The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6.3 DubRchWest Attch 1-6 ?"-~, RESOLUTION NO. - 05 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * "* 'It- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 'it ** * * * * * CERTIFYING A SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT REPORT AND ADOPTING MITIGATION FINDINGS, FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE DUBLIN RANCH WEST PROJECT P A 02-028 WHEREAS, James Tong submitted applications for future development of approximately 1,064 residences, a Neighborhood Park, and Open Space on an approximately 184 acre site located on the west side of Tassajara Road, east of Parks RFTA, south of the Alameda/Contra Costa county line, and north of the existing city limit line. The submittal includes applications to annex three properties totaling approximately 189 acres to the City of Dublin and to DSRSD; to amend the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan to replace a 9.7 acre school site with Medium High Density Residential, to replace a Neighborhood Commercial designation with Open Space, to prezone the site to PD-Planned Development and adopt a related Stage 1 Developmcnt Plan. The applications are collectively known as the "Project"; and WHEREAS, the Project site contains three properties, the 184 acre Dublin Ranch West site, previously known as Wallis Ranch; the 1.6 acre Bragg parcel; and the 3.2 acre Sperfslagc parcel; and WHEREAS, the project site is in Eastern Dublin for which the City adopted the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan to provide a comprehensive planning framework for future development of the area. In connection with this approval, the City certified a program EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15168 (SCH: 91103064, Resolution 51-93, and Addendum dated August 22, 1994, hcreafter "Eastern Dublin EIR" or "program EIR") that is available for review in the Planning Department and is incorporated herein by reference. The program EIR was integral to the planning process and examined the direct and indirect effects, cumulativc impacts, broad policy alternatives, and areawide mitigation measurcs for developing Eastern Dublin; and WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin EIR identified potentially significant environmental impacts and related mitigation measures, which the City adopted together with mitigation findings and a Mitigation Monitoring Program (Resolution 53-93), which mitigation measures and monitoring program continue to apply to development in Eastern Dublin including the Dublin Ranch West Project; and WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin EIR also identified potentially significant environmental impads that could not be avoided by mitigation and for which the City adoptcd a Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to CEQA; and WHEREAS, the City prepared an Initial Study for the Dublin Ranch West Project consistent with CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15163 and determincd that a supplement to the Eastern Dublin EIR was required in order to analyze substantial changes in circumstances and new information that could result in new or potentially more severe significant impacts than identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Preparation dated February 14, 2003 was circulated with the Initial Study to public agencies and interested parties tòr consultation on the scope of the supplemental EIR; and 1 ATTACHMENT \ lo.3 WHEREAS, based on the Initial Study and responses to the Notice of Preparation, the City prepared a Draft Supplemental EIR dated November 2004 (SCH No. 2003022082) which reflected the independent judgment of the City as to thc potential environmental effects ofthc Project. The Draft Supplemental ETR was circulated for the required 45 day pubJic review period, from November 19, 2004 to January 3, 2005; and WHEREAS, the City received five comment letters on the project during the public review period and two letters after the public review period. The City prepared a Final Supplemcntal EIR dated February 2005 containing written responses to all comments received during the public rcview period, and to the comment letters received after the public review period, which responses provide the City's good faith, reasoned analysis of the environmental issues raised by the comments; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission revicwed a staff report, the Draft and Final Supplemental EIRs, and all written and oral testimony submitted to them, at a noticed public hearing on February 22, 2005 at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, following thc public hcaring, and based on the record before it, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution os-xx (incorporated herein by reference) recommcnding certification of the Supplemental EIR with revision to Response 3.2 in thc Final SEIR document; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Planning Commission recommendation, a City Council staff report analyzing the EIR and the Project (incorporatcd herein by reference), the Draft and Final Supplemental ErRs, and all written and oral testimony, at a noticed public hearing on , at which time all interested partics had the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Draft and Final Supplemental ErRs reflect the City's independent judgment and analysis on the potential for environmental impacts, and constitute thc Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Dublin Ranch West Project; and WHEREAS, the Project would have significant effects on the envirornnent, most of which can be substantially rcduced through mitigation measures; thereforc, approval of the Project must include mitigation findings as set forth in attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, some of the significant effects cannot be lessencd to a level ofless than significant; theretore, approval of the Project must include findings regarding alternatives as set forth in attached Exhibit B, and must include a Statement of Overriding Considerations as set forth in attached Exhibit C; and WHEREAS, a Mitigation Monitoring Plan, as required by CEQA, is contained in attached Exhibit D; and WHEREAS, the Draft and Final Supplemental EIRs are separately bound documents, incorporated herein by reference, and are available for review in the City planning department, file P A 02- 028. The custodian of the documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings for the Dublin Ranch West project is the City of Dublin Community Development Department, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin CA 94568, attn: Mike Porto. NOW, mEREFORE,BE ITRESOLVED lhat1he foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this resolution. 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Duhlin City Council certifies the following. A. The written response to comment 3.2 in the Final Supplemental Environmental Report docwnent is hereby revised upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission to read as follows. Revised Response: Based upon discussions between the East Bay Regional Park District staff, City of Dublin staff and the applicant for development of thc Dublin Ranch West projeèt, it was understood that the Park District supported a change to show the Regional Trail along the Tassajara Creek corridor, which would be consistent with the 1993 Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. Mitigation Measure 3.3/16.0 contained in the 1993 Eastern Dublin EIR TCQuiTes the provision of a Class I paved bicvc1e and pcdestrian path parallel to Tassaiara Creek. The Park District presentlv controls an easement for a future trail linking the area south of the Dublin Ranch West project area with Mount Diablo to the north. The existing easement traverses moderate to steep topography on land owned bv Parks RFTA and is not located on the Dublin Ranch West proiect site. The Stage I Development Plan fOT the Dublin Ranch West proiect (reference DSEIR Exhihit 11) indicates that recreational trails are proposed generally parallel to and on both sides ofTassaiara Creek. The proiect developer has indicated a willingness to ensure that either one of the proposed trails would bc desilmed to be consistent with East Pav Regional Park District trail standards and could be connected to existing Park District trails. In addition. the Development Plan includes proposed trail linkages to the existing Park District trail easement to the west. In any event, the proposed Dublin Ranch West project does not change the existing Park District regional trail location off of the project site. The Stage I Development Plan for the Dublin Ranch West project offers a greater degree offlcxibilitv to the District to provide an alternativc location for the proposed regional trail adiacent and parallel to Tassaiara Creek. Trail locations adjacent to Tassaiara Creek could also be more conducive to visitor use, since t(1)ographv adiacent to the Creek is flatter. Thc City of Dublin believes the 1993 Eastern Dublin ETR adequately addressed the potential impacts of future trails adjacent to Tassajara Creek as shown in Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The City has not identitled any specific impacts with the requested land use change that would replace existing open space uses with Low Density Residential uses further to the west on the Dublin Ranch West property. B. The Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Project has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines. C. The Supplemental Environmcntallmpact Report and the Eastern Dublin EIR were presented to the City Council who reviewed and considered the information contained therein prior to approving the Project. D. The Supplemental Enviromnental Impact Report reflccts the City's independent judgment and analysis on the potential for environmental effects of the Dublin Ranch West Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council adopts the mitigation findings sct forth in Exhibit A, the findings rcgarding alternatives set forth in Exhibit B, the Statement of Overriding Considerations set forth in Exhibit C, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program set forth in Exhibit D, which cxhibits A, B, C and D are incorporated herein by reference. 3 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15'" day of March, 2005 by the tòl10wing vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Go\!'AIf\2OO2\02'{)28 Dublin Ranch WestlCityCouncil\R= EIRCort.OOC 4 EXHIBIT A FINDINGS CONCERNING SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines sections 15091 and 15163(e), the City Council hereby makes the following findings with respect to the potential for significant supplemental environmental impacts from the Dublin Ranch West project and means for mitigating those impacts. Many of the impacts and mitigation measures in the following findings are summarized rather than set forth in full. The text of the Draft and Final Supplemental EIRs (SEIRs) should be consulted for a complete description of the impacts and mitigations. Findings pursuant to section 21081 (c) relating to Project altematives are made in Exhibit B. Supplemental Impact AQ-1: Construction activities would have the potential to cause nuisanee related to the emission of dust and PM10, (DSEIR p. 43,) SM-AQ-1. In addition to Mitigation Measure MM 3.11/1.0 in the Eastern Dublin EIR, require construction contractors to water or cover construction materials; to sweep daily all paved access roads, parking and staging areas; to install sandbags or other erosion control measures. (DSEIR p. 43). Findina, Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant supplemental effect identified in the SEIR. Rationale for Findina. The additional construction controls will ensure that dust and silt are prevented from blowing or running offsite. Supplemental Impacts AQ-2, AQ-3j Project Emission increase that would exceed the BAAQMD significance thresholds for ozone precursors on project and cumulative levels. (DSEIR pp. 44-45,) SM-AQ-2. In addition to Mitigation Measures MM 3.11/5,0-11.0 in the Eastern Dublin EIR, require coordination with LA VT A for eventual extension of transit service; provide bicycle land, paths, sidewalks, connected to community-wide network; consider shuttle service to regional transit system; consider providing satellite telecommute center; provide interconnected street network, (DSEIR pp. 44-45.) Findina. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project. However, even with these changes, the impact will not be avoided or substantially lessened. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make infeasible the project alternatives identified in the final SEIR; therefore, a Statement of Overriding Considerations mUst be adopted upon approval of the Project. Rationale for Findino. The Eastern Dublin mitigations and the supplemental mitigation will reduce the emissions generated by the project by providing transit and other facilities for alternatives to automobile use, but not by the 30% necessary to be below BMQMD thresholds. Supplemental Impact 810-1: Impacts to California tiger salamander. (DSEIR pp. 63-64.) 735666-1 1 SM BI0-1. Prepare a CTS management plan prior to project construction activities that shall include installation of a herpetological fence around the entire development footprint, a maintenance schedule for the fencing, and a salvage plan for adequately relocating CTS individuals into permanently preserved suitable aestivation habitat. (FSEIR p. 3.) SM BI0-2. Install a herpetological fence around the entire development footprint following construction activities to prevent movement of CTS into the development area. (FSEIR pp. 3-4.) SM BI0-4. Acquire and preserve suitable CTS aestivation habitat at a 1:1 ratio and construct a breeding pond, or other as required by USFWS or CDFG. (FSEIR p. 4.) SM BI0-5. Prepare an Open Space Management Plan for preserved upland habitats, private open space and off-site preserved replacement habitat prior to construction activities. The Plan shall include strategies for grassland habitat management, shall address management of habitat for other special status species and shall include protection measures and habitat monitoring and reporting. (DSEIR p. 65.) SM BI0-6. A qualified biologist shall monitor construction activities and may suspend such activities to ensure protective measures are properly implemented and maintained. (DSEIR p. 65.) SM BI0-7. During initial ground disturbing activities, provide construction employees with educational training program on sensitive species identification and habitat, and project mitigation measures. (FSEIR p. 4.) Findinq. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant supplemental effect identified in the SEIR. Rationale for Findinq. The mitigation measures provide a comprehensive program for avoiding harm to CTS by safely relocating individuals and preventing their return to the construction and development area, by providing and managing adequate preserved and replacement habitat on- and off-site, and by providing qualified biologist monitoring and education during construction so that the species will be identified and the protective measures implemented. Supplemental Impact 810·2. Impacts to California red-legged frog. (DSEIR p. 66.) SM-BI0-2, 5. 6, 7. As described above SM-BIO-B. Acquire and preserve suitable CRLF upland habitat at a 1.5:1 ratio. (DSEIR pp. 66-67.) SM-BI0-9. Prior to construction of bridges, map CRLF breeding habitat, construction and laydown areas, and temporary fill areas in Tassajara Creek; conduct preconstruction surveys and move/relocate any CRLF or CTS as authorized by a biological opinion or other appropriate permit; fence construction areas to prevent CRLF and CTS movement in these areas, and confine construction activities to the fenced areas. (FSEIR pp. 4-5 re: (a), DSEIR p. 67 re: (b).) SM-BI0-1O. Grading activities should occur during dry season as practicable. (DSEIR p. 67.) 735666-1 2 Findina. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant supplemental effect identified in the SEIR. Rationale for Findina. The mitigation measures provide a comprehensive program for avoiding harm to CRLF by identifying any individuals in construction areas; safely relocating them and preventing their return to the construction and development area; and providing qualified biologist monitoring during construction so that the species will be identified and the protective measures implemented. Supplemental Impact 810-3. Impacts to breeding birds. (DSEIR pp. 67-68.) SM-BIO-5, 6, 7. As described above. SM-BIO-11. Conduct special status breeding bird surveys prior to any tree removal or ground disturbance, and prohibit construction activities within specified buffers until young birds have fledged and/or moved out of the nest. (FSEIR p. 5.) SM-BIO-12. Conduct vegetation and tree removal outside of breeding period as much as practicable. (DSEIR p. 68.) Findina. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant supplemental effect identified in lhe SEIR. Rationale for Findina. The mitigation measures provide surveys and construction buffers to ensure that breeding birds will not be harmed by construction activity. Supplemental Impact BI0-4. Impacts to bat species. (DSEIR p. 68.) SM-BIO-5, 6, 7. As described above SM-BIO-13. Survey potential roosting habitat prior to any disturbance and exclude bats from those locations prior to habitat removal. (DSEIR p. 69.) Findina. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant supplemental effect identified in the SEIR. Rationale for Findina. The mitigation measures provide surveys and species exclusion to ensure that roosts are not destroyed when being used by roosting special status bats. Supplemental Impact BI0-5. Impacts to Burrowing Owl. (DSEIR p. 69.) SM-BIO-5, 6. 7. As described above. SM-BIO- 14. Conduct pre-construction surveys; remove burrows if outside nesting season; maintain buffers around occupied burrows, and around active nesting sites; provide replacement burrows at a 2:1 ratio; provide replacement habitat at a minimum of 6.5 acres of habitat per pair or 735666-1 3 unpaired resident owl; prepare burrow and habitat creation, maintenance, reporting and monitoring plan. (DSEIR pp. 69-70.) FindinQ. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant supplemental effect identified in the SEIR. Rationale for FindinQ. The mitigation measures avoid direct loss of or harm to individual owls by providing construction buffers around occupied habitat or nests. The mitigations provide permanently protected replacement habitat for habitat that is lost through development of the project. Supplemental Impact BI0·6. Loss of Congdon's Tarplant. (FSEIR p. 5.) SM-BIO-5. 6. 7. As described above. SM-BIO·15. Establish and manage 0.63 acres of habitat in the Tassajara Creek Management Zone for Congdon's tarplant and implement specified mitigation and monitoring plan, inciuding secure funding source for implementation and long term maintenance. (FSEIR pp. 5-6.) Findina. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant supplemental effect identified in the SEIR. Rationale for FindinQ. The mitigation measures provide permanently protected replacement habitat for lost tarplant. Supplemental Impact BI0·7. Loss of riparian vegetation. (DSEIR p. 71.) SM-BiO-5, 6. As described above. SM-BIO-16. Replace removed habitat at a 3:1 ratio, or restore damaged riparian habitat. Develop and implement a Riparian Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan to fully compensate for impacts to riparian habitat, including any Heritage Trees. The Plan shall include mitigation design and planting, maintenance, funding and monitoring details, and shall include permanent preservation. (DSEIR p. 71.) SM-BIO-17. Prepare a Tree Removal and Preservation Plan where grading is proposed within tree driplines. The Plan shall include detailed recommendations for tree removal and preservation, including protective fencing. Delineate all removed or protected trees on project grading plans. (DSEIR pp. 71-72.) FindinQ. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant supplemental effect identified in the SEIR. Rationale for FindinQ. The mitigation measures ensure that any lost riparian habitat will be replaced and that damaged habitat will be repaired, with the replaced or repaired habitat permanently preserved and protected. The mitigation measures also ensure that any lost heritage trees will be replaced and that preserved trees will be protected during construction grading. 735666-1 4 Supplemental Impact BI0·8. Temporary loss of aquatic habitat. (DSEIR p. 72.) SM-BID-5. As described above, SM-BID-18, Develop and implement a Restoration Plan identifying measures to avoid and minimize adverse effects to aquatic resources, including measures such as temporary silt fencing, controlling flowing water, timing bridge construction activities during the dry season, and other measures as specified. The Plan shall also include contingency measures æd a secure funding source for implementation and long-term maintenance and monitoring. (DSEIR pp, 72-73.) Findino. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant supplemental effect identified in the SEIR. Rationale for Findino, The mitigation measures ensure that any temporarily filled aquatic habitat will be restored to pre-Project conditions following completion of bridge construction. Supplemental Impact TRA·2: Impacts to study intersections under Buildout conditions (Dublin Boulevard/Dougherty Road, DSEIR p, 107). (DSEIR pp. 103-107.) Mitioation, No feasible mitigations are identified in the SEIR. Findino. Even with mitigations adopted through the Eastern Dublin EIR, unæceptable operations at this intersection will not be avoided or substantially lessened, and no feasible mitigations are identified in the SEIR. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make infeasible the project alternatives identified in the final SEIR; therefore, a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted upon approval of the Project. Rationale for Findina, Mitigation measures for roadway improvements were adopted with the Eastern Dublin EIR. The Dublin Ranch West project is required to implement all applicable mitigations from the prior approvals, including fair share payments for cumulative impacts as further described in the DSEIR. No supplemental measures are available to further reduce these impacts, therefore the supplemental impact remains significant and unavoidable Supplemental Impact TRA·4: Impacts on Tassajara Roadway segments. (DSEIR pp, 109- 110.) SM-TRA-1, Widen Tassajara Road to four lanes between North Dublin Ranch Drive and Project Northern Access. (DSEIR p. 110.) Findina, Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant supplemental effect identified in the SEIR. Rationale for Findinq, Widening Tassajara Road provides sufficient roadway to accommodate project and buildout traffic, Supplemental Impact TRA·5. Potential traffic safety impacts. (DSEIR p, 110.) 735666-1 5 SM-TRA-2. Provide specified traffic improvements, including signals, right and left turn lanes and pockets. (DSEIR pp. 110-111.) Findinq. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant supplemental effect identified in the SEIR. Rationale for Findinq. Implementing the identified improvements will provide safe access between the project and Tassajara Road. Supplemental Impact PARK-1. Inconsistency with the City of Dublin General Plan, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and Park and Recreation Master Plan regarding provision of park acreage. (DSEIR p. 135.) SM-PARK-1. Revise the project to provide an additional 1.9 acres of Neighborhood Park land use designation; or pay in-lieu fees to compensate for the loss of 1.9 acres of Neighborhood Park land. (FSEIR pp. 6-7.) FindinQ. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant supplemental effect identified in the SEIR. Rationale for FindinQ. The mitigation measure insures that sufficient total parkland will be provided consistent with applicable plans. 735666-1 6 EXHIBIT B FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES The Eastern Dublin EIR identified four alternatives: No Project, Reduced Planning Area, Reduced Land Use Intensities and No Development. The City Council found the No Project, Reduced Land Use Intensities and No Development alternatives infeasible and then approved a modification of the Reduced Planning Area alternative. The Supplemental EIR updates the analysis of the No Project Alternative; it also identifies and analyzes alternatives to develop the site under the existing General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and to develop the site with a revised Neighborhood Park location. These findings are for the alternatives as analyzed in Chapter 5.0 of the DSEIR. The City Council considered the three alternatives identified and described in the Supplemental EIR and finds them to be infeasible for the specific economic, social, or other considerations set forth below pursuant to CEQA section 21002. Alternative 1: No Project (DSEIR pp. 138-139.) Findina: Infeasible. Under this alternative, no development would occur on the project site, although the Tassajara Creek Conservation Area would be implemented since it is a required mitigation for loss of wetlands and habitat elsewhere in Eastern Dublin. This alternative would avoid the project's significant air quality and traffic impacts since it would avoid the new traffic trips generated with the proposed development. This alternative would not, however, achieve any of the project objectives, including implementation of the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan which anticipate annexation and development of the site. Alternative 2: Reorganization and Development Under Existing General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. (DSEIR pp. 139-141.) FindinQ: Infeasible. This altemative would include annexation to the City and DSRSD, but would also include Neighborhood Commercial uses and the elementary school site. This alternative does not avoid the project's significant air quality or traffic impacts. This alternative would generally implement the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan to the extent these plans anticipate annexation and development of the site. The alternative would not, however, meet the project objectives to refine land use designations to protect Tassajara Creek and to consider alternative uses for the elementary school site which is no longer needed by the school district. Alternative 3: Reorganization and Development of Dublin Raneh West with Revised Neighborhood Park location. (DSEIR pp. 141-143, FSEIR p. 7.) Findina: Feasible but does not avoid the project's sianificant impacts and would require aeneral and specific plan amendments. This alternative would be similar to the project, including the same uses and number of dwelling units; however the proposed Neighborhood Park would be relocated to the southerly portion of the property along either side of Tassajara Creed and residences would be built in the current park location. The alternative would generally implement the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan to the extent these plans anticipate annexation and development of the site, but the location of land use designations would need to be amended. This alternative 735668·1 would not avoid the project's significant air quality or traffic impacts and thus, consistent with CEQA section 21002, need not be further considered. 735668-1 2 EXHIBIT C STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS 1. General. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15093, the City Council of the City of Dublin adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for those impacts identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR as significant and unavoidable. (Resolution 53-93, May 10, 1993.) The City Council carefully considered each impact in its decision to approve urbanization of Eastern Dublin through approval of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan project. The City Council is currently considering the Dublin Ranch West project. The project proposes a residential development on the west side of Tassajara Road, north of the existing city limits generally to the county line. The City prepared a Supplemental EIR for the Dublin Ranch West project which identified supplemental impacts that could be mitigated to less than significant. The Supplemental EIR also identified supplemental Air Quality and Traffic impacts that could not be mitigated to less than significant. The City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with the original land use approvals for urbanization of Eastern Dublin. Pursuant to a 2002 court decision, the City Council must adopt new overriding considerations for the previously identified unavoidable impacts that apply to the Dublin Ranch West project.1 The City Council must also adopt overriding considerations for the supplemental impacts identified in the Supplemental EIR as significant and unavoidable. The City Council believes that many of the unavoidable environmental effects identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR and the Supplemental EIR will be substantially lessened by mitigation measures adopted with the original Eastern Dublin approvals and by the environmental protection measures adopted through the Dublin Ranch West approvals, to be implemented with the development of the project. Even with mitigation, the City Council recognizes that the implementation of the project carries with it unavoidable adverse environmental effects as identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR and the Dublin Ranch West Supplemental EIR. The City Council specifically finds that to the extent that the identified adverse or potentially adverse impacts for the project have not been mitigated to acceptable levels, there are specific economic, social, environmental, land use, and other considerations that support approval of the project. 2. Unavoidable Si!:lnificant Adverse ImDacts from the Eastern Dublin EIR. The following unavoidable significant environmental Impacts identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR for future development of Eastern Dublin apply to the Dublin Ranch West project. Land Use Impact 3.1/F. Cumulative Loss of Agricultural and Open Space Lands; Visual Impacts 3.8/8; and, Alteration of Rural/Open Space Character. Although development has occurred south of the project area, the site is largely undeveloped open space land. Future development of the Dublin Ranch West site will contribute to the cumulative loss of open space land. 1 ".. .public officials must still go on the record and explain specifically why they are approving the later project despite its significant unavoidable impacts." (emphasis originaL) Communities for a Better Environment v. California Reso!,!¡ç!;lS Aoencv 103 CaLApp. 4th 98. _ (2002). 735669-1 1 Traffic and Circulation Impacts 3.318, 3.3/E. 1-580 Freeway, Cumulative Freeway Impacts: While city street and interchange impacts can be mitigated through planned improvements, transportation demand management, the 1-580 Smart Corridor program and other similar measures, mainline freeway impacts continue to be identified as unavoidable, as anticipated in the Eastern Dublin EIR. Future development on the Dublin Ranch West site will generate less traffic than anticipated in the Eastern Dublin EIR, but will still incrementally contribute to the unavoidable freeway impacts. Traffic and Circulation Impacts 3.311, 3.3IM. Santa Rita Road/l-5SD Ramps, Cumulative Dublin Boulevard Impacts: The Dublin Ranch West project will be required to implement all applicable adopted traffic mitigation measures, including contributions to the City's TIF program; however even with mitigation these impacts continue to be identified as unavoidable, as anticipated in the Eastern Dublin EIR. Community Services and Facilities Impact 3.4/S. Consumption of Non-Renewable Natural Resources and Sewer, Water; and Storm Drainage Impact 3.5/F, H, U. Increases in Energy Usage Through Increased Water Treatment, Disposal and Operation of Water Distribution System: Future development of the Dublin Ranch West project will contribute to increased energy consumption. Soils, Geology, and Seismicity Impact 3.618. Earthquake Ground Shaking, Primary Effects: Even with seismic design, future development of the Dublin Ranch West project could be subject to damage from large earthquakes, much like the rest of the Eastern Dublin planning area. Air Quality Impacts 3. 11/A, S, C, and E. Future development of the Dublin Ranch West project will contribute to cumulative dust deposition, construction equipment emissions, mobile and stationary source emissions. 3. Unavoidable Sianificant Adverse Impacts from the Dublin Raneh West Supplemental EIR. The following unavoidable significant supplemental environmental impacts were identified in the Supplemental EIR for the Dublin Ranch West project. Supplemental Impacts AQ-2, AQ-3. Project emission increase that would exceed the BAAQMD significance thresholds for ozone precursors on project and cumulative levels. Even with implementation of the previously adopted mitigation measures and the additional mitigation measures in the Supplemental EIR, project and cumulative precursor emissions will exceed BAAQMD thresholds. Supplemental Impact TRA-2. Impacts to study intersections under Buildout conditions (Dublin BoulevardlDougherty Road). Even with implementation of the previously adopted mitigation measures, including contribution to intersection improvements through the TlF program, the project will contribute to significant and unavoidable impacts at this intersection under buildout conditions. 4. OverridinQ Considerations. The City Council previously balanced the benefits of the Eastem Dublin project approvals against the significant and potentially significant adverse impacts identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR. The City Council now balances those unavoidable impacts that apply to future development on the Dublin Ranch West site as well as the supplemental unavoidable impacts identified in the Supplemental EIR, against its benefits, and hereby 735669-1 2 determines that such unavoidable impacts are outweighed by the benefits of the Dublin Ranch West project as further set forth below. The project will further the urbanization of Eastern Dublin as planned through the comprehensive framework established in the original Eastern Dublin approvals. The modifications to the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan provide important protections to T assajara Creek and are more reasonable and protective designations for sensitive creek areas. The project will provide over 1,000 units of needed housing with diverse densities and building types, as well as maintaining open space on the site. Redesignation of the elementary school site will increase the city's supply of housing, and is a reasonable alternate use for a site no longer needed by the school district. Development of the site will also provide construction empioyment opportunities for Dublin residents. 735669·1 3 RESOLUTION NO. _-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ********************************* APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN AND EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN FOR A PORTION (APN 986-0004-005-01) OF THE PROJECT KNOWN AS DUBLIN RANCH WEST P A 02-028 WHEREAS, the Applicant, James Tong representing Chang Su-O (aka Jennife.) Lin, et. aI., submitted appliOlltions (P A 02-028) to the City regarding a I 84-acre parcel ("Lin Family Property") located in the uaincorporatcd area of Alameda County (APN 986-0004·005-01); and WHEREAS, a I 89-acre projcct arca known as Dublin Ranch West (tormerly kliDlOwn as Wallis Ranch) is comprised of the I 84-acre Lin Family Property and two smaller, individually .awned parcels totaling approximately five (5) acres; and WHEREAS, Dublin Ranch West generally is locatcd south of the County boundary, north of the existing City limits, east ofthe property owned by United States Govcmment known as Parks Reserve Training Facility (PRTF), and generally west of Tassajara Road; and WHEREAS, all 189 acres of Dublin Ranch West are within the City's Sphere oolf Intluence (SOl), the Eastern Extended Planning Area of the General Plan, and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area; and WHERIILAS, thc applications include: a} Amendments to both the Gcncral PI_ and thc Eastern Dublin Specific Plan for the Lin Family Property only; b) prezoning of the entirc Dublim Ranch West project arca to Planncd Dcvclopment (PD) and a Stage I Development Plan; c) a prc-amnexation agreement tì)r the Lin Family Property, only; and d) a request to initiate wmexation oftl1e entire I 89-acrc DubJin Ranch West project area to the City of Dublin and to the Dublin SWl Ramon Services District. The applications collectively define this "Project"; and WHEREAS, the Projcct sitc currcntly is undeveloped and used for farming, grm:ing, storagc, and other rural uses; and WHEREAS, the Tassajara Creek corridor is a dominant topographic feature of the Project site; and WHEREAS, the Dublin Unified School District has abandoned plans for locatimg an elementary school on a sitc dcsignatcd within Dublin Ranch West; and WHEREAS, the realignment and location ofTassajara Road right-ot~way and iits intersection with the extension of Fallon Road atfect the configuration of designated land use areas as shown on current land use plans for the Project site; and WHEREAS, the Project would amend the General Plan land use map and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan land use map for the Lin Family Property only, as shown below, ineludinß: . Removal ofTassajara Village Center; . Increase in Open Space along Tassajara Creek; ATTACHMENT Z · Removal all of the Neighborhood Commercial land use designations; · Omission of the Neighborhood Square from the location shown in Dublin Ranch West · Elimination of the Elementary School site; · Relocation and redesignation of Neighborhood Park spacc; · Inclusion of some Public/Semi-Public land use; · Minor moditlcations to thc proposed road system; and WHEREAS, the Project would amcnd corrcsponding text, tables, and figures related to amendments to land use designations of the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, including but not limited to areawide land use diagrams, land use summary tables, Hgures regarding the location of schools and parks, and cnvironmental resource exhibits related to open space and stream corridors shown in Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 1993, the City Council ccrtificd a program Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for the Eastern Dublin GPA/SP Project and an addcndum thereto, dated May 4, 1993 (SCH 91103064). On August 22, 1994, the City Council approved anothcr addendum to update plans to provide sewer service. The May 10, 1993 program EIR, the May 4, 1993 addcndum and the Aub'Ust 22, 1994 addcndum are collectively referred to as the Eastern Dublin EIR; and WHEREAS, upon approval of thc Eastern Dublin GPAlSP Project, the City Council adopted mitigation findings, a statement of overriding considerations, and a mitigation monitoring program as set forth in Resolution 53-93, included in the Eastern Dublin ErR retèrenced above. All mitigation measures adopted for the GP A/SP Project continue to apply to implementing projccts such as the current PD Prezone; and all applicable City development ordinances and standards apply to thc Project except as othcrwise approved through the Project prezoning and related Stage I Development Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Calit'Ornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Supplemental ETR entitled "Dublin Ranch West Project" (SCH #2004112094) was prepared and circulated; and WHEREAS, on March 15,2005, the City Council adopted Resolution _-05 certifying the Supplemental EIR. The rcsolution is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, a staff report, dated March 15,2005 and incorporated herein by retèrence, dcscribed and analyzed the Project, including the proposed amendments to the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, on Fcbruary 22, 2005, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 05-19 rccommcnding that thc City Council approve the proposed amendments to the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specitlc Plan. The resolution is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the SErR, staffrcport, and recommendation of the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing held on March 15, 2005 at which time all interested partics had the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and use their indepcndent judgment and considered all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth; and 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL YEn that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that thc City Council ofthe City of Dublin approves the following Amendments to the General Plan and Eastcrn Dublin Spccific Plan based on findings that the amendments are in the pubJic interest and that thc General Plan as so amended will remain internally consistent. A. Amend the Land Use Map t'Or both the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan as shown below: General Plan Maps .