The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReso 138-06 Landscape AD 97-1 Engineers R eport RESOLUTION NO. 138 - 06 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN tctt**... APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 048-06, a Resolution DIrecting Preparation of Annual Report for City of Dublin Landscaping and Lightmg Mamtenance Assessment District No. 97-1 (the "Dlstnct"), thIS Council designated the City Engineer as Engmeer of Work and ordered said Engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscapmg and Lighting Act of 1972, and WHEREAS, said report was made and filed WIth the City Clerk and duly considered by thIS Council and found to be sufficient m every partIcular, whereupon it was determined that saId report should stand as Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to the aforesllld Resolution and that July 18,2006, at 7-00 p m. m the Council Chambers, Dublin Civic Center, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California, was appointed as the time and place for a heanng by the Council on the question of the levy of the proposed assessment, notIce of whIch hearing was mailed, published and posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.6, and WHEREAS, at the appointed time and place, said hearings were held, and all persons interested desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard, and all matters pertaining to said levy were heard and considered by this Council, and this Council thereby acquired Junsdiction to order said levy and confirmation of diagram and assessment prepared by and made a part of the report of said engineer to pay the cost and expenses thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT .R ESOL VED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby approve that: (a) The property owners ownmg more than fifty percent of the area of assessable land WIthin the District had not, at the conclUSIon of said hearing, filed written protests agl\l!lst the said proposed levy, or aglllnst the Engineer's Estimate of costs and expenses, or lIglllnst the maps and descnptlon, or against the diagram or the assessment to pay for the costs and expenses thereof; (b) The public interest, convemence, and necessIty require that said levy be made; (c) The DIStnct benefited by said improvements and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and the exterior boundaries thereof, are as shown by a map thereof fIled in the office of the City Clerk, which map is made a part hereof by reference thereto. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of July, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: NOES. ABSENT ABSTAIN: Councilmembers Hildenbrand, Oravetz and Zika, and Mayor Lockhart None Councilmember McCormIck None ATT~~~\..R_ City~ --- - Cl'O' Of })\JllLlJ" ~l'E ,.wr<'ffJ"ANCE olS'f1'lCT 1<0.199'1.\ SAl'off A lU'tA ~A fISCAL YEAR 1006-100'1 'El'lGINEEll'S llE-pOll1' TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ENGINEER'S LETTER ............................................................................"'"...3 2 ESTIMATE OF COSTS...."."......."'.,,,,"',...,,..,,.............................................................5 3 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT....u........................................"..................... 6 4 PARCEL LISTING ................................".............................................................. 7 5 CERfiFlCATIONS ................"............."....."............................................"'....."....9 IJ;IASSl1B$MENT OISTRIC'TS\97.1 Em<fiId P1t\'l7-IRpl2006.doo July 20. 