HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-010 DbRchAreaA-1SDR08-28-2001AGENDA STATEMENT
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: August 28, 2001
SUBJECT:
ATTACHMENTS:
PUBLIC HEARING - PA 01-010 Toll Brothers -Dublin Ranch Areas
A-1 Site Development Review.
(Report Prepared by: Michael Porto, Planning Consultant) °I~
1) Resolution Approving a Site Development Review for Area A-1,
Tract 7136 Dublin Ranch Area A.
2) Area A-1 Submittal Package
RECOMMENDATION: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation.
2) Take testimony from the Applicant and the public.
3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public.
4) Close public hearing and deliberate.
5) Adopt Resolutions relating to PA 01-010
DESCRIPTION:
The application is for a Site Development Review for the Areas A-1 Neighborhood within Dublin Ranch Area
A. Area A-1 -Tract 7136 is comprised of 110 single-family homes on a minimum ]ot size of 10,000 sq. ft.
There are approximately 38 acres within the boundary of this tentative map.
BACKGROUND:
This project is part of Dublin Ranch Area A comprised of 369+/- acres of mixed-use development including
Single Family Residential, Open Space /Golf Course with appurtenant structures, and a Neighborhood
Recreation Facility.
The City Council, at their meeting of November 18, 1997, reviewed and approved a PD District Overlay Zone
for Dublin Ranch Area A. The action designated the area for future residential and open space uses in a design
similar to that represented by this application. At their meeting of July 25, 2000, the Planning Commission
considered and approved Master Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7135, which created a subdivision for the over all
land within Area A. At that same meeting, The Planning Commission considered and approved seven (7)
individual vesting tentative tract maps for the subdivision of the individual lots. This current application is the
next logical step in the development of the Area A-1 site in question. The applicant is requesting a Site
Development Review approval for the residential units to be built on these subdivisions.
Dublin Ranch Area Al is located west of Fallon Road and northerly of the existing L-5 subdivision. The
project site is also easterly and northeasterly of the existing L-6 and L-1 neighborhoods in Dublin Ranch Phase
COPIES TO: Applicant
Property Owner
PA File
Project Manager
ITEM NO.
1. The project site is completely surrounded by the "front nine" of the proposed Dublin Ranch Golf Course.
Either open space or golf courses physically separate the homes from the above-described neighborhoods.
Grading has occurred to create the proposed lots and streets. Action on this SDR by the Planning Commission
will begin the process of allowing houses to be built on the graded lots.
ANALYSIS: TRACT 7136- NEIGHBORHOOD A-1:
Neighborhood A-1 is approximately 38.4 acres in size, with 110 single-family residential lots. This
neighborhood is surrounded by the golf course on all sides. Fallon Road is just beyond golf course holes 1 and 2
to the east. The residential development is sited above the golf course so homes that orient to the course will be
looking down to the various holes. The minimum lot size designated for this area by the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan is 10,000 sq. ft. A modified loop road and a series of internal through streets would provide access for the
neighborhood. Tentative Tract Map 7136 was approved by the Planning Commission at their meeting of July
25, 2000, setting the location and sizes of the individual lots.
The applicant, Toll Brothers is proposing 4 individual floor plans that vary in size, elevation and layout. A brief
description of the basic elements of each unit type is provided below.
PEAK NU. SQ.FT BED/BATt GARAGE STORIES
1 "Atherton" 4,967 5 bed-5 'h bath 3 split 2
2 "Carlsbad" 5,607 6 bed-6'/z bath 3 tum-in 2
3 "New Castle" 4,866 5 bed - 4 % bath 3 front-on 2
4 "Santa Barbara" 5,012 5 bed - 4 '/=bath 4 split 2
Each of the four floor plans has provisions for optional suites, bonus rooms, dens, librazies and bathrooms. All
four plans include breakfast nooks and family rooms. There aze unique characteristics pertinent to each floor
plan, which are described below.
Floor Plans
Plan 1: "Atherton;" This floor plan presents a three caz "front-on" gazage, however, the one car garage is
physically sepazated from the 2-car garage by the units entry. A similaz plan was proposed and approved for the
Toll Brothers A-6 Neighborhood. Unlike the A-6 Neighborhood, the unit is sufficiently wide enough to allow a
large enough separation between the driveways to provide for guest parking in front of the unit. Each garage is
treated in a similaz manner. The two-caz garage has a center post between the doors so the over all appearance
is of three doors separated by the entry. There are no provisions for the one caz space to be converted to
additional living area. A portion of the front facade incorporates aone-story element that reduces the massing of
the structure. This house has both a main stair and a secondary stair to better sepazate uses.
Plan 2: "Cazlsbad;" This plan incorporates atwo-car "front-on" and aone-car "swing-in" garage layout. There
aze no proposed options for this floor plan. The entry is significantly reduced back from the font facade to
provide a very formal feel. As the single story swing-in garage is a one story element, this portion of the home
which is forward of the main structure is given aloes-key street element and will allow for a more vazied and
interesting streetscape.
Plan 3: "New Castle;" This unit is 60 feet wide which is significantly wider than any residential product
currently being built in Dublin. Most units aze a maximum of 40 feet. This plan provides a 3-car front on
2
garage but, due to the width of the unit, a large portion of the home completes the front elevation. The front
elevation is stepped proving shading and shadow interest with single story elements over portions of the garage
and study. A unique feature of the garage portion of the plan is the varied roof forms and configurations of the
third caz space. On two plans the third car space is to the outside of the structure and stepped forward of the
main structure. One plan moves the gazage to the center of the structure and steps this element forwazd. The
fourth elevation keeps all three garages in line but orients the single door towazd the center of the structure. A
large central turret forms the focal point of the front fagade of this plan.
Plan 4: "Santa Bazbaza" This is an entirely new housing style for Dublin. This plan provides afour-car garage.
The gazages are physically split from each other with each two-caz element on opposite sides of a central
driveway. Both gazages are single story elements and the front facade appears large because there is no
appazent garage doors visible from the street. One garage blocks the other when seen from all but the sharpest
angle. The front facade of this plan steps back from the front plane and further creates interest for the
streetscape.
Because of the size of the lots and the Developer's designs that spread across the lot, this development will
appeaz to be that of asemi-custom home development. Setbacks between the houses are greater than in any
other Dublin Ranch Neighborhood. Of the 110 total lots within this tract, the Plan 1 is plotted 25%, the Plan 2 is
plotted 25 %, the Plan 3 is plotted 26% and the Plan 4 is plotted 24% of the time. With this dispersion of plans,
combined with the offering of 4 elevations per plan (see description below), the overall street pattern should be
very unique and varied creating a pleasing street scene and unique development.
Elevations
There are two architectural firms providing floor plans and elevations for this product. LSA Architecture, Inc.
is providing 3 floor plans and Hale Hunt Jones Architects are providing one floor plan. The architects aze each
proposing 4 different architectural styles. Each floor plan type will receive a114 of the of the general elevation
options. The three floor plans prepared by LSA incorporate 4 architectural styles: Federal, Provincial, Manor,
and New England. The Hunt Hale Jones elevations are only labeled A, B, C and D (American Colonial,
American Traditional, Manor and Mediterranean). The introduction of the second azchitect and the subtle
differences of the architectural styles between the two designers should serve to diversify the product even
further.
