HomeMy WebLinkAbout86-017 Corwood Car Wash CUP 10-06-1986
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
GENERAL INFORMATION:
PROJECT:
APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPERTY OWNER:
LOCATION:
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER:
PARCEL SIZE:
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
EXISTING ZONING
AND LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USE
AND ZONING:
ZONING HISTORY:
November, 1967:
March, 1968:
March, 1977:
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: October 6, 1986
Planning Commission
Planning Staff Mat t:t
PA 86-017 Corwood Car Wash Conditional Use
Permit, Site Development Review, and Variance
A Conditional Use Permit and Site Development
Review to remodel and expand the existing car
wash, including a detail shop, and a request to
vary from the sideyard setback requirements and
parking regulations.
Howard Neely
448 Amador Court
Pleasanton, CA 94566
Roger L. Woodward
P. O. Box 2688
Dublin, CA 94568
6973 Village Parkway
941-210-31
22,914 sq. ft.
Retail/Office
C-2-B-40 General Commercial Combining District
North:
South:
East:
West:
C-2-B-40, Commercial
C-2-B-40, Commercial
C-2-B-40, Residential
C-2-B-40, Commercial
Alameda County approved a Conditional Use Permit for a
drive-in business car wash and gas dispensing.
Alameda County approved Variance reducing sideyard
setback (Lewis Avenue) for vacuum pole and reducing
front yard setback to zero for free-standing business
identification sign.
Alameda County approved Variance for reduced lot area,
median lot width for a lot split resulting in reduced
south sideyard setback to 12 feet.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM NO. ~-~
COPIES TO: Applicant
Owner
PA File 86-017
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS:
Section 8-93.0 of the Zoning Ordinance (Variance) indicates that the
strict terms of the Zoning Ordinance may be varied in specific cases upon
affirmative findings of fact upon each of these three requirements.
a) That there are special circumstances, including size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings, applicable to the property in
the vicinity under the identical zoning classification.
b) That the granting of the application will not constitute a grant of
special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other
properties in the vicinity and zone.
c) That the granting of the application will not be detrimental to
persons or property in the neighborhood or to the public welfare.
Section 8-93.1 - .4 establishes the procedures, required action and
effective date for granting or denying a Variance, and indicates the granting
of a Variance shall be subject to conditions, limitations, and guarantees.
Section 8-94.0 states that conditional uses must be analyzed to
determine: 1) whether or not the use is required by the public need; 2)
whether or not the use will be properly related to other land uses,
transportation and service facilities in the vicinity; 3) whether or not the
use will materially affect the health or safety of persons residing or working
in the vicinity; and 4) whether or not the use will be contrary to the
specific intent clauses or peformance standards established for the district
in which it is located.
Section 8-94.4 states the approval of a Conditional Use Permit may be
valid only for a specified term, and may be made contingent upon the
acceptance and observance of specified conditions.
Section 8-95.0 states that the Site Development Review is intended to
promote orderly, attractive and harmonious development; recognize
environmental limitations on development; stabilize land values and
investments; and promote the general welfare by preventing establishment of
uses or erection of structure having qualities which would not meet the
specific intent clauses or performance standards of this Chapter or which are
not properly related to their sites, surrounding traffic circulation, or their
environmental setting. Where the use is proposed, the adjacent land uses,
environmental significance or limitations, topography, or traffic circulation
is found to so require, the Planning Director may establish more stringent
regulations than those otherwise specified for the District.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The City proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration of
Environmental Significance which finds the proposed
project will not have a significant effect on the
environment.
NOTIFICATION:
Public Notice of the September 15, 1986, hearing was
published in The Herald, mailed to adjacent property owners,
and posted in public buildings
ANALYSIS:
This item was continued from the September 15, 1986, Planning Commission
meeting at the request of the applicant.
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit and
Site Development Review to remodel and expand the use of the existing car wash
facility and approval of a Variance request to vary from the sideyard setback
requirements and parking regulations.
-2-
It should be noted that the existing 25 foot high free-standing sign
does not conform with the City's Sign Ordinance, and a separate Conditional
Use Permit must be applied for prior to the expiration of the City's
amortization period for non-conforming signs.
The existing car wash facility located on the southeast corner of
Village Parkway and Lewis Avenue consists primarily of a conveyor type car
wash, an office area, and a gasoline pump island. The existing structure
maintains a 30-foot front yard setback, a 90-foot rearyard setback, a 22.5 foot
north sideyard setback to the gas pump island, and a 12-foot south sideyard
setback.
The applicant proposes to add a redwood arbor over the pump island and
to add approximately 2,700 square feet to the existing structure for use as a
storage area, work area, and retail sales and service area. In addition to
the remodel and floor area addition to the existing structure, the applicant
proposes to expand the present car wash use with a 1,760 square foot detail
shop and 768 square foot office area, thus necessitating a new Conditional Use
Permit. The applicant indicates the proposed detail shop activities will
include polishing, waxing, and interior cleaning.
The applicant proposes a 19.5-foot building height for the car wash
facility at the roof ridge and a 23-foot height for the detail shop at the
roof ridge. Proposed architectural features of the remodel, addition, and
expansion include a blue metal roof, blue canvas awnings, and cedar siding and
trim on all elevation views except the elevation abutting the south side
property line and the rear elevation of the detail shop which the applicant
proposes as a blank concrete block wall.
The proposed new construction (including the addition and expansion)
will result in sideyard setback and parking deficiencies. The following is a
summary of pertinent zoning regulations and the applicant's proposal.
North sideyard setback (adjacent to Lewis)
South sideyard setback (adjacent to Midas building)
Front
Rear
Parking
Required
20 ft.
12 ft.
30 ft.
6 ft.
12 - 15
Proposed
8.5 ft.
o
30 ft.
12 ft.
11 spaces
ISSUES
1. Parking:
The City's Zoning Ordinance does not provide specific parking ratios for
either car wash or detail shop facilities. However, the Ordinance authorizes
the Planning Commission to establish parking ratios for uses that are not
specifically mentioned.
Staff surveyed several Bay Area cities with regard to parking ratios for
car washes and detail shop or auto service shop uses and found a wide variety
of ratios, including flat rate parking ratios, ratios based on the number of
employees, and others based on square footage. None of the cities surveyed
had ratios specific to car wash/detail shop combined uses.
The applicant indicates the use has approximately 8 - 10 employees per
shift. The car wash operation does not generate the need for customer parking
in that on-site queuing is provided for approximately 15 to 20 cars. However,
the detail shop services are typically by appointment only. Customers are
likely to drop vehicles off and pick them up once the service is complete.
The applicant proposes four service bays for the detail shop.
Based upon the employee count and the use, the car wash/detail shop
facility is anticipated to generate the need for a maximum of 12 to 15 parking
spaces.
-3-
The applicant indicates the majority of the employees use public
transportation or bicycles, and employee parking is not necessary. This
information is difficult to verify and is subject to change.
The applicant proposes 11 on-site parking spaces. However, the parking
proposed does not comply with the City's parking regulations for the following
reasons:
A. Location - The applicant proposes eight parking spaces within the
front and street sideyard setback area. The Zoning Ordinance does not permit
parking within these setback areas. The applicant also proposes one parking
space which obstructs the trash enclosure.
