The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem 6.3 Attachment A, B, C I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REZONING APPLICATION FOR 7S ACRE SANTA RITA RETAIL SITE GENERAL INFORMATION Project Location: Seventy-five acre site in the northeast quadrant of the 1- 580/Hacienda Drive interchange; Bounded by Hacienda Drive on the west, Dublin Boulevard on the north, Tassajara Creek on the east, and 1-580 on the south. Project Name: Santa Rita Commercial Center - Tri-Valley Crossings Project Description: Stand-alone Planned Development rezoning to permit General Commercial uses, with subsequent permits to be processed separately. Zoning District: Planned Development APN: 946-15-1-4 (partial) Co-Applicant Name: Homart Community Centers! Alameda County Surplus Property Authority WRITTEN STATEMENT Homart Community Centers and Alameda County Surplus Property Authority ("Applicants") are requesting that the City of Dublin rezone a 75+ acre portion of the 951 acre Santa Rita property in Eastern Dublin to permit general commerciaVretail uses. Presently, the site is zoned "Planned Development - Business Park/lndustrial (low coverage)" as defined in Zoning Ordinance 25-85. Under this ordinance, all projects within this District must be processed as a new Planned Development rezoning, complying with the 1985 General Plan designation. The Dublin General Plan (pages 1-5) states that the existing zoning classification is "intended to provide a campus-like setting with open plazas and landscaped pedestrian amenities for the Primary Planning area (research, limited manufacturing and distribution activities, and administrative offices that do not involve heavy trucking or generate nuisances) and to allow retail uses to serve business and residents (emphasis added). Maximum floor area ratio, to be determined by zoning regulations, should be between .25 and .37". In May, 1993, the Dublin City Council approved the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, which was upheld by a citywide referendum in November, 1993. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan designates this site for General Commercial (.20 to .60 FAR). According to the Specific Plan, this designation "accommodates a range of regional and community-serving retail, service, and office uses." RECEIVED SEP 0 6 1994 'I'BUN PLANNINr I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Rezoning Application Page 2 Consistent with both the 1985 General Plan designation and the newly adopted Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and as required by current zoning, the applicants are requesting that this 75 acre site be rezoned to a PD (Planned Development General Commercial) District to provide a dynamic retail/office/entertainment environment to serve businesses and residents. The Alameda County Surplus Property Authority is seeking to sell this 75 + acre site to Homart Community Centers for general commercial uses, while retaining full control over the remaining portion of the 951 acre Santa Rita property. On May 2, 1994 the Dublin Planning Commission found that this proposed sale is consistent with the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The Authority and Homart Community Centers will seek subsequent Site Development Review from the City for commercial projects, following leasing of the site. All structures, circulation, parking, landscaping and signage is subject to site development review and the development standards set forth herein. A parcel map is required to be completed in accordance with City of Dublin standards and recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. The Santa Rita Rehabilitation Center, of which this site is a part, is an ASPIS listed site, requiring "low priority preliminary endangerment assessment" by the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) Office. A Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Report was completed in January, 1994. Several underground storage tanks have been removed and are currently under review by regulators for closure. PROJECT BENEFITS This rezoning will have the following benefits to the City of Dublin: 1. It will replace an existing unsightly vacant property with a vibrant retail environment to serve Dublin businesses and residents. 2. It will provide much needed space for existing Dublin retail businesses to expand, while still remaining within the City of Dublin. 3. It will provide increased tax revenue to the City through increased retail sales tax. 4. It will provide job opportunities to City residents. 5. It will provide a source of funds to pay for the recently completed Hacienda DrivelDublin Boulevard extension. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Rezoning Application Page 3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The PD District will have the following standards: I. Permitted Uses The following principal uses are permitted in the PD District. A. Retail commercial establishments, including, but not limited to, the following: 1. General Merchandise Store 2. Discount/Warehouse Retail Store 3. Clothing/Fashion Store 4. Shoe Store 5. Home Furnishing Store 6. Office Supply Store 7. Home AppliancelElectronics Store 8. Home Improvement Store 9. Music Store to. Hobby/Special Interest Store 11. Gifts/Specialty Store 12. Jewelry and Cosmetic Store 13. Drug Store 14. Auto Parts Store 15. Toy Store 16. Book Store 17. Pet Supplies Store (including in-store veterinary clinic) 18. Sporting Goods Store 19. GrocerylFood Store 20. Automobile Service and similar uses that sell goods based on price and quality. B. Eating, drinking and entertainment establishments, including, but not limited to, the following: 1. Restaurant 2. Wine or liquor bar with on-sale liquor license 3. Micro-brewery 4. Nightclub I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I I Rezoning Application Page 4 5. Indoor movie theater 6. Delicatessen 7. Specialty Food 8. Bakery 9. Ice Cream Shop to. Sandwich Shop 11. Video ArcadelRentals 12. Drive-thru Facilities, including restaurants. C. Office and service establishments including, but not limited to: 1. Bank/Savings and Loan 2. Real Estate/Title Office 3. Travel Agent 4. Legal 5. Accounting 6. Medical and Dental 7. Optometrist 8. Architect 9. Employment Agency to. HairlBeauty Salon 11. Cleaner and Dryer 12. Shoe Repair 13. Key Shop 14. Tailor 15. Athletic Club 16. Formal WearlRental 17. Other Administrative and Professional Office 18. Hotel 19. Technology Access Center 20. Tele-Commuting Center II. Conditional Uses The following are conditional uses in the PD District and shall be permitted only if approved by the Planning Commission or the Zoning Administrator pursuant to Section 8 - 94.0, "CONDITIONAL USES," of the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance. \. A. Commercial uses such as: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Rezoning Application Page 5 1. Community, religious and charitable institutional facilities 2. Public Facilities and uses 3. Veterinary Office 4. Recycling Center 5. In-patient and out-patient health facilities as licensed by the State Department of Health Services 6. Gas Station 7. Outdoor food vendors 8. Automobile sales B. Prohibited Uses: 1. Residential uses 2. Drilling for and/or removal of oil, gas, or other hydrocarbon resources 3. Distillation of bones 4. Dumping, disposal, incineration, or reduction of garbage, sewer, offal, dead animals or refuse 5. Stockyard or slaughter of animals 6. Cemeteries 7. Migrant or other camps 8. Storage of radioactive materials III. Site Development Review Any structure, circulation, parking, landscaping and signage shall be subject to Site Development Review (pursuant to Section 8-95): unless zoning approval is granted upon the determination that the construction constitutes a minor project and that the Building Permit plans are in accord with the intent and objectives of the Site Development Review procedures. IV. Setbacks and Yards A. Minimum Setbacks: The minimum setbacks for buildings, accessory structures, parking areas, driveways and loading areas shall be as follows: . Along Interstate 580: 20 feet from right-of-way. . Along Hacienda Drive: 20 feet from right-of-way. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Rezoning Application Page 6 · Along Dublin Boulevard: 20 feet from right-of-way. · Along Tassajara Creek: A minimum 100 foot setback from the top of bank will be maintained along Tassajara Creek. The setback zones shall be fully landscaped with both hardscape (private sidewalks and other hard surfaced areas) and softscape (trees, shrubs, ground cover, etc.). Exceptions to the above setback requirements are the following: 1. Architectural projections (such as eaves, columns, balconies, arcades, awnings, steps and decks) which may encroach up to a maximum of to feet into a required setback, with a minimum setback of to feet from a street right-of-way. 2. Freestanding signage: As permitted in the Master Sign Program. B. Minimum Yards: The required setback for all yards is 0 feet. V. Maximum Building Heights Buildings and other structures will be limited to a maximum height of 75 feet in this District. VI. Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) The overall maximum floor area ratio for this district will be .25% permitting a total of approximately 800,000 square feet of Gross Leasable Area (GLA) on 75 acres. VII. Parking and Loading A. Parking and Loading Spaces. There shall be provided and maintained in accordance with these standards, off-street automobile parking and loading spaces for every building and use. No building or structure shall be erected or use established and no existing building shall be structurally altered, unless there be already in existence, or unless provision therefore is made concurrently with such erection or structural alteration or new use, the I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Rezoning Application Page 7 number of parking spaces and loading spaces necessary to meet the minimum requirements hereinafter set forth. B. Continuing Character of Obligation. The maintenance of the parking and loading spaces required shall be a continuing obligation of the owner of the real estate upon which the building or structure is located as long as the building or structure exists and the use requiring such space continues. It shall be unlawful for an owner of a building or structure affected by these requirements to discontinue, change or dispense with or to cause the discontinuance, sale or transfer of such building or structure, without establishing alternative spaces which conform to those requirements; or for any person, firm, or corporation to use such building or structure without providing such required parking or loading spaces, in compliance with these standards. C. Parking Spaces: Accessibility. These standards are intended to provide off- street spaces for the parking of the automobiles of tenants of the premises and for clients, customers, employees, and callers. They are required to be kept accessible for the purposes continuously, and the use of any such required space or spaces, uses other than these specified, shall constitute discontinuance thereof in violation of Section 8-63.1. D. Parking Spaces: Size and Location. A standard parking stall shall be a minimum of nine (9) feet wide by a minimum of eighteen (18) feet in length. Compact stalls shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet wide by a minimum of seventeen (17) feet in length. Compact parking spaces may comprise up to 25% of the required parking spaces. Where parking spaces abut sidewalks or landscape areas the length of parking stall may be reduced by two feet. - E. Loading Spaces: Size and Location. Required loading space at buildings aggregate floor area less than forty-thousand (40,000) s.f. shall be not less than ten (to) feet in width and twenty (20) feet in length. Required loading spaces at buildings with an aggregate floor area over forty-thousand (40,000) s.f. shall be not less than ten (to) feet in width and sixty (60) feet in length. Every required loading space shall be clear to height of not less than fourteen (14) feet. Every required loading space shall be on the same lot as the structure it serves or on an abutting lot and shall be continuously accessible from the street. No loading space shall occupy any part of a required parking space, or any required street side yard or a corner lot. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Rezoning Application Page 8 F. Parking and Loading Spaces: Approval of Plan. A site plan showing the location of the existing and proposed building or buildings and other improvements, the location of all required parking and loading spaces, and all provisions for maneuvering space and access thereto from a public right-of- way including proposed curb cuts, shall be submitted and approved as being convenient and functional prior to the issuance of Building Permit. No approval of occupancy shall be issued upon completion of a building or structural alteration of a building or for any land use when no buildings are erected or altered, unless and until all such spaces as required and as shown upon approved plans and made a part of the Building Permit are in place and ready for use. G. Parking and Loading Spaces: Maintenance. All parking and loading spaces, access driveways, and maneuvering areas required shall be graded and well drained and shall be maintained with all weather dust-free surfacing. Lighting of parking and loading spaces shall be so arranged as to be directed downward and away from any residential area. H. Collective Action Permitted. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent the joint use of parking or loading space for two (2) or more buildings or uses if the total of such spaces provided is not less than the sum of the requirements for the individual uses computed separately in accordance with these standards. I. Number of Spaces Required. The number of parking and/or loading spaces required shall be calculated based on gross floor area for retail and office uses, and customer service area for restaurant uses. When the calculation results in a fractional number, any fraction up to and including one-half (112) shall be disregarded and any fraction over one-half (112) shall be adjusted to the next higher whole number. J. Parking Spaces Required: The number of parking spaces required shall be not less than specified in the following table: USE PARKING REQUIRED 4.5/toOO sq. ft. 7/toOO sq. ft. 115 seats 4/toOO sq. ft. Retail Restaurant Theater Office I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Rezoning Application Page 9 Exception: Where an attested copy of a contract between the parties concerned is filed with the Application for Building Permit, which contract sets forth a valid agreement for joint use of parking spaces for the life of the buildings or uses concerned and a parking study has been approved by the Zoning Administrator demonstrating that a lesser number of parking spaces would be appropriate for the proposed used, through shared use of parking, then the number of required parking spaces shall be reduced in accordance with the number indicated in the approved parking study. K. Loading Spaces Required: Every allowable use which has an aggregate gross floor area of fifteen-thousand (15,000) square feet or more, shall provide loading spaces in accordance with the following: Aggregate Gross floor Area (sq. ft) Number of Loading Spaces required 15,000 - 40,000 over 40,000 - toO,OOO over 100,000 - 160,000 over 160,000 1 2 3 3 plus 1 for each full 80,000 square feet in excess of 160,000 L. Minimum Aisles Widths: Parking aisles with two-way traffic shall have a minimum width of twenty-two (22) feet for parking angles of 0, 30, 45 and 60 degrees. Parking aisles with two-way traffic shall have a minimum width of 24 feet for 90 degree parking angle. Parking aisles with one-way traffic shall have minimum widths as follows: a) 15 feet for parking angles of 0, 30, and 45 degrees. b) 18 feet for a parking angle of 60 degrees. c) 24 feet for a parking angle of 90 degrees. M. Bicycle Facilities: Bicycle parking facilities shall be provided, at the minimum, at a ration of one space per 150 required automobile spaces. These facilities, which would provide for convenient parking and locking of bicycles shall be located adjacent the fronts of buildings and dispersed throughout the shopping center. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Rezoning Application Page 10 IX. Signage: The Master Sign Program will be submitted for review with the Site Development Reveiw package. X. Landscape: A minimum ratio of twenty (20%) percent of the gross land area will be provided in open space, which shall include landscape, entry, plaza and sidewalk areas. The minimum ratio of landscape to gross land area shall be as follows: Perimeter site areas: Parking areas: Ten (10%) percent Five (5%) percent The landscape/open space concept is illustrated in the sketches following this section. wp51\homart\dublin\rezoning.app / I n '. n A n n n o ft 00 V) I ~ a D 11 ~ D [~ ~ ~ ...... eJIIIIIIIII 00. ~ ~ = ...... Q.c ~ u = Q U Q n I n Q . 110 ~ 0 q =- ~ "'" 0 CO ~ ~ a CO ;:J 0 &:> <:! ~ ~~ ~ 0 ~~c~~ 4:> aArna~~6YH~~ c1 .- == Q "I a u n o g n .... "'" ~ ~ ------------------- n ------------------- Flowering trees in evergreen groundcover Vehicular lighting T,rees in groundcover Low berm or shrubs Concave median catches rainwater TRI-V ALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN Homart Community Centers Hacienda Drive Section Conceptual Sketch ------------------- Flowering tree in median Sidewalk Evergreen groundcover. ? TRI- VALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN Homart Community Centers Cluster of street trees Berm or shrubs to reduce view into rear of buildinos b Dublin Boulevard Section Conceptual Sketch ------------------- I Evergreen groundcover or shrub Annual color Groundcover Light poles Service Area Large columnar entry framing tree J TRI- VALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN Homart Community Centers Dublin Boulevard Entry Conceptual Sketch ------------------- Utilize landscaping to reinforce circulation hierarchy Tall delineating trees & low hedges define auto entry spines & interior streets . ft--~~ ~ OJ-- o Provide landscaped pedestrian promenades through parking areas to linK various parts of shopping complex Cluster trees in parking areas to provide views of storefronts TRI- VALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN Parking Landscape Concept Homart Community Centers Conceptual Sketch ------------------- Pots @ wall ends ~~ i~ . .. 'D Shade trees " Thematic lighting Bollard Seating wall f'/\~ \(._ 0 ~ C: ?-. 'j,S '<. Co .;, I, c( L-- J ? ~ TRI- VALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN Typical Pedestrian Section Homart Community Centers Conceptual Sketch ------------------- Painted, colored concrete wall panels w /rustication accent banding Accent elements or lighting . . . . . Textural finish accent ,ffi . . . Tenant signage Entrance el.ament . " En' U1 . .- Post and Beam system Storefront window system TRI- VALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN Homart Community Centers Typical Building Elevation Conceptual Sketch I'~ '; ; , j, '~I , I' \~~~~ I ~ " i \ ~ i I . I 11 Ii J : t , , ~ \ i ~ r.rJ. ~ ~ ::r: ~ .:0 uZ ......0 ~~ ~O 0000 t.(') ~ I ~. ~ i~ ~O ~~ Q~ U> i / / , I 1\ ------------------- RESOLUTION -95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RESOLUTION APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MAKING FINDINGS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS CONCERNING THE SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment ("GPA") and Specific Plan ("SP") were adopted by the City in i993: and WHEREAS, the GPA outlines future land uses for approximately 4176 acres within the City'S eastern sphere of influence including approximately 13,906 dwelling units and 9.737 million square feet of commercial, office, and industrial development: and WHEREAS, the SP provides more specific and detailed goals, policies and action programs for approximately 3313 acres within the GPA area nearest to the City: and WHEREAS, the GPA and SP areas ("Eastern Dublin") are shown on the Land Use Map contained in the GPA (attached hereto as Exhibit A) and exclude the area shown on the Land Use Map as "Future Study Area/Agriculturell; and WHEREAS, a Program Environmental Impact Report (IIProgram EIR") was prepared for the GPA and SP (SCH No. 91103604) and certified by the Council on May 10, 1993 by Resolution No. 51- 1 EXHIBIT B 1 -23--,5" (P.~ 93, and two Addenda dated May 4, 1993 and August 22, 1994 ("Addenda") have been prepared and considered by the Council; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 1993, the Council also adopted Resolution No. 53-93, adopting the GPA and SP, making findings as to the environmental impacts and mitigation measures relating to the GPA and SP, and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Program (lIprogram MMplI) for the GPA and SP; and WHEREAS, Homart Community Centers (IIHomart") and the Surplus Property Authority of the County of Alameda ("Countyll) have proposed development of the Santa Rita Commercial Center (lithe Project") on approximately 75 acres within Eastern Dublin, in the location shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the Project consists of development of an approximately 800,000 square root commercial center to include retail shops, offices, movie theatres, restaurants, and/or similar commercial uses; and WHEREAS, development of the Project will require certain discretionary implementary actions by the City, including rezoning approximately 75 acres from Planned Development -- Business Park/Industrial (low coverage) to a standard Planned Development consistent with the GPA and SP ("Rezoning"), approval of a Development Agreement with Homart and the County ("Development Agreement"), approval of a Tentative Parcel Map, and Site Development Review; and WHEREAS, in November, 1994, the City prepared an Initial Study for the Project, as designed, which consisted of a project description, and environmental checklist with supporting 2 JAN-19-35 THU 12:30 P. 02/02 analysis, and a detailed ~atrix addre~sing the applicability ar.d implerner.tu.tion of each cf the programs in the SF and each of the mitigation measures iC1 t.he Program MMP1 nr:d the c;ity ame~.~ded chis Initial Study on NovemDe~ 221 1994, to include a Project-specific Traffic I~pac~ ~~~alY$is p~epared by BarLon-Ascnman Associates, lnc. (IITraffic Impact AnalysislI).; and WHER3AS, tne InlLial Study demonstrated that the Project, as designed, would have no potcnt~ally sigr.ificant environffie~tal impacts which were no~ adequately described and analyzed in th€: ~rog~am ErR (with t~e exception of site-specific traffic . " ~nroac:s a~-l zed 'n ~~c m_~~~~c Tm--~~ n~alvOl'D) ~na' ~~a~ ~~A D-_~~~~ -~~._y .:.~ ~_..