Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 59-07 PreAnnex Agmt Casamira RESOLUTION NO. 59 - 07 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ************ APPROVING A PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE DESIL VA GROUP (CASAMIRA V ALLEY/MOLLER RANCH AND TIPPER) AND SUN VALLEY LAND CO. (VARGAS) ANNEXATION NO. 17 P A 03-060 AND 06-030 WHEREAS, an agreement between the City of Dublin and The DeSilva Group and Sun Valley Land Co. has been negotiated entitled "Pre-Annexation Agreement between City of Dublin and the The DeSilva Group for the Casamira ValleylMoller Ranch property (hereafter "Casamira V alley") and the Tipper property and Sun Valley Land Development Co. for the Vargas property ("Pre-Annexation Agreement"), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Project site is in Eastern Dublin for which the City adopted the 1993 Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan to provide a comprehensive planning framework for future development in the area. In connection with this approval, the City certified a program EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15168 (SCH No. 91103064, Resolution 51-93, hereafter "Eastern Dublin EIR") that is available for review in the City Community Development Department and is incorporated herein by reference. The Eastern Dublin EIR was integral to the planning process and examined the direct and indirect effects, cumulative impacts, broad policy alternatives, and areawide mitigation measures for developing Eastern Dublin. The Eastern Dublin EIR identified significant unavoidable impacts from development of Eastern Dublin, some of which would apply to the Project. Pursuant to the Communities for a Better Environment case, any Council approval of the project must be supported by a new Statement of Overriding Considerations with respect to these previously identified impacts; and WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin EIR identified potentially significant environmental impacts and related mitigation measures, which the City adopted together with mitigation findings and a Mitigation Monitoring Program (Resolution 53-93.) The mitigation measures and monitoring program continue to apply to development in Eastern Dublin; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City as the Lead Agency, prepared a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the Casamira Valley Property entitled "Casamira ValleylMoller Ranch Supplemental Environmental Impact Report" and circulated the draft SEIR for review; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City as the Lead Agency prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Vargas Property entitled "Initial StudyIMitigated Negative Declaration" and circulated it for review; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated April 10, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, annexation, General Plan and Specific Plan Amendments and prezoning for the Planning Commission; and l Reso No. 59-07, Adopted 5/1/07, Item 6.3 Page 1 of2 WHEREAS, at its April 10, 2007 hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 07-12incorporated herein by reference, recommending that the City Council certify the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and adopted Resolution 07-13, incorporated herein by reference, recommending that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project; and WHEREAS, at its April 10, 2007 hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolutions 07-14, recommending annexation, Resolution 07-15 recommending approval of General Plan and Specific Plan Amendments for Casamira Valley and Vargas, and Ordinances 07-16 and 07-17 recommending that the City Council prezone the properties and adopt related Stage 1 Development Plans, which are incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report dated May 1, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, Mitigated Negative Declaration, annexation, General Plan and Specific Plan Amendments and the prezoning project (hereafter the "Project") for the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Project at a noticed public hearing on May 1, 2007, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Applicants, The DeSilva Group and Sun Valley Land Development Co., have executed said Pre-Annexation Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find that: Said Pre-Annexation Agreement, attached as Exhibit A, is hereby approved and the Mayor of Dublin is hereby authorized to execute it. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of May, 2007, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Hildenbrand, Oravetz, Sbranti and Scholz, and Mayor Lockhart NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ~CPV City Clerk J Oe.pv i:J ATTEST: Reso No. 59-07, Adopted 5/1/07, Item 6.3 Page 2 of2 RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF DUBLIN When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Fee Waived per GC 27383 Space above this line for Recorder's use PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT AMONG CITY OF DUBLIN, THE DE SILVA GROUP, INC., and SUN VALLEY LAND DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 1 st day of May, 2007 ("Effective Date") by and among the City of Dublin, a municipal corporation ("the City"), the De Silva Group, L.L.C., a California limited liability corporation ("De Silva"), and Sun Valley Land Development Company, L.L.C., a California limited liability company ("Sun Valley"). De Silva and Sun Valley are referred to collectively as "Developers." City and Developers are referred to collectively as the "Parties." Recitals 1. In 1993, the City Council of the City adopted the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan ("the Specific Plan"). 2. The General Plan and the Specific Plan include goals and policies to prevent development within the Eastern Extended Planning Area and the Specific Plan Area (hereinafter collectively "Eastern Dublin") from drawing upon and diluting the fiscal base of the remainder of the City. 3. The fiscal analysis included In the Specific Plan anticipates the last new fire station in Eastern Dublin will become operational in the year 2010. 