Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.6 Street Lighting AD 99-1 CITY CLERK File # D~~[Q]M[Z]~ AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18,2006 Public Hearing: Dublin Ranch Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 99-1 Report Prepared by' Ginger Russell, Senior Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: ATTACHMENTS: RECOMMENDATI~ !! 5) FINANCIAL STATEMENT: 1) Resolution approving Engineer's Report, continuing diagram and assessment, and ordering levy of assessment Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram 2) Open public hearing Receive Staff presentation Receive public comment Close public hearing and deliberate Adopt the resolution approving the Engineer's Report, confim1mg the diagram and assessment, and ordering levy of assessment 2IJU6-2007 Sources and Use oU5treet Lillht Mllintenllnce District Funds Revenues Total Amount Proposed to be Assessed. Estimated Interest Revenue Estimllted Prior Yew Co!lee/ions and Penalties Pub/ic Damafte Reimbursement Less Estimll/ed Co!ledion IInd Delinquency Cost. Ne/ Total Revenues $139,877 4,605 350 4,700 (3,777) $145,755 Expenditures' Con/ract Maintenance and Utilities. Administration and Enftineering' Total Operating Expenses COpy TO: g:\asscssdistW9-1 \99-] stfrptint.cnt2(ll)b $96,972 1,815 $99,797 Page 1 of2 ITEMNO.~ The revenue in this District is proposed /0 be hifther than the maintenllnee eost for 2006-2007 by $45,958. See the Description helow for further information regarding this recommendlllion. The proposed assessment. $36.80 per simde-familv home. is $15.70 per lot or 74% hil!her than the 2005-2006 assessment. bnt is less than the maximum allowable assessment established bv the initial Enl!ineer's Report for this District. DESCRIPTION: Assessment District 99-1 funds the electric energy, maintenance, and repair costs associated with the decorative street lighting within all of the Dublin Ranch development (excepting the golf course) and also m Tract 7067, which is thc Clifden Parc development offMountam Rise Place in the western hills. This Assessment District was formed in 1999 at the request of the developers in Dublin Ranch. The Clifden Parc development was annexed in 2000, and Dublin Ranch Areas A and G were aImexed in 2001 The remaming portions of Dublin Ranch, including Areas H, C, F aIld H, were annexed ]n Deeemher of2005 and are therefore a part ofthis District for the 2006-2007 assessment. The City began mallltammg some of the lights in Dublin Ranch Phase I, and also in Clifden Pare, during the 2001-2002 Fiscal Year It is expeetcd that the City will be maintaining approximately 1,194 lights by the end of Fiscal Year 2006-2007 For Fiscal Year 2006-2007, no change is recommended with respect to the method of determining the assessments. The assessment for a single-family residence is proposed to be $36.80, which is an inercase of $15.70 per individual lot over the 2005-2006 assessment. ThIS amount is within the maximum assessment allowed by the initial Engineer's Report for the District, and is necded to fund increases m power aIld maintenance costs, as well as increases in inventory For the first several years 0 f operation, thIS District did not incur a significant maintenaI1Ce cost; however, as these lights age, the number of repairs is increasing. As noted in the Preliminary Engineer's Report, a portion of the reserve is being set aside each year for future pole pamting costs. The poles are expected to need repainting on a ten-year cycle, which means that the I1rst poles may need painting in the next few years. Aside from the reserve specifically eannarked for pole painting, the reserve in this District has become extremely low The reserve is allowed by law to he approximately 50% of the annual maintenance cost, and it is recommended that an e/Tort be madc to keep the reserve at that level in order to have funds available for emergencies. For a street lighting