HomeMy WebLinkAbout86-017 Corwood Car Wash CUP/SDR/VAR 10-20-1986
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING COMMISSION
SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: October 20, 1986
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Planning
Staff flAOr{~
it
PA 86-017 Corwood Car Wash Conditional Use
Permit, Site Development Review, and Variance
SUBJECT:
GENERAL INFORMATION:
PROJECT:
A Conditional Use Permit and Site Development
Review to remodel and expand the existing car
wash, including a detail shop, and a request to
vary from the sideyard setback requirements and
parking regulations.
APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE:
Howard Neely
448 Amador Court
Pleasanton, CA 94566
LOCATION:
6973 Village Parkway
s~e
fir FI Le
FoLE1'6/T
PROPERTY OWNER:
Roger L. Woodward
P. O. Box 2688
Dublin, CA 94568
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER:
941-210-31
PARCEL SIZE:
22,914 sq. ft.
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
Retail/Office
EXISTING ZONING
AND LAND USE:
C-2-B-40 General Commercial Combining District
SURROUNDING LAND USE
AND ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
C-2-B-40, Commercial
C-2-B-40, Commercial
C-2-B-40, Residential
C-2-B-40, Commercial
BACKGROUND
This item was continued from the October 6, 1986, Planning Commission
meeting, at which Staff requested direction from the Commission concerning (1)
the rearyard setback for the detail shop and (2) the parking (tandem, in
setback area, numerical reduction) for the detail shop/car wash facility. In
response to the applicant's proposal, the Commission indicated the following:
1. Building Height: The applicant should reduce the detail shop
building to one story. The rearyard setback as proposed by the applicant is
adequate as long as the building height of the detail shop is reduced as much
as possible, and no windows are provided on the rear elevation.
2. Parking and Circulation: (a.) On-site parking for employees and the
shop use is necessary. (b.) Substandard parking stall size and tandem parking
may be acceptable. (c.) Plans must clearly specify a wash area for
recreational vehicles separate from the parking area and circulation area.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM NO.~..~
COPIES TO: Applicant
Owner
PA File 86-017
3. Concern about the safety hazard related to the location of the
vacuum hose.
4. The duration of the Conditional Use Permit would be for a five-year
period.
ANALYSIS
The applicant has submitted revised plans primarily addressing parking,
the detail shop building height, and the appearance of the detail shop.
As with the previous plans, the applicant's proposal requires approval
of a Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review to remodel and expand
the car wash facility and Variance requests to vary from the sideyard setback
requirements and parking regulations.
Variance:
Sideyard Setbacks Variance: The required sideyard setback in the
C-2-B-40 district is 20 feet. As a result of a previously approved lot split,
a Variance was granted for a 12-foot south sideyard setback adjacent to the
Midas property. The applicant is now requesting this be reduced to a zero-
foot setback. On the applicant's previous proposal, a Variance for a
reduction in the required north sideyard setback (adjacent to Lewis Avenue)
was requested to accommodate the support posts for the proposed arbor over the
gas pump island. However, the applicant has revised the plans by eliminating
one row of the arbor support post, thereby reducing the arbor width by 8 feet.
A Variance approval is still required for this setback area, in that the
required sideyard setback is 20 feet and the applicant proposes approximately
17.5 feet to the arbor support posts and 10 feet to the cantilevered portion
of the arbor. The applicant's previous submittal proposed reducing the
sideyard to approximately 8.5 feet for the arbor supports and to approximately
1.5 feet for the cantilevered portion of the arbor.
As noted in the October 6, 1986, Staff Report, special circumstances
exist due to the substandard lot area and lot width of this property, which
would warrant granting this variance request for reduced sideyard setbacks.
In meeting with the applicant and his representative on Friday, October
10, 1986, Staff indicated that the distance between the arbor support posts
and the property line was insufficient to accommodate another drive aisle as
mentioned by the applicant at the Planning Commission meeting, and that Staff
is still recommending the applicant locate some landscaping within this area.
The applicant's elimination of this row of support posts still does not
provide the minimum drive aisle width required (per City standards) for two
rows of cars between the existing pump island and the property line.
Parking Variance: The numerical parking requirements for this use are
determined by the number of employees at the largest work shift and the floor
area square footage for the use. The applicant's proposed remodel and
expansion of the car wash facility will require 12 on-site parking spaces.
The applicant proposes 14 on-site parking spaces, the majority of which
are located in the front and street sideyard setbacks. The proposed parking
includes nine spaces in the northeast corner of the lot (adjacent to Lewis
Avenue), two tandem compact spaces in the southwest corner and northwest
corner of the lot, and one standard size space located adjacent to the rear of
the car wash. In order to accommodate the nine on-site parking spaces in the
northeast corner, the applicant proposes a variation on the tandem parking
concept with three rows of three stacked parking spaces. Additionally, to
further accommodate this parking, the applicant proposes to provide a catch
basin and underground drainage pipe for a 30-foot portion of the existing
drainage ditch, and to cantilever the second floor offices over one parking
aisle. The Zoning Ordinance does not allow parking in the front or street
sideyard setback and does not provide for tandem parking, thus the applicant's
request for a Variance. At the October 6, 1986, Planning Commission meeting,
the Commission indicated a Variance for tandem parking and substandard parking
stall size may be warranted, provided adequate employee and use parking is
located on-site. Staff recommends that the Commission grant the applicant's
Variance request for tandem parking and parking within the front and street
-2-
sideyard setback in that special circumstances exist related to the
substandard lot size. The following conditions have been included in the
Resolution of Approval:
1. Comply with the following minimum dimensions:
B.
Compact size (small cars):
Stall length:
Stall width:
Stall length:
Stall width:
18 feet
8.5 feet
17 feet
7.5 feet
A.
Standard size (large cars):
2. Eliminate proposed parking space located at rear of car wash
adjacent to trash enclosure.
3. Modify the proposed parking in the southwest corner of the property
(adjacent to the Midas property) to consist of one standard size parking space
(minimum length 22 feet, minimum width 8.5 feet) rather than the two compact
spaces proposed.
Detail Shop Building Height:
At the October 6, 1986, Planning Commission meeting, the Commission
expressed concern regarding the proposed height of the detail shop due to its
proximity to single-family residential property. The Commission directed the
applicant to revise the plans to limit the building to a single-story height
more compatible with adjacent residential building heights.
The revised plan submitted by the applicant proposes to reduce the
detail shop roofline from 23 feet (previous proposal) to 19.5 feet (revised
proposal) at the top of the roof ridge. However, the applicant does not
propose a reduction in the height of the building at the bottom of the eaves
which is still proposed at 16 feet. This is not consistent with the
Commission's direction to reduce the building to a single story. A single-
story building would typically be 10 to 12 feet to the bottom of the eaves and
15 to 16 feet at the ridge of the roof.
Site Development Review:
As directed by the Commission, the applicant has revised the detail shop
elevations to continue the cedar siding and trim on the rear elevation.
Landscaping: As previously indicated, the aisle width between the
existing pump island and the north property line is not consistent with the
City's two-lane drive aisle width (minimum requirement 20 feet). Staff
recommends the applicant provide a minimum five-foot wide landscape strip in
the vicinity of the pump island adjacent to the Lewis Avenue property line.
Additional conditions relating to standard minimum tree size and landscape
widths have been included in the Resolution of Approval.
Vacuum Hose and Recreational Vehicle Washing Area: The applicant has
not identified the location of the R.V. washing area on the plans or addressed
the issue of the vacuum hose encroaching onto the public right-of-way
(sidewalk). A condition has been applied requiring the applicant to revise
the plans to clearly designate the R.V. wash area separate from parking or
circulation.