- I I "".I__~- ----:'''''_'- ___ -.l~ ., ,...... <..u '- ,-__"" --~J-C:- would ~ave no significant envi=onreental impacts with the implemen~atio!1 of mitigation ~easures al~eady required p~=suan~ to the Prog:r-a2 MNP ar.n t.hc)se 2.ciditional sit:e-specific traffic measures identified in the Traffic Impact Fnalysis; and WHEREAS, :;n.-ior to Novem:Ocr 22, 19941 Homart and the County agreed wi~h City staff to implement the site-specific t~~:Efic measuree identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis 1 as well as all of the mitigation m22sur~s required u~cler the P=ograr:'"~ ivr'vr '0 .. ......- I and WEEREAS, on November ') "J ~";"'1 i C 0.4 _.J,J _I the City ci:::-cu2.ated. a r':itiaa:.ed . . - ~ Negative uecla~aticn for the Project (which included th~ !nit.i~l Study), a copy of which is at~ached a~ Exhibit C to the Jar.~ary 23, 1995, City Coc:nc.i 1. Agenda Report ("Negative Dcclaration"); and WEEREAS1 the Negative Declaration was circulated for public review and com:nent from NO'v8!t'.ber 22, 1994 through Decembe:r 231 1994:; and 3 WHEREAS, three letters commenting on the Negative Declaration were received during the comment period, copies of which are attached as Exhibit D to the January 23, 1995, City Council Agenda Report; and WHEREAS, the City reviewed and prepared a written response to the three letters of comment, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit E to the January 23, 1995, City Council Agenda Report; ~ and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on the Project, particularly on the Rezoning on December 19, 1994, and January 3 and 17, 1995, and on the Development Agreement on January 17, 1995, and adopted Resolution No. 95-01 recommending that the City Council approve the Negative Declaration, Resolution No. 95-02 recommending that the City Council adopt the Rezoning, and Resolution No. 95-03 recommending that the City Council approve the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, on January 23, 1995, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project, during which it considered the Agenda Statement, the General Plan, the GPA, the SP, the Program EIR, the Addenda, the Negative Declaration, the three letters of comment on the Negative Declaration and the City's written responses thereto, all related correspondence received and the testimony received at the hearing, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and other items in the administrative record; NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin does RESOLVE as follows: 4 Section 1. The City Council finds that the foregoing Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as a part of this resolution. Section 2. Pursuant to section 21083.3, subdivisions (b) and (e), of the Public Resources Code and pursuant to section 15168 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that the Project is within the scope of the SP and the GPA, that the Project and all of its potentially significant environmental impacts were adequately described and analyzed in the EIR, that the Project incorporates all applicable mitigation measures identified in the Program EIR, and that all of the Project's potentially significant environmental impacts will be mitigated to a level of insignificance with the imposition of the mitigation measures identified in the Program MMP and the site- specific traffic mitigation measures identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis. Section 3. Pursuant to section 21166 and section 21083.3, subdivisions (b) and (e), of the Public Resources Code, and pursuant to sections 15162 and 15168 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds: (1) that the Project does not constitute a change from the program (i.e. the GPA and the SP) analyzed in the Program EIR which would require major revisions in the Program EIR, (2) that there are no substantial changes in the surrounding circumstances under which the Project is being undertaken from those circumstances which existed when the City 5 certified the Program EIR which would require major revisions in the Program EIR, and (3) that there is no new information of substantial importance to the GPA, the SP, or the Project which, despite the exercise of reasonable diligence, could not have been known when the Program EIR was certified and which shows either (i) that the Project will have significant environmental effects not discussed or substantially underestimated in the Program EIR or, (ii) that there are mitigation measures or alternatives not identified as feasible in the Program EIR and not included as part of the Project which would reduce or avoid any significant environmental impacts. Section 4. Pursuant to section 21080, subdivision (c), of the Public Resources Code and pursuant to section 15074, subdivision (b), of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council (1) certifies that it has considered the Negative Declaration, along with the three letters or comment received and the City's responses thereto; (2) finds that there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) hereby approves the Negative Declaration. Section 5. The City Council does hereby adopt the project- specific Mitigation Monitoring Program (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit F to the January 23, 1995, City Council Agenda Report) as the reporting and monitoring program required by Public Resources Code section 21081.6 for the Project, as a supplement to the Program MMP. 6 Section 6. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6, subdivision (a) (2), the City Council specifies that the documents which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its findings and decision herein are based shall be located at City Hall, and their custodians shall be the City Clerk, the Planning Director and the Public Works Director of the City. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of , 1995, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK 114\resol\S2\ceqa 7 nin Process (see text for complete discuSSion.) * General Commercial may be permitted by a Pl~nnedd~~~:~:e~ei~~~~sist~nt with APA (see text for complete discussion) * * Will convert to Future Study Area/Agriculture were General Plan -Eastern Extended Planning Area LAND USE MAP Legend COMMERCIAL ~ Neighborhood CommerCial ~ General Commercial ,':::::::::;::::::;il Carnous Offk;e CTI Industrial Park RESIDENTIAL ~ High Denstty ~ Medium-High Density CB:J Medium Denslly [IJ LOw Density 0-6 cIJIac [@ Rural ResldenliaVAgriculture 1 cIJIl00 ao PU BLIC/ SEM~PUBLlC/OPEN Public/Semi-Public Facilily @ Elementary School @ Junior High School @ High School @I PubrlC/Semi-Public c:::JJ Parks & Recrealion <V Cily Park @ Community Park @ Neighborhood Pa,k Neighbo,hood Soua,e Open Space Slream Corridor 25- dulae 14-25 dulac 6-14 dulac lID r~g$~"7~,t~ ~ CIRCUlA TION Arterial Slreel COlleClor Slreel Transit $oi'le 501 Boundary General Plan Amendment Study Area Specific Plan Sludy Area EASTERN DUBLIN Mey 10, 1993 Welece Roberts & Todd Figure 28 ~".. IBITn ~ ~, ., ~- ~ Eft ~ VICINITY 1vfAP (N.T.S.) I DOO[ ! CJCJCJ ODD r---'Ir---l r-::::::;:' ~ 0 LIi ULI '..J IL ~IT. ..LJ t [01 i -JDD II -- ~i l :N: %T. I CJ l j irlYL ) / ii>L~~!' .1 i ~~~~c' us="./0~. ./ :) "......-.. -~ .'.~./ - - . ----"y ., ! l.'subiect Pro erty ~ < 3 ~ ~ CAMP PAFlKS \ 3: 5\ ~, 0' ~: 0, t ~ t _ ~ DUBLIN ::e:: (': .- ,m ::==- ,- ~~-----VI -~~'--a->-' C:AA.... .0- "I: ,: . \\ HAC:E~CA DRIVE ; \ . OVS;:;C:;CSSiNG '\~ ' \ I ' \ / n "-C~9fJ;.E:1TY . J. . .~ /' OVE:-tHI::.~D lei l;0 c IF)"~ o~= /fl ~ ~ ' " '0/ ~ ~ pmirON ~~ EXHIBIT ~ 1'" . ~",--flt. r ~, , -' ! ""'. NlENDED NEGATTVR DECLARATION' J' (Prepared pursuant to city of Dublin Environmental Guidelinesr Section 1.7(C)J ~.~) Description of Project: A reauest to rezone 75 +/- acres from Planned Develooment - Business ParklIndustrial (lm-; coveraae) tc a standard Planned Develooment. The nroiect will also include a site Deve.loDment Revi eTt! and Tentative Parcel Man. This Drolect has a Soecif ic Plan and Genera 1 pl;::n Desianation of Gener21 COTI'21ercial. The Drooosed Planned Deve 1 oDment would allow for an 800.000 sauere foot cOTIU."TIercial center wh i c:-: may ; nclude retail shoos. off; ces. movi e theatres and restaurents amonc other uses. project Location: 75 +/- acres on the southe~st corner of Hecienda and Dublin Eoulevard Name of Propenent: r.omart Community Centers I hereby find ~na~ the above ~roject will not have 2 . . - . . S 2.~7:l~ lC2.rr;: effect on the . . en'\llronmen"L. . Attached is e copy of the Ir:i.tial Study (HEnviroru:lent~l Ir::orB2.tion Form" and Enviror:::sental Chec::dist") doclli:lenting the reascr:s to si.rppcr-: the above findina. . ~ Mitigation measures significant effects Initial study. ere included in the project to avoid potentially on the environment and ere included 25 p~rt of t~e ~\ 17.-!- ;V~ JJ Lc.;\;~0:-) signature~ U Dennis E. Carrinaton Printed Name Senior Planner Title N.D\J e+U~ YL "'2-"?., I C1 c. Lf Date J .?-.tt2.chrnents EXHIBIT L- Date Published: Date Posted: Date Notice Mailed: consice=ed by: On: 1-'"2.. '"30 -'""IS- c.:...3. ':' Acticn en Negative Dec!.=.~2.tic:;. :.... I ;.P9=oved Di.sa~~=o".:ec. ,'\. ", '-"~ ./-- r- "~ SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER INTIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Prepared by the city of Dublin Planning Department November, 1994 ,.- , r' INTRODUCTION This Initial study has been prepared by the city of Dublin to assess the potential environmental effects of the proposed Santa Rita Commercial Center. The analysis is intended to setisfy the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)( and provide the city with adequate information for project review. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment Final EIR (consisting of the DEIR dated August 28 ( 1992; Responses to Comments Part I dated December 7, 1992; Responses to Comments Part II dated December 21( 1992; Revisions to Part I of the Responses to Comments relating to the Kit Fox; an p.ddendum to the DEIR dated Hay 4( 1993; and a DKS A.'ssociates Traffic study dated December 15, 1992) (SCH 91103064); was adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993. The FEIR is available to the Public at the city of Dublin Planning Department located at 100 Civic Plaza( Dublin( California. An Addendum to the FEIR was approved by the City Council on August 22, 1994. The environmental impact report that was prepared for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan was a IIprogramll environmental impact report. If a program environmental impact report is prepared, subsequent environmental documents need to be prepared only if there were addi tional environmental impacts not considered in the preparation of the original environmental document (CEQp-. Guidelines section 15168). The Santa Rita Commercial Center is proposed to be located wi thin the boundaries of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. Although the City of Dublin has determined that the project will not have .s..D.Y additional environmental impacts that are not reduced to insignificance by mitigation measures and corresponding conditions of approval ( the city wants to ensure that the environmental review process is set forth in a document and opened for public review. Therefore( an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared. This Initial Study includes a project description, environmental checklist( and discussion focused upon issues identified in the checklist. The attachment to the Initial study is a Matrix which has incorporated the Mitigation Measures and Action Programs of the Eastern Dublin General Plan p..,i"nendment and Specific Plan which will reduce the environmental impacts of the project to a level of insignificance. The Matrix has been designed for use in evaluating SpeC.lIlC project proposals in Eastern Dublin for compliance with the Eastern Dublin Final Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring Program. Please see the Legend which is the cover page to the Metrix for an explanation of the headings and abbreviations within the Matrix. The Mitigation Measures of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Ji..:uend:nent and Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (IIFEIRII) and the two approved addenda thereto are referenced throughout this Initial Study. Please refer to the Matrix to review the Mitigation Measures and/or Action Programs. '.. .-....\ In summarYr the Initial study concludes that the proje9t will not pose any significant adverse effects that cannot be mitigated through mitigation measures required through the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring Program. The project is in conformance with the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Designations and conflicts will not be created with established land uses on surrounding properties. This study was prepared based upon the location of the project, staff office review ( field review, comments from City ( County and special Districts ( comments submitted by local agenciesj use of city Planning documentsr the CEQA Law and Guidelines( City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines, and previously certified Environmental Impact Reports. '. 2 ..... r ( PROJECT DESCRIPTION Homart Community Centers of Denver, Colorado (the applicant) is proposing a commercial project consisting of an 800rOOO ~ square foot center on approximately 75 acres of land on the southeast corner of Hacienda Boulevard and Dublin Boulevard. The site has a General Plan Designation of General Commercial; a Specific Plan Designation of General Commercialj and is in Plann~d Development - Business Park/Industrial (low coverage) Zoning District. The applicants propose as part of the project to rezone the site to be consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan to a standard Planned Development. The Planned Development Tdould allow general commercial type uses. As part of the project, they will process a site Development Review approval and a Tentative Parcel Map. The l>.pplicant plans to process the Rezone to a Planned Development first, following shortly thereafter with the site Development Review and Tentative Parcel Map applications. '. .., " ~. FIGURES Figure One: Vicinity Map Figure Two: Preliminary site Plan Figure Three: Dublin San Ramon Services District Proposed Homart Development Water and Sewer Facilities ~ "'r , J r . CC<{ Wz r-~ 20 WLL U-1 ...J<{ <(U - . U ~ CCZ W--1 ~aJ ~::J 00 U <( }- - cr:: <( r- :z < (j) b~C'EIVED r... x: J A. N 0 5 1994 'PA 'N. -00 ( ,..... !"'UN PLANNING u - e:: ~ Z ~ c u < i- U 2 < i- - 2: < > t:) . ..i:....:::..,..T~;,j,l;;~:-j;;'trr~..:~..::.: It.;;.. .h .... ~,.., .,~..;_.~ .:;?~~:--.:~;';';'~~":'::~~:i:i!~;';: '" ~-;:cu 'f, " ...::.111 I ;:-.. ;~.jll ~ '~';'-:::-';C;lo ~~!.=,X t :: . -'.1 Hi' :..... ..:.. ... _I " · ;:.~ ri I ::::: -"I12-,J -... ~'-I"- __ - ~J;': ?-' - 1!l II r: (. 1 :- t_. . ~7.4' f ~ '-0 .-J.t 1'" .1:::R-lrJJ..:.~ t ........;--,;~~] 0 '''~~...s r,; '~'-:il - ....:.1. .1 ~ ~(:;.,:~" ;~'1 - ~f::~ti-.~ ~ -Il:! 'l '..1..:: -...J ~":;1'1-2 ~-=~;r; S I Sir0' _ :1 ....,,,~ :J .....~P..~i.:~. 'I :.r. '.~;~ 'l."'iL :"~;':.-o:j'" -.:::::J~ ~-:-l :'"' ~:F-:..~~~ ~ ~'5.lj 2: -;~~~~~ ~ -- ~- ....iJ ... .~~~~~1~ 8 ~.~:-*: ;:; ..~~. =:; '.:a ::: ~ 2- \ < , < - FIGiJ'RE 1 ....:..........~-::-':"J:-:~"\ .a:a .::.~:';loo~......~..._-~-t".::...'-.4:.r.....-;.....-:.-.:.'""'-l:":.....: _~....s........ _.......~....~ ..... . ..~ ~ .. ";"..:":.i.:~:'1:-.f''''':;'.l:i~'",; .... . J . ... ~ '.',' ';. . . ',..j .. ~.!. ., . " '.'1' ';~i(r .: .:~ . 1.'" :1\: '. '. .:'.',.: .: .i;':f:f.N>: .... ';:!.'::'l:";'d '_.~. -. , ...-----.. ...- .---.-----....--.--..-.----------.---------------------- L. '. , --- --------1:>-1- -, iTTlL YD,. Y,~ ,~.q;"4qn.cq;_':::,;rqnQ""'~= ~ ~_".. _'_~ .. . '. _ . . . . '-'-.'" ...... -- D l{,i~{4'O'''''''',.c,,,,,O 0 .. -..,..""'-".,>~CC., ~_ ... , ''''''=."",~=- .. Ur> ""''''<' ".'. . ~.-q,,, · ,," ,-, "'''''''''C . "'1'... "_ ~''''''~' """,) "_"-' ---...._ ' =~~=J · .:---c-;.;::,,,ii~i~~I"xa@}<"d~'i'll:'c:.C,.;._:,:;;;~:~. ':~&UI1~j~~,~ . ' ,::'p tm~~~ ~ : !mtk ~q:fc ",,', ,~"F<I~i\1 \:Jo ''-' L: '\J~'1<>"'''-~o(~("<'j~. . - - c '.. . i\ ~ f' fIJ] .{ C0 - 'G, '" -. C,> '"" 'Gd, 'Cf "j''; 7-' <f II" ~ 'J {'.: Q, T fh it : Jjy' /1= .~. @('[l'<"'i' '~I I! ~ ~=~~ ,j , .': I '\ "I ~. l ~ "'. '"",~: I!, 4. <>.,<l ',' /' ".'1, , ,.n. i., ,I I n ,~~ .;. .- '. " .' "u ~~- ----I ',. -.- . -'. 'lh'J.!; .,. G/), [. . 0-9 _ .!,:_____ . XI · - ': "".--,.. . . 'H'-<=--""".. ~ ~10 ~;.> . u ---"'b!I~OJ ~ ." -~" ""C.:..::::J. "-'I --'-"-/,1))' 'f' l1l-n_~_ '1 . ," - . ',,,,,. ,~ ":' I. ,u.--.., .. . ~ ""=--0. I '. . .~. '~"I2J-r~l - . 11')1 ~:~ o".~. --'. ", ,,', 4"-~7-<!J . , , P----..'-'::.;.'--iJ' ~r--___ '. , ' '''~ ';E\. , """,.'.., ,~. , A , ~( " ~-,... .,,~ '.<;i?li!l'o", ':1' <(l;--'~" '-.''', ,.. "---" ~---=o- A 'II , .'. ", ~, 'Ii'" , " - ___ ''''''lli \&-" ".} C """"'.~~ :'_. :. . ' ' ,'<;; , A .<UlL....----, ,=,"""'.~ "" O.----____Il (, ',~ . . . . ~.. .'. ~'" ~l" 'r.)_ %'='='<ltu :(ll1II';~;'n ill'~~~':)'~'~11j-J?;fI3l;1"t~.)\ ~=~:::-f~l :Z~fI. /~i. :.',',.. ~~Lor:t " "."'" N . <: ,,' ",_, "~or .~..Y.l'. .. I~. .... .~~(1lb~~nm-tnr' .IJ=M~'.." ~ 'Iii. '1,---11" --" ;;~.' ~"Dll:::'=?---~ '.. . " ~""., '. , ., ""CO'" n,' , ' <"'''::/.''. . kic'~lc;;,,-, q --"='-'_~''''._ " "'.. ' , , '. . 1(2);"'1' c-" .. "'''+\,., "'--~,,~,~__ . " " u__ ___. ...... ~~"'~":~ >:-"O'~"'~:~,~'.::-:: ,~"C~':5~O '::=, .... ."_ ~__m___ __. ..... ... __, ,.. . '" "_ --.--- _."--- ~, _..-=-~:~:~::-I~~ =:':.::~. .. r=\ l~..._. _... -- ---- -- :--':':::-':-';:":::::=::::.~':":'~::'~;.;;-"-. ------ . .,........- II ~_.----- -(?~ .----- --- .-~- - -- ---~~.;..---" --. /:---- - FIGURE ~ 1. al Site Pla~,,<=-...~..._ ", '- .~~ Con C (;J) .l~rmt,..<-""".., .~ , . ;' '.::~.: .: "':', ,i~J~i:i~ 1~ij ......J.' . :~h~~~ .'.'" " . );';!!;1:;~!1 " '. j ',~, . "~';:;,\l !;~~ :';'1 ',,;::;1 ::i:l.~?:}: ~ ~ .~ ~;i',: J~~~~; .:\1 O-"'~Iifi&1jI .~ -~- \ ~ EXISTING ROAD ADANDOf.lED ROAD FU1VRE ROAD EXISTING l'tA TER FACILITIES PROPOSED WATER FACILITIES EXISTING SEWm FACILITIES PROPOSED SEYlER FACILITIES (ALT. 1) PROPOSED SEWER fACILITIES (ALT. 2) PROPOSED SEWER fACILITIES (ALT, :1) o 500 C::;,,- '"=1000' 1000 F'T , ~,s,.12QrJ$Q~n~A<;~;-(j(rAI C:! C 0 " S U l , I " Co {II I, 1" [ { , S [lOUGlfERTY IlESERVOIR STOll AGE TAI.II( 4.0 1.1e; CAPACITY ;=- SANTA I"TA JAIL Cl <( o n:. l!' :'( ~ ~==_-,!.l'-' Srr{~I:T_~=~_~.~==,==~.(' BRoom IJLVO '" :r, ~ ., CI-IP CAMP "ARKS n: I" ~ ~l :"( ~ g I:J a ~ 1--'[--- r,.\lL~U!1.Sg" ,.:./ ~i ~ = = ~ ~ _ __ ___ 51h STI1En i:~ '!l) , 1/ I[ ~ - :~,:",~II~~~I ~'::I,,,,,,",,\,",I.J; [===II="=~ ,== ~,= ._0. = =':~!,= = = L -- -- -.-!:'.~ J~ ~TrlEET """;~:.'...~~!:~="",.='~=r~_",'"",,,",,,=~~ ~"""===-~",",,!L,'''\~,~,};,n~):i!;},l!~-,,,,~,:, - - -- .. - = =ANIMAL /' '.,. ..".., ..... l:a~. ............... 2nd.STrlE.ET..iii ~ ~~~[~g~ Ii DUBLIN ,J II BLV[) Ji"'-- -~.~ ..' -' ~~l"" .-< ~ Cl ~ ..... ,.. ..... :r; II fJAfH I ~ r;:, :- II PARKING I ii' U IIOMART #' Sc:, ~ LOT <t. ~ DEVELOPMENT P'" I,?~ ~ ~). 3(t 3D" lr," .' ~" ~ // 3D"; _ _ _ '\ ' ~.:-~__t~~~~~~~===-~_0 ~ -::;-{/ . r-"~""- ~~,~' ~ '..J ()X~=._-_. ---- . ~ ,;=~~:.1-.------. ~ . -_:='="-""""-'::~-=:_Oor-:=C~IIO-' - _r;- }' _J ., ~ :l! ., m.EASOH o R1 vt: / GLEASON ." '~_: n: '" rj :> o Cl DUBLIN \ / ,;yo li .lJ; "': . '..,.~.. ._.u~.._ .". ....-. .... .. ( J / ! o C3 '" DRIVE BLVD' -< ~ ..., <( Vl Vl ~ / '! ~ r;;;ln~;i"l'~~o:m.~1fm'n~"""'~~ -FTGURE 3 -------.-1-- DUBLIN SAN RAMON SEW ICES DISTRICT PIlOPOSED HOMART DEVELOPMENT WATER AND SEWEFI FACILITIES fiGURE NUMBEf, JOB NO, "~-, INITIAL STUDY (ENVIRONMENTAL CHECXLIST FORM) (Completed pursuant to city of Dublin Environmental Guidelinesr section 1.~ APPLICATION NO.: PA 94-001 I. BACKGROUND 1. Name, Address and Phone Number of Proponent: HomartConunun i tv Centers 2. Agency Requiring Checklist: citv of Dublin 3. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Santa Rita Cowuercial Center 4. Description of project: A reouest to rezone 75 +/- acres from pl2.nned DeveloDment - Business Park/Industrial (low coveraGe) to a standard Planned DeveloDment. This Drolect has 2. SDecific Plan Desionation of General Commercial. The oroDosed Planned DeveloDment would allow for an 800.000 sGUare foot commercial center which mav include retail shoDs. offices. movie theatres and restaurants amonG other uses. " 5 II.: .ENVIRONMENTAL IM~~TS (See Part III for disc~. jion of environmental - , topics) YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2 1. X 1(3,6 X 1,3,6 X 1(3,6 X 1(3(6 X 1(3,6 X 1,3,6 X 1(3,6 EARTH. will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes of geologic substructures? b. Disruptions ( displacements, compaction or over covering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation( deposition! or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, Dud slides, ground failure( or si~ilar hezerds? 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in: X 2,6 X 2,6 X 2(6 X 2,6 a. Substantial air emissions of deterioration of embient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, ~oisture or temperature, or any change in climater either locally or regionally? d. Construction or alteration of a facility within one-fourth of a mile of a school which might emit hazardous air emissions? If Yes, school district must be consulted and must be given written notification of the project not less than 30 days prior to approval of EIR or Negative Declaration (Pub. Res. Code 21151.4). 3. WATER. will the proposal result ~n: X 2(6 a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? 2Refer to appropriate note on page 12 b . -". II.. .ENVIRONMENT1':..L IM:" ..":TS (See Part III for discu ,ion of environmental topics) YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2 x x x x 2,6 b. Changes in absorption rates( drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? x 2,6 c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? x 2,6 d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? x.. 2,6 e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? x 2,6 f. Alteration of the direction of rate of flow of ground waters? x 2(6 g. Change in the quantity of ground watersr either through direct additions or withdrawalsr or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? x 2(6 h. Substantial reduction in the c30unt of otherwise available for public water supplies? -'--C"'r" we. '-__ v .r.. 2,6 i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? x 1(3,6 a. 4. PLANT LIFE. will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of specles, or nu~ber of any species of plants. (including trees, shrubs ( grassr crops, and aquatic plants)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? Introduction of new species of plants in a barrier to the normal~replenishment of existing species? Reduction in acreage of any aqricultural crop? 5. ANIMAL LIFE. will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of ani~als {birds! 