HomeMy WebLinkAbout86-060.1 & .2 Dublin Security Storage CUP/SDR
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
GENERAL INFORMATION:
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 4, 1986
Planning Commission
Planning Staff
.2~bl~uritY Storag,
Permit/Site Development Review
PA 86-060.1 and
Conditional Use
PROJECT:
APPLICANT AND
PROPERTY OWNER:
LOCATION:
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER:
PARCEL SIZE:
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USE
AND ZONING:
ITEM NO. 84
Conditional Use Permit/Site Development Review
for a three-phase development of a partially
developed 6.6~ acre site. New development is to
consist of the construction of three two-story
mini-storage structures (70,000~ sq. ft. total)
and development of exterior vehicle storage.
Conversion of the existing buildings to mini-
storage (12,600+ sq. ft.) is also proposed under
these applications.
Glenn Kierstead
Dublin Security Storage
7124 Village Parkway
Dublin, California 94568
6005 Scarlett Court
Dublin, CA 94568
941-550-33 & -34
6.6+ acres
Business Park/Industrial: Outdoor Storage
M-1, Light Industrial District
An existing mini-storage facility occupies the
front (southern) 3.25+ acres of the subject
property. The rear portion of the property is
occupied by Burke Forms Group.
North:
South:
East:
Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way
M-1, Auto Dealerships
M-1, Vacant, partially developed
(PA 86-073 for Lew Doty Cadillac
pending on site)
M-1, Storage and reconditioning of
mobile office trailers
West:
COPIES TO: Applicant
PA File 86-060
ZONING HISTORY:
12/16/68 - Alameda County approved a Conditional
Use Permit (C-1959) to allow an outdoor storage
yard.
7/15/70 - Alameda County approved a variance
(V-5053) to waive the solid fencing requirement
along a portion of the perimeter.
12/8/71 - Alameda County approved: 1) a
Conditional Use Permit (C-2392) to allow a
contractor's storage yard and 2) a Variance (V-
5620) to waive the solid fencing requirement
along a portion of the perimeter.
4/27/77 - Alameda County approved a Variance
(V-728l) to create two (2) building sites
without street frontage.
10/4/78 - Alameda County approved: 1) a
Conditional Use Permit (C-3466) to allow office
use and outside storage of recreational vehicles
in the M-l District, and 2) a Variance (V-7766)
to reduce the south sideyard to zero where 10
ft. is typically required.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS:
Section 8-94.0 states that conditional uses must be analyzed to
determine: 1) whether or not the use is required by the public need;
2) whether or not the use will be properly related to other land uses,
transportation and service facilities in the vicinity; 3) whether or not the
use will materially affect the health or safety of persons residing or working
in the vicinity; and 4) whether or not the use will be contrary to the
specific intent clauses or peformance standards established for the district
in which it is located.
Section 8-94.4 states the approval of a Conditional Use Permit may be
subject to conditions.
Section 8-95.0 of the Zoning Ordinance states that the Site Development
Review is intended to promote orderly, attractive, and harmonious development;
recognize environmental limitations on development; stabilize land values and
investments; and promote the general welfare by preventing establishment of
uses or erection of structures having qualities which would not meet the
specific intent clauses or performance standards of this Chapter or which are
not properly related to their sites, surrounding traffice circulation, or
their environmental setting. Where the use is proposed, the adjacent land
uses, environmental significance or limitations, topography, or traffic
circulation is found to so require, the Planning Director may establish more
stringent regulations than those otherwise specified for the District.
Section 8-95.5 of the Zoning Ordinance states that at the conclusion of
the Site Development Review investigation, the Planning Director shall
determine from reports and data submitted whether the Use and Structures
proposed will meet the requirements and intent of this Chapter, and upon
making an affirmative finding, shall approve said application. If from the
information submitted, the Planning Director finds that compliance with the
requirements on this Chapter, and the intent set forth herein would not be
secured, he shall disapprove, or approve subject to such conditions, changes
or additions, as will assure compliance.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The City proposes to adopt a Negative
Declaration of Environmental Significance which
finds the proposed project will not have a
significant effect on the environment.
NOTIFICATION:
Public Notice of the August 4, 1986, hearing was
published in The Herald, mailed to adjacent
property owners, and posted in public buildings
-2-
ANALYSIS:
The front, or southerly, portion of the subject property is currently
occupied by the seven-building, 46,000~ square foot Dublin Security Storage
facility. The rear, or northerly, portion of the property is occupied by two
metal structures (Building A - 4,000~ square feet and Building E - 8,500~
square feet). The sole tenant for the rear of the property is Burke Forms
Group. That tenant is to remain on the site for the length of his current
lease. The lease holding area for Burke Forms Group is proposed to be
modified to allow it to be physically separated from the remainder of the
project. The proposed lease area involves the northeasterly portion of the
site up to a width of 110 feet.
The construction of new mini-storage rental spaces is consistent with
the uses typically established in an M-1, Light Industrial District. The
development of long-term exterior rental parking is a Conditional Use in an
M-1 District and, if approved for this site, will partially fill the
previously identified need for secured recreational vehicle rental facilities.
The plan to phase the development complicates both Staff's review of the
proposal and the coordination of improvements to the site.
Conditions #27, #28 and #29 of the draft Resolution for the Conditional
Use Permit and Site Development Review requests layout Staff's proposal for
phasing improvements to the site. A substantial amount of improvements and
design layout adjustments are recommended by Staff to be tied to the first
phase of development. The improvements and design adjustments recommended for
Phase I are summarized in Condition #27 and include the following:
improvement of the 50-foot access serving the two properties, including
development of a 35-foot radius cul-de-sac with curb, gutter and adjoining
landscaping at the terminus of the easement; provision of a second access to
the storage facility to serve emergency access; adjustments to the layout of
drive aisles and parking areas to improve internal circulation; installation
of perimeter curbing and landscaping along the west project boundary; minor
adjustment to Building B to provide for improved future driveway alignment;
and adjustment to current gate access to provide for emergency access.
Improvement and design adjustments proposed for Phases II and III are
outlined in Conditions #28 and #29. These improvements can be generally
described as an extrapolation of improvement and design adjustments requested
for the Phase I develoment.
RECOMMENDATION:
FORMAT:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Open public hearing.
Hear Staff presentation.
Hear Applicant and public presentations.
Close public hearing.
Consider and act on two draft Resolutions:
A) A Resolution regarding the Negative Declaration of
Environmental Significance.
B) A Resolution regarding the Conditional Use Permit/Site
Development Review applications.
ACTION:
Based on the above Staff Report, Staff recommends the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolutions (Exhibit A approving the
Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance for PA 86-060.1
and .2, and Exhibit B approving the Conditional Use Permit/Site
Development Review applications for PA 86-060.1 and .2.
