HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-07-2006 Adopted CC Min
MINUTES OF THE Crn' COUNCIL
OF THE Crn' OF DUBLIN
RE6ULAR MEIITIN6 - FEBRUARY 7. 2006
CLOSED SESSION
A closed session was held at 6:30 p.m., regarding:
I CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED
LITIGATION
Government Code Section 54956.9, subdivision (b)(i) Facts and
Circumstances: Government Code Section 54956.9, subdivision (b)(3)(B)-
ClP Project # 96920
II CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -ANTICIPATED
LITIGATION
initiation of Litigation pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9,
subdivision c (3 potential cases)
III CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
Government Code section 54956.9, subdivision (a)
Name of cases: Alameda County Superior Court Case Nos.
City of Dublin v. Angela Gaspare, et al- VG05222845
City of Dublin v. Ralph Gil, etal- VG0524l773
City of Dublin v. Tejindar P. Singh, et al- VG05228899
City of Dublin v. Wohlross Associates, et al- VG05238505
..
A regular meeting of the Dublin City Council was held on Tuesday, February 7, 2006, in
the Council Chambers of the Dublin Civic Center. The meeting was called to order at
7:00 p.m., by Mayor Lockhart.
..
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 46
~
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Hildenbrand, McCormick, Oravetz and Zika, and
Mayor Lockhart.
ABSENT: None
...
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The pledge of allegiance to the flag was recited by the Council, Staff and those present.
..
REPORT ON CWSED SESSION ACTION
Mayor Lockhart advised that no action was taken during Closed Session.
..
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Introduction of New EmDlovees
7:00 p.m. 3.1 (700-10)
Community Development Director Jeri Ram introduced the Community Development
Department's new Office Assistant II, Taryn Powell.
City Manager Richard Ambrose introduced new Administrative Services Director, Paul
Rankin, and advised that Mr. Rankin was previously employed by the City of Dublin from
1983 - 1993.
The Council welcomed Ms. Powell and Mr. Rankin to the Dublin City Staff.
..
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 47
~
Apvointment to Senior Center Advisory Committee
7:04 p.m. 3.2 (110-30)
City Clerk Fawn Holman presented the Staff Report and advised that the Council would
consider the appointment of Jim McCuen to the Senior Center Advisory Committee to fill
the unexpired term of Luis Batiza, who recently resigned.
Jim McCuen thanked the Council for his appointment and stated that his wife was a very
active volunteer in the City and he looked forward to becoming involved, as well.
On motion of Vm. Oravetz, seconded by Cm. Zika and by unanimous vote, the Council
confirmed the Mayor's appointment of Jim McCuen to the Senior Center Advisory
Committee to fill the remaining portion of a term which ends December 2008.
..
Public Comments
7:05 p.m. 3.3
No comments were made by any member of the public at this time.
..
CONSENT CALENDAR
7:05 p.m. Items 4.1 through 4.11
On motion of Cm. Zika, seconded by Cm. McCormick and by unanimous vote, the
Council took the following actions:
Approved (4.1) Minutes of Regular Meeting of January 17,2006;
Authorized (4.2 600-35) Solicitation of Bids - Contract No. 05-14, Freeway Underpass
Artwork Lighting, Phase 2;
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 48
~
Adopted (4.3 600-35)
RESOLUTION NO.7 - 06
ESTABLISHING A POLICY fOR THE REPAIR OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
DEEMED TO BE PEDESTRIAN HAZARDS
(CITY -FUNDED REPAIR PROGRAM)
and authorized Staff to advertise for bids for the FY 2005-2006 Annual Sidewalk Safety
Repair Program and Curb Ramp Installation;
Authorized (4.4 600-30) Mayor to execute City Manager's Employee Agreement;
Adopted (4.5 700-20)
RESOLUTION NO.8 - 06
AMENDING THE SALARY PLAN
TO ADD CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY
Adopted (4.6 600-30)
RESOLUTION NO.9 - 06
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH JA1\1ES & ELINOR LANGE, SUSAN PLISSKIN, LAWRENCE
PLISSKIN, STEVEN & JUDITH GOLDMAN, AND GREEN BEAR, LLC,
fOR THE PURCHASE OF A PORTION OF PROPERTY IN FEE
LOCATED AT 6500 DUBLIN BOULEVARD
and accepted the Grant Deed and Grant of Temporary Construction of said property; and
authorized the City Manager to issue a check in the amount of $1,012,267.20 payable to
Chicago Title Company for deposit into escrow;
Adopted (4.7 410-40)
RESOLUTION NO. 10 - 06
APPROVING PARCEL MAP 8726
(SHAMROCK fORD, INC., A CALIfORNIA CORPORATION)
Accepted (4.8 600-35) Work - Contract No. 04-08A, Village Parkway Sidewalk
Widening and Lighting Improvement;
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 49
~
Waived readings and adopted
ORDINANCE NO.4 - 06
APPROVING A STAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS DUBLIN
TRANSIT CENTER SITE E-l (METROPOLITAN AT DUBLIN STATION) PA 05-042
and
ORDINANCE NO.5 - 06
APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR
DUBLIN TRANSIT CENTER SITE E-l, PA-05-042
Adopted (4.10 600-30)
RESOLUTION NO. 11 - 06
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC., FOR
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL
INSPECTION SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $41,000
Approved (4.11 300-40) the Warrant Register in the amount of $2,588,897.59.