2Refer to appropriate note on page 12 x b. 1,3,6 1,3(6 c. 1(3,6 d. 6 a. i :1;1., 'ENVIRONMENTAL IMPr._rS (See Part III for discus..d.on of environmental topics) YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2 x x x x 6 land animals including reptilesr fish and shellfish( benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animels? x 6 c. Introduction of new species of animals into an arear or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? x 6 d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? x lr2(3,6 6. NOISE. will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? x 1,6 b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? x 1,6 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. will the proposal produce new light or glare? 8. LAND USE. will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? x 6 b. Substantial depletion of any non-reneweble natural resource? x 6 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (includinq( but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? v .... 6 b. possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? 6 6 6 11. POPULATION. will the proposal alter the location, distributionr density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 2Refer to app=opriate note on page 12 8 II. ENVIRONMENTAL 1MI-. _TS (See Part III for discu;.._J.on of environmental t.opics) YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2 X 6 X l(6 X 1(6 X 6 X 1(6 X l(6 x 2(6 X 2(6 X 2(6 X 2,6 X 2,6 X 2,6 X 2,6 X 2(6 X 2,6 12. HOUSING. will the proposal affect existing housingr or create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. proposal result in: will the a. . Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities( or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation and traffic systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne ( rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehiclesr bicyclists or pedest~ians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the preposal have a~ effect uponl or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas? a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Othe~ governmental services? 15. ENERGY. will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? 2Refe= to appropriate note on page 12 9 ,II. ,ENVIRONMENTAL IML_"::TS (S~e Part III for discu~::iion of environmental topics) YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2 16. UTILITIES. will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to the following utilities: X 6 a. Power or natural gas? X 6 b. Communications systems? X 6 c. Water? X ., 6 d. SetHer or septic tanks? v 6 e. storm water drainage? f>. v 6 f. Solid waste and disposal? ... 17. HW...AN HEALTH. will the proposal result in: X 6 X 6 X 1,3,6 X 1,6 X 1,2,6 X 1,2(6 b. X 1(2(6 c. X 1,2(6 d. 2Refer to appropriate note on page 12 a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. AESTHETICS. will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. RECREATION. will the proposel result in en impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. will the proposal result'in ~~e alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric, historic( or architecturally significant buildingr structurer or object? Does the proposal have the po~ential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the pote~tial impact area? 10 II~. ~NVIRONMENTAL IMPl'__'rS (See Part III for discussion of environmental topics) YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2 x 1(2,3,6 x 1(2,3,6 V .L"\. 1(2,3,6 c. x 1,2,3,6 d. x 1(2(3,6 21. J.f.J....NDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levelsr threaten to eliminate a plant or animal communitYr reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminete inportent examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term to the disedvantage of long-termr environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief( definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future). Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? (A project B2Y impact en two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant). Does the project have environme~tal effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings( either directly or indirectly? 22. EIR REQUIRED BY STATUTE. Does the project involve construction of any facility which burns municipal waste or refuse-derived fuel? NOTE: If the answer is yes( then an EIR must be DreDared and certified under Public Resources Code secticn 21151.2(a) unless subsections (b) and (c) make that section inapplicable. ' LRefer to appropriate note on page 12 11 -II.' ENVIRONMENTAL .L1"lr'ACTS (See Part III for disl,,;tlssion of environmental topics) YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2 III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (See attached statement) IV. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREP?~ED. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRON~ENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that state statute requires that an ENVIRONM~NTAL IMPAC~ REPORT be prepared and certified. }J-'--. Ii Signature "7 Senior Planner Title Dennis H. Carrington Printed Name November 22 I 1994 Date (1) Determination based on location of project. (2) Determination based on staff office review. (3) Determination based on field review. (4) Determination based on the city of Dublin General Plan. (5) Determination based on the city of Dublin Zoning Ordinance. (6) Determination based on Eastern Dublin General Plan ?~endmen~ and Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (consisting of the DEIR dated August 28, 1992; Responses to Co~~ents Part I dated December 7 ( 1992; Responses to Comments Part II dated December 21, 1992; Revisions to Part I of the Responses to Comments relating to the Kit Fox; an Addendum to the DEIR dated May 4, 1992; and a DKS Associates Traffic study dated December 15( 1992) (SCH91103064)r and an Adendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report dated August 22( 1,9 9 4 . (7) Not applicable. (8) 2Refer to appropriate note on page 12 12 /~-...... ~, ISSUES FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT The following issues have been found not to be significant as is indicated by a "No" response on the Environmental Checklist. The development will not produce significant adverse impacts for the following reasons: 1. Earth: The topography of the site is relatively level with minor surface variation; only minor gradingr trenchingr and compacting of soils is required to complete the building foundationsr water mains, sewer linesr storm drains,-and pavement. .No significant ground alteration will occur to produce erosion or destruction of any unique features. No geologic hazards are known or suspected to exist on the site or in surrounding areas. Mitigation Measures of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report that will be applied to this project in relation to this topic include 03.06/01.0; 03.06/02.0; 03.06/06.0; 03.06/07.0; 03.06/08.0; 03.06/11.0; 03.06/12.0; 03.06/14.0 - 03.06/16; 03.06/21; 03.06/25; andr 03.06/27, ~nclusion of these mitigation measures and corresponding conditions of approval will mitigate any impacts in this topic area to a level of insignificance 2. Air: The Santa Rita Commercial Center project is a commercial development ( dependent upon automobile traffic and therefore( automobile emissions will be generated. The FEIR developed mitigation measures to reduce mobile and stationery source emissions. certain uses that might include stationary source emissions or objectionable odors will be required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit, which would require additional environmental review. Since the project is a Commercial Center it will not be creating or causing any climatic changes regionally or locally. Additionally, uses within the Center will not be discharging hazardous emissions. Mitigation Measures of the FEIR that will be applied to this project in relation to this topic include 03.11/02.0 - 03.11/4.0; 03.11/06.0; 03.11/07.0; 03.11/08.0; 03.11/09.0; and 03.11/13.0. Inclusion of these mitigation measures and corresponding conditions of approval will mitigate any impacts in this topic area to a level of insignificance. 3. Water: The project site does not cross over any water ways. Although the project is adjacent to Tassajara creekr it is set back at least 100 feet from the top of the bank. A Master Drainage Plan for the entire Santa Rita Area is required to be prepared pursuant to the Specific Plan. Therefore, any changes in drainage patterns and flooding will be fully evaluated in that Plan to ensure there are no environmental impacts in this topic area.. DSRSD has indicated that they have water to supply the project. AdditionallYr the minor trenching necessary for improvements and construction of water utilities will not interrupt or disturb any ground water flow. The FEIR contained several mitigation measures which will be applied to this project 13 to mitigate any impacts in this area to a level of insignificance as follows 03.05/44.0 through 03.05/55.0. Action Programs 9T and 9U of the Specific Plan also mitigate these impacts. . 4. and 5. Plant and Animal Life: The project site is covered primarily with annual grasses and does not provide unusual or high quality habitat for any species of rare or endangered species of ,plants or animals. According to the FEIR the site is not in a biologically sensitive arear nor has the area been under cultivation in the recent past. Although the FEIR did not identify the site as having any endangered species of plants or animal life( certain mitigation measures of the FEIR and Action Programs of the Specific Plan have been included for this project. These measures and corresponding conditions of approval have been included to either protect any species that meY be discovered prior to or during construction or to protect adjoining areas. The mitigation measures are: 3.07/01.0; 3.07/02.0j 03.07/03.03.07/05.0; 03.07/06.0j 3.07/07.0; 03.07/08.0; 03/07/09.0; 3.07/11.0 through 3.07/14.0j 3.07/16.0j 03.07/17.0j 03.07/18.0j 03.07/18.1; 03.07/19.0; 03.07/20.0; 03.07/21.0; 03.07/22.0; 03.07/26.0; 03.07/27.0 and 3.07/28.0. The Action Programs are: 6A, 6E through GHr 6N and 60. Inclusion of these mitigation measures and action progreIDs will mitigate any impacts to a level of insignificance. 6. Noise: The noise impacts of potential projects in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area were analyzed in the Eestern Dublin Final Environmental Impact Report (IIFEIR"). The proj ect would result in increases in existing noise levels but would not result in the exposure of people to severe noise levels. Mitigation measures of the Eastern Dublin Specific plan that have been applied to this project as conditions of approval in relation to Noise include 3.10/05.0 and 3.10/07.0. These mitigation measures would reduce any noise impacts of this project to a level of insignificance. 7. LIGHT AND GLARE: The project will produce new light or glare. These impacts will be reduced to a level of insignificance by incorporating signage which conforms to the Sign Ordinance of the City of Dublin and the design of the project which will orient the main entrances of structuresr and signage at those entrances ( inward toward the parking lot. Parking and associated lighting will be located in the center of the project and will not be directly visible off-site due to screening by buildings and landscaping and by the use of luminaires which reflect light downward and not off-site. These measures will reduce the impacts of light and glare ~f this project to a level of insignificance. 8. LAND USE. The project does not have an impact to Land Use because it does not have the following impacts as described in Guidelines Section 15002(g): .'f! 1" ."1' ..':;'.". c' ...........-. ( 1 "',' a. The project will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community as there is no established community and as the project is consistent with the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; b. The project will not conflict with established recreational, educational, religious, or scientific uses in an area as there are no established recreational( educational ( religious or scientific uses in the area and as the project is consistent with the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; c. The project will not convert prime agricultural land to non-agricultural land or impair the productivity of prime agricultural land as the project is not located on prime agricultural land; and d. The project will not conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community where it is located andr as a result, cause "substantial change in the physical conditions which exist in the area affected by the proposed proj ect" as the impacts of General commercial land uses in the project location were addressed in the FEIR and as the project is consistent with the Eastern Dublin General Plan F~endment and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. CEQA Guidelines: Appendix I calls for an evaluation of potential environmental impacts if a project would result in the "substantial alteration" of the present or planned land use of an area. "Substantial land use al teration" r however J is not in itself considered a significant environmental effect by C~QA. 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. The project will not result in en increase in the rate of use of any natural resources or result in the substantial depletion of any non-renewable natural resource because no natural resources or renewable natural resources will be removedr used or depleted by the project. 10. RISK OF UPSET. The project will not involve a risk of an explos~on or the release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions because: 1) no hazardous substances will be stored or handled in the proposed project; 2) the application of mitigation measures from the FEIR of the Eastern Dublin General Plan p~endment and Specific Plan as conditions of approval, and 3) the application of Action Programs of the Specific Plan as conditions of approval. The mitigation measures are 03.04/01.0; 03.04/02.0; 03.04/04.0 through 03.04/13.0; 03.06/15.0; 03.06/16.0; and the action prograEs are 8Dr 8Er 8Gr 8H and 8J. The project will not involve the possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan because it does not physically impact either Dublin Boulevard or Interstate 580 and therefore would not block those roadways in the ev&nt of collapse of the project. These 15 ,.-.....~ "', (.?- measures would reduce any impacts due to risk of upset of this project to a level of insignificance. 11. POPULATION. The project will not alter the location, distribution( density or growth rate of the human population of an area because no humans inhabit the project site or will inhabit the project site. 12. HOUSING. The project will not effect existing housingr or create a demand for additional housing because no housing exists on the project site or will exist on the project site and because sufficient housing exists or will exist in the Dublin area for employees ..of businesses within the project. The following specific plan policies and action programs although not applicable to this project because it is a commercial project and not a residential project will encourage affordable housing: policies 4-7 through 4-10 j and Programs 4F through 41. The following specific plan policies and action programs will help Dublin achieve and maintain a balance of jobs and housing: policies 4-26 and 4-27 and Action Program 4K which will be a condition of approval. These measures would reduce any impacts to housing of this project to a level of insignificance. 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. The project without mitigation would result in the generation of substantial additional vehicular movementj demand for new parkingj modifications to existing transportation and traffic systems and alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods. These impacts are mitigated by measures incorporeted into the attached Traffic Impact Analysis for the Regional Discount Retail Center in Dublin California dated Novemberr 1994, and by the following Mitigation Measures of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan FEIR including an addendum to the DEIR dated May 4, 1993 and an addendum to the FEIR dated August 22, 1994j and Action Programs of the Specific Plan: Mitigation Measures 03.03/01.0j 03.03/02.1 through 03.03/16.1 03.12/07.0j and Action Programs SA through 5D and 5G which are incorporated as conditions of approval of the project. In addition, a traffic Impact Study prepared for this project addresses the specific impacts of the Santa Rita Commercial Center. Mitigation measures of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan FEIR and of the Traffic ,Impect study are included as conditions of approval of the project and will reduce impacts of the project to transportation/circulation to a level of insignificance. The project will not result in alterations to waterborne( rail or air traffic because none of those facilities are near the project. The project will not result in increases in traffic hazards to motor vehiclesr bicyclists or pedestrians due to the design of the project and incorporation of mitigation measures . which reduces those impacts to a level of insignificance. ',r. 16 ? ( .' 14. Public Services: The Santa Rita Commercial Center will require some of the improvements or service increases that were planned for in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. Mitigation measures of the FEIR required certain studies be performed to determine service and improvement needs at the time of development of projects. Therefore, service or improvements relating to fire and police protection, schoolsr parks ( government services and facilities will be determined by these studies. The studies are presently being performed and will be completed prior to the City and Applicant entering into a Development Agreement. Prior to any development occurring in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Arear a Development Agreement is required between the City and Applicant pursuant to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The Applicant's fair share of improvements and increased service will be determined and contained in the Development Agreement. Mitigation measures in the FEIR that will be implemented as conditions of this project include: 03.12/05.0j 03.12/08.0j 03.04/02.0j ..03.04/04.0j 03.04/06.0 through 03.04/13.0j 03.04/16.0; 03.04/17.0; 03.04/18.0j 03.04/20.0; 03.04/21.0j 03.04/22.0; 03.04/23.0; 03.04/24.0; 03.04/28.0; 3.04/29.0j 03.04/34.0 through 03.04/37.0. 03.04/49.0j 03.04/50.0; and( 03.04/51.0. Action Programs of the Specific Plan that will be implemented as conditions of this project include 40j 8A through 8E; 8Gj 8Hj 8Jj 8Kj and 8N. Inclusion of these mitigation measures and actions programs and corresponding conditions of approval will mitigate any impacts in this topic area to a level of insignificance. 15. Energy: The development proposed is for a cOThuercial center and wpuld not use substantial amounts of energy. Mitigation measures 03.04/45.0 and 03.04/46.0 relate to demonstration projects of cost effective energy conservation techniques and the incorporation of energy conservation measures into the design, construction( and operation of the development. These mitigation measures and their corresponding conditions of approval will mitigate any impacts in this topic area to e level of insignificance. 16. utilities: The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan anticipeted and planned for expansion of major utilities to the site. Although expansion was plannedr as development occurs, the location of the lines will have to be determined. The Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) has been developing plans to serve the Santa Rita Commercial Center with potable water and wastewater services_ and has the wastewater capacity to serve this project. Figure 3 is a copy of the proposed alternative routes for these services. These routes are generally consistent with schematic routes shown in the FEIR. The alternatives would either locate lines within an area alreadY disturbed by the BART construction project or replace existing - lines within the public right of way. Although some of the improvements are outside of the Specific Plan Arear they are in areas that are not environmentally sensitive because they are 17 ~ r> "-. , located in disturbed areas . Additionally r the improvements located within the Specific Plan Area are not indicated as biologically sensitive in the FEIR. DSRSD will be required to adhere to mitigation measures located in the FEIR to ensure that no significant environmental impacts occur. These Mitigation Measures are referenced at the end of this section of the Initial study and also within other sections of this Study. The FEIR also considered solid waste, power and natural gasr water, sewerr septic tanks and storm water drainage and developed mitigation measures to ensure environmentally sensitive provlslon of these services. The city's site Development Review procedure coordinates review of the site with the various utilities. At that time( locations of structures and utilities will be more clearly defined. Mitigation Measures were included in the FEIR to ensure that the extension of DSRSD and other services would not create significant environmental impacts. Inclusion of the following implementing actions( action programs and mitigation measures from the FEIR, and corresponding conditions of approvalr will mitigate any impacts to utilities to a level of insignificance: Specific Plan Implementing Actions 11.2.10 and 11.3.3j Action Programs 6E through 6Ij 8H; 8Kj 8L; 9A through 9C; 9E through 9X; and Mitigation Measures 03.04/09.0; 03.04/37.0j 03.04/40.0; 03.04/41.0; 03.04/42.0; 03.04/43.0; 03.04/44.0; 03.05/01.0; 03.05/02.0; 03.05/03.0; 03.05/04.0; 03.05/05.0; 03.05/07.0; 03.05/07.1; 03.05/08.0j 03.05/09.0; 03.05/11.0 - 03.05/14; 03.05/20.0 - 03.05/28.0; 03.05/30.0 - 03.05/35.0; 03.05/37.0 - 03.05/39.0j 03.05/44.0 - 49.0; 03.07/09.0 through 03.07/12.0; 03.07/14.0; 03.07/17.0; 03.11/13.0j 03.12/03.0 and: 03.12/08.0. 17. Human Health: The project consists of primarily vacant land that was previously developed with the Santa Rita Jail Facility. In the southwest corner of the siter adjacent to Hacienda Drive are the partial remains of the Madigan Building( which was a portion of jail facility. A portion of the Madigan Building was removed during the construction of Hacienda Drive. "However, building surveys have indicated that the remaining portion of the building contains asbestos. Removal of the building will be completed prior to construction on the site. Standard building demolition practices require that removal of asbestos be undertaken in a manner that will not endanger either the general public's health nor that of the construction workers. The site also had two underground storage tanks that have been removed. Alameda County Environmental Health monitors the site for a period of time after the removal of the tanks. At the present timer the monitoring period has not been completed. As part of the site Development Review process, staff routinely coordinates between the reviewing agencies to ensure that the monitoring process is completed prior to issuing building permits over the area. In general ( co~~ercial land use does not pose any significant risk that substances and/or machinery stored will create or expose people t~,health hazards. The list of permitted 18 and conditional uses has been designed so that there would not be any impacts to human health from the development. Mitigation Measures of the FEIR and Action Programs of the Specific Plan and corresponding conditions of approval that would apply ,to this area are as follows: 03.04/03.0; 03.04/05.0 thrQugh 03.04/09.0; 03.05/01.0; 03.05/03.0; 03.06/15.0; 03.06/16.0; 03.1010~_Q,.L03.10/07.0; 03.11/03.0; 03.11/07.0; BE; 9P and 9Q. Inclusion of these mitigation measures will mitigate any impacts in this topic area to a level of insignificance. 