRICTSIG9-l Dub R8nch SL\ll9.1 Rpt 2lXIll_doc JoJy :ZO. 2006 1 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on April 18, 2006, the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, adopted its Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment District 1999-1 for the acquisition and maintenance of improvements more particularly therein described; and WHEREAS, said Resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565, et seq., of said Act; NOW. THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the Council of said City, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of acquisition of and maintenance of said improvements and the cost and expenses incidental thereto, to be paid by said District. ummarv 0 ssessmen (1) (2) (3) As Filed As As Finally Preliminarily Approved Approved Cost of Maintenance $96,972 $96,972 $96,972 Incidental Expenses $136,962 $/36,962 $136,962 TOTAL COSTS $233,934 $233,934 $233,934 Estimated 2006-07 Interest Income Applied to 2006-07 Operating Costs $4,605 $4,605 $4,605 Prior Year Collections & Penalties $350 $350 $350 Reimbursement for Public Damage $4, 700 $4,700 $4,700 Estimated Surplus from 2005-06 Fiscal Year $84,402 $84,402 $84,402 SUB-TOTAL $94,057 $94,057 $94,057 NET TO BE ASSESSED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 $139,877 $139,877 $119,877 Assessment per Lot (3,801) $.36.80 $36.80 $.36.80 S fA t G:\ASSESSMENT DlSTRICTS\99-.1 Dub RI""" Sl\99-1 Rpt 2tlOO,doc July 20, 2tlOO As required by said Act, a diagram is hereto attached showing the exterior boundaries of said landscape maintenance assessment district and also the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said street lighting maintenance assessment district as the same existed at the time of the passage of said resolution, each of which lots or parcels having been given a separate number upon said diagram. I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within said street lighting maintenance assessment district by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the acquisition and maintenance of said improvements, and more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof: Said assessment is made upon the several lots or parcels orland within said street lighting maintenance assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said lots or parcels respectively from the acquisition and maintenance of said improvements, The diagram and assessment numbers appearing herein are the diagram numbers appearing on said diagram, to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description of said property The scope of work includes the maintenance, operation, repair and replacement of all public street lighting facilities located within the public streets and within public easements within private streets within the District Boundaries, as shown on the approved improvement plans for the following Tracts: 7067, 6925, 6956 through 6964, 7136 through 7142, and 7324 through 7327 and, including, but not limited to, the lighting poles, fixtures, conduits, conductors, service boxes, controllers, and appurtenances, and the furnishing of power, together with all incidental expenses for the maintenance, operation, and repair of the street lighting system, Dublin Ranch Areas B, C, F, and H were annexed to the Dublin Ranch Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment District 99-1 in December of 2005 Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Alameda for the Fiscal Year 2006-2007 and includes all of such parcels excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or rights of way to be acquired in these proceedings for public road purposes. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County This District has been established to pay for maintenance, operation and repair of the street light fixtures, which differ from the City Standard. A special light fixture has been created as a community element, which is a benefit to the homeowners within the District boundary Doud. ruf~ ~"/:~~~ Mer sa A Morton Public Works Director G:\ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS\99-1 Pub R.""h SL\99-1 Rpl2006,doc July 20, 2006 2 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated cost forthe maintenance of improvements described in this Report for FiscaJ Year 2006-2007 is as follows: ESTIMATE OF COSTS Maintenance Electric Energy $73,900 California Street Light Association $372 Other Repairs and Maintenance Costs $22. 700 $96.972 Incidentals Engineer's Report and Proceedings $2,825 County of Alameda Collection Costs (1.7%) $2,378 Delinquencies $1,399 Pole Painting Reserve (see description below) $80,324 ContingencieslUnallocated Reserve $50.036 $136,962 TOTAL: $233,934 Future Pole Painting Reserve: For 2006-07= $13,731 ($1l5nightx 1,194 lights + 10 years) Prior Year Pole Painting Reserve = $66,593 Total Future Pole Painting Reserve at end ofFiscaJ Year 2006-07 = $80,324 G::-'- AIElNll"IIllSJRICTSW.1 Du~R.nch SL_1Rpt2006,doc July 20. 2006 3 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT The maintenance of the street lighting within the boundaries of the Assessment District benefits each residential lot in the District in the same manner and to the same extent, Therefore. the Assessment has been equally apportioned over the proposed 3,801 planned single-family residential lots contained within the District. The per lot assessment will be $36 80 per lot for Fiscal Year 2006-2007, increasing to $41.54 (subject to inflation and utility rate increases) at build-out for all residential lots within the boundaries of the District on a per lot basis. Commercial property shall be assessed at 5,5 times the rate for residential lots times the acreage of the lot. Common areas and public land within the District have been exempted and will have a zero assessment since they receive no special benefit with regard to the special light fixtures, Until they are subdivided, the