Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Meeting Minutes 12-07-1987 . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ Regular Meeting - December 7, 1987 A regular meeting of the City of Dublin Planning Commission was held on December 7, 1987, in the Meeting Room, Dublin Library. The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Cm. Barnes, Acting Chairpersc~n. ~ ~ ~ ~ ROLL CALL ~ PRESENT: Commissioners Barnes, Burnham, Mack, and Zika, Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director, Kevin J. Gailey, Senior Planner, and Maureen 0'Halloran, Associate Planner. ABSENT: Commissioner Tempel. ~r ~ x s~ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Cm. Barnes led the Commissian, Staff, and those present in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. ~ ~ ~ ~ ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA None. ~ ~ ~c ~ ELECTION OF OFFICERS Mr. Tong advised that the Planning Commission Rules of Procedures pravide that officers be elected at the first meeting of the Commission in December of each year. He indicated that unless a vacancy occurs, the new terms of office will be until December, 1988. Mr. Tong also advised that'the Ordinance which establishes the Planning Commission provides that the Comrnission may appoint a Secretary. He indicated that Staff recommended the Cammission elect a Chairperson, a Vice Chairperson, and appoint the Planning Director as Secretary. Cm. Mack nominated Crn, Barnes for the office of Chairperson. Cm. Burnham seconded the nomination. Cm. Zika moved and Cm. Mack seconded, and by a unanimous vote (Cm. Tempel absent), the nominations were closed. By a unanimous vote (Cm. Tempel absent), Cm. Barnes was elected Chairperson. Cm. Barnes nominated Cm. Mack for the office of Vice Chairperson. Cm. Burnham seconded the nomination. There were no other nominations. By a unanimous vote (Cm. Tempel absent), Cm. Mack was elected Vice Chairperson. Regular Meeting PCM-7-1$7 December 7, 1987 On motion by Cm. Zika, seconded by Cm. Mack, and by a unanimous vote (Cm. Tempel absent), the Planning Director was appointed as Secretary to the Planning Commission. * * * * MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the November 16, 1987, Planning Commission meeting were accepted as presented. * * *.* ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. * * * * WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Tong advised that the Commissioners had received three Final Action Letters and three Appealable Action Letters for informational purposes. In response to an inquiry by Cm. Zika, Mr. Tong stated that the settlement for Pet Prevent-A-Care establishes automatic approvals for six pet clinics within the 12-month period from September 1987 to September 1988. He said the first of the six clinics was held last Saturday at the Town & Country Shopping Center. He reviewed the Conditions of Approval contained within the agreement. * * * * PUBLIC HEARINGS SUBJECT: PA 87-139 E1 Po11o Asado Restaurant Site Development Review and Conditional Use Permit, west side of Re~ional Street near Dublin Boulevard (APN 941-305-35). Cm. Barnes opened the public hearing and called for the Staff Report. Ms. O'Halloran advised that the Applicant was requesting approval of a Site Development Review and Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate a restaurant with an outdoor dining and seating and drive-through facility on Regional Street. She said the proposed site was a 28,200 square foot vacant parcel within the C-l Retail Business District located on the west side of Regional Street, north of the Grand Auto site and south of the Woolworth Nursery site. She indicated that a restaurant is a permitted use in the C-l District, but that the proposed drive-through and outdoor dining and seating require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Ms. O'Halloran indicated that the Applicant was proposing two driveways for the site. She said the northern driveway was proposed for ingress and egress, while the southern driveway was proposed for egress only, and would primarily Regular Meeting PCM-7-188 December 7, 1987 serve the drive-through aisle and the front parking area. She said the proposed location of the drive-through will not cause vehicles waiting to place orders to stack out onto Regional Street, and that vehicles stacking will have limited impact on on-site circulation. Ms. O'Halloran referred to the Staff Study and a letter from Staff which identified applicable policies from the Downtown Specific Plan and recommended specific modifications to the site plan and architectural treatment of the proposed building. She said this information was provided to the Applicant, who subsequently submitted revised plans in substantial compliance with Staff's concerns. However, she indicated that two main issues remained unresolved: (1) elimination of the southern driveway cut, and (2) creation of an emergency exit from the drive-through