HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 8.1 AppropLmtRevFY94-95
.
.
CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 28,1995
SUBJECT:
Adoption of an Appropriations Limit for 1995/96, including a
Revision to Fiscal Year 1994/95 Base.
(prepared by: Paul S. Rankin, Assistant City Manager/Administrative
Services Director)
EXHIBIT ATTACHED:
1. I Proposed Resolution
r!:l~ J Approve the seleeted factors used to calculate the Revised 1994/95
~ L/ Limit and the 1995/96 Limit and adopt the Resolution.
RECOMMENDATION:
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
The Revised 1994/95 Limit will be $22,338,721. The 1995/96 Limit is
$23,690,214 and only $12,375,629 in 1995/96 Appropriations are
subject to this Limit.
DESCRIPTION: Each year the City Council must adopt an Appropriations Limit in
conjunction with the annual Budget process. The City Council adopted a 1994/95 Limit on June 21,
1994. The Alameda County Assessor has now provided updated information which would substantiate a
revision to the 1994/95 Adopted Limit. Resolution No. 53-94 recognized the potential need to consider a
revision. The 1995/96 Appropriations Limit is calculated by multiplying the "revised" limit calculated for
the prior year by a factor reflecting growth increases.
Description of Appropriations Limit
The laws regulating the application of the Appropriations Limit forbid the appropriation of specific
funds which would exceed the Limit. The Appropriations Limit carries forward each year and is subject
to an adjustment in accordance with a specified formula.
Each government entity is required to calculate an Appropriations Limit and include it as part of the
Annual Budget. This Limit may also be referred to as the Gann Limit or Proposition 4 Limit. The
adjustment made annually is based on a formula which may include the following factors: change in City
population, change in population for the entire County, change in State per capita income, and change in
non-residential assessed valuation. As will be noted in the actual calculations, selection of some of the
factors are discretionary. Typically, an agency selects from those factors which provide for the largest
growth in the Limit.
The Appropriations Limit does not apply to all funds appropriated by the City Council. The law only
applies to those appropriations that are funded by "Proceeds of Taxes." Proceeds of Taxes are narrowly
dermed by State Law. Historically, the applicable appropriations made by the City of Dublin have
always been well below the Limit. In Fiscal Year 1995-96, the appropriations subject to this Limit total
$12,375,629.
Although the City is well below its allowed Limit, it is important to make revisions in a timely manner.
For record keeping purposes, the Limit carries forward each Fiscal Year, and having an accurate base
simplifies the calculation for the following Fiscal Year. The City must also adopt a Limit prior to the
beginning of the Fiscal Year, in accordance with State Law.
Revision to 1994/95 Limit
When the original 1994/95 Limit was adopted, the City had incomplete information on the change in non-
residential building valuation. The formula allows for the selection between (1) the change in State per
Capita Income or (2) Non-Residential Building Valuation. Although the change in State Per Capita
Income was less than 1 percent (0.71 %), this was the only factor which was available when Resolution 54-
94 was prepared.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM NO. .8....1.
COPIES TO: Cory Biggs, Maze & Assoc.
CITY CL'ERK
FILE~
.
.
The Alameda County Assessor has now provided updated information on the change in non-residential
assessed valuation for the City of Dublin. The total change in Fiscal Year 1994/95 was an additional
$4,475,900 added to the secured tax roll. This results in a percentage change of 7.873%, which is
beneficial in increasing the City's Appropriations Limit. The following table demonstrates the impact of
the change:
1994/95
As Originally
Adopted
$20,855,341
Proposed Revised
Limit
$22,338,721
Difference
+ 1,483,380
The significant change is representative of using a factor of 7.873% instead of 0.71 %. Exhibit A of the
Proposed Resolution (Exhibit 1) details the changes made to the 1994/95 adopted base.
1995/96 Limit
Staff has prepared the calculations necessary to adopt the Appropriations Limit for 1995/96 in
accordance with State Law. This information was also included on pages xix and xx of the Preliminary
1995/96 Budget. The factors used in calculating the 1995/96 Limit are: (1) the change in the County
Population and (2) the change in State per capita income. Based upon limited data available from the
County Assessor, it is not beneficial to use the change in assessed value. If in the future complete
Assessor data would warrant the use of this data, Staff will present for City Council consideration a
Resolution revising the base figure.
The new 1995/96 Limit as calculated on Exhibit B of the Proposed Resolution (Exhibit 1) is $23,690,214.
The Preliminary 1995/96 Budget (including the recommended Higher Service Levels) includes
appropriations of $12,375,629 which would be categorized as Proceeds of Taxes. Therefore, the
appropriations subject to the Appropriations Limit are $11,314,585 ~ the allowed amount as
calculated for 1995/96. ..,..--
Proposed Resolution
Staff has prepared a Resolution (Exhibit 1) which will adopt a revised 1994/95 Appropriations Limit and
adopt a Limit for 1995/96. This action to revise the prior year Limit will not change the appropriations
made by the City Council in adopting a 1994/95 budget. The change provides for the use of the most
accurate information in preparing the 1995/96 Appropriations Limit adjustment.
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution.
PSR/lss a:Approp94.agenda#15
. RESOLUTION NO. - 95 .
