HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.2 CreditCardPaymentProg CITY CLERK
File #
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 15, 2004
SUBJECT: Expansion of the Credit Card Payment Program for
Selected City Services [')19
Report Prepared by Joni L. Pattillo, Assistant City Manage
ATTACHMENTS: None
RECOMMENDATION: .~/ Authorize Staff to implement Phase Two of the E-Commerce
Program that would allow for Visa and MasterCard credit card
acceptance to pay for City Services, with a minimum threshold of
$10.00 and a maximum transaction amount not to exceed $1,000.00.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: Sufficient funds ($2,020) are included in the Fiscal Year 2003-2004
Budget in CIP 93321 (E-commerce and Payment Processing), to
complete the purchase of the required equipment for the Phase Two
proposal. The estimated annual cost for projected Merchant
Discount and Transaction Fees is $7,640.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council adopted as part of the Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Goals and Objectives a high priority goal
to investigate the feasibility of expanding the Electronic Commerce (E-Commerce) program. E-
Commerce is defined as the ability for citizens to complete business transactions with the City from their
home or office at their convenience using the Internet. For the past year the City has' accepted credit card
and Internet registration for it recreation classes and facility rentals. Citizens have widely used the benefit
of credit card acceptance to register both in-person and through the v~-,~v.iDublinlRecGuide.com website.
The Parks and Community Services Department has seen an increase in revenues of approximately
$34,000 (or 14%), over the same period the prior year (July 1-March 31).
In October 2003, the City's Information Systems Manager conducted a survey of various California cities
asking specific questions about E-Commerce. The goal of the survey was to identify the significant and
common trends in this industry, in order to make an informed recommendation for the City's next steps in
the development of a CitYWide E-Commerce program. The survey was sent to 135 different agencies
throughout California. A total of 20 agencies responded (14.8%); 12 (60%) of which have implemented
some form of E-Commerce. Some of the key findings are as follows:
COPIES TO:
ITEM NO.
throughout California. A total of 20 agencies responded (14.8%); 12 (60%) of which have implemented
some form of E-Commerce. Some of the key findings are as follows:
I. Category of E-Commerce Transactions:
Recreation Class Registration 42%
Building Permits 33%
Utility Bill Payments 25%
II. Lessons Learned from Implementing E-Commerce:
A. Implementation of recreation class registration was very successful, while on-line
Permitting proved more problematic.
B. A strong collaboration between Information Services, Finance, and the originating
department is essential for smooth implementation.
III. Public's Perception of E-Commerce
"Excellent," "very positive, .... favorable," and "pleased" were words used to describe the public's
response to E-Commerce offerings. In some cases the public acceptance began slowly, but
certainly gained momentum. One interesting observation was related to on-line permitting, which
noted that homeowners tended to use this convenience more than contractors.
IV. Were additional Revenues realized with the implementation of E-Commerce?
A majority of the respondents to the survey stated that E-Commerce is still a fairly new concept for
the public. On average those agencies offering E-Commerce have been doing so for less than two
years; therefore, there is not yet a long-term history established to track the revenues activity.
V. Benefits Derived from E-Commerce
One of the primary goals set by several of the agencies that have implemented E-Commerce was to
offer E-Commerce as a convenience to the public. There was acknowledgment "up front" by most
of these agencies that there would not necessarily be the capability to recoup the additional.
implementation and operational cost associated by offering E-Commerce services.
VI. Credit Card Limits
On average, the maximum amount accepted using credit cards was $1,000. The critical
component supporting setting such a limit is connected to managing costs and efficiencies.
Generally, as permit and fee transaction levels increase, so do the complexities surrounding the
transaction (requiring more detailed and direct staff time with an applicant); and possibly ~also
effecting an increase in the merchant discount fee.