...
WRITIEN COMMUNICATIONS - None
...
PUBUC HEARINGS
Public Hearing
Adoption of Ordinance Amending the
Loitering Provisions of the Dublin Municioal Code
7:06 p.m. 6.1 (585-25)
Mayor Lockhart opened the public hearing.
Inga Lintvedt, with the City Attorney's office, presented the Staff Report and advised that
the current City Ordinance pertaining to loitering required revision to assure the City's
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 50
19~m
I
Ordinance met current constitutional standards. There were four main issues the courts
ponder when considering the constitutionality of a loitering ordinance: (1) provide
notice by distinguishing between lawful and unlawful conduct, thereby enabling
ordinary people to understand which conduct is unlawful and prohibited; (2) require a
criminal intent element if criminal punishments are attached; (3) so vague as to allow
undue police discretion in its enforcement; (4) infringe upon a fundamental right (such
as the right of free movement) without being narrowly tailored to a compelling state
interest.
Mayor Lockhart asked about the penalty for a civil infraction.
City Attorney Silver advised that it was $100 for the first violation, $200 for the second
within one year, and $500 for each additional violation within one year.
Mayor Lockhart referred to the 10 p.m. - dawn curfew for teenagers and asked about the
situation where a teenager got out of a movie at 11:00 p.m. and wanted to get a coffee
after the movie or was waiting for a ride.
Ms. Lintvedt advised that it would be allowable. Case law provided that the City should
not regulate activity where the minor had an apparent purpose.
Mayor Lockhart asked if the Ordinance could be more specific to the behavior as opposed
to the location.
Ms. Lintvedt advised that Ordinances with more behavior descriptors tended not to be
upheld because it involved an element of subjectivity.
No testimony was entered by any member of the public relative to this issue.
Mayor Lockhart closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Hildenbrand, seconded by Vm. Oravetz and by unanimous vote, the
Council waived the reading and introduced the Ordinance amending Chapter 5.04 of the
Dublin Municipal Code, and continued the matter to the February 21, 2006, Council
meeting.
..
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 51
~
Reauest to Re-Ooen Public Comments
3.3 7:16 p.m.
Mayor Lockhart advised that several people had submitted speaker slips after the Public
Comment period had been closed, and asked the Council if it would consider allowing
the Public Comment period to re-open at this time.
The Council unanimously agreed to re-open the Public Comment period to hear from
only the four speakers who submitted speaker slips.
Sam Shin, Korean Americans United for Peace, expressed concern about the lack of
response from the Dublin Police Department and the City Council regarding the fatal
shooting of two Korean American men by Dublin Police Officers on August 11, 2005.
This lack of response was in contradiction with the City of Dublin's published Mission
Statement. The clear message the Korean American community received was that the loss
of these two Korean lives and the concerns of the growing immigrant community meant
little to the Council. He requested that the City reconsider the events of the past six
months and open dialogue in order to move forward.
Hun Kim, Executive Director of the Korean Community Center in the East Bay, a member
of the Korean American Justice Coalition, advised that the Coalition had written a letter
to Mayor Lockhart requesting a meeting. Mayor Lockhart's response to them was,
"However, because the City contracts with Police services and the personnel assigned to
Dublin are County employees, it would be inappropriate for me to meet with the
Coalition." He disagreed with that statement because two Dublin men were killed by
Dublin Police Officers, wearing Dublin uniforms and paid for by Dublin taxpayers. The
statement gave the impression that the City of Dublin did not want to take responsibility
and requested that the City Council re-open dialogue to discuss this issue, as well as
discuss proactive measures toward safety and policing in the community.
