HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.2 I/580 HOV Lane Project
CITY CLERK
File # D[8[Q][Q]-[:t][Q]
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 21,2006
SUBJECT:
ATTACHMENTS:
RECOMMENDATION:
~
~
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
Approval of Memorandum of Understanding for 1-580 Intelligent
Transportation System Managemcnt/Traffic Operations System
(ITSITOS) and Project Chartcr for "Phase I" 1-580 HOV Lane
Project
Report Prepared bY' Melissa Morton, Public' Work., Direr:tor
Rcsolution approving the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
and the Project Charter, together with Exhihit "A," MOU, and
Exhibit "B," Project Charter
Adopt the resolution approving thc proposcd Memorandum of
Undcrstanding for the 1-580 Intelligent Transportation System
Management/Traffic Operations System (ITS/TOS) and thc Project
Charter tbr "Phase 1" 1-580 HOV Lane Project.
Thcrc is no cost associated with the execution of the proposed
Memorandum of Understanding and Project Charter The City will
ultimately benefit from participating in regional coordination of
transportation management activities within the Tri- Valley area and
Alameda County by potentially receiving outside funding to expand
the City's tramc monitoring system and improving sharing
capabilities of traffic data and video with Caltrans and other
agencies. Staff time may he required in the future to implement
such regional coordination efforts. Funding commitments for
specifk projects committing local resources or personnel time will
he covered by one or more separate cooperative agreements.
DESCRIPTION: The CIties uf Dublin, Livermore and Pleasanton recently completed
a joint installation of the 1-580 Smart Corridor system that linked respective traflic operabons centers via
fiber optic interconnect cable. This enabled the three cities to monitor local traffic flows and manage
traflic incidents in a coordinated manner within the Tn-Valley area. The 1-580 Smart Corridor is one of
COpy TO:
Page I of J
ITEM NO. P> 2-
0:\1-580 Smart Corridur\I-S80 IIOV Lane. TMP ITS\agst 1-:580 IIOV Lane MOU & project chartCLdoc
~
two smart corridor systems currently in cxistcncc in Alameda County The other system is known as the
East Bay Smart Corridors Program along the 1-80/1-880 comdor in Alameda and Contra Costa CountIes,
led by the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (CMA). This systcm involves a cooperatIve
elTort among twenty-five local, rcgional and fcdcral agencies to implement an integrated, advanced multi-
modal transportation management system. Twelve local agencies are lI1volved on this project along the
1-80/1-880 corridor from the City of Hercules to the north, to the City of Union City to the south.
Memorandum of Undcrstand;n!! for 1-580 ITS/TOS
The proposed MOU for 1-580 Intelligent TransportatIon System Management/Tramc Operations System
(lTS/TOS) is intended to facilitate lI1ter-jurisdictional coordination and cooperation among operating
agencies in Alamcda County in order to improve traffic operations along highly traveled corridors,
including 1-580 Participating agencies in thIs MOU lI1clude the Cities of Dublin, Livermore and
Pleasanton, Alameda County, Caltrans, Livermore-Amador Vallcy Transit Authority (LA VTA), CMA,
and thc Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC).
Staff recommends that the City of Dub 1m partIcIpate 111 thIs MOU in order to secure the City's role as a
key participant in regional transportation solutions in Alamcda County By executing the MOU, the City
could potentially receive Operations and Management (O&M) funds in the future for Its traffic
management system by combining efforts with the CMA which periodically pursues O&M funding lor the
East Bay Smart Comdors Program. The MOU will establish a physical connection bctwccn the 1-5S0
Smart Corridor System and the East Bay Smart Corridors Program, allowing traffic data and video sharing
between the two systems. The current CMA website for the East Bay Smart Corridors Program will be
expanded to also provide real-time traffic and incident information to travelers on 1-580 and adjacent local
streets, by linking the East Bay Smart Corridors Program to the 1-580 Smart Corridor System.
The proposed MOU will also allow for closer coordination with LA VT A for improved operations of the
transit system. For example, transit pnonty systems at major SIgnalIzed mtersections m the Tri-Valley
area will be considered to possibly extend the green light for transit buses running bchind schedule and
expedite access to and from the current East Dublin/Pleasanton BART station and the future West
Dublin/Pleasanton BART station. The City Councils of tile Cities of Livermore and Pleasanton have hoth
approved the MOU.