American Federal: This architectural style incorporates brick masonry, lap siding on all four sides, wood
shutters, formal entry columns and flat concrete the roofs as primary exterior materials. full wood wraps of
horizontal siding with brick wainscoting and shutter accents. Roof pitches range between 6:12 to 10:12 and
generally run from front to back. Gabled end elements with vents, dormers or windows are used to punctuate
azchitectural features and wood framed porches and balconies further define this architectural style.
New England. The New England architectural style is comprised of traditional east coast features such as lap
siding on all four sides, square entry columns, arched top windows, wood shutters, dormer windows, pot shelves
and heavy fascias. Roof pitches are again 6:12 to 10:12 and are comprised or either hip or gable elements.
Second floor porches and balconies aze also important focal elements.
Manor: Stone and plaster exterior walls, shaped plaster trim and arched top window characterize the Manor
Architectural style. A raised concrete the roof and heavy building base further define this style.
Provincial: Similar to the French and Italian Mediterranean architectural style, the Provincial elevations
incorporate low pitch hipped roofs, earth toned "S" shaped concrete tiles, plaster walls with horizontal reveals
and trim accents, arched windows and heavily ornamented and impressive entries. Classical columns aze
generally found somewhere on the front elevation as well as shade and shadow niches.
New Castle Plan 3: As this plan was designed by a separate azchitect (Hunt Hale Jones), the nomenclature of
architectural styles is slightly different than those for the plans designed by LSA. There names for the
architectural styles are American Colonial, American Traditional, Manor and Mediterranean. The Manor and
Mediterranean styles are fairly well defined above and incorporate many similar features. The American
Colonial correlates to the New England elevations and the American Traditional elevations aze in keeping with
the Federal design of the other design firm.
Colors
The applicant is proposing 20 different color schemes for each of the architectural elevations. The color
schemes aze intended to complement the roof types and accent materials. Flat the roof with brick accents will
have 6 available color options, flat the with stone accents will also have 6 color options and the "s"the roof and
all stucco plans will have 8 optional color schemes. These colors are similaz to the existing colors on Toll
Brothers Emerald Glen product on Site 10 of the Santa Rita Properties. When these color schemes aze
combined with the 4 elevation styles and the four floor plans, the overall elements of the project should be
unique and pleasing.
Landscaping and Fencing
Both the front yard landscaping and fencing details are governed by the previously approved Site Development
Review granted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of July 25, 2000. Generally, where lots abut
either the golf course or permanent open space either a view fence (wrought iron) or a combination of wrought
iron and a low wall aze to be implemented. No solid walls aze proposed anywhere in this subdivision. Two and
three rail fences will be used adjacent to open space corridors and wrought iron fencing will be used to block
access from the residential neighborhoods to the golf course. Standard six-foot wooden good neighbor fences
will be used between lots and along the interior streets.
Gated Entries: As a part of the previously approved Site Development Review for the overall designs for Area,
this neighborhood was proposed with the possibility for gated entries. The applicant is proposing gated entry
points at both entries to the subdivision. The geometric and visual design of both of these gated entries was
included in the previous approval. Given the size of the lots (over 10,000 sq. ft.) and the size of the homes
(average 5,000 sq. ft.), it would seem that gated entries would enhance the overall design concept for Area A-1.
The access roads do not link with any other neighborhood and there is no need for the general public and
homeowners other than those in the A-1 Neighborhood
CONCLUSIONS:
The area that comprises the Area A-1 Neighborhood is physically divided from the remainder of the golf course
neighborhoods by the Golf Course itself thereby creating a unique environment unto itself. The applicant has
provided a lazger home on lazger lots with greater setbacks. Front facades will be regal and impressive with a
significant level of architectural detailing. Side and rear elevations incorporate some of the finer points of the
front elevations especially when viewed from the adjacent golf course. Common architectural elements,
materials and massing will also serve to connect the homes while creating a more formal and lighter look
4
compazed to the more Spanish feel of Dublin Ranch Phase 1. This proposed product would provide an
opportunity to add a new look to the Dublin Ranch community by introducing more traditional architectural
design and a feeling or an upscale neighborhood.
The overall design for this neighborhood will complement and accentuate the housing stock in Dublin and
should be viewed as the "premier" neighborhood for Area A. This neighborhood should blend well with the
houses currently being built, and will be visually pleasing from the off site views and from within the
neighborhoods themselves.
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Bill Momson
Toll Brothers
100 Park Place, Suite 140
San Ramon, CA 94587
OWNER: John Paynter, Asst. Vice President
Toll Brothers CA II, L.P.
100 Pazk Place, Suite 140
San Ramon, CA 94587
LOCATION: East of Tassajara Road adjacent to the future Fallon Road extension, approximately
4,500 feet north of I-580
ASSESSOR PARCEL: Portions of the following pazcels: 985-2-3, 985-3-3-2, 985-7-2-15, 985-7-2-6, 985-7-
2-7,985-7-2-9,985-6-7, 985-6-8.
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential (0.9 to 6.0 du/ac) and open space
SPECIFIC PLAN
DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential (0.9 to 6.0 du/ac)
EXISTING ZONING
AND LAND USE: Zoning: Single Family Residential Planned Development and Open Space
Land Use: Vacant
A:pcstfiptaug28
6
RESOLUTION NO.OI -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING THE SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR PA 01-010 SUBDIVISION 7136
(NEIGHBOHOOD A-1, DUBLIN RANCH AREA A)
AS FILED BY MAC KAY & SOMPS ON BEHALF OF TOLL CA II, L.P.
WHEREAS, Jon Paynter on behalf of Toll CA, L.P. has requested approval of a Site Development
Review for Subdivision 7136, Neighborhood A-1 of Dublin Ranch Area A to develop 110 residential lots and
open space/landscape parcels in the Eastern Dublin Specific Planning area; and
WHEREAS, a complete application for the above noted entitlement request is available and on file in
the Community Development Department; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), CEQA Guidelines Section
15182, the proposed project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern
Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan which was certified by the City Council by Resolution No.
51-93, and the Addenda dated May 4, 1993 and August 22, 1994 (the "EIR"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on said application on August 28,
2001; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, a staff report was submitted recommending that the Planning Commission approve the
Site Design Review, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and use their independent judgment and considered all
said reports, recommendations, and testimony herein above set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
does hereby make the following findings and determinations regarding said proposed Site Development
Review:
1. The approval of this application (PA01-010), as conditioned, is consistent with the intent/purpose
of Section 8.104 (Site Development Review) of the Zoning Ordinance.
2. The approval of this application, as conditioned, complies with the policies of the General Plan,
the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and the Planned Development Rezone Development Plan for the project,
which allows for residential development at this location.
3. The approval of this application, as conditioned, is consistent with the design review
requirements in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance.
ATTAC~~MENT
4. The approval of this application, as conditioned, is in conformance with regional transportation
and growth management plans.
5. The approval of this application, as conditioned, is in the best interests of the public health,
safety, and general welfare as the development is consistent with all laws and ordinances and implements the
Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
6. The proposed site development, including site layout, vehicular access, circulation and parking,
setbacks, height, walls, public safety, and similaz elements, as conditioned, has been designed to provide a
harmonious environment for the development.
