HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.2 Landscape & Light AD 83-2
CITY CLERK
File # D~~[Q]-[2J[Q]
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 17,2007
SUBJECT:
ATTACHMENTS:
RECOMMENDATION: A.d 1)
lift' 2)
~/ ~3)
S8 4)
d 5)
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
Public Hearing: Landscaping and Lighting District No. 83-2 C~. .
(Tract 4719 - Stagecoach Road)
Report Prepared by: Erin Lamberger, Administrative Analyst I
1)
Resolution approving Engineer's Report, confirming diagram
and assessment, and ordering levy of assessment
Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram
Informational Newsletter
Letter to Residents
2)
3)
4)
Open public hearing
Receive Staff Report
Receive public comment
Close public hearing and deliberate
Adopt the resolution approving the Engineer's Report,
confirming the diagram and assessment, and ordering levy of
assessment
2007-2008 Sources and Use of Maintenance Assessment District Funds
Revenues:
Total Amount Proposed to Be Assessed:
Estimated Interest Revenue:
Estimated Prior Year Collections and Penalties
Less Estimated Collection and Delinquency Cost:
Net Total Revenues
$66,755
1,403
450
0,135)
$67,473
Expenditures:
Contract Maintenance and Utilities:
Administration and Engineering:
Total Operating Expenses:
COPY TO:
$77,167
2,600
$79,767
Page 10f3
ITEMNO.~
O:\ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS\83-2 Stagecoach\FY07-08\Public Hearing\83-2StaffRptHrg 2007.doc
fY
The calculations include a proposed consumer price index increase
of approximately 3.0% over the 2006-2007 assessment. Please see
Description below regarding the source and reasons for the
requested increase. Based on the above, $12,294 of the reserve will
be used to offset the difference between expenses and revenues.
DESCRIPTION: In 1983, the City of Dublin formed Landscaping and Lighting
Assessment District No. 83-2 for the purpose of maintaining landscaping within Tract 4719. The District
originally included Stagecoach Park and Stagecoach Road north of the City Limit, but now includes only
roadway landscaping along Stagecoach Road and on the "interior slopes" (Coral Way and Agate Way)
within the Dublin Hills Estates development. The maintenance cost for Stagecoach Park, as well as the
undeveloped Dougherty Hills Park, is paid by the City through the Park Maintenance Operating Budget
and is not a part of this Assessment District.
The estimated June 30, 2007, reserve for this District is projected to be $48,631. The actual reserve will
not be known until the City closes its books and accrues the necessary revenues and expenses.
The spread of assessments assigns 61.6% of the total assessment to the single-family homes of Dublin
Hills Estates and 38.4% to the Amador Lakes Apartments.
In 2003-2004, Staff conducted a mailed ballot to all of the property owners in this District proposing an
increased assessment in order to maintain and replace certain landscaping improvements. In addition to
the 10% increase in assessment rates the proposed Engineer's Report also included an escalation clause
for succeeding years that allows the maintenance cost to increase according to the Consumer Price Index
and the utility cost to increase according to the actual cost of utilities. The assessment in the District had
not been increased for ten years prior to 2003-2004.
The results of the election were in favor of the increase, and the current proposed Engineer's Report
includes the approved assessment rates and a cost of living increase of 3.0%, which is within the 3.1 %
April 2007 Consumer Price Index. The assessment to single-family property owners in the Dublin Hills
Estates development is proposed to be $274.14 per single-family home, an increase of $8.00 over the
2006-2007 assessment. The Amador Lakes Apartments property is proposed to be assessed at a rate of
$46.36 per dwelling unit, an increase of$1.36 over the 2006-2007 assessment.
This information was previously presented using an earlier version of the district budget; in the previous
version, the cost of living increase was stated as 1.3%, the single family property assessment was stated as
$269.50, and the apartment dwelling unit assessment was stated as $45.56. This information was found in
time to ensure that the accurate information was presented at the July 10, 2007 neighborhood meeting. A
revised notice was published and was mailed to the property owners along with a letter explaining the
error on July 11, 2007.
In 2006-2007, the planter strip along Stagecoach Road between Turquoise Street and South Lake Drive
was replanted, the planting test area on Coral Way was replanted, and a retaining wall was constructed at
the top of a slope where erosion is occurring. Staffhas included approximately $20,906 in improvements
in the Street Tree Maintenance budgets. The proposed work includes replacement of 46 trees and
renovation of additional bedding and ground cover areas. Staff will continue to meet with representatives
Page 2 of3
of the property owners to determine which improvements are most desirable. It is recommended that the
work be accomplished in the fall, when the weather is cooler.
Many improvements are needed in this assessment district, and even though there is an existing reserve or
surplus at this time, Staff recommends that the Consumer Price Index rate of increase be added each year
so that improvements can be made on an ongoing basis. The reserve also serves as a financial cushion to
defray the cost of an unplanned event, such as an irrigation mainline break or weather-related damage to
plant material.
A newsletter (Attachment 3) was mailed to property owners the week of July 2nd, and a neighborhood
meeting was held on July 10th.
Staff recommends that the City Council 1) Open public hearing; 2) Receive Staff Report; 3) Receive
public comment; 4) Close public hearing and deliberate; and 5) Adopt the resolution approving the
Engineer's Report, confirming the diagram and assessment, and ordering levy of assessment.