distnct, such an emergency could be a major underground electric line break or a series of pole or fixture failures. Staff is therefore recommending a significant rate increase for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 in ordcr to bring the reserve baek up to a comfortable level. In future years, it may be possiblc to reduce the rate somewhat ifno extraordinary expenditures occur. The ongmal Engmeer's Report for this District prepared in 1999 provided for a maxImum assessment of $34.22 per parcel, which could be increased annually based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI), as well as actual increases in the cost of utihl1es. The Engineer's Report includes a chart which details the CPT and utility inereas"s for each successive year The April 2006 CPI rate of mer ease for San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners was 2.8%. The maximum assessment has therefore been adjusted by 2.8% to $41.54 Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public heanng, deliberate, and adopt the resolution approving the Engineer's Report, confirming the diagram and assessment, and ordering levy of assessment. Page20f2 /('0/3 RESOLUTION NO. - 06 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ******* API'ROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT CITY OF DUBLIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH AND TRACT 7067) WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 047-06, a Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for City of Dublin Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 99-1 (the "District"), this Council designated thc Public Works Director as Engineer of Work and ordered said Engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordancc with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, said report was madc and filed with the City Clerk and duly considered by this Council and found to be sufficient in every particular, whcreupon it was dctcnmncd that said report should stand as Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings rmder and pursuant to the aforesaid Resolution and that July 18, 2006, at 7'00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Dublin Civic Center, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, Califomia, was appointcd as the time and place for a bearing by the Council on the question of the levy ofthe proposed assessment, notice of which hearing was mailed, published and posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.6; and WHEREAS, at the appointed time and place, said hcanngs wcrc hcld, and all persons interested desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard, and all matt~Ts pcrtaming to said levy were heard and considcrcd by this Council, and this Council thercby acquircd jurisdiction to ordcr said levy and confilll1ation of diagram and asscssmcnt prepared by and made a part of the r~'Port of said enginccr to pay thc cost and expenses thereof; NOW, THERRFORE, fiR IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby approve that: (a) The propcrty owncrs uwning morc than fifty pcrccnt of the area of assessable land within the District had not, at the conclusion of said hearing, filcd writtcn protests against the said proposed levy, or agamst the Enginccr's Estimate of costs and expenses, or against the maps and description, or against thc diagram or the assessment to pay for the costs and expenses thereof; (b) The pubhc inl~Tcsl, conveni~-ncc, and necessity rcquirc that said levy be made; (c) The District b~-ncfitcd by said improvem~-nls and to be asscssed to pay thc costs and expenses thereof, and the exterior boundaries thereof, are as shown by a map thereof filed in the officc of the City Clerk, which map is made a part hereof by reference thereto. PASSRD, APPROVIW AND ADOPTRD this 1 Rth day of July, 2006 AYES. NOES. ABSENT ATTEST Mayor City Clerk 7-1 g - Oll> toile ATTAUIDIENT I. -""'j"''' ~ - ;; (" 1- "-") t..''''