Supervisor Nate Miley, Alameda County Board of Supervisors, thanked the Council for
re-opening the Public Comment period. The candlelight vigil and drum ceremony held
prior to the meeting was a way for Korean community to release pain and anger. He
referred to a letter that he had submitted to the Council and City Clerk, for incorporation
into the public record, in which he advised that the Bay Area Korean American Justice
Coalition met with him just last week and brought it to his attention that, because the
City of Dublin had a contract with the Alameda County Sheriff's Office, that the Police
Officers involved were County employees and the County had a role in this matter. In
light of that, he advised that he would be looking into the investigation and looking at
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 52
~
information around the diversity of the Dublin Police Department, as well as looking at
issues related to training and dealing with cultural sensitivity, language, use of force, etc.
He had had discussion with the District Attorney's Office, Sheriffs Office and County
Counsel regarding this matter, and it was his understanding that the Sheriffs Office had
completed its investigation and this matter was currently being reviewed by the Shooting
Team since this was an officer involved shooting. He expected that the District Attorney's
Office would complete its investigation within the next 3-4 weeks. After that time, it was
his hope and his understanding that the information would be released to Attorney John
Burris, who represented the family, as well as the City Council and other members of the
public, and the findings could then be discussed. Tonight he was present to stand in
solidarity with the Korean community. The City Council were good people, and he was
not blaming anyone for anything, but these were very sensitive and difficult matters
when people lose their lives. It was a tragedy for everyone, and he would not wish this
upon any City; but, it had happened and needed to be dealt with.
Joyce Chung, Tri-Valley resident, expressed concern about the lack of response and
communication by the Dublin Police and City Council. There needed to be awareness so
this type of tragedy would not happen again. The Korean community felt let down, but it
was not too late to come together to make this community safe for everyone. She hoped
this event would open communication between the City and the growing Asian
community.
Mayor Lockhart thanked everyone for coming this evening and stated that she did not
know that there were any words that she or the Council could say that would console
them for their loss. The entire Council cared deeply about the Korean American
community's loss and it was very difficult for the Council to maintain the position that it
was in right now because, as individuals, they all had feelings, thoughts and comments.
However, the Council was representing the City of Dublin and had been asked not to
comment on the issue so that everyone's rights could be protected. The studies needed to
be completed, information gathered and results examined first. The findings would be
open to the public and there would be an opportunity for everyone to comment on the
results at the appropriate time. A claim had been filed and, in keeping with the City's
desire to protect the rights of everyone, not only in the City of Dublin but in the County
of Alameda, the Council would maintain this position until the appropriate time and the
Council was able to comment and work on issues with the Korean American community.
She apologized for not saying what they hoped to hear; however, it was the position the
Council would maintain throughout this issue.
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 53
~
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Dublin Historic Park Master Plan Preferred Alternative
7:30 p.m. 7.1 (920-30)
Parks & Facilities Development Manager Herma Lichtenstein presented the Staff Report
and advised that the City Council would consider revisions to the Full Site Plan for the
proposed Dublin Historic Park that was previously presented to the City Council in
October 2005.
Aditya Advani, Royston Hanamoto Alley and Abey (RRHA), reviewed the proposed Full
Site Plan and the Revised Full Site Plan, which incorporated direction from the Council
received at its October 18, 2005, meeting. The revised plan included an allegorical
"Orchard History Garden" and the Green Store site. The total estimated cost for property
acquisition and development, which included generous contingencies, was $15,559,500.
Blaine Merker, RRHA, gave a digital 3-D tour of the proposed project.
Mayor Lockhart asked about the proposed creek improvements.
Ms. Lichtenstein advised that it would be more of a creek clean-up effort and sensitive
habitat needed to be remembered.
City Manager Ambrose advised that the original plan was estimated to be approximately
$25 million; however, the Architects reconfigured the plan and were able to reduce the
amount by $7 -$8 million.
Susan Hagen, Owner of Dublin Creek Kennels, advised that her kennel was situated at
the end of Donlon Way, behind the Heritage Center, and requested that the proposed
soundwall be extended all the way east to Donlon Way. If not, the noise and dirt would
be funneled to her property and to the museum.