Proiect Charter for "Phase I" 1-580 HOV Lane Proiect
Thc proposed Project Charter rcprcscnts a multj.jurisdictional agreement on key design elements for the
"Phase I" 1-580 HOV Lane Project. This project will include installation of advanced traffic managenlent
and monitonng devices on 1-580 and adjacent local streets to better manage traffic operations in this
corridor during construction of the interim eastbound 1-580 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane from
Hacienda Drive to Greenville Road. The interim HOV lane will be installed in the median area ofI-580
with the understanding that the right-of-way for a future BART extension in the 1-580 median will be
prcscrvcd with the ncxt phase of the full HOV lane improvements along 1-580.
The advanced traffic management and mOl1Jtoring devices on the "Phase 1" HOV Lane Project will
include traffic monituring cameras on 1-580 and adjacent local streets, transit priority systems at signalized
intersections, and advanced vehicle detection systems, changeable message signs and highway advisory
radio statIons on 1-580 The pwpose of these mstallatIons IS to facihtate traffic flow and incident
managcmcnt during construction of thc interim eastbound 1-580 HQV lanc. In Dublin, the "Phase I"
HOV Lane Project is expected to install traffic monitoring canleras at the intersections of Dublm
Boulevard/San Ramon Road and Dublm Boulevard/TassaJara Road, as well as SIgnal mterconneet cable
Page 2 ofJ
along Dublin Boulevard, at no cost to the City Thcsc cameras will be owned and operated exclusively by
the City of Dublin.
The proposed Projcct Charter establishes an agreement regarding the desIgn components of the "Phase I"
1-580 lIOV Lane Project among the CMA, Caltrans, Alameda County, the Cities of Dublin, Livermore
and Pleasanton, and LAVTA. ThIs multi-jurisdictional approach to intelligent traffic solutions in the
Tri- Yallcy area is consistent with the overall objective of the above MOD for 1-580 ITS/TOS to work
cooperatively toward improving the management and operations ofthe 1-580 corridor
The "Phase 1" HOV Lane Projcct is expected to cost $60 million and is fully funded by multiple sources
including federal, State and regional funds, as specified in the Projeet Charter (ExhibIt "B"). Project
construction is expected to start in 2007 and end in 2009 When completed, this project will henefit the
City of Dublin by increasing the capacity of eastbound I-5RO during the evening commute period and
potentially reducing cut-through trafflc on Dublin Boulevard.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed Memorandum of Understanding for 1-580
Intelligent Transportation System Management/Traffic Operations System (lTS/TOS) and Project Charter
for "Phase I" 1-580 HOY Lane Project.
Page] of3
/(Jf/~
RESOLUTION NO. - 06
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIl"
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
*********
APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR 1-580 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
MANAGEMENT/TRAFFIC OPERATIONS SYSTEM (ITS/TOS)
AND PROJ~:CT CHARTER FOR "PHASE I" 1-580 HOV LANE PROJ~;C'r
WHEREAS, the 1-580 Smart Corridor system enables the Cities of Duhlin, Livermure and Plcasanton
to monitor local traffic flows and managc traffic incidents in a coordinated manner in the Tri-Valley arca; and
WHEREAS, it is propuscd to participate in a Memorandum of Understanding with Alameda County,
CaItrans, Livermore-Amadur Valley Transit Authority (LA VTA), Alameda Cuunty Cungcstion Management
Agency (CMA), the Mctropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), and the Cities of Livermore and
Pleasanton, in order to improve traffic operations along highly traveled corridors, including 1-580; and
WHEREAS, thc City also desires to enter into a multi-jurisdictional agreement in the form of a
Projed Charter fur the "Phase I" 1-580 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane Prujcct in order to establish an
agreement regarding the deS1b'll compuncnts of the "Phase 1" 1~5X() HOV Lane Project among the CMA,
Caltrans, Alameda County, LA VT A, and the Cities of Ouhlin, Livem1Ure and Plcasanton, and
WHEREAS, the "Phase 1" HOV Lane Project is consistent with the abovereferenced MOlI tu work
cooperatively toward improving the management and operations of the 1-580 corridor; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City ufDublin does hereby
approve the Memorandum of Understanding tor 1.580 Intelligent Transportation System Managemcnt/Traffic
Operations System (ITSrrOS), and the Project Charter tur "Phase 1" 1-580 HOV Lane Project
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Public Works Directur is authorized to execute the said
Memorandum of Understanding, hereto aUaehcd as Exhibit "A," and the Project Charter, herdo attached as
Exhibit "H "
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTIW this 21 st day of February, 2006
AYES.