7. The project has been designed with azchitectural considerations (including the character, scale,
design quality, and the relationship among buildings), along with Conditions of Approval, in order to ensure
compatibility among the design of this project, the chazacter of adjacent uses, and the requirements of public
service agencies.
8. Landscape elements (including the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant
materials, provisions, and similaz elements previously approved) combined with Conditions of Approval have
been established to ensure visual relief and an attractive public environment.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby approve the
Site Development Review for PA 01-010 subject to the following Conditions of Approval.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Unless stated otherwise all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building
permits or establishment of use and shall be subject to Department of Community Development review and
approval. The following codes represent those departments/agencies responsible for monitoring compliance
of the conditions of approval: f ADM} Administration/City Attorney, jB} Building division of the
Community Development Department fDSR} Dublin San Ramon Services District ~F} Alameda County
Fire Department/City of Dublin Fire Prevention fFIN} Finance Department ~PLI Planning division of the
Community Development Department (PO} Police, DPW} Public Works Department.
NO. CONDITION TEXT RESP.
AGENCY WHEN
REQ'D
Prior to: APPLICANT
COMMENTS
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. Approval. PA 01-010, Neighborhood A-1 Dublin PL, PW Approval of N/A
Ranch Area, Tract 7136 is approved to develop 110 any plan
single family detached homes, open space and
landscape pazcels. This approval shall conform
generally to the plans, text, and illustrations
contained in the applicant's application package
dated received August 23, 2001 as prepazed by
MacKay and Somps (Engineers), LSA Architecture
and Hale Hunt Jones Architects (Architect), and all
NO. CONDITION TEXT RESP. WHEN APPLICANT
AGENCY REQ'D COMMENTS
Prior to:
other plans, texts and diagrams submitted as part of
the subdivision proposal unless modified by the
Conditions of Approval contained herein all of which
are on file in the Community Development
Department.
2. Fees. Applicant/Developer shall pay all applicable Various Various times, 31-33, 47, 266
fees in effect at the time of building permit issuance, but no later MM Matrix
including, but not limited to, Planning fees, Building than Issuance
fees, Dublin San Ramon Services District fees, Public of Building
Facilities fees, Dublin Unified School District School Permits
Impact fees, Public Works Traffic Impact fees,
Alameda County Fire Services fees; Noise Mitigation
fees, Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu fees; Alameda
County Flood and Water Conservation District (Zone
7) Drainage and Water Connection fees; and any
other fees as noted in the Development Agreement.
Un-issued building permits subsequent to new or
revised TIF's shall be subject to recalculation and
assessment of the fair share of the new or revised
fees.
3. Previous Approvals. All conditions contained in Various Various Times N/A
Planning Commission Resolution No.00-42,
approving the tentative tract map are hereby
incorporated by reference.
4. Required Permits. Applicant/Developer shall obtain Various Various times, Standard
all necessary permits required by other agencies and but no later
shall submit copies of the permits to the Department than Issuance
of Public Works. of Building
Permits
5. Building Codes and Ordinances. All project B Through Standard
construction shall conform to all building codes and Completion
ordinances in effect at the time of building permit.
6. Standard Conditions. The project shall comply PL, B Through Standard
with the City of Dublin Site Development Review Completion
Standard Conditions attached thereto as Exhibit A.
7. House Numbers List. ApplicanllDeveloper shall PL Issuance of COA
submit a house numbers list corresponding lots Building
shown on the Tentative Map. Said list is subject to Permits
approval of the Director of Community
Development.
8. Term. Approval of the Site Development Review PL Approval of Standard
shall be valid for one year from approval by the Improvement
Planning Commission. If construction has not Plans
commenced by that time, this approval shall be null
NO. ' CONDITION TEXT RESP. WHEN APPLICANT
AGENCY REQ'D COMMENTS
Prior to:
and void. The approval period for Site Development
Review may be extended six (6) additional months by
the Director of Community Development upon
determination that the Conditions of Approval remain
adequate to assure that the above stated findings of
approval will continue to be met.
(Applicant/Developer must submit a written request
for the extension prior to the expiration date of the
Site Development Review.)
9. Revocation. The SDR will be revocable for cause in PL On-going Municipal
accordance with Section 8.96.020.I of the Dublin Code
Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of the terms or
conditions of this approval shall be subject to
citation.
10. Air Conditioning Units -Air conditioning units and B, PL Occupancy of COA
ventilation ducts shall be screened from public view Unit
with materials compatible to the main building and
shall not be roof mounted. Units shall be
permanently installed on concrete pads or other non-
movable materials to be approved by the Building
Official and Director of Community Development.
Air conditioning units shall be located such that each
dwelling unit has one side yard with an unobstructed
width of not less than 36 inches.
11. Automatic Garage Door Openers -Automatic B, PL Occupancy of COA
garage door openers shall be provided for all Unit
dwelling units and shall be of a roll-up type. Gazage
doors shall not intrude into the public right-of--way.
WALLS AND FENCING
12. Interior walls and Fences. All walls and fences PL Occupancy of COA
shall conform to Section 8.72.080 of the Zoning Unit
Ordinance unless otherwise required by this
resolution. Construction/installation of
common/shazed fences or walls for all side and rear
yards shall be the responsibility of
Applicant/Developer. Construction shall consist of
solid wood fences and masonry walls as shown on
preliminary landscape plan.
13. Wall or Fence Heights. All wall or fence heights PW Approval of
shall be 6 feet high (except in those locations where Improvement
Section 8.72.080 of the Zoning Ordinance requires Plans
lower fence heights and where an 8-foot sound
NO. CONDITION TEXT RESP. WHEN APPLICANT
AGENCY REQ'D COMMENTS
Prior to:
attenuation wall is required). All walls and fences
shall be designed to ensure cleaz vision at all street
intersections to the satisfaction of the Director of
Public Works.
14. Level area on both sides of fence. Fencing placed PW, PL Issuance of
at the top of bazilcs/slopes shall be provided with a Grading
minimum one-foot level area on both sides in order to Permits
facilitate maintenance by the property owners.
15. Recreational Vehicle Parking. Recreation vehicle On-going Municipal
(as defined in the Dublin Zoning Ordinance) parking Code
shall be prohibited on public streets. Reference shall
be noted in appropriate CC&R's.
POLICE.
16. Residential Security. The project shall comply with PL, B Occupancy of Standazd
the City of Dublin Residential Security Requirements Units
and the Conditions of Approval for the Vesting
Tentative Map.
LANDSCAPING...
17. Final Landscaping and Irrigation Plan. PL, PW Issuance of COA
Applicant/Developer shall submit a Final Building
Landscaping and Irrigation Plan, conforming to the Permits
requirements of Section 8.72.030 of the Zoning
Ordinance (unless otherwise modified by Conditions
i of this Resolution), stamped and approved by the
Director of Public Works and the Director of
Community Development. Plans must reflect any
project design revisions approved for subsequent Site
Plans, Vesting Tentative Map or stream restoration
program.