\ ,,),r- -' CITY OF DUBLIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH AREA AND TRACT 7067) ~ Of Dl!/J/,), 6 ~4J ,~, ~lIf'O'R~\'~ FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 ENGINEER'S REPORT ATTACIlMENT L 3 -" ,~: , ( }," i , ) - TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ENGINEER 's LETTER,.,...........,............................................................... 3 2 ESTIMA TE OF COSTS ................................................................................"'....5 3 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ................................................,..........6 4 PARCEL LISTING......... .......... n............ ........,. ............. ............ ............. ..... 7 5 CERTIFlCATIONS........................................Io........"..........."'........................8 G:IAS$ES$M"NT DISTRICTS\99-1 Dub Ranch SL\99-1Rpt 2006.doo July 6. 2006 tit.,! 3 c~ 1 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on April 18, 2006, the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, adopted its Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment District 1999-1 for the acquisition and maintenance of improvements more particularly therein described; and WHEREAS, said Resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565, et. seq., of said Act; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the Council of said City, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of acquisition of and maintenance of said improvements and the cost and expenses incidental thereto, to be paid by said District. nmmary 0 ssessment (1) (2) (3) As Filed As As Finally Preliminari Iy Approved Approved r.,--'" Cost of Maintenance $96,971 $96,971 Incidental Expenses $136,962 $136,962 --- TOTAL COSTS $233,934 $233,934 _,~~_,~~'m.~~_~,.~___"._ ..- -~--- ---- Estimated 2006-07 Interest Income Applied to 2006-07 Operating Costs $4,605 $4,605 -"'..~. ~ -'~~ 1---,,--,,-- Prior Year Collections & Penalties $350 $350 f--::----.-;..-.-"-.--..--~.--.-.- Reimbursement for Public Damage $4, 700 $4, 700 ". Estimated Surplus from 2005-06 Fiscal Year $84,402 $84,402 SU~TOTAL $94,057 $94,057 ",._,,- NET TO BE ASSESSED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 $139,877 $139,877 -",...~._.~~.. .~.~,.~~--~~~ ~-~.~ Assessment per Lot (3,801) $36.80 $36.80 S fA G:\ASSESSMENT DISTRleTS'99--1 Dub R.""" SL'99--1 Rpt 2006.doc July 6. 2006 1-)' (\ ,). J 7, ..... . 1 """'. - As required by said Act, a diagram is hereto attached showing the exterior boundaries of said landscape maintenance assessment district and also the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said street lighting maintenance assessment district as the same existed at the time of the passage of said resolution, each of which lots or parcels having been given a separate number upon said diagram. I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon aU assessable lots or parcels of land within said street lighting maintenance assessment district by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the acqUIsition and maintenance of said improvements, and more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof. Said assessment is made upon the several lots or parcels ofland within said street lighting maintenance assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said lots or parcels respectively from the acquisItion and maintenance of said improvements. The diagram and assessment numbers appearing herein are the diagram numbers appearing on said diagram, to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description of said property The scope of work includes the maintenance, operation, repair and replacement of aU public street lighting facilities located within the public streets and within public easements within private streets within the District Boundaries, as shown on the approved improvement plans for the following Tracts: 7067, 6925, 6956 through 