The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6.3 Casamira/Moller Attch 3-6 1d.l 'fJ~1 RESOLUTION NO. XX - 07 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ********* APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN AND EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE CASAMIRA V ALLEY/MOLLER RANCH PROPERTY, THE TIPPER PROPERTY AND THE VARGAS PROPERTY P A 03-060 and 06-030 WHEREAS, the DeSilva Group, the Applicant for Casamira Valley/Moller Ranch (hereafter "Casamira V alley"), submitted applications for P A 03-060 regarding a 226.3-acre parcel located in unincorporated Alameda County at 6861 Tassajara Road and a 12.5 acre parcel at 7440 Tassajara Road (Tipper property) and Sun Valley Land Development Co, the Applicant for Vargas (hereafter "Vargas"), submitted applications for P A 06-030 regarding a 4.38 acre parcel at 7020 Tassajara Road; and WHEREAS, the Casamira Valley property and the Vargas property are referred to collectively as the "Project"; and WHEREAS, consistent with section 65352.3 of the California Government Code, the City obtained a contact list of local Native American tribes from the Native American Heritage Commission and notified the tribes on the contact list of the opportunity to consult with the City on the proposed General Plan and Specific Plan amendments. None of the contacted tribes requested a consultation within the 90-day statutory consultation period and no further action is required under section 65352.3; and WHEREAS, the Project would amend corresponding text, tables and figures related to amendments to land use designations of the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, including but not limited to area wide land use diagrams, land use summary tables and environmental resource exhibits; and WHEREAS, the Casamira Valley property and the Vargas property are within the 1993 Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment area for which a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by the City Council by Resolution No. 51-93 and two subsequent Addendums dated May 4, 1993 and August 22, 1994 (the "Eastern Dublin EIR," SCH 91103064). The Eastern Dublin EIR identified significant and unavoidable impacts from development of the Eastern Dublin area, some of which apply to both projects; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City as the Lead Agency, prepared a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the Casamira Valley Property entitled "Casamira V alley/Moller Ranch Supplemental Environmental Impact Report" and circulated the draft SEIR for review; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City as the Lead Agency prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Vargas Property entitled "Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration" and circulated it for review; and WHEREAS, separate Staff Reports, dated April 10, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and the Mitigated Negative 1 ATTACHMENT 3 1'21> Cb2tt1 Declaration, Annexation, General Plan and Specific Plan Amendments and prezoning for the Casamira Valley and Vargas properties for the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, at its April 10, 2007 hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 07-12 incorporated herein by reference, recommending that the City Council certify the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and adopted Resolution 07-13, incorporated herein by reference, recommending that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project; and WHEREAS, at its April 10, 2007 hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolutions 07-14, recommending Annexation, Resolution 07-15 recommending approval of General Plan and Specific Plan Amendments for Casamira Valley and Vargas, Ordinances 07-16 and 07-17 recommending that the City Council prezone the properties and adopt related Stage 1 Development Plans which are incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report dated May 1, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, Mitigated Negative Declaration, General Plan and Specific Plan Amendments for Casamira Valley and Vargas; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Projects at a noticed public hearing on May 1,2007, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, following the public hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution _, adopting the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, Mitigation Monitoring Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations and Resolution adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Casamira Valley and Vargas. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council approves the following Amendments to the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan based on findings that the amendments are in the public interest and that the General Plan as so amended will remain internally consistent (strikeout and bold text will not be shown in the General Plan). 2 l2-q rJb z,.C11 A. Amend the Land Use Map (Figure l-la) of the General Plan as shown below: DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP (Figure I-I a) as amended through May 1,2007 P(I"lIS/I'\.Jbl'!cf.lec"e.at.on Public/SemH'ubJic/Open Space CornmerciaVlndustrial - E<tl.::€1n f"tend<;>d f'l.<nnlr!g Art'6 Sound"y\l' @ill ~!,otl<:If'<J!"1t _ Of~Sr}./.(E' SlTI"l'r. ~:;)fridOf Pub!1(~ _ PutJf.(/~rt.'M:: _~;i--Pllj),'( o (.vmm.."",t'..~ Eti ~kir","'htxxi;q.-""c f#J ~cAtonodJ>"" B ~.,MI p~ Re>idenlial Planning Area limits _ Ge::eral CQIllme'"Ci<!! _Rc1'al~'(\ffl~ _ Reti<il,iOfflre.(l/xl Al..W!'lOtl~ Nelgtlb.xhooct Vmlll'lel'CI;M _ Ge!~e'aI (O!lY.I1f;!f(Id{'Caml;l-.;sOfflc't CMW~iS' O(fi{f' .lrldl.l;;t~~iPal< .H(!~~f'JlrlVint1u';U>t!' . BllsmesS r<'f!c;1Ik111Sll-;.,;.il:'Kl O<.)~.&.xlr :'>1'.-"-""* RMilre>JUst! ~ M~,rHl9hr:lt:/'lSltyf""''lkil!'nrl."1!i!!:C1~I()fflr.~ Rur~ ResrJeuual/p.gr!tl,iI,Ult! jT UnFl ~ lOt)(;IQS;S R<!sldernlil!,".crltS, hl'.<lre~<J.1t<"l'm"llrOO! !,;.8du/;:W:l lr.lw.oen~.>, SlIlg1e family 10.5.3,$ du/ar.J l!)WDen5.'l"}'~l:1aJ jO.:,l- f>.i)du/M! SIngle fami!y R<!skwll'lai (0.9 - M <k!/.aci .M~Im-L"enmyR~t"!>'ltk"'lIf;1 lHldWCltI .. Medlurrv'Hit:jh OellslttRl!',"',~iW 114.1 . ]'.;.t) ."1l.li.il(,j _ H1o/l-{jpntiryM~~:1i;I;1') l+dlVi'lCj - f'rlrr.a:yi"J./I!>'~ln9NeaBwrl.:J<,>ry ._- Wl:">I"" n E)7."l!'nded PI"'~f1jng /ve<! SOUllOf.ry L::J ~le!"t'Of !!ltJuel1(t' Tri...vaUey .hJflsdiction.'i (.il:yOfU~rIl)(l! ;"'::::1 Gty of ~~~nl')ll 1~~::J no/nf.~IlRilPlOO CJ (It'{of Dutf.ll'l C::J p,;lf!(s ~TA 3 B. Amend Figure 1-4 in the General Plan as shown below: Development Elevation Cap Eastern Extended Planning Area Amended April 2002 Legend _ . . ..... 0111 l.WU . aptm. DI ItdNlml. Lb. EDSP BtiI.1t$d.,., ArM Ab",.,. nO" !!\..,atttrn WUb Uo .o..'Vlkiipmtnl Pott:nlkl f777.:7l U,bln OIMl.iOptmtttl PlitanUl.I [At.. a.law lb. DnoIDpiMJltE\liY.UbnCli"l Revised July 2005 PA 04-040 Updated EDSP boundary, City limits, 770' elevation line, Fallon Reali and Dublii1 Road. CentralParkway bas been revised east of Fallon. ~ 6 ~ ~ SCAU: '''.-:2000' Note: This figure is not intenlled to illustrate actual road alignments. It's intent is to only show the Development Elevation Cap and its relation to dty jurisdictiooai areas. The Development Elevation Cap line is conceptual at this scale and is expected to vary once detailed plans are completed. Figure 1-4 4 130::5!Jlf:71 C. Amend the Land Use Map (Figure 4.1) ofthe Eastern Dublin Specific Plan as follows: B.w.~~'. PbJH:.~~ ,. -' ~------- ; ) / Parks Reserve Fortes Training (ca7 Parks) i I 5 2~'7 1 PLifb . Figure 4,1 Land Use Map ,~~.:.~ !;J"~1>:ot&;P:"" c:::J ~.......... ,~. ~t~;.!~. t._...l~;<c."N:l""_\I!~ Specific. Plan I.U ~~ ===~; _ "'M~*,...l'_ "'~ _~'!1-N'."" ...... ;>.on:F._l<f,,~,ti;Ul""'~ ~"#~_ rU,H"'~' ~ -"~"-' l'~_: ... _1~~:l,l'2S.C~ - >+,,~.~,~-"'_: ~- _~"';::"''''''.AI _~(~~'ZlI:>I -", :~!~~~~~~~~ -..r_v.-_ """"''''' _'f>lo....hrt f53 CanmUi'lItyPark fu}!"Ie~5quana ~ Nai9hOOi-hood hl'k [~f3 IWGkl'lat ;><"11'11 ~EIi;(r.ent3f'jrS<hQ<;i ~ MifldleSdu.'!J! EfE H:gh Sd'.oo! · ==a=~~ Thfi<<~Dfn~_~~"~. ~_,or:'!CtIoI!~<<'_'fiblIo""N ~ofI<I:t'l!._;,!P!:J';:_Al Cf May 2007 U'lll'~IItI'llf"""~.:t ~_~=-""IIii"- o !.oo 1.(j(;lJ ;',001) ~QOO Fo" l}G_oro_' '12 Q_~ OJ! 115 "'" /32 Db2.t17 D. Amend Table 2.1 in the General Plan as follows: TABLE 2.1 * LAND USE SUMMARY: EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AREA (Amended: Resolution 223-05) Classification Acres Intensity** Units Factor Yield RESIDENTIAL Du's/acre Du's Persons/du Population High Density 69.9 35 2,447 2.0 4,894 Medium-High Density ~125.4 20 ~ 2,508 2.0 ~ 5,016 Medium-Density ~ 565.2 10 ~ 5,652 2.0 ~ 11,304 Single Family ~ 864.8 4 ~ 3,459 3.2 ~ 11,069 Mixed Use**** 96 2.0 192 Rural Residential ~710.5 .01 87 3.2 ~22 TOTAL ~ .J..4,l-19 ~ 2,335.8 14,169 32,497 Floor Area Square Feet Square Feet / COMMERCIAL Acres Ratio (millions) Employee Jobs (Gross) General Commercial 347.9 .35/.25 4.228 510 8,290 General Commercial/Campus Office*** 72.7 .28 .887 385 2,303 Mixed Use 6.4 .3/1.0 .083 490 171 Neighborhood Commercial 57.5 .35/.30 .819 490 1,671 Campus Office 189.36 .75/.35 3.052 260 11,739 Industrial Park***** 114.7 .25/.28 1.329 590 2,253 TOTAL: 788.6 9.816 26,427 PARKS AND PUBLIC RECREATION City Park 56.3 I park Community Park 97.0 2 parks Neighborhood Park 4+.+ 48.2 89 parks Neighborhood Square 15.5 5 parks Regional Park 11.7 1 park TOTAL: ~228.7 ++ parks 18 OPEN SPACE &l-+ 649.6 PUBLIC/SEMI -PUBLIC Public/Semi-Public 102.9 .25 1.120 590 1,899 Semi Public 11.2 .25 Schools Elementary School 63.2 5 schools Junior High School 25.2 I school High School 0 o school School Subtotal 88.4 6 schools TOTAL: 202.5 TRANSIT CENTER (Total) 90.7 - Campus Office (including ancillary retail) 38.3 - High-Density Residential 31.5 - Park 12.2 - Public/Semi-Public (Transit-Related) 8.7 GRAND TOTAL ~ 4,295.9 6 E. Amend Figure 2.2 in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan as follows: 7 ) 33db2-~"7 Figure 2.2 Local Context legend . E3 County Boundary .E3 Specific Plan Area EASTERN DUBLIN Specific Plan Wallace Roberts &; Todd u.-__~ IZISlocotICI_l"_ So<IFtrdsco.CA'Cl05 14151S...OI3(t eJ F. Amend Figure 2.3 in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan as follows: 8 1~~~2q Specific Plan Area legend B Specifi<:Plan Area FIGURE 4 (Photograph taken 1()..17..g1) EASTERN DUBLIN Specific Plan Wallace RobertS & TOdd u..n""~RwftN U:StclenlI'-7JlFlDcr _"'-i$cc.c/',.1ilI (.(ffijSuo(ll)3Q. nr ~ ~Y'J-j EIJ _~ G. Figure 2.4 in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan will be amended as follows: " .-../l~ ~\-~~~_."':~~>? 'C~. l \ --'. , ...,( r' -'; r-' .~.<; i" ,; {}_.r:':', -.-~~' - ,/ <\ 1.: \."\!f'~.' ',--, (;-" '. '. / 16 18 17 H. Table 4.1 in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan will be amended as follows: 1 ~? tJfJ2Pil Figure 2.4 Ownership Patterns Legend OWNal ACFlEAlF 1 Chang~ 1251.0 2 MOl,ff8 1:z5 3 . vaJV8S 5.0 4 Herrera' 7.93 5 Haight 2.10 6 M1sskln Peak Homes 67.83 7 __ 160.0 8 SIvera 91.0 9 Plalo 10.0 10 Zimmer 10.0 11 Raley 3.75 12 Gygi to 13 ~~=~nat 27.2 14 KoJlef 71.56 15 C&$tersQO 111.19 16 County Of Alameda 100;4 .17. UnI1edStatge of America 4.17 180l.DJin land Compall)' 80.14 19.Pac:ti.in 306..04 20 Jordan 18a12 21 TMI t35.G2 22 Anderson 48.90 23 Righetti 48.18 24 .&anat;igh 39..B 25 08iiipbeI1 8.81 26 Ri(:heV.Hunun 225.2 TOTAL: 3527.04 :::..~ { EASTERN DUBLIN Specific Plan Walla.. Robarts. Todd ~lftIf~"""1 m_SlNM.n."""", Sa'>.i'...-..,CA~106 ~1i)li4.'" ffi .-- ffj- CJ _~ - .~.. _ L..