18. Final Landscape Plan Review. The plant palette PL Issuance of COA
varieties shall be shall be subject to review and Building
approval of the Director of Community Development Permits
and reviewed by the City's Landscape Architect to
determine compatibility with reclaimed water use,
where appropriate. An irrigation plan shall be
submitted with Final Landscape Plans indicating that
the system is designed for reclaimed water, where
required by DSRSD.
19. Landscaping required All front yazds and common PL Within 90 days COA
areas shall be landscaped by the builder or of Occupancy
homeowner within 90 days of occupancy of each
unit, unless prohibited by seasonal/weather problems.
NO. CONDITION TEXT RE5P. WHEN APPLICANT
' AGENCY REQ'D COMMENTS
Prior to:
20. Street Trees. Street tree varieties of a minimum 15- PL, PW Issuance of PW Standard
gallon size shall be planted along all street frontages Building
as shown on the Landscape Plan. Exact tree locations Pennits
and varieties shall be reviewed and approved by the
Director of Community Development. Trees planted
within, or adjacent to, sidewalks or curbs shall be
submitted to the Department of Community
Development for review and approval by the Director
of Community Development and the Director of
Public Works to determine the need for root shields.
21. Fire-resistant or drought tolerant plant varieties. PL, F Issuance of COA
Fire-resistant or drought tolerant plant vazieties shall Building
be required in the plant palette. Permits
22. Monument Signs. Design of any monument signs PL, PW Completion of COA
within the development shall be approved by the Improvements
Director of Community Development to assure
compatibility with design elements of the project and
by the Director of Public Works to assure
unobstructed traffic visibility.
23. Baclcflow Devises. Backflow devises shall be hidden PL Issuance of Standazd
from view by means of fencing, enclosures, Grading
landscaping and/or berms. Permits
24. Water Efficient Landscape Regulations. PL, PW, Approval of Standard
Applicant/Developer shall ensure that the Final DSR Final
Landscaping and Irrigation Plan conforms to the Landscape
City's Water Efficient Landscape Regulations, Plans
including dual piping to facilitate future recycled
water.
STANDARDS
25. Health, Design and Safety Standards. Prior to final PW, PL Occupancy of Standazd
approval allowing occupancy of any new home, the Unit
physical condition of the subdivision and the lot
where the home is located shall meet minimum
health, design, and safety standazds including, but not
limited to the following:
a. The streets providing access to the home shall PL Occupancy of Standazd
be complete to allow for safe traffic movements Unit
to and from the home.
b. All traffic striping and control signing on streets PW Occupancy of Standazd
providing access to the home shall be in place. Unit
c. All street name signs on streets providing PL Occupancy of Standazd
access to the homes shall be in place. Unit
d. All streetlights on streets providing access to PW Occupancy of Standard
the homes shall be energized and functioning. Unit
NO. CONDITION TEXT RESP. WHEN APPLICANT
AGENCY REQ'D COMMENTS
Prior to:
e. All repairs to the street, curb, gutter, and PW Occupancy of Standazd
sidewalk that may create a hazard shall be Unit
required or any non-hazazdous repairs shall be
complete and bonded for.
£ The homes shall have a backlighted illuminated PL Occupancy of Standard
house number. Unit
g. The lot shall be finish graded, and final grading B Occupancy of Standard
inspection shall have been approved by the Unit
Building Department.
h. All sewer clean-outs, water meter boxes, and PW Occupancy of Standard
other utility boxes shall be set to grade to the Unit
approval of the Director of Public Works.
i. The homes shall have received all necessary B Occupancy of Standazd
inspections and have final approval by the Unit
Building Department to allow occupancy.
j. All fire hydrants in streets providing access to F Occupancy of Standard
the homes shall be operable to City and ACFD Unit
standards.
k. All streets providing access to the homes shall PW, F Occupancy of Standard
be improved to an adequate width and manner Unit
to allow for fire engine circulation to the
approval of the Director of Public Works and
ACFD.
1. All mailbox units shall be at the back of the PL Occupancy of Standazd
curb/sidewalk as appropriate. The developer Unit
shall submit a mailbox design and location plan
~ to indicate where mailboxes and associated
lighting will be accommodated. The Postmaster
shall be consulted for design criteria.
Architectural enhancements should be provided
to community mailboxes where visible from the
project streets.
m. Exterior lighting shall be provided for dwelling PL Occupancy of Standard
entrances and shall be of a design and Unit
placement so as not to cause glaze onto
adjoining properties.
n. Lighting used after daylight hours shall be PL, PO, B Occupancy of Standazd
adequate to provide for security needs. Unit
(Photometrics and lighting plans for the site
shall be submitted to the Department of
Community Development and Dublin Police
Services for review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits).
NO. CONDITION TEXT RESP. WHEN APPLICANT
AGENCY REQ'D COMMENTS
Prior to:
Phased Occupancy Plan
26. Phased Occupancy Plan. If occupancy is requested PL, B Prior to
to occur in phases, then all physical improvements Occupancy for
within each phase shall be required to be completed any affected
prior to occupancy of units within that phase except unit.
for items specifically excluded in an approved Phased
Occupancy Plan, or minor hand work items, approved
by the Department of Community Development. The
Phased Occupancy Plan shall be submitted to the
Director of Community Development for review and
approval a minimum of 45 days prior to the request
for occupancy of any unit covered by said Phased
Occupancy Plan. Any phasing shall provide for
adequate vehicular access to all lots in each phase,
and shall substantially conform to the intent and
purpose of the. subdivision approval. No individual
unit shall be occupied until the adjoining area is
finished, safe, accessible, provided with all
reasonably expected services and amenities, and
separated from remaining additional construction
activity. Subject to approval of the Director of
Community Development, the completion of
landscaping may be deferred due to inclement
weather with the posting of a bond for the value of
the deferred landscaping and associated
improvements.
27. Acknowledgment. ApplicanllDeveloper shall obtain PL, ADM, Sale of any
a written acknowledgment (secured from the B unit within a
individual property owner) acknowledging the phase
continuance of construction activity within the
unoccupied phases of the project. The written
acknowledgment shall include a statement that the
property owner has reviewed and understands the
phased occupancy plan, and the associated
Conditions of Approval. Said acknowledgment is
subject to City Attorney review and approval.
Applicant/Developer shall keep a copy of said written
acknowledgment on file and shall submit the original
signed acknowledgment to the Department of
Community Development within three (3) days upon
request of the Director of Community Development.
If Applicant/Developer fails to comply, the Director
of Community Development may require the
submittal of the written acknowledgment prior to
NO. CONDITION TEXT RE5P. WHEN APPLICANT
AGENCY REQ'D COMMENTS
Prior to:
release of occupancy of any future units and/or future
phases.
PLOTTING
28. Plot Plan. A plot plan for each single family PL Issuance of Standard COA
residential lot shall be submitted and approved by the Building
Director of Community Development before approval Permits
of building permits for the respective lot. Said plot
plan shall include pad elevations, unit number and
type as well as elevation scheme, dwelling unit
outline, air conditioning units, setbacks, lot drainage,
and street utility locations.
29. Plotting Plans -Plotting Plans for each phase of the PL, PW Issuance of Standard COA
project shall be submitted by the Developer to the Building
Department of Community Development for Permits
approval by the Director of Community
Development, and Director of Public Works prior to
submitting for building permits in each respective
phase.