lane after the menu board and prior to the pickup window. Regarding the proposed south driveway, Ms. O'Halloran said that due to the close proximity of it to the intersection of Dublin Boulevard and Regional Street and the proximity of the proposed. driveway to the Grand Auto driveway cut, the City Engineer recommended the Applicant eliminate the proposed southern driveway cut on Regional Street. She said Staff's position was that adverse impacts which would result in terms of conflicts with the Regional Street/Dublin Boulevard intersection and Grand Auto driveway would far exceed the occasional inconvenience a customer may experience in having to make a u- turn in the front parking lot in the event the lot is full. She said conflicts between exiting drive-through customers and and customers parking in the front parking lot would be mitigated through the use of signage. Ms. O'Halloran indicated a condition is included in the draft Resolution of approval requiring a cross access easement between the proposed El Pollo Asado site and the vacant adjacent parcel to the west. Regarding the emergency exit from the drive-through, Ms. O'Halloran said Staff recommended the Applicant create an emergency exit from the drive-through lane after the menu board and prior to the pickup window. She referred to the Staff Study for details and said the proposed exit is a standard requirement for drive-through restaurants in the City of Dublin. She said the Applicant had expressed concern with this requirement due to the possibility that customers attempting to reach the drive-through lane may inadvertently enter the drive-through lane at the emergency exit point, missing the menu board and cutting into the line. In addition, the Applicant indicated the proposed exit may encourage pranksters to place an order at the menu board and exit prior to picking up the order. Ms. O'Ha11oran said the concern related to individuals entering the drive-through lane at the wrong place would be partially mitigated through the use of directional signage along the north drive aisle, as well as appropriate pavement signage directing vehicles not to enter. She also said that the proposed building and site layout would provide an excellent opportunity for direct viewing of the menu board from the pickup window, which would reduce confusion from "pranksters" placing orders and leaving the drive-through before picking up the order. Ms. O'Ha11oran advised that the proposed project is in compliance with the City's Zoning Ordinance, General Plan, and Dublin Downtown Specific Plan. Regular Meeting PCM-7-189 December 7, 1987 In addition to the modifications to the drive-through lane and south driveway, Ms. O'Ha11oran said it was Staff's recommendation that the Applicant contribute a proportional share of the cost of Dublin Boulevard/San Ramon Road improvements based upon the project's contribution to the total estimated build-out traffic in the downtown area. She advised that the monetary contribution would not exceed $5,000. Ms. O'Ha11oran indicated a condition was included in the Resolution requ1r1ng additional landscaping within the parking lot area as shown on the Staff Study. Ms. O'Ha11oran indicated it was Staff's recommendation that the Commission adopt the Resolutions adpoting a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance, a Conditional Use Permit, and a Site Development Review for PA 87-139. In response to an inquiry by Cm. Barnes, Ms. O'Ha11oran clarified the location of the pickup window and menu board. She also discussed the access easement in response to an inquiry by Cm. Zika. Cm. Zika expressed concern regarding traffic dumping onto San Ramon Road as an option. Mr. Tong clarified that the proposed property for the cross access easement is between the Chevron Station at the corner of San Ramon Road and Dublin Boulevard and Grand Auto and would basically have a right-turn in and right-turn out both onto Dublin Boulevard and San Ramon Road. He said Staff recommended that there be a drive-through connection which would allow vehicles desiring to exit eastward to do so without exiting onto Dublin Boulevard or San Ramon Road. In response to an inquiry by Cm. Zika, Mr. Tong said as the proposal was originally submitted, all vehicles would have exited onto Regional Street. He said Staff felt their proposal was a reasonable one which would alleviate additional traffic problems at the corners of Amador Valley Boulevard and Dublin Boulevard. Cm. Mack asked for clarification regarding concern expressed by the Applicant relating to pranksters. Ms. O'Ha11oran stated that Staff felt the proposed layout would provide a clear view of the menu board and would permit restaurant employees an opportunity to monitor the board. In response to an inquiry by Cm. Zika, Ms. O'Ha11oran said she thought all of the existing drive-through restaurants in the City of Dublin have a similar requirement for an emergency exit. Cm. Burnham asked if any