assessment for these lots shall be equal to the per-lot or per-unit assessment each year, times the number of proposed lots within each Tract. With the recording of the future Tract maps, the new assessments will be reapportioned to each of the individual residential lots. As more street lights are installed each year, until all have been installed, the assessment each year will be based on the estimated cost of maintenance (using the then current numbers in Section 2), divided by the number of lights to be installed that year, provided in no event will the per lot assessment be more than $41.54 (as adjusted for inflation). It should be noted that future annexations to this District may affect the spread of assessments, In addition to the increase in the annual maintenance cost as a result of additional lights, the annual maintenance cost shall be increased annually beginning July 1, 2000, by the percentage increase in the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Consumer Price Index ("Index") (applies to all costs except electricity), plus any actual increase in the cost of electricity If the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Consumer Price Index is unavailable or deemed by the City Council to be inappropriate, a comparable consumer price index, as approved by the City Council, shall be used to replace the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Price Index, G:\ASSESSM::NT DISTRICTS\990-1 Dub Ronch S~\990-1Rpl2OO/l.dO. July 20. 2006 SAMPLE CALCULATION' Assume an increase in the index of 1 % and a utility increase of 5%. INDEX INCREASE ASSUMED 1% 47,'J85 " ,01 ~ 480 US 465 ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENT COST LESS ENERGY COST SUBJECT TO RATE INCREASE ONL ASSESSMENT SUBJECT TO INDEX INCREASE ENERGY COST 5% UTILITY RATE INCREASE 45577" .05 ~ 2279 $45,577 279 U7.S56 NEW TOTAL MAINTENANCE COST $96 321 Since approximately 45% of the assessment is related to utilities the maximum assessment amount was determined by taking 45% of the assessment and increasing it by the increase in utilities. The remaining 55% of the assessment is subject to the index. The following table details the maximum assessment rates: Maximum %Cbange Maximum Total Year April CPI % Change Maintenance in Utility Utility Maximum Amount Cost Amount Assessment 1999 168,8 18,82 15,40 34,22 2000 174,9 361% 19.50 3,61% 15,% 3546 2001 184,9 572% 20.62 572% 16,89 3749 2002 188,8 2.11% 2106 2.11% 17.23 38,29 2003 193,6 2.54% 21.59 2,54% 17,67 39,26 2004 1947 0.57% 2171 0,57% 17.77 3948 2005 199.3 2,36% 22,22 2.36% 1819 40.41 2006 204.9 2.81% 22,84 2,81% 18,70 41.54 Uftllty COSIS consiST of PG&E elecTric raTes. Research Is sTIll being done on actual rare Increases. For now The CP]ls being used as an esTImaTe. G:\ASSESSMI1NT DISTRlcrS-'l Dub R.nch SL1Qll.1Rpl2008,doc JU/yZO.2llOll 4 PARCEL liSTING The description of each lot or pon;eI as part of the reconls of the County AsseS80r of the County of Alameda are, by reference, made part of this Report, The above property owners and the City of P1easanton and Dublin San Ramon Services District own additiooaI non...-esldenlial properties such as communIty..,wned open spIlW parcels, proposed public fucilities, and community owned recreIIlion JIllIWb, within the District boondlutes. which wtll have 11 zero a~ses"'I'DflInt . The listing of parceIs awears on the fullowing pBge: G:'" r II\ilElMl DlSTRICTS\fl9.1 Dub Fl.nch SL'4l9-1Flpl2006.doc July 20, 2006 ..,.... ").!,,~,,,: .~~ti..i>X , .\':,~~',~ ,,~ ~);,i{0jjD~ . , ~'.. _T' "", ,. FIoaIl Year Lots 'Inoet UIllmote bn ,...Lot .....Lot 1-92 69S6 Unkoown 91 $36.80 3.3....80 $41.54 3,7W,1~ Hl9 6957 Unkoown 69 $36.8U 2.539,20 $41.54 2,866,2/ 1-tl6 6958 Unknown 86 $36.8U 3.164,80 $41.54 3.572,"" HI1 6959 Unknown n $36.80 3.385.60 $41.54 3.821.68 1.113 6960 Unknown 113 $36.80 4,158,40 $41.54 4.694,0' 1.117 6961 Unknown 117 $36.80 4,305,60 $41,54 4,860.18 1.111 6962 Unknown III $36.80 4,084.80 $41.54 4,610,94 1-45 6963 Unknown 45 $36.80 1,656.00 $41.54 1,869,3C 1-123 6964 Unkoown 123 $36.8U 4t526.40 $41.54 5,1094 1-17 7(}67 Unknown 17 $.16.8U 62S.60 $41.501 706. I! Fu1nro Tracls 7'324. 7325. 7326. Unkoown 1.509 $36.8U 55,SlI.20 $41.54 62,683.81 ,A' ,_. _.. ,.,10 7136 Unknown 110 SJ6-80 4.048.00 $41.54 4.569 4t 1.so 7137 Unknown SO $.16.8U 1,840.00 $41.54 2,077,00 1-84 7138 Unknown 84 SJ6-80 3,09L20 $41.54 3.489.36 1-54 7139 Unknown 54 $.16.80 1,987.20 $41.54 2.243.11 1-82 7140 Unknown 62 $36.80 2,281.60 $4l.S4 2,575.48 1-W 7141 Unknown 'J7 $.16.8U 3,569.60 $41.54 4,029.3 1-105 7142 Unknown 105 $.16.80 3,864,00 $41.54 4.361.7 2tJ06_ Porcel 3 7281 ShIIIdard Pacific C<l<p. 119 $.16.80 4,379.20 $41.54 4.943.26 ParceI4 7281 Pulle Home C<l<p. 121 $.16.80 4,452.80 $41.54 5,026,34 Lots 1-3 7453 Fairway FOIlIily LP (PIwe I .... 626 $.16.110 23,036.80 $41.54 26,004,04 5 CERTIFICATIONS I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California. hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in Section 2, with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on June 20, 2006. Ani.' ~ - I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California. hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment and diagram thereto attached, was preliminarily approved and conftrmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No, 111-06, duly adopted by said Council on June 20, 2006. ~~ II ~~;, - I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California. hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment and diagram thereto attached, was finally approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. 139.06, duly adopted by said Council on July 18, 2006 ~~'ll~~ I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the Assessment was filed in the office of the County Auditor of the County of Alameda, California, on August 10, 2006, Ac,,~~ G:\ASSESSMENT DISTFlICTS\ll9-1 Dub Fl.""" Sl\ll9-1Flpt 2006-doo July 20. 2000