NOES.
ABSENT
ABSTAIN
ATTEST
Mayor
City Clcrk
;, ,J, ;)./; I/Oe,
J t)f/;2
Memorandum of Understanding for
1-580 Intelligent Transportation System Management/Traffic
Operations System (ITS/TOS) Among
o City of Duhlin
u City of Livcrmurc
o City ofl'leasanton
o Alameda County
u Caltrans District 4
o LivemlOre Amador Valley Transit Authurity (LA VT A)
o Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (eMA)
u Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)
1. PARTIES
This Memorandum oflJnderstanding (MOO) is entered into effechve January J, 2006 bctwccn the above
listed parties in recognition of the fact that the 1-5HO Corridor, including majur artcrials in thc Citics of
Dublin, Livermore, and Pleasanton (Cities), and Alameda County are important local and regiunal routes,
pruvldmg access tu commercial and other adlVlties in each uf thc jurisdictions it scrvcs. Since the
corridor serves as local and regional routes, there is a need to provide efficient traffic operahuns anoss
jurisdictional boundaries, specilkally during the construction of the 1-5HO Iligh Occupancy Vehicle
(HOV) widening projcct. Bccausc ofthc importance ofthc 1-580 corridor to the local and regional
economies, each jurisdiction will retain the authority to control its uwn transportation systcms, including
the operation oftratllc signals and transit system.
2. PURPOSE
The purpose ofthis MOU is to acknowledge the agreement of all parties to this MOU to wurk
cooperatively toward improving the management and operation of the arterials and State Highway
frccway along the 1-580 corridor.
3. NATURE OF MOU
This MOlJ constitutes solely a guide to the respective intentions and policies of the parties involved. It is not
intended to authorize funding or project effort nor is it a legally binding contract. Funding commitments
providing for the deposit o!'funds lor specitlc work phases or project effort committing machine or perSOIll1el
time will he covered hy one or more separate cooperative agreements.
4. RESPONSIBiliTIES
A. SMART Corridor Technical Advisorv Committee (lAC); The TAt consists of staff members uf
the agencies listed above. The TAC will be responsible for pruviding advicc on thc dcsign,
implementation, and operation of the Intelligent Transportation and Traffic OperatIOn Systems
along thc 1-580 corridor and associatcd local roads. It will be the responsihility of each agency to
ensure that appropriate personnel attend the TAt meetings. The T AC will m~ct on an as-needed
basis to fulfill its responsibilities.
mJDIT A.
?)o/-/;L
Memorandum u/ Understandingjur
1-580 Intelligent Transportatio/l/Tl'{!!!ic Operatio/ls Svstems
Page 2
B. Cities, Alameda Count~, Caltrans, and LA VT A. The participating agencies that operate and
maintain trallic or transit systems have the following responsibilities:
I hngineering review,
2. Operahuns and maintcnancc urtrallic systcms within the agency's own jurisdiction,
3 Reviews of traffic signal system, timing plans and partIcIpation in its dcvclopment,
4 Cunstruchun managcmcnt (when applicable),
5 Cooperate with all MOll particIpating agcncics tu dcvclop trat1lc operations strategies to
move tratfic efficiently in the corridor,
6. Implemenlmg timing plans and rcvicwing changes when updates are implemented,
7 Sharing the use of interconnect cable and commumcatiuns "quipmcnt (where available) with
n"arby jurisdictions to provide cost-etfective signal system communi"ations,
H Notify nearby junsdictions wh"n service intcrruptions occur that could affect system
operations.
9 Respunding to "mcrgcncy trailic conditions within each party's jurisdiction, or as agreed upon
by a joint response plan.