-3-
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A - Draft Resolution approving the Negative Declaration of
Environmental Significance for PA 86-060.1 and .2
Exhibit B - Draft Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit/Site
Development Review applications PA 86-060.1 and .2
Exhibit C - Conditional Use Permit/Site Development Review submittals
Exhibit D - Staff Studies - Phases I, II and III, dated July, 1986
Background Attachments: 1 - Location Map
2 - Applicant's Written Statement and
Environmental Assessment Form (dated
received June 20, 1986)
3 - Negative Declaration of Environmental
Significance for PA 86-060.1 and .2
4 - Pertinent Agency Comments
-4-
RESOLUTION NO. 86-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE
CONCERNING PA 86-060.1 AND .2 DUBLIN SECURITY STORAGE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WHEREAS, Glenn Kierstead, representing Dublin Security Storage,
submitted Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review requests for a
three-phased development of a partially developed 6.6+ acre site with new
development proposed to consist of three two-story mini-storage structures
(70,000+ sq. ft. cumulative area) and the development of exterior vehicle
storage-and with additional work to include conversion of two existing
buildings for mini-storage use (12,600~ sq. ft. cumulative area)and general
site work; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as
amended together with the State's administrative guidelines for implementation
of the California Environmental Quality Act and City environmental regulations,
requires that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impact and that
environmental documents be prepared; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has
been prepared for PA 86-060.1 and .2 by the Dublin Planning Department; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review the Negative
Declaration of Environmental Significance and considered it a public hearing on
August 4, 1986; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in' all
respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission determined that the project,
PA 86-060.1 and .2, will not have any significant environmental impacts;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
finds that the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been
prepared and processed in accordance with State and Local Environmental Law and
Guideline Regulations, and that it is adequate and complete.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
EXHIBIT A
Vr...ft R4!SIlvt./M-
t./e~ a.we. ~dfArA.-h~ fA- 8w -06>0
RESOLUTION NO. 86
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING PA 86-060.1 AND .2 DUBLIN SECURITY STORAGE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
6031 SCARLETT COURT
WHEREAS, Glenn Kierstead, representing Dublin Security Storage,
submitted Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review requests for a
three-phased development of a partially developed 6.6+ acre site with new
development proposed to consist of three two-story mini-storage structures
(70,000+ sq. ft. cumulative area) and the development of exterior vehicle
storage-and with additional work to include conversion of two existing
buildings for mini-storage use (12,600~ sq. ft. cumulative area) and general
site work; and
WHEREAS, the adopted City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance, which in part
provides for the establishment of uses in M-1, Light Industrial Districts,
lists storage as a permitted use, and lists outdoor storage as a conditionally
permited use; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on said
applications on August 4, 1986; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all
respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance,
prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by
the Dublin Planning Department, was considered and adopted by the Planning
Commission (Resolution No. ) with a determination that the project would
not have a significant environmental impact; and
WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the
Conditional Use Permit and Site Development review requests be conditionally
approved; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said
reports, recommendations and testimony herein above set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
finds:
1. The proposed expansion of the Dublin Security Storage Mini-Storage
facility serves the public need by providing for, in part, the existing
demand for small rental storage spaces.
2. The proposed use will be properly related to other land uses, and
transportation and service facilities in the vicinity.
3. The use will not materially adversely affect the health or safety of
persons residing or working in the vicinity or be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the
neighborhood, as all applicable regulations will be met.
4. The use will not be contrary to the specific intent clauses for
performance standards established for the District in which it is to be
located.
5. All provisions of Section 8-95.0 through $-95.8 Site Development Review,
of the Zoning Ordinance are complied with.
EXHIBIT
Vrc..ft ~>o("'-~
Cup (SD~
8
-1-
6. Consistent with Section 8-95.0, this project will promote orderly,
attractive, and harmonious development, recognize environmental
limitations on development; stabilize land values and investments; and
promote the general welfare by preventing establishment of uses or
erection of structures having qualities which would not meet the specific
intent clauses or performance standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance
and which are not consistent with their environmental setting.
7. The approval of the project will not conflict with the best interests of
the public as regards public health, safety and general welfare.
8. General site considerations, including site layout, orientation, and the
location of buildings, vehicular access, circulation and parking,
setbacks, height, public safety and similar elements have been designed
to provide a desirable environment for the development.
9. General architectural considerations including the character, scale and
quality of the design, the architectural relationship with the site and
other buildings, building materials and colors, screening of exterior
appurtenances, exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have
been incorporated into the project in order to insure compatibility of
this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent
buildings and uses.
10. General project landscaping and consideration including the locations,
type, size, color, texture and coverage of plant materials, provisions
for irrigation, maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and
similar elements have been considered to insure visual relief to
complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive
environment to the public.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission does
hereby approve said application as shown on Exhibit "A" on file with the Dublin
Planning Department and subject to the following conditions:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, PA 85-060.1 AND .2
Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions shall be complied with prior to
issuance of building or grading permits and shall be subiect to Planning
Department review and approval.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Development shall generally conform with the plans prepared by Richard A.
Bohn, Jr., A.I.A. consisting of four sheets dated received by the City
Planning Department, July 23, 1986, modified to generally reflect the
changes called for by the three Staff Studies prepared for this project
and the changes called for by these Conditions of Approval. Use of the
proposed mini-storage facility (and the interim use of the two existing
structures) shall be as generally described in the Written Statement
dated received June 20, 1986. Collectively, these materials shall serve
as Exhibit "A" for this project and shall be maintained on file with the
Planning Department. This approval shall be valid until August 14, 1987.
If construction has not commenced by that time, this approval shall be
null and void. This approval period may be extended one additional year
(Applicant must submit a written request for the extension prior to the
expiration date of the permit) by the Planning Director upon his
determination that the Conditions of Approval remain adequate to assure
that the above stated findings will be met. Development shall be subject
to the conditions listed below.
2. Comply with the City of Dublin Site Development Review Standard
Conditions and the City of Dublin Police Services Standard Commercial
Building Security Recommendations.
-2-
ARCHAEOLOGY
3. If, during construction, archaeological remains are encountered,
construction in the vicinity shall be halted, an archaeologist consulted,
and the City Planning Department notified. If, in the opinion of the
archaeologist, the remains are significant, measures, as may be required
by the Planning Director, shall be taken to protect them.
ARCHITECTURAL
4. The final design of building elevations and the choice of exterior colors
and materials proposed for use shall be subject to final review and
approval by the Planning Director. All ducts, meters, air conditioning
equipment and other mechanical equipment on the new structures shall be
effectively screened from view with materials architecturally compatible
with the main structure.
BASIS FOR RELEASE OF OCCUPANCY
5. Prior to release of occupancy, all improvements shall be installed as per
the approved landscaping and irrigation plans and the drainage and
grading plans. Additionally, grading of the subject property must
conform with the recommendations of the soils engineer to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
BUILDING CODE VARIANCE
6. Prior to construction of any phase of the project, the Developer shall
secure all necessary Variances from the Building Code deemed necessary by
the City Building Inspector. If said Variances are not granted, this
matter shall be scheduled for reconsideration by the Planning Commission
to determine what adjustments to the site plan will be necessary to
accommodate changes required to the size or location of the proposed
structures.
DRAINAGE
7. Grading, drainage and paving improvements shall be subject to review and
approval by the City Engineer. Calculations (hydraulic) shall be
prepared by the developer for review by the City Engineer to determine
the sizing of drainage lines. The Developer shall install storm drainage
improvements as directed by the City Engineer.
8. The proposed wall along the westerly property line shall not block
drainage from the adjacent property. An inlet shall be provided at the
low point.
9. The area outside the building shall drain outward at a 2% mlnlmum slope
for unpaved areas and a 1% minimum in paved areas (5% maximum slope for
paved areas).
10 Roof drains shall empty onto paved areas, concrete swales, or other
approved dissipating devices and shall not direct roof water onto
adjacent properties.
11. Where storm water flows against a curb, a curb with gutter shall be used.
The flow line of all asphalt paved areas carrying waters shall be slurry
sealed at least three feet on either side of the center of the swale.