2lNlO 1 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on April 18, 2006, the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, adopted its Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment District 1997-1 for the acquisition and maintenance of improvements more particularly therein described; and WHEREAS, said Resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565, et. seq., of said Act; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the Council of said City, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of acquisition of and maintenance of said improvements and the cost and expenses incidental thereto, to be paid by said District. Summary of Assessment (1) (2) (3) As Filed As As Finally Preliminarily Approved Approved Cost of Maintenance $257,413 $257,413 $257,413 Incidental Expenses $172,678 $172,678 $172,678 TOTAL COSTS U30,091 $430,091 U30,091 Estimated 2006-07 Interest Income Applied to 2006-07 Operating Costs $4,478 $4,478 $4,478 Prior Year Collections & Penalties $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 Estimated Surplus from 2005-06 Fiscal Year $192,403 $192,403 $192,403 SU~TOTAL $198,281 $198,281 $198,281 NET TO BE ASSESSED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2(106..2007 $231,810 $231,810 $231,810 O:V\SSIlSllMENT DISTRICTS\97-1 _d l'k\97.IR.pt lOO6.doo July 20~ 2006 As required by said Act, a diagnun is hereto atlaChed showing the exterior boundaries of said ""'.I.cape maintenance assessment district and also the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district as the same existed at the time of the pa9Sil8e of said resolution, each of wbich lots or parcels having been given a $eparaIe number upon said diagram. I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assesBllble lots or parcels of land within said 1and.scape maintenance assessment district by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be reoeived by each such lot or parcel from the aequisition and maintenance of said improvements, and more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached and by referen<:e made a part hereof. Said assessment is made upon the several lots or parcels of land within said Illndsr-'lpe maintenance assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be reoeived by said lots or parcels respectively from the aequisition and maintenance of said improvements. The diagram and assessment numbers appearing herein are the diagram numbers appearing on said diagram, to which reference is hereby made fur a more particular description of said property The total assessment District area shall be 421.87 acres as shown in Section 4 (the Assessment Diagram) of this report. The scope of work shaII include the following the maintenance and repair of landscaped and open space areas, entry features, entry lighting, masonry soondwalls, wrought iron fences, publicly-owned drainage ditches, irrigation systems, trees and plantings, furnishing of water and power for irrigation systems, together with all appurtenant and incidmtal expenses fur the following areas: . The northerly and southerly street frontages for Dublin Boulevard, from Arnold Road to Tassa,jara Road. . The northerly and southerly street frontages for Central Parkway from Arnold Road to Tassajara Road, excluding the future school frontage landscaping. . The southerly street frontage for Gleason Drive, from Arnold Road to Tassajara Road and the northerly street frontage for G1eason Drive, from Tassajara Creek to Tassajara Road. . The easterly street frontage for Arnold Road, from Duhlin Boulevard to Gleason Drive. . The easterly and westerly street frontages for Hacienda. Drive, from the 1-5801Hacienda interchange to Gleason Drive. . The westerly street frontage of Tassajara Road, 350 feet southerly of the Tassajara Road and Dublin Boulevard intersection, to 450' northerly of the Gleason Drive and Tassajara Road intersection. . Tassajara Creek and trail, from 1-580 to the northerly property boundary of the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority property (APN 986-1-1-10). . Street median landscaping is not part of this Di$trict. Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Alameda for the FiBca.l. Year 2006-2007 and includes all of such parcels excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or rights of way to be acquired in these pnv--!;l'lll'l for public road purposes. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County ~. / ~ D~: ~ VtfJ~ 7?'fj"L,:'~P! / ' 'e~ 'A. Morton, P.E. Public Works Director O:IASSESSMENT DISTRICTS197.1Ilmenld 1'kI97.1Rp! 2006.do< July 20, 2006 2 EsnMATE OF COSTS The estimated cost for the maintenance of improvements described in this Report for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 is as follows: ESTIMATE OF COSTS Maintenance Street Landscape Maintenance $184,670 Street Tree Maintenance $ 19,577 Utilities: Electricity $ 531 Water $ 52.635 $257,413 Incidentals Engineer's Report and Proceedings $ 1,295 County of Alameda Collection Costs @ 1 7% $ 3,941 Delinquencies @ 2.0% $ 4,636 Contingencies/Reserve $162.806 $172,678 TOTAL: $430,091 O:\ASSESSMENT DISTRlCTS\97.1 F.monld PI<\97.1Rl" 2006.110< July 20, 2006 4 MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT AMOUNT AND PARCEL LISnNG The cost of maintenance in the District has not reached the MaJOmum Developed Acre Assessment amount as of yet. In the future the City may need to asseSS at the maximum rate. This section is being written to document the Increase in Maximum Developed Acre Assessment of $886 annually based on the April Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Price Index. Maintenance costs are allowed to increase by the COl\llumer Price Index while utilities are to be increased based on the actual increase in costs of utilities. Since utilities comprise approximately 200fo of the annual budget, 80% of the Maximum Developed Acre Assessment is subject to the CPI increase. Since the cost for utilities are mainly water the increase in the water costs annually are being used to approximate the utility portion of the maximum assessment. The change in the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Price Index for April to April of the preceding year and the maintenance portion of the Maximum Developed Acre Assessment is documented in the table below' Maximum Maximum Water % Change Maximum Developed Year April CPl % Maintenance Unit Cost in Utility Utility Acre Charutc Amount Tier 1 Cost Amount Assessment 1997 156.7 $568.00 $166 $142.00 $710 00 1998 1608 2.62% $582.86 $160 -361% $136.87 $71973 1999 168.8 498% $611.86 $1.59 -0.63% $136.oI $747 87 2000 174.9 361% $633 97 $1.59 O.OOOfo $136.oI $769 98 2001 184.9 572% $670.22 $1.58 -0 63% $135 16 $805.3 7 2002 1888 2.11% $684.35 $174 10.13% $148.84 $833.20 2003 1936 2.54% $701 75 $177 172% $15141 $853.16 2004 1947 0.57% $70574 $177 000% $15141 $85715 2005 199.3 2.36% $722.41 $1.77 000% $151 41 $873.82 2006 204.9 2.81% $742.71 $1.84 3.95% $157.39 $900 10 The complete parcel list, showing APN, owner and assessment per parcel will be provided with the Final Engineer's Report. The following page shows the number of parcels assessed, the assessment amount per parcel, and the total assessment for the District. G;IA8SllSIlMf.N'T PISTlUCI"SI97-1 Fmtnld Pk197-1llJ112006.doc July 20~ 2006 ,., ,., 2-11hru2-154 3-16/;ithl1ia-2T7 4.' 4-' '-" 4-4 4-' '" 4.7 '" 4-9 4-'0 4-" 4-12 4-13 4-14 4-15 4-,. 4-" 5-, 5-2 ... 0-1 0-, "" ... 