ARCHITECTURE
30. Residential Units shall comply with the azchitectural
drawings submitted by LSA Architecture, Inc. and
Hunt Hale Jones Architects, dated received August
23, 2001, and shall generally conform to the colors
and materials presented to the Planning Commission,
on file in the City of Dublin Department of
Community Development.
DISCLOSURES
31. Disclosure. All residents shall be notified of the PW Sale of any COA
restrictions for parking on streets within the unit within a
subdivision. No Parking azeas, as established with phase
the improvement plans, towing, and other traffic
safety regulations shall be described. Additional
parking restrictions (e.g.: red curb areas) maybe
applied in the future if traffic safety or circulation
problems azise.
32. Disclosure. At the time of sale of lots within the Sale of any PW 3/19/98
project, all residents shall be notified of the special unit within a
standards for this development regarding yard phase
setbacks for accessory structures.
34. Fees. Applicant/Developer shall pay all applicable PW, PL Finaling 31-33, 47, 266
fees in effect at the time of building permit issuance, Building MM Matrix
including, but not limited to, Planning fees, Building Permits
fees, Dublin San Ramon Services District fees, Public
Facilities fees, Dublin Unified School District School
NO. CONDITION TEXT RESP. WHEN APPLICANT
AGENCY REQ'D COMMENTS
Prior to:
Impact fees, Public Works Traffic Impact fees,
Alameda County Fire Services fees; Noise Mitigation
fees, Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu fees; Alameda
County Flood and Water Conservation District (Zone
7) Drainage and Water Connection fees; and any
other fees as noted in the Development Agreement.
Un-issued building permits subsequent to new or
revised TIF's shall be subject to recalculation and
assessment of the fair shaze of the new or revised
fees.
35. Parkland Dedication -The developer shall be PL Addressed in 13
required to pay a Public Facilities Fee in the amounts Development MM Matrix/
and at the times set forth in City of Dublin Resolution Agreement Pazks letter
No. 32-96, adopted by the City Council on Mazch 26, dated 2/26/98
1996, or in the amounts and at the times set forth in
any resolution revising the amount of the Public
Facilities Fee. No credit against the dedication
requirement shall be given for open space within this
project.
36. Compliance With Requirements. F, PW, Approval of Standard
Applicant/Developer shall comply with all applicable PO, Zone Improvement
requirements of the Alameda County Fire 7, DSR, Plans
Department, Public Works Department, Dublin PL
Police Service, Alameda County Flood Control
District Zone 7, and Dublin San Ramon Services
District as referenced in Resolution 00-042 approving
the Tentative Tract Map.
37. Building Permits. To apply for building permits, B Issuance of Standard
Applicant/Developer shall submit six (6) sets of Building
construction plans to the Building Department for Permits
plan check. Each set of plans shall have attached an
annotated copy of these Conditions of Approval. The
notations shall clearly indicate how all Conditions of
Approval will or have been complied with.
Construction plans will not be accepted without the
annotated resolutions attached to each set of plans.
Applicant/Developer will be responsible for
obtaining the approvals of all participating non-City
agencies prior to issuance of building permits.
PUBLIC WORKS CQNDITIONS'
38. Decorative Street Lights. Applicant/Developer PW Completed
shall install streetlight per the approved decorative before
streetlights approved under Site Development installation of
Review PA 99-060, Dublin Ranch Area A except that the light poles
10
NO. CONDITION TEXT RESP. WHEN APPLICANT
AGENCY REQ'D COMMENTS
Prior to:
the poles shall be painted metal. A street lighting
plan, which demonstrates compliance with this
condition shall be submitted prior to installation of
any street, lights ins the tract and shall be subject to
review and approval of the Director of Public Works.
39. Gated Entries. Applicant/Developer shall provide a PW, P, Prior to the
detailed plan for the gated access points at Turnbeny ACFD, issuance of
Drive and Kingsmill Terrace. These plans shall be a DPD permits to
scale sufficient to determine any turning movements construct
and the methods of operation for the call boxes and improvements
the gates. This plan shall conform to Alameda
County Fire and Dublin Police requirements for
access at gated entries.
40. Addressing plan: A precise addressing plan shall be PW, B, P Prior to the
prepared and submitted for review in accordance with issuance of
the City/County grid system. Building
Permits.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of August 2001.
AYES: Cm.
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTF,ST:
Community Development Director
A:resA-Isdr
11
Public Works Conditions of Approval
CITY OF DUBLIN
STANDARD PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Attachment "A"
Applicant/Developer and it's representatives (engineer, contractor, etc.) must meet and follow all the
City of Dublin's requirements and policies, including the Urban Runoff Program and Water Efficient
Landscaped Ordinance.
GENERAL:
Applicant/Developer shall comply with the Subdivision Map Act, the City of Dublin
Subdivision Ordinance, the City of Dublin Public Works Policies, the City of Dublin Grading
Ordinance and the approved Vesting Tentative Map. Applicant/Developer shall obtain copies
of and comply with conditions as noted on "City of Dublin General Notes on Improvement
Plans" and "City of Dublin Improvement Plan Review Check List".
2. An encroachment permit shall be secured from the Director of Public Works for any work done
within the public right-of--way where the work is not covered under the public improvement
plans. Applicant/Developer shall obtain Caltrans' approval and permit for any work performed
within a Caltrans right-of-way or that impacts their facilities.
3. ApplicanUDeveloper is responsible for the construction site and construction safety at all times.
4. Construction of the project shall be conducted so as to minimize the effect of the construction
on the existing community and on the occupants of any new homes as they are completed, as
required by the Environmental Impact Report. Applicant/Developer shall submit a Construction
Noise Management Program/Construction Impact Reduction Plan for review and approval by
the Director of Public Works prior to issuance of grading permit. The following measures shall
be taken to reduce construction impacts and shall be included in the Construction Noise
Management Program/Construction Impact Reduction Plan:
a) Offsite truck traffic shall be routed as directly as practical between the freeway (I-580)
and the job site, and as approved by the Director of Public Works.
b) Applicant/Developer shall obtain an Oversized Load and/or Overweight Load Permit
from the City as required by the Director of Public Works prior to hauling of any
oversized and/or overweight loads on City streets.
c) The construction site shall be watered at regular intervals during all grading activities.
The frequency of watering should increase if wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour.
Watering should include all excavated and graded azeas and material to be transported
offsite. Recycled or other non-potable water resources shall be used where feasible.
d) Construction equipment shall not be left idling while not in use.
e) All construction equipment shall be fitted with noise muffling devises.
f) Erosion control measures shall be implemented during wet weather to assure that
sedimentation and erosion do not occur.
g) Mud and dust that aze carried onto street surfaces by construction vehicles shall be
cleaned up on a daily basis.
G:\PAH\2000\00-034\pw std coa.doc
Public Works Conditions of Approval
h) Excavation haul trucks shall use tarpaulins or other effective covers.
i) Upon completion of construction, measures shall be taken to reduce wind erosion.
Replanting and repaving should be completed as soon as possible.
j) Houses will be constructed in phases so that most of the construction traffic can be
routed into the subdivision without traveling in front of existing homes that are
occupied.
k) During construction, non-residential facilities shall provide pedestrian access from
public streets to building entrances as required by the Director of Public Works.