12. The pad elevation for the new buildings shall be certified by a
Registered Civil Engineer for checking against the 100-year flood
elevation (requiring a minimum finished floor elevation for all new
buildings of 331 on the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929).
13. The 12' x 14' rectangular concrete channel shall be extended northwards
to a point approximately 20 feet from th~ northerly property line of
APN 941-550-34, or as otherwise directed by Zone 7 of the Alameda County
Flood Control and Water Control District.
-3-
14. In accordance with Alameda County Ordinances No. 81-18 and No. 81-30, as
adopted by the City of Dublin, substantial improvement of the existing
buildings requires that they be protected by either of the following:
A) Having the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to or above
the level of the base flood; or
B) Providing engineered dikes to at least one (1) foot above the level
of the base flood around the development and, together with
attendant utility and sanitary facilities, be flood proofed so that
below the elevation of the base flood level the structure is
watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of
water and with structural components having the capability of
resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of
buoyancy. A Civil Engineer or Architect registered by the State of
California shall state that then standards of this subsection are
satisfied.
Note: Substantial improvement means any repair, reconstruction, or
improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals 50 percent of
the market value of the structure.
DEBRIS/DUST/CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
15. Measures shall be taken to contain all trash, construction debris, and
materials on-site until disposal off-site can be arranged. The developer
shall keep adjoining public streets free and clean of project dirt, mud,
and materials during the construction priod. Developer shall be
responsible for corrective measures at no expense to the City of Dublin.
Areas undergoing grading, and all other construction activities, shall be
watered, or other dust-palliative measures used, to prevent dust, as
conditions warrant.
EASEMENTS
16. The developer shall grant the necessary maintenance easement right-of-way
grant through APN 941-550-33 to the Alameda County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District for the existing 12' x 4' rectangular
concrete channel.
17. The developer shall acquire easements, and/or obtain rights-of-entry from
the adjacent property owners for any improvements, including grading,
required outside of the proposed development. Copies of the easements
and/or rights of entry shall be in written form and be furnished to the
City Engineer.
FIRE
18. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall supply written
confirmation that the requirements of the Dublin San Ramon Services
District Fire Department have been, or will be, met. The developer is
advised that the Fire Department's initial comments on the project
indicate that an additional fire hydrant will be required to serve the
project.
GRADING
19. Grading shall be completed in compliance with the construction grading
plans and the soil engineering recommendations as established by a Soil
and Foundation Study prepared for this project (subject to review and
approval by the City Engineer). The report shall discuss the compaction
of soil under the proposed building and shall comment on the necessary
setback from the existing slope. If grading on the adjacent property to
the West is necessary to backfill the wall and/or to make sure that the
area will drain into the pipe or downstream ditch, written permission
shall be obtained to do the offsite work.prior to the issuance of a
grading permit.
-4-
LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION PLANS
20. A detailed Landscape and Irrigation Plan, along with a cost estimate of
the work and materials proposed, shall be submitted for review and
approval by the Planning Director. Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall
be signed by a licensed landscape architect.
21. The Developer shall sign and submit a copy of the City of Dublin
Landscape Maintenance Agreement.
LIGHTING
--
22. Exterior lighting shall be of a design and placement so as not to cause
glare onto adjoining properties. Lighting used after daylight hours
shall be minimized to provide for security needs only. Wall lighting
along the new buildings shall be supplied to provide "wash" security
lighting, and shall be subject to review and approval by the Dublin
Police Services Department and the City Engineer.
PARKING AND DRIVEWAYS
23. The driveway widths surrounding all new buildings shall be a mlnlmum
width of twenty-five feet (measured between buildings and between
buildings and adjoining parking and/or landscape areas). An exception to
this standard shall be allowed along the west side of Building "A" and
the northeast side of Building "E" where the driveway width may be
reduced to 22' to allow the creation of a 6' width perimeter landscape
planter running the length of the respective buildings.
24. Minimum slope on A. C. parking lot shall be 1%, maximum slope to be 5%.
25. The layout and design of the exterior R. V. unit, passenger car and/or
truck storage areas across the entire site (both APN 941-550-033 and 034)
shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director prior to
occupancy of the new buildings. A continuous raised concrete curb shall
be provided for parking along the north and west property lines which
shall maintain a minimum setback of three feet from the property line to
accommodate vehicular overhangs.
26. The parking and driveway surfacing shall be asphalt concrete paving. The
City Engineer shall review the project's Soils Engineer's-structural
pavement design.
27. PHASE I - IMPROVEMENTS AND DESIGN MODIFICATIONS
A. Install continuous 6-inch raised curbing (300'~) along the existing flood
control channel along the east side of APN 941-550-033, and install
landscaping and irrigation in that area comparable to that planted within
the adjoining area to the south.
B. .Install a cul-de-sac turnaround within a 70 foot diameter, including
perimeter curb and gutter and accompanying landscaping and irrigation,
and a formal driveway access for Burke Forms lease space.
C. Install six-foot cyclone fence with redwood inserts along north and west
boundaries of the two subject parcels (see Condition #36).
D. Adjust entry gate access for existing entrance to provide for emergency
police and fire access (see Condition #37).
E. Provide a secondary gated emergency access to Buildings A and B (to be
provided in conjunction with imposition of a restriction on storage of
any materials within a 20' access zone extending from the new cul-de-sac
across Burke Forms lease holding to th~new gated access. This access
shall also be designated for emergency access (police and fire).
-5-
F. Install a continuous raised 6" curb observing a three-foot mlnlmum
setback from the property line and including adequate "pop-outs" to
accommodate a tree planting program reflecting an average planting ratio
of 1 tree @ 17'; curbing and landscaping are to be installed along the
west boundary of APN 941-550-034 and shall continue along the west
portion of the north boundary of that parcel for a minimum distance of
175+ feet.
G. Adjust the size and/or location of Building B by bringing its southern
edge 13~ feet further south to a point that will accommodate a straight
25-foot minimum width driveway between the three planned two-story
buildings at full development.
H. Modify the striping plan by adjusting the number, location and
configuration of drive aisles and exterior long-term parking spaces to
promote improved internal circulation. (Adjust plan to be generally
reflective of Staff Study - Phase I, dated July, 1986.)
I. Identify a minimum of five standard sized parking spaces adjoining
Buildings A and B for use by mini-storage space renters. (Location shall
be generally reflective of Staff Study - Phase I, dated July, 1986).
28. PHASE II - IMPROVEMENTS AND DESIGN MODIFICATIONS
A. Install continuous six-inch raised curbing along the remainder of the
north property line (observing a minimum setback of three feet) with
provision of adequate pop-outs to provide for a tree planting program
with an average planting ratio of 1 tree @ 17 feet linear distance.
B. Remove interior fence that defined lease area for Burke Forms with the
Phase I layout.
C. Install a modified secondary access gate off of the cul-de-sac bulb. The
design and location of the gates shall be subject to review and approval
by the Planning Department and the appropriate emergency service
agencies. "Knox-box" keyed access for emergency entrance shall be
supplied, or an equivalent method of access determined acceptable to the
Police and Fire agencies.
D. Modify the striping plan by adjusting the number, location and
configuration of drive aisles and exterior long-term parking spaces to
promote improved internal circulation. (Adjust plan to be generally
reflective of the Staff Study - Phase II, dated July, 1986).