B. Size - The applicant proposes six compact parking spaces at
6' xIS', where the minimum requirement is 8' x 17'.
C. Type - The applicant proposes four tandem parking spaces. The
City's Ordinance does not include a provision for tandem parking.
A Variance approval would be required in order to accept the parking as
proposed by the applicant.
Staff recommends that the applicant reduce the number of
for the detail shop to two bays, thereby reducing the number of
required and providing additional area to accommodate parking.
approval for tandem parking would still be required.
service bays
parking spaces
A Variance
2. Detail Shop:
The proposed detail shop is located within the rear of the property with
a 12-foot setback from the adjacent single-family residential property to the
east. The height of the shop is 16 feet to the bottom of the eaves and
23 feet at the peak of the roof. The applicant proposes a blue metal roof,
cedar siding on the Lewis Avenue and front elevation views and a blank
concrete wall on the rear elevation view facing the residential property.
The City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum six-foot rearyard setback
for C-2-B-40 property abutting a residential district. Due to the close
proximity of the two districts (R-1 and C-2-B-40) and the types of uses
allowed in the C-2-B-40 district, many of the existing commercial developments
along Village Parkway abutting the single-family residential properties
maintain rearyard setbacks far in excess of the six-foot minimum required by
the Zoning Ordinance.
Due to the proposed structure height, the color of the proposed roof
material (blue), and the proximity of the structure to the rear property line
(proposed 12-foot setback), the detail shop has the potential to be visually
obtrusive to the adjacent single-family residential property.
The
repair and
vehicles.
other than
detail shop as described by the applicant does not include
is restricted to waxing, polishing, and interior cleaning
There is no apparent functional need for the 23-foot tall
to house two office areas.
any auto
of
building
In order to lessen the impacts of the proposed detail shop on adjacent
R-1 property, Staff recommends the applicant (1) change the roof color to
brown; (2) reduce the building to a single story with a maximum l6-foot
height; (3) incorporate cedar siding and trimwork on the rear elevation of the
detail shop; (4) increase the rearyard setback to a minimum of 20 feet; and
(5) modify the landscaping within the rearyard setback to include IS-gallon
evergreen type trees.
-4-
3. Site Development Review:
In addition to site plan reV1Slons recommended in Section 1 (parking)
and 2 (detail shop), Staff recommends the applicant revise the plans to
increase proposed landscape areas to a minimum four-foot width, increase the
landscape area along Lewis Avenue (planter no. 8) to approximately eight foot
minimum, create a new landscape area, minimum 8 foot wide, adjacent to the
Lewis Avenue side property line and arbor supports running the entire length
of the proposed arbor, and increase the aisle width between the pump island
and arbor supports to a minimum 11 feet clear.
4. Variance:
The site development proposed by the applicant results in the need for a
Variance from the required sideyard setbacks and parking requirements.
Sideyard Setbacks: The required sideyard setback in the C-2-B-40
district is 20 feet. As a result of a previously approved lot split, a
Variance was granted for a 12-foot south sideyard setback. The applicant is
now requesting this be reduced to a zero-foot setback. On the north sideyard
setback, the applicant is requesting a reduction to approximately 8.5 feet to
accommodate the proposed arbor over the gas pump island.
In order to grant the Variance request, the following findings must be
made:
a) That there are special circumstances, including size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings applicable to the property which deprive
the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity under the
identical zoning classification, in that the site is substandard in lot area
(40,000 square feet required; 22,000 square feet existing), and median lot
width (150 feet required; 92 feet existing), as required in the C-2-B-40
district, making application of the required sideyard setback impractical.
b) That the granting of the application will not constitute a grant of
special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in
the vicinity and zone; in that a special circumstance exists due to the
substandard size of the lot. Additionally, variances have been granted for
lots with similar circumstances within the C-2-B-40 District (i.e, the
adjacent Midas site).
c) That the granting of the application will not be detrimental to
persons or property in the neighborhood or to the public welfare in that
conditions have been applied to the project.
Parking Variance: The Zoning Ordinance does not allow parking in the
front or street sideyard setback, and does not provide for tandem parking.
The applicant is proposing both, as previously noted. Staff is recommending
the applicant revise the site plan to reduce the size of the detail shop.
This may eliminate the need for some of the parking variance requests.
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take action on the
Conditional Use Permit, Site Development Review, and the setback Variance
requests. However, Staff recommends that if any parking variance requests
remain after the applicant's site plan revisions, they be heard at a Zoning
Administrator hearing.
RECOMMENDATION:
FORMAT:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Open public hearing.
Hear Staff presentation.
Hear Applicant and public presentations.
Close public hearing.
Adopt Resolutions relating to Conditional Use Permit, Site
Development Review, Variance, and Negative Declaration, or
continue the item and provide Staff direction.
-5-
ACTION:
4)
ATTACHMENTS:
Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following
actions relating to PA 86-017 Corwood Car Wash:
1)
2)
Adopt Resolution approving Negative Declaration.
Adopt Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit to expand
car wash facility.
Adopt Resolution approving Site Development Review subject to
conditions.
Adopt Resolution approving sideyard setback Variance request.
3)
Exhibit A: Site Plans, Elevations, Floor Plans, Landscape Plans.
Exhibit B: Resolution Approving Negative Declaration.
Exhibit C: Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit.
Exhibit D: Resolution Approving Site Development Review.
Exhibit E: Resolution Approving Sideyard Setback Variance.
Background Attachments:
1.
Location Map
2.
Application and Statement
-6-
m~
..~
~
~~~
,d.~
..., ~
r
~
l
%.
, \
~~m
~~~~ {~
. ~ '\.
K
"
~
tn
~T
~1
~.
@j~\' t
Il
.,~~ z
~~~ ~
~f~
t~~
~~
.q~
~
it?
h
-Ir-
~
'\
l'l)
<:
~
,\
, I ~
<:J _
~ 1'-
h~~
~~
~ ';J
~
Ci
0
c
~-
c::
z
~
S;;
z -
z ....
Z .1
Q .J
~~i ~~ fH'f'AHQ"""': ~-.,.J,w;
~'\ -. b ~ I't-AIJ
~ -
-j
"
O'l~
rC:
:s::r.
~..~
t.t;
1J!
III
;;:
~-
i ~
...
~ ~
I
..
/ I
I
/ ",,"."'7' ./
..
~
\ fJ g
~1 ~ >:
) '-
C:::, ~
.
-~
~
~
~{>:
;m,r:
~ --
~
.
" ! I
~
~
.
\J
.
\l
~
.d'
i'"
-r;
~~
'"
'~
~
t
~
,
!
I
~
l
z
..
...
~
...
~
Ii
__ _ t
;;; 1
\
}
~
X-
I\'
!i
.
\l
~ ~
~. .
I
iJ
/
;::;
;V/LLfc;E .u....'
(----)
d. ~ ~~~ ~,:;.~
~~ 11F n} ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
~fi; ~d l! i!~ {~ ~l ~ ! ~
~ '" J,,~ <::- ~~ It
z~?",~I?~ ....};Z.