type of railing would be required on the walkway. Ms. O'Hal1oran said that Staff recommended the width of the walkway be six feet, which would be adequate for pedestrians. In response to an inquiry by Cm. Burnham regarding the elimination of the driveway, Ms. O'Ha11oran said Staff's main concern was the close proximity of the site to the intersection. Frank Abajian, Applicant/Representative, expressed appreciation to Ms. O'Ha11oran for her comments and observations. He concurred with her statements that there were two remaining issues which needed to be resolved: Regular Meeting PCM-7-190 December 7, 1987 1) the emergency exit from the drive-through lane, and 2) the additional south driveway. He said the subject site was a very difficult piece of property to develop. Cm. Zika asked how close the proposed rear driveway would be to the Grand Auto driveway. Mr. Brooks, Representative, said Grand Auto has a two-foot landscaping strip and the driveway is about 35 feet from where El Pollo customers would exit. Cm. Burnham inquired about the location for loading and unloading passengers. Mr. Abajian responded that one of the reasons the "escape" routes were utilized was so that customers who changed their minds about ordering as a result of prices while in the drive-through line could exit. He said he didn't think that would apply to E1 Po11o customers. On motion by Cm. Mack, seconded by Cm. Burnham, and by a unanimous vote (Cm. Tempel absent), the public hearing was closed. On motion by Cm. Mack, seconded by Cm. Burnham, and by a unanimous vote (Cm. Tempel absent), a Resolution was approved as presented adopting a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance for PA 87-139. RESOLUTION NO. 87 - 076 ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE FOR PA 87-139 EL POLLO ASADO.RESTAURANT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APN 941-305-35 On motion by Cm. Burnham, seconded by Cm. Zika, and by a unanimous vote (Cm. Tempel absent), a Resolution was adopted approving PA 87-139 Conditional Use Permit. RESOLUTION NO. 87 - 077 APPROVING PA 87-139 EL POLLO ASADO RESTAURANT CONDTIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A RESTAURANT WITH A DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITY AND OUTDOOR SEATING PATIO AREA ON THE UNDEVELOPED LOT ON THE WEST SIDE OF REGIONAL STREET, APN 941-305-35 On motion by Cm. Zika, seconded by Cm. Burnham, and by a unanimous vote (Cm. Tempel absent), a Resolution was adopted approving PA 87-139 Site Development Review, with revision to Condition #36 permitting the proposed southern driveway cut, but requiring the Applicant to provide appropriate on- site signage designating the southern driveway as "One Way" "Exit Only" and restricting the driveway to a "Right Turn Only" onto Regional Street. RESOLUTION NO. 87 - 078 APPROVING PA 87-139 EL POLLO ASADO RESTAURANT SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT A RESTAURANT ON THE UNDEVELOPED LOT ON THE WEST SIDE OF REGIONAL STREET, APN 941-305-35 Regular Meeting PCM-7 -191 December 7, 1987 ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ , SUBJECT: PA 87-118.1 and .2 Post California Partnerships, Ltd. (Applicants)/Rafanelli and Nahas Real Estate bevelopment (Owners) - Village V(Post Creek) - Villages at Willow Creek - Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review requests. ' Cm. Barnes opened the public hearing and called for the Staff Report. Mr. Gailey provided a brief overview of the entire Villages at Willow Creek project. He said the subject Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review requests were for a proposed 204-unit, 9-building apartment/condominium multiple family residential project occupying the 13.1+ acre area identified as Village V of the Villages at Willow Creek Project. He said this was a change from the original 192+ unit, 18-building proposal, and would provide a sizeable increase in the amount of project open space area. He advised that, in accordance with Section 8-31.18 of the City Zoning Ordinance, the proposed change in the unit count and project layout prompted the need for the Conditional Use Permit process. Mr. Gailey indicated that the environmental document prepared for the project utilized the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance for the Villages at Willow Creek PD, Planned Development Rezoning and Tentative Map requests. He said no additional environmental documentation would be necessary. Mr. Gailey stated that since the time of the initial application submittal on August 20, 1987, the Applicant and Staff have been engaged in a continual dialogue regarding the submittal requirements and the proposed pro~ect design. He said extended discussions were also held regarding the Applicant's proposal to utilize a single project trash area containing a trash compactor. He referred to Background Attacnment #9, Post Creek - Compactor Trash Service Questionnaire, and said Staff was in a position