Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986: 11-03-1986 TriValley Plng Task Study Group CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: November 3, 1986 SUBJECT: Tri-Valley Planning Task Study Group - Final Report EXHIBITS ATTACHED: (Copies of the Final Report were previously distributed to the Planning Commission.) RECOMMENDATION: if" Consider and forward recommendations to the City Council. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None. DESCRIPTION: In February, 1986, the Tri-Valley Planning Task Study Group was formed as an ad hoc committee to review major Tri-Valley area planning issues. The Group has completed its Final Report and has requested the Planning Commission to consider making recommendations to the City Council. On October 20, 1986, Betty Croly, Alameda County Assistant Planning Director, made a brief presentation of the policy recommendations to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission took the Report under consideration, continued the matter, and asked for Staff comments. Staff has provided comments on each group of Final Report Policy Recommendations. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider the Staff comments and forward recommendations to the City Coucil. Group 1. Agency Roles and Responsibilities STAFF COMMENTS: Consider. Compatible goals and objectives, periodic joint studies, and a central information clearinghouse may be desirable, but a lot of practical mechanics would need to be worked out, such as: Who would determine whether the goals and objectives were compatible? How would conflicts be resolved? How much would the studies and clearinghouse operation cost, and who would pay? Group 2. Population STAFF COMMENTS: Recommend for inclusion in the County General Plan. It would be appropriate for the County to request the State to maintain employment data and to periodically update the County General Plan. ITEM NO. 9.d- COPIES TO: Betty Croly Group 3. Housing Condition STAFF COMMENTS: Recommend for inclusion in the County General Plan. It would be appropriate for the County to encourage housing maintenance as needed. Group 4. Housing Opportunity STAFF COMMENTS: Consider. Encouraging commercial/industrial projects to participate in housing programs, encouraging State and Federal infrastructure programs, educating local residents and businesses regarding infrastructure, and advanced planning for multi-family and other uses may help expand housing opportunities. Many of the other policy recommendations are compatible with existing Dublin General Plan policies. Group 5. Employment Opportunities STAFF COMMENTS: Consider. Encouraging a variety of commercial/industrial/office uses, and encouraging employment opportunities for all persons may be desirable. Group 6. Commercial/Industrial/Office Development STAFF COMMENTS: Consider. Providing flexibility for a variety of commercial/industrial/office uses may be desirable. Group 7. Public Facilities and Services STAFF COMMENTS: Consider. Focusing on community-level parks, and suggesting that the regional park district use existing parklands, may affect neighborhood parks and have other implications. The Dublin General Plan has a policy regarding additional sources of water supply. Group 8. Transportation STAFF COMMENTS: Consider. While Staff agrees that developments planned for the Tri-Valley will have a significant impact on area transportation facilities, the creation of a new entity might not be the most appropriate mechanism for addressing the problem. A new entity would raise many questions, such as: Who would participate? How much would it cost and who would pay? What authority or regulatory powers would the new entity have? How would the new entity coordinate with the City, County and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)? Perhaps alternative mechanisms should be explored, such as City and County-elected officials in the Tri-Valley area forming a group to cooperatively address the transportation problem. -2- Group 9. Environmental Resources STAFF COMMENTS: Consider. Maintaining vineyards, reviewing agricultural policies, and establishing standards for quarry uses may be appropriate for the County General Plan. Group 10. Hazards/Public Health and Safety STAFF COMMENTS: Recommend for inclusion in the County General Plan. The policy recommendations are compatible with existing Dublin General Plan policies regarding hazardous materials. -3-