Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout86-046 Fire Safe Roofing Matl Ordinance Amendment CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: March 2, 1987 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff if1) SUBJECT: PA 86-046 Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance Amendment GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT: A proposed Ordinance Amendment providing for: 1) the establishment of a building permit process for re-roofing of more than 25%; 2) a requirement that re-roofing in the "flatland areas" be "in-kind" or of a more fire retardant nature; 3) a requirement that in areas designated as "High Fire Hazard Areas", roofing materials of Level B or better shall be utilized for new developments; 4) a requirement that re-roofing in areas designated as "High Fire Hazard Areas" be of Class C or better materials; and 5) a requirement that smoke detectors and spark arrestors be installed in all new houses. PROPERTY AND ZONING: The proposed ordinance would cover the entire City. The proposed Fire Safe Roof Areas would be generally on the west side of the City in the areas adjacent to the hills and on the east side of the City between the Dougherty Hills and Dougherty Road. APPLICANT: City of Dublin ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A Draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. BACKGROUND: On April 28, 1986, the City Council initiated consideration of a Building Code Amendment regarding use of fire safe roofing materials. At that meeting the City Council referred the matter to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation. ITEM NO. ~.L( COPIES TO: DSRSD - Fire Department Attn.: Tom Hathcox V. Taugher Committee for Fire Safe Roofing Attn.: Robert Burns Red Cedar Shingle & Handsplit Shake Bureau - Attn.: Harry Abney National Forest Products Assoc. Attn,: Wallace A. Norum File PA 86-046 Consideration of the Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance was prompted by the March 6, 1986, letter from Paul Ryan, General Manager of Dublin San Ramon Services District. Within that letter Mr. Ryan advised the City that the District Board of Directors had reviewed a Draft Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance at its March 4, 1986 meeting and had directed that it be referred to the Dublin City Council with a request for adoption at the earliest possible time. This item was initially heard at the Planning Commission meeting of July 21, 1986. Following discussion between Staff and the Commission, the matter was continued indefinitely to permit Staff to arrange to have the appropriate industry representatives to attend a future Planning Commission meeting to speak on the pros and cons related to the proposed Ordinance. The item was renoticed for the November 17, 1986, hearing in anticipa- tion of Staff making the necessary arrangements to secure representation from the industry representatives at that hearing (i.e., representatives from the Committee for Fire Safe Roofing and the Building Industry Association and/or the Red Cedar Shingle & Handsplit Shake Bureau). Staff was not able to secure the necessary coordination between the respective industry representatives to provide for the desired presentation at the Planning Commission November 17, 1986, hearing. Therefore, the Planning Commission continued the item to the hearing of December 15, 1986, and sub- sequently to January 19, 1987, to allow Staff to arrange the desired presentation. Attendance at the January 19, 1987, included the following industry and public agency representatives: Robert Burns, Executive Director of the Committee for Firesafe Roofing, Harry Abney, Executive Director of the Red Cedar Shingle & Handsplit Shake Bureau, Vie Taugher, City of Dublin Building Official and Tom Hathcox, of the Dublin San Ramon Services Department - Fire Department. After considering testimony from Staff and the above referenced industry and public agency representatives, the Commission closed the public hearing and directed Staff to make the following modifications to the Draft Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance: Modify Draft Ordinance to allow re-roofing projects in the "flatland areas" of the City to utilize "in-kind" roofing materials (allowing property owners the option to utilize roofing materials of a more fire retardant nature). Modify Draft Ordinance to require that in areas designated as "High Fire Hazard Areas", roofing materials of Class C or Class B or better be utilized for new developments. (Staff advised that they would have to meet further with the Fire Department to establish the "High Fire Hazard Areas".) Modify Draft Ordinance to require that re-roofing projects in areas designated as "High Fire Hazard Areas" utilize materials of Class C fire rating. Modify Draft Ordinance to require that smoke detectors and spark arrestors be installed in all new houses with a commensurate education process established to advise property owners on the manner to care for them. (Mr. Taugher advised the Commssion that smoke detectors are currently required for construction projects with a value over $1,000.00 and that all new houses require smoke detectors.) Although Staff advised the Commission they could be in a position to present a modified Draft Fire Safe Roofing Ordinance at the Planning Commission meeting of February 17, 1987, the length of that agenda ultimately led to the matter being postponed to the meeting of March 2, 1987. At a meeting of February 25, 1987, between Staff and Tom Hathcox of the DSRSD - Fire Department, Mr. Hathcox recommended two additional modifications to the Draft Ordinance and accompanying Fire Safe Roof Area Map: -2- Require that roofing materials of Class B or better (rather than Class C or better) be utilized for new developments in the identified "High Fire Hazard Areas". Expand the Fire Safe Roof Area Map to include the upper reaches of the Estate Homes subdivision (at the northwest corner of the City) and establish a requirement that re-roofing projects in that area utilize roofing materials of a Class