Page 3 of3
I ~ bV
RESOLUTION NO. -07
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
*******
APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT
AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT
CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT 83-2 (STAGECOACH ROAD)
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 6-07, a Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for
City of Dublin Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 83-2 (the "District"), this
Council designated the City Engineer as Engineer of Work and ordered said Engineer to make and file a
report in writing in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, said report was made and filed with the City Clerk and duly considered by this
Council and found to be sufficient in every particular, whereupon it was determined that said report
should stand as Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to the aforesaid
Resolution and that July 17, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Dublin Civic Center, 100 Civic
Plaza, Dublin, California, was appointed as the time and place for a hearing by the Council on the
question of the levy of the proposed assessment, notice of which hearing was mailed, published and
posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.6; and
WHEREAS, at the appointed time and place, said hearings were held, and all persons interested
desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard, and all matters pertaining to said levy were
heard and considered by this Council, and this Council thereby acquired jurisdiction to order said levy and
confirmation of diagram and assessment prepared by and made a part of the report of said engineer to pay
the cost and expenses thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does
hereby approve that:
(a) The property owners owning more than fifty percent of the area of assessable land within
the District had not, at the conclusion of said hearing, filed written protests against the said
proposed levy, or against the Engineer's Estimate of costs and expenses, or against the
maps and description, or against the diagram or the assessment to pay for the costs and
expenses thereof;
(b) The public interest, convenience, and necessity require that said levy be made;
( c) The District benefited by said improvements and to be assessed to pay the costs and
expenses thereof, and the exterior boundaries thereof, are as shown by a map thereof filed
in the office ofthe City Clerk, which map is made a part hereof by reference thereto.
1
AnAunQ17.
cQ 1 e20t
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of July, 2007, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINING:
Mayor
A TTE.ST:
City Clerk
G:\ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS\83-2 Stagecoach\FY07-08\Public Hearing\Resolevy-832.doc
2
3~o(~
CITY OF DUBLIN
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
NO. 1983-2
(Tract 4719)
ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2007/2008
INTENT MEETING: June 19,2007
PUBUC HEARING: July 17, 2007
MuniFinancial
Corporate Office:
27368 Via Industria
Suite 110
Temecula, CA 92590
Tel: (951) 587-3500
Tel: (800) 755-l\1UNI (6864)
Fax: (951) 587-3510
Office Locations:
Lancaster, CA
Oakhnd, C\.
Sacramento, CA
Phoenix, AZ
Orlando, FL
Seattle, Wi\.
Memphis,1N
www.mum.com
ATTACIDIEff 2 .
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1983-2
Pursuant to the Landscaping and lighting Act of 1972
City of Dublin
Alameda County, State of California
This Report describes the District and services therein including the improvements, budgets,
parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2007/2008 as they existed at the time of
the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Alameda County
Assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the
District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City
Council.
Dated this
f-J;!2
daYOf~2007.
On Behalf of the City of Dublin
BT-~~t?~
Melissa A. M rton
Public Works Director
City of Dublin
41 0(,,(
S1<<~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. OVERVIEW.... ............ ..................... .......... ......... ..... ................. .................................. ....... 1
A. INTRODUCTION ............. ........... ~........ ...... ... ......... ......... ...... .... ..... ................. ...... ..... ..... ........ 1
B. APpu CABLE LEGISLATION....... ......... ....... ....... ...... ...... .... .............. ........ ........... ........... .......... 2
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT AND IMPROVEMENTS ..................................5 .
A. DISTRI CT ... ................ ................... ...... ..... ........ ...... ............. ................. ...................... ............ 5
B. IMPROVEMENTS. ...... ............. .... ..... ..........,.. ...... ............ ........... ................. .... ..... ....... ... ..... .... 5
III. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ..................... ................ .... .......................................5
A. BACKGROUND. ................................................. ................................................................ ...... 5
B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS ............. .............. ................... ....... .... .............. ........................................ 6
C. AsSESSMENT METHODOLOGy........... ...... ............ ........... ................ ........ ......... ............. ........ 7
D. INFLATIONARY FACTOR APPUED TO MAxIMUM RATE......................................................... 7
IV. D I STRI CT BUDGET ........ ............... ........................... ...................................... ..................8
A. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS ........,......:......................................................................... 8
B. DISTRICT BUDGET. ........................ .......... .... ................... ......... ...... ....... ........ ....... ......... .......12
APPENDIX A - DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP ...................................................................13
APPENDIX B - 2007/2008 ASSESSMENT ROLL ...............................................................14
01 ,),)
City of Dublin
Landscaping and Lighting District 1983-2
. Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2007/2008
I. OVERVIEW
A. Introduction
The City of Dublin ("City") annually levies and collects special assessments in order to
maintain the improvements within the Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1983-2
("District"). The District was originally formed in 1983 and is annually levied pursuant to
the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Pari 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and
Higbwqys Code ("1972 Act"). A diagram of the boundaries of the District can be found
within Appendix A of this document.
1bis Engineer's Annual Levy Report ("Report") has been prepared in accordance with
the provisions of Chapter 3, Section 22622 of the 1972 Act. 1bis Report describes the
District, the improvements therein, any annexations or other modifications to the
District including any substantial changes to the improvements, the method of
apportionment, the boundaries of the District, and financial information including the
district budgets and proposed annual assessments for fiscal year 2007/2008. The
proposed assessments are based on the historic and estimated costs to maintain the
improvements that provide a special benefit to properties within the District. The costs
of improvements and the annual levy including all expenditures, deficits, surpluses,
revenues, and reserves are assessed to each parcel within the District proportionate to
the parcel's special benefits.