The applicant has indicated he would examine the vacuum hose situation
to determine if modification is possible which would address the Commission's
and public's concern with the safety hazard of the vacuum hoses. A condition
has been placed on the project to insure the hoses do not interfere with
pedestrian and vehicular safety.
Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the Site Development
Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance request subject to Conditions of
Approval indicated in the Staff Report and Resolution of Approval, including a
reduction in the detail shop building height, modification to parking space
dimensions, and increased landscaping.
The revised plans submitted by the applicant will need substantial
modification to comply with the Planning Commission's direction and the draft
conditions. If the Planning Commission wishes to review how the applicant
-3-
will comply with the directions and conditions, the Planning Commission could
either (1) continue the matter until the applicant revises the plans
accordingly or (2) by motion, deny the application without prejudice to allow
the applicant to resubmit an application within a one-year time frame and
direct Staff to prepare a Resolution and bring it to the next Planning
Commission meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
FORMAT:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Re-open public hearing.
Hear Staff presentation.
Hear Applicant and public presentations.
Close public hearing.
Adopt Resolutions relating to Conditional Use Permit, Site
Development Review, Variance, and Negative Declaration, or
continue the item and provide Staff direction, or deny the
application without prejudice and direct Staff to prepare a
resolution for the next Planning Commission meeting.
ACTION:
Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following
actions relating to PA 86-017 Corwood Car Wash:
1) Adopt Resolution approving Negative Declaration.
2) Adopt Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit to expand
car wash facility.
3) Adopt Resolution approving Site Development Review subject to
conditions.
4) Adopt Resolution approving sideyard setback and parking
Variance request.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A: Site Plans, Elevations, Floor Plans, Landscape Plans.
Exhibit B: Resolution Approving Negative Declaration.
Exhibit C: Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit.
Exhibit D: Resolution Approving Site Development Review.
Exhibit E: Resolution Approving Sideyard Setback Variance and Variance
to allow tandem parking, parking in the front and street
sideyard setback, and reduced parking space dimensions.
Background Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Application and Statement
-4-
&-eN~fZ,AL- N
!.) Oe::? NtOi '7vAL-~ ~A\}J IN zY
OI/v1t-r )SIc?N"S
8)
0)
HA-b ~+J ".7~Aver7 t?~
?vt/u A? C,UP;P/ &016 0':';
N6>(~ A?!l fA ~VI "Sf:3;,D 'f .
19)
N AUA W/L--lr ~MAlrJ -rUE:-
lAJc?Oi:/ ~I~ cY .
It
ONA.f...,
\
...
.,...........
- ../ ~.~...".... ... "
L
AYE
1
---.
q\
II')
eXJ?/INv -'S1:fe:: ~A1N? 1"0 -n-lt:; oMlN.A~ orf~
AlON& ~-rJ..{,. ~A6-r pf2,oP~-rr Lrl i'.JfS,
~. N~~~crN~. $!: ~n ~!f;!te ewb;~~
~IIJA(Yf:. OF ~e"5p^Jl PAVI N (.y,
f3::xl-s--f/r0C/ 6!&-N I? -?t40Wt.j D/'J ?U1 N.?', '3.
(11 f-/A"'!::;, ~ jJlOPl/:;'re:o VJI1H M AOOI-(lo/0
Of ~t:.? PAc f f'.J cy )
~XI"S1/Nv L-1G'1-J1 ~ W!LL u. fil?MOIf::P.
l,j~ vlG'Hi)N& WI~ ~ AQO~ /(0 G1V&::-
AN If-..jOI(Af;:C.7 1Sff-e:::c.j. UGW16 VVIL--(... .~
IfJ S-rAlA/f2.0 Dt00~ M~p, :f W~ pL.AN--r~S
AS ~{)W(\J oN <si-rf 1'0. ~. {
(1vA(..f'o~ WI fl.# Uvll1eo ~ 1'J1~ p;c;>op,
-SMAU-t.~.~S HAW ~ ?HOWN c>N -1'HtE..
~ vvrAIL ft,Olw/t'.:::]G.;.;": I
Q
~
\()
~.
~
:t
/1)
J.3~
\' II
----' DlJb V I N
NO "'7vAt-e-
\ vV c;..<
II
II
I
I
7.W
t:?c:71
~
li1t7t71
I
58. PC
\
'(
\
~
Nt ~
~..~
~~~
,..J
~
~
-j
/\
~~
c(\\[I
~5
,~
! "'-,~4
?:x l.<?f! NcY'
3
M.f3;A
tG
\j
..~
"'J
~
~
1
J
c?f NE::\I( AP, f::>OP1 '"
"'
--
rt7. tltl
A qpo
f
; 3/,4&
-_. q
..-
UE
:~ECt:iVED
OCT 1 3 '1986,
DUBliN PLANNING
'fPiAfflv 41MOL-A-rIc?N t;;,YMl!?c7l-
~Xj/.:;;.;rH,J& tt?~ OfFAVj;;M~N1
N~ 1f-~?
~jl"5t<9D"S - I
~. N01t6 OM
~~ r~HJler/:
Sf!i::mrt>rry vt?~,
'i'" ".(-~--:, :. \. - ~
~Y'~IY /"'IN e- /-,
P/.,.ANI~~ NO, B
~",';--~,.:.-';,,;,,;,,~/,;; - ',-~,,-
~
\)
_\
'0l
eX'J.'?1. -SL.,Alb.tk? 1
(-;ee; N?{~ rJ)
e-xwr. .-?L-At? NP.2..
(~ NtY[e- E>)
-~~-~~~...... N e;.W ~OP, A (;..-E::- AJ:2,E:; A .,--~--
f',tl'vt- ~ UP
~;::;:'t7~-:;;
1
::;;
\J
_\
~
e:x I <S 1'1 N (,.I c.RN-
V~Yt?p., ?Y?I~
-"'-~~-"~
1\
\~
"2
--~.~_..~..-.._--~.~~.. E:::X/?..?-nNw t/;AiAWA6H ~tf'UIPM6N-r NOI ~OWN
v; 0 !."L. - Uf'
OOO~"5
111-t?"
New ?u.t;;i1t9Me:;f';
'1,:;:;>! L.-G.1~
,.4 /_1 ,I
1 ~-o
..... I - ----.''-~-_.--.--~---"....,,....'..,... ...,.,........."~,.-' .- . - ....,...,... - ...,
i ~XI~~& ~v1. (17M.) '1t:7~A?e-; VWt?IN& ~M'J
I ANO ~fL,Oy~ .,. P/I".f3;'1 ~
~Lv/
I
N~W ~AL-~ ~ 6~V/~
~
'."... ....._..~.._..._-~~
]
A~e:A ,.... ..,....~- III
, I
i '
-G
-I
N
tD
II
J:
~
~
~
~
i\
(5'
...,.
L
_....--- e-x 1ST! N CY
~ALLWAY -------
Wrt?~~j
"
~!S:LVe5
~~l.v' p~~
pz.~M
V~INc..-
~M
( fE9( ~-r.: )
~c::.#-l
~q~.ll~~
"', """ ~
",
e;:x I?t:
~ICA:S: .
~~s
"
,
Wt7Mf!:.N
~~~~~ -
r
h
,_ .,._ ~~."_u.,
PL,AIJ1e:f\17
N(?,,4 ,
ft..AtJ1'f1::.~
NO.3.
-fet.U.1 I.....~._..- .
11Mt-k1 FWa:::.
, !
,
pl-AN-rep., No 1.