18G Aesthetics: During the site Development Review processr the site plan and elevations are reviewed for many items, including aesthetics. The City of Dublin has in place site Development Review:~Guidelines for use by the Applicant in the design of the project. Additionally( the project layout has been designed so that 'scenic vistas will not be blocked from 1-580. Mitigation Measures-~T the FEIR and Action Programs of the Specific Plan and corresponding conditions of approval that will apply in this area are 'as';:follows: 03.04/43.0; 03.07/06.0; 03.07/08.0; 03.08/07.1j 03.08/08.0; 03.08/08.1j 6R and 6Q. Inclusion of these mitigation measures will mitigate any impacts in this topic ar~a to a level of insignificance. 19. Recreation: Commercial developments are exemp~ Iron the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act related to parkl2.!1d dedi~atlDn or payment of fees in lieu thereof. However, the improvement of parkland( open space and open space trail systems is not'restricted to residential development. The city is preparing several studies that will identify community needs and costs.~ The studies will examine improvements under this topic arear among others. Policies in the General Plan and Specific Plan require that development pay its fair share of costs to maintain the sane levels of service presently in place in the city .':Therefore, after the studies are completedr impact fees will.~l?e....:ascertained and costs will be included in the Development Agreement. As noted above( in section No. 14, a Development Agreement is required to be entered into between the City and applicant. This is a requirement of the Specific Plan. Mitigation Measures of the FEIR and Action Programs of the Specific Plan and corresponding conditions of approval that would apply iri this area include: 03.04/20.0 - 03.04/24.0j 03.04/28.0j 03.04/29.n; 03.04/34.0j 03.04/35.0; 03.04/36.0j 03.07/13.0j 4P; 6Aj 6B ;~6G j and 9V. Inclusion of these mitigation.:..measures will mitigate any impacts in this topic area to a level of insign:t:fi.cance. 20 . CULTURAL RESOURCES. The proj ect will not result in the alteration of or the destruction of a historic or historic archaeological site. The Project will not result in adverse physical'. or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric, historic, or architecturally significant buildingr structurer or object. The project does not have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique",ethnic cultural values. The project ..' 19 .-- ...,< '0, " will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. These impacts will not occur because of Mitigation Measures of the Eastern Dublin General Plan ~~endment and Specific Plan FEIR and an Action Program of the Specific Plan have been incorporated as conditions of approval of this project. Those Mitigation Measures and Action Program are as follows: Mitigation Measures 03.09/01.0 through 03.09/06.0 and Action Programs,-:6P_.and 7E. Mandatory Findings of significance (a.): As discussed throughout the checklist formr but specifical,ly under the headings "Animal Life" r "Plant Life", and "Cultural Resources", the project will not substantially degrade the quality of the environmentr reduce the habitat of a plant or animal;:;pecies or eliminate important examples of California histori or,.prehistory. '...... (b. ): .All potentially significant environmental impects can be mitigated to reduce both the long term and the short term environmental impacts below a level of significance. A description of the mitigation measures is listed below. . (c.): All potentially significant cumulative enviro~ental impacts have been addressed in the FEIR. (d..}: .. .As discussed under the headinq of "Risk of Upset/Hum'an Health" r the Commercial land lises that have the potential. for the storage, handling and use of potentially hazardous substances are subject to the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code( Uniform Building Code, and the Alamede County Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Plan. No business licenses are issued to these business types until all requirem~nts have been satisfied. / 94 001I~_'.. -"'............:::r.. , , , 20 :. ,- IT. NO.: .../'~"- ,;:-:+ HOMART PROJECT MATRIX LEGEND (Item Number) MIT. MEAS. NO.: (Hi tigation Measure Number per Eastern Dublin Specific Plan) ACT. PROG. NO.: (Action Program Number per Eastern Dublin specific Plan) LEAD: (city Department with primary responsibility) PW PL REC CM PO DRFA 'public Works Planning Recreation and Community services City Manager Police Dublin San Ramon Fire Authority WHAT IS THE ACTION OR MEASURE: (A capsule summary or a task that needs to be completed. For a complete description" see the Eastern Dublin . General Plan Amendment" Specific Plan" Final .EIR and Mitigation Monitoring Program.) ST1\RT lEND: PREZ ANNE REZO TMAP FMAP BLDP SDR CONT FIIO GRAD TBD (When work on the action should begin; end) Prezone Imnexation Rezone Tentative Map Final Map Building Permit site Development Review Continuous Final Inspection/occupancy Grading Permit To be Determined NA: (The Action or Measure is not applicable to the Project) PROJ: (The Action/Measure is part of the Project) COND: (The Action/Measure is a Condition of Approv..al) ASAP: (The Action/Measure needs to be addressed as soon as possible) ACTION TAKEN: (A capsule su~~ary of the action taken or that needs to be taken regarding the task) COMPLETED: . (Project Planner to enter 1) date" 2) initials" and 3) any comments after the task is completed) ISSUE: (Identifies the general topic of the task) , /.1 .' '.fnSKS REL1\TI!:D TO S1\NT1\ RITn COHHERCInL CENTER SOHTED BY HITI01\TIOIl HE1\SUHE tltlHDER, t10VEHDER 9, 1994 E1\STEHtI DUDLItI GEtlEHnT. PLntl nHEllDHEtlT/ SPECIFIC PUN HITIGnTION HEnSUHES/nCTIOIl PHOGHnHS/IHPLEHI!:NT1\TION HEnSUHES ,,' '."!'{~ C1.t:y needs to further analyze potential tlllP':j.Lc financing'techniques ouch as 1\ssessment O~ ~~tlo Hooo Districts, Lighting, landscape ""<I Haintenance Districts or Geologic Hazards ~batement Districts. nLLJl' The applicant is financing his own infrastructure and has not asked the City for public financing assistance, The city is analyzing public financinij techniques and as development occurs in the east area( will work with individu~l applicants or groups of applicants, if requested, to provide information and aosistance in this area. X Write l_tter to school district. ";!i;/'~' "';'"2,. ~. '~~rf) . , ' :'i;ir;dr.H\ ad - . !.. '. '" fjjf'Elncourage tl1(1 school t1ist~ rt;:t (s l to \lae best PI1EZ ~f!o~.s tb qualify for and obtaih state funding 1\NNE assistanoe for the con9tru~tlon of new schoolo. [it:' Dsltatop hou9ing and employment monitoring 'flil\P programs. SDR IVA8 4K eOt-I'r - x X 'l'he City ..hould set up a mon toring program. 1\ condition will require provision of employment information by employers. :IS3 a. Track residential growth in terms of unit type and price categories. b. Track employment generating uses in terms of nUmber, type, and salary level of employees in the planning area. PL Prepare summary of implementation programs to COWl' asaist developmenc applioacions CONT X This matrix implements this mitigation measure. VIVA1 . :,:,.' Ii ,....., ...\. . .~, ::..~!~~j:~~i~~; 6 ClI Work w th developers at freeway interchanges to provide park and ride lots. Parking locs will provide a minimum Qf 100 pal:'lting spaces and will include ligh~ihqand landscaping. Encourage local merchants to participate in pl:'ogramming and marketing special events in public areas, such as o~en air markets, weekend or lunch time concerts and seasonal celebrati.ona. FI/O CON'l' x Park and Ride should be located on west side of Hacienda per Eascern Dublin Specific Plan. 7E TH1\P son COWl' x city Manager needs to send a letter to the Chamber of Commerce. :::',:;; 5 SH PW 1. 'I.. ~J TJ\SKS RELJ\'rED TO SJ\NTJ\ RITJ\ COHHERCIJ\I, CENTER SOWl'!':D BY HITIGJ\Tlotl H!':l\SURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994 El\STERll DUBI,HI OEH!':RJ\T, PLI\Il l\HI~llDM!':NTI SPECI1"IC PI.I\N MITIOI\TIOll HEI\SUR!':S/J\CTION PROOnl\MS/IHPL!':HEtlTJ\TIOIl M!':J\SURES .., neq\lil:'e review and approval of the following as nEZO FI/o X a condition of pl:'oject approval for applicable THl\P project" in eastern Dublin: son al Public transit:; route and phanin') plnn, to be prepared in consultation with LJ\VTJ\. bl Bus turnouts and transit shelters, in consultation with L1\VT1\. cl Pedestrian paths between transit stops and bui.ldfng entrances. 9W PW l1equire the cleve lop<"; t:o obI;" in PZ:OPf:H: snn 1>1/0 X apr"oval.D for storm drnlnllgo. 41' HE ~Iorlt with the East: Day l1egional park9 l>int:,:ict: 'nll\t' l"HI\I' -XX to provide etaging areas in the Speci.fic Plan aI:'GI... S1\ PH Submit detailed development: plans that include THl\P Flil\t' XX- the atandarde for arterial st:reete, collector son DT.f)P streets, residential streets, and industrinl roads. see P. 137 of Specific Plan to develop conclJ.t:J.on. Dogin working wit:h EDnPD re Dtaging area ro<]u.lrcffient for this aite. Writ.. condit:ion reI cooperat:ion with EDI1PD in thi.o rocene. Part: of SDn Proceos. l1equiro condition. VX7 . IISl ;\{":,;:, '.,;; .1 ._\ ./ 2 1'nSI<S IlEI./\Tlm TO SnNTn nIT/\ COf.lHEnCI/\T. ClmTIm sonTED ny HrrIGnTION HEnsun" NllI-!n"n, NOV!':HnEIl 9, 1994 !':1\ST"1lI1 DunT,nl GI;NEnnT. pr.nll I\I.mllIlJ.mWl'/ SI'!':CII'IC l'1.nll IHTIG1\'XIOll HI;nSUIlI;S/1\CTIOll pnOGIl1\I-IS/IHP1."HlmT1\TIOll H!':1\SUnES l'Lnl~t}'.Il,re revie\o1 and app....oval of the following ql~mcnts as part of the application for ~rqp8~ed developments in eastern Dublin: ft: Clear and detailed identification of all potential open space areas. b. Clear and detailed description of the purpose and/ or function of open space areas nnd their relationship to other open space .reas bpyond the development of these a~cas; prppoded treatment (i.e., restoration, l"evegetal:ion, etc. ) of thesEl a rea"; p.;opofJnd foaintonance and cm~rgency access provi.oj.ona; the proposed ownership of open apace arElas; and the respon9ibility for theit" managelOqnt and maintenance. c. Negotiated agreements with any public agencies that arc going to acquire, manage, and/ or maintain open apace as a result of the project, or when private entities will be responsible for open space managElment and maintenance, a detailed set of codes, covenants, and restri,ctions lLe., CC&!l' !I) that set forth maintenance and management standards and, responsibilities. d. Review of open space plans by the City PD and fire deparl:menta and other applicable lIQencios le.g., Dept. of Flah & Game, Zone 7, etc.) to ena\lre compatibility with their _ stan~~!l~I?ract,ices. PH Determine the appropriate f\lnc\i.nC) IlHH:IHlni'J1l\ln) for on Q0109 loaintenance of opel\ apnea oreau. rmzo THIIP SOH TasOJajara Creek is not a part of this project. The Development IIgreement oho\lld provide for agreement with 1I1ameda county that when development occurs to the east all specific plan measures relating, improvement of Tassajara Creek should be required. City should begin coordinative effort ensure that (c) occurs and that open npacc pinna are reviewed. to ro.,,_ 6C' PI. lleCj\lire open apace iand.. that: OCCIIl; within , development project be restricted to permanent open space, with binding agreements established \4ith the city of O\lbU.n to permanently pc'otect !]llch ilt"cas. ---.----- In:zo F'H!\P X 'l'nfJUn:inL"il Cr:ock io not n Pill-t. of the 'l'HIII' nl..1l1' project; thet'eeoc"e, the project doeD ~!2n_ ___,_ ..__ _ _ _ .1:.!!!:.!J2!.!!!~!}L~p'en !!~/lce. HP.ZO 1'11111' X 'l'i1"saj/lc'a C':Elok 1D not a paL'l: of the 'l'HI\P II('DI' pL"oject; thorefore, the project does SDn inclUde any open space. 111112 60 not: II 11\3 not: J 6B 61 6J PH 01 PL 9T\ P~I ~P\oI 9E PL 11. 3 CH ';1,' 4C PL \':.1 '1'n51<5 HELnTED TO SnllTn' HI'.rn COmmHClnr. CEIITEll SOH'1,'ED BY l-lITlCn',nOIl HEnSllllE IIUHlllm, Il0VElmER 9, 199<1 EnSTERN DUIlLIll CENEHJ\L PLntl nHI~IIOHENT/SPEClF'lC PI.nll MlTlCJ\TlOll HEnSURES Il\CTlOll PROCRl\HSI I HPLEHENTl\TlOll HEl\SURl!:S 1'[. rl;;KPlore optiono for ownership and management of I ar.ea!.l oet aaJ.de ao open space. ~. Encourage the Eaot !Jay Regional Park DLstrictto accept ownership of the Taooajara I CJ:'eek open apace corrJ.dor. b. Nork with the Park Oiotr1ct to develop guidelines for management and uses in open space areas. PH Negotiate the level of flood control improv.ements needed ~Iith Zone 7 to meet di$tr.ict standards nnd r 19htso fwny r.,,'1" irement" and maintenance responoibilities. Establioh a landocape maintenance c.lilltt"ict or other equJ.valent mechanism to cover the longterm costs of maintaining publJ.c facilJ.tieo (J..e., trails, benches, etc.) along the stream corrJ.dors. Ensure that nn asoeoornent disl:t:ict, homeowner!] asoociation, or some other mechaniom is in place that will provide regular longterm lOa intcanance of the \lrbanL-2e!!.!!-!!El\ce l,nter. E nce. T\equire developero to obtain proper approvaln for wastewater service. Require the aeveloperto obtain proper approval for water oervlce. DSRSD standards. nequire, that des J.gn and construction of all water' and recycled water system facility lmprovements be in Ilccorclance ",ith Dsnso policien, otnndzu:do, l1nd lUaotet: _plnns. Prepare and adopt a Haoter Oevelopment 1\gracrncnt: no n format:. for all fut:uJ;"Q develo~~r.eemenl:1l Place a planned development district overlay zone on the entJ.re planning area. nEZO THill' son FHIII' OLDP THill' F l.l/\P X X SOR OLDP THill' ["H1\1' x-- SDH OI,OP IlI~ZO HI 1\ I' x '1'Hnp ')'H1\I' 1."HII1' ---X- son llLPP '1'11111' FMi\'P---Y SOR OLDP TH1\[, FH"i\P---T SDT\ GRIIO PllEZ 1\ tlllI;: nr:zo PllEZ I'IlEZ x I\lINfo: llf:ZO -[,jil';7,- -- x - i\ x X 1I1though Tassajara Creek is not a part of the project, the City needs to begin diocussJ.ons with the various agencies regarding development and ownership. IIdditionally, J.n the development agreement need to're~lire dedication and development when property to the east develo s. Zone 7 is a reviewing agency on the project. Staff needs to continue wor.kJ.ng with them in thio area. Tascajara Creek is not a part of this project. 'l'he City will begin worlcing on a maintenance financing plan when lmprovement of the stream corridors occUrS and maintenance needs are known. Project J.s not in the foothills - area of conCSrn 1n the specific Plan. \~t'1tG con<lll:ion aOllllint..nt \.itll chart on p. 136 of SpGCific Plan. Hrite condition aonsiotent with Chart on 1'.135 of sEecif1c Plan. Condition that infrastructure conforms to policies. 'I'he Cit:y hao Ilpproved a Haster Development: 1\gl:eemenl:.. 'I'hi.s project includes a rezone to a PO and wi.ll therefore meet the intent of ole. 1IIA6 1UBS IIIB6 IVC9 VD2 VR7 ) VIlIAl IA2 ( T1\SKS Rr:;TJ1\TED TO S1\IIT1\ RIT1\ COHH!':IlCI1\L CENTEIl SOllT!':O ny HITIC1\TIOlI HE1\SlJIlE IIlJHOEIl, IIOVEHOER 9, 1994 E1\STERN DunLIN OENEIl1\L PL1\N nHEIIDHENT/SPECIFIC PL1\N HITIC1\TION HE1\SURES/1\CTION PIlOCIl1\HS/IHPLEHENT1\TION HE1\SURES applications for consistency 1\irport P~otection 1\rea. 71\ pi:'; Bst;;abliah nesi']n Review ']llidclineo a"d procedures and asni']n review renponoibilit;;ieo for. projects proposed in eastern Dublin. 78 PL Require development applicants to aubmit, at a minimum, the following materials for review: Existing, Condition Map(s), Design Concepts, Site-Plans (Preliminary & Final), nuilding _ Deoiqn, and Special Concerns. 7C I'TJ Eot:abli.ah a Haster 5I:r081:0c"p" Plan for. 1:110 Town Center Commerci.al area. to j,nclude I:lIe followin'] elemenl:s: otreet t;;ree planting plan, paving standards, lighting atandardo, ai']na']o standards, and amenities otandarde. 70 I'L Establioh a working relationship with developers in the Town Center to encourage join\> development of public parking lots and _~es by area merchants and the City. 11.0 PL Hequire more opacific Planned DevelopmrHlt (I'D) 2.07 plans, Deoi']"s, sequencing, miti']ation measures, etc. 11.2 PW nequire infrastructure sGquencing progralll as .10 part; of PUblic Improvement Plans to allow orderly devGlopment; throllghollt; spGclfic plan area. nend, lIewer, wa\.:"!r, drnlnagG and o\:hor ut1.1itl.oo shnll be pr1.orl.t1"oc\ IIn<l 1n place prlor to opecl,fl.c levels of c\eve1.o~ellt. PilE? pn!':z x plmz /lNNE llE?O [;nil X- ICl '1.'he City 0 S1te Development RGview Guidelineo follows procedures identified in this Act1.on when reviewing Planned Develo ments and SDn /I 1ications. These requirements are part of the application requirements for Planned Developments. PREZ REZO son x IC2 1'1l1~Z IlF.ZO 'I'h \,.., pl:oject io l.ocnted 1.11 I:hOll Ill\ciondll Gateway /lroll. nnn X :tC3 I'n!':z llEZO This project io located ill the Ilacienda Gateway area. SDIl X IC4 I'lmz IlE Z 0 --- TI-IIlP X SOil 1 Thl.., project includes a I'D llezone and the applicant; waD required to Dllbmit " specific 1nformat;ion as required for that; t;ype of a1'1'11ca\>10n, The dGvelopment: agreement: .."d improvement plano will contain t;he i1CllC]lIencing pro<;lr..m. PRI~Z 1\NN1~ REZO '1.'1-1/11' X- son 2 ,- .' Tl\SKS HELl\TED TO Sl\IlTl\ nITl\ COf.lf.lEnCI1\L CEllTEn SOIl'.l'En BY f.lI'.rIGl\TIOll HEl\SllHE llllHIlEIt, NOVEHIlEIt 9, 1994 I':l\STI':RN DllllLnl Ol':lmHl\L PLl\1I 1\HEIIDHI':IlT/SPECIFIC PLI\II IUTIGl\TIOII HI!:l\SllRI!:S/1\CTIOII PROGRIIHS/IHPI,EHEIIT1\TIOII HlmSllRES 1\1 PL ., .n._ zoning HI?.. I.se regulation" to meet E:aster.n P!1EZ 'I'Hl\1' X 1\) Not applicable, the project is not in 11\1 " publin plan" and policie". 1\NNE snn tho campufJ oEfice area. nEZO 11: nevioe zoning regulation" to permi.t (1) The Santa Rita area combines many '. I b:>91dential lIlle" in Campll" OEElce de"ignated uses. 1\lthough this project is not a .-': ;:areas ~Ihen development is conoi"tent with "mixed use" project, it will have nearby G'! !.lr,ecific Plan and does not reoult in adver.se residential uses.. ..nvironmental impacts or eervice impacts. n:: b. Dev:elop Commercial Mixed Use zoning that accoml)1odates a mi.x of retail oEEl.ce, nOl-vi.ce, llnd reoLdentinl U"OIl in the tleighboJ:hnod and Cleneral Commercial dl;loignated at'"caa of nnul:er.n Dubl.1.n. Promote development agJ:eemento to l:hill: 'I'H1\1' - X - '1'ho p"ojcct incl.ucJc9 developmcnt.:. enuut'u I'IU,Z a 11\,3 project 1.B conoiotent with Specific Plan 1\1l1/I:: SI)1l. nCJreemenl:. policies and la'ld uoe proq."am. nEZO X - - DeveloL' an incluoionary houoing program which 199'1 TH1\1' Thl.s J.s a commercial project, not: IBl requires a minimum percentage of all approved son reoidentJ,lll. unito to be affordabla to vary low, low, and .' moderate income households. Explore poseibJ.lity of establishing in lieu 1991\ 'l'HI\P X - - 'I'his relnte9 to reoLdential pr:ojects 1B2 an fee Bupporting below marleet rate hOllainC] SDH development. . Develop Bpecific numeric goal fo" percentage 1991\ X - - ThLs relates to housing and 184 a '1'/11\1' not:. of affordable unit" in eaBtern DubU.n which son commercinl developments . ahould be ownership unit".,' -aD oppoBod to rontal units. -- - - !1equlre appll,cant" to demonstrate that p"opooed PH!': 7- TH1\1' X The wr:J.tten statement and p."oposal 1F8 developm.mt13 are J.n conformance >I.lth the 1\t/N8 son i.nclude infor:mntion that indicates the Eaotern Dublin Specific Plan poU.cien nne1 T..nlld IU;7,O pt'oject ls in confOL~mance with the _~LEr.oQE.~~!!.' .._--~_.._- -- - -- -- _~P~.9.l:Q~!~~.!"I I,,, tilb 1 J,nh l\ bic;ycle cJ.rcuJ.ut.lcJll nynl;em 1:0 hcdp 1'111';7. '1".11\ l' l( X 1\ bUee lnnc ., .i.l, 1 be pJ:ov.i.c1e<l Oil Dublin Irel oer,va the neod (:or: nonmot:orJ.zed t: ):n no pOI:"t: n l: ion I\flllf: snit llo\llav8J~d. IIdaC]lIllte oetbac)e nreas are and recroation in Dublin. Hl,ZO provl,ded 610ng the Creele for a future tr.a.ll. 1\ condl.tion will, r.equire bicycle __ __ _ _ _l:.!'.E]e i.!~ r:nci.li.tl.c!I nt: the project. I\[J I\J I\L ~ Pi:'" I\F PI.. I\e P""L I\A PI, ~r;w () SC SE Pf.. SF 9S PL 9F PL 9V PL 9X PL 4H PL Tl\SKS RELI\TED TO SI\NTI\ RITI\ COHHERCII\L CENTER SORTED DY MITIGI\TION MEI\SURE NUHDER, NOVEMDER 9, 1994 EI\STERN DUDLIII OElIERI\L PLI\N I\HE1IDHENT/SPECII'IC PLAN MITIGATION MEI\SURES/I\CTIOlI PROGRAMS / IMPLEMENTI\TION' HEI\SURES ~~ 'Require applicants to submit a detailed pedestrian circulation plan. The plan ohall include the foLlowing components: Taosajara Creek Trail, Staging Area and Trailheads and sidewalks. Revise the city's existing zoning ordinance as needed to allow flexible parking standards in eastern. Dublin. Requ~re the siting of wastewater system infrlstructure to be consistent with the Resource Hanogement Policioo of the Specific Plan. Require tho siting of water system infrastructllre to be conaiatent with the Reaource Management policies of the specific Plan. Coordinate modifications or enhancements to creeks or the abutting ripsrian areas with the re uired ermittin a enciea as necessar . Require the siting of storm drainage infraotructurs be conoistent with the Resource Management policies of the Specific Plan. Develop a monitoring program that will track residential growth in Dublin in terms of unit type and price categories.. Such a program will provide City decisi6n-makers with data necessary to make informed decisions rolating to c\.t:y !\ollo.l.n</ g.oals and clevc.l.o~!:9.~~:' PREZ IINNE RE7.0 PJ1EZ ANNE REZO PREZ liNN!;: RE7.0 PIU~Z ntlNE REZO PHEZ IINNE nEZO ['nE7. IImm liE 7.0 1994 THill' !inn THAP X SDJ1 TI1l\P -X- son. '['l.lll\, -7 son. 'l'1.!IIP -7 SDR '1'!11\P -x son '1'11111' X son 7 X The I'D Rezone & SDJ1 will include review of pedestrian transit facilities along Dublin nlvd. The Creek is not a part of this project but buildings will be setback 150' from the Creek to allow for future trail desi n. The proj~ct includes a PO Rezone which establishes specific parking standards for this project. Write condition of approval. Condition that infraat:.rllctllre conforms to policieo. IIny modificationa to the Creek will be required to go through the appropriate ermlttin a encies. storm drainoge infrastructure shall be designed in conjunction with zone 7 and wl.ll, be conoiatent with these 1'011.cie'",. Zone 7 is a reviewing aqency. This relatea to housing and not commerdial developments " IIC4 IIEl VA? VR6 VX6 vxa '. ) 03.01 /01. 0 03.03 /01. 