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 INCLUDING AN
ADJUSTMENT TO THE 1994/95 ADOPTED BASE
WHEREAS, State Law requires that the Appropriations Limit be adopted and presented with the
Annual Budget; and
WHEREAS, The Alameda County Assessor could not provide accurate information regarding the
change in non-residential assessed valuation at the time the 1994/95 City Budget was presented; and
WHEREAS, The City Council previously adopted Resolution 53-94, which anticipated a potential
Appropriations Limit revision in the event non-residential valuation escalated at a higher rate than the change in
per capita income; and
WHEREAS, The Assessors 1994/95 records have now been updated to provide complete information
on non-residential assessed valuation; and
WHEREAS, the law allows the City the option to select from specified factors those to be used in the
calculation; and
WHEREAS, The City Council previously adopted a 1994-95 Appropriations Limit in Resolution 53-94
using (1) the Growth in the City Population and (2) the change in the State per capita income; and
WHEREAS, the revised 1994-95 Appropriations Limit is calculated by selecting (1) the Growth in the
City Population and (2) the change in non-residential assessed valuation; and
WHEREAS, the revised calculation of the 1994/95 Revised Appropriation Limit is described in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, the proposed 1995/96 Limit is calculated based upon an adjustment to the 1994/95
Revised Appropriations Limit; and
WHEREAS, the factors selected for calculation of the 1995/96 Appropriations are (1) Growth in the
County Population and (2) change in the State per capita income; and
WHEREAS, the calculation of the 1995/96 Appropriations Limit is described in Exhibit B, attached
hereto and by reference made a part hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby
adopt an adjustment to the 1994/95 Appropriations Limit and a Limit for 1995/96 as shown in Exhibits A and
B.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of June, 1995.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
g: \agenda\resos\safety .doc
. .
REVISED CALCULATION OF FISCAL YEAR 1994-95
(Presented at a Public Hearing 6/28/95)
A. SELECTION OF OPTIONAL FACTORS
I. Population - City vs. County
% Decrease
.1LlL2.3. .lLlm. % Increase
City of Dublin 24,658 24,947 1.17%
QR
Alameda County 1,321,342 1,334,127 .97%
Selected Factor = City Population Growth 1.17%
II. State Income vs. City Non-Residential Buildin~
Change in State Per Capita Income
= 0.71%
QR
Change in Non-Residential Assesed Valuation = 7.873%
(Complete informatiaB Bot available tram :\lameda Caooty)
Selected Factor State Per Capita Income 9.71%
Change in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation = 7.873%
B. CALCULATION OF GROWTH LIMIT ADJUSTMENT
The formula for calculating the adjustment is as follows:
Selected Factor I + 100
100
x
Selected Factor II + 100
100
Y
(X) x (Y) = Fiscal Year 1994-95 Appropriations Limit Adjustment Factor
1.1 7 + 100
100
1.01170
7.783
Qrl.l. + 100
100
1.07873
1.9971 ()
1.91179 x 1.971Q I.Q1888 Pissal Year 1994 951'.djlistmeat Pastor
1.01170 x 1.07873 = 1.09135 = Revised 1994/95 Adjustment Factor
C. CALCULATION OF APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
Fiscal Year 1993-94 Adjusted Appropriations Limit = $ 20,468,888
Fiscal Year 1994-95 Revised Adjustment Factor x 1.09135
Revised Fiscal Year 1994-95 Limit
$ 22,338,721
a:PSR/lss a:AppExA95.agenda#15
EXHIBIT A
. .
CALCULATION OF FISCAL YEAR 1995-96
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
A. SELECTION OF OPTIONAL FACTORS
#1. Population - City vs. County
1/1/94
1/1/95
% Increase
City of Dublin
24,924
25,145
.89%
QR
Alameda County
1,332,779
1,349,763
1.27%
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::'::::::::::::::::::::::::I::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::~!!i.g:::fi!9~gr::lj::::ffi:::gggil:::BBPY!!tign::glll:::ji:!:11i1::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::':::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::':::::::::::::::::::::
#2. State Income vs. City Non-Residential Building
Change in State Per Capita Income
= 4.72%
QR
Change in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation = 3.30%*
(Complete information not available from Alameda County Assessor. The calculation was based on
Assessed Value information as of April 12, 1995)
.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~!J.!pl~:::E!lgr::I:::g::ffl::~il:::f.lr::I!p'g:mgpgmi!:i:::Ef4.~lgl::::!:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::!:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
B. CALCULATION OF GROWTH LIMIT ADJUSTMENT
The formula for calculating the adjustment is as follows:
Selected Factor #1 + 100
100
=
x
Selected Factor #2 + 100
100
=
Y
(X) x (Y) = Fiscal Year 1995-96 Appropriations Limit Adjustment Factor
1.27 + 100
100
=
1.0127
4.72+ 100
100
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::a:~ql:;i:::i:::llqliJ.:::ffl:::I:~qip1::ffl:::E!!S!I:::ler:::I:IJ~t~::IIJY.igint:::Ei.~ltl::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::!::::
=
1.0472
C. CALCULATION OF APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
Fiscal Year 1994-95 Adjusted Appropriations Limit = $ 22,338,721
Fiscal Year 1994-95 Revised Adjustment Factor x 1.0605
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::liil!!:I:::i~i~~Ur;i!r::I::I!itl~:::~!IIf.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::!:::::::::::::::::::I:::gl~I!I~II!:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::!::!::::::'::::::::::::::::::~:'::::I:::::::
EXHIBIT B