4. A condition was imposed on the developer of Dublin Ranch Area A in Resolution 00-36 of the Dublin Planning Commission to construct or fund construction of a new fire station in Eastern Dublin, but in no event earlier than July 1, 2003. In addition, Condition 109 of said Resolution obligates the Dublin Ranch Area A developer to fund any deficit between costs associated with services to properties in Eastern Dublin and revenues from such area, less amounts which other owners seeking Moller Ranch/Vargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 1 of 11 May 1, 2007 development entitlements should pay for such deficit. Development of the Annexation Area benefits from the new fire station constructed in 2003. 5. De Silva is the proposed purchaser under an unrecorded purchase and sale agreement of certain property within the Specific Plan Area consisting of 226.3 acres and described more particularly in Exhibit A ("the Moller Property"). 6. On September 26, 2003, De Silva filed an application with the City to prezone and annex to the City the Moller Ranch Property and certain other land, consisting of 12.5 acres, within the Specific Plan Area owned by James and Sue Tipper ("the Tipper Property"). De Silva did not submit any development plans with the application for the Tipper Property, but the property has been included in the annexation proposal to ensure consistency with state law policies regarding annexations. 7. Sun Valley is the proposed purchaser under an unrecorded purchase and sale agreement of certain property within the Specific Plan Area consisting of 4.38 acres and described more particularly in Exhibit A ("the Vargas Property"). 8. On May 11, 2006, Sun Valley filed an application with the City to prezone and annex the Vargas Property to the City. 9. The Moller Property, the Vargas Property, and the Tipper Property, are referred to collectively as "the Annexation Area," all of which is shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. As no development is being proposed on the Tipper Property at this time, the obligations that would otherwise be imposed on the Tipper Property by this agreement are being shared by the developers of the Moller Property and the Vargas Property. The Tipper Property is therefore referred to as a non-contributing property. 10. The City currently anticipates that the cost of providing public services to Eastern Dublin at a level consistent with services provided within the City will not exceed revenues generated to the City from property within Eastern Dublin. However, it is possible that, due to the expenses related to the operation of Fire Station 18, which serves Eastern Dublin and which opened in July 2003, or other factors, the costs of providing services to the Eastern Dublin may exceed revenues generated in the area. 11. Even if such a deficit does occur, as development takes place within Eastern Dublin as anticipated, it is expected to generate revenues to the City that will reduce and, in the near future, eliminate the above-described deficit. Nonetheless, consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and Specific Plan, this agreement provides that Developers will pay to City the Developers' proportionate shares of any such deficits, as provided herein. Developers' aggregate proportionate share shall be 7.38%, which is the percentage that the Annexation Area (243.18 acres) bears to the lands within the Specific Plan area that had not been annexed to the City as of July 25, 2000, the date of Resolution 00-36 (1,929.84 acres) plus the Dublin Ranch Project (1,363.29 acres). De Silva's individual proportionate share shall be 7.24% and Sun Moller Ranch/Vargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 2 of 11 May 1, 2007 Valley's shall be 0.14%, which reflects each developer's proportionate share of the non- contributing Tipper Property. 12. Certain improvements to the 1-580/Tassajara Road Interchange ("Tassajara Interchange Improvements") and the 1-580/Fallon Road & EI Charro Road Interchange ("Fallon Interchange Improvements") (collectively the "Interchange Improvements") must be constructed in order to facilitate development in the Annexation Area. City has previously entered into agreements for funding the construction of the Interchange Improvements with developers of property within the City. Pursuant to the Tassajara Interchange funding agreements, developers advanced the funding necessary to the City for improvement of the Tassajara Interchange Improvements. The Un Family has agreed to advance monies to the City needed for the Fallon Interchange Improvements. All of the funding agreements require the City to seek reimbursement from non- contributing developers prior to the issuance of building permits to the non-contributing developer. Development of the Annexation Area will benefit from construction of the Interchange Improvements. 13. Tassajara Road is currently two lanes, but the City plans to expand Tassajara Road to six lanes. In order to accommodate the Tassajara Road expansion through the Moller Ranch Property and the Vargas Property and to support the traffic that will be added to Tassajara Road by the development of the Moller Property, De Silva will be required to build a six lane bridge over Moller Drainage. 14. The proposed residential and trail system within the Moller Ranch development creates a security responsibility that cannot currently be met by Dublin Police Services. There are over six miles of trails planned for Moller Ranch. Many areas of the Moller property open spaces may be deemed to be sensitive environmentally or remain private and not open to the public. Dublin Police Services currently does not possess any vehicles that would assist officers in responding to incidents within this 226.3 acre development, which includes an expansive 173 acres of open space. The protection of the residents of the Moller Ranch development while they are walking the trail system and protecting the open space areas from trespass or vandalism is the mission goal of the Dublin Police. These issues can be successfully mitigated by the Developer purchasing and donating two off-road motorcycles to the Dublin Police Services. These motorcycles will be used to patrol the trail system and open space of the Moller Ranch development. AGREEMENT NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and conditions contained herein, the Parties agree as follows: Section I. General Fund Shortfalls A. The Developer's Payment