0 03.03 04.0 03.03 _ /05.0 03.03 /06.0 03.03 /07.0 TJ\SKS llELJ\TED TO SJ\ll'.r1\ llIT1\ COI.lr.t811CII\L CEllTEll SOIlTlm ny llI'I'IOI\TION HEI\StJllE lllJl1nEll, llOVEH13En 9, 1994 l':I\STP.:lllI DtJlII.III (Jl':lmnI\L 1'r.1\1I J\HlmfH.mll',r/sp!':CII"IC 1'1,1\11 HITIGJ\TION 1.fE1\5tJlll':S / I\CTIOII pnOGllJ\I.IS/ Il11'r.!':Hl':llTI\TION Hl':I\SUnl':S n.5~lve potential land use conflicts between ~~civiti.co at Camp l)nr)cs aflcl propooQ(1 tl0Cn J.n C~c Project. area. so a. Establish a liaison committee between the City and the Army. b. Establish a schedule for periodic meetings to discuss and provide updates on planning and development flf,fOrts Hithin the Project si.te and i,n Camp Parlc9. c. Provide the base commandor ",;,l:h a copy ot new davelopment appl.J.clltJ,ollo IHljacent 1;0 Camp l'arlcD for rovio"' ..n.1 comm13nt:.. PH Caltrano in coopernt.ion wit.h local jurisdictione could construct auxLliarry lanes on 1-5130 bet.ween Taoeajara noad and Fallon Road to provide a t.otal of 10 lanee in that oecl;ion, coneistent with the Coltrane Rout.e Concept Re~ort tor 1-580. PH Establish n Tranoport.at.ion Syot.emD /'Iallagcmenl: (TSH) l'roCJr:am. PH 1\seist in the funding of improvement.s to reqional transportation system. PH 1\ssist in funding the conetruction of auxiliary lanes on 1580 between Tllssajara and Air:way boulevard... P~I Est:ablioh funding for conet:ruct.ion of fut.ure _ ~L I6130 Intercllan~e i~provemelll:o. PH Est:abli..h funding for const.ruct.ion of auxiliary _ ~~~!' 1-500 east: of AJ.rway nlvd. PH l':n:;J\I):"c t:hu f:\lndJ.ng nod COt\fJt:ruct:1.()1l 01: improvements t:o the Dougherty Road/ Dllblin nlvd. intersection as needed. PH Provide improvement:s that will prevent cOllgestJ.on on the Qust:bound offl:ampo ["om 1500 at. lIacJ.endn or.lvc. --- CONT '1'he city is doi.ng all item.. on a cont:1.nno\.1o bnsis. IE1 COI'l'!' x THill' son -x- Traffic study will eXamine thio isoue. Payment of fee will be made a condit:ion of approval.. nr..D[' --- 'l'he CJ.t:y adopted a '1'HO whl-cll wou.td apply ___ to t:his '-0 ect.. X Part of traffic study and requirement ___~p"yment: ot fee. X Part of tratfic otudy and requirement for payment. of fee. '1'HIIP nr..op -X- Part of t:raffic ot:lIdy and requirement SDn ___ for ~y-ment. of fee. '1'HII[, IILUP X Part of l:1:affic study and requi,'ement _~l?~ ____ _ _ _ _ ....!2EJ?~y.~..!!nt o,f tee. Tf.11\P "I,DI' X Pill~t. of. t.t'nf:f:i.c atudy and l:cC]\1iecT1lQnt son COI'I'1' for payment 0 f fee. ['1/0 <':01'1'1' X TH1I.P ULDp son THill' Ol..DP son IIF4 1101 IIF12 IIFll IIF10 IIF9 '1'1.1111' snn -X- IIFB Par.t of traffi.c study and req\lirement for. payment: of fee. HI.DP 11 ~r/\SKS HE:L/\'.J:ED TO s/\wr/\ HIT/\ COH!.lEIlCI/\L CEI/TEIl SOIITED I1Y HU~IG/\TIO!I HE/\SUIlE NlIHIIEIl, 1I0VEHIIEn 9, 1994 E/\STlmll OllIlLIII OImEn/\T. PL/\ll /\Hlmm.mHT/SPECII"IC PL/\lI MITIO/\Tlotl lm/\SURI~S//\CTIOll PROGH/\HS/ UIPLEHElITJ\TIOll HE/\SUIlES 03.03 Fund and implement improvements necessary to '1'H/\P IlLDP and requirement /08.0 ensUl:'e the efficient operation of the son intersectIon of Tassajara noad with the 1500 westbound r.amps. 03.03 Prl' Fund and Implement improvements necessary to '1'H/\P IILlJP X Part of traffic study and requirement IIF6 /09.0 ensure adequate service levels on Santa nita son for payment of fee. noad and IS80 eastbound ramps. 03.03 I'll Airway Boulevard and Dublin Boulevard. The '1'HI\P OLDP X Part of traffic !ltudy and requirement /10.0 City of ..l~ubl.in shall. implement improvements in S011 for payment of fee. coordi.n'ation with the City of r",i.vermore to mod J:fy the intersection to provJ.de three thl:'ough lanes and a right-turn ],nno en!Jt:bo\1nd, and 1:"'0 lefl:-t:\irn lane" nnd two thl:oll9h lnnen westbound. The Project shall const:I:ibllte a pl:'oportionate "hare of the impI:ovement costo as detel:'mtned by a regional transportation study s\lch ao the current study by the Tri.-Valley Transpol:'t:ation Council. These impr:ovemen t a would provide LOS C conditions. 03.03 PH Fund and implement J,mprovement:.Iil nlllCQOOllry to '1'HI\P IlI.D!"' -X- I'art of t:rllffic at:ucly and roquirement: IU'S /11,0 enaure adequ..t:a flervice levelfl at: t:he GOR tor, p..yrnent ot t..... intaroectl.on ot 1\irway nlvd. llnd tho wQtJt:.bo\Jnd PW ramps. implement --X-~ of t:l:'atftc study and requirement UF3 03.03 Fund and improvements necessary to 'l'J.lI\f' BI.DP f'nrt /12.0 ensure unimpeded movement of trucks to and from son for payment of fee. ~uarl:J.efl on El Charro nOlld /Joul:h ot I-SOO. ----~_._- 9 , , 1/ TJ\SKS mn.1\TEO TO SJ\NTJ\ IlITJ\ COI.l/.1EIlCIJ\I, C~~NTER SOIlTIW IIY BITIOJ\'rIotl U1~J\Sl/ltE Ill/HilER, NOVEllllER 9, 1994 1~J\STI~1l!1 OUIlLIlI GENElt1\I. PLAN l\l.mIIOHEHT/SPECIlr1C PL1\lI H1T101\'1'10II ME1\StlRl~S/1\C'1'10II PROGRAHS/ H1PLEMElITAT1otl MEASURES 03.03 ~ /13.0 I ' 03.03 -PiT /14.0 03.03 PW 15.0 03.03 PW /15.1 03.0J -PL' /15.2 03.03 /15.3 03.03 /16.0 03.03 /16.1 03.04 /01. 0 l'W Cumulative impacts on Dublin 130uleval:d. The CON'l' BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement IIF2 c;it.:y of Dublin ahall continue to partl.cipate in 1'I1I\P CO lIT f.or. payment of. fee. regional otudies of future tranaportation son. requirements, improvement alternatives and t;unding programs, such as the current Dtudy by \'~:) the 'rt" i-Valley Transportation Council. l3ulldout of development outside of Eastern Dublin beyond 2010 levels would reqll ire the ., construction of grade-separated interchange!! on DUbl.if1, ..ri'ou1ovard and/or establi!lho,ent of. :, a1t:er.natJ.vu roul:eo to redl.otri,but:o tr.aff:ic flo\ol+ Tho project: oha1l par.tJ.cl.pate i.n the implementatJ.on and fundJ.ng of regional tranoportatJ.on improvement proC)'rillt\O ClO ~rmin~ theoe roC/J.onal stuclioo. Reserve CJufficient right of along 'l'a9flujara FI'II\!' - X of traffic atudy and requi>:cllnent way '1'111\1' Pal:t:. to I'IFl Road to nccommodate cumulative development: of SDn. I\LDP pay feo proi..cta north of the project area.. - - - Extend t:.!:'anait u..rvice within 1/4 mJ.le of 9S'L PIlEZ CON'l' x 'rhe CJ.ty ncods to coordinate and meet:. IIAl of the P!:'oiect area population. 1994 with LI\V'rl\. - - - Provide tt:anoLt aervice, at a minimum f re('1t1ency nr::zo COWl' X The cJ.ty nocda to coordinate and meet I I 1\2 of one bus every 30 mJ.nutou duri.nl) peak hO\1ro, son ".I.\:h LI\V'rI\. to employment cente!:'s wJ.th 100 or more , employees. ~ - Provide funcli.ng in Bupport. of expl\nsion of '1'111\[> FHJ\!' X St.nff needs to cont.act. t.he transit IIA:! tranait se>:vice to the project son authorJ.ty rega>:ding poaaib1e ~., area.. .. ,'. . - - - - _p'a>:t1.c1.pnt.iol~ the developer. Coordinat.e pt'ovioion of f eetlet" bun service to l' Ill:: Z corlT X The C1.ty neetlo to coordinate and meet IIA4 t.he planned B1\nT stations from the Project 1994 wi,th T.1\VTI\. .' area. .- - Pr.ovJ.de " paved Clag~ I bicycle/ pedeol:l:"J.i\r1 '1'1.\1\1' I"'.I^I' X 'I'D he cont:.alrHHl in Development l\9L~cement I102 path along 'l'ansajara Creelc. SDn. nr.nl' fo,: county to provJ.de at the tJ.me of ~!:..,:"clocrnent: of cant: o1.ele of C.,cck. ---- -- - - - Provide for nafe pedcstr1."n/ bicycle cl:o!lfJinC]!J '1.'1.[/\1"' 1"1.11\1' X Hill be roqll irod J.f detel.ol11ined necesgar..~y II03 of major ar.t.erial. streets. SDn. nT,lIp ~Eart of son procesa, - - - - Prov iele adelit 1.0na 1 personnel, facili.t:icn, nnd PIH:Z COil'!' X 1\ flacal. nn<llyni.s ia being pr.epnred and IVBl prOCCd\II:CS 1:0 1'0 ner.vice ot:D.ndnr.c.ln. l.t:n l:"ccommnndnt.i.on9 "ill be J.mplell1""t:ed ___~~~i.t:i.O!'!J of the p~ect:. - ) Pl. PH PO 10 .1 03.04 /02.0 03.04 03.0 03.04 /04.0 03.04 /05.0 03.04 /06.0 03.04 /07.0 03.04 /00.0 03.04 /09.0 03.04 /10.0 00 ~ l>c) ~Fit ~ Fl\ --- FIl ;''':.l ~l'J\SI{S IlELJ\'rt~n TO SJ\NTJ\ l\I'J'J\ COHI.mRCIJ\T. CENTER SORTEO BY In~l',IGI\TIOIl HEI\SUllr.: N!J~lTmR, 1l0VEHnr.:R 9, I!)!) 01 EI\S'J'lmN OUIIT.IN OI~llIm1\L 1'J.I\N I\Hlmnlmll~l'/spr.:CIIrIC PLJ\1l HITIGI\TIOIl HlmStJRES/J\CTIOIl PTtOGRJ\HS/ HIPLr.:HEHTJ\T.IOIl HEJ\SURr.:S -i7T7o------x X Cnnc:\.i.ttoll requi.l."i.IH] fire fic1."vice to tho nite. I\dditionhlly, staff neodo to work w!.l:h O.l.nl:t:ict on pr()v.l.slon of station sH:o. Ennure nHFJ\ input: on project desi\)n rel.lLting \:0 '1'1.\1\1' ~;un - X X - I'm:t of project review pL'ocesD. accesD, water preDDure, fire safet:y an,\ SOn 1"1.11\1' ConditJ.on aosuring compliance with DRFl\ _~!:~~~!~!:.!.~~~. . ______ ___ _ _ _ _!'~!I~!..!:E.~.~~!~!:~. It:n!Jur'o l:hat it llleChani.:lIo i.o in p1."c(-~ l:op70~r(fc- '-:riTi\I~- vr'1^1' X Hcchi.\ni.nm~1 nhnl.l be 1.n pli\cn to pr.ovide long tCl~111 n\i\.intcnilnce for. nafe' fi.l:C condi.t:.i.onn !inn. IlL!)P J:(~l)\11nr lOlllj-tcl:m.ma1.ntcnancc of the ..!!.l~.!~f)~!l.!:_!.~E.!,~~ ~L!:p.!:. !~_~ ['!~~!:...J:!:.!:!2!:.f,,~,~J!;.:~_~_____..__._._~ _______. ._"_.._...~.__ ___ __ ___ __. _~!~.:'~!.~:.~!L<};p~ !~--!~ [~~!:~:!~!:~~E~.~~D_ -"Rovide the PO Dept. j,nformatJ.on needed too I aqt!~ll1l1t:ely pliln for expansion o. f service", 06prclinllte wJ.th the City PO Depllrtment rtlgnrding the timing of annexation lInd proposed c1p~elopment, 00 thilt the Depllrtment clln adequately plan for the necessary expansion of _~erviceD to the area. Provide for PO Dept. input into the deoign of -EropoBed' development. Prep,re a budget otrategy to hire the rcguJ.rcel additional pernonnel anel implement necesslIry chang<its in the "bent" ayotem. EnDure I'D Dept. review of proponed development: for oafety luau",". Incorporate into the requirementD of project approval PO Dept. recommendationo on pr.oject design thol: lLffect traffic oafety and crime prevention. 1'<) "'"PO FA Provide for the conDtructlon of new fire facl,lltieQ coincident with nn., service dernnnd in oaotern Dublin. CH Establish appropr.iate funding mecllllnJ.omo (e.\). Hello ROOD DLstrict, developer financJ.ng with reimbursement agreements~.ect.) to cover upfront costs of capital' improvements (i.e. fire stations and related facilLtieo and --!"0~E!!~!!!\ t 1 . Ennure i'lCCj\1 i.nit:.ton new fJ.re ototiona. of oiL:.cn f(H: connl:J~\Ic;l:.i.on of: PHE?' 1INNE '1'111\[' SOn COWl' 'l'li 1\ I' son '1'111\[' son '1'1-1111' Son 'l'1.\1\1' SOH COI'IT '1'he Dublin Police Department i.s tile reviewing agency for tllis project. 1Id(litiol\nll.y, a fiscal. anal.YDin was prepllred and itD recommendations will be made conditions of the project approval.. IVB2 . .;~i; :~ IVS3 IVB4 .c. IVBS :.c x IlLI)!' Police Dept, ia a reviewing "gency on the proiect. 11 fiocnl analysis wao prepared and its reoornmenelat:ions will be made conditions ____..2~J:!E!!jacl: arnrovlll. X '1'he Pollce !Jept. should revie" i.temo in Olnl\ anel make sure that they comment on thooe speclfic items ao well as their uDual. areal3. Need a lettor from the Poll.ce DpacificallY,oayLng they are revJ.ewino J.tems 3.4/5.0 - X X negui.re condition for provioion of fire aervice to the project. Enter into an llgr.eemf1lnl: .,it:h I\larn'Hla county for inl:eL'im fir.e facility on the Sonta ni.ta ---_..!.~~. X X Tho applicant will be financing ita own infrastructue. Tllay will either conlltruct: the facilities, pay impact feea, and/or enter into reimburoement agreementD. ;"'............ 1'11111' nLDI' -COWI'- -- - X X ["I/O IVCl 1'1/0 IVC2 IVC3 IVC4 IVC5 11 03.04 /11.0 03.04 /12.0 03.04 /13.0 03.04 /13.1 03.04 /14.0 03.04 /15.0 03.04 /16.0 ~ T/\SJ<S ItELI\TED TO S/\t1T/\ 11ITJ\ COI-lI-lE:IlCII\T. CE:t1TE:1t 501t']~En I\Y HITIG/\TIOH Hl;;I\SllltE IIll1.InEIt, lIOVE!.lUEIt 9, 1991 E/\STEltll DllDLIlI OlmlmJ\TJ prJlI1I 1IH1~IIDHEtlT/ SPECIl'IC PLIIII HITIGJ\TIOII HEIISllltES/lICTIOII PltOGltl\MS/IHPLEHE!lTI\TIOII HEIISURES OJ t"h I' fntegrate fire trails and fire breales 6~en space trail nystem. a. Heet fire district ntandards for acceso r~ads in the open space trail nyntem while minimizing environmental impacts. 7R prepat"(~ a wildfire manaCJement plan fo~" the Project area in order to reduce the risle of impact related to wild land fire l"lt Determi.ne the number., location and timing of additional fire otationo for areas within the Project nrea yet o\ltnLde the Spcc:tfi.c Pll\n nrnn PI. Iteserve ochool DiteD within the Project area ao deDignated in the Specific Plan and Gonoral Plan I\mendment (PleaDe notel Thio mitigation measure has been renumbered as 3.41 13.1 vorous 3.4/ 13.0 because it 1.9 ident1.cally numbered as the m1.tLgntion measure regarding SiteD for Fire Facil1.tics for GPII Incre~ent), PI. l;;nsure t:llat adoquate capacity 1" provl.dod fo,: junior high ochool age students. PL Enoure that adequate clao....room apace io provided pd.or to the development of new homes. Oil 1'1. Hor.le oll.th the PllbJ.J.n 11l1lr..I.ed school. DJ.!lI:rJ.ct and the TJl.ver.mor.e .JoJ.nt Hnifi.ed School rli.nl;r.icl: t;o reaolve the jllr.in<llctlonal. innue reO"l'dJ,ng wlllch d1.nt:rict(n) nhoule! aervo the "'1I..t:ern Dubl.in plann1.ng orea. a. uetcr.mine the Gervicc that bent flervc,", the ncedn student:!J ilnd mi.nimi.:r.cn the ~~~ i.ci"'=-t:.t~o,:".i.~~~..E~,. dJ.st~J.ct: n~)~n"9crnan': oE planni.IH] ilr'on fi.ncnl bllt:dr.n of I:he Pltli:Z MINE Plt8(. liNN!': '1'/,\1\1' SPit 'l'HI\P SOH 'l'/-lI\P SOIt 199!i 11I~(.() FHIIP OLDP IlI,O P TlLIlP 1'1,11\1' OIJPP l"HI\P Or..DI' n. 1 0 - ':::[/0- 1. ~~ x Condition that access road be required to onFII otandards. Needs will be determined dllr1.ng son, fire authority is part of review process, X The fire diotr;ict rev1.ewes at the time of Site Development Review and comments on each project. At that time a plan is prepared by the dintrict on a project by _ _ _ J?E~j,ect ba.. 1.0 as needed. X Fire protection for the project area and other ourrollnding areas are being nrlalyzc(l nn pnrt of tl1e project'o fincal anal.yu1.o. 1\ condl.tion for provinion of ___ fl.r.e oel"vice wlll be re \lired. X No ochool oitee Were indicatec1 on t:hio nite in the Spec1.fic Plan. Tlddl.tionally, I;he Bchool c\iotrict 1.s one of the review1.ng agencies. IVC7 IVCB IVAl X No ochool 011:00 were indicated on thi" site in the Speciflc Plan. IIdditionally, the school distr1.ct 1.0 one of the reviewing ogencl.es. X No Bchool s1.teB are indicated on this aite in the Specific Plan. The project dooo not lnvolve residential devel.o~I1'ellt . "x - - X Tla;;ddo'cllrnentatl,oll fa;: tho file that we ilr.O <101,ng t:hJ.n. !lowove..., thin project: io comnwn:cJ.al. and the GaL-vice j,u!JueG do not <11.roctly apply. IVA2 IVA3 IVI\4 03.04 117.0 03.04 8B 118.0 03.04 SF /19.0 03.04 /20.0 03.04 /21.0 03.04 /22.0 ~1'/\SI(5 HEr../\'l.'~~[) TO SlItlTlI HI'l'/\ COf.ll.leHCIlIr., CEtlTI'.H :;OIl'.l.'ED lIY HI'l'IOI\TIOII HI'.lISlHlI'. lIlJHnJ,H, UOVEf.lnEIt 9, 1994 1,1I5'1.'I'.IlII Dt/llT.IU OE!mHlIT. PU\tl 1I!mlHl!mtl1.'/5PECIlrIC PT.lIU HI'rIOllTIOII HI'.I\SURES/lICTIOII PItOOHI\M5/IHPLEH!':t1TnTION HEnSURES I-'~lri~fjre that adequate school facilities al'e ,,"ai1.abl.e pri,or to development in the Project ilrea to the e>etent permitted by law. ~ ensure that the development of new Bchool facilities is provided for through the dedication of school sites andl or payment of developr~ent fees by developerD, or by any other _ ~n 'p'ermi.tt.ed by law. CH !!:etabl.illh appropriate funding mechani...Il,,,, o\1ch aD Hello Roos Community Facilitios Diotrict, development impact feeo, or a general ol~liQation bond measure, 1:0 fund new "chool development in eautern Dublin. It!!: E>epand parI, I1l;"ea throughout the Primary lI11(1 E>etended Planning Tlreas to serve new dovel,opmQnt. RR Haintain and improve outdoor facilities in conformance ~/it:h the recommandations of the City's Park and recreati6riHaster Plan 1992. ----'-- HE Provj,ch..: ncl:ivf~ pi\rks and .fnc.i.lit:.1.ou \o/hich Ul;e adequate to meet citywide needs for open space, cultural, and sports facilities, as well as the local needs of the Eastern E>eton~cd plnnning lIrea. HEZO x DUSD is a reviewing agency on this project.They have indicated that the sterling Fee will adequately mitigate impacts from this development. Need condition re uirin a ment of fees. Condition of approval to pay Sterling fees (letter from OUSO indicated those fees would provide all needed mitigation from this project.) IVA6 CaNT THI\P [,'1.\1\1' son BLOP l'nl~Z nl,DP I\NlIl~ COWl' COWl' x cOIn COH'l' x 't'he lltJSD ind.lcated by letteu' that this projoct does not adversely impact the P1..t>:1.ct z,nd t:hat impact" can be mJ,tJ.gat:...d through payment of the standard "chool fee (sterling Fee) by letter dated 9 23 94 . XX- The Public Facilitiecs Fea scucly will e>eam1.ne the impactcs on parkland and whether thJ." project shoulcl participate in acquiring , improving or maintaining them. If npplJ.cablo, the"e issues will be nogotiated in n development agreement and this will be made a condition of _ _ _ .1!.EJ2.Eova 1.. . x X The Public Facilit1es Fee Study will e>eamine the ~npacts on parkland and whether thJ." project should participate in acquiring, improving or maintaining them. If applicable, these is Dues will 1)0 negotl.ritcd in ~ development agreemellt nnd tills wi].l ))0 made a condition of ._ _. _ ~ ~1~P~~9_~~.1 . X X '1'lle Publ.i.c FacJ.litlco 1'"0<<2 Study will examJ.ne the impacts on parkland and whether this project should participate in aCC)l1iring, improving or maintaining l:hem. I ~ appl icable, theDe issues will be negotiated 1n a development agreement nnd this will he made a condition of ____ _ _ ~:.P.P.E..ov;~l..:_. ",;; IV1\.7 .-l...., cOtI1-;-- '"'(;0,;:;;"-' 13 Tl\SKS nEIJ\TED TO S1\NTl\ nl'.rl\ CO~Il,lEnCI1\r. CEllTElt sonTED BY IHTIGl\TIOll HEl\SIHlE llUMBEn, IlOVEMllER 9, 1994 El\ST8Rll 1IllllLIll OENER1\L PLl\1l l\MENIIM8NT/SPECIFIC PLl\1l HITI01\TIOll HI~1\StIRES/1\CTrOlf PROGRl\MS/ HIPLEM8NT1\TIOlI H!!:1\SURI~S 03.04 /23.0 ng I\<'CJtlir.c and improve pal:ltlands in con[ol:",nnce wlth tho priorities and phasing recommended in bne City's Park and Recreation Hnster Pl.nn. COWl' cor'lT 03.04 /24.0 PL Reqllire"land dedication and improvements for the 25" par.lt!! 9 deaignat:ed in the GoneraJ. plan l\menClment (01'1\) and collect in 11.ell feo" per. City fJtanclard. THl\1' FI.IM' x X The Public Facilities Fee Study will cKam1.ne the impacts on parkland and whether thin project should participate in acquiring, improving or maintaining them. If applicable, the~e issues will be negotiated in ~ development agreement and this will be made a condition of _-!E roval. X X No dedication will be required of this appL1.cant, however, improvement needs wilL bo addressed thorugh the Public Fnc1.J.i.tiefl Fee Study wh1.ch is being prepared by the C1.ty. Idenfitiecl needs w1.LI be negot1.ated in the development agreement and this will be made a cond1.tion of approval. 101 102 ;~;":' ~~.i 03.04 /25.0 PL Provide an adequate ra~io of developed parklanda to population. '1'HI\P F/1I\P x 03.04 /26.0 Pl., lleaignate uit:<HI tOt" 17 par.lta in thl.! Speci.r:ic Pl.an area and fJ additional lJites in the General Plan Amendment Extension to ensure maintenance of the CLty's parks provision standard.. Ensure that park development is consistent with the standards and phasing recommended 1.n the ..slJ:.Y's Parle a!!eI necreatio'ri'Master Pl,a,!. EnD\l~e tIle provision of open opaco, acceou arld areas for publ1.e recreal:io~. '1'/-11\[' l\ccompl.ished in the Specific Plan. This project (con\l\'lfllrci/l.l) J,,, not r"'CJuirood to __ _ _ _ _ ded!:~I!'":'lel"ncl per pOlicies. 1-'1-11\1' X l\ccol1lpliuhctl in the SpecJ.fic Plan. 'rhi.s project (comnu~rcJ.al) ia not re'luit"ed to dediCate parkland per policies, 103 03.04 /29.0 PI. J~n!Jl1re that oach 1\13...1 (lavclopmcnt J;crJ(.!!:Vf.Hi the open space nnd parkland designated in the Plan. Park Haster Plan incorporated Eastern Dublin recreation and open apace ___~~l2.!:..!!. X Include provision in Development l\greement: regarding dedication of the stl:ellm corridot" at the time the ellstern side of creek develops. This will be a r;ondit.lon of nPl:~I:oVllJ.. -Tl.I1\I)-~- -'vrSi\I.;--~ .--. - x -lic(j~lrrel~lQi)f-eol.; c.lcvclopn\cnt ugl:cclllcnt BO that County will dedicate open space ar.ea at time of development of east parcel. nl.Do Tnosnjnrn C~eel( ig not n pi1.1~': of: t:he pr.oject: but iHlcC")\li\t:C Bcl:hack9 have been designated to rcnerve opan opace. '1'hi9 will be mnde i\ .__________h__~ ___._.__ ____.....4' .~_._ ___ _ _.. _~~~.~!~~.~...!.:J:~~,~.~2E__~~I2P~~~... 'I'/11\P l"HI\P X 104 03.04 /27.0 RE 03.04 /28.0 PL '1'11l\P FHl\p IDS ID6 1'1 03.04 /30.0 03.04 4N 31.0 03.04 /32.0 03.04 /33.0 03.04 /34.0 03.04 /35.0 03.04 40 /36.0 Tl\SKS RELl\TED TO S1\llTl\ RIT1\ COH/-l8RCI1\L CEllTER SORTlm BY HITIGl\TIOll HE1\SURE IWlolDER, IIOVEHDER 9, 1994 . EI}STERll nUnLn~ OEI/!':R1\r. pr'1\ll 1\HEIIDJ.lEllT/SPECIl"IC PL1\ll Uf~tdn~IOll HEl\Su"iYlt~TIDll.PROGnnJ.ln/IJ.lPLEHEllT1\TIOll MEl\SURES . ..0.:'. n~velop a parks Implementation Plan for eastern ~ublin that identifies the following: preferreel phas1.ng of lanel e1edicat1.on and improvements, facilit1.es priorities and their location, and the design and construction of parks. PL Calculate and assess in lieu park fees based on THAI' Dublin's parkland and dedication ordinance. PT, Estall.l,.J.sh a trail system with connect1.ons to '1'1.1 1\ P plan~ed regional and aubregional syatem, son includi.ng the north-south corridors ollch aD EBnPD'a proposed trail along Taosajarn creek north to Haunt O1.abLo State Park. PL EotablJ.oh a compt"ehenoive, 1.nl:egrated 1;,:aiL network that permits oafe Bnd convenient _Eeclestrian and b1.cycle acceos. PL Establish n continuous open space network that integrates large natural open space areas, stream corridors, and developed parks and recreation areas. P'/-lI\P 107 X Not a residential project. P'HI\l' IOS l'I1I\P nr.Of' X T~ssaja~a Creek is not a part of th1.s proje6t. Tho City will begin working on a maintenance fin~ncing plan when lrnprovmcllt: of ti,e otream corridor occurs and tho loa.i.n\:ananco need!] ill';e known. X --- - - 1\ccolI\pliohc(1 by the Spoclf ic Plan and Parka Hautor Plan. 1II1\4 '1'1.11\1' 1"1.11\1.' SDn flY-I)P TI1I\P [0'1.11\[> son nLOP -x E"tabLJ,shed in the Specif1.c PLBn and p~rks l1aster Plan. Need provision in the development agreement for dedication of oteam corridor. This will be made a __ _ _ _ _~~tlJ.t:.I.Q!L.or. ul?proval. 1."1'11\1' X Contact l~nllPD regarding otaging areas. nLDl' for Tassaj~ra Creek Tr~il. 1II1\7 PL Provide convenient pedeotri~n connectiono TI1I\P between developed areas and designated open son space areas and trails. PL Require developers to dedicate pubLic access T/-lI\P eaaements along ridge top 0 .~nd stream corridors son to accommodate the development of trails and _ "taQl:..!:!9 araao. 1II1\8 FHI\P ---X nt,DP Include provisions in the development agreement for dedication of otream corridor. IIIAS lS ~ ,~ .il I' TlISK9 REL1\TED TO SANTlI RIT1\ COMMERCIlIL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGlITION MElISURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 199G EASTERN nUnI.IN GENERlIL PLlIN MmllDMEllT/ SPECIFIC PLlIll IUTIG1\TIOll ME1\SURES /lICTION PROGR1\MS / IJ.lPLEHENTlITIOll ME1\SURBS 03.04 /38.0 03.04 /39.0 03.04 CM 40.0 03.04 8L PL /41.0 03.04 /42.~ 03.04 PW /43.0 03.04 -Pi":"" /44.0 CH r (If-e['lwo " Solid Hante: Hanagcmcnt: plan (OJ: 1995/ [Jr.!)!' X X r)~epare SI-IHP u['da te for Eastern Dublin, VAAl 10 ;HltH~ r n Dublin, meeting the req\1 irernen t s of the 1996 'I'hin project will not exceed thresholds ft<l"'pted City SlmE, which inCludes: o( current SRRE. Therefore, preparation : 1:. 