Mayor Lockhart agreed and asked Staff if it was part of the recommendation.
Ms. Lichtenstein clarified where the soundwall was currently proposed to end and
advised that it would add approximately $100,000 to the project to extend the soundwall
east to Donlon Way.
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 54
~
The Council discussed the proposed Site Plans and concurred that the Revised Full Site
Plan (Attachment #2), including the extended soundwall to Donlon Way, was preferable.
It would be worth the extra cost to do the project right.
Ms. Lichtenstein reminded the Council that the $100,000 cost estimate was only a very
rough estimate and could easily change.
Mayor Lockhart agreed and requested that Staff calculate firm numbers and add this
component to the plan.
City Manager Ambrose clarified that the Council wanted Staff to proceed with the
completion of the Master Plan.
The Council concurred.
The Council commended Royston Hanamoto Alley and Abey and Staff for its creativity,
and stated that the overall plan was excellent.
..
Final Report for the
Recreational and Civic Facilities Assessment for the Camt> Parks Project Area
7:59 p.m. 7.2 (420-20)
Senior Planner Kristi Bascom presented the Staff Report and advised that, at previous
meetings, the City Council discussed possible future park and public facilities in the
Camp Parks Project Area, which consisted of 187 acres of property that the Army was
considering for private development. The City Council will receive the final report,
"Uniquely Dublin: A Vision for a Community Place," and recommendations of Advisory
Committees and Commissions on designing a unique park space for the Camp Parks
Project Area. Staff recommended that the Council consider information contained in the
Report, as well as input from advisory bodies and take the following action: 1) Evaluate
whether a theme concept should be pursued; 2) If so, determine whether one of the
original three themes was acceptable or whether some combination of the theme
elements was desirable; and 3) Determine desired acreage number for transmittal to the
U.S. Army.
Mayor Lockhart noted that the Valley Children's Museum was getting ready to announce
that the Army had ground leased 5 acres to them. The property was in addition to the
City's 51 acres.
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 55
~
City Manager Ambrose advised that, previously, the Council's preference was Alternative
#5, which had a total park land area of approximately 50 acres. He suggested that the
Council prioritize what was important to the Council in order to give the Army and the
future Developer a good idea of amount of park acreage that should be included. This
park land would be in addition to whatever neighborhood park acreage the Developer
was required to include in the housing development area.
The Council discussed the various themes and concurred that the combination theme was
preferred.
Mayor Lockhart indicated that Cm. Hildenbrand had suggested a carousel at this
location, as there was no carousel in the Valley. She agreed that it was an excellent idea,
noting that it would go well with the Children's Museum. It could possibly be funded
through a community fundraising project.
The Council discussed the desired acreage and agreed to start with 46 acres, deleting the
indoor cultural arts building, which took up 5 acres. The Children's Museum could be
part of the complex, but would not be part of the 46 acres. Plus 16 acres for the
neighborhood park development.
..
ReQuests for Prooosals for Financial Advisor and Public ODimon Research Firm
8:19 p.m. 7.3 (600-30)
City Manager Richard Ambrose presented the Staff Report and advised that, at its
November 18,2005, Park and Recreation Facility Planning Workshop, the City Council
received a presentation regarding the feasibility of developing a state-of-the-art
Recreation! Aquatic Complex in Emerald Glen Park and the expansion of the Historic
Park adjacent to the City's existing Heritage Center. The City had not identified a source
of revenue for this project. At the Workshop, the Council directed Staff to conduct a
survey of voters to determine the level of community support for either an increase in the
ad valorem property tax or the establishment of a parcel tax to fund these facilities. In
order to conduct a statistically valid survey, it would be necessary to retain the services of
a public opinion research firm. In order to develop appropriate survey questions, it
would be necessary to secure the services of a financial advisor to develop tax revenue
estimates. Since the November 18th workshop, the City had been approached by several
private fitness clubs interested in entering the Dublin market, which were not included
in the market analysis prepared by The Sports Management Group.
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 56
~
Mayor Lockhart stated that the survey should not be done until there was a clear picture
of the opportunities with the private fitness clubs and the exact survey questions to be
asked were determined. The Historic Park should not be put off, however, because the
City had outstanding landowner obligations that needed to be resolved. She
recommended not releasing the RFQ and looking at the phased approach to work toward
gaining control of the land.