Obligations; Definitions. De Silva and Sun Valley shall pay the City, respectively, 7.24% and 0.14% of the deficit, if any, Moller Ranch/Vargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 3 of 11 May 1, 2007 between Public Service Costs and General Revenues. "Public Service Costs" shall mean the general fund cost of providing public services to the Eastern Dublin Area at a level consistent with public services provided within the incorporated area of the City prior to the annexation. "General Revenues" shall mean those revenues deposited to the City's general fund from property and inhabitants within the Eastern Dublin Area. "Eastern Dublin Area" shall include all lands within the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment area (see map attached as Exhibit C) that are within the City limits of Dublin. B. Duration of Payment Obligations. The Developers' payment obligation under this Section I shall begin when a deficit exists and shall terminate when there is no longer a deficit but in no event shall the obligation extend beyond June 30, 2010 ("Deficit Period"). De Silva and San Valley's payment obligations may be terminated only by detachment of, respectively, the Moller Ranch Property and the Vargas Property from the City or by separate agreement approved by the City. C. Annual Fiscal Analyses. The City shall prepare a fiscal analysis each year during the Deficit Period to estimate the amount by which the Public Service Costs will exceed General Revenues. The fiscal analysis will be prepared on a fiscal year basis (July 1 to June 30) and will calculate the deficit for the preceding fiscal year. D. Payments to the City. No later than October 1 of each year during the Deficit Period, De Silva and Sun Valley shall pay to City 7.24% and 0.14%, respectively, of the deficit between Public Services Costs and General Revenues for the preceding fiscal year, based on the fiscal analysis, plus 7.24% and 0.14%, respectively, of the cost of the fiscal analysis described in Section I.C. E. Security for Payment. At such time as requested by the City Manager, De Silva and Sun Valley will provide the City with security in an amount and form satisfactory to the City Manager, to become effective once the Annexation Area becomes part of the City, to secure the payments to the City described in Section I.D above. The security may consist of a letter of credit or similar instrument. De Silva and Sun Valley agree that the City shall be under no obligation to continue processing any land use entitlement applications or other development permits for De Silva and Sun Valley if security has not been provided when requested by the City Manager. F. Reimbursement from Non-Contributing Tipper Property Owners. The City shall consider fair and appropriate ways of reimbursing De Silva and Sun Valley some of the amounts De Silva and Sun Valley may be required to pay under this Section I from the owner of the Tipper Property, this being the only other property included in the Annexation Area that is not controlled by either De Silva or Sun Valley. To the extent permitted by law, the City shall require owners of the Tipper Property that seek City approval of development entitlements for such property to pay a fair and proportionate share of the amounts that Developer is required to pay pursuant to this Section I. Moller Ranch/Vargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 4 of 11 May 1, 2007 Section II. Payment to City for Tassaiara InterchanQe Improvements A. Advance of Monies by Developer. De Silva agrees not to oppose the City's imposition of conditions on future land-use approvals that would require De Silva to advance, prior to approval of the first final subdivision map to create individual lots in the Moller Ranch Property, the sum of $111,141 for the Tassajara Interchange Improvements. Sun Valley agrees not to oppose the City's imposition of conditions on future land-use approvals that would require Sun Valley to advance, prior to approval of the first final subdivision map to create individual lots on the Vargas Property, the sum of $12,308 for the Tassajara Interchange Improvements. The advances are required by agreements with other Eastern Dublin developers that have advanced monies for the construction of the Tassajara Interchange Improvements. The amount of the contribution was calculated based on each project's proportionate share of estimated vehicle trips. B. Use of Monies by City. City will use the monies paid by Developers pursuant to Section II of this Agreement to fund obligations in the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Section I category. If there remains an obligation to reimburse the original parties who financed the Interchange Improvements, the City will make such reimbursements prior to funding any other Section I category obligations. C. Credit Against TIF. City will provide a credit to Developers in the amount of Developers' payment of monies under this Section to be used by Developer against payment of the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee ("TIF"). The TIF has different categories of improvements, and credits granted pursuant to the TIF program are granted based on the category of the improvements for which the credit was granted. In accordance with the City's TIF Guidelines (Resol. 20-07), establishment of the credit shall require the payment of an administrative fee. The use of credits (including limitations on the use of credits) and manner of conversion of the credit to a right of reimbursement will be as set forth in the City's TIF Guidelines, subject to the following provisions: (a) the credit shall be granted at the time Developer makes payments of money pursuant to this agreement; and (b) the Tassajara Interchange Improvements credit may be used only to satisfy Section 1 TIF obligations. Section III. BridQe Over DrainaQe on Tassaiara Road Tassajara Road is currently two lanes, but as part of the Tassajara Interchange Improvements, Tassajara Road will be expanded to six lanes. In order to accommodate the Tassajara Road expansion through the Moller Ranch Property, De Silva agrees not to oppose the City's imposition of conditions on future land-use approvals that would require it to build and bear all costs associated with design, construction, right-of-way acquisition, and permitting of a six lane