--r-"4 TABLE 4.1 EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE SUMMARY (Amended Per Resolution No. 66-03,47-04,223-05, -07 ) Land Use Description LAND AREA DENSITY YIELD COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL General Commercial 356.8 acres .25- .35 FAR 4.122 MSF General Commercial/Campus 72.7 acres .28 FAR .887 MSF Office Industrial Park* 61.3 acres .25-.28 FAR ,747 MSF Neighborhood Commercial 61.4 acres .30- .35 FAR .871 MSF Mixed Use 6.4 acres .30-1.0 FAR .083 MSF Campus Office 192.66 acres .35-.75 FAR 3.730 MSF Subtotal 751.3 acres 10.44 MSF RESIDENTIAL High Density 68.2 acres 35 du/ac 2,387 du Medium High Density -l4h1-137.5 acres 20 du/ac ~ 2,750 du 9 f.p tt/~'17 . L/ Medium Density 46e-,8 518.3 acres 10 du/ac 4,6e8 5,183 du Single Family 872.6 acres 4 du/ac ~ 3,490 du Rural Residential! Agric. ~ 697.4 acres .01 du/ac 4- 7du Mixed Use 6.4 acres** 15du/ac 96du Subtotal ~ 2,300 lJ,M8 13,817 du acres PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC Public/Semi-Pub lic 98.2 acres .24 FAR 1.027 MSF Semi-Public 9.3 acres .25 FAR Subtotal 107.5 acres 1.027 MSF SCHOOLS Elementary School 66.5 acres 5 schools Junior High School 21.3 acres 1 school Subtotal 87.8 acres PARKS AND OPEN SPACE City Park 56.3 acres 1 park Community Park 97.0 acres 3 parks Neighborhood Park 49.0 acres 7 parks Neighborhood Square ~ 16.7 acres e 6 parks Subtotal ~ 219 acres +417 parks Open Space 607.5 acres TOTAL LAND AREA ~ 4,073.5 acres 10 I. Table 4.2 in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan will be amended as follows: ) ~1 00 /..'17 TABLE 4.2 EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT SUMMARY (Amended Per Resolution No. 47-04, 223-05, 07- ) Land Use Designation Development Sq Ft/Employees Persons/du Population Commercial Industrial Park .747 MSF 590 1,266 General .887 MSF 385 2,303 Commercial/Campus Office* General Commercial 4.122 MSF 510 8,082 Neighborhood Commercial .885 MSF 490 1,806 Mixed U se** .083 MSF 490 171 Campus Office 3.730 MSF 260 14,346 Public/Semi Public 1.027 MSF 590 1,740 Semi-Public 590 TOTAL: 11.481 MSF 29,714 Residential High Density 2,387 2.0 4,774 Medium High Density ~ 2,750 2.0 e,776 5,500 Medium Density 4,6e8 5,183 2.0 9frl6 10,366 Single Family ~ 3,490 3.2 ~ 11,169 Mixed U se** 96 2.0 192 Rural Residential/Agric. 47 3.2 ~22 TOTAL: l&,M8 13913 ~ 32,023 J. Table 4.3 in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan will be amended as follows: TABLE 4.3 CITY OF DUBLIN PROJECTED JOBS/HOUSING BALANCE (Amended Per Resolution No. 223-05) PLANNING Dwelling Jobs Employed Balance Ratio AREA Units Residents Existing City of 7,100 12,210 12,000 -210 1.02:1.0 Dublin Eastern Dublin l#!% 29,424 20,244 -9,390 1.47:1.0 Specific Plan Area 13,341 TOTAL: ~ 41,634 32,244 -9,390 1.30:1.0 20,441 11 K. Table 4.10 in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan will be amended as follows: r~;/6 r>fJ Z~ I TABLE 4.10 FOOTHILL RESIDENTIAL SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL (Amended Per Resolution No. 07-) Designation Acres Density DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL Medium Density Residential ~ 301.3 10 du/ac ~ 3,013 du Single Family Residential 795.2 4 du/ac ~ 3,181 du Rural Residential ~ 697.4 .01 du/ac 4- 7 du Residential Subtotal 1,601.3 -- e,s:.w 6,201 du 1793.9 Open Space ~ 505.2 -- -- Community Park 32 -- I park Neighborhood Park 46.8 -- 7 parks Neighborhood Square &,3 6.4 -- l- 2 squares Park/Open Space Subtotal ~ 590.4 -- 9 10 parks Elementary School 22.7 -- 3 schools Junior High School 6.8 -- I school High School 55.3 -- I school School Subtotal 84.8 -- 5 schools Public/Semi-Public 4.8 0.24 FAR -- e,s:.w 6,201 du Total 2,217.6 -- 9 10 parks 2,473.9 4 5 schools 12 L. Figure 4.2 in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan will be amended as follows 13 J 3bf f1fJ 2.'-'1 Figure 4.2 Planning Subareas A Tassajara Gateway B Town Center - Commercial C Town Center - Residential o Faltoo Gateway E Fallon Vinage Center F T assajara Village Genter G FoothiU Residential H Industrial Park I County Center J Hacienda Gateway K Transit c.nter ~ May 2003 I4Orena_"""'(If ___..Illiof9A iJ_OI\IJ. 1.800 3.600 Foe! 0.25 0,5 - M. Figure 6.1 in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan will be amended as follows: -~';, ~.-~tr.+~-:~~-?- ',. ., Note: AI) m.lps have not bffn updated with the TrUlsit Center planning 8ubaNa. Ple8!W see Figure 4.1 for an illustrnlion of the Tr.lln&1t Center p~nning ........ NOTE: The__'" loooI_shownln """fi_1s -.... ..... 14 Figure 6-1 Open Space Framework Legend . ~ . Parks Open Space AutaJ AesldenUaJ E3 Trails l fa 't/!.~ 1 EASTERN DUBLIN Specific Plan Wallace Roberta. Todd ~_~1"Iaolnn UI!lloa:n;l--.hlAour s.,.,"'-*-CAS.1OS. (U5lSU,_ tfJ e1 J.1\1"i _ L.......r--- N. Figure 6.2 in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan will be amended as follows: 'Co..- ; '. ,.. l....".-, ! (V "J .---- Note: All maps have not been updated with the Transit Center planning subarea. Please see Figure 4.1 for an illustration 01 the Trarn;it Centp.r planning subarea. 15 1 t+1 'V~~7 FlQUre 6.2 Environmental Resources Legend E3 E:3 00 Tassajara Creek Intermlttant Streams SprlDg. Seep Of ImpouodJr!8ilt CD [II CD [U Golden Eagle PolenUalKR Fox Dens Red Legged Frog LocaftOn Red-Tailed Hawk or .olher Raptor Nest NorthBmRipnri8n Woo4iU\d Arr-QYOWlUow FUparian Woodtand ~ - .. ~ ~ Ilim AJkaieiGras*nd InlrodUGBd Annual Gr8s$l~ CuUivated Developed EASTERN DUBLIN Specific Plan Wallace _,Ia.Tqdd UbIllIlflll~~ ttt--.d"""'JftAoc>r 8M~CIo"1OS- ~'W$4141llll ~ J.rV'i _L..J-i O. Figure 6.3 in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan will be amended as follows: "..:.. ~'. J' Note: AIJ mapa have not been upd~fed with the Transit ('enter planning subare;a. Please see Figure 4.1 for all illustration of the Tramit Center planning . subarea. NOTe, 1be__ct, tocatSZ,.els.stlownin 1hisiigtwais -only. , l L.fZ ~2.. ~7 Figure 6,3 Environmental Constralnt$ Legend - mm - ~ E3 E2I [j] E3 - - Geotechnical Avoidance Areas Geotec;niCai Avoidance Areas 4Infraslt\Jctur. feasible Stopesover 30% tOO-year Flood Main TaBsajaraCreele: InterroUtentStream. SEmsIUve Habitat Area G()tden Eagle ~ecUOhZone Vitualty$ensili'ie Rldgelands- 4 No Development Visu'a.iIY~nsJtiYe RldQetands ..Restticted Development EASTERN DUBLIN Specific Plan Wallace Robert.. TO\kI ~-""'*-....... tl:l -.:l a.c.~",* _~W.M* Ullo)"''HIk!O en ~ -~lnrj EEJ...~ P: The Foothill Residential portion of Appendix 3 in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan will be amended as follows, with all other portions of Appendix 3 remaining in full force and effect: Foothill Residential Medium Density ~ Residential 301.3 10 ~ 3,013 Single Family Residential 795.2 4 M4l3,181 Rural 00&.-7 Residential! Agriculture 697.4 .01 47 1,601.3 Subtotal 1,793.9 &,-8l9 6,201 4n-6 Open Space 505.2 Community Park 32 Neighborhood Park 46.8 Neighborhood Square ~6.4 16 006-:7 Subtotal 590.4 Elementary School 22.7 Junior High School 6.8 High School 55.3 Subtotal 84.8 Semi-Public* 4.8 0.24 2,247.6 Total 2473.9 e,gw 6,201 I 1./3 Jb2"1 Q. Appendix 4 in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan will be amended as follows: #31 Richey/Moller ( Casamira Valley Medium Density Residential 48.9 10 489 Rural Residential/Agriculture 143.7 .01 1 Park 1.1 Open Space 32.6 Total ~ ~ GRAND TOTAL 4,159.3 16,785 R. The text in Appendix 4 will be amended as follows: Acreage and uses have changed since the original Specific Plan was approved via several amendments. The Fallon Enterprises, Croak and Braddock and Logan properties in Fallon Village and the Casamira Valley property were added to the planning area. Other amendments modified land use and intensities. 17 ) y. y '1J ;...G;'f PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1 st day of May 2007 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: City Clerk G:\P A#\2003\03-060 Moller Ranch\CC May 1 \CC Reso GP A-SP.DOC Mayor 18 1 ~6Pb ORDINANCE NO. XX - 07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ***************************************** PREZONING THE CASAMIRA V ALLEY/MOLLER RANCH PROJECT SITE AND THE TIPPER PROPERTY TO THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND APPROVING A RELATED STAGE 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN P A 03-060 The City Council ofthe City of Dublin does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: FINDINGS A. Pursuant to Section 8.120.050 of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows. 1. The proposed Stage 1 Development Plan for the Casamira Valley Project will be harmonious and compatible with existing and potential development in surrounding areas because: 1) the General Plan anticipated development of the properties and the properties have been designated for residential development since 1993; 2) development of. the sites represents orderly growth of the General Plan Eastern Extended Planning area and is a logical extension of the City; 3) the Stage 1 Development Plan includes a variety of housing types including attached and detached housing and includes cluster homes, single family dwelling units, townhouses and alley loaded housing units which will contribute the diversity of housing types in the area; and 4) no development is proposed on the Tipper property, however, the Stage 1 Development Plan does not permit development of the Tipper property at this time and requires approval of a Stage 1 Development Plan, in addition to other approvals required by the Zoning Ordinance, for the Tipper property prior to the development of the site. 2. The Casamira Valley/Moller Ranch Project site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the Planned Development Zoning District proposed because: 1) the proposed medium density of the project site is compatible with the proposed General Plan and Specific Plan amendments; 2) the proposed project will include residential uses which are consistent with the proposed General Plan and Specific Land Use Designations for the Site; and 3) the Stage 1 Development Plan will allow the constructed of 298 units which will result in an overall density of 6.1 units per acre which falls within the permitted density rang of 6.1 to 14.0 dwelling unit per acre in the Medium-Density Residential land use category. 3. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare because: 1) the General Plan anticipated development of the project site; and 2) there are several residential developments approved, under construction or under review in the vicinity. 4. The proposed Stage 1 Development Plan and PD Rezone are consistent with the Dublin General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan because: 1) the Applicant 1 ATTACHMENT 4 , f//.';f"l ILfLa~fl has requested approval of a General Plan Amendment to change the Low Density Residential land use designation to Medium-Density Residential on the Casamira Valley/Moller Ranch property to increase the density to allow the construction of 298 attached and detached dwelling units; 2) the General Plan Amendment also includes a request to reduce the developable area on the Casamira Valley site by 20 acres and increase the open space area on the site; 3) the Applicant for the Casamira Valley Project has requested an Amendment to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan to include the Casamira Valley/Moller Ranch site in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and establish the land use designation for the site; and 4) the Applicant for Casamira Valley has proposed to include three amenities on the site, outdoor museum, community building and trails, which are compatible with the provisions of the City of Dublin's Semi- Public Facilities Policy. B. Pursuant to Section 8.32.070 ofthe Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows. 1. The proposed Planned Development Zoning District meets the purpose and intent of Chapter 8.32 Planned Development Zoning District of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance because: 1) the proposed project is consistent with the intent of the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan which envisioned residential development in this area; 2) the proposed Stage 1 Development Plan allows for diversity in housing types on the site and in the area as discussed above and as required by Section 8.32.01O.B of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance; and 3) the proposed Stage 1 Development Plan focuses residential development in the flat area on the site to protect sensitive areas and away from Tassajara Road as required by Sections 8.32.010.E and 8.32.010.G of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Development under the Planned District Development Plan will be harmonious and compatible with existing and future development in the surrounding area because: 1) residential development is envisioned for the site and in surrounding areas within the City; 2) residential development has been approved west of the subject site on the Wallis Ranch project site and is currently under review for the Mission Peak project site located adjacent to the Casamira Valley/Moller Ranch site to the north; and 3) a buffer between the project site and the undeveloped land to the north in unincorporated Contra Costa County and unincorporated Alameda County is provided with a conservation easement and land designated as Rural Residentiall Agriculture which allows limited development. C. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council certified a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the Project on by Resolution XX - 07 incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2. MAP OF THE PROPERTY Pursuant to Chapter 8.32, Title 8 of the City of Dublin Municipal Code the City of Dublin Zoning Map is amended to prezone the following property ("the Property") to a Planned Development Zoning District: 238.8 acres generally located west and east of Tassajara Road, north of the Pinn Brothers/Silveria Ranch project and south of the Alameda/Contra Costa County border. (APNs: 985-0001-001 and 986-0004-001). 2 I 't1 cy:lql A map of the prezoning area is shown below: PROJECT SITE ! l UN t::) ~ tl:: ~ '"'5 ~ ~ PKW't BLVD IHTERSTAlE 580 ~ ~~ <.)~ c:l SECTION 3. APPROVAL The regulations for the use, development, improvement, and maintenance of the Property are set forth in the following Stage 1 Development Plan for the Project area which is hereby approved. Any amendments to the Stage 1 Development Plan shall be in accordance with section 8.32.080 of the Dublin Municipal Code or its successors. Stage 1 Development Plan for Casamira Valley/Moller Ranch (PA 03-060) This is a Stage 1 Development Plan pursuant to Chapter 8.32 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. This Development Plan meets all the requirements for a Stage 1 Development Plan and is adopted as part of the PD-Planned Development prezoning for the Casamira Valley/Moller Ranch project, PA 03-060. The Stage 1 Development Plan consists of the items and plans identified below, many of which are contained in a separately bound document titled Stage 1 Development Plan, Casamira Vallev, dated December 26, 2006 ("Stage 1 Development Plan booklet"). The Stage 1 Development Plan booklet is incorporated herein by reference and is on file in the Dublin Community Development Department under file no. P A 03-060. The PD-Planned Development District and this Stage 1 Development Plan provide flexibility to encourage innovative development while ensuring that the goals, policies, and action programs of the 3 I 't'b rfb2&t1 General Plan, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and provisions of Chapter 8.32 of the Zoning Ordinance are satisfied. 1. Zoning: This PD Planned Development Zoning District is to provide for and regulate the development of Casamira Valley/Moller Ranch site as shown below. The General Plan land use designations include: Medium-Density Residential, Rural Residential! Agriculture, Open Space and Parks/Public Recreation. 2. Permitted Uses: The following are uses permitted for this site: A) PD Medium Density Residential Intent: Medium Density land use designations are established to: a) reserve appropriately located areas for family living in a variety of types of dwellings at a reasonable range of population densities consistent with sound standards of public health and safety; b) preserve as many as possible of the desirable characteristics of the one-family residential district while permitting higher population densities; c) ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling unit; d) minimize traffic congestion and avoid the overloading of utilities by preventing the construction of buildings of excessive size in relation to the land around them; e) provide necessary space for off-street parking of automobiles and, where appropriate, for off-street loading of trucks; and f) protect residential properties from the hazards, noise and congestion created by commercial and industrial traffic. Intensity: 6.1 - 14.0 dwelling units per acre Permitted Uses, including but not limited to: Multi-family dwelling Single family dwelling Accessory structures and uses in accordance with Chapter 8.40, Accessory Structures and Uses, of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance Community Care Facility/Small (as defined by Chapter 8.08, Definitions, of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance) Home Occupation in accordance with Chapter 8.64, Home Occupation Regulations, ofthe Dublin Zoning Ordinance Private recreation facility including associated buildings, grounds and a pool Family Day Care Home/Small (as defined by Chapter 8.08, Definitions, ofthe Dublin Zoning Ordinance) Second residential unit, if built by initial homebuilder, in accordance with Chapter 8.80, Second Unit Regulations, of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Garage SalesN ard Sales Outdoor museum open to the public Conditional Uses: Boarding house Large vehicle storage (appropriately screened) Parking lot - residential 4 l '-t q Ob 2-'1 Accessory Uses: All Accessory Uses shall be in accordance with Section 8.40, Accessory Structures and Uses, of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Temporary Uses: Temporary construction trailer (in accordance with Chapter 8.108 ofthe Zoning Ordinance) Tract and sales office/model home complex (in accordance with Chapter 8.108 of the Zoning Ordinance). B) PD Rural Residentiall Agriculture Intent: Rural Residential! Agriculture land use designations are established to: 1) accommodate agricultural activities and other open space uses; 2) protect sensitive areas; and 3) allow for maintenance of these areas. Permitted Uses, including but not limited to: Public or Private Infrastructure Livestock Grazing Trails Associated Trail improvements including but not limited to signage, fencing, parking and roads Accessory Uses: All Accessory Uses shall be in accordance with Section 8.40, Accessory Structures and Uses, of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Temporary Uses: Temporary construction trailers (in accordance with Chapter 8.108 ofthe Zoning Ordinance). C) PD Parks/Public Recreation Intent: ParksIPublic Recreation allows for an active or passive park. Permitted Uses, including but not limited to: Neighborhood Square F) PD Open Space/Stream Corridor Intent: Open Space land use designations are established to ensure the protection of those areas of special significance. Permitted Use, including but not limited to: 5 2!1-[ 16DJb.. , Public or private infrastructure Trails and maintenance roads Other recreational or educational facility Trail staging area Associated Trail improvements including but not limited to signage, fencing, parking and roads Water quality, drainage, and other similar facilities, including swales and basins Streams and drainage protection corridors Woodlands Conservation areas Wildlife habitat preservation 3. Dublin Zoning Ordinance - Applicable Requirements: Except as specifically modified by the provisions of this Planned Development District Prezoning/Development Plan, all applicable general requirements and procedures of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance shall be applied to the land uses designated in this Planned Development District Prezoning. 4. Development Standards: Specific Development Standards within the project will be established at the Stage 2 Development Plan to determine if the development meets the established criteria. s. Phasing Plan. Casamira Valley/Moller Ranch will be developed as one phase. 6. Land Use Plan. Refer to Stage 1 Development Plan. 7. Landscaping Plan. Refer to Stage 1 Conceptual Landscaping Plan. 8. Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance. The City Council has adopted a policy stating its intent that new projects, including this project, will be subject to the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance, as amended, which requires that 12.5% of the units be inclusionary units affordable to persons of very low, low, and moderate incomes. The standards also allow for a portion of the units to be provided through payment in-lieu of construction. Casamira Valley/Moller Ranch proposes to construct 60% ofthe required number of affordable units, or 23 units and pay an in-lieu fee for the remainder oftheir obligation. No agreements currently are in place which would satisfy the affordable housing requirements for either property. However, compliance would be required when each property develops, and an arrangement would be agreed upon prior to approval of the Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Review. 9. Development Concept. Casamira Valley/Moller Ranch is proposed to be a residential village of 298 single family attached and detached homes with trails, open space, pedestrian corridors, infrastructure, and landscaping. The Development concept for the area strives to preserve the natural environment and create a community that is compatible with the natural terrain by emphasizing: open space, hillsides and ridges, scenic corridors, and the environs of the Creek tributary on the site associated with sensitive habitat preservation. A more detailed site plan, specific development standards, and a Site Development Review with design criteria will be submitted with the Stage 2 Development Plan following annexation. Tassajara Road is identified by the City as scenic corridor with standards for preserving views of scenic ridgelines and knolls from the corridor. Steeper slopes and ridgelines on site are designated as open space. Grading of the site is proposed to take into consideration the hilly terrain. Wherever possible development would be contoured to hillsides in order to avoid excessive cuts 6 ) 5/Ob &11 and fills. To minimize visual impact, most of the residential development would be tucked behind the ridgeline visible from Fallon Road. . A trail system, which will be open to the public, will be located in the areas designated as Open Space and Rural Residential! Agriculture. The trail system will connect to Tassajara Road. Cattle grazing will occur in the areas designated as Rural Residential! Agriculture. 9. Access & Circulation. Vehicular and pedestrian access to Casamira Valley/Moller Ranch will be from two entrances/exits on Tassajara Road. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan plans for Tassajara Road eventually to be expanded to six lanes. Tassajara Road frontage improvements and intersection improvements at the crossing ofthese two streets would be complete with this project. 10. PD ZoninglLand Use Summary. The following table provides the acreage per land use designation. PD ZONING/LAND USE SUMMARY TABLE Gross Midpoint Density Number of units Land Use Acres Density Range proposed min - max PD Medium-Density 48.9 ac 9.82 du/a 6.1- du/a 298 du 298- du Residential c 14.0 c 684.6 PD Rural 132.7 ac 0.5 du/a 1 du/a 0 0-1 du Residential! Agriculture c c PD ParksIPublic Recreation 1.1 ac nla nla nla nla PD Open Space 32.7 ac nla nla nla nla Interior Roads 7.2 Ac nla nla nla nla Right-of-way 3.8 ac nla nla nla nla TOTAL 181.6 ac 298 du Residential Non-Residential 44.7 nla nla 11. Tipper Property. Existing residential uses on the Tipper property as ofthe date ofthis Ordinance becomes effective are permitted to continue under this Stage 1 Development Plan. All improvements and uses on the property shall be in compliance with the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Future residential development of the site shall require a separate Stage 1 Development Plan for the site and all other applications required by the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Minor expansion of existing uses shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. 12. Public Facilities. As shown on the Stage 1 Development Plan, the Stage 2 Rezone and Site Development Review for Casamira Valley will include three amenities on site. The three amenities include an outdoor museum, community building which will be available for use by the public and a trail system which will also include education signage and displays which will highlight the history of the site and the environmental setting. The location of these amenities are shown on the preliminary site plan included in the Stage 1 Development Plan. 7 l ~~ "b z::tl SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE AND POSTING OF ORDINANCE This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days following its adoption. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 ofthe Government Code ofthe State of California. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this_ day of , 2007, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk G:\P A#\2003\03-060 Moller Ranch\CC May 1 \PD Ordinance for Casamira - CC.doc 8 \6?UfJZ~7 ORDINANCE NO. XX - 07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ***************************************** PREZONING THE VARGAS PROJECT SITE TO THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND APPROVING A RELATED STAGE 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN P A 03-060 The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: FINDINGS A. Pursuant to Section 8.120.050 of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows. 1. The proposed Stage 1 Development Plan for the Vargas Project will be harmonious and compatible with existing and potential development in surrounding areas because: 1) the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan anticipated development of the site and the site has been designated for residential development since 1993; 2) development of the sites represents orderly growth of the General Plan Eastern Extended Planning area and is a logical extension of the City; and 3) the Stage 1 Development Plan allows for a maximum of 33 detached units to be constructed on the site with small backyards an provides a housing type not currently offered in the vicinity. 2. The Vargas Project site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the Planned Development Zoning District proposed because: 1) the proposed medium density of the project site is compatible with the proposed General Plan and Specific Plan amendments; 2) the proposed project will include residential uses which are consistent with the proposed General Plan and Specific Land Use Designations for the Site; and 3) the Stage 1 Development Plan will allow the constructed of 33 units which will result in an overall density of 6.6 units per acre which falls within the permitted density rang of 6.1 to 14.0 dwelling unit per acre in the Medium-Density Residential land use category. 3. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare because: 1) the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan anticipated development of the project site; and 2) there are several residential developments approved, under construction or under review in the vicinity. 4. The proposed Stage 1 Development Plan and PD Rezone are consistent with the Dublin General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan because: 1) the Applicant has requested approval of a General Plan Amendment to change the MediumlHigh- Density Residential land use designation to Medium-Density Residential on the Vargas property to decrease the density to allow the construction of up to 33 detached dwelling units. 1 ATTACHMENTS ) 5" t.} Db zr1 B. Pursuant to Section 8.32.070 of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows. 1. The proposed Planned Development Zoning District meets the purpose and intent of Chapter 8.32 Planned Development Zoning District of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance because: 1) the proposed project is consistent with the intent of the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan which envisioned residential development in this area; 2) the proposed Stage 1 Development Plan allows for diversity in housing types in the vicinity as discussed above and as required by Section 8.32.01O.B of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance; and 3) the proposed Stage 1 Development Plan focuses residential development away from the Tassajara Creek and the Tassajara Creek bank to protect sensitive areas and away from Tassajara Road as required by Sections 8.32.010.E and 8.32.01O.G of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Development under the Planned District Development Plan will be harmonious and compatible with existing and future development in the surrounding area because: 1) residential development is envisioned for the site and in surrounding areas within the City; and 2) residential development has been approved west of the subject site on the Wallis Ranch project site and is currently under review for the Mission Peak project site located southeast of the project site. B. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the Project on by Resolution 07-_ incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2. MAP OF THE PROPERTY Pursuant to Chapter 8.32, Title 8 of the City of Dublin Municipal Code the City of Dublin Zoning Map is amended to prezone the following property ("the Property") to a Planned Development Zoning District: 4.38 acres generally located west of Tassajara Road, north of the Fredrich property and east of the Wallis Ranch project site. (APN: 986-0004-002-01). 2 155~ 7 A map of the prezoning area is shown below: ~~ PROJECT SITE FRtDfWH UN UN ~ ~ ~ 'ASON DRlvt ! -N'- I PKwr lNltRSTAlE .. </:.Q~ ~,,~ ~l\~ I~ i:;;f SECTION 3. APPROVAL The regulations for the use, development, improvement, and maintenance of the Property are set forth in the following Stage 1 Development Plan for the Project area which is hereby approved. Any amendments to the Stage 1 Development Plan shall be in accordance with section 8.32.080 of the Dublin Municipal Code or its successors. Stage 1 Development Plan for Vargas (P A 06-030) This is a Stage 1 Development Plan pursuant to Chapter 8.32 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. This Development Plan meets all the requirements for a Stage 1 Development Plan and is adopted as part of the PD-Planned Development prezoning for the Vargas project, PA 06-030. The Stage 1 Development Plan consists of the items and plans identified below, many of which are contained in a separately bound document titled Stage 1 Development Plan. Vargas", dated February 15, 2007 ("Stage 1 Development Plan booklet"). The Stage 1 Development Plan booklet is incorporated herein by reference and is on file in the Dublin Community Development Department under file no. P A 06-030. The PD-Planned Development District and this Stage 1 Development Plan provide flexibility to encourage innovative development while ensuring that the goals, policies, and action programs of the General Plan, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and provisions of Chapter 8.32 of the Zoning Ordinance are satisfied. 1. Zoning: This PD Planned Development Zoning District is to provide for and regulate the development of Vargas site as shown below. The General Plan land use designation for the site is Medium/Density Residential. 3 ) 5i..Q 't 2. Permitted Uses: The following are uses permitted for this site: A) PD Medium Density Residential Intent: Medium Density land use designations are established to: a) reserve appropriately located areas for family living in a variety oftypes of dwellings at a reasonable range of population densities consistent with sound standards of public health and safety; b) preserve as many as possible of the desirable characteristics of the one-family residential district while permitting higher population densities; c) ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling unit; d) minimize traffic congestion and avoid the overloading of utilities by preventing the construction of buildings of excessive size in relation to the land around them; e) provide necessary space for off-street parking of automobiles and, where appropriate, for off-street loading of trucks; and t) protect residential properties from the hazards, noise and congestion created by commercial and industrial traffic. Intensity: 6.1 - 14.0 dwelling units per acre Permitted Uses, including but not limited to: Detached dwelling units Accessory structures and uses in accordance with Chapter 8.40, Accessory Structures and Uses, of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance Community Care Facility/Small (as defined by Chapter 8.08, Definitions, of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance) Home Occupation in accordance with Chapter 8.64, Home Occupation Regulations, of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance Private recreation facility including associated buildings, grounds and a pool Family Day Care Home/Small (as defined by Chapter 8.08, Definitions, of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance) Second residential unit, if built by initial homebuilder, in accordance with Chapter 8.80, Second Unit Regulations, of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Garage SalesN ard Sales Conditional Uses: Boarding house Large vehicle storage (appropriately screened) Parking lot - residential Accessory Uses: All Accessory Uses shall be in accordance with Section 8.40, Accessory Structures and Uses, of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance 4 Temporary Uses: Temporary construction trailer (in accordance with Chapter 8.108 ofthe Zoning Ordinance) Tract and sales office/model home complex (in accordance with Chapter 8.108 of the Zoning Ordinance) IS,VfJ 2ff7 3. Dublin Zoning Ordinance - Applicable Requirements: Except as specifically modified by the provisions of this Planned Development District PrezoninglDevelopment Plan, all applicable general requirements and procedures of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance shall be applied to the land uses designated in this Planned Development District Prezoning. 4. Development Standards: Specific Development Standards within the project will be established at the Stage 2 Development Plan to determine if the development meets the established criteria. 5. Phasing Plan. Vargas will be developed as one phase. 6. Land Use Plan. Refer to Exhibit C, Stage 1 Development Plan. 7. Landscaping Plan. Refer to Exhibit C, Stage 1 Conceptual Landscaping Plan. 8. Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance. The City Council has adopted a policy stating its intent that new projects, including this project, will be subject to the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance, as amended, which requires that 12.5% of the units be inclusionary units affordable to persons of very low, low, and moderate incomes. The standards also allow for a portion of the units to be provided through payment in-lieu of construction. Vargas proposes to construct 2 affordable units, or 60% of the required number of affordable units and pay an in-lieu fee for the remainder of their obligation. No agreements currently are in place which would satisfy the affordable housing requirements for either property. However, compliance would be required when each property develops, and an arrangement would be agreed upon prior to approval ofthe Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Review. 9. Development Concept. The Vargas project is proposed to be developed as a small residential community with small detached dwelling units, each with a small backyard. The internal roadways will follow the contours of the land. A small pedestrian trail will be located on the site adjacent to the Tassajara Creek bank and will connect to Tassajara Road. A maximum of 33 units will be permitted to be constructed on the site. 10. Access & Circulation. Vehicular and pedestrian access to the Vargas site will be from Tassajara Road. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan plans for Tassajara Road eventually to be expanded to six lanes. Tassajara Road frontage improvements and intersection improvements at the crossing of these two streets would be complete with this project. 11. PD ZoninglLand Use Summary. The following table provides the acreage per land use designation. 5 PD ZONING/LAND USE SUMMARY TABLE 1~l5b2.&17 Gross Midpoint Density Number of units Land Use Acres Density Range proposed min - max PD Medium-Density Residential 5 ac 9.82 dufac 6.1-14.0 dufac 33 du 31-70 du TOTAL 5 ac 33 du Residential Non-Residential 0 nfa nfa SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE AND POSTING OF ORDINANCE This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days following its adoption. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this _ day of ,2007, by the following votes: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk G:\P A#\2003\03-Q60 Moller Ranch\CC May 1 \PD Ordinance for Vargas - CC.doc 6 }5~ D()2~7 RESOLUTION NO. XX - 07 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ********************************** APPROVING A PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE DESILVA GROUP (CASAMIRA V ALLEY/MOLLER RANCH AND TIPPER) AND SUN VALLEY LAND CO. (VARGAS) ANNEXATION NO. 17 P A 03-060 AND 06-030 WHEREAS, an agreement between the City of Dublin and The DeSilva Group and Sun Valley Land Co. has been negotiated entitled "Pre-Annexation Agreement between City of Dublin and the The DeSilva Group for the Casamira Valley/Moller Ranch property (hereafter "Casamira V alley") and the Tipper property and Sun Valley Land Development Co. for the Vargas property ("Pre-Annexation Agreement"), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Project site is in Eastern Dublin for which the City adopted the 1993 Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan to provide a comprehensive planning framework for future development in the area. In connection with this approval, the City certified a program EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15168 (SCH No. 91103064, Resolution 51-93, hereafter "Eastern Dublin EIR") that is available for review in the City Community Development Department and is incorporated herein by reference. The Eastern Dublin EIR was integral to the planning process and examined the direct and indirect effects, cumulative impacts, broad policy alternatives, and areawide mitigation measures for developing Eastern Dublin. The Eastern Dublin EIR identified significant unavoidable impacts from development of Eastern Dublin, some of which would apply to the Project. Pursuant to the Communities for a Better Environment case, any Council approval of the project must be supported by a new Statement of Overriding Considerations with respect to these previously identified impacts; and WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin EIR identified potentially significant environmental impacts and related mitigation measures, which the City adopted together with mitigation findings and a Mitigation Monitoring Program (Resolution 53-93.) The mitigation measures and monitoring program continue to apply to development in Eastern Dublin; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City as the Lead Agency, prepared a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the Casamira Valley Property entitled "Casamira V alley/Moller Ranch Supplemental Environmental Impact Report" and circulated the draft SEIR for review; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City as the Lead Agency prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Vargas Property entitled "Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration" and circulated it for review; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated April 10, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, annexation, General Plan and Specific Plan Amendments and prezoning for the Planning Commission; and ATTACHMENT 6 IIJ;D 0lJ 7.-&t7 WHEREAS, at its April 10, 2007 hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 07- 12incorporated herein by reference, recommending that the City Council certify the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and adopted Resolution 07-13, incorporated herein by reference, recommending that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project; and WHEREAS, at its April 10, 2007 hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolutions 07-14, recommending annexation, Resolution 07-15 recommending approval of General Plan and Specific Plan Amendments for Casamira Valley and Vargas, and Ordinances 07-16 and 07-17 recommending that the City Council prezone the properties and adopt related Stage 1 Development Plans, which are incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report dated May 1, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, Mitigated Negative Declaration, annexation, General Plan and Specific Plan Amendments and the prezoning project (hereafter the "Project") for the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Project at a noticed public hearing on May 1, 2007, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Applicants, The DeSilva Group and Sun Valley Land Development Co., have executed said Pre-Annexation Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Said Pre-Annexation Agreement, attached as Exhibit A, is hereby approved and the Mayor of Dublin is hereby authorized to execute it. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1 st day of May 2007, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk G:\PA#\2003\03-060 Moller Ranch\CC May l\CC Reso Pre-Annex.doc )l.ol~ 'i-Cf1 RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF DUBLIN When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Fee Waived per GC 27383 Space above this line for Recorder's use PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT AMONG CITY OF DUBLIN, THE DE SILVA GROUP, INC., and SUN VALLEY LAND DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 1st day of May, 2007 ("Effective Date") by and among the City of Dublin, a municipal corporation ("the City"), the De Silva Group, L.L.C., a California limited liability corporation ("De Silva"), and Sun Valley Land Development Company, L.L.C., a California limited liability company ("Sun Valley"). De Silva and Sun Valley are referred to collectively as "Developers." City and Developers are referred to collectively as the "Parties." Recitals 1. In 1993, the City Council of the City adopted the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan ("the Specific Plan"). 2. The General Plan and the Specific Plan include goals and policies to prevent development within the Eastern Extended Planning Area and the Specific Plan Area (hereinafter collectively "Eastern Dublin") from drawing upon and diluting the fiscal base of the remainder of the City. 3. The fiscal analysis included in the Specific Plan anticipates the last new fire station in Eastern Dublin will become operational in the year 2010. 4. A condition was imposed on the developer of Dublin Ranch Area A in Resolution 00-36 of the Dublin Planning Commission to construct or fund construction of a new fire station in Eastern Dublin, but in no event earlier than July 1, 2003. In addition, Condition 109 of said Resolution obligates the Dublin Ranch Area A developer to fund any deficit between costs associated with services to properties in Eastern Dublin and revenues from such area, less amounts which other owners seeking Moller Ranch/Vargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 1 of 11 May 1, 2007 Exhibit A 1l~2 tfb '2.'7 development entitlements should pay for such deficit. Development of the Annexation Area benefits from the new fire station constructed in 2003. 5. De Silva is the proposed purchaser under an unrecorded purchase and sale agreement of certain property within the Specific Plan Area consisting of 226.3 acres and described more particularly in Exhibit A (lithe Moller Property"). 6. On September 26,2003, De Silva filed an application with the City to prezone and annex to the City the Moller Ranch Property and certain other land, consisting of 12.5 acres, within the Specific Plan Area owned by James and Sue Tipper (lithe Tipper Property"). De Silva did not submit any development plans with the application for the Tipper Property, but the property has been included in the annexation proposal to ensure consistency with state law policies regarding annexations. 7. Sun Valley is the proposed purchaser under an unrecorded purchase and sale agreement of certain property within the Specific Plan Area consisting of 4.38 acres and described more particularly in Exhibit A ("the Vargas Property"). 8. On May 11, 2006, Sun Valley filed an application with the City to prezone and annex the Vargas Property to the City. 9. The Moller Property, the Vargas Property, and the Tipper Property, are referred to collectively as lithe Annexation Area," all of which is shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. As no development is being proposed on the Tipper Property at this time, the obligations that would otherwise be imposed on the Tipper Property by this agreement are being shared by the developers of the Moller Property and the Vargas Property. The Tipper Property is therefore referred to as a non-contributing property. 10. The City currently anticipates that the cost of providing public services to Eastern Dublin at a level consistent with services provided within the City will not exceed revenues generated to the City from property within Eastern Dublin. However, it is possible that, due to the expenses related to the operation of Fire Station 18, which serves Eastern Dublin and which opened in July 2003, or other factors, the costs of providing services to the Eastern Dublin may exceed revenues generated in the area. 11. Even if such a deficit does occur, as development takes place within Eastern Dublin as anticipated, it is expected to generate revenues to the City that will reduce and, in the near future, eliminate the above-described deficit. Nonetheless, consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and Specific Plan, this agreement provides that Developers will pay to City the Developers' proportionate shares of any such deficits, as provided herein. Developers' aggregate proportionate share shall be 7.38%, which is the percentage that the Annexation Area (243.18 acres) bears to the lands within the Specific Plan area that had not been annexed to the City as of July 25, 2000, the date of Resolution 00-36 (1,929.84 acres) plus the Dublin Ranch Project (1,363.29 acres). De Silva's individual proportionate share shall be 7.24% and Sun Moller RanchNargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 2 of 11 May 1, 2007 I~?OV Valley's shall be 0.14%, which reflects each developer's proportionate share of the non- contributing Tipper Property. 12. Certain improvements to the 1-580/Tassajara Road Interchange ("Tassajara Interchange Improvements") and the 1-580/Fallon Road & EI Charro Road Interchange ("Fallon Interchange Improvements") (collectively the "Interchange Improvements") must be constructed in order to facilitate development in the Annexation Area. City has previously entered into agreements for funding the construction of the Interchange Improvements with developers of property within the City. Pursuant to the Tassajara Interchange funding agreements, developers advanced the funding necessary to the City for improvement of the Tassajara Interchange Improvements. The Un Family has agreed to advance monies to the City needed for the Fallon Interchange Improvements. All of the funding agreements require the City to seek reimbursement from non- contributing developers prior to the issuance of building permits to the non-contributing developer. Development of the Annexation Area will benefit from construction of the Interchange Improvements. 13. Tassajara Road is currently two lanes, but the City plans to expand Tassajara Road to six lanes. In order to accommodate the Tassajara Road expansion through the Moller Ranch Property and the Vargas Property and to support the traffic that will be added to Tassajara Road by the development of the Moller Property, De Silva will be required to build a six lane bridge over Moller Drainage. 