For the purposes of this Report, the word "parcel" refers to an individual prope~ty
assigned its own Assessment Number by the County of Alameda Assessor's Office. The
County of Alameda Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and specific Fund
Numbers to identify properties assessed for special district benefit assessments on the
tax roll.
Pursuant to Chapter 3, beginning with Section 22620 of the 1972 Act, the City Council shall
conduct a noticed annual public hearing to consider all public comments and written
protests regarding the District. Following the annual public hearing and review of the
Engineer's Annual Levy Report, the City Council may order amendments to the Report
or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report and
confirmation of the assessments contained therein, the City Council will by resolution:
order the improvements to be made and confirm the levy and collection of assessments
pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 1, beginning with Section 22640 of the 1972 Act, The
assessment rate and method of apportionment described in this Report as approved or
modified by the City Council defines the assessments to be applied to each parcel within
the District for fiscal year 2007/2008.
MlInrFinancial
Page 1
'1 0;{ 0<,,(
City of Dublin
Landscaping and Lighting District 1983-2
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2007/2008
The assessments as approved will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller to be
included on the secured property tax roll for each parcel within the District. If.any parcel
submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid
parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel
numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County. The assessment amount to be
levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method
of apportionment and assessment rate contained in thls Report as approved by the City
CounciL
B. Applicable Legislation
The District has been formed and is annually levied pursuant to the Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highwt!)Is Code, beginning
with Section 22500. The assessments and methods of apportionment described in this
Report utilize commonly accepted assessment engineering practices and have been
calculated and proportionately spread to each parcel based on the special benefits
received.
Compliance with the California Constitution
All assessments described in this Report and approved by the City Council are prepared
in accordance with the 1972 Act and shall be.in compliance with the provisions of the
California Constitution Article XIIID ("Article XIIID").
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved the Right to Vote on Taxes Act
(proposition 218) by a margin of 56.5% to 43.5%. The provisions of Proposition 218
became amendments to the California Constitutional Articles XIIIC and XIIID, can be
summarized in four general areas:
1) Strengthens the general and special tax provisions of Proposition 13 and
Proposition 62.
2) Extends the initiative process to all local taxes, assessments, fees, and charges.
3) Adds substantive and procedural requirements to assessments.
4) Adds substantive and procedural requirements to property-related fees and
charges.
Pursuant to Article xnrD Section 4, all property related assessments must comply with
certain substantive and procedural requirements unless they meet certain exemptions
listed in Article XIIID Section V.
MuniFinancia/
Page 1
21 C;?d
City of Dublin
Landscaping and Lighting District 1983-2
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2007/2008
The assessments contained in this Report were imposed in accordance with voter
approval pursuant to the establishment of the District. The assessments are imposed to
finance capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for public streets (and all
improvements within the street right of way including landscaping). Based on these
exempt criteria, the City has determined that the assessments are exempt from the
substantive and procedural requiremen.ts of Article XIIID Section 4.
In 2003-2004, the City conducted a public hearing that included a mailed ballot to all of
the property owners in this District proposing an increased assessment in order to
maintain and replace certain landscaping improvements. In addition to a 10% increase
in assessment rates, the proposed Engineer's Report also included an escalation clause
for succeeding years that allows the maintenance cost to increase according to the
Consumer Price Index and the utility cost to increase according to the actual cost of
utilities. At the conclusion of the public hearing, there was no majority protest based on
the assessment-weighted ballots received, and the increased assessments were approved
by the City CounciL This Report includes the approved assessment rates and an
inflationary factor to account for increased cost of living and actual utility cost increases.
Any proposed assessment that exceeds the adjusted maximum assessment rate is
considered an increased assessment. Pursuant to the provisions of the California
Constitution Article XIIID, all new or increased assessments (the incremental increase)
are subject to both the substantive and procedural requirements of Article XIIID Section
4, including a prop'erty owner protest proceeding.
Provisions of the 1972 Act (Improvements and Services)
The Method of Apportionment described for the District Report utilizes commonly
accepted assessment-engineering practices and have been established pursuant to the
1972 Act and the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID. As generally
defined by the 1972 Act, the improvements and the associated assessments for each
District may include one or any combination of the following:
1) The installation or planting oflandscaping.
2) The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental
structures and facilities.
3) The installation or construction of public lighting facilities, including, but not
limited to streetlights and traffic signals.
4) The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of
the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or
servicing thereof; including but not limited to, grading, removal of debris, the
installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water,
irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities.
MuniFinancia!
Page 3
q '1 o?o<
City of Dublin
Landscaping and Lighting District 1983-2
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2007/2008
5) The installation of park or recreational improvements including, but not limited
to the following:
a. Land preparation, such as grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod,
landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks, and drainage.
b. Lights, playground equipment, play courts and public restrooms.
6) The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing including the
furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance,
operation, and servicing of any improvement, including, but not limited to:
a. Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvements;
b. Grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation, repair or
construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water,
irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities;
c. Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping,
including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating
for disease or injury;
d. The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste;
e. The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other
improvements to remove or cover graffiti.
f. Electric current or energy, gas, or other agent for the lighting or
operation of any other improvements.
g. Water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any
fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements.