1\ requirement for the City to compost all of an update p['ior to project approval organic Vlllt'ltes resulting from the ongoing is not necessary. Require condition of ) mii.lntanance of public parkis and open spaca. approval to ansure compliance with >: :1 . extension of Dublin's curbside recycling requirements of the SWHP and SRRE p~ogram for recyclable materials. . ;i I; 3. Sp~Qific 8['eas designated for the ool1.ec'I:i.on of recyc1.able mated.n1.n i.n ITlllltt- famtly and cormnerci.al arens, wl.th coor.cLlllati.on as nl!ll;!ded for pJ.clc-u p. 1\ . Support for re-UD13 of compofltccl mnt:cn:lnlll .' in lanclDcaped nreap of all new dCVQloI2!~!J.I: . - - Revise V/aate generation projectiona o( Dubli.n'o 1995/ Ilr.DP X CIIL"rellt sHIm ac:comodat:.e:a Ilomart.. Vl\1\2 SRI'le:/ IIImE All needed to reflect the population l'J'JG and oOl'1'lm..rcinl land use projectiono of the adopted PI~o;ect . forJ - - Ensure thnt: the Sol.id \~aste Managcment:. Pl.iln 19%/ IlLDP X cJ.ty ru:!cdo to prepare SWHI'. howe.ver, the Vl\1\3 Eastern Dul,U,n addreooes and .tncorpor.a.t.es the 1996 cUL-ront snRn: includes !lol\1art Project. goalo, objocti,v"D, and progr.amo of oubli.n'o SRREE and IImm. .- - , Ensl.lt'c that:. adequate landfill capacity iEl '1'11111' ~'HI\I' X- nequire will nerve letter VAA4 available to accommodate pro;ect waste. SDR Dr,DP - lIave project: applicants provide documentation nEZO J."Hl\P X- nequire will oarve letter. lVOl ;,Z) that electric, gaD, and telephone eervice can TH1\P OLDP be provided to all new c1eveiopment. - Require all ut1liti,es be located belovl gl:ude OLDP n/o X- X ~Irite condJ,tion, also City ohould begin IVD2 \.-1hCL.O roan J.hle Ilnd denl.gned to Cl.l:y nt:nnc1"rdn. contllcti.ng major utl.J.l.t1eo regllL'ding -~. - - - .J:.!~ei~,!,_,!.:!.!o~pllln" for. the area, l'Iodt with PGI.a: 1:0 plnl\ I:he underCjI:-oundi.n(J 0': SDIt X Staff neccJo to begin mcet:.Lngn wi.th PG&E IVD3 a1.l nnw clcct:I:".i.c lines nod 1:0 rant:c IlLDP l:"ncJilrcling p,:,ov.i.nlon of \ll:i.litJ."s nnd infraot:ruct:ur.Q n\o,ny fr.om flcnoil:ivQ hnbi.t:nt: nnd t:hoi.J: locnl:ion i.n rolati.on to thi!J open "paca land.. to mitigate tho of; facl:.rJ of miti.{JatJ.on menlJuz:a. IItJ.lit1Gls ex E!!.!' '" i !?!}~ JiT.j)p - - X- nCH] " I,:" I'I.'0J'JCI; nppllcllnl::J to liuhllli.t ,. Fnl\J> 11<",,1 (;oncli,t: Lon, IVD4 \It.\. 1 U;lon n(~):v.i.cn t:npO):I'. 1".0 I:hr~ City pl.'in.: 1:0 ~!::.l i.c JI1~pr:ovemcnt 111.An llEp['ov!!..l, - - - --. CiT PiT Hi 03.04 PT, /46.0 03.04 [lL /47.0 03.04 011 (>L /48.0 03.04 /49.0 03.04 8N /50.0 03.04 /51. 0 03.05 !lQ /01. 0 'I~J\SlCS RELI\TEll TO Sl\llTI\ IlITJ\ COl.If-lEnCII\T. CEllTETt SOllTEIl BY HITIGI\TIOll HEI\SlJRE llUI1IlI':R, 1I0VEHIlEIl !l, 1991 EI\STlmll lllJDLIll Ol!:llImJ\L PLIIIl 1\!.\ImlllmllT/SPECIFIC PLl\lI HITIGI\TIOII HI!:I\SUIlES/I\CTION PIlOCRIIHS/IHPLEHElITI\TIOlI HEI\SUIlES "~equire ~he installation of a demonstration rrojeC~(B) of coot effective enerqy conoarvntlnn tecl\ni.qllca. Require developers to demonstrate the incorporation of energy conservation measures into the design, construction, and operation of propoaed development. Encollrag~ and auppor~ ~he efforts of the U.S. POetal" 'Sl1rv ice to establish a poat: 0 f f ice .II,th ~ha callto!;'n !Jublin 'I'own Cent,,>:. CQordinate witi\t."h" u.s. Pootal. So>:vicu to identify facility needa and aite criteria for a new poe~ office in Eastern Dublin, and direct ~he land owner/developer of ~he Public/Bc'miPublic area designated in the 'I'own Center to explore the potential for a post offiCe in thia lOcation. ftE Encourage nnd support the efforts of the 1\lameda county T.ibrary Syatem 1:0 establish a lLbra~y(ioo) and aSDociatad Da~viceD tor Eastern Dublin ao determined to be npprop>:Latc given the DL~11 and population of the planning area. ftE Coordinate with J\lameda county to provide lib~ary aerviceD to Eastern. Dllblin. t.' . f1.E Require tho Ci~y r.1.brary Task 1>O>:C<l identify appropriate 10cat1.on and timing fo~ development Of new library(ien). PH IhH]tl.i.r.o t:.hnt:. ;tl.l. dcvelo(>lIlcnt:. ,."i.thin t:"o SpecJ.fic Pliln be connected 1:0 [ll\bl..i.r. nn.m.:n. Except ions to this ~equ irE1ment, in particlllat' septic tank oystnmn, will only bn allowed on n cant) by enn!'! hnni.n upon rcr.:ci.pt: of \-Jr.i.l:t:nn nppt."ovnl [l-om 1\1.;1111(1<.1i\ CO\lnl:y Ji:l\v1..~(lr\ll\etll:ill _ !leE' 1 t~!..J?_!::p~-=-"~!~Q~~!~:.D. 1'11111' s!Jn '1'1'\1\1' SDn 'l'I1J\P son 'I'111\l' son. pm~z I\NNE HE7.0 I'HEZ 1INlIE I1E7.0 PIU:Z /\l.1 N I" HE7.0 THI\I' :1DI1 ~ ~. . 1>1/0 Require project to use energy conservation techniques as identified in bllildinC) code. 1\lso, encourage other ___ energy aavJ.n techni Ilea, X X Part of project review will be to analyze these issues and require compliance with current energy standards. X This project ia not in the TOwneenter. nr.DP fHIII' 1lf.1)!' FIII\['-- -j( - - IlLD!' Con\:actJ,n<) tho pODt of f ice regal;"cling the location in \:he Town Center should not begin until the Dtraet layoutD are known J,n thnt area. IVE~ [i' 1-\ 1\ I' IJLIH' X City needs to write a letter. 1>/.1 1\ P OLD!' X City neads to write a letter. IVE3 f'i:1iiP- -- - - X 'I'he p>:oject is not in a site that .,as OLDp identified an n possible library l.ocnt:lon 1." l:ha Specific Plnn. ltO\.;,ravcL4, the C.l.l:y need \:0 beqin ,oorlcJ.nq with the tnol< force in tills nrea. '--I;rt-;\P'-"'---x--Nnr~~l will 1.;1l':1;'VO lol:.t.eL4 <<IB.I conc1i.l:.ion nLnp \:hnt the r,,'oject be connnetr"I, DsnSD Code p>:ohJ.bit!l the lIDe of septic or non- p\1hltc ['jn"'Jf!t~ oystems for. nny commer;,cial pl.'ojecl: (P"": r."'l:l:e.: 1:0 The Ci.t:y of llubl.i.ll dal:od Novell\bet" 3, 19~H). IVE4 V1\2 17 03.05 /02.0 03.05 91' /03.0 03.05 9N /011.0 03.05 90 /05.0 03.05 /06.0 03.05 /07.0 03.05 /07.1 TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTEn BY MITIGATION HEASURE NUHnER, NOVEHBER 9, 1994 RASTlmN DlIDI.ItI GEmmA!, PI.AI/ AHENnHEN'.r/SPECIFIC PLAI/ HITIOATIOI/ MEASURES/ACTIOI/ PROGHAHS/IHPLEMENTATION MlmSUTtES 9J 11\( lIave Dsasa update its wantewatec collection !JI/MI,cm maal,ec plan compul,el:' model. to l:'eflect 1.110 adopted Specific Pl.an/GPJ\. projectn mun!: pay fol:' deDign level wastewatel:' collection system master plan computel:' model. (nRIII, P. 819) VA3 x X DSRSD has all:'eady pl:'epal:'ed the Eastern Dublin Facilities Plan, Final Report, da!:cd Decembec, 1993, (Dodnon and nssociates) to pl:'ovide the updated computel:' nimulations and mastel:' plan analyses foc wastewatel:' collection and potable and recycled water systems. nlameda County funded the Dodson study in part.Applicant shall install required ______.E~si:1JI:l..'=E-'.'.n a condl.ti.on of aEl'coval. x 1'1:'(,1jCf:1.:. will be 1.4Qq\licecl l:.o hook i.nto pub1.ic \Iti.1.itieo and wate\:"/wantcwatcr nyot.cmo. PHEZ nt/Np. HE'l.O TM/\P snn (I \-1 nifJCOUriH;Q t:ha tUH: of onoJ.t:.e [Jl\CIUH]U pJ.nnt~1J ilod oept!.c oyotoms with!.n tho Project' al:oa in accol:'danco ~Iith policieo of the San F,:ancl.nco _ ...!!!!.y. n"g.h2!lal. Hate\:" Q\lnU.ty.....s.2!l!.:.E.2.!:-.!!~!!.!CQ. PH Hantewatc!:'. Roq\ll.ro a "wil.l oerve" lottot' from DSRSD prior to po!:'mit approval for grading. cc:;r;:p- 'ru~ !>Dll Vl\4 1;'1'1/\1' .---X anl\!) COIl(IJ,tl.on/J l:ugn...ding provision of will nerve lettero for waatewnter. '1'11/\1' SDf1. 1'1/0 ---x VAG Standard condition regarding al'P\:"ovnl by DSRSD of wautewater oYDtema. PH Require design and construction of all wastewater aYBtems to be in accordance with DSAse uorvLcQ pOlicies, procectu\:"cs, design nnd -E2!!~EJ~!~!!..!:.n!!.~l\r:'d~!.~I1\l\:lt:cl~l~li.'.!~:.i_:..____ _____ ______ ._.._ _ _ ___~ Enoure t:.hE\t~ tho pl.anned \olaot:e\olill:cr colleGt:.i.cll\ 'J'Hl\P FH!\P X Tht] J::..\~tCI:'Il Dubli.n Fi\cilil:ic!J Pinn system has heEm 'ol.zed to accommodate only the Sl)f1. prepared by DSnSI) pL-oviden pipeline development within the Eastern Dublin General sizing only to accommodate development Plan and Speci,!ic Pllln area. w.l.thin the Specific Plan area and areas located between the Specific Plan's wast boundary and existing development within the City. No oversizing for areas east or: no,:I:h of the Speciflc P1.an have been .I.lIcl.uded (pOl: lel:ter to 1'I1e City of Dublin from nsn.s[) dated November 3, _____.__ __ _ ._ _ -,U!..~_/U . I:".U\I' X IhH.!c.l to l:l'H.ll1.1.t:l! 1:r<.11t\ appli.clll\t; i\U pnl:l:. of; the t:ent:nt:.iva mOl? condJ.l:.ions of appt'oval. Val ULDP PH VFl 911 l'i\T It(:).(J'll}:I~ ,;;:0:1 (.:0 t:. nppl.j,cilnl:u t:CJ 1'):nl.ln~.;;-(TO"E7\1l.(i';"r- -1;jTj,P-'P waot:.c\o,ntoJ:" cupnci.ty l.nvcol:1.gal:lonfi, i.ncl\lcli.nCj :;nn. meana to minimlze waatewater flown, to ollpplemonl: t;he l.nforrnation tn I;he Spec i.f j.c Pli\n. -- ---,-- 1'\-1 '1'1'1/\. pl:ior: I-'Hl\l' X Cond.i.l:ioIlD J:n~Jn!:di.1l9 pJ:ovi.~)i.on of wi.ll GRnn nar:vn lnttnr:n for: wantewn!:ar: ncr:vl.cc via _________ __ ~ _ _ .2~'~0-.;___.__. J t tJ q \ I i. 1: l'.~ it .. VI .i. 11. n c 1: v e" -1 ctr:m.:-~;;'~;-'I)fi.iT?';i)-"'" tn pnr:mLt npp...ovnl fnr: gr:ndLng. THAI' :;nn 18 03.05 /08.0 03.05 /09.0 03.05 /10.0 03.05 91 /H.O 03.05 /12.0 03.05 .9K /13.0 03.05 /111.0 03.05 /15.0 !'1 TJ\SKS llELJ\TED TO SJUITJ\ ll1~'J\ COHHEI1C1J\TJ CEllTEIt SOItTEIl lIY HITIOJ\'rIOll HEJ\SllI1E lIUHlJEIt, IIOVEHlJER 9, 1991 EJ\STJmll Dll llTJ III o Ell I'. RJ\T, PI.1\1l nr.mllDHElIT/SPECIIrIC P1,1\H J.IIT.I01\TIOIl HlmstJl1l"S/1\CTIOll PItOGItJ\HS / IHPLI"HElITJ\'.rIOIl J.IEJ\StJItES 1'\,1 Ennure t:hat: \tlastewater treatment Clnd di~poaal j'"cilit:ies are available to meet the needs of future development in' eastern Dublin. Ensure that proposed development is consistent with wastewater treatment plant expansion as set fOrth in DsnSD's master plan. l'~r p~, Inclt.tdr;;t (J(\l):r~IY of.Ci.clcnl:. t.:.rclll;IIH.3nt: oyul:omu .i.n any waoccwatcr trontment pl.nnt oxpnntJi.on ntlC} operata tho plant to talco nclvantll'J'" of off:po"k -2!l~Y . CH Support r,l\VHH1\ and DSRSD in their cur):ont efforts to implement a now wastewater export .Jl!:pelin~E1tom. PH l1equire recycled wate): une or landscape irrigl\tJ.on l.n accordance with DSItSD'" nocycled _ Hnl:eE_!~.U:.~_e.!'!!::.-~!l....!.g-p'g. 021. P~I Itequire devel.opment ~d,thin thio pJ:ojoct to fund a recycled water distribution syotem computer model to reflect the adopted Specific plan/ GP1\. (1\IUIIr P. 821) 1\ will oerve letter will be required ensure this. Additionally, DSRSD is reviewing agency on the project. No expansion of the DSRSD wastewater treatment plant is necessary to accommodate this project (per letter 'rho City of Dublin from DSRSD dated _ ______ _ _ .___ ..J~!l~!~~!201~ 3~'.:22..'!J. (;O/oJ'j' X p(~r: 1\1\11.1, 1'. 021, tic cx[)nnoion ia L4QCp,d,I:c:sd no l\ rQoult: of I.:hio Pl:'ojoct.. Condition reo ):C!cyclad water in landscaping plan - pr.ovide for ,_-.- _ _ _ _ .J;!!f:r.~~~~~E.9-i!1~~1.-oven!:.!~El:ans. 'HI 1\ I' X DSn~;n hno al1:eady prepared tho l~asterll SDn Dublin Facilities plan, Final Report, dated December, 1993, (Dodson and l\ssociates) to provide the updated computer aimulationo and master plan analyses for wastewater collection and potable and recycled water systems. l\1i\11lcdl\ County funded the DodfJon study J.lI pal:l:. I\ppJ,J.callt oh"11 inotill.l required facilities no a condition of _.__.._..... .~_ _ __ _ ~~l~L:_~!?~!~.l.. cor'I'!' X X cOIHli.l:i.on J:U: l:l:!cyclcc:l \oJnl:ur 1n peojocl:.. 1\100 wr.ite letter to Zono 7. PI1EZ lINNE nEZO THI\P SDR THill' SOn. PI'lllP nLDP COll'l' COH'l' 'HIliI' SDn '1'1.11\[' son COII'l' 1'1lI,;Z lINNE m:zo PH tjuppor.t: tho uf:!Ot:t:.o 01: I:.ho 'l't:'i. v~II(!y \-/itt;;-;:--- -'Piij:;~'-" RocyclJ.n<J 'I'onle ForGO Study through ZOllQ 7, J\tlt'm oncouraging wasl:ewat:ar roc;:yc).J.ng alld L'e11l1ll1 for. RF:7.0 _ -l.!!.~~!!!;.!ll2.~_.Lr:t: J.9~1: J.~~!. 1'\'1 r';ncolI","~,Q r.IIV~IHJ\ to continlle J,t:1 p"'o~J1:i1;"Qr-- PTti':i-- -c;iii:j:r'.'x -- offpoalc pllmpJ.ng of Hilst:eHal:nr: 1:0 IHll.illlGe 1\11111': electric dem"ndn ill the PG&F: nyntcm RF:ZO !l rJ x ncquire a will serve letter. VCl x to a VC2 .~ 1.t",~}fJ to VOl X Need 1:0 write lettera. VGl X VG2 VG3 VG4 The cJ.l:y '":01:<: n lol:l:tH;' to I.I\VI"IlIJ\ on 10/3/91\ vnd,Cyint) a phone call verifying 1:11.1." policy "nd encOlII:1\tJJ.ng I:holO 1:0 cont:i,l\\lo il:. -- -----'- -- --- - ---- --_..~.._.~--------,...-_.--.--- 19 VEl 03.05 /17.0 03.05 /lB.O 03.05 /19.0 03.05 /20.0 03.05 /21.0 -- P Tl\SKS REL1\TED TO SIUITl\ RITl\ COHHERCIl\L CEI/TER SOltTED BY HITIGI\TION HEI\SURE NUHDER, NOVEHDER 9, 199<1 EI\STlmN DlJDLItI OErmRI\L PT,I\N l\HI~lIDHEtl'.r/SPECIFIC PLI\U HITIGI\TIOtl HEI\SURES/l\CTI011 PROGRI\HS/IHPLEHEtlTl\TION HEl\SURES .. .~r \./ Enllure that tha recycled water treatment 9Y9tem PRE? CON'!' X 'l'he City needs to write a letter to VE2 '!fi: ... 1.0 plannad, desl.gned and con9tructecl for. ener.gy IINNP. nsnSD rcmJ.ndl.nC) them of the requirement eEf l.cl.O!'GY......!:...'LEper.at ion) . HE7.0 - - of tlll.s Hi.tigation Measure. H l\void pol;enl;ial failure in the operation of tile TOD TOO X Heference 'l'W1\ DErR (see page 3.5-10 of VH1 ~~ I; pumps in the TW/\ wastewater collection system. Eastern Dublin DEIRi. W Ensure that pump station design minimizes TOD TOD X Reference THI\ DEIR (see page 3.5-10 of VIl potential for impacts related to noise and Eastern Dublin DEIR) . odors. 1'1 EnBur!?;t:hnt waate~/ater stor.age ball ins - - Heference 'nll\ DEIR (see 3.5-10 of . :;~\; .. arc THO T!lD X page VJ1 designed to control odors and mini.mi.zo the rlnk Enutern Dublin DEIR) . DsnSD stated in a of failure> in tile event of an oi1rthqunlt'Q. lel:ter to The City of Dublin dated ., Novembor a, 1994, thnt the Oictrict 10 not at: thl.o tl,me .,ropoaln9 II ':W1\ .:;;,:,' wnut:.ewntor OXpOI:'t: Pl:'oject J.nvolvin9 pumping anel expol:'t: of raw wn::Jtewat:er nnd thua waotewat:el:' atorage baaino al:'e not anti.cipated for tis project. The entire , wastewater collection aystem needed fol:' thl.a project will be a gravity system flo~d,lig to the exiflting District pump . ,'. utnt:.J.on fncJ,lJ,tie" l.ocnt..:.ed llonth of 1- - - 500. , H nequil:'e that Clonotl.'uction of the l.'ecycled water 'rIlD '1'f)1l X Need to wl.'ite condition. VK1 distribution system be in accordance with all .:~ ..!~ble State and local regulations. - - - . :;,;~,:, ~I Ensure that reservoJ.1:' conotruction meeto all TI.1D '1'~ X DSHSD otated in a letter to The City of VLl applicable standardo of DSnSD and hppropl.' ia te Dublin dated November 3, .1994, that in .. health agencies. accordance ~/ith the Policy on Hajor Infrnstr\lcturc adopted by the Diotl:'ict, nll rnnjot. fncU.i.l:co fll:e deeiCJnccl and L__- botlt by the Dietl.'l.ct:. nnd thUD will I l'ldhat.e t~o nll Dint:.rl.ct atnnclill':da. 1\11 I I h,,,Il.l:h ut;nnclnrc1 wi.ll be required to b.. IlHl t:. - (, r l' P 20 'l'J\SKS IlE:LIITED TO SJ\IIT'J\ IlI'J'J\ COI.IHEHCIJ\T, CE:Il'J'E:H SOHTI':1l IlY rUT-Ir.J\'.CIOIl 1.l!';J\SIJllE IIllHIlEIl, IIOVElmEIl 9, 1994 1,J\STEIlH IlllnT.III r.lmEI!1lT. !,T,IIII l\1.mllot-l!:.ln/SpECIFIC PLIIII HITIGJ\T.IOII l.mJ\SUIll~S/IICT.IOll PllOC;Ill\HS/ H1PLEHEIITJ\TIOH HEnSll!{ES l'~ i ..0'" l <0 ,he p<opoood <eoyd ed "",0< p'''''p stations meet to meet all applicable standards of DSIlSD. An III pg. 023. 1 03.05 /23.0 2 03.05 /211.0 91\ PH 90 PH 7 03.05 9D PH /29.0 8' 03.05 PH /30.0 PH Ensure that recycled water projects meet any applicable salt mitigation requirements of Zone 7. PH Expana 1)51\5D service }}o\lndarien to enCOll\pann the entire eastern Dublin Specific Plant Grn aren. P\-l EnCQUCh90 all devoloprnaul: in tho pl:njoct. nrCla. to connect to the DSI\SD water By'!!~ern. PH Ilequire water conDervation meaDur.eD to be deoLgned into individual projects. Require a recycled water distribution syotern be incorporated into individual proiectn. Enoure that Sona 7. has water Dupply neaded to me.t requirements of the project. Zone 7 and DSRSD ehould construct two additional turnouts from the Zone 7 Cross Valley Pipeline to Derv~ the Eastern Dublin area. PJ:'ovide for: lncl~ei\oc:d water nourcr..: rcl.i.nb.i.li.t.y, the Project water oystern should be interconnected with exiating adjoJ.nJ,ng oyotoms. TOD PIli': 7. l\Nlm 1\1>7.0 '1'111\1' son 'l'HJ\P son THI\P son '!'I1l\l' son 'l'l-ll\l' son x DSRSD stated in 11 letter to The City of Dllblin dated November 3, 19911, that as the owner and operator of allan and 00- site recycled water facilities needed for this project, the District will ensure that all Duch facilities shll meet all aE licable standards. Staff will work with Zone 7 when they begin design of any recycled water project for this area. Staff should wr.ite letter. DSIlSD Gtnted in a letter. to The City of Dublin dated Novcnilier 3, 1994, that the project oite is already located within the OJ.otrlct boundarleo. CondJ.ti.on foe PC'QvJ..o.1.on of w 11 BQJ."VQ l.etter. Require water conservation methodD identified in DEIn ~ FEIn be incorporated into project per City Hater Conservation Ordinance. Write condJ.tion regarding DSIlSD comment letter. nequire wil,. ..erve letter. Get cop.y of contraot or letter from Zone 7 re9ar~in9 contract for file. This project w 11 not present a ~emand which would require the construction of either turnout at th~s time. VP4 TnD x VNJ. VOl 'l'Hl\p snn x ';~I~'~~1 V02 1"1,11\1' --7- nr..r>p -F"Mi\p--T- nLD!' VPJ. 1'111\1' -7 ilL!)!' 1"1,11\1' --7 11T,r> I' VP2 VP3 CON'!' X COIIT <';011'1.' - - x - -Pinna !Hlhmil:ted by J)Sn.SD Lndici\te design La in nccordance witl, tIlls mitigation nlenOllra. DSRSO will construct fncJ.l.U,J.on recommencled by the Dodoon otudy. Hay need a condition regarding nn Cl\ocrnr::nt aC1."osa lIomn!:t propat-ty along Tnsoaj.ra Creek and I-SOD per. DSnSD ~ __.____ _ _ _ _ ~~n!!.'!~:.!' t: 1 c l: t~er a VP5 7.:1 " 3 -I ~ I, T1\SKS REL1\TEO 1'0 S1\/IT1\ RIT1\ COI,nIERCI1\L CEtlTrm SOltTEIl BY IH'.rIGI\TIOll HEI\SlJRE llUHf\ER, lfOVEf.lflER 9, 1994 EI\STERlf DlJflLIlf GEtlERI\L PLl\tI I\f.lEtlDHElfT/SPECIFIC PLl\lf HITIGI\'.rION f.lEI\SURES/1\CTION PIWGRI\f.lS/ H1PLEHE1ITI\TIOtl HEI\SURES Provide a baclcup source of water supply to il:o Zone 7 source. DSASD will reimburse City of Pleasanton for construction and operation of new groundwater wells south of the Project area 'l'llD TOD o 03.05 /32.0 03.05 /33.0 PH E;atabJ.l.nh n phalling for wat:or ta'enl:ll\'Hlt:. ny"l:of1\ improvements to meet incrQa"lng demand" on it:.s wat:.er 13Y13tem. PH Require DSRsn constrUction of two new chlorination/ fluoridation stations at tho two proposed Zone 7 turnouts tO,eastern Dublin to meet increased demand resulting from the ro ect. 'l'1l1J Tllll x DIAsn stated in a letter to The City of Dublin dated November 3, 1994, that it acknowledges that the baclcup water supply source ia desireable for ultimate build-out: of the Specific Plan area. The acope of thia project, however, does not warrant a backup supply source from outside the DiB~rict service area. The District has recently signed a new water supply contract with Zone 7 which specifies the Zone will provide all wter requested for the Specific Plan Area wi.t:.hi.n t:he conr,trainto of its ability to do 00. TIle Distric dOQD not C\lrrcntly ant:.icipate obtaining ~ny water aupp1y from t:he Ci.ty of Ple~llnnton' 0 well project referonced in the Mitigation Monoure. The Diotrict anticipated-s providing oignLflcant: amounts of recycled water to landscaping improvements to this nnd future projects i.n the are". Choclt w;,t:.h 7.ono 7 rtO I B\:~t:UO of ph"sing plan liotecl in PEIR. Staff should write le\:t:e~'. Write status letter on western turnout and chlorination/fluoridation otation et~tue to DSRSD and Zone 7 VP6 VQl 1 'i'UD '1'00 x VQ2 I ',' .,: :.\,~ --' \ . ' , ~ . ...., 2~ 52 03.05 /3<1.0 53 03.05 /35.0 5<1 03.05 /36.,0, 03.05 /37.0 55 \, TI\SKS RELI\TED TO SI\NTI\ 11I'l'1\ CO~II'lERCII\T. ClmTER SOR'I'lm OY IH'l'IGI\'l'IOII HEI\SIlRE IIlJ1.mER, 1I0VEnDER 9, 1994 EI\STlr.n1l DUIlT.!!l rmllEnl\T. PT.1\1l I\HI~rlllHElI'l~/SPECIFIC PLI\II HITIGl\'l'IOll HEI\SUnES/ l\C'l~IOll PIWGHI\HS / IHPT"EHElITI\'l'IOIl HEI\SUnES PH Provide an adequate water supply system and related J,mprovemanto and otorage facilities for all new development in the project arca. 90 l')H r::nu\u.'c thnt I)SHSO updateo it:.u \>li\l:ol: nYEJl:.OII\ mal'lter plan computer model to reflect the adopted Specific plan/cPI\ land uscn. Development must pay cost. PH COr\llo1.i.clnt:c t.:ho CIlI11[) P(ll~)ctJ ond l\lnlT\(H1H C01.1nt::y wnt~("r UY{l1:f,.'~mfJ nn<1 t;llr:nout;u \.oI1.t:h t:ho f)tiU:jn _-!:!'y'sl;(un. PH Require that dooign and conntnlCtion of. all water system facility improvements be in iJccorclanc::r~ wi.th n~HSO :Jt:nndnr:d!!~ '1'I.IIIP SDH pll.r:i'. I\rnm HI~7.0 co j.f.i;-- '!'!-IIIP son GHI\D OLDP '1'1.1 II P son. COH',. x Require will serve letter. DsnSD is currently completing an engineering analysis of interim water distribution ~nd storage alternatives to adequately oupply the proposed project while providlng facilities \~hich can be incorporated successfully into the ultimate system required to accommoclatd build-au I:. of the Santa Rita area and adjacent properties. The results of this analysis will indicate any required ol:or.a')o f:ncJ.li\:1.en whic;1I will become t:oC]uir.emento of I:.he pt"ovision of oDt:vicc. 1\1:. I:.hio I:.ime DaRSD ol:.ates that it doeo nol:. appear that new sl:.orage facilitleo will be neceoBary for this development. The existing Zone 7 turnoul:. to ~lameda county will be util1.zed (per letter to The city of Dublin fL"om DSRSD elated November 3, _ _ _ -!22..1..1 . x x Danso hall already prepnreel the Enatarn DUblin Facilities Plan, Final Report, e1atecl Dacember, 1993, (Dodoon ",nd I\ssociates) to provide the updated computer simulations and master plan analyses for wastewater co11ect1.on and potable and recycled water systems. I\lameda County funded the Dodson Study in part. I\pplicant ohall install requirod facilities aD a condition of ____~EI?L.ovaJ.. X Plnno oubmi.ttcd by DsnSD lndicate GOmpl.i.llrlCn with t:11 to ml. t~ j.Qlll: lon lnot\Qura. VRl ."," ~ VR2 .~ ,). VR3 Viil\i! - - X nLDP ;->.:1 I-/"il:a conditio!\ regarding approval by DSRSD re')arding water system. VR4 T1\SKS RELII~'CD TO S1\IIT1\ RIT1\ CQl.\I.mRCI1\1, CEllTCR SORTEll lIY I-\TTIGIITIOIl 1'H'1\SURE IlUHIlER, 1l0VEHnER 9, 1994 I':1\S1:ERII llunLIH GlmEIlIIT" P1,II11 1\HEIlDHEIlT/ SPECIFIC PI-1\1l HITIG1\TIOII HE1\SURES/1\CTIOII PHOGR1\I.1S/IHPLI':HEIIT1\TIOIl HE1\SURES 57 03.05 /39.0 ~\'Iater. Require a "will serve" l.etter from n~RSD prior to permit approval for grading. piT'l1educe the gL'owth induci.ng potential. of water. syctem expansion, the water. distribution system will be sized to accommodate only the estimated water demanda from approved land uses withi.n the Eastern Dublin specific plan and General Plan Amendment. sa 03.05 /40.0 pH Ensure that the water distribution cyatem is planned, driB igned ancl conlltruct:.ed for energy efficient:. operation. 