14. The proposed residential and trail system within the Moller Ranch development creates a security responsibility that cannot currently be met by Dublin Police Services. There are over six miles of trails planned for Moller Ranch. Many areas of the Moller property open spaces may be deemed to be sensitive environmentally or remain private and not open to the public. Dublin Police Services currently does not possess any vehicles that would assist officers in responding to incidents within this 226.3 acre development, which includes an expansive 173 acres of open space. The protection of the residents of the Moller Ranch development while they are walking the trail system and protecting the open space areas from trespass or vandalism is the mission goal of the Dublin Police. These issues can be successfully mitigated by the Developer purchasing and donating two off-road motorcycles to the Dublin Police Services. These motorcycles will be used to patrol the trail system and open space of the Moller Ranch development. AGREEMENT NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and conditions contained herein, the Parties agree as follows: Section I. General Fund Shortfalls A. The Developer's Payment Obligations; Definitions. De Silva and Sun Valley shall pay the City, respectively, 7.24% and 0.14% of the deficit, if any, Moller RanchNargas Pre-Annexation Agreement. CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 3 of 11 May 1, 2007 lip t.f Uf) between Public Service Costs and General Revenues. "Public Service Costs" shall mean the general fund cost of providing public services to the Eastern Dublin Area at a level consistent with public services provided within the incorporated area of the City prior to the annexation. "General Revenues" shall mean those revenues deposited to the City's general fund from property and inhabitants within the Eastern Dublin Area. "Eastern Dublin Area" shall include all lands within the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment area (see map attached as Exhibit C) that are within the City limits of Dublin. B. Duration of Payment Obligations. The Developers' payment obligation under this Section I shall begin when a deficit exists and shall terminate when there is no longer a deficit but in no event shall the obligation extend beyond June 30, 2010 ("Deficit Period"). De Silva and San Valley's payment obligations may be terminated only by detachment of, respectively, the Moller Ranch Property and the Vargas Property from the City or by separate agreement approved by the City. C. Annual Fiscal Analyses. The City shall prepare a fiscal analysis each year during the Deficit Period to estimate the amount by which the Public Service Costs will exceed General Revenues. The fiscal analysis will be prepared on a fiscal year basis (July 1 to June 30) and will calculate the deficit for the preceding fiscal year. D. Payments to the City. No later than October 1 of each year during the Deficit Period, De Silva and Sun Valley shall pay to City 7.24% and 0.14%, respectively, of the deficit between Public Services Costs and General Revenues for the preceding fiscal year, based on the fiscal analysis, plus 7.24% and 0.14%, respectively, of the cost of the fiscal analysis described in Section I.C. E. Security for Payment. At such time as requested by the City Manager, De Silva and Sun Valley.will provide the City with security in an amount and form satisfactory to the City Manager, to become effective once the Annexation Area becomes part of the City, to secure the payments to the City described in Section I.D above. The security may consist of a letter of credit or similar instrument. De Silva and Sun Valley agree that the City shall be under no obligation to continue processing any land use entitlement applications or other development permits for De Silva and Sun Valley if security has not been provided when requested by the City Manager. F. Reimbursement from Non-Contributing Tipper Property Owners. The City shall consider fair and appropriate ways of reimbursing De Silva and Sun Valley some of the amounts De Silva and Sun Valley may be required to pay under this Section I from the owner of the Tipper Property, this being the only other property included in the Annexation Area that is not controlled by either De Silva or Sun Valley. To the extent permitted by law, the City shall require owners of the Tipper Property that seek City approval of development entitlements for such property to pay a fair and proportionate share of the amounts that Developer is required to pay pursuant to this Section I. Moller Ranch/Vargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 4 of 11 May 1 , 2007 l (1)6 'fJ 2'17 Section II. Payment to City for Tassaiara Interchanae Improvements A. Advance of Monies by Developer. De Silva agrees not to oppose the City's imposition of conditions on future land-use approvals that would require De Silva to advance, prior to approval of the first final subdivision map to create individual lots in the Moller Ranch Property, the sum of $111,141 for the T assajara Interchange Improvements. Sun Valley agrees not to oppose the City's imposition of conditions on future land-use approvals that would require Sun Valley to advance, prior to approval of the first final subdivision map to create individual lots on the Vargas Property, the sum of $12,308 for the Tassajara Interchange ImprovementS. The advances are required by agreements with other Eastern Dublin developers that! have advanced monies for the construction of the Tassajara Interchange Improv~ments. The amount of the contribution was calculated based on each project's proportionate share of estimated vehicle trips. B. Use of Monies by City. City will use the monies paid by Developers pursuant to Section II of this Agreement t fund obligations in the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Section I category. I there remains an obligation to reimburse the original parties who financed the Interch nge Improvements, the City will make such reimbursements prior to funding any other S ction I category obligations. C. Credit Against TIF. City will provide a credit to Developers in the amount of Developers' payment of monies under this ection to be used by Developer against payment of the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact F e ("TIF"). The TIF has different categories of improvements, and credits granted pu suant to the TIF program are granted based on the category of the improvements for hich the credit was granted. In accordance with the City's TIF Guidelines (Resol. 20 07), establishment of the credit shall require the payment of an administrative fee. The use of credits (including limitations on the use of credits) and manner of conv rsion of the credit to a right of reimbursement will be as set forth in the City's TIF Gu delines, subject to the following provisions: (a) the credit shall be granted at the time Developer makes payments of money pursuant to this agreement;, and (b) the Tass jara Interchange Improvements credit may be used only to satisfy Section 1 TIF obligati ns. Section III. Brid e Over Draina eon Tassa. ra Road Tassajara Road is currently two lanes, but as p rt of the Tassajara Interchange Improvements, Tassajara Road will be expanded to six lanes. In order to accommodate the Tassajara Road expansion through the Moller Ran h Property, De Silva agrees not to oppose the City's imposition of conditions on futur land-use approvals that would require it to build and bear all costs associated with design, construction, right-of-way acquisition, and permitting of a six lane bridge (includi g stabilization and restoration of Moller Ranch and any habitat mitigation work required s part of the above) over Moller Drainage on Tassajara Road to be dedicated to City. Developer shall be entitled to credits under the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee (E TIF) program to the extent that the cost of the above work is included in the EDTIF. I accordance with the City's TIF Moller RanchNargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 5 of 11 May 1 , 2007 lLR~ /Jf) Guidelines, establishment of the credit shall require the payment of an administrative fee to establish the credit. The use of credits (including limitations on the use of credits) and manner of conversion of the credit to a right of reimbursement will be as set forth in the City's TIF Guidelines, Section IV. Payment to City for Fallon Interchanae Improvements A. Advance of Monies by Developers. De Silva agrees not to oppose the City's imposition of conditions on future land-use approvals that would require De Silva to advance, prior to approval of the first final subdivision map to create individual lots in the Moller Ranch Property, to advance monies towards the cost of the Fallon Interchange Improvements. Sun Valley agrees not to oppose the City's imposition of conditions on future land-use approvals that would require Sun Valley to advance, prior to approval of the first final subdivision map to create individual lots in the Vargas Property, to advance monies towards the cost of the Fallon Interchange Improvements. The amount of the contribution was calculated based on each project's proportionate share of estimated vehicle trips. Pursuant to that certain Agreement between the City of Dublin and the Un Family Regarding Funding for Construction of the Fallon Road/I-580 Interchange, dated May 1,2001 and as subsequently amended (lithe 1-580 Construction Agreement"), the City is obligated to seek reimbursement from newly annexed properties to contribute towards funding the improvements and/ or reimbursement to the Developer that advanced the funding. Accordingly, De Silva and Sun Valley shall contribute to the City, respectively, 1.2160% and 0.1347% of the monies advanced by the Un Family pursuant to the 1-580 Construction Agreement. The City may request payment from either Developer no earlier than the recordation of a final map that creates individual residential lots. As the advances by the Un Family may be made in one or more increments, the obligations will not be satisfied until such time as the Un Family has satisfied its obligations under the 1-580 Construction Agreement. Thus, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in herein, the City's requests for payments at recordation of final maps under this subsection may be requests to satisfy only a portion of a Developer's obligation, and the City may later request that the remainder (or portion of the remainder) of the Developer's obligation to advance monies set forth in this paragraph be satisfied. Accordingly, Developers agree to advance the remainder (or portion of the remainder) of its obligation upon request by the City. For example, if the Un Family has contributed $10,000,000 towards the construction of the Fallon Road interchange but they have not discharged their entire obligation under the 1-580 Construction Agreement, De Silva, upon filing any final map creating residential lots will be obligated (a) to contribute $121,600 (1.2160% of $10,000,000) and (b) upon the later request of the City, to contribute 1.2160% of such other amounts as the Uns later contribute pursuant to the 1-580 Construction Agreement. Moller RanchNargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 6 of 11 May 1, 2007 I (p l '1J 2..'17 In the event that the Fallon Interchange Improvements are complete at the time of filing a final map creating residential lots, the payment shall be based upon actual project costs. B. Use of Monies by City. City will use the monies paid by Developers pursuant to Section IV of this Agreement to fulfill obligations under the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Section II category. If there remains an obligation to reimburse the original parties who financed the Interchange Improvements, the City will make such reimbursements prior to funding any other Section I category obligations. C. Credit Against TIF. City will provide a credit to Developers in the amount of each Developer's payment of monies under this Section, to be used by Developer against payment of the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee ("TIF"). The TIF has different categories of improvements, and credits granted pursuant to the TIF program are granted based on the category of the improvements for which the credit was granted. In accordance with the City's TIF Guidelines, establishment of the credit shall require the payment of an administrative fee to establish the credit. The use of credits (including limitations on the use of credits) and manner of conversion of the 'credit to a right of reimbursement will be as set forth in the City's TIF Guidelines, subject to the following provision: (a) the credit shall be granted at the time Developer makes payments of money pursuant to this agreement; and (b) the Fallon Interchange Improvements credit may be used only to satisfy Section II TIF obligations. Section V. Payment of Funds for Construction of Eastern Dublin Fire Station A. Reimbursement for Construction of Eastern Dublin Fire Station. De Silva and Sun Valley agree not to oppose a requirement