1) After grading is completed, fugitive dust on exposed soil surfaces shall be controlled
using the following methods:
1. All inactive portions of the construction site shall be seeded and watered until
grass growth is evident.
2. All portions of the site shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive
amounts of dust.
3. Onsite vehicle speeds shall be limited to 15 mph.
4. Use of petroleum-based palliatives shall meet the road oil requirements of the
Air Quality District. Non-petroleum based tackifiers may be required by the
Director of Public Works.
5. The Department of Public Works shall handle all dust complaints. The Director
of Public Works may require the services of an air quality consultant to advise
the City on the severity of the dust problem and additional ways to mitigate
impact on residents, including temporarily halting project construction. Dust
concerns in adjoining communities as well as the City of Dublin shall be
addressed. Control measures shall be related to wind conditions. Air quality
monitoring of PM levels shall be provided as required by the Director of Public
Works.
m) Construction interference with regional non-project traffic shall be minimized by:
1. Scheduling receipt of construction materials to non-peak travel periods.
2. Routing construction traffic through areas of least impact sensitivity.
3. Limiting lane closures and detours to off-peak travel periods.
4. Providing ride-share incentives for contractor and subcontractor personnel.
n) Emissions control of onsite equipment shall be minimized through a routine mandatory
program oflow-emissions tune-ups.
o) During construction, noise control and construction traffic mitigation measures within
residential neighborhoods and on public streets must be taken to reduce noise and use of
public streets by construction traffic as directed by Public Works officials.
5. Applicant/Developer shall designate proposed haul routes, and shall repair damage to County
roads used as haul routes, or damaged by construction activity. An agreement shall be made
with the County, in the form of a letter, that is satisfactory to the County. A copy of the
agreement shall be submitted to the City of Dublin. If determined to be necessary by the
County, a permit shall be issued by the County which addresses the repair of any damaged
portions of County roads, and/or contribution to future overlay projects.
6. Construction and grading operations shall be limited to weekdays, Monday through Friday, and
non-City holidays, between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The Director of Public Works
may approve work on Saturday and hours beyond the above mentioned days and hours with the
understanding that the developer is responsible for the additional cost of the Public Works
inspectors' overtime.
2
G:\PA#\2000\00-034\pw std coa.doc
Public Works Conditions of Approval
7. Should any prehistoric or historic artifacts be exposed during excavation and construction
operations, the Department of Community Development shall be notified and work shall cease
immediately until an archaeologist, who is certified by the Society of California Archaeology
(SCA) or the Society of Professional Archaeology (SOPA), is consulted to evaluate the
significance of the find and suggest appropriate mitigation measures, if deemed necessary, prior
to resuming ground-breaking construction activities. Standardized procedures for evaluating
accidental finds and discovery of human remains shall be followed as prescribed in Sections
15064.5 and 15126.4 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
8. Applicant/ Developer shall ensure that stationary source emissions associated with project
development are minimized and shall meet the following requirements:
a) The houses shall be designed to meet or exceed the requirements of Title 24 of the
California Code of Regulations (energy efficiency requirements). By meeting or exceeding
these requirements, the houses will require less energy to heat and cool, thereby reducing
the emissions created in the production of electric power and created by burning natural
gas.
b) The project will utilize curbside recycling, which will reduce the amount of solid wastes
from the project which would be deposited at a landfill site, thereby minimizing the amount
of nitrous oxide emissions from the landfill.
c) During rough grading the construction site will be regularly watered to contain dust, and
after construction the front yards and street landscaping will be installed, thereby
minimizing the amount of air pollution caused by airborne dust from the site.
9. Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for controlling any rodent, mosquito, or other pest
problem due to construction activities. The use of rodenticides and herbicides within the project
area shall be performed in cooperation with and under the supervision of the Alameda County
Department of Agriculture and will be restricted, to the satisfaction of the Director of
Community Development, to reduce potential impacts to wildlife.
10. Within sixty (60) days prior to habitat modification, Applicant/Developer shall submit a
biological survey of the project site (Preconstruction Survey). The Preconstruction Survey shall
be prepared by a biologist that is approved and hired by the City prior to commencement of
work. The survey shall examine whether any sensitive species exist on or adjacent to the site
and if they exist, shall include protection plans for the species. ApplicanUDeveloper shall be
responsible for the cost of the survey and for City Staff review of the survey.
Applicant/Developer shall submit the survey a minimum of twenty-one (21) days prior to the
anticipated habitat modification date so that the City will have adequate time for review of the
survey. Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for implementing recommendations of the
Preconstruction Survey including any modifications to site design to protect sensitive species as
a result of the survey. Determination of the significance of the discovery shall be determined by
the Director of Community Development. Should any Kit Foxes be discovered on the site
either during the Preconstruction Survey or during project construction, Applicant/Developer
shall be responsible for complying with the Kit Fox Protection Plan.
BONDS, SECURITIES & AGREEMENTS:
11. Developer shall provide Faithful Performance (100% of improvement costs), Labor and
Material (50% of improvement costs) securities and a cash monumentation bond to guarantee
3
G:\PAk\2000\00-034\pw std coa.doc
Public Works Conditions of Approval
the installation of project improvements, including streets, drainage, monumentation, grading,
utilities and landscaping subject to approval by the Director of Public Works prior to approval
of the Final or Parcel Map and prior to issuance of any grading and/or improvement permits.
12. The approval of the Vesting Tentative Map shall be predicated upon and pursuant to the terms
set forth in the Development Agreement to be approved by the City of Dublin. The
Development Agreement shall include an infrastructure sequencing program and shall be
recorded. The Vesting Tentative Map shall expire at the standazd time of two and one half (2
1/2) years as set forth in the Dublin Municipal Code and in the regulations of Section 66452.6
of the Subdivision Map Act unless the Development Agreement is terminated at an eazlier date.
In the event of conflict between the terms of the Development Agreement and the Conditions
of Approval contained herein, the terms of the Development Agreement shall prevail.
13. Applicant/Developer shall enter into an Improvement Agreement with the City for all project
improvements prior to issuance of improvement permits. Complete improvement plans,
specifications, and calculations shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public
Works and other affected agencies having jurisdiction over public improvements prior to
execution of the Improvement Agreement. Improvement plans shall show the existing onsite
and offsite project improvements and proposed improvements along the adjacent public streets
and property that relate to the proposed improvements.
14. If grading is commenced prior to filing the Final Map or Parcel Map, a surety or guazantee shall
be filed with the City of Dublin. The surety shall be equal to the amount approved by the
Director of Public Works as necessary to insure restoration of the site to a stable and erosion-
resistant state if the project is terminated prematurely.