59 03.05 /41.0 P\-l llcq\lix:c all roner:voJ.r conutr\lction to meet all tho applicable otandards of DSIlSP, to meet C\l)~J:Cl1t lIo.i.nmlc hut.l.cli.n() L1t:nllr\nr~f.lfJ, nrld \:'0 pt.ovJ.dn ndc(junt:o nlt:c dt:ninn{Jc. '1'/111[> SDn Conditions regarding provision of will serve letters for fresh water. [>Hl~Z 1\NIlE REZO 'I'/1M' X -x IlSnSD hilS already prepared the Eastern son Dublin Facilities Plan, Final Report, dated December, 1993, (Dodson and Associates) to provide the updated computer simulations and master plan analyses for wastewater collection and potable and recycled water systems. The report provides for pipeline sizing enJ.y to nccolnodate dovcloplncnt witllin the spoci.fic Plan area nnd nraaD located betwoen the specific Plan's weot boundary and existing development within the City. No oversizing for areao east or north of the specific Plan have been included. Alameda County funded the Dodson study in part. 1\pplicant shall install required facilities as a condition of approval. (Per Letter to 1~o City of Dublin from DSRSD dated November 3. 1994 COI-/'!' 'X--- 1\11 utility Ilystenu! designed and bu'ilt to be owned by DSRSD are and will continue to be designed and built for energy efficient operation in conformance with sound engineering principleo as required by the District Code (letter to The City of Dublin from DsnSD dated November 3, 1994 . FHl\l' X - - - -65"1\50 ol:ol:ed i.n a letter to The City of Ill,!"> I' Dublin dnted November 3, 1994, that in nccol:dnncc wit), tIle I'ol.J.cy Oil Major Inf:l.~nf.lt:r.\1ct:'l1l.~C iHlopt:.cd by the })l.Gt:.L"ict:., Ill1 fnci11teo are designed and built by the District and thus will adhere to all I)i.n~rj.ct ntnndnrda. COllT ')'1-11\1' SDn 211 VSl vorl VUl TI\Sl<S RELI\TED TO S1\t1T/\ IU'l'1\ COl-lI-lERCI1\TJ CEN'].'EIl SOIlTEIJ BY !-1ITIGI\TIOtl I-lE1\SlIRE lllll.lllER, NOVEI.lDER 9, 1994 E1\STEllll nUIlLIIl GEllEIl1\T, PL1\1l 1\HEllDBEIl':r/SPECIFIC PL1\1l HITIG1\'.rIOlI J.lE1\SURES/1\CTIOll PIWGR1\HS/ HIPLE!-1EIlT1\TION HE1\SlIRES it ~. 'I \ Hcquire t:he proposed new water pump stations to meet all the applicable standards of DsnSD and i.nclude cmer.<Jcncy power gencraf:.orD nf: Ouch pump station. 61 03.05 /43.0 PH Include dcul.C)n pl:ovioionn t.o pump nl:iltionf.J t:o l':cd\lca pound levelu fr.orn opol::a(:.l.l14) pump mot:or.o and erncrQcncy g~ncrat.o)~o. 62 03.05 /44.0 63 03.05 /45.0 64 03.05 9T /46.0 65 03.05 9U /47.0 66 03.05 /40.0 67 03.05 /49.0 PW Provide drainago facilities that will minimiz.. any increaned ~otential for erosion or floodi.nq. P\~ nequire channel improvements consioting of natural creek bottomo and .ide slopes with natural veqetation wher~'possible. P\~ nequire the preparati.on of a Haatcr Ih'aina'Je Plan Eor each develoE!!'.ent. --Pw- ncCJu i.x:e Project: aL~ca development:. l:o [u.~ov ide facilJ.ti.cn to nl.).cviate potentJ.nl clowrlut:.:en," _ _Q~~~~l!~~-!,!!.!.!!-~~_!l )~O l~!!.E2!'__!.!..~!.'!.~!.I~P!!!.~:!~,l: . 1'\-1 Hc'll! i.':c t.:hu COlllJ t.:.J:'"ucl.: i.on of t.IH~ bHc1c.hono c1ral.nngo Enc11.i.t:ioo to bo cantlintclI!: wi.t:h the Storm Drainage Haster Plan. PW Plnn filci.l.ltico l1nd InnniH)Cmulll.: IH:'"OICl:i.r.O:l t:llnl: pr.otact: i\nd enhnnce \.Ji\t:CJ:O l)uilli.t:y. '1'1.\/\[' son '1',.,,,p snn 'l'1-I1\1' son '1'l-l1\P son 'l'111\ l' son TH1\P snn DSHSD stated 1n a letter to The City of Oub11n dated November 3, 1994, that no new potn))).e water pump stations arc requi.rod OL" antic1pated for thio project. In accordance with the lJistrlct'o Policy on Bajor Infrastructure 'all ~ump stations are designed and built by the District and thus will adhrer to all Distric standards which address factors such as _ ____,. _ _ _ _ ,..<::.!~~r!]~!!E.Y_p.0\''''''7 anel noine attenuatl.on. 1<'1'\1\1' X nsn!.J1J lJt:atocl in a lettel: to 'J.'he City of Ill..nl' Dub1.l.n dated November 3, 1994, that no now potable water pump stationa are required or anticipated for thia project. In accordance with the Oistrl.ct'lJ Policy on Major InfrastrucbJre all pump stationo are designed and built by the District and thuo will adhrer to all Distric standarda which add~eas factora such aa _______~g~o"'!er. Bnd no.l.nCl ntten\lnt:.ion. FI-I1\P X Condition rcgarding compliance au part OJ.oP of grading plan. " FIII\P nLDP x FHI\P OLOP -x Condition in the event of alterati.on to the Creek. FI-II\P -X nr.np -j:'i:ji\i;- - - X 111.111' County ia preparin'J' pnrt of ~tllnter Drninngo Pinll. 'I'Tii\P~~ -ir;ii\i.-.~ - - X .'inJl nT.,1l1' 'l'I-II\P ~nn Nouc.l cfJlld.i.t:.J.on. -X ZOlle '/, nsnSD r.. Ci.ty l'ubJ.i.c Hodes will lI\on1t:o..0 t:h.i.n reC)u1.r.eI\\CI1I: t:)ll:ouCJh project rcvi.c\-Jo FIII\I' Hr.1l1' 2S VWl "'8 :.,., , "~~;' : V\~2 VXl VX2 .:~ VX3 VXol VXS VVl 68 03.05 /50.0 69 03.05 /51. 0 70 03.05 /52.0 71 03.05 /53.0 72 03.05 /511.0 73 03.05 /55.0 74 03.06 /01. 0 75 03.06 /02.0 76 03.06' /03.0 'l'J\SKS 1u::r.J\TED TO SJ\II'.rJ\ IlITI\ Cotir-tEIlCI1\L CEIlTf;It SClJt'l.'IW IIY I-lITIGJ\'rIOH f.lEI\SlJIlE !HJ!.lllrm, NOV"Ef.lDEll 9, 1991 E1\STERIl OUDLIN GEHER1\L pr.nll nf.lf;1l0f.lENT/SPECIFIC PLJ\II MITIGJ\TIOII HEJ\SURES/J\CTIOIl PROGItnMs/IMPLEMEWCJ\TIOH HEJ\SUItES Protect groundwater resources with support for an ongoing groundwater rorftm for the Central Dasin. ~Iater QUlIlity Inve'ltiglltion. Tlequl.t'e II "pec!.fic water q\1a1!.l:y J.nveotigal:),on be suhmJ.tted ~Iith ench (levelopmen!: npPlicat!.on to demonstrate existing water quality and impacts that urban runoff would have. The water qllal!.ty investigation should addreol'l the I]lIlInl:il:y, or: i:uno~f' a.hd the ~ffecti1 {'ot'm dluch,r~ed ~o111ltahts from nurface rurio!f in~o breeks alld detention facill~ieD. '""Fi1-DeVolop corm,,"nity bae..d progrlll"o i:~Cllto local reoidenta and buaLneeaea on m..thod.. to reduco nonpoLnt eo~rcee of poLlution. and coordinate sllch programe with current 1\Lamoda _ COllntY~ramo. 1'1-/ Requit.s all development to meet the l:aql\it'ement ot the City of Dublin's "Dest Hanagement Practices" to mitigate storm water poLlution. I'H Tlequire all development to meet the water quality requirement;" of the CLty of DlIbl1.n'a _ ...!~f.!l!!L pe J:'"ll. t; . I'W Hequire all development to meet the WiJ!;el: ql\!\lity requirements of the Alameda County Urban Runoff Clean Water Pro ram. nL Require the use of modern seismic design in con.truation of development projects, and build in accordance with Uniform Duilding code and applicable cOllllty and city code re'"l~liro~~nts. D~ Provido setbacke from or modificat1.on of \lnatnlllQ nnel poCantJ.nlly lJnBtnl,l.e lnnclforn,o, and uoe af appropriate dcaJ.CJn to en!J\,1L~O nai.nOlle _ 13af:ety.. P\'/ norJui.ro nppr.opl:"J.nl:o 1Jl:i.H.llng nnd don.i.~JI1 \':0 completely remove unotable nnd potenl:i.1l1ly unstabl.e materi.nls in hi.lilli.de arean Hher.e develop_mont '!'.~Y..2:~lIire ollb!lt'!.!:!!:.!~.:!._gl=~!i.!:<]-,,--- __.~___~ ____ '1'1.\I\P son 'I'l-lJ\I' son '1'1-1111' SIHl '1'111\1' son 'l'~I1\ l' SDR '1'11111' son TH1\t' son 'J'I.IIlP !)tln 'l'H1\1' [;nH nll\ I' nLDP x Write letter to Zone 7 l'l-I 71 I' nUll' xx !loq'lire applicant 1:0 pr<llpare investigation and sllbmit as soon as pooaiblo. Conditons may be required depending on results of the investigation. . COII'I' ----x- St.Clf.f u).L~(~nc.1y conc.htct:.o l:.hco~ proc;p:nma. llLDI' -x- Need condition. 1.ILDP x !leed oon<\1.tion. 1IT-f)P --x !leed condition. HIli!' OLUI' x Write standard condition FHIIP nr..I1P --x Nued condition regilrdlng L"eD\.11tn of ~lQol:.ochnJ.c.nl ),,~epor.t:. may l."cCJulre r~vi[]lon to aLto plan. n.,i\'P""'--X--- '\I::I:r~l:fJ t:o }\.ll.lclide devclopmcl\l:. 111.111' ~r; VIE3 7 03.06 104.0 8 03.06 105.0 9 03.06 /06.0 0 03.06 /07.0 1 03.06 108.0 2 03.06 /09.0 3 03.06 /10.0 -I 03.06" /11.0 TIISKS RELIITED TO SIIIITl\ 11ITl\ COmmRCIl\T. Cr:;NTr:;R SaRTI>!) BY HITIGl\'l'IOII I1EIISUHE Nl1I-10ER, llOVEHOER 9, 1994 EIISTERlI DIIIILIII Glmr:;RIIT. PLl\tl 1I1-mllDllElI'.r/spECIFIC pLIIN MITIGl\TION MEIISl1RESIl\CTIOII pROGRIIHS/II1PLEHENTl\TIOII MEl\SURES ., ~ i!" retention structures and surface and ~ubsurface drainage improvements should be used .s appropriate to improve the stability of sidehill fills and potentially unstable materials, particularly colluvium~ not entirely removed bY-9radinq. PH Reduce eeismically-induced fill settlement by reqtlil:'ing pl:'opel:'ly designed fi.lls with key.,ays and subsul:'faca drainage, and whl.ch are adequately compacted (i.e. minimum 90% relative _~p'ac;t;ion) . PH I)oo!.gn r.ondo,-l3tt,.ucl:ural fO\lnclnt:loflfJ, nnr.t unct'arCJr.'ound ut:J.l1.l_:icoEJ to accornrnoc1ntc cnt:.i.mntnd settlement without failure, especially Bcross tranoitiono batweon fills nnd O"to, nllel to I:'emove or reconstruct potentially uno table Btock pond embankments in development: areas. P~I Require all development projects in the I'roject area to perform design level geotechnical inveatiqations prl.or 1:0 issuinC:L.~.!ly_permi.ts. CM Provide for the development of earthquake preparedneaa plans and the dissemination of appropriate emergency measures to all Project residenta and employees. PH Reduce alteration to existing landforms through the preparation of grading plans that adapt improvements to natural landforms and implementation of such techniques as partial pads and retaininq structures. PH Reduce landform alteration by carefully siting indivJ,dllnl improvcmanto to avoid nclvcrno conditions and tl,ua the need for rnmodlnl _ ..9E!!~.!1~.. PH 1":OPl1 l,'n dot:/1 t.lod d0I1147J1\ .lr.:vn.1. ~Jnnl:f)r.;11111,(:n 1 J.nv(JlJt~J.C'JH '~.t.orHJ on dovol.opUlont: f1J,l:U(I "I.i,t:h I.n bhr.J Project area, to locate and characterize grouncl'Hlter condi.ti.orts and formulate denign cri.t:cri.n nnd menfHlrcn t.o miti.<Jnt:e i\Clvcl:no condi.ti.ona.. development. Refers to hillside development. '1'1-11\1' SDR Fl11\P IJLDP x VIE4 ,~,~ --~-X Hd.tc (;on<lJ,t.l.ol\ 1:<19al:cl.lnl) guoteCllnicnl ropol:t fll1l\ utoc)t pond rel"ovnl. '1'1-1111' !:inn. /"111\1' 1)1.\)[> VIll;S --x Condition regarding geo\:echnical l:eport .,hich is requirement of tentative map f1ubmittal. Responsibility of the City to prepare and distribute per DEln. Need to prepare. 'nJIIP FI.I 11 I' son OLDP 1995 FI-1 11 I' OLDI' '1'1,1111' fHIIP SDR nr~DP VIE6 x VIE7 Relates to hillside developments. x VIAl l\eJ.ntco to hillside developments.. '.1'1-1111' SDH PI-1 II I' IILTlP x VIA2 J7fii\i';- -- - -X - II LIll' (:'"llld.i.t~ tOil l.'f.I~'1I1~tl.t.Il(J (:JfJ(:)t~nr:hl\ l(u\ l. ~:'cpc)J::'t:. wllJ.oll .Lu 1.""J"l.l:pment of L:cntllti.vc map uubnd.tl:.nl. . '(''''/\1' :,:1)1\ VIUl 27 '" TJ\SKS RELJ\TEI1 TO S1\ll'rJ\ IUT1\ cor.1/.mItCIJ\r, CF.II:rr:ll SOIlTEIl BY IHTIGJ\TIOlI HE1\SllItE lIUHnEIt, llOVEHIlER 9, 199<1 E1\STlmrr TlllllLIIl GEllIr.J11\r, 1'1.1\11 1\HEIII1HEllT/SPECIFIC rL1\ll HITIGI\TIOII HEI\SURES/ J\CTIOII PIWGRI\I.IS/ HIPLEHEIITI\TIOH HEI\SUItES 5 subdrain systems, drainage pipe and materials to reduce groundwater 6 03.06 - 'PW nemove stock pond embankment and drain /13.0 reservoirs in development areas to reduce _ ,..groundwater impacts. PH Prepare design level geotechnical investigations for development projects in the Project area to characterize site specific soil~~nd bedrock conditions, and to formulate _ _ .1!EI?iepr.inl:o....!:!eal.!Jn crl.toria. 03.06 PH Irnplorn~nt monout:oo 1~o control. moJ.lJt\ll;C 1n l:h(J /15.0 ground to reduce the potentl.al tor l.mpact reaulting from cKpanaive sol.ls and rock. IlL neduce the potential effects of eKpanoJ.ve ooi.l and rock through appropriate foundation and __ pavement desiqn. PH Prepare design level geotechnical inveotigationo for development wi.thin the Project area to characterize oite opecific olope stability conditions and to fornmlato __~pd...te doui'ln critoril1. PH J\void impacts from unstable olopcs by siting development away from unstable landforms and from slopes greater than 30%, and providing lower density development in steep, unstable areaD. 03.06 -PiT Implement measures such as removi.ng, /19.0 reconstructing, or repairing unatable nrean, or ol:r\lcl:ural ongineoring, whQn un..table areas cannot: be avoided. 03.06 - ""PW neg\l ire grading plans for hills i.de al:ons, which /20.0.. . pl.an" mJ.ni.rni:r.e gL'aclin<J nnd requi,lCerl cut:n nn,\ . . fJ.lln hy adapt:ing roads 1:0 nat:ur.aJ. 1nn,1for.mo and ote .p'J,nq~cturen do.,n nteop"'r. \llopos. 7 03.06 /14.0 o 9 03.06 /16.0 o 03.06 /17.0 1 03.06 /16.0 2 3 TI-IJ\P son x Condition regarding findings of geotechnical report, however, subdrains are normally used in hi.llside development:s. There are no stock ponds on this site. VIB3 I'I-IJ\P IJT.,O r '1'1-11\1' son ------ FI1I\P X OLDP '1'l-II\P son ---X- Submittal of a geotechnical report required at Tentative Hap application or prior to grading and building permit approval. VIB4 FI-IJ\P nLDr '1'1-11\1' II I.Il I' SDH THill' 1'"1111l' son Dl.,DP '1'1.11\1' L'HJ\P son nr.DJ:> - - x - t:or\c.U.t:ion l1\ny ba roql1.i.roc\ ul; 'l'Qntat.:ive Hap after. oubmil:tal of geotechnical _ _ _ _ ..E~pOl:t. X Condition required at grading and building permit approval. -X--- nefers to hillaide development. VICl VI135 :.;;~;~\~~~i~ VIS6 ~:~~t;::::.:':~:,;{ '1'1-1111' son [.'HIII' -X--- HefeL"S to hillaJ.de development. DLDP VIC2 .'1'HJ\1' SDn FI-I1\1' x--- nefers to hillside. development. nLDp VIC3 '1'111\ l' I1IlIl t::i1~-X--- Hefol:S 1.:0 hi,llside dovAlopment. nr.,1l1' VIOl 7.n 4 03.06 /21. 0 5 03.06 /22.0 6 03.06 /23.0 7 0:).06 /24.0 a 03.06 25.0 9 03.06 /26.0 03.06 /27.0 03.06 /28.0 03.07 /01.0 , , lj "1 '.r/\SKS REL/\TED TO S1\IIT/\ RIT/\ COf.IJ.lEIlCI/\T. CEI/TER r;ORTEIl BY IHTIG/\'.rIOIl HE1\SURE raHmER, llOVEJ.lBER 9, 1994 !,;/\STEIlIl DUIlT.II/ GEIIEIl1\T. Pr.1\N /\I.IEIlIll.mWr:/SPECIFIC PL/\I/ MITIG/\TIOI' HE/\SURES/ACTIOIl PROGR1\HS/IHPLEHEIITATIOII MEASURES PH Require grading plan and mitigation measure compliance with the minimum requirements of the Uniform lluildin9 Code and applicable County and ___ Cit~~~uirements. or, Require that un retained cut slopes nhould not exceed 3:1 unless detailed, site specific geotechnical investigations indicate that steeper inclinations are a~priate and safe. PH Requil;;e that slopes steeper that 5: 1 should be keyed and benched into competent material and provid~d with BUbdrainage, prior to pLacement _ of. e'!l9lnocu:ed fill.. PH He')uil'Q that unrein forced fill alop..o ollou).d 1><0 no steepol' than 2:1 and provided with benches anel BublJurface drainage, aa appL'opr ia te. rw Require that fill be engineered (compacted) to at leaat 90 percent I'elativecompnction. PW Hequiro that development projects prepare plans for tho periodic inspection and maintenance of subaurfacc drainage featurcs, and the removal and disposal of materials deposited in surface drains and catch basins. PW Hequire that grading activities be timcd to avoid the rainy season as much aD pODsl.ble, and that interim control meaSureD be implemented to control runoff and reduce eroDi~!!-potenl:ia'l. PW Reduce longterm erosion and sedimentation impacta through approprJ,ate. design, conatruction, and continued maintenance of !lllrfnco nnd llllbsllr.face dr.ainarre. --pr:-1':n(J"t~() I:hn'.:, dJ.I:uct: c1.i.ul:ul:hnnr.:u- (If: l.-elllovnl 01: t:,l:QCJl1 or nal:J.vo vCCJot:nl:lon covel:' he Ild.nl.m.L:r.cd and L"cotrictcd to thoBe nreaa actllally c1eol.<]nntcc1 f.or: I;ho conotrllctJ.on of __ ...l!.f!r.:!!Z.2.~!!!!~~l].~t!~ . ___" '1'H1\1I 1"'.11\1. SOn. II Ll)!' '1'1 11\ I' 1'111\1' SDn nLDl"' '1'l-\1\P FH1\I' SDH nLDP !'l-\1\ l' !JLDI' spn '1'1.11\1' SDn Tl-\1\1' SDH 'l'l-\I\P SDn '1'/11\ P son '1'1-1I\1' nnn , ", :':'; I :j FI.II\l' nLDI' Write standard condition. i' ~~;..f~:.' Ii . ,:\~?'; Ii ,. ,':;";;:;~:)i: '*t~~i :.:'!}~"::-;i;l x VID2 ----- [.'11/\1' X !lLPP Hefero t:o hillside development:. VID3 FI.l/\P DLDP Refera to hillside development. VI04 x X nct.."" to hJ.:l.loJ.de dQVllllopmont:. VIes - T Requirement of gl:ad1n9 pal:mit and soil.. _ _ _ _ -E.e.eort. X Retero to hillside development. VID6 . ,.~. VID7 X '1'hio l.s Il I:equiremellt of t;he City's Grading Ol:dinance. 1I0wever, also write condition. VIDa FI.l/\P nr-op Refers to hillside development and/or large undeveloped area... VID9 x ~---x- "'..1)1' Cnl1rltt:.i.l'Hl l~n(Jnl:(li.JHJ flood c:o"l:1."oJ. lmpl;'QVClIH'.H\l:.O t:o l:.hu Creak nnd L-evegotation. IIICl 29 !l TJ\S~:S HELJ\TED '1'0 Sntl'J'J\ IllT/\ cot-lI.mItCI/\I. ClmTEll SOItTEIl BY IHTIGJ\TIOII Im/\StJItE lllJllIIEIt, 1l0VEf.lIlETl 9, 1994 E/\S'.rEIlIl IltllJl.IfI GENlm/\T.. PL/\ll J\I-lE11D1-lEIlT/SPECIFIC PLllfI IH'l:IGII'rrOfl f.l1~J\StlllES/ IICTIOIl PItOGIt/lf.IS/IHPI.El.I!':IlTJ\'J'Iotl 1-lE/\SIlItES PL'ovide for the prepnration of vegetati.on enhancement/ manngement pIano for all open "pace areas (,.hetheL' held publicly oc- privately) with the intent to enhance the biologic potential of the area as wildlife habJ.tat. ltequJ.re a detailed revegetation/ eestoral:i.oll plan be developed for all disturbed areao that are to remain undeveloped. 203 Need to pc-epnre plall in coordinntion "Jith nKF/J\LJ\CO study. I1ny r.equire condition (oJ: n project to ensure' COllfOI:l1Iity with stlldy, 03.07 /02.0 x x TI.II\P snn FHI\I' I1I.DP (;t) .~- PL 204 03.07 /03.0 205 03.07 /04.0 206 03.07 /05.0 nequiee fellcing on ens tern boundney of site during constrllction and grading. If area is disturbed also need condition regnrdin reve etation, The subject site is within the City limit" and is in n ~oning district which doeo not pormJ.!:: graEing activities. SDn IlLDP X F l.lI\ P J\ImE !lEZO X 'J'HI\P -"P'L' neqllire the City of Dllblin to develop and imRfement gra~ing manngement plans to protect rtparian and wetland aeeao, illcraaoe pInnt d i.var'a icy, flnd cnco\lr1lge t.ho rccovf.U;Y 0 r: nn t.':lvr.! _ _ .planto. PL Ensure l:hat all areaa of diol:Ul:blU1CC be revegetated aa qllickly as possible to peevcn~ aL'OS ion. 3~li~--x FI.\I\P Iteq\li.t'c. fencing on cnsl.:,en:n boundary of aite dllring conotrllction alld grading. If aroa ia distllrbed alao need condition regnrdin eeve etation. -X- I\ny moeli.fication to 'fnsBajara creek for flood control purpooes will be completed in n manner senoitive to ita native otate. IWft- ~-- -- - X -;'r"alJnjnrn Croclt ia not a pa>:t of this !'1.IIIP project. Need to check ..-egarding _ - drainage area adjacent the highway. nny alteration or modification to TaBsajara Creek will be approved throllgh ______~J:'peoprinte federal and otate agencies. Il!.DI' X TasBajara Creek io not a part of this project. Shollld the creek be modi.fied or: chnncJoc1 i.n nny \o..ny, n. );"cvcCJctati.on ~_________l~.!~!l WO\11<1 be rcq~11recl, etc. 1'11/\1' X 'I'ho projoct Gl,to clooo not deain to nl.l)p 'l'i'\unnjn,:,a Cr.ook. IJOWQVQI:, no n r"~l.lvant:.nt:i.vo rnC)llD\lI..-(1) t.\ condtt..:.ion \.Jill be ,:eqlli.:o<1 that nny mocli,fl.cation to the Creek ao a result of this project will It..l.ck 1n t:l1c~e mitlgnt:lon mnnnurOD - need condi.t:i.ot1n. ---------.--.,.-- --...------"-. .._-".._~--- - - ._- - _.~_...._-..-....._.- - '"'PL"' nO<]lIi>:e the pecoe>:vation of natll>:nl ol:I.'onll\ corrJ.dorn, pondo, springs, neepo, and wetlnnd arena wherever posoible. 207 03.07 /06.0 fiftH:?'. I\NNE lm7.0 FI1I\P 1l1,f)P ';~'t:>.~; - ""PL He'lllJ.>:<:l the inc::oeporntion of ri.pnr:J.nn nnd wetland areas into project open opnce arenn, and ensure that loss of ripnrinn or wetland habitat be mitigated per Dept. of Fish & Game/ Corps of Engineers. 200 03.07 /07.0 IIIC7 -- PI. neguire all oteenm coieidoes be r.evegetatod with native plant species to enhilllCC theiL" nnt.\lJ~al nppeilt'"nllcc and i.mpt:ovc hnhi.t:'i1(:' vnlucn.. snn 1'1'11\1' 209 03.07 /00.0 -PiT f::ns\lrc ntorm L.uooff i.u cilt:):i.e(\ i.n nnt:11I:nl !It:.r.C!nrn ahnnnC!lo \o,honovcr. ponnihlo, r:llt:hnt: l:hnn l:CJplnclng \o/1.t:h tJl1dar:<iJ!.:'onnct dr.n.l.IH19t.1' D)'nt:nmn (Hit, I-lcno\ll'o 3.7/9.0), IIltII 1'. 5n~ - ooe fol' additional language re mnintennnce. '/'1-11\1' "nil 03.07 /09,0 210 ]0 1 03.07 /10.0 2 03.07 /11. 0 3 03.07 /12.0 4 03.07 /13.0 TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTEn ny MITIGATION MEASURE NUMDER, NOVEMDER 9, 1994 EASTER!! DUm,I11 GErIERAr, PLA!! n!-1E!!Df.lENT/SPP.:CIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Establish a stt'eam corridor syatem that provides multipurpose open apace corridors capable of accommodating wildlife and pedestrian circulation. ~~ PI, l\equire all pt'oject applicallta "ubmit multiparameter wetlands delineation to the COE for verification and jurisdictional establishment, and submit plans for proposed alteration to any watercourse to the DFG for their.review and aeproval. ~ r>i:'" Proy,i'de for the development of II compr'llhenoive ot~onr" corridor rQutorati.on prog~nln tl1nt: identifies a detailed aet of criteria far grading, Gtnbilization, and revegetation of _ _ .J?,lanninq area otream channelo. 60 PL Provido for the dedication of land and improvemento (i.e., trnilG, revcgetation, etc.) along both aidea of strellm corridors as a condition of project approval. 5 03.07 ~ PH /14.0 6 03.07 ~ PL /15.0 7 03.07 /16.0 Provide for the enactment of an erooLon and sedimentation control ordinance establishing performance standards to ensure maintenance of water quality and protection of stream channels. Establish and maintain a liaiaon between the City of publin and resource management agencies (i.e. California Dept. of Fish & Game, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, U.S. ftrmy Corp of Engineer.a) for t:ho pu r.pOflC 0 f monitor. i.n~1 compliance with SpecLfic Plan poLicicn. " " I'r.~ nuC]uir.e uQn[j.tt~lvc hllbil:.nt llt:aan I)(~ nvo.tdod tln(\ protocted wherevet" feasible. 'I'1.1lI t' son FHftP X Tho Specific plan and Parks Master Plan BLOt' establishes a trail system. One of the trails will be along Taasajara Creek. The project is setback at least ISO' from the Creek. FHlIl' - X should any alterations be required to IlLnp Tassajara Creek, the appropriate agencies will be contacted for compliance with permitting requiremerits. The negative dec. will be circulated through OPR. '1'1,1111' - X X I\lthough TaGflajara Creel~ ia not a part GOR of this p~oject. any modifications for flood control. will rcquire thio type of reotoration program. DegLn prepllration of D pr.ogram. \""11\1' - - X The City will requil:e 21.0 part of the IlLJ)[> development agreement that when the parcel to the east develops, the County will eatab1ish a trail system and dedicnte it to the City or agency ___ desi.qnated by the City. THill' X Need cOndi.tion regarding thio mitigation son mensure. City has ordinance covering this issue. " '1'1.11\1' SOR Plm? ANNI~ 11r,:?O '1'111\1"' SOn. PHE? ANlm HEZO J.9SlI\ CON'l' X 'I'hio area ia not a biologically sensitive area per the Draft EIR Figure 6.2. It is ehbwn on the map (includi.ng the creek area) as "developed". Jlawever, tho Negatlve Dr"claration will be circulated throbgh the OfElce of Plnnni.ng nnd T\aocarch, fjO 1':110 ci.ty will __.._~~_ ___ __ _ _ -..!l!L!!~!!.1!ll:.ll!&!..ll9 l~hQnc 1.it\loonn. '1'1.11\1' FIl1\P X No aqnoi.tl.vQ habitato have bOGn son J1LOP J.dentifi.ed on the project liIite. Require fenclng nlong eastern project boundary ___._._____..0.!~rJ.~ connl:r\lct.i.on to .:ot",ct Ct-eek. :.11 r. \; i ~ 8 03.07 /17.0 9 03.07 /18.0 o 03.07 /16.1 1 03.07 6N /19.0 2 03.07 /20.0 3 03.07 /2,1. 