__..,,-~,,~.,,~~- . _....__.___.............__ m.._..._m_.._...._....._._____.___.... o(!« "''''"' " ~ 1· "<8 e., (.~~ 1l'FO~'ii ........."........-.........--.... DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP * (rgur~ lali!1) i!lS aml!lnd.d throug'l Decer'nÞer 7, ¡!OO'" /---.,,,___) . _ t ~. {/ ..... .' J W"~~"' '~I,nØol!l Pl4nnlnll A_ /~ C~"_~____" - , _.......__....~....... ¡'.~;.P.:..:.:5..:.'::;!:~" 11:- .._n...""""'---' - -_._~~..."' "- -,......".,-~......~~~ -.......'-~~~, ._-¿~,.~..........._~ 1....:,......0 -- -..-- -,~,~"~...- .1 .-....- . ~~~:;':;~:,~~'J,:;'::;;',.~-;:;,;: Ì'IiII~._~"."...., -'..............,~..~, ".~' ;\1ft¡ .","_,.~,_~.,_..._, _.....~~'M.~'''......, .---..'''-.,.. ,...,~ _.~--_.y. ......... _.."'-._......,~.-~'- .~"'''''"..............;''W\I~'.".. ::::-.:_-=~";:",~=~...'.....~ -~~, _............_...._,~ --_.~, -,..,.~.- _..........,-, ..___u._n._ -............,.......-- --~--_.~_.""'" -~....._-......~. .-. ¡;:.:;:iE~.:.~"J:::..:;····-=7: .:.!'"~.;!..!;:,:..:;:,;;:::..:.:.':".~;;;.!.... ..,""" ,. ,............-~~--,,_..~_..- _...__.___n_.._....._..._ '''-~-'~''~ ,,~~ ._.~-_..._.._.......~"..~..... ~J:"~~~~"~.~ --..... --~~ _........... _~r~~..._ . _....._.~.~,.,~_.. '" ,~..._~~.~ ."_..~-" ." ,... ::::.;.~::;....!.~l·:::.::,~=:.....~ ¡,:.;;.=:::-,:,::?T.:t.::"!..:¡::,==.~ 3 Dublin General Plan ~ ( I I i , . ...:.;~;/~~~..... _Ir-"-~"-¡ "j:::;;:::!:¡¡;::!:!r::::::':':::::::::::L ~ I ,I Ci~I3<.'~II(I(¡rY ').....'"-,¡;:...\IÁ1I:I,~ð:iI'~. ® TIIr Ò'1I!1L11:1clW: LI:~~ ~"'" ,Ir''';'''' ,/" "'''1'~''' \.'"," ""~.".,... """',.....wI....... _..-~o¡mmI_o¡¡ri..~IurW.0_.¡-wIo.,.¡"'...u:rco{iIt<..,-ticl!uaH:w ·...._.:>~:><n..~IIII1L.._......:Iofpoi,lK...-.Io+-.4~ ,- , Extendfld Planning Area 'JJ...¡;,..¡_'..,I.."IIJ,.......f<I<.&I<..""Y<':>:I...I.'cMU<IIIII"""E,jI"""...C"'.o,I,~,LI1 1...~......,....,...¡¡,~;··""4/>II~'lluF_:a:¡>OI:OI--=:"u.I-..dI.".... r:>ð~H.,..,W.I"""'<II'"I«I'<t'.vj.w;~......"""n:I''''I''I:I'' ,"o.o¡:,.¡.Ii,...\<:.,.i..i..w ~"".I"""""""",,"",_I.o.I_""'~"""""'",.1I~_~.~""'¡"'.n ~-, f~~<l Rurul ~~ideni¡~/Agr¡",ult\l1l:; lilititJ Public ~ ,\.,.,,..:ifIiW:a.I)\W"¡;,r<dlm:ti....,;"'C"..I"'"!I_'-'v..o:.io~I*(,~r~.. wI~1\I:~..! ':1I!M ~ ,lItofl! ~1"'"~O'¡\!..INII"'~f(o t,.¡.", l&I:1Io\lt:mdr ~ ~II.r>:n." ~I"".~, ~-'F'''''' <ovn«! Þ¡ Ut'lpI"",,' ...,I~' riM. TIll ~¡>o<I!Ic ~1>."l(aJ ~oojl ,..;,.,¡,. ,~w ¡"........ .wi ",,110, I""¡¡rm:' wti"" ,¡¡:¡¡,., ~" ;......I:..,m ~"\,¡.. . ~ :~... (;"',IEI:W ~WI .,~ r. :l!;ipl"o J¡H:dllcaI;Y!orI!>::.!alC1L~~~Art:IL i\11\~lli,I!;:f1 ~1Vt'r,\I~r)'(}(,A I~CI1!"{p,O;p:r:y'MtII.,I'?I'I_"""":L-.I">t,"'~p,..""',,,.rLII:c..r= """'WI >pc<1Ii.:: l'I""d:..m" ~ b<nI, ~.;,"",...d -.. "', ['ho..;o¡._LJno~.IO%1¡;" TH:'" '" "'r.IJm.:.:""""lIIIII:Iwb,h'IE~_!:I<YI'¡""I."", "¡...,~...II,,_'4II"'w.. ~I'~ ~poc1lk";"""" ,.-OI....opmn,poÛ"",'III"<.~,.'UJI;,,¡s.,,;\I\. ""'.. f-ïgllrC 1-2 4 Development Elevation Cap Eastern ExtendEtd Planning Area N\i~!l(ed No"emDef 2a~ 6 ~ , I , ' ,~~u': ,".mtl .. ~._--'''-".,.,.,...,--_._.."".,.. .. ..-..-..-..-..-.. .. .. .. Flg;ure 1-4 p~,S 5 -r;:- -' .-' -" -' -' -"-- ' " '", þ Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Maps --" '-" ., ......-". .-"' -' .-" >- .- n-;;::....I·:-..........:::·' " -.1 F-""" 7 I _'-I7~J_---1 . I .- " ~ j ,.) r:-l ---trrr 2:~ 23 ~4 d3 .-' i, " ! "4 r, -..-..-.....,...-..+.--; .....- i ,..¡ " /.¡ .--..... = 17 '. " " Note: Mlln~ P/lr~"I~ hllve b~lIn 1IIJbdl"i~l!d ~Ir,,:o thl' m~p W"', orlQ:lnlo1lly prop~rod Ihl' mAI ,¡I'>o'I1I "'iI! ""!i"""!"" II'¡ II(!!I,;,II'I I~~ rYI~j<'>r (¡hl!ngn m owm'rll~lp duo, 10 ~\lI¡xl"II~n F-, I 1- '" I '" I I ' 6 Figure 2.4 Ownership Pattems c Legend OWt~ER Chu.¡¡SU·U-lIn Moura Y"rvn '''''"'' -¡¡~h! 1.Ii~~fooPellk~5 ,,- Slt>llIrð 'J ~[O II)ZimflWll" 111"1111411y 1:2:5\'111 13 EHr8l.yRoa-glol1oll1 I'AfkDI:t!tIc 14K/:!INilr I~ Collo~K\f'!ion 1IJC(lu,.,tyoAI.,n~ 1)¡Jrilt1dSrillro:lol''''~ 111 U~'n¡...w.,,(lc.....)lP.D(\Y 1(1 PICTUn ;!o..k1rQ¡n 21'!ft,!1 1:'¡'An1Jl15Q01 2~ ruQllaid 2"Bi_~ 2SC-~H , TOTAL ~~r>t 1~S1.0 ," " ,-" :<.1<.J G1.s.J ""'" ~I,O "'" '"' U~ " ?7.2 ì1.~ II;I,I~ ~(O.4 q, 1~ <!1l14 .""" 11:1~1~ ".., ..'" ..." ",. .., J,J01.64 EASTERN DUBLIN Specific Pian RC~I~od j¡f1UllfY:::OOS 25 ~ E9 JrJ'i _ L.....Ï""""" 7 .~~I. ", .~. '~~J' ...'"'" Figure 4.1 Land Use Map Log." - ¡;;;;....", ~-~~_.'" Eøl:DubÐn:ll","IfIçPlln .........__....''';1_' _..,",,_,.¡.~·.I- ___.,yo_ _......,....,LI''''...., _...,._"'O.....~ ---- -,-,_.......,-. - ----'-- _<__0_ __,... -- ---~ -.............- -.- ---...... ..........~"'>- i:üi:ü-___ ~--... ~- --- -..."'.... · 55='="" tI:II- ::.':':::-0...:::::::::--.=..... _.....~-- ... ~"===:;::,..~..-=--= ..,~_,_'_'__r._ if r~~CIO!i """'...--.. ---....- ~--"'" iØ¡ 1.'* ~.1!Ið 1._ 'ø ~O.I1III.1 H ~~ ~. ~, - .. -~.. - ___ __~ _, .-......... ._~"'J"" _, ...~r ~ ··"··--·---·l I L_ --~,,-~--- G , J. G ,'" --- ...... (---2',~.~"",>".,~ rr I ï C....· L..., .. l ~~~ ___ .~è:/ A --- F 8 .~~~> ~01Y'· II,.".,·'· Figure 4.2 Planning Subare ! ¡'~~~¡;'11~ (~':11';"'~'/ ; :-:~i::.:·:';·::;:::·:·:' I",II..~I",.II'~'~ " :;;·~::~:i:,::::;':::'·: II 1""'''1'''" VJI'''~~(:''''I''r 'I"Jo),,1:I LJ\Jt,'>II..." r::::: <; ", f\'" I·" ~.." j Dr~"n"':I~:.,"·'" $ 'A.~ ;¡OO~ ~I'<'I'~. ./"01¡"'"I' ~~ ,~"..<::::. , 1.~""'\ .....n.:' o ~~~ - '.' /" ".-- -' -- '.--' . :.~..-- ~':, , .:>J _M':: '. --- -" -- -' ~...--r' .¡, II,., 1".",,·;1 Ce,,<c" ~'¡"'\¡,il 'I: . \11 '''1'' h,w ,,,,Ith'"" LlP~'I~dWJ., Itl\'." r..,I,.I. ("""'" ¡'I'''''''''I ~:~~'::.." ;'11""" ,.·t· ~i~lIrL' ~.¡ ¡'<II ." il:..,II.,II""" "'~""., ~" ~..~":~:~~~';~ ¡t,¡"~~",,~~ IKi,If:\rullY''''II¡o. 9 FIQU'B 6.1 Open space Framework LElQend . f'~r"~ E'.l (IM:"~D""~ _ flur"I"~~I''',,,,,,,1 E~~.~ ['AIr" EASTERN DUBLIN Specific Plan R"",I...<'I:õ"pI..",bIIl:2004 ;;1). LV-- -~ I-~Tt~, ;",..........: -,- --" --' ........~.--. --' -' ~ ,.-- ---- --' --" -- , .. ~ 0 < v:\:i)~:'~<~o~::v :~~~[":~~~f:': ". ." '~,'J" : \,.,~", -\11 111.,1" 11..... w," 1,..,,,, . fI«.lt,',1 '" II h II.., ¡ r.""it ( ,,~!... 1'1 """"" . ,. ~""'" J ! ':<' ," " . '" I II', L " . I I ", I . ", ,II." I' "I " ,,\ ", ,I h' I r. LL \ "" ( , ." "J I; I." <II LI ,1:1'."", '(!II Th" ir~",..1 "y'l.m~f I<~...! ~tr~..~,. ~¡'''WI' h ,¡',¡. IO~"''' ~I,..t"'~I¥' ~lIly .._~.,.. 10 FiQure 6.2 Environmental Resources Legend b:.:.~ 1 ~!'\"I~IN r~r'('~ t: ',::1 ~1!~rri,(I~,,1 ~',Ip' lji] '."""" ,,,'" 1I1,..."",dmrl'l [Ü L£I [.:] W r~v.("" 1:,,,1.. 1'\\I""lIi,1"11 FN r,,'~" IIM<lI."¡'¡II"~ ¡""'.I L..¡~I",1' ..,."·T,,,I,,,I..,...I. (""II""".'!'IOI'I....I r9N" ~~L..m~nrl... AmM;nll ¡ <lc.J.I""", o I J [f.:"'] 1~<)r1'>~rn 1111"""'" v."mll;¡II~ ^"'...."W'II<>..,t'II.",".:.. WI\"<!I~,,,1 t::::;:J ,OJ'",I;li('"../'õ,',",I",,·1 [::..::] lel""t,,,,,,, A,,,,,,,,,I .,,""'~",~ I~ Cull"~¡',j lITE :JI'vr~'r·n" ~'--"._..- EASTERN DUBLIN Specific Plan _~~~:;.':',/.("I,l)0:(""n",(nf\O_ 1--1 -~.., _ --r--- . ...- -" -.- -" -" .-- . ..--...--.- '* -" . -" ...-.-......-. -' 1'...1.· ·111 '"''1''' 1',...·..')II....o!, \W(~.'I'·<t "'I',¡I", 1[,,,,>11(,,"1.., ..\'O"L om; "Ii, ,11','.1 I' ¡"....' "'!' I : I',LII'I'·I If", . '" i II II' I r ,.! i '" I ,,¡' ¡I,., .',.'." ,,; T ( " "II'" I' (,II' "'" I~ >LlI",,". "..., -, /' -------..¡ ThLl "'¡tffi.:ll~yUlt"l(f 1uc~I>IIIN'1~ """.....1. 111I:ilg..,rQI" ilu:.ll~~'I~cn¡" NóT£ 11 Figure 6.3 Environmental Constraints U~gi;!rld CB WI - r'''l ~~:::J 1'~""1 IT I':;; - ("..:¡,I~ëC,I1,pl "V"'~~(I~~ ~rr·.'·, (.M¡t~¡,~lr;,1 ~',r('I<:I~"C~ ;'r""~ 1,,1r~.I, u, ILJ'~ "(':¡';Ib¡~ ¡',I,;¡!,(".<..,,,,:lfI:I:. If~~v""r FI.',(\d Plu,n T""""IIICII(:","kl f'''f..~,.,¡~1 8Lfaam 1~[~r",II~n1 !;lr'¡~rI" r;Hn,.I,lv~ H31011~1 "'rllu ¡i)ldor.~ f:;lo::l" .-r"t~"'IC!"l I.one VI~U~II¥ :¡(,,\~H¡"~ I'!ld'J~I~n<J' N¡¡ LI\'vtll~¡,,"~,,1 ['.... j VI'.\I,llly ~;""~IIV" fllIl!!_r.",J>: n~.!III:I"') L\:v~I"cm~nl EASTERN DUBLIN Specific Plan ~..vi."d. Docornbar 201)~ 1-- i I (.1.'1 "'~V-- _-J- ~ Flgl,lro 7.28 Taooajara Vlllaga Concept Plan (111ustratlve only) ~..-c..... .-- (/,~.. ., ···',X'·,...J " !" ..'. Keyptan EASTERN DUBLIN Specific Pllln Rlto'iHd! F-'3rul¡Y 200:5 12 ~ t ~. 1 " "---¡-õw~~'~·,~-~,· .-'~"""""f" Figure 7.49 Residential Street CO\1Ml.~i\ITY rW~~]CN ~ ~ ~!1. ¡ 5. I ~. J ,~' I '~I' / K" \ " ¡ ~..~~ .It:. I " I<()w ---t Figure 7.49^ Residenlial Street !lltemat" ~ ~.~/ S>-~ "Vb ~ _...r..... ~~ ¡d~ J.¿.l ,... I I~' I WIIW ~..-.-~ Figure 7.50 Neighborbood Square SÞ'''et l~ f ~vl,. ... _ow Figure 7.51 Alley (':'I B. Amend the corresponding text, tables, and tigures related to above amendments to the Land Use Map of the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specitic Plan, including but not limited to areawide land use diagrams, land usc summary tables, fib'Ures regarding the location of schools and parks, and environmental resource exhibits relatcd to open space and stream corridors, as set forth below: Dublin General Plan Amendment Text Dublin Ranch West Annexation Area Project Application PA 02·028 Page 8, Eastern Extended Planning Area (East of Camp Parks-See Figure 1-la)* Residential catcgorics Rcsidential: Single-family, Residential: Medium Density, Residential: Medium High Dcnsity, and Rcsidcntial: High, and Combination classification: Medium-High Density Residcntial and Retail/Office are missing. These categories should be copied over from the Primary Planning Area (West of Camp Parks- Sce Figure I-Ia) with the exception of Residential: High which is not a category in that section. For Residential: High, insert the following: Rcsldentlal: High Density (25. I units and above per gross residential acre). Residential units in this density rangc will be all attached. Housing types includc condominiums, townhouses, apartments, and tlats, and can bc either for-sale or rental. Thcsc projects typically incorporate tuá-under or under-structurc parking and may have three or more living levcls. Assumed household size is two persons pcr unit. Figure 1-la Amend City boundary and revise land use plan pcr Stage I PO proposal. Figure 1-2 Corrcct City boundary; and delete Tassajara Creek Regional Park, as is in error. Figure 1-4 Amend City limits. Chapter 2 EASTERN DUBLIN EXTENDED PLANNING AREA First paragraph: ... The Eastern Extended Planning Area is projected to build out over the next 30-40 years, adding roughly 13,930 new housing units to the City. Buildout is projected to increase the City's population by approximately 32,500 32,905 people and add 28,100 28,077 new jobs. 14 Table 2-1: TABLE 2.1*:: lAND USE SUMMARY: EASTERN DUßI,IN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AREA (:I.II.S!iilftcatlon Ae...es Illten!dtv*** Units t'a.ctor Yield RESmENTlAl Du'sh,ere Du's Persons/du Population HI2h Density 69.9 35 2,447 2.0 4,894 Medlum-lIIoh Densltv H4.9149.3* 20 J,6üb286 2.0 ~~ Medlum-IJenslty 69&11498.5* 10 c ...... 9K~ 2.0 tÐ;-lé4)9.970 single Family ~1.001.4* 4 4,GW4~ 3.2 H,&E12.816 Rural Re.ldentlal 842.5 .01 8 3.2 25 TOTAl, ~22M.6 ~IM31 ~33.677 Floor Area. Square Feet S(lu"e Feet COM M I<:RClAL A~res Ratio (millions) / Employee Job. (Gross) General Commercial 316.84 .35/.25 3.889 510 7,625 Neighborhood Commerelal 1>9.'7%8.9* .35/.30 .98II.'lM 490 ~1.977 Camou. Offiee 189.36 .75/.35 3.052 260 11,739 Industrial Park 125.80 .25 1.370 590 2,322 TOTAL: ~700.9 M9lY12 ~2.1663 PARKS AND PUBLIC RIi:CRIi:ATlON City Park 56.3 I parks Commonltv Park 92.8 2 parks NellZhhorhood Park * 47.~* JJ!! parks Nel2hborhood SaulI.re E.310.5· ~ parks lI.e210nal Park 11.7 I pork TOTAl,: ~218.5· 19.11 porks OPEN SPACE 4&.8493.6 PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC Public/Semi~Public w.t.4!102.9* .25 l-.9W J..J1!! 590 l,8é41.899 Semi-Public 1.9* .25 0 0 0 Sehool. I:lemenlary Sehool ·...·'U.164.4· '1-6 schouls~~.\'! Junior Hli!h Sehool 25.2 I.ehool HI2h Sehoul 0 o school School Subtolal 9'8~ 8 schools TOTAL: ~1.J!U TRANSIT CENTER ITolal\ 90.7 - Campus Offi~ (im;)udîflg .18.3 ancillary retail) . - Hi2:h-Dcnsitv Rcsidential 31.5 - Perk 12.2 - Publk/SemÎ-Public: (Traníìit- 8.7 Related) GRAND TOTAL 4 266.7 :.þ: Dublin Ranch Wcø revisions Fcbruarv 2005. Dl".í Gen~ml Plari/Snedtìc Plan Amendment PA02-028, '~Tablc 2.1 appears as Table "2A" in the Eastern Dublin OP A. It was relabeled herein far fannatting purpase<. "'''Numbers represent a mid~fange con:-¡idercd n:a.'«:mabte given the permitted density range. "'~Partial school sites represent site< that lie partially a~t"ide the Specific Plan area, but within the Ea.tern Dublin General Plan Amendment area. 15 Section 4.4 Delete last two <;cotcnces of first paragraph. Section 5.1.1 RESIDENTIAL STREETS Right-of~way ~46' Cul-de-sacs Cm'b to curb- ..J4.!,]6' Right-of-way- ~' minimum The length of cuJ.·de-sacs shall not exceed éIm-] 000 feet. Chapter 7 Endromnental Resources l\fana¡ement, Conservation Element Page 58, Eastern Extended PlatUling Area Revise text to state that the majority of the lands are not in Williamson Act contracts. Appendix A Add this pl"Ojcct to list of Amendments and Approvals: Dublin Ranch \Vest Annexation Area, Resolution No., Date Adopted, and OP updated. 16 Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment Text Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment Dublin Ranch Annexation Area Project Application P A 02-028 The following are proposed amendments to the Eastern Dublin Spccific Plan as part of P A 02-028: CHAPTER 2: PLANNING AREA DESCRIPTION 2.3 Ownership Patterns Ownership patterns in the planning area are shown in Figure 2.4. There are G44 recorded parcels in the planning area, which are owned by ~2LdifIerent landowners. Landowncrs' names and size of holdings are listed in Figurc 2.4. Ownership holdings range in size from ~ld acres to 1,251 acres. This figure illustrates onl y the oriRinal parcels. prior to their being subdivided. Figure 2.4 Rcvisc map to update ownership list and add missing property owners (Bragg and Sperfslage). CHAPTER 3: SUMMARY 3.3.3 Land Use Categories Residential First paragraph: ...11 total of 12,35~12,496 housing units... Commercial First paragraph: .. .accommodate approximately 8-9.3 million square feet of new commercial space. 3.4.1 Streets and Highways Sccond paragraph: ... Tllssajara Driye ami FalleR Read ..:ill Be threligft rautes ITom I 580 te CeHffa Cesta CetiRty.Fallon Road will merge with Tassaiara Road and becomc a single through route into Contra Costa Countv. 3.6 Community Design Add to end of fifth paragraph: Although the East Dublin Spccific Plan envisions a social and mixed use core at the Tassaiara Village Center. existing topographical and environmental conditions limit the viabilitv of this plan conccot. Therefore. the Tassaiara Village Center as originallv envisioned is infeasible. 17 3.7.1 EÜ!I\tÞlffle ncw schools (five á elementary_: I intennediate) are provided by thc Spccific Plan. Approximatelv 1,300 acrcs Moot of Fhe '!laaniag area eastern Dublin currently lies within the Livermore Val1ev Joint e¡¡tsiEle the D>Ii1lia Unified School District but is expected to be detached from that district and attached to the Dublin Unified School District orior to anv development taking place within the area. Q¡¡estÜJHs reb'llfdiRg which jurisdietioR she¡¡ld S8F'1'e the plar.niRg area should serve the phmRiag B.r~a shmllcl Be resoh'ed thro¡¡gh eooßerative efforts oftl1e DHI1lia Unif-ieEl aREI Li'lermore JoiHt Uaified søRool Elîatriats. CHAPTER 4: LAND USE 4.1 Purpose Second paragraph: ... buildout ofthe planning area would generate approximately 27,681 27,982new residents, 12,31312.496 new dwelling units, and 29,48429.424 jobs. 18 Table 4.1 Adjust table to reflect the Dublin Ranch West Annexation Arca proposal. TABLE 4.1 EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE SUMMARY Land Use Description LAND AREA DENSITY YIELD COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL General Commercial 325.74 acres .25-.35 ¡: AR 3.783 MSF Neighborhood Commercial 7H2.S0· acros .30-.35 FAR 1.W+020 MSF Campus Office 192.66 acres .35-.75 fAR 3.730 MSF Industrial Park 72.40 acrcs .25 fAR .788 MSF Subtotal 664-.43.6 &9-149 321 MSF RESIDENTIAL IIigh Density 68.2 acres 35 Jula" 2,387 du Medium Hi.h Densitv ~148.7acrcs* 20 dula" ;!fr.J'72.974 du Medium Density ~64.3acrcs* 10 du/ac +.+;;s4.ó43 du Single Family ó2~2.1 acres· 4 du/ ac ~2 48R du Rural Resideutial! Agric. 410.8 acres .0 I Julac 4 du Subtotal ..1714.1 ~12 496 du PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC Public/Semi-Public %:-398.2 acrc:;;* .24 fAR -l-fI49l,Q2í' MSF Semi-Public 1_9 acres .25 FAR .019M"F SCHOOLS Elemeatarv School ~59_9 acrc~* 65.5 school, Juuior Hi~h School 35.9 acrcs 1.8 schools Subtotal -lM-Æ95.8 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE Citv Park 56.3 acfC!/' I nark Communitv Park 92.8 acres 3 Darks Neighborhood Park ;>µ3!l5 acre,· 6-5 narks Neighborhood Square .1-:>.;> 105 acre,- $-4 Darks Subtotal :w+.620I.8 Beres 16 DBrks Open Space ~3.7acres· TOTAL LAND AREA 3,254.1 acre, * Dublin Ranch West revisions, Fcbruary 2005, Pl,..í Gr;nl:ral Plan/Spec. l1c Plan Amendment P A02-028. 19 4.4,1 LOCATION Al'"D DIVERSITY First paragraph - The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan designates l,é92annmximatelv I 703 acres with a wide range of residential. . ... Table 4.2- Modify figures in this table to reflect the Dublin Ranch West Annexation Area proposal. TABLE 4.2 EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT SUMMARY Land Use Desi2Il3tion Develo01nent Sa FtlEmDlovees Persons/d. u. Population Commercial -Hml020 General Conuuercial 3.365 MSF 510 6.598 Nei¡dlborhood Conuuercial 1.021 MSF 490 Be420Rl Campus Office 4.625 MSF 260 17.787 Industrial Park 0.719 MSF 590 l.218 Public/Semi Public I.~ 590 1,-ff8.LW MSF TOTAL: 19.77811.777 19,18112d MSF 2.4 Residential High Density 2.387 2.0 4,774 Medium High Densitv M3-1? 07Ll 2.0 ~..n"<, , Medium Densirv ÑI'I. 2.0 ^ F'F" 'J<''' . , Sin¡¡;le Family ~?A<'.<'. 3.2 ~70"1 , Iùu;al ResidentiaIlA¡¡;ric. 4 3.2 13 TOTAL: U~1~12.496 ~ .82 PLANNED AREA Existinf City of Dublin Eastem Dublin S ific Plan Area Total TABLE 4.3 CITY OF DUBLIN PROJECTED JüBS!HOUSING BALANCE Dwelling Jobs Employed Balance l:nth Residentl 7.100 12,210 12,000 ·210 Ratto 1.02: 1.0 IDUI2496 19,1ß129.424 1!;!,!;!!;!1í20.244 9,11111 9.180 I 4S'1 ºl.d¡i 19,11.3 9,08 I.JØ2!!fl:U I Proj«tion. assume a ratio of I ,62 employed re.idents pel bOllOehold based on ABAG:. Proi«tion. '90. I The "balance" refer. 10 dw: IDIÐtbn: of employed residem. in relation tolhe UUlQber of jobs (ie., a >O'òltive uuø>ber melU1$1here re more empl~residems than jobs). j Ratio of jobs to employed =><Ieut.. · Taken from ABAG'. Proi«!iOÐs '90. 