10 Opcration ofthe transit system.
C. CMA. The CMA would provide coordination for the fulluwmg activitics:
1 CountY-WId" planning,
2. Pursuing funding for future phases,
J Pursuing limding tor Operations and Management (O&M),
4. Gran I managem<"'I1t,
5 Partnership agreement develupment with partl~lpating agcncics,
6. Developing necessary agreements,
7. Managing tbe delIvery uf capital projcct clements of the program,
8. Program administration and management,
9 Overall design, engineering, contract administration,
10 Cuurdinatmg thc TAC meetings.
D. Roles ofOthcrs: MTC will assist with corridor programming and funding Issues.
5. OTHER AGREEMENTS
Olhcr transportation rclatcd agreements (maintenance or otherwise) are nol mudified ur alTcctcd by this
MOU and will remain cffcctive bctwccn the signatOlyagencies.
6. TERM
This MOU is in c1Tcct as of January J, 2001> and will tenninate on December 31, 2010, unless tile term is
modified by parties to this MOU by way of an am"ndmcnt.
Memorandum of Understandinf? for
. .
J- 580 Jntel/igen~Z~,!nSl),!rtati{)n/Ji-ajfic Operat!()nS Svstems".
I-t 0 f /;2.
Page 2
The following agencies supporl the Memorandum ofUmlerstanding fur 1-580 Intelligent Transportation
Systems ManagementlTratllc Operations System (ITSITOS):
Signed by:
Date
Director of Public Works
City of Dublin
Community Development Director
City of I -ivennore
Director of Public Works
City of Pleasanton
Deputy Dimict Director
Caltrans District 4
Director of Public Works
Alameda County
Executive Director
Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority
Executive Director
Alameda County Congestion Management Agency
Executive Director
Metropolitan Transpurtation Commission
::; c> +-; 'J-
PROJECT CHARTER
Project Name:
County-Route-P.M..
District-ProJect EA.
1-5~O HOV Lane Prujeel, Phase I
ALA.580 KP RI2.6/30.7 (I'M R7.~/19.1)
04-29()~ 11
Project Phase:
Prepared by:
Date Prepared:
PS&E
Tom Wintch, TY Lin (CMA)
December, 2005
Charter Purpose:
ThIS Chartl-T represents ab'fecml-'I1t on kcy elements of Pmject
Development (PS&E Phase) for the 1-580 I10V Lane Project, Phase
I (lA and IB) between the Alameda Cuunty CongestIOn
Management Agency (ACCMA), Caltrans, Alameda County Puhlic
Works Agency, the cities of Livennore, Dublin, and Pleasanton and
the Livermore-Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA). This is
a working document, and may be modified as appropriate, by written
ab'feement of all parhcs.
Background:
1-580 is the main east-west interregional freeway connecting [-80
and US 101 in the Bay Area with 1-5 in the Central Valle.,. 1-580
scrves as the only maJur lransporlahun curridor providing a commutc
route between San Francisco, Oakland, and San Jose (via 1-680) and
the Tri-Valley (Dublin, Pleasanton, and Livermore), and growing
Central Valley areas (Tracy, Stockton, and the 1-5 COlTidor).
Addihonally, 1-580 is a major route for the movement of goods and
freight into and out of the region, as well as significant recreational
travel throughout the year 1"580 is classified as a "Lifeline Route",
facihtaling movcmcnt bctwccn maJur stagmg arcas and Impactcd
areas following major earthquakes and is the main access to the
Homeland Security Organizatiun at Lawrcncc Livcrmorc National
Lahoratory
The original four-lane divided highway from San Leandro eastward
opened in 1'138 as part of US 50. In 1970, the widening of 1-580
from four lanes to eight lanes was complcted hctween 1-680 and
Vascu Ruad. Caltrans, in a 1985 1-580 Ruutc Cunccpt RqJort,
identified the need to expand 1-580 between 1-680 and Ureenville
Ruad frum cight tu ten lancs. Subscqucntly, 111 Callrans' Drall 1-580
Transportation Corridor Concept Report (TCCR) for the year 2025,
HOV lanes were planncd for 1-580 bctwccn 1-238 and 1-205
Additionally, [-580 I10V lanes were recommended in the 1995 Tri-
Valley Transportation Council's Action Plan and MTC's "Blucpnnt
for the 21" Century" includes commitment for HOV lanes on 1-580
The 1-580 HOV lanes are listed in the MTC 1997 HOV Master Plan
Update. In May 2000, the 1-580 HOV lane project was included in
the Transportation Congestion Relief Program (TCRI') and received
funding through AB 2928 (Torlakson) in July, 2000
This HOV lane project is listed on the (iovemor's List of High
Priority Proj ects, and in the Countywide and Regional Transportation
Plans.