E. Provide a minimum of two' standard sized parking spaces adjoining building
C and two parking spaces adjoining Building E for use by mini-storage
space renters. (Location shall be generally reflective of the Staff
Study - Phase II, dated July, 1986.)
F. Provide a mlnlmum of three standard sized parking spaces adjoining the
"office/warehouse" area of Building E for use by employees or visitors.
(Location shall be generally reflective of the Staff Study - Phase II,
dated July, 1986.)
29. PHASE II - IMPROVEMENTS AND DESIGN MODIFICATIONS
A. Modify the striping plan by adjusting number, location and configuration
of drive aisles and exterior long-term parking spaces to promote improved
internal circulation. (Adjust to be generally reflective of the Staff
Study - Phase III, dated July, 1986.)
B. Provide a minimum of four standard sized parking spaces adjoining
Building D for use by mini-warehouse space renters. (Location shall be
generally reflective of Staff Study -.P-hase III, dated July, 1986.)
SIGNAGE
--
30. Any new project signs shall be subject to review and approval by the
Planning Director prior to installation.
-6-
STORAGE AND EXTERIOR ACTIVITIES
31. Additional outside storage, beyond vehicular storage referenced in
Condition #22, is expressly prohibited. All demonstrations, displays,
services, and other activities shall be conducted entirely within the
structures on the site. No loudspeakers or amplified music shall be
permitted outside the enclosed structure.
TITLE
--
32. A current title report and copies of the recorded deeds of all parties
having any recorded title interest in the property to be developed and,
if necessary, copies of deeds for adjoining properties and easements
thereto, shall be submitted at the time of submission of the drainage
and/or grading plans to the City Engineer.
MISCELLANEOUS
33. Pedestrian walkway areas serving the new buildings shall be of a minimum
width of five feet.
34. The materials used for new pedestrian walkways shall be of a uniform
design and shall be subject to review and approval of the Planning
Director. Those portions of walkways adjoining parking areas shall be
raised 6" above the level of the parking/drive aisle surface.
35. Parking areas on the end of the proposed Building D shall be physically
separated from the building by way of a raised concrete walkway, which
shall doubly serve to provide access to the east side of the structure.
36. Screen fencing, six-foot high cyclone fencing with redwood slat inserts
or equivalent, shall be established with the first phase of the
development along the north and west property lines of the subject
property. For security purposes, the height of this fence may be
increased to include "three-strand" barbed-wire security treatment above
the six-foot high cyclone fence. For the west property line, the
existing adjoining fencing on APN 941-550-19-3, -4 and -5 may be used to
satisfy this requirement to the extent that it covers the subject
property's west boundary and for as long as it remains in place and in
good condition.
37. The design and location of fences utilized in the project shall be
subject to review and approval by the Dublin City Police Services. A
Knox override switch for the gate entrance into the project shall be
provided to allow emergency police and fire access. An alternate means
to provide emergency access to the property may be utilized if approved
by the DSRSD Fire Department and the Dublin City Police Services.
38. Except as specifically altered by the above conditions of approval,
development shall comply with the conditions established for S-689.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
-7-
.::, c'~?\M,r
'r \.,;i,;i;~~
~/~r
. ,....
. ~..':~,<.
'"":">.:;"!t);
:'J:
/"~
::~.'~
.1"_40' -
- .
. f: -",
0;;- "
'" .
--v- '
/~,:-
A"r,';
o:r- _' '
. ,".' / ,,-
~., - -+
//,,);/ /01 ,J.,!.. p. J...I l..
, .t.'LLfl..:LI l:lr I i_
PLOT
SeAl-I:: :
e:.
('" 1-5
'" .".. ::: ,.,,:r ~.~... ,":'
'. , " ~_."::',:;?~"""
:~. , .
. .:,
.' ';.'
," .
-;
..~
\
-;
I
/
" "
<f
(0
~
<JY
"
,
,
.~ '. '.. :
~' ~.
.-~ .
/-- -.11
,..- - II~" ~ !
/C-_ ILJ
.~?/~-- ~ I!!
. I~
,
,
~17
G-/
"y
,
,
,
'.
of
'/-
/-.-
f
/-.-
}::.'
-..
I '_,
i
~.' .
~,.
'tf-.~
~1
li-~ .
1;' .
c"'.
S':
\,
f'
t
,
r
, .1/
2;0
~
..J
:4.. -
t-:<r-V
(j?-l\l
,. .
0-0
~ \ \ "
, i
\ \
" -- \ -
~ \ \
. '
~ \ 1\
" 'q' \ v
~
lD \' I. 1\
1.\1 \ \
" \ \
~ -,
9 \ \
v \ \ "'f
"
~ '~ \
, I'
v \ '
N ' ,i N
x '" \ I'
Q ~ \
I ,
\ I
,
!? \ i
" \ 'q"' lCl
Q t<ll- <'l
i
Q !
v i 0
C\I -'e--
Q t'-i..... N
I
~ , I, i\
. \ . [,
OJ \ \\
" \ \
\
.!!! \ \<V
, t\.I
10 ,
\
t
0 1\ ,~~
i to
v \ 0
I!)
~ 12
4 J
9 1~
~ <(li2 dl~
I---t
~
.~
{
,
o
l-
I[)
. \'
I I', I . I
. 'I
~
\J ~
cl.\
~
I ~
=\i
~ ..~
:r.:,,-
><~
I.L:&G
"
i'~
'~ t1
~;t
'Ill
; i~
. ,);;
. ;~Ii
i\
,~j~
.: ,"- i~,.
t':,?:" ,~
: I
; ~.
. l~
~ ,~
:~
. tl\
'"
XIi
l ~
...i~i
:j
. ~'I"lil
,.#:
fU;
!.~
. ~~In
:lll.1.i
"Hi
~MI
'fPII
'~r~
;
-\ '
........
.':" ,
-It{;
,-
,,'
, .}
"
,
"
f
'-
~,
.1~;' ,
f'
:"\.
I,.
f
.~f
......
. .J~:
. ,: '.r:-.1-';
.. ,: .."it
,:'.-
. ~.:~~!
'. . '~,t)~~
, ,
. . ,.:' ."-:
, J . ~: ~
-::.l?
"
'.",' .-
. :..0:. r~ ~
, ......>..,:.....
p
PLOT c} F I R5T
SeAl-I:: ," = .. 60'
E:
C I-i- 5
w
, I.
I
. : ". -1'..';:
'.',
-,... -'.._-._-- '-.'---.--.- -"--"-.--'
"
/
_-v-'
s
^
~ - -
-4" ..:.-_
s _ _
o
~-
v
7...."< -
-~-
-~ -
,~
0;'-
_ -.c-~ -
v>
-J
-J
~
~.
~
en
~
" '.
9
..~
~ 'EXI5TIt-JG: . srDRAGe:
k,,' "', .
co
Jt
.~ . ..
,:r:--..SECOND FLOOR PLAt--J
~__ _d I'. .....-: ~, .,.
.{. ..,
" '. .-
?
,t'
,
~'-
#- E'X.ISTING B/SJ'HRM,'[
, . ".~~ :r9,~r-w~,
~,-
v '
--v- ,
/~.
,~
9'i
/f;-r A ...
//p;(/Aj+!5H~j
, . .&" ct
.: . I 23 - \0' <'24' ST~
Q\ \ \~ \\ \ \ \ \\~ \ \ " : ,\\~ \ \ \ \ \ '\1__
, AM/~:s &1SA1I7Tik
FLOOR-' PLAN AlASE. Jl
;,
~~,'.