to recommend conditional approval of use of the proposed trash compactor. He referred to Condition #22 of the proposed Resolution marked as Exhibit A which outlined the requirements Staff recommended be applied to the trash compactor. Mr. Gailey referred to Attachment 11, which detailed adjustments to the Building Elevations which would mitigate some of Staff's concerns regarding the comparatively stark architectural design of Building Types D/B and G/H. Mr. Gailey advised that Staff and the Applicant were unable to reach a mutually satisfactory resolution on the following requests by the Applicant, , and said the referenced Conditions of Approval reflect specific recommenda- tions by Staff on the respective items: 1. The Applicant requested that the width of the sidewalk along the north side of North Loop Road from Dou hert Road to Alamo Creek be reduced from a g Y 6-foot width to a 4-foot width. Condition #32 of Exhibit A reflects Staff's recommendation that the Applicant's request be denied. Regular Meeting PCM-7-192 December 7, 1987 . . ~ • 2. The Applicant requested the elirnination of the recommended pedestrian walkway interconnection between Villages IV and V. Condition #29 of Exhibit A reflected Staff's position that the connection be retained. 3. The Applicant requested a modification of the recommended delivery time for the Architectural SoundwalZ along the Dougherty Road frontage of Villages IV and V. Mr. Gailey said Staff had a concern related to the appearance of the potentially undeveloped portion of the Villages project along Dougherty Road (Village IV), and said Staff was recornrnending the entire length of the wall be required to be installed with this project (Condition #34). 4. A concern not addressed within the Staff Report related to the recommended delivery time of landscaping and elevation improvements on the north boundary of the project. Mr. Gailey said the Applicant was requesting flexibility for the delivery time. He said Staff felt it would be appropriate to require completion by the time of the occupancy of the first unit in the proj ect. Mr. Gailey indicated that there were three Conditians of Appraval in Exhibit A which Staff recommended be modified. Specifically, he said Staff felt Condition #25 should be modified to include a statement acknowledging the Applicant's submittals to date pertaining to site lighting. He said Condition #28 should be modified ta reflect December 2, 1987, as the date of the Revised Site Plan and Grading Plan. Regarding Condition #41, he said a change should be made to reflect the Carport Plan Elevations submitted by the Applicant on December 4, 1987. Mr. Gailey said it was Staff's recammendation that the Planning Comrnission adopt the Draft Resolution approving the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review requests. Ron Nahas, representing the Property Owner, intraduced Representatives from Post California, and gave a background on the selection process for the Developer of the Post Creek project. Roger Greer, Applicant/Representative, Post California, introduced Dennis Suarez, Don Rutson (Landscape Architect), Jim Guthrie (Architect), Fred Holmes (Cost Consultant), and Norman Htzghes (Creegan & De' Angelo). Mr. Rutson gave a slide presentation depicting the extensive landscaping program proposed for the project. Mr. Greer said the average size of the proposed units would be approximately 854 square feet, ranging from 525 to 1,255 square feet, that there would be one- and two-bedroom units, with seven different floor plans. He also said the trash compactor is now used as a standard item in Atlanta, Georgia, for new multi-family projects. Mr. Greer expressed the following concerns: 1. Regarding the requirement for a six-foot sidewalk along the north side of North Loop Road, he referred to the requirement for provision of a flat three-foot wide deer path in the same area, and said that with the steep grade along portions of the roadway, a four-foot sidewalk would be more feasible. Regular Meeting PCM-7-193 December 7, 1987 ~ . 2. Regarding the requirement for a gate in the fence along the south property line, he said if the gate is installed there may be some problerns on the part of the homeowners' association related to maintanance of the gate as well as related to security. He said he thought the proposed gate would create more problems than it would prevent. He said the problem was not one of construction, as the gate could be installed if required. He also said he thought potential disputes may arise regarding easements adjacent to the gate. Of the unresolved issues, he said he felt most strongly about this one and the future impacts of the gate on the homeowners. 