Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.16 LandspLight AD 86-1 CITY CLERK File" O~[l;jD:[11Q] . AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 21, 2005 SUBJECT: Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District 86-1 (Dougherty Road): Preliminary Engineer's Report . &port Prepared by: MellllQ A. Morton. PublIc Worla DIrector ATIACHMENTS: 1) 2) 3) Resolution Approving Preliminary Engineer's RepOrt Resolution Appointing rune and Place of Hearing Protests of Proposed Assessments (July 19, 2005) Preliminary Engi",,«'s Report (Assessment Diagram to be displayed at City Council Meeting) RECOMMENDATION: ,/' Adopt resolutions approving preliminary engineer's report and setting )8.. rz,.-w' . hearing date and time (July 19, 2005, 7:00 p.m.) for the 2005-2006 o assessment FINANCIAL STATEMENT: . 1005-1006 Source.s and Use Qj'LrmdWYmP. Maintenance District Funds Revenues: Total Amount Proposed to be Assessed: &ttmated Interest Revenue: Estimated Prior Year Collectirms and Penalties Less Estimated Collection and Delinquency Cost: Net Total Revenues: $92,666 $ 1,587 $ 541 (U" (138) $92,756 Expenditures: Contract LandsaqJe Maintenance: Utilities: Fence Painting Capital Improvement Project Administration and Engineering: Total Operating Expenses: U2,924 $31,685 $32,920 J 1.350 Sl08,879 As shown above, $92,666 is proposed to be assessed to property owners for the 2004-2005 street landscaping maintenance costs. The individual assessments are calculated at $142.22 per single.tàmily home and $71.12 per multi-family parcel. This is a 2.4% increase above the 2004·05 assessment, which is commensurate with e _~~_~__._~________PM______~~_______~_.____________~_______._~M COPIES TO: 111:_ -.t.:Ø\86-1\86-I~400 I Db"2.. ITEM NO. 4. f (0 the Consumer Price Index rate of increase (April 2005) and is allOWed under the terms of the Engineer's Report that was approved in 200 1. Including the cost of the fence painting Capital Improvement Project, the budgeted cost of maintenance exceeds the projected income for the District; therefore, approximately $16,123 of the District reserve will be used to offset the cost of maintenance. The cash balance . at the end of2005-06 is estimated at $41,374. DESCRIPTION: This maintenance assessment district was formed in 1986 as part of the review 8Rd approval of the Villages at Willow Creek development. This assessment district funds the maintenance of landscaping, including fencing and soundwalls, along the west side of Dougherty Road from Amador Valley Boulevard to the northerly City Limit, along Amador Valley Boulevard ffom Dougherty Road to WUdwood Road, along Wtldwood Road and Fall Creek Road, and certain landscaped areas within the Ridgecreek single-family home development. Landscaping within the condominium and apartment developments is the responsibility of the homeowners' association or property owner for those individual developments. The landscaping along and within the Alamo Creek channel area is not included in the assessment district as it is the responsibility of .Alllmeda County flood Control, Zone 7. In Fiscal Year 2001-02, the assessment in this District was increased by 54%,.as the reserve funds had become depleted and could no longer be used to offset utility and maintenance cost increases. The rate increase was approved by property owners under the terms of Proposition 218. The property owners also approved an escalation clause for future years that allows the assessment to be increased to cover (1) actual increases in utility cost, and (2) inflationary increases in the cost of maintenance, as determined by the Consumer Price Index rate of increase. The latest Consumer Price Index information available prior to development of the budget (April 2005, Bay Area Urban Wage Earners) indicated that the rate of increase is 2.4%; therefore, the proposed .... assessment for 2005-2006 has been increased byapproximate1y 2.4%, from $90,492 to $92,664. There are ,., no changes in the District boundary or the method of calculating the spread of assessments. A portion of the reserve in this District has been allocated in the Capital Improvement Program for 2005- 06 to paint approximately half of the wrought iron fence along Fall Creek and Wildwood Roads. At this time, it appears that the reserve will not be sufficient to paint the balance of the fence the following fiscal year. Staff is therefore proposing to identifÿ and paint the portions of the fence that need the most work. The balance of the painting could be accomplished in a future year when the level of the reserve has increased again. Staff will be scheduling a neighborhood meeting prior to the public hearing date for this District. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolutions approving the preliminary Engineer's Report and setting a public hearing date of July 19, 2005, for the 2005-2006 assessment. . d-OQd- I CTI\O e RESOLUTION NO. -OS A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN _...***... APPOINTING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING PROTESTS IN RELATION TO PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86--1 WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 037·05, a resolution directing preparation of annual report for City of Dublin Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District (the "District") this Council designated the Public Works Director as Engineer of Work and ordered that Engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has made and filed with the City Clerk a preliminary report in writing as called for in said Resolution No. 037-05. and under and pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a public hearing shall be held on July 19, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. at the Dublin Civic Center, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California, at which the City Council will hear protests and will consider and finally a.ct upon the Engineer's RepOrt. e BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice of said hearing by the following means: publishing aootice once a week for two weeks in a local newspaper published and circulated in the City and conspicuously posting a notice at not less than three public locations; said noticing to be completed at least ten (10) days before the date herein set for hearing of protests. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said notices shall contain the following information: the estimated assessment per parcel, the general description of the purpose or improvements the assessment will fund, the address to which a protest may be mailed, and the date, hour, and place set for the aforementioned public hearing. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day ofJune, 2005. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor J.,,1t;..M (o-?\-O~ t.hlLQ ,'S: ~~r..h r~ ~.,,~ r~/~ t: ~\..rr I ,: ~. I, 1, '._ : .,.",. .':''''.' ., , ,... ,"'''.''''.'''''''"'. '" &i;t:£u.--hrll /Î..".,(!JlJÌ ~ ?~%ø;v ATTEST: . City Clerk 2otlO RESOLUTION NO. .OS A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ******... e APPROVING PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86.1 (TRACT 5511) WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 037-05, a Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for City of Dublin Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 86·1 (the "District"), this Council designated the Public Works Director as Engineer of Work and ordered said Engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has made and filed with the City Clerk a preliminary report in writing as called for in said Resolution No. 037·05 and under and pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient; and that said report neither requires nor should be modified in any respect; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED a) That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of maintaining said improvements and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, as contained in said report be, and - each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed; · b) That the diagram showing the assessmem district, description of the improvements to be maintained, and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective lots and parcels ofland within said District, as comBined in said report be, and it is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed; c) That the assessment of the total amount of the cost and expenses of the proposed maintenance of said improvements upon the several lots and parcels of land in said District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels, respectively, ftom said maintenance, and of the expenses incidental thereto, as comBined in said report be, and they are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day ofJune, 2005. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor . ATTEST: City Clerk J\'. .TT~.('·,¡,.)II~....ð. '-~!.T Z f'q d1v' ì~VI!::r'l; I 1&1]crW-~ ì;;_I.;~ ~ 'f'rolJR.. f<V ~i.~ 3ðÒlO · CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1986-1 (TRACT 5511) · FISCAL YEAR 2005~2006 ENGINEER'S REPORT · .l""'''rt t"".J~t!e·"iI·1i· :3 Ii"."~i ;f'\":.jt:¡;;ìt~:r.:.:'"'r ¡i ~~~~'~-Q:p;¿ L4 D:tJ\ 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ENGINEER'S LETTER............................................."..········.·......1........................4~.. 3 2 ESTIMATE OF COSTS...................................................................................5 '- 3 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT............................................................. 6 4 PARCEL LISTING................................................."..............................".......... 7 5 CERTIFICATIONS.........................................................................tr......,....... 8 · · · "- 5Dò\O · 1 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on March 15, 2005, the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, adopted its Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment District 1986.1 for the maintenance of improvements more particularly therein described; and WHEREAS, said Resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565, et. seq., of said Act; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the Council of said City, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the maintenance of said improvements and the cost and expenses incidental thereto, to be paid by said District. Summarv of Assessment (1) (2) (3) As Filed As As Finally · Preliminarily Approved Approved . . Cost of Maintenance $74,609 Capital Improvement Project $32,920 Incidental Expenses $44,677 TOTAL COSTS $151,206 , Estimated 2005·06 Interest Income ($1,587) Applied to 2005·06 Operating Costs Prior Year Collections & Penalties ($541) Estimated Surplus from 2004·05 Fiscal ($57,411) Year SU~TOTAL ($59,540) NET TO BE ASSESSED FOR FISCAL $92,666 YEAR 2005--2006 · , l..o 00\ 0 2 ESTIMATE OF COSTS · The estimated cost for the maintenance of improvements described in this Report for Fiscal Year 2005-06 is as follows: ESTIMATE OF COSTS Maintenance Landscaping and Street Tree Maintenance $42,924 Capital Improvement Project $32,920. Utilities: $31.685 $107,529 Incidentals Engineer's Report and Proceedings $1,350 County of Alameda Collection Costs @ 1. 7% $1,575 Delinquencies @ 0.5% $463 ContingencieslReserve $41.289 $44,677 TOTAL: $152,206 · · 7ðQ\O . 