"
?
:~
I'b
~
,q ..
, .. ~
0-'"
~cQ
~
~ ir. -~
If) " "
-0"9
,
~
" -
~
" t"
\ - \
\ '. " \ -
, ' \
\ \ \ \ \
\ ,\ \
\ \, ,
2 ',\\ \1
)l y 11\ \ I \ v
~ . \ \ '. ,
.
\0 , \ '\ 1\ "
N \' ,
. ,\ \ ' v ~
N ' \' '- -
- \ \ \
o \ \ \ , \
N \ \, 'f
dV\\\'\
I '
~rJ\\\\\'\t\I
o I I,
\ \ 1 \
--
'^ 1\
!!.: \ ..s
o \~-2-\1tl
\
Q :
, · NIt: r- cl'l ~' :2
2 't' 'V ,_
.J)
UJ \ \ , \
o S! \, , \ .. "1\9 ~
4~\\\ .l
ltl \jl '" i 'I' I
" t\I\IC\lII""l'
U Ul \'
4.. 0
\ \ , \
I. \ 731'; ~ \I~
.;, 'i \-I"~ \c
o I
~ . I
:t ~ t2 I-J
~ I t ~ g
Jl) 4:.ltll l!l 0 V \lJ I-
. \'
:,1', t 'I
,
;. ~
d~~
, (',Ii:
~j;
. :J1
, ,"~I
-~, I :~i'
)'1,"1.
~i"~
f~!\
m'~i
fl'~,:!:
~~~l'l
,'jf;
~~..~i
lFl:,l\
: .1~(\~1~
. ''''f
. ~!
J~';
;~:(
~jlH~
;'~~i
. .~fi~
l~l:
~~I'
~f;
[,,',,
i~~,'i:
t~1
Ii,
:'1
I~;
If'
",.il:;:
I>) ~:-
~)l;
~ ~~'!'
{~r,;~
~j
/(;
~')lf
:,~;
q:
.,1':
,jtt
.i~'j.
, :~;l
-Ill
~-~1
~t~
If
~ ,:; ~ (" :~'. '. ~ ,
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
I'~ ~ fbtJ'1-
..-~...
'. ':, .7]1,
';:~',;,:':( 'f":i:,',;:',:, ',-
" ',~';, '~
. ,', , '. ~
.' ,', ".
,-., '.1,
.'\
.:: f
:.;ftJ!~lJI
,''''-, ..
" ,
-.-
ff~
v .
-v--
~.
A"r,
o:r- , .
~,'.
,
A
PLOT '~." FI F\$T
SeAl-t.: ,":Jttd'60.''t
s
A._
~ ;---
4
, '
)
s__
( ~,
-:::r-- , -
~
- G')--
-A-
~L '
_?i:..L--
....: . -; ---:---...
: ~,~:.,>~::~.:':;. ."~: . ,~-':' ,
'.' . ..
. I"
"
.I
/
"l <0 eO
IP ...U)
...1
~
lP <:':~
" X
0-9
, :1'.i)(15TI~G,-:~:.. 5IORAG~:::' .,',
:.i,::~,..,.:i'!1'\"::, ~ ,'~ . . " '.. .'. '; ; :.,' )
~.J:;
~~.~
. 'it
f
"
-~
t
;
I
t
I
~,
i
!
,:':d't;':.: .
2'3 - 10' lt2,4' STAi..L~", , . . ; ..
\ ,\\ \ \.~\\\\, .
...~ --
.'.' 'f', \J'r~^ .I?tiPi; UJtJT'.s Sll~i", 7Tii
FL.60;F(;:"Ptf';:~V:i:: PHA5E ill
.~':..: .... "~'T~j"i' .l'f.~:;.'> 7'
',":,' , ~~: .1.<'f.
c r- ,::_"(~.~f.,..;;:~...'"
W. .:r,~~~f{-
"
-- -=L
, .. I
\
\ I \ \
\ , i , \ "I'
\ ' . \ .
,\ "
\'\\\\!:~
0 \
\ , .. I',
I
N \ ' '''I'
X "'l' \ \ i \
~ \
i , \
~ ,
N \ \'J' ,
'=' >- , , nI
0 ., , .
,
~ I ,
'!fl \ I \
~ \ ~ - 21- ~ - \li
C Q
0 \
I
\ . C\li- t'- ,Il ()I"'~ \:2
Q ,C"- v.... NIO
I ,N
(f)
UJ , , ,
I \
V ~ 1\ \ \ ., \
4. ~ \ ' \ \\9\9
\l) \ \ \ , I
I ,
~I\I " ,
iN -, N '-9
x (\J \
If) \ \
Q 1\ \ d) \, OJ \ rfl ll"
" (), l:- \ IS) ~
10 I - II \ "'...
I \'
,
l-
I[) I~ - ~ ..i d j ~
o It 0 L1. 0 IL ~ ,J
..J ~\ 'Z ~I '2 t '" )1;<1
- N-N- 6
;n ..,(lOlOuvQQlllf
, \'
! -,l', ~ "
--- -------------.--..- _..__._--- --- --- " ...- -- .. .-... -- - -..-. --- - -, ,,- --- -, ----_. -- - ------ .- -_.. -........- -..---
, \
,
,
- .-.. - -- - --- --- - . -- ...- - --. .-- --' .... . . ... - .. -- - - -~
"1 = n 1 --, ~ l~-1 '11 - r-=r-j
I f . . -- "I
I I
. I :i I i\ \i
I II ~ I
I -- ' i
I i
I ' f
,
~'[Ij;,i'"
'""".,~!,1I,\"i,,I,
. !il'
:,r!j
'111;1
Ai
::il
:J J
-- 1:1
,Ii
, '~Ii
, 'I'
'm'
, '(.
~
! I,'"~
,~ ;.'1\
j~;
i
~
l
.~ ,:1
~il
';I' ~
.JE:ST E.LeVATION
" 8' r....'
d'
., t~
Ji
\ J
11'1
i!i
,; )
1
! --
r
,
, '
\
J
"
-------.-:::- .--_... ---==-~--=-..=._--_._-_-:_--_.._~- ---==-
SOUTH E:.LE,VATfoN
". J' '..
,
I
.!
I '
NO~TH ELEVATION
I A"~ . v'" ~
, .
l
I
,
-----.---
-.----- -_..~- . -- . -:..;-..:.: ;--=-~_==:=====::--.:--'-=:;:..:=:-..=:=:~..::.==-=-..:.::.:.=:=:.-:-_-=----=-.:::=.=::-=_:.=::..::.:---.:.:..=====-
-------
.. .."
- -----------------.-
-------------------.-
'I
!
"
i
, I
II
I
: ,~
'I
~
'I
, II
) wi
", ~r,
: ~
i'l!
'l I
! '
[]ill -11 ~
I r 11 .ll
-1 rIll j1[-..
I' I \,,' f
,; / :1 I! 'I
,*,,-"i'
!l:;J\~. ..' -
'~~~T.~k;
, II.
j;"; I
I
~: I
"iYI'fMt ~ euV.A11~J!',
1/tDt!r$. ~'.I C t P JII
,H"
i'l"
EAST eLEVATION
-,
P&{,De- De,v'ewtH rf1i,S fp1917~/r
.. ~\h~ 8,!:1-CF~ w'C.D :..f'vYVf' 7
, .