on future land-use approvals that would require each to advance, as reimbursement for funds advanced by others to the Fire Impact Fee program to assure the availability of fire stations and equipment necessary to timely serve development in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area, the respective sums of $461 ,808 and $8,930. The City shall require payment no earlier than the first final subdivision map to create individual lots on, respectively, the Moller Ranch Property or the Vargas Property, or, if no subdivision map is required to facilitate the development of a particular property, prior to approval of Stage 2 Development Plans. The amounts of these advances are based on the total amount advanced to the Fire Facilities Fee Program by DR Acquisitions, L.L.C. and the City General Fund that still remain outstanding as of April 2007, multiplied by the percentage of acreage that the Moller Ranch Property (7.24%) and the Vargas Property (0.14%) bear to the total acreage of the Eastern Dublin area. The total amount advanced was $8,138,163 (consisting of $5,996,345 advanced by DR Acquisition and $2,141,818 advanced by the City General Fund). The calculated amount of the advances outstanding as of April 2007 is $6,378,564 (consisting of $4,574,381 advanced by DR Acquisitions and $1,804,183 advanced by the City General Moller Ranch/Vargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 7 of 11 May 1, 2007 lu>~ Vb2!17 Fund). This outstanding amount is lower than the total advance because it excludes credits transferred by DR Acquisitions, L.L.C. to other entities and because the City General Fund loan has been repaid as Fire Facilities Fees have been collected. B. Use of Monies by City. Funds collected under this section shall be used to reimburse DR Acquisitions, L.L.C. for its advance of costs to construct and equip the new Eastern Dublin fire station (Fire Station 18), as well as borrowing from the City General Fund in order to complete Station 17. City to shall allocate the funds between City and DR Acquisitions based upon the proportion outstanding at the time the payment is made. (Leo amount owed to the general fund compared to the amount still held as a credit by DR Acquisition). C. Credit Against Fire Impact Fee. City will provide a credit to each Developer in the amount of each Developer's advance of monies under this Section. Developer shall be responsible for the payment of an Administrative Fee to establish the credit. The credit may be used by each Developer against payment of Fire Facilities Fee on this property or any property where Developer has an interest in the City of Dublin. The amount of the credit, once established, shall not be increased for inflation and shall not accrue interest. The credits with written notice to City, and payment of an Administrative Fee, may be transferred by Developer to another developer of land in Dublin. If Developer has not been able to use the credits within ten years of the date the advance is made, the remaining credits will convert to a right of reimbursement and shall terminate after 10 years. Any reimbursement shall be from Fire Facilities Fees only, if available. Other aspects of the credit and right of reimbursement shall be consistent with the City's Traffic Impact Fee Guidelines. Section VI. Purchase and Donation of Two Police Motorcvcles De Silva agrees not to oppose conditions of approval on future discretionary land use approvals that would require it to contribute funds to the City to allow the City to purchase two new off-road motorcycles of the type used by Dublin Police Services. Section VII. Payment of Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Preparation Fees By Resolution Number 115-94 ("the Fee Resolution"), the City established a fee for the purpose of defraying the City's costs associated with preparing the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The Tipper Property and the Vargas Property are subject to the fee, and the Moller Property, which is outside of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area, is not subject to the fee. Accordingly, notwithstanding the time for payment set forth in the Fee Resolution, Sun Valley, concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, has paid to the City the sum of $1 ,801 in satisfaction of the Vargas Property's obligations under the Fee Resolution, and De Silva and Sun Valley, concurrently with their execution of this Agreement, have paid to the City the respective sums of $4,503 and $85 in satisfaction of the Tipper Property's obligations under the Fee Resolutions. Moller RanchNargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 8 of 11 May 1, 2007 i(o~ ~ 2&t Section VII. Payment of Development Impact Fees Notwithstanding any vested rights Developer may later obtain, Developer hereby agrees to pay all lawfully enacted development impact fees that are in effect at the time building permits are issued, or at such subsequent time that the fees are otherwise due, for each individual structure within the Project. Section VIII. Approval of Annexation This Agreement shall take effect when the City adopts a resolution of application to annex the Annexation Area, with or without conditions or, if the Developer files a petition to annex, upon annexation. Upon adoption of such resolution, the City shall take reasonable steps to facilitate annexation of the Annexation Area in a timely manner. This Agreement shall become ineffective, however, if the annexation is disapproved by LAFCO or the voters or does not become effective for any other reason. Section IX. Additional Provisions A. Correctness of the Recitals. The Recitals set forth in this Agreement are true and correct and are a part hereof. B. Further Assurances. The Parties shall execute, acknowledge, and deliver such additional documents or instruments as may be necessary to carry out the intent of this Agreement, including but not limited to, those expressly referred to in this Agreement. C. Construction by California Law. This Agreement is entered into in the State of California and shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with its laws. D. Representation of Comprehension of Document. In entering into this Agreement, the Parties represent that they have relied upon the legal advice of their attorneys who are the attorneys of their choice. The Parties further represent that the terms of this Agreement have been completely read by and explained to them by their attorneys, and that they fully understand and voluntarily accept those terms. E. Authorship. Each Party and counsel for each Party has reviewed and revised this Agreement, and accordingly, the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement or any amendment of it. F. Authority to Execute. Each of the persons executing this agreement on behalf of a legal entity represents and warrants that each has full power to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the entity and that the Agreement is binding on the entity. Moller RanchNargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 9 of 11 May 1, 2007 1'10 ~ 1.-~7 G. Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Parties with regard to the matters set forth. There are no additional written or oral agreements or promises between the Parties concerning these matters which are not expressly set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by an agreement in writing executed in the same manner as this Agreement. H. Attorneys' Fees. In the event a Party to this Agreement is found in a court of law to have breached this Agreement, said Party shall pay the opposing Party's reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred in litigating the breach of contract action. I. Approval of Project. By entering into this Agreement, City makes no commitment that it will approve the Project. J. Notices. All notices shall be by certified mail or hand delivered to the Parties as follows: To the City: City Manager City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 To De Silva: The De Silva Group 11555 Dublin Blvd. Dublin, CA 94568 Attn: James B. Summers To Sun Valley: Sun Valley Land Development Co. 4471 Stoneridge Dr., Suite B Pleasanton, CA 94588 Attn: Fred Musser K. Recordation. This Agreement shall be recorded against the Property described in Exhibit A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOllOWS] Moller RanchNargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 10 of 11 May 1, 2007 l'1lOb2..€t1 CITY OF DUBLIN DEVELOPERS: Janet Lockhart, Mayor THE DE SILVA GROUP, L.L.C. B=11~ Its: N f\Nfl~t: SUN VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CO., L.L.C. Approved as to form: Elizabeth H. Silver, City Attorney ~/ By: Its: ~, f 0$:5;ET1"< Attest: Kay Keck, Acting City Clerk [NOTARIZATIONS ATTACHED] Moller RanchNargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 11 of 11 May 1, 2007 !l2~Z~i CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT . State of California County of A-la.rn-e.Jo. 4-;;.J-7 personally appeared before me, rrr~ d f/Ylu 5$--{ ( Name(s) of Signer(s) On Date ~.. -~=-I i NOIaIy PublIc - CaIIan*J ~ t CoMa Colla CcudV I __ _ _ ~~..:.~~2:~ o personally known to me ~ved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person~hose name~~scribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that ~he/tl,ey executed the same in diI:S/J:1er/theiF authorized capacity(l.es), and that bydiiS/horlthoir signature(p}--on the instrument the person,,(sr, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(sracted, executed the instrument. Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: o Individual o Corporate Officer - Title(s): o Partner - 0 Limited 0 General o Attorney in Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other: Top of thumb here Signer's Name: o Individual o Corporate Officer - Title(s): o Partner - 0 Limited 0 General o Attorney in Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other: RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER Top of thumb here RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: . @ 2004 National Notary Association. 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 . ChatsWorth, CA 91313-2402 Item No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6827 11~ ern z'~ 1 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT . State of California County of A- bVJlLe('J C{ On A-J-4-7 Date ss. appeared before me, f3rvu s;f rl s.-h ~Ct personally Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Ja LCL (M tJ k\VL !tame(s) of Slgner(s) la.-. -..- ~ =..~:s If I -_.~ ConIIa Calla CcuIIv - _ _ _ ~~..:.~""2.2OOI1 o personally known to me ~ed to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person{sfwhose name~bscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that @~he/tII!:;;Y executed the same in ~/her/tl'leir authorized capacity~ and that bi:::fi]Slheritl'leir signatur~esron the instrument the perso~or the entity upon behalf of which the person(.8Yacted, executed the instrument. Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: o Individual o Corporate Officer - Title(s): o Partner - 0 Limited 0 General o Attorney in Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other: Top of thumb here Signer's Name: o Individual o Corporate Officer - Title(s): o Partner - 0 Limited 0 General o Attorney in Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other: RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER Top of thumb here RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: . @2004 National Notary Association. 