.......... --
: !
:\
ft)MP
P! ANl6p,
~, Ie.
\ ~l"1JN& M>f'.j.IAt-1-----~
I PAVlt.J&
~XI~INvCO~e.
~
e:x mlN&
VAWUM
t?/f::.P>I-iM(l
l.-ii0~ ,
:::
~
_\
~
11)f1->t'"J1 N e:. (cY;
(/A'SO~INf;:.. -rANlL5
~x l?flrV 0.-- -?iC/#J
:!- PL-AfIJ 1'M
,
~~~:'l
- iJ~!tJ~-~-,
,/
FIL.L. PIPe;. fOp,
&A'50L-IN{3.. TANKS
e:xV:Jl'IN~ NA'1-
(/A~, ?U'f--L?ff
tJ~ ~~w~t?
A~~P~
~f~1Y
~jt,11Y P't?~1 (Ntyf~.4)
~ N6.-
eXI~INv
L c::. t1//?
-4 )/ L?=A/ue
; j
I . 11t-t' II; . .' .'. 7'-t/ I
,- ~XI?l'IN& ..~..; "Jve- .. AC?t?11. "1
. . . . 1?4-'.....pll I
l--._~.."..~-~_..._._--~_......,"7~--""~'~~
I f{6Mt9C9e.~O t:'~1l/t!;WA Y I
~":;!-r.
~IN.
\
}
;
IN~ ....
I M~tJS fO N'S.
6) ~CY~O: ,<:,,''':J -t~AFF'Ic.. pt.-oW
....r-
-+3[ ~1~IOpj t.,.1~1'&
:\
1) eXV?I. "7LAf::> NO i. rv CA:7V~ Fe:>(i; 6At-.JO
-r~AP P' WASt--! WA-r~ p;f3;:c;.t.:.,AA-1A-nON.
..,.
W~ IkJl?!c;A'"'fe= ~r;:W ~N'5IP;()c-lION.
g) .t:7A~ A~A hHAt.-L. ~ ~ lZ,nAIl- ~7A~ Ah-
wew A~ ?A"'Sj...lI~ ~ c..AfZ,WA~J1. A~.A ~J.lAu...
COf\JS/"S/ O'r ?14e::t.V1t..J(j,/ p1:?pt,Me.f"O.iAf-Je'I'bIi'.JCY WI1't-I
P&AN1~~ ~ ~(/J,./. 'PA~f!U) c::e..lt..-/I0(.., ~t1Au.... ~
lL.L-UMlfJAfW bY~Yt.,.lv{.r(~.
A'1 ~/L)rll.. y P~bl"7 A(l.@. ~oVA~ OUI;2.,INCv l.A4.y'~
~"1It:d7N. (A-r NlwHf. 0(AIN/;:> W/L..J... E:;:~L ftA~
A 1 r3AbU eNl? bp- Aj;Z,pO~)
!f.) No-r~"b ~NC::~NINv PL-AN1'6fZ,-? A~. oN P~-r,. No 1.
8) e:-Xl<ei'f ~f;> Nt? Z, ~ Cc:Ne:,p.,..~ ft,.tN~
WA-r~ -S7ofJ.,AcY;';:- uJA1'~. f1~4.-{1 ok) .
R~
I
(
(?t1AI c.~
F.JAy/5 -\
)
Ii
Cr L IU ~ ?jo1ACvrE'
f r I ~
, I
I
II
II
1
t,f/\/ e;... ~
f'
/1
f.
~ "~M"_"_"_~"'_" ...._..~..,.."~._~.-,~.>.. "._"~___~'~'" .",~._.._______,_.__...."._ __.'<..__.._,...._~,.._",,'"'".,...._...___~....__,_~r-"" ."...~"'~~....,.,.~._.,<.._..,__".".'.~~'''..",w_,''''.'''~"~'~.~...-._.~'_v._~.__-,.~'~___
--~..,~---~---~---,--'~._. ,..,..,_._~.-_., ..,-~.."._,.,.,-"."...._--._-.-~---'~---. ~.-
f~AN11"')v
(
\h{0b h/1t
~ LAN~7Cl~~
I
O~AWlfJ(Y5 ,~,
)
/
1t? I
Pvcf?~1Y
vi ~J e.
;/
v
-\\r,
\J .
__I X
\:J- ""1..
-- ~
'-~
I.~.'
m
, I
i
1\
/1 \
- - .~-_.._---~.-
..-;----. ffNG- e:.
;'";;''''~k-J; .'&~p""'" ," . ~~
\~~$_~W'l,':_'"."""i_""...x:,;
L-OO~
fo~1
~UIP.
Y."e: & /4
C:.rl....10v-
l wAI11~&
-suc::,p
c:?ff~l~
odc.~~ J,
I
P~11f\.jV
~_._~t._~--+
-1-! I
- \ 1
~ I
~I
~~I
...~,
~I
., I
C~'.' ,,~
r-~ I
. I
~/ I'
--
. I
~
~~\
I\--'J !
I...) I
iJ'2' .
:.V\? I
I, I
1,- i
i. I
132 I
!<~ 1
\~~ I
".' '~.J I
I {\ '.
. . "\- I
iP ~ I
! I' h:; I
I 1\-\) I
I~~ I
1\1i& I
l~<( \
'. I~~ I
I I~~ I
I ~*I
I I
I \' '
\>-- \
\ {\ \
I~ I
I~
\s:..
_.
~
\'f\
Prof~f2;1'(
(......INt
,
A bAY'-S e 11
{{?p(
,_,.~~_....~.._e...'._."~_' _____"_______.,,_'"'_~~.__.,~_'"_____'_~___."_".._._'~....,_.,,~
7i?
L-AN
Ii Ii
/'8:> ::::
l (I
I r?7
M&1 A L.- r1..oDf
/(
tr
(,
/",
N0e::-; AwNIt0&"S A-r( WINO.OWS
No1 6UOW N "S>6e pt?-t::-
V10I,)'S ~Wlf\JCY)
vJ ! otS: f?CLL-'"
O~Y;'5 (4-)
) I 1\ 1\ 1/
@ :f~;:. ""0
I
I. I
----------------------l .
1/A-f~ frZ-IN~e;.()
(l--e:.V\ ~ To/i'i7 ~ ___I
~r L.-oW~!:St? i CA~fO,z,1
AClr/6(? .
~
i
a
~
<0 ..J
€S 11
~ I~
I~ I
I\L
IG
l~ Iv!
:: I~
I~ It
I~ ~
i;t. ~
~ ~
'~
;r~
~~1
v~i0c..e
(fP 0~f..., @
~l'?nNH(/
1~A:;;J
~&U/11..)p,f3;.
(tYftC;?() ~--.)~ C:;C;V~
-...,
~
ill
1 ~
'2
o
~
(Var6~",;f M
p', f:1J:;
rr;.~..rL~'-'_.r\
,.J r4. -,iA 1t0 f3: )
(1r-/8 <YAL-)
\,
P'(0lJ-7 ~" \
.16AWA~IAA11 ~ .
, (~e-~~~tJ ~J
( -Z --17 <9AL,.. ) .
\
~
I
j
!