7.' .11..M~ANDAftM "",14 ~7355 Pi!rcI!Il7 ~kQ86Pl!ias&6&7 ~ 986 -0008-013 8 , 986 -0008.011 986 -0008-1)09 i :~ 1986. i~~, 986 -0016,008 (Auto NMlon 986 -0014-001 ase . :mi -ilO~4-003 988 -0014-008 986 6 '0 6 , 0-, 8-, ... A 986 -0008-015 Arol"lltonl A 986 -0015-009 ase .0016.010 986 -0016-011 1 , 9Be .0016-1)13 986 -0016-01.4 '-1)1 966.0016-1)16 988 -0016-002 98fi-001~ '" 1988 -0020-106 thru 148 IBook ge6 Pac. 21 & '2:2 986 -0017-012 *HAMJBIUEO PARCELS 20084007 ....----.ay ROLL ~ ~~ "..--..mrr 0Ia1ltMn' NO. 11.... (MHtAlUTA MIlA) _TY_ IICSPA CI I MUL TIP"~ INDIVlOUAl- ""'N~RS MUl TlPLE INDIV10UAI I ~NTERPRISES DUBliN HWANG BABYSU E , AMORICAIlEIT RREEF AMERICA RElT BRINK~R RESTAUR~ SCAR OUGH W i15 1lOBlIN ~"'-""7_"C RREEF AMEirICA~ A~E aAV EAST REGAL CINEMAS I cullffiTliANK ~XTENDED STAY CA FIRsT SECUR FYBANK US PRoP.FU & ~ DE ""UST CREEKSIDE NORTH lRUST HHHI C,S,T. R,S. oPuS WEST ",,"PA ~ """""" MOPA' I~EA PsnPloIflo Retail lei Inc. L P ~ INDIVIDUAl- ""'N~RS ~~i~~~~iNERS ML NRS RILAN S II Pankcl.A.mBricll alNln ~'" conter KoII Center ~"I Center Trlod KollCenter ARGONAlJT A ONAUT HOLDINGS ARG AUTH ~ IUULT1PL~ INDIV~ (MINERS MULTIPLE INDIVIOIJAL OWNERS MUL I I IVI M_ SI'IM Hornee Umited 1:lh8o Homoo Limited Shea Homea LirnilBd 8tIM I-Ior1"JMi Umltld LESS P....~ LESS FUTURE PARK ....~A LESS "". 7m ("- 16 & 15) 'tOTAL. IUI.-."IIIII . ACMe -pO<- Pogo S ~Nt OF .....-....Blr f'OIt 20M- """"" LDnl 2OIT/ TM_ 2. ,26.11 21.9 .7 1.2 2.1 3,38 2.41 , 1.08 ,."" 1,08 1.01 1.03 1.31 13,47 4.63 2.53 19.17 1 ,1S 5.93 11,47 9.93 4. 5.05 11. 14,37 14.59 14.69 12,6S 7.19 00. eU~8 15.08 12,4 1.63 " , 2." 5.81 7,04 6.46 7.14 1.1 3,36 3.01 a,11 15.07 4. 6.99 11.08 7.47 8.28 1,00 _... , 123 ""'''''''' INICI (NIG) 1;49.66 78,20 34.42 8 , 117.34 62,86 62.40 32. .28.11 -~2.07 -11.08 (DELETED FROM DISTRICT) 421. . ...... 1 1 1 .8. S4\l,86 549.86 049.6 ~49.66 549.86 S4\l,00 549.86 549.86 S4o.s6 549.86 S4\l,66 549..6 549.86 ........ 549.66 549.86 549.86 S49,66 549.86 .49. 549,Be 549.86 s.<8,66 ......86 988 -0006-039 1586 Ir.:~ 9-1 thl\l 9-&1 ~ 1lJ..t'ltlr1,l10-238 I Book 986 PooIB& 11 &12 11-''thru11..48 IBool<gaaPllge13 12-1 ,,., 1.4-1 14-' '4-3 ,4-4 14-5 ,'" 14-7 ,4-8 ,5-, 10-2 '5-3 16-1 ttuu18-1CO 17-1 ttll1,,17-43 11M tlm.l18-24 1;"'1 thN 10-05 2'''' 20-1 New Annex, 986 -0017-.Q1 NEJNAnnex. 986-0017-011 1 1 1 ., 8 46 , 1 1 1 1 549,86 5,49.88 .0. .Be ',8. 549.88 549.86 S49..0 549.86 S4\l,66 549.88 .49..0 549. " 549.86 1 , 1 100 549.86 .... s.<8,Be 549.88 162 549.86 s.<8,86 549.Be . 12042.80 4233.66 fi76.32 1186.70 ,.5M2 1:3~.16 10293.38 S9M4 874.28 593.64 555.3fi 2 10. MS.3/) 720.32 7406.82 286M2 1391.14 10540.82 7 o. a 3260.66 3 067.22 ,00 5480.10 2 4.34 2,776.80 8 248.40 901.48 8022.46 8.077.44 ,70 3 954.02 27 :3 e18.24 8291.ea 18,28 _.28 8 6 1 527.58 3194.68 3.671,02 3'563.10 3926.00 \140. 8 11).47.~2 1 865.08 4 ,36 8 288.00 286. 4943.04 41 .48 4 552.84 .8 1 088 72 . 211.810..00 5 CERTIFICATIONS I. the CiilJ Oed: of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certifY that the foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in Section 2, with the diagram thereto attached, was fIled with me on June 20, 2006. ::-\1I~~ I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certifY that the foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was preliminarily approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. 109-06, duly adopted by said Council on June 20, 2006 ~~~0-M I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certifY that the foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached. was finally approved and confinned by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. 138-06, duly adopted by said Council on July IS, 2006. 4~HV~ I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certifY that a certified copy of the Assessment was filed in the office of the County Auditor of the County of Alameda, California on August 10,2006 ~lli~M ~ . O:\A8SESSMllNT DISTRlCTS\97.1 Fmmld l'k\97-11l)lt :lOlk\.doc July 20, ~006