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ \\
~ ~;;~ ~f ~\' ~~ . ~ ~ \)
;:~ ~ l~ l'l' ~~ ! ~"
~ ;f~ tz l~ ~~ l ~
)~ ~ 1;"-)>~ ~ I
~> z;--'{ ~ \'f It c
h -\ )>. - I)
ti ~,,~ ~ ;I -:\' ~ \lo
~t z~ I:> f sc Sl
"'~ \)1\ ~ , '" "'~ ~ J:
~ . -" ""' r;" ~ ~
ft: .!. ~ ~ ~ 'ill) ~
~ i t i.3I ~ ~
\J~ t' ~ ..
..E...5. ........9..A,!!.
i ! ;t~~~~ ~iI ~t t~
i ~~ ~"'t ~ ~
~ z~~<:' % \' ~ i~
1'\11 ~ ~ * lIlt ~-~ ~
lh- f~~ UI ~z '~
S<t ~ -\~e ~ ~ ~:l:.
~Il ~ ~;~~ ~~ ~ ~~
~~~:l~ ~~ ~
~! l! . ~(~ ~~ ~ ~:
~ "i ....!~F :t'"" ~l ~
~ z:"~ ~~ ~
~ t l~~~ t& ~I ~
~ l ~f ~i i~ _ . ~
~ ~ t~.~.- ~
..
z
1\
~
'"
).
r-
1\1
KuJ.
~!t.f/~
r."'."f j!;. '....-.? "'.'. '...""('-'.." A
. '!!I" >'10" '
. . " ~~~'t;riW ~,
"?~,:_{" "< ~ "1.1 .~
'."....".<.:.:~ 1~,~.fJ ;'i<.J.. ~.....JI /t .~
, 1'A-&~OI7 -----.
i ~~; E~~:;~~
f g~ ~t~~ ~ ! ~
1~~;i:H
~ ~$ ~ !~F ~ f
~ hI ~~~~ i z
i t~ r~J~l ~
~ "3:~ i I
~ ~ ~!~~ ~ ~
II ~\ l' ~ ,
z. ;~ ~~~~ ~ ~
~ ~~ t~~ i ~
z ~\.l c \'~ 4 - ".
\) ~ \ e~l: ti g
!'- ~ l~F '?!1' '"
~
'\.
~
a..cl. ~
M~i ~
..e '~ \)
t;lz ^
F 17 ~u ~
ij ~~ t t ~
J~ ii ~ i ~
~t ! ~
~ ~o ,.
l
;
-
ilt I
i ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ,
z;
~~ ~
~I z.
l~~ - ~
1~~ \
~~ ' ~ n
~t
i ,. t ]~
'" \
"'- . . \11 ~
~ ~ .!.1t
l. ~ \ ~
\' - O! !'
,.
.!l;
-z:
j ~
'" ~
t ~
t ~ ~ i Jl
>
! : : z._ ~-
.,
. III
)
i t( ~
~ $ N
~ l>
~' }
1 ---+- i
,
- - - -~ - --
".-
Il!~ ;
"'W '
::0 --v- ~
m G ~~
() -~ ~
~ ~ ...
'T1 I I : I
I II i
..
\"l\')! II fNI'''''''' ,.....: ""',,~ I&h-~. "'~
,"\. i~~ I'
~/~
I .,
I
I
!
,
~
~
~
i
I. [-0
!J ?u JRi ~) ~ .~11
F\)~~~, \i '" ~r-'
~~!~ V ."1>
Z Il' z;~ I(]".
c\ ~ ~ ~- ~~ ~~~~~ ~li ~~
~ ~ ( ~ h~-~ ~ II ~
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~\ ~ z} l
~ f'- ~~ '1~~ '1_" i
!! ~ -ii~~
~z ~ e. II-
l~ ~ n~
~ ~!
~
~.:
i~t~ i ,;c~r
.~l' H r
. ~t h I~ \ . I I
~ i ~ IP ~ !.1 ~ }> /-_ '" -/ ~I
\"" ~ z.--.~ . \' l\~
-;;:,,~t..... ~I\I ~ WW 1
li~tl ~ I · t Iffil "-
~ ~ . ! ~ ~ -I,' I \
~ ~ - ;:l~\\ '
~ ~ 4t!......
}> I-:':":' \~; \
~ - ',' ':i'
~J.,;"" ,I ~~.\
,-j ~ ~I: ~~.\
~~ t'~ \ ""111,."..., -. \
: ,0/
I~' ~'l ~_
=:J 'III/ '. n ~
~ I if/j' - 1'\
-1% ~
:, ~
- ~ t ~
\
,~-
I ~i ~
~l
i i
0 ;0
C - -
~~~ m
;;: ~ ()
~ l~ m
~o+ -
Z ~~ <
Z P') 11
Ci) 0
-]~
~~
pi:.
~ ~
!
.
~I>>t 3l ~~; ,.",..~~
!\-5, ti -,.",..... ~ ~~ ~
II -
\ \ I I
nli~ ,
...,)~ ~ ""
iiJ:~~~
S~ l<~c ~
~ ~
lilt,,;,.
.....,.,.,~
. .~.
~)
l~
~~
~~
~~
!r
r
'"
$:
Il'
':]~".'
\. ,'- '..
,,\.'
- \\:.\'
!WI
',;/
!'
"',:-:\\- \ -"..:
>>\,>',\' '
- . I -, f=-
- ;~
. ,I-
,s".\\.
r
Z
I\'
~
(l1
z:
c
1\1 ,~
Ii !'\\" ~ i
~ = I
~: ~ I
a ~k~1
,- ~ I
~ _1-= ;IJ. '\'
--="01
n ~ ~ (::)?-
1: tl=t-"
'1' -
i~ .~~~!-
-l~\\
- f-=
I-
-- I-
~ ,,!-
I ( '-I
r \\ I
.\\\\\
r--.
~
",
j /~'
f
,
~
, "'1\''-
, ~'\ '\ \\
( , \
~,~.\~\
. ~:.\\, ~~<
~~'\
,~
--
, -
v-
GON'1I I
Of>v4WN "'Y' 1 ~, \fa - I __.,............., ",.AA-"""
~~ "f1~~Y-~c+l~~l'
M6 ~ e1- ~1C::N, CA.
I
.-
-
--
-
-
.-
--
--
-
t\
i
i~ ~!!
I j H ~~
I ~ ~~
l:h 8F
i 11 n
I i I J.~
I I
I
i
r-!\
! l~
~
~::;.
~~
'Z.
~---
IJ -
f-
~
I-
~
!-.
f---
.
~w N~ ~k
I
~.
I
l
I
~i
:{
~
~
\l'
~
J1'
1: '
I
I'
t
.i~.'"
~.
I j !
"
..... :; ..
;;:'1!1111 i II iJ' H I II i _: ; "
, II I"" '.',
-- <.~. W' 'f'I,I-", ~ . . . ~
'1 ", L II" I -
~t g ,; ~ Ii p'-
J€~~~?~~ h C~
. ~!:~~g~J:~~ 6~ t
ill\",J." , ~ 'i:
-~--1l'" ~U- i ..
~ S!li' hH ~~ .,
~~,~...~~ ..
~~~f~~h 1'~ t
~ .. ..~~~ JE.
i:t ~~~~pf ~E i
E ~~H. z.z l!~ i:.
,S~"f,~''1n ""'l~'
~~ ~ ., u q
Jr~;._~~ .
~ 1': ~ :.. " ....