G:II.S8D Smart Corridorll-5BD HOV Lane - TMP ITSII-5BO hoy project charler 12_30_05,doc
mIBlT 5.
b () OJ.
PROJECT CHARTER
Project Name:
County-Route-P.M.:
District-Project EA.
1-580 HOY Lane Project. Phase T
ALA-580 KP RI2.6/30 7 (PM R7.R/19 1)
04-2~0811
Project Phase:
Prepared by'
Date Prepared:
PS&IJ
Tom Wintch, TY Un (CMA)
December. 2005
Background Continued
In lOOO ACTIA's Measure B was approvcd by Alameda County
VOkTS, dcdicating sales tax revenue to an auxiliary lane project un 1.
5ilO between Tassajara Road and AIrway Boulevar'd. In March,
l004, Regional Mcasure 2 (RM2) was approved by Bay Area vuters,
dedicating new toll bridge revenue to specific projccts, mclud;ng the
1-5ilO HOV lanc proJcct. The I-5RO HOY lane project has also
received SAFETEA-LlI funding.
A Projcct Study Report (Project Development Support) (PSR (PDS))
was prepared for eastbound and wcstbound HOV lanes on 1-580
from Vascu Ruad (KP 1 'i.6/PM 9.6) to Tassajara Road (KI' 2KYIPM
179) in Alameda County for a distancc of approximately IJ km (8
milcs), and was approved hy Caltrans on June 29, 200! This proJcct
is a variation from Alternative 1 (Minimum Project Alternative,
MPA) of the PSR (PDS) in which only the eastbound dircctlOn IS
being proposed, and cxlcnds thc westerly limit to Hacienda Drive
aod the easterly limit to the Greenville Overhead.
In latc January 2002, the State and the Al'l'MA exccutcd a
Cooperative Agreement (District A~,'rccment No. 4-1 R7I-C)
authori<<ing the <\CCMA to assist the State in the preliminary pruJcct
development design and cnvlronmcntal clearance of improvements
of castbuund and westhound HOV lanes on I-5ilO from west of
Tassajara Road in Plcasanton to cast of Vasco Road in Livermore in
order to hring ahout the earliest possible construction of thc project.
The project, now under sponsorship of the ACCMA, will providc for
both eastbound and wcstbound HOV lancs along 1-5RO Irom the
Greenville Overhead in Livermore to westerly of the Haclcnda Drivc
Interchange in Plcasanton. The project is proposed to he constructed
in several phases, with the first phase consisting of an castbound
only HOV Ianc betwc<.'ll thc Grccnville Overhead in Livermore and
thc Haclcnda Drive interchange in Pleasanton. This first phasc
project is the subject uf thIS ProJcct Charter Funding lor this first
phasc will be provided hy Regional Measure 2 (RM-2), TCRP, STIP,
Measure Band SAFETEA-LU funds.
Environmental studies were initiated in January 2002 for
improvement of both easlbound and westbound HOV lancs on I-5RO
bctwcen wcstcrly uf Tassajara Road/Santa Rita Road to easterly of
Vasco Road. During 2004, the <\CCMA and Caltrans decldcd to
deliver the overall project in phascs m ordcr to prDvide needed
benefits to the pubhc in the shortest time frame possible.
Environmental documentation for the Phase 1 improvcmcnts,
easthound only, will be available for public rCVlCW III latc 2005 or
early lOOG.
C;\1-580 Smart Corridor\I-560 HOV l.ane - TMP ITS\i-580 hov pmjecr r.harter 12 30 05.doc
Page 2
? '" 112
PROJECT CHARTER
Project Name:
County-Route-P.M..
District-ProJect EA.