15. Prior to acceptance of the project as complete and release of the Faithful Performance Bond or
securities by the City:
a) All improvements and landscaping shall be installed as per the approved Improvement
Plans and Specifications.
b) An as-built landscaping plan prepared by the Project Landscape Architect shall be
submitted and a declaration by the Project Landscape Architect that all work was done
under his/her supervision and in accordance with the recommendations contained in the
landscape and soil erosion and sedimentation control plans shall be submitted to the
Director of Public Works.
c) Photo mylazs and, if available, AutoCAD (or approved equal) electronic copies of the
Improvement, Grading and Storm Drain plans along with the Final or Parcel and
Annexation Maps, if any, which are tied to the City's existing mapping coordinates
including all as-built plans prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted to the
City.
d) A complete record, including location and elevation of all field density tests, and a
summary of all field and laboratory tests shall be submitted to the City.
e) A declaration by the Project Civil Engineer and Project Geologist/Soils Engineer that all
work was done under their supervision and in accordance with the recommendations
contained in the soil and geologic investigation reports and the approved plans and
specifications and that the finished graded building pads are within t 0.1 feet in elevation of
those shown on approved plans shall be submitted to the City.
4
G:\PAk\2000\00-034\pw std coa.doc
Public Works Conditions of Approval
f) Copies of the Final Map and improvement plans, indicating all lots, streets, and drainage
facilities within the project shall be submitted at 1" = 400' scale, and 1" = 200' scale shall
be submitted to the City for City mapping purposes.
16. Upon acceptance of the improvements and receipt of required submittals, the Faithful
Performance bond or security may be replaced with a Maintenance bond that is equal to 25% of
the value of the Performance security. The Maintenance bond is released one year after
acceptance of the project and after the repair of deficiencies, if any, are completed.
17. The Labor and Materials bond or security is released in accordance with the City's Subdivision
Ordinance and the Subdivision Map Act and after acceptance of the improvements.
18. Applicant/Developer, and any parties or individuals granted rights-of--entry by
Applicant/Developer, shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Dublin and its
agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of
Dublin or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of
the City of Dublin or its advisory agency, appeal boazd, Planning Commission, City Council,
Director of Community Development, Zoning Administrator, or any other department,
committee, or agency of the City concerning a subdivision or other development which actions
are brought within the time period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37;
provided, however, that the Applicant/Developer's duty to so defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless shall be subject to the City's promptly notifying the Applicant/Developer of any said
claim, action, or proceeding and the City's full actions or proceedings.
IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATIONS:
19. The Improvement Plans for this Vesting Tentative Map (including Improvement Plans, Grading
Plans, and subdivision Final/Pazcel Maps) shall be prepared, designed, and signed by a
registered civil engineer to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works in accordance with
the Ordinances, standards, specifications, policies, and requirements of the City of Dublin using
standazd City title block and formats prior to issuance of building permits and prior to filing the
Final Map/Parcel Map. Minimum lettering size on all plans submitted shall be 1/8 inch. After
approval, original mylars or photo mylazs with three sets of blue prints must be submitted to the
City.
20. A current title report and copies of the recorded deeds of all parties having any recorded title
interest in the project property and copies of the deeds and the Fina] Maps or Parcel Maps for
adjoining properties and easements which aze no more than 6 months old as of the date of
submittal shall be submitted as deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works.
21. Dedication of land shall be made to the City of Dublin such that it conveys land sufficient for
the approved streets' right of ways.
22. Layout and design of the project pazking, striping, drive aisles, and sidewalks within the project
shall be configured to maximize safety, circulation, convenience, and sight distance per the
City of Dublin zoning ordinance, standazd plans and details, and current policies as approved
by the Director of Public Works. Final detailed layout and design of internal private and public
streets and drive aisles must be approved by the ACFD and Director of Public Works.
5
G:\PA#\2000\00-034\pw std coa.doc
Public Works Conditions of Approval
23. All improvements along streets within the subdivision and as required offsite (including curb,
gutter, sidewalks, driveways, paving, drainage, landscaping and utilities) must be constructed
prior to occupancy of the first building in accordance with approved City standazds and to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and only after the Subdivision Improvement
Agreement has been approved and required bonds and fees have been delivered to the City.
24. The minimum uniform street gradient shall be 1%. The structure design of the road shall be
subject to approval of the Director of Public Works. Pazking lots shall have a minimum
gradient of 1% and a maximum gradient of 5%.
25. Minimum sight distance for public streets, including intersection sight distance, shall meet the
CALTRANS Highway Design Manual.
26. All public sidewalks must be within City right of way or in a pedestrian easement except as
specifically approved by the Director of Public Works.
27. Any relocation of improvements or public facilities shall be accomplished at no expense to the
City.
28. Applicant/Developer shall acquire easements, and/or obtain rights-of--entry from the adjacent
property owners for improvements (including grading, stockpiling and storing of equipment or
material) required outside of the project. The easements and/or rights-of--entry shall be in
writing and copies shall be furnished to the Director of Public Works prior to issuance of any
grading permits.
29. The boundary of parcels and the exterior boundazy of the project shall be survey monumented
at completion of construction of project improvements. The centerline of City and private
streets and new boundaries shall be survey monumented and set in accordance with the City of
Dublin Standard Plans and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. At least three (3)
permanent benchmazks shall be established as shown on the applicable Specific Plan. Plats and
elevation data shall be provided to the City in a form acceptable to the Director of Public
Works.
30. Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for transitioning existing improvements to match
proposed improvements required as Conditions of Approval for this Vesting Tentative Map.
31. Applicant/Developer shall install all water, gas, sewer, underground electric power, cable
television or telephone lines and storm drain facilities before any paving, curb, gutter or sidewalk
is installed or as approved by the Director of Public Works. Utility stub connections to property
boundaries shall be required unless waived in writing by the Director of Public Works.
32. Applicant/Developer shall show in the project construction documents the locations of all
transformers, vaults and electrical boxes, double detector check valves, and joint trenches that
will service the site with electricity, fire protection water system, telephone and CATV to the
buildings to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. All new utilities and utility vaults
shall be underground. All above ground boxes and transformers shall be screened by landscaping
to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development and the Director of Public Works.
6
G:\PAtJ\2000\00-034\pw s[d coa.doc
Public Works Conditions of Approval
33. Applicant/Developer shall construct a site lighting system in accordance with the City of Dublin
Zoning Ordinance and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The Developer shall
submit a preliminary lighting plan showing the distribution of lights on the site, type and location
of street and yard lights that shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of
Public Works prior to construction.
34. Applicant/Developer shall construct all new fire hydrants in streets to City and Alameda County
Fire Department standards. Applicant/Developer shall comply with applicable Alameda County
Fire Department, Public Works Department, Dublin Police Service, Alameda County Flood
Control District Zone 7 and Dublin San Roman Services District requirements.
35. Applicant/Developer shall submit a utilities service report and plan (including a composite base
map showing the location, phasing and construction of all existing and proposed utilities) prior
to issuance of grading permits and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director and
Community Development Director along with documentation that domestic fresh water,
sanitary sewer, electricity, gas, telephone, and cable television service can be provided to each
residence and building within the project by the applicable utility companies and shall indicate
when such service will be available.
36. Applicant/Developer shall construct all utilities as may be deemed necessary to provide for the
proper, clean, and safe functioning of utility services for each proposed residence/building
within the project. All utility construction is subject to the requirements and specifications of
the agency having jurisdiction over the respective utility facilities.
37. All utilities within the project and to each lot shall be underground in accordance with the City
policies and existing ordinances. All utilities shall be located and provided within public street
right of ways and/or public service easements as directed by the Director of Public Works and
shall be sized to meet utility company standards.