4.9 PLANNING SUBAREAS 4.9.5 VILLAGE CENTERS LAND USE CONCEPT At the end of the first paragraph, add: Although the East Dublin Spccific Plan envisions a social and mixed use core at the Tassaiara Village Center, exi:.ting topographical and environmental conditions limit the viabilitv of this plan concept. Therefore. the Tassaiara Village Center as originally envisioned is infeasible. Table 4.8 Revise this table as shown. TABLE 4.8 TASSAJARA VILLAGE CENTER SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL De~ignation Acres Density DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL Neighborhood Commercial U7-8 .30 FAR ~.102 msf Medium High Densitv Residential ~22.3 20 dul ac M;!-446 du Medium Densitv Residential ~29.6 10 du/ac £{-296 du Sing;le Familv Residential 17.6 4 du/ac 70du Residential Subtotal -1%.377.3 ~12 du Open Space -l-'7-A-2.0 -- -- n,_'- ~ , -'- ;;,g , -'- Park/Open Space Subtotal ~2.0 -- 2 parks -l-h& I school -- ~.J.!!1 msf Total -lGð79.3 commercial ~812 du 2 parks 1 elementary school 21 Table 4.10 Revise table to retlect the elimination of Dublin Ranch W cst (Lin property only) from Tassajara Village and its uses included into Foothill Residential. TABLE 4.10 FOOTHILL RESIDENTiAL SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL Designation Acres Density DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL Medium Hil!h Densitv Residential 20.1 20 dulac 402 du Medium Density Residential ~238.1 10 du/ac ~2.381 du Single Family Residential 505.8 4 dulac 2,023 du Rural Residential 410.8 .0 I dulac 4du Residential Subtotal 1174.8 1,32C}1 810 du Open Space ~348.7 -- - Communitv Park 0 - , -,. Neighborhood Park ~2S.3 -- 34 parks Relrional Park 11.7 ° I IJark Park/Open Space Subtotal 400,;!385.7 -- 4-5_parks Elementary School 16.1 -- 2 schools Junior High School 21.4 -- I school High School 55.3 -- I school School Subtotal 92.8 -- 4 schools Semi-Public 1.9 0.24 19863 sf -- 1,2331.810 du Total 1,Ci3Ci.211.655.20 4-~parks 4 schools 19863 sf Figures 4.1 and 4.2 -- Maps revised to reflect proposed Dublin Ranch West land uses and related features. CHAPTER 5: TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Program 5A Residential Streets LOCAL RESIDENTIAL Add: Rjght-ot~way: 46' or 56' with separated sidewalks (replacing 52') Cul-de-sacs Add: Right-ot:way: 46' with monolithic sidewalks Program 5C- Tassajara Creek Trail Revise last sentence as: There should be a buffer with an approximatc minimum width of I 00 feet between the top of bank and nearby development. 22 5.5,2 Bicycle Parking Requirements ArtIoD Program: Biryde CU'robtion Bike Path: CBRSlæet II bike path parallel IS the Tassajara Creek.Reouire the trail aIonll: Ta.<¡saiara Creek to be a multi-use trail ~h~ bv ~ans "nd bicvclists Bike Laues: Add to end of sentence: or nmviderl off street on a sharM mnlti-IL<¡e trail with Ci(y aooroval for safety reasons. CHAPTER 6: RESOURCE !\iiA.'lõAGEMENT 6.2 OPEN SPACE 6.2.4 O~ERSmp AND ~"E:"OÅJ.'lõCE From the standpoint of resow'ce protection. it is preferable that undeveloped Rural Residential lauds be assembled into a contiguous whole that cau the be managed au maintained by an agency with experience in open space management such as the East Bay Regional Park Distriet (EBRPD). The land could be dedicated to an agency or remain under private oWllership, and management responsibilities contracted to an outside agency or deeded in 8 cnnsO':I'VAtion easp.rntmt to an OW::In17ation with eXDenP.nce mM'uurine ooen snace for nHntNlI resource orotection. Program 6B: The City should explore options for ownership aud management of areas set aside as open space. Denendina on the Dnm..".. of the ODen sDace. oGwnership ofthese areas by public agencies, such as the East Bay Regional Park District, is usuallv preferred. In particular, the City should encourage East Bay Regional Park District to accept ownership of tile Tassajara Creek open space imi1.corridor. The ~eity should also worl<: with the Park District to develop guidelines for management and uses in recreational. open space areas. lithe Dumose of the ODell SDace is nahU'a1 re~n1lrc~ nmtiP.~tion BIlp.nt':1p.s or nl"'lmni73tilm!l;. with exnerience in such nreseJVes wOlllñ he nreferred Polley 6~11: All stream corridors. as shown in Figure 6.2, shall be rn"n"~ to tm"01lfal!:e revegetat;i¡med with native plant species to enhance their natural appearance and improve habitat values. Active rRevegetation DnlSt be implemented by a professional revegetation/restoration specialist. Habitat manAtrement should be overseen bv a restoration ecoloeist. 23 6.3.2 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Previously developed and Dreviouslv cultivated ~nn1lJ" 2fasslands occupy the majority of the planning area. Because of their history of disturbance. these areas generally have few if any remaining native plant species associated with them, and have low habitat value. Annual grassland is by far the ae¡à..lnost dominant habitat type ~ase¡ eft _II. However, this habitat is generally degraded by overgrazing and now cOIlSists of primarily introduced annual and perennials, and few native species. This habitat, which has been displaced by ~agricultural activities and cnrrent development in the lower elevations and fiat plain areas, is now fOlmd primarily on the sides and ridge tops of the areas rolling hills. PI'ogl'alD óN: TIle use of rodeuticides an!l herbieides within the project area should be restricted to avoid impacts on wildlife. TIle City shall require any poisoning programs to be done in cooperation with and under supervision oCtile Alameda County Department of Agriculture. Herhicides should he used onlv selectivelv within the nmiect area should Iw. ca,.."filllv annUed in accoTchtnc.e with the mHnu&c.t11rP.'!iò in~trnl':tinn!i;, and n~ed onlv for control of non-native nest nlant soecies. RARE AND ENDANGERED SPECIES No rare or endangered plant species have been identified in the planning area,,; IIkke..\WI: special status ol311t Consrdon's tamlant (Centromadia 1Jll1wi SSD. Conr!"donil). found in the o]annin2 area _is on the c~ lifornia Native Plant Society (CNPS) lnwmtotv of Harp. and Fndam>p.rRd Plants of California (1994) Hnrl cate!!orized as rNPS 1 H føuaå au the site. However, Con2don's t9mlan' is now mown to occur more widely and in raeater abuncl::.nce th~n was mevirnL~lv mown a-ð munber of special.:staltis wildlife species (i.en species that are listed or DroDOSed as threatened or encbnaererl or are nthetWi~e of cot1~enr3tion concern 13ekliPleel 18 l3e staSi! te qoo.lifyiBg {-or listing liS IIII'I! B£ eft"~-geFed due to declining popuJations or threats to CIllTent oooulations) are known to occur in the planning area or the hmnediate vieinity. including the red-legged WI!: (federallv listed ;;tg tbreatp-npd) C.aHfomia tifreT ~~1~mJlntfl!'!T (fMfI!ral1v 1idp.tI Ã!C¡ thrp.atP.t1p.ñ\ western pond turt:le~ golden eagle, nOl1hern harrier. burrowing owl, great blue berea, grellt egret, lIRa AmereiÐB badger and othP.1'S. Figures 6 2 and 6.3 showsmanv of the locatio~ where such species have been observed were sited liutia!'; the ~iolegielll. IISSeSDHl.æK ee :ÎD.-the planning area. Most of the northern portion of the planning area also represents. suitable foraging habitat for the federally endangered San Joaquin Mt--ki!.fox. Te !I¡¡:¡e, h!!oweyer. no definitive confirmation of kit fox presence in the planning area has been found desuite extensive survevs. Figun 6.1 ~ modify to show Project's cbauge to parks and open space. Figuns 6.2 and 6.3 - modify to show cwrent enviromnelltal infonnation 011 the Project site. Section 6.3.4 VISUAL RESOURCES TASSAJARA CREEK AND OTHER lNTERL1ÆI1TENT STREAMS In addition to the foothills. the key visual elements in the planning area are Tassajara Creek and the other intermittent strealll5 that flow through the area. CHAPTER 7: COMMUNITY DESIGN FIgUl'e 7.28 TassaJal'1I Vmage Concept Plan- Revise as illustrated. 7.3 FOOTIflLL RESIDENTIAL SETBACKS add" or as approved by the Conununity Development Director" at end of the sentence. BUILDING TYPES · Yse-,FnrN1nUre ~tepped foundations OPEN SPACE AND PUBLIC FACILITIES · On second bullet, add "or as approved by the Community Development Director." at end of sentence. · Revise tbird bullet as follows: Avoid lining open space conidors with private yard fences. Use walls or fences less than 4 feet high. slopes, benns, 6' tall ooenIview fencinll: and vegetation masses to separate publie open space from private yards. Figm'' 7.33: Add "or as approved by the ComullUlity Development Director." at end ofselltence. 7.5 CIRCULATION SYSTEM 7,5,2 Stnets RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR · 12'~from curb liue to light-of-way line includes 6' sidewalk and 6':.1.Q:..planting. · J.æ.;IS 'Jandscape easetnent outside right-of-way RESIDENTIAL STREET · -HI-'-~froUl curb line to ROW line includes S' monolithic sidewalk ilBd S' planting strip with eanopy trees Flgul'e 7.49A Insert new street section being used for the project and is the City standard- street with monolithic sidewalks. 25 APPENDIX 3 The following tables were revised to remove the affected lands of Un (Dublin Raneh West) from the Tassajara ViIlagc Center Subarea, and include them into the Foothill Residential Subarea. Tassa.iara VilIaee Center Neighborhood Commercial &67.8 .3 Jl2,3g5101930 Medium High Density Residential 2+.+22.3 20 ~46 Medium Dcnsitv Residcntial £YI29.6 10 ~296 Sinl!:le Familv Residential 17.6 4 70 Subtotal -WS.J77.3 I 11,38§tol 930 ~812 Open Space -l+.+2.0 ~ U Subtotlll ~ +h8 T otlll ~79.3 112 285101 930 ~8t2 Foothill Residential Medium HiclJ Densitv Residential 20.1 20 402 du Medium Density Residential ~238.1 10 ~2.381 du Single Family Residential 505.8 4 ~2,023 du Rural Residential 410.8 .01 4 du Subtotal 1,141.71.174.8 1,3291.810 du Open Space ~348.7 ReQÌonal Park 11.7 0 I nark Community Park 0 Ncil!:hborhood Park ~25.3 Subtotal 400.'7385.7 Elementary School 16.1 Junior High School 21.4 High School 55.3 Semi~Publìe 1.9 0.24 19.863 Total 1,636.21.655.20 19.863 1,3291.810 du II GRAND TOTAL 3,382.5 113,575,198131584.606 112,1§lí12.626 I 26 APPENDIX 4 Modify the following table to reflect the proposed Dublin Ranch West changes in land use: Owner/Land Use Category Acres Density Sq. Ft. Units #1 CHANG SU-O-LIN General Commercial 49.1 .25 534,699 I Neighborhood Commercial 2.80 .3 36,59026.136 Campus Officc 39.4 .35 600,692 High Density Residential 7.0 35 245 Medium High Density Residential +9,935.2 20 :w8704 Medium Density Residential Wh9192.4 10 ~1,924 Single Family Residential ;!9HJ29S.8 4.0 ~1,183 Rural Residential 170.5 .01 I Community Park -WHSS.4 Neighborhood Park -1-M13.8 Ncighborhood Square 4,.3.1.5 Open Spacc ~338.1 Elementarv School 3!W28.3 High School 20.6 I Semi-Public 1.9 0.24 19863 TOTAL 1,251.0 1,171,9881.181.390 3,8511.056 Add the tollowing properties to Appendix 4 Table: Owner/Land Use Cate 'or #26 BRAGG Medium Hi h Densit Residential Nci hborhood Commercia1 TOTAL Acres Densit 1.0 20 .6 .30 FAR 7,841 1.6 7,841 Acrcs Densit 1.0 10 2.2 3.2 Units 20 Owner/Land Use Cate or #27 SPERFSLAGE Medium Densit Residential en S ace TOTAL Units 10 10 II GRAND TOTAL 1 3,301.7 D 110,971,903110.984.312 112,38812.593 I 27 Program !A Residential streets LOCAL RESIDENTIAL Add: Right-of-way: 46' or 56' with separated sidewalks (replacing 52') Cul-œ-sacs Add: Right-of-way: 46' with monolithic sjdewalks Pt'Ogram SC- Tassajara Creek Trail Revise last sentence as: There should be a buffer with an approximate minimum width of 100 feet between the tfail-tOD ofb..nk and nearby development. 5.5.2 ßirycle Parking Reqnh'ements Artlon Prog1'Øm: Bicycle Clnulatton Bike Path: CBllS1mEt a bike path parallel to the Tassajilfil C£eek.Rp.nuire the trail ..10112 Ta."saiara Creek to he B m1l1ti-I1~p. tr::lli] ~hared hv nM~Sln!it Jilorl hir.v~lid~ Bike Lanes: Add to end of sentence: or nrovided offstreet on a "harM multi-use trail with City ~nnmval for ~afetv reasons 28 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this IS'h day of March 2005 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Exhibit A - Dublin Ranch West Annexation Area, General Plan/Specific Plan Amendment Exhibit Exhibit B General Plan - Figure 1-1 a: Land Use Map General Plan - Figure 1-2: Extended Planning Area (Amend City boundary limits) General Plan - Figure 1-4: Development Elevation Cap, Eastern Extended Planning Arca (Amcnd City boundary limits) [note: this probably should not be done now, since LAFCO approves boundary changcs and not thc city.J General Plan - Table 2.1: Land Usc Summary, Eastcrn Dublin General Plan Amendment Area General Plan - Chapter 5.1.1 Roadways, Section 6. Residential Strccts and Section 7. Cul-de-Sacs (Amend distances for right-ot~way, curb-to-curb, and maximum length) General Plan- Appendix A: Amendments and Approvals (add current project) Eastern Dublin Specific Plan - Figure 2.4: Ownership Patterns and corresponding text in Section 2.3 Eastern Dublin Spccific Plan - Figurc 4. I: Land Use Map and Table 4.1: Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, Land Use Summary Eastern Dublin Specific Plan - Figure 4.2: Planning Subareas Eastern Dublin Specitìc Plan - TahIe 4.2: Population and Employment Summary Eastern Dublin Specific Plan - Table 4.3: Projected Jobs/Housing Balancc Eastern Dublin Specific Plan - Table 4.8: Tassajara Village Center, Subarea Developmcnt Potential Eastern Dublin Specific Plan - Table 4.10: Foothill Residential, Subarea Development Potential Eastern Dublin Specific Plan - Chapter 5: Traffic and Circulation (Amend text under Program SA and 5C regarding distances for right-ot~way, on residential streets and cul-dc-sacs, curb-to-curb, and maximum lenl,>1h, amend text under Chapter 5.5.2, Action programs on Bicycle Circulation regarding Bike Paths and Bike Lanes) Eastern Dublin Specific Plan - Chapter 6: Open Space (Amend tt;Jxt under 6.2.4 Ownership and Maintcnancc, Policics 6B and 6-11) Eastern Dublin Specific Plan - Chaptcr 6.3.2, Biological Resources - Amend text to reflect changes to Program 6N, and the text on Rare and Endangered Species. Eastern Dublin Specific Plan - Figure 6.1: Open Space Framework 29 Eastern Dublin Specific Plan - Figure 6.2: Environmental Resources Eastcrn Dublin Specific Plan - Figure 6.3: Environmental Constraints Eastern Dublin Specific Plan - Figure 7.28: Tassajara Vìl1age Conccpt Plan Eastern Dublin Specific Plan - Chapter 7.5.2 Circulation System, Streets (Amend text establishing distanccs on rcsidcntial street for right-of-way and cul-de-sacs, curb-to-curb, sidcwalks, and landscapc cascmcnts.) Eastern Dublin Specific Plan - Figure 7.49A (Insert Alternative Street Width diagram) Eastern Dublin Specific Plan - Appendix 3: Tassajara Vìl1age Center and Foothill Residcntial Eastern Dublin Specific Plan - Appcndix 4: Owner/Land Use Category, #1 Chang Su-O Lin, #26 Bragg & #27 Sperfslage G:\PA#\2002\02-028 Dublin Ranch West\CÎty Cûutlci1\CC-Rcso OPA&SPA.doç 30 ORDINANCE NO. XX - 05 ************************ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO PREZONE A I89-ACRE UNINCORPORATED AREA KNOWN AS DUBLIN RANCH WEST TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) AND APPROVING A RELA TED STAGE 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN LOCATED SOUTH OF THE COUNTY BOUNDARY, NORTH OF THE CITY LIMITS, WEST OF TASSAJARA ROAD, AND EAST OF PARKS RESERVE TRAINING FACILITY P A 02-028 The Dublin City Council does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Pursuant to Chapter 8.32, Title 8 of the City of Dublin Municipal Code the City of Dublin Zoning Map is amended to rezone the following annexation area to a Plarmed Development (PD) Zoning District: Approximately 189 acres located in an unincorporated area of Alameda County and bounded by thc County boundary to the north, the City limits to the south, Tassajara Road the east, and the Parks Reservc Training Facility to the west (APNs: 986-0004-005-01, 986-0003-001 & 986-0004-003 ). The Zoning District for Dublin Ranch West annexation area, including the Stage 1 Dcvelopment Plan area, is located within the City's Sphere of Influence and within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area. The PD Zoning District and Stagc I Development Plan established by this Ordinance are included herein. A location map of the prezoning area is shown below: DlibHn R!lrtch W¢M AmJr;;x<.lÜú)''1 A~íl: ,:;¡~~iM "I nn""ln"mnnl' Plnn 'l'Ic:tNH\"' MAl' W,'" --- ",,;..,t~',>fo·; L~,.,.p.~~I.>~",~rI .,.' J)UBIÆ'· pU';,4s,.¡N'tDN <\'f --::.I' -- ATTACHMENT 3 ~_...............- Proposed Stage 1 Development Plan l!ul\'~~tNl<:~\\t' ..w.,':,,'~ Þnhliti ~~niwl'l¡hli(: 11r..r'I~~. ,.~,s ~, , RRA " os G- Dublin Ranch West Annexation Area ~~. .,~,_J D~Ii~:(.1c)ftle.rlt Fl;,¡n.. STAGE 1 PD SITE PL"N .I.~.,., I','~' "i,'~·~ \j,¡(\,;, 1-...... . , M,~-~ it '.\ "1''J'1>'" .!, ,.. / I \\ )/ ; ~/' ( . ..~r:'·:/ \' ~!IIIo~""",,,,1JiIoII : j~....,"", t""" ."_ I \ ."~I \ !il!Ml-f'øltlt M \ ¡·p"II<LP'" I,~"''':'''''''" \o~t\,· :t ,~.¡/io;,,!1 ;,,". .:.1 .lJ ("W' , ......! " I~~~J"¡ -~..:-.\ t~~Q 1-",' ~::~.~.,."..,".,"" ,- '\ .~r...! U... ¡""""\1~ 1iEo¡c ~\,Jw"" Aeri(;~I)l1lm! I.~ds '..~,... ~""""" ¡:..I..." ~.¡,.\,¡ ~,,'~~~'. ""01"",·'" .-. ~....., 'I..,""'.....LP'~I.....·;~· ¡,;,., ... "" " ", I~L) 1~.6 ,t, " '" '<,-II¥"f'!,I\.m"""" .......-"'"'''''............ ;;.0' ,., ~~I 00' ~. I' ~, ~,,','''" ,-...,,,..,'"................ .;,~ '(, " ' .~~ 'G,' ~')' '.....,~<.,... " <:,~ 'J......"_~""." " :"~,~,,.. " ·0," ~~^~,,...,."".... ¡~,,,¡... ~,·:~·I~,= ".......,""'.(,....."", -, '~"iI ").l.1 ......"¡"..",,,.. . " ~"<,' IA'.' A',' . ""') ~.,'. .',~I· 'II,~;' ~,:,!.]IJ:,o;:,¡, ',i.,';~ Ir:.~¡,,\ ~'_"'"f.,.'1:- ....k'""'t\"'""':;".....w ~ ,': r..; :,~. " ,.~~ ~ ~ nOI k I.\O'I.~ 'I 1 ~;: .',"'","..l1li1 ",~J""',':;¡¡, ~, ~ ~·"""1 .......~............"""'" ~ (: .".. '0 I'"~ '""""'-" 1...., ¡">" ..;;!".';.' '.''''~ ,",II ¡"'I~ !lfIYi!11J :~.~'> '''~A~OI:;:'·JII!I 11.:0:>-1 ;~,;I~:,,",',~,. ..t"JI... -- -.----. os L ~1(~II"';M..\H'1II\Œ '. ~< "',.>, ?,í\"" ..i" M'f(""",," 1'", " f{l,j~I"",I/) ., ,/", M,H M ,A.dJo1D~'¡::Pro~~ OwnIl':Þ"'.lnll, Ußkll~~.,. :<1tt..". ", ".. '~'I""~i"II:'m,~!, 6<11411) " ,iI:~oIdcll"WI tÜtÌ\~ '\ " I.,., '\\' ':""" , , ~ \":>"'" M "')"-"7" -"-"> !"'h',,,.,,¡,,';,,"~") \,'e,~..,\,,",,1/! !"""'~"". II".! RItA Il.RA Dublin Ro.ncll We.t Annexation Area St.;;¡GI~' I O/'htgloorr¡!::I1LEliill EJCHBOIUlOOl1 pHASiNG I'µN ~<~(....... ^¡¡ri.II,¡Jl\lrnl L'\.I'Il'h MH \\<'"l1~~ '''''..,,:'''''' ,",-',...", ~RA ~1':1~¡ ~'W<J,I,,.,":',,,"·..¡J;,·,~,, " ',-,,: \ \ ('¡¡¡¡"'ll " "~., ... ,\j\',lil;((\ ~¡'lio;ll~ 1.«"¡';C,1'\1~( Phase 1 '('.\ '''I'' '^dj~'~;'~i'~nÞperty J OW~i\~ulIl,n)w. t;"jl\;) 51.\(1,"1. III' ,~J:II¡¡¡:~~ !'\INi,;'/~<;;(~lj-f'lllh(' !..¡¡ruþ , , \ """ ,'::;';::>' \ '¡~,,,,.~)\O'" ]..1" ,~,:8? 1:r.m:rl~I,''''''\I!''':",.'';r:,. PI,bl.n:.:SlII11)'I'\lbk·I,¡¡:p\¡'" .~ -...... ~I:PrJ Dublin .Ranch West IUt..... ....I~\!"1 ...\ " -\~.....~-.~ ,C"_lIaIol. i·1.~·"MHoi \ 'jHtA .I 1 / , i ::=:'t:.rlGl~ I OC!:vc"'!kXJr)1r;:'1t rl;¡~ MASTER N.EI~H"ORH()(){) LANUSCA.f't: ,PI'"AN ,""':~I. ·-1';· """ --~- ~,'-""IIdIII¡¡ IffiItIlr . ,Rtlidiltltlti ,--~'!!!:D::. 'i/I)ôI.- ·'I*tf,"N'I....._r: : t:~J ~.\ ~III(I·~ , '\ -- ;;¡¡;;¡,;,,~~ ~"\IIÞ:(ino:oJ ~1IP:0r!>III1I\II.~":>II'" 1'~II.~, ~ ~ .....- ~"""T""""'~~ ._"'_M ~,-<, .", ~.''''~'~~' 'I',.-"A\.., ... .. '~'t.> f!f' ,eI1 ...{ClIp ~~~ .. 0-....,,' M & --"'-~. r..¡. ..",+-"..±,r~.. ··..:··..E· . ..·l<:±:":±·!:.:.4'J·,¡O:·'l PARJ(II"" Ilõ''J.:I'... -,.."., - -1""' lIE ~~~r.'. lil!:!lwrl ~~.I.~'I~ln' .....T""··..····- ,nPUIKl'n ~ldl' ¥,¡:¡n~,.--_.J, ~ u.~ ";'1t~ LIKII: ill:~ wq¡¡'~pI:,LAtnr; WI \.- -5Iœ"I'A.!.II: ......::~ .':iJ¡~-r,j...::::==::::::::.........,.:",:::::~==·~,_" '.... - :::;W;¡'~J¡\..", .., h. ~rM',~M."',~"~º~,,I~,,~ ~,~~' ~~W ···············ti.ü;· . ....... "'" I~m" ~....: ~ .~.:?~ ¡,¡¡. ('05>' ... J~" .. ".".-;:: & "'" .. ~;.. ;C. {.~: ¡). . .."L .- ....~...:...!"'l=".~ 1'.4./!J;WH ttil:lr'-I- --. -... 1~.t\'I~~V ~lDnA1M:'-' ~"."..".,_._.. ..I UI~~ .,loll/II: L!.lIf ~.IIlltlmt'llICI!:/,·,·I',·"·,,.I . :...,,-~...-..-..'... tANïlIIC.U':Ii:t:AJDa1tN'T _.__._,.'^'.'^'__". E'·· "+JK±.,.:.;,.''t.. ·"·..·1 IlAVII,'t'RA.. ~!~~~: \"r- ,.---- - I'AIIØ'u EITRIP LUI~·l.tH1 LA~I~ .n__._II1DE'I.u.J .,,",M.:"W"~~-----J ........ wl"llBLW BI!IRVlCllj LiHlISi."'IJ'J!lWIDmit '0' ¡:HI' 1,~ ..I.NJi):m·1 J'A~'!;i,~~,~,~"ROA.D .1J9', RPW ................... .i'.T""..