3 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT Each single family lot shall be assigned a benefit unit of one (1), each multifamily unit assigned a benefit unit ofone--half(I/2), the commercial lot shall have a benefit unit offoUf (4), and the open space lots shall have a benefit unit of zero. This gives the following benefit units and apportionments for each Village for this Fiscal Year: Number of Living Units Benefit % of Total Assessment Units Lot 150 Village 1 56 28 4.3 Lot 149ViIlagell 248 124 19.03 Lot 148 Village ill 224 112 17.19 Lot 146A Village IV 135 67.5 10.36 Lot 146B Village V 204 102 15.66 Lot 1·145 Village VI 145 145 22.26 Lots 152·177 Village vn 138 69 10.59 Lot 151 Commercial 0 4 0.61 Lots A· D Open Space 0 0 0 . Total: 1150 651.5 100 The amrual maintenance cost shall be increased annually beginning July 1, 2002, by the percentage increase in the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Consumer Price Index ("Index'') (applies to all costs except utilities), plus any actual increase in the cost of utilities (power and water). If the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Consumer Price Index is unavailable or deemed by the City Council to be inappropriate, a comparable consumer price index, as approved by the City Council, shall be used to replace the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Price Index. SAMPLE CALCULATION MAINTENANCE COST FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-05 $123,155 LESS UTILITY COST (sUBJECT TO RATE INCREASE ONLy) $(32 387) $90 768 ASSESSMENT SUBJECT TO INDEX INCREASE $90,768 INDEX INCREASE (ASSUMED 2.4%) 90.768 X .024=1,906 $2 179 . $92.947 lJI1LITY COST $32,387 ASSUME UTILITY RATE INCREASE IS 2.4% 32,387 X .024 = $]77 $33 164 e NEW TOTAL MAINTENANCE COST $126.111 EFFECTIVE RATE INCREASE; «(125 061·123,155)/123 155) 2.4% -----. ....-.. ..._....__.......u... .. .---------..- ß~\O 4 PARCEL LISTING · Assessment & Lot Property Number Assessment 2005--06 Number Ownen of Units per Unit Total Assessment Lot 150 (Village I) Individual 56 $71.12 $3,982.72 Owners Lot 149 (Village II) Individual 248 $71.12 $17,637.76 Owners Lot 148 (Village III) Individual 224 . $71.12 $15,930.88 Owners Lot 146A (Village IV) Individual 135 $71.12 $9,601.20 Owners Lot 146B (Village V) Individual 204 $7Ll2 $14,508.48 Owners Lots 1 - 145 (Village Individual 145 $142.22 $20,621. 90 VI) Owners Lots 152·177 (Village Individual 138 $71.12 $9,814.56 VII) Owners Lot 151 (Commercial) Unknown 4 $142.22 $568.88 Lots A . D Open Space Unknown 0 $0.00 $0.00 District Total: 1,154 N/A $92,666.38 · · · · · ----P ~~\O As required by said Act, a diagram is hereto attached showing the exterior boundaries of said landscaping maintenance assessment district and also the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district as the same exilrted at the time of the passage of said resolution, each of which lots or parcels having been given a separate number upon said diagram. I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment dilrtrict by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the maintenance of said improvements, and more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof Said assessment is made upon the several lots or parcels of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said lots or parcels respectively ftom the maintenance of said improvetl1ents. The diagram and assessment numbers appearing herein are the diagram numbers appearing on said diagram, to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description of said property. The scope of work shall include the following: . The median and roadside landscaping along the north side of Willow Creek Drive. . Roadside landscaping along Shady Creek Drive within Lots 1,2,3,4,5,6, 15, 16,37,38, and south of Lot 145, all within Tract 5511. o Roadside landscaping, wall, fence, and pathway improvements along the west side of Dougherty Road, between Amador Valley Boulevard and the northerly City Limit line, and along the north side of Amador Valley Boulevard, between Dougherty Road and Wildwood Road. o Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements on the west side of Wildwood Road. o Roadside landscaping, fence, wall, and pathway improvetl1ents on the west side of Dougherty Road and the south side of Amador ValleyBoulevard, adjacent to Lot 150. o Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements on the west and north sides of Fall Creek Road. o Roadside landscaping and etl1ergency access surfacing at the north end of Crossridge Road within the street right-of-way. Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Alameda for the Fiscal Year 2005/06 and includes all of such parcels excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or rights of way to be acquired in these proceedings for public road purposes. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Dot" &/'7/0'3 'ClS!!~::,p ~ Public Works Director \ 0 ~\ 0 5 CERTIFICA110NS 1, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certifY that the foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in Column (1), with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on June 21,2005. 1, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certifY that the foregoing Assessment, , with the diagram thereto attached, was preliminarily approved and confumed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. -05, duly adopted by said Council on June 21, 2005. 1. the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was finally approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. -OS, duly adopted by said Council on July 19, 2005. I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certifY that a certified copy of the Assessment was filed in the office of the County Auditor of the County of Alameda, -California, on August 10, 2005. · · ·