A:ZA~A--1~~
(W11H~KJ IlJalvA~
(ffl/uJHI1& - 9 c9AL)
N
o
~
. \)
..~~~~~~~C~~-
rJP?{~: vJ(n1~IA I))llh ~ ~i
/JtAfJ fo91? I D P ffl\J1~
0()M~'5 ,?-, 3, ~ 4-,
-exJl/1/ ;)r,;, /{'f2U,-G ( ~)
.__0'~e~6 r~1Y~~t~.
rArlA1N ijAU.tS /JrJl0A1w
f)~~ ~~~AP; ~
CtYt1f z aJf/lfAc'1 -
x I~) -----
/fL:?14L 01'0 '"6t1~ -
N~6:
LANt?~(--APf=" pLAN UA6t ~ wN~ UN~ ~?-!,;3;
OIe.6c--[10N ~ AI- C:U1C+1G:?V&:-f2., '--'/!-AN~-7?~~ /~AO)I-r~1-
(~~?At-J-r.c;.>N/ CAL..1P,)
~UAp.-e: ~A~~ 1~~MA-rION :
?AfZ. IJJA"!;; ~l ~ OJ V
VJ(.~Y-;I"J v 2' '~.:;"1~,A~.
p,%-( '1-L?OM?
Ii.-- A~A
A~A -
6& '2 I ? r.
~Cg "6.f.
-t 8 -s.f
-
-
:;:::::;
~~AL- /~~
(P1cP~ ?f
r?t9{AIL btJIWJN&,
?l...J.!?f? AI2eA "' ~7~Ac;.-G:.
I .
A~-A f...,t:;V
-1~ A l..... Af2~/A.
- ...s,r:
- "'Q.":;
, '
- '5. r-
OA-r~ ff~~-reo-
$!E
I
-~~,---
~
~
~~
~ ~
.. 2
~ ~
~ ~
1
~12~
=~l
"'-!~
lli
. ..
~~ ~
~~
tZ%
~3~
~~\i
~
'V
~.
~
~
~
:t
\:l
~
~.
~.
~
~
~
~
"
~
~
~
~'2
2~
~~
JOb N.e?
8~
~~:
L-- I
~tt(G
~.tC?f~~y L-l~E;
MIV'A?
~O&..
P~f'~-ry viNe:
I
/
-
r
I
I
M61 A L.- fhe;?t?f.
(6L-w)
?WA~ -,?IV NcY
fl6?r;tLVc?t?D MWr;z,
!
I
I
-/
I
I
ql
P;OL--Lr- U f'
pC/opt...
_ ~e;,t_ J7c?>K J&~~~;R~J
~~A~
~ C:;MWA"'OH ~. (1?
vA::V~J? Ht!vLt(
(q tJwC/.
\
j
I
..,
./
//
UWA~
-'101M
j I ."~.
r;eA~ e:-~VAT I?>N or ~1AJ'- f:L.OG'. r? ~l~ .l._l-C;/
M?fA . ~~
(e-v06 )
OA'T'e f1A1 N1'6:::!? ;
~t?AD;J'5; 1C'/I~/~
LL>>J~ 1-it1G+l1'. ~ ).v?r?f.4?
~r:::1tJG- ~ ~?'
~
~
~
~
~ :2
\' ~"(
, ;J \.)
~ ~:i
: ~t
~ ~~
~ ~~
~ ~
J 1':-
II ;.-\)
~~ ~.~
z~
\:\~
'\i.~
"{""l
~~
"
~
,.
\\i
j
~
~
\i
~~
\l~
-<:{;n ~
Ii z ~
'73 ~
~~ ~
~
\(
"<{
3 ,
t. ~,
~ \J~
~~
t{ :r
\\\ '-f\.j
~ j~
~~
~
~ \)~
, ,
~
t ~
~ >
~ ~
\: ~
\U
~ ~
~ Nt:'.
a, *~G
~ee-r
1--2
pc
()rn~:u1~ .
RESOLUTION NO. 86-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PA 86-017 CORWOOD CAR WASH CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT, SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, AND VARIANCE APPLICATIONS FOR THE
EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING CAR WASH FACILITY, INCLUDING A DETAIL SHOP, WITH
REDUCED SIDEYARD SETBACKS AND TANDEM PARKING, IN THE C-2-B-40 GENERAL
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, 6973 VILLAGE PARKWAY
WHEREAS, Roger Woodward, property owner of Corwood Car Wash, has
filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit (PA 86-017) and Site
Development Review to allow addition and expansion of the existing car wash
facility to include an auto detail shop and a request to vary from required
sideyard setbacks and parking regulations at 6973 Village Parkway; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together
with the State Guidelines and City environmental regulations, require that
certain projects be reviewed for environmental impact and that environmental
documents be prepared; and
WHEREAS, an initial study was conducted finding that the project,
as proposed, would not have a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this
application; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Negative Declaration was given in
all respects as required by State Law; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review and consider the
Negative Declaration at a Public Hearing on October 6, 1986 and October 20,
1986;
NOW, THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
finds as follows:
1. That the project PA 86-017 Corwood Car Wash Conditional Use
Permit, Site Development Review, and Variance, will not have a significant
effect on the environment.
2. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared and processed
in accordance with State and local environmental laws and guideline
regulations; and
3. That the Negative Declaration is complete and adequate.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission hereby
adopts the Negative Declaration for PA 86-017 Corwood Car Wash Conditional Use
Permit, Site Development Review, and Variance application.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
EXHIBIT B
RESOLUTION NO. 86.;..
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPROVING PA 86-017 CORWOOD CAR WASH CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT APPLICATION TO EXPAND THE EXISTING CAR WASH FACILITY
TO INCLUDE A DETAIL SHOP IN THE C-2-B-40 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT,
6973 VILLAGE PARKWAY
WHEREAS, Roger Woodward, property owner of Corwood Car Wash, has
filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit (PA 86-017) and Site
Development Review to allow addition and expansion of the existing car wash
facility to include an auto detail shop and a request to vary from required
sideyard setbacks and parking regulations at 6973 Village Parkway; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on said
application on October 6, 1986 and October 20, 1986; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said Public Hearing was given in all
respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance
provlSlons of the California Environmental Quality Act and a Negative
Declaration has been adopted (Planning Commission Resolution No. 86-
this project as it will have no significant effect on the environment;
with the
) for
and
WHEREAS, a Staff Analysis was submitted recommending conditional
approval of the application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on
October 6, 1986, to consider all reports, recommendations, and testimony;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
does hereby find that:
a) The use is required to serve a public need in that the use
provides an auto detailing use.
b) The use will be properly related to other land uses and
transportation and service facilities in the vicinity in that daytime
activities will be commensurate with present use of properties in the
neighborhood.
c) The use, under all circumstances and conditions of this
particular case, will not materially affect adversely the health or safety of
persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the
neighborhood, in that all applicable regulations will be met.
d) The use will not be contrary to the specific intent clauses or
performance standards established for the District in which it is to be located
in that the car wash and auto detail shop is consistent with the character of
the commercial district.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Planning Commission does hereby
conditionally approve PA 86-017 as generally depicted by materials labeled
Exhibit A, subject to approval of the related Site Development Review and
stamped approved on file with the Dublin Planning Department subject to the
following conditions:
1. The auto detail shop use shall be restricted to the following
activities: polishing, waxing, and interior cleaning.
2. All said detailing activities shall be conducted indoors.
3. The office areas shall be ancillary uses for the car wash and
detail shop facilities.
EXHIBIT C
4. The height of the detail shop building shall be reduced as
specified in the Site Development Review Conditions of Approval.
5. No residential use of the property is permitted.
6. Hours of operation shall be restricted to 8:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m.
7. This Conditional Use Permit is subject to approval of the
related Site Development Review permit.
8. The existing 25-foot height freestanding sign is not approved
under this permit; a separate Conditional Use Permit approval is required.