7) The acquisition of land for park, recreational or open-space purposes, or the
acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized by the Act.
8) Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited
to:
a. The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications,
estimates, diagram, and assessment;
b. The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting and
mailing of notices;
c. Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments;
d. Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services;
e. Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or
maintenance and servicing of the improvements; and,
f. Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or
increased assessment.
MumFillancial
Page 4
)0 ~;J ~
City of Dublin
Landscaping and Lighting District 1983-2
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2007/2008
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT AND IMPROVEMENTS
A. District
In 1983, the City of Dublin formed the District for the purpose of maintaining street
landscaping within Tract 4719. The District originally included Stagecoach Park and
Stagecoach Road north of the City Limit, but now includes only roadway landscaping
along Stagecoach Road and on the "interior slopes" (Coral Way and Agate Way) within
the Dublin Hills Estates development. The maintenance cost for Stagecoach Park, as
well as the undeveloped Dougherty Hills Park, is paid by the City through the Park
Maintenance Operating Budget and is not a part of this Assessment District.
A Diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the District is provided in this Report at
Appendix A. Parcel identification, the lines and dimensions of each lot, parcel and
subdivision of land within the District, are inclusive of the parcels as shown on the
Alameda County Assessor's Parcel Maps as they existed at the time of the passage of the
Resolution of Intention, and shall include subsequent subdivisions, lot line adjustments
or parcel changes therein. Reference is hereby made to the Alameda County Assessor's
maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel of land
within the District
B. Improvements
The scope of work shall include the maintenance of landscaping and irrigation within the
road right-of-way and within a public easement along Stagecoach Road between the
limits of Amador Valley Boulevard and the northerly City Limit.
Further, the scope of work shall include the maintenance of the slopes and landscaping
and irrigation of the slopes within a public easement for those slope areas to the rear of
Lots 80 through 86 and 37 through 48, all within Tract 4719.
III. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
A. Background
Pursuant to the 1972 Act, the costs of the District may be apportioned by any formula
or method that fairly distributes the net amount to be assessed, among all assessable
parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such parcel from
the improvements. The benefit formula used should reflect the composition of the
MuniPincmcia!
Page 5
)1 ~ 0),;)
City of Dublin
Landscaping and Lighting District 1983-2
Engineer's .A.nnual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2007/2008
parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly proportion the costs
based on special benefit to each parcel.
B. Benefit Analysis
Each of the proposed improvements, the associated costs and assessments have been
carefully reviewed, identified and allocated based on special benefit pursuant to the
provisions of the 1972 Act
All the assessed parcels receive direct and special benefits from the improvements and
activities to be funded through the District assessments. The improvements include all
necessary activities, services, operation, administration, and maintenance' required to
keep the improvements in satisfactory condition.
Special Benefit
The method of apportionment (method of assessment) established herein is based on the
premise that each assessed parcel within the District receives special benefits from the
improvements and the desirability of those properties enhanced by the presence of well-
maintained landscaping in close proximity to those properties.
The special benefits associated with landscape improvements are specifically:
1) Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements.
2) Improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of
the area and properties.
3) Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment
from adequate green space and landscaping.
4) Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance, dust and
debris control, and fire pr~vention.
5) Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting
from well-maintained improvements associated with the properties.
6) Enhanced quality of life through well-maintained green space and landscaped
areas.
7) Reduced criminal activity and property-related crimes (especially vandalism)
against properties in the District through well-maintained surroundings and
amenities including abatement of graffiti.
8) Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures,
providing oxygenation and attenuating noise.
The preceding special benefits contribute to the esthetic value and desirability of each of the
assessed parcels within the District and thereby provide a special enhancement of the
MumFinancia/
Page 6
)~ ~. oI~
City of Dublin
Landscaping and Lighting District 1983-2
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2007/2008
properties. Furthermore, it has been determined that the lack of funding to properly service
and maintain the District improvements would have a negative impact on the properties
within the District.
General Benefit
In reviewing each of the District improvements, the proximity of those improvements to
both properties within the District and those outside the District as well as the reasons for
installing and constructing such improvements, it is evident that the improvements axe
solely the result of developing properties within the District and the ongoing maintenance
and operation of these improvements will directly effect the properties within the District.
Although the improvements include public areas, easements, right-of-ways and other
amenities available or visible to the public at large, the construction and installation of these
improvements were only necessary for the development of properties within the District
and were not required nor necessarily desired by any properties or developments outside
the District boundary and any public access or use of the improvements by others is
incidental. Therefore, it h'as been determined that the improvements and the ongoing
maintenance, servicing and operation of th"ose improvements provide no measurable
general benefit to properties outside the District or to the public at large, but clearly provide
distinct and special benefits to properties within the District.
C. Assessment Methodology
The assessment spread for this District shall be calculated as follows: Sixty-one and six
tenths percent (61.6%) spread equally among the 150 single-family homes of Dublin
Hills Estates; thirty-eight and four tenths percent (38.4%) spread equally among the 553
apartments of Amador Lakes Apartments.
Lots 152 and 153, being park and open space, shall have a zero assessment. Lots 154
and 155, being public agency owned, shall have a zero assessment.