. " t' .; - ,-
- ~-';'.'--~---- T'
I
r
t
c-..>-r"""-C7bf<
~N e:>"1"'. HN. ~t..': ,....J........M aKflfllll': M.oU".1'l&r,
____ ~: ~ ~__'W ~",.:rr
I
..l--~
; \<- ~ ,..o( t~,,' \'! ..". .lo'),-.
, I -'1- ~. c-. .
,~.~--t ~.
. '" \
, '
--\-~
t'-..' ~~
.. r
ip
~~i
~~
~'.
.r~: ;,0
. -.'i.~'-+-~-4-
: \:
,I
I!
Ii
, :1
'I '
...,.....~.
I
I-
i
l;!\_~
~ "
J" .
Ii
"
~
"
<
\l
r
- ..-0=-- .
,
- ...
:i l
t-'
-- J
...,---
'-~C-
at!...e;:/ _
c
c.
~
, I
.... 1-
,,,- 17-
j - 1'-
'\1"
'0 I
~ ~/ ~ l~
't
~ \ '<;'
\
~
<:
\\I
('
~
z:
i
I~-
'\
I
tIn
111
t(()J ,
~!..pII-1
r-
- \!"
\$ ~.
k,-l. :
di
1=~
r.:___
"
~--
.:- ~;j'-+/ u.
- ~I'"' ;"/ED
I, ,_
AUG 2-0 1986
DUBLIN PLANNING
~
}
j
k'm
~
\to ~
, \)L
-~~
..
I
s:
z
It
I
,-
I).
--L_ _
~
~~
F~
~
"~
..~\
I~
"
,t l" ~~ ,...,..:_-~ ..-......~
~",' I ~f
t ...~-\ i~ ~ VIl!W6 Df":~"'>I ~.
;t. .,..,-AI(.. e..-c:>.....
(
I
I l
i I
\",\1 I
\ "1-1\
'~ ;!~, h
\ . ~...
\ 1
~
l'
~
~
2.
l
~
~
()
I:
~
~
~
I
(
",."..~ .....' II'WAJ'P ~-~I""" CDOI""'4
M-& AMA..- 'U- ~~1'otJ,c.4-
I
,
,
I
i
---t
I
I
I
!
!
~ ~! l~~!
! ~ r ~! H ~" N~ ~
)' ~ \ ~ ~ ~ _q ! \) z~
~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ F- t ~ ~~
f ;i~ f :'i~; ;i
s ~ f i ~ i~
. ~ ftI ~ ~ ! -=-~~
~ 1\ ~~
11.1,1.2 t
j'
~i
~ -
\II ,':Pl'
<\ \<
Qt \P
11 .. ~
-;1' :1\:1'
~ .Jl"'~
~ "lilt
" "..-
~ ~!J. ~
,. "":\1":\\
~~
~~
!
--
\:ECEiVED
AUG 20'\986
DUBLIN PLANNING
~ ~
i ~ ~ ~ f:
J ' aiij i
~ -4 1'1_
~
, ~
. I' · s;:
i ::: \1\ ~ ~
\. r- ~ ~~ fHt'AHSl IW': ~ ~.w,'"
! \:. ~ ~f ~~ ~f\.l, _F1U1 "~INc,.>
'"
~~
,
~
z.
~
1
!
!
}
~
I '
I
l
I 'I
~~
~
iq
l'!~
"'e
.~-~
-;.C-,
~~\t
.,.
~
t;"t
}\,
t"
l t ,
~
'f
'C,.
~u).
RESOLUTION NO. 86;...
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PA 86-017 CORWOOD CAR WASH CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT, SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, AND VARIANCE APPLICATIONS FOR THE
EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING CAR WASH FACILITY, INCLUDING A DETAIL SHOP, WITH
REDUCED SIDEYARD SETBACKS, IN THE C-2-B-40 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT,
6973 VILLAGE PARKWAY
WHEREAS, Roger Woodward, property owner of Corwood Car Wash, has
filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit (PA 86-017) and Site
Development Review to allow addition and expansion of the existing car wash
facility to include an auto detail shop and a request to vary from required
sideyard setbacks and parking regulations at 6973 Village Parkway; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together
with the State Guidelines and City environmental regulations, require that
certain projects be reviewed for environmental impact and that environmental
documents be prepared; and
WHEREAS, an initial study was conducted finding that the project,
as proposed, would not have a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this
application; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Negative Declaration was given in
all respects as required by State Law; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review and consider the
Negative Declaration at a Public Hearing on October 6, 1986;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
finds as follows:
_ --1_. That the project PA 86-017 Corwood Car Wash Conditional Use
Permit, Site Development Review, and Variance, will not have a significant
effect on the environment.
2. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared and processed
in accordance with State and local environmental laws and guideline
regulations; and
3. That the Negative Declaration is complete and adequate.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission hereby
adopts the Negative Declaration for PA 86-017 Corwood Car Wash Conditional Use
Permit, Site Development Review, and Variance application.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
EXHIBIT B
RESOLUTION NO. 86"'"
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPROVING PA 86-017 CORWOOD CAR WASH CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT APPLICATION TO EXPAND THE EXISTING CAR WASH FACILITY
TO INCLUDE A DETAIL SHOP IN THE C-2-B-40 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT,
6973 VILLAGE PARKWAY
WHEREAS, Roger Woodward, property owner of Corwood Car Wash, has
filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit (PA 86-017) and Site
Development Review to allow addition and expansion of the existing car wash
facility to include an auto detail shop and a request to vary from required
sideyard setbacks and parking regulations at 6973 Village Parkway; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on said
application on October 6, 1986; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said Public Hearing was given in all
respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance with the
prov1s1ons of the California Environmental Quality Act and a Negative
Declaration has been adopted (Planning Commission Resolution No. 86- ) for
this project as it will have no significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, a Staff Analysis was submitted recommending conditional
approval of the application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on
October 6, 1986, to consider all reports, recommendations, and testimony;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
does hereby find that:
_ -a) The use is required to serve a public need in that the use
provides an auto detailing use.
b) The use will be properly related to other land uses and
transportation and service facilities in the vicinity in that daytime
activities will be commensurate with present use of properties in the
neighborhood.
c) The use, under all circumstances and conditions of this
particular case, will not materially affect adversely the health or safety of
persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the
neighborhood, in that all applicable regulations will be met.
d) The use will not be contrary to the specific intent clauses or
performance standards established for the District in which it is to be located
in that the car wash and auto detail shop is consistent with the character of
the commercial district.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Planning Commission does hereby
conditionally approve PA 86-017 as generally depicted by materials labeled
Exhibit A, subject to approval of the related Site Development Review and
stamped approved on file with the Dublin Planning Department subject to the
following conditions:
1. The auto detail shop use shall be restricted to the following
activities: polishing, waxing, and interior cleaning.
2. All said activities shall be conducted indoors.
3. The office areas shall be ancillary uses for the car wash and
detail shop facilities.
EXHIBIT C
4. The size of the detail shop building shall be reduced by
eliminating two of the service bays as specified in the Site Development Review
Conditions of Approval.
5. No residential use of the property is permitted.
6. Hours of operation shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.
7. This Conditional Use Permit is subject to approval of the
related Site Development Review permit.
8. The existing 25-foot high freestanding sign is not approved
under this permit; a separate Conditional Use Permit approval is required.