3. Regarding the soundwall extension along Dougherty Road, Mr. Greer said his concern was one of timing. He indicated that he thought it would be more feasible to require the completion of the wall with the development of Village IV. 4. Regarding landscaping requirements along the north side of the North Loop Road, Mr. Greer stated that it would be preferable to delay the installation of the landscaping until after the last building on the north side has been completed. Ron Nahas expressed concern regarding a previously established condition placed on the project by the Fish & Game Department related to providing a way for deer to cross from the creek area into Camp Parks to the east. He I discussed the requirement to provide the three feet of flat area for this same area, and the difficulty which would arise if the six-foot sidewalk was also required for this same area. He also referred to the proposed gate at the southern portion of the project, and stated that during the appeal period for the Site Development Review the related condition was not appealed as it was thought that Rafanelli & Nahas Real Estate Development would develop the adjacent Villages. He said he thought the easement for the gate would vialate the property rights of the owners of Villages IV and V, and that he did not think the condition should be imposed over the ab~ections of both property owners. Mr. Gailey gave some background regarding the rec{uirement for the deer path, which arose during the meetings between Fish & Game, Zone 7 and the City Engineer regarding development of the Improvement Plan for Alamo Creek. He said the requirement was not foreseen at the time the Rezoning process occurred. He advised the Commission of a project pending in the City of San Ramon which may be required to augment the pathway requirement in place for the Villages project. Mr. Gailey suggested that if the six-foot requirement for the walkway was seen as untenable, then Staff would encourage inclusion of language in the appropriate Conditions of Approval directing the Developers to make a diligent effort to contact the property owner to the north to be allowed to do some off-site grading. Mr. Gailey said Staf~' did not yet have Improvement Plans for that roadway. Fie advised that some of the areas might be tight and that there might be a need to include some retaining walls. Cm. Barnes said her only concern with the proposed project related to the use of only one trash compactor. She said she was concerned about the distance between the compactor and some of the units. Regular Meeting PCM-7-i94 December 7, 1987 ~ . • ~ Cm. Burnham said it seemed more feasible to put individual trash campactors in each unit. Mr. Greer said with the exception the four items previously noted, he agreed with the proposed Conditions of Approval. He said the one outstanding critical issue was the proposed gate between the projects. On motion by Cm. Mack, seconded by Cm. Barnes, and by a unanimous vote (Cm. Tempel absent), the public hearing was closed. Cm. Zika asked Staff to review the reason for the gate. Mr. Gailey said the main reason would be for convenience of the future residents in the respective projects. He said Staff felt because of the large size of the project and the long distances between the entrances, there may be the potential for family units in one project to visit those in the adjoining project. He cited the Morrison Homes project behind Iceland as an example where an easement through a multiple family residential project had been provided. Cm. Burnham indicated that he agreed with Mr. Greer on the issue of the gate, and said he thought the argument could go both ways. He said he would prefer not to require the gate. On the issue of the trash compactor, he said he had seen the concept work and thought it was a good idea. Regarding width of the sidewalk, he said he thought this must be determined by the height of the ground. He also said he thought the installation of the landscaping could be delayed until the adjoining units were ready for occupancy. Regarding the soundwall, he indicated he was still undecided on that issue. Mr. Gailey indicated that the function to be served by the installation of the soundwall would be to provide a visual barrier of the project as viewed from Dougherty Road and to serve as a sound attenuating structure for units at the southeast corner of the project. Cm. Burnham asked if the Developer would have a problem with requiring the landscaping to be in and the soundwall installed for Village IV prior to occupancy. Mr. Gailey said he could not speak far the Applicant. Cm. Burnham agreed with Staff, stating that the soundwall should be required to be installed. Cm. Zika indicated that if the soundwall were installed, there would at least be some consistency if Viilage IV was not immediately developed. Cm. Burnham asked at whose expense the soundwall would be installed along the frontage of Village IV. In response to an inquiry from Cm. Mack regarding Condition #33, Mr. Gailey said in addition to the carports, the Developer proposed to install some garages. He said Staff was concerned that there should be clear direction regarding what the allowable use of the