D. Inflationary Factor Applied to MIDdmum Rate
The District assessments include a formula for increasing assessments for each future
. fiscal year to offset increases in costs due to inflation and actual utility costs. This
assessment adjustment formula was approved by the City Council pursuant to a mailed
ballot and public hearing referenced in Section 1. B.
The maximum assessment amount allowed for each fiscal year shall be increased in an
amount equal to the annual percentage increase of the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose
Area Consumer Price Index for "All Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers" of
("Index"), plus any actual increase in the cost of utilities (power and water). Each fiscal
year the City shall identify the change in the Index for April to April of the preceding
MuniFinatuial
Page 7
)3 ~ cJ(<
City of Dublin
Landscaping and Lighting District 1983-2
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2007/2008
year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the
preparation of such index, the City shall use the revised index or comparable system as
approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living.
In the event that the City Council determines that an inflation adjustment is not required
for a given fiscal year, the City Council may authorize the assessment without applying
the adjustment formula to the amount levied. If the budget and assessments for a district
require an increase greater than the adjustment set forth in the formula, then the
proposed increase would be subject to approval by the District property owners. Each
fiscal year, the maximum assessment rate shall increase at the maximum amount
allowable regardless of whether the increase is levied to the parcels within the District.
Utility costs for this year are anticipated to increase at the same rate as that of the Index.
The percentage difference for the Index from April 1006 to April 2007 was 3,07%.
Therefore the maximum assessment rates will increase to $274.31 for single-family
residential parcels and $46.38 for multi-family residential units within the District.
However, the assessment to single-family property owners in the Dublin Hills Estates
development is proposed to be $274.14 per single-family home, an increase of $8.00
(3.01%) over the 2006/2007 assessments. The Amador Lakes Apartments proposed to
be assessed at a rate of $46.36 per dwelling unit, an increase of $1.36 (3.02%) over the
2006/2007 assessments.
IV. DISTRICT BUDGET
A. Description of Budget Items
The following describes the services and costs that are funded through. the District,
shown in the budget.
DIRECT COSTS:
Maintenance Tree - The cost of installation and maintenance of trees and plantings
along the street frontages within the District
Maintenance Landscape - The cost of maintenance and repair of the landscaping and
open space areas within the District.
Utiiities Water - The cost of furnishing water for maintenance of landscape and
irrigation systems within the District.
Utilities Electricity - The cost of electricity for maintenance of landscape, powering of
irrigation systems, and entry lighting within the District.
MumFinancia!
Page 8
14 ~ c<~
City of Dublin
Landscaping and Lighting District 1983-2
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2007/2008
Miscellaneous Expenses - Costs that cannot easily be categorized into any of the
other Direct Costs defined above.
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS:
District Administration, Consulting - The costs of contracting with professionals to
provide services specific to the levy administration, including preparation of the
Engineer's Report, resolutions, and levy submittal to the County. These fees can also
include any additional administrative, legal, or engineering services specific to the District
such as the cost to prepare and mail notices of the public meeting and hearing.
County per Parcel Fee - The cost to the District for the County to collect assessments
of the property tax bills.
LEVY BREAKDOWN:
Reserve collection/(Transfer) - The 1972 Act pursuant to Chapter 1, Article 4 Section
22569 (a), provides for a District Reserve Fund, which shall not exceed approximately
50% of the fiscal year costs. Negative amounts shown for this budget item represent
transfers from the Reserve Fund that reduces the Balance to Levy. Maintaining a fully
funded Reserve eliminates the need for the City to transfer funds from non-District
accounts to pay for operational expenses during the first half of the fiscal year and also
provides the District with sufficient funds to address any unforeseen or unusual
expenditures that may occur during the year.
Capital Improvement Fund collection/ (Transfer) - The 1972 Act pursuant to
Chapter 5, beginning with Section 22660, provides for the District to establish by resolution
an assessment installment plan for proposed improvements and expenditures that are
greater than can be conveniently raised from a single annual assessment. Depending on
the nature of the planned improvements, the collection of funds necessary to complete
the project may be collected over a period up to thirty years, but typically not more than
five years. The funds collected shall be accumulated in a separate improvement fund
commonly referred to as a Capital Improvement Fund (CIF) and are not considered part
of the regular maintenance of the improvements or the Reserve Fund. .
Because the money accumulated in the Capital Improvement Fund is for a specific
planned project (budgeted separately), the amount shown for this item in the annual
budget will typically be a positive number representing the amount being collected that
yea.r as part of the Balance to Levy. A negative number (fransfer) should only occur
after the project has been completed and excess funds are being credited back to the
District's .. regular accounts. The actual fund balances and expenditures for Capital
Improvements are dearly identified under the Fund Balance Information section of the
Budget.
MumPinondal
Page :I
I tt:... ('.' (. ''''. '"'I
:....;> t.;, ex 0>,'
r"
City of Dublin
Landscaping and Lighting District 1983-2
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2007/2008
General Fund Loans Repayment/(Advances) - This item represents repayments of
amounts that had been temporarily advanced to the District from other revenue sources
(usually the General Fund) or represents funds being loaned to the District for the
current fiscal year that must be repaid by future assessments. Similar to the Reserve
Collection/ (Transfer) line item, this item directly impacts the Reserve Fund Balances
either positively or negatively.