9. This permit shall expire on October 30, 1991, 'and shall be
revocable for cause in accordance with Section 8-90.3 of the Dublin Zoning
Ordinance.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
-2-
RESOLUTION NO. 86 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR PA 86-017 CORWOOD CAR WASH
WHEREAS, Roger Woodward, property owner of Corwood Car Wash, has
filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit (PA 86-017) and Site
Development Review to allow addition and expansion of the existing car wash
facility to include an auto detail shop and a request to vary from required
sideyard setbacks and parking regulations at 6973 Village Parkway; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on said
application on October 6, 1986 and October 20, 1986; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said Public Hearing was given in all
respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance
provlslons of the California Environmental Quality Act and a Negative
Declaration has been adopted (Planning Commission Resolution No. 86-
this project as it will have no significant effect on the environment;
with the
) for
and
WHEREAS, a Staff Analysis was submitted recommending conditional
approval of the application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on
October 6, 1986, to consider all reports, recommendations, and testimony; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that:
a) All provisions of Section 8-95.0 through 8-95.8 Site
Development Review, of the Zoning Ordinance are complied with;
b) This application, as modified by the Conditions of Approval,
will promote orderly, attractive, and harmonious development, recognized
environmental limitations on; stabilize land values and investments; and
promote the general welfare by preventing establishment of uses or erection of
structures having qualities which would not meet the specific intent clauses or
performance standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance and which are not
properly related to their sites, surroundings, traffic circulation, or their
environmental setting;
c) The approval of the application as conditioned is in the best
interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare;
d) General site considerations, including site layout, open space
topography, orientation, and the location of buildings, vehicular access,
circulation and parking, setbacks, height, walls, fences, public safety, and
similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the
development;
e) General architectural considerations, including the character,
scale, and quality of the design, the architectural relationship, with the site
and other buildings, building materials, colors, screening of exterior
appurtenances, exterior lighting and signing, and similar elements have been
incorporated in order to insure compatibility of this development with its
design concept and the character of adjacent buildings;
f) General landscape considerations including the location, type,
size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials, provisions for
irrigation, maintenance and protection of landscaped areas and similar elements
have been considered to insure visual relief to complement buildings and
structures and to provide an attractive environment for the public.
EXHIBIT D
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
approves the Site Development Review as shown on the plans labeled "Exhibit A"
as amended subject to the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval
Unless stated otherwise, all
issuance of buildin ermits
Planning Department.
General Conditions
1. Comply with the plans labeled "Exhibit A" as may be amended by the related
Conditional Use Permit and by these conditions.
Site Plan and Landscape Plans
2. Revise and resubmit site plan at a I" = 20' scale to the Planning Director
for review and approval of the following items:
A. Maintain consistency between site plan and landscape plan.
B. Provide minimum of 12 on-site parking spaces in compliance with the
following:
2)
Compact parking space size:
Stall length,
Stall width,
Stall length,
Stall width,
18 feet
8.5 feet
17 feet
7.5 feet
1)
Standard parking space size:
C. Increase landscape areas to a minimum width of four feet.
D. Create an additional landscape area, minimum of five feet wide,
adjacent to the Lewis Avenue property line in the vicinity of the pump island
running the entire length of the proposed arbor.
E. Eliminate the proposed parking space located at the rear of the car
wash facility adjacent to the trash enclosure.
F. Modify the parking in the southwest portion of the lot (adjacent to
the Midas property) to one standard size parking space (minimum length 22 feet,
minimum width 8.5 feet).
G. Designate the R.V. washing area on the site plan separate from
parking and circulation.
H. In addition to the five-gallon evergreen shrubs proposed in the rear
setback, provide IS-gallon evergreen type trees.
I. In addition to the proposed annuals within landscape areas adjacent
to structures, include perennials or evergreen plants.
J. Increase trash enclosure size to minimum Livermore Dublin Disposal
Service standards.
3. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an automatic irrigation system.
4. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared and signed by a landscape
architect or architect. Planting and maintenance specifications shall be
prepared. Submit to the Planning Director for review and approval.
5. Comply with Standard Plant Material, Irrigation System, and Maintenance
Agreement (attached).
Architecture/Elevations
6. Revise elevation plans to reduce detail shop structure to a single story
with a maximum 16-foot height, subject to Planning Director approval.
-2-
7. Submit to the Planning Department color samples for the roof, exterior
walls and doors, trim, and awnings.
8. Comply with applicable Site Development Review Standard Conditions (copy
attached).
9. Comply with applicable Dublin Police Services Standard Commercial Building
Security Requirements (attached).
10. The existing 25-foot high free-standing sign shall be subject to a
separate Conditional Use Permit prior to expiration of the amortization period.
Miscellaneous
11. Vacuum hose shall be maintained in a manner so as not to'create a nuisance
or safety hazard for either pedestrians or vehicles.
12. Comply with all applicable Building Code requirements.
13. Correct deficiencies in existing frontage improvements such as offset
sidewalk and curb and gutter as directed by and subject to the approval of the
City Engineer.
14. Submit grading and drainage plan for review and approval by the City
Engineer.
15. Submit a lighting plan indicating proposed lighting distribution on-site
and lighting manufacturer's specifications for proposed lighting, subject to
Planning Director review and approval.
16. Fill in the low area at the southwest corner of the site, subject to
review and approval of the City Engineer.
17. All construction activities, including delivery of materials, shall be
limited to Monday through Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., except as approved in
writing by the City Engineer.
18. Measures shall be taken to contain all trash, construction debris, and
materials on-site until disposal off-site can be arranged. The Developer shall
keep adjoining public streets free and clean of project dirt, mud, and
materials during the construction period. The Developer shall be responsible
for corrective measures at no expense to the City of Dublin. Areas undergoing
grading, and all other construction activities, shall be watered, or other
dust-palliative measures used, to prevent dust, as conditions warrant.
Provision of temporary construction fencing shall be made subject to review and
approval of the City Engineer and the Building Official.
19. Any relocation of improvements or public facilities shall be accomplished
at no expense to the City.
20. An improvement plan shall be prepared for public right-of-way improvements
and shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer.
21. An encroachment permit shall be secured from the City Engineer for any
work done within the public right-of-way.
22. All signs shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director
prior to installation.
23. All demonstrations, displays, services, and other activities associated
with the new structure shall be conducted entirely within the structure. No
loudspeakers or amplified music shall be permitted outside the structure. Only
those uses specifically approved as outdoor uses by the Conditional Use Permit
shall be conducted outdoors.
-3-
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Planning Commission Chairperson
Planning Director
-4-
RESOLUTION NO. 86-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPROVING PA 86-017 CORWOOD CAR WASH VARIANCE APPLICATION TO REDUCE THE STREET SIDEYARD
SETBACK TO 17.5 FEET FOR THE ARBOR SUPPORT POSTS AND TO REDUCE THE SOUTH SIDEYARD SETBACK
TO ZERO AND TO ALLOW TANDEM PARKING AND REDUCED PARKING STALL SIZE AND ALLOW PARKING IN
THE FRONT AND STREET SIDEYARD SETBACK AT 6973 VIIJ.AGE PARKWAY
WHEREAS, Roger Woodward, property owner of Corwood Car Wash, has filed
an application for a Conditional Use Permit (PA 86-017) and Site Development Review to
allow addition and expansion of the existing car wash facility to include an auto detail
shop and a request to vary from required sideyard setbacks and parking regulations at
6973 Village Parkway; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on said
application on October 6, 1986 and October 20, 1986; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said Public Hearing was given in all respects
as required by law; and
WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance with the
provlSlons of the California Environmental Quality Act and a Negative Declaration has
been adopted (Planning Commission Resolution No. 86- ) for this project as it will have
no significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, a Staff Analysis was submitted recommending conditional
approval of the application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on October 6,
1986, to consider all reports, recommendations, and testimony;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby
find:
a) That there are special circumstances, including size, shape, topography,
location or surroundings applicable to the property which deprive the property of
privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity under the identical zoning
classification, in that the site is substandard in lot area (40,000 square feet required;
22,000 square feet existing), and median lot width (150 feet required; 92 feet existing),
as required in the C-2-B-40 district, making application of the required sideyard setback
impractical and warranting granting of a Variance for tandem parking spaces and reduced
parking stall dimensions.
b) That the granting of the application will not constitute a grant of special
privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and
zone; in that a special circumstance exists due to the substandard size of the lot.
