The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986-91 Five Year Capital Improvement Program CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Date: June 2, 1986 Agenda Statement/Staff Report TO: Planning Commission FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: 1986-91 Five Year Capital Improvement Program EXHIBITS: Capital Improvement Program (under separate cover) RECOMMENDATION: qJI Review Capital Improvement Program; determine conformity with the City's General Plan. DESCRIPTION: Staff has completed the City's Five Year Capital Improvement Program for 1986-91. The Five Year Capital Improvement Program consists of projects which Staff views as desirable and are also within the City's financial capability during the next five years. The projects included in the Program will cost the City an estimated $22,867,850 during that period. The only projects which are recommended for funding by the City Council are those projects scheduled for Fiscal Year 1986-87. It is Staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission review the Capital Improvement Program and determine its conformity with the City's General Plan. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ITEM NO. 9./ ""l- - J ,~~ QrlIfO~~'~ C I T y 0 f DU 1) 1 I N 111 p RO P os E D II F I V E y E A R C A P I TA L I M P ROV E M E N T P RO G R A M II 1 9 8 6 - 1 9 9 1 iiiii!!:i!i!!i!!!!!!!I:!!!!!:!!!!!!!!!:!!!!!:!!!!!!ill Eti C I T Y o F DUB L I N PROPOSED FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1986-91 NAY 1986 Peter W. Snyder, Mayor Peter J. Hegarty, Jr., Vice Mayor Linda J. Jeffery, Councilmember Paul C. Moffatt, Councilmernber Georgean Vonheeder, Counci1mernber SUBMITTED BY Richard C. Ambrose City Manager 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE City Manager's Letter of Transmittal Capital Improvement Program Summaries All Programs General Community Improvements Parks Streets l ii iii v vi General Improvements Police Vehicles Word Processing Equipment Civic Center Data Processing System Records. Management System 1 2 3 4 5 Community Improvements Downtown Improvement Plan 6 Sidewalk Safety Repair/Bus Stop Pad Program 7 Sewage Facility Expansion 8 Dougherty Road Fencing - East Side 9 Bus Shelters 10 Catch Basin Grate Replacement Program 11 City Entrance Signs 12 Handicap Curb Ramps 13 Major Arterials - Fence Replacement 14 Street Name Identification Sign Replacement Program 15 Underground Utilities-Dougherty Road, Southern Pacific Railroad to Amador Valley Boulevard 16 Parks Amador Lakes Mini-Park Kolb Park Senior Citizen Center Shannon Park Renovation Dolan Park Mape Park Renovation East Dougherty Hills Park (Phase II) Dougherty Hills Park 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) PAGE Streets San Ramon Road Improvements (Phase II) 25 Landscaping Village Parkway, Amador Valley Boulevard to Kimball Avenue 26 Rehabilitation and Landscaping Amador Valley Boulevard, Village Parkway to Dougherty Road 27 Traffic Signal - Dublin Boulevard/Sierra Court 28 Sierra Court Southerly Extension 29 Annual Street Overlay Program 30 Dougherty Road Widening at Southern Pacific Railroad 31 Dublin Boulevard Improvements Northwest Frontage at Clark Avenue 32 Traffic Signal Interconnect 33 San Ramon Road Improvements (Phase III) and Hillside Landscaping 34 Traffic Signals - Amador Plaza Road @ Amador Valley Boulevard; Village Parkway @ Lewis Avenue; Landscaping & Street Light Additions 35 Traffic Signal Pre-Emption for Emergency Vehicles 36 San Ramon Road Improvements (Phase IV) 37 Traffic Signals - Village Parkway @ Brighton Drive and @ Tamarack Drive 38 Dublin Boulevard Improvements - SanRamon Road to Village Parkway 39 Dougherty Road Improvements - South of Southern Pacific Railroad 40 Dublin Boulevard Improvements West of San Ramon Road 41 Landscaping Silvergate Medianss 42 CITY OF DUBLIN P.O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 (415) 829-4600 May 29, 1986 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: Transmitted herewith is the new Proposed Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 1986-91. This Five-Year Capital Improvement Program is a planning document, which identifies the City's capital facility needs and the financing of those needs for the next five years. This program is updated annually and submitted to the City Planning Commission. The Planning Commission's responsibility is to determine whether or not the Five- Year Capital Improvement Program is in conformance with the City 's adopted General Plan. The City's Park & Recreation Commission reviews those projects within the scope of park and recreation. After review and comment by both Commissions, the Five-Year .Capital Improvement Program is submitted to the City Council for its review, consideration and adoption as the official City capital facilities planning document. Those capital improvement project appropriations recommended for Fiscal Year 1986-87 are included in the 1986-87 Preliminary Annual Budget. Both documents will be considered by the City ~ouncil during the City's annual budget hearings. Projects included within the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program, were included for the following reasons: 1. Work on a project had been initiated in a prior year. 2. The project had been in the last Five-Year Capital Improvement Program, and a need for the project had not diminished. 3. The proj ect is wi thin the City's financial capability, provided there are no major additional operating demands on the City's budget. 4. The project will be needed because of the impact of new private development on City facilities. The total estimated cost for the Capital Improvement Program over the next five years is $22,867,850 (1986 dollars). Of that total, $6y568,550 is identified for General Improvements; $2,018,100 is identified for Community Improvements; $4,329,100 is identified for Parks; and $9,952,100 is identified for Streets. For Fiscal Year 1986-87, projects totaling $7,385,100 are recommended. Of this amount, $3,793,300, or 51% will have to be borne by the General Fund. The remaining cost is funded by various grants, developer contributions and long term financing. , ~'.._~_-----~'-""--"'-""""""",,,: :_..r. ----~.<..........-...!"U~------~07..":..'."...-:-:.:_-~..~_:~~-~."'.-'";'.':!"~~.....'~..._c_;;;; ;;.:i;:..<i::.':~-~- :;......_.,~"'~~~;:-='._.,..,"!__ Described below are the highlights and changes in each program area: GENERAL ($6,568,550) The major project dominating this program is the development of the City's new Civic Center. During Fiscal Year 1985-86, the City acquired 10 acres of land for the purpose of constructing the Civic Center. Funding has been included for the construction of City Offices and a Police Facility. New projects in this area include the purchase of 8 patrol cars, additional word processing equipment, a data processing system and a records management system. COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS ($2,018,100) Most of the projects included in this program area have been carried forward from the previous program. The only project which was changed was the Bus Route Improvement proj ect. In the last program, this proj ect provided for the construction of bus stop pads and asphalt reinforcement in anticipation of the new transit system. This project has been split in two, with the concrete bus stop pads being included with the Sidewalk Safety Repair Program and the asphalt reinforcement bus stop locations being included in the Annual Overlay Program in the STREETS portion of this document. New projects include the Dougherty Road Fencing East Side Project; Catch Basin Grate Replacement Program; and the Underground Utilities Dougherty Road Southern Pacific Railroad to Amador Valley Boulevard proj ect. It's important to note that the underground utility proj ect is not in the location which was next in line on the City Council's adopted underground utility priority list. However, Staff believes that the City Council should consider placing this underground utility project at a higher priori ty, because of the widening of Dougherty Road which will be undertaken by the developer of the Alamo Creek Villages. Wi th this widening, the existing overhead utility poles would remain in a dirt median between the new pavement and the old pavement on Dougherty Road. It is Staff I s belief that consideration should be given to removing these utilities, in order that this section of Dougherty Road can be a completed 4-lane facility. The Golden Gate Drive-Regional Street Connection Specific Plan Study has been deleted from the Capital Improvement Program with the anticipation that BART would be required to undertake such a study if it is seriously considering a BART station in downtown Dublin. PARKS ($4,329,100) During Fiscal Year 1985-86, the City completed a park development plan for 6 parks within the City. As a result of this plan, the size of the recommended Parks Program has increased by $3,000,000. This addi tional funding requirement will have to be borne by the General Fund, unless other funding sources are secured. The construction of Amador Lakes Mini-Park and the renovation of Shannon Park were expanded in scope. The acquisition and improvement of a Senior Citizen Center, the renovation of Mape Park and the development of the Page Two 90 acre Dougherty Hills Park have been added to the new Five-Year Capital Improvement Program. During Fiscal Year 1986-87, it is anticipated that Amador Lakes Mini-Park, Kolb Park and the Senior Ci tizen Center will be completed. The first phases of construction for the renovation of Shannon Park, Dolan Park and Dougherty Hills Park are included for Fiscal Year 1986-87. No funds have been allocated for the renovation of the Shannon Communi ty Center because the building improvement plan has not yet been completed by the architect selected by the City during Fiscal Year 1985-86. The Council may wish to modify the Capital Improvement Program once the costs included in the renovation have been identified. STREETS ($9,952,100) The Streets Program in the Capital Improvement Program is by far the largest and represents the City Council's commitment to improving overall circulation, the life blood of the community. The major focal point of the streets program is the phased improvement of San Ramon Road which will represent a total cost to the City of more than $4.3 million by the time it is completed. Funding is also included for the improvement of Dougherty Road to a 4-1ane facility from Dublin Boulevard to the Southern Pacific Railroad and Dublin Boulevard for much of its length. There have been changes in the scope of several projects in order to recognize an economy of scale when placing projects out to bid; and also recognizing commitments for street improvements, which the City has obtained from the development community. Those projects which have been restructured include Dublin Boulevard related improvements; Dougherty Road improvements; Traffic Signal at Amador Plaza Road/Amador Valley Boulevard; Traffic Signal at Village Parkway/Lewis Avenue; street lighting in the Downtown area; Traffic Signal at Village Parkway/Brighton Drive; and Traffic Signal at Village Parkway/Tamarack Drive. The San Ramon Road Improvement Project (Phase III) has also been modified to include the Hillside Landscaping Project, which was included in the Community Improvement Program in the last Capital Improvement Program. The Landscaping Project on Amador Valley Boulevard between Village Parkway and Dougherty Road has been modified to include street lighting, as well as roadway rehabilitation. The landscaping of the Village Parkway median and the east side of Village Parkway from Amador Valley Boulevard to Kimball Avenue has been modified to include median lighting. On both projects, the median lighting was included in the Community Improvement Program in the last Capital Improvement Program under Street Light Additions. The only new project proposed for the Street Program is the Sierra Court Southerly Extension, which will provide direct signalized access to the Civic Center. As these capital improvements are completed over the next five years, it's important to bear in mind that the City's Operating Budget will increase with additional maintenance costs. For Fiscal Year 1986-87, approximately $1.6 million will be required from the City's reserves to finance these projects. Over the subsequent four years, Staff Page Three projects that only $2.3 to $2.5 million will be available over and above the City's operating and debt service commitments to fund capi tal improvements, unless new major revenue sources are found. Significant expenditures over-and-above this recommended range would severely deplete the City's reserves and jeopardize the City's ability to meet its debt service commitments. Keeping these financial limitations in mind, there are a number of capital improvement proj ects which will need to be done in the future, which cannot be funded within the five year timeframe without additional revenue sources or placing recommended projects at a lower priority. These proj ects include: 1) the extension of Dublin Boulevard to the east; 2) the construction of a road connecting the Dublin Boulevard extension and Dougherty Road; 3) any additional underground utility projects; 4) construction of Dougherty Road to its ultimate 6-lane width from the Southern Pacific Railroad to the County Line; 5) a direct off-ramp into Dublin from Interstate 680; 6) the renovation of the Shannon Community Center. There are also several proj ects which have not been included in the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program which have been requested by other organizations or individuals: 1) construction of a soundwall around Arroyo Vista (Pleasanton Housing Authority); 2) the installation of television cable at Arroyo Vista (Pleasanton Housing Authori ty residents); 3) grants for art equipment (Valley Artists); 4) assistance with the renovation of the old Murray School (Dublin Historical Preservation Association); and 5) funding of a Local Access Cable Television Studio (Community Television). There is also the likelihood that the City will need to undertake specific plan development in the City's eastern and western sphere areas. It is Staff's anticipation that these projects would be funded by the development community when requesting annexation to the City. Staff has not included these projects in the Capital Improvement Program because the timing for those requests is still uncertain. The City Council may wish to consider adding anyone or several of these projects to the Capital Improvement Program by giving them a higher priority than other projects which are presently recommended by Staff. No Capital Improvement Program message would be complete without acknowledging the invaluable support provided. by the Planning Commission, Park & Recreation Commission and City Staff in not only assisting the City Council in planning the program, but also in its implementation. RCA:kk (2;J~ S~bm tted, Richard C. Ambros City Manager Page Four r-I C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> '0 0'1 C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> ~ I C> 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ... ... ... 0'1 0 I.{) I'- 0'1 r-I r-I 0 r-I r-I 0'1 0'1 I'- I.{) \D 0'1 M \D 0'1 ~ rO r-I ~ I'- M M M l--I r-I ,N N N ~ ~ V}- V}- V}- V}- ill ill ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :> 0'1 0 0 I.{) 0 I.{) I.{) I.{) or-! s:: I 0 0 I'- 0 I'- I'- I'- ~ or-! 0'1 ... ... ... ... eo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..jJ 0 0'1 \D \D I.{) 0 I'- I'- I'- X C> r-I \D I'- eo N N N 0) 0 ... s:: N N N ~ V}- V}- V}- "J}- ill r-I ..c N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..jJ .. 0'1 0 0 0'1 0 0"\ 0"\ 0'1 r-I eo 0 \D \D 0 N N N 4-l V}- I ... 0 eo 0 0 0 r-i N N N ill eo 0 r-I r-I 0'1 .-1 \D \D ~ Ul 0'1 N N \D I'- eo I.{) I.{) ~ r-I fa r-I N N N l--I U {f}- {f}- {/}- V}- 4-l l--I .~ :1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 C> ~ 0 . eo 0 0 r-I 0 r-I r-I 000 r-I ..jJ'O 0 eo 0 0 M 0 M M 000 M ill ..jJ I ... .. .. <!J'O I'- 0'1 r-I M I.{) eo 0"\ 000'1 eo ..c :1 '0 eo 0'1 I'- N r-I 0 0 o I.{) 0'1 I.{) ..jJ ~l ill 0'1 M r-I \D eo 0 I.{) r-I N M N U Ul r-I ... .. s:: s:: :1 I.{) r-I eo N I.{) eo . r-! . r-! ~ {/}- {/}- {/}- {f}- ..c ill JJ ..jJ ~ .;.., 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 00 000000 0 2; s:: I'- I.{) 0 I.{) 0 0 001.{)001.{)00 C> eo I.{) I.{) 0'1 r-I r-I eoM\DI'-O\DOO r-I '0 ill Ul P; I ... .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. 0) l--I 0) \D 0'1 r-I \D I'- L~ N I.{) M eo r-I eo \D 0'1 I.{) ..jJ rO 'r-! ~ eo r-I 0 eo I'- eo eor-l I'- I.{) ~ \D ~ 0'1 eo ill s:: Ci'\ eo 0'1 eo I'- M eo I.{)I'-NI'- M r-I\D ~ I r-I ... ~cp r-I M I'- N r-I r-I I'- {f}- {J)- V}- {f}- 01.{) '0 Ueo ~ 0'1 ~ * 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 ~r-I ~ ~ 0 0 \D 0 \D 0 C> \D C> \D 6 Cf) eo ~ 0'1 0'1 0 eo o~eo 0 r-I ~ r-I ~ rO H H r-I r- M ~ eo 0'1 eor-leo eo r-I ill ~ ~ 8 ~ \D \D \D I'- \D IV) r- \D eo \D 'r-! ~ 0) ~ M ~ 0 0'1 r-I ~ N 0'1 2; s:: ~ .. r-I 0) H P; \.0 r-I r- r-I \.0 r- '0 rtl c..'J ~ V}- Vr {/}- {f}- ~ ~ ~ 0) u ~ 'r-! Ul 0 0 0 0 0 r-IOO 000000 0 ..~ :1 r-I I.{) 0 \.0 0 r-I ......... U") 0 1.{)00r-lOO r-I Ul rtl 0'1 ~ <<I M I.{) 0 0 0"\ <'1 M \.0 r-O.-1eo 0 0'1 Ul tJ1 U I .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. 0) s:: .8 \D gg 0 I.{) r'l I'- U") \DI.{)MCOO'lOMO'I U") ~.r-! co M co Ci'\ N M O'Ir-Ir-l.{)r-ICOMU") M S~ 0'1 0'1 0 I'- 0 eo \.0 I'- ~ 0'1 eo eo C> r-I .. H'O 0 N N ~ r-I 0 M r-Ir-IN 0 ~'O I.{) i r-I r-I M r-I r-I M .. {J)- {f}- V}- {l}- s:: ill 0 . r-! ..jJ r-I ill 0'1 illr-l V}- :5 ~ ~ >, Cf) 0 .Q ..c U U '0 .r-! Ul ill c: ..jJ ..jJ ~ U rtl ill ..jJ Ul 'n en oW ..jJ 0 l--I C U H ~ rtl illP; H 'n 3 c..'J '0 0 l--I . ~ C ~~ en 8 ~ or-! H H r-I o tJ1 ..jJ ..jJ OJ U) :1 4-l 0 H U) U '00)'0 H & ..jJ r::i'; ..jJ ~. r-! s:: ill U) P; C s:: ~.... r-i ..jJ P4 GJ. c..'J oW '"d Q) I ~ -fa U) .w ::l ffi z U s::: E s:: o s:: en H ~2&~H~ r-I U GJ. 6 ~ .r-! E '0 '"d r-1..o s::.,....j rtl Ul Q) s::: H s::: C Q) ~ OoW Ul ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ Z SO):> :::> . ,....j . r-! ..jJ H '0 N 0) oW r-I C :1 l--I H ~ s::: .,....j 0 '0 rtl 'r-! Q) rgj 'd~ ~~ ..jJ ?~..jJ '~UU~ :>-1 Ul ~ ;.!4 H' ,....j >, . ,....j rtl s::: CH H s::: ..jJ 0 mu..jJ 'Oti-lUl ~ .,-j ~~ E-1 r-I .r-! Ul U r-I P; 0 r-! r-I ill ~ .-1 U rO ; JJ rO HS::rOOU >'rO 0) 8 l--I (J) iu r-I H 0) 0 :::1 H .,-j -9 r-I r-I..jJ c..'J s:: ill ~ ill rO H 0) ..jJ . r-! j::: ill ~ r-I ~ rO 8o,-j rO r' ~ H ..jJ ~ s:: rtl s:: 8 '"d ~ ..0 " ..jJ ..--..0 ~ 8 ..jJ g <1J ..jJ ill (!) ~ 0) g ~ r-I H P; U P; Cf) i< c..'JCf)Cf)U~P; ~ * U '--'::> i r-I 0 0 0 0 0'1 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 a 0 .. .. 0'1 0 a 0 0 0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 r-I {f}- {I}- {I}- {f}- a 0 0 0 0 0'1 0 a 0 0 I 0 a a a 0'1 co a a 0 0 0"\ \D \D \D \D r-I {I}- {J)- {J)- {J)- 0'1 00 0 a 0 co 00 a a 0 I a 0 0 0 0 co ... co 00 a a a 0'1 r- M a a a r-I r-I N N N ~ {I}- {J)- {I}- {I}- ~ co 0 0 0 a P; co a a 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 ~ r- co 0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 ~ 0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 a, r-I M M M (Y) g; ... L{) L{) L{) L{) ~ {I}- {I}- {J)- {I}- ~ r- 000 0 00 0 ~ co L{) 0 0 L{) L{) 0 U") H I L{) 0 0 L{) L{) C> L{) , ~ \D co (Y)\DO 0'1 0"\ 0 0'1 ffi ' 0'1 Or-lO r-I r-I 0 r-I H r-I r-I r- co r-I r- eo ~ c..'J U {I}- {I}- {I}- {I}- r-I 0 0 o 0 0 0'1 I 0 0 00 0 \D 6 Cf) co eo oeo eo eo ~ .. ... 0'1 H r-I r-I L{) \D r-I r-i ~ \D \D r-I~ \D (Y) (Y) r-IN (Y) :>-t ... .. .. I \D \D \D \D {I}- {I}- {I}- {J)- 00000 0 o 0 0 CJ) ~ L{)OOOO L{) L{) 0 L{) E-1 L{)OCOOO (Y) L{) eo (Y) Cf) .. .. .. .. .. .. g 0 M\DOOO 0 ~L{) 0 U Or-l'..DN(y) (Y) co ~ (Y) r-I ~ M 0'1 L{) (Y) 0'1 N N N N {I}- r-I r-I r-I r-I {I}- {I}- {I}- ..jJ m s:: ~ ..jJ Ul C1 ~ .,-j CJ) B 'U ..jJ ~ Q) s:: r-I Ul tJ'l g'~ ~ .g <1J s:: H Ul r-I r-I .,-j . r-! tJ1 ~ <1J -,-j U Ul lo-I Ul rO or-! rcl .r-! Ul <1J Ul ~ ..jJ ~ ..c<1J..jJ<1J ..jJ .,-j ~gffig Ul H rOr-I 0 ti.l ~ or-! ~ l--IUl--l~ U ' u Q)P; P; ~ rtl & u U lo-I r-I ~ E-1 .,-j rO or-! rO 0 rO r;d U U r-Ilo-I:>oW~ ..jJ ~ o :2 -,-j rO g lo-I-r-! r-I P; UQ~ ~ <1Jr-I rO ~~ ..jJ P; r-IN(Y)~L{) i< g ii r-I 0 0 0 0 0 0'1 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. .. .. ... .. 0'1 U") 0 L{) L() L{) C'l N L{) r- r- r- r-i {I}- i.Fr i.Fr {I}- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, m 0 0 0 0 0 0 I .. .. .. .. .. .. 0'1 L~ 0 L{) 0 0 0 eo N L{) CO \D \D \D 0'1 UI \D \D \D r-I {I}- {J)- {J)- {f)- a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'1 0 0 0 \D \D \D \D eo .. .. .. I L{) 0 0 UI 0 0 0 c:l N UI r- \D r-I r-I r-I eo N N N 0'1 r-I {I}- {I}- {I}- {I}- 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 CD 0 0000 0 0 0 CD .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. I L{) L{) 0 r- -<::I' r-I r-I r-I r- N M L{) N M r- r- r- eo r-I r-I r-I 0'1 r-I I{I}- :8 {I}- {I}- {I}- ~ 0000 0 0 0 8 0000 0 0 0 0::; ~I L{) 0 0 0 L{) L{) UI p,; .. .. .. .. .. I '-:000 r-I r-I r-I H \D M L{) 0 N 0 0 0 Z eo eo 0'1 0'1 0'1 ,~ 0'1 en r-I ~ ~ {I}- {I}- i.Fr {I}- ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ g2 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Cf) 0 ~ -<::I' ~ -<::I' H 0 o~ ~ H ' r- r- r- r- " ~ 0::; r - \D \D \D \D ~ P,;:>-t H H :>-t {I}- {J)- {J)- {I}- 6 E-i H Z , 000000000 0 0 0 0 0 r-I ~ ~ [;)1 000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0'1 Uloooooooo 0 0 L{) L{) L{) I t5 gg .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .. .. .. .. .. \.D cooo 0 L{)or--<::I' 0 \D L{) L{) L{) UI co U O'IL{)ONMONMr- \D co eo eo eo 0'1 r-I co N L{) 0 0 0 r-I N N N ; {I}- {I}- {J)- {I}- ~ >.., <1J lo-I r-I tJ'l I r-I 0 rtl Cf) ~ ~ '0> p,; rtl o H 'U l--I ..jJ ~r8 rcl ~ tJ'l C p,; 0 ~ t~ .,-j H ~ CJ) p,; ~ & <1J ..jJ ..jJ ..jJ m-r-! ..c 0 CJ) Ul s:: r-1Cf) tJ'l..jJ r0 ffi ~ :1'0 Ul ~ <1J s:: 8 rtl ~ :1 s:: ~ 0 CO 0 I ~ or-! 0 r-I "-.. - r-! <1JoW I H P,;HUltJ'l r-1 U rtl r-1 . r-! ~ s:: O-l s:: u Ul-,-j ..jJ rtl 0 ,-j <1J <1Jo,-j ~ <1J rtl s:: O-l ~ U 0::: Ul Ul ~4-l . r-! 0::; ~ <1J s:: <1J & ~ I 'r-! l--I oW O:::~Q) oW 8' or-! U <1J ~ ..jJ o,....j s:: r-I . r-! r-1 :>>..,>.., cO CJ) 0::: Ul ,<1J lo-I -,-j 4-l CJ .g OoW..jJ'U H r-1 'U ~ ..jJ - r-! Z l--I <1J-,-j rtl c..'J<1J.ocOH ::>u H r-I ~ 4-l r-I 0 Ul U ~.,-j ..jJ cO ~ -,....j cO .r-! 0::: lo-I s:: ~ H ~ s:: '"d ~ cO H Cf) U <1J .,-j U <1J ~ B 'U ~ rO ~..jJ Ul ~..jJ c ..jJ z F.; ~ ~..jJ r-I $..jJ O-l~ z 0 ~ ~ Ul H '0 ~ r-I H <1J s:: cO U H Q) :> 0 ti.l ~ ~ o cO Q) <1J ..c ~ U oW rtl tJ'l..c <1J u ..jJ 2; tJ'l..c Cf) ..c ~ lo-I <1J r-I lo-I ..jJ r-I ~ ~ E-1 ~<1JrOtJ'l u>.., oruO-l<1J:1:1 r-I ,;> 'U ~ :1 Ul ..jJ ..jJ ffi -n lo-I Q) '0 0 S cO j r-I U o . r-! <1J 8 :1 cO. r-! ~..jJ 0::: s:: Cf) ..jJ cO ~ OCf)Cf) o:luu:r: Cf) :::J g l--I r-I ~ <1J cO C ..jJ . . . .0 r-1 ~ g ~ r-1NM'<:j'L{)\Dr-eoO'lr-l r-I i< - iii r-I 0 0 0 0 0'1 0 0 0 0 I -<::I' ~ -<::I' -<::I' 0 0"\ I'- I'- r- I'- 0'1 L{) L{) L{) L{) r-I ~ -<::I' -<::I' <;j1 {f}- V)- {J)- {I}- 0 0 a 0 0 0'1 UI L{) UI L{) I I'- I'- I'- r- 0'1 .. eo 0 0 0 a 0'1 UI L{) L~ L{) ri I'- I'- I'- I'- {I}- {I}- {f}- {f}- 0'1 a a a a a 0 eo N I'- 0"\ m a 0'1 I I'- 0'1 \D \D a \D co ... ... .. co L{) -<::I' 0 a a a 0'1 0 0 r-I 1..0 U") r-I r-I (Y) ("f) \D (Y) N \.D {f}- {f}- {f}- {f}- co 0 a a a 0 eo (Y) eo .-: r-I ri I 0 N (Y) (Y) (Y) I'- eo -<::I' ()) ("f) (Y) (Y) ~ 0'1 r-I 0 N N N r-I -<::I' N \.D \.D \D {f}- {f}- {f}- {J)- 8 ~ ~ I'- a a 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ eo 0 0 0 ("f) N a L{) L{) L() 0 lJl 0 L{) I L() (Y) 0 r-I 0 0 0'1 (Y) \.D ("f) \D 0 ()) .<:. \.D ~ co 1..0 r- N 1..0 I'- eo \.D 0'1 eo L{) (Y) 0 1..0 ()) -<::I' r-I 0 L{) 0 L{) eo 0 \D r-I I'- N eo 6 r-I eo r-I -<::I' -<::I' eo ()) I'- r-I eo {f}- {f}- 0::; r-I r-I g: {f}- {I}- H ,...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 CfJ. '-' ~ ~ 0 0 1..0 1..0 a \D 1..0 6 Cf) eo L{) 1..0 ()) L{) -<::I' ()) i::-l ~ .. H ~ H 1..0 N -<::I' (Y) N r-I (Y) ~ 0::: ~ U") \D \.D '-D p., ~ -<::I' ~ -<::I' U {f}- {f}- {f}- {f}- r-I 0'1 I a 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a a \D eo ~ <<I 0 0 0 1..0 1..0 N I'- L{) 1..0 a r-I 0 L{) 0 \D ()) (Y) co 0 r-I ()) I'- ()) r-I a a r-I ("f) \D 0 0 r-I ~8 .. ... .. .. .. .. ("f) C'l N a a L{) -<::I' \D ("f) -<::I' a L{) (Y) 0 (Y) :>-t L{) r-I 0 I'- r- 0 0 1..0 ()) 0 eo r-I r- N ()) ! eo r-I eo 0 (Y) (Y) N I'- r-I -<::I' r-I I'- {I}- r-I r-I ~ (Y) r-I -<::I' {f}- {f}- {f}- CJ) H H <1J Ul cO ..c P; v '0 C ~ ~ ~ 0 P; ~ H .,-j ill ..1J C Ul ~ ::J ..jJ ~ ..jJ cO 0 r-I ~ ill ~ I C :> or-! r-I .,-j ill .r-! ill 0 ..jJ -,-j P; ~ r-I C U C cO :r: ~ I ..jJ '0 .g .~ & 8 Ul c ~ c s:: ~ r-I H H S r-I ill ..jJ r-I ~ .r-! Ul N ~ & lo-I .,-j s:: '0 rtl ill -,-j ~ ill :r: 0 s:: s:: Ul ~ ~ ..jJ ~ ..c ..jJ z -,-j S ill ..jJ ~ or-! ~ ~ ~ tJ'l 8 Ul H '0 oW N C ~ ~ U ~ :1 0 ~ & cO -,-j ~ Ul s:: P; 0 ~ U U ~ oW 'D ~ P; lo-I ~ P; Q <1J ~ ;B ~ .r-! ~ .g 0 ffi ..c r-I U Ul E-1 .0 -,-j Q) oW g cO ~ r-I ill p., ~ U ~ r-I C r-I ~ Ul ..jJ cO 0 lo-I 8 :2 Q) ..c 0 cO 8 g l--I Q) 0 r-I CJ) CJ) Q ~ ~ Q) ~ ..1J or-! cO C ~ ro s:: -,-j ..jJ 0::: ~ ..jJ Q) ill g p., r-I N (Y) -<::I' L{) \D r- eo i< p., Cf) Cf) 0::; iv - ~ ~ p., ~ ~ ~ ~ HCJ) E-I ~~ ~~ 6Cf) r-I m I 1..0 eo m r-I I, VSl r-I m I o 0'1 0'1 r-I o 0'1 I 0'1 eo 0'1 r-I m eo I eo eo 0'1 r-I eo CO I r- eo 0'1 r-I V}- V}- V}- {J)- o o o .. o (Y) r-I o o o .. o (Y) r-I o o o .. o (Y) r-I o o o o I.{) .-j o 0 0000 0 o 0 0000 0 r-I 0 0000 0 r- eo I 1..0 eo 0'1 r-I ~ ~ "~ ~ ~ eo 0 m CO 1..0 0 0 0'1 r- COr-l-<::l'(y) N N mNI.{)r-1 r-I .. r-I V}- .. r-I :>-1 <1J U r-I . r-! r-1'O 4-l ~ ~ cO cO - r-! lo-I:>-1 rtl >0..jJ ~ 0<1J U 9 ~ H lo-I~~ ~ ~ ~~ 53 ..--. Q)~ b 0 H l--I 0:>-10 . H E Ul tJ'l ~ :> s:: ..jJ Ul Q) .Q <1J '"d ..jJ U s:: 8= ~ Ul C lo-I Q) C!2J -:: g ..c Ul s:: 'v ::J rtl H H Q)" -,-j 0 ~ M ffi ..jJ ~ cO ~~~~~~B ~ ~ ~ ~~j~ ~~~o::: ~ ~ ;B .:::. I ~ g' 8::J .~ -@EiSUl P; ~ ~ ~ ~ .:::. ~ ~ ~ I Ul ~ r-I - ,-j CJ) s:: id Cf)..jJ cO cO r::J:: ~ cO lo-I Cf) ..jJ Q) Ul ~ r-I O-l "-.. <1J l--I S::..jJ Ul r-I ~ Ul P; cO Ul s:: :> ~ ~ ~ G B rg ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B ~ Q) ~ I ~ ~ ~ -d ~ ~ -,-j ~ :>-1 @ ~ tJ'l :> 2 2 ~ ~ p., -~ -.0 ~ g 8 13 ~ 8:> Q :> p., ~ ffi ~ c ~ :>-1'~ 8 ~ 8 ~ 01 'D~m OJ ~ ~ :> ~ ~ ~s:: :>::=j 8 .8 o 0 f-4 ~ -,-j ~ rO s:: ~ "'" ~ 0 ~ Q'"'l.j..J ~ 0 .,-j 0 cO 01 cO H ~ oW '0 ~ r-I ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) H -,-j cO Q) I H > '0 :>-1 lo-I 0::: 8 tJ'l ~cO'Offi~"8oWQ)-~ ~~~~I ~~~ ~I ffi13~~u~ ~ H ~ ~ Q) Q is <3 'B r-I H H ~ Ul ->r-! &S ~ H ~ lo-I H or-! H '0 :> '0 -,-j :> s:: tJ1 r-I Cf) '0 cO U r-I '0 '0 r-I r-I rO ~ ~ 8 cO '0 ~ cO cO::=j ~ > ~ _~ ~ ~ ..jJ ~ ~ ~ ..jJ ~ ~ ffi ~ rd 0; ~ cO cO -,-j H p., cO U :> 0 CJ) ~ ~ is ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ 0::: 3 cO.~ 0::: f-4 .~ ~ .~.~ ~ _~ ts ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s:: . ,-j o:l ..jJ > Cf) 0 oW :>-1 '0 0 Q) Cf) s:: Q) Cf) o:l O-l Cf) Ul s:: Cf) C r-I cO :>-1 s:: 0 ~ - ~cO ~ O-l - r-! U CJ) ..jJ cO o:l tJ'l ~ '0 cO Q) ~ 0 co r-I ..jJ l--I co ~ cO :>-1 r-I I U lo-I 0 cO U .,-j U :>-1 U U r-I U..1J r-I lo-I Q) U Q) - ,-j - ,-j cO r-I Q) l--I s:: ..jJ - r-! Ul . r-! Q) en - r-! U . ,-j.c c. ,-j Q)..c C 0::: U ..jJ 0::: en r-I .0 '0 4-l lo-I cO ..c r-I . r-! s:: 4-l 0:: r-I 4-l r-I 'D 4-l . r-! 0::: 4-l tJ'l. r-! > ..c ..jJ - ,-j en Ul '"d r-I cO :> 4-l l--I ::J tJ'l - r-! r-I 0 4-l r-I 4-l r-I ~ 4-l ..c 4-l . r-! r-I tJ'l :1 r-I ffi 'D 0 ffi ~ ~ ~ @ ~ -~ ~ 8:1 ~ .s ~ ~ ~ -::2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi ~ Bj "8 B 8:1 c7S "8 CJ) ~ U CJ)~ 0::: ~CJ)~ 0 E-1CJ) 8 E-1 CJ)E-I Q Q ~r-1 cO o..jJ ~g ~ , rv' B H 0::: p., E-1 Cf) o U ! ~ p., o o 0'1 (Y) (Y) r-I V}- o o o .. N (Y) -<::I' .. r-I V}- r-1N o o o r- eo I.{) o 0 0 000 000 co N N r- o:::t' o:::t' o o o 0000 0 0000 0 0000 0 ... r- I.{) 1..0 ... ... ...... ... r-oeoo 0 1..0 1..0 eo r- (Y) ONI.{)\O r-I (Y) -<::I'1.{)\Dr- o 0 00 o 0 r-I 0 1..0 UI r-1r-1 o o o o r-I o 0 00 00 r-10 1..0 0'1 r-1N ex) o o o r- (Y) r-I o o o (Y) · 0 0'1 r-I o o o (Y) I.{) N ... r-I o o o .. N (Y) o o o I.{) 1..0 o o o ... o I.{) (Y) r-I r-I r-I o o o N -<::I' N o o o o eo r-I o o o .. I.{) m o o o .. o N o o o .. eo N o o o 00 o 0 o 0 I.{) N 0'1 (Y) I.{) ... o r- -<::I' N r-I - V o o o m r-I ~ .. r-I o o o ... (Y) ~ o o o o r- .. r-I (Y) -<::I' r-Ir-1 o o o .. o r- N o o o .. o r- N I.{) r-I o o o .. o o I.{) o o o ... o o ~ o o o .. o o 0'1 \0 r-I o 000 o 000 o 000 .. m -<::1'\00'1 I.{) eoO'l\O CO r-I r- r-I V}- a o o o o o 1..0 r-I o o o o 0 0 o 0 0 000 o 1..0 r- o m N N 0 .. 0'1 I.{) eo r- r-I .. o o eo V}- o o o .. r-I 0'1 r- r-I V}- o o o .. I.{) r-I eo r-I V}- o o r-I r- r- r- (Y) V}- o o 0'1 <;j1 r- o .. r-I V}- .. r-I r-I {I}- o o o 0'1 o r- r-I V}- a o o o 0 o 0 o 0 ro .~ .. o 0'1 1..0 1..0 r- r-I V}- a o o r-I cO lo-I .gj <1J ~ s:: -,-j o o o -<::I' r-I N r-I V}- ... o o eo V}- .. o o co V}- o 0 o 0 o 0 .. ~ r-I 0'1 m r- r- r-I r-I V}- {J)- Q) Ul cO ..c U H ::J O-l o ..jJ '0 Q) Ul :1 <1J H ~ Ul Q) or-! s:: S '0 ~ 00 0 00 0 00 0 ... I.{) 0 I.{) r-10 r-I r-r-1 co ... .. r-I r-I V}- V}- o 0 0 0 0 0 000000 -::ror-OOr-l Nr-IeoO'lI..Or- UI-<::I'I.{)r-~r- 0'11.{) \D1.{)r- .. r-I M {J)- {J)- 00 00 00 00 0'1 0 0 0'1 -<::I' eo N-<::I' U") r- ~ r- 0'1 0 r-I m lo-I Q) s:: ~ .. r-I V}- V}- * 000000 000000 Mor-OOO Q) Ul ~ U Q) ..0 o o I.{) .... .... ... ... ... .. NO'ICOO'leor- Nr-ILf")(Y)CON mr- r-I.{)O .. r-r-1 r-I V}- r-I {I}- .. o r-I m V}- ~ i H ~ ..1J ~ lo-I o ~ ~ r-I ~o:l ~~ ~ C O-i Ul r-I cOO Q)-,-j ..0 r-I - ,-j rtl ~<1JUl.j..J~ ::> :> ..jJ . r-! "'" 'd Q) C r-I ~ ] ~ ~ 'g ~ ..jJ(J)~S r-I r-1'r-! l--I ~ cO cO C :1 U l--I lo-I ::l.Q or-! r-I Q)Q)~8r-1cO C 'D .r-! ~ ..jJ Q) Q) <1J 2 c..'J~UO::: ~ .6 'd <1J ..jJ cO ..jJ Ul H Q) 'D B rO ~~ Ul -,....j ..jJ H & ~ Ul '"d ~~ ~~ Q) s:: ffi ~..o lo-I * :::> ~ j ~ i< G E N E R A L It. I M P R o V E M E N T 5 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENr PRcx;RN-i FUND PROJECT ACTIvJ:TY CAPITAL PROJECTS Police Vehicles GENERAL Description-Location This item provides for the purchase of eight (8) patrol vehicles. Corrments This purchase was authorized by the City COQ~cil during Fiscal Year 1985-86. However, the City will not take delivery on the vehicles until July. Therefore, it is necessary to allocate funds in Fiscal Year 1986-87. Estimated Cost Financing Year(s) Scheduled Patrol Vehicles $103,550 General $103,550 Prior Years 1986-87 $103,550 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 Total: $103,550 $103,550 $103,550 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 1 - 1986-91 CAPITAL H1PROVEMEl\1T PRCGRAl~ FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY CAPITAL PROJECTS Word Processing Equipment GENERAL Description-Location This i tern provides ftmding for an additional word processing work station and a high- speed printer which would interface vnth the existing word processing work stations in Development Services and the City Manager's Office. Comments Tne additional word processing work station would only be purchased if additional office space becomes available. The high-speed printer would inl?rove the overall productivity of existing units on large typing projects. Annual maintenance is estimated at $1,000 for the additional work station and $660 for the high-speed printer. Estimated Cost Financing Year(s) Scheduled Word Processor $ Printer 8,500 7,500 General Fund $ 16,000 Prior Years 1986-87 $ 16,000 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 Total: $ 16,000 $ 16,000 $ 16,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 2 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEl-1EN'r PRO:;RAH FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY GENERAL Civic Center PL~LIC FACILITIES Public Facilities Fund $12,345,800 General Fund 115,000 Description-Location This project includes the acquisition of 10 acres of land adj acent and west of the Dublin Sports Grounds, the construction of a Ci ty Hall and Police Station on that site, and furnishings. Comments The City Hall and Police Station facilities will not occupy the entire Civic Center site and ",rill therefore provide future opportun i ties to provide future communi ty facilities. In December, 1985, the City issued $11,968,000 in Certificates of Participation to acquire the land and construct the City Offices and Police Station, as well as associated road and park improvements required for access. The access road and associated park improvement costs are identified separately as the Sierra Court Southerly Extension proj ect under the STREETS Section of the Capital Improvement Progr~~. Estimated Cost Financing Land Acquisition $ 5,677,168 Cost of Issuance 88,726 Underwriters Discount 394,944 Design 499,962 Improvements 5,800,000 Total: $12,460,800 Year(s) Scheduled Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $ 6,361,800 700,000 5,399,000 $12,460,800 $12,460,800 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 3 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IHPROVEMENT PR(X;IW'1 FUND PROJEcr AcrIVITY CAP ITAL PROJEcrS Data Processing System GENERAL Description-Location This item provides for the installation of a comprehensive data processing system which would handle not only the financial needs of the City but also provide services to all other operating departments except Police Services. Comments The funds allocated for this item are based on the development of a centralized data processing system in comparable cities. The actual data processing needs of the city and ultimate configuration of a data processing system will be reviewed during Fiscal Year 1986-87 and 1987-88. Estimated Cost Financing Year(s) Scheduled Computer Hardware $ 170,000 Computer Software 150,000 General Fund $ 320,000 Prior Years '1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $170,000 60,000 90,000 $ 320,000 $320,000 Total: $ 320,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 4 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPRO\?EMENT PRCGRN-1 FUND PROJ"".c,CT ACTIVITY CAPITAL PROJECTS Records Management System GENERAL Description-Location Tnis item provides for the services of a records management consultant to develop a records management program, as well as equipment to implement that program. Comnents Jl~ though this study could b2 undertaken at t..his tLrre, it could not be adequately implemented due to space limitations. It is recommended that this item be funded during the first year of occupancy of the new Civic Center. Estimated Cost Financing Year(s) Scheduled Professional Services $ 15,000 Machinery & Equipment 15,000 General Fund $ 30,000 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 $ 30,000 1989-90 1990-91 $ 30,000 Total: $ 30,000 $ 30,000 -------------------~_CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 5 - " c o M M U N I T y I M p R o V E M E N T 5 1986-91 C.n..pITAL n-~ROVEMEr-.--r PRcx;RAL1 FUND PROJECT ACTIVITi COMMCJNITY IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL PROJECTS Downtown Improvement Plan Description-Location This project would provide for the professional services of a contract urban designer/planner to assist U1e City in developing a plan for the Ci ty 's downtown area. This plan would address issues such as intensi ty of development, land use alternatives, parking, pedestrian amenities, public landscaping, street furniture, etc. Comments Through a downtown improvement plan, the Ci ty and corrmercial property owners could work together to assure that the vitality of Dublin's retail center is maintained. Estimated Cost Financing Study $ 98,500 General Fund Total: $ 98,500 <'. Year ( s) Scheduleq > ' 1, .' $ 98,500 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $ 67,000 31,500 $ 98,500 $ 98,500 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- . ~....:. . h,. .~_....-..-: .... - 6 - 1986-91 CAPI'l"'AL n~.PRO\TEMENI' PRcx;F1\tvi FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS O.PITAL PROJECTS Sidevlalk Safety Repair/ Bus Stop Pad Program Description-Location This project would provide for the replacement of damaged sidewalk at various locations and installation of bus stop pads at designated stops along the LAvrA/BART transit routes. Comnents State law provides that sidewalk repair is the responsibility of the property owner adj acent to the sidewalk, yet ci ties are typically held liable for hazards associated wi th sidewalk in need of repair. Tnis program reduces the City's liability exposure. Bus stop pads are needed to protect private property at bus stop locations, facilitate subsequent installation of bus shelters, and promote the use of public transit. Reimbursement for installation of the bus stop pads may be a possibility. Estimated Cost Financing Year(s) Scheduled Design/Inspection $ 27,000 Improverrents 123,000 $150,000 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 General Fund Total: $150,000 $150,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 7 - $ 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 $150,000 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPRO\lR.MENT PROvl{AM FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY CAPITAL PROJECTS Sewage Facility Expansion COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS Description-Location Alameda COUTlty, prior to Dublin I s incol~ration, agreed to enter into the DSRSD/LAVMA sewer plant expansion on behalf of Dublin to resel-ve 100,000 gallons per day se\~r capacity for industrial (non- retail/commercial) 'use. The County has paid the constnlction bills to date. In 1984, the City of Dublin filed an erninent domain lawsui t against Alameda County in order to secure the 100,000 gallons acquired by the COll.l1ty. This i tern covers the anticipated acquisition cost of the sewage capacity, if the City is successful in its eminent domain lawsuit. Comments . The City would be responsible for a portion of this plant expansion and can establish sewer hookup fees to recoup the City's costs. This capacity allows DW)lin to approve additional industrial projects within the City limits. Financing Year(s) Scheduled Estimated Cost ACquisition cost $800,000 General Fund $800,000 Prior Years 1986-87 $800,000 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $800,000 Total: $800,000 $800,000 --------------~------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 8 - 1986-91 CAPIT..Z\L IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. FONTI PROJECT ACTIVITY CAPITlUJ PROJECTS Dougherty Road Fencing East Side COM!>1UNITY IMPROVEl\1ENTS Description-Location 'This proj ect provides for the installation of chain link fencing on the east side of Dougherty Road from Amador Valley Bl vd. to a point approximately 2,000 feet to the north. Corrnnents During Fiscal Year 1985-86, the City agreed to construct this fence as well as a number of other long-range improvements along Dougherty Road in exchange for an easement along the east side of Dougherty Road from the U. S . Army. This easement w:::mld enable the City to widen Dougherty Road to its ul timate width in the future. The U. S. Army has not yet completed processing of the agreement. 'This fence \o\Duld b2 constructed behind a landscaped bem which will be constructed along the east side of Dougherty Road by the developer of the Al&~ Creek ,Villages. Estimated Cost Financing General Fund $ 20,000 Improvements $ 20,000 Total: $ 20,000 Year(s) Scheduled Prior Years 1986-87 $ 20,000 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 9 - 1986-91 CAPITAL I..!\1PROVENENT PRcx:;RAM FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY CAPITAL PROJECTS Bus Shelters COMMUNITY IIvlPROVEMENTS Description-Lo8ation This proj ect provides for the erection of five (5) bus shelters at heavily used bus stops to protect those waiting for buses from the elements. Locations for bus shel ters are yet to be detel.'1Tlined, pending approval of the proposed bus routes and stops. Comments Bus shelters will encourage the use of public transportation, especially during inclement weather. On-going costs will include normal maintenance plus vandalism (estimated at $2,000-$3,000 per year). The cost of the shelters and maintenance may be ftmded with Tr2..Dsportation Development Act Article 4 funds, if grants become available. Design of these structures is proposed to be recommended by the Downtown Study Committee. Estimated Cost , Financing Year(s) Scheduled R/W Negotiations Design/Specifications Shelters $ 1,000 4,000 30,000 General Fund $ 35,000 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 Total: $ 35,000 $ 35,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 10 - 1986-91 CAPITPL HIJPROVEME:.NT PROGRN-1 FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY CAPITAL PROJH'..LTS Catch Basin Grate Replacement Program CO!v1MUNITY IMPROVEMENTS Description-Location Tnis project vlOuld provide for the phased replacement of 550 existing catch basin grates with a new standard bicycle grate. The first phase of this project will focus along existing designated bike routes. Corrments Prior to incorporation, Alameda COlli'1ty had modified existing catch basin grates by adding steel bars in order to make them safer for bicyclists. Over the years, many of these bars have broken lOJse. These grates present a maintenance problem. Staff 'will endeavor to obtain grant funding for this project, if at all possible. Estimated Cost Financing Design/Installation $ 20,000 Improvement 180,000 General Fund Total: $200,000 Year(s) Scheduled $200,000 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $200,000 ---------------------CITf OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 11 - $ 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 $200,000 1986-91 CAPITAL ll'iPROVEMEl\lT PRCGRAH FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY CAP ITi\L PROJECTS City Entrance Signs CCMIvlUNITY IMPROVEMEl\lTS Description-Location Comments ---- ~ r This project provides for the construction of City entrance signs at the following locations: (1) San Ramon Road at 1-580 off-rarrp, (2) San Ramon Road at Alcosta Blvd., (3) Dougherty Road at 1-580 off-r~~p, (4) Village Parkway at Kimball Ave., and (5) Dougherty Road at the northerly City limit line. Ground signs will be placed in City right- of-way so as not to obstruct traffic sight lines. No specific design has been determined at this time but is proposed to be a product of the Downtown Improvement Committee's report. Annual maintenance costs are estimated at $500. Estimated Cost Financing Year(s) Scheduled Design/Inspection Construction $ 7,000 20,000 General Fund $ 27,000 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 $ 27,000 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 Total: $ 27,000 $ 27,000 $ 27,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORl~IA--------------------- - 12 - 1986-91 c..~ITAL IMPRCJvEMENr PR03RAM FUND PROJEcr AcrIV IT"r' Cl-\PITAL PROJEcrS Handicap Curb Ramps COMMUNITY IV@ROVEMENTS Description-Location rrhis project provides for the construction of approximately 55 handicap curb ramps at various intersections throughout the City as a continuation of the progrmn commenced during Fiscal Year 1984-85. Corrrrnents The City proposes to apply for Transportation Development Act Bikeway/Pedestrian funds in Fiscal Year 1986-87. If the city is successful in obtaining these funds, they will become available in Fiscal Year 1987-88 and would obviate the need to use General Fund monies for this project. Estimated Cost Financing Year(s) Scheduled Design/Inspection $ Construction 4,000 30,000 General Fund $ 34,000 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 $ 34,000 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 Total: $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFOP~IA--------------------- - 13 - 1986-91 CAPITAL TIvJPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUND PROJEcr AcrIVITY COMMUNITY IMPROVEIv'lENTS CAP ITJ.L PROJEcrS Major Arterials - Fence Replacement Description-Location This project would replace the existing older wood fences along J.~ador Valley Blvd. just east of Village Parkway and just west of the Southern Pacific right-of-way with a decorative masonry wall. Corrunents The original subdividers constructed wooden fences along arterial streets with units backed onto these streets. The wooden fences have run their life span and are now in various stages of disrepair. In 1984-85, the fence along the west side of VLLlage Parkway was replaced with a precast concrete wall. A similar, but not 'necessarily the same, type of wall is proposed for the residential portion of Amador Valley Blvd. Estimated Cost Financing Design/Inspection Construction $ 10,000 60,000 General Fund Total: $ 70,000 Year(s) Scheduled $ 70,000 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 $ 70,000 1989-90 1990-91 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 14 - t 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPRCJ\TFYJENT PROSRAz.1 FUND PROJEcr AcrIVITY CAP ITAL PROJEcrS street Name Identification Sign Replacement Program COMMUNITY IfVlPROVEMENTS Description-Location This project would replace the existing black-lettering-on-white-background street name identification signs at approximately 400 intersections throughout the City with distincti ve reflector ized green-and-whi te street name signs with the City's logo as adopted by the City Council during Fiscal Year 1985-86. Comments The new sIgns are easier to read because the signs are reflectorized. These signs are presently being installed on all new subdivision streets. Estimated Cost Financing Year(s) Scheduled DeSign/Inspection $ Construction 6,000 60,000 General Fund $ 66,000 Prior Years $ 400 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 65,600 1989-90 1990-91 Total: $ 66,000 $ 66,000 $ 66,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORl~IA--------------------- - 15 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPRavEHENT PROSRl\M FUND ACTIVITY PROJECT Underground Utilities - Dougherty Road, Southern Pacific Railroad to p~ador Valley Blvd_ CAP ITAL PROJECTS Description-Location This project will underground the overhead utilities in the center of Dougherty Road from the Southern Pacific Railroad to ~~ador Valley Blvd. Comments As a condition of the development of the Alamo Creek Villages, the developer was required to construct an additional two (2) lanes of pavement on the west side of Dougherty Road between the Southern Pacific Railroad and Amador Valley Blvd. With the construction of these new lanes, the existing overhead utilities would be left in a dirt median in between the new pavement and the existing Dougherty Road, unless the poles were relocated or placed underground. It is anticipated that the new road construction will commence during the summer of 1988. There are no PUC Rule 20 funds available for this project. Estimated Cost Financing General Fund $585,000 Survey/Inspection $ 20,000 Improvements 565,000 Total: $585,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- COMMUNITY IHPROVEL'1El\lTS Year(s) Scheduled Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 $585,000 1990-91 $585,000 $585,000 - 16 - P A R K S ~ 1986-91 C..1\PITAL IMPROVEMENT PRcx:;RAM FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY PARKS Amador Lakes Mini -Park CAPITAL PROJECTS Description-Location This proj ect provides for the construction of a 3/4-acre park at the intersection of Stagecoach Road and Turquoise Street. Park improvements include a children1s play area, - picnic tables, barbeques, and turf area. Comments As a condi tion of development of Amador Lakes, the developer was required to dedicate the land for this park and construct $88,000 in park improvements. During Fiscal Year 1985-86, the City Council approved the design for this park, which resulted in an estimated cost of $141,300 to construct the improvements. The City ,has agreed to contribute $53,300, which is the amount over and above the developer'? commitment. Estimated Cost Financing Park Dedication Fund $ 53,300 Design/Inspection Improvements $ 7,800 45,500 Total: $ 53,300 Year(s) Scheduled Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $ 6,800 46,500 $ 53,300 $ 53,300 ---------------------CITY OF PUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 17 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRffiRAM FVNJJ PROJECT ACTIVITY Ko1b Park CAPITAL PROJECTS PARKS Description-Location This project provides for the acquisition of a 5-acre park from the Murray School District at the Fallon School Si te. The project includes the renovation of existing recreational facilities as well as the construction of new facilities. Comments Land acquisition would occur under the auspices of the Naylor Bill which enables the City to purchase the park at 25% of market value. Major elements of this project include installation of park furniture, installation of tot and children's play areas, field and irrigation rehabilitation, lighted walkways, renovation of tennis courts and lighting.1 group picnic and shade structure, parcourse, barbeques, and restrooms. Annual maintenance costs are estimated at $36,800. Estimated Cost Financing Design/Inspection "$ 89,630 Improvements 640,170 Land Acquisition 90,000 Year(s) Scheduled State Park Bond Act $ 15,300 Park Dedication 514,900 General Fund 289,600 $ 2,500 817,300 'Ibtal: $819,800 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $819,800 $819,800 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 18 - 1986-91 CAPITPL IMPROVEMENT PRcx;r:w1 FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY Senior Citizen Center CAPITAL PROJECTS PARKS Description-Location This project provides for the acquisition, renovation, and furnishing of the Fallon" School Multi-Purpose Room for use as a Senior Citizen Center. Comments It is anticipated that the City would purchase the land and the building from the Murray School District at a price which would only include the cost of the land. This acquisition cost would more than offset the 15% local match required under the terms of the Senior Citizen Bond Act. L~ual operation and estimated at $48,720. maintenance is Estimated Cost Financing Acquisition Improvements Furnishings & Equipment $ 28,350 53,500 20,150 Senior Citizen Bond Act $ 73,650 General Fund 28,350 Total: $102,000 Year(s) Scheduled Prior Years 1986-87 $102,000 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $102,000 $102,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 19 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEHENT PROSRAM FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY Shannon Park Renovation CAPITAL PROJECTS PARKS Description-Location This project provides for the renovation of Shannon Park, which is presently owned by the Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD). This park is located on the northwest corner of San Ramon Road and Shannon Ave. Comments It is proposed that this proj ect be undertaken in two phases. Work undertaken in both phases would include: derrolition, grading, drainage & irrigation work, concrete paving, lawn replacement, and the installation of new park furniture. Shown below are the other major elements to be included in each phase of park construction. Phase I ($456,130) Older Children's Play Area Tot Lot Spray Pool Phase II ($414,030) Pond Construction Hillside Landscaping Stream Bank Planting & Irrigation Parking Lot & Drop-Off Improvements Lighting Bridge at Creek Plaza Area & Fountain Southwest Garden Renovation Outdoor Plaza at Building Pursuant to discussions with D.S.R.S.D., the District has indicated that it would make its park dedication funds available for improvements at Shannon Park. As of July 31, 1985, these funds were estimated at $200,000, less corrmitted funds for 1985-86 improvments at $100,000. Estimated Cost Financing Design/Inspection $106,950 Improvements 763,210 Year(s) Scheduled Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 Park Dedication $124,050 General Fund 646,110 Reimbursements 100,000 Total: $870,160 $456,130 414,030 $870,160 $870,160 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 20 - 1986-91 CAPITAL ll'.iPROVEMENT PR<X;RAM FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY CAPITAL PROJECTS Dolan Park PARKS Description-Location This proj ect provides for the acquisition and construction of a 5-acre park at the Dolan SchCXJl Site, which is located on Padre Way, west of Castillian Road. Corrments , The City purchased approximately 4 acres of this site from the Murray SchCXJl District and 1 acre was dedicated to the City by the adj acent subdivider during Fiscal Year 1985-86. It is proposed that this project be undertaken in two phases. Work undertaken in both phases would include: tree planting, concrete walkways, park furniture, and lighting. . Shown below are the other major elements to be included in each phase of park construction. Phase I ($407,020) Grading Drainage Lawn & Irrigation System Children's Play Area Phase II ($209,280) Sports Court Parcourse Group Picnic Day Camp & Shelter Tot Play Area Annual maintenance is estimated at $31,150. Estimated Cost Financing Design/Inspection $ Improvements Land Acquisition Year(s) Scheduled 75,600 540,700 454,660 Park Dedication $ General Fund 454,660 407 "Q2-0 . 209;280 Total: $1,070,960 537,860 533,100 Prior Years 1986-87 $ 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $1,070,960 $1,070,960 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 21 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRc:x:;RA..M FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY CAPITAL PROJECTS Mape Park Renovation PlffiKS Description-Location This project provides for the renovation of t-1ape Park which is presently owned by the Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD). This park is located on Plata Way. Corrments Major improvements at this park would include play area reconstruction for tots and older children, a parcourse, lighting, additional trees, rehabilitation of turf and irrigation system, and portable restroom facilities. Estimated Cost Financing General Fund $305,720 Design/Inspection $ 32,650 Improvements 273,070 Total: $305,720 Year(s) Scheduled Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 $305,720 1989-90 1990:-91 $305,720 $305,720 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 22 - 1986-91 CAPITAL nJjpRovr~?I' PROGRAM FUND ACTIVITY PROJECT CAPITAL PROJECTS East Dougherty Hills Park (Phase II) PARKS Description-Location This project \".Quld fund the second phase construction of p~k inprovernents at East Dougherty Hills Park. This park, which has not yet been constructed, will be located on Dougherty Road north of Amador Valley Blvd. Comments The developers of the Alarro Creek Villages Residential Development have dedicated 8 acres of parkland to the City and will construct the first phase of park inprovements at a cost of approximately $666,380 to the developer. First phase improvements include basic park improvements such as turf area, lighting, parking lot, park furni ture, fencing, and a bridge connecting those portions of the park which are divided by Alamo Creek. Second phase improvements include restroom facilities, children's play area, picnic areas, and revegetation of Alamo Creek. Annual maintenance is estimated at $54,480. Estimated Cost Finarlcing Design/Inspection $ 37,750 Improvements 267,220 Year(s) Scheduled Park Dedication $250,000 General Fund 54,970 Total: $304,970 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 $304,970 1989-90 1990-91 $304,970 $304,970 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 23 - " .' 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEl>1ENT PRcr..:RZ\M ;..w: FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY CAPITAL PROJECTS Dougherty Hills Park PARKS Phase I ($58,000) Safety fencing Phase II ($436,950) Firebreak & hiking trails Parcourse OVerlook Interpretive Area Day Camp Gathering Place Buffer Planting Along Stagecoach Rd. Description-Location TIlis provides for the development of a 90- acre natural park along the ridge of the Dougherty Hills between Amador Valley Blvd. &~d the COllilty Line. Comments TIlis parcel was dedicated to the City by the developer of Tract 4719 in 1985. Development of this park could be undertaken in four phases as shown below. Phase III ($313,800) Amador Valley Mini-Park Phase IV ($457,400) Interpretive Center Restroom Hillside Park ,(Stagecoach Rd.) TIle developers of Tract 4719 and Amador Lakes have agreed to contribute $20,000 toward the cost of safety fencing. Annual maintenance is estimated at $32,200. Financing Year(s) Scheduled Estimated Cost Design/Inspection $ 148,400 Improvements 1,117,750 General Fund Reimbursements $1,246,150 20,000 Prior Years 1986-87 $ 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 58,000 750,750 457,400 Total: $1,266,150 $1,266,150 $1,266,150 ---------------------CITY OF. DUBLIN, CALlFORNIA--------------------- - 24 - 5 T R E E T 5 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRcx;RAM FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY STREETS CAPITAL PROJECTS San Rarron Road Improvements (Phase II) Description-Location This project would provide for the widening of San Rarron Road to six ( 6 ) through lanes between Dublin Blvd. and Silvergate Drive. This project would also include median street lighting, landscaping, extension of the 84" storm drain for Martin Canyon Creek, rrodification of the traffic signal at the intersection of Amador Valley Blvd. and at Dublin Blvd., and installation of a new traffic signal at the intersection of Silvergate Drive. Corrments In 1983-84, the City Council approved a traffic study which established the ultimate width and street configuration of San Ramon Road. This project combines the first two of four phases for the ultimate improvement of San Ramon Road. During Fiscal Year 1985-86, the City purchased $614,000 in Federal Aid Urban funds from the City of ~Bdera for $460,500. The ' City of Dublin will be required to recognize $614,000 in Federal Aid Urban funds as 1986-87 revenue. This results in an understatB'1lent of General Fund support (see asterisk below) of this project by $460,500. The total actual General Fund support of this project is $692,500. Annual energy and maintenance costs are estimated at $38,000. Estimated Cost Financing Year(s) Scheduled $ 133,900 44,000 General Fund $ Federal Aid Urban Reimbursements 232,000* 854,000 346,000 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $ 133,900 1,298,100 Design/Survey Inspection Construction Signals Landscaping Street Lights Road Inprovements Staking Total: 222,000 100,000 30,000 892,100 10,000 $1,432,000 $1,432,000 $1,432,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 25 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEMErU' PRcx;RAM FUND PROJEcr AcrIVITY CAP ITAL PROJEcrS Landscaping Village Parkway Amador Valley Blvd_ to Kimball Ave. Description-Location This project provides for the installation of median lighting and upgrading of the landscaping on Village Parkway from Amador Valley Blvd. to Kimball Ave., both in the median and on the east side of the street. Comments The improvement of the landscaping will improve the aesthetics of this major, north/south thoroughfare. Median street lighting will improve, traffic safety. Annual maintenance and energy costs are estimated at $30,000. Estimated Cost Financing Design/Inspection Landscape/Irrigation street Lighting $ 90,000 480,000 87,000 General Fund Total: $657,000 STREETS Year(s) Scheduled $657,000 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $587,000 70,000 $657,000 $657,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 26 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRcx::;RPM FUND ACTIV.lTY PROJECT Rehabilitation and Landscaping Amador Valley Blvd. Village Parkway to Dougherty Road CAPITAL PROJECTS STREETS Description-Location This project would provide for the rehabilitation, overlay, and median landscaping of Amador Valley Blvd. from Dougherty Road to Village Parkway. This project would also provide for the rrodification of the raised median in order to move the existing travel lanes away from the parking lanes to enhance the residential character of the street. The project also includes the installation of 37 median street lights. Comments The City Council has previously approved the conceptual plan for the street and landscaping design as a result of a lengthy series of traffic studies. The developers of Amador Lakes, Dublin Hills Estates, Heritage COilln8nS and the Alamo Creeks Villages are required to contribute to the cost of these improvements as shown below. During Fiscal Year 1985-86, the City purchased $600,000 in Federal Aid Urban (FAU) funds from the City of Foster City for $450,000. The City of Dublin will be required to recognize $ 6 00, 000 in Feder al Aid Urban funds as- 1986-87 revenue. This resul ts in an understatement of General Fund support of this project by $450,000. Annual energy and maintenance costs are estimated at $30,000. Estimated Cost Design/Inspection $ 116,000 Construction Overlay Median Modification Street Lights Landscaping Staking Total: Financing Federal Aid Urban $ Reimbursements 765,000 302,000 Year(s) Scheduled Prior Years $ 78,000 1986-87 989,000 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 250,000 296,000 185,000 200,000 20,000 $1,067,000 $1,067,000 $1,067,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 27 - 1986-91 C.~ITAL IMPRCJ\TD1ENI' PR(X;RP..M FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY STREETS CAP I TAL PROJECT'S Traffic Signal Dublin Boulevard/Sierra Court Description-Location This project would include full vehicle and pedestrian signalization as well as safety street lighting for the intersection at Dublin Blvd. and Sierra ct. It will calso provide protected landscaped and lighted left turn medians on both Dublin Blvd. approaches to Sier~a Court. Comments A total of $31,000 of the signal cost will be borne by the developer of Sierra Trinity Business Park. Annual maintenance and energy costs are estimated at $6,500. Estimated Cost Financing Year(s) Scheduled Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $ 42,000 218,000 Design/Inspection $ 50,000 Construction 210,000 General Fund $229,000 Reimbursements 31,000 Total: $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, C.~IFORNIA--------------------- - 28 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENr PR03RAM Fill'ill PROJECT ACTIVITY PUBLIC FACILITIES Sierra Court Southerly Extension STREETS Description-Location This project provides for the extension of Sierra Court through the Dublin Sports Grounds to provide access to the Civic Center site. The project includes street improvements, street lighting, and utilities. It also includes reconstruction of those playfields which are displaced, additional Sports Grounds parking areas, park restrooms, relocation of a park storage facility, and drainage facilities. Cormnents During Fiscal Year 1985-86, the Ci ty purchased 10 acres adjacent to the Dublin Sports . Grounds for the construction of a Civic Center. Optimum access to the property requires the extension of Sierra Court through the Dublin Sports Grounds. The Ci ty has agreed to a number of condi tions, imposed by the Dublin San Rarron Services District in order to extend the road across the Sports Grounds. This project will be funded from the proceeds of the City's $11,968,000 Certificate of Participation issue for the Civic Center Facility. Estimated Cost Financing Public Facilities Fund $588,000 $ 42,000 546,000 Design/Inspection $ 63,000 Construction 525,000 . Total: $588,000 Year(s) Scheduled Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $588,000 $588,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 29 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENr PRc:GRAM FUND PROJEcr AcrIVITY c.~ ITAL PROJEcrS Annual Street Overlay Program' Description-Location This project provides for the placement of at least a one- and one-half (1-1/2) inch asphalt overlay on streets that are presently in a deteriorated condition at various locations. This project also provides for pavement reinforcement at bus stop locations on residential streets. Comments As streets begin showing major structural failures, it is important to reinforce these streets with repairs and overlay to reduce the need for more costly reconstruction at a later date. The Street Maintenance Account in the Operating Budget includes funding ,for preparatory patching for this project. The Public Works Administration Account in the Operating Budget includes funding for development of a Pavement Management System. Bus stop pavement reinforcement is proposed in the second operating year of the transit system to make certain of the permanent locations of the bus stops. This program will protect the substantial investment the City has in its streets. Estimated Cost STREETS Financing Year(s) Scheduled Design/Inspection Construction General Fund $670,000 $100,000 570,000 Prior Years 1986-87 $ 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 Total: $670,000 $670,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA-------------~------- - 30 - 130,000 150,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 $670,000 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUND AcrIVITY PROJEcr CAP I TAL PROJEcrS Dougherty Road Widening at Southern Pacific Railroad STREETS Description-Location This project would provide for the purchase of right-of-way from the Southern Pacific Transportation Company and D.S.R.S.D. to allow for future widening of Dougherty Road~ Comments Community Development Block Grant funds can be used for public improvements within a qualified "targeted" area. This project would set the groundwork for the future widening of Dougherty Road. This project would use up a two-year allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The City would have to pay the cost of acquisition and would be reimbursed for a portion of the acquisition cost from the CDBG program. Estimated Cost Financing Right-of-way Acquisition Costs $ 120,000 10,000 CDBG General Fund Total: $130,000 Year(s) Scheduled $ 58,700 71,300 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $ 10,000 120,000 $130,000 $130,000 ---------------------CITY OF DOBbIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 31 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEMEl\"'T PRCXiRAM FUND PROJEcr AcrrvITY STREETS CAP ITAL PROJEcrS Dublin Boulevard Improvements Northwest Frontage at Clark Avenue Description-Location This project will implement a portion of those improvements identified in the Dublin Blvd. Traffic Study, which was approved by the City Council in 1983-84. These improvements include the widening of Dublin Blvd. at the northwest corner of Dublin Blvd. and Clark Avenue to allow for on- street parking and an eastbound-to-westbound "u" turn. Cormnents Right-of-way acquisition will be required at the AAA property. Estimated Cost Financing General Fund $161,000 Design/Inspection $ 16,000 Right-of-Way 18,000 Construction 127,000 Total: $161,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- Year(s) Scheduled Prior Years 1986-87 $161,000 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $161,000 $161,000 - 32 - 1986-91 CAPITAL n1PROVEt~ PRcx;RAM FUl\1D ACTIVITY PROJECT Cl\PITAL PROJECTS Traffic Signal Interconnect S'IREETS Description-Location This project would tie together electronically the City's traffic signals in order that traffic progression could be programmed. This project would require the upgrading of all existing traffic controllers, by interconnecting each controller wi th a wire to indi vidual arterial master controllers. Comments This project would facilitate a smoother flow of traffic and reduce vehicle delays. The proposed staging for this project would be as follows: (1) Dublin Blvd., (2) Village Parkway, ( 3) Amador Valley Blvd., ( 4 ) San Rarron Road. Condui t for the interconnect has been installed on much of Dublin Blvd. Estimated Cost Financing Design/Inspection $ 30,000 Improvements 260,000 General Fund Total: $290,000 " Year(s) Scheduled $290,000 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $ 3,000 150,000 137,000 $290,000 $290,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALlFORNIA--------------------- - 33 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRCGRAM FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY CAPITAL PROJECTS San Ramon Road Improvements (Phase III) and Hillside Landscaping STREETS Description-Location This proj ect will provide for the widening of S&'1 Ramon Road to four (4) through lanes b2tween Vomac Road and Alcosta Blvd. This proj ect would also include roadway median and hillside landscaping, the installation of a new traffic signal at the intersection of Vomac Road, and street lighting. Corrments This project is the third of four phases for the ultimate improvement of San Ramon Road. This year, the landscaping of the large hillside parcel along the west side of San Ramon Road was included with this project instead of b2ing shown as a separate project as was indicated in last year's Capi tal Improvement Program. The City may receive an additional $400,000 in Federal Aid Urban funds if Congress reappropriates funding for this program. Annual maintenance costs are estimated at $35,000. Estimated Cost Financing Environmental Review $ Design/Inspection Construction Signal Landscaping Street Improvements Street Lighting Staking Soundwall 7,000 135,000 Year(s) Scheduled General Fund $1,250,000 Federal ,Aid Urban 100,000 100,000 300,000 600,000 42,000 20,000 146,000 Total: $1,350,000 Prior Years $ 65,000 1986-87 32,000 1987-88 1,253,000 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALlFORNIA--------------------- - 34 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVE1.-1El\"T PRCGR.N-1 FUND ACTIVITY CAPITAL PROJECTS PROJECT Traffic Signals - AnBdor Plaza Road @ Amador Valley Blvd.; Village Parkway @ Lewis lwe.; Landscaping, & Street Light Additions STREETS Description-Location This project provides for the installation of traffic signals at the intersections of Amador Plaza Road/Amador Valley Blvd. and Village Parkway /Lewis Ave. This proj ect will also complete the landscaping of Amador Valley Blvd. from Amador Plaza Rd. to Village Parkway and add street lights on Golden Gate Drive (7), Clark Ave. (9), Sierra Ct. (4), and Sierra Lane (6). CO!1unents These proj ects have been combined to maximize an economy of scale when bids are solicited. Annual maintenance costs are estimated at approximately $19,000. Estimated Cost Financing Design/Inspection $ 73,000 Improvements 397,000 General Fund Total: $470,000 Year(s) Scheduled $470,000 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $ 28,000 20,000 180,000 242,000 $470,000 $470,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 35 - 1986-91 CAPITAL II-1PROVEMENT PRcx;RAM FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY CAPITAL PROJECTS Traffic Signal Pre-Emption For Emergency Vehicles STREETS Description-Location This proj ect W)uld provide radio receivers and pre-emption equipment at the Ci ty 's 17 signalized intersections to allow fire trucks to turn their approach direction signal to green. Comments The DSRSD Fire Department has already equipped their trucks with sending devices. Estimated Cost Financing Year(s) Scheduled Design/Inspection $ 10,000 Improvements 85,000 General Fund $ 95,000 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 $ 95,000 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 Total: $ 95,000 $ 95,000 $ 95,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 36 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMJ?ROVEl~'T PRcx;RA."1 FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY CAPITAL PROJECTS San Ram:m Road Irrprovernents (Phase IV) S'IREETS Description-Location Ii This proj ect will provide for the widening of San Rarron Road to four (4) through lanes .' between Silvergate Drive and Vomac Road. This project would also include roadway and median landscaping, street lighting, sound walls, and reconstruction of the Shannon Ave. traffic signal. Corrments This project is the fourth and final phase for the ultimate improvement of San Rarron Road. Annual maintenance and energy costs are estimated at $30,000. · Estimated Cost Environmental review $ Design/Inspection Construction Signal Landscaping Street Irrprove~ents Street Lighting Staking Soundwall Total: Financing Year(s) Scheduled 3,000 165,000 General Fund $1,532,000 Prior Years$ 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 70,000 43,000 100,000 286,000 734,000 54,000 25,000 165,000 1,419,000 $1,532,000 $1,532,000 $1,532,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 37 - 1986-91 C..APITlili IMPROVEMENT PRcx.;RAM FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY CAPITAL PROJECTS Traffic Signals - Village Parkway at Brighton Drive and at Tamarack Drive STREETS Description-Location This project would provide for the installation of traffic signals at the intersections of Village Parkway and Brighton Drive and Village Parkway and Tamarack Drive. Comments A traffic study conducted during Fiscal Year 1983-84 fOW1d that these signals were marginally warranted. Annual maintenance costs are estimated at $10,000. Estimated Cost Financing General Fund $270,000 Design/Inspection $270,000 Total: $270,000 Year(s) Scheduled Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 $270,000 1990-91 $270,000 $270,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 38 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PR(X;RAM FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY CAPITAL PROJECTS Dublin Boulevard Improvements San Ramon Road to Village Parkway STREETS Description-Location Tnis project will implement those improvements identified in the Dublin Boulevard Traffic Study, which was approved by the City Council in 1983-84. These improvements include the development of Dublin Blvd. to a six (6) lill1e street between San Ram~n Road and Village Parkway. It will provide additional right-turn lanes vlhere needed. Corrments Right-of-way acquisition will be required in five locations. Estimated Cost Financing Design/Inspection $ 80,000 Right-of-way 320,000 Improvements 500,000 General Fund Total: $900,000 Year(s) Scheduled $900,000 Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $400,000 500,000 $900,000 $900,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 39 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEl1Et\"'T PR((;RAl1 FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY STREETS c.~ ITAL PROJECTS Dougherty Road Improvements South of Southern Pacific Railroad Description-Location This project provides for the acquisition of right-of-way and the widening of Dougherty Road, primarily on the east side of the street between Dublin Blvd. and the Southern Pacific right-of-way. It would also provide landscaped medians, street trees, and street lights for this same section of street. Comments The section of Dougherty Road between Dublin Blvd. and the Southern Pacific right-of-way will soon be developed for its entire length. There are sections of the street on the east side that have not been widened. Some right-of-way will be required to be purchased to complete this project. Estimated Cost Financing General Fund $859,000 Design/Inspection $ 65,000 Right-of-way 344,000 Improvements 450,000 Total: $859,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- Year(s) Scheduled Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $859,000 $859,000 $859,000 - 40 - 1986-91 CAPITATJ IMPROVEMEI.-IT PRCGRAM FUND PROJECT ACTIVITY STREETS Cl-\P ITAL PRo.JECTS Dublin Boulevard Improvements West of San Ramon Road Description-Location This project would fund the relocation of the Dublin Boulevard median immediately west of San Ramon Road, provide new median street lights, and provide for an additional five (5) feet of pavement on the west side of the street. Comments This project is necessary to accommodate additional traffic demands on the intersection of Dublin Blvd. and San Ramon Road by providing an additional left-turn lane to northbound San Ramon Road. Estimated Cost Financing Year(s) Scheduled Prior Years $ 16,000 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 184,000 $200,000 Design/Inspection $ 24,000 Right-of-Way 16,000 Improvements 160,000 General Fund $140,000 Reimbursements $ 60,000 Total: $200,000 $200,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 41 - 1986-91 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRcx;RAM FUND PROJ".c..CT ACTIVITY STREETS CJl.J>ITAL PROJECTS Landscaping Silvergate Medians Description-Locatio~ This project \\Dald upgrade the landscaping that exists in the medians at the south end of Silvergate Drive, and install new landscaping in the medians at the east end of the street. Poth areas would be fully irrigated. Comments The landscaping on the south end of Silvergate Drive has never reached its potential, basically due to lack of irrigation plus the need for a more integrated design for the plant materials. The medians at the east end of the street have never been landscaped and have been left as bare soil. The annual irrigation and maintenance costs are estimated at $4,000. Estimated Cost Financing General Fund $ 96,000 Design/Inspection $ Landscape/Irrigation 10,000 86,000 Total: $ 96,000 Year(s) Scheduled Prior Years 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $ 96,000 $ 96,000 $ 96,000 ---------------------CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA--------------------- - 42 -