9350 De SolO Ave., P.O. Box 2402. Chatsworth, CA 91313-2402 Item No. 5907 Reorder; Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6827 II Lf1J 2!17 EXHIBIT A Moller Ranch and Vargas Property Description l'6UfJ2~1 Date: March 1, 2007 CASAMlRA VALLEY REORGANIZATION P A- ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICE DISTRICT DETACHMENT FROM THE ALAMEDA COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT AND THE ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT i. ~ Parcels located in Alameda County, California All that certain real property situate in a portion of Rancho San Ramon and portions of Sections 21 and 22, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, being: 1. the Parcel described in deed to "Jose L. and Violeta, Vargas.", recorded October 6, 1987, Series Number 87-274300 2. the Parcel described in deed to "James G. Tipper and Sue Tipper", recorded January 24, 1996 in Series 96016417 3. the Parcel described in deed to "Richey ET AL", recorded ???????? in Series ?????????? Official Records of Alameda County, described as follows: Beginning at the northwestern corner of the Fallon Crossing Reorganization, PA-04-016 Annexation to the City of Dublin and the Dublin San Ramon Services District by LAFCO Resolution No. 2006-47 on September 14,2006 and filed ?????, 2006 in Book ??? at Page??, Series No. 2006??????, Official Records of Alameda County, said point being on the eastern line of the Dublin Ranch Reorganization, P A-02-028 Annexation to the City of Dublin and Dublin San Ramon Services District by LAFCO Resolution No. 2005- 03 on May 12,2005 and filed October 19, 2005 in Book 287 at Page 2, Series No. 2005451459, Official Records of Alameda County; Thence along said eastern line the following five (5) courses: 1. North 08036'01" East, 347.50 feet 2. North 14019'59" West, 533.39 feet 3. North 89055'51" West, 519.08 feet 4. North 72049'31" West, 407.83 feet 5. North 25018'33" West, 381.25 feet to the Alameda-Contra Costa County line, Said point being the nOlthwest corner of said Tipper parcel (96016417); Thence along last said line and northwestemline of said Tipper parcel, NOlth 73046'43" East, 973.56 feet to the center ofTassajara Road; thence continuing along said County line and continuing along the northwestem line of said Richey parcel the following three (3) courses: 1. North 73050'29" East, 1344.68 feet; 2. North 73051 '13" East, 594.30 feet 3. North 73051 '45" East, 4164.61 feet Page 1 of3 Exhibit A l1 f.t, t1() 2.47 Date: March 1,2007 CASAMIRA VALLEY REORGANIZATION PA- ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICE DISTRICT DETACHMENT FROM THE ALAMEDA COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT AND THE ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT " to the northeast comer of said Richey parcel; Thence along the eastern line of said Richey parcel, South 01001' 46" West, 2501.72 feet to the southeastern corner of said Richey parcel; Thence along the southern line of said Richey parcel and the southern line of said Section 22, North 89020'49" West, 2610.32 feet to the section comer of Sections 21, 22, 27 and 28, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian; thence along the southern line of said Section 21 and northern line of said annexation (Fallon Crossing Reorganization, PA-04-016) the following eight (8) courses: 1. North 89020'13"West, 1866.04 feet 2. South 31001 '0 1 " West, 953.44 feet 3. South 33023'01" West, 92.57 feet 4, North 13002'00" West, 164,60 feet 5. South 77004'31" West, 66,00 feet 6, South 88036'36" West, 30.34 feet 7. South 76051'41" West, 168.97 feet 8. South 78028'16" West, 287.73 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing: 244.12 Acres:!:. Prepared by; Ruggeri - Jensen ~ Azar & Associates Charles F. Sellman, Licensed Professional Land Surveyor No. 5186, License Expires: 06-30~07 Date Page 2 of3 Date: March 1, 2007 CASAMIRA VALLEY REORGANIZATION P A- ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICE DISTRICT DET ACHMENT FROM THE ALAMEDA COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT AND THE ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT References to the existing boundaries of the City of Dublin and the Dublin San Ramon Services District are primary calls. Any bearings or distances refen-ed to herein should be only considered secondary. Boundary line of territory is shown on Exhibit "A" Casamira Valley Reorganization, PA- 04-016 Annexation to the City of Dublin and Dublin San Ramon Services District approved by LAFCO Resolution No. on the _ day of _, 2006. Said map was certified by the County Surveyor on the _ day of , 2006. This description confolIDs to the requirements of the Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission. Daniel Woldesenbet, Ph.D., P.E., Director of Public Works County of Alanleda By: Russell Reid Penland, Jr., County Surveyor L. S. #5726, Expires 12/31/05 Page 3 of3 G:\Admin\Jobs-02\021066\nnncxalion\CASAMJRA V ALLEY Anncxation.doc 11lavZ~7 11~l5b zer page 1 Moller Property/Cassamira Valley Project: 021066 Parcel Map Check Thu March 01 11:42:13 2007 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parcel name: BNDRY-ANNEX North: 452887.8613 East : 604176.1952 Line Course: N 08-36-01 E Length: 347.50 North: 453231.4539 East : 604228.1604 Line Course: N 14-19-59 W Length: 533.39 North: 453748.2411 East : 604096.1155 Line Course: N 89-55-51 W Length: 519.08 North: 453748.8678 East : 603577.0359 Line Course: N 72-49-31 W Length: 407.83 North: 453869.2945 East : 603187.3915 Line Course: N 25-18-33 W Length: 381. 25 North: 454213.9499 East : 603024.4062 Line Course: N 73-46-43 E Length: 973.56 North: 454485.9135 East : 603959.2082 Line Course: N 73-50-29 E Length: 1344.68 North: 454860.1343 East : 605250.7666 Line Course: N 73-51-13 E Length: 594.30 North: 455025.4047 East : 605821.6240 Line Course: N 73-51-45 E Length: 4164.61 North: 456182.9306 East : 609822.1378 Line Course: S 01-07-46 W Length: 2501.72 North: 453681.6967 East : 609772.8258 Line Course: N 89-20-49 W Length: 2610.32 North: 453711.4484 East : 607162.6753 Line Course: N 89-20-13 W Length: 1866.04 North: 453733.0426 East : 605296.7603 Line Course: S 31-01-01 W Length: 953.44 North: 452915.9303 East 604805.4607 Line Course: S 33-23-01 W Length: 92.57 North: 452838.6339 East 604754.5248 Line Course: N 13-02-00 W Length: 164.60 North: 452998.9936 East 604717.4046 Line Course: S 77-04-31 W Length: 66.00 North: 452984.2314 East 604653.0767 Line Course: S 88-36-36 W Length: 30.34 North: 452983.4954 East 604622.7456 Line Course: S 76-57-41 W Length: 168.97 North: 452945.3745 East : 604458.1319 Line Course: S 78-28-16 W Length: 287.73 North: 452887.8682 East 604176.2072 Perimeter: 18007.93 Area: 10,633,760 sq. ft. 244.12 acres Mapcheck Closure - (Uses Error Closure: 0.0137 Error North: 0.00682 Precision 1: 1,314,447.45 listed courses, radii, and deltas) Course: N 60-12-54 E East : 0.01192 114 flb EXHIBIT B Map of Annexation Area 7 ~ ~ N c<!!"Cl!J!!!:! ~iiJ"~ + VICINITY MAP NOT TO StAlE BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARING OF NJlrJ1'O'-E AS SHOMJ ON THE NORTH 'ES1FRN UNE OF FALLON awssJNC REORGAN1ZA TION. PA-(H-OI6 ANNEXATION TO THE aTY OF OUBUN AND DUBUN SAN RAMON SERWCE DlSTRlCT. F1lE/J TN BOOK _ OF MAPS A r PAGE _ RECORDS OF ALAUEDA COUNTY, CA1JFORNIA THIS MAP CONFORMS TO THE REQlJlREUENTS OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORJIA 1ION COJJJJtSSION OF ALAMEDA COlINTY. OAN1E'- Il'OUJ<SEN8CT. PliO., U., DlRE:C11JR OF P/JBUC IIVRKS n ~~ RUsscu. REID PENLAND. .11.. COIJNrr SlIRICra? LS S726 EXPIf/ES 12/JI/07 LEGEND P.O.S. POINT OF BEGINNING _ _ _ _ EXISTING CllY BOUNDARY UN( _ _ _ _ _ _ BOUNDARY UNE OF ANNEXAllON PARCEl UN( 1HIS MAP, 'MiEN RLED. WAS ACCOMPANIED BY A CE:R17F1CA 1E OF COMPLE11al AND CER7lFIED COPY OF TIlE BOUNIJARY DCSCRJPDON DfIlNEA lED HEREON. AS Re1UHIED BY SECTlOJ/ S7203 OF 11-/E GO'tflmUENT CODE. BY, CR'rSTAL H/SHIOA GRAFF. LAFCo EXECUl1VE OFFICER DATE: ~ mE ALAUEDA COUNTY UBRARY WAS ESTABUSHED SEP1fJ/8ER, 1910 IJNOfR CONTRACT 11Im TIlE OAKlAND FREE UBRARY. ON JJt. Y I, 1918 TIlE 80ARD OF SUPERVISORS \t)IED ro rAKE 0vt:7? TIlE COUNrr UBRARY OEPARTMENr OF TIlE OAKLAND FREE UBRARY iIAK1NG IT TIlE ALAJIEDA COIJNrr FREE UBRARY /JNOfR 1IIEIR DlREcr CONTROl. EFFECDIC AUGlJST I, 1918 IT IS KNOIW talA Y AS TIlE ALAJIEDA cOIRIrr UBRARY. THE AlAUEDA COUNTY FIRE DJS7RJCT WAS CREATED BY THE REORGANIZATION OF ALAUEDA COUNTY FIRE SERVICES BY LAFCo RESOLuna/ NO.9J-04 ON APRIL IS. '993. THE CER71RCA1E OF CDUPl..E11ON WAS RECORDED.AJNE 11, 1993 IN SERlts Na93-20749J, omClAL RECORDS OF ALAUEDA COUNTY. THIS UAP F1l..ED A T THE REQUEST OF THe aTY OF DU8L/N AND THE DUBUN SAN RAUON SERIACES OI.STR/CT AT _ UINUTES PAST -1J. ON THE DAY OF 2007 IN 800K _ OF MAPS. A T PAGE __ SCRJES NO. IN THE omcc OF TIlE COIJNrr RECfJRlJER OF AL4lIflJA COUNTY. CAUFDRNIA TIlE CER11F/CA 1f' OF COUPlE1/ON AND BOUNDARY OESCRIP11ON ARE RECORDEJ) IN SERIES NO. OF OFFICIAL RECCl/iJ5. IN TIlE OfflCC OF TIlE RECORDER ALAJIEDA COUNTY. CALIFORNIA PA TRICK J. O'CONNElL COUNrr RECORDER 8Y, DEPUTY COUNTY RECORDER APN 205-050-004-4 coNtRA COSTA cOUNTY ~~~~ ~ ~ -"fJ3'51'-45"E -- ~1f~ ~~~1J"51~. -- "'" _,,,,,611 -- ~~~'Zg-( i: , " ii~ ~I~ ~il lit! BASIS (T BEARINGS I \.,\ '\~ -, \~ )1 rtt-'I .I; RICHEY/HUNT R TOTALANNEXATION= 44.12:1:AC ~ N89"2O'1J~W ~ 1866.()#' ;' -_..--_1 I I I r_=__~__ : , " I .~. I ~.... / r .............'......-..........~.__/ _ ' YAUOH CRosstNG REORlWttZATJON. PA-04-016 ANNEXATIoN TO THE crry 01" DUBUN AND THE QUBUH BAN RAMoN sERVIC!S DBTRICT BY W'CO Rf$DlllTJOH HD. z006 D1i SUT!MBER 14, 2006 AND f'lLEO _, ZOOS IN BOOK _ OF WJ"S AT PAlZ _ I ) RECORDS Of' ArN 205-060-005-1 CONTRA COSTA coUNTY ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~""".,...61 """'~ ...",--- c~---~1Jl<l'I l:! --- --- ~ ~ r.., R. l. E- ... .... 21 22 28 21 N89'2f1'.f97/ 2610.32' UN 99-445131 12-15-1999 APNI 9B5-002B-D03-02 ~ 1. 1HE UE1HOO USED TO CALCULA 1E 11HS AREA WAS BY lRA H;RSit. 2. RUERENCES TO EXISTING QTY BOUNDARIES ARE PRlUARY CAJ.1s. ANY BEARfNGS AND DISTANCES SHOIW HEREON Sl/OUUJ BE COJ/SIDBIBJ SECONDARY. J. AS A DRAF1ING CONItfNDDN. THE SlIALL SEPARA TlDNS 8ETKEE1I TIlE PDRTlOJ/S OF TIlE UNaH1RK AROIJND THE BOUNDARY OF "THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION KfRE PRCMDED TO ALLOW IIUL1IPI.E DCSCRJPTIDNS ro BE PlACED ON lIIIAr IIllULD 01/lERlllSE BE A SlNGI.E UNE THESE UNE5 ARE TO BE CONSJOERED COINCIDENT EXCEPT VtHERE NOTHl. 4. THOSE: PORnON KfTHiN mE BOUNDARIES OF TNls UAP OF THE .4l.AAilDA COUNTY UBRARY DISTRICT AND ALAU8JA COUNrr FIRE OIS1R1cr lIIlL BE DETACHflJ. THE 80UN0ARJES OF THOSE DISTRICTS ARC ALL 1Hf UNINCORPORATfD AREAS IN ALAJIEDA COUNTY. .. ~I ~ EXHIBIT "A" CASAMIRA VALLEY REORGANIZATION, PA-D3-D6D ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF DUBIlN AND THE DUBIlN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT DETACHMENT FROM THE ALAMEDA COUNTY IJERARY DISTRICT AND THE ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT BY LAFCO RESOLUTION NO. ___ ON RJcJ!EY {HUNTER APN 985-0001-001 ~ 1 Ac'Ad4 PARTN!RS II u.c 2005037868 APN, 985-0028-001 o 400 U"-..- 600 , 1 inch.. 400 ft. 1200 I :! :z ~ ~ ..... .- ..c .- ..c= ~ ~ lii ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 % ~ I ~ ~ ~ 22 23 27 26 RUGGERI-JENSEN-AZAR & ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEEIlS, PLANNER', SURVEYORS 4600 CHABOT DRIVE, SUl'l'E 200 - PLEASANTON. CA. 94688 llARCII 2OIl7 lOB NO. 021068 SHEE'I' 1 OF 1 SHEET l<b l an 2'1 EXHIBIT C Map of Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment Area v~, Revisions: PA 04-040 FaBonVlhgodeslgnatlanmadllled. Croak. F,l:Jn EntllprlsllS and Braddock & l.Jlll'anprope~ln.ddodIl>S,"clflcPIan. Dubl~n TiaR51tCenleredd.dtoSpecift;Plan. Rea/ignlNnt of Dublin a",d. at Fallon Rd. ,iO<""'>"...,,,,,,. ."',,,."',.... -'> '\"" \ ?~"~ o Il ~ \ i.... f':.t,,- S\~~ \l." ~;.....- COil / ~\ .'----100" / C 0;::'---:--: " \'I / .......- " \/~~ D Parks / ! Reserve Forces Training Area (earn! Parks) / I H 1-3 () (~ ...~1f ~ Figure 4.1 Land Use Map "II~ ~~! Ea,t Dublin Specific Plan ~\;::7~::;:j C.mp Parks RFTA [:::1 city of Ollblin C..:':::J CRy of Dubtln. Sphofll of Influllnce Specific Plan lU :\w0tr:~~:~: Park r~i.:,.:l..:1i Park$J Pub&c Rllcr.allon IIIm"OpenSPilce ~ PubllclSeml-Publlc; PL _.Soml-PUblic Residential Rur.tRe.slde-ntiaIlAgfieullufll (0.01 dulac) Singh Famly(O.9-6.0dufac) ~ Mediumo.nsity (6.1. 14.Ddufae) _ Mod-Hi O.nslty(14.1-ZS.0dulac) _HIghOllnsity(ZS.o+dulae) CDmn.rcl.lllndl1$trial .... GlJflIllBlCommllt~illl _ Gen.roICommer~ldC.rn,u5 Olr_ _UU NelghbOfhood Commerd1l1 CampusOflice _lndUllriD1Pillk ~ Community Park ~ Neighborhood Square ~ Neighborhood Park ~ Regional Park ~ Elementary School ~ Middle School ~ High School . =:~~=;:~~~~P~:~:es: bye (selllextforcoOllleledi5CUllsiDn) Th.latilt!onofthIlSeml-publcllleontheCroalr. ::::~~ a~~: =:~~~f::::~~lage wri btl ~ May 2007 NOTE; The internal syalemof lDcalltre.1s sho'Ml in Ihls figufe jsillllshtllleorny. 500 1,000 3.000 . Feel 2.000 o 0.05J.1 0.4 0.5 . Miles N c:f?1 t'> ~ .....,J. 0.2 0.3 --