9. This permit shall expire on October 16, 1991, and shall be
revocable for cause in accordance with Section 8-90.3 of the Dublin Zoning
Ordinance.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
-2-
RESOLUTION NO. 86-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR PA 86-017 CORWOOD CAR WASH
WHEREAS, Roger Woodward, property owner of Corwood Car Wash, has
filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit (PA 86-017) and Site
Development Review to allow addition and expansion of the existing car wash
facility to include an auto detail shop and a request to vary from required
sideyard setbacks and parking regulations at 6973 Village Parkway; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on said
application on October 6, 1986; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said Public Hearing was given in all
respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance
provlslons of the California Environmental Quality Act and a Negative
Declaration has been adopted (Planning Commission Resolution No. 86-
this project as it will have no significant effect on the environment;
with the
) for
and
WHEREAS, a Staff Analysis was submitted recommending conditional
approval of the application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on
October 6, 1986, to consider all reports, recommendations, and testimony; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that:
a) All provisions of Section 8-95.0 through 8-95.8 Site
Development Review, of the Zoning Ordinance are complied with;
b) This application, as modified by the Conditions of Approval,
will promote 9rderly, attractive, and harmonious development, recognized
environmental limitations on; stabilize land values and investments; and
promote the general welfare by preventing establishment of uses or erection of
structures having qualities which would not meet the specific intent clauses or
performance standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance and which are not
properly related to their sites, surroundings, traffic circulation, or their
environmental setting;
c) The approval of the application as conditioned is in the best
interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare;
d) General site considerations, including site layout, open space
topography, orientation, and the location of buildings, vehicular access,
circulation and parking, setbacks, height, walls, fences, public safety, and
similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the
development;
e) General architectural considerations, including the character,
scale, and quality of the design, the architectural relationship, with the site
and other buildings, building materials, colors, screening of exterior
appurtenances, exterior lighting and signing, and similar elements have been
incorporated in order to insure compatibility of this development with its
design concept and the character of adjacent buildings;
f) General landscape considerations including the location, type,
size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials, provisions for
irrigation, maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements
have been considered to insure visual relief to complement buildings and
structures and to provide an attractive environment for the public.
EXHIBIT D
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
approves the Site Development Review as shown on the plans labeled "Exhibit A"
as amended subject to the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval
Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions shall be complied with prior to
issuance of building permits and shall be subject to review and approval by the
Planning Department.
General Conditions
1. Comply with the plans labeled "Exhibit A" as may be amended by the related
Conditional Use Permit and by these conditions.
Site Plan and Landscape Plans
2. Revise and resubmit site plan at a I" = 20' scale to the Planning Director
for review and approval of the following items:
A. Maintain consistency between site plan and landscape plan.
B. Increase rearyard setback to minimum of 20 feet.
C. Reduce the size of the detail shop by reducing the number of service
bays to two bays.
D. Provide mlnlmum of eight on-site parking spaces in compliance with
City regulations concerning maneuvering space, location, type, and size.
E. Increase aisle width between pump island and arbor supports to a
minimum 11 foot width.
F. Increase landscape areas to a minimum width of four feet.
G. Increase landscape along Lewis Avenue (Planter No.8) to
approximately eight feet minimum width, and create an additional landscape
area, minimum of approximately eight feet wide, adjacent to the Lewis Avenue
property line and the arbor supports running the entire length of the proposed
arbor.
H. In addition to the five-gallon evergreen shrubs proposed in the rear
setback, provide IS-gallon evergreen type trees.
I. In addition to the proposed annuals within landscape areas adjacent
to structures, include perennials or evergreen plants.
J. Increase trash enclosure size to minimum Livermore Dublin Disposal
Service standards.
3. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an automatic irrigation system.
4. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared and signed by a landscape
architect or architect. Planting and maintenance specifications shall be
prepared. Submit to the Planning Director for review and approval.
5. Comply with Standard Plant Material, Irrigation System, and Maintenance
Agreement (attached).
Architecture/Elevations
6. Revise elevation plans to include the following modifications, subject to
Planning Director approval:
A. Reduce detail shop structure to a single story with a maximum 16-foot
height.
B. Incorporate cedar siding and trim work on the rear elevation of the
detail shop.
-2-
C. Revise the detail shop roof color to a color compatible and
harmonious with the adjacent residential properties.-
7. Submit to the Planning Department color samples for the roof, exterior
walls and doors, trim, and awnings.
8. Comply with applicable Site Development Review Standard Conditions (copy
attached).
9. Comply with applicable Dublin Police Services Standard Commercial Building
Security Requirements (attached).
10. The existing 25-foot high free-standing sign shall be subject to a
separate Conditional Use Permit prior to expiration of the amortization period.
Miscellaneous
11. Comply with all applicable Building Code requirements.
12. Correct deficiencies in existing frontage improvements such as offset
sidewalk and curb and gutter as directed by and subject to the approval of the
City Engineer.
13. Submit grading and drainage plan for review and approval by the City
Engineer.
14. Fill in the low area at the southwest corner of the site, subject to
review and approval of the City Engineer.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
-3-
-,
,-
~
CITY
OF
DUBLIN
POLICE SERVICES
STANDARD ~ BUnDING SID.lRITY REXn'-MENDATICNS
I. JXXJRS
All e:ct:erior doors are to be oonstrocted as follONS:
a) WXxi doors shall be of solid core construction, no less than 1-3/4
inches thick.
b) Auxiliary leeks are to be adCed to each door and shall be double
cylinder, one inch, threw deadbolt or equivalent burglary resistant
locks where permitted by the Building and Fire Ca:1es. '!he cylinders
are to be protected by cylinder ring guards so they cannot be gripped
by pliers or other wrenching devices.
c) In-swinging doors shall have rabbited jambs, or alternate neans of
strengthening.
d) Exterior hinges shall have non-rerrovable hinge pins.
e) Exterior and interior garage out-swinging doors shall have non-
,rerrovable, hidden or non-accessible hinge pins.
f) Doors with glass panels and doors that have glass panels adjacent to
the door frarre shall be secured with irom..urk or steel grills of at
least 1/8th inch material or 2 inch rresh secured on the inside of the
glazing.
g) All e.-xterior doors, excluding front doors, shall have a minimum of
40 watt bulb over the outside of the door. St:ch bulb shall be
directed onto the door surfaces by reflectors.
h) The strike is to be a wrought 1::ox strike, or equivale.'1t.
i) Sliding glass doors: All sliding glass doors shall be equipped with a
locking device that shall e.'1gage the stri.l<e sufficie.'1tly to prevent its
being dise.'1gaged by any pJssible rrovement of the door wi thin the space
or clearances provided for installation and o;;eration. - '!he 1::o1t and
strike shall be reinforced by hardened material so as to prevent their
separation by pulling, prying or similar attack. '!he loc.1dng device
function may be operable by a keyed or ceded lock inside and out as
permitted by the Fire Cepartrrent or Building Codes.
Double sliding glass doors shall be locked at the rreeting rail.
II. 'W"INIXWS
A. All accessible rear and side glass windo.vs shall be secured as follCJ\'l"3 ~
1) Any accessible windew shall be secured on the inside with a
locking device capable of withstandi.'1g prying or wrenching.