0 4 03.07 j;l.2.0 5 03.07 /23.0 TI\SKS IlELIITEn TO SlIllTI\ ItITI\ COHl.IEIlCIl\r. cr::rlTEll SOllTlm nv HITIGIITIOIl HEIISl/IlE llur-mER, NOVEI.mEIl 9, 199<1 I:.IISTEIlII nl/nr.III GlmElllIL ['Lilli nlmlllll.lr::llT/SP~~CIFIC PI.IIN MITIG1\TIOll HE1\SUIlES/1\CTIOII PIlOGIl1\HS/IHPLEHENT1\TIOll HE1\Sl/IlES h':tr ltequJ,t:Cl all development comply with the Eastern FOx Protection Plan. in the Project ilt.ea nublin San Joaquin Kit 1'1. Provi,de for the coopernti.on between t:he City of l'Jubl:in and other approprinto a<J"'nGJ.fHJ in lohe proparntJ.on at. a Kit Fox lIabit"t: Hanu<Jcmont Plan. PH Restrict the use of rodenticides and herbicides within the Project area in order to reduce potential impact.. to wildlife. PI, Tr i-colored illacl,bird. Hequire developers conduct a preconstruct ion survey within 60 days prior to habitat modification to verify the resence of sensitive species. l'L Ensure the protection and ,enhancement of sensitive species habit~t areas. PI.. noqui.rc Che mnint:cnl\llce of: a bllf.fcl.~ l\J:"C.HIrH.l breeding sites of the red legged frog, Callforrd.ll t i.ger oalnmnnder, nnc\ t:h~ Wcnl:cr.n __EE!.!!d t:\lrt:.1.o ..bofol-C c01T\roenclng CO~!!!l:),;"\l::.~.!.'. PL Ensure that a natural open spaco zone (Goldon Eagle Protection zone) is maintained around tho golden ea<Jle neDt located in the northeast corner. of t:l!~p2.~!,i.n9 al:cn. TI.IIIP son THill' snll 19911 THill' SOil '1'/1111' son '1'1'IIIP SOrt FI.I1\1' OLDI' '1'1'11\1' snIt FHIIP ilLOP Modification or construction within 100' of stream bank needs to be in dry oenson. -X- - The pl:oject env. is not associnted with Kit Fox dens. No kit foxes were observed on the site during the Specific plan biological.survey. Need condition that should preconstruct ion survey identify foxes, S.J. Kit Fox Protection Plan will be followed. The project site is flat and is not oho..n J.n t:he OEIR to be in an area ..here Kit FoxeD would locate. Reference page 205 and Pi<J. 6.2 of the Specific Plan - should preconstruct ion survey identify Kit Fox - a plan would need to be prepared; Should a preconstruction survey identify the presence of the Kit Fox a Kl'lIHP would have to be ce ared. nequire developer to contact County Ag and prepare and distribute handout to t:tJnnnt:.n: 7\].00 2:'c:tC]'uirQ aho[")ping centcu,," ___~~-=!!'.!:.!l\: \:0 comply. X Need condition. i :1"Y~;:. ~tj{.~",: : FH/I[> flL1'J1' UIC18 I ,. I ..,~..;:. :. ~i)~}j ,];';,>t,~}:'r CONT x CON'I' X- [o'HI\P BLOP x Need condition re pr.econstruction survey and protection if sensitive species identJ.fiod. condi.l:.ion J,"C: if prccollt.1l:t:t1ct.ion o\lrvoy turns up certain spooieo require n l.Hlffcr, etc. IIIC23 FHI\P BLI'JP 't;'1/0--)( "pjTi\px -- [H,DI' Project is not within or near thia area.. IIIC24 :l? 26 03.07 /24,0 27 03.07 /25,0 28 03.07 5H /26.0 29 03.07 /27.0 30 03.07 6L /28,0 31 03.00 /01.0 32 03.08 /02.0 33 03.08 65 /03.0 34 03.00. /04.0 TI\SKS ltELI\TEO TO SI\NTI\ ltIT/\ COf.llmRCII\L CENTER r>ORTEll BY IHTIGl\TIOH }.IEI\SlIflE limmER, NOVE1-IBElt 9, 1994 EI\STlmH nUBLIIl GENER/\L PI,l\1l /\!.IEIlDl,!p.:w.c/sPECIFIC PLl\H }.IITIG/\TIOIl }.IEI\SUREr>II\CTIOH PltOGRI\}.Is/IMPLEHENTI\TION }.I!':/\SURES i'f- Require an additional temporal bu f fer be established within 250 feet of the Golden Eagle Protection Zone during the golden cagle lO'eproductJ.vQ per.iod, pr.iOL- to const:L"ucti.on. -rf:' Require that the Project maintain substantial lO'ural residential/agricultural acreage to provide suitable forage for the golden eaglen. PH Require the placement of all transmission lines underground whenever feasible, to avoid the potential for raptor electrocutions. pH Requite a minimum buffer (at least 300 fect) bc mairi't;ained around nesting sites of the bur.roo/in<] owl and blO'eeding ai,teo (either: lcnoom or those identified in plO'econotr.ucti.on our.veyo) of the nmelO'ican bad<]elO' dUlO'ing the blO'ccding Deason to avoid direct'loss of indivJ.duale. PL speoLal Status Invertevrateo, Require developers conduct a preconstruct ion survey within 50 days prior to habitat modification to verify~rQsence of sensitive specieD. PL Establioh a vJ.oual.ly diatincti.ve community which plO'''Serv'ul the chnr.lIctor of I:h" nat,,,:n1 lnndac/lpo by pr.ot<oct;i.n9' l~"y vipunJ. elemonto llrHI maintainin9' views from major travel corridolO's and ublic s aces. PL Ensure implementation of the Specific planl GenelO'al Plan land use plan, which was developed to retain predominant n~~ural features and a sense of openness. I'L Estllbl ish techn iq\le (D) for implement:i.ng the long term proo"rvati.on of vi.DURtly n1QnJ.f1cnnt portions of hi.lloidea and othor 1mportnnt vi.nltal r.esource!]. --py:- ncclocC"t:)\o ~ta\lnl impncl: of: O)C\:OIlIl.i.v(J cJl:il{I.i.llC] t:hr.oul)h nenniti.ve engineeri.ng c.ll'lni.gn thnl: tlllOn grad\lnl transiti.onn from graded a~C~5 to natural 610~~d revegetation. IlLO!' PlIO X '1'/11\1' F/.Il\p X SDR flLOP '1'/11\1' FI1I\!' X SDn flLDP flLDP I'J. I 0 -X Site is nowhere near Golden Eagle Protection Zone. ':;~~~':~ IIIC25 Provided in specific Plan. Need condition. Standard condition regarding prcconotructi,on survey. No bndgers i.dontified on site durln<] biological Dllrvey of DI~IR. THI\P SDn Need condition. FHl\p IlLOP X pnEZ I'lNNr:: l\l~ 1. 0 X- The project.: hns been designed with this mi.ti.gnti.on lOon Dura i.n mind. It ia oonnit.:i.ve to the cr.eak nnd cloee not block viewo of vi.ataa fr.om I-Saa. F'H^P or..op PREZ ANNE n87.0 FHI\P X 'l'his project has been designed with this BLOP mitlgation measure in mind. It is sensitive to the Creek and does not block vistas from I-saD. l"/oII\P X 'l'hi<1 project has been designed with thio 11T..np 0\11:1gnt10n menoure in mind. It io oonni.tive to tho Creek and doeo not hlock vi.ntae from I-SOD. -j7-Til\P-x-----;j;i\IfJ t:e.ltl.t~;!I to hilluide development:.. nr..!)]> 1I1D4 IIJ:02 PHr,z I\NIH: n1~'l.O :tIID3 I'IH':'l. 1\ Ntll~ nE1.0 ;';'l.'" JJ " Tl\SKS RELl\TED TO Sl\NTl\ RITA COMMERCIl\L CENTER SORTED BY MITIGl\TION MEl\SURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994 l~l\STP;Rll DlJBLIll GElIERl\r. PLl\lI lHlElllll,IEIIT/SPECII'IC PLAN MITIGl\TION MEl\SURES/l\CTION PROGRl\MS/IMPLEMEllTl\TION MEl\SURES to existillg natural 03.00 /0....2 03.00 /04.3 03.08 /04.4 03.08 /0....5 240 03.08 /05.0 41 03.08 /05.1 ...2 03.0e /05.2 243 03.08 /06.0 PL nvoid extensive areas of flat development. PL Encourage building design to conform to natural land forms as much as possible. PI. Heqlli,re graded slopes be recontoured to ref!embl.e existing land forma in the immediate arcn. PH Minimize the height of cut and fill olopen aD much ilD pOBoible. PL MinimizQ vioual impacts by prohibiting devel.opment on the main ridgeline, and ensuring that development on foreground hills meetO certain standards. PL Locate otructuros 00 they do not obstruct Bcanic views or: appaar to extend above an identitiod ocontc bnclcdrop whon vJ,ewed from n deal"lnat(!d ocenJ,c routa. PL l\"lltrict;. otructllroo on tho hillnides that appear t;.o project above major ridge1ineo. I'L nvoid unnecessary alteration o~' diotur.bance and maintain access to the ,stream corridors from adjoining development ~o protect the vioual cllaractcr of the ctrenm corridoro. 24... 03.00 /07.0 I'L IJrcnorvQ vicWG of cleaignal:od olJel) "[)n(:u 01:0;':J. PHI':Z ANNE 1m Z 0 PHE7. l\llN8 HE7.0 PHEZ nllN8 HE7.0 PHEZ Fl-II\P nNNE nLDP nE7..~______ PIlJ':7. 1'111\1' X 1\NNr:: nLD!' HE~W 1'1181. ANNE nEZO 1'1187. l\NN8 nElIO Pin: 1. nNNE nr;:zo PHEZ AN1l8 HEZO 1'111\1' IlLDP x Tasaajarn Creak is not a part of this project. structures will be set back 150 from the top of bank. nny, alterationo to the creek for flood control purpooeo will bo minimal and done with consultation with permitting ftgcncj.cA. Acceoa and viawo of ti,e creek wi.ll be Il\nlnl:.cd.nod. -piti7:"~-- -pj'.t'i\i;-- -- X - - -'ri)~Tocnt:io~i (leoigll of utrllctureo l\NNg ilL!)!' will not block view"" from I-SOD. ~!'X~f2-_ __ _ _ __. l'I1I\P IlLDP x The project site is flat. Varying pad heights would change the natural contours of the land. This relates to hillside development. SDR x x This relates to hillside development. Thiu relateD to hillside development 1'111\1' IlLDP Thio relate" to hillside development. x I'HI\P nr..Dr x- The location and design of structures will not blOck scenic views from I-SeD. 1"HIII' l31.PP x-- This relateS \0 hillaide developme~t. I'Ml\P IlLDP x- :"\t1 I.t TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CEllTER SORTED DY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMDER, NOVEMDER 9, 1994 I~ASTERl/ DUOT.ItI GEl/EHAL PLAlI AHEIIDHENT/SPECIFIC PI.AlI MITIGA'rIOlI HEASUHES/ ACTIOll PHOGH1HIS/ UIPLEHEl/TATIOll MEASllHES 45 Provide for tho preparation of a vilJlIal survey of the Project area to identify and map viewsheds of Bcenic vistaa. ~ Provide for the designation of ocenic corridoro, anel the adoption of scenic corridot" policies and review procedures for projects within a scenic corridor viewshed. 46 03.08 /00.0 6Q a. Adopt Tassajara Hoad, 1-500, and Fallon ,Hoad as designated scenic corridors. 47 03.08 6n /08.1 48 03.09 /01. 0 49 03.09 /02.0 50 03.09 /0"),.0 51 03.09 /04,0 52 03.09 /05.0 PL Require projects with potential impacts on Becnie corridora submit a detailed visual _ analysis with develo",ment project aEp'l.icationa. I'L Require mechanical' and/ or hand oubaurface taating on all locationa of prehiatoric rseourcea to determine the preaence or absence of midden deposits. PL Require all locatlons containing either midden componenta or concentrationa of cultural materiala located on the surfnce be recorded on State of CnlifornJ.a site surY!'!Y. forma. PL Require evaluative testing if propoaed devlllopment would directly or incHr.cctly impact recorded and mapped locations Of resources. PL Require aqualifLedarchaeologiat develop a protection program for '.'s'ignificant" resourCOD whose condition will b~ altered by the proposed develapmont. PH Roquire grading and construction ceaClo i.n tho event that hiataric or prehistori.c ramaln. are di.scovered dur i.09 such activi.t:JcB. pnEZ ANNE REZO pn,"z ANNJ~ PHEZ IIN/H~ REZO THAI' SDn '1'111\P son. '1'HI\P son '.l.'HI\t' SOR !If.!) I' TWIP SOH x x nequire preparation of a visual survey as part of project site Development Review submittal. -X- X Staff is currently working on a scenic corridor policy for the Specific Plan Area. The location and design of structures will not significantly block or impact views from I-580 to major scenic views. ~ visual survey will be required as part of site development review liE lication. The project han been deoigned to not block Bcanic viBtaa of oither tho Creek or hilloide areas. 1\lthough no prehistoric resources were identified ne a result of the DEIRt the standard condition re discovery will be inoluded. Although no prehistoric resourceD were identified ae a result of the DEIR, the standard condition re di.ocovcry will be inol.uded. J"/'lIiT>- - - 7 -1\TETiQi'i'9h no prchiatori.c r.ooouroeo were OLDp identified au a result Of the PEIR," the otandard condition re discovery will be included. I\lthou9h no preh storie resources l<erG) identified as a result of the DEIRt the standard oondition re discovery will be J.nclucled. Wril:e ol:andard conditi.",n. 1\Nlm snn 1'/.\111' x FI.\1\P nl-Dp --- X FI.\lIp OLDP X 1'1-11\1' nr.D!' -x 1'1/0 -7 J5 ...;:,..~ ~ '.,...... 3 03.09 /06.0 4 03.09 /07.0 55 03.09 /00.0 56 03.09 /09.0 57 03.09 /10.0 58 03.09 /11.0 59 03.09 /12.0 \) T1\SKS IlEL1\TE[) ~'O S1\l/T1\ lln.'1\ COf.ll.IEIlCI1\T, CEl/TEll SOIlTlm BY HITIG1\TIOll I.IE1\SlIIlE N Ul-IO Ell , 1l0VEHllEIl 9, 1994 E1\ST!':lltl [)llnLIll GEIlEIl1\T, PL1\ll 1I1-lEllDHENT/SPI!:CIl"IC PLI\Il MITIG1\TION HEIISllRES/1\CTlml PROGR1\HS/IHPLEMENT1\TION HE1\SURES a. Ootormino whethor the subject sito i.n Ldentifiod as having prehistoric or historic resources potentially located on it based on the first stage cultural resource survey of the area. b. D!=termine the level of archaeological or historical significance in the socond level of detallecl reoenrcl1 and field rcconnniollnncc for sLt~s with potential resourcos. c. Oevolop a mitigation plan consistent with policies in the specific Plan and current cmQ~ Guidelines concerning cultural rooourceo for sLtOD c2ntaLninCJ~nificant rellOUrceo. PL Require all properties with historic rellources which may be impacted by development be subjoct to inderth archival research. PL Encourage the adaptive reuse or rostoration of historic structures whenever feaal.ble. PL Require an architec~llral tlistoriin to aoocon the significance of all standing structures and other indicators of historic occupation and/ or USe of the area. PL Require archival research and oral iuterviews to determine the local or. 'regional significance of structures or locaticins (identified in the 1980 report) by their association with important: persons or events. PL Hequire thllt all previously nol.;ed locationo (in THT\P - F~ X--- 1900 report) be recorded on off1c1al stnte of son nLUp Cnlj.to~nln llintorJ.cnl gJ.t:c Inv~nt:ol~Y fnl~ln". . IlL -necJlII.re~pre;ervntlon of a" i.,;:;J1icr;iiT:-Ic;oo._. -:rHT\P- P1.'i'l\P- X - - ,- program for historic sites which CJuali.fy I1ndell: SDn BLDp CEQ1\ Gu ide lines as historicall' s i9n i.f: ica!1t. 6P --TflL I Tlequire as part of the development application process that steps be talcen to ensure that cultural resources are not impacted. THill' FHl\p X S Ltc not snn or.,nl' h1ol:ol:1.c '1'i1io.P--l'i.ii\i"- X - - - 51\:e 1\01: son GLOP historic '1'HI\I' son 1'1.\1\1' DLDP '1'111\P SOil FH 1\ I' DLOP x, '1'H1\P son FHI\P OLOP x J(, x site not identified as having any prehistoric remains or historic structures. However, stnndard condition regzll:ding discovery of prehistoric remains will be required. site not identified ns having any historic structures. identified as otruct:urea.. J.c1entified aD ot;ructurea. having any having any Site not identified as having any historic structures. sil:e not identified as having any h1.ol.:o):lo at::.rucl:ures:. 5J,to T,ot idontified DO llUvitlQ hi.otor tc structures. any .. ,", T1\5K5 J1.E!.1\TED TO 51\111.'1\ lU1.'1\ COI.ll-IEHC I 1\1. CEll1.'Elt SOlt1.'ED IlY IHTIG1\TIOtl HE1\SlIJ1.E IlllHlmn, lIOVEHllEJ1. 9, 199"- E1\5TEJ1.1l DUm.IlI GlmEH1\I. P1.1\1I 1\l-1E!IllHEIIT / SPEC I FI C P1,1\1l HI1.'IG1\TIOIl HE1\5l/H!':S/1\C1.'IOII pnOGH1\HS/ HIPLEI.lEIIT1\TION HE1\SUllES '-,=;,;,< -neqllLl:e acoustical studies fOI: all I:esidential development projects within the future CUE!. 60 contour to show how interior noise levels will ba r:edllcec1 to 45 (In. ~,~~ pl. rtci~tl)at all development: [H:ojecl:s in 1:lle '1'1,11\1' project area provide noise bal:l:iers or berms SDn near existing residences to control noise in outdoor use spaces. pH Require acoustical studie~ priol: to future T}.\I\P residential development in the' Foothill SDJ1. n,ElB.idential, Tasoajara Village Center, county Crll'ltor, lInd Haciendll Gateway "uhnreas to dBtarmino whether future noi.no impncl:o from Camp Park" and the county jail will be within acceptable limito. ~ Require development projectu in tho Projecl: '['1.\1\1' area to submit a conotruction Noioe Hanllgement SDn program that identifies measureS proposed to minimize construction noioe impacto on exiating residents. ~ nequire applicants to ml.nimize conotructl.on IlI,DP noJ.a'" l,mpnet;s. 260 03.10 /01. 0 261 03.10 /02.0 262 03.10 /03.0 2,63 03.10 /0<1.0 264 03.10 /05.0 265 03.10 PL /06.0 266 03,10 - -pr:- /07.0 a. Request that all constructl.on operntl.ono comply with local noise standards and be limited to normal daytime hours, and stationary equipment be adequately muffled and located away from sensitive receptors. nequire the preparation of noioe f1\nna']ement plans for all mixed uoe projects in w~ich residential unita would be combined wl.th commer-el.al, office, or other: lll:bnn nonresidential uoes. l't:ovi.da for t.he eotahl.i.ohmcnt. CJ[ i\ noi.uo ml.t;igatLon monitorin'] fee to pay for on nnd offsite noise mitigations, including but not limited to, noise barriera, earthen berms, or. rct:rofi.t:ting nt.r\lctur.C[] 1o'/i.t:h ooundr.ill:cd \o,1.ntlo\>/o. 'l~hi.n rn1.t1.C]nt:.lon mnafJ\1t:'O npp('!al~D i.n the cUlOlIlativa impact:s oectio.!' of: the DETft. FI'II\l' X nLllp Not a residential pl:oject. 11"2 FH1\p X 01.01' No significant noise impacts on existing residences. IF3 1'1.11\1' X nLDP I~O rculdential davelopmallt ill the vl.cinl.ty of thio project. IF4 1;'1/0 --X 1\ condi.tion will be requl.r:ed l.mplementl.ng thia. IFS THI\I' FHI\P X SDn nLDI' 1'1U':'l, '1'1,\1\1' /lIHm $1)[\ 1\81'.0 No re5l.dential development l.s included in this'project, 11"6 - X X 'rho orcli.nl1nce ",\lut. be pJ:~pilred l\nc.\ a condi.tion applied whl.ch ensuros that dovelopers partl.cl.pato. IF7 'f. :1 'J 67 03.11 /01.0 68 03.11 /02.0 69 03.11 /03.0 70 03.11 /O~.O 71 03.11 /05.0 72 03.11 106.0 73 03.11 107.0 74 03.11 /08.0 75 03.11 109.0 76 03.11 110.0 TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTEn UY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMDER, NOVEMDER 9, 1994 EAs~rERN nUIlT.Ill GENERAl. PT.AN AIlErmMEN~'/ SPECIFIC PLI\N IUTIGA'j~IOll HEASlJlll~S/ ACTIOfl PROGRIIMS/ UIPT.E11ENTATION MEI\SURES PH Require development projects to implement dust control measures to reduce project dust deposition to acceEtable level~. HJ.nlmize construction interfeJ:l~ncc wIth regional non-project traffic movement. PL Require emissions control from onsite equipment through a routine mandatory program of low emissions tuneups. PL Require preparation of a construction impact redu,c't ion pLan t ha t incorpor.n tea IlU, propoGcrl _~ul'lll,ty mitl.qnt:i.on str.atel]J.en. PW EnQOUrAge cooperation to integrat:c nJ.r qunlit:y plannino effortn on l'l rOQional bnnio. P!. Iiaint:/d,n consJ.otency among epecJ.fJ.c devo1.opment plane and regJ.onal tranoportation and growth _~~ent pLans. . PH Implement transportation demand management techniques to reduce mobile eource emiosJ.ons. PH Opt.:.iln.tz.e tho oxlnci.nQ t;'l:nnrJ(>ol:t:.nt:.i.ol\ nYrJt(~ll\ t:.o roduce congestion and shift travel to nonpenk travel perJ.ods. PH Coordinate leveLs of growth with roadway transportation facilities. improvements to accommodate travel demand without inducing demand by providing eKc~ss system capacity. PL l:'":ncouL.age mi.Ked une development: l:hal: rn:ovic1cu hO\1ning, jOb:9, C)ooc.1n nnd [H:~rvi.C(:!:!J 1n clone proKi.mity. "HAP FI/O X This is required by the city's Grading GR1\D Ordinance OLOp Fi.7c)' .--- I'/rite condition regarding FHAI' X approval of GR1\D construction traffic route. DLOP FHI\[, FI/O X Need condition regarding construction GR1\O equipment at the site. OLDP SOR FI/O X Require as condition of tentative map. 199-1 COWl' THill' I"Hlll' son nT_IH' THI\P Fl.llIl' SI)R !3LDP CCH1'l' COII'I' THill? FHIIP son OLDP 'I'he CJ.ty parti,ci,pates in all. regional and subrogional .Cforts that havo influence on aJ.r unlit . consistency findings need to be made on project. Conditions may be necessary. x -"j(- -"j(- Require developer to submit employment information. Also require compliance with Trip Reduction ordinance. 'I'he City adopted a Trip Reduction Ordinance which will implement this mitigation measure. D1\I\QHD adminstere the Ordinance. 'j'he traffic study will address these issues. 1\ Traffic Impact Fee will be developed to fund construction of transportation improvements as they are needed. A condition that applicant pay traffic fee will be required. IIlthollgh the project is solely commercial, tlle SAnta nitn area, of ",hich thi.o project is a part hao both r.enident:1.nl and commerc1.n1 and providee .lL..9ood balance ot iobe and hou9ing. --"j( x PRE? I\NtH: nJ':'l.O -;~-"j(-- :;nn JIl ,~ I S' ... ~. 77 78 03.11 /12.0 79 03.11 /13.0 eo 03.12 /01. 0 81 03.12 /02.0 82 03.12 /03.0 83 03.12 104.0 84 03.12 105.0 85 03.12 /06.0 11.3 .1 ~ ':I TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTRR SORTED ny MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994 Ir.ASTEIUl DunT.IIl m::rlERAr. PL1\N Ar.l811Dl.IEIIT/SPECIPIC PI.1\N MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Require linkage between 9ro\1th or job opportunities consistent \1ith slIbrogJ.onal cont:rJ.buti.on to jobsl bnll1nces. . hOllsi.ng and a positive hou5i.nC) ratio PI. I'r~tll're developmont ngroomonl:o wlth dotaJ,lcd financing plnno prior to specific lovelo of development approval to identify necosoary capital improvement:.o, incllld ing publl.c facilities, streets and utilJ.tJ.eo, and aonuro their timely financing. CM ndopt an Area of Denefit Ordinance and form an Area of Denefit for those properties benefiting from construction of public improvemento described in the Specific Plan. CM Croate one or more Mello ROOD CFn or Special AOOOBPm"'nt PiGt:rict~o to flnance conotL-\lctl.on of the infrastructure to serve the Area of !lenefit. CM Have bond cOllnsel evaluate the beneflt to the City, in terms of savingo of money and avoidance of undue risk, ~f poollng bonds under the Harks Roos !lond Pociiing Act CM AnalY7.e the citywide infrastL'uct:ure ncedo 1:0 PH8Z '1'1.11\1' -X AOlGOO studies are being prepared for nSneon I:he ullofulness of lmplcment:lng an j.mpnct: I\NUE s!>n !:he Enlltorn Dubl1.n SpocJ,f.1.c Plan. Any fee program, ln compliance with 1\n 1600, !:hnt Imzo participation in identifled improvements could draw some funding from new development will be made condit1.ons of approval or ~ _ ~!~'!_!!"J:!!." 1 Hap- or !l~' Udl.n~E..mi!:-"-._~:..!!-:!:_~!:'.~~!2~!..:_ ___ ___ __ _ _ _ ..2:!!.cl'!f1ed i.n the 1?eveloP!!lE!~9.,:eement. CH Coor:dillllte city and Sc:hool UJ.nl:J:.l.ct nrt:ortn to /'HI':Z 01'1\1\1' X The nus!> han lnd.Lcnted thn!: th1.o projoct: func! necelJsnry ochool fnc1.litias and collect: All I'll; SUR wl.ll not ndversely lmpact: the District payable fees. REZO and that the impacts can be mitigated by pnyment of: the stnndarcl school impact _______ f:ee lst:p.rl.i.n PGG. PT, Hinimize stationary sOllrce emissions associated with Project development wherever feasible. PL Incorporate solid waste recycling in all development planning. PREZ ANNE m:zo PI<EZ ANilE REZO PREZ ANNE REZO PIH,Z 1\87.0 PHE7. ANNr:: REZO l'R87. I\Ulll; RE7.0 PREZ ANNE REZO CONT This commercial projGct, whGn combined with other projects, commercial and rGsidentinl in the specific plan, provides n positive linkage between housln and ob ratio balances. Development standards for the project havG been designed to satisfy this condition. Write condition. x THAI' SDR x CONT x 'J'HI\1' !;Dn X- 3 1\ development agreement io being prepnrod that will odclreos iaBuoa llpeclflc to thla project. 'l'I-l/\ P son 'rhe Ci.ty adopted nn Area of Denefit Ordinance. x Tl.II\P son The devolopur wll1 be putting in the infrnutructuro surrounding tho projoct. An area of benefit mny need to be formed for some of the im rovements, Thls project is not requesting assistance from the City in the area of bond flnancing. x 'l'I-1AP son x '1~!it) VIIIJ\6 '.~, ":. 39 ( ~ TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMDER, NOVEMDER 9, 1994 EASTlmN DUIILIN Gf:lmRAL pI.AN AJ.mNDHENT/SpECIFIC PLAII IU'.rIGATION HEASUHES/lICTIOll pIWGRAJ.IS/IHPLEt,!ENTI\'.rIOII MEI\SURES ':' 7 03.12 /00.0 Coo~dinate City and Calt~ans efforts to fund necessa~y freeway i.mprovements and collect develo~erB' share of costs. CH Coo~dinate city and DSRSD efforts to fund utilities se~vices and collect developcr'o share of costa. THAI' SDn x 11 t~affic study will identify impacts and develop a fee to mitigate the ro'ect s fai~ sha~e of these im acts. See DSRSD comments 1ette~ dated 9/21/94 VIIIA7 03.12 /07.0 pREZ 1\NNE I1EZO pnEZ 1\NNE I1EZO VIIIA8 '1'H1\p SDI1 x ...) III .:~~ 'iJ::+r~,tl ""',~",""". ~'ttit(i:'l' ;,1 , :. '. ~" , . i ~ \: I, t. " ,'J ~ ~ {~~J 110