carports/garages would be. Regular Meeting PCM-7-195 December 7, 1987 . - ~ ~ Cm. Mack referred to the questionnaire regarding the trash compactor. Mr. Gailey said it should be stressed that in researching the use of trash compactors, Post was not the sole entity using them. He said no problems were cited in the projects developed by Post. Mr. Tong advised that proposed Condition #22 required the operation of the trash compactor be reviewed at the one- and two-year anniversaries of the project. In response to a question from Cm. Barnes, Mr. Nahas said the plans for the widening of Dougherty Road south of the Village project have been submitted. He advised the Commission of their intention to proceed with that widening by the middle of the summer of 1988. He said Camp Parks has a transformer in the middle of the road which is scheduled to be removed by the middle of February. He said this must occur before the widening can proceed. Cm. Barnes expressed concern regarding the potential for increased traffic. Mr. Gailey said the project in and of itself would not trigger major problems. Cm. Barnes indicated that her preference regarding the gate between Villages IV and V allows its elimination. She also said she does see the need for the immediate installation of the saundwall. Cm. Burnham inquired about signage and asked if the soundwall would include project names on it. Mr. Gailey said the signs would still have to be reviewed. He said it is an integrated project and that he anticipated one name. He said-that Mr. Nahas had requested that something appear on the wall indicating which projects include for-sale units and which are rental complexes. Regarding the requirement for landscaping along the west and north sides of the North Loop Road frontage Mr. Tong said it would be possible to trigger the requirement for landscaping either at the time of the framing inspection or as soon as a finished unit was occupied. I It was the consensus of the Commission that the landscaping along the north 'i side of the North Loop Road frontage be allowed to occur in increments tied to the completion of the immediately adjoining units. The consensus of the Commission was to eliminate the need for the gate between the Village V project and the future Village IV project, as detailed in draft Condition #29. Regarding Condition #32, which called for provision of a six-foot wide attached sidewalk along the north side of North Loop Road, the Commission concurred that this Condition should remain as written. It was the consensus of the Commission that proposed Condition #34 remain as presented by Staff, requiring the soundwall along the entire frontage of Dougherty Road for Villages IV and V to be installed prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for any unit in the subject project. Regular Meeting PCM-7-196 December 7, 1987 , ~ . ~ Mr. Gailey recommended that Condition #35, regarding fencing, the pedestrian pathway and landscaping and irrigation along the length of the west and north sides of North Loop Road, be deleted as it was covered elsewhere in the proposed Conditions. The Commission concurred with Mr. Gailey's recommendation. On motion by Cm. Mack, seconded by Cm. Burnham, and by a unanimous vote (Cm. Tempel absent), a Resolution was adopted approving Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review requests, PA 87-118.1 and .2, contingent upon modifications as indicated above. RESOLUTION N0. 87 - 079 APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQIJESTS PA 87-118.1 AND .2 POST CALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIPS, LTD. - VILLAGE V OF THE VILLAGES AT WILLOW CREEK PROJECT FOR A PROPOSED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 204 APARTMENT/CONDOMINIUM UNITS PROPOSED OVER A 13.1+ ACRE PROPERTY FRONTING AT THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF THE INTEitSECTION OF DOUGHERTY ROAD ANb THE ALAMEDA COUNTY/CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LINE ~ ~ 7C X NEW BUSINESS OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. ~ ~ ~ ~ OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Tong indicated that the New Ewe Planned Development Rezoning would be on the December 14, 1987, City Council agenda. He said the Applicant has dropped the request for a massage use. He also said the Council has indicated they will hold their second meeting of December on the 21st instead of on the 28th. Regarding Planning Commission training sessions, Mr. Tong stated that the second Wednesday of December would be the 16th and the training session wauld be held at the City Offices at 6:00 p.m. ~ ~ ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSIONERS' CONCERNS None. ~ * ~ ~ Regular Meeting PCM-7-197 December 7, 1987 , . ' • • ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:07 p.m. ~ ~ ~ ~ Respectfully submitted, r' ' g " sion Chairperson ti Laurence L. Tong Planning Director ~ ~ ~ ~ Regular Meeting PCM-7-198 December 7, 1987