2) Louvered windews shall not be used wit.llln eight feet of ground
level, adjacent stroctures, or fire escapes.
DP 83-012
....
-- ....:
B. Accessible-Transans
All exterior transans axceeding S" x 12" on the side and rear
of any building or premise used for bus~ess purp::lses shall be
protected by. one of the following:
1) Outside iron bars of at least l/S" material spaced no rrore than
2" apart.
2) outside iron or steel grills of at least l/S" material; but not
rrore than 2" Iresh. .
3) 'l'hEi window barrier shall be secured with rolts, the rounded
or flush head on the outside. .
4) Wire hlIDg glass with positive locking devices.
III. RCOF OPENINGS
-<-
A. All glass skylights on the roof of any building or pre.'nises used
-for business purposes shall be provided with:
1) Iron bars of at least l/S" material spaced no rrore than 2" apart
lIDder the skylight and securely faste.'1ed as in B-3.
2) A steel grill of at least l/S"-material of 2" Jresh under the
skylight and securely fastened as in B-3.
3) Other skylight protection of approved design.
B. All hatcbvay openings on the roof of any building or pre.'11ises used
for business purposes shall be secured as follcws:
1) If the hatchway is of wucden material, _it shall be covered on
the inside with at least 16 guage sheet steel or its equivale.'1t
attached with scrE'tls at 6".
2; The hatchway shall be secured fran the inside with a slidebar
or slide l::olts. The use of crossbar or padlock must be
approved by the Fire Marshal.
3) Outside hinges on all b.atchway Op=_!1ingS -shall be provided with
non-rerrovable pins when using pin-tyI::e hinges.
c. All air duct or air vent op:nings exceeding S" x 12" on the roof
or axterior walls of any building or premise _used for business
purposes shall be secured by covering the saTfe with either of the
following:
1) Iron bars of at least 1/2" round or 1" x 1/4" flat steel
material, spaced no rrore than 5" apart. and securely fastened
as in II B-3.
2) A steel grill of at least 1/8" material of 2" Iresh and securely
fastened as in I I B- 3 .
",
. ,."
'. ~.,~;
~;~~ ~:..
;,', .'
'-"~' ;... ~
.....-
. .' ":~~
'l'HE CITY OF DUBLIN
P,O. Box 2340
Dublin. CA 94568
(415) 829-4000
STANDARD PLANT MATERIAL, IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT
I
agree that all plants (trees,
installed in accordance with
landscape plan for
project) located at
(address) . All plants will be replaced in kind as
approved plan at such time as they are found to be
diseased, damaged, or dead, for at least one (1) year
date of their installation.
(prop~rtyowner) do hereby
shrubs and ground cover) will be
the City of Dublin's approved
(name of
per the
missing,
from the
I further agree that all plants will henceforth be irrigated,
fertilized, weeded and tended on a reg91ar basis such that they
will maintain a healthy and weedfree ~ppearance.
I further agree that the - irrigation system will be installed
according to the irrigation plans as approved by the City of
Dublin, and that said system will be kept in good working order
for at least one (1) year from the date of the -landscaping
installation.
This agreement is binding against this and all property owners
of record.
Signed:
Date:
Form 83-05
1/83
.. -or
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARD CONDITIONS
CITY OF DUBLIN
All projects approved by the City of Dublin shall rreet the following standard
conditions unless sfecifically exempted by the Planning Cepartrrent.
1. Final buildinq and site develoQl'eI1t plans shall J:e reviewed andl approved
bv the Plarminq Cepartrrent staff prior to the issuance of a building r::ennit.
All . such plans shall insure:
a. That standard ccmrercial or residential security requirerCEnts as
established by the Dublin Police Cepart::rrent are provided.
b. That ramps, sfecial parking spaces, signing, and other appropriate
physical features for the handicaPfed, are provided throughout the
site for all publicly used facilities.
c. That continuous concrete curbing is provided for all parking stalls.
d. That exterior lighting of the building and site is not directed onto
adjacent properties and ti'..e light source is shielded fran direct
offsite viewing.
e. That all mechanical equipre.'1t, including electrical and gas meters,
is architecturally screened fran vie\", and that electrical trans-
fOrrIErs are either undergrounded or architecturally screened.
f. That all trash enclosures are of a sturdy mate::=ial (preferably
masonry) and in hannony with the arcllitecture, of the building (s) .
g. That all vents, gutters, downsp:)Uts, flashings, etc. I are painted to
match the color of adjacent surface.
h. That all materials and colors are to J:e as approved by the Dublin
Plarming Departrrent. Once constructed or installed, all irnprove.rre.'1ts
are to J:e maintained in accordance with the approved plans. Any
changes which affect the e."rterior character shall J:e resul:Ini tted to
the Dublin Plarming Departrrent for approval.
i. That each parking space designated for c~ct cars J:e identified
with a paverrent marking reading "&nall Car Only" or its equivalent,
and additional signing J:e provided if necessary.
j . That all e."rterior architectural eleme.'1ts visible fran vie,,, and not
detailed on the plans be finished in a style and in materials in
hannony with the e."rterior of the building.
k. That all other public age.'1cies that require revietl of the project be
supplied with copies of the final building and site plans and that
ccmpliance be obtained wit.11 at least their minimum Cede require'te.'1ts.
DP 83-13
.,- r
" .'
2. Final Landscape Plans, irriqation system plans,. tree preservation tech-
niques, and guarantees, shall be reviewed and approved by the Dublin
Planninq Departrrent prior to the issuance of the buildinq permit. All
such suJ:mi ttals shall insure:
a. That plant mterial is utilized which will be capable of healthy
grcwth within the given range of soil and climate.
b. That profOsed landscape screening is of a height and density so that it
provides a fOsitive visual impact within three years fran the tllre
of planting.
,
c. That unless unusual circumstances prevail, at least 75% of the prot:Osed
trees on the site are a minimum of 15 gallons in size, and at
least 50% of the prq::osed shrubs on the site are minimum of 5 ,gallons
in size.
d. That a plan for an autaratic irrigation systeru be provided which
assures that all plants get adequate water. In unusual circumstances,
and if approved by Staff, a manual or quick coupler syste.'l1 rray be
used.
e. That concrete curbing is to be used at ti'.e edges of all planters and
paving surfaces.
f. That all cut and fill slopes in e.'Ccess of 5 feet in height are rounded
both horizontally and vertically.
g. That all cut and fill slofes graded and not constructed on by September 1,
of any give.T'l year, are hydroseeded with fere.'1I1ial or native grasses
and flowers, and that steck piles of lease soil e.'Cisting on t..l-Jat date
are hydroseeded in a similar rranner.
h. TI:'.at t.'1e area under t.'le drip line of all existing oal(s, walnuts, etc.,
~vhich are to be saved are fenced duril'1g construction ar.d grading
oferations and no activity is fermitted under the.'l1 that will cause
soil compaction or d2J.-rage to t.'1e tree.
i. That a guarantee fran the cwners or contractors shall be required
guaranteeing all shrubs and ground cover, all trees, ar.d the irrigation
syste.'l1 for one year.
j . That a ferrranent maintenance agree.rrent on all landscaping will be
required fran the owner insuring regular irrigation, fertilization
- and weed abate.rr.ent.