City Manager Ambrose advised that, with the phased approach, the first phase, land
acquisition and a minimal level of improvements to the land, would be fundable.
Vm. Oravetz agreed with Mayor Lockhart and stated that it would be great for someone
else to build and maintain a pool, and the Council should consider requiring reduced
memberships for Dublin residents. It would also provide the opportunity to allocate all
the money toward the Historic Park.
City Manager Ambrose advised that, under the Public Facilities Fee Program, fees had
been collected and were obligated to be used toward a pool. A different, less expensive
pool facility might be considered.
Cm. Hildenbrand appreciated the opportunity to reconsider the overall programming at
Emerald Glen Park. An aquatic facility that would enhance competitive swimming sports
in Dublin might be advisable.
City Manager Ambrose clarified that the fitness company in question had not secured any
land and were was two options: 1) secure the land at another site and build their facility
with possible City partnership; or Z) build a different prototype at Emerald Glen Park.
Staff could explore the two options, if the Council so desired.
The Council concurred that Staff should explore the two options proposed by the
Developer. After the Council was presented the information, it might have time for the
public opinion poll, if necessary.
The Council and Staff briefly discussed the phasing plan, which would be a pay-as-you-
build plan, and potential project revenue and grant sources for the projects. The Master
Plan process needed to be completed before land acquisition was pursued.
City Attorney Elizabeth Silver reminded the Council that the process for the Historic Park
was first for the Council to decide whether to amend the General Plan to designate that
land for park purposes. A Specific Plan had been initiated for that area, so the Council
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 57
~
could either decide not to go forward with the Specific Plan or to continue with the
Specific Plan and adopt it. That would also designate it for park purposes. Once the
General Plan had been amended and the Specific Plan adopted, with associated
Environmental Review, a Master Plan could then be adopted for the park. At that point,
the Council would have designated an enlarged park beyond the park that already
existed. Those actions were required before the Council could consider adopting a
Master Plan for that area. After that, the Council would be able to acquire that property.
City Manager Ambrose advised that Staff anticipated that the Specific Plan and Historic
Park Master Plan would be submitted to the Council by June 2006. The discussion
regarding the RFQs was part of the planning process.
Mayor Lockhart asked when the process for amending the General Plan would take
place.
City Manager Ambrose advised the same time frame.
On motion of Cm. Zika, seconded by Cm. McCormick and by unanimous vote, the City
Council directed Staff not to release the RFPs and to begin planning for a phased
approach to the Historic Park and develop a more detailed report outlining the City's
recreation and aquatic facility options in consideration of the privately owned facility
(Option #3 in the Staff Report).
..
RECESS
8:39 p.m.
Mayor Lockhart called for a brief recess. The meeting reconvened 8:44 p.m. with all
Councilmembers present.
..
NEW BUSINESS
St. Patrick's Dav Parade Float
8:45 p.m. 8.1 (950-40)
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 58
~
Assistant City Manager Joni Pattillo presented the Staff Report and advised that the City
Council would consider options for entry of a City Council float in the 2006
St. Patrick's Day Parade to be held on Saturday, March 18,2006.
The Council discussed the various options offered and directed Staff to request the use of
Alameda County's antique fire truck.
.
Reoort on Status of Open Space Plan
8:47p.m. 8.2 (420-20)
Parks & Community Services Director Diane Lowart presented the Staff Report and
provided an overview of the land acquisition related to the Dublin Hills Regional Park
and Calaveras Ridge Trail in the Western Dublin Extended Planning Area.
Mayor Lockhart referred to the Milestone Property and asked if there was opportunity to
use funding from Waste Management tipping fees to create a loop trail that would
connect to the East Bay Regional Park District properties.
Ms. Lowart advised that the property was very heavily incised terrain with a lot of habitat
issues and could be used for visuals only. It was also outside the City limits.
The Council thanked Staff for the report.
.
Dougherty Hills Park - ~ Park
8:57 p.m.
8.3 (920-20/600-30)
Parks & Facilities Development Manager Herma Lichtenstein and Parks & Facilities
Development Coordinator Rosemary Alex presented the Staff Report and advised that, as
approved in the 2004-2009 Capital Improvement Program, the preparation of the final
design and construction documents for Dougherty Hills Dog Park is scheduled to
commence in Fiscal Year 2005-2006 with construction to follow in Fiscal Year 2006-
2007. In order to proceed, Staff prepared a conceptual park design that would be
presented for further input from the public and City Council. Once input on the
conceptual design is received, in order to commence with preparation of final design and
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 59
~
construction documents, it was necessary to secure the services of a licensed landscape
architect. Staff recommended contracting with Paul Niemuth and Associates.
