Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-035 CalifrnaCreekside02-26-2002 AGENDA STATEMENT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING - PA 01-035, California Creekside Conditional Use Permit to amend the Planned Development Zoning Ordinance to modify Condition 2 of Resolution No. 55-96. (Report prepared by: Kristi Bascom, Associate Planner) ~ ATTACHMENTS: Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit amending Condition 2 of City Council Resolution No. 55-96 City Council Resolution No 55-96 Location Map RECOMMENDATION: 2. 3. 4. 5. Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation. Take testimony from the Applicant and the public. Question Staff, Applicant and the public. Close public hearing and deliberate. Adopt Resolution (Attachment 1) approving Conditional Use Permit amending Condition 2 of City Council Resolution No. 55-96. BACKGROUND: The California Creekside Planned Development, located North of Dublin Boulevard between Hibernia Drive and Tassajara Creek and south of Central Parkway, was originally approved by the City Council on May 28, 1996. The approval was to rezone approximately 35.4 gross acres of land designated Planned Development Business Park Industrial District to 26.8 gross acres Planned Development Single Family Residential and to 8.6 gross acres Planned Development Medium-High Density Residential. The Planned Development approval permitted the construction of 277 dwelling units, including 154 single-family homes and 123 townhouses. Contained in the approval were several conditions pertaining to permitted uses and development standards such as setback and yard areas, required parking, and building height maximums. Included in the resolution is Condition 2, which states that additions to residences in this project are prohibited. In November 2001, the applicant submitted an application to amend the California Creekside Planned Development so that additions to single-family homes could be considered. The Planning Manager reviewed the request and determined that additions to the single-family homes in the project could be accommodated in some instances where the homes sit on larger-than-average lots within the subdivision and exceed the setback requirements of the Planned Development. COPIES TO: Applicant Property Owner PA File Project Manager ITEMNO. ?' ( This application is being reviewed under Section 8.32.080 of the Planned Development Zoning Ordinance, which states that a minor amendment to a Planned Development may be approved by a Conditional Use Permit as long as the amendment does not materially change the provisions or intent of the Planned Development Zoning Ordinance for the site. Because the proposed change has the potential to affect several properties in the development, the Planning Commission is the appropriate review authority for the request. ANALYSIS: The Planned Development, as originally approved, showed the location and arrangement of all proposed uses, specified the circulation system, defined parcels, refined the development standards, specified the infrastructure requirements and their sequencing, reflected the applicable mitigation measures of the FEIR, and included master neighborhood landscape plans. The individual building elevations were reviewed and considered and the proposed development was approved with the mix of building types and styles shown. The purpose of prohibiting additions to the project was to preserve the development as it was approved. However, Staff believes that allowing minor single-story additions to the houses on larger lots would allow for small expansions that would not have a significant impact on the project as a whole. The Planned Development plans were consistent with the Dublin General Plan, as amended by the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. Amending Condition 2 to allow minor additions would not substantially alter the originally approved Planned Development and is supported by Staff. Upon the request of the applicant, the City of Dublin is proposing to amend Condition 2, Resolution 95- 048 as follows: Existing Condition 2: Additions to residences in this project are prohibited. Amended Condition 2: Additions to residences in this project are allowed under the following conditions: a. Additions are allowed to detached, single-family dwellings only. b. Additions shall be limited to the first floor and a maximum height of iS feet. c. Additions shall be limited to side or rear yard areas. No additions shall be allowed to the front faqade of any buildings. d. Additions shall meet all development regulations of the R-1 Zoning District, including but not limited to, building setback and lot coverage requirements. e. Additions shall meet all aspects of the most currently adopted Dublin Building Code. This change would allow unobtrusive first story additions to properties within the project that can meet the standard R-1 Single-family development standards. A comparison of the approved PD single-family standards for the project and the citywide R-1 standards is provided below: Development standard California Creekside Planned Development R-1 Zoning District (current standards) Side yard setback 5 foot minimum from property line Minimum setback of 5 feet plus one foot for each full 10 feet by which the lot width exceeds the minimum lot width required. Street side yard setback 10 foot minimum from property line 10 foot minimum from property line Rear yard setback 12 foot minimum from property line 20 foot minimum from property line Maximum lot coverage 40% for single-story house, 40% for single-story house, 35% for two-story 35% for two-story 2 There are approximately 30 lots out of 154 on which a viable addition could take place. Most of these lots are on Mangrove Drive and Fawn Way, where the lots are deeper and the building footprint smaller than others in the subdivision. There are also a handful of pie-shaped lots at the end of cul-de-sacs in the development that might be able to accommodate a minor addition. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan was adopted in 1994 and has a certified Program EIR (SCH No. 91- 103064). Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), CEQA Guidelines Section 15182, the proposed project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan, which was certified by the City Council by Resolution No. 51-93 and the Addenda dated May 4, 1993 and August 22, 1994 (the ("EIR"). CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Amending Condition 2 to allow additions with conditions would not materially change the provisions or intent of the Planned Development Zoning Ordinance for the site. Permitting additions to the first floor only of single-family homes as long as they meet the R-1 development standards would allow homeowners to enlarge their homes with minimum impact to neighboring properties while maintaining the integrity of the Planned Development. Therefore, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit amending Condition 2 of City Council Resolution no. 55-96. G:\PA#L2001 \01-035\PC Staff Report.doc GENERAL INFORMATION: APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: LOCATION: ASSESSOR PARCEL: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE: Terence Wong (initiated application) 4691 Finch Way Dublin, CA 94568 Same North of Dublin Boulevard between Hibernia Drive and Tassajara Creek, south of Central Parkway. Assessor Parcel Numbers: 986-7-1 through 64 and 986-6-5 through 94 (All single-family properties within the Califomia Creekside Development) Low Density Residential (0-6.0 du/ac) Single Family Residential (0.9-6.0 du/ac) Zoning: Planned Development (PA 95-048) Land Use: Single Family Residential RESOLUTION NO. 02 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PA 01-035, AMENDING CONDITION NO. 2 OF CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 55-96 WHICH SETFORTH THE FINDINGS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE OF CALIFORNIA CREEKSIDE (PA 95-048) WHEREAS, Terence Wong requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit to modify Condition 2 of City Council Resolution No. 55-96 setting forth the Findings and General Provisions for the California Creekside Planned Development Rezone approved May 28, ! 996, to allow minor additions to single-family houses in the development, and WHEREAS, Section 8.32.080 of the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance, Planned Development Zoning District states that the Planning Commission by means of a Conditional Use Permit may approve minor amendments to an adopted Development Plan upon a finding that the amendment substantially complies with and does not material change the provisions or intent of the adopted Planned Development Zoning Ordinance for the site, and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Dublin held a public hearing on said application on February 26, 2002, and WHEREAS, the proposed revisions to the Conditions of Approval have been reviewed and it has been determined that the revisions are consistent with the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, which was adopted in 1994 and has a certified Program EIR (SCH No. 91-103064). Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), CEQA Guidelines Section 15182, the proposed project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan, which was certified by the City Council by Resolution No. 51-93 and the Addenda dated May 4, 1993 and August 22, 1994 (the ("EIR"); and WHEREAS, the staff report was submitted recommending the Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit in accordance with the findings referenced below, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find that: The proposed revisions to the Conditions of Approval are compatible with the other land uses, transportation and service facilities in the vicinity as the implementation of the revised conditions will allow for minor single-story additions to approximately 20% of the existing houses in this established neighborhood. The proposed revisions to the Conditions of Approval will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity or be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the revision allows for minor additions only to existing residences. o The proposed revisions to the Conditions of Approval will not be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood as the revised condition will allow additions that are minor in nature. The proposed project will allow for adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation and public utilities because it will use existing facilities and infrastructure, ensuring that the proposed use and related structures will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. o The revised Conditions of Approval will not alter the existing development pattern, therefore, the site will remain physically suited for the type, density and intensity of the planned use and those structures being proposed. o The proposed revisions will not be contrary to the specific intent clauses, development regulations, or performance standards established for the Planned Development Zoning District because the revised condition will still meet the intent of the development regulations and the performance standards. 7. The proposed revised Conditions of Approval are consistent with the Dublin General Plan andthe Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Planning Commission of the City of Dublin does hereby conditionally approve PA 01-035, Conditional Use Permit to revise California Creekside Planned Development Condition 2 of City Council Resolution No. 55-96 as follows: Amended Condition 2: Additions to residences in this project are allowed under the following conditions: a. Additions are allowed to detached single-family dwellings only. b. Additions shall be limited to the first floor and a maximum height of l 5 feet. c. Additions shall be limited to side or rear yard areas. No additions shall be allowed to the front fafade of any buildings. d Additions shall meet all development regulations of the R-1 Zoning District, including but not limited to, building setback and lot coverage requirements. e. Additions shall meet all aspects of the most currently adopted Dublin Building Code. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of February 2002. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Planning Commission Chairperson Planning Manager G:\PA#\2001 \01-035\PC PESO.doc RESOLUTION NO. 55=96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING AND ESTABLISHING FINDINGS AND GENERAL PKOVISIONS FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) REZONING CONCERNING PA 95-048, CALIFORNIA CREEKSIDE WHEREAS, Kaufman & Broad of Northern California have requested approval of a Planned Development Rezoning to establish General Provisions and Development Regulations for a residential development consisting of 154 single family dwellings and 123 townhouses on approximately 35.4 gross acres (APN 946-15-1-10 (per)) in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area; and WHEREAS, a complete application for a Planned Development Rezoning is available and on file in the Planning Department; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) the City has found, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182, that the proposed residential project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan which was c~rtified by the City Council by Resolution No. 51-93, and the Addenda dated May 4, 1993, and August 22, 1994 (the "EIR"), and has further found that the proposed project is consistent with the adopted Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on said application on April 16, 1996 and did adopt Resolution 96-10 recommending that the City Council approve and establish findings, general provisions, and development standards for a Planned Development Rezoning, and recommending that the City Council adopt a Development Agreement for PA 95-048 California Creekside; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the City Council approve the Planned Development Rezone subject to conditions prepared by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and use their independent judgment and considered all said reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City Council does hereby make the following findi~gs~.and determinations regarding said proposed Planned Development Rezone: 1. The Planned Development Rezone, as conditioned, is consistent with the general provisions, intent, and purpose of the PD District Overlay Zone of the Zoning Ordinance, the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The Planned Development Rezone will be appropriate for the subject property in terms of providing General Provisions ~hich set forth the purpose, applicable provisions of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance, range of permitted and conditionally permitted uses, and Development Standards; which will be compatible with existing vacant and proposed commercial, office and residential uses in the immediate vicinity, and which enhance development of the Specific Plan area; and 2. The Planned Development Rezoning will not have a substantial adverse affect on health or safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or public improvement as all applicable regulations will be met; and 3. The Planned Development Rezoning will not overburden public services as the Dublin San Ramon Services District has stated that public services are available; and EXHIBIT E 4. The Planned Development Rezoning will be consistent with the policies of the Dublin General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan designation of Single Family Residential, Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Medium-High Density Residential; and 5. The Planned Development Rezoning will provide efficient use of the land pursuant to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan that includes preservation of significant open areas and natural and topographic landscape features along Tassajara Creek with minimum alteration of natural land forms; and 6. ' The Planned Development Rezoning will provide an environment that will encourage the use of common open areas for neighborhood or community activities and other amenities through Conditions of Approval; and 7. The Planned Development Rezoning will create an attractive, efficient and safe environment through Conditions of Approval; and 8. The Planned Development Rezoning will benefit the public necessity, convenience and general welfare and is in conformance with Sections 8-31.0 to 8-31.19 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance; and 9. The Planned Development Rezoning will be compatible with and enhance the general development of the area because it will be developed pursuant to Conditions of Approval and site development review; and 10. The Planned Development Rezoning will create attractive, efficient and safe development because it will be developed pursuant to Conditions of Approval and site development review. NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City Council does hereby approve a Planned Development Rezoning including the following General Provisions and Development Standards for PA 95-048, California Creekside, which constitute regulations for the use, improvement and maintenance of the 35.44- acre parcel 946-15-1-10 (per) subject to the following Conditions of Approval: GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Purpose This approval is for a Planned Development (PD) District Rezoning for PA 95-048, California Creekside. This PD District Rezone includes a Land Use and Development Plan which is represented by the Tentative Map dated received April 10, 1996, Site Plan'~nd Preliminary Landscape Plan dated received April 2, 1996 (Both Labeled Exhibit A), and the written statements provided by the Applicant dated received April 1, 1996 and on file. The PD District Rezone allows the flexibility needed to encourage innovative development while ensuring that the goals, policies and action programs of the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan are met. More particularly, the PD District Rezone is intended to ensure the following policies are met: The approval of this Planned Development Rezone shall be pursuant to the term set forth in the Development Agreement approved by the City of Dublin on May 28, 1996, and recorded on ,1996. In the event of conflict between the terms ofthe Development Agreement and the following conditions, the terms oftbe Development Agreement shall prevail. [PW, PL]. Encourage innovative approaches to site planning, building design and construction to create a range of housing types and prices, and to provide housing for all segments of the community. Create an attractive, efficient and safe environment. Develop an environment that encourages social interaction and the use of common open areas for neighborhood or community activities and other amenities. Create an environment that decreases dependence on the private automobile. B. Dllblin Zoning Ordinance - Applicable Requirements Except as specifically modified by the provisions of the PD District Rezone, all applicable and general requirements and procedures of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance R-1 District shall be applied to the PD Single Family Residential designated lands, and of the R-3 District shall be applied to the PD Medium- High Density Residential designated lands in this PD District. C. General Provisions and DevelOpment Standards Intent: This Planned Development District is to be established to provide for and regulate the development of the California Creekside Subdivision. Development shall be generally consistent with the Land Use Development Plan. This approval rezones 35.4 gross acres currently zoned Business Park Industrial to 26.8 gross acres zoned PD Single Family Residential District (I 54 dwelling units at 5.75 dwelling units per acre) and 8.6 gross acres zoned PD Medium-High Density Residential District (123 dwelling units at 14.3 dwelli, ng units per'acre), for a total maximum of 277 dwelling units. 2. PD Single Family Residential Permitted Uses: The following principal uses are permitted in the PD Single Family Residential district: A. Residential development limited to: 1. Single Family Detached houses Prohibited Uses: The following uses are prohibited in the PD Single Family Residential district: 1. Field Crops 2. Orchards 3. Plant Nurseries 4. Greenhouses used only'for cultivation of plant materials for sale 5. Hospital Conditional Uses: All conditional uses in the R-1 District are conditional uses in the PD Single Family Residential district with the exception of prohibited uses listed above. Development Standards: Development standards within the PD Single Family district are as follows. ¸.% SETBACKS AND YARDS A. Minimum Single Family Setbaq:ks: The minimum setbacks for single family detached houses and accessory structures shall be as follows: Front Setbacks: Eighteen (18) foot minimum from flae property line to the garage face Fifteen (15) foot minimum from the property line to the habitable portion of the house Sideyard Setbacks: Five (5) foot minimum from the property line Sla'eet Sideyard Setbacks: Ten (10) foot minimum from the property line. Rear Yard Setbacks: Twelve (12) foot minimum from the property line Bo Accessory Structures: Five (5) foot minimum from the property line Exceptions to the Setback reouirements are a~ follows: Architectural projections (such as eves, columns, balconies, awnings, steps, and fireplaces) may encroach up to a maximum of two (2) feet into a required front, rear, or side yard setback and decks may encroach a maximum of five (5) feet into a required rear yard setback. C. Building Height Restrictions: Buildings are to be limited to a maximum of two (2) stories and a height of thirty (30) feet measured at the topmost point of the structure. This height Iimitation shall not apply to chimneys. Accessory structures are limited to a maximum height of fifteen (15) feet. D. Parking: The number of parking spaces required for each single family detached house shall be two (2) garage spaces and two (2) spaces in the driveway apron. PD Multi-Family Residential Permitted Uses: The following principal uses are permitted in the PD Multi-Family Residential district: "' A. Residential development limited to: 1. Multifamily Townhouse units 2. Multifamily Condominium units Prohibited Structures: Accessory Structures are not permitted except for common area facilities such as pool equipment, restroom buildings, trash enclosures, and similar structures. 4 Prohibited Uses: The following uses are prohibited in the PD Multi-Family Residential district: 1. Field Crops 2. Orchards 3. Plant Nurseries 4. Greenhouses used only for cultivation of plant materials for sale 5. Hospital Conditional Uses: All conditional uses in the R-3 District are conditional uses in the PD Multi-Family Residential district with the exception of prohibited uses listed above. Development Standards: Development standards within the PD Multi-Family district are as follows. SETBACKS AND YARDS A. Mirlimum Multi-Family Setbacks: The minimum setbacks for multi-family attached houses and accessory structures shall be as follows: Front Setbacks: Ten (10) foot minimum from the public street right- of way to the garage face Ten (10) foot minimum from the public street right- of way to the habitable portion of the house Four (4) foot minimum from the public street right-of way to the porch face Zero (0) foot minimum from common area parcel lines Fifteen (15) foot minimum from adjacent buildings Sideyard Setbacks: Five (5) foot minimum from the public street right-of way Zero (0) foot minimum from common area parcel lines Fifteen (15) foot minimum from adjacent buildings Rear Yard Setbacks: Twelve (12) foot minimum from the public street right-of way Zero (0) foot minimum from common area parcel lines Thirt~ (30) foot minimum from garage face to garage face Accessory Structures: Five (5) foot minimum from the public street right-of way when permitted 5 Bo Exceptions to the Setback r~quirements are as follows: Architectural projections (such as eves, columns, balconies, awnings, steps, and fireplaces) may encroach up to a maximum of two (2) feet into a required front, rear, or side yard setback and decks may encroach a maximum of five (5) feet into a required rear yard setback. C. Building Height Restrictions: Buildings are to be limited to a maximum of two (2) habitable stories and underground garage, and a height of thirty-five (35) feet measured at the topmost point of the structure. This height limitation shall not apply to chimneys. D. Parking: The number of parking spaces required for each multi-family detached house shall be two (2) garage spaces. Fifty-one (51) guest parking spaces shall be provided as shown in Exhibit A. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to final occupancy_ of any building, and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. The following codes represent those departments/agencies responsible for monitoring compliance of the Conditions of Approval. [PL] Planning. _lB] Building. [PO-] Police. [PW~_ Public Works. [ADMI Administration/Ci .ty Attome? [FlN] Finance. iF] Doughert3/Regional Fire Authori _ty. [DSR] Dublin San Ramon Services District. [CO_] Alameda Coun _ty Flood Control & Water Conservation District (Zone 7'~. The Land Use and Development Plan is conceptual in nature. No formal amendment of this PD Rezone will be required as long as the materials submitted for the Tentative Map and Site Development Review are in substantial conformance with this PD Rezone and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The Community Development Director shall determine conformance or non- conformance and appropriate processing procedures for modifying this PD Rezone (i.e. staff approval, Planning Commission approval of Conditional Use Permit, or City Council approval of new PD Rezone). Major modifications, or revisions not found to be in substantial conformance with this PD Rezone shah require a new PD Rezone. A subsequent PD rezone may address all or a portion of the area covered by this PD Rezone. [PL] Additions to residences in this project are prohibited. [PL] The applicant shall comply with all applicable grading guidelines as indicated on page 103 of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. [PW, PL] All project construction shall conform to all building codes and ordinances in effect at the time of building permit. [BI The applicant shall comply with all Eastern Dublin Specific Plan EIR mitigation measures for mitigating potentially significant plant and animal species impacts (e.g. APPlicant shall submit a preconstmction survey prepared within 60 days prior to any habitat modification to verify the presence of sensitive species. A biologist shall prepare the survey and shall be subject to the Planning Department review and approval). Any updated surveys and/or studies that may be completed by a biologist prior to Tentative Map application submittal shall be submitted with the Tentative Map application. (222, 230) [PL] Applicant shall comply with all DRFA fire standards, including minimum standards for emergency access roads and payment of applicable fees, including a Fire Capital Impact Fee. (74, 77)[F] The location and siting of project specific wastewater, storm drain, recycled water, and potable water system infrastmctore shall be consistent with the resource management policies of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. (39, 40)[PL, PW] Any proposed modifications or alterations to Tassajara Creek shall be approved by the City of Dublin and any required permitting agencies and shah be consistent with the policies of Eastern Dublin Specffic Plan and FEIR the Eastern Dublin Comprehensive Stream Restoration Program and the Master Drainage Plan. (41)[PW, PL] The garbage service provider shall be consulted to ensure that adequate space is provided to accommodate collection and sorting ofpetrucible solid waste as well as source-separated recyclable materials generated by the residents within this project. (279)[PL] 10. The applicant shall comply with the City's solid waste management and recycling requirements. 11. The use of rodenticides and herbicides within the project area will be restricted to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director to reduce potential impacts to wildlife. A written statement from the developer shall be submitted to the Community Development Director to that effect prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. (221)[PL] 12. The applicant shall comply with the City's solid waste management and recycling requirements. (103, 279)[ADM] 13. The applicant shall comply with all applicable action programs and mitigation measures of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan and companion Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), respectively, that have not been made specific Conditions of Approval of this PD Rezone. [PL] PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of May, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: Couneilmembers Barnes, Burton, Howard, Moffatt and Mayor Houston NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk GfiPA95-048\ccpdre~ 7 November 14, 2000 East Dublin Planning Area LEGEND ~S1DENTIAL RURAL RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURE L LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL I MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY~SIDENTIAL I HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL 1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL / CAMPUS OFFICE PUBLIC / SEMI-PUBLIC I PUBLIC / SEMI-PUBLIC ~.~!i ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MS~: MIDDLE SCHOOL PARKS AND OPEN SPACE I NEIGHBORHOOD SQUARE I NEIGHBORHOOD PARK I COMMUNITY PA~RK I OPEN SPACE This map is for representation purposes only and should not be assumed to be accu rate. For accurate details, please review the actual Planning Application files. CAMP PARKS DUBLIN I PLEASANTON BART STATION N. ?~S. P£EA$~NTON VICINITY * MAP September, 2000 OS California Creekside Planned Development OS MENT"