1-5~0 HOV Lane Project, Phase [
ALA-5~0 KP RI2.6/30.7 (PM R7.~!l9 1)
04-290811
Project Phase:
Prepared by:
Date Prepared:
PS&L
Tom Wintch, TY Un (CMA)
December. 2005
Background Continued
Final cerlilleation of the Phase I environmental document is
expected in August 2006. The ACCMA will be responsible fur
performing an appropriate pubhe heanng process for thIS projcct.
projcet Development fur Phase 1, including the prcparation uf Plans,
Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E), is proceeding "at-nsk"
concurrent with the P A&ED preparahon and approval. Project
advertisement is currently scheduled for Fall 2006, with construction
cost estunalcd at $55,000,000
Programming
TCRI' funding (Paragraph No. 3 I) provldcd $25 million for this
phase 1 project, and will he complemented with Regional Measure 2
(RM2) funds, Cunstruction funding, including construction
management, has heen committed through TC1U', RM2, STll',
Fcderal Demonstration (SAPETEA-TU) and Measure R timds.
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to reduce cungcstion by cncuuragmg
mass transIt and HOV usagc, support regional air quality attainment
goals and improve safely for motorists, CHI' and Caltrans
maintenance workers.
Cunstruction of the proposed 1-580 HOV lancs will provide
significant relief to peak hour commuters who carpool and to mixed-
flow traCllc during non-commute hours. Phase 1 of this project (the
subject of this Project Charter) will construct an eastbound-only
HOV lane hetween the Hacienda Drive interchange in Pleasanton to
easterly of the Oreenville Overhead in Livermore.
Project Phase Objectives:
Cost - The ACCMA, Caltrans, the Alameda Count) Public Works
Agency, the CIties of Duhlin, Livermore, and Pleasanton, and
LA VTA agree that each agency will diligently endeavor to contain
eusts associated WIth both thc preparation of all the required project
plans and specifications, and the subsequent construction project.
Each agency commits to work 111 partncrshlp to retrain from project
additivcs that will exceed the approved design and construction
budgets of $5 M and $55 M respectively These hudgets represent
the total dollar allocations for both Phase lA and Phase lB. The
distribution of these budgcts betwe~'TI the twu PhaSeS IS yet to bc
determined.
Wherc feasible without undue detriment to project delivery,
additional corridor and/or local improvements may be added if
cummensuratc funding IS pruvidcd by the requesting agency
G:\t-580 Smart Corridor\I-580 HOV Lane - TMP ITS\i-5BO hov projoct charter 12 30 OS.doc
Page 3
'6&1/:1-
PROJECT CHARTER
Project Name:
County-Route-P.M ..
District-Project EA.
I-oRa HOV Lane Prnjoct, Phase I
ALA-SRO KP RI2.6/30 7 (PM R7.R/I9 I)
04-290R I I
Project Phase:
Prepared by'
Date Prepared:
PS&E
Tom Wintch, TY Un (CMA)
December. 2005
Project Phase Objectives Continued:
Schcdule - All signatures to this Charter will work coopcrahvely to
ensure that tinal Plans, Spcclfications, and Estimates (PS&E) for
Phasc lA arc approved hy Caltrans District 4 no later than May 30,
2006. Additionally, all signatures agree tu work coopcratively to
ensure that Phase 1 B PS&E arc approved hy Caltrans District 4 no
later than June 30, 2006, and to certified by Caltrans OE as RTL no
later than March 1, 2007 (depending on the administering agency
selected hy the ACCMA1.
Quahty CIlnstruction documents will meet Caltrans' dCSlb'll
standards, provide for a safe environmcnt for both motorists and
cunstruction wurkcrs, minimize inconvenience to the public and
provide for a cost-effective design.
Customer Satisfaction - The contract documcnts and suhsequent
cunstructlOn shall be supported hy the Project Sponsor and cach of
the Project Partners.
Project Description/Scope Statement:
'Ibe Phase I I-SgO HOV Lanc ProJcct, proposes to construct:
Phase I A. lMP-TOS,lTS/Advance Elem<'llls
. Ramp metering cqulpmcnt along easthound on-ramps at North
Livermore Avenue interchange, First Strcct mtcrchange, Vasco
Road interchange and Greenville Road interchange
. Ramp metering equipment along wcstbuund Iln-ramps at
Grccnvillc Road interchange, Vasco Road interchange, hrst
Street interchange, North Livermore Avenue intc'Tchangc,
Portola Avenue mterehange, and Airway Iloulevard
intc'Tchangc.