bridge (includ}ng stabilization and restoration of Moller Ranch and any habitat mitigation work required as part of the above) over Moller Drainage on Tassajara Road to be dedicated to City. Developer shall be entitled to credits under the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee (EDTIF) program to the extent that the cost of the above work is included in the EDTIF. In accordance with the City's TIF Moller Ranch/Vargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 5 of 11 May 1, 2007 Guidelines, establishment of the credit shall require the payment of an administrative fee to establish the credit. The use of credits (including limitations on the use of credits) and manner of conversion of the credit to a right of reimbursement will be as set forth in the City's TIF Guidelines, Section IV. Payment to City for Fallon InterchanQe Improvements A. Advance of Monies by Developers. De Silva agrees not to oppose the City's imposition of conditions on future land-use approvals that would require De Silva to advance, prior to approval of the first final subdivision map to create individual lots in the Moller Ranch Property, to advance monies towards the cost of the Fallon Interchange Improvements. Sun Valley agrees not to oppose the City's imposition of conditions on future land-use approvals that would require Sun Valley to advance, prior to approval of the first final subdivision map to create individual lots in the Vargas Property, to advance monies towards the cost of the Fallon Interchange Improvements. The amount of the contribution was calculated based on each project's proportionate share of estimated vehicle trips. Pursuant to that certain Agreement between the City of Dublin and the Un Family Regarding Funding for Construction of the Fallon Road/l-580 Interchange, dated May 1, 2001 and as subsequently amended ("the 1-580 Construction Agreement"), the City is obligated to seek reimbursement from newly annexed properties to contribute towards funding the improvements and/ or reimbursement to the Developer that advanced the funding. Accordingly, De Silva and Sun Valley shall contribute to the City, respectively, 1.2160% and 0.1347% of the monies advanced by the Un Family pursuant to the 1-580 Construction Agreement. The City may request payment from either Developer no earlier than the recordation of a final map that creates individual residential lots. As the advances by the Un Family may be made in one or more increments, the obligations will not be satisfied until such time as the Un Family has satisfied its obligations under the 1-580 Construction Agreement. Thus, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in herein, the City's requests for payments at recordation of final maps under this subsection may be requests to satisfy only a portion of a Developer's obligation, and the City may later request that the remainder (or portion of the remainder) of the Developer's obligation to advance monies set forth in this paragraph be satisfied. Accordingly, Developers agree to advance the remainder (or portion of the remainder) of its obligation upon request by the City. For. example, if the Un Family has contributed $10,000,000 towards the construction of the Fallon Road interchange but they have not discharged their entire obligation under the 1-580 Construction Agreement, De Silva, upon filing any final map creating residential lots will be obligated (a) to contribute $121,600 (1.2160% of $10,000,000) and (b) upon the later request of the City, to contribute 1.2160% of such other amounts as the Uns later contribute pursuant to the 1-580 Construction Agreement. Moller Ranch/Vargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 6 of 11 May 1, 2007 In the event that the Fallon Interchange Improvements are complete at the time of filing a final map creating residential lots, the payment shall be based upon actual project costs. B. Use of Monies by City. City will use the monies paid by Developers pursuant to Section IV of this Agreement to fulfill obligations under the Eastern Dublin Traffic tmpact Fee Section II category. If there remains an obligation to reimburse the original parties who financed the Interchange Improvements, the City will make such reimbursements prior to funding any other Section I category obligations. C. Credit Against TIF. City will provide a credit to Developers in the amount of each Developer's payment of monies under this Section, to be used by Developer against payment of the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee ('TIF"). The TIF has different categories of improvements, and credits granted pursuant to the TIF program are granted based on the category of the improvements for which the credit was granted. In accordance with the City's TIF Guidelines, establishment of the credit shall require the payment of an administrative fee to establish the credit. The use of credits (including limitations on the use of credits) and manner of conversion of the credit to a right of reimbursement will be as set forth in the City's TIF Guidelines, subject to the following provision: (a) the credit shall be granted at the time Developer makes payments of money pursuant to this agreement; and (b) the Fallon Interchange Improvements credit may be used only to satisfy Section II TIF obligations. Section V. Payment of Funds for Construction of Eastern Dublin Fire Station A. Reimbursement for Construction of Eastern Dublin Fire Station. De Silva and Sun Valley agree not to oppose a requirement on future land-use approvals that would require each to advance, as reimbursement for funds advanced by others to the Fire Impact Fee program to assure the availability of fire stations and equipment necessary to timely serve development in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area, the respective sums of $461 ,808 and $8,930. The City shall require payment no earlier than the first final subdivision map to create individual lots on, respectively, the Moller Ranch Property or the Vargas Property, or, if no subdivision map is required to facilitate the development of a particular property, prior to approval of Stage 2 Development Plans. The amounts of these advances are based on the total amount advanced to the Fire Facilities Fee Program by DR Acquisitions, L.L.C. and the City General Fund that still remain outstanding