·· , _M_JI:iII! !lQœ:911 d,,'" r-.lI1OO4_ " J¡~I... '·,!!!i,,!_,It. North Dublin Propertie. ~hl:'l~ ! OI"!..,doX1mCf1t PI;m STREET SECTIONS -"""",J,~" ~~ North Dublin Properties 5~"Be I Development Plan STREET SECTIONS htJti.f¡'¡'My~ ;(,054,.....0 PARKII'AY STRII' _"' lfut_ SIDEWALl: _J PUBUC SERIfICE/ .,". .. J "' LANDSCJ.PE EASEJam' ROW I- _ . PARlClfAY STRIP '- -·-SIDPALII: '-. -PUSIJC S!lMCE/ ROW lANIISCJ.PE EASEIfENT .3. TYPICAL RESf.D£NTIAL COl~LEcrOR - 72' ROW N.T.S. ------lsk.6'1 LANDSCAPE E4m¡,""'\ft smnA:LK- - ROW ;,Ø' ~=p- - PUBLIC SERVlCEI UNIISCAPE IAftIoIENT ROY ð' . 6' PO mmNlŒDWM DENSITY 1tI8IDEIWI'IAL 4. TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL STREET- 46' STREET ROW (1'I>1>Uc) IU.s. IIf!!A_ 2-28-2005 ot:OZ;!./l ...... Dublin Ranch West 5t,1¡:;¡:: ¡ \?!:o.::t"!la~m~l1t t'"I,," ,"="". MASTF..R INFRASTlJCTUIU: rLA,."II ", (f',C1Ð;1) .;.::::::::;... W~I~'Ir^1fil!. _____ r.¡,:,zr)l>1!1W.\Tl:R. _ W!\:~jw.~l'~JI: [x.rm;~"wA.~~ ~-~""~' 7I1~1:,2RIU""I¡.~L1 n·8X.ZC)J\"I!!JU;CLAIMm ~..~ S)~W~ ~ ~" - "~~ EX.1EWER ~ \'I'-'TU,M.5ii\JJI!,:w~m~¡¡ -··-PR01ECTII():Ifo.'P..I.l.V ·"lm:: MJ MAlOR ~1 !)Rro'Il;II\ ~11\I ~~CIJTIr_~ 1rR(IP()sf,f]. fJ(.!.'T1~f; {~f~~"(.l,A.~F.L TOilE L'SlIDJ1)¡;ONVtYU;.¡QÞT'. / ",.,," , "'ì ,;,~ /: " ,~ 'ii' \ì':, ':~~ I' ,. \ : \"~: .: (I,', \ '",,:. i '\ SECTION 2. The regulations of the use, development, improvement, and maintenance of the Property are set forth in the Prezoning and Stage I Development Plan for the anncxation area as shown below which are hereby approved. Any amendments to the Stage 1 Development Plan shall be in accordance with Section 8.32.080 of the Dublin Municipal Code or its successors. PREZONING STAGE 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN (P A 02-028) This is a Development Plan pursuant to Chapter 8.32 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance for the Dublin Ranch West annexation area gcnerally located in an unincorporated area of Alameda County bounded by the County boundary to the north, thc City limits to the south, Tassajara Road thc east, and the Parks Reserve Training Facility (PRTF) to the west within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan arca. The allllcxation area is comprised of three parcels (APNs; 986-0004-005-01, 986-0003-001 and 986-0004- 003). This Development Plan meets all of the requirements for Stage 1 review of the project. This Development Plan is represented by the PD Zoning/Land Usc Summary Table (contained herein), the Aerial Photo, the Stagc 1 SitelDevelopment Plan, Stage 1 Phasing Plan, Conceptual Landscape Plan, Street Sections, and Master Infrastructure Plan sheets dated Fcbruarv, 2005 labeled Exhibit A-2. The Planned Development District allows the flexibility needed to encourage innovative development while ensuring that the goals, policies, and action programs of the General Plan, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and provisions of Section 8.32 of the Zoning Ordinanee are satisfied. l. Zoning: This PD Planned Dcvclopment Zoning District is to provide for and regulate the development of Dublin Ranch West as shown on Exhibit A-2. (General Plan land use designations include: Single Family Residential, Medium Density Residential, Medium High Density Residential, Neighborhood Commercial, Neighborhood Park, Open Space, and Public/Semi- Public. 2. Permitted Uses; The following are uses permitted for this site: A) PD Single Family Residential Intent: Single Family land use designations are established to: a) reserve appropriately located areas for f¡¡ruily living at reasonable population densities consistent with sound standards of public health and safety; b) ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling; c) provide space for semi-public facilities needed to complement urban residential areas and for institutions that require a residential environment; and d) accommodate singlc family housing, including a widc range of units from small-lot and zero-Jot line units to large lot estate units. Intensity ofUsc: .9 - 6.0 dwelling units per acre Permitted Uses: Single family dwelling Accessory structures and uses in accordance with Section 8.40.030 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance Community care facility/small (permitted if required by law, otherwise as conditional use) Home occupation in accordance with Chapter 8.64 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance Private recreation facility (for homeowners' association and/or tenant use only) Small family day care home per Chapter 8.08 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance Second residential unit, if built by initial homebuilder, in accordance with appropriate regnlations ofthc Dublin Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 8.80) Conditional Uses: Ambulance service Bed and breakfast inn Day care center Large family day care home Parking lot - residential Religious facility School/private Second residential unit, if not built by initial homebuilder, in accordance with Stage 2 P1anned Development Acce.~·sOlY Use.~·: All Accessory Uses shall be in accordance with Section 8.40. of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance Temporary Uses: Temporary construction trailer Tract and sales office/model home complex B) PD Medium Density Residential Intent: Medium Density land use designations are established to: a) reserve appropriately located areas for family living in a variety of types of dwellings at a reasonable range of population densities consistent with sound standards of public health and safety; b) preserve as many as possible of the desirable characteristics of the one-family residcntial district while permitting higher population densities; c) ensure adcquate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling unit; d) minimize traffic congestion and avoid the overloading of utilities by preventing the construction of buildings of excessivc size in relation to the land around them; e) provide necessary space for otf-street parking of automobiles and, where appropriate, for off-street loading of trucks; and t) protect residential properties rrom the hazards, noise and congcstion created by commercial and industrial traffic. Intensitv: 6.1 - 14.0 dweJ1ing units per acre Permitted Uses: Multi-family dwclling Single tamily dwelling Accessory structures and uses in accordance with Section 8.40.030 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance Community care facility/small (permitted if required by law, otherwise as conditional use) Home occupation in accordance with Chapter 8.64 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance Private recreation facility (for homeowners' association and/or tenants use only) Small family day care home per Chapter 8.08 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance Second residential unit, if built by initial homebuilder, in accordance with appropriate regulations of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 8.80) Conditional Uses: Bed and breakfast inn Boarding house Community center Day care center Large family day care home Large vehicle storage (appropriately screened) Parking lot - residential Religious facility Schoollprivatc Second residential unit, if not built by initial homebuilder, in accordarice with Stage 2 Planned Dcvclopment Accessory U~'es: All Accessory Uses shall be in accordance with Section 8.40. of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance Temporary u.çe.\': Temporary construction trailer Tract and sales office/model home complex C) PD Medium-High Density Residential Intent: Medium High Density land use designations are established to: a) reserve appropriate1y located areas for family living in a variety of types of dwellings at a reasonable range of population densities consistent with sound standards of public health and safety; b) preserve as many as possible of the desirable characteristics of the one-family residential district while permitting higher population densities; c) ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling unit; d) minimizc traffic congcstion and avoid the overloading of utilities by preventing the construction of buildings of excessive size in relation to the land around them; e) provide necessary space for ofT-street parking of automobiles and, where appropriate, for off-street loading of trucks; and f) protect residential properties from the hazards, noise and congestion crcated by commercial and industrial traffic. Intensity of Use: 14.1 - 25.0 dwelling units per acre Permitted Uses: Multi-family dwelling Accessory structures and uses in accordance with Section 8.40.030 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance Community care tacility/small (permittcd if required by law, otherwise as conditional use) Home occupation in accordance with Chapter 8.64 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance Private recreation facility (for homeowners' association and/or tenants use only) Small family day care home per Chapter 8.08 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance Conditional Uses: Bed and breakfast inn Boarding house Community care facility/large Day Care center Large tamily day care home Parking lot - residential Religious facility School/private Accessory Uses: All Accessory Uses shall be III accordan.ce with Section 8.40. of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance Temporary Uses: Sales office/model home complex Temporary construction trailer Arts and Crafts Fair D) PD Neighborhood Commercial Intent: Neighborhood Commercial provides for the creation of community and neighborhood oriented commercial centers that serve the retail, service, and entertainment needs of the neighborhood. Permitted Uses, including but not limited to: Officcs - real cstate, legal, accounting Laundries Dry cleaners Beauty Salons Financc Video rentals Restaurants Bars Cultural Facilities Conditional Uses: Hotels Bed and breakfast inn Boarding house Community care facility/large Day Care center Large family day care home Parking lot - residential Religious facility School/private Acce~'~'ol)' Uses: All Accessory Uses shaH be III accordance with Section 8.40. of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance Temporal)' U"es: Temporary construction trailers E) PD Neighborhood Park Intent: Neighborhood open space and recreational areas, both activc and passive, Permitted Uçe.ç, including but not limited to: Ncighborhood Park Community Park Recreational or educational facility Trail staging area F) PD Open Space Intcnt: Open Space land use designations arc established to ensure the protection of those areas of special significance. Permitted Use, including but not limited to: Public or private infrastructure Public recreation facility - active or passive Trails and maintenance roads Other rccreational or educational facility Trail staging area U scs allowed by the U. S. Army Corp of Engineers under Section 404 and 1603 agrcements Water quality, drainage, and other similar facilities, including swales and basins Streams and drainage protection corridors Conservation areas Wildlife habitat preservation area Permitted or Conditional U~e~, including but not limited to: Agriculture and grazing (if not already existing) Private recreation facility - active or passive F) PD Public/Semi-Public Intent: Idcntifies areas where governrnental or institutional uses are anticipated. Permitted Uçes ilîîil!111!~!Ifiiî~ilj.la~II!I), including but not limited to: Community Center/Clubhouse COmmuni¡ Facility ø.··;: "'"'''''':''''' ''','¡:i¡;¡i' ':IIIIW!JIi¡ "çmm~!:I IIBmillf Cultural Center Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Square Day Care Center Fanners Market Recreation or educational facilities 'I',"" "1.'1.':1." I,' . '--: active or passive ·¡i¡..:~Îi '¡iti"¡¡illIIiW !>1~æ ...~"I;!!i\~!!II~ Trail staging area Other recreational or educational tàcilities Other officcs, as detennined by the Director of Community Development Other governmental and/or quasi-governmental offices, as determined by the Director of Community Development Incidental and accessory structures and uscs Parking lot Public recreation facility - active or passive Public or iII~~ infrastructure Recreation facility - passive Senior Center Uses allowed by the U, S. Army Corp of Engineers under Section 404 and 1603 agreements Trails and Maintenance roads Water quality, drainage, and other similar facilities, including swales and basins Youth Center G) Existing Agricultural, Commercial and Residential Uses Intent: To allow all existing residential and agricultural uses that were in cxistence prior to the effective date of annexation. Thesc uses shall be allowed to continue until such time the landowner of this property applies for a Specific Plan as applicable, and Stage 2 Development Plan in accordance with Section 8.32 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance, to develop thc property. Any minor expansion of any existing uses shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. Permitted Uses: Existing residential and agricultural uses in effect as of the date of anncxation (such as existing wood storage and sales) Similar and related uses (to the existing residential, commercial and agricultural uses) shall be determined by the Director of Community Development. 3. Dublin Zoning Ordinance - Applicable Requircments: Except as specifically modified by the provisions of this Planned Development District Prezoning/Development Plan, all applicable general requirements and procedurcs of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance shall bc applied to the land uses designated in this Planned Developmcnt District Prezoning. 4. Development Standards: Specific Development Standards within the project will be established at the Stage 2 Devclopment Plan to determine if the development mects the established <..TÌtetÍa. 5. Phasing Plan. Refer to Exhibit A-2, Stagc I Development Plan, Phasing Plan. 6. Landscaping Plan. Refer to Exhibit A-2, Stage I Conceptual Landscaping Plan. 7. Master Infrastructure Plan, Refer to Exhibit A-2, Master Inrrastructure Plan. 7a. Street Sections. Refer to Figure 7.49A 8. Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance. The City Council has adopted a policy stating its intent that new projects, including this project, will be subject to the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance, as amended, which requires that 12.5% of the units be inclusionary units affordable to persons of very low, low, and moderate incomes and only a portion of these units (7.5%) arc allowed to be satisfied through payment of in-lieu fees. The development of the Lin Family property in Dublin Ranch West has been addresscd in prior Development Agreements rcgarding compliance with the City's Inclusionary Zoning Ordinancc and affordable housing requirements. The Fairway Ranch project was developed to accommodate the affordable housing that would be applicable to the new residential development within Dublin Ranch. No agreemcnts currently are in place which would satisty Inclusionary Zoning requirements for eventual development of the remaining 5 acres under separate owncrship. Compliance would become effective for those properties at that time. Implementation of the Inelusionary ordinance for those properties will be identified when the Stage 2 Development Plan is prepared and submitted for the property in the projcct area. 9. Development Concept. The Development concept for the area strives to cmphasize the natural beauty of the area and create a community that blends into the existing environment by preserving: opcn space, the Tassajara Creek environs, and the western foothills. The residential development is expected to be a mix of detached and attached units. The Tassajara Creek open space area serves as a focal point for the neighborhood. This corridor will function as a linear route and trail system for pcdestrians, bicycles, and equestrian circulation. In addition, it will serve as a wildlife habitat and passage. A minimum setback of 100 feet from the top ofthc bank of the creek and its tributaries is proposed to preserve the existing riparian corridor and provide adequate distance from storm water runoff. The creek corridor is proposed to be maintained by a land trust and homeowners association while the homeowners association will maintain the hillside areas. 10. Access & Circulation. Two bridge crossings over Tassajara Creek are proposed to allow for adequate site circulation from Tassajara Road, while minimizing environmental disruption. One road will lead to a residential collector street within Dublin Ranch West and will provide access to the neighborhood streets. The other crossing will provide primary nccess to the neighborhood parks and scrve as a secondary access route. A creek frontage road also would be available for additional emergency access. Public streets would be comparable to those already approved or built in other neighborhoods of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area. In addition to sidewalks, pedestrian and bicycle access wiII be provided by a multi-use trail along the ,--reek and along other pathways within Dublin Ranch West. PD ZONING/LAND USE SUMMARY TABLE Gross Midpoint Density Number of units land Use Acres Density Range midpoint mln - max PD Single Family Residential 18.8 ae 4.0 du/ae .9·6 du/ae 75 du 16-112 du PD Medium Density Residential 55.6 ae 10.0 du/ac 6.1 -14 du/ae 556 du 339-778 du PD Medium High Density 21.1 ae 20.0 du/ac 14-25 du/ae 422 du 297-528 du Residential PD Neighborhood Commercial 0.6 ae .30 FAR nla 7,841 sf 6.534 - 15,681 sf PD Neighborhood Park 8.8 ae nla nla nla nla PD Neighborhood Square 0 ae nla nla nla nla PD Open Space 82.1 ae nla nla nla . nla PD Elementary School 0 ae nla nla nla nla PD Publie/Sem~Public 1.9 ae .24 FAR nla 19.863 sf 19,663 sf TOTAL 188.9 ac 1,053 du 652 - du Residential 1,418 Non-Residential 27,704 sf 26.379 - 35,544 sf SECTION 3. Once annexed, the use, development, improvement, and maintenance of the prczoned annexation area shall be governed by thc provisions of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance except as provided in the Stage I Development Plan. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days following its adoption. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at Icast three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the Statc of California. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this 5th day of April 2005, by the following votes: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk G:\PA#\2002\fJ2-o28 Dublin Ranch Wcst\City CO\1l1cit\Ordinill1ce.w>e RESOLUTION NO. XX - 05 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN *********************************** APPROVING THE PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND CHANG SU-O LIN P A 02-028 WHEREAS, an agreement between the City of Dublin and Chang Su-O Lin (aka Jennifer Lin) has been negotiated entitled "Pre-Annexation Agreement between City of Dublin and the Lin Family for the Wallis Property" ("Pre-Annexation Agreement"), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 1993, the City Council certified a program Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for thc Eastern Dublin GP NSP Project and an addendum thereto, dated May 4, 1993 (SCH#91-103064). On August 22, 1994, the City Council approved another addendum to update plans and provide sewer service. The May 10, 1993 program EIR, the May 4, 1993 addendum, and the August 22, 1994 addendum are collectively referred to as the Eastern Dublin EIR; and WHEREAS, upon approval of the GP AlSP Project, the City Council adopted mitigation findings, a statement of overriding considerations, and a mitigation monitoring program as set forth in Resolution 53-93, included in the Eastern Dublin EIR referenced above, and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Supplemental EIR entitled "Dublin Ranch West Project" (SCH #2004112094) was prepared and circulated; and WHEREAS, on March 15, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution _-05 certifYing the Supplemental ElR. Thc resolution is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, on March 15, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution _-05 approving the amendments to the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The resolution is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the proposed development identified in the Pre-Annexation Agreement is consistent with the type, location and density ofland uses approved by the 1993 Eastern Dublin GP AlSP Project and subsequent mnendments; and WHEREAS, all mitigation measures adopted for the GPAlSPA Project continue to apply to implementing projects such as the current annexation and prezoning Project; all applicable City development ordinances and standards apply to the Project except as otherwise approved through thc Project prezoning and related Stage I Development Plan; and WHEREAS, a Staff report, dated March 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Project for the City Council; and WHEREAS, the applicant, Chang Su-O Lin, has executed said Pre-Annexation Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: ATTACHMENT 4- Said Pre-Annexation Agreement is hereby approved and cxecution thereof by the Mayor of Dublin is hereby authorized to cxccutc it. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of March 2005, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk G:\PA#\2.002\02~028 Dublin Ranch West\City Council\Rcso Prcanncx,doc RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF DUBLIN When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Fee Waived per GC 27383 Space above this line for Recorder's use PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE LIN FAMILY FOR THE WALLIS PROPERTY THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered in the City of Dublin on this 15th day of March 2005, by and between the City of Dublin, a Municipal Corporation ("the City") and Chang Su-O-Un (also known as Jennifer Un), a married woman ("the Developer"). City and Developer are, from time-to-time, individually referred to in this Agreement as a "Party," and are collectively referred to as "Parties." Recitals 1. In 1993, the City Council of the City adopted the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan ("the Specific Plan"). 2. Developer is the owner of certain property within the Specific Plan Area described more particularly in Exhibit A ("the Wallis Property"), which is incorporated herein by reference. 3. Developer has filed an application with the City 10, among other things, prezone and annex to the City the Wallis Property and certain other land within the Specific Plan Area owned by Roy J. Sperfslage and Eileen M. Sperfslage ("the Sperfslage Property") and by Claire Bragg and Elvera Bragg ( "the Bragg Property") (collectively, "the Annexation Area"), all of which is shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. The Developer did not submit any development plans for the Sperfslage Property or the Bragg Property with the application. 4. The General Plan and the Specific Plan include goals and policies to prevent development within the Eastern Extended Planning Area and the Specific Plan Pre-Annexation Agreement Between City of Dublin and the Un Family for Wallis Property Page 1 of 6 EXH fšCï rZ~£À Area (collectively "Eastern Dublin") from drawing upon and diluting the fiscal base of the remainder of the City. 5. The City currently anticipates that the cost of providing public services to the Eastern Dublin at a level consistent with services provided within the City will not exceed revenues generated to the City from property within Eastern Dublin. However, it is possible that, due to the expenses related to the operation of Fire Station 18, which serves the Eastern Dublin and which opened in July 2003, the costs of providing services to the Eastern Dublin may exceed revenues generated in the area. 6. Nonetheless, even if such a deficit does occur, as development takes place within the Eastern Dublin as anticipated, it is expected to generate revenues to the City that will reduce and, in the near future, eliminate lhe above-described deficit. Consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and Specific Plan, Developer will pay to City the Developer's proportionate share of any such deficits, as provided herein. Developer's proportionate share shall be 5.74% (five and seventy-four one~ hundredths percent), which is the percentage that the Annexation Area (188.9 acres) bears to the lands within the Specific Plan area that had not been annexed to the City as of July 25, 2000, the date of Resolution 00-36 (1,929,84 acres) plus the Dublin Ranch Project (1,363.29 acres). 7. Certain improvements to the 1-580/Tassajara Road Interchange ("the Interchange Improvements") were required in order to facilitate development in the Annexation Area. City has previously entered into agreements for funding the construction of the Interchange Improvements with developers of property within the City. Pursuant to these agreements, four developers (Alameda County Surplus Property Authority, the Un Family, Greenbriar Homes and Mission Peak) (collectively "the Advancing Developers") advanced $13,075,151 to City for the Interchange Improvements. All of the agreements require the City to collect monies from developers of the land in the Tassajara Interchange Contribution Area (as defined in the Agreements) ("the Subsequent Developers") in advance of the Subsequent Developers pulling building permits. The Annexation Area is within the Tassajara Interchange Contribution Area and is therefore a Subsequent Developer. AGREEMENT NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and conditions contained herein, the Parties agree as follows: Section I. General Fund Shortfalls A. The Developer's Payment Obligations; Definitions. Developer shall pay the City 5.74% of the deficit, if any, between Public Service Costs and General Revenues. "Public Service Costs" shall mean the General Fund cost of providing public services to lhe Eastern Dublin Area at a level consistent with public services provided within the incorporated area of the City prior to the annexation. "General Revenues" Pre-Annexation Agreement Between City of Dublin and the Un Family for Wallis Property Page 2 of 6 March 15, 2005 725640.3 shall mean those revenues deposited to the City's General Fund from property and inhabitants within the Eastern Dublin Area. "Eastern Dublin Area" shall include all lands within the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment area (see map attached as Exhibit C) that are within the City limits of Dublin. B. Duration of Payment Obligations. The Developer's payment obligation under this Section I shall begin when a deficit exists and shall terminate when there is no longer a deficit but in no event shall the obligation extend beyond June .30, 2010 ("Deficit Period"). The Developer's payment obligation may be terminated only by detachment of the Wallis Property from the City or by separate agreement approved by the City. C. Annual Fiscal Analyses. The City shall prepare a fiscal analysis each year during the Deficit Period 10 estimate the amount by which the Public Service Costs will exceed General Revenues. The fiscal analysis will be prepared on a fiscal year basis (July 1 to June 30) and will calculate the deficit for the preceding fiscal year. D. Payments to the City. No later than April 1 of the next fiscal year, Developer shall pay to City 5.74% of the deficit between Public Services Costs and General Revenues for the preceding fiscal year, based on the fiscal analysis, plus 5.74% of the cost of the fiscal analysis described in Section I.C. E. Security for Payment. At such time as requested by the City Manager, Developer will provide the City with security in an amount and form satisfactory to the City Manager, to become effective once the Annexation Area becomes part of the City, to secure the payments to the City described in Section I.D above. The security may consist of a letter of credit or similar instrument. Developer agrees that the City shall be under no obligation to continue processing any land use entitlement applications for Developer if security has not been provided when requested by the City Manager. F. Reimbursement From Other Property Owners. The City shall consider fair and appropriate ways of reimbursing the Developer some of the amounts Developer may be required to pay under this Section I from the owners of the Bragg Property and of the Sperfslage Property, these being the only other properties included in the Annexation Area that are not controlled by Developer. To the extent permitted by law, the City shall require owners of the Bragg Property and of the Sperfslage Property who seek City approval of development entitlements for such property to pay a fair and proportionate share of the amounts that Developer is required 10 pay pursuant to this Section I. Section II. Payment to City for Tassalar8 Interchanae ImDrovements A. Advance of Monies by Developer. Developer agrees not to oppose the City's imposition of conditions on future land-use approvals that would require Developer to advance, prior to approval of the first final subdivision map to create Pre-Annexation Agreement Between City of Dublin and the Un Family for Wallis Property Page 3 of6 March 15, 2005 725640.3 individual residential lots in the Wallis Property, the sum of One Hundred Eighty One Thousand Eight Hundred and Seven Dollars ($181,807). B. Use of Monies by City. City will use the monies paid by Developer pursuant to Section II of this Agreement, together with any interest earned thereon, to reimburse the Advancing Developers that have previously advanced monies to the City for construction of the Interchange Improvements. As used herein, "construction" shall include preliminary engineering, preparation of project study report, project report, plan specifications and estimates, engineering, environmental documentation and review, right-of-way acquisition (if necessary), permits, processing, utility relocation, construction, construction inspection, project management, and inspection. C. Credit Against TIF. City will provide a credit to Developer in the amount of Developer's payment of monies under this Section II, to be used by Developer against paymenl of lhe Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee ("TIF"). The use of credits (including limitations on the use of credits) and manner of conversion of the credit to a right of reimbursement will be as determined in the development agreement between Developer and the City, or, if not, as set forth in the City's TIF Guidelines, subject to the following provisions: (a) the credit shall be granted at the time Developer makes payments of money pursuant to this agreement; and (b) the Interchange Improvements credit may be used only against the Category 1 TIF Fees. Section VI. Approval of Annexation This Agreement shall take effect when the City adopts a resolution of application to annex the Annexation Area, with or without conditions or, if the Developer files a petition to annex, upon the LAFCO Executive Officer's acceptance of the annexation application for filing. Upon adoption of a resolution of application, the City shall take reasonable steps to facilitate annexation of the Annexation Area in a timely manner. This Agreement shall become ineffective, however, if the annexation is not approved by LAFCO or the voters or does not become effective for any other reason. Section VII. Additional Provisions A. Correctness of the Recitals. The Recitals set forth in this Agreement are true and correct and are a part hereof. B. Further Assurances. The Parties shall execute, acknowledge, and deliver such additional documents or instruments as may be necessary to carry out the intent of this Agreement, including but not limited to, those expressly referred to in this Agreement. C. Construction by California Law. This Agreement is entered into in the State of California and shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with its laws. Pre-Annexation Agreement Between City of Dublin and the Un Family for Wallis Property Page 4 of6 March 15, 2005 725640.3 D. Representation of Comprehension of Document. In entering into this Agreement, the Parties represent that they have relied upon the legal advice of their attorneys who are the attorneys of their choice. The Parties further represent that the terms of this Agreement have been completely read by and explained to them by their attorneys, and that they fully understand and voluntarily accept those terms. E. Authorship. Each Party and counsel for each Party has reviewed and revised this Agreement, and accordingly, the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement or any amendment of it. F. Authority to Execute. Each of the persons executing this agreement on behalf of a legal entity represents and warrants that each has full power to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the entity and that the Agreement is binding on the entity. G. Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement contains the entire agreement belween the Parties with regard to the matters set forth. There are no additional written or oral agreements or promises between the Parties concerning these matters which are not expressly set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by an agreement in writing executed in the same manner as this Agreement. H. Attorneys' Fees. In the event a Party to this Agreement is found in a court of law to have breached this Agreement, said Party shall pay the opposing Party's reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred in litigating the breach of contract action. I. Approval of Project. By entering into this Agreement, City makes no commitment that it will approve the Project. J. Notices. All notices shall be by certified mail or hand delivered to the Parties as follows: If to City, to: Richard C. Ambrose City Manager City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94569 If to Developer, to: Martin W. Inderbitzen 7077 KolI Center Parkway, Suite 120 Pleasanton, CA 94566 With Copies to: James Tong Charter Properties 6601 Owens Drive, Suite 100 Pleasanton, CA 94588 Pre-Annexation Agreement Between City of Dublin end the Un Family for Wallis Property Page 5 of 6 March 15, 2005 725640.3 K. Waivers. All waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by the appropriate authorities of City and the Developer. L. Recordation. This Agreement shall be recorded against the Property . described in Exhibit A (the Wallis Property). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. CITY OF DUBLIN DEVELOPER r"h~ -,f:I-«> L . Chang u-Q-Lin (also known as Jennifer Lin) Janet Lockhart, Mayor Approved as to form: Approved as to Form: City Attorney /77Â.",/. /1 Martin W. I~derbitien.. Attorney for Chang Su-O-Lin Attest: City Clerk [NOTARIZATIONS ATTACHED] Pre-Annexation Agreement Between City of Dublin and the Un Family for Wallis Property Page 6 of 6 March 15, 2005 725640.3 CALIFORNIA ALL.PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ~~::':"-{....":,<,...."-'/:,, ~~..:::.: '~"'(":(¡':'<'~ ..;-.~~(";-:' <,.::::.,;:~ ).'"". :;.~ ,.;~.:;..::; {':ò~ ,'-7<:"~;.(~~.Ir;', ~~;i::'2·('.:""; ~~.,'-';{:~""'~(:~<-':';".'";f:~~y",,;_~.\";.~::.\.. "'X~<,)ê;,(":.r.¡~}:;~ ,~<'~."",:' ...,....::/.::.,: '~,,=:(~.r; "--'~.";;''''''' ""'(\i:':';';'''';','~~: ~ ~ fj State of California } ? ~ County of A-L~rY'I êO A ss, * ~ 4 .~ :~ ß g ~ ~ ~ '~ þ\ ~ 'Ii, g ~ ~ ~ (1 ,~ ~ ~ If! ~ § ~ l1 o .~ ,~ o '~ ~ o ~ o l1) o @ ?; ')1 1; ~ 1 ,':11 " ,.^tl o , 0,'11 \ . .~ '·;:::::;:"¡':~::"":':.:;;O_-;;(.j.;;<....:,-;,....;::::'-C(':·~~;T;',:::;:;~c<::::c"::::;.~-~",;'s:··:::::;3:;-¢:;;~,~,-;'_-..;<~~i.:..,..:.,;<":,:-:.;.:...:,;...Q·;:";:.'::¿;:':-';.;~,;L:;¡'::<.::¡~,-;<:..:......:c::,,;'::::;·~.::~-Z:.:c;~;;:~.:,~~?~(:"·~-:"':;:::~':)' \ ", " On m"u2CH ~ 2 (105, before me, })rir21f L.. 0611111 penoonally appeared (! f/J-JN 1:7 5(/ - Ci Name and TiUi;I of Offic:.l!!f (e.g., "Jliln.. Do!!, Notary Publjt;,") '-I IVl , ; ~ ~ :- ~ " " , ,. , I r~ J" - - :~=i¡:~~=;"t ~ ~ 1II0tary publiC· California ~ ~ ~ Alamed.eountvo ~[ ~:"~'"i,~,~~ _ ~, My~_~~rBß~~~ £'51" IN OS Ie:.¡ N¡IIme(s) or signerls) ~personally known to me o proved to me on the basis evidence of satisfactory (~ , Pla!;1I Nclllry Ses. AbQv~ to be ,the person(s) whose name(s) Islare subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that helshelthey executed the same in hislherltheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by hislherltheir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s). or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. - Pub¡i~ OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons T6lyi"g on the document and eQuid prevent frsudulBnt removal and reattachment of this farm to another document. " Description of Attached Document P!2E Title or Type of Document: " Document Date: I"ItJNCf.A liON ¡q. t?f!.€EII?EN r Number of Pages: RtGHTTHUMßPRINT OF SIGNEn: Top of thumb here 'oJ 1991/0 N"II'''L~I Nm.1N ¡\~~c¡;laIIOf\' ,\.~~D DQ ::;,C¡OI\~f!¡.. ro. All. ~:-IO:! . "~:I~I~w',"lh. ¡'.;A 9 1::1 1::J·~·\11~ . www.nJIICnHlm¡(~ry "'n l'f':'IJ. ~J,). 5~D7 ~¡¡Qracr: ":;;:¡IIT'"II_F(~[j [,~()I)-!m¡·(,jE!:!7 , '\ , Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: " :~ Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: o Individual o Corporata Officer - Title(s): o Partner - 0 Limited 0 General '-' Attorney in Fact C Trustee ':J Guardian or Conservator ., Other: " \ '1 :,1 ," Signer Is Representing:__ EXHIBIT A Wallis Ranch Property Description EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF PA "-""" DUBLIN RANCH WEST REORGANIZATION . ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN . ANNEXATION TO THE DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT BY LAFCO RESOLUTION No. ON BEING ALL THAT CERTAIN PARCEL AS CONVEYED TO CHANG SU·O LIN AND RECORDED ON THE 6HJ DAY OF JANUARY, 1982 IN SERIES NUMBER 82-001756, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS (HEREINAFTER REFERRED 'f0 AS PARCH" An), ALL THAT CERT AIN PARCEL AS CONVEYED TO 'rHE "ROY AND EJLEEN SPER]1SLAGE LIVING TRUST" AND RECORDED ON THE 6T1J DAY OF MAY, 1997 IN SERIIJS NUMBER 97-114479, SAID COUNTY RECORDS (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS PARCEL "B") AND ALL THAT CERTAIN PARCEL CONVEYED TO ELVERA l. BRAGG AND CLA]]{E SILVA TRUSTS AND RECORDED ON THE 21"DAY OF SEJYrEMBER, 1993 IN SERIES NUMBER 93-333991 SAID COUNTY RECORDS (HEIŒLNAFTER REPERRED TO AS PARCEL "C'"); SITUATE IN T.HE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, ST A TE 0]1 CALIFORNIA AND ßEING MORE P ARTICU LAm, Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING Af A POINT ON THE COMMON BOUNDARY OF THAT CERTAIN AREA ENTITLED "CITY 0]1 DUBLIN ANNEXATION No. 2" TERRITORY ANNEXED BY DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 110-86, ADOPTED OCTOBER l3, 1986 AND FILED ON THE 24T1I DAY OF DECEMBER, 1986 IN BOOK 151 OF MAPS AT PAGES 57-58, SAID COUNTY RECORDS AND THAT CERTAIN AREA ENTITLED "ANNEXATION NO. 10 (EASTERN DUBLIN) AND DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DlS'fRICT ANNEXATION NO. 94-1" TERHlTORY ANNEXED BY DUBI,IN CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 3-95, ADOPTED JANUARY 23, 1995 AND FILED SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 IN BOOK 204 OF MAPS AT PAGES 75A- 75B, 76A-76B, SAID COUNTY RECORDS, SAID POINT BEING COMMON WITH THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID pAHCEL "ß"; THENCE, FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING ALONG THE BOUNDARY or SAID "on OF DUBLIN ANNEXATlON No. 2" BEING COI\1MON wrfH THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY or SAID PARCFL "B" AND PARCH" A" THE FOLLOWING:B COURSES: 1. NORTH 78"55'40" WEST 122.36 FEET; 2. NORTH 67'13'05" EAST 64.59 FEE'r; 3. NORTT 106°38'55" WEST 53.61 FEET; 4. NOJ{TH 47°29'55" WEST 154.89 FEET; 5. NORTH 28°19'55" WEST 164.54 FEET; 6. NORTH 11 °14'55" WEST 43.01 FEET; 7. NORTH 03°57'05" EAST 109.10 PEET; 8. NORTH 17°22'05" EAST 98.93 FEET; 9. NORTH 14°32'55" WEST 152.21 FEET; IDACKAY & SOIDPS CIVil ¡:NGINŒiING'LAND PLANNING 'lANI.) SURVóYING 5142 FrQnklln Urlve Suite B. PI606(:mlulI, CA. 94588-3355 1925) 225-0690 1-':\ 16034-40\ office \ Submlllals\ -<',X- r -REORGANIZATION-City St<1ff Rt.:pùr'Ldoc WI 2/1/zn05 no PM Page 1 of 5 10. NORTH 32'43'55" WEST 59.41 FEET; 11. NORTH 87°51'55" WEST 23.96 FEET; 12. SOUTH 67°56'05" WEST 42.08 FEET; 13. NOKfH 75°09'55" WEST 25.00 FEET; 14. NORTH 12'36'55" WEST 49.58 FEET; 15. NORTH 09°54'05" EAST 189.30 FEET; 16. NORTH 21 °51'05" EAST 51.29 FEET; 17. NORTH 02°48'05" EAST 97.28 FEET; 18. NORTH 16°37'55" WEST 185.58 FEET; 19. NORTH 39'26'55" WEST 100.73 FEET; 20. SOUTH 79°12'05" WEST 79.66 FEET; 21. NORTH 71 '20'55" WEST 39.03 FEET; I 22. NORTH 08'37'55" WEST 55.46 FEET; 23. NORTH 43'18'05" EAST 38.07 FEFT'; 24. NORTH 79°16'05" EAST 104.05 FEET; 25. NORTH 30°44'05" EASI' 30.12 FEET; 26. NORTH 02'28'05" EAST 57.05 FEET; 27. NORTH 25'41'55" WEST 117.97 FEET; 28. NORTH 34°22'55" WEST 75.66 PlJET; 29. NORTH 17"49'55" WEST 149.28 FEET; 30. NOR"11I 44°35'34" WEST 75.08 FEET; 31. NOR'!'