.'. .1
.
I I I I I I I I I I I
i I I I I I I I I I I
/
"
. ?1Itff5'rVT/Y
- PH,,5e;I:
~VL", r'B'
(tNKeY
LfJ. ' .'
f}~1l5 "'~ffQ-'~
'.,
'j.
(
'5TORAGE:
" .',',
',' .'
,
.;
"
%' ;nil
23 - 10' "24" STALLS
~\.\\ \~~ \\ '\\ f.
6rC't'cLP,4/'F ~n'tT ff/r/77 ~:.,~
//'/.f'nQ--$. 7i? ~~~ BV7?/F49Vcmy
~.f/7fr/j- ~ /1f~ #F' d'C/AJ/7~
PHA CS[ 1 pW/'7Y /~,.yq::- #:~~ GWU/"t'~
PLOT
.....,
''-PLAN
. !~
r
Ul-
'~I
'nr I
~'~~.
.-:~~'i;-~
ti~2i
'Ill
. ~fI!;
;.;~;
.;,.:;~:::
.:.k.;i."(
\~fg
~J~:~.l~ .
f~'~,l>'1.;"
. ~ ,J;. ~:'.' ..
~j~~
t:9~!~~ I
.:'.:!l~~~~7: I
-\
\
~
~
~
;g
t--.... \G
_.~ -'
.CCi C
lIlM"*- ~
~\L
><!
~
, .1 "
.' ~'
. J : ~ t I
. ,I;,. ': r ,I
i;~;~
.I~~;!
"..,'
1",1
\~~I
'~"
;~.,Qii
.'; )~J'
I~II
,.;jl}!!~
,t!1
'i~lf'"
'II'
, 1(:!
:.i!':
, ".I.'.ii.'i.,.
"l'
.,I!
~. '~
','
,
, ~
,~;jl
;~I
j ',~~!
~.."
..,
'.'\;\/a;
~~i
',,,!;1
~_ In,~i
~~'~~1
I~
~Ii"~l
tl
~i
.\,,\
".
,r,;'
~!~~~I
, .II:
1:~
'l.~
.~;
~j'
!',
:i;C
~:
U'!:
~'"
;;1....
'1'1
i~r
I,,:
'i'.
.""
"-'f
if.
;1
~i
'i;
,~
-:- ,.,...
. '" "i~'I ,,"'.
pe,{,oe pe'V/fW1t17fi's LP1977~ IF
__ f?Prl VI eel> e. ,!.1"c F ~ we p :: .z'v"vC' '7
.
I I : II I : : : : I
/
/
/
/
,
/
/iN KeY
/ .
.. ?1Itft5TcJPY
~ ~ME:~:rr" .
.. ., .~.'f:r-..;.: -:.,
-
Ld.. .
~ll1'S fJt.4/I.?7lVtr ~
'5TORAGe:
, ,-
" ;.
.....' ,:.:
.' ',: .; "f ' .
~ '::'~~':: ','. . .~. "'. '.. "~~."
.pEo'~i':~":f'; F! RST
,
''';
,
:PLAN
-----
. ,I,
--~I-
..: "
f;, ~. I
2~~ I
":'~f
,',~Ni
~;;'l~
:~~.
.,~~~.....;.
._;t~"
'iii1x~ I
~~.I
'. I
, .1 I
. -
-.
~
S<
<:S
~tE
\
Dr
C:i
I .- ~
----.~~. ~
~tt
=~
><V)
I.Ir.J
, ~',
:/ :..', , 1,1 I
'"';
I ,
,
I",
.' 1
. ~ ,I
, 1
-' '~i
, I'"
I
'~~
~{h
~r,
Ii!,
. ti:\
.r,
:IJ,
~,'
",
'~:l,
{i:
'~; ~
.'it
>#,::'
.;~':. ~;
... .":'..._,'10 ,.,,:'"
'I" :,' pe,{,De' P~Iv'ewh1-,11IS LP1?r1~ If'
'.~ f?Pa..h~ e.,!_1-CF~wCP :J'vwt' (
--~
, I' II II I
I I I I
t. ;
" ,
, ,
. .
. " .
_ :.' '~~l ,';~~r .;":- ~/... ~: ~~: ~~.-
~'i"/ A ; / J/.e \ / . ",' ,t.'....... ',.-.; , ,
LN7V !'at. 7 t.... .... '.'.;.5 '. '- ,,'~ .
l I . .1....,' ..." ll!l;.
?11tff 5Tc)'f/Y
- PtM5E' JI[.
j"",," ,.I'B~,
I I I
I I
srORAGe:
,
.J~l Isk.Lis
.: I
~
v
~ ~
\~
U;-
D.
I .- ~
I _.". ~
CQ~
B1V1'l'ilii'l''lO ~
::C~
~4VJ
~-,--
L&~
PLOT ~ FI~5T
s eAl-E: I"" 40'
'PHA~[m
---...
)
c
, I"
Uf
, .. I
, I'
I" I I
.If '. ,,'
" :\:1
. . .~I~
, ';
f :~i!
.11
'f. ~;
,~ ".J
'~'1;
j'(
'.f '~',)i
~K1'
;~f;i
. ~jr,
,~,~:!
~~;
?IJ!~
'~!
'Iii
'Ii"'l
!'~:~
'i.' ~
iili,
/'1'
':{I
\",
'1'1"
-if
11,'
"1,,1
'uJ,
.' ~l
'It'
,,!jl
~JI
'I'"
;)\1
'II'
~v
~,~i
'II
:!~
. ~h
:~1;
l
Ji
,;~,
F
,~.
\1.:,
It
'Il'
.',,",.
.~"j
IIJ:
,:',
i(;
:'r1'
~f!;
r-
(
~
,..
:0:
-.
I
I
CA.." '"lit..
...
,..
u
...
j;
~ ! I
-; I
'--
i _
\ :
o.j' ;;
'I
'1 ! I
Ij
"
I
,I
,"">. j'
__. " II
-~=:~:.~~--~- !:
, ,.~," ...... ,", -. ...' ...... I !
,'~Iill.
(~()
\ '
..... ..."......-:............ '.......\..\ I,
.................... - ....: ", ..~\ \
..... ...... \ .
..... ...,
........ ......\
, -,
I
ATTACHMENT i
- -- - [PGItTlo-N M f'rf
('
\,
..,
JUN 20 19ijo,
..........
DUBLIN PLANNING
PROJECT STATEMENT
Project development of 3.36 acres to mini storage and outside
vechicular storage.This will be an addition to the existing
facility and will be built in three phases. As shown on the plans
attached, the project will provide 150 outside parking.spaces for
motor homes and boats etc., and 267 indoor storage areas in Phase
1.
The new street parking ordinances for both Dublin and San Ramon
have created a definite public need. This project will fill that
need.
There will be no additional cost to the city as a result of this
project.
A IT ACHMENT 2
Vi ~-l T(1fN > mTEWteNT ~ e- rJv. A- 57'e5 5 Fort..rA.
,..,.............-' ~""'.:,.. ~:>''''''"'''~......'''~~.'''::">''.-~-<:'''.~'\._...,...._-,_.;,..~':^...,''-.,..,.......,......-'-~.~..~- -, '.
(
PA No "t?G ~V1w 0
RIE C F. . " E ri=NVIRDNMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM, INTERIM
_ 6 1Pursuant to Publ ic Resources Code Sectio;'\. 21 000 et sec.)