Council and Staff discussed the differences in, and pros and cons of, the two alternatives.
Alternative #2 had a larger small dog area.
Cm. McCormick asked if public art had been incorporated into any of the dog parks that
Staff had studied.
Ms. Lichtenstein advised no.
Cm. McCormick suggested that Dublin be the first to incorporate art at a dog park.
Rose Rose, Dublin resident, advised that she had first proposed a dog park in Dublin
several years ago and expressed enthusiasm over the proposed plans.
Lisa Dial, Dublin resident, expressed enthusiasm over the current plan and advised that
small dogs needed the larger space included in Alternative #2 because much of the new
development was restricting dog size to small. As a fundraiser, she suggested memory
tiles that people could purchase.
Mayor Lockhart read a speaker slip submitted by Michelle Cowles, San Ramon resident,
in which she requested that the small dog park be made as large as possible. The small
dog area in the previous design was too small. With high density housing on the rise, the
need for small dogs to run and exercise increased every day.
The Council and Staff discussed the various ground cover options and maintenance issues
of each, as well as dog park configurations.
Cm. McCormick indicated that there was opportunity for dog-themed art, benches, etc.,
and stated that the Dublin Fine Arts Foundation should have the opportunity to survey
dog owners.
City Manager Ambrose advised that the budget had not yet been finalized and it could
include an art component, if the Council desired.
Vm. Oravetz asked how the park would be named.
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 60
(i)
Mayor Lockhart noted that it was part of the Dougherty Hills Open Space, but could be
named something else, such as "Carlo Park" after the dog buried in the Pioneer
Cemetery.
Cm. Zika made a motion to accept the Revised Conceptual Park Design (Alternative #2)
with turf, and adopt the Resolution approving an Agreement with Paul Niemuth and
Associates.
Cm. McCormick asked if the motion included the art component.
Cm. Zika stated no, the motion did not include an art component.
There was no second to the motion.
On substitute motion of Cm. McCormick, seconded by Cm. Hildenbrand and by majority
vote (Cm. Zika opposed), the City Council approved the Revised Conceptual Park Design
(Alternative # 2) with turf and an art component, and adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 12 - 06
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH PAUL NIEMUTH AND ASSOCIATES
FOR THE DOUGHERTY HILLS PARK- DOG PARK
..
Prooosal for Compliance with the Ethics Training ReCluirement Set Forth in AB 1234
9:23 p.m. 8.4 (640-45)
Assistant City Manager Joni Pattillo presented the Staff Report and advised that, at its
December 20, 2005, meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 31-05, complying
with the reimbursement requirements of AB 1234, which became effective January 1,
2006. AB 1234 also imposed a new ethics training requirement for local officials. The
Staff Report discussed the City's obligations with respect to the ethics training
requirement and recommended a proposal for compliance with the requirement. AB
1234 mandated that members of the local agency's legislative bodies receive ethics
training, one hour per year, which would include members of Dublin's City Council,
Planning Commission, Parks & Community Services Commission, Heritage & Cultural
Arts Commission, Senior Center Advisory Committee and Youth Advisory Committees.
Additionally, Staff recommended that the City Manager, City Attorney and those
Staffmembers listed in the City's Conflict of Interest Code receive the same training.
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 61
@)
Those local officials in service as of January 1, 2006, must receive training before
January 1, 2007. However, those officials whose service ended prior to January 1, 2007,
would be excluded from training. Staff recommended that training occur in December
2006 in order to encompass new Councilmembers and new Commission and Committee
members.
Ms. Pattillo advised that the Staff Report should have stated that Contractors listed in the
City's Conflict of Interest Code be excluded from the training requirement.
City Manager Ambrose advised that regular City Staff would receive regular ethics
training, as well; however, not on the same schedule as the Council.
Mayor Lockhart expressed concern about mandatory training during the holiday season
as many trainees might be unavailable.