! J 02°10'55" WEST 592.34 FEET; EXHIBIT A IDACKAT Ik SORlPS CIVIL eNGINeeRING' LAND PLANNING' LAND SURVeYING b142 ~ranklln Drive SuitE;! 13. PI8Ösan1on, CA. 94588-3355 (9251225·0690 P:\"16034-40\ offjce\Su bl1.1jltalQ\ FX-J-REORGANIZATJON-City Staff Repùf\,doc JKJ 2/) /211051 ,10 I'M Page 2 of 5 EXHIBIT A 32. NORTH 47°:\9'03" WEST 2.875.51 FEET TO A POINT ON nIE BOUNDARY OF THAT CERTAIN AREA ENTITLED "ANNEXATION OF CAMP PARKS AND ENVIRONS" TERRITORY ANNEXED TO DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 7, 1982 AND FILED APRIL 7, 1983 AS SERIES NUMBER 83-056907, SAID COUNTY RECORDS COMMON WITH THE BOUNDARY OF SAID "CITY or DUBLIN ANNEXATION NO.2"; nIENCE, 33. ALONG SAID COMMON LINE NORTH 100:\6'07" EAST 464.41 FEET TO A POINT ON THE COUNTY LINE COMMON TO AI ,AMEDA AND CONTRA COST A COUNTIES; THRNCE, THENCE, ALONG SAID COUNTV LINE NORTH 73°51'42" EAST 2,187.64 FEET; TIIENCE, LEAVING SAID COUNTY LINE ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SArD PARCEL" An THE FOLLOWING 9 COURSES: 1. SOUTH 25°1:\'29" EAST 381.25 FEET; 2. SOUTH 72°44'27" EAST 407.83 FEET; :\. SOUTH 89°50'47" EAST 519.08 FEET; 4. SOUTH 14'14'55" EAST 533.39 rEET; 5. SOUTTT 08°41'05" WEST 462.06 FRRT; 6. SOUTH 30°01 '20" EAST 297.69 FEET; 7. SOUTH 6S020'02" EAST 198.10 FEET; 8. SOUTH 30°48'42" EAST 1:\2.35 FEET; 9. SOUTH 01'17'48" WEST 14:\.63 PEET TO A POiNT ON THE NOJ{THERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL IICI'; THENCE, ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL "C" SOU11-:1 89'24'41" EAST 102.45 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF T ASSAJARA ROAD (COUNTY ROAD No. 2568, 66.00 rEET WIDE); THENCE, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TASSAJARA ROAD COMMON TO THE BOUNDARY OF 'I1-TAT CERTAIN AREA HNTITLED "SILVER]A, HAIGHT, NIELSEN PROPERTIES REOJ{GANIZATION, PA-02- 024" TERRITORY ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVJCHS DISTR]CT, AOOPTED BY LAFCO IŒSOLUTION NO. 2003-01-A ON JANUARY 9, 2003 AND FILED ON THE 5lTl DAY OF MAY. 2003 IN SERIES NUMBEJ{ 2003-262895, SAID COUNTY RECORDS, TTTE BOUNDARY or THAT CERTAIN AREA ENTITLED "QUARRY LANE SCHOOL REORGANIZATION ANNEXATION" TERRITORY ANNHXED TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT, ADOPTED BY LAFCO RESOLUTION NO. 200]-4 ON MAY 10, 2001 AND FILED ON THE 26'H DAY or IDACIAY & S811PS CIVil .NGIN.ERINCò'lAND PlIINNING'LANlJ SURV.YlNG 5142 Franklin OriYB Suite l\, PleasantQf1. CA. 94588,3355 (92t1 22G-0690 P:\ "[6034-40\ oHlce\Submith1ls \EX~I~REORCANTZATlON~Cj ly St<.lff R!:::por't.doc JKJ 2/1/'.(1115 1,10 PM Page 3 of 5 EXHIBIT A NOVEMBER, 2001, IN BOOK 264 OF MAPS PAGE 3, SERIES NUMBER 2001-456824, SAlD COUNTY RECORDS AND THE BOUNDARY OF SAID" ANNEXATION NO. 10 (EASTERN DUBLIN) AND (JUBLlN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT ANNEXATION NO. 94-1" THE POLLOWING 4 COURSES, 1. TO TIIE RIGHT, ALONG THE ARC OP A 767.00 FOOT RADIUS, NON-TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIAL BEARING OF NORTH 63°34'41" WEST, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30'28'17"' AND AN ARC LENGTH OJ:' 407.91 FEET; 2. THENCE, SOUTH 56'53'36" WEST 203.05 FEET; 3. THENCE, TO THE LEFT, ALONG THE AHC OF A 1,033.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, lIA VING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°29'20" AND AN ARC LENGTH OP 964:36 FFET; 4. THENCE, SOUTH 03°24'16" WEST 2,318.72 f'BET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAlNING 187.747 ACRES, MORE OR LESS [TOTAL ANNEXATION AREAl ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 986-0004-005-01 (pARCEL "An), ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 986-0003- 001 (PARCEL "0") AND ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 986-0004-003 (PARCEL "C). PREPARED BY; ..- ROBERT erIAN, L.5.5412 (EXP.09/30/2004) STATE OF CALIFORNIA DATE REPERENCES TO THE EXISTING BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE DUBLIN SAN FAMON SERVICES DISTRICT ARE PRIMARY CALLS. ANY BEARING OR DISTANCES REFERRED TO HEREIN SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ONLY SECONDARY. THE BOUNDARY OF THE TERRITORY IS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF PA **-'" DUBLIN RANCH WEST REOFGANIZATION, ADOPTED BY LAFCO RESOLUTION No... _ __, ON THE DAY OF ,2003; SAID MAP WAS CERTIFIED BY THE COUNTY SURVEYOR ON THE . DAY OF _._..___,2003. THIS Df,SCRIPTlON CONFORMS TO THE REQUlFEMENTS OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION. mACKAY & SIRlPS CIVil ,NGINFFRING'LAND PLANNING'LAND SUINEYING 5142 Franklin Drive Suite B, PleOl'¡on1or I, CA. 94t188-3355 (9?5) 225-0690 IJ: \ 16034 -!¡)\ office \ Subl'lÜttals \ EX-l-RFORGANIZATJON-City Sh1ff Re port..d(x KJ 2/1/200SUU I'M Page 4 of 5 EXHIBIT A DONALD J. LABELLE - DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA BY: RUSSELL REID PENLAND JR. COUNTY SURVEYOR L.s. No. 5726, EXPIRES 12/31/2003 mACKAY & SOIlPS CIVil ''JGINEERING.LAND PLANNING'LAND SUINbYING j 142 I-ranklln Drive Sujle 8, Pleasanton. CA. 94588-3355 (925) 225-0690 P:\ 16U34-4.o\ offic:e\Submittals\ J:i,X-I-REORGANIZA'J."ION-City Stõ:'1H I~t:"'port.doc ¡KJ 2/1/20051:J.() PM Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT B Map of Annexation Area = E-< ..... = ~ ¡,¡¡ ~ ~ i ~I. ! . 1 .~ ~ ~ 'I i! !¡i ' !:~!Î¡! i ' I'W!'! ~I~~ ~ ~; ! ~Ii ! ;~~ ~I ~ I~~~~~ i I' ! , ! I 1;;1 Lilln . !!",j] e1 3~ ~ ~ ~bt i ~~ n§~ ~ ~ ð ~ I"'~ ~ ~UBHnU g~5[!1~ O!IJ 111:z ", I~ ~ ~t¡ : ~ãb I·~~~ ~ i I ~ · ~h· ¥ * i:iI 1> ~ J ". 8" . ~ - i ~ I'b' ,5 . ~ .~~ªd~ !¡~~ ~pí1 ~ d - ",1!i!I'!Ii ~ I: ~~ ~ i~;¡ :1: ¡ ,¡¡.¡ i ¡ !I: , ! ,¡":ii'l új¡ hh!!' ~ ",¡::¡¡ ¡.¡ .dIIl' êi ~ I'~ ~ ;~~~ I~~ ~. :š I~ Š I'§ ~ ~ ~ ~g~:H~~ ~m~Ii!~~~~~ ~ ~ g ..' .,' 'i ,ii'.'" " "i ",., I' ~;: I lí Iii ¡ !!I~ ;Iii J'¡¡ ¡'ii:;:¡ i ,: i ¡1 umibl !!!!IUII i! ~;~ ;1" ",.. !' ;;IIi" J' ¡ f' iilll:m¡ i ¡ ¡¡ ¡i ¡ ¡ i ¡ ¡ . i!i ~ ¡ ¡i,'I'" ' .. . ~ ,.,' iii!!!!':! ì·" .~ , I i:,¡!i:!!!lliiil!ii!!! t _o!'I,.j.....s... 'III a: ! . .... . .. jij,:n /ìiM]f Ji¡¡;--!I¡~;n__m_Lm..- , ~.ø ' "h'· ~~"~~ ' ¡¡~IS~~ I ~~1¡· ~@ , I!!I i i¡i~ ~ u..q¡I±1 ! ¡¡Inl!!:! ¡i~ C"II ' ',,- ¡;¡~~~. I ~f''''~ ~~a~ a"J:i eh~ l : ii!¡¡~iiî~i ¡;;!:~~æ .iM ¡¡¡~8'i~ .hl , '''~ ~,;: .!!~n'-~ ~~ ", ~! \!~ "o~! I~h~~ ~o~' "',/ ~:¡ _ 'I ~~i~~~ i ~g§~~1 ¡¡S~!1 /.<';;,?i"',,"",,~,: ~! ~td~~: .¡¡Wi! !m! s"d/;f~;!-' !ii¡¡ì~~ 'I ~\.-": 'ì\? \. . II II ~ hil h~~ c -, . ¡~~ t ~ i å ow,( ~;; ".:''::':''''''''~''' ; ; ~ ! i II i~~~" ;¡ - ,,,,1r':k~~,J;'" ~ f-r~-~~ . . !!!' -,-,; ~.- .", , \i\ a å:!!! 1m; ..... ,,.!!1h ¡bi '" i . Ii ~ ...'1 ! mm!,II!';'!!·¡;¡';' ,.v_I ~ .\.. ~Iill. I:' ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡j¡;¡¡¡¡m1h!m I L.~. ,. ,., . . .,1 "m'ii'''''¡''''··- í \¥. f'- .... - i ~",¡,¡, i &8 ~ I ~ w .¡¡~~ t'i\ ~ g I~~;~ '\\ I .., '" : 't., ." '"~ ' ·1'" !:II II!:' I 't~';'.~ \Ù' _____!I.. :I!!I i \~, \t~", ~ ' \\~. " I .__..Ä i ~ . o ~ ~ ; I h~ ~ ~ ~ oj I~ ~ ;::¡ ~~~;¡, ! : I ~ I I d I I ;.I; EXHIBIT C Map of Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment Area ; ffl ~.I! ~ ~ ~ ! p~p j ; I i,¡~~d g! I J ¡ ~l~ ~;H ' ~ ; '&ffi~~f ~Il.; i~Z ~. 1~lp i!itf'i~lliJndHd lliiJ.í,f¡¡'~! 'ffij' .::;': 1 a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '!,! -: ð ë ! i 00' I ~ _J ~ ,~"...I i ' I ,- :g i õ 5 i P d! ,:i:,<:r$@"I) Œ€J~<!I:d H ~ ~ !:~,<!- 'œ:-~ji ~'-, ','00 _? ~¿~ ! 8~~lm ~Ø~GB~ ;1 ~ ~~l!Jj II IIII ~.å t·' ¡ ,. I. ~ , t .. .. < ,"" " c " .. õ: ... .. ... ,,¡¡ ~ ,!_"; ::Ii .0. 1ij w '- E IJI ell:;) .. ~ C c-IIJ :z. .. .. "" a" a.y ...1 - -. .. ~ ~ -- r \ I ~--l' \ ---- ' ""..~ " Ë L o .: .. .; ~ .. -< w c: « >- o :J I- (j) W 0: ,:::;¡ I- :J u. W 0: :J f- -I' :J Ü 0: Q1 « : . o œ - :r:: x w -1 it L !! ~ - " ~ æ ;- ji II II 0-11 Ii it h !i foo H' H . . " RESOLUTION NO. XX-OS A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ********************************* AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF APPLICATION FOR REORGANIZATION FOR PA 02-028, ANNEXATION NO. 15 WHEREAS, the City of Dublin desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the Cortese-Knox- Hertzberg Local Govcrnment Reorganization Act of2000, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code, for a reorganization that would concurrently annex unincorporated territory of Alameda County to the City of Dublin and the Dublin San Ramon Services District; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 1993, the City Council certified a program Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for the Eastern Dublin GP A/SP Project and an addendum thereto, dated May 4, 1993 (SCH 91103064). On August 22,1994, the City Council approved another addendum to update plans to provide sewer service. The May 10, 1993 program ETR, the May 4,1993 addendum and the Au.gust 22, 1994 addendum are collectively referred to as the Eastern Dublin EIR; and WHEREAS, upon approval of the GPA/SP Project, the City Council adopted mitigation findings, a statement of overriding considerations, and a mitigation monitoring program as set forth in Resolution 53-93, included in the Eastern Dublin EIR referenced above, and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Calit'Ornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Supplemental EIR cntitlcd "Dublin Ranch Wcst Project" (SCH #2004112094) was prepared and circulated; and WHEREAS, on March 15, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution _-05 certifying the Supplemental EIR. The resolution is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, on March 15, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution _-05 approving the amendments to the General Plan and Eastern Du.blin Specific Plan. The resolution is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, on March 15, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution _-05, approving a Planned Development Prezoning and a Stage I Development Plan for someone P A 02-028; and WHEREAS, on February 22, 2005, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 05-21 recommending that the City Council direct Staff to file an application with the Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) to annex 189 acres ofunincorpofated territory into the City of Dublin and thc Dublin San Ramon Services District; and WHEREAS, a Staff report, dated March 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Project for the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the SEIR, staff report, and recomrnendation ofthc Planning Commission at a duly noticcd public hearing held on March 15, 2005 at which time all intcrcstcd partics had the opportunity to be heard. ATTACHMENT 5 WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has been given, and this Council has conducted a public hearing based upon this notification; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hcar and use their independent judgment and considered all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth; and WHEREAS, the Projcct is consistent with the type, location and density of land uses approved through the 1993 Eastern Dublin GPA/SP Project. All mitigation measures adopted for the GPAlSP Projcct continue to apply to implementing projects such as the current PD Prczone; and all applicable City development ordinances and standards apply to the Project except as otherwise approved through the Project prczoning and related Stage I Development Plan; and WHEREAS, the principal rcasons for the proposed reorganization are: 1) to provide the full range of municipal services to the territory; and 2) to assure orderly dcvclopment consistent with the City of Dublin Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the following agencies would be affected by the proposed jurisdictional changes: Agency City of Dublin Dub1in San Ramon Services District Nature of Change Annexation Annexation WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be reorganized is used for agricultural purposes including two residences. A map and a legal description of the boundaries of the territory are attached as Exhibit A, Annexation to the City of Dublin and to DubJin San Ramon Services District. Exhibit A is incorporatcd herein by this refercnce; and WHEREAS, it is desired that the proposed reorganization be subject to the following terms and conditions: a. The effective date of the annexation shall be ,2005; and WHEREAS, this proposal is consistent with the spheres of influence of the City of Dublin and the Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: This resolution of application is hereby adopted and approved and the Local Agency Formation Commission is hereby requested to takc proceedings for the annexation of territory as authorized and in the manner provide in the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of2000. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of March 2005, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk G:\PA#\2002\02-028 Dublin Ranch West\City Coul1cH\Rcso LAFCO appliclltion.doc Appendix 82. APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE (Revised 1/02) Local Agency Formation Commission of Alameda County 1. APPLICANT (Local Jurisdiction, Individual, or 3 Chief Petitioners). Agency/Individual Name: City of Dublin 1.a. Name of Designated Agency Contact or Chief Petitioner. Richard Ambrose, City Manager Address. 100 Civic Drive, Dublin, CA 94568 Phone. 925-833-6650 1b. Name 2. Marty Inderbitzen, Attorney at Law FAX. 925·833-6651 E-Mail. www.ci.dublin.ca.us Address. 7077 Koll Center Drive. Suite 120, Pleasanton, CA 94566 1c. Name 3. N/A Address. 2. NAMEfTlTLE OF APPLICATION PROPOSAL. Dublin Ranch West Annexation Area PA 02-028 3. TYPE OF PROPOSAUPROJECT. (Check all that apply.) (0 Annexation () Consolidation () Formation () Incorporation () Disincorporation () Merger (~) Reorganization () Special Study () SOl Amendment () SOl Update () Establishment of Subsidiary District () Detachment () Exercise of Latent Powers () Dissolution () Service Review () Initial SOl Determination 11 P'\1$(1~-40\Qffll;lI\$ubmlttJ:¡l$\L..ft;Q\1ß034-40Qg1-i"-O!!oLllftoApp.pdf EXHIBIT A 4. CERTIFIED RESOLUTION OR PETITION (Attach). Application Initiated By: H Resolution of Application No.: xx-xx Date Adopted: xx-xx OR () Landowner/Registered Voter Petition (The CKH Act requires that a petition contain the number of signatures required for each type of requested government change.) 5. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION AND SETTING. 5a. Describe the proposal or proposed change(s) of organization. Provide a justification for each of the proposed changes. Attach extra sheets if necessary. Annexation of approximately 188.9 acres to the City of Dublin and DSRSD. The land is intended for urban development and Alameda County cannot provide the required urban services. The City of Dublin will provide public works, police, fire, recreation and general government services and DSRSD will provide water, wastewater and recycled water services all at urban levels. 5b. What are the intended uses of the territory, over the next 5,10 and 15 years (if different), if application is approved? Construction of approximately 1,065 single family and multi-family dwelling units and neighborhood park developed in accordance with the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. A small component of neighborhood commercial and public/semi-public is also included. It is anticipated that this project will be built out within five to ten years of the effective date of annexation. 5c. Is the proposed change consistent with the terms and conditions of the affected local agency's General Plan? Yes [;'] No 0 Explain. The City of Dublin adopted an amended General Plan for the subject property concurrently with the proposed project. Hence, the proposed development described in 5b above is consistent with the Plan. 12 5d. With Community or Specific Plans? Yes 121 No 0 Not Applicable 0 Explain. The City of Dublin adopted an amended East Dublin Specific Plan for the subject property concurrently with the proposed project approvals. Thus, the proposed development described in 5b above is consistent with this Plan. 5e. If applicant is a CITY, Government Code Section 56375 requires that the city prezone territory proposed to be annexed. Has territory been pre-zoned? Yes0No D If Yes, what is the pre-zoning designation and what does it mean? The annexation area has been prezoned PD (Planned District) Single Family Residential, Medium Density Residential, Medium High Density Residential, Neighborhood Commercial, PublicJSemi-Public, Neighborhood Park, and Open Space. This prezoning will allow residential development from O.g to 25 dwelling units per acre, neighborhood parks to serve these and edjacent residences, a system of riding and hiking trails, an enhanced creek corridor and other open spaces that will encourage livable (Continued on separate sheet) 5f. Attach copy of certified City Resolution/ Ordinance Number: xx-xx Date Adopted: Month X, 2005 5g. If applicant is a DISTRICT, what planning, zoning and subdivision changes are proposed, or have been approved by the city or county? NIA 5h. Explain the reason(s) for requesting the proposed boundary change/s? To avoid creatinQ islands and/or peninsulas of unincorporated territory, follow existing property lines, ensure an area large enough to finance the cost of major infrastructure needed to serve the annexation territory, and annex properties where possibility of development Is likely tc occur in the near term. Please refer to the Plan for Services .ection of this application for greater detail. 51. What is the estimated future population in the territory? At end of 5 years ± 2,800 At end of 15 years ± 2,960 At end of 10 years ± 2,960 Source of Information Based on anticipated Dublin General Plan and East Dublin Specific Plan population figures. 13 5j. Have landowners consented to the proposal? Yes 0 No 0 If Yes, how many? 1 % of total landowners? If Yes, attach originals of Signature Consent Forms. If No, explain. 