6964, 7136 through 7142, and 7324 through 7327 and, including, but not limited to, the lighting poles, fixtures, conduits, conductors, service boxes, controllers, and appurtenances, and the furnishing of power, together with aU incidental expenses for the maintenance, operation, and repair of the street lighting system. Dublin Ranch Areas B, C, F, and H were annexed to the Dublin Ranch Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment District 99-1 in December of 2005 Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Alameda for the Fiscal Year 2006-2007 and includes all of such parcels excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or rights of way to be acquired in these proceedings for public road purposes. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County This District has been established to pay for maintenance, operation and repair of the street light fixtures, which differ from the City Standard. A special light fixture has been created as a community element, which is a benefit to the homeowners within the District boundary Dated. 7k)mu / ~Y7pE-J hssa A. Morton Public Works Director G:\ASSESSMENT DISTRleTS\91l-1 Dub R>""" Sl\91l-1 Rpl200S.doc July 6. 200S ,I -. ~ ._"~ ,12 (,J., :" 2 ES17MA TE OF COSTS The estimated cost for the maintenance of improvements described in this Report for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 is as follows: ESTIMATE OF COSTS Maintenance Electric Energy $73,900 ~_~'_~~_M.__~'~_"'_~'"~'I California Street Light Association $371 Other Repairs and Maintenance Costs $22.700 $96.971 Incidentals Engineer's Report and Proceedings $2,825 County of Alameda Collection Costs ( 1.7%) $2,378 Delinquencies $/,399 Pole Painting Reserve (see description below) $80,314 ContingencieslUnallocated Reserve $50.036 $136,962 TOTAL: $233,934 Future Pole Painting Reserve: For 2006~07 = $13,731 ($115/1ight xl, 194 lights + 10 years) Prior Year Pole Painting Reserve = $66,593 Total Future Pole Painting Reserve at end off'iscal Year 2006-07 = $80,324 G:\ASSESSMENT OISTRICTS\99-1 Dub R._ Sl VJ9.1 Rpt 2006.doc July 6. 2006 3 Ic~/3 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT The maintenance of the street lighting within the boundaries of the Assessment District benefits each residential lot in the District in the same manner and to the same extent. Therefore, the Assessment has been equally apportioned over the proposed 3,801 planned single-family residential lots contained within the District. The per lot assessment will be $36 80 per lot for Fiscal Year 2006~2007, increasing to $41.54 (subject to inflation and utility rate increases) at build-out for all residential lots within the boundaries of the District on a per lot basis. Commercial property shall be assessed at 5.5 times the rate for residential lots times the acreage of the lot. Common areas and public land within the District have been exempted and will have a zero assessment since they receive no special benefit with regard to the special light fixtures. Until they are subdivided, the assessment for these lots shall be equal to the per-lot or per-unit assessment each year, times the number of proposed lots within each Tract. With the recording of the future Tract maps, the new assessments will be reapportioned to each of the individual residential lots. As more street lights are installed each year, until all have been installed, the assessment each year will be based on the estimated cost of maintenance (using the then current numbers in Section 2), divided by the number oflights to be installed that year, provided in no event will the per lot assessment be more than $41.54 (as adjusted for inflation). It should be noted that future annexations to this District may affect the spread of assessments. In addition to the increase in the annual maintenance cost as a result of additional lights, the annual maintenance cost shall be increased annually beginning July 1, 2000, by the percentage increase in the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Consumer Price Index ("Index") (applies to all costs except electricity), plus any actual increase in the cost of electricity If the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Consumer Price Index is unavailable or doomed by the City Council to be inappropriate, a comparable consumer price index, as approved by the City Council, shall be used to replace the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Price Index. G;\ASSESSMENT DISTRleTS\99-1 Dub Ranch SL \99--1 Rpt 2000.doc July 6. 