Additionally, variances have been granted for lots with similar circumstances within the
C-2-B-40 District (i.e, the adjacent Midas site).
c) That the granting of the application will not be detrimental to persons or
property in the neighborhood or to the public welfare in that conditions have been
applied to the project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission does hereby
approve PA 86-017 Variance application, subject to the associated Site Development Review
and Conditional Use Permit Conditions of Approval.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
EXHIBIT E
-'
,-'
CITY
OF
DUBLIN
POLICE SERVICES
sTANDARD cc:t'lMEOCIAL BUILDING SECURITY ~MENDATICNS
I. CCORS
All e..-rterior doors are to l::e constructed as follcws:
a) WCod doors shall l::e of solid core construction, no less than 1-3/4
inches thick.
b) Auxiliary locks are to l::e added to each door and shall l::e double
cylinder, one inch, thrChl deadbolt or equivale..Tlt burglary resistant
leeks where permitted by the Building and Fire Cedes. The cylinders
are to l::e protected by cylinder ring guards so they carmot l::e griPFErl
by pliers or other wrenching devices.
c) In-swinging doors shall have rabbited jambs, or alternate rreans of
strengthening.
d) Exterior hinges shall have non-rerrovable hinge pins.
e) Exterior and interior garage out-swinging doors shall have non-
,rel1ovable, hidden or non-accessible hinge pins.
f) Doors with glass panels and doors that have glass panels adjacent to
the door frarre shall l::e secured with irom..urk or steel grills of at
least 1/8th inch ma.terial or 2 inch rresh secured en the inside of the
glazing.
g) All e..-rterior doors, excluding front doors, shall have a minimum of
40 watt bulb over the outside of the door. so:h bulb shall be
directed onto the door surfaces by reflectors.
h) The strike is to l::e a wrought rox strike, or equivale..Tlt.
i) Sliding glass doors: All sliding glass doors shall be equipped with a
leeking device that shall e..'1gage the stri.lee sufficie..'1tly to prevent its
l::eing dise..'1gaged by any fOssible rr6vement of the door within the space
or. clearances provided for installation ani operation. ' The rolt and
strike shall l::e reinforced by hardened Il'aterial so as to prevent their
separation by pulling, prying or similar attack. The loc.1dng device
function may l::e of€I"able by a keyed or ceded leek inside and out as
permi tted b~ the Fire Cepart::rrent or Building Cedes.
Double sliding glass doors shall l::e loc.leed at the meeting rail.
II. w"!NIX:WS
A. All accessible rear and side glass winda.-lS shall be secured as follO:'iS ~
1) Any accessible windChl shall l::e secured on the inside with a
leeking device capable of withstanding prying or wrenching.
2) Louvered windChls shall not be used wit:.'1.in eight feet of ground
level, adjacent structures, or fire escapes.
DP 83-012
---_..~-----...._-_._.----- - .-. .-..--.------.. ...--
','
.'- ...".~
B. 1Iccessible-Transans
All exterior transans e.xceeding 8" x 1211 on the side and rear
of any build.in9 or premise used for business purp:lses shall be
protected by. one of the follONing:
1) Outside iron bars of at least 1/811 material spaced no rrore than
2" apart.
2) Outside iron or steel grills of at least 1/8" material; but not
rrore than 2" mesh. .
3) The window barrier shall be secured with bolts, the rounded
or flush head on the outside. .
4) Wire hung glass with positive locking devices.
III. :RCOF OPENINGS
-./"
.... I"
, . ",--~~
~.:::.:..~~:;
.J:,~:'
A. All glass skylights on the roof of any building or premises used
for business purposes shall be provided with:
1) Iron bars of at least 1/8" material spaced no rrore than 2" apart
under the skylight and securely fastened as in B-3.
2) A steel grill of at-least 1/8"-material of 2" mesh under the
skylight and securely fastened as in B-3.
3) Other skylight protection of approved design.
B. All hatcmvay openings on the roof of any building or pre!mses used
for business purposes shall be secured as follows:
1) If the hatchway is of wocden material, .it shall be covered on
the inside with at least 16 guage sheet steel or its equivale.'lt
attached with scretlS at 6".
2} The hatcmvay shall be secured fran the inside with a slidebar
or sJ.ide bolts. The use of crossbar or padlock must be
approved by the Fire Marshal.
3) Outside tringes on all hatchway q:e.'1ings . shall be provided with
non-rerrovable pins when using pin-tyFe hinges.
c. All air duct or air ve.'lt openings exceeding 8" x 12" on the roof
or e.xterior walls of any build.ing or premise ,used for business
purposes shall be secured by covering tre sarre with either of the
follONing:
1) Iron bars of at least 1/2" round or 111 x 1/4" flat steel
material, spaced no rrore than 5" apart and securely fastened
as in II B-3.
2) A steel grill of at least 1/8" material of 2" mesh and securely
fastened as in II B-3.
'.
"
'... BE CITY OF DUBLIN
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin. CA 94568
(415) 829-4/ll10
STANDARD PLANT MATERIAL, IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT
(prop~rty ,owner) do hereby
shrubs and ground cover) 'will be
the City of Dublin's approved
(name of
I
agree that all plants (trees,
installed in accordance with
landscape plan for
proj ect) located at
(address) . All plants will be replaced in kind as
approved plan at such time as they are found to be
diseased, damaged, or dead, for at least one (1) year
date of their installation.
per the
missing,
from the
I further agree that all plants will henceforth be irrigated,
fertilized, weeded and tended on a reg~lar basis such that they
will maintain a healthy and weedfree ~ppearance.
I further agree that the irrigation system will be installed
according to the irrigation plans as approved by the City of
Dublin, and that said system will be kept in good working order
for at least one (I) year from the date of the 'landscaping
installation.
This agreement is binding against this and all property owners
of record.
Signed:
Date:
1/83
Form 83-05
-r
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARD CONDITIONS
CITY OF DUBLIN
All projects approved by the City of Dublin shall rreet the follcwing standard
conditions lIDless specifically e.xempted by the Planning Cepartrrent.
1. Final buildinq and site developrent plans shall be reviewed ana:' approved
bv the Planninq Cepartment staff prior to the issuance of a buildinq pennit.
All 'such plans shall insure:
DP 83-13
a.
That standard canrercial or residential security requi.rerrents as
established by the Dublin police Cepartrrent are provided.
That ramps, special parking spaces, signing, and other appropriate
physical features for the handicapped, are provided throughout the
site for all publicly used facilities.
That continuous concrete curbing is provided for all parking stalls.
That exterior lighting of the building and site is not directed onto
adjacent prof€rties and the light source is shielded fran direct
offsite viewing.
That all mechanical equiprent, including electrical and gas meters,
is architecturally screened fran vie\.." and that electrical trans-
forrrers are either undergrounded or architecturally screened.