33% 5k. How will the proposal affect the physical and economic integrity of agricultural lands, as defined by Section 56016? Explain. The proposal would convert approximately 107 acres of agricultural land to urban uses. These lands have been historically used for grazing and dry farming of grain crops, but are currently lying fallow. Their previous agricultural economic value is de minimis when viewed in the context of the millions of acres of grazing and dry farming land throughout California, 51. How does the proposed change and its anticipated effects conform with LAFCo policies for promoting planned, orderly, efficient patterns of urban development? Explain. The annexation area is contiguous with the City of Dublin. This reorganization would not create any Islands or peninsulas of unlnoorporated land. It Is consistent with the City's General Plan and Eastern Oublin Specific Plan. The proposal is also consistent with the various facilities plans of DSRSD. The territory to be annexed is contiguous with the service ares of DSRSD. Howeverj a portion of Parks Reserve (Continued on separate sheet) 5m. How will the proposed change affect mutual social and economic interests of adjacent areas? Explain. The proposed change would allow urbanization of the territory in accordance with the Dublin General Plan and the Eastem Dublin Specific Plan. It Is the continuation of urbanization taking place to the 50uth and 6outheast, also in ecoordanœ with the General and Specific Plans. Other properties included in the General and Specific Plans to the east of ~he annexation area have not yel been annexed to Dublin but are 8xpected to be In the future. Urban development (Continued on separate Stieel) 5n. What is the effect of proposal denial on proposed or approved development if any? Denial of this reorganization would affect proposed development on neighboring properties scheduled for urbenization under the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Speolfic Plan by increasing the cost 01 utilities and other infrastructure for those properties. Development of the annexation area would Involve the widening of Tassajara Road lrom Dublin Ranch Phase 1 northward lor a distance of about 6,000 leet and the extension 01 water, sewer, recycled water, power, etc. within the widened right-ai-way. Other properties in the area scheduled lor development would also havs to pay thosB added costs if this reorganization was to be denied. (Continued on separate sheet' 14 50. Is territory contiguous to the district or city's existing boundary? Yes ø No 0 If No, is the area less than 300 acres in size, owned by the city and currently being used for a municipal purpose? Explain. 5p. Do the proposed boundaries create an "island" or pocket of unincorporated territory? Yes D No EJ If Yes, provide supplemental information explaining how the proposal promotes the orderly growth and development of the community. 5q. Each applicant is required to notify all affected local agencies of this proposed change. Have all affected local agencies been informed? Yes ø No 0 (Attach a list of the affected agencies and a verification for each.) 5r. For district formations, district consolidations, incorporations or city consolidations, provide a proposed agency name (optional). N/A 5s. For district formations, provide the name of the Principal Act under which the proposed district would be governed. N/A 51. Provide a proposed appropriations limit (optional) if applicable. N/A 6. PLAN FOR PROVIDING MUNICIPAL SERVICES. 6a. Provide a plan for providing services (See Part III, Sections 2.24 and 2.25 of Alameda LAFCO's Guidelines, Policies and Procedures.) 6b. Indicate, which agencies currently provide, affected public services within the proposal territory and which agencies are proposed to provide services. Services Current Aoencv Pro Dosed Aoencv Alameda County Sheriff Police California Highway Patrol City of Dublin Fire Alameda Co. Fire Department City of Dublin Water Wells DSRSD Sewer Septic DSR$D Garbage Alameda County City of Dublin Street Lighting N/A City of Dublin Road Maintenance Alameda County City of Dublin Flood Control Zone 7 City of DublinlZone 7 Parks & Recreation East Bay Region:;!1 Park Di¡;¡t. Clly of Dublln/EBRPD Library Services Alameda county Alameda County 15 Electricity Transit Other P"~E NIA NIA pG&E LivéfmOl'1!I Amador Valley Transit Authority. Wheels. BART 6c. If a chanae in service provider is proposed, has each local agency provided a statement indicating the desire and ability to furnish services? Yes0No 0 If Yes, a Letter of Agreement from each agency assuming service responsibilities must be Included with the application. The letter must identify each agency's role and responsibilities as the new service provider and the method for funding additional services (See Part III, Sections 2.24 and 2.25). If No, explain. 6d. If a chanae in service provider is proposed, are alternative providers available for any of proposed service providers? YesD No ø If yes, list providers and explain why they are not proposed to provide service. 6e. Will the related land use project require widening or upgrading of existing streets, the construction of new streets, sewers, or other infrastructures Yes 0 No 0 If Yes, describe how modifications will be financed. (See Part III, Sections 2.24 and 2.25). The financing of street and roadway improvements, water lines, sanitary sewer maÎns, recycled water lines, storm sewers and other utilities will be done as part of the private project costs. Payment of these costs will be the responsibility of the landowner/developer. Some costs will be reimbursed from TIF oredits. 6f. List any proposed or required terms, conditions or mitigation measures for the proposal. Use an extra sheet if necessary. Refer to attached EIR mitigation measures. 16 7. BACKGROUND DATA AND INFORMATION. 7a. Describe the proposal area's general location and boundaries (access road/way, closest county road intersection, road junctions, freeways, railroad lines). The territory Is generally located west of Tassajara Road and immediately south of the Alameda/Contra Costa County boundary. For greater information, refer to the annexation maps. 7b. Number of acres 188.9 ;Square Miles 0.29 in project site. 7c. No. of registered voters. x Source of information. Registrar of Voters 7d. No. of dwelling units. ± 1065 Source of information. Prazoning Approval 7e. Assessed Valuation. Land $1,221,317. Improvements $204.454 Total $1,425,771 7f. Existing land Uses. Rural residential, fire wood sales, and fallow lands. 7g. Proposed land Uses. The approved Stage 1 PD Development Plan allows single family, medium and medium high density residential uses, neighborhood oommercial, neighborhood park, public/semi-public. open space, and multi-use trails. 7h C t . d I . d . t· () Current Alameda County zoning for the annexation . urren zoning an p anmng eSlgna Ion s . area is Agricultural. The County General Plan designation Is Low Density Residential, Medium High Density Residential, Resource Management and Water Management. The City of Dublin has prezoned the property PD (Continued on separaté sheet) 7i. Provide the following land use maps with legends. Clearly identify the project site and indicate all adjacent parcels. ( ) County General Plan ( ) City General Plan ( ) Existing land Use Zones ( ) Prezones if applicable () Community/Specific Plan 7j. Are any other in-process or anticipated development, planning or land use proposals expected for this site within the next two years? Check all that are applicable. ( ) Proposals to lAFCO (,) land Use Entitlements from a county or city (,) Permits from state or federal entity 17 8. WILLIAMSON ACT LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACTS (agricultural preserves). Are any agricultural preserves on project site? Yes 0 No ~ Adjacent parcels? Yes D No [2] If Yes, provide map with sites boundaries indicated and contracted lands identified with names and contract numbers. If Yes, has non-renewal fOnTlally been requested? Yes D No D If Yes, date of request to Alameda County: Date of tenTlination: 9. POPULATION. How many people currently live in the project site? ± 3 Source of information: Project Applicant 10. ADJACENT LAND USES. 10a. Describe land uses on adjacent parcels. Parks RFTA is located to the west; to the north and south are rural residential parcels. In addition, to the south Is an EBRPD staging area and trail head; and rural residential, single family and multi-family residential dwellings. Open space, a landscape corporation yard, and a privata school are located to the east. 10b. Describe the site's proximity to populated areas. The annexation area is bordered on the west by a military training bass and on the north by agricultural land which probably will not be urbanized. To the south, southeast and east. however, It Is adjacent to sectors of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area which are either developed Or slated to urbanize shortly. Development In the Specific Plan area commenced on the County's Santa Rita property and progressed to the north and northeast. Mixed use development ha:!i> tç¡ken ph¡lCe on the County property end Is now mostly complete. Several large housing developments have been built or are (Continued on separate sheet) 11. LANDOWNERS. Number of parcels in project site 3 Number of landowners 3 Source of information: Alameda County Assessor maps and tax roll information 18 --- 12. NAMES & ADDRESSES OF ALL LANDOWNERS & ASSOCIATED PARCEL NUMBERS. Assessor's Parcel Numberls/Address Landowner Namel Address 1. 988-0004-005-01 6582 Tassajara Road 1. Jennifer Lln. Et. AI c/o James TOl1g. 4690 Chabot Drive. #100, Pleasanton. 94588 2. 986-0003-001 6060 Tassajara Road 2. Roy/Eileen Sperfslage 6060 Tassajara Road, Plea5anaton, CA 94588 3. 986-0004"003 Tassaiara Road 3. Bragg & Silva Trusts P.O. Box 1896, Sonoma. CA 95476 13. APPLICABLE TAX RATE AREA(S). Parcel Numberls Tax Rate Area/s 986·0004·005·01 xx 986-0003-001 XX 986·0004-003 xx 14. SPHERES OF INFLUENCE (SOl) Government Code Sections 56375.5 and 56376 require that territory be included in the affected local agency's 501 before a Change of Organization is approved by the Commission. 14a. Is the proposed territory currently within a local agency's (county, city or special district) SOl? Yes [;:] No 0 If Yes, which agency or agencies? City of Dublin, DSRSD 14b. If No, the applicant shall fully and completely explain each of the following factors as they pertain to the subject proposal (Government Code Section 56425). If any of the factors are already fully described in the master services plan, the applicable section and page number may be referenced. · The present and planned land uses in the area, including agricultural and open space lands; · The present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area over the next 10 years; · The present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services which the agency provides or is authorized to provide; and · Identify all social and economic communities of interest in the area. 19 14c. Is a CHANGE in Sphere of Influence boundaries of any local agency required prior to proposal consideration? Yes 0 No 0 If Yes, Explain. List affected agencies and provide a contact name and phone number. Agency Contact Name Phone # --.-.- ..... ..._-,_.". ..-... ....- ..- 14d. Provide evidence that a service review has been completed for any affected SOls pursuant to Government Code Section 56430. 15. COUNTY/CITY/DISTRICT PROPERTY TAX EXCHANGE AGREEMENT LAFCO has no jurisdiction to act on an annexation proposal until resolutions agreeing to an exchange of property tax are passed by each of the affected local agencies (Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99). It is the applicant's responsibility to identify which local agencies (cities and special districts) share in the tax distribution in order to properly determine how future revenue exchange agreements should be structured. 15a. List all affected local taxing agencies. Agency Contact Name Phone # City of Dublin Richard Ambrose 925·833·6650 Alameda County Susan Muranishi X ,,_.,.._.'''-~,_. -..--'". .--- 20 15b. Have all participating local taxing agencies reached agreement? Yes 0NoD (In the case of complex reorganization proposals, multiple agreements may be required) If Yes, attach a certified copy of each local agency's tax exchange resolution and provide the following information: Local Aaency City of Dublin Alameda County Resolution Number Adoption Date 52-93 5/4/93 xx-xx 5/4/93 m - If No, Explain. 16. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW LAFCo is required to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for purposes of considering the environmental impact of its actions. If LAFCo is a RESPONSIBLE Agency for this application, the applicant must submit copies of environmental documents prepared by the Lead Agency and Certified Resolutions or Notices of Exemption or Determination. (See Alameda LAFCO's CEQA Handbook, Adopted CEQA Procedures, and Guidelines, Policies and Procedures, Section 2.23) 16a. If LAFCo is a LEAD Agency for this application, the applicant must submit . A description of environmental conditions in the project area including topography, agricultural land classification, vegetation, wildlife, land uses, traffic circulation patterns and major water courses and water bodies; and . A description of how the project might change environmental conditions. 16b. The CEQA document(s) submitted with this application are: () Noticefs of Exemption () Negative Declaration (-) Draft Environmental Impact Report (-) Final Environmental Impact Report (-) Noticefs of Determination (-) Mitigation Monitoring Program (-) Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations () Other 21 .-- · 16c. Lead Agency/Responsible Agency. (if more than one agency/attach information on separate sheet) City of Dublin Type of Document Project Description (Actions approved) Date approved' certified SEIR Prezoning (Stage 1 PO) XIX/OS .--. .,. 16d. Any project that has the potential to cause an adverse impact on fish or wildlife must pay a State Department of Fish and Game fee based upon the type of environmental determination that is made. The applicant must provide evidence that the appropriate State fee has been paid. or submit the fee to LAFCo (See Fee Schedule for further information). () "De Minimis" Determination (Fee: $0) () Negative Declaration (Fee: $1.250) (-) Environmental Impact Report (Fee: $850) 17. PUBLIC NOTICE AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS. 17a. Provide an 8 Yo" X 11" map indicating the project site and identifying all parcels adjacent to and within 300 feet of the project site. Outer boundaries (not adjacent to project site) of large parcels need not be identified. All parcel numbers need to be indicated 17b. Provide a list of all parcel numbers within the 300 foot radius and the name and address of the property owner as of the most recent assessment roll being prepared. Provide a mailing label for each parcel on the list. 17c. Provide signed financial disclosure statementls (See Appendix E, Exhibit C) pursuant to Government Code Section 56700.1. 18. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION. I hereby certify that the information contained in this application and accompanying documents is true, correct, and accurate to the best of my knowledge. In addition, I hereby agree to pay all required filing and processing fees required by the State of California and Alameda LAFCO, including any expenses for preparation of environmental documentation and planning studies needed to complete this application. 22 I further understand that Alameda LAFCO will not process an incomplete application and that State law and Alameda LAFCO policies and procedures require that specific material be submitted in conjunction with the application. Name of Applicant or Authorized Representative Title of Applicant or Authorized Representative Signature of Applicant or Authorized Representative Date 23 16034-40 10/15/04 e.G. Supplement to Wallis Property Annexation Application Se. residential development while ensuring that the goals and policies for all of EaSŒm Dublin. The I'D designation allows the flexibility while ensuring the goals and policics of the City's General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan will be adhcred to. 51. Force Training Area (PRFTA) immediately west of the annexation area has not been annexed to DSRSD (but is within the City of Dublin). So on the west, only a portion of the annexation area is immediately adjacent to DSRSD. The reorganization, thereforc, would create a 470 acre island within which DSRSD serviecs may not be available. Discussions with PRFTA have not resulted in PRPTA requesting annexation to DSRSD at this time. Government Code Section 56744 generally prohibits annexation to a city if that annexation would create an island of unincorporatcd territory. Since the PRFTA island is part of the City of Dublin, it is not unincorporated and, therefore, is not eontrary to Section 56744. This portion of I'RFTA has no structures on it and is used only for military field maneuverS. As long as this is the only function of the land within the island, it will have nO need for the services provided by DSRSD and, therefore, annexation to that entity will not be necessary. If the mission of the land within the island changes and urban services become necessary, the Department of the Army will be able to apply to the District for annexation. Sm. is also scheduled for those properties. Since the annexation area would be developed in accordance with Dublin's General and Specific Plans, it should not impact the future development pattern of those unannexed properties. Also, beeause it is consistent with the General and Specific Plans, development of the subject territory will be complemcntary to the urbanizing properties to the south and southeast. 5n. Additionally, the denial of this project would delay important planned infrastructure in this part of the East Dublin Specific Plan area. Namely, the street and utility improvements within TassajarR and Fallon Roads ITom the Dublin Raneh development (south and east of this annexation request area) and the Alameda/Contra Costa County line. These improvements (part of the local specific plan and regional traffie plan) will improve traffic from Contra Costa County and the northern area ofthe EDSP to Interstate 580. 7h. Single Family Residential, I'D Medium Density Residential, PO Medium High Density Residential, I'D Neighborhood Commercial, I'D Neighborhood Park., PD PubJic/Semi. Public, and PD Open Space. Uses are designated Low, Medium and Medium High Density Residential, Neighborhood Commercial, Neighborhood Park., Public/Semi-Public, and Open Space on the Dublin Generall'lan. lOb. under construction on both sides of Tassajara Road on lands to the north and northeast of the Santa Rita property. The annexation arca is just to the north and northwest of those housing projects and, hence, is the logical next phase in the overall development of the Specific Plan area. G:\PA#\2002\02-028 Dublin Ranch West\City Council\I..AFCO AppHcation\16034-40cgl-ll-05ContinucdFromApp.dol:: N ~ ~ , 8 8. [2._ IC .~ '~n 9.; ~ ~ o iSP Gl.l ~~ "~ ~. .1 ~i!)_ c " ¡;¡ " '" ,," ...... l~j u>U> ." o " .. '" eo '" ?i .. c ~ ~ w. . ~ " " ~ , , .9· ~ X / 8 e ~ f , ,,; , r ~ f 1 .....~J_ .. ~"~UJ~,tJ 1~J' ¡J.hKò. """',;',1'",-", '-, . ,..,"'J.. 0 ro " r~ e ":I~~ ~§ < ~2Ëi ~ ~!:.: ~~ ~.~ t. ~~, z ~ -' <- ,.,...----. 8 ~~~I )-., > < / ~i·'·"·j"'··, !IO. ,..' n::Z: .~.,." ",,!, -~l~'K . .,' '.-....... . p ~~~ h j¡" ~ ~ . it ¡¡ R ]a àJ- ~~ o " c ~. î~ ~i ~ 0 ~~ o ~ æ 1 ~ ~W'iíP.·~ [ !1.ih-iJH if "F nhH I' ¡.,! 0. w ~. ~ :;'/'TIz:z ~ it "l;Il,l1l,1)o~:Þr!:IR ~ ~ z o .- iè c ~ '" ~ , ~ '" ~ <j' .90' " Hr;.!2.~ !r'l íf ?ï~ ~- .? >~ '$ r ~[ n ?i" ~d[ $1 d , - ~J ~? H ? ~ I (,):-"?{!,,:':J:..i:~ D>~I-, 1JIoc"c,.:·, 0 ;?~:Z::Z::Z:::Ci~~ !,Y It ~. !!. !!. ~ I'b (II ,8 = 3 (Q o.D..c Q a. CI. 111 Z~ ~~~-o;:'E'=' Ll1......cQQ:;¡\1I331J1 3~ ~~~~.~.c:J:-g _, 0 Q 0 Co .... .....D" ¡þ -b~a.a.c.~-;~.::r ê:5.w~~[~4"~ 1),2.:5 3 Þ!-......... ~ ::z:¡ ~ ib 3 ..È'";:¡ ~ ,..,: [ ~ [ Ii " . :'. e: " }~ I ~: ~j;- ~ i ~~~ . " -, ~~ ~~ .., . '., J ~ I , ~, ~ 0:.:%; : """t: K-.ji3 :t - I ~ ~ I !:'> [j 'i' ¿;. .. i.,¡ I , \Ii; 1:), ',_~' ÇD 'D. IS) ~§ ~ i " " ~~. ',,~'~~~-_.',."~-- I ¡¡~~ '" '" ~ ?;;.. ~~ ~ i ~~ \" <> ",I" ¡)ow" i ~ I \" \" ~ " tH~ c " ;:¡ '" " ~ .".; ~!15 "0 .., ,.. ~ eo '" ?i >- ._J.¡:~z ----¡j. o..·,_nU ..-- 1",,"~O.:J 1"Jl <J.r~a:J , ~~ (!) ... n ~ _. """". ::no (':¡(JQ ~a ::>0 (!) o 1;;1 l'8 g¡ ..... p..'"ti cS' '" 0 (¡) --- ~tTI ::>0 ::>0 1;;1 ~ t:J g. ....... ... 1;;1 l'tj'"ti ::>0 ~ ..... o 0'" 0 p.. ....... 'd C S' @ '" VJ (!) CD 'd p.. ::gga ::>0 ...CD =::nl;;l a ~ '"ti::>O ....... ....... g¡ '"ti ....... ~~ ~~ g ..... -- r ;:¡ "" ;;'n"' >;; ~ () 0 I~' (t:¡ ~ "t pBõ:~ 0 8 J> '" = r::r > 0 (t:¡ om~ ~> 2 ~ ~.. , , - " :3 --, = - CO) ~'='::¡¡ !:: " ~('¡" ~ ~ ~ 0< (t:¡ II) .... c ~c:~ ~" '!' ~ ('þ = = c. ¡ ~", _. . ;:I " If ----¡j " ~- )1 tL ~ æ::: = H (I :3 '" ~ '~ 8, _._"'~_.___n_... (1¡ ;:I rn -- ~~ . ;:I (j1 Z 0 ~ IT \I 0 = 00004 ( j ~ rTl (1¡ = ~ x Q ) ::s- ::!' >=' lJ'\ ~ IT " 8, )/ '.'....". " M- ~~ """ 0 \J '~ 6 \\) ('þ('þ l\ :¡ ~!;I.) \j "'"