. TOS/ITS elements identitled within the CUTTent Systcms
Engineering and Managemcnt Plan that are a required
component ofthe TMP for the Phase IH project
Phase I B Easthound HUVAuxiliary Lanes
. An interim eastbound HOV lane wIthin thc eXIsting 1-580
median rrom the Haci.mda Drive interchange to east of the
(jreenville Overhead. CHI' enforcement areas in the median at
standard spacmg.
G:\1-580 Smart Corridor\I-580 HOV Lano - TMP ITS\i-580 hov project charter 12_30_05.doc
Page 4
'7 () fI:z.
PROJECT CHARTER
Project Name:
County-Route-P.M .:
District-Project EA.
1.580 HO\l Lane Project, Phase I
ALA"580 KP RI2.6/30 7 (PM R7.8/19 1)
04-290Rll
Project Phase:
Prepared by'
Date Prepared:
PS&E
Tom Wintch. TY Lin (eMA)
December. 2005
Project Description/Scope Statement Continued:
Phase 1 B Eas/hound HOV/Auxiliarv Lanes Continued
. Eastbound auxiliary lanes between:
o Fallun Road/EI CharTO Road interchange and AilWay
Boulevard interchange
o AilWay Boulevard interchange and the proposed Isabel
A venue interchang<:
o First Slr<:d mt<:rchange and Vasco Road interchange
. M<:dian foundations/columns for future overcrossing structures
at the proposed Isabel Avenue interchange and the new Purlula
^ venue uvcrcrussing.
. Arroyo Las Positas h,'idge widening to accommodate the
proposed eastbound on-ramp fur the n<:w Isabd A vcnu<:
ml<:rchangc.
. TJnder separate timding through Caltrans Pavement
Rehabilitation (SHOPP) Prub'1'am, pavcmcnt rchabilitation
within the existing 1-580 eastbound direction from Hacienda
Drive interchange to the Gre<:nvillc Ov<:rh<:ad
Th<: attached Exhibit "A" illustrates the interim Phase I Project
Project/Phase Constraints, Assumptions, and Risks.
Com/raillt..,
. Environmental Document restrictions
. Environmental Document schedule
. Traffic operations at 1-680
. Availabl<: funding
. Resource Agency permitting
. Constrained right-of-way
. Eastbuund trafllc operations
. BART operations
. Adjacent interchange projects
. Uesign exceptions at mt<:rchanges
. Caltrans pavement rehabilitation strategy
A""umptioll,<:
. Th<: dcsib'II y<:ar fur thc pruject is 2030
. Projcct Partncrs will not endeavor to add scope elements to
thc Proj<:ct withuut the provision of separate and availahle
funding for same.
. Project Partners will mamtain cost control on Project issues.
G,II-580 Sow, CO";do<\l-580 HOV lane - TMP ITS\;-580 hov projec' charter 12_30_05.doc
Page 5
10 of /.2
PROJECT CHARTER
Project Name:
County-Route-P.M..
District-Project EA.
1-5RO HOV T .ane Project, Phase I
ALA-'iRO KP R 12.6/30.7 (PM R7.~/19 I)
04-290Rlt
Project Phase:
Prepared by'
Date Prepared:
PS&L
Tom Wintch. TY Lin (CMA)
December. 2005
Project/Phase Constraints,
Assumptions, and Risks Continued:
Assl/mptions COlllinued:
. ProJcct Partners will work together in a cooperative fashion
to further transportation improvements throughout the entIre
1-5g0 corridor withm thc Tn-Valley
. Ca1trans will construct ramp metering for both eastbound
and westbound 1-580 bctwccn San Ramon Ruad/Foothill
Road mt~'Tchangc and Tassajara Road/Santa Rita Road
interchange, under Contract No 04-151054
. Resources will bc providcd by all partncrs to meet the
schedule.
. funding will be provided by all partncrs, mcludmg SHOPP
fundmg.
Ri,'ks:
. Agency resourccS availability which could lcad to schedule
and cost ovcrruns.
. Regional and Local Agency support.
. Timely certIficatIon oflhc Environmental Document
. Multiple contractors working in the corridor concurrently
. Design Exccption approvals.
. Aerially deposited lead contamination.
Phase Deliverables:
At/VI/flee ITStTOS Elemellls
. Concept of Operations Report
. Draft Systems Engineering and Management Plan
. Final Systems Engineering and Management Plan
. Draft Cooperative Agreement
. Pinal Cooperative Agreement
. Final Environmcntal Clcarance
. 35')'0 Plans, Specifications and Estimate
. 95% Plans, Specifications and Estimate
. Final (100%) Plans, SpeCIficatIons "nd Estunalc
EB HOV Lafle
. 35% Plans and Estimate
. Prchmm"ry TransportatIon Management Plan
. "Infurmal" 65% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate
. 95% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate
. Final (100'10) Plans, Specifications, and bstim"te
. Final Transportation Management Plan
8:\1-580 Smart Corridor\I.580 HOV Lane. TMP ITS\i-580 hov project charle~ 12_~O_05,doc
Page 6
II 01 /J,
PROJECT CHARTER
Project Name:
Cou nty-Route-P .M.:
District-Project EA.
1-5811 HOV Lane Project, Phose 1
ALA-580 KP R 12.6/307 (PM R7.R119 1)
04-2911811
Project Phase:
Prepared by'
Date Prepared:
PS&E
Tom Wintch, TY Lin (CMA)
December, 2005
Key Team Members:
ACCMA................................. Frank Furger
Stefim Ciarcia
Caltrans Stewart Ng
Mark Zabaneh
Issa Bouri
Steph~'Il Haa,
Alameda County Dawn Argula
Ruben 120n
City of Dublin Ray Kuzban
Ferd del Rosario
City of Livermore ............. Bob Vinn
Mohammad Poumia
Ken Ross
City of P1easanton u'"'''''''' Jeff Knowle,
Mike Tassano
LA VTA. .Barbara Duffy
Deliverable Management:
. The ACCMA Project ManageT will communicate with Project
Partners to resolve issues, as required.
. PDT Meetings will he held on a regular, monthly basis.
. Thc ACCMA will provide meeting minutes and action items for
all Project Partners no later than 14 day' priur tu thc ncxt PDT
Meeting.
. Action items will include re'pun,ible partie, whu will ~'Ildcavur
to complete ta,ks by thc ,chedulcd date.
. The ACCMA will preparc a detailed schedule fur this phase of
the proJcct.
. The Al'CMA will provldc Projeet Partners with copies of all
PS&E milc,tunc submittals. All Project Partners agree to
provide comments to the ACCMA on all draft milc,tunc
,ubmittab withm SIX wccks of receipt.
G:\1-580 Smart Corridor\I-5BO HOV Lane - TMP ITS\I-S80 hov project charter 12_30_0S.doc
Page 7
Project Name:
County-Route-P.M..
District-Project EA.
PROJECT CHARTER
t-580 nov Lane Project, Phase I
ALA.580 KP R12.6/30.7IPM R7.8/19 1)
04-290811
Project Phase:
Prepared by'
Date Prepared:
f J of/?-
PS&E
Tom Wintch, TY Un (eMA)
December, 2005
Approvals.
Project Sponsor:
Project Partner:
Project Partner:
Project Partner:
Project Partner:
Project Partner:
Project Partner'
Dennis Fay
Exeeuhve Dlrectur
'" lameda Counry
Congestion Management Agency
Bijan Sartipi
DIstrict Director
Califomia Department of Transportation
Donald J LaBelle
Director of Public Works
Alameda County Public Works Agen"y
Mehssa Morton
Director of Public Works
City of Dublin
Marc Roberts
Community Development Dlreelor
City of Livermore
Robert Wilson
Director of Public Works
City of 1'Ieasanton
Barbara Duffy
General Manager
Livermore-Amador Valley Transit Authority
G:\1-58Q Smart Corrldor\I-5BO HOV Lane - TMP ITS\I-580 hov project charter 12_30_05.doc
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Page 8