That all trash enclosures are' of a sturdy mate.l:ial (preferably
masonry) and in harmony with the architecture, of the building (s) .
That all vents, gutters, downsp:lUts, flashings, etc., are painted to
match the color of adjace.'1t surface.
That all materials and colors are to be as approved by the Dublin
Planning Cepartrrent. Once constructed or installed, all improve!rents
are to be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. Any
changes which affect the e.xterior character shall be resul::roitted to
the Dublin Planning Cepartment for approval.
'I'hat each parking space designated for canpact cars re identified
with a paverrent marking reading "Small Car Only" or its equivalent,
and additional signing be provided if necessary.
That all e.xterior architectural elements visible fran vie'.'" and not
detailed on the plans be finished in a style and in materials in
harmony with the e.xterior of the building.
That all other public age.'1cies that require revie<tl of the project be
supplied with copies of the final building and site plans and that
canpliance be obtained with at least their minimum Cede require.'rents.
b.
c.
d.
e.
L
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
~
.- r
"
2.
a. That plant naterial is utilized which will be capable of healthy
growth within the given range of soil and c1inate.
b. That proposed landscape screening is of a height and density so that it
provides a positive visual impact within three years fran the tiIre
of planting.
I
c. That unless unusual circumstances prevail, at least 75% of the propjsed
trees on the site are a minimum of 15 gallons in size, and at
least 50% of the proposed shrubs on the site are minimum of 5.gallons
in size.
d. That a plan for an autcnatic irrigation syste!ll be provided which
assures that all plants get adequate water. In unusual circumstances,
and if approved by staff, a manual or quick coupler system rray be
used.
e. That concrete curbing is to be used at tr.e edges of all planters and
paving surfaces.
f. That all cut and fill slopes in e."{cess of 5 feet in height are rounded
both horizontally and vertically.
g. That all cut and fill slopes graded and not constructed on by Septenber 1,
of any give.'1. year, are hydroseeeed with pere.nnial or native grasses
and flcwers, and that stock piles of lease soil e."<i..sting on t.~t date
are hydroseeded in a similar rranner.
h. Tr.at t.'1e area under the drip line of all existing oal(s, walnuts, etc.,
\vhich are to be saved are fe.'1.cee during construction ar.d grading
operations and no activity is permitted \.IDcer them tr.at will cause
soil compaction or daiTh3,ge to t.'1e tree.
i_That a guarantee frcm the a.mers or contractors shall be required
guaranteeing all shrubs and grour.d cover, all trees, and the irrigation
syste!ll for one year.
j . That a pe:r:rnanent maintenance agree!rent on all landscaping will be
required frcm the owner insuring regular L..--rigation, fertilization
. and weed abate.rrent.
3 _ Final inscection or occupancY ;::ermi ts ",-ill not be aranted until all
const..""Uction and landscaoin is ccrrnlete in accordance with acoroved plans
and t.'1e conditions required bv t."le Ci tv, or a bond has been osted
to cover all costs of the unfinished work, plus 25%.
,
,
,
1\
\\
I'
I'
"
II
,I'
I'
.,
.. '
"
I'
I' .
'~'\ \\', . ~-'" ...--
\ \\... -~. "Jo..-..:;5:........
.~><..:~. -:---- _-,'-7
. >-..........--- ._ r...:.- I /
.... _'...-" ... ....' ",' I I
......-</. _'- , ' I I
''; 'C. .' ... ." ,\ 'I I
,..' . \ ~ \... " r I
".'. \ 0, '. ......._..;',,'
~~~i~~l'
'::. ~ .;vd:;!:'~~" r\" ,I .1 \
;L'&~~~!1~\j .~\ V<~.
,
...\
A TT ACHMENT I
-rASCo-Ole
. ~'".f"'" ~'.'.V ~...'_.,.. ".-;:,:,..,","",Y.
. .'_~F~~~"'~W]1IV,\.
. _..---._.~,-,,;........;....:.- ------.- -..-
~,
t ~ .-.-
\.~..
r"'" Tel ?/ (L{-!~G:.
5/)J~ . ~Sl .f tC(;7t;-
LV? r-€.-lL 1t I ?D-
;
~ ..----'
CITY OF DUBLIN
P.O. Box. 2340
Dublin. CA 94568
Ilannin9 Department
i500 Dublin Blvd. Suite 0
lUblin CA 94568
R E C E.' " r: r')
IAAR 1 ~ '\986
DUBLIN PLANNING
(415) 8294600
(4lS) 829-4916
Eff.: 1/84
JLANNING APPLICATION FORM
~s to Applicant:
* Please discuss your proposal with Staff prior to c~leting the Planning Application
foon. "
* All items related to your specific type or application must be completed.
* Since this is a comprehensive application foon, sore or the items. might not apply to
your specific application.
* Please print or type legibly.
.. Attach additional sheets if necessary.
AUTHORIZATION OF PROPERTY OWNER
A. PROPERTY OWNER: In signing t11is application, I, as prq:e..rtyowner, have full legal
capacity to, and hereby do,authorize the filing of tJlls application. ,I understand.
that conditions of approval are binding. I agree to be bound by t..'1ose conditions,
subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal period.
Narre: 'ROGER L.. WOODWARD Capacity: Property Owner
Address: P.O. BOX 2688 DaytirnePhone: (415) 828-5151
~LIN CA 94568 ( )
Signature:. .~D~~ Date: ~\~~..
B. APPLICANT THAN PROPERTY' ~: In signing this application, I, as applicant,
represent to_ have obtained authorization of the prC]::erty otvner to file this
application. I-agree to be bound by conditions of a:?proval, subject only to the right
to object at" the hearings on the application. If this 2~plication has not been signed
by the property owner, I have attached separate docurrentation of full legal capacity
'to file this.. application and agreement to conditions of approval, subject only to the
right to object at the hearings or during the appeal Feriod.
Name: Capacity:
Address Daytime .:phone: } ,
}
Signature:
Date:
CERTIFICATION
I certify that I have the authorization of the property owner to file this application.
I further certify that the . information and exhibits sul:mitted are true and correct.
Capacity:
Daytime Phone:
Name:
Address:
}
}
Signature:
Date:
(OVER)
ATTACH ENT ~
VA &0; 017 .~,'
.:'~'~~~~;!~!h~~;::t_;i1-;:?;:.]~~~;?.:~;;~~~:tE::-i~:::t_::.::'~.'-"
. ,,_.'~'-~",.~_._'-_._~~' ,.~~:":-"""~'.'-- -- -
_......~..~.. -.. .. ,~
-"
f--~
1,/
f',,'.'
~ ',':
,
dENERAL DATA REQUIRED
A. p,ddress or Location of property:
B. Assessor Parcel Number(s):
C.
E.
Site area: 22. g14 SO.
Existing Use of Property:
h973 VTLT~GR ~ARKWAY
DUBLIN, CA . 94568
q41-?10-~1
FT. D. Present Zoning:
CAR WASH
F. Zoning and Existing Use Of surrounding Property:
Zone
Existing Uses
- North:
- South:
- East:
:
- West:
G. Detailed Description of Proposed Use of Property:
REMODEL OF EXISTING CAR WASH BUILDING
ADDITION OF DETAILING BUILDING
(Continue on separate sheet if necessary) .