C or better rating. To provide for these modifications, the Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance and accompanying Fire Safe Roofing Map would have to be modified to reflect the following three sub-areas and the following corresponding roofing regulations: Roofing Area New Construction Replacement Roofing Roofing Area 1 Class B or Better (All homes in this area currently meet this standard.) "In-Kind" Materials (Class B or Better) Roofing Area 2 Class C or Better a) (Only a percentage of homes in this area currently meet this standard.) b) For Projects resulting in less than 25% re- roofing - "in-kind" or better materials. For 25% to 50% re- roofing - Class C or better materials for portion re-roofed. c) For more than 50% re- roofing - Class C or better materials. Roofing Area 3 Alt. A - Class C or Better "In-Kind" or Better Alt. B - No special fire safe roofing require- ments apply. (Roughly 50% of the homes currently have Class C or better roofs). Attached to this Supplemental Staff Report is a Revised Draft Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance reflecting the modifications requested by the Commission at the January 19, 1987, meeting and also reflecting the additional changes requested by the DSRSD - Fire Department. In reviewing the Revised Draft Ordinance, the Commission should give special attention to two items where additional direction appears necessary: 1) Determination of merit in expanding the boundary of the "High Fire Hazard Area" to create a Roofing Area - 2 in the northwest corner of the City. 2) Determination of what special roofing requirements, if any, should be applied for new construction in the "flatland areas" (denoted as Roofing Area 3 on the enclosed Fire Safe Roof Map). -3- RECOMMENDATION FORMAT: 1) 2) 3) Open public hearing. Hear Staff presentation. Hear presentations from industry and agency representatives and the public. Close public hearing. Consider and act on two Draft Resolutions: A. A Resolution regarding the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance for PA 86-046 (Exhibit B). B. A Resoltuion recommending City Council approval of Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance - PA 86-046 (Exhibit C). 4) 5) ACTION: Based on the above Staff Report, Staff recommends the Planning Commission provide direction on the two items identified in this Report as requiring additional Commission direction and then adopt the following two Resolutions (modified as necessary to reflect the Commission's direction): Exhibit A - approving the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance for PA 86-046 and Exhibit B a Resolution recommending City Council approval of Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance - PA 86-046. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A - Draft Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance (including Draft Fire Safe Roof Area Map) Exhibit B - Draft Resolution of recommending approval of Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance for PA 86-046 Exhibit C - Draft Resolution recommending approval of PA 86-046 Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance BACKGROUND ATTACHMENTS - 1. January 19, 1987, Planning Commission Agenda Statement/Staff Report (without attachments). 2. Section from 1982 Uniform Building Code pertaining to spark arrestors. 3. Draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance for PA 86-046. -4- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A FIRE SAFE ROOFING MATERIALS ORDINANCE THROUGH MODIFICATION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE AS ADOPTED BY THE DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL BY REFERENCE The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5 and 17958.7 the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby expressly finds that the non- administrative changes set forth below are reasonably necessary, while also being reflective of reasonable economic and structural design considerations, because of certain climatic, geologic and topographic conditions within the City creating the potential for extremely uncontrollable and contagious fire situations which can result in danger to life and property in the community. These specific conditions are as follows: 1. The climatic conditions within specified areas of the City of Dublin are such that: - Extensive fire damage may occur due to the ready ignition, intense burning and rapid spread of fire involving untreated wood shakes and shingles caused by dryness, high climatic temperatures and/or winds. - Extensive fire damage may occur due to the limited effectiveness and capabilities of the fire district to control exterior fires due to early exhaustion of firefighters subject to high climatic temperatures. - Extensive fire damage may occur due to the susceptibility of untreated wood shake or shingle roofing and building exteriors to ignition from other fires involving either nearby dry vegetation or other buildings, thereby resulting in multiple fires due to dryness, high temperatures and/or winds. - Extensive fire damage may occur due to the reduced effectiveness of hose streams due to disintegration and misdirection caused by winds. Extensive fire damage may occur untreated wood shake or shingle roofs overhead electrical transmission lines caused by the ready ignition of exposed to arcing and sparking of caused by winds. 2. The geologic conditions within specified areas of the City of Dublin are such that: - Extensive fire damage may occur due to limited effectiveness and capabilities of the fire district due to reduced and delayed response of fire companies on arterial routes obstructed by collapsed overpasses and bridges and/or landslides caused by earthquakes and/or unstable soils. - Extensive fire damage may occur due to limited and/or delayed response of the fire district due to dispersion to multiple fires caused by escaping natural gas or electrical transmission equipment damaged by earthquake. r' ':~ ,A: t;~ ~, ~r; v." ,; ~ " fr -~-;; ,-. ,,,.. _~,~w~__ .___,_. -->- ",.-- ..