Repayments are shown as a positive number and represent additional monies being
collected in the current annual assessment to repay a prior loan. These loans are typically
for capital improvement expenditures or unforeseen expenditures incurred in prior years
and Reserve Fund monies were not sufficient to cover the expenses. To ensure the
ongoing operation and maintenance of the improvements, the City may advance funds
to the District as a temporary loan to meet current expenditures, and collect repayment
of the loan through the annual assessments the following year or possibly over several
years. Generally, all available Reserve Funds are exhausted before a temporary loan is
advanced to the District and the Beginning Reserve Fund Balance will be a negative
number indicating the loan amount still outstanding.
A loan for the current fiscal year (Advance) is shown as a negative number. If the
District is expected to incur significant expenditures in the current fiscal year for special
services or capital improvements (upgrades or refurbishing of the improvements) and
the proposed assessment revenues (annual assessments) and/or available Reserve Funds
are not sufficient to cover the expenditures, the City may advance funds to the District
as a temporary loan to. meet the proposed expenditures. Generally, all available Reserve
Funds must be exhausted before a temporary loan is advanced to the District and any
funds temporarily loaned in excess of the available Reserve Funds will be reflected as a
negative Ending Reserve Fund Balance. This negative Reserve Fund Balance will be
repaid and replenished through future assessment revenues.
Other Revenue/General Fund (Contributions) - This item includes additional funds
designated for the District that are not annual assessments. These funds are added to the
District account to reduce assessme~ts, and may be from non-District or District
sources including City General Fund Contributions and/or interest earnings. Any funds
indicated on this line will be shown as a negative number indicating a reduction in the
amount to be levied and represent funds that do not have to be repaid.
Balance to Levy - This is the total amount to be collected for the current fiscal year
through the annual assessments (for special benefits). The Balance to Levy represents the
sum of Total Direct and Administration Costs, Reserve Fund Contributions or
Transfers, Contributions from Other Revenue Source, and the Contribution
Replenishment. Only those costs related to the improvements identified as special
benefits are levied and collected on the tax roll.
MuniPinandal
Page 10
)11 ~f <<:2
City of Dublin
Landscaping and Lighting District 1983-2
Engineer's i\nnual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2007/2008
Total Parcels - The total number of parcels within the District including exempt
parcels.
Total Parcels Levied - The total number of parcels within the District that will receive
the special benefits during the current fiscal year.
Balance to Levy for SFR - The total assessment to single-family property owners in
the Dublin Hills Estates development.
Balance to Levy for MFR - The total assessment to property owners of
condominium or apartment units in the Amador Lakes Apartments development.
Maximum Levy per SPR (prior Fiscal Year) - This is the maximum rate allowable in
fiscal year 2006/2007 to assess single-family property owners within the District.
Maximum Levy per MFR (Prior Fiscal Year) - This is the maximum rate allowable
in fiscal year 2006/2007 to assess property owners of a multi-family residential unit
within the District.
Maximum Levy per SFR (Current Fiscal Year) - This is the maximum rate allowable
per SFR parcel to assess property owners within the District, in accordance with
Proposition 218, adjusted for inflation as described in the Method of Apportionment.
Maximum Levy per MFR (Current Fiscal Year) - This is the maximum rate
allowable per J:vfFR unit to assess property owners within the District, in accordance with
Proposition 218, adjusted for inflation as described in the Method of Apportionment.
Inflationary Factor - Annual percentage increase in the San Francisco-Oakland-San
Jose Area Consumer Price Index for "All Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers"
applies to all cost except water and electricity, plus any additional increase in the utility
cost of water and electricity. Each fiscal year the City shall identify the change in the CPI
Index for April to April of the preceding year. .
MlIniFinancia!
Page 11
)1 ~ d;'
City of Dublin
Landscaping and Lighting District 1983-2
Engjneer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2007/2008
B. District Budget
City ofDllblin '
2007/2008 Budget Worksheet
Landscaping an.d LIghting District No. 1983.2
Fund Number: 711
L'\7-\\ Com: pnnents T()taI :B':'tl:d..:::~t
DIRECT COSTS
Maintenance - Tree
Maintenance ~ Landsca.pe
Utilities - Water
11 tilities Electricity
Miscellaneous Expenses
TOTAL DIRECT
$20,906.00
43.39-1.00
12,134.00
733.00
0.00
$77,167.00
\DM INISTRATION COSTS
District Adm11~,isrration . Consulting
County pet' Parcel Fee
TOTALADMIN
52,600.00
1,135.00
$3,735.00
COLLECTION /fCRED1TS} \I'PL1ED TO LEV'!