as of April 2007, multiplied by the percentage of acreage that the Moller Ranch Property (7.24%) and the Vargas Property (0.14%) bear to the total acreage of the Eastern Dublin area. The total amount advanced was $8,138,163 (consisting of $5,996,345 advanced by DR Acquisition and $2,141,818 advanced by the City General Fund). The calculated amount of the advances outstanding as of April 2007 is $6,378,564 (consisting of $4,574,381 advanced by DR Acquisitions and $1,804,183 advanced by the City General Moller Ranch/Vargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 7 of 11 May 1, 2007 Fund). This outstanding amount is lower than the total advance because it excludes credits transferred by DR Acquisitions, L.L.C. to other entities and because the City General Fund loan has been repaid as Fire Facilities Fees have been collected. B. Use of Monies by City. Funds collected under this section shall be used to reimburse DR Acquisitions, L.L.C. for its advance of costs to construct and equip the new Eastern Dublin fire station (Fire Station 18), as well as borrowing from the City General Fund in order to complete Station 17. City to shall allocate the funds between City and DR Acquisitions based upon the proportion outstanding at the time the payment is made. (i.e. amount owed to the general fund compared to the amount still held as a credit by DR Acquisition). C. Credit Against Fire Impact Fee. City will provide a credit to each Developer in the amount of each Developer's advance of monies under this Section. Developer shall be responsible for the payment of an Administrative Fee to establish the credit. The credit may be used by each Developer against payment of Fire Facilities Fee on this property or any property where Developer has an interest in the City of Dublin. The amount of the credit, once established, shall not be increased for inflation and shall not accrue interest. The credits with written notice to City, and payment of an Administrative Fee, may be transferred by Developer to another developer of land in Dublin. If Developer has not been able to use the credits within ten years of the date the advance is made, the remaining credits will convert to a right of reimbursement and shall terminate after 10 years. Any reimbursement shall be from Fire Facilities Fees only, if available. Other aspects of the credit and right of reimbursement shall be consistent with the City's Traffic Impact Fee Guidelines. Section VI. Purchase and Donation of Two Police Motorcycles De Silva agrees not to oppose conditions of approval on future discretionary land use approvals that would require it to contribute funds to the City to allow the City to purchase two new off-road motorcycles of the type used by Dublin Police Services. Section VII. Payment of Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Preparation Fees By Resolution Number 115-94 (lithe Fee Resolution"), the City established a fee for the purpose of defraying the City's costs associated with preparing the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The Tipper Property and the Vargas Property are subject to the fee, and the Moller Property, which is outside of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area, is not subject to the fee. Accordingly, notwithstanding the time for payment set forth in the Fee Resolution, Sun Valley, concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, has paid to the City the sum of $1 ,801 in satisfaction of the Vargas Property's obligations under the Fee Resolution, and De Silva and Sun Valley, concurrently with their execution of this Agreement, have paid to the City the respective sums of $4,503 and $85 in satisfaction of the Tipper Property's obligations under the Fee Resolutions. Moller Ranch/Vargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 8 of 11 May 1, 2007 Section VII. Payment of Development Impact Fees Notwithstanding any vested rights Developer may later obtain, Developer hereby agrees to pay all lawfully enacted development impact fees that are in effect at the time building permits are issued, or at such subsequent time that the fees are otherwise due, for each individual structure within the Project. Section VIII. Approval of Annexation This Agreement shall take effect when the City adopts a resolution of application to annex the Annexation Area, with or without conditions or, if the Developer files a petition to annex, upon annexation. Upon adoption of such resolution, the City shall take reasonable steps to facilitate annexation of the Annexation Area in a timely manner. This Agreement shall become ineffective, however, if the annexation is disapproved by LAFCO or the voters or does not become effective for any other reason. Section IX. Additional Provisions A. Correctness of the Recitals. The Recitals set forth in this Agreement are true and correct and are a part hereof. B. Further Assurances. The Parties shall execute, acknowledge, and deliver such additional documents or instruments as may be necessary to carry out the intent of this Agreement, including but not limited to, those expressly referred to in this Agreement. C. Construction by California Law. This Agreement is entered into in the State of California and shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with its laws. D. Representation of Comprehension of Document. In entering into this Agreement, the Parties represent that they have relied upon the legal advice of their attorneys who are the attorneys of their choice. The Parties further represent that the terms of this Agreement have been completely read by and explained to them by their attorneys, and that they fully understand and voluntarily accept those terms. E. Authorship. Each Party and counsel for each Party has reviewed and revised this Agreement, and accordingly, the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement or any amendment of it. F. Authority to Execute. Each of the persons executing this agreement on behalf of a legal entity represents and warrants that each has full power to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the entity and that the Agreement is binding on the entity. Moller Ranch/Vargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 9 of 11 May 1,2007 G. Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Parties with regard to the matters set forth. There are no additional written or oral agreements or promises between the Parties concerning these matters which are not expressly set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by an agreement in writing executed in the same manner as this Agreement. H. Attorneys' Fees. In the event a Party to this Agreement is found in a court of law to have breached this Agreement, said Party shall pay the opposing Party's reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred in litigating the breach of contract action. I. Approval of Project. By entering into this Agreement, City makes no commitment that it will approve the Project. J. Notices. All notices shall be by certified mail or hand delivered to the Parties as follows: To the City: City Manager City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 To De Silva: The De Silva Group 11555 Dublin Blvd. Dublin, CA 94568 Attn: James B. Summers To Sun Valley: Sun Valley Land Development Co. 4471 Stoneridge Dr., Suite B Pleasanton, CA 94588 Attn: Fred Musser K. Recordation. This Agreement shall be recorded against the Property described in Exhibit A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] Moller Ranch/Vargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 10 of 11 May 1, 2007 CITY OF DUBLIN Approved as to form: C.--- fe-r EI' c- ---- Attest: DEVELOPERS: THE DE SILVA GROUP, L.L.C. ~.lIc~~k By: C::RN~<;I CJ. lAM It/IV Its: fV)AN4\~€@... SUN VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CO., L.L.C. ~~ "'..- . /"". -,~..---'-'- /' ./ . - ~. ~A"/J~~ ,- ~ - · Ery: Fest'::! J. J1A O$573R Its:~ '~:Af~~y~_ Ca.("oll~e p. 50 tv I Oepv+'j C l~ C/et" k [NOTARIZATIONS ATTACHED] Moller Ranch/Vargas Pre-Annexation Agreement CLEAN Moller Ranch_Vargas Preannexation Agreement_042307 Page 11 of 11 May 1, 2007 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ,},:>~viti<'viti<'~viti<'~~~~~&~~~;G<>i5't!~~<;>~~~vC<:'~,.(X~~~,if5;"~~,C{'~.6<'~~~.4&'~ State of California personally appeared } ss Ca.VO\\V\C- p. ~.tz., Nota.v Name and lltle of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe. Notary Pu i ') ~.//v,et LocJLkltv' t Name(s) 01 Signer(s) me, 'Jk>l~G, County of A ~vt e.d C'-',- (\,~ 7 ! 2007 before Date On J....----------- CMOUNE P. SOJO -@ COrnmINion" 1691321 J i ~ Notary PublIc . Callfomla f J Alameda County - - - - ~~.:.~~~~~ ~erSOnallY known to me D proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capadty(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Place Notary Seai Above WITNE_S"S mY,hZ' and ~ idal seal. (.C I / ~.. . ., "";' ~1/vl7 / ~" cr Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: o Individual o Corporate Officer - Title(s): o Partner - 0 Limited 0 General o Attorney in Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other: Top of thumb here Signer's Name: o Individual o Corporate Officer - Title(s): o Partner - 0 Limited 0 General o Attorney in Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other: RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER Top of thumb here Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: ~C1~"'(;~~~}'fi}~~;:'CV~~~(S~V~S-~V~<~(~f.:;;~~>9:?:.~7~~~~~Z':.Y0j~'.~~~~~'Q;;b:Q;~'<f0~~;:;ix>Q!:;;-'Q(,;.~~if~->~~~>t;'<);{~Yvv~>,~~r @ 2004 National Notary Association. 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 . Chatsworth, CA 91313-2402 Item No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toli.Free 1-800-876-6827 ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of Californ.i~. ^ _I County of /+-Ia~~ On 4- ;;J4- 7 before me, hf'l~-hV\'" I (here inse personally appeared .r:-r..e..4 mL1..5S-e1 personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person~s) whose name~~~subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me tha~hefthey executed the same in ~/heFlthetr authorized capacitypesr.- and that b~J1cr/thcir signatureJ.s10n the instrument the person,(st;- or the entity upon behalf of which the person{s) acted, executed the instrument. j WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature/~-f) W~ . ~A.fIOOCiJIRI CommIIIIDIt (J 1_118 NaIaIy PubIc . CGIIfDna CoMa COlla Cot.IItv MrColNft. ..... "" 2. (Seal) CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT .~ State of California County of 4lvt Vi\.Lc--fC.{ 4-),4 - 7 personally appeared }ss before me, (i,NS.{vv:;. QoJtq.t(-~1 .40~f'~ ()u 1o) j ~ Name and Title of Off1cl;r (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary P bile") EC~l..f b-J 4~ vY\.eJ[\.v,\ Name(s) 'of Signer(s) On Date J.- ==:::( J ~ NabV I\tlIc . CaIIomIa j j ConIIa COlla Ccudv - _ _ _ ~~.:~~2:~f D personally known to me ~ed to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persol1W-Whose name(51::ls1are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that (fi~hcJthey executed the same in d1iSlhor!thoir authorized capacity(i.esr, and that by <1liS/flefIthetr signature(,s1on the instrument the person(sy, or the entity upon behalf of which the persol}(s1 acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. /7 ~ / 1 \7'..- t r ,4r ( \/.,;,,,.'t/A OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Place Notary Seal Above Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: D Individual D Corporate Officer - Title(s): D Partner - D Limited D General D Attorney in Fact D Trustee D Guardian or Conservator D Other: Top of thumb here Signer's Name: D Individual D Corporate Officer - Title(s): D Partner - D Limited D General D Attorney in Fact D Trustee D Guardian or Conservator D Other: RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER Top of thumb here Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: ~~~~~~'@?'