3. Final inscection or eccucancv fermits will not be aranted until all
const....""Uction and landscapinq is complete in accordance wit..11 aCDroved plans
and the conditions required bv t.l-)e Ci tv, or a bond has been posted
to cover all costs of the unfinished work, plus 25%.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPROVING PA 86-017 CORWOOD CAR WASH VARIANCE APPLICATION TO REDUCE THE STREET SlDEYARD
SETBACK TO 8.5 FEET FOR THE ARBOR AND TO REDUCE THE SOUTH SIDEYARD SETBACK TO ZERO IN THE
C-2-B-40 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, 6973 VILLAGE PARKWAY
WHEREAS, Roger Woodward, property owner of Corwood Car Wash, has filed
an application for a Conditional Use Permit (PA 86-017) and Site Development Review to
allow addition and expansion of the existing car wash facility to include an auto detail
shop and a request to vary from required sideyard setbacks and parking regulations at
6973 Village Parkway; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on said
application on October 6, 1986; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said Public Hearing was given in all respects
as required by law; and
WHEREAS. this application has been reviewed in accordance with the
provlslons of the California Environmental Quality Act and a Negative Declaration has
been adopted (Planning Commission Resolution No. 86- ) for this project as it will have
no significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS. a Staff Analysis was submitted recommending conditional
approval of the application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on October 6,
1986, to consider all reports, recommendations, and testimony;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does
hereby find that revisions required as conditions of approval for the associated Site
Development Review may eliminate the need for parking variance; any parking variance
requests remaining upon compliance with the Site Development Review Conditions of
Approval shall be subject to Zoning Administrator review and approval.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find:
a) .That there are special circumstances, including size, shape, topography,
location or surroundings applicable to the property which deprive the property of
privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity under the identical zoning
classification, in that the site is substandard in lot area (40,000 square feet required;
22,000 square feet existing), and median lot width (150 feet required; 92 feet existing),
as required in the C-2-B-40 district, making application of the required sideyard setback
impractical.
b) That the granting of the application will not constitute a grant of special
privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and
zone; in that a special circumstance exists due to the substandard size of the lot.
Additionally, variances have been granted for lots with similar circumstances within the
C-2-B-40 District ei.e, the adjacent Midas site).
c) That the granting of the application will not be detrimental to persons or
property in the neighborhood or to the public welfare in that conditions have been
applied to the project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission does hereby
approve PA 86-017 Variance application, subject to the associated Site Development Review
and Conditional Use Permit Conditions of Approval.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
EXHIBIT E
ATTEST:
Planning Director
I
I
I
II
\I
II
I'
"
II
"
I'
"
, \
\ '
"
I' ,
,', . ;.........
"'\ \~. )" .P:i...;:.
\.. ..\.~:. .:3--:::~v-__..-?
- j::~~. - -" __--r- ,---- / /
." --{"~.:..---:")... ~ ."-"',", I"
..... ~.' ..-:~.-. . \ \/ I
,.. .; '. ',' " ,,' ,I
~ \ '. ...__,'" I.,'
. ,1 '- \ ~~.. ....: /
. ~\ " ... ' \
~t~;?~~~~\~l
;: ....',i.';f?.f ,...... ~ \ ' '\I~
''''''.~'-'~' . I.
~~~~~~).j;~!t.t"~.: . .\ \.:>
:;.::..R.;t....,..~.*'~'*'&:..:JSi... .-\...;.
I
\
"
A'.T.'TA"IJ
... . flU;..
?AB(O~Ol(
[NT I
CITY OF DUBLIN
,~- Tet?/ It.f/~b
5/)<. . ~S/./ fC67S-
LV? r-€..JL 1130-
;
('
.~
-
P.O. Box. 2340
Dublin. CA 94568
Planning Department
6500 Dublin Blvd. Suite D
Dublin CA 94568
R E C E _ , " "': F)
IAAR 1'"; 'i986
DUBLIN PLANNING
(415) 829-4600
(415) 829-4916
Eff.: 1/84
PLANNING APPLICATION FORM
Notes to Applicant:
* Please discuss your proposal with Staff prior to carpleting the Planning Application
form. "
* All items related to your specific type or application must be completed.
* Since this is a comprehensive application form, serre of the items. might not apply to
your specific application.
* Please print or type legibly.
* Attach additional sheets if necessary.
AUTHORIZATION OF PROPERTY OWNER
A. PROPERTY OWNER: In signing t..'1.is application, I, as prcp=-.rty owner, have full legal
capacity to, and hereby do,authorize the filing or this application. I understand.
that conditions of approval are binding. I agree to be bound by t..'1.ose conditions,
subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal period..
Name: Capacity: Prcperty Owner
Address: Daytime Phone: (415) 828-5151
(
Signature: Date: -4d ~ ~
B. APPLICANr THAN PROPERTY OWNEE: In signing this ap~lication, I, as applicant,
represent to_have obtained authorization of the property ~vner to file this
application. r- agree to be bound by conditions of a:?proval, subject only to the right
to object at the hearings on the application. If this application has not been signed
by the property owner, I have attached separate docurrentation of full legal capacity
to file this.. application and agreement to conditions of approval, subject only to the
right to object at the hearings or during the appeal Feriod.
Name: Capacity:
Address Daytime -1?hone:
Signature:
Date:
CERTIFICATION
I certify that I have the authorization of the property owner to file this application.
I further certify that the ,information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name: Capacity:
Address: Daytime Phone: )
)
Signature:
Date:
(OVER)
~~""TIII~!I!'
~ f ~" ,~ . "--. ~ ~
'~ .f: ' ~ ~ ti'e,'
{i ~ I i;"~uj i
VA &o~OI7
~",;{~W. ~;::::. ;-':,::\":.:~:~'.'..;:'~~?< .'.' ,"
ENT~
-".';","'"'~' "
....
~
( .
)
('
,
dENERAL DATA REQUIRED
A. Jl.ddress or Location of Property:
B. Assessor Parcel Number(s):
C.
E.
Site area: 22. g14 SO.
Existing Use of Property:
h973 VIM,AGR PARKWAY
DUBLIN, CA 94568
Q41-?10-"S1
FT. D. Present Zoning:
CAR WASH
F. Zoning and Existing Use Of surrounding Property:
Zone
Existing Uses
- North:
- South:
- East:
- West:
G. Detailed Description of Proposed Use of Property:
REMODEL OF EXISTING CAR WASH BUILDING
ADDITION OF DETAILING BUILDING
(Continue on separate sheet if necessary)
TYPE OF APPLICATION
Check type of .planning pennit(s) being requested:
o Administrative Conditional Use Pennit
o Boun~ Adjustment
IX! Conditional Use Pennit
o General Plan Arrendnent
o Planned Development
o Other:
o Rezoning
o Sign
o Site Development Revie~v
o Subdivision Map
o Variance
, SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
A. Planned Development: (See Planned Development Rezoning Suhnittal Requirerrents)
B. Subdivision Map: (See Subdivision Map Suhnittal Requirerrents)
C. Any Other Planning Permit: (See General Sutmi ttaL Require.rrents )
PROCESSING
(See. Planning Application Cover Letter)
REFERENCE PHONE NUMBERS
Most questions related to the Planning Application should be directed to the Dublin
Planning Department, however, sane concerns might be addressed directly by another
appropriate department or agency:
1. City of Dublin:
Building Inspection: (415)
Engineering: (415)
Planning: (415)
Police: (415)
829-0822
829-4916
829-4916
829-0566
2. Dublin San Rarron Services
Fire: (415)
~later, Se'Ner, Garbage: (415)
District:
829-2333
828-0515
< 7.~nQ 7 _ al~mP~ rnnntv Flood Control: (415) 443-9300
(-
CITY OF DUBLIH
/"".-
~
PA No.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM, INTeRIM
(Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000 et sec.)