TOTAL DIRECT AND ADMIN COSTS
Reserve Cullectton/(Transfer)
Capital Improvemcnt Fund Collection/(Tnnsfer)
General Fund Loans Repaymcnt/(Advances)
Other Re,'cnue/(Contributtons)J
TOTAL AD]lJSTMENTS
Balance to Levy (Budgeted)
$80.902.00
(12,294.00)
0.00
0.00
(1,853.00)
($14,147.00)
$66,755.00
Total Revenue atMaximum Rate
Variance abov-e/(below) Maximum Revenue
$66,795.09
(HO.09)
Applied Charge
Difference abuve/(bclow) Balance to Levy'
$66,758.08
$3.08
DISTRICT STATISTICS
Total Parcels
Total Parcels Levied
Tutal Single Family Residential (SFR) Parcels
Tntal Multi-Family Residential (MFR) Parcels
709
703
150
553
Balance to Levy for SFR (61.6U% ofTutal Applied Le\'y)
Applied Levy per SFR
$41.121.00
$274.14
Balance to Levy for MFR (38.40% of Total Applied Levy)
Applied Levy per MFR
$25.637.08
$46.36
Maximum. Levy per SFR (PrioT Fiscal Year)
Maximum Levy per MFR (Prior Fiscal Year)
Maximum Levy per SFR (Current Fiscal Year)
Maximum LevyperMFR (Current F,scal Year)
InfIat10nary Factor Applied to Ma)c;lmum Rate
$266.14
$4 5.00
$274.31
$4 6.38
3.07%
. -FUND $ALAN'CE IN;f10R~f,j\'1'lON '. - .'. -' ".~.-- '. _' ,- ,_--
Begmning Rcscn'e Fund Balance
Reserve Fund Adjustments
Anticipated Reserve Balance
$48,631.00
(12,294.00)
$36,337.00
I Compri5td DIE slimtJlull"Juul Dnd Prior Year A Jsusmtfff Ptl/ullits;
, D iff'''"'' in Bu/un" Ja Ln:y nnd Appli,d Churg' is dn, /. 'D""Jing.
MuniPinancia!
Page 12
I g f/f... ex" f;,
fI"'.
City of Dublin
Landscaping and Lighting District 1983-2
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2007/2008
APPENDIX A - DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP
Landscape Lighting District 83-2
_...___ ----....-.....- City of Dublin
c:J 83-2
camp ParKS RFTA
CJ City of Dublin
c=-...~ City of Dublin. Sphere of Influence
---I"
.--------- ,
._,-,...".....- \
(
~_r\.. .
-"'
.....~\
\,
,.
"
.\
"
"
"
''1.
\.
...
4-
~'"
}
..- -
83~2t
'\,
,..
f
"
"-
,
.
I;
,-
t
\.~ >4"'- ~,
l
'"
"'"' .
J
~
",
'.J!
,';,'
f"~~
-~.",
~
;1'
l:-!-'~
~~
~"~
~
,,.~
f
:..:
" I
t..~Sf..!._!
ik*"1!o ""J'
/,,- . .. .,.<r
~.._,,-~---
;,..,
......_~ ,--...M.....__._n_. ~
l"!~
~ ~-
~~~.,....
.~.,. .
....~.>.. ,.,..<!M' ~W~..
\
II ~.
I
t
l
;
\
t
,-
,
IP
i
J
I
":k".
""'~i
.,
I
l
\
\
\-~
, t
\
I"
...
F
t
\
,
",
....1
:;",'='""-
, \t
fIF.
;# \
"... J
.~
M,m:h 2007
MuniFinanciof
Page 1.'>
/'11 c2J
. City of Dublin
Landscaping and Lighting District 1983-2
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2007/2008
APPENDIX B - 2007/200-8 ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the
Alameda County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared.
A listing of parcels assessed within this District, along with the property type, and assessment
amounts, is included on the following pages. If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by
the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected
parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County
Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or
parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report.
Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each.
of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of
apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.
Non-assessable lots or parcels include areas of public streets and other roadways (typically not
assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas and rights-of-ways
including public greenbelts and parkways; utility rights-of-ways; common areas; landlocked parcels,
small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots, and any other property that can not be
developed or has specific development restrictions. These types of parcels are considered to receive
little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore exempted from assessment.
Mum Financial
Page 14
U01 cJr!
STAGECOACH ROAD (TRACT 4719)
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NEWSLETTER
July 2007
FACTS ABOUT THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
While the City pays the cost of maintaining the median landscaping through its General Fund for all of the major
arterial streets, street-side landscaping that is installed in conjunction with residential or commercial development is
maintained either privately by a property owners' association, or by the City and funded through an assessment
district.
This Assessment District was formed in 1983 to maintain certain landscaping improvements along Stagecoach
Road and on the "interior slopes" of the Dublin Hills Estates development (Coral Way and Agate Way). The following
areas are maintained by the City as part of this District:
. Landscaping and irrigation within the road right-of-way and within a public easement along
Stagecoach Road between Amador Valley Boulevard and the northerly City Limit.
. Landscaping and irrigation of the slopes within a public easement for those slope areas to the rear of
Lots 80 through 86 and 37 through 48 of Tract 4719. These are the "interior slopes" which face
houses on Agate Way and Coral Way.
The annual landscape maintenance assessment is calculated by dividing estimated maintenance costs for the
coming year among residents of the single-family homes of Dublin Hills Estates and the owners of the Amador Lakes
Apartments. The single-family homes are assigned 61.6% of the total assessment, divided evenly among the 150
parcels. The Amador Lakes Apartments are assigned 38.4% of the total assessment.
The funds collected through assessments are accounted for separately from other City funds. These funds can only
be used for specified expenses within the boundaries of the Assessment District.
The City is required to notify property owners each year regarding a required public hearing for the Assessment
District. State Law requires that this notice be given by means of a notice printed in a local newspaper and posted in
official City posting locations. A copy of the public hearing notice is included with this newsletter as a courtesy. The
public hearing regarding the 2007-2008 assessment will be held at the regular City Council meeting of July 17, 2007.
The meeting begins at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Dublin Civic Center.
~ City Staff has scheduled an informational meeting prior to the Public Hearing in order to provide an
opportunity to answer questions and address concerns in an informal setting. The informational meeting will
be held in the Program Room of the Library, 200 Civic Plaza, on Julv 10.2007 at 6:00 p.m.
RECOMMENDED ASSESSMENT
Prior to 2003, the assessment in this District had not been increased for 10 years. In 2003-2004, the City proposed to
increase the assessment in this District by 10% in order to fund the cost of additional fertilization and plant material.
As required by law, a vote of the property owners was conducted, and the 10% increase was approved. The approval
also included an escalation clause that would allow the maintenance cost to be increased each year based on the
Consumer Price Index (Urban Wage Earners). The cost of utilities may increase based on the actual cost of the
,,';qg;:';;';~"'f,:,
utilities. The assessment for 2007-08 is proposed to increase by 1i;9o/~ which is within the 3.1 % April 2007 Consumer
Price Index (CPI), resulting in the following proposed assessment:
per single family lot (an increase of """'
per apartment dwelling unit (an increase of $11.)
ATTACHMENT
3
d?/ ~ cJel
MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES
The City will continue to utilize TruGreen LandCare as its primary maintenance contractor in this District. MCE
Corporation will provide some supervision and irrigation repair services as needed to supplant TruGreen's work. The
District budget for 2007-08 is proposed to be 8S follows:
Revenues:
Total Amount Proposed to Be Assessed:
Estimated Interest Revenue:
Estimated Prior Year Collections and Penalties
Less Estimated Collection and Delinquency Cost:
Net Total Revenues
$66,755
1,403
450
(1.135)
$67,473
Expenditures:
Contract Maintenance and Utilities:
Administration and Engineering:
Total Operating Expenses:
$77,167
2.600
$79,767
Based on the above, approximately $12,294 of the existing reserve will be used to offset expenses. The res.erve
balance at the end Fiscal Year 2007-2008 is expected to be approximately $36,337.
During 2006-07, a committee consisting of City staff and homeowners reviewed possible locations for landscape
improvement as well as types of plant material. The planter strip along Stagecoach Road between Turquoise Street
and South Lake Drive was replanted, the planting test area on Coral Way was replanted, and a retaining wall was
constructed at the top of a slope where erosion is occurring.
The projected expenses for 2007-08 include approximately $20,900 in improvement items, which would include
replacement of 46 trees and a continuation of the replanting project in bedding and ground cover areas. It is proposed
to use a portion of the reserve in the District to accomplish the improvements. It is important to continue to maintain a
reserve balance for the following reasons:
(1) The City does not receive income from an assessment until midway through a fiscal year. The reserve
therefore provides operating capital for the District until the funds are received from the assessor's office.
(2) In the event of an unforeseen emergency, such as a major irrigation break or a catastrophic freeze, the
reserve provides funds for repairs or plant replacements.
REPORTING VANDALISM AND MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS
The City's policy is to repair vandalism damage and eradicate graffiti as soon as we become aware of it. If you
notice vandalism occurring or are able to provide a description of vandals, please contact Dublin Police Services at
462-1212. If you notice damage or graffiti that has already occurred, or if you notice broken sprinklers or other types
of maintenance problems, please call the Public Works Department at 833-6630. We appreciate your help!
If you have any questions about the proposed assessment or maintenance activities in this assessment district,
please call the City's Public Works Department at 833-6630.
/.'i6f75ii'
tJ)~~~p
ff~I~\\ll
-\~6
~~)i/
~~~~
CITY OF DUBLIN
"Celebrating 25 Years Of City hood 1982-2007"
100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California 94568
Website: http://www.ci.dublin.ca.us
July 10, 2007
Dear Resident:
A newsletter containing information regarding Landscape Maintenance Assessment
District 83-2 (Stagecoach Road) was recently mailed to your address. This letter stated
that the assessment for FY2007-08 was proposed to increase from FY2006-07 by 1.3%,
translating into an assessment of$269.50 for single family lots (an increase of$3.36 from
last fiscal year) and $45.56 for apartment dwelling units (an increase of$0.56 from last
fiscal year). This increl:J,se is due to an escalation clause that allows the maintenance cost
to be increased each year based on the Consumer Price.Index (Urban Wage Earners).
Unfortunately, the information reported in the newsletter was incorrect. The correct
assessment for FY2007-08 is scheduled to increase from FY2006-07 by 3.0%, which is
still within the 3.1 % April 2007 Consumer Price Index. This corrected increase translates
. into an assessment of$274.14 for single family lots (an increase of$8.00 from last fiscal
year) and $46.36 for apartment dwelling units (an increase of$1.36 from last fiscal year).
An amended notice reflecting the appropriate assessment is enclosed.
The City of Dublin apologizes for any inconvenience the erroneous information may
have caused you. Please feel free to contact me at (925) 833-6630 with any questions.
Sincerely,
Melissa Morton
Public Works Director
Enclosed: Amended Notice of Assessment
MM/el
AnAUDDT q
Area Code (925) . City Manager 833-6650 . City Council 833-6650 . Personnel 833-6605 . Economic Development 833-6650
Finance 833-6640 . Public Works/Engineering 833-6630 . Parks & Community Services 833-6645 . Police 833-6670
Planning/Code Enforcement 833-6610 . Building Inspection 833-6620 . Fire Prevention Bureau 833-6606
Printed on Recycled Paper