~~~ @2004 National Notary Association' 9350 De Solo Ave., P.O. Box 2402' Chatsworth, CA 91313-2402 Item No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6827 EXHIBIT A Moller Ranch and Vargas Property Description Date: March 1, 2007 CASAMIRA VALLEY REORGANIZA TION P A- ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICE DISTRICT DETACHMENT FROM THE ALAMEDA COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT AND THE ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT Parcels located in Alameda County, California All that certain real property situate in a pOltion of Rancho San Ramon and portions of Sections 21 and 22, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, being: 1. the Parcel described in deed to "Jose L. and Violeta, Vargas.", recorded October 6, 1987, Series Number 87-274300 2. the Parcel described in deed to "James G. Tipper and Sue Tipper", recorded January 24, 1996 in Series 96016417 3. the Parcel described in deed to "Richey ET AL", recorded ???????? in Series ?????????? Official Records of Alameda County, described as follows: Beginning at the northwestern corner of the Fallon Crossing Reorganization, PA-04-016 Annexation to the City of Dublin and the Dublin San Ramon Services District by LAFCO Resolution No. 2006-47 on September 14, 2006 and filed ?????, 2006 in Book ??? at Page ??, Series No. 2006??????, Official Records of Alameda County, said point being on the eastern line of the Dublin Ranch Reorganization, PA-02-028 Annexation to the City of Dublin and Dublin San Ramon Services District by LAFCO Resolution No. 2005- 03 on May 12,2005 and filed October 19, 2005 in Book 287 at Page 2, Series No. 2005451459, Official Records of Alameda County; Thence along said eastern line the following five (5) courses: 1. North 08036'01" East, 347.50 feet 2. North 14019'59" West, 533.39 feet 3. North 89055'51" West, 519.08 feet 4. NOlth 72049'31" West, 407.83 feet 5. North 25018'33" West, 381.25 feet to the Alameda-Contra Costa County line, Said point being the nOlthwest comer of said Tipper parcel (96016417); Thence along last said line and northwestern line of said Tipper parcel, NOlth 73046'43" East, 973.56 feet to the center of Tassajara Road; thence continuing along said County line and continuing along the nOlthwestem line of said Richey parcel the following three (3) courses: 1. North 73050'29" East, 1344.68 feet; 2. North 73051'13" East, 594.30 feet 3. North 73051 '45" East, 4164.61 feet Page 1 00 Exhibit A Date: March 1,2007 CASAMlRA V ALLEY REORGANIZATION PA- ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND. THE DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICE DISTRICT DETACHMENT FROM THE ALAMEDA COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT AND THE ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT to the northeast corner of said Richey parcel; Thence along the eastern line of said Richey parcel, South 01007' 46" West, 2501.72 feet to the southeastern corner of said Richey parcel; Thence along the southern line of said Richey parcel and the southern line of said Section 22, North 89020' 49" West, 2610.32 feet to the section corner of Sections 21, 22, 27 and 28, Township 2 NOlth, Range 1 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian; thence along the southern line of said Section 21 and northern line of said annexation (Fallon Crossing Reorganization, P A -04-016) the following eight (8) courses: 1. N0l1h 89020'13"West, 1866.04 feet 2. South 31001 '01" West, 953.44 feet 3. South 33023'01" West, 92.57 feet 4. North 13002'00" West, 164.60 feet 5. South 77004'31" West, 66.00 feet 6. South 88036'36" West, 30.34 feet 7. South 76057'41" West, 168.97 feet 8. South 78028'16" West, 287.73 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing: 244.12 Acres:!: Prepared by: Ruggeri ~ Jensen - Azar & Associates Charles F. Sellman, Licensed Professional Land Surveyor No. 5186, License Expires: 06-30-07 Date Page 2 of3 Date: March 1, 2007 CASAMIRA V ALLEY REORGANIZATION PA- ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICE DISTRICT DET ACHMENT FROM THE ALAMEDA COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT AND THE ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT References to the existing boundaries of the City of Dublin and the Dublin San Ramon Services District are primary calls. Any bearings or distances refel1'ed to herein should be only considered secondary. Boundary line of territory is shown on Exhibit "A" Casamira Valley Reorganization, P A- 04-016 Annexation to the City of Dublin and Dublin San Ramon Services District approved by LAFCO Resolution No. on the _ day of _, 2006. Said map was certified by the County Surveyor on the _ day of , 2006. This description conforms to the requirements of the Alameda County Local Agency Fonnation Commission. Daniel Woldesenbet, Ph.D., P.E., Director of Public Works County of Alameda By: Russell Reid Penland, Jr., County Surveyor L. S. #5726, Expires 12/31/05 Page 3 of3 G:\Admin\Jobs-02\021066\anncxation\CASAMIRA V ALLEY Annexation.doc Project: 021066 Parcel Map Check Parcel name: BNDRY-ANNEX North: 452887.8613 Line Course: N 08-36-01 E North: 453231.4539 Line Course: N 14-19-59 W North: 453748.2411 Line Course: N 89-55-51 W North: 453748.8678 Line Course: N 72-49-31 W North: 453869.2945 Line Course: N 25-18-33 W North: 454213.9499 Line Course: N 73-46-43 E North: 454485.9135 Line Course: N 73-50-29 E North: 454860.1343 Line Course: N 73-51-13 E North: 455025.4047 Line Course: N 73-51-45 E North: 456182.9306 Line Course: S 01-07-46 W North: 453681.6967 Line Course: N 89-20-49 W North: 453711.4484 Line Course: N 89-20-13 W North: 453733.0426 Line Course: S 31-01-01 W North: 452915.9303 Line Course: S 33-23-01 W North: 452838.6339 Line Course: N 13-02-00 W North: 452998.9936 Line Course: S 77-04-31 W North: 452984.2314 Line Course: S 88-36-36 W North: 452983.4954 Line Course: S 76-57-41 W North: 452945.3745 Line Course: S 78-28-16 W North: 452887.8682 Perimeter: 18007.93 Mapcheck Closure - (Uses Error Closure: 0.0137 Error North: 0.00682 precision 1: 1,314,447.45 page 1 Moller PropertyjCassamira Valley Thu March 01 11:42:13 2007 East: 604176.1952 Length: 347.50 East: 604228.1604 Length: 533.39 East: 604096.1155 Length: 519.08 East: 603577.0359 Length: 407.83 East: 603187.3915 Length: 381.25 East: 603024.4062 Length: 973.56 East : 603959.2082 Length: 1344.68 East: 605250.7666 Length: 594.30 East: 605821.6240 Length: 4164.61 East: 609822.1378 Length: 2501.72 East: 609772.8258 Length: 2610.32 East: 607162.6753 Length: 1866.04 East: 605296.7603 Length: 953.44 East 604805.4607 Length: 92.57 East 604754.5248 Length: 164.60 East 604717.4046 Length: 66.00 East 604653.0767 Length: 30.34 East 604622.7456 Length: 168.97 East: 604458.1319 Length: 287.73 East 604176.2072 Area: 10,633,760 sq. ft. 244.12 acres listed courses, radii, and deltas) Course: N 60-12-54 E East: 0.01192 EXHIBIT B Map of Annexation Area LEGEND (tJlfl,l.C051~~Tf c MJIlEP~ ~ 7HIS MAP CONFORMS TO THE REQUfREMENTS OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMA TlON COMMISSION OF AlAMEDA COUNTY. DANIEL 'MJUJESENBET, PH.D., P.E.. DIRECTOR OF PUBUC KfJRKS P.O.B. POINT Of BEGINNING _ _ _ _ EXISTING CITY BOUNDARY UNE _ _ _ _ _ _ BOUNDARY UNE Of ANNEXATION PARCEL UNE BY: DATE: RUSSELL REJD PENLAND, JR., COUNTY SURVEYOR L.s. 5726 EXPIRES 12/J1/07 ! ~ THIS MAP, KflEN FlLED. WAS ACCOMPANIED BY A CERTlACA 7F OF COMPLETION AND CERT1FltD COPY OF THE BOUNDARY OE:SCRIPTlON DEliNEATED HEREON, AS REQfJlRED BY SECTlON 57203 OF THE GO~RNMENT CODE. BY: CR}S'TAL HfSHIOA GRAFF; LAFCo EXfCUTlVf OFFlCER DATE: l::lQID;. THE ALAMEDA COUNTY UBRARY WAS ESTABliSHED SEPTEMBER, 1910 UNDER CONTRACT WITH THE OAKLAND FREE UBRARY. ON JULY ,. 