TYPE OF APPLICATION
Check type of 'planning permit(s) being requested:
o Administrative Conditional Use pennit
o Boun~ Adjustment
1XI Conditional Use pennit
o General Plan J\rreI1drrent
o Planned Development
o Other:
o Rezoning
o Sign
o Site Development Review
o Subdivision Map
o Variance
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
A. Planned Development: (See Planned Developrrent Rezoning SuJ:::cni.ttal Require.'l'ents)
B . Subdivision Map: (See Subdivision Map suJ:::cni. ttal Requirerrents)
C. Any Other Planning pennit: (See General SuJ:::cni.ttaLRequire!rents)
PROCESSING
(See. Planning Application Cover Letter)
REFERENCE PHONE NUMBERS
Most questions related to the Planning Application should. be directed to the Dublin
planning Department, however, sane concerns might be ad.dressed directly by another
appropriate department or agency:
1. City of Dublin:
Building Inspection:(4l5)
Engineering: (415)
Planning: (415)
police: (415)
829-0822
829-4916
829-4916
829-0566
2. Dublin San Rarron Services
Fire: (4151
vlater, Se'Ner, Garbage: (415)
District:
829-2333
828-0515
":I 7J"1n'" "7 _ ll.l;\mPM C.nnnt".v Flood control: C415l 443-9300
C
CITY OF DUe-L-IH
GOO
PA No.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM I INTE!<.1M
(Pursuont to Publ ic Resources Code Section 21000 et sec.)
The State CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) Guidelines
require the city to take an active role in preparing environ-
mental documents. This comprehensive Environmental Assessment
Form is designed to assist the City in preparing a complete and
accurate environmental assessment in a timely manner and in
conformance with the state CEQA Guidelines. The form has three
sections: General Data, Exemption, and Initial Study. The
applicant is requested to complete Section 1, General Data. The
planning Staff will prepare either Section 2, Exemption, or
section 3, Initial Study. Please type or print legibly in ink.
SECTION 1. GENERAL DATA - - - to be completed by the APPLICANT
" " -COR\oJOOD CAR WASH ",
Nome (if ony) and address of proiect: 6973 VILLAGE PARK1llAY mr:iT,HJ r.A 9456E
1.
2. Proposed use of property:
EXISTING CAR WASH
-
"3. Name, address, and telepnane of Applicant: ROGER L. WOODWARD
P.O. BOX 2688 DUBLIN, CA
--
"4.
Name, address, and telephone of con~act person 1Yl in addition to opplicant or
o instead of ap?1 icant: HOW A RD N'R"RT.Y R4h -4RI1R
448 AMADOR CuURT PLEASANTON. CA 94566
5. " Atlached plans ore 0 prel iminary orIXHully developed.
"0
6. - Building area: 8882
sq. ft.
7. Site area: 22,914 Ji]sq.ft. orDacres". 8. Current zoning:
9. Maximum Building Height. 23
rn ft .-or 0 stories.
10.
Describe ~mount of daily traffic generated by number, type and time of day:
2S0 AU~Os/nAY R.~O-S.~O )
11.
Number of oFf-street parking spaces provided: 6
12. Number of loading Facilities provided: NONE REQUIRED
~-~-~l: r V E 0'
fA A R 1 ~ 1986 .
DUBL;/\I ;- "
~.~. ;:
~- \
allA~H ENT~
\: :
.----..::;......-.,- ;',
c
G'"
_: ,u~
~,
,13. Proposed development schedule: beginning: E) /1 /86 completion: 9/1/86
14.0. If residential: number' of new 'units ; number of existing units
bedrooms ; unit sizes ;range of D sole prices or 0 ren~s
dwelling Osingle familyD duplex D ~ultiple. ,
14.b. If commercial: scope of proiectlIJ neighborhood, 0 city, 0 regio~al
sales 'area fiSO ~sq.ft. orD acre; estimated employment per shiFt 8 ; hours of
operation R. 30;:'lm-5~ 30pm
;number of new
; type of
14.c. If industrial: materials involyed
hours of operation'
, ; estimated employment per shift
14.d. If institutional: maior function
estimated oc~upancy
,.
; estimated employm~nt per shift
;hours of operation
15.
Describe City permits required: 0 Site tlevilofM~ ~"ic..""; 0 Va.~a..~c.e.)
o A~vY\iVllstr",t\"e CoMitiONU Use. f.e.Y"Mit; 0 ~ct~sif\9"-{\CV'\ (re.ZOl'\:~ j
o Pla."'~ pe.\1e.IOprf'\eN\-tj IXJ Co~itioM1 USe.. ftrMrtj 0 SI~Y\ O""'t\ ~
o othe.r
16.
Describe other public approvals required: I!J unknown; 0 locel agencies;D regional
agencies; 0 sfate agencies; 0 federal agencies; for
CERTIF-lCATlON
I i,e'~eby certify that the information submitted is true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief. I u erstond that the findings of this Environmental Assessment apply only to the
proieetasde rieddove. \. '
" Signature: <Y~ Dote: ~
Nome (print o~ type): <<.. L. ~<;J \:>'):> ",J~
k'J-.
'~w<
r.
"
')'-.7
dr /7"'- ('
-!P / v"'\. -1""1 'x -. ~...
Ii C"/ /.;; - Q
R.L. WOODWARD INDUSTRIES INC.
<> CAMINO CAR WASH
1101 EL CAMINO REAL
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94040
(415) 967-7788
<> CORWOOD CAR WASH
6973 VILLAGE PARKWAY
DUBLIN, CA 94568
(415) 828-5151
Augus t 20, 1986
Ms. Maureen O'Halloran
Associate Planner
City of Dublin
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568
RE: Your letter of May 5, 1986
~ECEIVED
AUG 201986
DUBl~N PLAI\!NING
Dear Ms. O'Halloran,
Per your request, I submit the following in answer
to your letter. Items A2, A3, A4, A5, B4, B6, B7, and
B8 are addressed in revised drawings submitted herewith.
Item A1. Detail shop activities to include pol-
ishing, waxing, interior cleaning that is currently
being done in the area of the proposed waiting room
addition.
The purpose of relocating this function is to re-
move it from a public area, to provide for a quieter
- operation, a better employee work environment, to improve
-traffic flow, and to provide a more esthetically pleasing'
site.
Item B1. Variance is hereby applied for. The 0'
, sideyard was utilized to accomodate on-site parking and
landscape areas. The building will thereby abut the
Midas trash bin which is on the property line. Using a
sideyard setback would result ifi poor land use planning.
This would not be detrimental to the neighborhood.
Item B2. Variance is hereby applied for. The pro-
posed arbor is both functionally (sun screen) and
esthetically planned (vine covered). The design of the
arbor was chosen after careful consideration of the
esthetics in relationship to the whole site plan. Any
reduction would result in an inferior design and the removal
of newly added landscaping. The encroachment would not
be detrimental to the neighborhood.
CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O. BOX 2688, DUBLIN, CA 94568
ATTACH ENT I
17A 60-00
._.....:._.1....::__.
..'.'-- ......-..-. ~:....~_:...__.. ..- - ---
r
C'"
Item B3. Variance is hereby applied for. The
plan 'calls for utilizing the 12' sideyard, which is
now a waste of space and a maintenance problem. We
desire to build to the property line which has pre-
viously been granted to Midas so as to better utilize
the lot and provide for a more esthetically pleasing
site which would not be detrimental to the neighborhood.
Item B4. The plan has been modified to provide
an additional 6 on-site parking spaces for a total of 11.
Parking for customers is not required as they do not
leave their cars. Our customer waits for the processing
of his/her car and claims it when it is finished, thereby
eleviating any need for customer parking.
Item B5. Our plan calls for fire retardant im-
pregnated redwood, which meets building code requirements.
o
L. Woodward
sident
RLW:lg