2000 '35f-,I-j l~ SAMPLE CALCULATION Assume an increase in the index of I % and a utility increase of 5%. ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENT COST $93,562 LESS ENERGY COST (SUBJECT TO RATE INCREASE ONL~__. $(45.577) ASSESSMENT SUBJECT TO INDEX INCREASE $47,985 _m $47,985 INDEX INCREASE;!A~SU~l'..Q.l%) 47,985 x .01 48() $480 ~,- $48,465 ENERGY COST $45,577 5% UTILIlY RATE INCREASE 45577 x .05 2279 $2.279 m'.n"~,,...~~,, $47856 NEW TOTAL MAINTENANCE COST $96,32..L Since approximately 45% of the assessment is related to utilities the maximum assessment amount was determined by taking 45% of the assessment and increasing it by the increase in utilities. The remaining 55% of the assessment is subject to the index. The following table details the maxImum assessment rates: ,~,~.. Maximum % Change Maximum Total Year April CPI % Change Maintenance in Utility Utility Maximum Amount Cost Amount Assessment 1999 168.8 18.82 1540 34.22 2000 1749 361% 19.50 361% 1596 3546 2001 1849 572% 2062 572% 1689 3749 -- 2002 l~?..o.~_ f--_. 2.11% 2106 2,11% 17.23 38.29 2003 1936 2.54% 21.59 2,54% 1767 39.26 2004 1947 0.57% 2171 0.57% 1777 3948 ~-~-~~~._~~"" W',".'" 2005 199.3 2.36% 22.22 2.36% 1819 4041 _~""_,'m'ft'_" ~"---,,"~ 2006 2049 2.81% 22.84 2.81% 18.70 41.54 -~-'~-'-'~'"",~~-""-,, ~""'~~ Ulilily cosls eonsist of PG&E electrie rates. Researeh is still being done on actual rate increases. For now the el'l is being used as an eSlima/e. G:\ASSIOSSMIONT DISTRleTS\99-1 Dub Ranch SL\99-1Rpl2006.doo July 6, 2000 9(iir,/3 4 PARCEL LISTING The description of each 101 or parcel as part of the records of the County Assessor of the County of Alameda are, by reference, made part of this Report. TIle above property owners and the City of Pleasantlln and Dublin San Ramou Services District own additional non-residential properties such as COIlUI\unity-owned open space parcels, proposed public facilities, and community owned recreation parcels, within the District boundaries, which will have a zero assessment. TIle listing of parcels appears on the following page: G:\ASSI;:SSMI;:NT DISTRleTS__1 Dub Ranch Sl__1RpI 2IlO6.~oc July 6, 2IlO6 /06)--/3 L, ..',....,..", ", ,.:;'" ~io,i':," ,.ii, ' d. ':.: .....'t' ,ii, .' , ',,~\ ,/ , ),', FlKaI Year LOOJ TJ'8d UItImaIe bn """""" P..-LeI _LeI 1-92 6956 1 JnkOllwn 91 $36.80 3,348.80 541.S! 3,780.1 1-69 6957 Unknuwn 69 $36.80 2,539.20 541.S! 2,866.2<1 1-86 6958 lJnknuwn 86 $36.80 3,164.80 541.S! 3,572.4 1-91 6959 Unknuwn 92 $36.80 3,385.60 541.S! 3,821.6 1-113 6960 Unknown 113 $36.80 4,158.40 541,S! 4.694,0 1,117 6961 Unkno"" 117 $36.80 4,305.60 541,54 4.81'10,18 1,111 6962 Unknown III $36.80 4,084.80 541,54 4.610,94 1-45 6963 Unkno"" 45 $36.80 1,656.00 $41.54 1.869.30 1-123 6964 Unkno"" 123 :136,80 4,526.40 541.54 5.1094 1-17 7067 Unkno"" 17 :136,80 625.60 541.S! 706.1 1'\Iture Tmct' 7324, 7325. 7326, Unknown 1.509 :136,80 55.531.20 541.54 62.683,8, .H'" '^_ ~, 1.110 7'-16 [ J...known lllJ $36.80 4.0<18.00 $41.54 4,5694<J 1.