The Council and Staff discussed the requirements of AB 1234 and various training
schedules and venue options, such as by video or online, so everyone could be trained in
a timely manner. The current legislative body and designated Staff, excluding those
ending service by the end of 2006 could train earlier in the year, and incoming
legislative bodies could receive their training just after the new year.
Ms. Pattillo reminded the Council that the Contractor exclusion from training needed to
be incorporated into the motion, if that was the Council's direction.
On motion of Mayor Lockhart, seconded by Vm. Oravetz and by unanimous vote, the
City Council approved the ethics training set forth in AB 1234 for the current legislative
body, City Manager, City Attorney and designated Staff listed in the City's Conflict of
Interest Code, excluding Contractors and those ending service by January 1, 2007, to
receive training in October 2006 and new legislative bodies to receive training in
February 2007.
.
League of California Cities
Call for Action on the Telecommunications Revolution Imoact to Cities
9:35 p.m. 8.5 (660-40)
Assistant City Manager Joni Pattillo presented. the Staff Report and advised that the
League of California Cities recently called for action to all cities regarding the
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 62
~
telecommunications revolution and its impacts to cities. Due to advances in technology,
local telephone companies now have the capability to provide cable television-like
services over their existing phone lines with some minor modifications. Each telephone
corporation is approaching this differently and many are refusing to enter into cable
franchise agreements with local franchising authorities. The League of California Cities
is seeking legislation which would support the continued authority of local government
to franchise cable services providers and opposing legislation and regulatory efforts to
divest local government of that authority.
Cm. Zika recommended that the term "SBC" be left out or another term used since SBC
now used "AT&T."
On motion of Vm. Oravetz, seconded by Cm. Hildenbrand and by unanimous vote, the
City Council approved the proposed National Association of Telecommunications Officers
and Advisors (NATOA) template and directed Staff to distribute City's comments to the
Federal Communication Commission (FCC) by February 13, 2006; approved the letter
prepared by the League of California Cities that would be sent to the City of Dublin's
legislators and directed Staff to prepare those letters for City Council's signature and
distribution; and adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 13 - 06
SUPPORTING THE CONTINUED AUTHORITY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO FRANCHISE
CABLE SERVICE PROVIDERS AND OPPOSING LEGISLATION AND REGULATORY EFFORTS
TO DIVEST LOCAL GOVERNMENT OF THAT AUTHORITY
..
OTHER BUSINESS Brief INFORMATION ONLY reports from Council and/or Staff, including Committee
Reports and Reports by Cooncil related to meetings attended at City expense (AB 1234)
9:41 p.m.
City Manager Richard Ambrose advised that the draft agenda for the Tri-Valley Council
meeting was inadvertently distributed to Council. The final agenda would be distributed
in the near future.
Cm. McCormick advised that, at a recent California Historical Resources Commission
meeting she attended in Sacramento, the Old S1. Raymond's Church and Cemetery were
approved for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. This was the successful
fruition of a long term goal. Staff was to be commended.
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 63
~
Cm. Hildenbrand advised that she was recently appointed to ABAG's Regional Planning
Committee. The Committee was studying bringing transit-oriented development to the
Bay Area and planned a field trip to Dublin as an example of successful example.
Vm. Oravetz reported that he, along with Mayor Lockhart and Cms. McCormick and
Zika, attended the East Bay Division League of California Cities meeting on January 16,
2006. The speaker discussed the Governor's propositions from the Special election in
November 2005 and why he thought they had failed. He also attended two LAVTA
meetings, at one of which was a discussion regarding the possible consolidation of four
transit agencies in order to save taxpayer money.
Mayor Lockhart reported that she attended the u.s. Conference of Mayors Conference in
Washington, D.C., from January 25 - 28, 2006, and described the many meetings,
sessions, seminars and subjects covered during the conference. Most notably was her
meeting, along with the other Mayors in the Tri-Valley, with senior staff members for
Congress member Pombo, Congress member Tauscher, Senator Boxer, and Senator
Feinstein to discuss topics that included the Tri - Valley Tri -Angle Study, Housing
Opportunity Center, emergency preparedness, BART to Livermore, and
telecommunications issues. The discussions included descriptions of what the Valley
Cities were working on together and what funds the Cities were interested in obtaining.
..
@JOURNMENf
11.1
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned
at 9:52 p.m.
~~/.~
Mayor
ATTEST:~~
City Clerk
.~
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
VOLUME 25
REGULAR MEETING
February 7, 2006
PAGE 64
CB