'JUN 2 0 I~H \
._ The state CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) Guidelines
'.'. .'IING require the City to take an active role in preparing environ-
mental documents.. This comprehensive Environmental Assessment
Form is designed to assist the City in preparing a complete and
accurate environmental assessment in a timely manner and in
conformance with the State CEQA Guidelines. The form has three
sections: General Data, Exemption, and Initial Study. The
applicant is requested to complete Section I, General Data. The
Planning Staff will prepare either Section 2, Exemption, or
Section 3, Initial Study. Please type or print legibly in ink.
CITY OF 'DUBLIN
SECTION 1. GENERAL DATA - - - to be completed by the APPLICANT
1. Name (if any) and address of project:
Security Storage
2. Proposed use of property: mini storaGe facility
3. Name, addresst and telepnone of Applicont: Glenn E. Kierstead
7124 Village. Parkway, Dublin, Calif. 94568 .
',4. Namet addresst and telepnone of con~cct person Din addition tq applicant or
D instead of applictmt: Keville Parker - 829-5600
5. A~tached plans areDprelimincry orGfully developed..- '.
6. Building aree: 35,250
~.~~hase It20800 Phcise I~,& 21600 Phase III
1. Site area: 3.36
Dsq.fr. orDacres'. 8. Currentzonins:M-I Light Indus-
trial
9. Ma;<imum Building Heisht '26!,z
D ~. or [2] stories.
--
'10. Describe amount of daily trcffic generated by numbert type and tim'e aF day:
, Very licht, lp~~ +n~n GO cars in and out per day.
11. Number of off-street parking spaces provided: 10
12. Number of loading facil ities provided: 0
I,;"
]..- \
-. .~,Ji_ -:J:i~<-,'. .
/"
{
(.
,'.
, 13.
Proposed development schedule: ,beginning: ls'l: oct~86completion:
"
let .T~,.,
1 Q87
1-4.0. If residential: number' of new 'units ; number of existing units
bedraoms ; unit sizes ; range of 0 sale prices or D ren~s
dwelling Dsingle femilyD duplex D ~ultiple.
;number of new
; type of
1-4.b. If commercial:
sales 'area
operation
scope of proiectD neighborhood, 0 city, D regio~al
o SCj. ft. or D acre; estimated employment per shift.
; hours of
Light' Industrial
1-4. c. If industrial: materials involved Mini-storaqe; estimated employment per shift
hours of operation'
1-4.d. IF institutional: maior Function
estimated oc~upancy
; estimated employment per sh ift
; hours of opere rion .
15. Describe City permits required: d Site. 'Devdof'Wlev.:t' ~V'ic..""; 0 Va.';'a...~O::'';
o AetVVliVlistr,;\.;1V€. CoV'<iitio~ Lise. f.e.rlYlitj 0 Reclossifico..-t\Cl". Crezcml~ ;
o PIClV\~ De."~lopY'1l€N\-tj D Co~itiDv'.oJ ~t'Se. R:V-M'rtj 0 SI~"'" 0", I~.>
o O-tJ",e. y-
16. Describe other publ ic approvals required: D unknownj 0 locel csencies;D regional
agencies; D stcr.e agencies; 0 federal cgencies; for
CERTIFlCA TION
. , . f h ' .. t' "" d' I' .1 · I' .' b . f kid
1 hereay certl y t at tne lniorma ion suomlire IS rue onu CQrrec. 0 .ne es, 0 my nowe se
and belief. I understand thoI' the findings of this Environmental Assessment apply only to the
. d" d '
prolec~ as escrloe coove.
.-d ~--~O~
Sigi\c~ure: ~ (' ~ -
7 /
Nome (print o~ type): t:/..E"u"U
Dote: 6~~/-fb~
~ / /
E ..eS'/c Ai)
E,
k')..,
.'-"~~:~_~~"S"..;'X~~--;'::::<'::..~.
, P.O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568
CITY OF DUBLIN
(415) 829-4600
NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE:
PA 86-060.1 and .2 Dublin Security Storage
Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review
(Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.)
LOCATION:
APPLICANT AND
REPRESENTATIVE:
DESCRIPTION:
FINDINGS:
INITIAL STUDY:
Parcels C & D of Parcel Map No. 2765
6005 & 6015 Scarlett Court
Glenn Kierstead
Dublin Security Storage
7124 Village Parkway
Dublin, CA 94568
Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review requests
for a three-phase development of a partially developed 6.6+
acre site. New development is to consist of the
construction of three two-story mini-storage structures
(70,000+ square foot total) and development of exterior
vehicle-storage. Conversion of two existing buildings to
mini-storage (12,600+ square feet) is also proposed~
The project will not have a significant effect on the
environment.
A copy of the Initial Study may be examined at the above
address. The Initial Study includes a brief discussion of
the following environmental components:
1. Drainage and Channel Form
2. Flooding
3. Police and Fire Access
4. Road Safety and Design
5. Visual Impacts
MITIGATION MEASURES: None required.
PREPARATION:
SIGNATURE:
This Negative Declaratien was prepared by the City of Dublin
Planning Staff, (415) 829-4916.
Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director
A IT ACHMEr~T
tlcer. D8e ]?A 8 (P - fJbO
3
(
MEMORANDUM
Date: July 30, 1986
To: Senior Planner
From: Senior Engineer
Subject: PA 86-060 Dublin Security Storage
Revised Submittal
These comments on the revised submittal are in addition to the comments
submitted on July 21, 1986 (copy attached).
I. A condition of this approval shall be that a turnaround be provided at the
end of the driveway leading into the area noted as "Burke Form Lease Area" if a gate
is proposed at this location.
2. Comment (I) of our memo dated July 21, 1986, shall be modified to indicate
that the minimum finished floor elevation for new buildings shall be 331 on the
National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929.
3. In accordance with Alameda County Ordinance No. 81-l8 and 81-30 as adopted
by the City of Dublin, substantial improvement of the existing buildings requires
that they be protected from flood water by either of the following:
A) Having the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to or above the level
of the base flood; or '
B) Providing engineered dikes to at least one (I) foot above the level of the
base flood around the development and, together with attendant utility and sanitary
facilities, be floodproofed so that below the elevation of the base flood level the
structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water
and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and
hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. A Civil Engineer or Architect
registered by the State of California shall state that the standards of this
subsection are satisfied.
Note: Substantial improvement means any repair, reconstruction, or improvement
of a structure, the cost of which equals 50 percent of the market value of the
structure.
DM/gr
Attachment
All ACHMEf~T 1-
PErf:rlrVE'N1 A6-eNct/ {O,v'IjliIe-r/T5
('
MEMORANDUM
Date: July 21, 1986
To: Senior Planner
From: Senior Engineer
.
Subject: PA 86-060 Dublin Security Storage
vI. This site is in the 100-year flood plain, Zone A-I as shown on the Flood
Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 060705 OOOlA dated August 18, 1983. The
finished floor elevations of the new buildings shall be a minimum of 332 on the
National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929.
2. ~rading, drainage, and paving improvement plans shall be submitted for
review and approved by the City Engineer. ~he minimum on-site pavement slope shall
be 1%, and the maximum shall be 5%. A gutter shall be provided where water flows
along a curb. The applicant shall install storm drainage improvements as directed by
the City Engineer.
3. The existing buildings (A and F), which are proposed for storage use, have
floors which are apparently below the 100-year flood elevation.