-50 71.17 llnknown 5U :136,80 1,840.00 $41.54 2,077.0C 1-84 7138 Unknown 114 $36.80 3,091.20 541.S! 3,489.36 1.54 7139 1 JqkJJown 54 $36.80 1/)87.20 541.S! 2,243.16 1-62 7140 Onkno"" 62 $36.80 2,281.60 541.S! 2,575 48 1.97 7141 IJllknown 'f1 $36.80 3,569.60 541.54 4,029.38 1-105 7142 Uhkno"" 105 $36.80 3,864.00 $41.54 4.361.70 ZOOIlA__ Parcel 3 7281 Standard Pacific Corp. 119 $36.80 4,,379.20 $41.54 4.943,26 Parcel 4 7281 l~llte Home Corp. 121 $36.80 4.4l2.80 541.54 5,026.3 Lots 1-3 7413 Fairway Family LP (Phase 1 and 626 $31;.80 23.036.80 541.54 26.004.0 1/6 h 13 '- 5 CERTIFICATIONS I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in Section 2, with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on June 20, 2006 :i'JTILM- - J, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engmeer's Report, together with the Assessment and diagram thereto attached, was preliminarily approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. 111-06, duly adopted by W. CmmciI 00""'" 20, 2006 _ ~... \_ ~J I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment and diagram thereto attached, was finally approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. -06, duly adopted by said Council on July 18, 2006 I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the Assessment was filed in the office of the County Auditor of the County of Alameda, California, on August 10, 2006. G:\ASSESSIIIIENT DISTRICTS\99-.1 Dub Ranch SL\99-lRpt 2006.doo July 6. 2006 ...-..---....... -.--.-r .'. *"-........ /~/. .........w........."....-....-l -- :J V3ClV ' H V3ClV H:JNVCl .L:JICl.LSI~1 HONVCl .LOICl.LSIO I -.~-- .-~IC C~ /:f.~~-"~-~~ '.0-___ : . ( __-- -- - -~::::-----)/ )1 CUd'lld'llWNI : .. -i )f~ 7\0'&----_ I! ANVdV'400 : ~ V3ClV . I --,'~!j '-. N~lN8~~ 'klN'!(~PIf!J..~I~, I \\. \ ~ \: \ , .;j V3ClV HON .LOICl.LSIO 'I. '," \ . . . ,;;. -----.~ It~;o ...' II '.'l:':;r-I[=:~-~/').' y,,~iI' V'-"II')\ 1''IiII, ~(~K \\~i~l#JJ~mREfjff ~il J\\;~)""~q \1 ~CJ7~~:~111~1~1 " ~ ":'~:~'~~~\:f)~ 'II J1IlDJl[LDJ),;, ~~'\\~\:~'>:9r,'1]r~~~~ '1' .""' .r - -- fJ Z If.! ~ \ )., "; -.- ' ~ 1I'j ,." - Il~I!i'/ ,1_ l '-.iJj/lf}!l " t~i{I.~/ {;6\f~~' / \~\>\\ \~;r~~fJjfL"'--- / ~,'" ,- [~J~:\ ~~lJ \\' > \t\~~'dJ~~mr- ir 01\~\"-i;-", / . ;, ",'\' '.>' ,~,' \~:I : . T, =" -"'LIT.L\~- \ ,~.. { -,. __L --: -.. t _ '\ -- ';]I Ifi,,{ ('\ ' - \1Ul7Jl.J , ) '-\r-7. ZS:(I~I~(--: ,,\ ;..._._.J... ......- ~.. ...~~ \ t-'I- / n_~ n) '. ,'" , /'_ \ " /... / '-<>-M '~.-t. --.~ ~ ~ j ,"g ;; " N /d,(~13 ~I ~I Iii w ~ 0 I- Z UJ ::;..- Cl"',j, !!:ffl81 1-",..- ::t:", . Cl<(O :JI.LIZ 1-01- WZO w<(;;: ~Zl- "'wrn 1-- zO :;;: ::; "':g; z2'::;;5z -Z>-'" ...J;;;I...JO IllO<!!: ~OC)...I o !!l< U.~LLO 00,...... ~Wgo -:fa!!: 0~8;:! "'Ol '" '" o >- '" U) z o 1ii ;:; UJ '" UJ !;c o ...J o '" ~ - >-S1)E III 0 wlc i5 ~ ffJ i2 Cl Cl -;;,...-!-- <5 ' 0"1 ~f-: :gz o UJ W z>--:;t "'<0 ~C1rn 6~lil i ~;Imil ~ :z: .-<?-z (0" '17 .1.'.11 99--1 a boundarl3 m LOT 110 TRACT NO 5926 LOT 11 0 BK. 222 MAPS, PG 71 TRACT NO. 5926 "1.1.1.1...1.1~\.1.1.1~'t....t. BK. 222 MAPS, PG. 71 ~ ........~ I ~ I -....:...~t.. __...\.I.'.~',,,,, ....- I ~'''''~.. .1.1.~ ',' .'. ./ I ~'.I- ""_'_' I "- ~."':' ~.,:",~.I.I.r.I.I.I.f.I.I.I.I.l.'.I.I.I~ I'... ,~ I I . I ,I .cO'., 5t~ 1 \ ... ."'., iif II II I:' .'.,.,., i . I ... ~ I ~-________ ,i ...... i ~ , ~,' CLlPJfN::;T" ---___.. /-------.>... ...... !! ~ ---- Ii ~,I ----------j 1---- ~..... Ii ~r - I" I ---_ - _WAY CT ,. ~. Ii. I ! --------I -- ,i ~ --- I I ~ \ -- Ii! i1 jl! I ~ I !! i. i ~ I! ! ~ \ ~ 1 I ii !1 I I;:;' Iii ~ ~ ,\ Iii .. I _ ii I I ..... J! -, 'I '. ,i. , III ~ " I, " ~I I I I I . .~ ..I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.~.J.J.'.I.I.t.'.I.I.i.I.'.'.I.~1.1.1.~.'.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.J.'.I.I.I.e.I.J.I.I.I.I.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.I.J.I.I.I~I.I.I.I.I.I.I~I~ TRACT NO. 6306 LOrE' LOrD" TRACT NO 6300 BOOK 233 PG 32 LOrD" il - , ! STREET UGHTING I '-- - JOBNO BY CITY OF DUBLIN SHEET ---L.(JJ DESIGN ! MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DATE 06130/06 CKD ALAMEDA COUNTY z-'C< BY II , DISTRICT NO. 1999-1 OF \~ SCAlE N.T.S. 200512007 FISCAL YEAR ----L:>) i .,--....-.-- DRAWN: CKD I STATE OF CALIFORNIA (DUBUN RANCH AREA) -- ! --- SYMBOL i DATE I REVISIONS' Byl CKD UJ . &:H=i~ ....,....