With the experience gained from the Parks and Community Services E-Commerce implementation, a
proposed Phase Two is recommended to permit credit card acceptance by all City Departments for
selected services. The proposed Phase Two would allow that credit cards be accepted over-the-counter at
Police, Community Development, Public Works and Administrative Services Departments,
Proposed Credit Card Acceptance
The Community Development, Public Works, Administrative Services and Police Staff have investigated
the potential acceptance of credit cards. The departments met, discussed and developed some uniform
recommendations to be considered, if the City is to move forward with the acceptance of credit cards:
I. $10.00 would be the minimum threshold for credit card charge acceptance.
Justification: Based on the current fee structure for Police Services, it was determined that
most fee collections fall into the $10.00 range (considering the cost of their more common
permits and fees). Staff also contacted other agencies and in a majority of instances they
have established a minimum threshold of $10.00 to $15.00.
II. $1,000 would be the maximum credit charge allowable.
Justification: The potential largest user of credit card acceptance would be the Community
Development Department; when permit fees exceed more than $1,000, it generally denotes
that the work is probably for new construction or major tenant improvements, that would
require more personal attention from staff.
III. Acceptance of VISA and MasterCard Only.
Justification: American ExpresS and Discover merchant charges are significantly higher.
Currently, Bank of America is charging the City 1.65% of each sale and $0.20 per
transaction cost, as compared to a range of from 3% to 4% for American Express and
Discover. ~
Unlike, Parks and Community Services (where there has been a confirmed positive increase in revenues
for those agencies that have implemented an E-Commerce program for recreation type services), Staff is
projecting that there may not be an increase in revenues, if the City expands credit card acceptance to
other departments (specifically, Community Development, Public Works, Administrative Services, Fire
and Police Departments). Those departments that cannot logically predict a marked increase in revenue
tied to credit card acceptance, are actually offering the City's customer base a convenience and a customer
service tool that the public would utilize and appreciate. In those instances, it should be noted that any
additional costs of providing this service would probably be absorbed by the General Fund.
Staff has explored the possibility of charging a convenience fee to customers who pay by credit card,
however, any agreement with the credit card company would prohibit the City from charging a surcharge
for use/acceptance of credit cards. Information provided to Staff indicated that the Dublin San Ramon
Services District (DSRSD) charges credit card customers an additional fee. However, this additional fee
is allowable because DSRSD has contracted with a third party to process credit card payments and
therefore the customer is paying a processing fee to the third party contractor. Staff would not
recommend using a third party contractor to process credit card payments, since it is Staff's eventual goal
to have credit card acceptance integrated within the City's various program. The key benefit of having the
ability of a credit card acceptance process that would integrate with the City's computer programs is that it
would allow for Staff to perform one-stop entering of data, which in turn would enhance efficiency.
In order to fully analyze the potential cost implications of accepting credit cards for the various
departments, Staff has looked at the Fiscal Year 2002-2003 revenues for the permits and fees that fall
within the $10.00 to $1,000 range:
2002-2003 $122,234 $12,705 $111,646 $123,172 $16,000 $385,757
Revenues
Merchant $2,347 $260 $2,289 $2,267 $477 $7,640
Fees (1.65%
plus .20 per
transaction)
on a 100%
of the
Revenues
Merchant $1,408 $156 $1,373 $1,360 $286 $4,583
Fees on 60%
of the
Revenues*
* In establishing the Parks and Community Services E-Commerce program, the 60% of tOtal
transaction was used to establish projected merchant and transaction fees. The 60% was based on
surveying other agencies, where on average credit cards were accepted for 60% of the total
transactions.
Conclusion
If the City Council direction is to implement an E-Commerce program that goes beyond the Parks and
Community Services Department, then the next proposed stage would be the Phase Two acceptance of
credit cards for the remaining City Departments that is outlined in this report. It appears that on average
the City receives about 50 inquires concerning credit card acceptance a week. Due to the successful
implementation of E-Commerce for Parks and Recreation Services, the foundational pieces have already
been developed to assist staff in accepting and reconciling credit card payments, as well as protecting the
City and its customers from unauthorized credit card usage.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize Staff to implement Phase Two of the E-Commerce Program that would allow for Visa and
MasterCard credit card acceptance to pay for City Services, with a minimum threshold of $10.00 and a
maximum transaction amount not to exceed $1,000.00.