---- jJ;:#rI If ff S~ ;€cJCF/N'(:r ./11~1J#5 O/'-tJ/N!J#{E 3. The topographic and related conditions within specified areas of the City of Dublin are such that: Extensive fire damage may occur due to multiple fires involving untreated wood shake or shingle roofing and building exteriors ignited because of exposure to fires involving other buildings or dry vegetation within close proximity but not readily accessible because of terrain. - Extensive fire damage may occur due to the inability of the fire district to gain sufficient access to fires involving untreated wood shake or shingle roofing and building exteriors due to terrain, slopes, landscaping, fences, electrical transmission lines and other buildings. Section 2. Modification of Uniform Building Code. Under the of Dublin reference authority of Section 50020 adopted Ordinance No, the provisions of the 1982 et. seq. of the Government Code, the City on , 1987, which incorporated by Uniform Building Code. 1. Subsection (b) of Section 3202, Chapter 32 of the Uniform Building Code, 1982 Edition, is hereby modified by adding the following paragraphs to read: A. For structures with an occupancy classification of R or M within areas designated as Roofing Area 1 on the map of Fire Safe Roof Areas: 1) Any new roof shall fire rating of Class UBC Standard 32-7, consisting solely of tiles. use roof covering material with a B or better, which complys with or shall be made of material concrete, metal, slate, or clay 2) Any roof covering alteration, including replacement or repair, shall use roof covering material with a fire rating equal to or better than the existing roof covering material or shall be made of material consisting solely of concrete, metal, slate, or clay tiles. B. For structures with an occupancy classification of R or M within areas designated a Roofing Area 2 on the map of Fire Safe Roof Areas: 1) Any new roof shall use roof covering material with a fire rating of Class C or better, which complys with UBC Standard 32-7, or shall be made of material consisting solely of concrete, metal, slate, or clay tiles. 2) Any roof covering alteration, including replacement or repair, made within a 12 month period which: a) does not exceed 25% of the projected area of the existing roofing shall use material similar to the existing roof covering material or with a fire rating equal to or better than the existing roof covering material, or shall be made of material consisting solely of concrete, metal, slate, or clay tiles. b) exceeds 25% but not 50% of the projected area of the existing roofing shall use roof covering material with with a fire rating of Class C or better, which complys with UBC Standard 32-7, or shall be made of material consisting solely of concrete, metal, slate, or clay tiles. -2- c) exceeds 50% of the projected area of the existing roofing shall use on the entire roof roof covering material with a fire rating of Class C or better, which complys with UBC Standard 32-7, or shall be made of material consisting solely of concrete, metal, slate, or clay tiles. C. For structures with an occupancy classification of R or M within areas designated a Roofing Area 3 on the map of Fire Safe Roof Areas: 1) Any new roof (shall/may) use roof covering material with a fire rating of Class C or better which complys with UBC Standard 32-7, or shall be made of material consisting solely of concrete, metal, slate, or clay tiles. 2) Any roof covering alteration, including replacement or repair shall use material similar to the existing roof covering material, or with a fire rating equal to or better than the existing roof covering material, or shall be made of material consisting solely of concrete, metal, slate, or clay tiles. 2. Section 3210, Chapter 32 of the Appendix of the Uniform, Building Code, 1982 Edition, is hereby modified by adding s second paragraph to read: "A building permit shall be required for any roof covering alteration, replacement or repair for any structure with an occupancy classification of R or M where any such roof covering alteration, replacement or repair made within a 12 month period exceeds 25 percent of the projected area of the existing roof. 3. Requirements for skylights and penthouses shall be as contained in Chapters 34 and 36, respectively, of this Code. Section 3. Map of Fire Safe Roof Areas. A map of Fire Safe Roof Areas, as prepared by the Dublin San Ramon Services District Fire Department and the City of Dublin, is attached hereby as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. Said map may be amended from time to time by action of the Services District and the City, based upon recommendation of the Fire Chief of the District and the Chief of Planning of the City. Section 4. Referral to State of California. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7, the City Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Ordinance to the State Department of Housing and Community Development before the date the Ordinance becomes effective. Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance shall not be affected thereby. Section 6. Continuing Effect. The provisions of this Ordinance editions of the Uniform Building provisions and/or modifications of with this Ordinance. shall remain in effect even if subsequent Code are adopted to the extent that the such future editions are not incompatible -3- Section 7. Effective Date and Posting of Ordinance. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in after the date of its passage. The City Clerk cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 State of California. force thirty (30) days from and of the City of Dublin shall three (3) public places in the of the Government Code of the ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Dublin on this , 1987, by the following votes: PASSED AND _____day of AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk -4- Mayor ,,',\,' '\{?\ \-':':~">' ~~" 21t \ <\::, , ' '. " ......,,'\'. "\\\t,',. \\~?}~, fl.oo F",.., Cr ^~A ~ ' , ,,:'; ~F'N Jr~~ ~ -". ~~:." _ ___ _ . . __'_-: __ -- -:_~"~':__:'_-~-~~u-:-_-~:::::::::-:::'U .-- r- , --~ ~._~- - ~ - -, . -- -- - - :: ~ -..::: ::: ...~.~-~-~~ :-~~-~.~.~: ~~: ~;.:~~'!~:::::-::.._. n. . -.....- . ..' ._u__::.---:".....: .' ._,::::::::,~~.::'::-::~-::'.:';; .,.-' _u. .-.-.'" ...u.~~...h ":::::::::: :,,:.::::~:., . ...~f:: .' ,~-, ' --.-:: ...", ..,\il. l .......~:~:.::::--:: ...~____ .n.. -- .--....:::..~--~:..~~~.-::.:----.~:~:~-~ . .... CITY OF DUBLIN BASE MAP SCALE' 1In.8ooft. DAre:.M,.Y lV83 S "'PAMD ANTINA 'T, . & THOMPSON, INC. _v ..'.' ',; l.'f.~;~;r;"" "','" " ~j{l:~;~;:~.;'i,/;,i.:tf;~~ J!' ,......."'..'i1;lfj,...... it'" "''' . ,,~:7);' :.;~t~:d!~~14~~~~~~1j:~ RESOLUTION NO. 87- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PA 86-046 FIRE SAFE ROOFING MATERIALS ORDINANCE WHEREAS, on April 28, 1986, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to consider adoption of a Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance through modification of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the City by reference; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State Guidelines and City environmental regulation, require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impact and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, an Initial Study was conducted finding that the Ordinance Amendment, as proposed, would not have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been prepared for this application; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was given in all respects as required by State Law; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review and consider the Negative Declaration at its public hearings on July 21, 1986, January 19, 1987, and March 2, 1987; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission finds as follows: 1. That the project prov~s~ons of the Draft Ordinance, contained with- in PA 86-046 Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance Amendment, will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been prepared and processed in accordance with State and local Environmental Laws and Guideline Regulations. 3. That the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance is complete and adequate. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission hereby adopts the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance for PA 86-046 Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance Amendment PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of March, 1987. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director ~Q; tlra.H- 2eJo/u'6'bt1 - ;v{~) ( Pf?' :~ ___~'H_ . 1.1 8 {j; -~h RESOLUTION NO. 87- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF PA 86-046 FIRE SAFE ROOFING MATERIALS ORDINANCE WHEREAS, on April 28, 1986, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to consider adoption of a Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance through modification of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the City by reference; and WHEREAS, a Draft Ordinance amending the City's Ordinance regarding Fire Safe Roofing Materials has been prepared; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received and considered testimony at public hearings on said Draft Ordinance on July 21, 1986, January 19, 1987, and March 2, 1987; and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearings was provided in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, said Draft Ordinance has been reviewed in accordance with the prov~s~ons of the California Environmental Quality Act and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been adopted (Planning Commission Resolution No. 86- ) for this project as it will not have significant effect on the environment; and Commission Commission WHEREAS, at the January 19, 1987, public hearing the Planning directed Staff to modify the Draft Ordinance presented to the at that hearing to reflect the following generalized modifications: 1) that re-roofing 25% or less of a dwelling not require a building permit; 2) that re-roofing in the "flatland" areas be "in kind" or of a more fire retardant nature; 3) that in areas designated as "high fire hazard areas", roofing materials of Level C or Level B, or more fire retardant, shall be utilized for new developments; 4) that re-roofing in areas designated as "high fire hazard areas" be with Class C or more fire retardant materials; and 5) that smoke detectors and spark arrestors be required to be installed in all new houses. WHEREAS, the March 2, 1987, Staff Report was submitted with a modified Draft Ordinance and with a recommendation that the City Council approve said modified Draft Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations, and testimony as hereinabove set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find that the Draft Ordinance will meet the following purposes: 1. Provide regulations pertaining to the type of roofing materials used in various parts of the City which will serve to mitigate certain climatic, geologic and topographic conditions within the City which create the potential for extremely uncontrollable and contagious fire situations which can result in danger to life and property in the community. 2. Provides regulations consistent with the Implementing Policies outlined within the Environmental Resources Management Section: Seismic Safety and Safety Elements of the City General Plan by enacting, in part, a High Hazard Ordinance specifying use of fire safe roofing materials. ~~f S , J}"Jf &J"Iu:h~ - ,ee(t7mtn(y,a/~ {~'~b~~tA8(p1J'Ifp r~'" , f'ljO &r BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find that the Draft Ordinance is consistent with the City's General Plan, and does hereby recommend that the City Council adopt Ordinance Amendment (PA 86- 046) regarding Fire Safe Roofing Materials. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of March, 1987, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director -2- 1." (" r- CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: January 19, 1987 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff \i6"l{- SUBJECT: PA 86-046 Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance Amendment GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT: A proposed Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance providing for Class C or better roof covering for all new apartments, hotels, dwellings and accessory buildings and for Class B or better roof covering in the area designated, on an official City map, as a Fire Safe Roof Area. The proposed Ordinance would also specifically require that building permits be secured for re-roofing, and that there be at least two additional roof inspections for the building permit process for roofing jobs. PROPERTY AND ZONING: The proposed ordinance would cover the entire City. The proposed Fire Safe Roof Areas would be generally on the west side of the City in the areas adjacent to the hills and on the east side of the City between the Dougherty Hills and Dougherty Road. APPLICANT: City of Dublin NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the November 17, 1986, hearing was published in THE HERALD, and posted in public buildings. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A Draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. BACKGROUND: On April 28, 1986, the City Council initiated consideration of a Building Code Amendment regarding use of fire safe roofing materials. The City Council referred the matter to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation (see Attachment #2). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ITEM NO. <6.1 COPIES TO: DSRSD - Fire Department V. Taugher ' PA File 86-046 Committee for Fire Safe Roofing Attn.: Robert Burns Red Cedar Shingle & Handsplit Shake Bureau - Attn.: Harry Abney National Forest Products Assoc. ,; '" ""'. 1"~'" ,..".,., ~-J.. ,,~. ~. ,,'..; ~ ~H ~~:J, I /-/'1-87 Plallllill'J UmIfJ/55"/l?YI dM ~rf -;-,~~ " , 'i:~,;"'I~~f:1l~:~;/~..::':;.::,~"i;?~Y0.i~~jJf!~ ~('J;i~I ,_ ,~: "v;.::'" .:::::;.;~'~(;fi~:'.-;;~::: <:i:::.( i:' , Consideration of 'the ,Fire-:Sa~eRoofing Materials Ordinance was prompted by the March 6, 1986, ';letter :fromPaul Ryan, General Manager of Dublin San Ramon Services District.-C:'!Within:that >letter (see Attachment #5), Mr. Ryan advised the City that the District Board of Directors had reviewed a Draft Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance at its March 4, 1986 meeting and had directed that it be. referred to the Dublin City Council with' a request for adoption at the 'earliest poss~ble time. This item was i~itialliheard at the Planning Commission meeting of July 21, 1986. Following discussion between Staff and the Commission, the matter was continued indefinitely to permit Staff to arrange to have the appropriate industry representatives to attend a future Planning Commission meeting to speak on the pros and cons related to the proposed Ordinance. The item was renoticed for the November 17, 1986, hearing in anticipa- tion of Staff making the necessary arrangements to secure representation from the industry representatives at that hearing (i.e., representatives from the Committee for Fire Safe Roofing and the Building Industry Association and/or the Red Cedar Shingle & Handsplit Shake Bureau). Staff was not able to, secure the necessary coordination between the respective industry representatives to provide for the desired presentation at the Planning Commission November 17, 1986, hearing. Therefore, the Planning Commission continued the item to the hearing of December 15, 1986, and sub- sequently to January 19, 1987, to allow Staff to arrange the desired presentation. Attendance at the January 19, 1987, meeting by industry representatives is anticipated by Robert Burns, Executive Director of the Committee for Firesafe Roofing, Harry Abney, Executive Director of the Red Cedar Shingle & Handsplit Shake Bureau, and Wallace A. Norum, District Manager, Naional Forest Product Association. Attendance at the hearing is also anticipated by the Building Official and a representative of the Dublin San Ramon Services Department - Fire Department. ANALYSIS: The attached Draft Fire Safe Roofing Ordinance was prepared by the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District (with assistance from a consulting Fire Protection Engineer). The Draft Ordinance was modified by the Dublin San Ramon Services District (D.S.R.S.D.) to reflect the appropriate references to the City of Dublin. The Draft Ordinance and the accompanying map of the proposed Fire Safe Roofing Areas were reviewed by the D.S.R.S.D. Board of Directors at their meeting of March 4, 1986. The Board directed that the District General Manager, Paul Ryan, to refer the Draft Ordinance to the Dublin City Council with a request that the Ordinance be adopted at the earliest possible time. At the April 28, 1986, City Council meeting, the item, appearing on the Council's Consent Calendar, was referred to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation. Features of the Draft Ordinance The essential feature of the Draft Ordinance is the establishment of a basic Class tiC" fire retardancy rating as a minimum, Citywide standard. The Draft Ordinance would also establish increased requirements for higher risk areas as indicated on the map of the proposed Fire Safe Roofing Areas. If the Ordinance is adopted, it is anticipated that copies of the official map will be maintained by the City and the D.S.R.S.D. to facilitate the administration of the Ordinance. The report from the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District dated February 13, 1986, (see Attachment #1), provides additional summary informa- tion regarding the .thr~e basic..ratings fr~~the Uniform Building Code for tested roof coverings'":(A; 'BandC). ',The report also describes where and when the various types of roof would be required to be utilized if the Draft Ordinance was adopted Costs vs. Benefits ot the Draft Ordinance The subject matter of this Draft Ordinance has proven to b~ fairly controversial when considered by neighboring communities. Its adoption would cause some increase in new home construction and re-roofing costs. The extent of these increased costs is subject to debate. The Ordinance may also influence the architectural design of new structures by limiting the extent of wood shake roofing used. The benefits of the more stringent roofing requirements of the Ordinance include a higher level of fire safety to the community. Available statistics indicate that the property damage that may be avoided by the application of the roofing requirements may be worthwhile but there are also statistics indicating that roof fires are not a significant regional problem, Input secured from representatives of the building industry and roofing manufacturers, as well as fire service personnel, has lead Staff to a conclusion that the various statistics available suggest a moderate and manageable increased cost to new home builders. The cost to the average homeowner under the re-roofing provisions of the Ordinance, however, will vary greatly depending upon the circumstances. A detailed summary of the principal arguments for and against a Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance are outlined in the report from the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District (see Attachment #1). Elaboration on the principle arguments against the Ordinance are contained within the report prepared by the Red Cedar Shingle and Handsplit Shake Bureau entitled, "The Facts About Wood Roofing Safety: A Matter of Perspective" (see Attachment #9A). Related Issues - Action by Neighboring Communities In the process of considering adoption of similiar Ordinances, neighboring communities received testimony dealing with the full range of the issues outlined above or within the referenced support materials of this report. Major discussion regarding the proposed adoption of similiar Ordinances seems to center on the aesthetic implications of increasing the fire rating of roof materials, the practical aspects of enforcement of such an Ordinance and the justification of requiring Class "C" roofing materials in the flat land areas. In the most recent action, the Town Council of the Town of Danville decided that application of a Class "C" minimum to flatter and more accessible areas of the community was unreasonable in view of local fire response times, costs to builders and homeowners and the problems associated with enforcement. The aesthetic implications were also discussed. Along that line of discus- sion, testimony was expressed that the requirement for Class "C" or better roofing material might tend to limit the range of design choices available to builders. In response to the above concerns, the Town Council of the Town of Danville choose to adopt an Ordinance that differed from the one forwarded by the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District in the following respects: Class "C" roofing material would be required as a minimum in designated hazard areas; the environmental review process might increase this minimum standard to Class "A" or "B" (and conceivably require even greater fire protection measures - i.e. sprinklers in certain cases). The approach to regulation of the use of roofing materials was tied to General Plan Safety Element Standards recognizing the following criteria: a. distance from fire stations b. fuel loading,(the nature and density of nearby vegetation) c. slope and grade features d. wind and temperature conditions (microclimate) e. nature and density of proposed and nearbY,development f. water availability g. any identifiable special risk factors -3- " -, _{~l\?1.~~r7':C"'?i,::?;; , ";- . ., i :. " ~ 'i ;.:i, .' ~ ;rJf<~:;?;,~:F~:":/c';;- /" . ",I Comments from the City Building Official Vie Taugher, the City Building Official, has indicated that he has reservations regarding the proposal to require Class "C" or better roofing for re-roofing projects in the flatland areas of the City. He indicates that a quick drive-through survey of these areas indicates that 50% - 60% already have fire safe roofing materials. His reservations are tied to concerns whether adequate documentation exists of fire hazards to flatland areas, to justify the imposition of this requirement. Additionally, he indicates concern that costs to modify an existing structure to accomodate a fire safe roofing material may, in practice, be more expensive than indicated by the studies proposed by the Fire Safe Roofing Committee. Actual up front costs would have to account for engineering design costs to assure the roof could accomodate the weight of the new materials and may need to include structural modifications to the existing roof intrastructure. Mr. Taugher also voiced concern that replacing a roof with wood shakes or shingles with one of asphalt tile, or equivalent materials, may have a visually significant impact to a neighborhood if the surrounding homes utilize wood shake or shingles. Mr. Taugher indicated support of an Ordinance that would require use of Fire Safe Roofing Materials in identified Fire Safe Roof Area, for new residential devlopments located anywhere in the City and for reroofing projects where fire save roofing materials are already in place. Conclusion and Recommendation The Draft Ordinance should be discussed fully because of its long term implications and probable additional costs to builders and homeowners. Staff recommends that this Commission meeting be used as an information gathering hearing to allow Staff and appropriate industry representatives to present the pros and cons of adoption of the Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION FORMAT: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Hear Staff presentation. Open public hearing. Hear presentations from those in favor of adoption of a Fire Safe Roofing Ordinance. Hear presentation from those opposed to adoption of a Fire Safe Roofing Ordinance. Provide Staff comments and direction regarding the proposed Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance for additional Staff review and/or revision to the Draft Ordinance. Continue the public hearing to the Commission meeting of February 2, 1987, or later date as appropriate. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A - Draft of Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance Exhibit B - Draft Resolution of recommending approval of Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance for PA 86-046 Exhibit C - Draft Resolution recommending approval of PA 86-046 Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance -4- ."y~,:~{~~~~~lt~J2~~~ BACKGROUND ATTACHMENTS - 1. San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District Staff Reports dated February 13, 1986, and March 12, 1986, both entitled "Fire Safe Roof Ordinance". 2. Memorandum, with attachments, from Victor Taugher, Building Official, to Planning Commission regarding proposed Ordinance for Fire Safe Roofing, dated May 5, 1986. 3. 1982 Uniform Building Code Standards, pages 993-1001: "Test Standard for de terming the Fire Retardancy of Roof Covering Materials." 4. Letter dated March 4, 1986, from DSRSD General Manager, Paul Ryan, referring Draft Ordinance to City Council. 5. Draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance for PA 86-046. 6. Portions of Minutes from Planning Commission meeting of July 21, 1986. 7. Background information supplied by the Committee for Fire Safe Roofing supporting adoption of a Fire Safe Roofing Ordinance, including: 7a. Letter dated December 20, 1986, summar~z~ng points to be discussed by representative of the Fire Safe Roofing Committee at the January 19, 1987, Planning Commission meeting. 7b. "Statement of Purpose", undated. 7c. "Cost and Investment Analysis for Re-roofing Pitched Roofs", dated July, 1985, prepared by the Committee for Fire Safe Roofing. 7d. Fire Resistant Roofing Requirements for Residential Structures-47 Northern California Jurisdiction, dated January, 1986. 7e. List of communities that have adopted fire retardant roofing ordinances. 7f. "The Need to Restrict the Use of Wood Shakes and Shingles", an undated report prepared by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District in support of a Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance considered by the City of Concord. 7g. Selected newspaper articles pertaining to roofing fire hazards. 8. Background information supplied by the Red Cedar Shingle & Handsplit Shake Bureau (prepared by the Bureau unless otherwise indicated), including: 8a. "The Facts About Wood Roofing Safety: A Matter of Perspective", undated. 8b. "Fire: The Facts about Wood Roofing", excerpt from TF News, a publication of the Texas Forest Service, dated Winter 1981. 8c. "Questions to ask the Fire Officials before City Councils pertaining to their Request for Fire Retardant Roofing Materials", prepared by the Red Cedar Shingle & Handsplit Shake Bureau, undated. -5- r. 8d. "Estimated U.S. Building Fire Losses Caused by Sparks on Roofs", Red Cedar Shingle & Handsplit Shake Bureau, undated. 8e. Contra Costa County Fire Loss Statistical Tabulation, 1928 - 1983. 8f. "Ventilate - Don't Suffocate", prepared by the Red Cedar Shingle & Handsplit Shake Bureau, undated. 8g. "City of Pleasanton Fire Retardant Roof Costs", undated. 8h. Memorandum from Moraga Fire Retardant Roof Committee to the Moraga Town Councilmembers, dated July 1, 1986. -6- .... o ..... '" N o ..... '" cu 1"0 fI'J 11.) l! ..c 8..~ ,,- CO U E.!! -5~ :.a 0 c.. :::1'- :::i ~ uS :~ '0 .S "5 8 .~ eu v:I ~ .oU S-S C ~. >. -5 to'~ "8 o.~5E c "0=_1-00 o~ .~ ~ ,g ~ S ~ ~ 0" fr"'B] g "0 0 ~ aCUV;bO :.:5. () I.... .s :.: .5 ~ u .s ~ .~ '0 .E l.I...o ~ '" 8 - t> .- Co "E '- ~ g u Vl._ v:I 0 .0 0 8 61:>8..'" 8U ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ] ~ E 0 u u .g t.9 ~ ~~~-5 ......c .~ ~ .:: -a-s -g .~ .0 c:; ~'3 cu..... >. -0.0;';: ,€O... 0'"'" C v:I C':I 8 C':I V,) cu'- In cu.::: ~ -5-5Q.\C':I oCc ~ 1-0'- c.J"E t':S =' U.... t':S..c = 0 .~ >. u~Q.~ Q.\2 t\1 -;-g~t':S ~o .~ -7 ;~ ~ ~ .5 "'S. ~8 ~r-....."O-"'C e ~:~E]~ ~ri ~Z",u:h8 i:;'c = ~.o.... ~ ..: c B r_' "0 r_' >. 0 tn "'" C> II) >. ;a;acu-cu~rIl "'~ S ~ S ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ .g .CI).~ I.C ~Cl+::..._~-5 , ...,,- >.~ >'c llJ "'COCOUo..c ~ IJ') cu.o ~'.:::"" ~ :~ [~ ~ ~ ~ ":eg.~~5~ 1S o..~'t: ~~ cu ~:B g 8. sa 0 ~ "Vi t':S = 0. VJ 8:0 .g ~ ~ ~ t':S c.g o.VJcu]uo -8 g..~ ~ u oS a -",oc"'C2S...... c; '";CElU-~oc-5 .c ('Q:._ C ~ v:I 11.) 0 Vl ~ -5 .~ 0 ~:O''::: .~ >;0.. ~u::scoe~ u"...:""oo;~g"o; s-8,,~:&U08 .- (1:1 '"0 B .0 8 " U U -C:.aOc .Q"a:o U....U::sc;B=r.n..::: .: .5 :E 1: -5 e ~ 6 g: ...."'0....00 :::IVJ~.o &. U .....v iJ' 8 "" "" 8 Co.:: 0 ~ c.- c ~ 0 '" '" 0- C 8 ~ "'.- u tI'.1 g"N ~ :a E CQ 50 sa ;;a......"Oouu~eu ~~~.~-5-s('")~g 8""r- c" bOO-5 ~ _ .- 8 N l.'U w.5 Z c ~ ca....c.... "'-=."0 cu_ Uc.8\O,-cQJ~..cU ~ '2,S N.. ~ ~ 8 ~ :;; ai ,~-e~o ~ ~F'] u "'-'." "0 "'....c....c .. f'f') C .. "" _ 0'- 0 ca U)=""~olnC~c; . >-f"o."'CN-cVl";j G.l ~f'f')~~]a~~~o~ E ~ 8. Q.. ti e ClJ u ..... -. Cor') :E rn g.~ 5 g U) i ~ 0 u "'u'" '= ~_"'. ,_Z ;b'f~';,%,;~'~ U :0 ~ >, .0 "" ~ .:; <:1' ~ '" " ,B ~g2~ H. ~H~ ~ ::t bl)= C > ~ .c ,-. b.O 9< ?. "OcC':lo GJ O""""c.,..... GJ .- .c .c C "';; 0 ~ .2 "'C '- c.5 Vl -5 .... u '"'" r- ._ GJ 0 .- - Vl 0 c :c_- :: ~ s:: -u ~"to ""'""'::::: ~.t: t.) .0 ~.s E -5 c.8 0 .... 0 GJ E Vl O-Vl __bl) ~Zu VI .,g ~ '""';>'~ u ~.5 0 GJ ~ g GJ ~ ~ ~ .!! a _ "C ~ :c ._ 0 .c C':lEVI "":: cO"C ~ - ~ h ._ ~ c.c:::s ""0 F' GJ ~ ,..... .....c - .-.... .0 C c'::: :-;_ .. ~ -5 u .0 h 5..cGJ GJ._::J 8 0 ....... .... W K C Vl = ._ '"'" c::i ~ ::;; -5 - ~::t 5 !:! .c 0 1._ E Vl >.. _ 0 0 Vl ;.~~~ :~i ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ] ~ _~ ~ ~8 ~~ ~ . 0 l'J 0 __ GJ c.. .- - .;; ..c Zo ti ::0 -= _ 1-0 "" :a :9 .~ ~ g c; "" ~ ..... _ GJ 0 .- 0 c._..c I-or-::: :a-5~ ::::It;:; Vl 2 ti c .....;>..D ..: .s ~ 00 .0 1-0._ ai 00" 0 t cO 0 '"'" bl) bl) ~ ~ -5 t: ~] ~ tij t; ,gf_ ~ c C >.. "'0 1-0 0 ~ ~ E . _ "'0 - :.a '2 .0"0..88 u\ilbOEg~'3 Ojljg" "C E u ~ ~ .C GJ -= c...D -s; ~ 0 ~ ..00> Vl8t:u;ca>.Q) VlGJ '-~VlO ~e~>..c~.c >...... g..~ "" 5. c.. "" C Vl.e - ~ g ~ is ti go >.. :.a:6iJ ~ r.... t; u" . E.c ~ ._ GJ c.. C - G.l C Q) ~:a ~ c_..cc ccOQ.)cF'o""c - U I.::; - .- e u '" bO .'" S< 8 u.... 8 ~ ....c:"O .-.c Vl'- "'CS cO (5 ~~g~ .cU.....!!~;>N:.a . .... ._ "0 C C "0 _ .!! '"'" 0 ell Q) Q.) . 0 :::s O..c Q.) t) Q.) c:::S~.D ~g "';.2Pt)~-5 .cl;:c>.. ~'::::~Q)G.l]Vl~ ::s_~~= ......... or-:g= bl)CU _ ~ Q) -. Q) M .- "0 .:c - ~ e ~ ~~. ~ 2 0 ~ s, ~.g.bO:( -It:: ~ 0.53-,. 8 Z..o~' .s.:~ "" '" ~ :0 ~ ~ ,= g "€ ~ ~ c tl " '" "" '" '" " c "" bO U .~ ti "" E ~e ~ :;; C!; 8 ..c r- U "'.... .0 ~g~ ~.': ..c E ~ :: :.c en ~ u"" c ~a~ o ~ u ~e c ~8 5 c~ ~ III .~ c 8 >- f:.9 t; !Q~~ E '2en ~ :E '-:'-5 ;> (J ~.~ .!d >r->,- . ~""c..~i:l? o u E _~ I.~ 8 eo g z l!l o (,) Cl z is .... 5 Dl :E a: ~ Z ~ en > WCI) ZW :!:::::) i:frl Om wo: ..... I- <c C") Wm ...0: CI) 00 'Q.zZ l'O 0 <c .c 0 CI) o o:W o~ >...1 0:0- ZW og: Cl)Uo <c :!: , ~ '" ,- c..c 0- .=~ u 0 U C '" 5= ~ e .u ~ oS .:; ",,<:1' a ~ - u' :1-5 '" u 0 ,B- ~ E .00 "0";3. ~ 8 '" u_ i!] 0.'" U .:= .9 '- '" '" U '" "'.0 l;:;8 :i8 u... ~ 0 .- '" og ...."8 ~5. 4D ~ ~ "'" c.. -u .- .!! o G.l >. c.. u<l.l~" (/) u-E u ~ .2 a ~ a 'CS ~ ~ ~ ~. J,I..; - . - '': e ~~ ...' I ~ ~ CiQ.)Q) Vl~ cue j3G)O o~ =0 av.)f "ii t) .g.. g 5 0. 8 2. E ~.~ ~ J.:! ~ ~ 8. ::I ~ ~ c.2 ~ ~ -5 t~-Q.E ot:"~ ~~]: eE-:05 tSt.) (l$EN ~ 'Qj >.c ca E 0 1;)::::l ~ 0.. cO e '- c - C5 '': .S E e '- Vl to: ..0.. 80 ..o..c ~""GJ ..:~oo= _ - ..;c.;...;o ti GJ ~:Scu.....8 ~-5:C 08.-5 :;5~'~< ~]g ==Vl ~ ....N ~ e "0 == - oc U 00 >.. _ .D'- 8 :g...; '+-'0 E U) .E.9 rl OC --:- "" :$ - lU ::J E . ......~ eo - ca z t; ><.D::J - 0 Q.) I - 0 Q.) t.) "" s;;..,o .0 _0 ~ e -!.. _ -"'::J GJ 8 0 ~'" u Vl >... Vl", >< u ." ..c bO Q) ::s I '-L. ~ cO..... 5.D c .c Vl '- ca L.,- Q) ..c: 0 .... """0 ti >..c.8: ,.n' U 0.... .:::: ~ _ e..... 0.., .- 0 bO o.J::J8 - u U ~.~ eo 0""- .~ Vl _ _ C::J U U .... -u .= .- ~ o ~#.... ~ 0 .... - Vl.~ 0 '0 bl) 5 ... U) c .c - .... .c Eo:;::J ti - 3 ~ 8 ~:'9:J - (.) c C ~ (:) .g ~ 8 r; ::: ~ oS . 1i ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ :;;",- ~ .If ~ e :: t; ~'g 30. ~ -5 ~ : 'Ci ~ co.=:: ~ Q) 0 -5 e ~ ..::: 2 () ~ 1-0 ,.' .- Vl cO" '" cl.. e.D .-. _U)::O .5 ~ 0 ~ .c Eo>';;~ 01:'"'" oe~ "'-000' uo..E _ .cu~::-;" c .... _ cu._ Vl Ja .... 0 ~ ~ g c ~ 43 . c cu 0 8. g .g .... ~'" 0 " 0,," - U "'e 1l" .~ <t: ;...'" 0 0 ....c u ;..."" - lj :g '0 Z go ~.g.5 '0 -5 > 'u -; c _ '*t e.::: '0 .;:: :a ;0 ~... ~ e; '"'" Q.) >.." 0 t; oC_,- '0 e '"'" Vl 0'- tl c..~~ 8..~ ca..5'u~ ~ c...D -e~tZ3] .... . co::::l 0 V 0 0..-8.-:'~ 0 c: t.).o.o '"'" '::2 00( > :::s :::J cuE 0 ~ 'C5 "0 ca C c.D "" Vl U) ~ go.a .. Q,)::::l Vl .59 -5 ~ E.c.8::::J 0 "80 .59 = 8 8. Q.. -;; a .~.~ :5 ~ .~ 8.8 e C..c u . _e:.oe 8 -a ~ u B co ~ ] 5 '""'0. g -a bO bO .s..].C- -= .... eo u cu e .~.5 ci5 l< Ct - bO c..... "" ~ - Co C C U _U en. ~ "" c '- E-:r 0 - :.a ~ = Z l" 8 GJ < .~ .5 ] :5 tS ... .... Vl - -<';;:'0 ..;. ~ t.) ca U 00 g. 0 0 ;.J U Q) u" ca 0 <.Ie.... ."_ ." e ",0 ._:: .n :9 c.8: 8 8 -.. 08.a _u - u 8 . cac;.,u.:!i~"O-5 ftSQ)';;~..o_ 1;1II -I.....U"'CSCUCC ....._Vl(l) CQ Vl c.. ~ 0 ;;J C 1'! Vl.5 Vl Eo-!.- 0 .C e -g g Q.) C c:o.~.~ .C cu e :::S:'- -- ~......; '--0 ftS.g = ftS";::l ._~ i)'< 'Q.t; c -;;... ,"",'.::1 ~..~ I-C So..o. 1;;'" c..O CI:: ~._-" ~ 8 "5i 0 ~ B'~ >.::: = U ~:::s ~ ::I 0 c...- 0 --a .....- c.. c.. ::I (; Vl g 0 ~ .5 'C) ;:lu~....~~~.~.~ ~c8~<-o~ "'CS~~i~c..~~~""~e~8c~8-'" ~ - Z~ ~ 0"" c~~oc=!>""""'u u" U ~ r..,.~ __0 2P 0 ..... ~ :g ~ '..c- ~ ~_ ....0...... ".......,... C 0 GJ ..~ - 4) ~"....... - t.) .- Vl C ~ _ _ t..... ....... _ ....... "'J 1;1II ....... .... ca C':I :::.c I c t.) -.::I _.J:l.~ u ~..c: .- Q) lQ "" 0'- .......= " u u <I.l - bO" .. .~:.:: gf-a - 8 8 -';= 0; .. ,,- " Z u ~ e ~ :ll ..c i;)' Y :s! "E ' = S i'" -< ; ".S! -'= '" 0. _ E: " ::I - 8;1 l!'3 ~" .,. 0" t.l iU < ::I :: i: ~.:; 8 O:a g ~ :5!'> ~ ~ tn go.~ ~ ~ =B ~.= ~ ..C: U) ~ 8: 0 - ~ 'S CQ ...- 0 .D u u U) U rIJ ~.o ~ ~~ 8,..5. ~ ~ ca ~ ~ .2P ~ ~ ftS t.) 8.J g" "5;";::;';-u" ;t:i"'S;"&!u8 ... 1l0bO-,o:;tl8":r:c..cu;..a;..'" l!! S u t.l..8 t.l -5 .= ... 2 - t.l ,:;'" 8 . ~ ;t OJ'2 ~ ,:; e bO ~ ,:;.5..c ~ t.l:':: t.l 1l ~$;;~~o~all .~~~~ ~.abOai ~'uoE.g~ ~6.=u.; "-8.~"~g:~~ c rJ (; .... ~ .... -5:0 ~ (]) e ~ ~ .5..2'~ ~ .5 '3 b'o g u.; ~ E ~ E 0 m ca ..c: -g :!; bO ~ is ~~la~a..c~~JiJ~aBt.g~u-'=~'E=Jo8",~0~~~-8u~~:r:s:r:8 c = u ... ~ .- .- 0 ::I - '" U l(l Ql N U E:l u E u - t+= c 0 ~ to) ;:: -5 ; ~ 5.c 5.s 3 :! S e ~ 'C3 6.s e .s .s It) ..... It) .... ..... It) Ifi2.- - v~?"f:,{;;;;,;;';J;J:!k z o i= Q w N co ~ N o ..... '? ~ o ..... '" _0- 0.___ --=-=--=---~ "" ... "" 'S: o .... 0. '" .0 ..'.~ .- \(~J'. ., 'f.~" . \:'~-~ ,~-. ~_ ..:_.:.:....:..:.~.: ~::.:..:.:.:~_.-_. - ,',,:: ~:;_-Ti:::::1.:~:.:; ~.<:....:..-A.: ,,~~-,:,:,,:~;:..,:.:... ,'" ". " . -'- 'm'_"' ,~_.._. ..,.... CITY OF DUBLIN Planning/Zoning 829-4916 Building & Safety 829-0822 Engineering/Public Works 829-4927 Development Services P.O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR: PA 86-046 Fire Safe Roofing Materials Ordinance. City Council initiated Ordinance Amendment to the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the City Council by reference. (Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.) LOCATION: The proposed Ordinance Amendment would cover the entire City. The recommended Fire Safe Roof Areas would be generally on the west side of the City in the area adjacent to the hills_and on the east side of the City between the Dougherty Hills and Dougherty Road. DESCRIPTION: A proposed Ordinance Amendment providing for Class C or better roof covering for all new apartments, hotels, dwellings and accessory buildings and for Class B or better roof covering in the area designated, on an official City map, as a Fire Safe Roof Area. The proposed Ordinance would also specifically require that building permits be secured for re-roofing, and that there be at least two additional roof inspections for the building permit process. FINDINGS: The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. INITIAL STUDY: The Initial Study dated July 16, 1986, is available for review upon request. MITIGATION MEASURES: None Required. PREPARATION: This Negative Declaration was prepared by the City of Dublin Planning Staff, (415) 829-4916 SIGNATURE: Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director DATE: ATTACHMENT.3 PPrff ;/m-/117~!Jtr, Tb/!-. 14 &0 --o1~ \ ...-:---....-,..,~...--. <,/'.