1918 THE BOARD OF SUPfRlI/SORS VD7fD TO TAKE O~ THE COUNTY liBRARY DEPARTMENT OF THE OAKLAND FREE UBRARY MAKING IT THE ALAMEDA COUNTY FREE UBRARY UNDER THEIR DIRECT CONTROL EFFtC11VE AUGUST 1. 1918. IT IS KNOKN raJA Y AS THE ALAMEDA COUNTY UBRARY. THE ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT WAS CREA TED BY THE t?EORGANIZA T10N OF ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE SERlACES BY LAFCo RESOLUTION ND.9J-D4 ON APRIL 15, Igg~ THE CERnACATE OF COMPLE7fON WAS RECORDED JJNE II, 1993 IN SERIES NO.93-20749J. omC/AL RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY. h " THIS MAP F7l.ED A r THE REOUEST OF THE CITY OF DOBUN AND THE OUBUN SAN RAMON S8?lACES DISTRICT AT _ MINUTES PAST _AI. ON THE _ DAY OF _----' 2007 IN 800K _ OF MAPS, AT PAGE ______ SERIES NO. IN THE omCE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ALAMEfJA COUNTY. CAUFORNIA. THE CERnFlCA TE OF COMPlETlON AND BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION ARE RECORDED IN SERIES NO. OF OFF1C/AL RECORDS. IN THE OfflCC OF THE RECORDER ALAMEDA COUNTY. CAUFORNlA PI. TRICK J. O'CONNEl.1 COUNTY RECORDER APN 205-060-005-1 CONTRA COSTA coUNTY VICINITY MAP HOT 10 SCAlE BY: DEPUTY COUNTY RECORDER BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARING OF "'31'01'01-[ AS SHOWN ON TH[ NORTH WESTERN UNE OF FALLON CROSSlNC REORCANlZATlON, PA-04-016 ANNEXA TlON ro THE CITY or WBUN AND DUBliN SAN RAMON SERVICE DlsmlCT, FILED IN BOOK _ OF MAPS A r PAGE ____ RECORDS or ALAMEDA COUNTY, CAUFORNfA. APN 205-060-004-4 cONTRA COSTA COUNTY --,--' --' ~~J'~'E .-'- --,--' --' ~~~1'~E ~-? 594-. ~13......68 RICHEY/HUNT A TOTAL ANNEXATION = 44.12:t: AC ~I ~,~ ~I~ ~i~ "I BASIS OF BEARlNG$- I - N89'20'fJ.W T. 2. S R. l. E. M. . M. 21 22 1866',1 I =T~~~~H~~~~~~~uJt:~~~6 I DUBUN SolIN RAMON SERVICES Dl9TRlCT BY lAYCO I RESOLUTION NO. 2006 ON sEn!:MBER 14. 2006 AND rILED _, 2006 IN BOOK _ or M<\PS AT PA<;E _ ( I RECORDS Of AlAMEDA COUNTY, CAJ.JfORNIA ~---~_..- ,: ,/ ',-.,.~, . . ....-......,., .'......--// r ~ ~ f:clf H~ ll:Il HO 1-3 ll:I \ \ \ \\ ) ( "-- TAsSAJARA REAiJGNMENT "II ~~~~a: ::6r:, 67, A.C.R. ,: ! ~~R~~~ D=J~EB:~~gO SAN RAMON '., o~~o~~~:ft' RESOLUTION No. 200S-oS 01'1 MAY 12, '____ 2006, AND TIll'D OCTOBER 19. 200S Y'~-' BOOK 287 Dr MAPS AT PAGE 2. . 12oo5451459l, RECORDS O( AlAMEDA " j- COUNTY, CAUrORN16. ' r~1 I .-'- ---.- .---- -~ ~ ,~~-4164-61 051'" CO~ ~ cotttw>> ~ ~\l\'it1 ~ .- .- -;'v>>toi' ~ N89'20'49"W 26'0,31' UN 99-445131 12-15-1999 APN, 985-0028-003-02 llilIES;. 1. THE METHOD USED TO CALCULA TE THIS AREA WAS BY 17\'A 1ffiSE: 2. RUCRENCES TO EXISTING GIrt BOUNDARIES ARE PRIMARY CALLS. ANY BEARfNGS AND DISTANCES SHOIIII HEREON SHOULD BE CONSIDERED SF:CONDAR~ J. AS A DRAFTING CONVENTION, THE SMALL SEPARA 710NS BETWEEN THE POR71ONS OF THE UNEWORK AROUND THE: BOUNDARY OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXA nDN IH'7/E PRDI1DED ro ALLOW IoIUL nPLE DESCR/pnONS ro BE PLACED ON HIlA T IItJULQ OTHERIIISC BE A SINGlE UNE. THESE liNES ARE TO BE CONSlQffiED COINClDENr EXCEPr WHERE NOTED. 4, THOSE PORTlON WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF TH/S MAP OF THE Al..A.AIEDA COUNTY UBRARY DlSTRlcr AND ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE O/STRlCT mLL BE DETACHED. THE BOUNDARIES OF THOSE DISTRICTS ARE AU. mE UMNCORPORA TED AREAS IN ALAMEDA COUNTY. 1"1 ~I ~I EXHIBIT "A" CASAMIRA VALLEY REORGANIZATION, PA-03-060 ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF DUBIlN AND THE DUBIlN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT DETACHMENT FROM THE ALAMEDA COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT AND THE ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT BY LAFCO RESOLUTION NO, _____ ON ______ RlCHEY I HUNTER ApN 985-000 1-00 I ! T ACA~ pARTNERS Jl UC 2005037868 APN, 985-0028-001 o 400 1..1'"'-- 800 , 1200 I 1 inch _ 400 It RUGGERI-JENSEN- AZAR & ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERS, PlANNERS, SURVEYORS 4690 CHABOT DRIVE, SUITE 200 - PLEASANTON, CA. S458e MARCH 2007 J"OB NO. 021066 SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET <: I~ I~ 8 ~ I ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ! 22 23 27 26 EXHIBIT C Map of Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment Area Revisions: PA O'~40 \, FlIllonVlIa;edeslgrlllllonmodlfled. Croak. F8IIDn EnterprlseslInd BraddDck& Loll'" prllpeltieos add8d tD Spec:1fIc Plan, Dwlin Transit Center add,d 10 Specific: Plan, Realignment of Dublin Blvd. al Falfan Rd, ~l-I"'{ CO C;"~7\l"'{ C .~:...-- C 0 R"....--- " l'I" ~.,.... ~ c. 0 -~" j/ D / I Parks Reserve Foy~es Training Area (earn? Parks) U.S. Department of Justice ~~i;!;tJ H ~ () "'I~ ~ ~ East Dublin Spedflc Plan F9 ~~":f::::nRFTA E:J Cltyof Dubfln. Sphere oflntluenc:e Specific Plan LU PubllclSeml-PublJc _B~ RlIlIlonalPalk @I,m Palrbl Pub6c: R,c:r8ltllln RIIIOpllnSpace I!mIB Public/Semt-Pubtlc; Pl _Semi-Public: Resldenthd RurllIRe$ldenIillIlAgrlc:ulturll{O.01 dulac:) Single Famly (O.g.S.O dulac:) ~~dlumOllnslty(6.1-14.0dul'c:) _t.t.cl-HIOlln&lly{14,1oZ5.0dufac:) _HighDlInslly(25.0+dUlac) Commen:lalllndustrial _ Gen'l'illICommercllll _ Geolll'illICarnmerciaVCampl./S omC:1I RIII.v /giH1:% NelghltolhDlId CDrnmerdlll CampusOI!lc:e ~lrnfuslt,",lP.tk c~ Community Park ~ Neighborhood Square ~ Neighborhood Park ~ Regional Park ~ Elementary School ~ Middle School ~ High School . ~~~~a~~=;:~~~:.p~:::::: by II (ue text far cO""ltile dIKua.lon) The IaClllian oflhll Semlopublic:atll on !he Clolk. Joldan, lIind Chen pl'llpllrtleli lIf FII80nVlhgll w11 be d&lermln.datth.t1mlloIPD-2approvll ~ May 2007 NOTE; The intetnallyslem of b~ldr.lItllha'.Wl'"tl1lsllgul'8 is illustrlllive only, 500 1.000 3,000 Feet 2.000 o O.O!ll.l 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Miles