The State CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) Guidelines
require the city to take an active role in preparing environ-
mental documents. This comprehensive Environmental Assessment
Form is designed to assist the city in preparing a complete and
accurate environmental assessment in a timely manner and in
conformance with the state CEQA Guidelines. The form has three
sections: General Data, Exemption, and Initial Study. The
applicant is requested to complete Section 1, General Data. The
Planning Staff will prepare either Section 2, Exemption, or
Section 3, Initial Study. Please type or print legibly in ink.
SECTION 1. GENERAL DATA - - - to be comp 1eted by the APPLI CANT
COR WOOD CAR WASH
6973 VILLAGE PARKWAY nTJRT.TN r.A 9456E
Name (iF any) and address of project:
1.
2. Proposed use of property:
EXISTING CAR WASH
,3. Name, address, and telepnone of Applicant: ROGER L. WOODWARD
P.O. BOX 2688 DUBLIN, CA
,4.
Nome, address, and telephone of con~act person [Y] in addition to appl icant or
o instead of applicant: HOWARD N"R"P.T.Y R4h-4RL1R
448 AMADOR CuURT PLEASANTON. CA 94566
5.
Attached plans ore 0 prel iminory or [X] fully developed.
6. - Building area: 8882
sq.ft.
7. Site area: 22.914 IiJsg.ft.orOacres'. 8. Current zoning:
9. Maximum Building Height' 23
rn ft .-or D stories.
10.
Describe ~mount of daily traffic generated by number, type and time of day:
250 AUTOS/DAY R.7jO-S.7jO )
11.
Number of off-street parking spaces provided: 6
12. Number of loading focil ities provided: NONE REQUIRED
R-rrt: l: r V E 0'
MAR 1 ~ 1986 '
DUBt;i'l r- ..,
~'~a ;
~-l
i\.~ l ~""I"t~Tl
~:.:. t'.. i. t 't $'" t~. ;..\ ~ L r1'
") ~ r, :~,p s: ~,l Wk~ ~ i
''fA 8fo "- 0 I'''''' ." .. ~ \L 1M I .
c-~
~.
,13. Proposed development schedule: beginning: 6/1/86 completion: 9/1/86
14.0. If residential: numb~r- of new units ; number of existing units
bedrooms ; unit sizes irange of 0 sole prices or Dren~s
dwelling Osingle familyD duplex D multiple. .
14.b. If commercial: scope of proiectI1J neighborhood, 0 city, D regional
soles 'Crea 6 SO ~ sq. ft. or D acre; estimated employment per shift 8 ; hours 'Of
aperatian R' 30::lm-5 : 30pm
;number 'Of new
; type 'Of
14.c. If industrial: materials invol~ed
hours 'OF operaticn '
, ; estimated employment per shift
14.d. IF instituticnal: maior function
estimated cC<7upancy
"; estimated employment per sh ift
; hours of 'Opera tion
15.
Describe City permits required: 0 Site 'Devil'OfME:M::t' ~vi{."V; 0 va.';;a..",,,e,;
o AotvY\iY\istr~tille. CoMitio~.u t,lse. P-e.r-lYIit; 0 -Rec.tdSsifi~tio~ (rezot\l~ j
o Pla."'~ De.\/~lopY't\e,.t.-ti 1X1 CoV'GtitioV\OJ USe.. ftV-MI1"; 0 Si~V\ O'^ l~ ~
o othe.r
16.
Describe other public approvals required: l!J unknown; 0 locel agencies;D regi'Onal
agencies; 0 s~ate agencies; 0 Federal agencies; for
CERTlF-lCATION
I he';eby certify that the informati'On submitted is true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belieF. I u erstond that the findings 'Of this Environmental Assessment apply only to the
pr'Oiect as de ri ed'O
S i gno ~ure:
ove. \
<Y~
R. L. ....;:J~ \')J::> '-,,).~
Dote:
~
Nome (pr1nt a~ type):
A#'J,..
,~
(,
JJ
.$ ?::! ~
-. ('
-Ij-'"/-x -, c_<.
1/ ~' //..-~ <.._
R.L. WOODWARD INDUSTRIES INC.
<> CAMINO CAR WASH
1101 EL CAMINO REAL
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94040
(415) 967-7788
<> CORWOOD CAR WASH
6973 VILLAGE PARKWAY
DUBLIN, CA 94568
(415) 828-5151
August 20, 1986
Ms. Maureen OIHalloran
Associate Planner
City of Dublin
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568
RE: Your letter of May 5, 1986
Dear Ms. OIHalloran,
')
'\ E C E , V E D
AUG 201986
DUBUN PLAt>.!NING
Per your request, I submit the following in answer
to your letter. Items A2, A3, A4, A5, B4, B6, B7, and
B8 are addressed in revised drawings submitted herewith.
Item A1. Detail shop activities to include pol-
ishing, waxing, interior cleaning that is currently
being done in the area of the proposed waiting room
addition.
The purpose of relocating this function is to re-
move it from a public area, to provide for a quieter
- operation, a better employee work environment, to improve
traffic flow, and to provide a more esthetically pleasing'
site.
Item B1. Variance is hereby applied for. The 01
sideyard was utilized to accomodate on-site parking and
landscape areas. The building will thereby abut the
Midas trash bin which is on the property line. Using a
sideyard setback would result ifi poor land use planning.
This would not be detrimental to the neighborhood.
Item B2. Variance is hereby applied for. The pro-
posed arbor is both functionally (sun screen) and
esthetically planned (vine covered). The design of the
arbor was chosen after careful consideration of the
esthetics in relationship to the whole site plan. Any
reduction would result in an inferior design and the removal
of newly added landscaping. The encroachment would not
be detrimental to the neighborhood.
CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O, BOX 2688, DUBLIN, CA 94568
~.. ~T- A n~J~~r~I~T.'
.~. I ~.~'~ I{.... . ~.;...,",".i. ' '._.'c.'..? ,,'i;J ~ .:~ -.
". f~li~ ~~~u.~ r; .
'fA 6(0- Ol7
I
\
r"
Item B3. Variance is hereby applied for. The
plan calls for utilizing the 12' sideyard, which is
now a waste of space and a maintenance problem. We
desire to build to the property line which has pre-
viously been granted to Midas so as to better utilize
the lot and provide for a more esthetically pleasing
site which would not be detrimental to the neighborhood.
Item B4. The plan has been modified to provide
an additional 6 on-site parking spaces for a total of 11.
Parking for customers is not required as they do not
leave their cars. Our customer waits for the processing
of his/her car and claims it when it is finished, thereby
eleviating any need for customer parking.
Item B5. Our plan calls for fire retardant im-
pregnated redwood, which meets building code requirements.
L. Woodward
sident
RLW:lg