4. Alameda County Flood Control should provide comments regarding their
requirements for easements and improvements along the east and north sides of the
site.
DM/gr
~~
(~
ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
5997 PARKSIDE DRIVE
.
PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA 94566
.
(415) 484-2600
July 23, 1986
i~ECE'VED
JUL 24:1986,
Mr. Kevin J. Gailey, Senior Planner
City of Dublin
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568
DUBLIN PLANNING
Subject: PA 86-060, Dublin Security Storage, Scarlett Court
Dear Mr. Gailey:
Reference is made to your July 7, 1986 transmittal of subject application
referral.
Some flood control improvements (a 12' x 4' rectangular concrete channel) have
been completed per a May 26, 1981, Deferred Improvement Agreement which was
required when Parcel Map 2765 was approved. However, the completed channel
ended up being shorter than we anticipated. The 12' x 4' rectangular channel
should be extended northwards to within 20 feet of the northern property line
of APN 941-550-34. Also, the right-of-way through APN 941-550-33 for
maintenance of the channel has not yet been granted to Zone 7.
The Zone maintains a 24-inch water transmission pipeline which is located
approximately 20 feet south of the northern property line of APN 941-550-34.
Before any construction work which may affect the pipeline or appurtenant
structures (e.g., air valves, electrolysis test stations, etc.) an encroachment
permit should be obtained from this office.
The Zone is also responsible for enforcement of the Groundwater Protection
Ordinance (Ordinance No. 73-68). Well 3S/lE 6G6, located near the northern
property line of APN 94l-550-34, and any other known water wells without a
documented intent of future use, filed with Zone 7, are to be destroyed prior
to any demolition or construction activity in accordance with a well
destruction permit obtained from Zone 7. Other wells encountered prior to or
during construction are to be treated similarly.
Very truly yours,
Hun J. Mar
General Manager
Vincent Wong,
Environmental
Division
VW:bkm
cc: David Meiser, Santina & Thompson
Development Services
P'-O, Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568
r
CITY OF DUBLIN
(---
:>lanning/Zoning 829-4916
Building & Safety 829-0822
Engineering/Public Works 829-4927
'-
APPLICATION REFERRAL
Date: July 7, 1986
RE. PA #:
86-060 Dublin Security Storage
Site Development Review/Conditional Use Permit
FINANCE CONTROL #:
32104
Project/Site Address:
Scarlett Court
Assessor Parcel Number(s):
941-550-34
Applicant/Representative:
Glenn Kierstead
Dublin Security Storage
7134 Village Parkway
Dublin, CA 94568
TO: Paul Ryan - General Manager, DSRSD
Phil Phillips - DSRSD Fire Department
Pacific Gas & Electric
Pacific Bell
Livermore Dublin Disposal Service
DSRSD Water Department
Zone 7, Alameda County Flood Control
.& Water Conservation District
Lee Thompson - City Engineer
Vic Taugher ~ Building Official
C Clty Police Services
Kevin J. Gailey -Senior Planner_.
FROM:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Development Review and Conditional Use Permit
requests for a three phase development of a partially developed 6.6+ acre
site. New development is to consist of mini-storage (four new buildings
totaling 64,000+ sq. ft.) and exterior vehicular storage. Conversion of two
existing buildings to mini-storage (12,600+ sq. ft.) is also proposed under
this application.
ATTACHED FOR YOUR REVIEW ARE:
- Application, Written Statement and Environmental Assessment Form
- Area Maps
- Site Plan and Building Elevations
PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM WITH COMMENT TO DUBLIN PLANNING BY:
July 21, 1986
~.~ ~ /nil ~ tdn~. ~ab
/U~~~'~l~ '.
~ rflod P'Umf' ~:~-A'dA;M~~
?7:/7#'Vvv,~
~-
8evelopment Services
P.O, Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568
(~'
CITY OF DUBLIN
Planning/Zoning 829-4916
. ~uilding & Safety 829-0822
EngineeringlPublic Works 829-4927
APPLICATION REFERRAL
Date: July 7, 1986
RE. PA #:
86-060 Dublin Security Storage
Site Development Review/Conditional Use
Permit E D
RECEIV
JUL 17',986
FINANCE CONTROL #:
32104
Project/Site Address:
Scarlett Court
DUBLIN PLANNING
Assessor Parcel Number(s):
941-550-34
_Applicant/Representative:
Glenn Kierstead
Dublin Security Storage
7134 Village Parkway
Dublin, CA 94568
c.....
:nCJ = :u
!'T1e:
;c c;, 1TI
<~ LO
(, ~. 0
~
:.) .." ill
;:.,
- ~ V1 <
(f> ~ N
~> --;;l fT1
~::t: =c
C) '2 - 0
~- cc
CT>
TO:
Paul Ryan - General Manager, DSRSD
~~illiPS - DSRSD Fire Department
acific Gas & Electric
Pacific Bell
Livermore Dublin Disposal Service
DSRSD Water Department
Zone 7, Alameda County Flood Control
& Water Conservation District
Lee Thompson - City Engineer
Vic Taugher - Building Official
City Police Services
FROM:
Kevin J. Gailey -Senior Planner__
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Development Review and Conditional Use Permit
requests for a three phase development of a partially developed 6.6+ acre
site. New development is to consist of mini-storage (four new buildings
totaling 64,000+ sq. ft.) and exterior vehicular storage. Conversion of two
existing buildings to mini-storage (12,600+ sq. ft.) is also proposed under
this application.
ATTACHED FOR YOUR REVIEW ARE:
- Application, Written Statement and Environmental Assessment Form
- Area Maps
- Site Plan and Building Elevations
PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM WITH COMMENT TO DUBLIN PLANNING BY:
July 21, 1986 - I. /~ - I);
/i;; J?7,J /;t?5 l/tJ CJ~<?chol/f. ~ I'I;/r ?rcu~c./) oWPVPy-.
an tl);jfp~/ -hy~ ;tI/7-iVH1 ~/// )c= r7u/~~/,J1)s~
;f CtVJ e he J",/~J E'H/l"Olnr(- 7t:?-t /S- ,,<see!; ~ j(Y'OX oU~Y' --r I~/P
S'IAJ,-+cl /S' ,.eCJu/~~
~.~
,,r---
I'
DUBLIN SAN rlAMON SERVICt:S DISTRICT
,~
/-
i
General Offices: 7051 Dublin Boulevard · Dublin, California 94568 · (415) 828-0515
July 17, 1986
ilECEIVED
JUL- 211986
DUBLIN PLANN'~G
Mr. Kevin J. Gailey, Senior Planner
City of Dublin
Development Services
P. O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568
Subject: Application Referral - File No. PA 86-060 - Dublin Security
Storage Site Development Review dated July 7, 1986
Dear Mr. Gailey:
With regard to the above subject application referral, the District
requires the usual water, fire and sewer fees for construction of four new
buildings totaling 64,000 square feet of building area for mini storage.
District fees for conversion of two existing buildings to mini-storage will
be contingent upon additional services to be provided by the District.
A site drawing showing water and sewer utilities and any necessary
easements will be required for District approval.
Sincerely,
cfl~m(,m~9t1.
Douglas McMillan Jr.
Office Engineer
DMcM:la
cc: Emil Kattan
A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA' PROVIDES MUNICIPAL TYPE SERVICES TO CITIZENS OF AMADOR-LIVERMORE AND SAN RAMON VALLEYS
ALAMEDA AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTIES,