HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.1 AmendEDublinSpecPln&CityGPA
'<II~:~i: :
CITY CLERK
File # ~[i]~~-~[Q]
..,.:~,
'f
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15,1996
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING: P A 96-020 Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
Amendment and City of Dublin General Plan Amendment
(Report Prepared By: Jeri Ram, Associate Planner) Of!-
EXHIBIT ATTACHED:
1) Resolution adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring Program
2) Resolution approving the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment
and General Plan Amendment.
3) Map and Text Amendments
4) Final Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (under
separate cover)
5) Existing and proposed EDSP and City of Dublin General Plan Land
Use Map (Figure 4.1), EDSP Road System Map (Figure 5.1), and
Planning Subareas (Figure 4.2)
._,..~COMMENDATION:~
...-
. .,'
1) Open public hearing and hear staff presentation.
2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public.
3) Question staff, Applicant, and the public.
4) Close public hearing and deliberate.
5) Adopt resolutions approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring Program and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
Amendment and General Plan Amendment (Exhibits 1 and 2).
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The 1994 Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and City of Dublin Ge~eral Plan
establish a mix of land uses for the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area. Development of the lands under
provisions of those plans will result in the generation of municipal revenues and expenditures, The proposed
amendments, if approved, will result in a relatively minor change in the overall mix of land uses now allowed
and no demonstrable shift in the fiscal balance assumed for the existing Plans.
DESCRIPTION:
In summary, this Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment and General Plan Amendment woll.l:d allow for
combined Industrial/Office uses near Gleason Drive, allow residential development near Gleason Drive and
___._~_________________________________________.__________..~~________~_______.~_______~______~____.____~_______w_~______________~________~__
COPIES TO: Alameda County Surplus
Property Authority
P A File
Internal Distribution
'.-
....
- ~ . ~
ITEM NO.
t./
, "'"-':"V:'
create a new site for a multifamily development between Dublin Boulevard and the Central Parkway. More
specifically, those amendments would include:
I. A revision to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP) Land Use Map (Figure 4.1 of the EDSP) to
rearrange land uses and to add 'Industrial Park/Campus Office' as a new 'combined' land use category;
.
2. A revision to the EDSP Subareas Map (Figure 4.2) to modify the subarea boundaries for consistency with
the changes to the Land Use Map;
3. A revision to the EDSP Road System (Figure 5.1 of the Specific Plan dated January 7, 1994) to ,realign the
planned alignment of Hacienda Drive north of the proposed Central Parkway (also referred'to as the Transit
Spine);
4. A Text Amendment to Chapter 4 of the EDSP relating to nuisance and land use compatibility as a result of
rearranging of land uses on Figure 4.1 ;
5. Text Amendments to Chapter 4 of the EDSP to bring into consistency various tables and text directly related
to the change in Figure 4.1 of the Plan; \
6. A Text Amendment to Chapter 11 of the EDSP relating to Hazards;
7. Text Amendments to the EDSP, Chapter 5, Traffic and Circulation, to ensure consistency with the
Applicant's proposed amendinents, and to specifically address Arnold Drive, Dublin Boulevard, and
Gleason Drive; and,
8. A revision to the General Plan to incorporate changes resulting from amendment of the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan (replacing the EDSP Land Use Map with the revised EDSP Land Use Map).
J....~
. "'..
. ";.:.'.
.,1.
AGENDA STATEMENT SUMMARY:
The proposed Amendments to the Eastem Dublin . Specific Plan and City of Dublin General Plan are set forth in
full in Exhibit 3. In summary, the amendments will modify maps and text that will result in a better p8.rce1
configuration for development in the area Additionally, Hacienda Drive will be straightened and connect'at
Gleason Drive at a "1'" intersection. This will provide for better traffic circulation in the area. A newIND/CO
land use designation will be created that will provide flexibility for the. development of a business center at the
comer of Oleason Drive between Hacienda Drive and Arnold Road. The new designation will provide for a
combination office and industrial park. The County has also requested some changes in the mix of land uses
that they feel is more logical based on the current market. For example, allowing residential development near
Gleason Drive and creating a new site for a multifamily development between Dublin Boulevard and the
Central Parkway at Hacienda Drive.
Staffhas evaluated the requested changes and is recommending approval. However, as a result of the County's
requested amendment, modifications to other portions of the Specific Plan must be made for consistency.
Additionally, staff is requesting the addition of two new policies relating to environmental assessments and land
use compatibility (see below).
Staff will present overheads at the City Council Meeting that will clarify the intent and scope of the project.:::-'
2
. ':"'::
Background:
The Alameda County Surplus Property Authority has filed a request for approval of amendments to the City's
.,':'7:-\ 1994 Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and the City of Dublin General Plan, as amended by the 1994 Eastern Dublin
General Plan Amendment (General Plan).
The purpose for the proposed amendments is to provide a suitable land use designation .and parcel configuration
for lands at the southwest comer of the future intersection of Gleason Drive and proposed Hacienda Drive for
development of a business center.
The Applicant has proposed no changes to the text, goals, policies, or action programs of either the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan or the City's General Plan. The requested amendments related to Figures 4.1 and 5.1 of the
Plan (Items 1 and 2 under Project Description). Staff is proposing additional amendments to address map and
textual changes required to achieve consistency of the Applicant's proposed amendments with the balance of the
EDSP (Items 3 through 8 as noted above under Project Description). The complete amendments (maps and
text) are attached as Exhibit 3 to this report.
Planning Commission Meeting of September 24, 1996:
The Planning Commission heard this item at a public hearing on September 24, 1996. At the hearing members
of the Commission questioned the location of residential adjacent Gleason Drive (and its proximity to the
Sheriff's fIrearms ranges and the reduction of neighborhood commercial at the intersection of Hacienda and
Dublin Boulevard. After questioning staff and the Applicant, the Planning Commission unanimously
......~_ recommended approval of the Project.
.' ANALYSIS:
Environmental:
Prior to adoption of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and the City of Dublin General Plan Amendment, the City
Council certified the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan Amendment Final Environmental
Impact Report. That document was a 'Program Environmental Impact Report' which allows it to serve as the
basis for future environmental analyses of the Plan's implementation. The City has prepared an Initial Study and
, Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH 96082092) for the proposed Specific Plan and General Plan amendments
based on that earlier document (Exhibit 4). The findings of the Initial Study, as outlined in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration, are that the proposed amendments will not have a significant effect on the environment
that was not previously addressed and mitigated via the earlier document. The EDSP Master Matrix, modified
for this project (Appendix E to the Mitigated Negative Declaration) serves as the Mitigation Monitoring
Program for this project.
The draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 30-day public review and comment period on
August 27, 1996. The public review period closed on September 24, 1996. One comment letter was received
during the public review period. The Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (Exhibit 4) contains those
comments and staff's responses to the comment letter. None of the comments received in the letter were
substantive or required modifications to either the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration or proposed project.
:e.
3
. ,~!,;:.;: >~, ~<'.~,< ~'. ~
Land Use Amendments:
The proposed amendments would rearrange uses delineated on the Specific Plan's Land Use Map (Figure 4.1)
and would add Industrial Park/Campus Office as a new 'combined' land.use category. The same change wcA~,::
be made to the City of Dublin General Plan Land Use Map as shown in the 1994 Amendment. Exhibit 5 to tIr<
staff report presents graphic depictions of the existing and proposed land use maps.
The proposed land use changes and the addition of the combined land use category have been evaluated by staff
for consistency with the text, goals, policies, and action programs of the EDSP and General Plan. Staff found
the proposed amendments generally consistent with those plans. While the proposed amendments would
rearrange some land uses 'and add a new combined land use category, the overall balance of uses set out in the
EDSP is not significantly altered. As a result of the changes in the 'land use designations, changes had to be
made for consistency in the Tables in Chapter 4 of the Plan. The Tables have been updated to reflect the
changes in the land use mix. The Tables also reflect new information that was obtained as a result of
engineering surveys for specific projects in the area. A text amendment in Chapter 4 clarifies that there will be
some neighborhood commercial development west of Hacienda Drive (a small 5 acre portion of the Campus
Office area west of Hacienda Drive).
The proposed amendments will also require a revision to the Plarming Subarea Diagram. The Planning Subarea
Diagram divides the EDSP into "villages," "gateways," and "centers". Since the land use designations are
being modified, this Map must also be changed so that it conforms with the intent of the Plan and the revised
land use designations (Exhibit 3). Exhibit 5 to the staff report presents graphic illustrations of the existing and
proposed Planning Subareas.
As a result of the Applicant'-s requested amendments, staff recommends two new policies be added to the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan in rel8.tion to land use compatibility and environmental assessment:
.':'
. -:......
County of Alameda Sheriffs Department Firearms Range:
The Alameda County Sheriff's Department operates three fireanns ranges on lands north of Gleason Drive,
including a pistol range and an automatic weapons range. The proximity of these ranges to the new proposed
location of residential development repre~ents a,somce of nuisance noise and an attractive nuisance to- future
residents within the area, with particular attention to children, due to proximity and ease of access to the ranges.
To address this issue, staff recommends the following policy:
Policy 4-7:
Before the construction of any of the residential units within 400 feet of Gleason Drive, in
Subarea C, by any developer, the Alameda County Sheriff's firearms ranges shall be relocated or
reconstructed by that developer for appropriate sound and public safety mitigation to the
satisfaction of the Sheriff. Reimbursement for costs associated with said relocation or
reconstruction will be considered by the City when adjacent affected properties are developed.
Any developer seeking building permits on any residential dwelling unit north of Central
Parkway in Subarea C, shall fence the Sheriff's firearms ranges to the satisfaction of the Sheriff
for public safety purposes prior to the issuance of building permits.
e,,:
, ,.
4
';~~ft"".
The addition of this Policy would necessitate renumbering all subsequent policies within Chapter 4 of the
EDSP.
....-'.
.':
Phase I Environmental Site Assessments:
Historic use within the Eastern Dublin area included the use of materials and methods of
processing which today are classified as hazardous. To ensure that future development of lands
within the area occurs only after any and all hazardous materials are properly remediated, staff
recommends the following new text and policy:
11.4.7 Phase I Environmental Site Assessments
Some former uses of the land within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area involved the use of
process and materials in the form of construction, in the manufacturing of goods, in the pursuit of
agriculture, and in the provision of medical services, which today may be considered to be
hazardous materials. Information available to the City indicates that some remnants of these
materials may remain on lands within the area. To ensure that development of the Eastern Dublin
area does not occur until such time as such materials are either removed or encapsulated on-site,
the following policy shall apply.
Policy 11-1:
Prior to issuance of building permits for site-specific developments, site-specific Phase I (and if
necessary Phase II) environmental site assessments shall be made available to the Community
"." ""~~, Development Director, with appropriate documentation that all recommended remediation
actions have been completed.
Road System Amendment:
t
The Applicant has proposed a revision to the future alignment of Hacienda Drive depicted in the EDSP. As now
adopted, the alignment of Hacienda Drive, north of the future Central Parkway (also referred to as the, Transit
Spine), turns first to the west and then to the north in an'S' configuration, intersecting Gleason Drive at its
present intersection with Arnold Drive (Exhibit 3). The Applicant has proposed that the future alignment of
Hacienda Drive north of Central Parkway continue directly north to a 'T' intersection with Gleason Drive.
Exhibit 5 includes a diagram of the existing alignment and the proposed alignment of Hacienda Drive.
As part of the Applicant's filing, a traffic analysis was prepared, which among other circulation issues,
evaluated the proposed realignment. That analysis was reviewed by the Public Works Department staff and
found to reflect an accurate projection of future traffic within the area of the proposed amendments. Further, the
analysis and staffs conclusions concur that the future alignment of Hacienda Drive proposed by the Applicant
reflects a preferable alignment over that now reflected in the Specific Plan.
Text Amendments:
The Applicant's proposed road system amendments necessitate textual changes to the EDSP to amend the
."::,:narrative description of the roads and their function. The text of these amendments can be found in full on
, : Exhibit 3.
5
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council open the public hearing, deliberate, and adopt Resolutions approvi~.:,:.."
the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program and the Eastern Dublin Specific Pt.;,)'
Amendment and General Plan Amendment. (Exhibits 1 and 2).
O:\P A96-020\CCSRl
.-";"
:.:::.
.'.'
-..
6
.~
.'
.
RESOLUTION NO. - 96
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
______________________________________________~______________________w__________~____________~~____________~_------~
ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION
MONITORING PROGRAM FOR P A 96-020
WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment ("GP A") and Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan ("EDSP") were adopted by the City in 1993; and
WHEREAS, the EDSP provides more specific and detailed goals, policies and action
programs for approximately 3313 acres within the GP A area nearest to the City; and
WHEREAS, a Program Environmental Impact Report ("Program EIR") was prepared for
the EDSP and GPA (SCH No. 91103604) and certified by the City Council on May 10, 1993, by
Resolution No. 51-93, and two Addenda dated May 4, 1993, and August 22, 1994 ("Addenda")
have been prepared and considered by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on May 10, 1993, the City Council also adopted Resolution No. 53-93,
adopting the GP A and EDSP, making [mdings as to the environmental impacts and mitigation
measures relating to the EDSP and GP, and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Program
("Program MMP") for the GP A and EDSP; and
WHEREAS, the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority has requested approval of
a Plan Amendment for the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and City of Dublin General Plan for
revisions to portions of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan land use and circulation system maps
and City of Dublin General Plan Land Use Map; and
WHEREAS, a complete application for the Plan Amendment is available and on file in
the Planning Department; and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration
("MND") for the project which includes a detailed matrix addressing the applicability and
implementation of each of the programs in the EDSP and each of the mitigation measures in the
Program MMP; and
WHEREAS, the Initial Study demonstrated that the Project would have no potentially
significant environmental impacts which were not adequately described and analyzed in the
Program EIR and that the Project would have no significant environmental impacts with the
implementation of mitigation measures either already required pursuant to the Program MMP
and those additional measures identified in the Initial Study and made a part of the Mitigation
Monitoring Program for the Project; and
EXHIBIT
:1
I
WHEREAS, a 30 day public review period was held for the MND, from August 27, .
1996, through September 25, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the project and MND
during the public review period on September 24, 1996; and
WHEREAS, one letter commenting on the MND was received during the comment
period, a copy of which is attached to the MND, available and on file in the City of Dublin
Planning Department; and
WHEREAS, the City reviewed and prepared a written response to the letter of comment,
a copy of which is attached to the MND; and
WHEREAS, on October 15, 1996, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing
on the project, during which it considered the MND, Mitigation Monitoring Program and the
General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE City Council hereby finds
that:
1.
resolution.
The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein as a part of this
.""
"
2. Pursuant to Section 21083.3, subdivisions (b) and (e), of the Public Resources
Code and pursuant to Section 15168 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that
the Project is within the scope of the EDSP and the GPA, that the Project and all of its potentially
significant environmental impacts were adequately described and analyzed in the EIR, that the
Project incorporates all applicable mitigation measures identified in the Program ErR, and that -
all of the Project's potentially significant environmental impacts will be mitigated to a level of
insignificance with the imposition of the mitigation measures identified in the Program MMP
and the project specific mitigation measure identified in the Initial Study for the Project.
3. Pursuant to Section 21166 and Section 21083.3, Subdivisions (b) and (e), of the
Public Resources Code, and pursuant to Sections 15162 and 15168 of the State CEQA
Guidelines, the City Council fmds:
a) that the Project does not constitute a change from the program (Le. the GP A
and the EDSP) analyzed in the Program ErR which would require major revisions in the Program
EIR;
b) that there are no substantial changes in the surrounding circumstances under
which the Project is being undertaken from those circumstances which existed when the City .'"
certified the Program EIR which would require major revisions in the Program EIR; and
:2.
...".
"
.'
.
~
c) that there is no new information of substantial importance to the GP A, the
EDSP, or the Project which, despite the exercise of reasonable diligence, could not have been
known when the Program EIR was certified and which shows either (i) that the Project will have
significant environmental effects not discussed or substantially underestimated in the Program
EIR or, (ii) that there are mitigation measures or alternatives not identified as feasible in the
Program EIR and not included as part of the Project which would reduce or avoid any significant
environmental impacts.
4. Pursuant to section 21080, subdivision (c), of the Public Resources Code and
pursuant to section 15074, subdivision (b), of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council (I)
certifies that it has considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration, along with the one letter of
comment received and the City's responses thereto; (2) finds that there is no substantial
evidence in light of the whole record that the Project will have a significant effect on the
environment; and (3) hereby approves the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
5. The City Council does hereby adopt the Project-specific Mitigation Monitoring
Program (a copy of which is attached as Addendum E to the Negative Declaration) as the
reporting and monitoring program required by Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 for the
Project, as a supplement to the Program MMP.
6. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, subdivision (a) (2), the City
Council specifies that the documents which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its
fmdings and decision herein are based shall be located at City Hall, and their custodians shall be
the City Clerk and the Community Development Director of the City.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 15th day of October, 1996, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
MAYOR
CITY CLERK
G:\PA96020\ccres
RESOLUTION NO. - 96
.'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING THE EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR P A 96-020
WHEREAS, the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority has requested approval of
a Plan Amendment for the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and City of Dublin General Plan for
revisions to portions of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Land Use and Circulation System maps
and City of Dublin General Plan Land Use Map; and
WHEREAS, a complete application for the Plan Amendment is available and on file in
the Planning Department; and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration
("MND") for the project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin has evaluated the requested amendments and is
recommending additional amendments to ensure overall Plan consistency and compatibility with
surrounding uses;
..-.-",
.,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a duly noticed public hearing on said
application on September 24, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Project to the City
Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did hold a duly noticed public hearing on said application
on October 15, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the City Council
approve the amendments to the City of Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and use their independent judgment and
considered all said reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City Council hereby .. ',:
finds that the proposed changes to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP) are consistent with
the City of Dublin General Plan as proposed to be amended herein. The changes to the EDSP
L/
EXHIBIT 2
,". .....
....
"
."
.:~:.
will provide a new land use designation to assist development in Eastern Dublin. Changes to the
circulation system in the EDSP and General Plan will provide a better configuration and
improve traffic flow through the area. These changes will help implement policies of the
General Plan regarding development in Eastern Dublin
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVE THAT THE Dublin City
Council hereby approves the Amendments to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and City of
Dublin General Plan, attached as Exhibit 3 to the Staff Report for PA96-020 dated October 15,
1996.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of October, 1996.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
G:\P A96020\ccres2
5
CITY OF DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AND
EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN
TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENTS
.',:
The following are proposed amendments to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan as part of
P A96-020:
I. A revision to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Land Use Map (Figure 4.1 of the
EDSP dated January 7, 1994) to rearrange land uses and to add 'Industrial Park/Campus
Office' as a new 'combined' land use category. The revised portion of the map is
attached.
2. A revision to the EDSP Road System (Figure 5.1 of the Specific Plan dated
January 7, 1994) to realign the planned aligrunent of Hacienda Drive north of the
proposed Central Parkway (also referred to as the Transit Spine in the EDSP). The
revised portion of the map is attached.
3. A Text Amendment to Chapter 4 of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan relating to
nuisance and land use compatibility as a result of rearranging of land uses on Figure 4.1
Policy 4-7:
.'"'"
"
Before the construction of any of the residential units in Subarea C, by any
developer, within 400 feet of Gleason Drive, the Alameda County
Sheriffs firearms ranges shall be relocated or reconstructed by that
developer for appropriate sound and public safety mitigation to the
satisfaction of the Sheriff. Reimbursement for costs associated with said
relocation or reconstruction will be considered by the City when adjacent
affected properties are developed.
Any developer seeking building permits on any residential dwelling unit
north of Central Parkway in Subarea C, shall fence the Sheriff s firearms
ranges to the satisfaction of the Sheriff for public safety purposes prior to
the issuance of building permits.
The addition of this Policy would necessitate renumbering all subsequent policies within
the Land Use Section of the 1994 Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
e:
fr,
EXHIB!T 3
.
4. Text Amendments to Chapter 4 ofthe Eastern Dublin Specific Plan to bring into
consistency various tables and text directly related to the change in Figure 4.1 of the Plan:
(note: addition indicated in bold type)
4.9.7 HACIENDA GATEWAY
LAND USE CONCEPT
Last sentence, first paragraph:
"General and Neighborhood Commercial uses are designated along
the east and west side of Hacienda Drive, to take advantage of the
high visibility and convenient vehicular access from 1-580,
Hacienda Drive, and Dublin Boulevard."
(Please see Tables attached on separate pages)
5. A Text Amendment to Chapter 11 of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan relating to
Hazards.
.'
11.4.7 Phase I Envirorunental Site Assessments
Some former uses of the land within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area
involved the use of materials and methods of processing in the form of
construction, in the manufacturing of goods, in the pursuit of agriculture,
and in the provision of medical services, which today are considered to be
hazardous. Information available to the City indicates that some remnants
of these materials may remain on lands within the area. To ensure that
development of the Eastern Dublin area does not occur until such time as
such materials are either removed or encapsulated on-site, the following
condition shall apply.
Policy 11-1:
Prior to issuance of building pennits for site-specific
developments, site-specific Phase I (and if necessary Phase II)
envirorunental site assessments shall be made available to the Community
Development Director, with appropriate documentation that all
recommended remediation actions have been completed.
.'
6. Text Amendments to Chapter 5, Traffic and Circulation, to ensure consistency
with the applicant's proposed amendments, and to specifically address Arnold Drive,
Dublin Boulevard, and Gleason Drive
17
(Note: additions indicated in bold type, deletions, indicated by strikct-hrough)
5.2.2 NORTH-SOUTH CIRCULATION
(at first paragraph, first sentence) The major north-south streets will be Arnold
Drive, Hacienda Drive. . . .
(beginning of second paragraph) Arnold Drive will facilitate access to Dublin
Boulevard for residents and employees along the western boundary of the
planning area. Arnold Drive is planned as a four lane road with extends
from the northern City boundary to Dublin Boulevard.
(new last paragraph for Section 5.2.2) Arnold Drive will be a north south road
that will connect the BART station to Gleason. Arnold Drive will be limited
access which will serve local as well as through traffic.
5.2.3: (end of second paragraph). . the freeway. Dublin Boulevard is also a
major transit route which connects residential and employment users along
Dublin Boulevard to BART.
Gleason Road, located aApproximately a half mile north of and parallel to the
Dublin Boulevard extension, will be widened to, a smaller a four lane arterial
road would be located along the Gleason Road along its current alignment.
7. A revision to the General Plan to incorporate changes resulting from amendment
of the proposed Amendment of the EDSP (replacing the EDSP Land Use Map with the
revised EDSP Land Use Map in the City of Dublin General Plan).
G:\P A96.020\exhibit
<l
e.:"
.'
"
..-
....2:~';..
...
..
"
.'
q
Table 4.1
EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN
LAND USE SUMMARY
Land Use Designation Land Area Density Yield
COMMERCIALIINDUSTRlAL
General Commercial 298.2 acres .25-.35 FAR 3.365 MSF
Neighborhood Commercial 73.6 acres .30-.35 FAR 1.031 MSF
Campus Office 220.2 acres .35-.75 FAR 4.625 MSF
Industrial Park 72.4 acres .25 FAR .719 MSF
Subtotal 9.740 MSF
RESIDENTIAL
High Density 68.2 acres 35 dulac 2,387 du
Medium High Density 133.4 acres 20 dulac 2,637 du
Medium Density 482.3 acres 10 du/ac 4,823 du
Single Family 612.6 acres 4 du/ac 2,492 du
Rural Residential! Agric. 410.8 acres .01 du/ac 4du
Subtotal 12,343 du
PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC
Public/Semi-Public 96.3 acres .24 FAR 1.049 MSF
SCHOOLS
Elementary School 69.6 acres 6.5 schools
Junior High School 35.9 acres 1.8 schools
High School 55.3 acres 1 schools
Subtotal
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
City Park 56.3 acres 1 park
Community Park 126.7 acres 2 parks
Neighborhood Park 45.2 acres 7 parks
Neighborhood Square 13.3 acres 7 parks
Subtotal 241.5 acres 17 parks
Open Space 436.9 acres
Subtotal 678.4 acres 17 parks
TOTAL LAND AREA 3,307.2 acres
Table 4.2
EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN
POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT SUMMARY
..,
Development Sq. Personldu Population
Ft./Emolovees
Commercial
General Commercial 3.365 MSF 510 6,598
NeiJ?;hborhood Commercial 1.031 MSF 490 2,104
Campus Office 4.625 MSF 260 17,787
Industrial Park 0.719 MSF 590 1,218
Public/Semi-Public 1.049 MSF 590 1,778
TOTAL 10.788 MSF 29,484
Residential
HiJ?;h Density 2,387 2.0 4,774
Medium High Densitv 2,637 2.0 5,274
Medium Density 4,823 2.0 9,646
Single Family 2,492 3.2 7,974
Rural Residential! Agric. 4 3.2 13
TOTAL 12,343 27,681
Table 4.3
CITY OF DUBLIN ..
PROJECTED JOBSIHOUSING BALANCE .'
Planning Area Dwelling Jobs Employed Balance Ratio
Units Residents
Existing City of 7,100 12,210 12,000 -210 1.02:1.0
Dublin
Eas tern Dublin 12,343 29,484 19,996 -9,488 1.45: 1.0
S ecific Plan Area
TOTAL 19,443 41,694 31,996 -9,698 1.30: 1.0
.";-.
"
10
.'
.'.,..,
"
e::
11
Table 4.6
TOWN CENTER - RESIDENTIAL
SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
Designation Acres Density Development
Potential
High Density 33.6 35 dulac 908
Medium High Density 44.9 20 dulac 852
Medium Density 189.0 10 dulac 1,949
Single Family 89.2 4 dulac 399
Subtotal 356.7 4,108
()pen Space 49.8
City Park 56.3 1 park
Community Park 80.6 1 park
Neighborhood Park 11.6 2 parks
Neighborhood Square 7.5 5 parks
Subtotal 205.8
Elementary School 31.1 3 schools
Total 593.6 4,108 dwelling units
9 parks
3 elementary schools
Table 4.11
HACIENDA GATEWAY
SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
Designation Acres Density Development
Potential
General Commercial 85.8 .21 FAR .800 MSF
Neighborhood Commercial 0.0 .30 FAR
Campus Office 65.0 .37 FAR 1.048 MSF
Campus Office 53.0 .85 FAR 1.962 MSF
Subtotal 203.8 3.810 MSF
High Density Residential 34.6 35 dulac 1,211 du
Medium High Density 16.2 20 dulac 324 du
Residential
Residential Subtotal 50.8 1,535 du
Total 254.6 3.810 MSF
1,535 du
Table 4.13
COUNTY CENTER .:,
SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
Designation Acres Density Development
Potential
Public/Semi Public 88.5 .25 FAR .964 MSF
Total 88.5 .964 MSF
.~
.
,:L
.:
.':
.>
J~
PROPOSED EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING SUBAREAS
~
"(
Q
-u
o
c
L
(
---------
NOI<i"H
Gleason Dr"ive
-u
u
o
It
IJ~
({
! CenTral Parkwa 1
o
"lJ
C
U
"0
o
I
~
u
"0'
Ill,
III
t!!
Dublin Soulevar"d
A
1..560
A
S
C
G
I
..J
,.. dSSSc;jdr"d Gdi"ewdY
,.. own CenTer" .. Commer"cidl
,.. own CenTer" .. ~essidenTidl
Foc::rt+lill l<esidenTial
CounTy Ceni"er"
Hdciendd GaTeway
Proposed Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Planning Subareas
rKurU:SElJ EA~lJ:l.,Kl"'l UUJjLl1~ ~rJt.,Ll~lL. rLA1~
AND GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP
."'~:
.,
Gleoson Dl""ive G/I '"U
0
0
~ l1
L- ~
T I
() INDia L 0
"U ~ F' "0'
III
0 GC III
I: "[ ~
L Q C
1: {)
"U
I:
H Ql MH M GC
"ij
u L-
I
Dublin 60ulevol""d
CO.. GC CO.
GC
CO
INDia
H
MH
M
L-
G/I
es
F'
-----
NOR'TH
..
I..sea
.
Genel""ol Commel""ciol
Compus OfAc::e
Indusi"l""iol F'ol""k10fAc::e
High Densiiy Resideni"iol
Medium High Density Residentiol
Medium Oensiiy Resideni"iol
Single Fomily Resideni"iol
Public/Semi Public
elemenTor-y Sc::hool
Ciiy POl""k
NC moy be pel""mi"l"'ted by 0
Plonned DevelopmenT
Zoning PI"""c::ess
Includes .5 oCl""es of NC
Proposed Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Land Use Map and General Plan Map
..:
J 1
.:"~.,,,>
"
.:"
."
I;?
Gle05"~ Dr-ive G/I "U
tJ
0
~ OC
l- ~
"[ I
0 \NDIO L u
"U ~ P -ij'
UI
"0 c#C UI
t: '[ C ~
L 0
( U
"U
I:
H QI MH M c#C
-ij
{) 1-
I
DL..Ibli~ S"L..Ilevar-d
CO.. GC CO.
GC
CO
INDIO
H
MH
M
1-
G/I
55
p
*
------
NORTH
...
1..580
Ge~er-c::Il CC'mmer-ciol
COmpL..l5 Office
l~dL..lsTr-ic::ll Por-I<IOffice
Hisn Del"lsii'y I<.esidel"l1ioI
MediL..lm Hisn Del"lsii'y l<.esidel"l1iol
MediL..lm Del"lsii'y l<.esidel"l1ic::ll
5il"lSle Family l<.esidel"l1ic::ll
PL..Iblic/5emi PL..Iblic
5\ememi"cry 5c:nC'C'\
Cii'y Par-k
NC may be per-mitted by a
Plc~ned DevelC'pmeni"
Z"nins Pr-C'c:ess
InclL..ldes 5 ocr-es "f NC
Proposed Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Land Use Map and General Plan Map
{b
E
Q)
-
(/)
>-
""':CJ)
l!)
co ""0
~ ct'l
5,0
u:a:
2
0 .S2
~ j
"0
0 ~ <:
0 Q; 0
Ii i: i?
::?l <: ::?l
I . I
.
.
.
'"
a>>'
II> :::c
!!! c=;:
~ -= ....J..!... 5
a> 0-' op:::
-< ...= .....=c:;)
Ui- a>o ~O~
.0::> .r:.- a>
:::~ E 0 EO: II>
=CP
...:::. ::> ::: ::l..a>
t-tf.l zi= zEc':
I ''It e
z
-
-J
OJ
::) l:: 'tl
C~~
Z Q. -',".
a: CJ ."
W :;: 0 I~;~
L- .... c: ......
r- CJ I>> i~
en (1) ~ Ii;
..A a. = l~t
...... CD j 01\':
LU rn ~ ~;::
2
o
a>
'5
o
I
I
I
I
.~
............. ..~...
+-5
z
<<10
...
..............
o 0
:................~..~: : .....
: :...
o
o
.
o
.
.
."......
.,..""
I ..
\ ..
. ..*.~.......... ~....:..
:, "
: \
: \
: '"
: " N
: ,
o --
. I
: I
........ .
II ....... 4
o 0"
......... (6)
."
::
Cl
6
(8)
'If"
0
'....
, - [f>
I
I Cl
I
I
+--
I
oe-IN
I
I
I
I
.
4 6
(6) (8)
Fallon Rd.
4
{6l
....---
.,..,.,"-
~
,~
~
\
.
'If"
Tassaiara Rd.
~ " J
"-:." .",/ (:J
~ ,~....~~~ .iII.........,.......................
" .. ..
" 0 .
" .. ..
~ ..- .....................
\ ........./
-41."
4
(6)
I (~) .
4
-0
.2: a:l 0
II) ....
.1;
"It :0
::l
D
4
Dr.
4 6
(6) (S)
'If"
Cl
0
....... ............. ...
ell
II>
<:
:::
Cll I
E:
'If" Hacienda
~ 5a --,
co
$: I
: I .
:.....~..._.....~~..
'::::"'
."";".
,.-.
, ,
.. .."
.:.,
.
..
Negative Declaration
(Prepared pursuant to City of Dublin
Environmental Guidelines, Section 1.7 (c), 5.5)
Description of Project: Proposed amendments to the land use and circulation diagrams
of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan to create a useable site for the proposed Santa Rita
Business Center; adjusting the circulation system and remaining land uses to create a
more efficient roadway system and reduce potential conflicts between adjacent uses; and
adoption of a Development Agreement with infrastructure sequencing program.
Project Location.; The Santa Rita property encompasses 954 acres (Assessor's Parcel No.
946-15-1-4), of which approximately 705 acres are included within the adopted Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan Oanuary 1994). The site is bounded by Broder Boulevard on the
north, 1-580 to the south, Camp Parks on the west, and Tassajara Road on the east.
Name of Proponent: Alameda County Surplus Property Authority
I hereby find that although the above project could have a significant effect on the
enyironment, because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been
added to the project, there will not be a significant effect in this case.
Attached is a copy of the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration documenting
the reasons to support the above finding.
Iv litigation measures are included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects on
the environment and are included as part. of the Initial Study.
5i~ -
Ten Ram
Printed Name
Associate Planner
Title
8/23/96
Date
At:acilmenls
\1
Date Published:
Date Posted;
Date Notice Mailed:
Considered by:
On:
Action on Negative Declaration: Approved _ Disapproved_
Notice of Determination filed:
Council Resolution No.
EXHIB!T ~
FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
.'
EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT/GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT
September, 1996
I. Introduction and Document Format:
This document constitutes the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment and associated applications.
This document contains all letters (one letter) received by the City of Dublin during
the comment period concerning the Mitigated Negative Declaration with associated
responses to each of the comments. Taken together, the Draft Mitigated Negative
Declaration/Initial Study and the Final Negative Declaration constitute the complete
environmental documentation for the proposed project.
II.
Project Location:
.:::
The Santa Rita property encompasses 954 acres (Assessor's Parcel No. 946-15-1-4), of
which approximately 705 acres are included within the adopted Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan Uanuary 1994). The site is bounded by Broder Boulevard on the north, 1-580 to the
south, Camp Parks on the west, and Tassajara Road on the east.
III. List of Persons and Organizations Submitting Comments:
The following individuals and/or organization have submitted comments on this
environmental document:
· Beth Stone, East Bay Regional Parks District
IV. Comment Letters and Responses:
The following is a summary of the only comment letter received by the City of Dublin
regarding the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and the City's responses to the letter.
The full text of the comment letter follows this section. Note that responses have been
prepared for individual paragraphs constituting the letter where appropriate.
.
,<6
.'
.'.,..",
"'
."
(1
Comment Letter: Beth Stone, East Bay Regional Parks District
. The preferred alignment of the regional trail along the Tassajara Creek corridor in
the area between Dublin Boulevard and Gleason Drive is on the east side of the creek.
Response: Comment acknowledged. The City has recently adopted a Stream Corridor
Plan which designates the alignment for the Tassajara Creek Trail on the east side of the
Creek between Dublin Boulevard and Gleason Drive.
. A local connection (for the trail) will be provided from the creek corridor through
the project site along the north side of Dublin Boulevard in a westerly direction to
provide the important connection to the Dublin BART station and EBRPD Regional
Iron Horse Trail.
Response: Comment acknowledged. Staff continues to work with Alameda County on
the improvement plans for Dublin Boulevard. Plans submitted indicate that the trail
connection will be provided along the north side of Dublin Boulevard.
. The District requests that the location of the Tassajara Creek Trail be shown on the
final land use map for the project.
Response: The location of trails is shown in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan on the
Open Space Map, not on the Land Use Map. Additionally, the locations on the Open
Space Map are "general". The exact alignment of the trail has been determined as part of
the Stream Corridor Plan, which was prepared as part of the implementation measures of
the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
. The District requests that they be contacted during the design and implementation
phase of the project so that they can be involved in the review process.
Response: The District is a regular reviewing agency for the City. They will be
contacted when projects occur adjacent any creek or open space area that the District
would have interest in. This is done as a part of the regular procedures of the City of
Dublin Planning Department and as a mitigation measure of the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan.
G:\P A96-020\FinalIS
REGIONAL PARKS.
R E eEl v.:~.
SEP i 8 1995
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
September 17, 1996
DUBUr..f P.J:A'-'
,:,,,~.,,;~-;"',,rl, NNING
Prt!'!':nenl
t'(-r;Jp'..i~ S,,"'Jen
Vlr~.PI i~l:t(ln!
.1"..::5",
Tr.ellSu'i'1
Ms. Jeri Ram
Associate Planner
City of Dublin
Community Development Department
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin, California 94568
Bt~\.il."j\.i;mp.
St"";~I~i:I.\"
J~"'..:i'i,'n C("tm~$
7 en Rn~''''P
C~lfrl'! St:I'\'emn
F'.a: 05r,~n
Gener at Mana~ei
SUBJECT: PROPOSED EASTERN DUBLIN" SPECIFIC PLAN /
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS
Dear Ms. Ram,
Thank you for forwarding us a copy of the initial study and mitigated negative declaration for
the subject project. The District has reviewed the study and has the following comments on the
project. District staff has been coordinating with City and County staff on the issue of providing
a regional trail connection through the project site. Our approved Trails Master Plan calls for a .. "': '
regional trail along the Tassajara Creek corridor in order to implement the Sycamore Valley to
Tassajara Creek Trail. Through meetings with City staff, it was detennined that the preferred
alignment for the regional trail segment will be along the east side of the creek corridor. In the
future, a northerly alignment will be detennined to provide a connection to the Sycamore Valley
area. In addition, a local connection will be provided from the creek corridor through the project
site along the north side of Dublin Boulevard in a westerly direction to provide the important
connection to the Dublin BART station and the EBRPD Regional Iron Horse Trail.
When completed, these trail segments will improve circulation and offer alternative modes of
transportation and recreational opportunities for future residents and employees of the project
site. Attached is a copy of the Specific Plan Land Use Map depicting the subject area, with the
location of the regional trails shown in green. The District requests that these proposed trails are
clearly shown in the final document for this project. We further request that we be contacted
during the design and implementation phase of this project so that we may be involved in the
review process. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project.
Sincerely,
~~
Beth Stone .
Advanced Planning
.~:
/).0
Ene: Revised Specific Plan Land Use Map
~ .795:: =;,'<::a OakS Cou': POBox 538 i Oakla,.,:: CA 94605-0351 Tel' (510) 63;'-0735 TOO: (510) 633-0460 Fax: (510) 569-4319
".
::: ,,' ..
, ' l_-<'::-:~('':=--C:::::::::::~\ ~ g !g ~ ~
.:./;<1/: ,";/i' '.' ' \ ~ ~ '- ~ i
~/__I I i I " ,u _..., , ..., I 1
~. "" ' ~ ,'\ ~. i ~ i
.:" ~ ~-l~'~'. \~\ \,;'<, I x . g i~ ~ 00 I g
;:.....-';:. ~k - ~. , r:::I:! 1 1
0-- !-' _' _~ - . i I . ,
,.' ,_ \ J'I . I ; .
l __ . ".-.-. , , " , u ,-", ,., ' I
". . ,,' u' (.:>. , "cp,' I \
\ .~~,~,_~~;", '_+_,,=~_~L~J, :i ,:,";~i';~Y; ,l
.or;:; ",.. .~. :. I;" "T -.' ,--~.~---........~~"~;~~' '\
:':~, .C.:---'.., .' J ~i'~. ,. , , ;" ;_:',,' ", ' ,': i" ,'.r ,-". ~ ,.' ; =':---l-.;~~~,J~"~---:'
._I...,SI..II. '1/;" ..,:E' ,1"'1. .,"1", ,.' " ~ " , '"~I
: ,", ''"' , "~l;):"r..' ",' ., 11" .' ~',.. ' , ' ,',' , .. , ' .
c.,i. ":<;\"~ . :'. : ,. " -:.~ ,7""; ",' .r';,..- T> .'."h ~ , ',' ",,:.', . ,,' --;'1' ..... i \
.. ......,=-.e~~':.~~. ,,' /,.' , ""e.';' , J", 1:"...........":';,li';>;~ ,....:;.......:... .', "',' '. I' ,I ",;
. ._ ..'" .'. ""., _v--' .'''''''' I.'.. .,,' \" " .' ' , . " .-,,~,....._,. "} ,'oJ ~~ .::--,"';,',". 'r_ I.. o.
~:::t.r.:.,;.:-..r:~~~.N~::;J'~N~-"'" "~I~ ii""";~'-'i.~"';;:'';'''-7"-,,,,'')'r~", "ii" ~,u.,. I ~
-: .- ,'. ._',.' .. ". ....~,J..> ~S:i.' to.: ,:' .,'. ;";''''''~3i' ;[ ! ,I' :-:~1.~..:1 '::s :s-'j "~~':'51' -..: . ... "
, :.,~; ;... '.! ' ..;' . i '~ ~,..'"/',;,::,, ....." ,,. '. 1.11 ,-<l.F::-;:,t ,"'" ,l."" .."'-..... -':"i:. ", '.":. .'" f u,,' "'~
,,' _' ,"" ",',,,,,,,". "," .' ..':" ...",. ....,"'o"',,,.'~"'.. .G, .,'
.,," , " ,."." ," , "'" '" W" "r '''':.-~ ""'H C',! ,..;; '.",,'" " .., i'" "''''''', e" 'Ill' ,'. ,"
'~'" ,'< ;!: ;.~:~"' :i. ~ ~'",~;~f.!;', (.j~ -ciJ': ){}/ !":-.:..: ,), ~:
,'. r,-."-' " ._~.....""", "I, _,.,,~~'i'
.... ~l ,....". .._':.:..;~;: ~. ~'~. .. If'. "".::." ..:-... , ,I ' ,...,' ":-. ., ~ =::--4:'
, ._, , .,J ,," -;~'''..~'''!'''.....;,<'." ,~-,,, f>":-~~~~
.:. . --' .... :-: r---::-).:: : ~, ", ' -;:, t" " -....,~'f-~~~""/:-:.1~ :: /.~ ...~~
. ~,_.,' '''' ..;-l''''' , j~,...." ~--,.,~ .~' -"'r' /' '" " ., ..,
,:Co..,,>:''' ':':')".- ''- ,'ft':: ~i',: . '1/.", . T ~~?" .,n!,,; '~';o:'/.. ..1'" < .<.,. ,':/',
, > ,....',,_ k'...'. I U, ' , -<( I, " ',J'" II II) '.....'/.. '~t' 1
,.,.. :::'o,"'7-"-;-p'F~ 1 ::;rf.i~, .1" ~!, :1': ~i;}'>' '>. ":
, ,.' ' ' ,_ . ". '. " , ; I ,... .. ' x -- ." , ,'..' " ,,' Jt!f
," '.' ,'_' ,_."11 ,7' x'i . II> ,\ I"". 'I · ' I, ' " " :' , >\A. . "1
" , '":'; ,::;:--=--: _ , L ' ,. ~ . . =>' 1 "" ... ' , , ..,...:...' j ~~ r I' '1 .
. ", " ,.,...."'-.,~i13rmr v,.l,J.p:lS"'" " ',I, . .\", , '.,. -" '.:. .,: ,
. ",:'"," ',' ".., ",". I: .0,1' '.- ...='c':" ,,'. ';',1 . · ..'+ ....: ....:au. " ~",'
" " :, ",' ,', .: ._.' -' ., ';";','1' ~_:~, .: .. -i l . . . ~ ;0.,. II I '
',",' '.' ,,;' 'I i: ' ',~'~ ' "" " , " ' ,,',', ; .:',,: ;.... " ~~.., :.:'
.. \'. ;o.j1..".!.... ,,'~ . I" ' ,".J' :--, r',,-, ""':.'" "
, I;> 1\ ......... L,C1 :::,7"..:.; .' ';.' .,,' " "..' ' ,.... '
., ,._::::;:;': (.:>', ',':;I . ,'- ,. 1, r;".f'=.....",,-'- .....,;:! ~
.. ,,,' ,,""" ~ . 'I, " .,...'..~,'" '. . ~
;, ", ~<ii: i:r '~). . ," " , :: T :;, ~; 'J'l'.' : ,', ,~:g ..: ,(I
d' ~i'- "T~'I ',.' " .' X., n .' 1 _n. . .
:: ' ' -/' ': ~ : : 1 I . :C -=' . ,_' Xl:!;" ,'.' :.. " ;: - r
?".A"I .~ .; ',~.._..._' .,,' . ::E ,: ' ,n'!. 'I: '", !~~~. 'i~:i:~"
.,n' ,;0 ',; ---- -.--...' .' I \ IL' "'/-"~11J:~'
, . '.. ,'~ ' ", ' , ,_______,________ . ,,~~..;a
i' '"', ,.i :Po ',: " ;i, ' . I' 'lu.. i ., ~ ~ . ':-~ .";-.--.
I,' ~ ~!lD: ,'" "0 71<' ~: ' , ~;;;,':""'-'" '
[' ":r~~O:, .t u "'!.O 'I' ",' :,'":":;.,~~:/'y.,k,.,.....
'.,. . ~,,1!":'/~ :'1 d :;',S! ' - .' !-= ~,<..::/'~'~. \
, , 'I' . '. ' · Z I I- C . - ,. ".. ' , ,;I ;y, ,
.i ' " " ~l'l' t 'j . - , II>::Z;"> [' ,', '.; ,^,',y. ",'
.,. ". ' ,.,t '1\,' ,'.t => - .,~ 1 ~ 1-:;:-:-( ,.."'; 0.: I'
..' . " :: _.-.1' :LJ."" ,I I", c: .,' . ' j "U '
'.' .,.,.. . I ._' ..-..:.::.', ,.! 1:, : " 1 . \ : .~ · . ...,':'/ . I .
',... ........ , r- '_', .... ' r I," . 'I' ......... .
... , '.,. ._-; -:.:-.._ 'l~ ,:,'" " ,.,' ~. ,....,.-;.,7 .,'. '. '
: " :' I:".': .':.' , ,!"""-... ....~".~~....~\l Ii.UolQW;ii"-' 'I'~' . . " r., '..:,,' ,,: .' \. , ,.
, . ;' :.i;:::(: ~'';;;;:4~ ;,..: ':.-: ~r,:..~?:-':'t\:'f 'r';i, ':: :'.', ; ::: .;
, I' . ,,.:., .1,,,1,,,, _ .,' ,. "'I' ,,' 01"\ : .1-
'. '1' .........;.. :jI..;I".~...' I r' :-_'. j ',- - .....11 -p'.-.~ . \. '. n' . . "I"
, .' ,',." ~'I~I.' . 1,"----=" ,,-' , ..-' "\" " ,'. ." ~
, I" ,. , ',..'-: In,";;" "'i' 't i -.\'....:..'-,..~'<'... ,..:.' -',. ",. '\ -' '
, " ,', )...': ',' ,',. ii' __ ", ''',',' '.,'.'.' ""J,nl' "I'
~. __, '.,. , ' . ,;".-__".:<",i,:...' ',_.,., ' , . ~', 1"."" ,'(, ',., ',;' '" '.
~';?'. : ,>:::'. ?'';''~f;'i\ili. ;~'-:-',~~;~~--o i. o~;' '. 'i'. 1.: 'c, J , . '.~' ~! " \ ' . -,-,.. I' r
~:'..,' ".;,l..,'~.'!~':( ,--..: ' I,' ,...1'="'''11 ..""'."..,......'.'.." '.:./ ~ ",
. .."".,..''._., 'c. ::'.:.- .;:-~-".~ " . "","'Io':" ", I :"'\'~ ~ .... }....~.. ,.',l;,
.,' ,,~..,I'_':""""''':"::'^'~''-- ',"_~" ."."":-,,'.-....,'_-.~"J'.JJ:. : ,,:'.' ~: \~'J.'~.:'" i':" "., I"
I :.,: ...j..., ,~, _::::-' - ~<' '"rJ.lli'-, ;:-" ..' : 'I~~~I"'\- I :r_+I, -", '- -: ~ 'I < , . n.; ,\~ ' .,1 :." " ,: ~
" 1"'__" :,~-I';:;,,'~';)rl" ~... . 'IL": -' , . ,., i ,'I .;",', '\. ' , I
"' ~'i;l'.;J:~',>'~"~;;:':~>'>":~"':-'" ~\ ""}"JIIJ" I:it 'I~'.I'. !:,;: \';1,..,:"/"':'" .."~~
, .'.' ,. ,_ u, ' ., " -'-~''''''''jl'l':'=i"d ',' d, . I l ,', " ~ I k,. ','. . '
"';'.",,::,;~.: ,~:_~~~\'":::'!I~;,r:,l,:::,:~_:.''' 'i::,.; ,"l,I': .'.1, J;l.:I::. ,~.::;! l,r/~.~.~';:'.- :~..: 1/ 't'
. ." , .'" . -'-":'...=i" ,...", ,- I, i /I' ~.",~..' I"" . .,J., i.. (Ori:
.;':"..:..;." ,;";..,>':.,,,.... .,' k':";'-':,,--' '" I, -'~"ll'l.I;.";",-=-. :.,:,
, .., .1,:".:.-.7"" :..~~;,I. , .,!', 0;'; I I" ::l',\, _ I' : f," ~ :1 ..' I' .I....r.
" ,,' . i __ '. ,,'~ ',. , . " " , . "--' ,,,.' . ' , -- · 'I ' ", ", '-, '
." ~.,~:;:.:;~ffi:~':.:,,',' ','.~j(~k;'~~:<i~: ,!,!,';'::+! r',ii~'!';;T' ,:~,:~ 1(' '" j' ;;~.:;,;
, .' - ".,..\'. \ I ,.. ' ' I ,,' I I !' ) '. I' " 1 \
': ,; ,.. .,;:-'r'~,\. .; " ' '.', ',:;'~'.' .:~! . '" .,...:', ,.' .:_:' ,I' ....~
.m'" ..., '. .'~"" ,,' . 1,J ,I. (' ,.' '. r. ...... " . ~ . I!
." , ,.<:'tJ;~:'~-J~': ~;;.,:,: )L~~.:;- ,;> ;;~ :'.: >:1~:\ ,J .::~~~
".' ...' ,'_,___ "',' ".', " ,0 .,', "t'. j .,' I' ,..",~.--:,." if'. "C", '."-'- _,iI:
'. ::: ;,;:.;: ;;i;;:j' ~;~: ~~~~. c~~i ',,': >, : .i:;.r:,' ? ~:'~' , ~.:~, t~~~~~, I,
'''''J ti,;liJc'""~,, ,,, .,'- """.~~--~-- ,.. '" -."..$. -,-"",ll -' -,' J!:~""-
J', : :,.:~,~:~',:'-.::;'~..,:\ :L'~:,.' "_~n' " .;:" . 'j' ';' j ',0/.-';1'..';- ;~. ~',:i :,i\i\, 0::'-::.: _..,~I. }~~..~~. .
",_ .,":'__ . ,"0.'.. _'. "."_._-=___n"_'- .,'.~".. 'l..,.,."j' "I'~l" "r.:X,' '1:.... ~'
, ,_. ,: :_." .,j",,-- ,""-, ;',,' .., . , . ,'_ "....,..~, .. ',,:,. . "\11 . I' I ...!\ i1' ".:.:.:." ~~.....""
""-.....::" ,..,. ", ~-',;.: _""iI!r~i~ ;cr"~j ,;./ .,: .' ' , '. .,.,~' ',~, ,~t~;,'~i;' '
. , :' ',C'j ,'(j"~'_" '"~~'.', '," ~.. ':....:, . , . "",",:i' '" , ?-'''- -'-"-':,~,
, '," .;,~,,~'t~l'" "1)'1';'-""/ .,. ~rnp'.;" .','u";" _' .. -.,.--,...." ,...'.. t-:::1'. ", "-'1'" J
" , ""',.",~~,~.':', ,:'"~: ?i}~~4R~/:'~.~ ~ ;;'~.-~~:-~' ,~~<~~:'~~~~;/~~~~~~~WV1~{ ':!'
-\"
,..
....
0:
..
"-
o
a:
"-
\~
.0:
,,"'
,X
'" :
;. ~.
.'
..
.
;.,/
i ~ ~'fo
~ ~ W 5~
~ :;) o...~"
<{ ~ 0 ~~
C~O::O~
~-'c...fO
2Z<(3
o:5l-!.
PI: ICL. _ ""
... U 0:: l;:
5 <( S
U I- 8
~ zel
<(l
V)~1'
~I.:
~
% .. i
Q !
3 :(
'" III
~
u
..
.. ..
% ~ '"
Q s: g
~ 8 0
0
0 0 ;;
~ .. " ~ u <)
~ 2 2 ; "
0 " " :Ii
" ,.. !2 !2 ~ ~
.. (j !< !< 0
..
::1 II
~ .. .. .. (;
" z "
~ ;; ;; t
2 0
"
~ Q ~ ~ ~
~ :; "
'" " ~
.. .. ;;
~ ~ i Q ~
3 ~ ~ ~
~ .: "
;;: '"
" ::: '" .. Q
~
.
.
.
.
~
~ ;
Q
; ~ ~ l;:
~ X Q "
Q ~ ~ ;
~ '" Q
" 0; 0; '"
1!i :< i i !:!
o.
~ z '"
;l; ;l;
....
..
c ~
~ ~
~ 8
~
I :;(
.. ~
(j
u i ~
Q
0 :Ii ~ 0
0 0 u
" " <5 ;)
2 ..
~ .. e
" '"
~ z ~ 1:
i> ..
z u !i
0
" u II
0 Q
>: " u 3;
~
'U!
\/I
Q
I\.
~
l{ 'Ir II
~ ~ \.,
~ I-- J
r.;-,\Jll/,-t
&~ ~~
~~ ~~
!~ ~{
~ <t ~
::J Il/q
~~ ....'"
h:.... .." ~
4~ eI
~~ 1ii~
~:- ~~
~~~It
~~ -J~
~;) ~ Ii
11:\).. "IQ
1lJV\"\lJ
. D
t D
, n
,~
.:::,.-:,'
, .'
lN1:RODUCIION
GENERAL PURPOSE! SCOPE OF ENVlRONMENTAL REVIEW
This Initial Study (IS) has been prepared to determine whether or not the proposed
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment/ General Plan Amendment for the Santa Rita
property (project) will have a significant effect on the environment which is outside the
scope of a prior Environmental Impact Report (ElR) for the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
(discussed below), and to identify feasible mitigation measures. Major features of the
proposed project include:
. Amendments to the land use and circulation diagrams of the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan to create a useable site for -t.'le proposed Santa Rita
Business Centerj amendments to the text and diagrams of the General Plan
to update existing and proposed roadway designations, alignments, etc.
.
Adjusting the circulation system and remaining land uses to create a more
efficient roadway system and reduce potential conflicts between adjacent
uses.
.'~:.
,~ .-
.".or '_
. Adoption of a Development Agreement with infrastructure sequencing
program.
If, based upon the information presented in ibis study, it is determined that the
proposed project will not hl!.ve any significant impacts or that such impacts can be
mitigated, a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be issued. If it is determined that the
proposed project will have one or more significant impacts that cannot be adequately
mitigated, and which were not -examined in the EIR for 'the Eastern Dublin S~c
Plan, the lead agency (Oty) will require 'the preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR).
Th'VIRoNMENTAL PRoc:EDURES
This IS has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
of 1970 (CEQA), as amended (Public Resources Code, Section 21000, et seq.) and the
California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (California Administrative Code Section
15000, et seq.) This report complies wifu the rules, regulations, and procedures for the
implementation of fue California Environmental Quality Act as adopted by the City of
Dublin.
-.):
~')-
-1-
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
The project represents an amendment to a portion of the City's adopted Eastem Dublin
Spedfic PIan (1994) and General Plan (1992). An Environmental Impact Report (ErR -State
Oearinghouse No. 91103064) for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and
Specific Plan was certified in May of 1993. The project site was included in the analysis of
tha t ElR.
CEQA Section 15150 states the follov..ring concerning incorporation by reference:
"An EIR n' may incorporate by reference all or portions of another
document which is a matter of public record or is generally available to the
public. 1'\7here all or part of another document is incorporated by reference,
the incorporated language shall be considered to be set forth in full as part
of the te>..i of the EIR..."
As further required by CEQA Section 15150, the certified Eastern Dublin General Plan
Amendment and Specific Plan (parts I-III) will be available for public inspection at the
Oty of Dublin Community Development Department, 100 Ovic Plaza, Dublin, California,
during normal business hours. Appendix F contains the Executive Summary of the
Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan EIR, which surrunarizes that
projecfs potential environmental impacts and recommended mitigation measures.
Also incorporated by reference is a Matrix which has incorporated the mitigation
measures and action programs of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment' and
Specific Plan which vvill reduce impacts of the proposed project to a level of.
insignificance. The Matrix was designed to use in evaluating specific project proposals in
Eastern Dublin for compliance V\'ith the Eastern Dublin Final EIR and Mitigation
Monitoring Program. The Matrix has been modified to include any additional mitigation
measures required by this Initial Study. Therefore, the Matrix also serves as the
mitigation summary and mitigation monitoring program for this proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration. The Matrix is attached as Appendix E (only those applicable
mitigation measures/ conditions are included).
LRID AGENCY/CONTACT PERSONS
In accordance vvith Sections 15050 and 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Oty of
Dublin has been designated the "lead agency" V\Thich is defined as the "public agency
V\Thich has the principal responsibility for carrying out or disapproving a project. II The
project sponsor is also the Oty of Dublin.
-2-
~3
.'.,"
'_w .'
. '".+
.'.,'
~ :": :
. ::-.;
. .:~.:..
.:i,
:.,....;:.
". -'.
- 0"..
."'-',.,
, '.
..- +
..'
.'.,;',.,...
. . . . ~'..
,.' -
.~.~.:~;
..,'"
':::.>:}:::
Lead Agency/ Project Sponsor.
MS. Jeri Ram, Associate Plarmer
Community Development Departm.ent
100 Ovic Plaza
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568
(510) 833-6610
(510) 833-6628 Fax
RESPONSIBLF/ 1RUSTEE AGENCIES
Responsible agencies are those which have discretionary approval over one or more
actions involved with development of the proposed project site. Trustee Agencies are
state agencies having discretionary approval or jurisdiction by law over material
resources affected by the project For the purposes of this project these agencies include,
but are not limited to the following:
. California Deparbnent of Fish & Game - Region 3
. Caltrans - Alameda Branch II and District ATSD Coordinator
. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
TECHNICAL SIUDlES
1JKM Transportation Consultants prepared a traffic report and CurrIes M. Salter
Associates, Inc. prepared a noise impact assessment (both firms are under contract to 'the
Alameda County Surplus Property Authority). These reports have been summarize~ in
the text of the Jnitial Study and may be found in their entirety in the Appendices
_ section.
d-1
-3-
PROJECT DEscR1PnON
.',."..
.....
"<.-:.-
IN1RODUCIION
The Alameda County Surplus Property Authority (ACSP A), . owner of the Santa Rita
property within the City of Dublin,. is requesting an amendment to the City's Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan to reflect proposed modifications to the land use
and circulation pattern for the Santa Rita property.
The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan planning area (consisting of approximately 3,300 acres)
is located on the eastern edge of the City of DubliI\. situated near the center of the Tri-
Valley regio~ which includes the communities of Dublin, San Ramon, Pleasanton, and
Livermore, and portions of both Alameda County and Contra Costa County. Interstate
highways 580 and 680 provide regional access to the planning area. Figure 1 represents
the local vicinity.
The Santa Rita property encompasses 954 acres, of which approximately 705 acres are
included 'Within the adopted Eastem Dublin Specific Plan Ganuary 1994). The site is
bounded by Broder Boulevard on the north to 1-580 on the south, and from Camp Parks
on the west to Tassajara Road on the east Land use designations include a wide mix of
residential densities, as well as retail, office, industrial, and semi-public uses. The
property is also designated for an elementary school, a large community park, and an
open space corridor along Tassajara Oeek (designated as a major perennial stream).
Total residential development, based on .average pennitted densities is .2,.971 units, over
half being medium-high to high density units. Total non-residential development based
, on average permitted floor area ratios (PARs), is approximately 5.8 million square feet
The existing Specific Plan Land Use Map for the Santa Rita property is shown in Figure
2
.'<,::.\
. ~'.'~
. ':::?~:
DFSCRIPTlON OF PROPOSED PROJECT
The primary purpose of the proposed amendment (project) is to permitihe development
of the 25-acre Santa Rita Business Center being proposed h}T Opus Southwest, to be
located in the northwest comer of the properly. The Business Center proposal will,
require a Specific Plan amendment to 1) create a viable site for the project by realigning
the proposed segment of Hacienda Drive near Gleason Road; and 2) to accommodate the
intensity of use being proposed for the development by essentially combining the current
Campus Office and Industrial Park designations into a new Industrial/Office
designation.
-4-
.:...
~ . ..
~:'. ~ .~.: : .-
'5
~
.<c:;::>.
, '
.',.
- ~\.~.:.
.0. -.:.'~
.";
'.,
......
. :':\-:.-.
EASTERN DUBLIN
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMEl'--TJ / GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
FOR THE
ALAMEDA COUl'\lTY SURPLUS PROPERTY AUTHORITY
SANTA RITA PROPERTY
INITIAL STUDY AND
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
CITY OF DUBLIN
CoMMUNITY DEVEWPMENT DEPARTMENT
AUGUST 1996
'..-:
~b
TABLE OF COhTffiNTS
Irrtroduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Project Description. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Environmental Olecklist F onn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Olecklist Responses and Environmental Analysis. . . . . . . . . . ..' . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
List of Figures and Tables
Figure 1 - Local Vicinity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Figure 2 - Adopted Specific Plan Land Use Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Figure 3 - Proposed Land Use Map ............................"... 8
Table A - Adopted Specific Plan Land Use Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Table B - Proposed Specific Plan Land Use Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Appendices
Appendix A -
Appendix B -
Appendix C -
Appendix D -
Appendix E -
Appendix F -
9-1
Public Notice and Responses
Transportation Study and Proposed Text Amendments
Noise Study
Hazards Memorandum
Mitigation Monitoring Matrix
Executive Summary from Eastern Dublin General Plan
Amendment and Specific Plan draft ElR
."'~"':2'"
..... "
....-.
.--..,.,'"
.....,
..~+'/
.,.,
o. .'
~. .~.
..,"""..:;
. .,
--~....
....
.. ~:.
.:.:~. ,;
. -.."
:-~. -
.";'
..-. .
~ ~ ;'.&"..~
j't{
~
NORTH
Local Vicinity
Figure 1
Source: City of Dublin
- 5 -
Gleason Drive G/I
~
C':l
IP M 0
0:::
r-s
CO a
'2
<r.>
LM.ES p <r.>
{) GC r=
>
is MH
-' M M
::;;
- H CO NC LM.MH GC
<
....:; Dublin Blvd.
0
GC
Interstate 580
NC "Neighborhood Commercial
GC Gene11ll Commercial
, CO Campus Office
IF Industrial Park
H High Density Residential
MH Medium High Density Residential
M Medium Density Residential
L Single Family Residential
GII Public/Semi Public
ES Elementary School
P City Park
~
NORTH
~1
Exisring Land Use Map
Figure 2
- 6-
co
Source: City of Dublin
, ,
.."...
.'~"';,.".::~:,
'"
....
.'.
...'.
.:".
,-.
.'~'"
. .,
.::\
, ..
- --a
.-. .--
.'
2b
In addition to accommodating the needs of the Business Center, the applicant's proposed
Specific Plan amendment has the following objectives: to adjust the remaining land uses
to reduce potential conflicts with the adjacent uses; provide viable sites that can be
marketed and developed in a logical fashion; and reflect the as-built location of Dublin
Boulevard and specific or approved developments on the property. Figure 3 illustrates
the proposed Specific Plan Land Use Map. Tables A and B summarize the existing and
proposed land uses and intensities for the property.
Proposed area-by-area Specific Plan land use changes are described in detail under the
'Land Use' heading of the Checklist and Responses section of this report The proposed
amendment also adjusts the major roadway pattern to accommodate the Santa Rita
Business Center. Specific adjusbnents to the circulation system are described under the
'Transportation' heading in the Checklist and Responses section of this report and in
Appendix J?
DISCRETIONA.RY ACTIONS
Implementation of the proposed project will require a series of discretionary actions as
listed below. The Gty of Dublin is the agency responsible for making the discretionary
actions. Please note that one or more of the agencies listed on page 3 may have
additional discretionary authority throughout the approval/planning process.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Adoption of the Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring Program
Approval of Specific Plan text and map amendments
Approval of General Plan text and map amendments
Approval of a tentative parcel map
Approval of Planned Developm~t (PD) rezone
Adoption of a Development Agreement
Site Development Review approval
-7-
t)
>
Q
o
<
NC
GC
lND/CO
H
MH
M
L
G/I
ES
P
.
~
NORTH
31
Proposed Land Use Map
Fi gure 3
Gleason Drive
Gfl
GC
INDiCa
M
"0
r:;
o
~
L
:-;l
1:3
.~
v:>
v.:
GC ~
IND ICO
p
M
ES
M
MH
H MH
:..:
Q
-
...
'-'
....
C3
CO'" -g
M
L
u lin Blvd.
GC
GC/CO
Interstate 580
Neighborhood Commercial
General Commercial
Industrial/Campus Office
High Density Residential
Medium High Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Single Family Residential
Public/Semi Public
Elementary School
City Park
Includes 5 acres of Neighborhood Commercial
Source: City of Dublin
-8-
.'.,.
. ,'.
,", ..
."_'-0';
...
. "
-'.'
.. '..'
.... .
.'~.
......-r.
.--,,:'0>
.,
.'
...:,..
: ~;!~\
.""
_"w". .
- -.. ~
Table A
Santa Rita Property
Adopted Specific Plan - Land Use Sum.Inary
Land Use Category Qoss Acres Density Square Feet Units
General Commercial 103.0 351.25 FAR 1,153,033
Neighl:)(lIhood Com.. 18.0 0.30 FAR 235,224
Campus Office 140.8 .75135 FAR 2,.791,325
Public/Semi-Public 00.8 0.25 FAR 988~2
Industrial Park 53.4 0.28 FAR 651,309
High Density Resd. 36.3 35 dul ac 1,271
Med-High Density 39.5 20 dul ac 700
Medium Density 642 10 du/ac '642
Single-Family Resd. 892 4-5.5 dul ac 399
City Park , 56.3 -,
Open Space 24.6
Elementary School 10.5
IOIAL 704.6 5,819,703 ..",,972
Somce: Appendix 4 of the adopted Eastem Du~lin Specific Plan.
FAR = Eoor .AIea Ratio
duf ac = dwe1l.iiig units per acre
'It Total shown in adopted Specific Plan was 2,.971 units, but appear.> to be a typographical error.
7/-
- 9-
Table B
Santa Rita Properly
Proposed Specific Plan - Land Use Summary
.J-~':_:'-
..,."...
.... .'
-.....
'....
Lmd Use Category Gross Acres Density Square Feet Units
General Commercial 133.75 .21-.3 FAR 1,369~74
Campus Office1 79.05 .&5/.40 FAR 2,,416,273
Public/Semi-Public 88.5 0.25 FAR 963,765
Industrial/ Office 65.0 0.37 FAR 1,047,618
High Density Resd. 34.6 35 du/ ac 1,211
Med-High Density 38.9 16-20 du/ ac 747
Medium Density 602 10 du/ ac 602
Single-Family Resd. 892 4-5.4 du/ ac2 399
Community Park 56.3
Open Space/ Creek 29.1
Elementary School 11.0
'IOTAL 685.E? 5,797,530 2,959
....,-'~,.....,
','
Source: Alameda County Swplus Property Authority
1 Jncludes 5.0 Bcxes of Neighoo:z:hood Comm~ _
:2 Density nmges fpr Medium High and Single-Family reflect actual Califomia Creekside densities.
3 Acreage total does not correspond with adopted Specific Plan due to more acew:ate mapping.
.',.-:,
":.".
. .'.::
.'. .-
'7.2
- 10-
.'
D.'VIRoNMENTAL 0tEc::KLl5T FORM
IN1RODUCIION
The following 1'v.,'o sections evaluate the potential impacts of the proposed project The
environmental checklist,. approved by the City and consistent with CEQA Guidelines,
was used to focus this study on physical, social, and economic factors that may be
further impacted by the proposed project The checklist indicates ",rith.a "potentially
significant impact", "potentially significant unless mitigation incorporated", "less than
significant impact", or "no impact/no new impact" for each specified potential impact
The second section, Olecklist Responses and Environmental Analysis, will respond and
analyze in detail those impacts identified in the checklist A brief explanation is required
for all answers except "no impact" answers that are adequately supported. A "no impact"
answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the
impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. "No new impact"
responses are briefly summarized.
.~~
,.-,
, "
. "-".
Referenced information sources utilized for this analysis include the following:
1) Determination based on location of project;
2) Determination based on staff office review;
3) Determination based on field review;
4) Determination based on the City of Dublin General Plan;
5) Determination based on the City. of Dublin Zoning Ordinance;
6) Determination based on the Easter Dublin General Plan Amendment and
Specific Plan Final EIR and Addendum";
7) Not applicable.
.An Initial Study is a preliminary analysis prepared by the lead agency to determine
whether an EIR or Negative Declaration must be prepared and to identify the significant
effects to be analyzed in an ElR (CEQA Guidelines See. 15365). .An Initial Study may
also be used to determine "'Thether a project is within the scope of a previously prepared
Program EIR (CEQA Guidelines See. 15168 (c)). The Initial Study for -the proposed Santa.
Rita property and associated Specific Plan and General Plan lunendments will serve to
focus on effects determined to be potentially significant In accordance ",rith CEQA
Guidelines, the folloV\ring checklist has been prepared that identifies any environmental
effects.
.,..,
. -~.~::-:~:>::
"~t/
-11-
E1\'\:'ffiONMEN'TAL CHECKLIST
1.
Project Title: Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment/General Plan Amendment for the Alameda
County Surplus Property Authority Santa Rita Property
.~-'-',,::.-;:;
. . -"
2 Lead Agency Name: City of Dublin
3. Contact person and phone number: Ms. Jeri Ram, ..6,ssociate Planner
(510) 833-6610
4. Project location: The Santa Rita property encompasses 954 acres (Assessor's Parcel No. 946-15-1-4),
of which approximately 705 acres are included within the adopted Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
Ganuary 1994). The site is bounded by Broder Boulevard on the north to 1-580 on the south, and
from Camp Parks on the west to Tassajara Road on the east
5. Project sponsor's name and address: Alameda County Surplus Property Authority, ""4 W.
Winton. Room 151, Hayward, California. Contacts: Stuart Cook or Pat Cashman
6. General plan designation: Refer to Table A
7. Zoning: Refer to Figure 2
8:
Description of project: The primiU}' purpose of the proposed amendment (project) is to permit the
development of the 25-acre Santa Rita Business Center being proposed by Opus Southwest, to be
located in the northwest comer of the property. The Business Center proposal ",'ill require a Specific
Plan amendment to 1) create a viable site for the project by realigning the proposed segment of
Hadenda Drive near Gleason Road; and 2) to accommodate the intensity of use being proposed for
the development by essentially combining the current Campus Office and Industrial Park
designations into a new Industrial/Office designation.
..,-
....
,'. .
- .......
. ..-
The project site is generally flat and largt::ly vacant Tassajara Creek bisects the site in a north-south
"direction and contains the majority of tress 1>n-site. Several public facilities (California Highway
Patrol County corporation yard, and animal shelter) located north of Gleason Drive will remain.
Numerous decrepid buildings associated with the old 'Navy Hospital are in 'the process of being
removed.
9. Smrounding land uses and setting: Camp Parks Army Base is located to the west,. Santa Rita
County jail to the north, 1-580 and the Oty of Pleasanton to the south, and vacant agricultUral land
deSignated for a variety of urban uses to the east (part of adopted Eastern Dublin Specific Plan).
10. Other public agencies whose approval may be required during the processing of future site-
specific applications: California Department of Fish & Game - Region 3; CaltTans _ Alameda
Branch n and District A1SD Coordinator; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; US. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
.::
.....'..
I},~
;/
-12-
._....,..r_' ..
. ENVIRONMENIA.L FAODRS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,.
involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by
the checklist on the following pages:
o land Use and Planning
o population and Housing
o Geological Programs
o Water
o .A.ir Quality
DETERMINATION:
o Transportation/Circulation 0 Public Services
o Biological Resomces 0 Utilities and Service SystemS
o Energy and Mineral Resources 0 Aesthetics
B Hazards 0 Cultuxal Resomces
o Noise 0 Recreation
c Mandatory Findings of Significance
o I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment,. and a NEGATIVE DEa..ARATION 'Will be prepared.
s I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment,. there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project A
~TEG.~11VE DEa..ARATION will be prepared.
D I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on !he enviroronent, and
an ENVlRoNMENTAL Th1P ACT REPOKf is required.
D . I find that the proposed project roay have ~ ~ignificant effect(s) on !he environment,
but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document
pursuant 10 applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on an earligr analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect
is a 'potentially significant impact" or 'potentially significant unless mitigated.' An
ENVIRoNMENTAL lMPACI REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the
effects that remain to be addressed..
D I find that' although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environp:l.ent,. there WILL Nor be a significant effect in -this case because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable sbmdards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant
to that earlier ErR, including re'visions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon
the proposed project
Si~~~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . Q ~~. .\S0!": . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Printed Name
. . . . . '8 : ~ :3;-:1.3 . . . . . . . . . . .
Date
.":~"
'~.,,:~~::~+\
.',...
..-. '.
( ,+. . )\ .
. .'-""'1 ~ .D.\.J.~. . . . . . .
For <J
. +" .
....:.
'....
-13 -
'?Jh
Th'\1RO~TfAL Th1PACIS
1 L.4..ND USE A..1IID PLANNING. Would the
proposal:
8) Conflict with gen:ral plan designation or zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project?
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the
\'icinity? (2, 4, 6)
d) Affect agricultullU resources or operations (e.g.,
impacts to soils or f8Imlands. or impacts from
incompatible land uses)? (6)
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low income
or minority community)? [T)
H. POPIJLA.TION AND HOUSING. Would the
proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrast:nwture)? (6)
c) Displaee existing housing, especially affordable
housing? [T)
ill. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMs. Wauld the proposal
result in Dr expose people to potential imp~ts
invoIl'ing;
a) Fault rupture? (6)
b) Seismic ground shaking? (6)
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
(6)
-14 -
~1
Po&:atiaIIy
S~
~
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
1'oCaJt1aUy
Si:Dlftc:U
UDle:q
Mititldio.a
IDeot1lO~
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
1.- aa.
SipUic:.nt
~
8
8
o
o
o
8
o
o
o
o
o
No lmpadf
No Ne'I'I" Jnu-d
o
o
f5I
f5I
B
o
f5I
f5I
f5I
8
8
.'.,'
. '
.......
", .-
".-..
.',-,.,
. .:. '.~' ,"
," ....
......
','
.',.,
'. -. -.
. ~.." -'. .' .
.... . : . ~ ...
,:....-...
'. ...
.-.
.:'"
. ,..-
. '..-
:'-",'
..r.",
..-....
......
-. '..
. .......
~ -. - _ ~'. ~
'.-:~' ."
."'.,
" -"
.' .-'
. ." -_ ...: r:~::.
+"'-:"&'
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (7)
e) Landslides or mudflows? (4, 6)
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (6)
g) Subsidence of land? (6)
h) E>.."pansive soils? (6)
i) Unique geologic or physical features? (4,6)
IV. WATER- Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or
the rate and amount of surface runoff1 (6)
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? (6)
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (6)
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in my
water body? (6)
e) Changes in currents, or the c_oursc or direction of
water movements? (6)
f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals. Of
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability? (6)
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
(6)
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (6)
i) Substantial reduction Dl the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies7(6)
7;1
p...-ny
S~
~
o
o
o
o
-15 -
p~
Sipl1k:lmt
UDIess
1&1iptiOQ
lDeoTllOnRc!
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
l.aI e-
s~
~
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
"-
o
o
o
o
No lmJI-d'
NoN-~
S
s
s
s
s
s
s
R
a
8
B
,181
B
8
I8l
v. AIR QUALITY. ff' ould the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation? (6)
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (6)
c) ..6Jter air movements, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? (6)
d) Create objectionable odors?
VI. lRANSPORTATION/CIRCUUTION.
Would the proposal result in:
a) Increased vebi cular trips or traffic congestion? (3)
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.,
sharp cW"Ves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., fann equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity onsite or offsite?
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
(6)
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transpOrtation (e.g., bus turnouts,.
bicycle racks)? (6)
g) RBi!. waterborne or air traffic impacts?(7)
VlI. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal result in impacts 10:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats (mcluding but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)? (6)
b) Loca.lly desiBDated species (e.g., heritage
trees)? (5)
c) Lo::ally designatednatuIal communities (e.g., oak
forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (4, 6)
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and veInal
pool)? (6)
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (6)
"77
- 16-
PoO:ntiaDy
SI:nmc:aJt.
~
o
D
o
[J
o
o
o
o
IJ
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
l'o=tiaDy
Si:DmCMlt
UJlIcsa
~-601l
lDcon>ol1lR:d
o
o
o
[J
o
[J
o
[J
o
o
o
o
[J
o
o
[J
r.es. fila
S!:nl1iant
~
o
o
o
iii
o
III
iii
iii
o
o
o
D
D
o
o
o
.'.,...
..' ..
. ..'
,".:-:::-.
No~
No Nrw ImJ-d
iii
II
.
8
8
iii
iii
8
III
8
8
[J
8
[J
o
o
....
.'r .~::
",' .......
..,.::
..-'-''-- ".- ".
..
..~""'"
.....
. ~ .&:~ .::.
....
vro. ENERGY ~"'D MINERAL :RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation
plan? (7)
b) Use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner?(2, 6)
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known
romenl resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State?(7)
lX. HAZAlU>S. W (JULd the proposal im>olve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or ndiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?(7)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazards?
e) Increased frre 1:ulz,ard in areas ""ith flammable
brush, grass, or trees'] (6)
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels'] (3.6)
b) :Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (3, 6)
:xI. pOBUC SERVICES. Would the proposal have
all effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered government sen'ices in mry of the
following areas;
a) Fire protection! (2, 6)
b) :police protection? (2, 6)
c) Schools? (2, 6)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
(2,6)
e) Other government services? (2,6)
~D
p~
sipiA~
~
o
o
o
-17 -
p~
s~
Unless
Mitita6oll.
locofpOJ"lded
o
o
o
1J
1J
1J
1J
c
IJ
c
1J
1J
IJ
o
1J
Leu bn
s~
~
o
1J
IJ
o
III
o
o
o
B
II
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
No Jmpood'
No Ne,.- lmPad
III
IlJ
III
o
III
o
o
II
.
B
o
o
1J
o
I!C
8
III
II
o
III
xu. UTlLII'IES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS.
Would the proposal result in a need for new
systems or supplies, or substantial alterations
to the following:
a) Power or natural gas? (6)
b) Communication systems? (6)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
systems? (6)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? (2, 6)
e) Storm water drainage? (6)
f) Solid waste disposal? (6)
g) Local or regional water supplies? (6)
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (6)
b) Have a demonstrn.ble negative aesthetic effect?
(6)
c) Create light or glare?
XIV. COLTlJRAL RESOtlRCES.
Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? (6)
b) Disturb archaeological resources? (6)
c) mve the potential to cause a physical change
which wouJd affect unique ethnic cultural values?
(4,6)
d) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact area?(7)
XY. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) lncrease the d:mand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities? (6)
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (6)
t/I
-18 -
p~
sJ:nUkant
~
D
D
D
o
D
D
o
D
D
o
o
D
D
o
D
D
l'otmllUllly
Sl:Dl1lamt
Unless
Mifi:lItiOll
Inco\1l(lnded
D
o
D
D
o
o
D
o
o
D
o
o
o
o
o
o
Less tb:mt
SI:nmcomt
~
D
o
D
o
o
D
o
D
o
B
o
o
o
D
o
o
No:&np.dl
No Ntw Irm-ct
.' ~,:,..,.~:, .
.....
, "
II
B
B
B
III
B
B
B
.'.".,'
.."+
...":
III
o
III
B
B
llIl
B
B
.:.:.
.~. .
~_......-~
.'.,"
, "
.'.,-.-
."-:-:-:,'
". ..
....
-- .'~..
-:. -
.' ...
..:.-,:
':-:;.~~
vJ..
l"otenCiIIlIy
S~CIlJ1If
~
potmtiNly
S1pUkaat
Unless
MiIl.tmon
JDcorponoted
No Jmp8dI
No Nr::w bnp8d
Less e..
SlpI.ncapt
~
XVI MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the enviroDlIlent, substantially reduce the habitat
of Ii fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or pre-history?
o
D
D
B
b) Does the proj ect have the potential to achieve short-term., to the disadvantage of1,mg-term, enviroDlIlental goals?
o
D
D
rill
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but c1lII1ulatively considerable? (-Cumulatively
considerable- means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)
o D 0 rill
d) Does the project have environmental effects 'which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either
direetly or indirectly?
D
c
c
rill
-19 -
OmCKLlST RESPONSES AND ENvIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
.....
~.. . .
,.,:":'~~ ;.:
The follo'Wing section provides responses to those questions in the previous section. Each
subsection is annotated with the number, name and letter corresponding to the checklist
form. Sources used to complete the IS include the City of Dublin General Plan, Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan and EIR, the proponent's application,. and the technical reports
listed on page 3 of this study.
Please note that a majority of the potential impacts discussed within this Initial Study
(checked as "no new impact") were analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR
(incorporated by reference) and mitigation measures adopted. The issues which Were
previously analyzed are noted below and mitigation measures and/or policy numbers
are noted (derived from the Cityls matrix).
It should be noted that for the purposes of this analysis, impacts to the adopted Specific
Plan itself (i.e. conflicts with goals and policies), as well as what potential impacts the
proposed amendments could have on the environment should 'the future development
occur, were considered and analyzed.
.';..
.'...
- ~'".
-::. ~~~:..
1 LWD USE AND PlANNING
Existing- Setting
Please refer to the Eastern. Dublin GP A/SPA Final .mR for a description of the existing
land use and planning setting.
Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures
SignifiCllnce Criteria: According to CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, a project may have
a significant impact on existing land uses if it would: 1) disrupt or divide the physical
arrangem.ent of an established community; 2) conflict 'with established recreational,
educational, religious, or scientific uses in an area; 3) convert prime agricu1turalland to
non-agricultural land or impair the productivity of prime agricu1turallandi or 4) conflict
with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community where it is located.
bnpact
Project approval may result in conflicts witJz the City's General PIan
designations or zoning for the site.. This impact is considered less
t1um significant
.",.
---" ....
.. +.. "."
..... .....
- 20-
~1;
,(,.;~""-.
..;...,;
...~,.),~..,
~ . .",
~". ..
..:'..
"" ..-,
'0. ."
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and General Plan Amendment incorporate
minor adjustments to the arrangement of land uses within the project area, and combine
two previously adopted land uses into a single use category to allow for greater
flexibility (combines the current Campus Office and Industrial Park designations into a
new Industrial/ Office designation to accommodate the mix and intensity of uses being
proposed for the development). The policies outlined in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
and the O.ty's General Plan and which are designed to guide use and development of
the area, generally support the proposed land use amendments as proposed. Presuming
adoption of the proposed amendments, any impacts that may arise are anticipated to be
less than significant
No mitigation is required.
bnpact
Project approval may result in amf1icts with applicable
envtronmentnl plans or policies adopted by agencies wi1h
jurisdiction over the p,*ct This impact is considered less than
signifiamt ' '
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and General Plan Amendment, as noted above,
include adjustments to land uses previously approved. No areas previously planned for
open space in the adopted Eastern Dublin Specific Plan nor the Otis General Plan are
proposed for development, and similarly, no lands previously contemplated for
development are proposed for open space. The magnitude and intensity of development
'that could occur if the amendments are adopted as proposed are relatively similar to
-those shown under the adopted Specific Plan. As such, any impacts that may arise are
anticipated to be less than significant '
No mitigation is required.
Impact
Project approval may result in incompatibilities witit. existing 1and
uses in the vicinibj (both on- and off-siie). This impact was
aifdressed in the prior EIR. No new impacts are anticipaJe.d from
the proposed proFct
Please note that although this impact was addressed in the prior ElR, updated
information regarding surrounding land uses and their potential incompatibility has
been included below.
Off-site land uses
Off-site land use impacts for the proposed project are similar to those analyzed for the
adopted plan,. including the proximity of Camp Parks to the west and the Santa Rita
Rehabilitation Center Gail) and Alameda County sheriffs Firing Range and Training
Center and California Highway Patrol office located to the north.
~4
- 21-
Potential impacts associated with off-site land uses include noise generated by Camp
Parks and the Sheriffs training center (please refer to section X. Noise, for a complete
discussion) and security concerns 'with the Rehabilitation Center. Some future residents
in the northeast portion of the Specific Plan area (as well as future business in along the
northern and western Specific Plan boundaries) may perceive the proximity of the
Rehabilitation Center and it's release program as a potential land use conflict This
potential conflict is more of a social and marketing concern rather than an actual land
use confli~ and is not considered an environmental impact per se. At present, there are
no physical barriers (other than roadways) separating the specific plan area from these
off-site uses.
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final ElR are
expected to occur.
On-site land uses
Potential incompatibilities for the proposed project are similar to those analyzed for the
adopted plan. The focus is on the proximity of residential to non-residential uses and can
be manifested in many ways including: noise, odor, light and glare, and visual impacts.
The proposed land uses represent a similar mix as that adopted for the Specific Plan.
'Through the Site Development permit the City analyzes all of the issues mentioned
above and consults with other agencies, as necessary, for making further conditions of
the project '
No impacts not previously .analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GP A/SF A Final EIR ,are
expected to occur.
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of "the following mitigation measures will reduce
potential impacts associated with off-site land use incompatibilities to a level of
insignificance.
:Mitigation Measure 03.01/01.0 from the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final ElR is
applicable.
No mitigation is required for potential on-site land use incompatibilities.
bnpact
Proj?ct approval may affect agriai1bi.ra1 resources or operations (e.g.,
impacts tv soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses).
This impact was addressed in the prior EIR and identified as less than
signifia:m:t. No new impacts are aniidpated from this proposed project
As indicated in -the prior EIR, loss of agricu1turalland (dry farming occurs on-site) is
considered an insignificant impact due to the fact that underlying lands are not
- 22-
1~
...'..:,
.".~ .::
.-"',:.,~:.
.-, .
. .
....
::.:/.::'0.-
..'
_w.'
..:;> ,
.....
,"
,',
-. ".
: '"~.~. .-
. ~. - . .'
. . ~ w _
.',.
~. : : .
." '\- '..-
. 7"W -
~ :,' ". .~. '.~.
*"
considered "prime". No impacts not previously analyzed In the Eastern Dublin
GPA/SPA Final EIR are expected to occur.
II. popUlATION AND HOUSING
Existing Setting
Development of the Specific Plan area is in the very early stages, with only one
commercial development (800,000 square feet) and a 271 mixed-unit residential
development approved. A 422,800 square foot business center is currently proposed and
in the planning process.
Potential Impacts and :Mitig-ation Measures
Significance Criteria: CEQA Guidelines Appendix G indicates that a project would have
a significant effect on the environment it if will induce substantial gro'Wi:h or
concentration of population or displace a large number of people. Typically, an increase
in population or housing is not considered an environmental impact in and of itself, but
rather the secondary impacts (such as traffic generation and demand on public services)
are those considered potentially significant .
From the information provided in Tables A and B, it is calculated that buildout of the
Santa Rita Property would result in a daytime population of approximately 16,257
employees under the adopted scenario and 16,403 under -the proposed scenario. A
residential population of approximately 6,267 is anticipated under the adopted scenario
and 6,395 for the proposed scenario. (All calculations were based on generation factors
given in Table 3.2-5 of the draft EIR for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment
and Specific Pl.mt- Part L page 32-7, except for the new Industrial/ Office designation,
for which an average of Industrial Park and Campus Office was used). This represents
anincrease of less 1han 1 % for employees and 2% for residents for proposed populations
versus adopted. .
Impact
Project apprcroaI may -result in a cu.mu1aiive exceedence of official regimUil
or 1.oca1 popu1ation proj!!.cf;itms.. This is considered a 1ess tJzan significant
impaCf:.
As indicated above, build out of the Santa Rita property under proposed land uses would
result in a negligible increase of employee populations and a very small increase in
residential populations over build out under the adopted scenario. The Santa Rita
property encompasses a portion of !he Easler Dublin Specific Plan area, a majority of
which still remains undeveloped. }Jthough the proposed plan represents an increase
over adopted uses, because so much remains to be developed and because the increases
are so small, it is anticipated that -they can be off-set during the remaining planning and
build out of the Specific Plan area.
- 23-
No mitigation is required.
bnpact
~ct approval may induce substantial growth in an. area eiiJzer directly
or indirectly (e.g., tJwugh projects in an undeveloped area or extension of
11Uljor infrastructure). This impact was addressed in the prior ErR. No new
impacts are antidpaied from this proposed proj?ct
Adoption of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan signified the City's intent to introduce
substantial grov.'i:h in an area that previously supported minimal development Growth-
inducing impacts associated with the adopted Specific Plan were analyzed in the prior
ErR. The proposed amendments represent minor changes to the plan,. with similar
grov.'i:h-inducing impacts anticipated. No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern
Dublin GPAjSPA Final EIR are expected to occur.
m GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS
Existing- Setting
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GPAjSPA Final EIR (incorporated by reference) for
the existing geologic setting for the project site.
Potential Impacts and 1v.fitig-ation Measures
Significance Criteria: CEQA Guidelines Appendix G indicates that a project may have
significant impacts on the environment if it interferes substantially with groundwater
recharge, causes substantial flooding, erosion or siltation.. or exposes people or structures
to major geologic hazards.
Impact:
Projxt approval may result in exposure at future un-siJE residents to
potential impacts involving fll1lltrupture. This impactwas addressed in the
prior E1R aniJ was detimnined to be less than signifiamt No new impacts
are anticipated from this proposed project
No known active or potentially active faults traverse ihe project site, and Alquist-Priolo
Special Studies Zones are not located within the site. The potential for fault ground
rupture is therefore considered to be nil. No impacts not previously analyzed in the
Eastern Dublin GPAjSPA Final EIR are expected to occur.
No mitigation measures required.
hnpact:
'11
Projxt lip pI 'Oval may result in exposure of future on-site residents tD
patential seismic ground sluiking and! or seismic ground failure, in.c1uding
liquefac:t:iotL 17zis impact was addressed in the prior ErR.. No new impacts
are anticipaJeiJ from this proposed proj!.ct
- 24-
.',...,..
.... ',"
. -~ :::":.-::"
..~"
. .-;.
.:".- -~.:. !
. rOW'
.,:;:
. -.. - .
... -
. . ~ ," .
.. ,"
.'.':...:.-.
" -.
. -.~ -'
.':;"::-:,:--
. ~ . .
, --
. -f":.".
":.~::: .+:
.',.
.".-,
.".-.''''
......
- . Ow.
~{
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR for a discussion of this potential
impact No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR
are expected to occur.
Mitigation Measures: According to the prior ElR, implementation of mitigation measure
03.06/01.0 will reduce but cannot completely eliminate hazards associated 'with
groundshaking. Implementation of the remaining mitigation measures listed ",rill reduce
secondary effects of earthquake ground shaking to a level of insignificance.
:M1tigationmeasures 03.06/01.0, 03.06/04.0,03.06/07.0,03.06/09.0, and 03.06/11.0
from the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR are applicable.
bnpact
Projedapproval may result in erosion, changes in topography, or unstllb1e
soil conditionS from future exarvation, grading, or filL This impact was
addressed in the prior ErR.. No new impacts are anticipated from this
PT?Posed project.
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GP A/ SPA Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce
this impact to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation measures 03.06/27.0 - 28.0 from the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA F~
Em. are applicable.
lmpacr
Future development on-site "may result in expansive soils and subsiJIence
of 1muI. This impact was addressed in t1te prior ErR. No new impacts are
anticipated from this proposed project. "
Expansive soils and bedrock are present on the project site and have the potential to
cause damage to foundations, slabs and pavements. Expansive soils and rock tend to
shrink upon drying and swell upon wetting. TIris process can cause distress to overlying
structures and infrastructure. No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin
GPA/SPA Final EIR are expected to occur.
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the folloV\-dng mitigation measures will reduce
this impact to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation measures 03.06/14.0 -16.0 from the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final
EIR are applicable.
- 25-
N. WATER
.'.,>~.::
. .. ~ .
.~. .
Existing Setting
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR (incorporated by reference) for
the existing water setting for the project site.
Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Significance Criteria: CEQA Guidelines Appendix G indicates a project may have a
significant effect on the environment if it substantially degrades water quality,
contaminates a public water supply, or substantially degrades or depletes ground water
resources.
Impact
Development of the project site tnIllj result in changes in absorption rates/
drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water. This impact
was addressed in the prior EIR. No new impacts are anticipated from this
proposed project.
The project site is located in an area of minimal groundwater recharge and groundwater
reserves and the majority of the Tri-Valley's groundwater resources are in the Central
Basin, south of the project Nevertheless, development of the project site could have an
impact on local ground "water resources and groundwater recharge due to an increase
in impervious surfaces within the project site. No impacts not previously analyzed in the
Eas~ Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR are expected to occur.
.'-_.,
'."'-:.;,
. .:.:'~~:::
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of t:he following mitigation measures will reduce
this impact to a 1evel of insignificance.. -
Action Programs 11.210,9X,.. and Mitigation Measure 03.05j46.0from the Eastern
Dublin GPAjSP A Final EIR are applicable.
Impact:
,Development of the project site tnIllj result: in the exposure of people or
properly 1D water -re1Ried hazards such as flooding. This impact was
addressed in tJze prior EIR. No new impacts are anticipated from this
proposed project
As development occurs in the area, more impervious surfaces will be created due to
paved streets and building development TIris ",rill increase runoff to T assajara Creek.
Improvement to creek channels in the project area V\rill be required by Zone 7. Basically,
Zone 7 requires "that the hydraulic capacity of the channel be sufficient to carry the 100-
year design flow with one-foot of freeboard at the ultimate upstream development
Already flooding occurs along Tassajara Creek during conditions that are less severe
than l00-year flood due to an undersized culvert Thus with development, it is inevitable
.',.:
...........
11
- 26-
" .
,- -. .-..
.~' that significant channel improvements will be required along Tassajara Creek. It should
be noted that more creek channel acreage is being proposed than what is shown for the
adopted plan, which is considered a benefit of the proposed plan. No impacts not
previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GP A/SF A Final EIR are expected to occur.
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce
this impact to a level of insignificance.
Action Programs 11.210, 9W, 9X and Mitigation Measures 03.05/44.0,03.05/45.0,
03.05/47.0, 03.05/48.0 from the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR are
applicable.
It should be noted that the applicant has submitted a Master Storm Drainage Plan
which has been conditionally approved by the Oty of Dublin Public Works
Department
bnpact
Development of the project site may resultin disc1;arge into surface waters
or other a1Jerati.on of surface water qu.a1ity. This impact was addressed in
the prior EIR. No new impacts are anticipated from this proposed P-roFct
..:----,.~>
, '
Please refer to me Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern. Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce
this impact to a level of insignificance.
MitigationMeasures 03.05/49.0, 03~05/51.o., 03.05/53.0, 03.05/54.0, and 03.05/55.0
from 1he Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final ElR 'are applicable.
bnpact
Development of the project site may resu1tin changes in. the amount of
surffa water in mry water body or changes in currents, or the course or
4iret::tiDn oj water morement ThiS impact was atUlressed in the prior ElR
aru1 determined to be less than Signifiamt. No new impacts are anticipated
from t1zis proposed ~ct
Due to the fact that future on-site development -will be required to adhere to
requirements of Zone 7 and the Gtyls NPDES permit, no significant impacts to Tassajara
Creek are anticipated with regard to increased surface water or changes in currents or
the course or direction of the creek. No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern
Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR are expected to occur.
.::. No mitigation measures are required.
.' -' .~'.
.-.
&J
- 27-
bnpact
Development of the project sUe may result in changes in the quanti1y of
groundwa/ers, a1te.red direction or rate of flow of groundwa/e.r or impacts
to wa/e.r qu.a1ity, or a substrmtial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public wafEr supplies. This impact was addressed
in the prior EIR. No new impacts are anticipated from. this proposed
prYJi!ct
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce
this impact to a level of insignificance.
Mitigationmeasures 03.06/120 and 03.06/26.0 from the EastemDublin GP A/SPA
Final EIR are applicable.
v. AIR QUAUIY
Existing Setting
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR (incorporated by reference) for
the existing air quality setting for the project site.
Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Significance Criteria: CEQA Guidelines Appendix G indicates that a project will
nonnally have a significant effect on the environment if it violates any ambient air
quality standard, contributes substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation, or exposes sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
Impact:
Deve10pment oj the project sUe may result in. construdion-re'la:red air
qu.a1ity . impacts ,including short-fEnn vio1atkm of adopted stmuIm-ds or
contribution to tm existing or projeded air quality violation; and result in.
exposure of sensitive receptvrs ttJ po11utzmis. This impact was addressed
in the prior EIR. No new impacts are anticipated from this proposed
proj?ct
Please refer to me Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
No impa<;is not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GP A/ SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
Mitigation 'Measures: Implementation of proposed mitigation measures ",rill reduce the
impact of dust emissions as related to PM-10 to a level of insignificance. The Eastern
'SI
- 28-
...-.;- -= :~.
....,',.
. .
.".:::.-::-:,
",.,,-
.-.'
.....
.:'"
.' ,
-0 ,.
, .'
~ . .
"~
..,:~:-::,::.:.-
: :",:
.,-'
.....
.':"':::.~..,
;,.-
<{'.'):.
..,
" ~ - -~
~ '. ..'
, "
Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIRindicates that impacts related to construction equipment and
vehicle emissions will remain potentially sigriificant even after implementation of
proposed mitigation measures.
Mitigation measures 03.11/01.0, 03.11/020, 03.11/03.0, 03.11/04.0 from the
Eastem Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR are applicable.
Impact
Development of the project site will result in. traffic..-re1aJe.d air qu.a1ity
impacts. This impact was addressed in the prior EIR. No new impacts are
anticipated from this proposed ProFct
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GP A/ SF A Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
MitigatiDn Measures: Implementation of the folloVYing mitigation measures will not
achieve the 98 % reduction in project-related rraffic needed to reduce emissions below the
ozone precursor significance threshold. The Eastern. Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIRindicates
that residual air quality impacts -will remain significant
Mitigation Measures 03.11/06-11 from the Eastern Dublin GP A/ SF A Final EIR are
applicable.
Impact
Development of the project site will resu.7tin air quIi1iiy impads re1aied tv
stationary source emissions. This impact was addressed in the prior EIR.
No new impacts are anticipated from this proposed project.
. -
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GP A/5P A Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed:in the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR are
expected to _ occur.
MitigaJiDn Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures cannot
achieve the reduction in stationary source emissions needed to meet the insignificant
threshold. The Eastern Dublin GP A/SF A Final EIR indicates ihat stationary source
emissions air quality impacts remain significant
Mitigationmeasures 03.11/120 and 03.11/13.0 from the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA
Final EIR are applicable.
bnpact
Development of the project area mJlJj resu1tin the creatiDn of ob}ect.iontlb1e
odors. This is consiJ1e;red a less tJu:m significtmi impact
Some commercial/industrial uses, such as fast-food restaurants and certain types of
manufacturing, can create odors that may be deemed objectionable to the local populace.
5?-
- 29-
The likelihood of impacts increases when residential and non-residential uses are
proposed in close proximity, as with the proposed project However, through Site
Development Review and Conditional Use Permits, standard conditions of approval such
as installation of appropriate ventilation and/ or scrubbers, it is anticipated that buildout
of the project site would result in a less than significant impact
No mitigation is required.
VI IRANs:'OKTATIO~ ORCUlATION
1JKM Transportation Consultants (under contract to the applicant) prepared a Traffic
Study which is included in its' entirety in Appendix B. Portions of this study have been
summarized below.
Introduction
The Eastem Dublin Specific Plan was completed in 1992 to serve as a planning
framework for future growth and development of the Eastern Dublin area. The plan
provides a comprehensive land use program as well as recommended infrastructure
needs to support the future gro'Wth.
There is a need to update the Specific Plan to reflect current refinements to the land use
plan and the -transportation network Currently the County of Alameda is proposing a
new update to the Specific Plan. There are no new developments or higher density
pr:oposed in the updated plan. The changes are all relatively minor; they affect only- the
local area trip distribution and routing with no regional impact
The major change in the -transportatiOIi network fu.volves revising the alignment of
Hacienda Drive north of Central Parkway (also referred to as the Transit Spine) so that
it heads straight north to intersect Gleason Drive at a right angle. In the ~sting Specific
PIan.. Hacienda Drive is routed at a diagonal and intersects Gleason Drive at a point
west of the new location. The new alignment provides a better connection between
Hacienda Drive and Gleason Drive and allows Gleason Drive to serve as an alternative
route to Dublin Boulevard. In additio~ Arnold Drive is added to the network west of
Hacienda Drive going from Gleason Drive to the BART station area south of Dublin
Boulevard.
The traffic study was done using the Tri-Valley Model with the 2010 expected land use
scenario. A number of enhancements to the model were implemented and are described
in Appendix A of T]KM's report Two future horizons were analyzed in this study for
each of 'the three scenarios: Year 2010 and build-out of the Dublin area
The analysis has shown that 'the new roadway network improves traffic flow in Eastern
Dublin by lowering -traffic volumes on Central Parkway and, to a lesser extent, on
5;)
- 30-
..::,<.:.::/::
. .
f-;''''_
.......:-..
. .oW
..
! ./;;;:~-~
-.
..--
.,.h:':.
. -. ~
"
~'. ~
..~:_"n
.~':.
Dublin Boulevard and Tassajara Drive. 'This is due to the fact that the Hacienda/Gleason
Drive arterial1ink is much more attractive in the refined plan due to the removal of the
Hacienda diagonal. For the same reason, there are improved operations at intersections
along Tassajara Road. This results in better circulation in the area north of Dublin
Boulevard and also provides some relief to the heavy traffic on Dublin Boulevard.
Existing Setting
Information and data regarding the existing project area conditions are shown in the
Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR (incorporated by reference) and TJKM's Traffic
Study, located in Appendix B.
Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Significance Criteria: CEQA Guidelines Appendix G states that a project will normally
have a significant effect on the environment if it will cause an increase in 'traffic which
is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system.
bnpact
Imp 1ementaJion of the proposed ~ 1fUllj result in increaSed vema/Jar
trips or traffic congestion. This impact was addressed in the prior EIR. No
new impacts are im.t:idpaied from this proposed project
The projected average daily traffic volumes on the major roadways for the three
scenarios are illustrated in Figure 5 and Figure 6 of TJKM1s Traffic Study (see Appendix
B), for 2010 and Dublin Build-Out, respectively. Due to the better connection linking
Gleason Drive with Hacienda Drive wiihout ihe back-tracking of the diagonal
connection, the proposed plan attracted more 'traffic to Gleason Drive west of Tassajara
Road and Hacienda Drive between Gleason Drive and Dublin Boulevard. Tassajara Road
has less traffic because of the 'traffic diversion to Hacienda Drive. Dublin Boulevard has
less traffic between Hacienda Drive and Tassajara Road because Gleason Drive has
become a viable alternative for east-west 'traffic.
The a.m. and p.m. peak hours intersection level. of service results are included in Tables
4 and 5 of TJKM1s Traffic Study (see Appendix E). The biggest improvement with the
proposed plan is at the intersection of Tassajara Road and Gleason Drive, due to ihe
decrease in southbound 1hrough traffic. At ftrls location LOS E condition improves to
LOS C Only one intersection is projected to operate at LOS E or worse during one or
both peak hours during 2010 for the proposed plan. Three intersections are projected to
operate at LOS E or worse during one or both peak hours during Dublin Build-Out for
the proposed plan. However, traffic conditions at this intersection under the proposed
plan are no ",TOrse than were already identified in the Eastern. Dublin GP A/ SPA l'inal
ErR.
54
- 31-
The proposed amendments will not have any site-specific impacts on the County's
property nor the proposed Opus property. With project approval, no intersections result
in a degradation that is considered unacceptable.
.'"
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce
a majority of the traffic-related bnpacts to a level of insignificance. The Eastern Dublin
GP A/SPA Final EIR indicates that some impacts (both project-specific and cumulative)
remain potentially significant even after implementation of proposed mitigation
measures. Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final ElR for a complete listing.
:Mitigation measures 03.03/01, 03.03/021,03.03/13,03.03/15,03.03/15.1-15.3 and
03.12/07 from the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR are applicable.
Impact
Future on-site. deve1Dpments may result in hazards 10 safety frmn design
features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., fann equipment>. This is considered a less tJzan significant
impact.
Considering the major existing/proposed roadways on-site, the proposed project actually
represents an improvement in safety and design over the existing plan due to the
removal of the Hacienda Drive "diagonal". All projects must go through a site
development process prior to approval and are required to meet all City zoning
standards.
.--.~':::.,
'.:-
- ~ . .
. . .."4
....4
. ..
No ~tigation measures are required.
bnpact
Future on-siJe deve1Dpmen:l$ may result in inm1equate emergettaj access
or acCess 10 neaiby uses. This is considerei1 a less than significa:ntimpoct
All projects must go through a site development process prior to approval and. are
required to meet all City zoning standards.
No mitigation measures are required.
Impact
Future on-siJE deve1Dpments may have insufficientparking alpactty 011.- or
off-siie. This is amsidered a less than signifiamt impact
lill projects must go through a site development process prior to approval and are
required to meet all City zoning standards. Because of the combination of land uses
(Industrial/Office), future developments will be required to meet the Oty zoning
standards for each use (ie., if 40% of the project is proposed for industrial uses and 60%
for office, then 40% of the parking must meet the industrial standard and 60% the office
standard).
..,
'....:.:...~.. .-
.......
!is
- 32-
tit.: No mitigation measures are required.
bnpact
Development of the project area t1UlJj result in Juzzards or barriers for
pedestrians or bicyclists. This impact was addressed in the prior EIR. No
new impacts are antidpate.d from this proposed ProF-ct
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GP A/ SPA Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce
this impact to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation measure 03.03/16.1 from the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final ElR
would apply.
Impact
Future on-site developments may result in conflicts wi:tJt adopted policies
supporting aliernatire transportation (e.g., bus blrnouts, biaJc1e racks).
This impact was addressed in the prior :EIR. No new impacts are
anticipated from this proposed ]JT01rl
..,
. ..w.",
+-....
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of -the following mitigation measures will reduce
ibis impact to a level of insignificance. .
Action Program 5B from the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan would apply.
VlI. BIOLOGICAL RFlDURCES
Existin2: Setting
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GP A/Sf' A Final EIR for a discussion of the biological
resources existing conditions.
.;.:,:.:::-
:-,-.' ~
"'5
Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Significance Criteria: CEQA Guidelines Appendix G states that a project will normally
have a significant effect on ihe environment if it will substantially affect a rare or
endangered species of animal or plant or habitat of the species.
- 33-
bnpact
Development of the project site may impact endangered, threatened or rare
species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects,
animals, and birds). This impact was addressed in the prior EIR. No new
impacts are anticipated from this proposed project
.""".
, ,
....:..
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final ElR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
It should be noted that although the prior EIR did not identify endangered species on
the Countyls property, the Eastern Dublin GP A/SF A Final EIR requires certain
investigations and protocols prior to issuance of a building permit
Mitigatkm. Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce
this impact to a level of insignificance.
bnpact
Mitigation measure 03.07/28.0 would apply.
Future development on the County property (other than the Opus site)
may resu7tin impacts tD on-siie wetland habttrits (e.g., marsh, riparian., and
vernal pool). This impact was addressed in the prior E1R. No new impacts
are antJcipaied from tJz.is proposed project
.':~,>:
':. ~'.-' : .
Please refer to ihe Eastern Dublin GP A/ SPA Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
Wetlands were not identified for the Opus project site. No impacts not previously
analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR. are expected to occur.
MiiigaJion Measures: Implementation of the folloWing mitigation measures will reduce
this impact to a level of insignificance. - ..
Impact
Mitigation'measures 03.07/06-09, 03.07/11, and 03.07/17 are applicable.
Development of the proj?d site may result in impacts 1D wildlife dispersal
or migration rorriilors. This impact was addressed in the prior E1R and
deemed to be less than significant No new impacts are anticipated from'
1ltis proposed project
Please refer to the Eastern. Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR. for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR. are
expected to occur.
No mitigation is required.
s1
e".
, '
".' -.".
~ '. -'
- 34-
t., Vill ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES
Existing Setting
Although partially developed in the past with urban uses, these are no longer in
existence. Other portions of the site currently have dry farmland rotation crops. No
mineral resources are known to exist on the project site.
Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Significance Criteria: CEQA Guidelines Appendix G states that a project will norroally
have a significant effect on the environment if it will use fuel, water or energy in a
wasteful manner or encourage activities which result in the use of large amounts of fueL
water or energy.
The proposed project represents an amendment to the adopled Eastern Dublin specific
PIan. The project site is not subject to any adopled energy conservation pIan. Although
consump~on of non-renewal resources (for the specific Plan area as a whole) was
identified as a significant cumulative impact (discussed under section XlI), future
development of the site is not anticipated to use such:resources in a wasteful or
inefficient manner. No mineral resources are known to exist on-site, therefore no
impacts are anticipated.
......
",-
.,\)
". :r.::~~::
IX. HAZARIJS
Infoxmation for this section is provided by the Alameda Counly General Services
Agency, :from an interOffice memorandum dated May 13, 1996. This memorandum can
be found in Appendix D.
Existi.'l.~ setting
The project site was furmerly owned by the US government as part of Camp
Shoemaker, arid contained a military hospital and numerous suppartbuildings that were
reportedly constrUcted in the 1930's - 1940's. The military facililyWas closed after World
\,\7ar II., then reopened during the Korean War before shutting down permanenlly.
Following the closure, Alameda Counly first leased, then putchased the propertY from
the military for use as a jaiL which occupied former Navy buildings (!mown as Old
Greystone) near 1-580 until 1989 when the neW jail facility was completed north of
Broder Boulevard. Other buildings on the site have been used for warehousing County
stores, arid the Counly animal shelter was located just north of Dublin Boulevard until
earlier this year. Portions of the property were also used inteIIl1ittent1y for agricultural
operations relating the jaiL including a pig farm north of Gleason Drive and a
greenhouse on the site currenfly planned for residential uses by Kaufman arid Broad.
..,.,.
. - . . -. ~
.......~&:. ~ ---
's1
- 35-
A number of studies have been conducted over the years to ascertain the location and
nature of potential hazardous materials, including Underground Storage Tanks (USTs),
buildings containing asbestos, or other environmental contaminants. A list of
environmental reports in the Countyls files pertaining to the Santa Rita property is
included in Appendix D. All known storage tanks located on the property south of
Gleason Drive have been removed, and have received closure letters from the
appropriate regulatory agencies. Asbestos removal from existing buildings is currently
underway, "With demolition of all existing structures scheduled to be completed by
August, 1996.
Please refer to Appendix D for a more complete description of the UST s previously
located on the project site.
Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Significance Criteria: CEQA Guidelines Appendix G states that a project will normally
have a significant effect on the environment if it will create a potential public health
hazard or involve the use, production or disposal of materials which pose a hazard to
people or animal or plant populations in the area affected, or interlere with emergency
response plans or emergency evacuation plans.
Due to the large size, history and complexity of the Santa Rita property, the applicant
(County) has not pursued investigation and complete remediation of the entire property
at once. The long (and largely undocumented) history of use for military and other
,activities leaves the potential for discovery of currently unknown underground tanks 'or
other environmental concerns. The County has 'therefore recommended site-specific
Phase I and n investigations be condu~ as part of the purchase process of particular
portions of the property. Some investigations performed to date have indicated higher
than normalleveJs of DDT associated With planter beds in the old greenhouse on 'the
site. As a result, ihe County is in the process of having the contaminated soils removed
to an appropriate landfill.
I:mpact
Development of the project si/e may result in a risk of qrrioentaI explosion
or release of hazardous subsil11tres (incbuIing, but not lim:it1!d tD oil,
pesticilIes, chemiCRls, or Tadiation) muI may result in the creation of Il1t1J
hea1tit hazmd or pofEntiaI hea1:9t hazard. This impact is considered less
than significant
It is not known at this time what future tenants may occupy lands currently designated
for commercial and indushial uses. These tenants may store on-site or use in their daily
operations any number of chemicals or compounds which could pose hazards in the
event of an explosion or release or may result in the creation of a potential health
hazard. This potential impact is compounded. by 'the fact. that the project area is planned
for mixed uses, vvith future residents being located in proximity to -the commercial and
5'?
- 36-
.'.-:.':..:
....'.:..:
.".-
. ,.'
'.-'
..-. .~::~:.. ~
.".:::.
..,
. -",.
". . ~
. ..,."
..
......,'
.--"
." ~ &.
::~~~;>
e,..
.--.
:". .:.~. .
industrial uses. Although future residents may keep potentially toxic substances on-site (paints,
pesticides, etc.), due to the normally small quantities, this is not anticipated to create a
substantial risk.
Development projects (those proposing non-residential uses) are normally conditioned by the
City and/ or applicable health departments and fire departments to submit information
regarding chemicals to be used and/ or stored on-site. Therefore, it is anticipated that buildout
of the proposed project would result in a less than significant impact. No further mitigation is
required.
Impact:
Development of the project site may result in exposure of people to existing
sources of potential health hazards. This impact is considered potentially
significant unless mitigation is incorporated.
As indicated above, past uses on the project site have resulted in various forms of
contamination, many of which the full ",,'tent of contamination is not presently known. As the
project area begins to develop, future residents and on-site workers may be exposed to
contaminants existing on as--yet undeveloped properties. Due to the lack of complete
hazardous information on the entire project site, this remains a potentially significant impact
until such time as subsequent studies are performed and required remedial work performed
Alomeda County has indicated that Phase I environmental site assessments are normally
required at -the time of sale of property. Any necessary remediation is required as a matter of
law.
Mitigation. Measures:
-
IX-l. Prior to issuance of building permits for site-specifiC developments, site-Specific
Phase I (and if necessary Phase II) environmental site assessments shall be made
available to the Community Development Director, with appropriate
documentation that all recommended remediation actions have been completed.
Impact: Development of the project site may result in increased fre hazard in areas with
j'l.a:rnmable brush, grass, or trees. This i:mpact was tuIdressed in the priar EIR- No
new impacts are anticipated from this proposed project
please refer to the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR for a discussion of this impact.
The City has prepared and adopted a Wildfire Management Plan. which future applicants
would be required to adhere to. No further mitigation is required.
.-.-.
~ - -.
... .
'"GO
-37 -
x.
NOISE
Information for this section was derived from the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR,.
as well as from a report prepared by Olarles M. Salter Associates, Inc. for the County.
It should be noted that the latter report focused specifically on potential impacts
associated with the off-site uses to the norm and west of the project site, and to a lesser
degree with noise generated by traffic on Gleason Drive. TIris report may be found in
its entirety in Appendix C.
Existing Setting
The major constant noise source is traffic along Interstate 580. Other noise sources are
traffic along Tassajara Road, occasional aircraft flyovers from Livermore Municipal
Airport, and from training exercises at Camp Parks and the Sheriffs training center.
Currently, lands south of Gleason Drive are zoned for residential and industrial uses
(refer to Figure 2). There are several activities near the Santa Rita property that generate
noise. The primary noise generator is the Alameda County Sheri:f:fs training center north
of Gleason Drive. Activities at the Sheriffs training center include small weapons
training on firing ranges, emergency vehicle training and ordnance disposal. Camp Parks
Reserve Forces Training Area (RFTA) to the west of Amold Road is also a potential
noise generator. Camp Parks has similar training activities, with the addition of
helicopter fly overs and heavy ariillery exercises.
Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Significance Criterilz: CEQA Guidelines Appendix G states that a project will normally
have a significant effect on the environment if it will increase substantially the ambient
noise levels for adjoining areas. .
The Oty of Dublin uses the CNEL descriptor to assess compatibility of various land uses
willi noise environments. A rnEL of 60 dB or less is considered "normally acceptable"
for residential development
The Oty also recognizes Title 2, Part 2 of the California Code of Regulations in
implementing Measure G of the Noise Element Title 24 requires all multi-family
residential dwellings, hotels; and motels exposed to a rnEL of 60 dB or greater to have
an acoustical study that shows how an interior CNEL of 45 dB will be achieved in
habitable rooms.
The proposed Specific Plan amendment would replace some of the industrial ZDne5
lands adjacent to Gleason Drive with residential uses. TIris change will result in low
density residential lands being moved approximately 500 to 700 feet to the north (based
61
- 38-
e"':.>
"._r.
." .",
...
, .'
::."
:.:.~ ..~.::;
..
e,...
" .
".-- .. .
....:..-:.:
e..'.
......
"-:..-."
, .'
.:-;--'
. -.1 . ~
." ",
'. \~-. ..
..~. "0-".
-......
.:::
on proposed site plans submitted. at the time). This change places future residences
closer to the County's training facility.
bnpact
Development of the project site tnmj result in inc:reaf;eS in existing 1Wise
levels and may expose people tv increJ.zSed noise levels. This impact was
addressed in the prior EJR. No new impacts are anticipated from this
proposed p~ct
As the project site is basically undeveloped at this time, future development vvill result
in increases of ambient noise over existing levels. The two major sources of noise that
may impact future on-site residents are traffic-related noise from roadways and off-site
noise generated by Camp Parks and the Sher:iffs facility. Impacts may also result from
the placement of residential and non-residential uses in proximity as proposed in the
mixed-use land plan and from construction-related noise. These are discussed below:
Traffic-generated noise. Proposed residential housing along Dublin Boulevard, Tassajara
Road, and Gleason Road will be exposed to future noise levels in excess of 60 dB CNEL.
Future noise contours for the Year 2010 with the buildout of the entire Specific Plan are
shown in Figure 3.10-B of the Specific Plan EIR (pg.322). According to the Gtyls land use
compatibility guidelines, these land uses would be in the "conditionally acceptable"
range for this type ofland use. II Conditionally acceptable" means -that an acoustical study
should be initiated during project development to determine how interior noise levels
will be controlled by the Gty and State goal of CNEL 45 dB.
Off-site noise sources. Noise measurement of activities at Camp Parks were not made
as part of -the Charles M. Salter report Noise projections from Camp Parks were
obtained frOp:l. an Installation Compatible Use Zone (ICUZ) study which was done in
1988. Most of the weapons training activities at Camp Parks occur near Tassajara Road,
far north of the project site. According to lCUZ, 'the noise from activities within Camp
Parks site. generates a CNEL of less than 65 dB on the project site. According to the
lCOZ study, a CNEL of less than 65 dB is considered "acceptable. 11
"
:--.".:"
. :. . . ~-
.. ".
According to fue Salter report, fubJre noise levels (assumes use of firing ranges,
emergency vebic1e training, and ordnance disposal at fue Sheriffs facility) would be 3
to 4 dB higher at the new proposed residentially zoned areas adjacent to Gleason Drive
versus 'the adopted specific plan residential locations to the south. A 3 to 4 dB change
in noise would be just noticeable but not considered a significant change in
environmental noise since levels from the training center will be below a O\TEL of 60 dB.
~tUthough noise levels will meet the Gty's standards, there is still potential for annoyance
and complaints due to gunshot noise, particu1arl)T at night
On-site noise compatibility. The presence of different land use types 'wifuin the same
development creates the possibility of noise impacts between adjoining uses, particularly
y\Then commercial and residential land uses abut
bJ-
- 39-
The Uniform Building Code does not specifically address the sound insulation
requirement between business and residential uses. Impact and airborne sound
insulation for such demising partitions should be designed on a case by case basis and
may need to exceed those required between residences.
Construction-related noise. Construction ""ill occur over a number of years on the project
site. Major noise associated "With construction is truck activity on local roads, heavy
equipment used in grading and paving and impact noises from barriers used in framing
of structures. Pile driving can also generate substructural noise.
Mitigatitm Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce
these impacts to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation measures 03.10/01-07 are applicable.
XI. PUBliC SERVICES
Existing: Setting
Public Services agencies were contacted via a questionnaire for an update to existing
conditions and potential impacts. With the exception of updated enrollment/capacity
figures from the school districts, all other agencies either indicated that conditions had
not changed from those analyzed in the previous EJR. or did not respond at all Please
refer to the Eastern Dublin GP A/SF A Final Em for a description of the public services
setting.
Potential Impacts and Miti~ation Measuxes
Significance Criteria: CEQA GuidelineS do not have a specified criteria for public
services. Typically, if a proposed project results in an increased demand in services
and/ or personnel provided or anticipated to be provided for an area, this results in a
potentially significant impact (especially if current services are at or near capacity).
Impact:
Development of tJze project area 11UlJj resu1tin an i1u:reased denu:md for fire
prote.cJion services aniI exposure of developmen:ttv wildland fire ha:zmds.
This impact was addressed in the prior ErR. No new impacts are
anticipated from this proposed proj!.ct
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce
these impacts to a level of insignificance.
(,3
- 40-
.....,.
. .'.',
::';',):'
....
.. .
. :: '. "-
.~: .:. :
.... ..
!'
..-.,~
.-,,,,,,,:,
.....
. .::.:~.
.....:.'
,,'
{)..-
. .
-..-
-:.,..
Mitigation measures 03.04/06 and 03.04/09 are applicable.
Impact
Development of the project area 1tUlJj result in an increaSed demmuI for
police services. This impact was addressed in tite prim' EIR No new
impacts are anticipated from 11tis proposed ProF-ct
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GP A/ SF A Pinal EIR are
expected to occur.
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce
these impacts to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation measures 03.04/01-05 are applicable.
Impact
Development of the prop:t area may result in iJu;reased demand on school
fad1ities and personnel. This impactWRS addressed in the prior EIR No
new impacts are antidpared from t1zis proposed project
Please refer to me Eastern Dublin GP A/SF A Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in -the Eastern. Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of -the following mitigation measures -will reduce
these impacts to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation measures 03.04/13.1, 03.04/16-19, and 03.12/06 are applicable.
Impact
Development of the projeCt area may result in i:ncreJlSed demand on
-m.ainfEn,an.reofpub1ic !t1Cl1itiP-s, i:nc1u.ding roads, and otiter gUDemmentnZ
seruit:es. This impactwas addressed in 11te. prior EIR. No new impacts are
anticipated from 1his proposed project ,
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GP A/ SF A Final ErR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
Typically, these types of services are funded through a combination of property taxes,
assessment districts, and/ or special financing plans established, thereby allowing future
developments to pay (usually placed as a condition of project approval) for their
contribution towards these service demand.
: . .' .~-
-
Mitigation ~res: Implementation of the following mitigation measure will reduce
these impacts to a level of insignificance.
(,q
- 41-
Mitigation measures 03.12/01 is applicable.
.--'---:,.:.
-." '.-
XlI. UlJLIIIEs AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Existins?: Setting
Utility and Services agencies were contacted via a questionnaire for an update to existing
conditions and potential impacts. All agencies either indicated that conditions had not
changed from those analyzed in the previous Ell\. or did not respond at all. Please refer
to the Eastem Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR for a description of the utilities and services
setting.
Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Significance Criteria: CEQA Guidelines Appendix G states that a project will normally
have a significant effect on the environment if it will encourage activities which result
in the use of large amounts of fuel, water, or energy; use fuel, water, or energy in a
wasteful marmer; or extend a sewer trunk line with capacity to serve new development
bnpact
Development of the proj!ct site 11UllJ result in increasetl demand for
electric, gllS, and telephone serDices and require extension of lines. This
impact was addressed in the prior EIR. No new impacts are anticipated
from this proposed project.
..,.
....
....:....r
-. ..
Ple~ refer to the Eastern Dublin GP A/ SF A Final EIR for a discussion of this impact.
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce
the impact of increased demand to a level of insignificance. The Eas~ Dublin
GP A/SF A Final EIRindicates that service line extension is a significant growth-inducing
impact and an unavoidable adverse impact which cannot be mitigated.
Mitigation measures 03.04/41-46 are applicable.
bnpoct:
De'Delopment of the prcrj!.ct site may result in impacts to local or regional
water treatment or distribution systems and 1oca1 or regional water
supp lies. This impactwas addressed in the prior EIR. No new impacts are
R11.iidpated from this proposed proj!!.ct.
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
....
,~:~ ....~:::
b;;
- 42-
.",...:..,'
. "
'.'
....-:-.:'.-
..
.,
:'.::"10"
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures "Will reduce
these impacts to a level of insignificance.
Action Program 9G, 9E, 9F, and mitigation measures 03.05/12-13, 03.05/20,
03.05/24-31, 03.05/33-34, 03.05/37, 03.05/38-39, and 03.12/08 are applicable.
Development uf the proj!d site 1tUlJj result in an increaSed de:numd for
wastewaJe.r treatment and require expansion of facl1:ities. This impact was
addressed in the prior FlR No new impacts are antictpared from this
proposed proj!:ct
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR and Addendum (dated August
22, 1994) for a discuSsion of this impact No impacts not previously analyzed in the
Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR are expected to occur.
bnpact
The following information is also included as an update to the information provided in
the previous EIR and Addendum.
DSRSD currently has an Area-wide Facility Agreement V\.hieb. states that 1,500 dwelling
unit equivalents (d.u.e.) of sewer capacity have been allocated to the Alameda Countys
developable property within the specific plan area A separate allocation of 100,000
gallons has been made for industrial and non-retail users 'within Alameda County's
developable properly in the specific plan area. Of this amount it is calculated that
approximaiely 363 d.u.e.'s will be allocated for the approved Homart projedt and 248.5
d.u.e.'s for -the California Creekside project The proposed Opus development woUld
utilize approximately 182 d.u.e.'s. Therefore, between the tw'o allocations, there is more
than sufficient sewer capacity presently available to serve all approved development
The plans of -the G.ty and DSRSD to provide sewer service to future development within
Eastern Dublin were addressed in the . Eastern Dublin GP A/SF A Final EIR and
Addendum (dated August 22, 1994). DSRSD has indicated that it still plans to provide
sewer service to Eastern Dublin with disposal either via one of the export options
analyzed in the 1992 'EIR for the long range V\7astewater Management Plan for -the
livermore-Amador Valley or via groundwater recharge and recycling (including reverse
osmosis). DSRSD is currently planning the construction of facilities to treat wastewater
via reverse osmosis, and -these facilities will have sufficient capacity to serve all portions
of Eastern. Dublin already annexed to DSRSD (including all areas covered by this
Specific Plan Amendment). D5RSD is expected to circulate a draft EIR for the reverse
osmosis facilities in September 1996.
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce
these impacts to a level of insignificance.
- 43-
Action Programs 9R 9S and mitigation measures 03.05/01-07, 03.05/07.1,
03.05/08, 09 and 11 are applicable.
....':..::.
.'.
bnpact
Development of the proj!.ct stiE may result in impacts trJ existing strmn
drainage faci1i.ties. This impact was addressed in the prior ErR. No new
impacts are anticipated from tJzis proposed project
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
Mitigation A1easures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce
these impacts to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation measures identified for storm drainage impacts discussed under
section N. Water above are applicable.
bnpact Development of the project stiE may result in impacts trJ solid waste.
. disposal services. This impact Wlls addressed in the prior EIR No new
impacts are anticipated from this proposed prop:t.
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final ElR for a discussion of this impact .::
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce
these impacts toa level of insignificance..
Mitigation measures 03.4/37-40 are applicable.
XlIL AEbllilillCS
Existing Se~
The project site is relatively fiat, containing farmland, undeveloped areas, and
abandoned/ demolished building sites. Scenic features of the site include Tassajara Creek
and views of the hillsides and vistas to the north and northeast
Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Significa-nce Criteria: CEQA Guidelines Appendix G states that a project will normally
have a significant effect on the environment if it 'Will have a substantial, demonstrable
negative aesthetic effect
e.'
~. ' / . ; . -.
. ....
<:"<".+
h1
- 44-
.6.~
..:.::
e'..;'"'"'
.. .
,'.
" .'
.....
. . ~- . .
. ~.. . -&
':.::'. .
e,>:',
.. ~r;'.: //'
"ft:J Y>
Impact
Development of the project site may affect a scenic vistn or scenic highway.
This impact was addressed in the prior ErR. No new impacts are
anticipated from this proposed project
Please refer to the Eastern Dublin GPA/sPA Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the follo",,'ing mitigation measures will reduce
these impacts to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation measures 03.08/02-03, 03.08/04.3, 03.08/08.1 are applicable.
bnpact
Future development on-site may 'haDe a demonstrable negative aestitetic
effect. This impact was addressed in the prior E1R and detennined to be
less than significant. No new impacts are anticipated from this proposed
project
As identified in the Specific Plan EIR,. development of the flatter portions of the project
area (such as this project site) is regarded as a trade-off measure designed to preserve
slopes, hillsi9.es and ridgelines contained in the larger Specific Plan area. Although
development of the project site will change the visual character, it is anticipated that
through the Cityls design review process a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect will
not occur. No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final
EIR are expected to occur.
In April of 1996 the Gty-adopted a Scenic Corridor Plan as a requirement of Program
6Q of 'the adopted Eastern Dublin S~c Plan. Identified scenic corridors include
Tassajara Road, 1-580, and Fallon Road. The intent of the policies arid standards of the
Scenic Corridor Plan is to allow project development as sho'VtTJl in the Specific Plan to
occur while maintaining 'the visual character of the eastern ridgelines, watercourses, and
distinct landscape feab.1res, for travelers on scenic routes in Eastern Dublin.
No mitigation is required.
bnpact
Future development on-site unlI create light or glare. This is considered a
less tJum. signifiamt impact
Both residential and non-residential development on the project site ",'ill contribute to
light (associated with street lamps and indoor office and home lighting) and glare
(mostly noticeable from multi-storied buildings or homes) impacts that will be noticeable
both on- and off-site.
- 45-
At build out;. this would represent a significant increase over existing light and glare and
change the visual urban/rural boundary as it now exists. As the proposed project
represents an amendment to the adopted Specific Plan, and as it is assumed that all
future projects \-",ill go through the City's site development process (where conditions on
lighting and building materials are typically made), no significant impacts from
development are anticipated.
No mitigation is required.
XIV. CUL'IUR.L\L RESOURCES
Existin,; Setting
Information contained in the Specific Plan EIR indicate that no known prehistoric or
historic archaeological sites are found on the project site.
Potential Inroads and Mitigation Measures
Significance Criteria: CEQA Guidelines Appendix G states that a project will normally
have a significant effect on the environment if it will disrupt or adversely affect a
prehistoric or historic archaeological site or a property of historic or cultural significance
to a community or et1:mic or social group; or a paleontological site except as a part of a
scientific sh1dy.
Development of tJze project siJe. may result in impacts to unidentified
pa1eonto1ogiaiI or archneo1ogiaiI resources. This impact was addressed in
the prior E1R No new impacts are anticipated from 1kis proposed project
Please refer to 1he Eastern Dublin GP AJ SF A Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern. Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR are
expected to OCCUI.
bnpacJ:
Mitigation Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce
these impacts to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation measures 03.09/01, 02, 04, 05, and 06 are applicable.
xv. RECREATION
Existing Setting
Please refer to the Eastern. Dublin GP A/ SF A Final EIR for a description of recreation
existing conditions. Please note that the Parks and Recreation Master Plan has been
adopted.
b1
- 46-
.<::',
. -
.....
" '
" '
~.;''''.<~''
.....
'. '
.~:.
~- . . ;
.'-':"-:::.
.: ::::~
.:"
.::. :: .~~
.-".-. .
. . . ~
......
,'.
..;- .:
".-. .
".'- .
-,.-,-:
Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Significance Criteria: CEQA Guidelines Appendix G indicates that a project would
normally have a significant effect On the environment if it conflicted with established
recreational uses of the area. For the purposes of this report, an increased demand for
parks and recreation services, particularly if this increase has an effect on the quality or
quantity of existing recreational opportunities would be considered a significant impact
A 56-acre City park is proposed within the project boundaries. The adopted Specific Plan
indicates that this park would provide a major destination site to serve the diverse needs
of the entire City, with facilities that maximize the recreational and leisure experience
of all citizens. Open space and facilities will accommodate a range of activities including:
active and passive recreation, formal sports, community events and social/cultural
gatherings.
bnpact
Development of the proj!.ctsite will increase tize demand for neighborhood
or regional parks or other recreational faciJitjes and affect existing
recreational opportunities. This impact was addressed in the prior EIR. No
new impacts are anticipated from this proposed project
Please refer to -the Eastern Dublin GP A/SPA Final EIR for a discussion of this impact
No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GPA/SPA Final EIR are
expected to occur.
MiiigatiDn Measures: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce
these impacts to a level of insignificance.
-.
Mitigation measures 03.04/27, 29~ 31, 32, 34, and 36 are applicable.
fJD
- 47-
......
'. ....0
....."_0
.';
APPENDIX A
PUBLIC NOTICE AND RESPONSES
:~'>:~..:;_:-.:'
,w. 0"'
....
. .0.....
. . .. ~ 'w'
. . .:.
.:'
11'
-,-.. ."'
.....
>'
.'
. '. ~
~:.'~. ~.
e,.
.' .
. ..:<~~~'{:/>;..
.:...' ~"/1
!.'f@'l ~ \\\
;:. -:- -~ .:. CITY OF DUBLIN
~',: ~ /1,'
......'\~\ ~ .....;.:/.--.
" -'. __......:...;~. P.o. Box 2340. Dublin, California 94568
-....-:.:.-5/~.
----_._~--_.....---.. -
.
City Offices, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, Californ:a 9455B
TO:
Applicable Responsible, Trustee and Interested Agencies
Jeri Ram, Associate Planne<<
City of Dublin
FROM:
DATE:
May 9, 1996
RE:
Proposed Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendments
The City of Dublin (Lead Agency) is in the process of preparing a Focused Initial Study and
Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-referenced proposed project. CEQA Section
1063(g) requires the Lead Agency to consult infonnally with all Responsible and Trustee Agencies
to obtain recommendations as to whether an EIR or Negative Declaration should be prepared.
The Alameda County Surplus Property Authority, owner of the Santa Rita property within the City
of Dublin, is requesting an amendment to the City's Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General
Plan to reflect proposed modifications to the land use and circulation pattern for the Santa Rita
property. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan was adopted in 1994 and has a certified Program EIR
(SCH No. 91-103064).
The site is bounded by Broder Boulevard on the north to 1-580 on the south, and from Camp
Parks on the east to Tassajara Road on the east Land use designations include a wide mix of
residential densities, as well as retail, office, industrial and semi-public uses.
The primary purpose of the proposed amendment (project) is to pennit the development of the 25
acre Santa Rita Business Center being proposed by Opus Southwest, to be located on the
northwest corner of the property. The Business Center proposal will require a Specific Plan
amendment to (1) create a viable site for the project by realigning the proposed segment of
Hacienda Drive near Gleason Road; and (2) to accommodate the intensity of use being proposed
for the development by essentially combining the current Campus Office and Industrial Park
designations into a new IndustriaVOffice designation. In addition, revisions are proposed to the
land use map to facilitate more logical future development in relation to land uses and circulation.
The approved and proposed Specific Plan Land Use Maps and land uses and intensities (in
tabular fonnat) are attached.
We solicit your recommendation regarding preparation of the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration and any comments you. may have regarding this project.
Please forward your comments within ten (10) days of receipt to:
Jeri Ram, Associate Planner
City of Dublin
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568
G:\PA9602D\ar11
f}9-
Aoministration (510) 833-6650 . City Council (510) 833-6605 . Finance (510) 833-6640 . Building Inspection (510) 833.6620
Code Enforcement (510) 633-6620 . Engineering (510) 633-6630 . Parks & Community Services (510) 833-6645
Police (510) 833.6670 . Public Works (510) 833-6630 . Planning (510) 833-6610
-~.
:.:. ~...'
.. :::.:....
"t..~::.
,+, -.'
::.;~~':'.: .-"
:., ..':.
,.., '.
..... .
. ....
. '
'T)I'pIcIII~AppIIoad_ J)~" CoutJO'OlJ .....~..
L
.
,
.u..... c:...tJ
- ......
~ CA. !M$4oC
.. ~ e.....r PuWk lIioob Dcpt.
-./tCI'fIA......W-.lta 111
~~. -~....,..I.bLIU
r.a." 0I00I0pt.1W DoocllJ . bL 111
.u...II c..tr.." Ja.,.m.n
"of~
Inl o.t IlaaC, ... SU
00tIIId, a. 94611
~~~0ftI.
122IOC......IU
0IiIIM, CA "'12
o...lJ ~- DoMl4 Xn,r
......... c.., rIn >>-p&.
1111011I. A_
u.-.a....S$O
A.: .........
.uu... c..v ..1. - - . ..... hpoi.-t
101 a.tIw&., ftw)', hlla DI
~a. ..soum
AIR: 11II1-.,...
.u-.6a c...,..--""'" D...
~.........
1131........ rbl7
....15lI
~ CA. H5Q2.a7'1
t'..'-~""'" f -,
--;ri~. ......
~.o.Jka:23UG
~CA.~
Aa:. A.S... ~aldl
, '*d\;~~
~ Co\. P4G3--o16O
Aal: 0.,. Ad-.
c-,~ '.' ,
~:u.CalDol..... .
. 1.CCPaIb, UTA BWc. 'l9O
IllIlIIIl. CA P4561-m1
. '-"'U-
~n.--
, l0S2IlDu1b~A--
u.-. CA. P45.
AM: .......,.....".....
~~
, .a.-A_
'.:~CA~
. A-= ....1Iwt1l......~
arr;~~ ..
11, ....
2mc...m. ___
.. J--. C/o. 94513
"'*' M W..........DIl.-
ewp.cI_~..s A.-:t COLQ
_lW~.S"221
~ Co'. ....,2.
loa bII Jim
c.~c.;\Y
, Dopt. .
Ul ,......
.. ....1IIIIlb .....
........ CA Hm
~~~tlc.n.
-.. . L c.:... .r~~";"; . .
Uf'~~ _' .1 a.-:II .."-..: .~:
. ..2l1NoiDSftal . ,'. " ~.
. .,;'........... eA 'PCIOS:lJlll5 : . ,.
. ,.._.....J..~.......a.;.
. ":'.' .:-;:.v :.;.~ . '-. ::: ::}.::L;'::.: ....
'./
11 ,.
~~.CUa'
".0. "'7
V'" CA. ~S"
~M-.Al:6c~"""'"
_~,.... CJ:tqj_ '-'I.... _ -.... OP '-11II1
_0Ihw: r-l (IlrqtHG ~""''''''''''''..-I)
IIHPto'b' ...- JIIn A-..m,
---""PIIctelc t-
s......l':A N50
AIM: Xarl~
JhMa lholIW..... ~d
-----,..,1 ....... ""'
DIbl.. CA N,"
V-... AMellrio
.....:.
.'
..wi_ ... a._.....,.. DIIIl'Id
'7Il51 ~.......
J)aIIlk, CA P45"
bMt....... nsuo 0...1 w....,
~W~DlUDW"'tlBp(.
1M..,............. DoIrict
1950,.,.,. O*t eo.t
0Ilt0Dd, CA. ~
~ Yllr.tli,...
_ua-~ PootI'lMMl'(kIl~"'" pIaa)
u.. VWJoU,.
&:z:) W. MJri* c::-c.
~CA MSI7-1""
c.li~
L4vtA
130 __ a.. ..11IO
Li-. CA ?t55O
U- DUIII.........
----J175....... M.
~CA. MDD
A-.: 0.....
u.-... V..., Jllal UaIIeIIcllc* DIIIItd
'" &Jd:.lMdIn ~
u..-, CA MS.
.AAlI: Dr, JllJOC......
,.... JaIl
_.elI'z.-~COI
w.a.a OINk. Co\. M59W"1'
Alii: IL ANI
hlMcC..__
--"' .....8hlI.
u.-.CA. ..sSO
Aa:__~
.........
t~ ...,...,......
ODD.-A_
~ CA. ..""""
ua. ...............1lrfItt
-1L"2.IllOc.oo.- w.. a.- KIlOS
,... U"A C4 was
W.,.. WWta,.... '-"-
.:.
"
VIa._ CaIlIeTlkftol_
~ H-. tlmM
u-.,CA. Mf.
Alii: NJrt--
'- '1.......... c:..tJ,....
~. ""...o--....JJWrkt
5W7 J'IItIMI DIM
-...-.... CA ,."
~ Vlac:cW..,.
--,,"-.. ~o-IlI
~ 'J,.u..... c.-, "'-"
c:-.I4 w.... c.-.. ...110... DWrid .
7lMl Xotl c.-rrt" "'1"
"--. CA MUll
--Aa:Y_~
.
~:'tII~
cm' OffiCES
U3 MA1S STREET
cm' COUNCIl.
4:-8001
cm' MAJ'AGER
4:-8008
cm' A ITORN:Y
~3
Cm'Cl.ERK
~5
Fl~t~NCE
. 484-8033
PERSONNEL
48t-8012
cm' OffiCES
200 OLD BERSAl. A ''E,
PLANNING
.. 4~..3
.' '. \'>JINEERlNG
::~1
Btm.DING INSPEcnON
484-8015
COMMUNITY SERVICES
~160
WATER. Bn..llNG
484-8038
FIELD SERVICES
3333 BUSCH RD.
SUPPORT SERVlCES
~7
PARKS
~6
SANTT ARY SE\\'3.
~
~J
48t-8Cl66
WArd{
~1
FIRt
4.44-; RAILROAD A "E,
./~1l4
, roUCE
4833 BERJ\'AL AYE-
P.O. BOX 909
484-81:7
14
CITY OF PLEASANTON
P.O. BOX 520 PLEASANTON. CALIFORNIA 94566-0802
May 29. 1996
Jeri Ram
City of Dublin
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin. CA 94568
RE:
Proposed East Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendments
Dear :Ms. Ram:
The City of Pleasanton has received the City of Dublin's notice regarding the
preparation of a Focused Initial Study and intent to prepare a Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the above-referenced project. The City has the following
comments which should be addressed in the Initial Study:
1. "Why is the "Transit Spine" to be eliminated in favor of an arterial street in
essentially the same location? The East Dublin Specific Plan emphasizes the
"Transit Spine is central to land use and circulation concept of eastern Dublin.
which is to link land use with transit in an attempt to offer alternatives to the .
private auto for daily trips. The Spine is the focus of neighborhood commercial
activity in the Town Center and is within walking distance of all Town Center
residents." Section 7.5.2. "The transit system for eastern Dublin will provide
service to all land use areas in the Specific Plan area. The Transit Spine service
will connect the Town Center. campus office areas. the higher density residential
areas directly to regional transit opportunities at the eastern DublinfPleasanton
BART station." Section 5.3. page 55. See also section 5.2.4 and Amendment
5.2F. "Encourage higher densities and mixed use developments near major transit
lines and transit transfer POirlts as a means of encouraging the use of public transit.
This type of transit-oriented development is especially encouraged along the transit
spine and near the Eastern Dublin BART station. It
,\V'nat are the implications on land use patterns. traffic circulation and trip
distribution by elimination of the Transit Spine? What effect 'will the elimination
of this "central" feature of the land use and circulation pattern have on regional
arterial streets. on freeways, on the Hacienda Drive intersections in Dublin and in
Pleasanton. and on the 1-580 interchanges? Several land use changes have been
proposed. Please reevaluate the EIR traffic model and conclusions under these
proposed changes. .4..5 a "central" feamre, it is difficult to understand how the
elimination of this feature can occur through a mitigated negative declaration.
R :- c: Eo nr E ~
.~ -N ':; 1 tn9~
I It" '"' I ::1 u
Page 2
May 29, 1996
How will the deletion of this transportation feature affect promoting transit service and
pedestrian circulation plan? Program Sc.
.'.
".",
2. One of the requirements of the East Dublin Plan EIR was to prepare a Master Storm
Drainage Plan prior to any development. Program 9T. The Plan is to include hydrologic studies
of the entire related upstream watersheds which would include a major portion of the drainage
area of East Dublin Specific Plan if any portion of the Alameda County property has been
approved for development. Please provide the phase approaches and system modeling produced
to date concerning this watershed, detailed analysis of effects of development on water quality of
surface runoff, design level analysis of the impacts of proposed developments on the existing
creek channels and watershed areas, and design features to minimize runofffIows. Has the
hydraulic computer analysis been prepared to establish channel and pipe sizing, as stated on page
A6-23 of the East Dublin Specific Plan? Has the City negotiated with Zone 7 the level offlood
control improvements required to meet district standards and rights-of-way requirement'\and
maintenance responsibilities, as required in Program 61? Has the City developed a
comprehensive stream corridor restoration program? Program 6E.
3. Another requirement of the East Dublin Plan was the construction ofa Fire Station prior
to any development. Section 8.3.1, Policy 8-5. How is this requirement being met in the
amended Plan?
.. '. . ~ .
4Th" C tyThe City ofPleasanftthon iInS inlter~sted inHthe ~VaiOlabdility of affithordablifie housing in thealVfialley. .
e i requests copies 0 e c uslOnary ousmg r inance, e spec. IC numeric go or
percentage of affordable units in eastern Dublin, the Density Bonus Ordinance, and the Rental
Availability Ordinance. Section 4.4.2, Policy 4-8, and Program 4F and 41.
", ....-
:.......
The City of Pleasant on also is concerned about only ten days response time accorded interested
parties in your "Notice of Preparation." The City does not feel that ten days is an adequate
amount of time to ascertain whether a proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration/Focused Initial
Study is the most appropriate and thorough method to evaluate the potential impacts of the
Proposed Specific Plan and General Plan amendments.
If you have any questions or comments, please refer them to Mr. Dennis Beougher. the Assistant
City Attorney. He is most familiar with the East Dublin Plan and can provide you with a much
better understanding of the City's concerns with the East Dublin Plan and the proposed
amendments. In the future, please include Mr. Beougher on your mailing list for projects
proposed within the East Dublin Plan area. Thank you.
Sincerely,
:: . .". ~-
/ I .,~ ~
.-tc-:..":::J ~ CAvo...A-1'
Kathryn Wart
Associate Planner
.
.~. . + -
.'.
CEDUBAMND.SAM)
fl:7
..'.....:.
..
.'.;
" -'
.._-.-
....
'.
. ....-
-.&.-'
..'
APPEl\TDlX B
TRANSPORTATION STUDY .Al\TD
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS
AVAILABLE AT
THE CITY OF DUBLm
PLAATJ\1ING DEPARTMENT
UPON REQUEST
0&
PROPOSED EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN
TEXT AMENDMENTS
.....
, .
5.2.2: The major north-south streets will be Arnold Drive, Hacienda Drive. . . .
(beginning of second paragraph) Arnold Drive will facilitate access to Dublin
Boulevard for residents and employees along the western boundary of the
planning area. Arnold Drive is planned as a four lane road with extends
from the northern City boundary to Dublin Boulevard.
(new last paragraph for Section 5.2.2) Arnold Drive will be a north south road
that will connect the BART station to Gleason. Arnold Drive will be limited
access which will serve local as well as through traffic.
5.2.3: (end of second paragraph).. the freeway. Dublin Boulevard is also a major
transit route which connects residential and employment users along
Dublin Boulevard to BART.
Gleason Road, located aApproximately a half mile north of and parallel to the
Dublin Boulevard extension, will be widened to, 0 Gmoller a four lane arterial
road would bo loc::Jted ::JIang the Gleason R03d along its current alignment. .
G:\PA96-020\AMEND1
.
f}.IJ
..-.
.. .
...':....
.....
_-..t ':..:~.~'
. '.
e,.,.
..- .
~. - - ':.-. .
APPE1\TDIX C
NOISE STUDY
AVArrABLEAT
THE CITY OF DUBLIN
PLA1\1NillG DEP ART:MENT
UPON REQUEST
r ~ - ~ - .
11
e'
APPENDIX D
HAZARDS MEMORANDUM
.\
0~
e,
e:: interoffice
MEMORANDUM
to:
from:
subject:
date:
Stuart Cook, Surplus Property Authority
Rod Freitag, General Services Agency ~y
Status of Santa Rita Remediation Projects
May 13, 1996
Per your request, this memo is a summary of environmental investigation and remediation work
conducted at the Santa Rita property in Dublin, as it relates to the County's proposed Specific
Plan amendment for the property.
Background
.'"
--
The Santa Rita property was formerly owned by the U.S. government as part of Camp
Shoemaker, and contained a military hospital and numerous support buildings that were
reportedly constructed in the 1930's - 1940's. The military facility was closed after World War II,
then reopened during the Korean conflict before shutting down permanently. Following the
closure, Alameda County first leased, then purchased the property from the military for use as a
jail, which occupied former Navy buildings (known as Old GTeystone) near 1-580 until 1989 when
the new jail facility was completed north of Broder Boulevard. Other buildings on the site have
been used for warehousing County stores, and the County animal shelter was located just north of
Dublin Boulevard until earlier this year. Portions of the property were also used intennittently for
agricultural operations relating to the jail, including a pig farm north of Gleason Drive and a
greenhouse on the site recently sold to Kaufman and Broad.
Because of the long history of use of the property by the military and for different County
functions, a number of studies have been conducted over the years at the behest of the County to
ascertain the location and nature of potential hazardous materials, including Underground Storage
Tanks (USTs), buildings containing asbestos, or other environmental contaminants. A list of
environmental reports in GSA's files pertaining to the Santa Rita property is attached. Extensive
work has been carried out to address known environmental concerns. All known storage tanks
located on the property south of Gleason Drive have been removed, and we have received closure
letters from the appropriate regulatory agencies. Asbestos removal from existing buildings is
currently underway, with demolition of all existing structures south of Gleason scheduled to be
completed by August, 1996. With the exception of one former UST site located north of the
Specific Plan area, on the Sheriff s property, this will result in the completion of actions to
address environmental concerns on the property.
.::,
Of course, the historical use of the property as a military installation will require site-specific
investigations as portions of the property are sold for development to ensure that additional,
unknown, tanks or other hazardous materials are not present, or if present are remediated.
~D
Stuart Cook
Page 2
May 13, 1996
.',
, .
StoraQe Tank Removal
Most of our efforts to date have concentrated on the removal and remediation of underground
storage tanks from the property. A total of 17 underground storage tanks were removed from
the property between 1988 and 1992. Six of these tanks (#5, 6, 7, 10, 18 and 19) were
considered to require no further action by the Alameda County Department of Environmental
Health (DOER). Investigative and remedial actions for the remaining 10 tanks in the Specific
Plan area have resulted in the DOER issuing remedial action completion certification letters
(#1, 2, 3, 4, 4A. 4B, 9, II, IIA. and 12). The former tank site #23, which is located north of
Gleason Drive, outside of the Specific Plan area, has been submitted to the DOER for closure.
The tanks requiring investigation and remediation were located in four clusters, with each cluster
containing I~3 tanks. The approximate locations of these former tank clusters are indicated on
the attached maps to show their locations relative to the adopted Specific Plan and proposed
Specific Plan amendment land uses. Two of the former tank site clusters are located on the "phase
IT' portion of the Tri-Valley Crossings property. These tanks (#9, 11, IIA. and 12) were related .
to the former "Old Greystone" jail site. A "remedial action completion certification" was issued .. ,:'
for these tanks by the Department of Environmental Health on July 7, 1995. The Specific Plan
amendment will not modify the proposed land use for this area.
Two other clusters offormer tank sites are located along the old 4th Street alignment,
approximately 1200 feet south of Gleason Drive. The western-most cluster, which contained
tanks #1,2 and 3, was associated with an old boiler plant that was located west of the proposed
Hacienda Drive alignment, between Gleason and the Transit Spine. This site is designated for
Campus Office under the adopted Specific Plan and is proposed to be Industrial/Campus Office
under the proposed amendment. The site received a remedial action completion certification on
AprilS, 1996.
The other cluster, located at 4th and Madigan, contained tanks 4, 4A and 4B. This site is
designated for Low Density residential uses under both the adopted and proposed Specific Plan.
The site also received a remedial action completion certification on AprilS, 1996.
BuildinQ Removal and Site Clearance
The property's history as a military facility and use for various County functions has resulted in a
large number of structures in various levels of deterioration on the site. The majority of buildings
are associated with the former military hospital complex located east ofTassajara Creek. Other .
structures were associated with the former County jail (Old Greystone), a group of warehouses , ,,,'
adjacent to 1-580 and Hacienda Drive, the old animal shelter, and a number of other miscellaneous
buildings and foundations dating back to Camp Shoemaker.
~I
.'"
"
e;.:,
.;-
Stuart Cook
Page 3
May 13, 1996.
The former jail facilities, located primarily on the Tri- Valley Crossing site, were demolished
several years ago, subsequent to the removal and disposal of asbestos containing building
materials. The County has is proceeding with a contract with a demolition company to remove
asbestos-containing materials from the remaining structures south of Gleason, and then to
demolish the buildings. Asbestos removal is nearing completion, and a number of buildings have
been demolished, including the old animal shelter and the Madigan building. The demolition
contract is scheduled to be completed by August, 1996.
Site Specific Environmental Review
Due to the large size, history and complexity of the Santa Rita property, the County has not
pursued investigation and complete remediation of the entire property at once. The long (and
largely undocumented) history of use for military and other activities leaves the potential for
discovery of currently unknown underground tanks or other environmental concerns. The County
has therefore recommended site-specific Phase I and II investigations be conducted as part of the
purchase process of particular portions of the property. For instance, Kaufinan and Broad
conducted a site-specific investigation of the California Creekside site that indicated higher than
normal levels ofDDT associated with planter beds in the old greenhouse on the site. As a result,
the County is in the process of having the contaminated soils removed to an appropriate landfill.
Similar site-specific investigations of other portions ofthe property may result in the discovery of
additional environmental concerns that will be addressed in an appropriate fashion.
Attached are the existing and proposed Specific Plan land use maps with the approximate
locations of tank clusters that have-required remediation. Closure letters for all known
underground tanks removed from the property south of Gleason are also attached, as well as a
reference list of environmental reports in our files relating to the Santa Rita property.
cz'J-
~
~
. .'
.' .:.
~g~~1 ~
inaz Z
~~i~ 0
~ 5 ~ 5
E e n =
e ~ ~ ~
;:: n
n 0
~ ~
i'i
~
;;::1
~ ~ ~ i
=< ..; g ~
I
,-
. ~ -" ~.
I' .....,
:"'-."'.-: -;
'.~. ~.>.-"
~!!i~
~~:iEi
~ n ~
g 8 R
~ ~
ng:;'i"~
~x%nG:
~gli~5
~ ~g i
g -....
~
0 [l
0
0 I
0
.. ~
~ ~
;s ;
:~ ! El
~ =
~
~[E
. ~ . . .~.
'.. .
.:.......
(') > ""
~~ >
=; a Z
-<>-1
~8>
>~ ~
> :< ::(
~;>
C!.,,~>
}>::~ mz
~~oQo
!::~~ Re;
o~ m m
,,~::O~3:
~g~~~
.'
.':":
~
"..;-.
li
!:
~,
G)
n
G);' "
n~; .
.,
I .
:..;-
~i
I \
o
"I -" ''-- --"""\~ -::-.,.-:..:'=
, ' _ 'I . f,. ---'
, I - :l_- -;";".:-\:.:-.;..\----~~ --
I =~. -
. ~\ \ \,.... \ I
I ,\ \
\ ! ..... \ I I I
. z;; \ I' I
I ..\ I'
z... ,\ l," 11'11 i'
"." \.. \.~-.... 1/1
V"'''''':--. ... --.,: ' I I
" .."'\
.
, '
, '
,
,
\
,
=
.'
G'l
n
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
z
:r()
::
:%:
@'
;,'
?:
Z'
."
. ;
-d?// /
'I~--/
.
I
i
/
.'
,
, '
itt;:;
/'; \ \.
-."'"
3:
,:%:
-."
.":,
...
.'
...
. .:.' ~.-
I::A,
--t:::..
~g~~g;;;
n ~ (;'l
o ~ m
~ a
~
Z n !: z
5 ~ ~ g
i 5 ; ..
~ 2 n g
B ~ ~ 8
~ ~ ~ :::
= n 0
g ~!
n
~
.... t: ~ :: 5
.~
~~~~;
t) = C - ~
~ l:: l:: co
is tl' ::: !t
~ ~ a ~
""" = -<
~ E
~
:: '- WI ^
""" :: M ~ i
:: c: = .g
gpd E
l5 ; i g :;;
g E ;"g ~
... ~ ~ ~ 0
8 g ~
~ ~
\1 g :i :; .. ~
::
,. ~ $ E !:! >
.:z.al;):(~
~~s;i:
g n ~ !:! ,..; n
6 ,., g g E
2 ~; 0
".. '"
: ft
II 'i n
a
;; ~ ~
~ ~ ~
$
5
;l~
I~ ~ VI
J~3~
I ~>Q
~:::o 11...
IA-~:ID
i~"'" 0
~>S;o
'C'~"'r-~
"o;::g > Q
~~ 0 6 ~
c;-CC:n'1
:::::m ~ a
26:::0 ~ ==
_11::-...4 m
l
i
I
~j
'(;'l I [!]
.
I
() I
I
I
I
I
. 3:
I
I
I
I Z
I
I ....
I
I
.
I 3:
I
I
,
AlAMEDA COUNTY
HEALTH CARE SERVICES
AGENCY
DAVID J. KEARS. Agency Director
~j)
U.:i'
cfJ
-
January 25, 1995
Mr. Andy Garcia
Alameda County General Services Agency
Engineering & Environmental Management
1401 Lakeside Drive, 11th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
JAN "3 1 1995
. RAFAT A. SHAHTD. Assistant Agency DiroclOf .
ALAMEDA COUNTY ENV. HEALTH DEPT.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION
1131 HARBOR BAY PKWY., #25Q
ALAMEDA CA 94502-6577
f,51()}567-n7()()
Dept.
RE: SANTA RITA REHABILITATION CENTER - MADIGAN BUILDING, UST #5
Dear Mr. Garcia:
This office has reviewed the July 20, 1992 Environmental Science
& Engineering, Inc. (ESE) report documenting the closure of a
single underground storage tank (UST) at the noted Santa Rita
subsite. The subject UST previously served the former Madigan
:Building.
......
.,
The referenced report documents that no noteworthy release of
petroleum hydrocarbons has occurred. Consequently, no further
environmental investigation is re~~ired at the subject Santa Rita
subsite. Therefore, this department is satisfied that the
subject UST has been closed in full compliance with the
requirements of Title 23, California Code of Regulations.
,,--.
Sincerely,
Please contact me at 510/567-6783 should you have any questions.
./
, CHMM
ous Materials Specialist
cc: Rafat A. Shahid, Agency Director
Tom Peacock, ACDEH
Rob Weston, ACDEH
Jim Ferdinand, Alameda County Fire Department
-..--.
Cj5
.,n . f
f'\r'"r"'''''f'''\I'"'\'''''n 1,... If'\tt" ,
t .,..."" '. t'!'''''''I ,.""._ .,"""''''' t.. 9:" _....^ ~ ...... ....... ...... . ....
eo:'
JI'"
Pet 'VO}
ALAMEDA COUNTY
HEALTH CARE SERVICES
AGENCY
DAVID J. KEARS. Agency Director
.
.
.:'
~~
FES 2 :1 10Qti
/?&P7r\/J: /
RAFAT A. SHAHlD. Assistant Agency Director-/
STID 4086
Alameda County
Environmental Protection
1131 Harbor Bay Parkway,
Alameda CA 94502-6577
February 21, 1995
Mr. Rod Freitag
Alameda County General Services Agency
Engineering & Environmental Management Dept.
1401 Lakeside Drive, 11th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
RE: SANTA RITA - OLD G~~YSTONE, USTs #6, 7, 10
Dear Mr. Freitag:
This office has reviewed the December 11, 1990 Certified
Environmental Consulting, Inc. (CEC) report documenting the
closure of four of the underground storage tanks (UST) associated
with the noted Santa Rita subsite, USTs #6, 7, 9, and 10. The
subject USTs previously served the former county rehabilitation
center.
The referenced report documents that no noteworthy releases of
petroleum hydrocarbons from USTs #6, 7, and 10 have occurred.,
Consequently, no further environmental investigations are
required for these UST sites. UST #9, the remaining tank of
_ those referenced in the cited CEC report, is currently in the
last stages of its post-closure ~nvestigation.
This department is satisfied that USTs #6, 7, and 10 have been
closed in full compliance with tpe requirements of Title 23,
California Code of Regulations.
Please contact me at 510/567-6783 should you have any questions.
,Sincerely,
Specialist
cc:
Rafat A. Shahid, Agency Director
Tom Peacock, ACDEH
Rob Weston, ACDEH
Jim Ferdinand, Alameda County Fire Department
t{b
CC4580
Division
Room 250
"
/'
/'~
;'
~EDA COUNTY
,AEALTH CARE SERVICES
AGENCY
DAVID J, KEARS, Agency Director
@H~"'\
u'=
cTJ
.;;JUL 1 4 [995
. ,....
July 7, 1.995
RAFAT A. SHAHID, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL H
State Water Resources Control B ,....'
Division of Clean Water Programs
UST Local Oversight Program
, , 31 Harbor Bay Parkway
Alameda, CA 94502-6577
(510) 567p6700
STID 4086
REMEDIAL ACTION COMPLETION CERTIFICATION
Jim de Vos
Alameda County General Services Agency
Engineering & Environmental Management Depa~tment
1.401 Lakeside Drive, l1.th Floor
Oakland, CA 946i2
RE: II OLD GRAYS TONE II - SANTA RITA REHABILITATION CENTER
Dear Mr. de Vos:
This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and
remedial action for the underground storage tanks formerly
located at'the above-described location. Specifically, the
subject tanks are: USTs 1.1, 12, and 12A (fueling complex); and,
UST 9 (mess hall). Enclosed are the Case Closure Summaries for
the two tank locations at the referenced site for your records.
..'
Based upon the available information, including current land use,
and with the provision that the information provided to this,
'agency was accurate and representative of site conditions, no
further action related to the underground storage tank release is
required.
This notice is issued pursuant to a regulation contained in Title
23, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 26,
Section 2721(e). If a change in land use is proposed, the owner
must promptly notify this agency.
Please contact Sco~t Seery at (510) 567-6783 if you have any ,
questions regarding this matter.
Sincer;:. AI J W
Rafat Ii!. Shahid
Director of Environmental Services
cc:
Jun Makishima, Acting Chief, Env. Protection Division
Kevin Graves, RWQCB
Mike Harper, SWRCB
Rod Freitag, GSA
..
cz1
.':~"
.'
....
.:"."
e:.
.:.~
ALAMEDA COUNTY
HEALTH CARE SERVICES
AGENCY
DAVID J. KEARS. Agency DireClor
~.)j)'\
0":
cfJ
1r-70g7
~1
.,.,~.. .oJ ".. \0
STID 5541
RAFAT.A. SHAHID, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
1131 Harbor Bay ParkWay
AWneda. CA 94502-6577
(510) 567.6777
September 25, 1995
Mr. Rod Freitag
Alameda County General Services Agency
Engineering & Environmental Management Dept..
1401 Lakeside Drive, 11th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
RE: S~7A RITA - FORMER MILITARY HOSPITAL SITE, USTs #18 & 19
Dear Mr. Freitag:
This office has reviewed the July 20, 1992 and June 26, 1995
Environmental Science & Engineering, Inc. initial and
supplemental UST closure reports for the referenced Santa Rita
subsite. The referenced reports document that no noteworthy
rel~as~s of petroleum hydrocarbons from USTs ~le and 19 have
occurred. Consequently, no further environmental investigations
are required for these UST sites.
This department: is satisfied that USTs #18 and 19 ha.v~ b~en
closed in full compliance with the requirements of Title 23,
California Code of Regulations.
Please contact me at 510/567-6783 should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
------.
Specialist
County Fire Department
-~ - --.. -~-- .-- ~- -.... -~~.. ...~ ..... ..-.
I
.......
\~EDA COUNTY
~
HEALTH CARE SERVICES
AGENCY
DAVID J. KEARS, Agency Director
AprJ..l 5, ~.9.9 6
~j):\
0':
4~
RAFAT A. SHAHID, DIRe,:",
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
"31 Harbor Bay Parkway
Alameda, CA 94S02.6Sn
STID 5541.
REMEDIAL ACTION COMPLETION CERTIFICATION
RE:
"CENTRAL PARCEL" - SliliTA
~~~ ~ fl\'y;r :-'1 r:-~'
fa Ii: r''''~u - ~
~\!..~'0- ~
tiLr liP R 1 7 1995
Departmen(.;~, "......... ('~ ~; .'.:ir::~...-GSA
,*',:N:, ~.+. !'1,_....'..t:!.JI"\
'. Engi.'i9-?.cng &, Environmental
~ianag,9ment
RITA REHABILITATION CENTER
Jim de Vos
Alameda County General Services Agency
Engineering & Environmental Management
1401 Lakeside Drive, 11th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
Dear Mr. de Vas:
This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and
remedial action for the underground storage tanks formerly
located at the above-described location. Specifically, the
subject tanks are: USTs 1, 2, and 3 ("old boiler plant"); and,
USTs 4, 4A, and 4B ("4th and Madigan sitell). Enclosed are the
Case Closure Summaries for the two tank, locations at the
referenced site for your records.
e,.
, .
Based upon the available information, including current land use,
and with the provision that the information provided to this
agency was accurate and representative of site conditions" no,
further action related to the underground storage tank release is
required. "
This notice is issued pursuant to.a regulation contained in Title
23, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter '16,
Section 2721(e). If a change in land use is proposed, the owner
must promptly notify this agency.
Please contact Scott Seery at (51.0) 567-6783 if you have any
questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
~>><-~
Jun Makishima
Acting Director of Environmental Services
enclosures
cc:
Gordon Coleman, Acting Chief, Env. Protection Division
Kevin Graves, RWQCB
Mike Harper, SWRCB
Rod Freitag, GSA
.
1'1
General Services Agency
Darlene A. Smith, Director
May 13, 1996
TO: Pat Cashman, Surplus Property Authority
FROM: Jiin de Vos, E&EM - General Services Agency
SUBJECT: UPDATED LISTING OF SANTA R1T A REPOR S
Following is a listing oftbe "Environmental Reports" in our files:
· Gregg & Associates, Inc.; Underground Storage Tank Management Plan; June 1988.
· Gregg & Associates, Inc.; Underground Tank Removal and Site Remediation Report, Santa Rita
Rehabilitation Cenlc:.r at Old Boiler Plant, Tanks 2942-1,2 & 3; May 1988.
.
· ESE; Report of Stockpiled Soil Sampling, UST 1,2 and 3 Site, Santa Rita Correctional Facility,
Dublin, California; December 7, 1993.
· ESE; Report of Stockpiled SoU Spreading and Disposal, UST 1,2,3 $ite, Santa Rita
Correctional Facility, Dublin, California; June 20, 1994.
· ESE; Site Assessment Report. Alamerla County UST I, 2, 3 Site, Santa Rita Correctional
facility, Dublin, California; December 21, 1994.
· ESE; Quarterly Monitoring Report, Alameda County UST 1,2,3 Site, Santa Rita Correctional
Facility, Dublin, California; January 30, 1995.
· ESE; Quarterly Monitoring Repon, Alameda County UST 1,2, 3 Site, Santa Rita Correctional
Facility, Dublin, California; March 13, 1995.
· ESE; Quarterly Monitoring Report, Alameda County UST 1, 2,3 Site, Santa Rita Correctional
Facility, Dublin, California; June 19. 1995.
· ESE; Report of Additional Site Assessment, UST 1,2,3 Site, Santa Rita Correctional Facility.
Dublin, California; February 1996.
· ESE; Closure Report for Underground Storage Tank (US1) numbers 2942-4, 2942-4A aoo. 2942-
4B, Santa Rita Jail, Dublin., California; July 20, 1992.
.
qD
-
Engineering & Environmental Management Department
1401 lakeside Drive, 11th Floor. Oakland, California 94612
Telephone (510) 208-9525. FAX (510) 208-9530
Pat Cashman
Pagc 2
5/13/96
.'""
"
· ESE; Report of Stockpiled Soil Sampling, 4th and Madigan Site, Santa Rita Correctional
Facility, Dublin, California; November 22, 1993.
· Versar, Inc.; Contaminant Modeling Using Sesoil for the 4th and Madigan Site, Santa Rita
Correctional Facility, Alameda County, California; December 28, 1993_
· ESE; Spreading of Stockpiled Soil, 4th and Madigan Site, Santa Rita Correctional Facility.
Dublin, California; June 26, 1995.
· Versar~ Inc.; Subsurface Investigation Report, 4th Street and Madigan Avenue on the Santa Rita
Property, Alameda COUllty, California; October 23, 1995.
· ESE; Soil Sampling, 4th and Madigan Site, Santa Rita Correctional Facility, Dublin, Califomia;
February 7, 1996.
· ESE; Closure Report for Underground Storage Tank (USn number 2942-5, Santa Rita Jail,
Dublin California.; July 20, 1992.
· Certified Environmental Consulting, Inc.; Santa Rita Tank Removals - UST s 2942-6, 7, 9 & 10;
December 11, 1990.
.:,
· Versar, Inc.; In..<ttallation of One Monitoring WeIland Performance of the First ofFoUT Quarters
, of Groundwater Monitoring, Santa Rita Property. Fonner Underground Storage Tank #9 Site;
July, 1994.
· Versar. Inc.; Second Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report for 1he Former Underground
Storage Tank #9, Santa Rita Property, Santa Rita, California; November 29, 1994.
· Versar, Inc.; Third Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report for the Fonner Underground Storage
Tank #9, Santa Rita Property, Santa Rita, California; February 27, 1995.
· Versar, me.; Fourth Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report for lhe Fonner Underground
Storage Tank #9, Santa Rita Property, Dublin, California.; Mareh 30, 1995.
· Versar, Inc., Groundwater Monitoring Abandonment Report for Fonner Underground Storage
Tank #9 at the Santa Rita Prop~rty, Santa Rita, California; JWle 3D, 1995.
· ESE; Closure Report for Underground Storage Tank (UST) Numbers 2942.11, 2942-12 and
2942-12A, Santa Rita Jail, Dublin., California; July 20, 1992.
.
C(I
.-
e.
.--:.
Pat Cashman
Page 3
5/13/96
· ESE; Vehiele Fueling Area, Old GraystDnc. Santa Rita Correctional Facility~ Dublin, California;
January 7. 1993.
· Report on Soil and Ground Water Investigation at Old Graystone Fueling Facility, Santa Rita
Correctional Facility, Dublin, California; January 15, 1993.
· ESE; Corrective Action Report for Old Graystone Fueling Area, Santa Rita Correctional Facility,
Dublin, Alameda County. California; March] 993.
· ESE; Report of Stockpiled Soil Confmnation Sampling, Old Graystone Fueling Area, Santa Rita
Correctional Facility. Dubl~ California; August 9. 1993.
· Versnr, Inc_; Final Contaminant Modeling using Sesoil for Old Graystone Fueling Area, Santa
Rita Correctional Facility, Alameda County, California; January 6, 199.4.
· ESE; Site Assessment Report, Old Graystone Fueling Area, Santa Rita Correctional Facility.
Dublin, California; February 21, 1994.
· ESE; Quarterly Monitoring Report, First Quarter 1994. Old Graystonc Fueling Area, Santa Rita
Correctional Facility, Dublin, California; February 25, 1994.
· ESE; Quarterly Monitoring Report, Second Quarter 1994, Old Graystone Fueling AI~ Santa
, Rita Correctional Facility, Dublin. California; July 12, 1994.
· ESE; Quarterly Monitoring Report, Third Quarter 1994, Old Graystone Fueling Area. Santa Rita
Correctional Facility, Dublin. Cal~ornia; July 12. 1994.
· ESE; Report of Limited Cleanup at Four Sites, Santa Rita Correctional Facility~ Dublin,
California; March 3. 1995.
· ESE; Report of Site Activities, Old Graystone Fueling Area, Santa Rita Correctional Facility,
Dublin. California; June 15, 1995.
· ESE; Closure Report for Underground Storage Tank (UST) numbers 2942-18 and 2942-19;
Sa.nta Rita Jail, Dublin California; July 20, 1992.
· ESE; Additional Clarification Concerning Activities Performed at the UST 18 & 19 Site, Santa
Rita Correctional Facility, Dublin, California; June 26, 1995.
· ESE; Report of Stockpiled Soil Sampling, UST 18 & 19 Site, Santa Rita Correctional Facility,
Dublin, California; July II. 1995.
~9-
Pat Cashman
Page 4
5/13/96
· Versar, Inc.; Disposal of Stockpiled Soil, Santa Rita Correctional Facility Site, Dublin.
California; September 12, 1995.
· ESE; Report of Site Activities, UST 18 & J 9 Site, Santa Rita Correctional Facility. Dub~
California; December 4. 1995.
· Enviropur W cst; Non-PCB Containing Transformer Oil Spill Cleanup; November 1994.
· Versar, Inc.; Asbestos Survey and Engineering Cost Estimate for the County of Alameda, Santa
Rita Property, Dublin, California; December 10, 1993.
· Versar, Inc.; Phase r Environmental Site Assessment, C01.Ulty of Alameda, Santa Rita Property;
January II, 1994.
· ESE; Report of Limited Excavation and Disposal, Northwest of Former Boiler Room, UST 18 &
19 Site, Santa Rita Correctional Facility, Dublin, California; November 29..1995.
· Versar. Inc.; Project Oversight for Hazardous Waste Removal Services, County of Alameda,
Fonner Santa Rita Hospital Facility; November 17, 1995.
cc: .Candace Fitzgerald, GSA - Real Property
Rod Freitag, GSA - E&EM
JdV:mtf:g:\crspndc\idv\spa60513.doc
q0
.C"
, '
.'
. ~:
.'
e'
APPENDIX E
MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX
.:
.;
, q~
rr~......
..... .
.
_. 00..
....:. -."
APPENDIX E
MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX
.r_''-.
: .:...~-.~: ::..
.
.
qy
.
.,,"
X
H
c::
E-<
." ;1
. . 0';. E-<
Z
r>:l
, , :s
~
r>:l
.. ." ~
,.
. " .. ~
'. ..:l
.. Po
U
H
~
H
U
r>:l
Po
: tIl
Z
H
..:l
I%l
::;l
Q
,. Z
e>::
r>:l
E-<
" .. tIl
<
~
.....
.
q~
IIfl1
1111
B
~t~II~1
:Ho
=: 51
e]
~ .=
"':;:;
u :::;
:~ c
-::;I 0
o~
g ~
c:; c::
'" 0
:E~
.J:) ..
"'-::;I
e ..
~.:
I> "" .
C5 (:; ~
-... ......
E...... V"I
.,--
.:= ~ N
~~"B
--::;1-
.. '" ..
~~"'O
I> .. U
- .c Ai:
I,) = V;
~<"C
t:l.. l-
e Z
-l 0
t:C U
~ <:..
Nz <=:
~z ::';;0
t:l..< f-tn
.",
~.!!
.. 0
~ g
c~
~ ~
e-~
o 0
: g
@'~
eJ ~.
... -
I> is
.J:) u
1;: I>
~-=
o ..
;:::.2
;'B
u -
"i:: =
::;';;
:.:i .~
- c::
~ ~
];:s
~a
-;; ~
"""
E'u;
S +-
~ ~
:.::l"S
::.;;
u
u
00
N
><:
.~
i:
..
0...,
~:2
;:: >
'S e
r.:...,,-
E.
~ ~
~~
.. 0
"-"E.
ell~
.= 5
E .~
Wi: ....
2 g- -
= .....:=
II; ..... c;
"-;l: ==
= en i:
--2
~.g .=
"i:g u
~8~
D'E ..s!
~;:e-
~ ~ 5
>::
'"
.",
'>
e
0.
-::;I
:::
..
<
f-
>
<
-l
.~
-=
~
is
u~
S ~
~'=
I> ...
0.1>
..s! :;
~.J:)
I>
""::I a;:
.. ..
a~
'"
.g ~
~.=
::: '"
8.s
>::
..
"
'c
~
"S!
>, iij
.J:) ;l:
-::;I I>
~ ";
g e
E: ti
ec -:i .~
.. e
a -: ~
in 6- c..
~~<r; e 6
"''''::';;>0;,,;1::
~..Q t- ~ = = !3
~ o,Oc.."=ou
"f! "; "E ~ ~ -; ._
"':j ..: :::; U ;;; ~?: .~
t:o~.~g~:: ==
B:t~::...;.:~ ~
~.~iUo.~E.u; "E!
:=:C5=~CI)5 0
~==~.gg.~u r,)
~'o.E~~<.g .g
;~.88.8~:g ~
o GJ r-o "0
;S~'~.8'~6~.~ .
=c..~ ""N.-:=:s::.-=.c:
88F='ii=~~E:~ii:
.s
<>
<::
'u
'"
0.
tn
....
o
\0
...
<>
c:
'u
8-
tn
....
o
V'\
...
0...
is
t:
5i
c:;
>::
I
t:l.. <:"t:l..t:l..<:..t:l..<:..e..e
Q Q < <0<0<0<<
::.;; :::E...J:;>-...J;:E...J;:E=:
li: li: r.:... r.:...CO....CJr.:...I%lI.t.O
oe.. e.. c.. t:l.. ::l.. e..
N<=: =: < <=:<=:<..:<..:
w:::Ec 0 :;>- :::Ec::Eo::Ec:::Ec
":f-tn tn f- f-tnf-tni--tnf-cn
~
?
Cll
e
0.
.5
.g
c::
E
;:
~
>.
o
c..
'"
u
-::;I
c:
'"
.~
]
"-
c
-;:;
>
'"
e
~.., v
.~ ~ .~
~~ ~
t"j~ ~
8 t r_S!
Wi: ..c
eo;: ~
"'2 ~ 25
~'B~:;:_
~u,~;:E
!: eao=e=
_~.=_50
::I _ ==-
~ -~ .E ~ .Y
'" ~ Q.~ ~
-_11 aJ
~ ~-= ~.:
a=: .5 \0..., ~
.-EU)Cu
?:5~~-~
E=::D..2EE..
en:: =- E::..!:!
~E~~~
ii~o~~
..,,-- -
.;;;g-~~g.
::: ii .!! -;: 0
....:i: ~ >- u &..=.
U U ..... M_
-= "' -= cJ. =::
"- .1- CC .... >
:- toll p
U ~
ri..:i =:: ~
..
.2
~
.[
~
... '.
""=' c -:j u :':.:...~"
~ ~,~ ~:g~
~ A;: ~ ~ ~ =: c..
c:; ~ ~ z:: O.
::;.. ._ ....... ~ U u:a ... ro.-
::.~ tB~g;o g-~t:
~ U u = C.~ ~ ~
1; ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ .~ ~ 1:
t:"'2 E ~.i3 Ui :g ~.~
.ge =-c;;~~ =-t::"i:
~~ C:~cnQ.. 'o.B'~
~ .E e ~] 5' '5 ~ ~
1:0 ~d:I;:" c._~
8.0 ~r;:..r::.-""'" In=-
-::J~~e;:;<<I=o =~-;
== t;; ..!:! .~::E.!!i ~ = "'ED ~
- ~ - - = ~ ~
_5kEo~i5.. ~E_~
.2!J~~~._ coB,; o..::::,=_~
~ e = "'%.= ~'ii Q.==
-::J:-5,g 6:= ~ vr =ao5 'S c..
C; ::: ~ II) U .= - ~ ,= = t ..E
.:- :: :: ObQ "'0 ~ ~ g.-= ~
;.:ctI fj.5-.~ _. IJ_ C U
I.. - en .- - - - = :;::::; ~ ""C -:::;
.:; u "E c.. -~ ! ~ ~ g- ~ = ~
~~{:~&3t:o.. U)~~
~ ii a _ .."g ~.2 ~ ~ fc~
- u ~ -- d ~ ~ ~ >
~~~ E.~ ~~.!O~"'2+;~
~ : .~ g ~.~ 5-.-g ~ ~ -:i ~
- -.- U &... = ~o"" -.. ,E _0 :-;--R
!:~o;a;~= tIb- --
tJ) ..,. ~ ~ VI f:: E.E .: "i: ~ ~
~~~~==-~~eE,.I'c
~ "[ ~ -='5 ~ "6- g os. ~ ~ ~
en u Vi g- = c U C'" u r; .... .-
O~~=:= =::;:::::-~~
.;
U
At
I>
'"
..
I>
..
;l:
Ji
0;
>
e
~
..
..
s.1
0'
is.
'iij
.E
o
.!:!
..
s.1
0'
-;:;
>
I>
."
-S
,~
~
~ ~
'0 'c
~ ~
I>
.J:)
'"
'"
.J:)
>::
><
.i
'"
I>
:~
-0
0.
E.
'"
..
..!:!
is
u
!:::
'"
"is
~
01
~
~
.S! 3 .S! ~ .~
.~ ] "~ : ::
"C..-.... tt~-
:_ ~ S_o]: ~,~ ~
-;::tno~ i@~E
,";:_lJV'} ....::
~ 5 B Od Of; ~ U
~g-~~ ~:.~
~u>Br- Y.gi:..
'" 1>'" N .- ii ='
~C!:::L:J ;l: c::
~]'6-:; ~~~
= C I:) 4J vi u _
.~~ :;"E:_~ ~_~
8- Co. ~ .= ~ GJ cw <
~ B.- g..~ ~ go;:E
4)\-~C)= ....-
VI ~ 11I'I i- 0'" _ Co.'-...
~C:=iUI)UOOC
-=!!.!!::..:: =.5 s::
1) ;3 Q. ~ lIS g. g .S!
1J.=Qo~ "i)tJ.~
5 6-.in VI.i5 ii g. "'g
~~~i=i;;o~8
><
.S!
~
;::
~
c;
U
,=
-::0
~
01
c..
~
"-
I>
~
E
-;;;
Ai: u
i: U
c: 'E
.. ..
a ui u,
'" -::;I ..
~~~
= ... ~
=C;~
.s -.5 -.
'" '" ..
I> ;:: ;l:
-5-gk
CO) .- 8
"'i-g.!!
-Bea~
.E u:a- E
0; "-
__= e c.
';;; :=
'" - I>
! ~.~ g.
($ Q.ii=-
+~ ii~_5
t::: . = ~.:2i
~eg-~~
Qcut:_
cg..e~~ ::
r.u ;:.. "'::l .E g-
~~~a1~
u - = U
:JI U e ~
"E ~ ~ ; _~
-t:~ cu:=.,
c +:: .= ~ ;:)
~._J5v;=,
~
c:
,2 ..,;
- I>
:.a _::
c :>
o 0-
U !:::
><:
>::
><
'"
'"
~
'"
~
';;j,
~
'"
.",
'>
o
Co
.!:!
~
';;;
.[
.;
ell
~ ~
~ +E
c-::;l
'" -
E ~
I> _
l>Il'"
c ..
~~
.s~
"Sl ~
iij ~
c.ii"
~ R.
o
'" C.
g
'"
~
'"
e..
><:
_ t:l..
..: <=:<=:
o :::gc:::gc::
tn f-cnf-tn
NO
WN
=:w
e..=::
NONL:JO
~NWZN
..:w=,Zw
c..": t:l..<":.,
'U
';:
...
:5
-[
Ii
~
~ -r;
":; .3
u 0
.~ ~ ~ B
~ >- ~
- <~ i
.......J ~ E
I:Q' = IU
._ en.; ~ :;
~<_... "'0
c:. E.... m Co)
-e ;: !: ,g .5 -=
~~==~~~
_ - ] :: 1: -s
;:.- :: E ~ g-
r.:: :; ~ tJ U c::
-=
?
'"
'5
e
3: 3: 2 I~ ~ ~ ...J ...J , 3:
c... c.. c.. c.. e-
N r-i
3: ~ r-
:::: < =:: 0 UJ CJ - - =-
V'\ "" :;;: V'\ c- "" "" r- - ~ -- --
-..,
--
.' ..
'. .'
,
;;:
~
.,.
I~
r-
00
'"
1=
00
I~
=>
N
V'\
<-,
00
N
'"
N
,
, .
.;......
"
..
','
..-.........
.... '.
'. .- ."
. ....-
.....
.':.". -.
......
..:....;::::.
.....
..:.:.,:....
-.-:....:.:.
.....
1"
.-...,-
"
;
.....
"..;
..
"
'0
..
"
o
..
"
'0
8
";;
>
e
0..
0..
..
N
l1J
l>:
N
w
eo::
c..
io
~
"
~
C.
::
5
...
...
co
..
.J:)
.~
...
~
><:
c..
--=eo::
::Eo
!-Cf)
..
"
'0
..
"
o
~
.E
'"
...
c .
.g ~
'" '"
... -
:= e-
o....
0....
'" .-
..
..= &:
- ..
'-c-
o ~
~.~
~.3
.."-
.~ cc
::: ..
g-S
... ...
.8~
c
"i ~
.~ .;
~e
><:
c..
<eo::
::Eo
!-Cf)
..
"
l
...
..
'-'
e
c..
.5
c
o
ii-g
'"
~..o
'u ~
i;:==
.~ ~
~~
c...E!
a.~
.....
:': ::I
S"U
.g .=
~ ~
o ...
~=
... "
.. ..
"i'~ .~
C;;;- u
:c:-:: m
u'S..,]
.= 0 ~
:fi ~ ~ "i
:::) - ... VI
Q 0 ~ _
c- _ AU; ;::
..
"
'0
8
~
eo::
.g
;;:;
i5
c
c..
~
~
x
c..
<eo::
::Eo
!-Cf)
..
>
e
"-
c..
'"
'-
o
.~
=E
5
...
.~
~
x
c..
<eo::
::Eo
!-Cf)
..
.J:)
c
o ...
.- ..
~:~
.~o
:: 0..
o ..
... ...
c ..
._ ..c
,,-
..
~.~
':1 _
.. ..
to) .!!
.J:) ...
c
- 0
!!! ...
.. ..
g.Q
~.~
2"'0
- c
::: co
..: ...
c"E
.- '"
"'''
bO-
.; ~
'" >.
{;.:::
EU
($ ....
Vi ~
e
.~
...
..
]JS
..-;;
:E!::
~ l:l
o c..
-Cf)
~.s
;:;
c ,-
'" ~
E '"
u
N c
l1J '"
eo::"E
_ 0
u ...
.- u
~ co
i5 .;
o ..
c.. :;;
x
x
'3'
...
..
:~
-0
0..
!;
...
E
.g
5
u
e
:::
U
2
;;:;
..
~
.s
'"
.E -d
-c .~
= 6-
a e
x
x
c..
<r::::
::Eo
!-Cf)
c..
<~
::Eo
!-eI)
Po
<c::
::Eo
l-eI)
Po
<r::::
::Eo
!-Cf)
NUlO
Ul';ZN
r::::';Zw
c..<l>:
NUlONlJJONl1JONUlONUlONl1JONWO
W';ZNwZNwZNl1JZNWZNwZNUlZN
eo::Zl1Jr::::zwr::::Zwr::::';Zwr::::';Zl1Jeo::zwr::::';Zw
c..<eo::c..<r::::c..<r::::c..<r::::c..<r::::c..<r::::c..<r::::
eN
.;
..
:~
&.
:2
;;;
...
c
'"
C.
.=
:.s
'"
o
E
~
..
w
U
..
S
!;
~
.g
.!!
Q,
e
bO
c:
.;:;
13
~
.>
..
r::::
..
~= --~
0;;; . X
;6~ ~.::...~ .~~
s-:; 8. !!_u ~ :: "g ....
~ l::.S liJ '::: tI; c.E
U'u I) :g ~ ii ~ ~
.5 8.~~ ~ '" [.~ ~
cncnL.. -if 0= c
~ ~ .:;:~ ~&. .s
~.i ($ ~~ .g a; ~:e
.~_!!Jm!~ ~C:: ~o
ii ~ ~ ':S -=;0 ~ c.__u c.. .E
~.;:j=-ODf:f.~ .. -
lJe._ ._~ c~ ~o
Io.ec=o~r; E./i; 0"'=
_.~ = N ~-u ~ ~ - e
5=~f;t~~_ ...::.- ijU
_:).... .c -...e
c..!:! '" E:: :; --;; >."
s a.g ~ c 5 E C "'-
~..=!~~,,;U ~E ca:
.~~U~ii-; o.!:! .-E.g
E~~~~i ~~ 3~
ioi)~t~U ;o__!! _;::0
",-=.._._0 _Q.
~~-=EE"E ~~
_=:--oc:;cc ;;-;: ~=
S!:!-;U.s5 ~;; .~"'='
Nllivt="=O =-~_..c~
.~]~~Ec irg~';.~
ii ~ g t ~:;.:; .~ 5 ~:s =g
~.~~~ c.:P:;e E-~ u.=
COJ~.g':gz5~8:5~g
E:
-.
..,.
::l_
..,. .....
:::>
.....
<
..,.
I~
'"
.....
~
1=
..
:;:;
.e; .~
~~ c::
Q. .>< ~
6 ~ .2
"~u -=
:; CIS B
~~ "'C
.u -i ..g
... "
.~ ~ ~
",.. U1I
:!J: en . c:::I
~:=..:e
c..~"'iC ~
1l &.~.=
=_"'t:l"E:::
.so-u;o=
.g ~-g ~.g
'".S "';:;0
E~~~t
-8a~ ~;
~ I> ~ .~ UJ
g -= r= -;( .=
V'I., C,lI U)
a ~ "'E .rIJ ""C
u..Eia~~
~~~u-g
~= -< ~ ~
ut:bO-=O
.!= "'Uij = ~ =
5- i -i -;; ~
~ c.c;; ~ ~
~
c..
~
U
'"
-=
.....
r-
.....
....l
c..
I::
Wt:..
'" ...,
00
.....
I=-
...,
OJ
;;:;
.;;;
c:
o
u
'" ;;;
~c:
- u
eS
::> u
- ..
u c..
Eel)
~.s
<=,-
o
- ...
- ..
~.u
111=
>'0
~c..
...
'E ii
~ E
.. ..
;~
". C
~ ..
'o~
=0"'
.= ~
.~ ~
.. ..
:r::::
.5.E
g.~
c:: ;:;
<f)
~
~
-::::
~
'i
E
..
.~
'"
o
u
..
.J:) .
B ~
eE:
~5
'" u
... ..
;~
~.s
- ....
<: 0
.!! ...
~~
:Go
=c..
;:;E
'- ..
o E
~~
-.= g
.U; ii;
~~
-= ..
... u
... ...
.g. ~
.. ..
eo::c::
.~
.~
5
u
..
.J:) .:
.. ..
...-
",c..
u~
2.-
- u
... ..
~~
.= u
...-=
bO-
..'-
.= ::
E.!!
" .!=!
-"0
t: c..
!;~
... c
'- ..
o ::
bOil
c: bO
._ co
.-= ::
... ..
~~
-:::: ..
.. u
... ...
.- ::
_ 0
e-...
.. ..
r::::r::::
==
==
I.:.
'"
x
'"
.
<=>
..".
N
.....
.
: .....
.........
. ,..".
".-.-, .
" '.'
:<'.~-.:"
......
", ",
. ':'-.-.-
",.. ,
..," .
-......
.....
....-.
e;,
.-......
......
. : '. .~".
.:. ,..::
: ':::''-:>:
-:'::.'
: :-. ,',
W"_".,
'"
. -...'..
.' -"-
-.....
....::
",. :::".
".-..
:.."::':-:
'. ".": .'~
,"
, ,
-....
e,:
--.:."::-'.
q4
..:
.. .. ~ .. .. ~ ~ ~ ~
<: <: <: <:
'0 '0 '0 -~ of. .~ .~ 1 ],
.. .. ..
<: <: 0 <: is <: C :5
0 c 0 0
....
~=
:c
:;:l
o
....
o
=:-
u
"
-:S
.~
~
';:j
,~
E
'"
e
'"
....
:; g
~ ''::
~ ~
U'u
!;:';:
!-&.
x
.:..!-
OZ
...lO
ellU
!-o..
Z<",:
o:::Eo
U!-<n
~
...
~ !!
~,g '"
c: ..c .5 L.
66 ]ii:
O ~ ~ 0
_~o Uu;
,= ] =:- -g s
1l,eu ~<
~et Uf-
0,,-0 ~>
"-,, I: - <
~~=' .9....J
8s.~ "'C:::
.5e>>ti to
u-> =~
~~8 ..
- :l -0 'i,g -g,
~ ::: s:; >to..!! i
ii~M .~o~
Euo ~~oh
.g~B _5:~,...:
g.~~u.!f<~\5
... c.~ ~ ~ ..-..:;::
~c:~E~~.dj
~ IJ :t f c.>.= .=
.... E <.!.. <>0 0.< U 0
~39ct:...Jo:
~~':=r.....~ <<it.!!
ii:~'~l=;:t'i8~
x
><
><
I-
Z
o
U
~ ~ '"
o .2 ~~ co
~ u ~5 -S i5
~ S :l~;;;'ic:1l
=_..< .~iS..>Ec'E
~ .~ ::.eui!CIlJ
] > -.,;:.c.=g:E~5
u :S '~aoC;]~;~c..
~ ~-~.g.=~frIV5
u *i ~ 0 .g ?; .~ 0 e"z
.8 .~bE~E.eg~
._ . i ~.!! =.g N ~ ~ ~
~ge ;:~-g~~~~=
~~]'" ~.~.5cN~;~
_"" "o€<::""Ul-C:"
~~u .;iieEEC:::"'g~:Q
C l:: n; C"~i: 00 0 e: \i; 1:: g
Eiii-5 ei.=~x.;;;g:;
~g] u-:;J'"E...uJ~5.=
,::I ,- 0 .c u '" .... Z >. - -=
w :f u = c. ~.-::: :z "':' '; ...:
.Ea...Bo~~=]<~-=~u;
U ;"oIl"lUll....ml+-._....iU.-
~ t-'; ~ ~ L.,. ~-cJ C CCI a ?; ::3
"_>c>s::mc-u=~ o..c
t:l-~ij~':~:;C~6='"
~ ~ ~.-= -;; ~ ~ e-:.a !!O.~ iiIi 6
-u; 0 D B ~ ~ B ~ -g .~ E: ~ ~
= c.. II) ti E "'Co..~ ;:: R c: 5 .;:...~
d:O_\.::.cd -u-=l..::.O....
~ b.I= ~~.E<~ :E:.5 ~8
><
c..
<
:::E
l:.
><
f-
Z
o
U
l'.o..l-
<oz
:::E...lO
l:.l:lU
x
2:::.:: <:",:~....<:",:t;j
UlO ~oo:::g::::Ec=:
c::<n f-CI')l'.-!-<nc..
t:
,~
e
l'.
.5
s
....
I:
,S!
~
~
"
e
<;;;
'- u 2
0.= -
: 'S 6-'i:Jr--;e; tJ
- 0 ~ ~ . - - ~
] ];g';~~"~.g 2_
&n5w~-;-;=:if
"= ".= ,.n 0 0 0 to) ....... E
:c"'E ;!;ellE'o:l 0';
:::Jt:eo- "V'lCc;I tJ Uf
C &.Oo~ti:=.= ~= ~ ~
'c=~3~.g.!!~J; ou
~r: O~C..5= ;.~
.-= - ~u_ i::&i;t:::1l II:S e
~~:66~~.;].~ ~~
~a~.~-g~"'g~E E-:S
~>:'5~a;.s~ .~'o
-::i~~~.81i;s: II)
~.~ ~ i _ ~ B g m ~~
~-g.~~:E.5 e E;: DOC
~ in ~ .>. := ""::J u ~;; ::: %!
~~~~O!!"~g-~ ~.~
.cc.:="iiEfe;-=f: >.0
::"- CIi:S > II> c.'" -...- u_ c. c 5-
..c~_.u;II>II)-- ~....
.;::J....ii~ce'r-=::~ f.....C
Oc:- Ul"...:::: .::=
g.; ~.s'C?E'o~ ~ .:: u
~ tt e ~~ ~ == w:' E .~ [
g:~ ft~ ~B c E"~ g- ~ ~
~~.::~ g,~:-_; ~.: "- >
- .g~
.;;6"Eiii~g~:;.g ~
> G.) ~ .11 :::: 11>
"= -;; := ii E ~ 'in -;; ~ ~ .,::
~ E.~ ~~s::: n~:i i:-;
~..g:: u ~ u~w~~;:a ~ ~
G8[~~~a~~~~u
"'-c..
<0
;:;!...l
l:.ell
!-
Z
o
U
o u
'"' 0
1:-E
" ..
> 0
"0
!lo
E-
u
s'i
~ ~
~-E
c: "
'" '"
:;:l
~ii
~ =
E ~
,,-
.~ ~
's B
'" .;;
- ...
'" :::
. 0
~-=
'>~
~ ~ ";
..0 ,=
.~ -~ .-=
~-:;~.g
~ ~ ~.!!
A;: ~ .a. ~==
e.:: ;: E
&::.. ii c..
~
0..
~
<
ell
-0
~
'"
'"
c..
~
'"
u
-E
:l
.i:
"
1::
'"
t5
.~
....
o
S 00
~ .~
.t e
:l u
.... "
" U
.L> '"
... u
-8 ::c
" 1::
= .~
o <;;;
_cC~
.g ~ ~
.:.:: c= c.
~~~
Co"O" VI
'" ... ...
! ~ a
:.E-=~
. ~ -i
~ g 6 E
t=ur;::c..
Co.
<",:
:::Eo
I-<n
t;jon
",:g:
"'--
....
~
....
o
I:
o
.~
0;
"'-
><
"
'-
o
1::
o
C.
~
,
E
;:t
l'.
~
c..
'"
e
..
t:
w~
t:.
~
....
o
*-
on
0-
....
o
..!!
'e
::<.!:
~
.i
...
u
WE
"
....
"E!
;; -
=.=
,,-.;
~~
>< 0
L:lc..
;:t
0..
;:t
"'-
,. <::! 0 0 N '"' "'!
'"' -i- vi vi vi vi ..6 -
- - - - - .... - e
;:.:; .... .... .... .... ....
"~f&'1 .., '"' .., ~ '"' '"' ..,.
~~Il;: 0 "'! "'! <::! 0 "'! c:::.
...; '"' .., .., .., ...; .., '"'
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~~III .... c- o - N .., on ""
or. on '" "" '" "" "" ""
..'
..- .-
x
><
I-
Z
o
U
NUl
UlZ
",:z
0..<
...
'"
'E
:;:
Cl
I'-.
B
~
"
"
u
u
o
c..
-0
::
'"
.;;
~
"U
~
11
;::
o
~
"
Co.
~
,g
::0
" ,
.. ....
..."2
" ..
':; 1!
:E~
.s ~
'"
- ~.~
1Ji':::' >
~ - ...
c: 0 "
L.o 1:: ~ U)
.!: E. -= ~
to 0 ~ ;.
c. CD :0.. "Vi
>..s 2 ~
-:::uc-
.s c:: > it(
:gE:.g ~
~","':;:l 1:-
"'0 w~ ~ ~
11:0 U 0 ~
.E!!g.~
~_l-....
~-~~
~.E E ~
fJ s::,.e
.2 1!.g -
_.= C'O =
~~ :ic..
.i: C >..
a8c;]
.5 . '0 ~
7E..E~g-
o .~ .g "i
o :l'':; ;;;
=--'-CJU
I) c 05 c..i
-=5~~~
u.- = .= tv
:=~~~tI
>C'C~_-=
o c.. ~;;:r-
rk.~~DB
Q
o
c..
o
....
o
....
e
....
o
'"'
o
r-
'"
.;
t:
...
.~
c..
:e
5
t.:.i
..
~
'i
"
':;
e
... .;
~ >
0
.~ ~
..
""
c. ""
... ""
0 ~
...
,!:!
-0 u
...
c.. <n
X ><
c.. '-
< c ~
~ ...J
l:. ell U
<: !-
.... Z
;:;: Ci 0
f- <n U
...
1!
g c;
]
c.
0 is
U ....
> t
u c..
"
" -;;
u "
.... .g .
0
c. ::0' :;
e " ~
c. .. ~
.... "
0 .~
.~ ;;;
;. ...
" e ?
"
.s ~ .5
.~ .~ ,-
..: ....
S "
!:ell
.~ '" ;;:
oil..:
" u
E c
or <;;; ~
c ..
u
C ~ u
"- ~
.. .5
.s .. ~
" e
"
':; .. '"
c..-
0 u
c: c: ,-
0 2
"-
"'! c;
..., ~
g
6
8 8
.... 0-
"" '"
.w -"."';
:..'::~: .'
:.-: :.~:.
.. t.
'_:;::-~~
:::.\:.::'
...::....
: : .'.:_.
-'.' -'.
':':'.::-:::
., ':.
'i
.. .. ~ ~ ~
c c '0 'g, '5
Z. 'f. ~ ~
c c 6 c 6
0 ~ x x 0
...
.J:j
'~
.;
u
...
'0'
a
,=
::c
~
o
ui
u
...
"2'
Q.
~
". .',
-;'.. .
.' -.'
Ii
~
...
'>
e
...:....
,...:....
*i
. ....
.'
0.
..
o
...
.!O!
o
t::-
!=!
i==
x
x
, "
t::-
o
...l
Cl
o
t:
t::..
<0:::
::Eo
E-V)
"'- c..
<0:::<0:::
::Eo::Eo
E-V)!-V)
:t:
..
c
w .~
~ <.>
.~ '6. ~
~o ~ "5
";c~ "'0
~~~ :~ ~
u ~Jg :_~ ~
5. g. u .~
..eti~ ] r=
~,,~ c= "'E
~~] ~
""'='...... - ._",;;0
~::_~ ~ t)
"'-oi:~ c: ~
...!:!""C tr.....:::5-
E;i-u ~6"~
o.=~ 2 E ~r:
~a..E g~.9
.~ ~ ~ ... ~ 0 ':=
lL) ~ 0 ~ u :; 2
i-o'5V'1 ct:c.C,1I
E..95 ~~__c.
c-=-~ _ii<"'3
~"'2 4o.E~c;
~f:i1o...e~D~
G)~5~~u~~
3og~.>.~=iI>>
~~u~EI:~~
E:.:..:::.:!~e:..~t.:.:~
0 "'" IE
"'- ;:;:
'" ,,' uJ
.. 00 ;:;
..
:w.:.
q q => => =>
.,.; ..,; 0:
0 e e
~ .... ....
=> =>
" ...; ...; 8
=> =>
=> - ....
t- t- t-
f!
..
'"
...
i;:
.~
:;:
!:!
i=
x
t::..
0:::<
0::E
V) \.I.,
r:...:::;t::..
<00
::E...l...l
\.I.,t:lal
t::- l:.l"'-
<o:::~Z<o:::
::Eco:::Z::Eo
!-V)c.<E-V,l
0_
'E.~
eo: ~
a:I IJI--
..!!EO
g..o
"'5.- 2
"'~u
'Ca:;?tn
-=u-o
~ g.!!
~ U ~
.= > ~
E:; :
~ .*5
... ..
":' ...
.9 cc .;
"Ou-
... ...
-.'="'11 U
~ 2 E
":' 0.....
5 ~ ~
<.> - '"
<>O"'Cl)
.~.~ .:
..0 b-g
tJ U1I ==
;.9::
~"E g
:.e""O.=
E ~ ~
V)c..
x
"'-c..
<0
::E...l
1.:-:::1
Ii
-;;~ .91:
l:; u ~=
g. t: '0 :; :t
iic....86
> u u ...-": ~
~=2C::.ou
.. ~ E.!! is'~
.s3:~=:;:Q.
.~ -:::: :a'u "= N
oij"'C..!;::W
'"';;;0- r=::
C?t:-sgti"'3
~ ... ~.= t.II ...
Ch~5:;t.2'~
~ c !=! ell c..~
.... .S? -=.= >0 0:::
o C;..: 'U..cQ..
_ all.!!!:;::::I"'C _
~:~~E~:E
f2=Ui6i)='
Eo .. U C C
~~~o~~
OM.~:g~-=
6c.=cciio
:~s~~].E
"E .=-'u 'v.i~
(5.... 0 - lU'''-
u~.,g!~c:.
<5~tE~g.
x
Q
r;:
.....0
_N
~' l.:J
~o:::
...
~ ~ ~~ :g
~ .u .-ii: ._~
:; s ~ :;;1.0 ~~
ij 1.0 ClJ6~t.E C,).E
'i: ... ~*=u~ c"E
.!!!_-_ ] -:o~ .-= E ~
.5.:0(1) utJ
__ .5 -:::s.-'cab >L.
c8cd .!!S........5 ::i~ca
~~~ :g.~::a:1! !!.!a!!
aot;~ .~;::M~ =-~
]"SIJ u"I Cll)U -oS!:::
'0' f! ~ J" iil ""...... li ,S! 's
~~c:~: ~= 'Uua
>Q,.uc::m >:2 ..E:O","E..
eUll-=...!:~ -:~ In.-c
c..5......,CI; t""It: 3.~:E
.Es.B~11:"'~_~ oo~5
8::1;~~- '-
.!! ~ -a.:: .g 5:::c, -5; t:
c..*- - EdS-':: CI)..E:~
E: = ~~~-c-g.E6-g S c:
.;;.,g::u - ii 10. u!;~ flU
._~~~ _ :.8= ~.c 0 u
~c..u;;:<e:ao;~=-
.E~6E.~g:-o~ .g~
~ &It E.5::C: f ~-:ou; ~
~,,~ ~'o.~c; ti..8~.6C~
E.~!5..:.::o t:i..8 Eo *'0-
iG -g =.E g u th ~ a... _ E ~
-; 0 == ~ u 0 , >",.2 u ~
UI'CI_~ --"" tI).-.
; ~ ~ -; ~ -g ~ ~ .~ .~ ~ :
~~ ~~ i:~.~=~~~
t!l~~e::~~~~~:5:5
~
u
c..
...
...
..
:t:
0:::
I.:-
=> => -
ci N ..;
- :::: ...
-
.... .... ....
0 0 c;
...; ...; '"'
0 => 0
.... t- o-
t- t- t-
E
i
<
00
=>
..,;
...
....
c;
'"'
=>
'"
00
~ 3 ;_'"
~ 'E
= IoJ E..
.. '" 0
-=:u Ii
V'I ':S >
~ '0 ~
~ 5 .s
UlI "'C .2
.8j ti
~.. :E~
=~ .!$!ca
~ u .~ ~
- - ..> J:J
~;
r ~ ~]
m..... Vlo."E
~.g ~ t
U.~ ~ c..
-~~ ~ ~
~~ ]"Z
u.!! u!:!
.>~ w-=:
~] ~ B
t.II en ~ tIJ
-=ca r;-~
;IU ~ca
.= r; c::; u
E .~ vi ] .s
CI) - ... - '-
~~~~~
:~2~=
C> r:>.l.:J ,_
~
';:;
~
6
;:;
jti
~ .~
~ ~
c..Q.
E ~
0..-::
.s~
-=~v~_~
=..<::'-
., ... "'" t)
~ :g "'7
V;UN~
5 ;:; 5
~~~ '~
~V;O~
::tt""'~:::I;:
c.E=>.E
::o..!:!o.."
J.l~!5:s
b.e; r.t: b
w > a... '"
tJ m IV U
~f~-.;:I
=",-
tJ ~ U U
E.~ ~ 5
~ ~ 0" ~
~ u..!! l;l.O
<~<<
:;:
~
....
o
.,
:;;
E
l5
...
c
o
"~
e-~
.. ~
~o..
+i .=
N f!
00 ..
"" -
.S ~
..,,:;
1: E
+L: ..!:!
u '"
.. '"
... -
":'u
..
a; E
E <>0
~~
eIlC
<2
-;
=
o
-c
f!
<10'-
.= 6-
... ..
.. ...
5.8
c
.E .e .~ -g
3 ~!! U
'E 5 5 15.
:;: U E E
f! .;.~ 8
t= U1:S ::::
'- t:if ~
o 0.... E:
g c..< -=
.:;; ~ 2 ~ ~
.;:: .;:: ~ ~E:
[ ~-= ~~"'C
_.- z::.J:. dJI
~ .~ ; ~ .5 u
= e~ ~-cc.
.g -g ~.! ~ ~ ~ g
~.= os..~~ ~ ~
gg.:;co::::-c..
uf!l:.,85o::3:16E:
x x
Z t::-l:., "'-
<0 0
0 ::E...l ...l
U \.I.,c:l Cl
0 C. uJ
<c::: NZ
N uJz
l:.l ::Eo g:<
c::: !-V,l
w ~ E E
roBE. ..-~
"t:I 0 ii ~
..g'U oQD&I
--> QCI:J.E
~~~c:::s_
t-. r.... CI:I..e . IU
~~-;'"ii ~ E
'" ~ J:J :E o!! g.
~~]:~~
.uCI:J.-=.=.c..t)
~=E~.E::
0" _0
0.... .::>. '" c 52
9-gcJ::~~
U COJ i'3 VI E.. IIfI
~rl==E~
ii.;;~-fi~~
- -,,&1"0
":g~="":=
~..=>t.~~~
5ft;a~.E.s
E -0 >" =: *~ ..r
g-::::~~C:;
;j.2 0 ~ ~ ;
~=~".t:;E~
"'O.~ IJ t::.,.u -
C) "<::I r.:. 0 ec: ""C
-=~~S.L:..5
l;~~g..~~
-=::""~~.5! .
~~E:E ~ ~~
;j 0 "" E:I ::.-.D
~.$~~8~cS
=>
,..:
::::
....
c;
8
...l ::E
l:., U
:::I \.I.,
00 00
0 0
oC 0:
- -
- -
.... ....
c; ~
'"' '"'
0 0
... ....
00
,..,
00
~
'c
!!'
o
.~ 5
~ E
'" g.
s-.;]
~ ~ m
.- -0 M
- ....
5~ia~
~ ~c.. ~
c~=:;;
o u 0 .
~~~=
:aa 5]
~=~~
.;.j ~ 8
.. --
= ~.!! ~
C '" l!:.-
E .~ l:l 0
..!!::<8
g.~.E.>
- u. 0 ...
~=~5~
:t: ~ E.~
~Q., Q ==
u~ ~ E
.~ .;] g
i=ii<u
E-
Z
o
U
E-
Z
o
U
..
'"
f!
<
..:.~
...
'S
;;;
'"
E:
":'
..
"0
c
u
;(
uJ
-=
;
~
..
-~
.,;:
.E
o
..;;E
<>0...
~ -
o C
~ 0..
.::: 0
;"ii
... >
... u
"'-c
.... :>-
ic c:;
CoC
-c ..
- >
~ 4i
0..",
~B
w
c:::
o
ci
~
....
~
'"'
=>
'"
00
.'
e;-:
.'~"
IrP
. :' -~.". .
: <._:~.~.:..
-," .. '..... ~
", ::....:
..
-- ,
- ......
:'. '..::.
. ,'..-"
.- . '.~'..
-; -.': :.,
..::.:;......::.
....
"'.:::"..'
-, .....
,." .-.'
: -'.".
. :-::.~.~-
".W,"..
.)::::\.::
.......
:'.:.:: :~.::~.:;,
::..:::.;.~~.~.
..' :.:::.'-::
::. ..~.-.:;:
. :.~ :".:: =;.:"
.........
u.:.:..-....
:' :~.: :+.:~--':
...... .
..... .'::
..,....
:: '. ~ ,:;'- ':::
........-
.-. ."
. :;'.':: :::.
,'. :.....
" ,
:....... .
".",. . .
.,......-.
.', ":.',
. t,"
"':'
..~:-. -'
",;
,,'
,," w"
-.. ",
_..:_ o'
...... .
~':~f,ti,
!!P
~
!!P
5
;"
'is
..
c
o
..
c
Z.
c
o
;"
.~
5
?;-
';:;
'"
E
o
'"
....
o
;;;
o
'"
.5
-;
....
o
t:
'"
Co.
.,
'"
.",
0.>
'E
'"
'5
<.>
"0
u..;
~oo
""
'~ u
.>( :=
<c 0
0.-;::
~~
..2e:::;
]~
~.~
0.> 0
:; ~
..
a:o
"g6
'" '
....l:.:.l
\0
00
""
G:i ~
> 0
O~
'" ..
\0
'~ ~
., .,
~ ~
~E
c.'"
,5 'E
'" .,
,!! E
=g.
'u Ii
~ ~
.~ -::J
::i5-i=:
'" '"
"" c.
\0
00
""
c
.~
~
..
~
~
E
.~
~
.E:!
0.>
e:::;
i-
Z
o
u
'-
z
o
u
'-
z
o
u
""
<
::E
I<.
i-
5
u
i-
Z
o
u
i-
Z
o
u
""
<
~
1)- ~>.
M~CIit -g ~.-=
~ .~] : ~ ~ ~
-5-.u.5 .~~.~~
~- .~~=~
._ a... ~;: +t: f!:l VI c.2
=:: ~ E - c:...~ ~ ::s
~ i s ~ .s 0 ~~
~~~:g .=~
::::C::lui'" ._~N'':
I:OC"'l) :::ul)~
a t) II,)U =
8 r: 'g ~ ~:; .E 8
.5 ci: ~.... < ;: g ~ -g
~-=u.eaD~~~~
.~ ia _ &..5 6 P i3 ~
=.:.(~.,,=~->o
g ~ ~1! c; t:+~2___
!.,;...c... U iaE:-;.- J::.._
:s _rn 5 ri "'C = U .E ii
o~u....gm~~5
~iJc.!aii~-=;E
CCI.l"'O;::I-m :;:U
~ ~ ;; ~ ~ ~-g.g ~
Eo':~E~]B::
Q.:~~~~~~c:
:.; c ~ ~~.~ _"t:J{;
; -s .~ g- 4l> ~ e --g ~
Cj~.... lI;~-=~.
.s:: E 11~~ ~ ~eo"E
g ~ -a ~ .s. U1 "2. ~ -E
.~ ~ E ~ t: u ~ ~ - ~
::E.. cc<c.-,-'"
:.:.l
c::
~
~
Ii
~
~
....
~
~
.-i
o
~
....
~
....
o
,..;
o
M
~
<:>
.-i
<:>
o
N
c:!
....
c;::
....
o
r-
oo
00
00
c..
00
I?;
..
c
"is
..
c
o
..
c
"is
g
..
.~
..
c
o
;a
li:
u
~
';:j
.,
Co.
en
"E!
;a
<
""
o
.s
....
-0 0 ,0;:
e c!! ~
~ -g. .~ "; t:
.2 e 'i.-.!!
..::: u e ~-~
:g.o ~g5
< .~ -=.~ ~
g~ ef.o
E:ii) 5~:
~ ~ u.~::
.E 0; ~ :g <
~ ~.. c ~ :-;:t ~
"'::Iu~~tEt"""'u
~ .5 ..i .~ =]:g
~~~=E~;:;~
_caccp.. t:JU
O"'-"'.,In]::=:Lt
GJd5.!!: Ili! W
=E.~51ft~.C:~
.5~iig~~8.[
]'0::-;; ~~ ~ e!
i;c~.!ScrrOBC.
:.: .2 .0' ~ u ~ c.. ~
(:l.- .... u ~ CI1 u....
s rl ~~ e-t) t:: Ii
Q'=C.;:; l).uJ:J
U.t: ~ t1 5:.0' IV ii
-< ~~ ~Sc..~ii:
,::
"::l
0.>
..r::.
,:!l
g-
o
u
u
<
""
<
::E
I<.
"'"
<
::E
I<.
""
<
::E
~
:;;:
::E
i-
:;;:
::E
i-
""
<
::E
i-
'"
.g
..!!!
'"
c.
o
C.
~
~
;;;
~
'"
c.
"::l
..
<:..
o
;:;
>
.,
.",
'0
.2
E
.,
~
6-
.,
.",
co
;;;
<.>
"::l
';
o
t:.
'-
o
<.>
u
~ ~
:~ 5
.",'E
11 .;;
00 E
"::l e
~ ~ ~
~ ii :Q
=a,g ~
ii c ~
E: 'U; c;
u;5 ~
~ x cu
~ W ~
~5 _ .;
~ E ;:: ~
-=~.g ~
~!~~
~goo
!:: E: -~ ::
~ E E.~
cB ~ s:::..._
~ ~ ~ 2
.~ 0 ~ Co.
~t)c..1I
tw .; -~ -= .~
c_-u-
.~.~ u ~ ~
u.!!CJ~U
O';;"5~~
,~
::i5
'"
c.
....l
c..
i
<:>
.,.;
c:!
~
8
<:>
..;
~
....
~
....
<:>
c
...
c:!
.,.
o
,..;
=>
c..
M
c..
.,.
0-
~
'0
oD
c
o
..
c
~
5
..
c
'i
c
o
.g
;;;
e
'"
.,
e:::;
.",
c
co
'"
-i=:
~
.~
"::l
c
'"
c
'"
E:
u
.::
';:j
.,
c.
en
.s
]!
"E.
e
o
'"
<.>
co
c
..
li:
<.>
<=
';:j
<>
Co.
en
....
o
'"
.,
:Q
'0
""
:; ~
o.>.!!
~::
:O~
.!! ~
til::E
""
<
::E
l.1..
"""",""Q.,
<0<0
::E...J::E....l
1<.c::ll.1..c::l
"'"
<."
::EO>
i-~
"" ""
<e:::;<e:::;
:::Eo::Eo
i-<nl-en
\C
..'- "'S! -g
~ -=_ CO c; ",;;;
!E
5~'~ ~ g
3~.= ~ "'0
.. '" 0.>
-S~5 i:: go
.= u ~ "ii
~~-g ~_!! ~
-ecalKl - ""='
6g_~ ~ ij
~'~~ ! ~
~~~ ~ ~
a;.g .;~.2
c:=cc -o~u~
ea- ~Ul)=
E:~.g f:~E
c~- co-o-
og.=~ ~~~-g
== S -: .5.:E ._-",:= :
5c.ii CJ"'C C
E:~= -=E~~
-at:-g ~~~~
E~co f~.Eci5.
-~~ c..Vl4)V)
V'IIc........ _G)c.e:
~..-= g~~~
6:~.g uc.t:o
ra":;: ~ ~ - 8-g
Co. c ~ U'J'~ CO) ~
o.~ _-"'='C
"'ij~.= ui~ 4)._ t:IoO
> ==..:.::::=~~.;;
~~~[~8:t~
:.:.l
e:::;
i
::E
....
<:>
ci
~
....
~
....
<:>
~
....
~
....
o
,..;
=>
o
.,.;
~
....
<:>
,..;
=>
\0
c..
'"
0-
o
.... .
. ~'..:.+:
......
'.-'-" -.
"
, "
.' '
.:: :'. :;-
:H\~
10 l
, .
, '
0 0
...; ~
~ ~
..". .,.
<:< <:<
..., ...,
0 0
..". '"
0 0
- -
x
x
.,
" U
5 5
" "
" "
~~ ~'-Ci
<~<~
;!~513
~~ 5~fti
CCI ~:P>.~...~o
c'EZ::-o."-
~::>..;;c..c..
""'o~o"li-
~U"Uo::o::
:g~t;;~co
~,,;!,,{f){f)
5?!:'-,-
-g.!!",==,~~o
ii<i<.~g
~ i: ~ C :a :-=
"EE~Eg-g
- ~- ~ u 8
~ .. ~ .. .. ...
U s:: II) = co m
= c'I5 = m e IJ
3 ::E " ~ .S .=
VJ~~4)to'"6-
&.i = .:::: ~
5~g~==
0..s8..s~;i
....:.~ N'~..;.....
."
'"
u
g-
o
u
x
c..
0
....l
co
'"
'"
'"
-
-E .-
c..
o
....l
CQ
-
'" '"
"''''
'" '"
--
."
'"
."
~ I-. c; !:!_"
:ga ~ '"
~i: (Q ~;:: :5~
E~ ~ ~~ -g~
u~ '1:' 0 of!
::0;; ~ p,-..':: Eao
.=c= I.'I:J -u ~e
~= &; t;J.~ ens::..
1>0"'_ ti:::e ~~-o
",'':;: o::o..-c
~~ ~ ~~ 0=
~ ~ .s _"';: ~ ~
g 00 -.~..." -.0+= -g ~ .!:
.u u =: c... u
~.:: 11> 6~ _~
8-~ ~ 'o.u EO
~:; -0 ~ ~ i-E
: ~ ~ .9 E ;; ~
~~ g. ~8 ~~
.,,:!!! 0- .E'''' "-uj
CJu c.t:..-...
~!! u :~3;
:0= ~ ._~._~ ~ ~
v:i =:: _ ~ Q.._
.ge 7' ~.; ~5~
~= ~ -co tt?~=
~; i-~~&.g!!~W
=>. 8auu.,=",,"::_.I::::::
.~== ,,-~ii-5,F=:g;
~"~~ ci.~~ ~u:;;-= ~..~
l::l -0 ~ ~ u f! ~ .=
.~ ~= ~ J3 ~ - --
&::;u ,.~~o~~.e
:= ~ E .E.~ ~ c::: ~ ~ w -g .5
,..-
ClO ClO
.~ .g l)
--~ -; :g
~liC;;
,~ .. IE 1;-
:s ~~e
=' in CIS = i-
O~~~..E
E'=.~ 0
uUC",,=,m
- c .. c ...
~.- ClO .. IlO
ill...eo&l?E
.. .~ _..x Q.
..E~=~~
~wo.~u
~ ~ e-:g ~
iiVJ8~~
~.~.& ~i1
l>llU>'I>.o
~1:1B~3
CIiI _ ::: u
~ .s ~ ~ .;;
~"i L.."e;=
: 1Jr.E E-g
~-=.,ClOo
:E~~='o
oU'Jt;.~=
~ ~ .; g.~
~~~~~
~.E<5"5
l:. ~"":~N
~
u
~
W
::E
u
::.!
DO
o
r..:
~
...
o
..;
o
~':tll
...,
o
x
."
"
u
C.
E
o
U
.~
u O~.>=:
.~ G? u ~.,g 2
E e:ioDO\eo
~ ~i::6:=~
~ .u.e'=~~
!!.2 ta~oo._1It'I
=>-..-:= ::~~:~
~~-g 3-=UJ 0;
~-::>o R = ~o ~ ;.~
.... .- I.:=. 0 0 ....
::EW", ~..c....;::t>
C)~= ~j:€~~
1i;1U"C .,!!.Q.!:;;:ao
~ E u ~ ~ w--.=
~..,=." ClO <.>
.,,:;:: 6- ,di.s 5 ~
~~~ ]Ei.~~
~~.8 ;:.i; c.2~
.!::t.JI .u~=-=.=8
.E ~.i . ~ ~~:;: . c'
~ ~ E:: = .- .c - -0 ~
~ ~.~ .g] g -g 6"~ .g
~ ~.. ii :.c aa w mug..:.a
'OJ' g.....:se-gl1 .u:::
~~=~u~~~~~3
!:! B[..~:;:t::::.5=~~
8.~8 g.~~t3'o E~Z
0;
e
"
~
l>ll
<
x
x
x
c..
::l
....l
t::l
c..c..:="c..
<0<00
~....l::E....l;:,
l:-t::lL:..tcl:-
l>-c..
<0
~....l
l:-t::l
-
-
'"
"''''
'" '"
- ""
c.. oc..c..
<O::N<:::
::EOl:J~....l
!-cnO::;.-t::l
0::
o
(f)
."
C ...
] : ~
-g - u-
"~ ::: ..!
: ~ ~ 8
:0 ~ ~~
.~..;: ~ii
~!!~ ~g.
- - en !:! ""':J
C,)E..= "'c
'23~ -Ilg
"=C)C) ~m
=:it 0"::::
(5"'0":: ao-g
.=::it c-.
-E~.g :g~~
~=e :::t"=~
=c:aI:l Or_=
~ i3_o!'; ~=E.
.u I:) ... C) ~
m -c1:-t ~"'&)
g. IU-C~ 56.!!
u =>""0 u='::
- ~ E ~ ..c: >.=
!E E.;-~ -;;;"S
~ ~.D- .!S.'o
.! g~.8 ~~~
~ u u ~ -; ~
- -E.e)~u;w~t:
g- ~~ == ~ ~ L:: U
11~~t"S~~~.5
-::Si roJ U ""'= c;-=~ I)
~- ~ C'!:! = - := .- ';
~u~5e~;t~.~
=,UGJ7-;:.="':'=:=
&I'l .0' > ij =- U is E _
Ji ~=]~.E~.E.E
~
'"
-;:I
S
e
8
<.>
'"
.&
"
:0
~
'0;
>
..
~ , ~ ~
u E: c.. r::..
....l
""
0 '" "" 0
0 - N ,..;
::::: ::;: ::;: ::;:
..". .,. .,. ....
'" <:< <:< <:<
..., ..., ..., ...,
0 "" "" 0
'" r- I~ '"
0 0 0
- - -
x
c..
o
....l
tc
c..
<
~
l:-
:;.
u "
.~
.5 t>
~
.& "
1:; :s
r::.. I>
~ '0
" .......
I> ..
.E ~
~ "
~ .e'
.~ c..
.~ -; !::
_ ~.E
.... ..
.. r::.. ....
~~
]5~th
iiiE:ii~
~ 'E ;: C"
U'I U ~"E
.,Eo..=
m U _ CJ
~ ~.~ ~
Q.L..-=
Q. g. ~ .9
I'a _ C'C" c;
t):;~i::
CJ.-._u
.S:E !! ~
~:: ,~=_ 8
.;;: .E - >.
= i- co
g-.S? g- ~
!:::: Q. c:: iii
i
....l
c..
'" 0 0
..". ...; ..a
::;: ::t ::;:
.,. .,. ..".
<:< <:< '"
..., ..., ...,
0 0 0
1= 1= <"l
-
-
; ~
.. "
"' '"
" "
C"...
.5 ~
uo
~ "
c ""
.g ~
.. 0
i: ~
~ ij
g it
1>-
~< Ii
~.8 -g
u 0 u
~ ~ ~
~:6~~
--GJ_
~ ] .E- '::
'e'.5 ~ ..>.
C. "C u .":::
Il)IJ~U
'S !E ~ ~
C" '" .- 1::
~:Em~
x
Q
~
c..
<0::
::Eo
f-{f)
x
~.~
" c
;!: c
"..!!!
"'c..
.~ c
:0=
::>.0
0.."
00
- 0
.,,-
" ...
- ..
~iiv
c-",
= &) I
0"""
I> .. ,
" 0-
.0..."
~<~
.0' . ~
~~C
,,'_ (f)
- =- "..,.
-::: C"'ti;
C;~O
-= CJI _
-.oc
_ 0
.2.- C:::
,~ ;!: ...
." 0
J::: - U
01:1.tJ
U ~.!::
<..0
x
c..
o
....l
r:::l
c..c..
<"
~:J
l:-t::l
=-
<0::
::Ec
!-(f)
c..
<0::
~O
!-(f)
.....
o
c
.2
>.<0
ClO~
... ..
" r::..
c c
"-;:I
'- -
o ;;;
~.
;;;
"('-
o~
- -....
,"=,.!oE.
~ u - Ii.J
~ E:~O
=t,lIu,,:;
g~~.:;
~.!! I:~
II B ~=
..:::: - cc
ii =.~ ~
'~,~ ~.~j ~
E.E; .u~-=~
0" ~Ul>';;:
uf: tnf:~t:
.= 8 u "~ ~ ~
.:E~ -=s.:
~-ii ~~~o
E~ '=.~cU
u;~ i':;o~
5'= -o~~
==.9 ii:~E:
ij = [.c_o ~ -<"
""1:1.: o-c;
.s~~"iifr.8g
5;c.~~>'~
c.~.2"'Or.:J=~
..9.=u-.c .0>
~g~=~E:=~
~.~~ ~==g-
" > .. ,_~ An ui = d
.:: ~ d _ _~ E u ~
_dg. 5 g- ~~ ~ .E en
-- u E.=: E..~~~
....l
c..
~
c..
0
'"
~ "
-
~
'"
0
..;
0
DO
-
-
e.
e"
:,
e.:,
".,-
'. "
,oJ-'
, .'w.
. ~ ".
" ....
. ....
........
. .....
,"; .
,-:: ::;\
'.' '.
.......
-. -."
:.-;....
...:;-..
.......
.;".';".:
::=:::"'.
::::~_:::.:::
;:,:..:::.
.-.":.',
.-.:...:..
/-~.~.:.:?
-: :"::.
":'.'!::".:.
- ',,,.
. .....
....
o
..;
e
.,.,
~
....
o
. .;-.
;; e.. "..u
.5 ,g s: ~ -.g ~ ~
(.l... ~ _ u ~ 'S E::
d""iQ.~!!-f.J [ ~
i:.1!;e;;~ u 0
:l g : -g -g ,= Ii ~ :Q
'-=~Ecau=-v." c;I)
:=<..,ucOl<"'~ Cl
.u '=' c:O.o ~ .....: ~ .t:! -0 0
CliII:t:lISfO__ftl_UC- I)
I.t..CU~o""C5>-'~~i:i ::
.=C::ot::-~ue"'02U)::: ~
::s ~.~ -g ~ =a ~!! '::~.!!
~-g:;=9-_c..ea~9==~ >
...... 0 E c < \5 0 .;: "", '::
E--;:-:n.,g ~r:a l:cn<.~ o.~
~ ~ ~ ~"u ~.,g c:: ...;:0 ~ ~ =
~~==-;<~~ ~ a<:~.~--d
~ .:~8'~c 6 = ii 0 a..n'>.~
-st)g=:;~uuc.!::cU:"'C e:::
",,=,..D u ~o..:= c.:: :JO- U;.!! t:l.g"
t) E"'I:t ~ t)"E "" . S"~ >-ora QD'"
~ 8 ~ ~.f= U ::.!:: k 0 ~ ~ .5 t)
c.lUraVllr-~uCO..cu"""C~
~o].; ui<:';: ~tn.9r;c:o=
..,,, EC:=c~c~ '..~
;s~ ~J2.!:!E:~E:~.~~ ~~ t
o "'O..:":l ~-; ~ ~ ca is ; 0: .9 0;;
(I) ~ :E ~ ... ~.~.g .~ 6 t:= ~ ::ij ~
~ fr ~!:; 5 600:3 u ~.g a i
o~ a,;;; ~o e.5!;-E~Ou ~
x
><
.;:' '.
ll-
<~
~Cl
;-VJ
ll-
<~
~o
l-VJ
NUlO
UlZN
~ZUl
ll-<~
z
o
U
.a
,',w,
;;; ..
" u
E~
.., Co
'" tl E
'" u 0
"E. '0' u
t Q: ;
';; .P.-
E ~ t
eQ:
u c '"
u; .!! ..
~t::.. E
" ..
.... to: ';;
.g.u ~
" .. -
~ br.E
O'"'C U
~~~
E. SO
; ~ ~
~~~
..'=~
;~~
.~~;o:
-~ -
rao"'iiDO
""8.=~c.:
::'IU-
o -g g=.,~
VJ E 'in ~
~t~$
~ ~~~
~ g~]
_ u c.. =
~; >.
.... Ol
E~
~.~
>0"
.., c
" Ol
"i. ti:
~ eo
-OVJ
::: ..
....=
.., -
...
;; 0
c.. J~ "E
:O~ ~
~ ~~
a:@ g
.. ~ '"
.~ 88
6 ia ~
o"'E~
.. 0 "
~~<:
-$.= ~
~:i~
~ ~-;
= - c
8 ~.e
.~ We' ~
Cill-=:
,,' ..'
,-' '
'-, ',~.'
~
ll-
3:
ll-
.....
C>
c:
<:>
....;
e
.,.,
~
....
o
~-,:~i1.~iti
0-
<:>
N
..
<2
..
..
.i
'0
o
VJ
=:
VJ
Cl
>0
.$;J
x
Ol
~..o
Q."~
c.:>
Ol or
""e
.S u
..,.$;J
d_
eo Ai
E
.g ~
:o~
5 ~
" ~
"E Ol
.. ~
=.;;
;;; ..
iii ~
x
ll-Cl ll-
<< g <
::E~ ::E
l.l..O l:. /.I-
ll- c. ll-
<~ 0 <~
::Eo ....l ::Eo
;-VJ ::l ;-VJ
E
u
Co
.5!
..
.g
Co
Cl
VJ
=:
VJ
o
o
..:
..
~
.i
.
..
e:
u
..,
~
Ol
.~ ~
" ,-
or...,
u Ol
~~
...
u~
Oi_
" co
.... "
~ 0
"' ..
.. c.
~ g-
3:
ll-
Z
'"
c::,
....
e
.,.,
~
....
<:>
N
.!i5 ~
ll-C -
'" ..s ~ :; __~
.~ ii e) ...
=e ;.; c;~
'~<.5!lii'" :l~
/.I- :ii~ii:5l :;...
c-c-=: ,,0
-~of!tn Uis:::
-gE~gc >..g
Cl~-j;jUE "5~
C u'- 0 0 ~=
!o:~~ B:;
'" s:: = - L.
~ .- = = B SOl .0 ~ ._>"'
:C8..'=~ _'oJ
!J::l.--=a... ec~~
,- 0 c. -i 2S ;;; .2 -;; c.
~E-8- =_~o-bb
.~ ~ ";: ;;:; ~ ~ ] ~ .5
"> ;: 2 5'E ..g 0 I) "'E
eUJ e.g.; abu..c:o
~u=-::- .5u..= e "
_1Io.._u- - ~ I)
5'~ ~ ~ B g .2' ~ 5'~
t::uS:~L.. -gr:...e".::t:
~1)..!!~.2 - ;::I'-I)
(J-=~Il;I'ii 8~'i(-g=
.~ u !! ~ -; "~ .5 t: 8 ~
o-gl==:.: o=::"~
~gai~o ~~.~:;!!
CI).- e u.!! . tI) ~ E e =
Cl.9<~<~Oc."ll-:;
..
.,g
~
~
.!:!
..
e:
:.:
"i
...
o
c
.2
~
<~ ,,"'U
c- "~o=!:!
cJ~ ~-
Ul t:: ~1i.;-
.sB !!-aB.-:..
vi-=U"'''IIQ'''
,~~ci:=~g~g:
~.~~; >.~~-..
g.EV):;~'=u~
u IU 0 Ul C3 .... c....
-;.=.:= 5~.;-=-~
"'~.-=o~>~=
~ ~ ~ .; .: ~ "e ~
:; 8. g e ~ :; c.,$
~w_~_CJ3:Iii);Lo
~::c; ~ ~'~o:s-g
o~~~-V)C)c=
:,g a; 0 ..8 :: =: i; -0
..,~o ,_VJ-oo
-g!!"=oogVJ
"":;.., ~VJ ~;;=:
.= ~ ia ~ ~:: 0 ~
aot::=,""otl,...
=c:::8.~-..f:cQ6
c."'t:i Co. ~ ~-~ g C
.!! ~ ~ t ~ ; ~.=
~ e.g~.2 ~~:E
r::::: ~ .;: ::::a ... ~ ::::
VJ"'o~-oo"Cl
o~l!:<<:Z~'o
x >< x ><
c. t:..Cl ll- ll-_
< << <=: <0
::E ~=: ::Eo ~....l
/.I- /.1-0 ;-VJ (.:..::l
Il- ll- NUlOll-
<~ <=: wZN<.....
::ECl ::ECl ",:ZUl::ECi
;-VJ l-VJ ll-<~;-Vl
0-
- E
-0 ..
U C
";] .~ ~
..c~ :::c:
sOD t::p
~._ .D:::s
... '" : 0
,B-8 ..=c
~ ~ 5 ~
~~ ~~
~ g '" ~
.,... C:'=
~ t=; -'B-=
~[lvi..!!~
=~]8!
'-Oc....E:
Op,.L.o~1U
c..~~E
o B ~ ... I;l,
_ > ::: ~ 0
g~~=~~
~oii~.g~
8~~]]~
~ en cc = ~E
cCl..,.!!-"
=_::(:.,t:t:
;o->~~~.u
-~~s=~~
~().=fGcv:l
u~~-E12
.5~Ee::=
~~g~~.5
t::::.~uUi=t:-
~o
-g :r
~~
:::1;;
U ..
di ~ "'"'
;: ftI _~
., ~ ~
~ ~ . c
~~]~
uuc..CI:l
._ _!::! " Cl
CIi:I _1-
~ .E~ 6
u-:: s:::..~
ti~~ !!
G.\I---
Q.~~~
.g:~~
~ Eo.....
~ ~~ ~
u-- =
~]a'
~g-= -=
~ ":- ~ .~
.0' g - g. .
~.~ ~ :j.SO
u aI):: ---='
.='i~<f
2"~E:~~
~.=~:-~
3:
t:..
~
t:..
3:
ll-
o
'"
::E
0.
<:>
.....;
e
.,.,
~
....
o
o
..0
e
.,.,
<:>
..;
o
<:>
,..:
e
.,.,
<:>
..;
o
.....
N
....
N
..,.
.....
-;
>
o
a,
c.
Ol
co
.9
..
:0
.!! ..
';;; ~
> Ol ~
.. '~
e ~
Ol ~
.., .5 ..
~ :0 ~ '"
" e
'<;; 0 '~ ..,
o!:: E 1:l
i ~ Vl
~ .....
0 co 'in 1i5
~ ., c 0
:; -- 0 .5
"
.., :: -~
c .,
Ol ;: :: .2
:: c. i:1
.. 0 ~
.5 ;:; c.
> 0 ..
Ol ., -.; ..
~ '" > c
.. e " .~
.. -0
;;; .:: .., ;;
~ ., c-
.. ... ~ ><
;;; 0 c. U
Ol .!8 0
~ U ~ {
~ .. ~
::: -:::
~ -s j ~
:1! 0:; c:
u:: ~ ~
3: ~
c. ll-
'2
!:
<>
c.
.5!
~
t:..
- 0 e
,..: .,; ~
e <:> e
.,., ;;; ~
'=< '=<
.... .... ..;
<:> <:> e
IE '" ......
N N
- -
: .'~....
.". :;J.'.
....:....
:;': .~:'I"~ ~
....+ ..
.......
.~:~.:.::~....:..
.:....";..
.......'...
, '
...... .
." ..:.
" ..
. .,'
. ~ . .. .
-:. .... .
.......:
......-..
...... .
.:.::.::.:--::
:'~~::'7~~'
...... .
........
:/;,:,;:~,{~,
. .:~.::. , :::-"
'.," .'
.:: .:.
.'. ~.-. .
I 0 "'7
"
. +'.
15
><
><
C>ll
.5g ] ~ E~
~~ti "'3 :: m~-==cn_~
-~= ~ 5~ ~~=~gE~-
'0 c..~ t:I. c:: ..0 _ r: 0 -.- U) - "'t:f
~~Q~~ i~ .~:~&BE~~
&."'C ~ ~t ~!; f.:.. 0-;"'::"'0 5-;~
~~~~~ .~~ .5iE~!~~C
~<.!!",;t g.~ :Oo-;;;<:-c"-<;.~
<: 0 <::E ~ bl "- ::0 '-' ~ ,g g-< "-en
.-a:t +~: "'i:;I .0 --u cao
g W E.= ~ ] ~ E ;: a~.~ 5 ~ =
5BEu~ ~ ~~~3~<gB
il~~~ ~~ ~i~~~i~i
~~~8m =~ ~=~~jE6u
~[<eu :t.:: ;~].~c..-gu~
u~OoE ~+5 ~~~;~~:3
~u~~u u~ m u~E~~~
.g~~c} ~.= e-"i:-:58~~~.=
dSOcacn... ~~ ~r=~l..:;.~=':2
>.uot:::::o '-C ~~.>rllnE:=n::I
5~i~~ ~~ ~~o~~~~~
u ~ ._ -c 0 ~ ~ !! & E.. ia ~ t ~ .=
U..~~5~ ;.~ -uo~~e--
~>E-~ ~~ :~_m~~+g~
~ < ~ < ~ ~ ~ Jg ~ i] ~ ~ &0
o~~::E~~Eo~o~~~~~es
-;:oat....=+~.u;~ I.:...u'--t)
tI) U > 0:=-0._._ CI) .. o.!! ~ 5:;; ~
~~~<~~5~&~5~;~u~= .
o85~~~U<;.eCl~<E~~~~:
-....
=-
<c:::
::Eo
f-en
'-
z
o
u
'"
g
tl
-a
.~
s
'"
1:
~
u
tl
t:
;::I
r.>
..
~_~ Ii
~
.s ~
0'"
en ~
c:::;.:
Cf) u
c,=:-
-c~
:::1:
'" 0
-< "-
::E ~
3: ~
>=
< ~
~1;;
1: '"
&.~
"-::
= u
en :::
::E
u
3:
=-
Q::
~
o
N
-
-
--
...,
~
...,
=>
-
...,
~
...,
o
0-
N
+i
u
"
:::
co
"::I
o
"
"
'"
:::..;
.: N
0'"
'::; ell
+~;
ic:::
..<
" ..
'" u
"::1"-
::: >,
~ "
0:;
u=-
'" ..
= u
..Iii
~3:
;t-c
...
-0-
... r.>
- >,
r.> "
>,U
gc:
.. '"
u~
_: ""
=-
~u;
=:c::
--
c
'"
~
u
..I;;;
!!'1J
'" u
;t ~
-c""
u-C
u~
>,~
r.> 0
u-c
.. '"
'" u
"g-S
a'E
0:::
- u
U ..
u 0
.0'=
Q.~
'" 0
:s :
u
;:;
'i g-
cS'-'
~ E ~
E. ~ .
J2 ~~
u "'_
> --
4.1 0 e::::
-0,::; <
.~.E ~
~'~ ~
~?O
3: 3:
=- c..
:>' ,
'" c::
0 c:::
...; .,.
- -
--
..., ...,
~ c:::
..., ...,
0 0
- 13
...,
-
~
x~
o
><
x
x
~ ..
.~ ui OD ~ ....e:=
~_B+~ .50 ~ c~ ~=~o
cr c: .0' -" E .2 ~ :;::: ""C c= C - .-
u~~o ~i ~~ ~~ ~~~~~
i5;:S 6.s CD,... O~us::~~...t;
__~_~:::_"'u U~A ~~ E~5.;~~i~
- e .: 0 '::;"0" "'=';;
._~U~ ~.~ ~o ~~.~>M~~~
!.O~~~~~ DC/) ;o.;C_=2.~Q._
~:~~~~~ ~~ W~=-=e.~.~
.~~~UN-8 3~ ~o~.l]~~~
is. ~.= ~ ~ I:: C ~ CO!! g g ~ ~ I~ 3
~g~a;~~ ~i ~~.~~~:;~
+:.,;:u~"'C~ii ao:i r"i.E.~~~~~.~
~g,::<<:o"..;-; "'.... .. -U~u
<<J:C:~ .UlI::>::' ....... "'CJ=>e-....u.;::c.
~g8~E>= ~- ~=.~~~B~~c
-= u :; .~ c < &. :a ;: c. ~ 0 .!! ~.e. E !! ~
~J2g~~~ ~g ~:~;~~~~t
~~~5H ~- _.__~-~~-o
~~~=~t~ ~5~5~~:~:=~:
~u --=::: Cl"'e~=~;tEg_E~;::Io
o~~~=o~.= ~~~o-~ 0 ~"
~=~.-~-E ~~~ ~~<~~ao~~
;f~~-:~ ~~~<O~~~~~~~~
..g~;;~o6 o~~:;r;~-..~-::J~85~=
~.;~~~kU B~~~~~~=.~~~g-
~.owo~=d~ ~uot~mmu~ ~
.,g ~ : C ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 U .b C OO"Q m 1ft:; 0
~ .-0cuoc~~~5~E.~.5~~~.~~
~~~~~u5E~;o~-~~~~~~~~
8~~~o~~8~E~~~~[[~~~~~
>,
"0
;::I
Vi
u ..
~a
L:.. u
'"
..>( ::0
'" u
'" ..
f--c
2!l;;
=ao
r.> =
~=
~~
~ ~
- ..
~~
>,;t
u~
= '"
'" '"
> ;t
;;: ~
r- .=
~E
- '"
08..;
:: 5 .~
e:":~
u ~.E
~ 0+-
-=N~
10..."::::: ::-
o I>ll "
E:6~
~1:a
'-
e
l>O
'"
.g-
;;;
"--
u
..>(-
'" '"
u >,
c.'"
l::~
oo;:l
~o
o=-
e u
~=
e.=
~'"
~!
,- '"
u :::
;::I -
.E~
-;: r.>
c.t::
r.> ;;;
o u
--.;
< u
::E ~
3:~
>Jg
< 0
~-
u ..
""~
'" '"
!::: ?:
- u
o_
r.> '"
W ~
3:
=-
;l:
""
-=
ill
-c
u
'"
l>O
';;;
u
-c
-c-
u
<:
c
'"
C.
_!!l
=....:..
~ 5
>,-::;
'" '"
"5 [
:: 0
c; .-
~ ~
.. =
u u
m.u
;tE
"::I u
..!!>,
" l>O
~t
~ ~
u ..
-=~
~B
'= "
~i
l.:.:i 8
<
3:
f-
.s
C
t::l
f-
Cl
'"
l..:: "
..
e
'"
u
'"
"-
.5
..
..<:
~
- tl
0
"-
'"
u
...
:~
e
+~
U
-c
<:
,S!
;;;
1;; ri
c.
0
;; -c
c. 0
;,; ?
- ~
u
:; .g
'"
'" .E
W
3:
""
.
-'
...,
c:::
,..,
0
'-0
,..,
-
>< >< ><
'- p.. '- ' , - l- i-
Z <c::: Z Z Z 0
0 :Eo 0 0 0 l:l
U f-Cf) U U U f-
I<~ N~O N~O N~ON~OO
~ZN ~ZN ~z!?J~z!?Jt::l
::E:::l ~z~ c:::ZW
f-en p..<~ =-<c::: =-<C:::=-<C:::f-
,::
'"
g-
;;;
c.
.s
~
o
.g
E
u
~
o
u
-= ii
.5 i
f ~
.E ,0
~Z
u
:E=a
-;::: "
i: ..
C;E
c.~
:= aj
o 1;;
> '"
< ~
3:
l:..
0 0 0
'" .:; ,...:
- - -
-- - --
..., ..., ...,
~ c::: ~
,.., ..., ...,
0 0 0
,.., I~ '"
,.., ...,
- -
.~
e:.
'0'
e,::,,--
I 0 ~
';....~..,._;.
;;.-",+:'''.,
....
......
'..;"'".
. ." '.
..... '."
, ,.
-......
, ,
. .......
-:,'-.;-':
.... .
.......
..... ,
':." ",
'.:-.': ~....:;.
...:....:..
.. '...
.. '
.....::
.:-
..
" '.':
.......
:...-.......;.
,',
"
.':.
x
..
"
'0
x8
':.,:
". .-,
.-.,"-
, "
'. -.'
'"
...,
~
E
.~
.e
...
<.!:!
'"
'"
x
Cl
L:l
I-
Cl
ell
i-
Cl
:::)
I-
Cl 0
ell ell
~ t-
o
L:l
I-
= .E
OJ '"
'" ~
:s :::
] ~
e ~
1: .; E iii
8~'5g
,g~:eri:
-:Jg~==
~i:e~
;:0 IP ... ~
.~ ;; ~ B
""...3:0
~~-g-::;
<:-<:
~ .., u =
.~ t ~~
.ELl~!!
,,~!!~
aD -=.....
tc .... '-- .J:;J
o ~ 0 ~
V; ::; c.
a... = 0 c..
a) ~ -.:: C.
= &... ~ 'CtI
~oE-
~ ~ ::! ~
~ ~ 8'?;
cc-=!!u
-= f:j -;:: g
~.:= ~ e:::
::;.S -;]
~.=g-u
~ == =::: ~
<0
II
~
.e
.,
.,
E
'"
<:
o '
,- ..,
- '"
.!!!...
'" ,
c.0Il
::: c.
5_
... -
...",
~<
3: .
,...,
.",-
",Vl
-'"
u'"
too
.,....
.; 0
., '"
"'.",
o ...
c.'"
0:<
c..=
., ;;;
..:: <>
;:;
... '"
-= .~
E-"'E..
'" -
-' -
- ..
~
~
I'..
g:
0 0 0
.,; 0 N
- C:! C:!
;;:; '" '"
0' ~ ~ ~
,.., .., ..,
0 0 c
!t:~lt,~ ,... 00 ~
..... ..,
- - -
..
"
"0
~
:5
o
ell
I-
o
c:::
i-
.~
<5
:~
E
-=
.,
:0
'"
.~-
Q..
Co
'"
~
OJ
"
.,
E
'"
U
.~
e
Co
...
<>
;;; .
>,...
... '"
.", -
., 0
uN
>- ...
u 0
'" .,
~ E
~ ~
., il
== .:
;; 50
~ ~
3:
I'..
~ ~
.., .".
C:! C:!
'" V'\
c; ~
.., .....
0 C
- !;!
.".
-
x
ci
Vl
c:::
Vl
o
.",
'"
><
~
OJ
.e
I'..
<",
~O
I-Vl
..
"
.~
"
o
..
"
'fo
8
u
.~
o
Q.
>-
~
u
.,
'2'
c.
..
<:
o
.",
.,
OIl
::!
g
:,:
:::;
.,
-'"
'"
~
'i
'"
~
;;;
..
5
.g
..
1:
.,
.,
=
o
u
...
.,
...
3:
OIl
c
~
..
OIl
~
'~
.Ja
0:;
3:
Cii goo.
~ .:-=]:.;]
.~ .!! -g .; ~ "e..
]j8~8f!
x
x
c.._~t:...c:...=.
<0<0<0
~..J~...l~...l
u.t:lu.cu.ell
LllOc. I'.. =...
t::JZN<C:::<C:::<-'
c:::ZLll~0~o~3
Co<C:::l-eIli-eIli-Vl
E
2
'"
'"
.,
.~
;;
.s
'"
'"
'"
~
o
~
il
.9
'"
.~
.. .;
~ ~
]:::
~6
.;:
~.,g
"'=...
o "
tl;t;:;
::::: 'u
Vl .,
.::l~
- -
!~
><-
u.:O
g:
o
ell
ot:
Vl
Cl
~
..:s
';;:
]
.~
.",
!:!
.~
'"
.",
.,
.L>
.g
.a
.e
u
E
o
u
.e
'"
~
'"
u
.~
c:
.E
'"
~
..
5
,g
:0
~
...
;_c .2 ~
t; .2
a ~ c:
~ ~ ~
~ E ~ ~
'":3 to) 1.~
c; .2 uE
Il) a tw ~ C.
CD Ii; ~ = r:;
g ~ ~ ~ :!..g
o J... .- u .- --
~ ~ $.*s g.~
tij;;~Q.~.5
.S
3:
"-
g: Ig:
<
'"
o
.,..;
l::!
V'\
~
,..,
o
o 0
..0 r...:
~ ~
~ d
..... ,..;
o 0
..,
-.:-
13 I~
..
"
],
5
='
],
6
..
"
00
..
"
o
..
"
00
..
"
o
.s. ,g_ ~
'- a5 *::: VI
0'= E ~;;::E
1:.", ., ="1-
~~ ~ -E=;:;
;.g 0 u ~
,-.g tlEE:..
~-g..... ra2~.;;
.S: e g .5 o:E $
II) u 0 .~ u ::: U
:: ~ N c'- g u
"ij = ~ en ~ f.=.. .~
-5"i <<i .~o ~
...., O""Vl"':;:;>-
t.E'U cn~CO:::';::I.c
';'50 ~2E~~1l
g is. . Q ~ a Ii 5"e-
N a; "'5 ._ 8 ;s: ;:; ~ ~
S:-5=:tuVlcn~ce
"'C.;:E.:.;:..o.!:!~ t:
uo_;::::J "'''1::1'-== SOi1 c
:;-::J~~_~:::-5~
2-=~ c g~.e~::
Co) vi a... :;; -= .5 i~ E
;alJ~u--.-tU'"
!! g~ ~ g-g.-=-o-a.
u....,.;<EoE5E
.~ c.. 1: <::0 .!! E'-
~]:;;8~~-EE.8
_g=.q~1a~8.-
<<:il:Uil:Lll3:~3:
.,
-'"
'~
E
~
E-
o
ell
c:::
'"
o
.9
c
.g
u
5
o
"
~
~
..
OIl
~
:><
,~
.",
<>
...
:;
E-
o
.s
.,
-'"
B
E-
x
"-I'..
<0
;:E...l
u.ell
<-'
~3
l-<Il
~
'0
'"
c
'"
E
.~
;:l
c-
~
II
.,
E
.e
.",
.,
.",
.,
g
>-
Q..
~
'"
...
.,
...
3:
.,
~
r-
!:!
o
N
~
., -
, "
;: <>
;; .~
.:::
:::
I'..
L:l
'"
o
00
C:!
'"
o
,..;
o
'"
....
x
i-
Z
o
U
i-
Z
o
U
00_ .s
:5 ~ g u ,;:.,
3>. ~ ~<~
(.) ..... -; 'S = c. c
a.~ "'g'o=.~ Q~1::
.~~ Ci;o.....~!! ut:~
~t- ~e:.:: ~~=
;; ~ ':is ~ ~ ~ ~.= ~
t:aO 0 ~ ::J 0"'0 -;;; ..:::: 6-.~
~m.9C]~~ '~f~
~~32~IUE:;: -~
e~~~g;~ ~~.~
.,-;~u~.!:!t! ;::_:l
"'2U.!:::::t>O=_ 6l::Lo.
:O~"t=!!.u~ usa
=]-B~~': ~~~
~ ._ ~ ~ ~ c 0
>.~~~!;;~ '5=N Cj
gU;3..!!'=~~M'~':,g ~
~= ~ dS....;~~"E ei-o VI
co.-._-O'IrJ::!ms::.. IU::~
~ ~} ~ ~ ~ ~ -g ~ ~ ~ ::
cclJ....tJ "IJU~'iiU'/l"'~+""
..!:!gora~"'=v;:teuUdS
.~ ~ ~ ~ ii .~ .~ ~ "t:J:g e; ~ ~
o 0 .g 0 ~ ~ u ..g .!! a:I ~ - -
tn tl:a tI'J ij 0 +t:.~ ~ -fj ~ ~ t:
e::: <<:I:: c::: >'~ Ui"a. u.=+sc.O'
~.s 8 ~ Z ~ 0 ;- ~ ~ is. g c:
.... i-
<c:::z
~oo
i-"'U
o
~ ~
;;;
'" >-
o ..
~rGi;
UI ~ -;
'5..3:
~ .= u ~
3 :g .~ ~
~~:t~
OL:~oD
~ ~ ~-.E
~ U3 ,2'15
oll,):= :.g'
3:-=~'"
_ ..... o.D
ti t ~ .=
E ~ ~.~
g B 6 lL)
ulJ&n-
::2 ~ ii.~
::; ~ ~-o
!2c:3:~
"';;) ~u
o ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ E
~ > t ~
~ ~ _: ~
-ge~lU
",U -'"
r"'-r-~
!! 2 ";: ==
5 E E g
NN"-u;
g:
3:
....
Cl
'"
o
.,;
c:'
V'\
o
,...;
<;;>
o
o
~
V'\
~
.....
<;;>
,...
....
~
, ,....
'.)~/;:~'
-....
....
-....
." ,..
. . .. . '~.:.: :
"-','.
'. ..
,,;.:.+:.
._......:..
......., .'
.:: .:~. '-.:
::'-'-'
.:'.:;.<.
'::';: :.:
. :'~'~:.'~ ::~:.
: ~.-, .~- .
::..~:~.:'::.:
..... :'-:'-'
,:,:,-:\.
.-.. .';.'
.' .-.,.:
. .'.'
..-- :-.'.
..-.......;.
."
-.. ",
.. .'-".
"':'-.'-:.':.:'
.. +.,
.....: :':.:.';
....:...
IDS
'. ..
......
~
I'-
x x
.. ~ .. .. ..
c: c: c: c:
'0 c; .i -g '0
.. .. .. ..
c: 5 :5 :5 c:
0 0
" . .: ~ .
..
.s IU g~5
c.....~6~~:.~ ~
~~C~<.g5.~cu e
13~s~-:S~.;c:::~gE rG
c;~:2 ~ ~c::c-E:~~ ~ ~
"Cil,).=tr.D'=u!:!c.-=ttbO "5
.s=.s.;;;'ut:J= Ui c"U; E. E
:g ] ~ ~ ~.~ d t ~ ~.5 .=
Q;;E5-=~"'=~:.aOD r-
-o~:=: ~-~!!.g ~ ~">"E. !!
"'C~"'",;:-=o~ue<<l 0
~t>L.o~""L..-;"-=-c..c,JI N
u~..El1r-c.9~ao~:J~ ~ c
ug~u~"'C=-=~;ii~~
-",X..o"t: o~.o =.';;Q..- "';:.
~uf':;N~~ce.i;ig~ "'r-...
o ca.._._ _ ~ '" _ c..- _ _ ""l:::i "IIIit"
-:.= t: c:= ~e -g _ e ~ .5 ~ :::;
~rs;~~fct)~=:1n2""
"ii -= .- ~ U N = ~ ~ .!:! .... V ;; ii
- .. &) era!!.::: c. U) .. "'0 tJ =.-::=
.~ c;:: g ~ E ~ .E :2 .6 .!! ~ .2' B s
~~;8=;~cC;;~~..8~
~~>,.::: >-: 5 >.:~:::;;_ ~
~tiE:]::=~~] 'o~~~
..o~u=>=~c...IiVl U)"'::i
CEtht:V12 "''-!::'E-g=~
~ ~ t.u t ~.g B 0 ~ ~ ~ .2,-
CI) ~ ec [c;:::= o.~~ e'~ t; e.
OZ:trn:t:t:t",u~...;:ii5e
.......
.....
o
t::!
f-
o
t::!
f-
o <0:::
l:l ~O
f- :-rn
":-:-."
o ~
Vl :::
0:::...
Vl 0
o _
o
U ".=
~ E
5 K
... 0
....-g
., '"
'"
~.g
.. '"
.".:: 2 ..
B 'iii ~
b 6 c
5:~~
~ .E .0'
~ge:
ta -::: t)
~;;;.;:
'o5~
~ t "5
:;l 0 0
~b:
g-u ~
~~:
.0-"
~ ~ ~
~.~ ~
-:; """ :;
o 0
:t:=~
..
~
;:;
l~
.s U
"'C.~
~ e
..'!c:..,
~ ~
",,:
.; 'H ;;.5
E .E' ~ ~
= J::..1i; =
o-u>.E..
! r; :; ~..e
t....._-_l)
oo~=-t
c N..::: =~
.52 " 100 .. :t
- IU C ..... I;)
E t:=~..:
"iiii 0 :;:; :: Q
g d.. ::: .!:! ....
uo-o~a
D~-5-U)
c.n-r:tUlIJ
=:::: v :: "'::' :.;:
cn=~c;~
o c~ iiE ~
~ ~ :;: ~ tU
,- - tt: -.;, co
E-.g ~ ~> E
~~.;~~
u
.,
.g ~
'"
" -
'C -
g-e
';;0
--
'_~ 5
<;;
<a ..
.= I)
.g.9
U
:i:
~
.'.
~
"-
~ 0
- ..; .".
!::! !::! :::2
..... ..... .....
0 ~ ~
..; ..., ...,
0 0 <::>
~/.I '" - I~
.". .....
- -
...
o
a; ..!!
.__!OIl :<: ~ g
:ta~
'iiCJ-Vli=
e. ~.~ ~ .s
ES[g~
UII,I) ~""O
~=-g""BS!
gc;C:~E
t:gg.oo
- ,- .... e- '"
~]~8g
c'';';:.::!:!
CIJ ~.a~ ~
~L.c..r:::.-
~.2~Bg.
: ; ~"'5 f:!
u \0-0 iU =
~~~~_..utri
-..... C'" >. ~
~ b~ .i! ~ m
.. fC: fO.':: ~;
":~B~~ti:
~ ~[l~;:::~
:; '5 .1: .~ ; .~
"; g :g == -= c..
~.- ... > 0 en
~~~E'E~
0::: ., .. c.,._ _
>,.
"E 100
~ Eon co
u :e
d ~ :0
] ~ e
~ ~~
<S~
"E"'O
;;~~
0'= .0
~ .~ iii
~ ~ E;
0'0 a
_ co <>.
~ -~ :0
!~c
~:a~
!! 0 ~
c 0 ~
E ~ ~
tt -= .g
L..L.o=i5
:f~ c
~ ~ 8
";:.;; .~
c% ~~
><
o
tJ:I
!-
~I'-
<0
O:::...J
Ot::!
!-
Z
o
u
:::...
'- _ I'-
Z <=:<......
o ~0~3
U f-rnF<n
"E
iO
"E
;;;
'"
;:;
<;;
'"
..
....
~
'"
:t
'"
E
::>
o
U
..
""
~
~
~ ...
.u 8-
t!! ,g
Eon....
~"E ,,~
~{g is.
.. c 0
t' <<t tI)
mine:::
:t~d
-,;O:::c
'0 d E
....
c: ..
< . 0.;: ~
"EE"'--.;
i~2~;-
U)~'E~!:!
~~B~~
I'-Vl"'"
g-~ 1i ~ 'i ~
me=.!:!:: -
U ., .2,0., .. ~
.5:.8~..g~
co ::> ....
1).-__~IUC"C
~:: c~~
.- : .~ ~ ~ ~
~_:~2&~~~
8-~.~~..
I~
~
I'-
o
-=
:::2
.....
=>
..;
<::>
or,
'i
...
o
5-0
:~ ,,~
e g.
c:>.e
lOll"
"'.0
=E ._
.. ,.
100-
- ~ B
., '" ..
,;;g!;
~= ~
t~~
Iii 5 '5
:i: U <>.
><
1'-=..1'-0
<0<<
~...J~"""
l.:-tJ:Il:..O
::t
c:..,
~
c;::
=>
,...:
!::'
.....
o
..;
o
o
..;
!::'
.....
o
..;
o
.....
.....
'"
.....
..
.e
l:
~
.:!1
t
~
...
5 - 0
- 1Uf! ~
';;;~ :E":~ U
.~ l= -g - c.,o .,
~ m =_ i,~ ~ ] ~
ftJ Z::.."'t:I "'-S.; 0
lJ;.. <.e t:: c.E c cr-
C:-ii~~:a~~;-
_c O~---O\
.ge 'ti';:'i~~~
O~';;I,)E ~......
1..0 5 ~15 t:..~=~~
1)= u;cr;-...
:< E:.~c..2-5c;E
uJt::_<<:I&)U->u
.. .. 0 ~ - ,. '" 0 ,.
.-=;s:~ ~t=~.~ aD
~"2 ~ ea .,; !! Co g.Z
.- i3: cc :: = (0 t:- '- ~
oS; ="'&.""" ;:;]< 0 tE
~O;:l&.E~E~6~
f,,)UJU) CJ'-C1
~.~-= ~ G:i 0 :a:6~
C-IU~-(J -.....
~ii~~~~~8lS
B.5E~~.E.g:_
.~ u c...g u >.. a c= E
o ].:; :- ~ is e.~ ~
en;,:;.;- ~ ~ ~<.-==_
~.5 ii ~"'S:.~ ;~~
c ,g c. _ ii ou; E:: ~ C
....
. -..
><:
><:
I'-
<=:
~o
f-Vl
NWO
wZN
o:::Zw
=..<0:::
e-
'- .,"
--~
:..~
c.
.9 ~ Ui
;g;:'!:!
~ t: ~
>< 0 ,_
c;. C,II -=
s:: ii;i .-=
a:i "'0 :=
;; i ~ ii
~5~:=
tg~-g
ii S g ~.
:t .. - '"
~.9wg-:
"';-g~.s
.= .!::! t5. t:..
~ : g-"'E
8.~ E ~
~~~o
.UE.:g"'O
~~~ii
.= ~ = ~
., -
~E:~
~.'S~==
t):e~~
-= .; ~ 8;
S -.;, r;
... """ --
-5 ~ .= ..:
~~~6
~
I'-
=>
~
:::2
.....
~
...,
=>
.
.....
.....
.
.;~;
.:-,
.w."..-
10&
-. .'
',"' .
......
........~ ..
:','."':
,.-.
.' ".
-' ~ . '.
.........
-: :':".-
~(\\
....;..:..
...::....
..::.'-."
:.-.....-.
'_:.::'~{::
",
.....;....
.. ".':
.." .f
......-.
:.......
-..... ':
--....
-', ,"
. -.;,'
" '...:':
._:.;.::~..'..<
....
-'.-,-.-
.",'
....'
.. .. .. .. ..
" -€ " " C
>< ]. >< ]. "0 >< X '0
.. >< >< .. ..
" " " " ~ .. .. .. "
0 C 0 0 " " " C
"0 } '0 .~
.. 8
" "
0 0
>.
.D
.9
~ e
J:: :: ~ .~ u
o ..~ =a ..c ~ .~
"O_~:5C "'O:;c
U' ~~1!
-;j (5 J! "i .. ....
"O~_cn o-g!~
=1)-:;::3 'c;"~~1U
:;:;-=-..--= ",._<>~
_ t:i&l.cO
0= ._ .~ ] C "'0 u; Co.
~ _ lID 0 cJ'- ;Ir."
~ ",. .~ _ ~.D 0 g
oeo.~ ;::S-..!.'.
~ = I) = -.r
u~-=.~ ~eB~
....>,0 ":u:!:u......-
!!8.ct) -
i=~-o-= ';::6~;
o ~ >- .-; .~ ;: v
..: ":: g..D 0 -;; = ~
~~-g.5 .!! g-"i::
..!!-..e.o~~:5 tlB
~ ~ .a E :is - Co..= u
:;; ~ 2 ~ ] "i ~ .; ~
u ..-~S~~;j!a
-r"\;Cv.lc: -
!:!... t&:=.~u ca-=U-t; r:
J::j c ~.- ""C ~.i:"":'.::
~ E-:-8 ~ 8 E:~ co;;
c::::: ~.e..t)i5 u ;aou E
IZ)Ol'Cl..c_=~t)_!!
0:z:::E.9;; .:,--= ~;;;
..;
t:-t:-
<0
:::E,...l
....c::I
ll-
<c:::
:::Eo
r-CIl
.......;
, .'
....
o
...
"E ...
~:9
B e
... 0.
.!! 0
.D~
","0
<> c:
= CI:I
Co -
~-E
.. '"
.1: "0
~ c:
"';~
i.~
c:.",
;==
-;;.:s
o <>
~1:
~ u;
.s ""
... ...
Be:
v ~ ~
+0 B ~
t: "i) "E
~ ~ '"CI
~ = u
= 0':
cc-::
.~ 5; ~
g.~ if
~c-g
......
. .':'
,',
~
II'
.
~;:~lilJ!1
~
:::;:
on
~
.....
o
0-
on
ll-t:-
<0
:::E....l
....t::I
"-
<c:::
:::E.::l
r-CIl
.,
:0 ~
J~ ]
8:i
'" ...
... ~
o
-"E
.. ..
~ ii
E ~
.,
.E ~
le &.
.g ~
~~
c....
5 E
Co...
... '"
~=
...1:
,.. <>
.. c:
,..-
~-g
'"
~D
o~
c.",
g Cl ..:
~'- 0
..::: 0_=
- ... c
~ ~ 'in
.~ -g g
~~E:.
~
t:-
0 0
N ,..;
~ :::;:
on on
:> 0
,...; ,..;
0 <:>
<:> -
,.., \0
- -
...
.; "E ~
~ -g'~
a~"'C
"CIlC
o u 11 ~
.;" ~.i: v
:::E.- 1;; ~
c.gc g.
~.8:;; g
,g.9.9~
l!. e e t
'^ ~ ~ E
_U1=t5CU
.~ .2 cu :
.~ :E .;: -5
o ~ ... :;,
.s5];
oJ: 15..'; .9
"i - ~ ~
&.1~ti:l
~~.~~==
...... u.-:::3 0
~2C~.'E
u;;-.>..=;::;
~~-=.~5
.:.:1;'~ii
"-ll-
<0
:::E,...l
....t::I
ll-
<c:::
:::Eo
r-CIl
E
o
..::
'"
;;
>
.!!
.",
c:
::l
o
...
...
g ri
] 0
~
E ~
... "
,g ~
s ~
... "
S-~
c: ...
&.~
:~
'"
o ...
:~ ~
e E
c.
en
. ij E..
vl>/l
t) +=
=rc
- ...
]K
-= 0
~
t:-
"
e
'""c;'" +Ei
> rij cr
2.s ~
~ ~ (5 ~
&n<~ Q.
~'O.!! =
E:i:t:... ca
lJ.9 ~ ~
~~ ~ ~
.~ g .~ tT
O~C ;.
..fCI~ IJ
~ ~ ~ 5
i<:::E N
_ . a:I .-:5
'-Ee~'i
;tu~d5:>o,.
-gEe,gc..
-5i~=a:~
E-~~~ ~ .,g
g~=:f; ='5
t.JClIJ'""'= c:
;:.gg-~o 8
.8 :E ~ -~ ::g ~ ~
~]~~8J!z
>.
0=
- ~ VI -
.!2~g.a:5 0
~~ ~.= [
Q . "ii i:: 0_
- ~~
.E._ l=
g ~ ~ 0 :::
- u:S"= ..J
.- .~ ; g ~ E
~e~~.=o
II) Q.. L.. .... ::I c.=
~~:J8g-t-
c po.... ... IU
~.~,gf2~ g
,g e&.o = N
::E-.......,Q...'> c
~.g,~~~ ~ .;
>,O<>'"U.- '6
.~Q.~~ryC g
u-=.5ii3:E c.>
Jd~"ECID=:::'::; :
o 2 ~E u ~ rc:
~-=.~~-=o; .1l
CI) i: U ~ >. a.> ~ .=
OU.uU-=~I~
..E:E~~ij~~
r--t)II$=~=M""
g-~~ ~~.!!~.8
oc--o....-o
N e ~u E ~ ~ r-
><
><
><
><
><
t:-ll-c.,ll-t:-t:-I=-ll-ll-ll-
<0<0<0<0<0
:::E....l:::E,...l:::E....l:::E....l:::E,...l
",-t::I "'-t::I....t::Il:.c::I ",-t::I
ll- e.. c.. 1"- t:-
<c:::<o::<o::<o::<c:::
:::Eo:::Eo:::Eo:::Eo:::Eo
r-Vlr-CIlr-CIl;-CIlr-CIl
~
..:
~
;:;
"0
0.
"
.,
...
..
e
<>
,::
~
..
.~
:;
'~
'"
-=
...
~
'u
~ ~ E
eLl _:: ~
~5 ~
c c.
~~ t:: D
--....-=
" c -
t)t:~
~ .~ 'S
o 0 <7
~ ~ <>
t:-...o::
~
t:-
o
..,,:
:::;:
on
o
,..;
o
.....
\;l
~
E.
o
;:;
>
.,
"'::l
U
'"
...
~
..:
...
..
;;;
~
., .. ..
'iC ~ g
"; ii B !
~ == II') c
-; =-..!:! IU
B~@ -g
IIf.I =-- U CICI
-~ .:g ~ 1i
~e~~e
~ L'C = ia. c.
~ueC:';;
_....~""'='.... -
~ e u ~ U'I
~::..i5;~
~ .E ~ ::E -'5
- t,) u a> 1'1:I
--coo'"
5..s~;gc.
~~.s"E "5
o:::;'-oc:
Ii 0 0 = i:i
~~g6~
""i:l _.= _ ec:
~;s~tr.JE
;:~~~~
ti~E'::cc
'~6~'~.~
~:::i:~
e ~= e I.' ~ .__>'
.5;:';_;;1.::
c:"'!::! :::- c - ~
., !2 .. 0 '" -
='_=:: uE: 6-
..
E:
...
l>/l
~
'..
c
...
...
;;;
~
'"
....
o
-g
~
ll-
3:
c..
3:
t:-
~
r-
0-
=>
0-
<:>
..0
:::;:
on
c:::
....
<:>
<:>
,..:
::;.:
~
8
o
..,;
::;.:
~
.....
o
I
o
c:r:
:::;:
on
<:>
,...;
o
..,.
\0
on
-e
-
I~
...
\0
><
ll-ll-t:-ll-
<0<0
:::E....l:::E....l
....t::Il:.t::I
t:- c..
<':=:<0::
:::Eo:::Eo
l-CIlr-'"
~
'"
bi>
e
0.
:;:
.s
...
u
::l
:l
is
<>
>.
"
'"
e
;;
l::
'"
cI5
r-
:z
o
U
t:-
<...
:::Eo
l-CIl
N
~ .~
~....l::
QD Oeo ""='
c: ~~= ~c:~
.0 Bt::o~=2 fiillSa
eP ., !!ga...
o .q.22~~ 5-;:e
~ ]~::~:; ~~c.
~ ~:a.e-=II) ~8.~
:=.!!.c..::::s~s -;c'-~
g":a;E]~-; ]~8
~::~E;~~ ~~i
U1!+Uc..~"'O- g~=
r-'=:~.,gc.=~ -0 !!
~8"'~.5~~ ~.=<
04):-o-g~-::; .9~t:
~~...-.=_":,,,,;:ca._g~... ...c:...
-~ gg!;:
.i ~ ~ ~ -~ ~~ ... e) is
In _~__~'~.!i ~ egoS
~ E::::t tr~"":J..~ Q..~'i
g e.g~~-= ES~; '^
'" c.. c:;: - ('C ~8 C) =: - -
~ ~ _~-= ~ == ~ r!! ..0 ~ c:l
~~U;..E~~u-~g~
ii Jg ~ ~ tn ~~ .~ .;: ~ -
~ tt- IJ-;C.!:! U i:i E E...=
:2 ~ >,..0 fI) = 1.1 'i) - ~
:; t):E g e) ?;:"'O go in
E:i6:;+'::EIU 12u~~
oll~O'C70V; =;e.~=
~-g ~.~ 6 .l:::':~!:~
o g = ~ = ~ : ~ ~.~ 0
:t ~~.=~~ i:: ti~.E B
3;
"-
3:
t:-
0 ~ 0
d - N
~ ~ ~
on on on
<:> 0 0
,...; ,..; ,..;
0 0 <:>
00 c- o
,.., \0 ...
- - -
~
10 rJ
...:
"
.......
..
. ,
.........
, ,
.. ..
'..
..... .'.
>:-'::::'
"'-:'.o"'!
'.',' .
....;....
.......
.',
...-..".
." ."
......
. .....
".: :_":. ~ :
I ~::'.: . .
. ,'.
.... .
..
.<',
..
0:
"i
;5
'"
.g
~
c:
o
u
E
.g
~
o
u
E
to
..
'0'
i:i.
.g
~
c:
o
u
>.
0:>
to
.!;!,
E
0.
c:;
'"
..
.....
o
-0
.g
:::I
0-
e
..
0:>
..
0:
>d.
e
..
~
o
U
.~
~
is
:;.
u
E
-0
.~
g-
~
x
::.
<5
::iE...J
l.:.CJ
:::..:::..
<0
::E...J
l.:.Q
~
~
o
..
0:
.~
:5
><
..
0:
'0
..
"
o
..
0:
'0
..
0:
o
'"
t-
-
E
~
'"
'"
I;Il
x
r:-c:...
<0
::iE...J
l.:.l:!l
r:-
<r.::
::Eo
f-1;Il
2:- ..
..~__ g :ii D E
II) .s a U)'i: ~ -=~
~ ~ ~ 3~ s~.~ ;.~ ~
o~~ 0 ~= ,g~&. ~ ~~ ~~ao
'00 ~~: ~lCJu E .u,U oc....
~"s ~ ~ 'e "8 ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ .[.~ "~~ :~
iJ=lU.g s:::~ -ut:ui~E..,","__.o... c.....G.)
sa&'-E = 0_ ~8.erl;l- uaa...
~ B f [ ~ "=2u ~ 50::1. eO. ~ .; ~ -c..~; Co.. -g '"'='..=
o cc: L..;:::J -c ta.li .... ..:::: ~ 1'-1
c~g ~~~m ~fo~~~~f -~~
~=~ =....6- b~=e-u.~~...:::I," -.....
=~~ ~~UEui~~C~ ~;:::J~
t!~c- c-~.=~'E:::=Eo.~;;c..~ e~:S
- o. .....Ojc.__....u..:='ofu>E.~~E __
~~~ at E.... c.. - ~B=
ri~ i_~~~~~S~uE~~ ~~~
u~~ ~~~E.;~~~E~~g~ E~c~
~E~ :Du~~g~~~~Ei~ ~ ~
~~!~I~j~iilfiiji~ lIt
eG,)o u 0 = ~"'E u ::5 :::: ""C..:.c .e ';E i: ~ Cb c....:
-~-~-~EOb~~~g~~~.~ ~~~
~c~!~ljj!~~I~~~I}t 1!j
- -~- -- ~~u~ s~.~
g. ~ Sz g-~ c.:::; = u E ="E g.-- >- ~ _
u~- -~O=~5~to~~~~ ==0
>c~~~~~~~~~~~>-uc~c~-
u ~ a) - A) ~ ~~ ~ "'C,)-"':'=: 1,)--= c:: u-~;;.9
~~~~~~-~8~~~uO~~-OUkC-
~===uu;D~~~-=uo=~~E~
i~'"~~~~ii~~~~!~~!ij}ii:1
6->,,6-= - C,.l:=__ 0 ~ c: -"'ij > Q) LI.;"'O..=.g
g- ~ ILl _: C) ~ g-.E' 5: ~ ~ ~ ~ 'i" > E : -= _~~ =-1'>._=- -=..
=== t:::U.c::=::<::::: c..e=O == :;:::..Ec..=-5~""'_
u
...
-E'
Co
c:;
..
..
.....
o
-:;J
.~
6-
e
'"
.D
c:;
..
'"
'-
o
-0
~
":;
C"
e
..
.D
~
~
~
x
x
x
c:...
o
...J
t:ll
=-
o
...J
Q
r:-
C
~
CJ
r:- r:- r:- r:-
<~<~<=:<""'
::Eo::f:o::Ec::iE5
1-1;Ilf-1;Ilf-1;Ilf-1;Il
~
r:-
/s
:t
r:-
:t
=-
0:>
...;
l('
'"
~
....
0:>
0:>
vi
l('
'"
<;;
....
0:>
>?
~
...,
<::>
0:>
-.i
l('
'"
<;;
....
0:>
<;;
t-
N
t-
r.::.
...,
t-
r:-
<~
::iEo
f-1;Il
:t
Q..
0:>
...;
~
0:>
...;
0:>
'"
.....
vi
t-
vi
.....
...
<E
c
.g
'E
o
u
Qo
=
~
-0
..
U
c..
;:
o
u
e
..
0:>
...
...
~
c
.g
::s
c:
o
u
Qo
:::I
~
-0
..
U
]-
o
u
~
..
0:>
...
\0
t-
\0
t-
E
~
..
==
~
x
x
r:-r:-r:-
<0<0
::E....l::iE....l
u..CJu..l:!:I
c:...
<.....'"
::iE;5O-
f-1;Il~
~
=-
o
,...:
o
;;;;
o
...;
o
I~
o.
fll
~
..
::iE
.?;o
U
...
..
Co
-0
..
0;
g-
o
u
:d
.8
OJ
.!:!
c..
Co
..
5"5
1;Ilc;
- ..
o c
'" 0;
~}
E .;;
-go:>
:=
.. 3:
"0 ..
.~ :g
&~
~ 0;;
... '"
C;~
~!!
'" ..
i5.......
0110
==1::
:gd.
... '"
0<
x
=-=-
<0
::iE....l
u..CJ
r:-
<~
::iEo
i-1;Il
::iE
u
~
0:>
oci
0:>
;;;;
=>
...;
o
o
0.:
E?
'"'
e:
...,
o
...
'"
...
..
i:i ii
E >
g-~i
uca!!
> ... ..
..g -E .~
o ~n~
rlOoO
o '" '"
.~ -~ ~
-~~ '"
en g :;
~ c; E
.5 ii-=
-;~ii
"E ~-~
~ ~.~
-E g b
.. - c
~.g~
~ ~..~
..!:!m~
c ~ ..
.!:P il :;;
~ '0' E
~==a
.!!!!-c
~.5: ui
"t:J":::=c
~ 0;: _g .g
to - .-.-
.I::.."''"'O~
;.I I) c;. =
'::'OJ 8 e
~
=-
<;;
--
-0
<;;
....
0:>
'<r
...
~
'0
!!!'
:5
'"
t-
==
~
'"
'"
I;Il
x
r:-r:-r:-r:-
<0<0
::iE..J::iE....l
lJ-l:!lu..l:!l
r:- c:...
<~<~
;:i;o::iEo
f-1;Ilf-1;Il
~
'0
..
0:
o
'"
t-
s
~
'"
..
I;Il
x
..
"
';:;
..
0:
o
:
"i
0:
o
..
0:
}
'"
t-
".,
t-
'"
t-
-
E
~
E
~
E
~
..
..
I;Il
'"
..
I;Il
'"
..
I;Il
x
x
x
r:-
o
....l
l:!l
r:-c..r:-c:...
<0<0
::iE...J::f:...J
lJ-l:!ll.:.Cl
r:- r:- c:...
<r.::<~<~
::Eo::Eo::iEc
~I;IlFI;Ilf-1;Il
.....t"'""1
'"
to
..
.9 '0'
~ Q. -E ~g
... .= :=
-i: -,:.( ~ _=~
~ EU g Qa E.~
E ""C"',::; U rI;t
e ~~ ~-ti __~ ::::::
~ ~~~.ge c::
~ -8 ~ .S ] ] ~ .E~
ow.-:::::e..!:! utn
X. ':.o~ao.o= .53
"'9' cU)c:ntU~r; ens::
Ii ~g~.u;.;u--=6~
"'y" "~5l .e.o il ~
.~ ~~~.~~~:lL._oO
~ ~ t; ~ c..;; "'C .=_bD.t:
~ i;-~.~:E ~ ~ ij > IU
~ '-IIhOO-C._o~
'0; "2l5.E6~fiE.E
.~ c..crt:r.- > ~:
..0 CI)C=...aoOE.,^"
:i~"5g.!!Ez::=~~",;
~tt-5i;~8 ~5iu:;
~.~ ~-5 E E ~ ti g ~ U
In i;"ii.EJ2 ~ u ~-~ ~ ~
wE ~ ] ~ E u; it ~ -g ~ 0
"';:J-6c:co""'l:S~:::c;:l5",r
-s == .~ u g E": c..":= e ec
~g~'" --~IUU'2:~
:...~ Cb...,.~:: g - -= -~ I): "
u ~t:l. c =+~ I) E..E:::o'"g
~gd.~ ~~.gg~s:s
:s-g:;::- 0;::"0 C,) i:5:E= >
U I-ot::-._ u": c.r::::::: c;._:;::::I tIS
~
5:
o
'"
<;;
'<r
--
..:;
o
...;
o
--
-0
0:>
...;
o
".,
...
.....
...
..
0:>
;!;
r:-
....l
CJ
~
=-
o
vi
;a
0:>
..;
o
o
0:
0:>
...;
--
-0
~
....
o
;;;;
0:>
...;
o
...
...
'"
""
N
'"
.';
.
e.:,.
IO(
., '
. .......
.',-: '.
-::.Ow':'.
.": :';"':.:
......-<.:
..........
.."'.~ ~':',:
>(
.. .. ~ ... ..
c: c: c: "
.~ '0 '0 'i Q
... .. ..
c: " :5 c: :5
:::0 :::0 x :::0
I> <;;
::0 I) i.;
I> '" U
.:::.~ u.; "'C
-"E. ::Oii~
= g- .~ ~
:t-o ~ ~&=
u:=; Q.....f!
UI;;I G)E.-o
.~.g =~ ~
-0 L.t ~
tu a ~ k
o l>ll '" '" "
ul:: ~.=~
e:E _ca...
~._ t::....o"'C
;1:::l ~~~
U Q ~ ~ .~
Eg ~5fr
5~ViC.VI-='
.=c5~-g~
cio~::::~v.I+=
:.;:.,g e &E" r.o ~
E,:::'E=~~
=og"=~,.::
iii.!! ... ~ c 0
~ii~a-Ec;
_Eoo--'"
~f~~5~
.5-~D~-c:O
~f'!~1!~~
=.o=i5-=g""
~:;>-~+== .
'=E-::::'=r,)>~
6- -= :; c- g,. s: .=
~ "5 8 ~.~ ~ j
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- ..0 ,...: oci ~ ....; ..0 ,...:
~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" \a \0 r- r- r- r-
~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.... ..... ,.; ..... .... ..... ..... .....
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~. ..,. I~ 0 - U"\ '" I~ 00
c- o 0 0 0 0
- M M M ..... N
;
U
E
e
'g.
e
::-
o
-0
<a
-0
=
..
..
>-
.0
-0
~
-a
'"
o
U
U
<
X
Q-Q- 1>-1>-
<0 <0
::!:...l ::!:...l
~c::l ~c::l
l>- I>-
<l><: <l><:
::!:o ::!:o
t-cn f-cn
.".,.:
'.
-.. '..
. .....
.":"'.
'. .
',' ;.
'.,
:?;
c:..
;:.
1: .s
5' ~ 'i ~ ~ ~
>t5rcE~~
.cii-g.2~..
~ g.:t; : = .5
= '- g ';i "; "'E
'~ 3 ~ i-~ ~
u ~ :~ e .;: "0
u; 5 :: ~ e e
:;;Oc I>"i 0..0
.:: -e; ~ :I e ...~
~E-g~:;.=
"";:I "C c.. te :: U
E5ica~~o
.8 =~.~.~ M
VI tJ 8) iU = q)
,~c.c-o;; "
_.:_=-oc"
..gi:i:;:;2~
Q.a>....-u"E
tc; 0 ~ 13.= r=
4U..:gEB~
U i..o C L.. .s
ii~~~] U)
5 ~~~::ui
_ u _ 10... c=:.+- UJ
.i; :e ~ 'g. :l .E ~
::!:lS::..e-:!!1=z
~
I>-
x
"2
'" ..
.. I> -0
"2 ~ =
~ ..
iii *;;
'" ~
c ..
.!! 0 .0
0.. tl
~ ;;; t>ll I>
-a <: .~
:;; '5
'" .. c..
~ ~ 0 >-
.0
ti E U '" <.S
.~~ l>ll };-
9 I>
U .-,
e 0 ~ 0
0..... .... E..
....Q.. 0 '"
ol::; bII
.: 0 c .. <: .
.. <: .;::; I> o~
:;I -oe!l
0..:;1 co er-
'" l><: ~ e ;~
.. <:
.. -e I> ...
-0 .. ._ 0
1>..0 "0 '" > u
3: ... .. "2 I> U
1>::> d ... '"
-:; >... c.. ~ 1>-0
1>.0 e .0 I>
"'-0 0.. Cl3cti=5
I> I> '" .:!! uJ :l=:;:
.0 ...
-:; ::- '" 0 ","0
;;t e 1=2::::: '"
u 0
U
X X X
I>-
o
...J
::!:l
0..1>-
<0
::!:...J
~t:l
01>-
N<
w::!:
I:::i-
I>-
o
...l
t:l
r:..
<I:::
::!:o
"-t.r.l
Q..
<0:::
::!:o
f-t.r.l
uJ
Z
Z
<
I>- uJo c:..
1:::< tlZN 1:::<
O::!:l><:ZuJO::!:
t.r.l~=-<l><:cn"-
fJ:- .! l1J
E ~ .!: ~
&nO C.O 0; "'0 '"
=u a.. C. __<>0
:::: 0 t:1. ~ Q.
~ .;; g--s! <<i ~ oS
~~ .=cc ~~ z.. in
>.u ~8 "N.= ~ ..n
.~~ ~~ ~;.6- 1.
oe- ~~ i.1~~; ~
~.= u 0 _ <<I ~
"'0 t) ~~ 5]Q..~. ~
.0 ~...u .g a ~.g ~ ~ 0
~ cS:: .5~~~~ u.p
,g~ .g-s -.:J"'Oc> E:O
~~ S-tii 6i'o~ ~+;;
~e 5E g-_~~ -a~
+; =_e ::___~ .~ ~ 1!.~ ~ 8 e i;
_ -gs 4.1~8C ~?:...
01)"'.- OJ-i:CJ$_....
:~~~~g Bii~= ~~
> mt) .::IU-=U; o~
..=~El::" -e;:s ctn
~]].~~ :gc.QO~ .g~
ab_~O .QBE~ r=c:
:c!t)GjO::Or....~CfC .t:~
~-=uE..=l:Oo_u~cQJI_
c:I""O~ uC>'<<Ii)=.2:G..5
;0 ~ 11 ~ E -E D ~..., =i5 0 Eo C)
-; ..1o.~~-:::;I~C:~_~u~
-:E]..e8~-E~~"E.sE
.~ ~ ~ 8 _- ~ .~ :;n.~ ~ ~ .~ rG
g.~2~~;;o~ s.g ~ ~ s.o-fr
~~2~~5;~_:.a~~~~
~
I>-
~
I>-
c:
...l
I>-
.. .. ..
" c: "
'0 '0 ';
.. ..
c: " :5 ><
0 0
~ -t:i
"2 .2 .2 .~
OJ '" '" 6-
'" ;:; 1! 0 e
~ == U
E < I>
!! .0
e -t:i 9
.0 I> <;; U -'" 'i
:;I ... .~ .Ef I>
'" '; I> 3:
<: er- e
.9 e ... .-; .E .!!
';c OJ - ~ >.
;; .. '"
I> I> "E. I> C. "'B .~..o
.~ ..Q
i:; .2 l>ll ~ l>ll fr~~
<: r:
'" ~ .g :;; .~ :a ~ ~";
'0 '" E '"
c E ~ ~ '" ... C"
.:.9 t>ll :a ~ f::
~ .... ~ '0 <:
C'V .'= C> -;;; '" - '" '"
0.."0 '" .: .: c: - CC'-=
'" <: .... .... ~ ~ E
.. 0 0 '" 0 '" 0
-0 U 0.._ c.. " I>
?3 '" c '" ~ =c==-
I> ii '" I> '" ';0 c
d!i '" > I> > I> .~ 'OJ
:;I '" I> U I> U 0 Ui
-;;; '" I> C I> C U tl :c
> I> } .9 '0 0
U - - <: "0
I> !:! "E. E '" '" !:
I> ,5 <:
.- E e 0..
.0 .... 0 0 ti
.g .g 0 en '.:::'
U U U I>
'i ~ e I> .... "2 we'
:;; :;; 5 0 ~ ~
'" <: :;I <: 0..
~ -;: 0 '" 0 !!l ... <l ...
'"
e u u u U I>- < 3: .E
X X X X
Q..-
<Cl
::!:...l
"-:::I
1>-1>-
<0
::!:...J
~c::l
1>-c..Q.._
<0<0
::!:...l::!:...l
~::!:ll.:-::!:l
I>-
o
...l
c::l
l>-
n
:i
c:l
1>-1>-
0:::<<0::
o::!:::!:o
cn~f-t.r.l
Q.. r:..
<l><:<0::
::!:o::!:o
f-t.r.lf-cn
~
::: 8 A :5
g. -; ~ ~.9 ~ c ...
u u ~~ c'ii=-='Z
.~~'u > ~'"'5~in=
c~ ~ ~g oJ:~-="'3o
E..-;e ""~~ l)U~e;c.=.
0.-= =!1-;~ll) 01::-.-:'0
"".0 -=.="'I>l>ll e-"''''=I.:-
.:]~c.<<=U)ol)~ ::l.~~~~
eJO>q:;~CID c..~:f.: -.lI
I>...cu-g~.==;;~ - ="'C...."iii..::
=---5.~l! :JlUu'--
~~~__~_~u_~~~ ~i~~.2
...~'-.-u=5.~ ~m~C)~
t;oo~>~o.-= .;:~,-;;s
?;g~"'Ce~Oo:g o=.=-=~
.,";: ~.!!: .c:.. U) Ii rI;I a:2: --=.~ tJ
i; !. 8 ~.E E -g 0 ~ Ai e] -;
5~l ~~ ~:~ -S ~.=.2! ~
"5 0 ; ~ <<; :::= ~ 5 .~ .s .~ ~
"e-~o ~ ~.= ~ I ~5 Vi..., 0
~..9r;e::.:cE-g~:; ~EMa:
Om~~~.i:"uV'l i5Eccoo
5-='~..g Ka.!:=': :E 8~.=E
.=f~.Eg-:::fr= ....ut:-c:;Jl>
E :; 0 0 - .- .... r:::::: R ~ ~t=.~_ ~ ~
c~ "uEl::~<.... -
E-o'E..E.=:2-=...-:. :::~uGj~~
O-:::JUCU<<:O=-O ~_CJ>""k
.E~~~:~~Pi ~~'~o~E:
-;:!! - eJ ~"ij = -= ~ .; -: ~ =~ o..~ ~
~~:; -5 B E. ~ ~ _ ~ ~ 0 a... =
~ ~ ~ ~ 8 IU...VI:6 ~ i3 ~ E .~ u ~ ;
.= cJ :0'= = VI.c ""0 - () "'"
6- u"=: 5- $: ;;;.~ C'Y._ c:I'i: 6-..:: = .~
~ ~'E ~] ~ ~:E e ~ 8 ~ E ~ ~
,
c:
...l
I>-
...J
I>-
~
...l I~
l>-
t:.!
'"
0 q
0 -
- -
- -
r- ,..
q q
..... 8
0
- I~
-
M
o
...
e
r-
q
.....
o
o
0;
o
;:::
o
...;
o
'"
C
N
o
M
/oq
,......:-.
".' -
",..." 'w"
",.-.
". .....
..." .
'........:.
',.
.. ' ...~ -'
:-:.;.: ~:. .
'" -:.& ~
'..-
, -';"
-.':": :
........
.' ',..~., :.
-:.::.':':
......
'"":.:-.':
. . wO"
.~:.-:.- .-.':~:
......
. -.>.~ ..::":',
.......
......,..
.... "'"
.......
.......
'" . .
-: ..... ~.
.........
:...,-.. .
~
xi
c
o
.s
vi
S!:
....I:::
:: eN
~:E!-
" ...
e s 0
l'l."<>O
<Eg
0' In-
~;~
U]~
:: ID >..
00(;.0
= .~ ~
o <>0-
== 0 ~
=0'"
1l:E~
.S t ~
"'.c
'E '0 ~
At; t.-. ~
E 0 1;:
., = '"
.1:;J.9 IJ
=c;E
'i "5 6
g is.~
In..!:!' QD
"CiS 5:-=
:i._ E
..,
=
~ .-
f-
Z
o
U
....
'"
'"
~~
::> '"
5:E:....
euic ~
~::i~ ~
Cl:J u. [ !:!
.f: E 5 "i
:g r3 ~ ..,
e~: ~
o .!! t.E :j e
.~ ~ -;- -(3 c..
u~~:s~
!! ~c..ii
-= Q.."Co t: -::s
.c; IU t:..5! IU
t:Owc..;E
!-!E'o~~
II ~ Eo 'u :;
::=:oK.o
5:-mUtn ~
.- U ;>.,.c .,
~';E.~a
~6<;;.~
.~ .~ ~ ~ .o_~
- ,,::> ,-
"a ii eJ- Q.. IU
E~.~o.~
-::::s i: u A;;
a~~~~
&nU~.!:lJti
::c ~;g..g -5 ;e
'_~.' ~ = c g- ~
E~Eo::~
,
c:
~
\0
<::>
vi
-
.....
<::!
.....
<::>
\0
N
..J
c..
<::>
..0
-
.....
<::>
...;
""
.....
N
..
c
C
..
c
o
=
.,
.,
.&:I
.,
>
~ c u
,~~:: .0
)(U-~l.;..
~ oS '~ ffi 0
~~g=-g
;;;S";:;;GS
.~ ~ g c 8
ut:."6~=
~ < t5.:; .~
., ,.., t:; -=
.~~g.~o
-u; tl. .=! c.. 00
cuucn=
~~.~'o~
t ~ i:. ~ 0
~ tI] ~:~.,U'J
;;; .5 ; &. .~
~.=~ii~
-="'C~c..o
:ES's.] ~
.- - tJI - ::I
~ii:;ag-
c..:E.&:I~0::
><
~
<5
;:E..J
I:.c:::l
c..
<t=:
:::Eo
I-cn
-=
.,
"i E
>,0
., e..
> ...
... 0
a.s
..
c
'0
..
c
o
><
c..c..c..c..f-
<o<o:z
:::E..J:::E..JO
J.L.c:::lJ.L.lXlU
c.. c..
<t=:<0::....
:::Eo:::Eo'"
f-cnFcn~
'"
:i:
'"
:ll
>,
~
-5
.r
-5
.,
"
'"
Q.
.,
.><
!!
'"
.,
<>0
'"
=
.OJ
-5
...
'"
~
=
,E
to
.5
'"
<:
o
"
,~
::>
er
.,
<=::
~
t:.
o
,..:
::::
.....
""
...;
""
...
N
:>
Z.
c
o
..
c
x'o
..
6
..
c
'0
g
0::
iii
o
.,
-S
....
o
uJ
><
'0
<:
.,
e..
l'l.
<
,=
-0
.,
.&:I
';:
:;:
.,
"'0
<:
'"
c..
,~ -0
- .,
" >
.!! is
~;E
>< .,
~~
:;2 '!:i'
><
0:: :...._g
iii
o :1"E .!:i'
~'u "'""'" LI:I
...:: c = -8
,:: ~ 6 'u
~:~ :e
-~ .!! ~ ~
"9 a~ a
[~~ ::
.c.t::;..- u
<"'-= -0
.= .E ii :~ .e
-e~~ u ;..."
:e....- ""::I
... 'ii ~ e"':i ~
~~~ C;J:~6
"i:J u t:- &).;:J ~
~ ~j ~ g- p.
c..cj E CD:; ~
= 0 .=.&:1
0-0<.:: "E='E
'';:: u........ fa'- t'CI
u~V\ CIO:!:eIO
.;~~ ~eD~
8....2 N 6 ~ :.;:_6
~..8:;~~~~
=~~g-e'5
~~-=O::Ue..U
E
.,
]j
uJ
-s
'i
;>.,
c..
<:
<5
", ,
~~
;c..
1j-~
'0' U
... .,
c..'C
!!c:
0;:: >(
.- ~
;:
., .-
E~
e..=
o -=
Ii 5-
> '"
., 0
-= ....
~ t;
.,cn
~ <:
'E ::
C'"-'"
., ::>
<=::0
g
~
... '"
'" :::
~~
"'Ec;
ii:a
.S ..!
:0-
::> >(
o~
'0-=
;>.,~
.= c=
u....
:!! 0
:: .~
~ -;
., ...
! l!.
., .,
.&:IE.
<: .,
.g-s
E =
., ,-
e..'"
c .!!
8 g
.a~
~.~
~e..
.;: r::
_F 5:~
r:::::"
...J
c..
..J
...
<::>
00
..;
-
.....
<::!
.....
<::>
-
.....
<::!
.....
<::>
C>
""
/",
N
N
><
i-
:z
o
U
"'- c..
<0::<.....
:::Eo::!:5
;.-cnf-cn
.,
!::!
u
.g ~
~ a
... .,
iii-:
6c
" .-
:!:! t
e..>
=-_5 ~.E
g (5
.i -g .~
'" 0"
C,lI . u r.=
:=~V'J_
;E'5uO
...:: g. E
~?:"iic;
a.E~:E
ca~-oca
~ g.~ ~
-0 c.=-
:~.~ ~ (;
~ ]! =: .~
"'C-=-;:::''''
e u..!::;; '.~
c......o"'O"'t:J~
o c.-ti O"u ~
;8.!S':~E
-..s;:a:Q.
.5~~'~,~~
o .... .-= -
- >.. VI "-_~
8~ij_
.t: :: ~ ~
~v;cW
'"
f::
'"
u
.,
.0'
ci::
.5
.~ ~
~-E
0:: ::>
~
c:
Z
\0
<::>
e.:
~
~
.....
<::!
....
o
-
.....
<::!
.....
<::>
N
N
N
N
/",
-=
.,
= 'j ~ ..,
~ ~ 0 ~
_.,e-
= u i: 8 8.~
:: ~ ~.5 e .=
.E.c l'l. E
u .E.g.8. ~.E
~-o ~~~ffi~~
~.~~~g"Ou
c:::2; C 0._:= =._
C:SC""IIIIUU=U...-~
>. f .!! ~ IU C ._ "'0
UIUU=-O..!:~u
~::: ~< c.~ g-c;
11):= I,J ."'t:Jr.=:;;~
:: a: .::= a ii.u .= >
.2-c:1.;;E:~~;~
;jl.)c:uutn_..c
2!gtJcu,-c
i:ii 5 V1.U.O' 0 ~=
5-0 ~ ~Q..~j1 ~
e'~"i~:;;~ g-~
c..'u : -= ~ &..~ ~
~ 8. e .= "1j t ,.g ':S
="'~""t:Je~=-o
.g~..!!~.;:a~;
:.o:E:s!EgsSco
=~=C:~r.E~;;
8~tf~..8=~-E
~
"fo
c
o
~
'c
..
c
o
..
"
'0
..
c
o
-0
.~
::>
er
~
.,
.&:I
'i
:0..
.,
i:
;;;
><
><
><
r::..
<-
::E:J
I:.c:::l
-r::..
<00
::E..J:.::.
J.L.t:QJ.L.
c.. "'-c..
<c::<o
:::Eo::E..J
f-cnJ.L.c:::l
..;
'"
~
'"
.,
t
.=:
-=
.$8-
'0 E
'" .,
.~ "it
;~
::: .,
'0-::
~-g
.&:I '"
-0":
= .,
::>"'0
e Iii
'" <:
~~ .
::> '" =
,J:) b.E
eel cr.o ti
'0.; E
G.l.- Il,I'J
~ E 5
~ 8 u
~~ ~
.s U 'u
!!~ii
~ ~ ~
0;::""0
e ~ u
.- <>0"
g...!! ~
~].8
:9
:;;
.2
:1
.u
'"
e..
'"
.,
.~
.~
c;
'"
....
o
U
E
<l
"
=
.5
u
-=
;;;
1==
..J
c..
<::!
o
N
r.::!
.....
<::!
.....
<::>
~
.....
<::!
.....
=>
IfJ
....
N
N
..
c
'0
..
o
..
c
"fa
o
..
c
"fa
8
e'
.,
.&:I
'~
~
::>
.&:I
..
lS
~
.!!
.~
.,
"
=
.S
c..
<: ,
o .,
" ;,;
co'i:
= l'l.
.;:: 0
,- ...
'" e..
ere..
., '"
... '"
= '"
.52 "'0
~ .,
~ .=
E 5-
U ~
><
><
..
c:
"
<;:
'u
~
.;;
...
.~ C
to .,
E ;
2.llto
.~.~
'" ...
;: e..
8-5
.~~
~ ~
o iii
..!!!-a.
'" ...
:g~
9 ~
~.;
-':: ~
uo;::
<>0
~ .=
.E "E
.: rii
-0<>0
6 ~
" '"
.~ :.;
~
r::.._
<0
;:E...J
I:.c:l
Q
E:
.E
-=
.,
-=
';::
e
t:.
><
><
c..
<0::
::Eo
I-cn
c..
o
..J
c:l
c..c..c..c..
<0<0
::E..J::E..J
I:.:::ll.;.c:::l
t:. c..
<....<0::
~3::Eo
,.....cnf-cn
.:b.
....
.!!! ~ c.- IU _-_~ L-
t) 0> _ IU
~g ~.~ ~
N u ~ -6 .~ !!
WJ 00 I:i, -
0'" ""e..~ _'" ~
"~.s Ne ..-
~o I) ~ g
ec: --"i ..g~E~
~ ~ ~ ~ .- ~ ~
~~ ~ 5 ~io.g.g
t41..- -='"'C _1JI=;:::i
~~_t) :i"fo ~~;E
- - ....""='8)_
..g e ~~ ~~:5]
-o.E ;>- 'E.,t:~
Sn ~~ .s-=.~~
~; ~~ ~o.~;-
~Qo ~u ;":~~
~:3 ~5 .Sgf;8
e..cv~ ea...N .5"-""-
_ .=tE==.~
~"'C 8.6o<<JIU"i;'E
[~ 5'~.~~~'o-6
Ct.l -t)::S~.-==Et::.
_..:: c;~~O'~~~
~; ta.E~ 5~.:g ~=
ii :; IU - - u .- u -
:::Ea:g~B-a~~.g
'C(5=DOcaUJ....-;s.;;1IP
~~.E;; u.g-5s,: 0
=.=g~:::::=c..CJ ..
~.s t:l.= O-$.~ ~.~:5
;; .= "'E.. 5- o.~ 6- ~ &.;;:;
eE.a~~~~g~~
<::!
....
r.::!
S
....
""
.,.,
N
N
==
<::!
....
~
""
,..;
""
\0
N
N
~
c..
:::E
>0
.
o
vi
~
.....
=>
,..;
""
o
..0
~
.....
q
.....
<::>
.....
N
N
...
N
N
e,
e::
.:~.
pD
";'-..
'"r,"::'
........
-. . :~..
, "
, ,
'.-..:.:.-
,-.'.......-:.
," ,",
,":...... .
,n.'
".:_, .
.. .,'-
d
. . . .':':~.
,'-. -... -.~
.....-=:+:
. . ~" ..
....-...
.......
" .....
,":"':'
.-.;: . :::
". ....
'.:'.::.::
:. ~ ......
.. ,-.
".-.'.:.
,.....
.-.. ..
.......
........
~ : : : :
: :, .' ; - ~". .
. .. -.
, ..-'.
"". .
;';."
..
"
a
..
"
o
'"
~
'~
>-
'"
1:
::I
..
'"
,~
u
~
'"
o
Cj
'"
Co
~
'6
<=
all
~
.g
:s
I:
o
Cj
".
...-0
.. ~
"'E "::
ii 6-
- '"
Vl ...
.,'
,"
-.'.',
.....
....-.
. .
, "
. :.
"
"
~~l~t~t~~1-
~
.~
o
'"
~
'~
>-
'"
1:
::I
..
I:
,~
U
~
o
<.l
'"
l5..
all
'"
~
~
~
I:
,g
:s
'"
o
Cj
~-d
'" '"
""::;I .=
:: ::I
.. 0"
ti5 ~
><
Q
1;:
I'-.
o
...J
t:=
3
I'-.
o
...:
~
r-
o
...;
::>
'"
'"
'"
..
"
a
..
o
~!
.- ..
.'::: ";;
- ..
u =..lC
'" '" <.l
~..o
II).~ :c
>--
.. - 0
..c: ,I:
u -g t<<
,50's .g
c..C:"'O
~ "; ii
; ~ :a
c ~ ~
.. '" ..
~ E CJI
~ t: r.J
... 0 ..
~"= ~
3 ~ s::
~:~ 8. en
II) E ~ C5
5.~ :!:!:E
Q...J: -= L..
0::00
t:'=~ u
Ea .- c:: u
ii:~~.2
-0 .. '"
s ~ 1 ~
~ .29 u E
br~.9~
><
""'I'-.
<0
~...J
u..1!l
c..1'-.
<0
:::!:...J
u..t:=
I'-.
<.::::
~o
f-oVl
NWO
wZN
.::::zw
1'-.<'::::
...J i
I'-.
...J
'"
0 ~
00 -
~ e
r- oo
~ ~
.., ..,
0 ::>
0 I~
..,
N
..
"
.~
o
~
.~
6
..
"
a
..
8
~
'0
..
"
o
..
"
.~
o
..
"
"io
::)
'" ~.... "'> B
> .- ~
=~.~ =~.;!] ~ -'_!
~C~ ~51:i.:::: d$ <<I
~~g ~..o~ ~g ~g ~~
u.~:c ~.~z8 ~~ ~~ ~~
>__ >__ - "a";
~~g ~-g.g ~ ~~ E~
~]~ ~~~~ ~a ~g ~._
"'-0 ~_OVl ~~ ~~ c~
.~ E ~ e f: ~ <<i g::.:; E ..g ~
Po.E -g c..= -= ao -a..~ ~ 7i. 5 -g e ~
~Otlil !:!t)ca.= c:o-.....ao'=.=='iii
-= =...... ':::s.. ~ =ae.. ::: .5"S c.= ~ (':....
~ ~ - --M~'-~~~O
~~~ cm~~ ~..._.~~~..._'~~...~~
~E: a;lU~~
~ U :;588') ao~~aI)~~O~
~ rg ~ ~.g ~<~ .i-~ ~.i'~ ~ i. b
~~~ ~~EU l~~l~~;~
c...-=:c..vric.-~~M c==c=s::"'t)~
~E~~~E~~ .~~~"~'i~i]
5 .~ !:!:E ij.~ ~ == :>- VI ""I:) !t Vol -:::t :: -
c..--.... c....=-.... o"'iii::: 0"'; =-;; 0
0-=;'050:::00 ...-0,...-0>
==~u_=~u ~~U~~U~~
~i~~~i~~ ~j6~j6~~
~~M~~~~5 =~~ ~~ ~
~ ~~ ~~ u~ ~ .'i~ U'ic... U';O
.~.~~-.~.~eE~~<~~<~:~~
~r: u g &~ u 0 =-=::E''= ...::E.'= -::E ~
Vl-02~Vl''2~~Ff-o~Ff-o~F~~
1'-.0..
<0
~...J
u..1!l
L:lo
~ZN
,::::ZL:l
1'-.<'::::
c~
..!!! '"
c..u
'" ..
.. ..
::l-o
-0 '"
~ ::
~ ~
c:'Ri
-~
to;
= :;
"'-
o :g
ac
E: ~
u"=
..-:: -
'u .g
:it
~ .5
':SS
... '"
o ...
I: 2
,~ -0
- '"
~.3
'" '"
E >
~~~
e..",..
- c= ~
.;:; ~ t=
...- '"
~.!::! g-
='=i...,.
L1J :: C
...J
I'-.
<;;>
,...;
e
00
~
.....
<;;>
'"
...,
N
c..c..
<0
::E...J
u..c:l
NL:lO
L:lZN
'::::ZL:l
c..<'::::
...
o
I: _
o ..
:::
~.~
'" -
.. C
'" ..
~ t:
""0
::: Q,
!: E
"'"-
-;~
1:""
0-
_ 0
~"'5!
= ;
all..
.: ~
~]!
~
- ...
e..o
-~ ~
... 0
cS--e
"""0
~""
'" -
::I I:
""..
.- Cj
5r.:
U I:
'" ell
- AU; ui
"'Ui >. CJ
._ _ r,)
:0-;=
~.; ~
~ > ~
...J
c..
Vl
'"
::>
...;
e
""
o
...;
::>
...,
.....
N
x
><
c..~
<-
~9
u..c:l
.::::
Cl
Vl
~
o
-0
"E
o
<.l
.~
~
~
'"
'"
'Ri
c
all
.;;;
'"
-0
oS
... ..
a e
" '"
~ ~
.. -
e..c..
~~
all'<;;
.= ~
~Vl
,~ ]
>-::
~ .=
...-
~ .~
><
c..c..
<0
~...J
u..c:l
I'-.
<.::::
::Eo
f-oVl
><
>>
,!.!
C
e..
lS
:g
lS
Cj
.~
~
~
-0
'"
>
e
l>-
e..
..
..
~
:=-
U
L:l
Z
Z
<
NUlO UlONUlONL:lONUl
L:lZN~ZNL:lZNWZNWZ
.::::ZL:l.::::zw.::::ZUl/>1.ZL:l.::::z
c..<'::::""'<'::::c..<'::::o..<'::::I'-.<
..
..
U
:::
E
..
..
..
E
.e
-0
I:
~
E
::I
g
;:;
5
;;
<;
>
u
'"
;;;
;;
'0
..
co
e
co
'"
>
.~
;;
;:;:
.,
'":l
"0
>
<
2
E
~
o
<.l
2
c
.r!
'"
-0
all
,.
~
.:5
'"
all,
E..=!
::l.LJ
8 -in
~&.
...
'"
""" 0 U
-c ~ ... -;; E
o...~~i '~:_~_%l
1;IiI~..ctli ~ -=.c:~
-Cti;sC;IC'- ",ctlg.
~.s"~-5u-g IU~U
-;.iiti->~E ~;;:E
=::E:a-gc; ~5E.
.~ .~ <.= 8:E s:..~ ..,
;; ~w5 '0 ~ ~ "5 "ii ;
~_ .: '0 ~o o~,g -=:::1 tit
~ ... ~'~.g
l: ~ -;--= "'ii 0 >t ,...-
~15 ~~~ ~ .'~~ ~
~ -g :s:O IU ~_~ = ~ Co)
tn~::::2;~ ~ E'a~
~ ~.9 ~ g-g ~ 8 ~ ~
:o.D~~C::_~e,)eL..
--.5 .E E. ",- -;: -~ .:: .::.-~
....:iI-~olU=.;;;u>.E
~_'" E:...... 5 V'I fa ~ ~::..I:I
~ ~ i: ::: ~ ~ = .~ ~ a
:=..0 Q. &n t: > 0-0 r3~
G.I ~ U "- iLJI ;.-....." M
E=.E:.a ~ ~ ~-;;]!';
"-c "'0 -g 3 - c ~ en jS .!!
l;;..... en~g C) --- >
c~'~-;~~~:~~
~';;5 V"J.E~_rc.E
f CiD2 ";.r= ~ -=.~ ="e;
~~"E ::: ~= .~ 8 ~ ~ eJ .-;
1)~2:;Q,.~n'iii,-s
=::: s:: -= ""0 V'J Co. ;it- :.:.: c =
,
E:
...J
I'-.
"! "l ::> -
:=:: ..... ...: ...:
0:: e e e
00 00 00 ""
:::; <:> :::; 0
..... ...; .., ...;
=> <= 0 0
I~ r- ..... VI
..., .". .....
'" N N
~
..
~
CO
'"
Cj
..
Si-
I:
'"
"'-
o
-0
.!l
!!:
i>D
";;;
'"
-0
.....
o
..
~
'"
.;
'"
:::
~
J:
2
..
~
..
u
,~
~
.s
...
o
~ui
e:S
;::l .!:!!
.. >
-;;; Cj
,E -~
> ..,
...:
... 0
o ..
I: -0
.2 ~
a;U;
~-~
'" >
Coe..
~ E
::-0
~ ~
~~
> -
~.!1
c.. .~
...J
I'-.
~g
~
~
.... Cj
o .=
I: ;;
.~ ~
c...
o
'"
..
~ ~
.;~
:: g
.. '.,..,
- 0
'" ~
::; c..
'" ...
'E ~
o ..
Cj ~
<.l :::
+= -0
- u
'" Cj
Cj 0
.. ~
....c..
~ ~
- '"
o ,_
~.:= >
~ ~
.~-g .
"''''-0
-0 .. ..
IU _g~
-=.~ ~
0"0 .~
lo=- ~ >
U ~ ~
",00
.- ""=' "'='
:> .:: Ai:
0__
"- ::;: 0
=.. u ~
...J
c..
...J
I'-.
0-
\:>
o
00
o
;;c
c:
.....
<;;>
\:>
,:::,
\:l
'"
'"
~
i>D
';;;
'"
'"
..
..
-0
..
o
.::::
..E
-;;;
u..
:=
..
ci
00
":'
-0
..
~
E
,!:,
~
,"
...
c..~
E.g
<-~
Cj
,!.!
.,,; U
- ~
'.~ .:.....
..'. ~".
. "".'
.......-.
':"
,'. .-'.,
.::-;.;
...,....
'. ,..
." ."l
':,:.:;/
. ;......
((:~::~~;
- ~': :-.......;
, '
'.-;;....:-
."
..' -.
......
'-.. '-'
...:....
..-.....:.
. ",'.:
>:.... .
',,-
.' "
"
}\\
......
......
';:
.E
;::I
~ ui
;.E
.g.~
'E "E..
o 0-
'" ..
.~ u
8 .~
... Is..
"
o
~ ~
g is.
0..0
,,-
-= ~
- .,
.~ -0
ij....
- ,..
o ...
0.....
';;;
>.
-~ ~
... '"
u-
., ..
'~.5
c.,..
"-0
.= ~
to- ';;
~~
:'.'.:
...J
r:..
~
""
eO
s;:
""
"'!
....
o
t-
V
'"
Q
-;;r:..
~ E:-
E.a
~ E
> 0 .,
., "'..0
-;:I ll:
-0 ,-
5,;: ~
u .... ~
; ~ .S!
~~r;
==''''C
~ in s:::
--;au :::
'i'~ ~ "E
-o=:;8 ~~
~8~ ~~
.E -c: ~ ~ .0 -g
..c~.u.!! C fIiI
~~t)c.~o
~.; ~ B :f ~
] ~].s 6- ~
~u:]eB
rJ~=E6.;;
.- .- GJ 0 .- 0
;~Ee-~-o
8~g8g~
< "E.. -0 ,= U ..0
><
.. .. ~ .. ..
c c c c
'0 .~ '0 'i "&
.. ..
0 :5 c c :5
0 0
..,;
., .~
-;:I =
;::I '~
] ...
l:: ,!:!
., .. "E..
.0 en 0-
co
.~ .g g
~ '" is..
., E 0
> u
0 ]
1:\ >
.,
:;; ..,; -0
~ ... ....
~ :s 0
'5 ,...
E 0- t: a
.. e .~ c.
<>ll ., 'E ..
e .0 0 c
C '" ,2
.g .~ Q!.
::0 "" "" a ~ !1
" .,. .,. .g -0 i:
0 '" N c: ] '"
'" "" "" ::0 '" .~
"E ::: c c 0
'" :~ -~ 0 c ~ ~
-0 '" ;;:
<: E E "E '" E"
~ .. t.: .,
... '- '- -0 'u '- .,
~ .!: ~ <: ., 0:; ti
" ., .. C. 0- .c
i= :>:: ~ ii5 Vl ~ ~
x x x x
..
c
'0
!!!'
:5
>.
,~
&.
::;
-0
'S
o
'"
,~
<:
..
u
..
..
-0
.,
>
~
c:
..
..
J!
~
D
x
x
r:..
=:<
o~
VlLl.,
r:..r:..
<0
~...J
LI.,/%l
r:..=-
<0
::E...J
Ll.,Cl
=-r:..
<0
~...J
LI.,/%l
=-r:..
<0
;:E...J
u.Cl
r:..r:..
<0
::E...J
U.Cl
Q
~
NuJO=-
L:.lZN<Q!.
~:ZL:.l::Eo
=-<r:::!.!-Vl
=-
=-
<Q!.
~~
=-
<--
::EiS
!-Vl
=-
<Q!.
~o
;-Vl
0..
o
...J
ell
<Q!.
::Eo
;-Vl
'"
~ 2) ..., ]
Oc "'B ~ .=
a~ -e a...[ 0 ~
.9 :E! 8 8 e........'" ...
=5 a...E EI:- ~
U'- Oe) .".E: ..
..20 .,,~ 00= '_~_ _
l) 0 .:5
~5 ~~ ~~ ]~..
~~ ~ ~ .g ~ -:~ E
.~o 8.s ~~ ~~~-:;
:/., Ell" <:!i
-;; ~ u 0 P-_ ~ ] .i =
""=;;;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .; -=:0 ~ go
..... Er; 0' .-....--.=
Q......~ C)O ~.="E..o
-=~ ~-V'i~:-= ~.s~=
;;; :;::".!!",E...'i:I"':;:J u"'C':::~
~.r: = _C.liic:;l;
~.;: Glli).E-5,8 .~t5t1
..ct: ~>"O4) "(j>c.u
....1) ._=41,)-U1 28..2;
~:g -E-i~~; ~-~~~
-:20 O....~-~ g~..g~
~- u.2~~~ UW&)_
-;:1 ~=u;co~ "'C~.::f!
.~ ~ E U -= -g = ;; _~ ~ -=
c= c;~.E5~ bDlC....~
-5 ~ :s w ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ ~ ~
!:!u :~c;c-E~_,,-uv:l_
=-- l.'!:c:;u~~_co.t:C=CJ...
e.E.~ ~~'- ~~ Q.~E e
-; .~ d .; ~ ~ .:; .E ~ -= .~ ~
=-~ c.. :::- = 'i6 C'" en > S--= :i" ij
~ c.~ ~ 8 Vi ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _
,- "
~.o
~-s U1
= '- ~ .~
.= 0 --
= >- .~~
~lU .Q.>
a~ ..!:!
CI') in !! ~
~ ~ a.s
~ 5 ~ ~
~ ~ < ~ .~
_~_k~~ 0',- "':I~
.. c;:: 0 0 .- t;J 0 ";: .=
ur,~3=utf ~u~ ''::~
.;;:.==-~tii ~l1~ ~j
.~ ::; ~ .E! :; .!3 ..-.!::::Io en -Vi ~
u.!::!~g5~ .~u~~~E
~E:~~6 8-g~~~~
~.~~~:H~~:~e~w
:~=~=; ~ ~.:s:== *,,:1
-= E..~ c ~ ij S E ~ B ii .!! E
t 2,D -; ~ ~ ~ ~ -= ~ ~5 -; 8
Ii -;: 0 ~ g .. ..:: :Ou'= ~ u; 0
..:!~ ~ ~ ::_~:-= !tt.u;iii\D .
;:";; :-=suc E~!::! co'1::Efg
~ c:; ..c ~ ~ :; ~ CI:I ~ o.E ~ Z '"
-=~._.=,Elf( 0 c.-= u C ouv
i::55....= ~ c..~.= tl.,S g t) S
~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~.;: > ~:E 5 ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~.- u u.= = ~
-:.~ 5-: ~'s ::-:~:g 41 5-~-5
m -=..o:E..gU1u&.5'u;~_~
,;
~
...J
r:..
~ ;;:
=-
""
<:> 0
vi ,,0
0 <:>
0; 0;
"'! "'!
.... ...,
0 0
'" ...,
'" '"
'" '"
E::
...J
"'-
<=! 0 "'!
- N ~
~ ~ '"
<=! C>
.... ;; ..;
0 <:>
... '" -
...,. .". '"
'" N <',
.,
..
., ..
'S :s
<: 0
.,3
-0 ..
';; 0
E.::
Cl. ,.,
~ .~
= g
~]
.... <:
E 0
"'" u
., 0
-5:
.,
,- '"
.!1 ii
u-o
~~ .~
~!D
u ..
E ><
Cl..,
o '-
"'i> ~
t r:::
~ i:
." 5
....D
-= 0
~ ~
-: .~
0-'-
~~
...J
r:..
..
c
.~
c
o
..
c
'0
..
c
o
-0
e
'5
t:t'
e
..
.D
.s
"i
-0
.~
E
.D
..
..
'i
g
.,
.D
II
.i
..
e
'"
u
,g,
E
c.
'-
~
>.
-0
~ en
~=
.!:! u
; g
8 l::
",-0
-0
<"'"
...
o
>::
>::
""'=-
<0
;:E...J
I.I../%l
0..",-
<0
~...J
I.I../%l
=-
<Q!.
~Cl
i-Vl
"'"
<r:::!.
::ED
i-Vl
r--
.s
,..
..
~ ~
';; -g E:~
!! &0..";;-;;
a~.~:O
3"5gi
~ u ~ ~
&) >-.:= u
~'Eal!C
.:! 5 t -5
~u-=~
'i:t..IJ...
'~~'ill
~ U ~.-
s :o.E ~
a.!! ii .ft:
o - --~
::>~ ~
0..0=
.- .... - -
E..~ :g B
.~ = ~ ~
-g;:.g.;
iii",:lnS::
_ CJ:I >,. Ie
CIiJ.= ~ In
.~ 5 ~ ~
~:E~l:
o ~ D I:-
~ c::: cc E
.. -0"
~.: i:i U
~ 6-0.U...
~~~..!~
~
"'! <:> C>
- N ..;
~ e <:>
<:> 0 ..
- - -
..; ...; ..;
C> <::> 0
c - .....
"" "" '"
'" ..... '"
.'
, ,
.. .. .. .. ..
" " " " "
.' Ai ], -~ ], 0
..
" 0 0 " :5
0 0
--
....;:...
:".' .
.....
'" .
.....-.
e::
....
'. ;.
<., ~....-
+.-"
-......
".-',
", ,,;.
. ~ .- - ,c.."
".',.+.
-..,-',.
~ . \
'-. .-
'". .
.......:...
e,
llr
c '"
U .J:l
'"
E E -:;l .; 'i
'" ~
<>Il ~ ~ .,
!'3 .. +g. ~ ~
t: .
OJ .. ::>
;:E ;:E e :; I:
'" ~ '" 0 <.>
... -"" E
'0 '0 - ~
z :z '; :;:; ~
.9 ,2 ;:; .. c
0 ,2
U "0 '" U
E ..
.5 ~ '" ~ ~
co
.. -Q -::i Q. U
c c;
0 e 0 e .; ~ ;;;
U 'S U ':; <.>
t>Il C" t>Il C" ~ ~
.g e .~ e 11 '"
-"" ~
.- '" ':;i '" > -0
s.= .J:l I: e ..
C"_ t>Il
e "'- ~ ':;i e
.~ .. .- ~
c - ~ .. ". c;
.g E :~ ... e .g -::i
~ f " E ~ ,l!l ~ e
t>Il t>Il ~ .. ';
0 I: t: I: a 0-
0 U
U Q. U Q. i- U e
>< x x x
Q..::...
<0
;:E....l
L:..t:l
ll.
<<:::: is
;:Eo ....l
i-<I> l::!
,'.
,2
u
2
;;;
gE
ull
co ..
._ &. iii vi
je=g
~ ~:E E
.9 ~ ~ -;;
~ ~ .~.~
C='-_-
c ...
tJ tn-;( 0:
.~~ u .;:
J:'::52
Go) ~ ur, ';;.
.o5:2gg
._~Q..u
cn-=.g~
~ 5 ~ re
.0' E "Q +a
i5.. ~ c: --
~ 6 ;;
~ - +=-
:: ~ g ~
E 5 ~ =
~ cD = .~
>cvo"E.
~ _ tJ c.,
"'C C':I li.1 to
U ~.!::! ~
+: C) .-
- ~ s.
g- "0 _~
<::::zE~
..
.' .;
,'.
....l
Q.
. ",:,
<:'!
"<I"
e
<:>
8
~JI1t(~~1
....
""
'"
Q
ii:
Q.
<<::::
::Eo
1-<1>
Q
ii:
~
'S
..
o
.,
.J:l
'i
~
';;;
.a
ii
u
c;
.g.
5-
.,
.~
U
2
;;;
t:
C
...
<>Il
c
~
co
<>Il
e
Q
ii:
~
.e ~ = "i ~ ~
@:e ~-5.E~
.,::0 _'_~ ~ :.= .g g
_c.. 5-~=-::::
~.g; c;~u"'i~
.~ :.s :i: ~ \w.. ~ ~.. 0 -a
ffC., ::E E
.D 8:: ~ .~ ~ :5 0 5 r:
~.~~ I "'ObO'-<~bO
_ '" ErE.;: 0 < ~ ~
-g r- tn i" "'C r= g::J.- -
'=:>'-6 -s =~.= .05
CI ._ .~ C!J C g ~ ~ :::
g-;-;; o~-c~:i)
"QQ g. ~ . B .~ :.; ~ 3 IU ~_Ol)
~.!:: ~..: ~ aD U r::..... ....
-'- 0;;; = "= .i: = ~ =
"ii~E@t: .J:l~I-_..::E
o 0 0; .S2IJ~
.st>r-:u ",oC'l:l-S::s::
~ ~ Do ~ ; C ""0 ::E ~ .~ ;;; ~
-.,::J C)~ll.IO''E...:: ~
.5-~ ~ ~ 0 E: t: < .g = cr.;
.~ ::: -.0 g- g ~ < ~~!: ..; c
~+;;-g"=' a'=:: =o;~ ~.g
c.1O'E~UI~~B"::~~~
~ ~ I) E cc 0 en s:: ~ !::!.- 0
D!~e:~g.~Ei:J5~~
"'--;;.QQ......_ ",t>Il.,"E-O c
t= ~.~ ~ ~ ~ B ~ ~ .~ .5 ~
..
"
.i
o
x
..
"
'0
..
o
-::i
e
.~
~
.,
.J:l
'i
.2 -::i
- .,
,- ..
" ,-
s g.
U e
<=
Q.
....
c
=
.g
E
..
c.
e
c.
t>Il
c
~
CO
<>Il
e
.g
:;:;
c
c
U
x ><
Q
1::
Q
ii:
I-
Z
o
U
NUlO
wZN
<:::::Zw
l'-<<::::
l'-oQ.l'-Ol'-l'-Oll.
<<0<<0<<0~
;:E<::::....l::E<::::....l::E<::::....l0
L:..OCO L:.. 00 L:..OCO <I>
....
""
""
'"
..
~'" ..
~ ~ ~'E ~ ;
"g t-.~ J! =. -g e- u
_!1I'l Qb.E-;o= ~
cu- -=:;J....1U a;'I
g+g~ l...1U'"C> U
_~.._ .~'ES~ E
t:.= 0::: --:::1:
"~-g~ ~:: M a
>tCD>" =0 :;I 0
_ c= c='i~ ~ui
[:~ ,g.E~-s "'~
00 ~ l... -5...!!
u"':=~ =O~E-= t)
+~ ~ e .5:g 2 ~ ~ ~
TO ..>--:; ~u u; K. ~ =-
ii ~ _ 'S; -=.. ~ ~ c.. 8
c._ GJ - VI.= I) ~ g
::~-g ~Et=~ ,g.E
.2~6 Ocae~ Me
g~E 5~eE 1j,g
~ .:; .; E -= 0 6 -e-;
C;U~ ';;;cno..= ~c::..
o ~ =~::~ _~
... ::> ~OI:.-c:.,_
~-g- ~~~~CiE~
_~"'O 1.I.-=_...-,....,c..""::J
t;:~= !:!~!!-=i...,jE-
:"":;It) -=\-;:':""""~u~
";;:;t;-C L..Ocv:--=~.'="
~."u:~-g~vi~~~
~ ~ = 0 u ~ : ~ _ ~ -
~.g.E-fr~ 6 ~.g"='= ~
~ ~ g.~ E E cc.~ 'E g--5
1I'J.u....,Q.,\o-o"O~In~~
~
<:>
'"
~
<:>
,..:
e
<:>
c:::
E::
...,
<;:>
...,
<:>
'"'
'"
""
""
'"
r-
""
'"
E
~
u
,S!,
c
E..
C
g
~
a
'0iI
!l'
.~
.,
...
c
.,
~
.,
.5
,2
i
;;;
...
.,
:~ ~
>
~ ~
3:
l'-
o
,.,;
e
-
-
...,
<;>
...
-.c
'"
.~
E
..
c
~ ~
== a
-E.~~
c ,- t>Il
.g r.E
~.s;;
-gene.
.... 0 ~
t> .= .-=
it:O~
E:i: 5-
.;; E .!::
0"'"'
.'5 == ~
2 ~ ~
~.~ -E
o m--
~ ~ B
.... .. -
g ~.~
.~ lO. ~
a-;gui
E- ~ ~.~
~ c;; eD-=
"~ ~ ~ ~
E-08.E
'" U ell
c:::.s: f.' ~
..
~
~
ij ..;
E lO.
~,
- '"
...=
'" ::>
~;
"E! 5
c -:
oS
~ .,
"0 ~
.. -
-:::....
;;; 0
<.>
l!l
.~
.~
f
ell
C
E.
ti ~
... ;;
:=
., <=
::::: ::
i
....l
Q.
3:
Q.
c:::
....
s=:
<:>
..i
~
o
'"
e
,..;
o
,..;
<:>
,.;
o
0-
>:>
'"
<;>
r-
'"
~
'5
..
o
..
"
'5
..
C
..
"
'5
8
Q.Q.Q.Q.I-
<o<oz
;:E....l;:E....lO
L:..COL:..l::!U
ll. l'- i-
<c::<<::::Z
::Eo::E:::iO
i-<I>I-<I>U
0<;:
~
o
'iii>
e
:=
a
..
c
co
C.
"
t:
to
.,
...
::>
-:;l
e
E
.~
~
<3
...
.,
...
"
"
e
.,
.,
"
"~
ii
~
U
i:
g.~~ B
"'ii oS ~ _..~
~ ~ ~
- ;:;-
viiS ~
r.::: :: .2]
.~ ~..L1 ~ _-,-
~ .. s~
t;"' ii = .-
~E.g ~i
E~5uiE';
:. e .~ .e ~ 1j
~:E.;+B ~
~:::~5~~5
.;; co; ~ : ~ =
g"9'::~~.9
UtC_6-;;~
.- 0 ~ ~ .~ ;;
~!::..ii==':::
"; ~ ~ ~ ''E. ~
::E,g;..=EC~
....l
Q.
3:
Q.
~
<;>
..0
E::
<:'!
r-
E::
,.;
e
-
-
-
-
-
-
....
<;>
....
e
....
e
r-
'"
'"
r-
'"
,:..
'"
...,
r-
'"
, ..'
-. ....
, "
',:...:.'
,'~'. ....
.~.-':~:~...::
.' ......
.. ':.
.',..:..
.:......::..
.. ....
'. '.
:;.' ;. '....
. .....
.~/t;:;::
....,...
...........
'. ....-
.;... ";.'
:t.:~:~.:.:
.:: ~ ;:.
.. '-.'.~ .'.-
.0' ....;
. .',
.... "
.- .....
.. ,.,
.' -.
........
;W/~i
. '., ::
... .: ~:...
..'....
........
.'....
. '-.'
,;.. '.
;......
., .;.
:' :.-.'::
. '. ~.:::.
. '. :~".
',' ..
. '....
, ,"
'. '.,.,
i.-.; .'
, I ~
~ ~ ...
c -; c
.. .. ~
<: >< <:
0 >< c
..
!!=
~ a u
.;;B~.Q
].~~-~
:;u-=~
""UUl.....
~-=:~
-::l >. -= ....
....::> ;:; E
SllE;"
13~~~
... ... 0
.- ... '- -=
c-~g-~
u .=._
~~5~
..::>..::> ';;: ..
M ~ -
.i!!;~
VI ~ i:t~
.~ ~ :: 0
]u~~
Inm4-._
uc.=i5
E - '"'
f!~.g< .~
1iE2-d~ci
.~~ in ~"S Co'
Q. =u=-_
ll:<8~eF
x
"'-",-
<0
:;:...J
l.1..t:l
l>-
<r::::
::!:o
;-rn
"'"
'"
~
ii
:;00
;E~
u 'u
.. '"
.........
'" '"
..e .-
eo 5
1:..=
5-.i
E-g
- ..
~E
>~
.;..:
~ ~ >.
.... c;::.-
... '"
- ..
-0"'-
3:]i3
_ i5
;t ;;
e _ t;i
Ql)O~
'- '" ..
;: ~ )3
~.E~
.B~~
~~&
c ~.~
~ 0 ~
=c.c..
o = ~
U._ _
~
c..
e
0:
€
-
-
,...,
c
....
....
...'
~
e
"
>
~
.i-
]
.~
e-
e
>.
..
:E
on
';;;
..
..::>
U
'"
'9'
..
c
..
...
.E
..
~ ;a
>0
e:=
>.=
B e
x
co
'0
~
c
;i
.,
-;;
e
u
.Y.,
~
:::
..
?
"'"
..
...
.E
..
...
-::l
-:;
~
,;
.;;: :ll
~
.~ .=
:.,g
2;
'" :.J
~2
.:: .-
e e
Q..!;o-
~:J
c.. ...
"'..=
50::
'" 0
<> ...
"'-...
en 'u
...-
'<:0
~"'-
'i
~
-:r :...t
-5 'E
.=.5
'" -
= ::.:.
.- ':J
ut ':="
c;
~ ..
\ii"5
C '"
- ...
-=2
=5 ~
e s
g -~
e ...
~~
::it}
X
<>
..,
.;: u
... "
70'
~ ~
g::i
... ..
::o~
..
- <J
~ ,'"
['2
~~
> '"
... ...
-::l "
<.~
<
c..
c::
=
;:
;:
c:
'"
l;;:
'u
~
iif
I X
c.. ;- "'- ,;- c..
<... Z <c:::: Z <...
::!:5 0 ::Eo 0 ::!:2S
!-'" U ~rn U !-rn
NUlONUlONUlON:!lONO
UlZNUlZNUlZNUlZNWN
=::Zl:.:=::Zwc::::ZW<::ZW<::Ul
c..<<::c..<:=:c..<::::c..<::::c..::::
.;
o
o
:ll
.g
E
..
"5
......
~
.~
]
'"
~
-;;
::
"'-
~
'" ~
.3~
.- ~ U
.: -- .*,
52 ~ ~
t::.~ Q...
o 0
~: ~E
='~ ]
:; ..5 r.;
~.~ 'u
.~ 5 ~
= u ~
0_ '"
.:. '"
"'- = c
o.~ 'zj
- u .=.;
o...~ -=_M ~ :;
u.;;
::,OWl ut:
U = ~
;..=:: 6....
~:~ ~ ~
~ = - ~
..Q- Su
~ t:: .2-E
::P-= -=_
-:_~ .~ U;;j
" -
.~gENg.
.....E!~._~
ii.8]::E~
!,~
&i..;;
> ..
~ e
~ ~
... -
~ ~
L\'1:i
'"
'"
~~
t: ,..
... ...
= ~
o ...
~
~ -
It It c:
I I
<:> '" c
c:i - N
- :::: -
-- ::::
- -
- - -
:; ,..; ...;
e <:>
I~ l~ ...
....
.... ...,
g
a
o
-;:;
,..
.g
;
'"
>.
'"
~
~
;
"0
'"
.,
<:
~
is
.E
It
'"
,...,
,...,
c
I~
,~
-[
E::
r-i
c:
€
...'
,...,
c
I~
e
~
;:;-
~
c
E
I
:5
aa ~
= 1:
B~~ <~_~
.= a
~~'o ~:~
u ... ~ ~;:;
oU~'rift::.
t~B.~c..2 ~
=- ~ ~~ u 5 -
u>- :n ,~ "0 t: g- C!_
~_..:!2:-::; C'\~
:~e~..:!~ 2~
~36 ..g: ~~
Co- =:l. 'i ~ ~ t ~
CJ =a =-~ ii ~
;.aM~ro.E -:]
=c-=~._=-
o.~!;~;t~ ~~
N .- -:::J :.D -= ~ . ;. ~
f::!=_CI:I~..Q"Eoi::
.t:..-U=--i:..U
'- g.t: o""U= Oc u
c :::...~ as 't: 3: "'ii (I) VI
.g.5c~~s;j=: e
~oO ..!!:=:t3.=
g.,g.,g-o ~~ u ~ 2
u~~iiiu3~~;;
~
'0
~
c
"
..:!
'"'
en
<::
tn
o
Ix X x x
I
I~'" t:.. c..
<=:: <....
::E5 ::E.::l ::!:c c..
~rn ;-tn ~rn t:l
NUlO N t:l 0 IN t:l 0
UlZN t:lZNt:lZN
=::Zt:l ::::Zt:.I<::Zw
c..<:::: c..<=:c..<:=:
&2-
.:
'"
...
@
.,
16
I
<:>
..;
g
",
:;
Iv-.
I""
,....
E
]
i:"
~
"
<J
g
I~
I
c
!i
"==
'"
...;
c
I~
...,
<J
..5!
e
<J
>.
c::
3:
.,
...
.::
i:"
: ~
" =
'" '"
~'E
- ~
~ =
0-:';
- .",
'" -
- "
~2
<> .,
'" ~
E~
.:; g
U'E
= '"
..
~=
u:
~ ~
f!
0._
;:
'"
.,
'"
.E
5:
'"
:~
-g
..:
'"
~
.,
C
~~
'" 0
C '"
10-
_ 0
.. "
~r=
t}~
~~
.~ g.
""'-
o ~
8~
~
-: - :
~.[ ==
-..
'" '" -
li ~ ~-
"'-:l;
!D~
.= u _
'" ...
- '"
~~-
t.= -- ~
"?u~
-=:""::'11..
~.; ;;
., - '"
~~:~
._ 0:::
: ~a ~ ~
C:u ';iu
g_~ r:~
5~= .:;~
~:..:- =:;
=.ooaa y>'
c;~~~tI)~
~.g~&5;~
=-.=:::.t::.
~;:-E~8
Olo:;:;=U....
~~~~Em
_.~ ~ !:: i ~
P" ~.= "=jW:.!!
:E
U
'"
""
€
'"
,...,
::::>
I~
. '^ :J
.!! .- >-
'Vi ~ ~ ~
t;,j Vi ....- !:!
== ~ B ==
U tA ~.-
~ :a.g g
oE--
"'i:i 'U;
]r;~
oJ = :: :J
uu=-_
l;;: 0 =
.- - r.,I
u _ V i-
... 0 >
~.;~]
,,- -
..... a >. ~
~-=~
2 ~ :: ?
In := == ~
=- 0 ..
OJ;:';...
1:..t3!!:_
'" - =
.:0",--
- ':J -=
3~=-
.- - ~.E
.5-
'- -
C ii :: ~
u _ _ =
v - - .
-- - U-:::;I:
~~~.g-5
J8~=~].
- -; = .~ g
wS-=-u
o :0,) _ - -
e) - .... :JI
- ~~ g: ~
.::,~
.
<=
en :J
xg~~
""
oc
...,
.'~
APPENDIX F
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FROM
EASTERN DUBLIN GPAlSPA DRAFT EIR
.:.-
e--:.
\ IlIi
s
I
~ l)gb&l SPfGPA Em
~l:nITRODUcnON
. '
e'
." ..
1.1 LEGAL BASIS FOR THE DR
This EIR was prepared in conformance with the objectives of CEQA to inform the public and public
agency decision-makers of the potential enviromnental effecu of the Eastern Dublin General Plan.
Am.endmml and Specific Plan (the "Projd) and to identify meaDS of reducing or eliminating these
potential impactS..
1.2 Em REQUIREMENT
The City of Dublin. acting as the Lead Agency. conducted an Initial Study in September 1988 on the
potential environmenml effectS of the Project and determined that the Project would have a
significant effect on the environment. A subsequent lDitia1 Study and Notice of Preparation were
prepared in October 1991 in response to minor revisions to the Project description. This EIR was
authorized 10 assess the environmental impacts identified in the twO Initial Studies and to identify
appropriate mitigation measures.
State CleariDlhoasc Number
The Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan ErR has been recorded with the State
of California Govemor's Office of PWming and Research (OPR) and has been given State
Oearinghouse Number (SCH#) 91103064. All correpondence and comments regarding this Project
should include this number for reference and identification purposes.
1.3 PROGRAM EIR
.'"
.. ,
,~, :: : .
"':::. _w, .
Beeause this EIR assesses the im.pacts of a series of actions that can be charaCterized as one
,comprehensive .project." it was determined to be most appropriately a wprogram EIRw.
1.4 Em SCOPE
The environmental and related issues rscopeW) of the EIR were identified by the City of Dublin
Wough its Initial Studies. responses to the Notices of Preparation ("NOr). and public comments. The
EIR addresses environmental impacts and relaled plaDning concerns in the following areas: .!aDd use;
populalio~ homing and employment; traffic and circulation; commmlity services and facilities; public
utilities; so~ geology. hydrology and seismicity; biological nsources; visual resources; cultural
resources; DOise; air quality; and I1.scal considerations. '
1.5 ORGANIZATION OFTHEEIR
This EIR. is orga:nized into a Summary, six. chapters. and a teclmical Appendix. Chapter 3: Setting,
Impacts and Mitigation Measures. is divided into twelve seetiODS. each of which analyzes specific
topical environmenml eonccms. Chapter 4: AlternatiYes Analysis dis,...""USSCS a nmge of alternatives to
the Project. including the required wNo Projd Alternative. ChapLeT 5: CEQA.-mmuiated
Considerations contains the mandatory discusSion of different types of impacts. including cumulative
impactS. aDd Chapter 6: References provides lists of"EIR preparers :md sources consulted for this
report.
1.6 REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS
.~
\ \ s
For the Projec:t to be implemented. this EIR. must be certified following a pUblic comment and
response period. The City of Dublin will make Findings on any significant im~ i4entifed in the
SM-2
010
..:,,:
&....
.
~- .' -' .. .
e:
"
, ,
\\'G
~ J)-oba SP jGPA KI&
Sa=aoary
EIR after which it can certify the F1D3l EIR.. The CitY may also need to make a Statement of
Overriding Considerations and will have to approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program in accordance
with CEQA. requirements.
1.7 FlJ'IlJRE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Future activities under the Project not ~ for environmental impacts may require additional
environmental assessment. Prepartion of this EIR does not preclude the need for further analysis of
environmental impacts.
CHAPTER 2: PROJEcr DESCRIPTION
2.1 PROJECT LOCATION
Terms Used to Designate the Project Site
The EIR clarifies the terms used to designate discrete areas of the Project site.
Re&ioDal LoanoD.
The Project site is located approximatelY 35 miles east of the CitY of San Francisco in the Tri- Valley.
a subregion of the San Francisco Bay Region.
BoUDdaries oC the Project Site
The Project coDSists ofa Genet3l Plan Amendment (GPA) for a 6.920-acre study area and a speci1JO
Pla:n (SP) for 3,328 acres within the larger stUdy area.. The "Project site" refers to the entire GP A area
, wbich is bounded by 1-580 to the south. the Alameda County/Contra Costa County line to the north.
Parks ReserVe Forces TI3inin& Cenrerto the west. and the ridgeline berween Doolan Road andCOUiet
Canyon Road 10 the east. The'sOuthern, wester1l and northern boundaries of the specific Plan area
coincidO with those of the GPA- The easrem boundarY of the speci1JO PJan area fDI1D~ a srepped
alignment east of Croak Road (refer to Figure 2-B.)
2.2 PROJECT SITE FEATURES
The Project site consists of a ..ney plain and rnUing foothills. FJattet portions me ooltiwted; the
~ul<jdes are genet2IIy passJands. Riparian corridors snpport stands of associaled vegetation and
isolated treeS an: scattered tbronzhout the site. Rmal residences me found on Tassajam Road and
Doolan Road. The County PropertY in the southwestern cornet is urbafti7P.d.
Owuership
'The Project site consists of ~9 paroels. Fioe JandownetS own more than 11fty percent of the site.
AJ'lI<m..m. COUIlty owns approx;...ntltf'!ly 600 acres in the southwestem portion. Ownership is shown on
Fxgure 2-D. c
2.3 PROJECT coMPONENTS
The Project consists of an amendment to the City of Dublin Genet3l PJan (EasuI7l Dublin G.,..,-a1
pltJn Ammdment) and a speci1JO plan (Eastern Dublill spedfi& pltJn) for a 3,328-acre sire within the
General PJan Amendment area. A lltItIlber of procedom sreps (Pro j.a Imp[emmU1lion) reQUited to
imPlement the Project are slso part of the Project. '-
SM-3
011
&..&.:. Dabb SP IGP A Em.
ct.
~
2." PROJEcr CONCEPT
e"
.',
.~., ...
The Project calls for the development of a mixed-use community in eastem Dublin that will be a
vital. self-sustaining urban environment with a strong sense of identity and community. Housing and
employment-generating uses will be balanced to provide residents with the oppommity to live near
work. Higher density housing has been located adjacent to commercial centers and traIlSportation
corridors to encourage walking, transit-use, street activity and -neighboring: Significant portions
of the Project site have been designated for new parks and open. space uses to provide enhanced
outdoor recreational opportunities.
,
Additionally, the Project sets aside principal ridgelands and riparian corridors to preserve the natural
features that give the area its unique visual quality and CODStitllte important habitat for :lnim~l and
plant species.
2.5 STATEMENT OF PROJEcr OBJECTIVES
In making its decision to approve or deny approval to the Project, the City of Dublin will consider
how the Project fulf'ills the fOllowing stated objectives:
· To ensure responsible and environmentally-sensitve development i1i Eastem Dublin.
· To respond to community needs for housing, employment and leisure opportunities.
· To protect visually-sensitive ridgelan:ds and biologically-sensitive habitat.
.
.'-'
:.\.~
.' ..-
To encourage higher density housing in more level portions of the site and discourage
major alterations to ~tinctive hill forms.
· To encourage development patterns that support transit use and facilitate safe and
efficient traffic flow.
· To maintain a jobs/housmg balance in the area as a means of reducing traffic
congestion and air pollution..
2.6 .PROJECT CHARACTERISllCS
La.ad Use De,.elOPllleJlt Plus
Eastern Dublin General Pltm .4mmdmmz
.....--- . . 1" .T -.."'3".. z::. :....~-:. ..
The General Plan Amendment area encoDq)2.SSeS 6.920 acres and constitutes the entire area referred.
to as the "Project site- in the.EIR.. Approximately one-half of the Project site (3,327.8 acres) is
designated as the Specific Plan area.. That portion of the Project site th3.t lies outside the Specific Plan
area. is referred to in the EIR. as the General Plan Amendment Increment area (3.592 acres.) Most
(3290.& acres: 91 percent) of the GPA Increment area is devoted to Residentialla.nd use with a full
62 percent (2262.9 acres) in Rural Residential use. A small portion (6.8 acres) is d-;PSM as
Neighborhood Commercial and 58 acres are reserved. for Industrial Park use along the 1-580 corridor.
The GPA Increment area adds 2.75 schools and 7.8 parks to these land uses under the Specific Plan..
Easurn Dublin. Specific Plan
.~
The Specific Plan provides a more-detailed land use concept for the 3~27.8 westem portion of the
General Plan Amendment area. Residential uses (1,702.6 acres) will occupy more than half the
Specific Plan area with Medium-Density and Single Family hoU$ing predomin,.tin~., R~identia1 areas
..... ".
-,". .~\ . .
H1
SM-4
012
.':
."
"w' :".r.
.........
. -.".
e';,
'\\,:,4
. . ~ .
~ D'abb 51' /GPA. EI1
s--zT
are envisioned as C<lmpact "villaS..' with neighborhood-serving c:onunercial and ",tail uses (69.7 """",)
located along pedestrian-oriented streets.
/;:J.., '1V8 :?. ~~
At buildout. the Specific Plan is pro jectcd to providll 12,451 new housing units (70% of the Project) i <!. :0. ~ - 3
and Dublin's population will increase by 27,794 new residents. 1lRIJI.: 7:>'7
The Specif"1C Plan ioclodes 10.9211 million _ feet of uw ~ space and will ptovidlllD
estimated 2Jl.2U new jobs. All employment-generating land uses are loatcd along JIllLjOt aneriaIs
with convenient tranSit access.
SeveoteeD new patks and 412.4 """'" of OpeD SpaCe will be provided by the Specific PJan. The
Specif"1C Plan includes a p~ for a 56.3-""'" City ParI< near the Project site's center ("Town
Center").
Policies
Eastern Dublin ~ra1 plan Amendment
The General Plan AmeDdment includes teXt ameodmeDts as well as a uw land use map for the
EasterD Dublin 1'IanDioB Area (See Figme 2-E). The teXt amends the following eiemeDts of the City
of Dublin General Plan.
j,aDd Use Element: Proposed policy llD1eodments suppon the dllvelopmeot of a mixed-use community
m the Eastetn ExteDdcd pJanDing Area including commercial and employmeni-generatiog land uses.
J'3rl:S aDd Ooeo S1>8OO' Specif".es the need for me'" parks in Dublin's PriJIllLrY and Extended !'lanDiDB
^""" aDd recommends coofonoance with the City of Dublin Park and Rea""i"" Moster Plan of
1992. Adds policies for acquistion and maintenance of parks and trails.
Schools. Public Londs and Utilities: Pulicies UIllIetsCO'" the need to ptovide adequate schOOls in
EasterD Dublin aDd recommend a revision in the jurisdictional boundaries of the Dublin UoiIlCd
School DisUict.
~i=h1tion and Scenic lU2bwavs: Recommends extensive improvements to the City's roadways and
c:ircUlatioD system with an emphasis on CODDectioDS betweeD Dublin and the Eastem Extended
Planning Area and tr3DSit use.
p,osem>tiou: Policies describing the suitablity of the EasteIDExtended Plamtiog Area for agricu1mra1
use "WOuld be llD1ended to indicate its value as aD ""'" of loca1ly-imPOrtant farmlands. Historic
resource policies would be amended to yeeognizc the potential for historic sites.
Eastern Dublin Specific plan
The Eastern Dublin S pea fie plan is organized into twelve chaP""" which denne the pJanDiDg concept
for the SpeclIlC Plan ""'" and the goals. policies and action progIOJDS designed to implell1eDt this
C<lncept. The seven Policy chaP""" are: Land Use; TraffIC and (;irculatioo; }tesour<e MaoaB-eot;
community Design; CommunitY Services and Facilities; Sewer. Water and Storm !)taioage; and
F1%l3D.cing.
SM-S
013
~ Dabfia s:P !GPA EDt
s-,..
CH.AP1':ER 3:
ENVIRONMENTAL S~l UNG, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASmu:s
This Chapter forms the .core- of the environmental analysis of the EIR. Pursuant to CEQA., existing
environmental conditions rtlle Staing-) are described from a regional and local perspective. The
potential effectS C'ImPactsj of the Project on the Sming are analyzed and actions designed to reduce
or eliminate rMiligation MellSllJ'eS-) are identified. Of~ the Mitigation Me/ZSUTes are policies
included in the Eastern Dublin General Plan Ammdment or Eastern Dublin Spedfic Plan. In this case.
the Project is considered .self-mitigating-. In cases where DO applicable Miligation M ellSllJ'e has been
included in either document, the ElR proposes an appropriate action.
Chapter 3 is divided into twelve sections. each of which conforms to the Selling. Impacts and
Miliganon Measures format.
For organizational and reference purposes. lmpaas are stated in bold type as 1M 3.3/X with the
PleIlX 1M preceding a number (ie. 3.3) and a letter indicating the section and alphatetical order in
which the impact is given in the ten. Mitigation Me/ZSUTes are stated in italics as MM 3.3/_ with the
prefIx MM rneceding a number for the section in which the measure is found and a letter indicating
the numerical order in which the measure is given.
1/1
SM-6
014
. ...... ....
e::.
e:"
: ;. '~..-.:: :.:
...... "w
......-
),
, "
. .-.~..~ '.
~ : -: .....: . . -..,: ...-
....
, ,
e,..
-. .. ~
.... ~~ ~.
....
ttO
~ I)abiia SP /GP A:sm
!
~
SECOON 3.1: LAND USE
This section discusSeS land use impac1S and land use planning concerns of the Project. The section
also addIOSSOS planning issUeS rdated to jurisdictional boundaries and discusSeS the consistenCY of the
Project with relevant land use plans and policies.
IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: PROJECT SITE
1M 3.1/A
SabstaDtW Alteration to ExistiJal LaIld Use
The alteration of existing land uses from primarily nual to mban uses is identif"JOd as an impor13llt
planDing concern of the Project but an ipsi'2nific:ant imoact. pursuant to CEQA..
No mitigation is required.
1M 3.1jB
On-Site Project Land Use Conflicts
The land use plans f Ot both the specific Plan area and General Plan AtI10ndment Area avoid abrllPt
tt2DSitions between potentially incompatible land uses and provide adequate buffer and open space
areas. This is an insieificant imoact.
No mitiption is required.
IMP ACTS .AND MITIGATION MEAStJRES: AGRICULTURE
1M 3.1/C
Discontinuation of A&ricultaral Uses
This impaet is identif"JOd as insienificant due to the high peteenmge of Wim.m",n Act contt3ctS that
have been non-renewed and the limited value of non-prime soils on the Project site.
No mitiption is required.
1M 3.1jD
Loss of Farmlands of Local Importance
Because the fannlands on the Project site "'" not c]assiIJOd as "prime". their loss is judged to be
insi2Difi~nt.
No mitigStion is required.
1M 3.1/E
btd1reet Impacts Rcsultmc from the NOD-'RCDcm of Williamson Act eo.trae:ts
Non-renewal is not an envrronmenw impact, as deImed by CEQA..
No mitigation is reQuired-
",
SM-7
015
-....... .-"
x....- D1IbIia SP!GPA Em.
s...
;I
IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES; TRI-VALLEY NON-UlmAN LANDS
.::.
.:' j
1M 3.1/F
ColnersioD DC NOD- Urh.. Laads
Areas of the Project site that adjoin non-urban lands have been designlilted for Open Space and Rural
Residentia1land uses to reduce growth pressures on these lands. This is an insi2nifiC'::\ut imoact..
No mitigation is required..
IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: .A.JACENT LANDS
IM 3.1/G
Poteatial CoDfIJcts with LaDd Uses to the West
This is a DOtentialJv siRnifjc:\ilnt imnact due to the possibility that the U.5. Anny will increase its
training activities at the Parks Reserve Forces Training Area (-Camp Parks-), located due west of the
Project site.
MM J.l/1.0 calls for the City of Dublin to coordinate its Planning activities with the Army
to achieve compatibility with adjacent land uses.
Implementation of MM 3.1/ J.O will redUce this impact to a level of insimifieanee.
1M 3.11H
PoteDtiaI Conflicts with !.aDd Uses to the South
Project site land uses are compatible with existing and projected land uses to the south. This is an
insi2nifi~t imnaCf.
.,....
. ....
No mitigation is required.
.'--
1M 3.1/1
PoteDtiaI Collfllcts with Laud Uses to the East
Project site land uses are compatible with existing and projected land uses to the east. This is an
insimific:ant imnaet.
No .mitigation is required.
1M 3.1/ J
PoteDtialCollfllcts with Lud Uses to the North
The Presence of the Dew Sanm Rita Rehabilitation Center to the north of the County Property is seen
as more or a marketing concern than an environmental impact.. This impact is. therefore,
insi2nific:itnt.
No mitigation is required.
..1URtSDICIIONAL BOUNDARIES
The Project site is affected by a number of jurisdictional, pmnn;ft! and service district boundaries
including; city and county limits. spheres-of-influence, planning areas and special service districts.
SPHERE-OF-lNFLUENCE
The Project entails an eX:J:mftflon of the City of Dublin sphere-of -influence to eventually encompass
the entire Project site. including the Doolan Canyon Road. area.. This portion of the Project site lies
outside the ctuTent City of Dublin sphere-of-influence and is also the subject of ~ CitY of Livermore
.
. ,
-., .+.
... :."..
Iii
8M-I
016
."
, "
e,.
, ".
. :. ":'. :-.":. ~ :.:
w_",. .
.+.-.-
e",
.. '
....-
~ .. .
.&. -
\\y
z.....- I)gb&l SP /GP A J:Dt
,
gencnJ plan amendment stUdy. The Alameda Coonty Local Agency Formation Commission has
indicated that it will consider the _ueslS of both Dublin and Livennore to annex the Doolan eanyon
Road area in May 1993.
PLANNING AREAS
The Project site constitutes a plll..niug..... A portion of this pl..ning area boundarY over~ with
the planDing area boundarY established for the Nom Livermore GeucnJ Plan Amendment area-
oTHER SPECIAL DISTRlCIS
A number of special districtS are current or future providerS to the l'roject site including: oougbertY
Regional Fire Authority; Dublin Unified School District; Livermore Valley Joint UniIJed School
District; East Bay Regional Park District; Dublin San Ramon SefVices District; and Livennore Area
Recreation and Park District. Service issues related to these districtS are cfis<:1lSsed in the applicable
section of Chapter 3.
CONSISTENCY WITH RELEV ANI' LAND USE pLANS AND P<>IJCIES
This subsection cfiscusSeCS the consistency of the Project with City of Dublin plans and pOlicies sucb
as the GeMral Plan and Zoning Ordinana. Also discussed are the applicable plans and pOlicies of
other counti~, cities and agencies.
Table 3.1-4 provides a delailed matrix of the Project's consi=nCY with the CitY of Dublin (ieneral
Plan.
SEcnON 3.1:
POPULATION, HOUSING k EMPLOYMENT
This section provides the c\elIlllBIlIPbic. \101lSins and eDII>lo}'1OeDt conrext of the l'roject at the regionllI
(Bay Area). subregional (fri- ValleY) and local (City of Dublin) level. This section doeS llot anaJy>e
these projections in tenus of potential enviro"",enlOl impaCIS wbich are adlIresSed in the re\eVlIIlf
cnviromnental sections of CJuz.pter .3.
SEcnON 3.3: TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION
Tmllc and circulation conditions are evaluated onder four .,w,.is ...".nos: E;dsring 1992
Conditions; Yem 2010 Without Projer:t; Yem 2010 With Pro jet:!; and Qmul/Dri'Je BrdldourWilk p,."je&t. -
ImpaCtS are cfis<:1lSsed in termS of changes in daily mUfic volumes, peakhottt inrenecnon operationS.
tranSit operations, and bicycle and -pedes1:rian impacts.
IMPACIS.uID MITIGATION MEAStJllES: nAIL y TRAFFIC VOLUMES (TEAR 2010 ll'"ITHOUT
PROJECT)
1M 3.3/A
1-580 Freeway, Tassajara-Falloll
y _ 2010 growth without tbe l'roject would cause freeway vo\umCS 10 exceed level of service :E on
1-580 betWeen Tassajara Road aIld Fallon Road. This is a ~omifi"""t MnftuJat\Ve imDaOt,
Jmplemen,.,;on of MM 3.3/1.0 10 consrruct auxiJiarY lanes would provide LOS D operations and
reduce the impact to a level of iJtsj2t1ifi~nc:e.
..' .
SM-9
017.
:z....a.. DIIbb SP/GPA Em
s--,.
IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: DAILY'IRAFFIC VOLUMES (YE..4.R 2010 JYrrH
PROJECT)
....:
-;':.'
1M 3.3/B
1-580 Freeway, 1-680-HacieDda
Year 2010 growth with the Project would cause 1-580 between 1-680 and Hacienda Drive to exceed
level of service E. This is a Sitmific:lnt imoa~
This impact is also a si2nif1cant cumulative imoact as discussed in Chapter 5.
MMs 3.3/2.0-3.3/2.1 propose participation in 1'SM programs and sharing of costs for regional
mitigation measures. Implementation wouId reduce the impact, but the impact would remain
simificant.
1M 3.3/C
1-S80 Freeway, Tassajara-Falloll .Airway
Year 2010 growth with the Project would cause freeway volumes to exceed level of service E on 1-580
between Tassajara Road and Airway Boulevard. This is a sismificant imoa.ct.
This impact is also a si2nificant cumulative i~nact as discussec.t in Chapter 5.
MM 3.3/3.0 calls for the construction of auxiliary lanes. Implementation of this mitigation measure
would reduce' the impact to a level of insi2nificance but LOS on the Tassajara-Fallon Road segment
would remain DOtentiaIlv siRnifica.nt.
1M 3.3/D
1-680 Freeway, North of 1-580
.......:.
'. i- &.... ~.:.
.". .".
Year 201 0 growth with the Project would cause freeway volumes to exceed level of service E on 1-680
north of the 1-580 interchange. This is a simifi~nt imoa.ct.
This impact is also a SiRnifi~nt cumulative imnaq as discuSsed in Chapter 5.
MM 3.3/4.0 calls for CODtributions to planned improvements. Implementation of this mitigation
measure would reduce the impact to a level of. insiRnificance.
IMPACIS AND MITIGATION MEA.SImEs: DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES (CClMUUTIYE
. BUILDOUr FrrR PROJECT)
1M 3.3/E
CamaJa.ti~ Freeway Impads
~ BuildDlll with ~Projeci would cause additioDal freeway sections to exceed level of
service E compared to Year 201 0 With Project, iDclnding 1':'580 west of 1-680 (from E to F), and I-S80
east of Airway Boulevard (from E to F). This isa simificant cumulative iml"l!'a~ .
Implementation of MM 3.3/5.0 would reduce the impact, but the impact would remain Si21lifi,..nt
and an unavoidable adverse imD1lCT.
IMPACI'S AND MITIGATION MEA.SImEs: PEAK HOUR lNTERSEcnON OPERATION (YE..a
2D10 W7TH PROJECT)
1M 3.3iF
.DD.perty Road & DabJia BoaJeYard
-'.:
.~. --..~ .:. - .
Year 20]0 development with the Project would cause level of service F opentions at the intersection
of DoUgherty Road with Dublin Boulevard. This is a si2njfi~nt i!J1nact.
"
. . .....
".".. .
.'. .
\\ :7
SM-IO
018
.. .. ~ .... ~. -. ". '.. . .' :. ':. .' ... . . :.' ."". - .
.>.
......
..-
::::,/-\:
e:
.. .-
..... .
"..'-
\\i
:a:-... Dabb 51' /GP A J:D1.
'-1'
MM 33/6.0 calls for the consmrction of additonal lanes on approaches to the inteneetiOD..
Implementation of this mitigation measure will reduce the impact to a level of insilZDifjcance.
IM 3.3/G
Hacienda Drhe "1-580 Eastbollnd RsmPS
Year 2010 development with the Project would cause level of service F operations at the intersection
of Hacienda Drive with the I-S80 eastbound ramps. This is a sjlrnificant imoact.
MM 33/7.0 calls for resttiping. Implementation of this mitigation measure will reduce the impact
to a level of jnsilZnifjro.:::mce.
1M 3.3/H
Tassajara Road" 1-580 WestbouDd Ramps
Year 2010 development with the Project would cause level of service F operations at the intersection
of Tassajara R.oad with the I-S80 westbound ramps. This is a lilZnificant im'DaCt.
MM 3..3/8.0 calls for the widening of I-S80. Implementation of this mitigation measure will reduce
the impact to a level of insilrnificance.
1M 3.3/1
Santa Rita R.oad " I-S80 Eastbound Ramps
Year 2010 development with the Project would cause level of service F operations at the intersection
of Santa Rita. Road with the 1-580 eastbound ramps. This is a ~i21ljfjc:ant imnact and an unavoidable
adverse imoact.
MM 3..3/9.0 c:alls for widening of freeway. Implementation of this mitigation measure will reduce
the impa.c:t but will intrOduce out-of-direction travel for 'certain drivers, thereby resulting in a
notent1:!lllV si211ificant imnact..
. 1M 3.3/J
~y BouleTUd " DabJiD BoaleTani
Year 2010 development with the Project would cause level of service E operations at the intersection
of A.irway Boulevard with Dublin Boulevard/North Canyons ParkwaY. This is a linificaut imuat.t.
MM.3..3/10.0 calls for improvements to provied LOS C. Implementation of this mitigation measure
will reduce the impact to a level of jnsirn.ifi~nce-
1M 3.3/X.
Ainra,. Boa.leu.rd &: I-S80 WestbollDd }WDps
Year 2010 development with the :Project would Cause level of service F operations at 'the interseetion
of Airway Boulevard with the 1-580 westbound ramps. This is a p~ifiMtnt imoact.
, - - .. .~ . ~..
MM 3..3/11.0 calls for widening the Airway Boulevard overc:rossmg. Implementation of this
mitigation measure would reduce the impact to a level of iJlsi21lificance.
1M 3.3fL
El Charro Road
Project traffic could introduce stops and delays for loaded trncks from the Q1Wries on EI CbarTO
Road south of 1-580. This is a t>Otentia1lv si2nific:ant imoact.
Implementation of MM 3..3/12.0 calls for coordination with Caluans to modify the 1-580 interchange:
This would reduce the impact to a level of insi2nmMlnce.
IMPACTS AND MITIGDION MEASURES: PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OpER.A.T/ONS
~' .
SM-ll
019
x....... DabIba ZIP IGP AlCIlt
!'L
(CUMULATIVE BUILDOUT WITH PROJECT)
1M 3.3jM
Cuwlatiye Impacts on Dublin Boalenrd
Cumulative buiIdout with the Project would cause level of service F operations at the intersection of
Ha.cienda Drive with Dublin Boulevard anc1level of service E operations at the intersection of
Tassajara Road with Dublin Boulevard. This is a si2Ilificant cumulative imoact and an unavoidable
adverse imoact.
Implementation of MM 3.3/13.0 c:aIIing for grade-separated interchanges would reduce the impact,
but the .impact would remain si2nificant.
1M 3.3jN
Cumalatift Impacts on Tasujara Road.
Curnulati,e Buildouz with the Project would cause level of service F operations at the intersections of
Tassajara Road with Fallon Road, Gleason Road and the Tramit Spine. These impacts would be
caused primarily by trafiJC from the Tassajara connection to Dougheny Valley, and full buildout of
the Tassajara Valley. This is a sjeificant cumulative imoact and an unavoidable adverse imDact.
Implementation of MM 3.3/14.0 requiring the widening of Tassajara Road to six lanes would not be
compatible with plann.ed land uses, resulting in a Dotentiallv si2nifieant imoact.
IMPACIS AND MITIGATION MEASUREs: TRANSIT
1M 3.3/0
Tra.usit Senic:e Extensions
The Project would introduce significant development in an area Dot currently served by public tranSit,
creating the need for substantial expansion of existing transit systems. This is a si2Dificant imoact.,
MMs 3.3/15.0-3.1/16.3 caIls for coorriin:t'ting improvements to ttansit service with LA VTA and
BART. Implementation of these mitigation measures will reduce the impacts on transit to a level of
. . ifi
1DS12n, Cl~ce',
IMPACTs AND MITIGATIONS MEASUREs: PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLES
1M 3.3fP
Street Crosship
Pedestrians and bicycles would cross major streets in easter:D. Dublin with high projected trafIJC
volumes, such as Dublin Boulewrd, Tassajara Road and FaDon Road, introducing potential safety
hazards (or pede:striam and bicyclisu. This is aDOtentiaIlv sirmific.:ant imoact:..
MMs 3.3/16.0-3.3/16.1 call for the provision of Class I paths. Implementation of these mitigation
measures will reduce the .impact to a level of iusirmificance.
,L7
SM-12
020
I
e.',
.' i'
-;F
'.'
..
, '. ~
-";.<:.::.-&.:.'
. . .' . ~'.. '. .~ . :. . _.+ ,"..,
e.,.
'-. +'
....
.. '. ~ . .
~ .. .. .'
+ ... ~. ~.+.
. --~ -:.':
.<:
.-. .
""F:.:
\~.1p
........-..-........_..
~ DabIiD sp/GPA:mt
!
..,
SECTION 3.4&: coMMUNITY SERVICES AND FACILITIES
IMPACIS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: POLICE SERVICES
1M 3.4/ A
Demand for lJlcreased police Senices
The Project will incrca>e demand for police protcetion and services from the Dublin Police
Department. This is a ~tentia11v silznificant imnact on existing police services.
A> mitigation to a le..1 of jpsi2nifi~~ce. adcquatC budgetin& for mcrcascd police services wiD be
required.
1M 3.4jB
Police SerYices Accessibility
The hilly topography of most of the Pro jcet site may present some accessibility and crime-preYCtltion
problems and result in ootentiallv sie:nificant imoacts.
DcsigII s1llIldards which take safety and crime prevention into acco1ll1t will mitigate this impaCt to a
level of insie:nificance.
IMP ACIS AND MITIGATION MEASlJRES: FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES
1M 3.4/C
Demand for Increased Fire Se"iees
Buildout of the Project will substantiallY expand the DRF A service area and increase demand for new
rn statiODS and f"rrefighting personneL This is a ~jmifiMtnt imnact of the Project.
1M 3.4fD
Fue Response to OutlyiD& Areas
Based 011 DRF A's prcIim;".". JocatiOllS for new 1"" S1lttioDS. the northern-most portiollS of the GP A
i1lt:rcmCl1t area wouJd be o1l1Side the ])jstrict's $1lttldard respcmse..... This wouJd tcS1IIt in Rl'tCI1ti2l
Si211ifi(;nt imnacts. ,
1M 3.4fE
-
F~re to WUdflre Huards
ScttlcmCl1t of population and C01l$ttIlCtiOI1 of ncW communities in proximity to high 1"" ha23td opel1
space areas would pose an incrcaSins wildt"" ha23td to people and property if opeIl space ..... are
not mainmined for Irre safety. This is a simifiMtnt imnaet. of the Project.
This is also :a ~ignifiMlnt enmulative imnaC12S further discussed in Chapter 5.0.
The polCtlti2l signif"1CaI1t impac1S rcJative to 1"" services. respcmse time and wildt"" cxposme will
be mitigated to a level of jllSi2nificance by mcasmcs ""mng for adcquatC 1"" pctSOl1I1Ci sllIf1mg,
_ intctface \atldS ........gcmcm pIaCticcs. and dcsip $1ltI1da:rds for dcvcloptoCl1t that take 1""
safety into ac:::ounL
IMPACIS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: SCHOOLS
1M 3.4fF
Demand for New Classroom Space
Buildout of the Project will inorcllSC the demand for IlCW cJasstOOm space and school faci\itiCS. This
is a shmific:ant imnact.
.,
SM-13
021
'..~ :.:.- ~ :. . . .. . A.- _ '. ".
~ l>tabb SP/GPA. Em.
!Il.
;I
The Project provides 9 new elementary schoo~ 2 new junior high schools and 1 new high schooL
This impact is reduced to iJisillnificant.
....
.".
"", .
1M 3.4/G
DeDlaDcl tor Junior RICh Schools
Project buildout could result in DOtentia11v sillnifjcant imDacts on junior high school classroom
capacity. Projected need is for 2.7 junior high schools and the Project provides 2 new junior high
schools.
This impact is mitigated to insillnificant by proposing that junior high SChools be designed to
accomodate the project number of junior high school students.
1M 3.4jH
(hoercrowdilll of schools
Another POtential impact of the Project is the potential for overcrowding at existing schools if
insufficient new classroom space is providecl.
Mitigation Measures 3.4/13.0. 14.0 and 15.0 are applicable to the entire Project site and when
implemented. would reduce overcrowding and school space impacts to a level of insi2nificanc:e.
1M 3.4/1
Impact 011 School FiDUCiaC District JurisdictioD
Development of eastern Dublin under existing jurisdictiOnal boundaries would result in the area being
served by two different school districts and would adversely affect f"mancing of schools. This is
considered a Dotentiallv simificant imD3.C1-
.:..,
This issue will require resolution by the Dublin Unified School District and the Livermore Valley
Joint Unified School District to reduce impacts to a level of insignificance.
.+:....:...
IM 3.4/J
FUWlcw Burdell 011 School Districts
The cost of providing Dew.school facilities' could adversely impact local school districts by creating
an. unwieldy 11DaD.cial burden. This is a ootentiaIJv SillDifi~t imDact.
Mitigation will be provided by fees and appropriate, funding meehllftic:-mc to rednce this impact to
in.~Vificant. _
lMPACI'S AND MITIGATIONS: PARK FACILIlIES
1M 3.4jX
Demod for Park FaclUties
Without the addition of Dew parks and facilities. the increased demand for new park and recreation
facilities resulting from buildout of the Project would create DOtentiallv si2Dificant im~ and
si2nific:mt cumulative imD8C'tS discussed in Section 5.1.
Mitigation measures calling for adequate funding. phasing and implemention of the City of Dublin
Park and Recremion Masler Plan 1992 will reduce this impact to insi2nificant.
IMPACIS AND MIllGATIONS: PARK FINANCING
1M 3.4jL
Park Facillties FISC&! Impact
.:-
1\1
Acquisition and improvement of Dew park and recreation facilities may place a rmancial str.Un 011
existing City of Dablin revenue sources. This is a DOtenmt1v sisznificant imnaet:
.. : .'. ~.. .
SM-14
022
.
w. ..
e::.
. .' - ~
. j . '. .~.
.:. ~.':'
e::
._; . .
- .....
..../
"0
\ l
B..-.s J)abiiR SP /GP A EDt
,
7
In-lieu fees and the provision of parklands at the time of development reduce the impact on City
financial resources to a level of insilznificance.
IMF ACIS AND MITIGATIONS: PlffiLIC ACCESS AND TRAIL SYSTEM
1M 3.4/M
Impact OD Re&ioaal Trail System
Development of residential and commercial areas without adequate provision of trail easements may
prevent implementation of a regional trail system. This is a ttatentiallv simifiMlnt imoaet.
The specific Plan supportS establishment of a trail system with regional connections. This impact is
mitigated to a level of jpshmificance.
1M 3.4/N
Impact OD Open Space Connections
Urban development in eastem Dublin may eliminate recreational oppornmities if not adequately
designed and implemented- This is a ootentiallv sismificant imoact.
A continous open space network will be provided on the Project site. This impact is reduced to
insi2Difieant.
IMP ACIS AND MITIGATIONS: SOLID WASTE
1M 3.4/0
Increased Solid Waste Prociu.ctioD
Increased population and commercial land use will cause a proportional increase in the total projected
amount of solid waste and household hazardous waste generated 'bY the City of Dublin. This is a
potentially si2I1ificant imtmC1 of the Project.
1M 3.4fP
Impact oa SoUd Waste Disposal Facilities
The ~ of the projected increment of solid waste and household .ba%ardous waste generated by
the Project may accelerate the closing schedule far AltaD10nt landfill unless additional capacity is
develOped or alt:er.Date disposal siteS are identified. This is a ootentiallv si2nificant imoact of the
Project. It is -also notenri!;ll1v sieifiMlnt cumulative imnact.
Solid waste generation and solid waste disposal c3pacity .impactS are reduced to a level of
insimifi~ee by implementation of the City's recycling and solid -waste progIamS.
IMPACIS AND MITIGATIONS: EXTENSION OF U1UITY LINES
1M 3.4/Q
Demand for Utility ExtenSions
Development of the Project site will significantly increase demand for gas,' electric and telephone
services. This is considered a sitmifiMlnt 2TOwth-inducin2 imoact and an J.1Davoidable adverse imnact.
Extension of utility lines are nec~ry if the Project is to approved and built. There is no mitigation
to this impact.
1M 3.4fR.
Utility ExteasioD V1$Il&lud Biolopcal Impacts .P
Exp'21'o:;on of electrical. gas aDd telephone lines could result in DoteDriallv si2"n.ifiMlnt imoaets to visual
and biological resources if DOt appropriatelY sited-
8M-IS
023
~ DabZi:D. SP tCPA EDt
s~
Undergrounding of utilities would reduce impactS to a level of insi2nifica.ncc.
..:
1M 3.4/5
Consumptioa of Noa-Renewable Natural Resou.rces
Natural gas and electrical service would increase coI1SUIXlption of non-renewable namral resources.
This impact is considered a sirnifjcant imoaet of the Project and an unavoidable imoact.
Despite energy-conserving design standards, the Project will still cause the COn.sumption of nOn-
renewable resources and therefore the residual impact of the Project is considered an unavoidable
adverse imnact. .
IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASUllES: POSTAL AND LIBRARY SERVICES
1M 3.4/T
DeDWld for Inerea.sed Postal Senice
The Project will increase the demand for postal service. This is a DotentiaJlv si2nificant imoact.
Mitigation is provided to a level of insili!nificance by policies which call for a new post office in
eastern Dublin.
1M 3.4/U
DelD&Jld for Increased. Library $ernee
Without additional library facilities and staff, the increase in popula.tion resulting from the project
would create si2nificant imoac:ts on existing library service and facilities.
The Project suPPOrts adequate library service in eastem Dublin., inCluding a new library. This impact
is reduced to insignificant.
.....,
- . - . .'
-:. : . ~. ~ .' .
SEcnON 3.5: SEWER, WA'I'ER AND STORM DRAINAGE
IMPACl'S AND MITIGATION MEAStJRES: SERVICE PROVISION
1M 3.5/ A
hdirec:t Impacu RemltiJli fro. the Lack of a Wastewater Senic:e ProTider to the
Project SIte
The Project assumes annexation of the .Project site to the DSRSD which will provide wastewater
service. No indirect impactS resulting the lack of a wastewater service provider are identified.
No mitigation is required.
IMPACIS AND MITIGATION MEASURF.s: W AS'rEW ATER COLLECTION
1M 3.5/B
Lact of a Wastewater CoUectiOD System
Estimated wastewat=r flow for the Specific Plan area is 4.2 MGD-ADWF (See Table 3.5-1) and the
esri"'!!I"~ wastewater flow for the General Plan amendment area is 5.6 MGD (see Table 3.5-2). This
will be a sil!nifjcant imoact.
I \ 'I
1M 3.5/C
ExteusiOD of a Sewer Tnznk Liae with Capadty to Se"e New DeTelopmeDu.
.:
'..
T?e Project provides measures for wastewater collection to this impact to insi2Ilifieant.
SM-16 n~4
.:"-
.-<':
....- -'~~.:-
e:
\,}O
!
~ o.bIia 51" /GPA EDt
"
ConstrUction of a wastewater collection system could result in the development of other projectS that
would connect to the Project's collection system. This is a ootentiaIlv si2nific:ant imoac:t.
This impact is also a DOtentiaJ1v si2nificant lZrowth-inducin2 imoact as discuSsed in ChapleT 5.
The proposed wastewater system bas been sized only for the Project site. This reduces impactS to a
level of insismific:ance.
IMPACIS AND MITIGATION ME.ASURES: WASTEWATER. TREATMENT
1M 3.5/D
Current Limited Treatment Plut Capacity.
There is a limited available treatment capacity at the DSRSD, Wastewater Treatment Plant. Available
export capacity limits wastewater treannent plant expansion. This is a si2nifi~nt imoact.
A Design Level Water investigation will be required to reduce this impact to a level of insienificance.
1M 3.5/E
Future Lack of Wastewater Treatment Plut Capacity
Development of the Specific Plan and the Project will require an increase in wastewater treatment
plant capacity to adequately treat the additional wastewater flows to meet discharge standards. This
is a si2nifil""!itftt imoaet.
A.s mitigation. it can be shown that DSRD has the funds available to design and construct W3SlCwater
treatment plant expansions once export capacity is available which will reduce this impact to
insi2nifi~nt.
1M 3.5/F
bacrease ia. EDern Usqe Throu.eh Inc::reascd Wastewater Treatment.
Development of the Project will result in increased wastewater flows (as shown in Tables 3.5-1 and
3.5-2) and will require increased energy use for treamlent of wastewater. 'Ibis is a DOtentiallv
si2Ilml""!itnt imoact.
This impact is also a DOtentiaIlv si2nifi~nt irrevemble'chanee as discussed in CiuzplU 5.
Despite energy-conserving measures, energy use will increase and this impact will re:ma.in DOteftri~1JV
si211ifi~nt. '
IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: WASTEWATER DISPOSAL,'
1M 3.5/G
Lack of Wastewater OureDt Disposal r.padty.
The increase in wastewater flows through the development of the Specific Plan and the Project will
require an increase in wastewater disposal
Additional wastewater disposal can be achieved through developing additional export capacity and/or
recycled water projects_ Implementation of these mitigation measures will rec1uee this impact to
insi2Ilifil!:mt.
1M 3.5fH
hacrease ill Eaeru Usage 1'Arou.ell JDaea,sedWaste.w.atcl DU;r....l
Development of the Project will result in increased wasteWater flows (as shown in Tables 3.5-1 aDd
3.5-2) and will require increased energy use for disposal of wastewater. Energy for Vo'3StCwater
disposal will be required for 1) pumping of raw wastewater to CCCSD for neann~nt ~der the TW A
.I~ ~
-".
SM-17
025
........ Dahiia SF IGP A EDt
~
proposed project; and/or 2) operation of an advanced treatment and distribution system for recycled
water. This is ootentiallv sisznificant imoact..
."
.,
This impact is also a ootentiallv si2nificant irreversible chanlZe as discussed in CJu:zpter 5.
Despite mitigatio~ energy consumption will still increase and the impact will still be DOtentiallv
sitznific:ant.
1M 3.5/1
PoteatiaJ Failure of Export Disposal System.
A failure in the operation of the proposed TW A wastewater pump stations would have serious impactS
on the overall operation of the wastewater collection system for the Tri- Valley subregion as well as
the eastern Dublin Project. This is a ooteDtiallv simificant im'D8Ct.
Engineering redundancy will reduce the impact to a level of insi2D.ifieance
1M 3.5/J
Pulllp Statioa Noise ud Odors.
The proposed TW A wastewater pump Stations could generate noise during their operation and could
potentially produce odors. This is ootentiallv Si2nificant imoact.
Local noise standards and odor control equipment will reduce the impact to a level of insi2nificance.
1M 3.5[K
Storqe Basia Odors ud PoteatiaJ Failure.
The proposed TW A Emergency Wastewater Storage Basins could potentially emit odors and/or the
basins could have structural failure due to landslides, earthquakes or undermining of the r~ervoir
from inadequate drainage. This is ootentiallv sitznifiC3Dt imoact..
e"",,
:;-..
..' .
Basins will be covered to reduce the impact to a level of insi2Ilific::lnce.
1M 3.5/L
Recycled Water System OperatiOIl.
The proposed recycled water system must be const:n1Cted and operated. properly in order to prevent
any, potential COTJt!lmin.tion of or cross-connection With potable water supply systemS~. This is a
ootentizIlv simificant imoact..
Distribution system will meet all applicable standards to reduce the impact to a level of insimifi~1tce.
1M 3.5/M
Keeyded Water Storqe Failure.
Loss of storage through damage from landslide.. Qrthquakes, and undermining of the reservoir
through inadequate drainage. This is a ootentiallv sisznificant imoact.
Reservoir construction standards will reduce the impact to a level of insienific::lnce.
1M 3.5/N
Loss of :Recycled Water System Pressme.
Loss of pressures in the proposed recycled water distribution -systems could result in the system being
unable 10 meet peak irrigationdl'!m.nd This is a ootenriSll1v sienificant iII1D3.C:4
e.-",
" .
EmergencY power generation backup will reduce the impact to insimific:ance.
1 ~I
~. * .
1M 3.5/0
Seccmdary Impacts from RecycleIl WatersJstelll Operatio. ".
-.~
G.~i...' ,
SM-I8
026
..~
.::":'
....
....
-.' .
-' .
""r
\f'
~ Dahb SP jGPA. Em.
s-y
Failure to identify and implement required improvcmen1S may increase salinity in the ground'Water
basin. This is a DOtenria11v si2nificant imoact.
Reycled water projects shall incorporate salt mitigation measures to reduce this impact is a level of
insi2nificance.
IMP ACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: SERVICE PROVISION
1M 3.5/P
(herdraft of Local Groaadwater Resoan:es.
This is a DOtcnrlallv si2t1ificant imoact.
Coordination with DSRSD will reduce this impact to a level of insi2nific:ance.
IMP ACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: WATER SUPPLY
1M 3.5/Q
Increase in Demud for Water.
Estimated average day water demands for the Specific Plan Area is 5.8 MGD (see Table 3.5-4) and
the estimated average water demand for the General Plan Amendment .Area is 7.7 MGD (see
Table 3.5-5).
Measures to reduce this impact to a level of insi2nifiMllnce iDcluQe water conservation. water
recycling, and new capital facilities improvemen1S for Zone 7. including ground'Water wells.
IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: WATER TREATMENT
1M 3.5/R
Additioul Treatment PlaIlt Capacity.
The increase in water demands through Qeve10pment of the Specific Plan and the Project will require
an expansion of existing water treatment facilities in order to deliver safe and- potable water. This
is a si2nifiMllnt impact.
Two new chlorination/fluoridation stations and other Zone 7 improvemen1S will reduce this impact
to the level of insimfjMllnce.
IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: WATER DISTRIBUTION
1M 3.5/5
Lack of a Water Distribution System..
A wa.tt:r distribution system is need for the Project site. This is a ~i2nifi~nt imnact.
A Water System Master Plan will reflect the Projcct and reduce the impact to a level of ;nsi2nifiMlnce.
1M 3.5rr
lDdDeement of SabstaDtial Growth and CoacentratioD of population.
The proposed water distribution system has been si%ed to potentially accommodate the DoughertY
Valley Development to the north. This is a si2nificant imoaCt.
This impact is also a DOtenriallv si~cmt erowth-indncine imuact.3S. di.scuSSed in Cluzpler_S~
This impact will remain si2nifi~nt. despite mitigation.
1M 3.5fU
Increase in Enerc Usqe Throaeh Operation of the Water Distri_~ati_on System.
SM-19
027
. :..l;'
.-'. ....- . .".-.'-'
x......c. Dabb BP /GP A EDt
s--,.
Development of the Project wiI1 result in increased water demands requiring a water distribution
system which will require additional energy. Primarily for pumping of a water to the System and to
storage. This is a ootentiaJlv silZnifieant imoact.
This impact is also a ootentialJv silZnificant irreversible chan2e as discussed in Chapur 5.
Energy-conserving technology will parti.a.IIy reduce this impact; however, energy consumption will
still increase and the impact will still be potentially significant.
1M 3.5fV
PoteJltial Water Storqc RcserToir Failure.
Loss of storage in proposed water distribution reservoirs from landslides, earthquakes, and/or
underm.ini.ng of the reservoir through inadequate drainage would impact the ability of the water
supply system to maintain. water pressures and to meet I.1fe flows. This is a ootentialJv si2nificant
imoact.
Reservoir construction takes safety hazards into account and will reduce the impact to a level of
insi2nifi~n~.
1M 3.5fW
Potmtial Loss of System Pressure.
Loss of PI'e$SJ1fe in the proposed water distribution systems could result in con~m;n::!tion of the
disttibution system and would Dot allow adequate flows and pressures that are essential for Iue flow
conditions. This is a ootentiaIlv Si2Dific:ant imDaCt..
All applicable pressure standards wiI1 be required to reduce the impact to a level of insilZnificance.
1M 3.5/X
POtUltial Pump StatioD Noise.
Proposed water system pump stations would generate noise during their operation that could impact
the surroundinS community. This is a DOtentialJv sjmifi~nt imnact.
Design. of pump stations will reduce this impact to insimificant.
IMPACIS AND MITIGATION MEASuREs: STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
1M 3.5/y
PotuatiaJ F1n...1i"l.
Development of the Project will result in an increase in runoff to creeks and will result in an
increased potential for flooding. This is a 'DOtentiatJv si2DifiOlnt imD8Ct.
Flood contrOl measUres and a Storm Drninage Master Plan will reduce the impact to a level of
insi2nificance.
1M 3.5/Z
Redaced. GrollDdwater R~e.
~ Project is JOCD:1ed in area 0/ minimal rrDUNiwlZler recharge. 'This is a oot!!utia11v sienific:ant
imnacr_
:....
e'.
. -.......
....
'. .'.
.- ...... .'
.... ....
.' . .
....
~..~~:' .....""', ground_ recIwse programs to reduce the impaot to a Ievd of .,
r:3 1M 3.5/M Noa-PoiDt Sources of Pollatio..
-~n
SM-20
028
: . ~. .:. . : ..
.......
.. ".'.
-.'w .
e'
.,'
.:.,:,
, ".:.~:.~'=~.>
.:"
.. . . -
:':~:"q
\r
x-- Dub4n ;:,r f...r,..--
s
"T
Development of the Project could ,..ult in a deterioration of the qualitY of stormwator due to an
in=ase in nOD-point sonn:es of pollutioD including 1) urban runoff; 2) "",,-stOrmwater disChatles
to storm drains; 3) subsurface dr1litJage; and 4) coosuuctiOD site runoff (erosion and se<funenation).
This is a potentially si2t1ificant imoaet.
This impact is also a potentially sillnificant cumulative imoact as discUSSed in Chapter 5.D.
The reqWremeDt to conduct a Water QualitY jnvestigation will roduce the impact to a level of
insilltlifiMlnce.
SECTION 3.6: sons, GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY
IMP ACIS AND MITIGATION ME.ASlJRES: SEISMICITY
1M 3.6jA
Fault GrouDd Rupture
The exposure of people or strUctures to hazards from fault ground rupture is ipsi2nificant.
No mitigation is required.
1M 3.6/B . Earthquake Ground ShaJdng: Primary Effects
The primarY effects remain 'DOtentiallv Si2nifiMlnt.
1M 3.6jC
Earthquke GroaDd SbakiDI= SecondsrY EffcdS
Seismically-induced landsliding, diffeteDrlal COJllP3Ction and/or settlement axe CODSidered J!P"'1"ilIl1'
~llnifiMlnt.
Design and engineering standards will reduce these impacts to insi2uifieant.
IMP ACTS AND MITIGATION, ME.ASlJRES: TOPOGRAPHY AND LANDFORMS
1M 3.6jD
Sabstalltial Alteration to Project Site Landforms
Permanent change to the Project site's existing topography is considered a potentially sillUific:an1
jmnaet.
Grading stancm'-ds that J'l1;nimt'fi! cut-and-rill will reduce this impact to insillUifiMlnt.
1M 3.6jE
EJjwnination of FutJU'e Use of Project Site AurePte Resources
This impact is considered insilmificant. No mitigation is required..
nBACIS AND MITIGATION ME.ASlJRES: DRAINAGE
1M 3.6jF
Groa.ndwater Impacts
Shallow groundwater conditions IIIllY =te geotechnical ha2;ards which axe ~oteutia1IV si",,;r;=
1M 3.6/G
Groudwater Impacts ..4sJ<<iwtcd with Jrriptioa
SM-21
(
029
.... . . . . '. . '.. .' ~ -. .. . . .
x....:. Dubb SP IGP A :Em.
,
This is considered DOtentiaJlv sis!Difi~t.
Ch2ra.eterization of groundwater conditions and construction oC snbdrains, among other recommended
improvements, will reduce 1M 3.6jF and 1M 3.6/G to insirmificant.
IMPACTS AND MIIIGATION MEASURES: GEOLOGY
1M 3.6/H
ShriDkiDC and SweUinl of ExpaJl$in Soils aDd Becirock
Geotechnical ha:ards are DOtentia1Jv silmificant.
Design and moisture-control measures will reduce this impact to insi2nificant.
IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: SLOPE STABILITY
1M 3.6/1
Natural Slope StabUlty
Geotechnical harards are DOtentia1Jv si2nificant.
Engineering Cor site-specific conditions can reduce this impact to insi2nificant.
1M 3.6/J
Cut-and-Fill Slope Stabillty
Potentially-unsta.ble cut-and-rill slopes may present safety hazards which are Dotentiallv si2nificant.
Grading plans and periodic mOnitoring will reduce this impact to insilmificant.
IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASuREs: EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
1M 3.6jX
Erosion aDd Sedimeutation: CoDStnactioa-ReIated
Modification oC the ground surface and vegetative cover may create 1)OtentialJv si2:Dific:ant imDacts.
Measures adopted during construction can reduce this impact to insimifieant.
1M 3.6/L.
Ero.ion aDd Sedimelltatioll: Lonc- Term
Long-term impacts are t>Otentistl1v sirmific:ant.
Appropriate design. and construction that takes subsurface drainage into a.ccaunt should reduce this
.impacr to insi2nific:mt.'
SECllON 3.7: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASuREs: HABITAT
1M 3.7/A
Direct Habitat Loss
'P
The Project will result in the loss, degradation, or disturbance oC as much -as 3,700 acres oC -existing
vegetation. This substantial reduction oC habitat and range is a DOtentialJv Si2Jljf'i~nt imoact oC the.
Project.
, ,-.
... .
SM-22
030
l~
e,."
., :~'_:.' .:
e\'.
. :.~ . ....
::..:....:...
\....... .
.. .
-w'.
!?
.: ',"
e""
'-
, .
.,."
.,'...
- '....-
'.::::&.::.
.::'"",
',::::-:&
,~'
~ I)abIDa s:P IGPA EIJt
,
~
This impact is also a DOtentiallv sillnific:ant cumulative imoac;t and a ii,nifil"=l'lnt irTevcrsible cllaDie
as discussed in Chapter 5.
Vegetation management will reduce this impact to a level of insi2nifi~nee.
1M 3.7 {B
hdirect Impacts of Ve&etatio. Remow
ConstrUction activities on the Project site may cause dust deposition from CODStrUction activities,
increased soil erosion and sedimentation, increased potential for slope failures, and alteration of
surface and subsurface drainage panerns. These are ootcntiallv Si2nific:ant.
Revegetation measures reduce these impacts to a level of insillnificanee.
IMFACIS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: RARE OR ENDANGERED PLANTS
No rare and endangered plants were documented in the GPA area; therefore, impacts to rare plant
species are not anticipated and no mitigation measures are required.
IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: BOTANICALLY SENSITIVE HABITATS
1M 3.7 Ie
Loss or Degradation of Botanically Sensitive Habitat
The following impacts could occur to Northern Riparian Forest. Arroyo Willow Riparian Woodland.
and Freshwater Marsh: Direct loss and degradation from grading, road CODStrUc:rlon, and culvert
crossings. Indirect impactS could result from increased sedimentation or spoil deposition affecting
stream flow pattemS and damaging young seedlings and the roots of woody plants. Given the
sensitive and unique nature of these habitats, pre-mitigation effectS represent ootentiallv si2nifj~nt
imoacts.
'This impact is also a DOtentia11v si2nific:ant cumulative imoaet as discuSSed in Chapter 5.
ExteDSive...protection measures will reduce impacts to a level of ;nsillnifi~nce.
IMPACIS AND MITIGATION MEA5tJllES: THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIFS
1M 3.7/D
SaIl Joaquin kit fox
1InpactS of the Project on this species are nntentiallv si2I1ific::ant.
The ~m Dublin Kit Fox Proteetion Plan (Appendix E) will reduce impacts to an jpsitrnifi,..nt
level
1M 3.7 IE
Bald ea&le, perecriDe falCOIl, aDd Alameda whipsuke
potential impa.c:ts to these species are considered jnsi2nifiMlnt due to the lack of appropriate habitat
on the Project site.
No mitigation measures are :required.
IMPACTS AND,MI11GATION MEASURES: FEDERAL CANDIDA'I:ES FOR LISTING
1M 3.7 IF
Red-leaed. f~.
The destrUction and alteration of small water impoundments and stream courses on the Project site
~' -
SM-23
031
L.t:.::. D1Ib6a SP IGP A J:Dt
s.a.-z,.
threaten to elimmlil~ habitat for the red-legged frog. This is considered a OOteDtiallv Si2Dificant
imoaC1 to red-legged frog populatioDS.
e"
1M 3.7/G
California tiler ul."".wder.
This ~Jlilmlilnder is vulnerable to many of the same impactS as the red-legged frog. These impacts are
ootentiallv siszDificant.
1M 3.7/H
Weste~ poad turtle.
Western pond turtles would be impacted by degradation of water courses and larger permanent water
impoundments, similar to those discussed for the red-legged frog. Impacts are ootentiallv sili!Dificant.
1M 3.7/1
Tri-colored blackbird
Potential destruction of riparian and freshwater habitat for this species is a DOteDtiallv Si2Dific:ant
imooC1.
Mitigation meas1UeS which provide buffers and protect riparian habitat reduce poten.tial impacts to
red-legged frog, California tiger ~ Jlilmlilnder, Western pond turtle, and tri-colored blackbird to a level
of insismifiClilnce.
IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: CALIFORNIA SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN
1M. 3.7/J
Golde.a. Eac1c: DestructioD of NestiD& Site
.,..
-." .; :"--::-:-,
.", .....'.:,.
Construction. and operation. of a proposed. road connecting Doolan Road to Tassajara Road could result
in. the loss of a golden. eagle nesting site. This loss would constitute a si2nificant imoact to the pair
of breeding eagles.
Nesting impacts to the golden eagle are reduced to a level of insi2nificance by the provision of a
Golden Eagle Protection Zone.
1M 3.7fK . GoldeD EaeJe: ElimiDatiOD of ForqiDe Habitat
The conversion of grassjands and the COnsequent reduction of potential prey are expected to reduce
the amount and quality of foraging habitat for golden eagles. ImpactS due to the reduction. of
foraging habitat are expected to be 'DOtenrial1v si2Dificant.
This impact is also 2. DOtentialJv silrnifie:llnr cumulative imoact due to its contribution to the overall
regioD3l1oss of {oraging habitat for this species as discussed in. Chapler 5.
The Project provides wide areas of undeveloped land which will reduce this impact to a level of
insi2nificanee.
1M 3.7/L
Golden Eqle aod Other Raptor ElectroartiollS
Direct mortality of golden eagles and other raptors which may perch or fly into high-voltage
tr:In~~ion.lin.es is a DOtentialJv si2Difieant imDaC't of the Project.
Undergrounding of utilities- will reduce this impact to a level of insi2Difieance.
1M3.7/M
Bmrolrill& owl
,e
, . :;',/,::~ .
. ....
/J ....
Ii I . ,:.'
SM-24
032
.::
'::'::
e"
. . ~ -.- .
. .. ~ .
\~{
~~SP/GPA:IDt
,
Impacts from h2fa,SSment and destrUction of burrows are ootentiallv sirnifi~nt.
1M 3.7/N
Americ::aJl bad&er
Badgers could be directly affected by destrUction of burroWS. poisons. or reduce prey populations.
Increased human activities could decrease badger populations. Impac13 are ootentiaJlv sienificant.
Buffer :zones will be provided to reduce impacts to burrowing owls and badgers to a level of
insirnifif"'2nce.
1M 3.7/0
Prairie falCOD. Dorthena hanier, aDd b1ac:k-sbou.ldered .kite
ImpactS due to loss of foraging habitat are DOtentiallv sirnifiC3llt.
1M 3.7/P
Sbarp-sbiDued hawk and Cooper's hawk
Impacts due to loss of foraging habitat are considered Dotentiallv sirnificant.
Proteetion and buffer :zones for riparian and freshwater marsh habitats should reduce impacts to
sharp-shinned hawk and Cooper's hawk to a level of insi2Uific:ance.
1M 3.7/Q
Short-Eared Owl
Impacts to Sbon-eared owl populations are considered insienifican.t due to the ).ack of appropriate
habitat.
No mitigation is required.
, 1M 3.7 {R.
California. Honaed Lizard
California horned li%ard distribution is fairly extensive throughout California and therefore habitat
loss anticipated -in the p1aJming area is considered to have an jnsirnifif"'2nt imoaet on -this species.
No mitigation is required.
IMPACIS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: SPECIAL STATUS INVERTEBRATES
1M 3.7/5 .' Special StatJIS InTertebra.tes
ImpactS to special statUS invertebrates cannot be estimated at this time and -are potentially significant.
Species-specific surveys shall be conducted in appropriate riparian/wetland habitats 60 days prior to
development will reduce this impact to a level of insi'!Difi~nce.
SECIION 3.1: VISUAL RESOURCES
IMPAcrs AND MITIGATION MEASUUS: VISUAL CHARACI'ER
1M 3.8/A
StaJldardized. -Tract" DeTelopJDeJlt
Generic .cookie-cuner- development conld obscure the ~c natural f~ ,of ~e Project site
SM-25
033
'. '. o' . do .'.. .....:.
~ Dabiia tiP/CPA J:m.
~
(such as its landforms, vegetation and watercourses) that make it a unique place with its own identity.
This is a ootentialJv-silmificant imD3ct.
.":..
, ,
The Specific PIan calls for establishment of a visually distinctive commtmity and reduces this impact
to a level of iD$imific:anee.
1M 3.8jB
AIteratiOD of Raral/Open Space V1SUal Character
Urban development of the Project site will substantially alter the existing rural and open space
qualities that ch.ancterize eastern Dublin. This is a ootentia1lv sismificant imoact..
This impact is also a ootentialJv SillDificant irreversible chan2e as discussed in Chapter 5.
Despite mitigation, this impact will remain DotentialJv si2nificant.
IMP ACTS AND MIIlGATION MEASURES: DISllNCTIVE NAlURAL FEATIJRES
1M 3.I/C
ObsauiDI DistiDctbe Natura) Features
The char2cteristic tlDvegetated (-spare-) landscape of the Project site heightens the visual importance
of existinl trees, watercourses, and other salient natunl and cultural features. The Project has the
POtential to obscure or alter these existing features and thereby reduce the visual uniqueness of the
site. This impact is DOtentiallv si2nificant.
The Plan calls for preservation of distinctive 'natural features to reduce this impact to a level of
imi2Jlific:ance.
.....
. .....
.,w....
IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: HILLSIDES AND RIDGES
1M 3.ljD
AlteratioD of YlSIIal Quality of Hillsides
Grading and excavatiOIl of building sites in hillside areas will severely COmpromise the visual quality
of the Project site. This is a DOtentialJv sirnificant imDaCt.
Sensitive grading policies reduce this impact to a level of insi2nificance.
1M 3.8/E
AlteratiOR of V1suI Quality of .Rid&es
St:ructu.re:s built in proximity to ridges may obscure or fragment the profile of visually-sensitive
ridgelines. This is a DOtentiallv si2nific:ant imoaet.
Ridgelands protections reduce this impact to a level of insignificance.
IMP ACTS AND MITIGATION MEAStJRES: VALLEY GRASSLANDS
1M 3.8/F
AlteratiOD of V1SIUI1 Charuter of Flatluds
Commercial and residential development of the Project site's flatlands will completely alter the
existing visual chan.c:ter resulting from valley grasses and agricultural fields. This is a 'DOtentiallv
,i>rnifi=r imDact. . ,.
This impact is also a DOtentiallv sirnificant irreveTSible ehan2e as discussed in ChD.pter 5.
:;.'1
No mitigation measure has been identified which can either .fully or JJarti3ny rM1tCe this impact.
. ....
SM-26
e,:,'
....:,,:
'. .
.:-.....
.::,
. .&. . ~
.w -.
l~D
B..-. ])gb&D SP /GP A J:Dl
!
I
Development of the Project site's flatter areas is reprded as a .t:rade-Of~ measure designed to
preserve slopes, hillsides and ridgelines. 'Ibis impact remains ~tentiallv si2nifie;mt.
IMP ACIS AND MlTIGATION MEASURES: WATERCoURSES
1M 3.8/G
Alteration of the VlSIlaJ Cha.rader of Watercourses
Urban development of the Project site in proximity to watercourses may d;m;ni<tll or eHmiMtf'! their
visibility and function as distinct landscape elements. 'Ibis is a ~tentia11v si2nifiMtnt imoact.
Revegetation of stream corridors and a comprehensive sueam corridor restOration program will reduce
this impact to a level of insi2nificance. -
IMPACIS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: COMMUNITY mENTITY
1M 3.8/H
Alteration of Dablin's VlSW Identity as a FreestudinC City
The visual perception of Dublin and Livermore as freestanding cities will be substantially altered.
This is a potentiallv si2nificant imoact.
Design guidelines in CJuzpter 7: Comrmmiry Design will reduce this impact to a level of insiEnificancc..
1M 3.8/1
Scenic VistaS
Development on the Project site will alter 'the character of existing scenic vistaS and may obscure
important sightlines. This is a DOtentiallv sirnifi~nt imoac:t.
Viewsheds will be identifed and pLeserved to reduce this impact to a level of insi2nifj~nce.
IM3.8/J
Scenic :aoates
Urban development of the Project site will signif"1C3l1tly alter the visual experience of travelers on
scenic routes in eastem ~b1in. This is 2 DOtentiallv silmifiMlnt imoact.
Designation of scenic routes,will reduce this impact to a level of insiEnifiMlnce.
SECI10N 3.9: CULTURAL 1tESOURCFS
IMPAeIS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: l'REBISTOlUC RESOURCES
1M 3.9/A
Disnaption or Destruction of Iden~fied Prehistoric Resources
Doe to the level of development proposed in the Project. it is assumed that all prehistoric siteS
identif"lCd in the 1988 inventory will be di:sL~bed or altered in some maDDer. This potential
disturbance is identified as a simifit:::mt imDaCt of the Project.
Protections under the guidaDce of a certified archaeOlogist will reduce this impact to a level of
insimifl~Tlce:
1M 3.9fB
Disruption or Destruction of Unidentified. Pre-Historic Resources
Previously unidentified pre-historic resources may exist on the Project site and would be subject to
..' .
SM-%7
035
B--. DU&a SPIGPA KIlt.
q...
I
potential disruption or destruction by construction and development activities associated with the
Project. This is a. ootentialJv si2nifieant imoact.
.'.
In-depth protections and measures will reduce this impact to a level of insi2nificance.
IMP ACTS AND MITIGATION MEASUltES: HISTORIC RESOURCES
1M 3.9 Ie
DUnaptiOD or DestradioD of Identified Historic Resources
Due to the level of development proposed in the Project, it is assumed that all historic sites identified
in the 19&8 inventory will be disturbed or altered in some manner. This potential disturbance is
identif'ICd as a si2nificant imoact of the Project.
InventOries and preservation programs reduce this impact to a level of insi2nificance.
1M 3.9/D
DisnaptioD or DestraCtiOD of Uaidentified. Historic Resoim:es
Previously unidentified historic resources may exist on the Project site and would be subject to
potential disruption or destruction by consuuction and development activities associated with the
Project. This is a oorentiaJlv si21lifieant imoact.
Preeonstruction protection measures would reduce this impact to a level of insi2nificance.
SEcnON 3.10: NOISE
.....
.',",".:",
1M 3.101 A
l;xposare of Proposed. HoasiIlz: to Future Roadway Noise
Proposed residential housing along Dublin Boulevard~ Tassajara Road, Fallon Road, Hacienda Drive
and Doolan Road will be exposed to future noise levels in excess of 60 dB CNEL. This is considered
a simificant imnact.
Required acoustical studies will reduce this impact toa level of insi2nificance.
1M 3.10/B
ExpoAue of Exfstbtl Residellces to Future Roadway Noise
Increased traffic noise on local roads would result in DOise level increases of 6 dB or more along
Doolan and Fallon Roads. This would be considered a simific:ant imoact.
impactS will be reduced to a level of DOtenm.l1V simificant since mitigation may Dot be feasible at
a1lloca.tions due to site constraints such as driveways or proximity to roadways.
1M 3.10/C
Exposare of Exis1iDz: ad Proposed DeTelopmcJlt to Airport Noise
The Project is located north and west of the Livermore MUDicipa1.Airport. According to the Airport
Land Use Policy Plan for Alameda County~ the future (1995) CNEL60 contour for the aiIport would
not extend into the Project area.. Although the area would be exposed to occasional single-event DOise
from aircraft flyovers~ average noise leveb (CNEL) would not exceed TItle 24 nor the City's
scmdards. Consequently ~ aircraft noise would be considered an insilmifieant im1)3ct..
e.
..".-.:.-.'
)1
No mitigation required.
. .
-~'.' ~ ..~.
1M 3.10/D
Exposare of Proposed ResideatiaI DeyelopmeJlt to Noise from Futa:re MIlitary
- .... ...
SM-2I
036'
e.,.
"
....:.:
. .~.
, .
.'-
+ . +. +~.
'.. .:. '-~~.
,
E--=a I>obaa SP /GP A EDt
.,
TraiDiDI ActiTities at Parks Rescne Forces Trainml Area (Camp Parks RITA) ancl
the Coa.aty Jail
Residential development on the Project site within 6000 feet of CamP Parks RFT A could be exposed
to noise impac1S from gunshots and helicopter overflights.1 If development is to proceed in this ~
then a detailed study should be made of the noise-generating activities and which mitigation measures
should be imposed. Exposure of proposed development to noise from CamP Parks RFT A and the
County Jail would therefore be considered a DOtentia11v sisznifit"':lnt imoact.
This impact will remain DOtentiallv simifi~nt since mitigation of Camp Parks and jail noise may not
be feasible at all locations.
1M 3.10/E
Exposare of ExistiDI &lid Proposed Resid.eaces to CoDStnlmoll Noise
CoI1SttUction would occur over years on the Project site. ConstrUction noise is considered a
DOtentia1lv silmifir""llnt imoact.
A Con.str11C1ion Noise Management Prognm will reduce impacts to a level of insisznifjcance.
1M 3.10/F
Noise Conflicts due to the AdjaceDCY of Diverse Lud Uses Permitted by Pla.n Policies
SIlPportiDI Mixed-Use Development
The presence of different land use types within the same development createS the possibility of noise
impacts between adjoining uses, partic:ularly when commercial and residential land uses abut. This
is considered a DOtentia1lv sj2Difi~nt imoaet.
Noise management plans will reduce this impact to insil!nifi~nt.
SECTION 3.11: AIR QUALITY
IMPACIS AND MITIGATION MEASURES: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
1M 3.II/A
Dust DepositiOD SoiIiDI Nuisance from CoIlStruCtiOD Actirity
Dust deposition soiling nuisance js a ootentiallv si2D.ifi~nt imoact :near any individual constrUction
site. Dust emissions also constitute a DOtentiallv si2Difi~nt cumulative imcact as discussed in ChaptQ"
5.
Measures adopted during the Project"s consttuetion phase will Teduce project dust deposition soiling
impacts to a level of insisznifi~nce but ootentiallv sisznifi~nt cumulative imnactS will remain..
1M 3.11;B
CoutnlC:tiOD Eqa.ipmeutfVehicle r.mimoRS
Ccmstruction equipment operation constitutes a chronic source of equipment/vehic:le emissions that
is a tlOtentiallv si2Difi~nt imoact.
'This impact is also a DOtentiallv sisznific:ant cumulative imoaCt as discussed ~ Chapter 5.
1 NoDe ~t of. the ~ Pla=., CoDtn c-ta Comlt)'. lQQQ.
-~
SM-29
031
~ Dabb SP/GPA Em.
~
~
Mitigation measures that mtntmt~ construction interface with regional non-Projectc traffic::
movement and other emissions control measures will provide some reduc::tion but this impact will
remain ootentia1lv si2nificant.
e::.
.' .
. ...
..
Because of the non-attainment status of the air ~ residual impactS will remain a Dotentia1lv
si2nifi~nt cumulative imDaCt as discussed in C1uzpleT S.
1M 3.ll/e
Mobile Soarce EmissiollS: ROG or NOx
Project implemenmtion/fun buildout will cause 500,000 daily automobile trips to be generated within
the air basin. This is a si2nifi~nt imnact.
Mobile source emissions may result in regional iInpacts through emissions of ozone precursor
pollutants. This impact is. therefore. a DOtentiaIlv sienificant cumulative imDaet as discussed in
C1uz.pler 5.
Implementation or mitigation measures will Dot achieve the 98% reduction in Project-related traffic
needed to reduce emissions below the ozone precmsor significance threshold. Residual air quality
.impacts will remain si2nific:ant.
1M 3.11/D
Mobile Source Emissions: CO
CO emissions are insilmific::ant.
No mitigation is required.
1M 3.11/E
Stationary Source Emissiou
.......
. .
.-. ...
Specific Plan build out will create emissions from a variety of miscellaneous sources which constitute
a si2nific:ant immct. .
This impact is also a DOtentialIv sienificant cumulative imnaet as discussed in Chapler 5.
Implementation or mitigation measures cannot achieve the eight-fold 1'educ::tion in stationary source
emissions needed to meet the insignificant project threshold. Stationary source emissions air quality
impacts remain sirnifi~t.
SECTION 3.12: FISCAL CONSIDERATIONS
IMPACTS.AND MIIlGATION MEASURES: OPERATING COSI'S AND REVENUES
1M 3.121 A
Fual Impacts to the Cost/ReyeJlue Bal.a.uce of the Oty of Dablill Bud&et
A.ssuming at least a 2S perc.ent share of property taxes. the I1sca.l analysis prepared for the Project
indicates that, after shor1ialls in the early yean, .Project-generated revenues would be more than
sufficient to cover Project-generated costS. (See Table m-9 in Appendix 7 of the Specific Plan for
more details). Therefore, the Project is e:x:pec:ted to have an insirrnificant impact On the cost,!revenue
baIaDce of the City's budget.
.i..
No mitigation is required.
I~~
IMP ACIS AND MITIGATION MEASU:RES: CAPITAL FACILITIES
....
;. t
SM-30
038
... ~~
.
.-,.
,'.
.'.-.- .
....
. ~ - ~
1~~
x.-tca D..bIia tIP IGP A EDt
II
I
1M 3.12/B
F1scaI Impacts related to the Cost aDd ProTision of Project-related. Infrastructure
Improvements
The Project will require capital facilities improvements which could have DOtentialtv silZIlifieant
impacts on the City's budget if these improvements are not fully funded through sources other than
City revenues from existing residents.
Implementation of new funding recommendations combined with implementation of existing City of
Dublin impact fees and funding mechanisms available to developers would mitigate f"1SC3l impactS
related to provision of needed infrastrUctUre to a level of insimificanee.
No funher mitigation is required.
CHAPTER 4.0: ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
4.1 INTRODUCTION: REQUIREMENT AND PURPOSE OF THE ALTERNATIVES
Four alternatives to the Project an: analyzed: Alternative 1: -No Project"; Alternative 2: Reduced
Planning A.rea; Alternative 3: R.educed Land Use l1uensities; and Alternative 4: No Del'dopment.
4.2 ORGANIZATION OF THE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Each altemative is described and evaluated according to its chief characteristics and signii:scant
environmental impacts relative to those of the Project. A land use table (Table 4.0-1) summarizes key
land use data for alternatives 1-3.
4.3 ALTERNATIVE 1: wNO PROJEcr
Pursuant to CEQA., this alternative provides a baseline CODdition for amlysis of the Project's impac1S.
The -No Projed Alternative is not a -no developmen~ altemative.
The most imporlmt reductions to Project impactS would be land use impacts related to alteration of
existing land use conditions. Traffic and circulation impacts would be substantially reduced.
Demands for sewer; water, recycled water, and storm drainage inf:rastI"11Ct'Ql would be substantially
less than under the Project. Impacts to biological, visual, and cultural resources would be
substantially reduced.
4.4 ALTERNATIVE 2: REDUCED PLANNING A.RE..4.
This alternative permits development in easter.D. Dublin within the current sphere-of-influence
boDIldary. Some reductions to environmental impacts would result from a reduced planning area..
especially impacts to the Doolan Canyon area. Traffic and circulation im:pacts from the Project on
Tn-Valley freeways would be reduced by 10 percent. Sewer, water, recycled water and storm
drainage impa.et:S would be slightly reduced. Significantly less habitat would be lost under Altemative
2.
4.5 ALTERNATIVE 3: REDUCED LAND USE INIENSITIES
This alternative reduces land use intensities throughout the Project -site by n;m;nic:ning the amount
of acreage devoted to large-scale commercia1land uses. Residential land uses an: concentrated in
Single Family and Medium Density. Some improvements to uart1C and ~tion im])8Ct5aIC
achieved. Alternative 3 would require sewer, water, recycled water and storm drainage improvements
..' .
SM-31
039
~ D1d:& SF/CPA Em.
~
similar to those in the Project. No reductions would be achieved for biolog.i~ vis~ or cultural
resources.
-. ..~
....
4.6 ALTERNAlIVE 4: NO DEYELOPMENT
This alternative proposes that no development take place on the Project site.
4.7 ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVES
This section I2I1ks the alternatives according to each alternative's ability, to achieve reductions in
environmental impacts compared to the Project. In order of superiority the alternatives are:
Alteruative 4, Alte.n1a.tive 1, AItemaitve 2, and Alternative 3.
4.8 ALTERNATIVES NOT SELECTED
The alternatives not selected for discussion are: Off-Size Alternative, and the Single Family
Alteruative.
CHAPTER 5: CEQ.4-MANDATED CONSIDERATIONS
As pan of its. required contents, CEQ.4 mandates that the EIR. discuss the fOllowing six subjects:
Cumulative Impacts; Growth-Inducing Impacts; Unavoidable Adverse Impacts; Shon-Term Uses
versus Long-Term Productivity; Significant Irreversible Changes; and Impacts Found Not to be
Significant.
5.1 CUMULATIVE IMPACIS
......:.
" .."
; :'.:".l"
Daily Traffic Volumes (Year 20]0 Without Project)
IM3.3/A
1-580 .Freeway, Tassajara-liaUoll
This section of 1-580 ~Ould exceed LOS E. This.is a silmificant Cumulative imoact.
MM 3..3/1.0 calls for the cooperatiOD. of the City of Dublin with Caltrans' efforts to construct
.auxiliary lanes on 1-580 between Tassajara and FalloD. roads.
Implementation of this'mitigation measure will reduce this impact to a level of insismifi~nCe.
Daily Traffic Volame5 (Yem- 2010 W-uk Project)
1M 3.3jB
1-580 .Freeway, 1-6IO-Ha.eicDda
This section of 1-580 will exceed LOS F with the Project. This is a si2I1ifj~nt cumulative imoact.
MM 3.3/2.0 aDd MM 3..3/3.JJ.require ,business with SO or more employees to participate in 'ISM
programs aDd for the Project to conuibute a proportionately to regio:aal transportation mitigation
measures..
Imp1emeZllztion of these mitigation measures will reduce this impact but not eliminate it.. It will
remain a silmific.::lnt cumulative imDaCt.
1M 3.3/C
1-510 Freeway, Tassajara-FaUoa-Ainra,.
.':
'.'
)~5
: \ .. ....
SM-32
040
.:;0
.....
...
"0: &+
./),&
1/
:s...-a D1IbIia SF /GP A JaIt
..,
1
LOS would exceed. level E on this section of 1-580 with the Projec:t. 'Ibis is a sillnifi~nt cumulative
imoact of the Project.
MM 33/3.0 calls for the Project's developers to contribute to the CODStrUction of auxiliary lanes on
1-580 between Tassajara Road and Airway Boulevard.
Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce this impact to a level of jnsiC1ifi~nce for
the Fallon Road-Airway Boulevard segment. LOS on the Tassajan-Fallon segment would remain a
si~jfj~nt cumulative imnact..
1M 3.3/D
1-680 Freeway, North of 1-680
LOS on 1-680 north of the 1-580 interchange would exceed level E. This is a sienificant cumulative
imoact.
MM 33/4.0 calls for the Project to contribute proportionately to planned improvements at the 1-
580/I-680 interchange.
Implementation of this mitigation measure would achieve LOS D operations and reduce this impact
to a level of insimifi~nce.
. Daily Traffic: Volumes (CunadatiJe Buildout With Project)
lM 3.3/E
Cumulatin Freeway Impacts
Additional freeway sections would exceed LOS E under full buildout of cumulative projects including
1-580 west of 1-680 (from LOS E to LOS F), and I-S80 east of Airway Boulevard (from LOS E to LOS
. F). This is a si2D.ifi~nt cumulative imnact.
MM 33/5.0 calls for the participation of local jurisdictions in regional t:raI1S?ortation mitigation
programs.
Despite implementation of this mitigation measure, this impact would remain a si21lifi~nt cumulative -
imna.ct. - .". . .
. Peak Hoar lDtersec:tioll OperatiollS (0DnulDti?e Bvildout W"ztk Project)
1M 331M Camulati!_e lIaP8.C7ts 011 ~bllll BouleTUd .
At the interseetion of Hacienda Drive with Dublin Boulevard, LOS would be at level F. At the
iIlte~on ofTassajan Road with Dublin Boulevard, LOS would be at level E. This is a ~21lifiMlnt
cmnulative lmnact.
MM 303/13.0 suggestS the constrUCtion of grade-separated interchanges on DUblin Boulevard ad/or
establishment o.f altemarlve routes to redistribute trafnc flow.
Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce but Dot eliminate this impact. It would
remain a ~i2D.ific:ant cumulative imnact.
1M 3.3fN
CIlmulatiye lapaels OD Tassajara Road.
LOS F operations would result at the inu:rsections of Tassajara Road with Fallon and Gleason roads
and the Transit Spine. This is a si2I1ific:ant cumulsrive imnact..
SM-33
041
~ Dahms SP/CPA JlDt
s--.-,.
MM 3J/14.o states that buiIdout of non-Project-rela.ted development would require the widening
of Tassajara Road to six lanes between Dublin Boulevard and the Contra Costa County line. This
widening would not be compatible with the proposed land use plan.
.:...~.."
.....: .
Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce the trafI1C impact. However. due to its
conflict with the proposed land use plan of the Project, this impact remains a ootentialJv si2nifica.nt
cumulative imna.ct.
Community Senia:s and Facilities
Fire ProtectiOD
1M 3.4/E
Exposure to Wildfire Hazards
The development of new residential development in ridgelands areas with difficult access exposes the
~ew. residential po~on to increased safety hazards from wildlands I1res. This is a DotentialJv
SJIi!:!1lficant CUmulatIve lmoact.
Mitigation for this impact is provided by MM 3.4/9.0. MM 3.4/10.0 and MM 3.4/11.0 which call for
project design that takes I1re safety into account, buffer zones for homes which adjoin wildlands. and
maintenance of buffer zones. and the integration of fire trails and lIre breaks into the trail system.
Additional mitigation for this impact is provided by MM 3.4/12.0 which calls for the preparation of
a wildf"Ire management plan.
Implementation of all of these mitigation measures will reduce this impact to a level of insili!:nifi~nce.
.....
"."
." .."
-: .::::...~::.~:
Parb ud Recreation
1M 3.4jX
1>>--"d (or Park Facilities
Increased population results in additional need for park and recreation facilities. The City of Dublin
Recreation Department is c:mrently.UDable to develop the Dougherty Hills Open Space due to a lack
of surncient il!WJcial resources. This is a DotentialJv si2l1ificant cmnulative jmoact.
MM $.4/24.0 requires that land be dedicated. and improved or that in-lieu fees be collected for the
2S parks desipliltM by the Project.
Mitigation for this impact is provided by MM 3.4/27.0 which requires that park development in
eastelll Dublin by consistent with the City of Dublin Park and Recreation Master Plan 1992. The
Master Plan contains standards and phasing to ensure the adequate provision of park facilities.
Together, these two mitigation measures will ensme that adequate monies are available for park
development and that park development is phased with residential development. Implementation of
both of these mitigation measures will redu.ce this impact to a level of insimificance.
Solid Waste
1M 4.4jP
Impact on Solid Waste Disposal Facilities
Solid wzste generated by the Project would contribute to the cumulative demand for landIill capacity~
and could accelerate the closure time for the Altamont landfill which is a regional facility handling
waste from Allilmeda. County and San Ff'!tnM~ County. Although the landfill operatOrs are pmsuing
an expamjon PrDgIam which would provide 350 million cubic yards of cap~ty.. the additional
e..
. ---.....
::-<:::"/.
J~1
SM-34
042
-~---~
.
.:
, ,
.--'::-
- . . + ~ -'
,-?it'
z...-. D8hIi:D SP /GP A J:Dl
CL
T
capacity cannot be counted until all permits are granted. This is a si2nifil"2nt cumulative imoac;t.
MM 3.4/39.0 and 3.4/40 call for the preparation of a Solid Waste Management PIon for the Project
and link approval for development in eastern Dublin to the availability of landnll capac:ity to absorb
projected wasteS generated by proposed development.
Implementation of both of these mitigation measures will reduce this impact to a level of
insie:nifil"2nee.
Sewer, Water ud Storm DraiDa&C
1M 3.4/D
Fature Lack of Wastewater Treatmellt Capacity
Development of the Project will contribute to cumulative demand for treatment capacity from
DSRSD.This is a ootentiallv si2nifiMlnt cumulative imoact on these facilities.
This impact is reduced by MM 3.5/8.0 and 3.5/9.0 which require that v.'2Stewater treatment facilities
be available to meet the needs of future development in eastern Dublin and that DSRSD can co:cstrUct
the facilities it needs.
Implementation of both of these mitigation measures will reduce this impact to a level of
insi2nific:anee.
1M 3.5/G
Lack of Cunellt Wastewater Disposal Capacity
The Project, combined with other subregional development. will result in an. increase in subregional
wastewater flows to the wastewater export facilities of the Tri- Valley. Until new capacity is
developed, Project wastewater will continue to represent a si2nifi~nt adverse cumulative imoac:t.
MM 3.5/11.0 through MM 3.5/14.0 call for the City of Dublin to support the TWA in its carrent
effort to implement a new wasteWater export pipeline and to promote water recycling as a means of
reducing wastewater flows. '
Implementation of all of these mitigation measures will reduce this impact to a level of insicmifieance.
Water
1M 3.5/Q
Iac:rease ill DeIllUd. for Water
The Project, combined with cumulative projectS. will increase the ovenl1 demand for water.in the
Tri- Valley at a time when water supplies and deliveries are uncertain- The following discuSSion of
water supply and potential cumulative impacts is men from the Western Dublin SpecifiC
Plan/General Plan Amendment Final ErR.
Stona Drailutee
1M 3.5/y
POteJltiaJ FloodiaE
The increase of impervious surfaces associated with development on the Project site would jncreaSe
the volume and rate of runoff in local creeks and watercourses. thus contributing to a potential
increase in flood hazards.
1M 3.5/Z
Red..accd Ground....ter Recharle
SM-35
043
x..... Dobia sP 1Cl' A J:m.
~'rT
The Project would contribute to the increase in impervious surfaces in the Tri- Valley which could
result in a reduction in groundwater recharge. This is identified as a DOtentialJv silZnifjeant
cumulative imD8.ct.
..
1M 3.5/ AA
Sources or PollutloD.
The Project would contribute to a subregional increase in non-point pollution sources. thus leading
to a deterioration in the Quality of runoff. This is a DOtentiallv si2nifjc:ant cumulative imoaet..
Soils. GeoIO&)' ad Seismicity
1M 3.6/C
Earthquake GrouD.d Shakin&: Secondary Effects
The Project site is located in. a region subject to ground shaking from active faults. Further
settlement of population in the area has the potential to expose residents to significant safety hazards
and to strain the capacity of emergency response systems. This is a potential silZnificant cumulative
imoact.
1M 3.6{D
Substantial Alteration to Project Site Ludforms
Grading and excavation will permanently alter the existing landform of the Project site. This impact
will contribute to the cumulative process of landform alteration as hillsides and ridgelands of
SUITOunding cities of the Tri- Valley are also graded and excavated for development projects. This
is a si2nifieant c:umulative imDact as well as a si21lificant irreversible chan2e to the local environment.
1M 3.6/1.
ErosiOD ad SedimeDtatiou: LoDe Term
......
...
"... -
Grading and construction activities on the Project site will occur concurrent with development of
~imi12" sites throughout the Tri- VaDey. At a subregional level. the Project will contribute to both
shon-term and long-term increases in erosion and sedimentation and POtentially impact'the
hydrological coDditiom of subregional watercoUISes. This is a Si2nifi.C2Dt cumulative imDaCt of the
Project. .
BiDlocicaJ :R.esoarces
1M 3.7/A
Direct Habitat Loss
The Project will contribute to the ongoing process of habitat loss in the Tri- Valley region and is
considered a Si2nificant cumulative imoa.ct.
JM.3.7/C
.Loa or DearadatiOD. of BotaDic:aJly Seasith'e Habitat
.
The continued loss and deterioration of bomnica.l1y sensitive habitat.
IM3.7/X
Golde. Eape: ElimiDatiDD or Forap.nE Habitat
The ongoing urban development of rangelands and hillsides in the Tri- VaIley is contributing to the
cumulative loss of foraging habitat for golden eagle and other raptors such as prairie falcon. Dorthern
harrier. and blaclc:-shouldered kite. This is a potentially si2nifi~l1t cumulative imDaCt..
VlStlal Resources
1M 3.8/B
Alteration of RllraJ/OpeD space VlSIIa1 Character
.:
.' .
,1Q1
SM-36
044
..:;
4t::-
.~-:
- ~. -.. ..~
. .. ~
/.~D
~ ))abIiIl 51' /GP A xm.
ct.
...,
Development of the Project would contribute to the on-going process in which the natur2l rural
cb.uacter of the Tri- Valley is replaced with urban development.
Noise
1M 3.1D/B
Exposure of Existin& R.esidences to Future R.oad.....y Noise
The Project would contribute to cumulative traffic-related noise impacts in the region.
Air Quality
1M 3.11/ A
Dust Deposition SoUma: Nuisance from CoUStnlc:tiOD Actirity
This is a ~tentiallv si2Difi~nt cumulative imoact due to the Don-attainment statUS of the air basin.
1M 3.11/B
CoDStnlction Equipmeat/V chicle Emissions
This is a oorentiallv sjmifi~nt cumulative imDact due to the non-attainment statuS of the air basin..
1M 3.11/C
Mobile Source Emissions: ROO and NOx
Mobile source emission may result in regional impactS through emissions of ozone precursor
pollutants. This impact is. therefore. a DOtentiallv sismific:mt cumulative imoact.
1M 3.11/E
StatioUl"Y Source EmissioDS
StatiOnary source emissions may create a potentially significant impact from regional electricitY
generation emissions. from on-site natural gas combustion. and from miscellaneous non-vehicular fuel
combustion and volatile Organic coJDf)OUIld evaporative emissions. Residual impactS wiD. be
sirnifi~nt cumulative imoactS because of the non-attainment statUS of the airshed.
5.2 GROWTH-lNDUCING IMPACIS
Growth-inducing impacts. as deimed by CEQA. Guide1ines: Section 15126 are those which could
"foster economic or population gro~ or the constrUction of additional housing. either direCtly or
indirectly. in the sarroudiDl environment.- The focus of this discUsSion is Project impactS that may
lead to growth. outside the boundaries of the Project site.
eo_uait)' .Serric:es aDd Facilities
1M 3.4/Q
:p.--.d for Utility ExteDSiollS
Development of the Project site will require expansion of electrical and gas lines onto undeVeloped
lands currently in agrieulnual and open space JaIld uses.
Se....er, Water ud Storm J>raiDar;e
1M 305/e . ExteDSioll of A Sewer TruDk. Line with Capacity to Sene Ne.... DenlopmenU
The extenSion of sewer inftaSUUcmre onto the Project site may have a 2rowth-inducinli! imoa.l:<10n
adjacent undeveloped areas in Alameda County and Contn Costa County.
1M 305fT
lDdacemellt of SubstaDtial Growth aDd Conceatration of population
The water distribution system infrastI'Ucmre bas been sized in anticipation of growth beyond the
.. .
SM-37
045
:z....- I>abma f1:p IGP A J:Dl.
9
I
Project site (particularly. the Dougheny Valley to the north) and will cenainly facilitate development
within the total Project site as a result.
.".
'.'
5.3 UNA VOmABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS
Pursuant to CEQA.. a draft EIR must d.escribe those significant environmental impacts for which no
mitigation or only partial mitigation are feasible. While mitigation measures have been proposed for
these impactS. the impact would not be reduced. to an insignificant level without SUbstantially altering
the basic characteristics of the Project.
Traffic aDd Circ:ulatiOD
1M 3.3fB states that even with mitigation, LOS would exceed the significance threshold established
by the City on I-S80 between 1-680 and Hacienda Drive. This remains an nnavoidable adverse imoact
of the Project.
1M 3.3/E states that under the Cumulativ~ Buildout with Projea scenario. LOS would exceed the
significance threshold established by the City. Even with mitigation. this impact remains an
unavoidable adverse imDact of the Project.
1M 3.3/1 states that by the year 2010, development with the Project will cause LOS F operations at
the intersection of Santa Rita Road with the 1-580 eastbound ramps. Mitigation will reduce this
i.mpact but will create silZIlificant indirect imoacts as drivers seek alternate routes to avoid the poor
circulation conditions. This impact remains. therefore. an unavoidable adverse imDact.
1M 3.3 1M states the onder the Cumultlli,e Buildout with Project scenario. LOS would exceed the City's
significance thresholds at two key intenections of Dublin Boulevard: Hacienda Drive and TassajBI3
Road. Implementation of MM 3.3/13.0 would reduce but not eliminate this impact. It remains an
unavoidable adverse imDact of the Project.
e.-"
'. ','
+. '.' ..'
The .impact of the Project on level-or-service (LOS) at Tassajara Road intersections is identified as
a silZIlificant cumulative imoac:r 1M 3.3/N. To mitigate this LOS F. Tassajara Road would need to
be widened tb at least six.1anes. A widening of this kind would fundamentally change the visual and
physical character of the pllmTted community. It is considered preferable to leave Tassajan Road at
its current width and to accept Congestion as an Wlavoir1~hle adverse imnact of the Project.
Commwty Serrices aDd Faclllties
The extenSion of utility lines onto the Project site for gas. electric aDd telephone semce has been
identiiIed as a sieificant 2TOwth-induciDlZ immct of the Project. If the Project.is to be developed.,
these ext=nsioIlS will be a necessity aDd are. therefore. unavoidable adverse imDaCtS. Substantial
mitigation can be achieved by MM 3.7/26.0 which calls for the undergrounding of utilities lines.
Implementation of this mitigation measure will red.uce this impact to a level of insilZnificance.
Air Quality
RqionaI OzoDe EmissiODS
Motor vehicles ~4ted with the Project would contribute to regional ozone emissions. Given the
region's existing non-compliance with air quality standards, and regulatory requirements to red.ace
ozone emissions. this would be a simifi~t unavoidable adverse imDaCt. Mitigation measures in the
EIR. would not reduce this impact to an in~gnttJCaJ1t level
...
j '-
Noise
} Lf{.
SM-38
046
.:;
.-~
- -
.:..
}~j-
~ DUb SP/GPA EIB.
s-,.
Increased traffic on area roadways will significantly increase noise levels. thus adversely affecting
existing residences and population. Mitigation can be achieved to buffer residents from levels that
exceed acceptable standards. by providing berms or walls adjacent to outdoor use spaces of existing
residences. However. the magnitude of change in the noise environment, from quiet rural roads with
little tI2ffic to busy suburban thoroughfares. c::an.Dot be avoided. This is. therefore. an unavoidabl~
adverse imoact of the Project.
V1suI
Development of the Project area will adversely impact the existing rural. agricultural charaCter of the
area., eliminating the sense of simpliciry and openness that currently charac'terizes the planning area
landscape. Although the highest ridgelines would be preserved as open space. the visual charac:!er of
the rounded lower foothills in the foreground would be altered by constrUction of homes and roads.
This is. therefore. an unavoidable adverse imoact of the Project.
SA SHORT-TERM VERSUS LONG- TERM PRODUCTIVITY
The impacts d.iseu!sed. below are those which would narrow the range of long-term beneficial uses
of the site. If the Project is approved. the Ciry of Dublin would. by this action. foreclose other future
beneficial and productive uses.
Caltl1raI Resources
Despite archaeological surveys performed to date. it is possible that unidentified prehistoric sites may
exist on the Project site.
5.5 SIGNIFICANT IRllEVERSJBLE CHANGES
This discuSSion evaluates the Project in terms of its consumption of irretrievable natural reso~.
The discuSSion also focuses on Project land uses that will make it unlikely for future generations to
reverse or remove these land use decisions.
Electricity, Natmal Gas od Telephone Senice
1M 3.4/S
CollSUJDption or NOIl-ReDewable Natural Resources
The Project will increaSe demand for Don-renewable fuel sources. including fossil fuels used in the
generatiOD of electricity. and namm1 gas.
Sewer. Water 011 Storm DraiDa&e
1M 3.5/F
lDc:rease in Enerey Usaee Throu&h Increased Wastewater Treatment
and
1M 3.5/H
lDc:rezse in Enerey Usaee Through Increased Wastewater Disposal
Development of the Project will increase demand for non-renewable fuel sources. including fossil
fuels for electriciry.
1M 3.5jU
lJu:rease ill Ellerey Usaee Through Operation of the Water Distributioll System
Analogously. the water distribution system required by the Project will increase demand for energy.
primarily for pumping water to the system and for stonge.
SM-39
047
\
.
'\
'/h
I~/
~~SP/Gl'AEDt
~
Geo1oa, SolIs ud Seismicity
As stated in Section 5.1: Cumulatiye Impacts above. grading and excavation of the Project sire will
perDWlently change the existing physical condition of the Project site. Once the landscape is graded
to create safe and stable building sites. it is highly unlikely that it will revert at some future ~e to
its natural condition.
BiolOlic:a1 Resoarc:es
In developed portions of the Project site. direct habitat Joss (IM 3.71 A) will be total and permanent.
This representS a si21lifi~nt irreversible chanRe to those portions of the General Plan Amendment
area. This loss of habitat would also cause the reduction or el;minRtion of dependent wlldlife~
including some special statuS species.
5.6 IMP ACIS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT
Discussed below are impactS which. although they appear significan~ were determined to be
insi2nifi~nt. .
GeololY, Soils ud Seismicity
1M 3.6/E
Elimination of Future Use or Project Site for A21repte Resources
The use of the Project site for urban development will preclude future extraction of aggregateS.
Noise
1M 3.10jC
Exposure of ExistiD~ ud Proposed DeyelopmeDt to Airport Noise
ImpactS due to aircraft noise were found to be insi2nifi~nt since the CNEL 60 contour does not
. extend upon the Project site.
SM-40
.;
"
)
e-'
~~ -. -
.....
. .'
, '.
.......
.-...
048
.'
_ - 'l'r:,~:IIl'.!.
;:>=~ -
U
I.'l
n.
I
CI L
) HJ,...J
L
[)
I:
0 Q
.. I
0 [)
CI
~ :?;
..^'-' Cl Pi"':."......
e:.
1'''pr~5'''.!.
?"'~
U
I.'l
I
o
u
::....~=;-;
U
"'0
I '-
CI ~
t: I CI
U\- n. I r "5
w Ifl 0
" + :J III
~ 1 ,~
1i
:l
F U 0
Z
~
0
>
L
0
I: ~
0
III
0
CI
~
o
U
I
I
=-^,!.J::: ?Fl,.:.,..I'c'"
e:.,
/~~
I
---Ui)JlOf:U
001 010 O~~:E 0 ~)..1I "Z
Ii U Y+"-E c t :lJ:n..Il E u,,-
'-lElf~e"lIn..~ "'Oll.~O
" r\ 0 1] 3! 3! 3! ... u, 1: e ..!l n. ..
Eu,.......t>-_tll "
E.Jl"eJ~"~Ut~~b
OR.~OCOCIL ~+ '-OCO
~ijn.1:1::f~:ll~ x.1]~U\
OUO...ij.IlE G1~ ...
ij Jiiill.Q.!! .Ill: {l
5 .000" W )....!! 2
:l - un. U
\!) ~J:iE~ E 1:
-Ol_::Idi U
- I - u,
I 11 Z
EI
:J
'6
"
L
o
'I "Ifl
U02III.J\!)wn..
\!)U_
" 0 + ..
--0 uO't l:.
-0 'Jlo o~+:n 0 0 >-""
~Ii U ~"-E"-E I: t: ::Iiin..Il E g
'- dEn. e ''.!{In.1I\ >-"U R-,-
"GO "U"'O "-- +- "-n.
EE o-...E>--t"
EE.L:"J~"liUE~~
ooi1iltltlL m+ '-01:
U~ ~-ti.f".f.fG~ i ~"'O~
"UOU1:....E.IlE till
gij 1:5i~Q.!!.Il~
J:I: 0"00 W >-..!!
'-" .!! on.
]\!) J:..r:OlE~ E
J: Ul::l _
..!!l II '6 11\ U
" Ell\!)
Z ::II
'6
01
I
I "11\
UUOn.IIL.J\!)wn..
Z\!)U_
[VH-ifiB,< IT
U\ -iI '(fa'
1:
U
0..
u
L
m
1:
m
~
I:
U
ll.
u
~
u
Q)
n...
III
\J
Q)
m
o
n...
~
ll.
1:
u
'0..
u
L
(\)
1:
m
~
1:
U
ll.
u
~
u
Q)
n...
tl)
m
1:
+=
m
'x
III
s-
" U) ."-
., ).]iiiiL). U
: J:t...c>(::>5l!J='..!. ~~t~~~
uuUUall ~
'bE3!3!U+- L
E .. 13 U
\!l 0 ~ ~ ~\!l ...n
~ U I"" ::J ~ :l
a I L tOt: U)
\i'LU Uu
.U+-o Ii
~iilL I J:
"E I-UU U
~ ~ ~ fi-
U
:i 1-1-
0 U
lD
c q:
:= .0
: .J}
U ::J
. 2- a ~
L
0 n.
c ~ (IilU\!l_. {{}
.... 0
-. .
u
. " "U
- ~ u
.
. . m
- D,,!-,O Pi"''''''">o::'' 0
. n.
0
L
fi-
e ...,
" '.
::
. ).ii li li L ). U)
pC=='"e! ~li++~~ U
Lt:t:r
.. U Il Il " G ~
'b~~~U1i L
\!lo""~\!l U
aU1i11 u ...n
ij,~~61!
\i'i"1iUtl :l
=1:1:& 1 U)
u " .. I
"E rUU r:
t: U
~ t: ~
Cl ~ 0
t: " 01- n.
:n. :i r
dl I)
lD U
: i: t:
. "" ~
t: .J}
~ 13 ::J \)
f: 0
1: \U
: a
" ll..
t: a^!-'I"'''''",,!=H (IilU\!l_.
I) U)
.
I)
u I
~ m
I:
+
" D~C:: PF'-'>o::" Ul
'x
Ul
.,:
I ~;7
..~~:,
..
.
....
.
.
+
.
..
II'
.
. 11
,. ~
2. ,
..... II
n. . . . . . ... ...
c. ~ ::>PU'"!='r-l
o
II.
~.
~.
.
.
a"l-'C1 PI""""''''''
.'~
.
.
.
.+ ,=
c=
.. IE
· IIIS
. +=
. Ii::
c=
u. 0::
>. F~=
1:.
n. ... !~~F~~H
5. .. =
~H I
a"l-' CI PI"'''""'~
.
/~b
E
m
1.. 1i 1i +
tOL:L: m
u u >-
~~~tl)
U
~
~
u
"5
o
a
:J
n
1..
o
0'
I
1..
~\J
I U
o
it
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1:
U
n.
o
q:
'0
m
n..
\Il
\J
\1)
m
o
n..
o
l..
n.
E
1.. 1i 1i ~,~
t1i1i1i. m
.!! t t III >-
~<(~~\Il
1.. 0 \)
II 0'....
U'Il-"U
I U
o
it
-0'
1..
~
U
~
10
.&
:n
:J
n
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I:
U
D-
o
~
o
\1)
lL
(f)
m
1:
"+
Ul
-X
III
~
\ \0 ,
'" o{~~ 'I