38. All transmission lines shall be constructed away from sensitive azeas unless otherwise approved
by the Director of Public Works.
39. Existing and proposed access and public utility easements shall be submitted for review and
approval by the Director of Public Works prior to approval of the Final/Pazcel Map. These
easements shall allow for vehicular and utility service access.
40. A 10 foot public utility easement shall be shown to be dedicated on the Final/Parcel Map along
all street frontages unless otherwise determined by the Director of Public Works, in addition to
all other easements required by the utility companies or governmental agencies.
41. Applicant/Developer shall construct a recycled water line and contract with the Dublin San
Ramon Services District (DSRSD) to provide water, wastewater, and and/or recycled water
service connection points to the project, including all landscaped common azeas prior to
occupancy of affected units. The plans for these facilities shall be reviewed and approved by
DSRSD and the City of Dublin Public Works Department.
42. The landscaped common areas of the project shall have laterals installed to the satisfaction of
the Director of Public Works to enable future recycled water connection in addition to potable
G:\PAtI\2000\00-034\pw s[d coa.doc
Public Works Conditions of Approval
water connection prior to occupancy of any building. Recycled water lines shall be installed to
serve landscaped areas. All landscaped areas shall be subject to the City's Water Efficient
Landscape Regulations.
43. Applicant/Developer shall prepare a detailed drainage study of all proposed storm drain
improvements of the project for review and approval by the Director of Public Works prior to
issuance of grading permit. Final pipe sizes, slopes, depths, etc. shall be based upon final storm
water design calculations by a licensed professional engineer in California.
44. For all storm drains located outside of the public right of way, a "Storm Drain Easement" or
"Private Storm Drain Easement" shall be dedicated on the Final Map, to the satisfaction of the
Director of Public Works.
45. Applicant/Developer shall provide an access road and turn-around and maintenance easement
for access to all storm drainage detention facilities and trash racks.
46. Applicant/Developer shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works that
all mitigation measures that aze necessary as a result of drainage impacts of this project will be
constructed to the satisfaction to of the Director of Public Works prior to occupancy of any
building.
47. Where possible, roof drains shall empty onto an approved dissipating device and then over
lawn or other planted areas to street or approved drainage facility. Concentrated flows will not
be allowed to drain across sidewalk areas.
48. An 18" minimum diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) shall be used for all public storm
drain main lines and 12" minimum diameter RCP shall be used for laterals connecting inlets to
main drain line.
49. Storm drainage facilities for a drainage area less than 1 square mile shall be designed to meet
the capacity of a 15 yeaz storm; storm drainage facilities for a drainage area of between 1
square mile and 5 square miles shall be designed to meet the capacity of a 25 year storm; and
storm drainage facilities for a drainage azea greater than 5 square miles shall be designed to
meet the capacity of a 100 yeaz storm.
50. All streets shall be designed so that the 15-year storm is contained within the gutter and
shoulder area. In addition arterial streets shall have one lane of traffic in both directions of
travel above the 100-year storm level.
51. No buildings or other structures shall be constructed within a storm drain easement.
52. All concentrated storm drain flow shall be carried in concrete curb and gutter, concrete valley
gutters or storm drain pipe and shall dischazge into an approved drainage facility, not onto
slopes.
53. ApplicanUDeveloper shall comply with Alameda County Flood Control District requirements.
If there is a conflict between City and County Flood Control requirements the Director of
Public Works shall determine which requirements shall apply.
8
G:\PAtI\2000\00-034\pw std coa.doc
Public Works Conditions of Approval
54. A detailed fencing/wall plan shall be submitted with the improvement plans for the first phase
of development. The design, height, and location of the fences/walls shall be subject to
approval of the Community Development Director and Director of Public Works. Wall
sections shall not be butted together but separated by pilasters unless otherwise approved by the
Director of Public Works.
55. Where finish grade of this property is in excess of twenty-four (24) inches higher or lower than
the abutting property or adjacent lots within the subdivision, a concrete or masonry block
retaining wall or other suitable solution acceptable to the Director of Public Works shall be
required and any fence or wall height shall be measured from the top of grade on the higher
side of the retaining wall or slope.
56. All wall or fence heights shall be a minimum 6 feet high (except in those locations where
Section 8.72.080 of the Zoning Ordinance requires lower fence heights or where an 8-foot
sound attenuation wall is required). All walls and fences shall be designed to ensure clear
vision at all street intersections to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
57. A registered civil or structural engineer shall design all retaining walls over three feet in height
(or over two feet in height with a surchazge) and a building permit shall be required for their
construction. A maintenance and inspection program shall be implemented by the
Applicant/Developer or by the homeowners association for the periodic inspection and
maintenance of all retaining walls that could possibly affect the public right of way.
58. Fencing placed at the top of banks/slopes shall be provided with a minimum one-foot level azea
on both sides in order to facilitate maintenance by the property owners.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE:
59. The grading plan designs for this Vesting Tentative map shall be designed in conformance with
the approved Vesting Tentative Map and shall be based on an approved soils reports. The soils
report for the project shall include recommendations 1) for foundations, decks and other
miscellaneous structures, 2) for design of swimming pools, and 3) for setbacks for structures
from top and toes of slopes. Additionally, the soils report shall include a professional opinion
as to safety of the site from the hazards of land slippage, erosion, settlement and seismic
activity. Both the project civil engineer and the project soils engineer must sign the grading
plans. In case of conflict between the soil engineer's recommendations and City ordinances, the
Director of Public Works shall determine which shall apply.
60. The soils engineer or his technical representative must be present at the project site at all times
during grading operations. Where soil or geologic conditions encountered in grading operations
are different from that anticipated in the soil and geologic investigation report, or where such
conditions warrant changes to the recommendations contained in the original soil investigation,
a revised soil or geologic report shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Public
Works. It shall be accompanied by an engineering and geological opinion as to the safety of
the site from hazazds of land slippage, erosion, settlement, and seismic activity.
61. Applicant/Developer shall prepare a Geotechnical Investigation Report covering the project site
for review and approval by the City prior to issuance of grading permit, and (as a minimum)
9
G:\PAtI\2000\00-034\pw std coa.doc
Public Works Conditions of Approval
shall design the grading plan based on the recommendations outlined in said report, and as
required by the City's Grading Ordinance.
62. Prior to any grading of the site and filing of the Final/Parcel Map, a detailed construction
grading/erosion control plan (including phasing) and a drainage, water quality, and erosion and
sedimentation control plan for the post-construction period shall be prepared by the Project
Civil Engineer and/or Engineering Geologist and shall be approved by the Director of Public
Works. Said plans shall include detailed design, location, and maintenance criteria, of all
erosion and sediment control measures. The plans shall provide, to the maximum extent
practicable, that no increase in sediment or pollutants from the site will occur. The post-
construction plan shall provide for long-term maintenance of all permanent erosion and
sediment control measures such as slope vegetation. The construction grading/erosion control
plan shall be implemented and in place by October 15th and shall be maintained in place until
April 15th unless otherwise allowed in writing by the Director of Public Works. It shall be the
Applicant/Developei sresponsibility to maintain the erosion and sediment control measures for
the year following acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City Council.
63. Grading plans shall indicate the quantity of soil that must be imported or off-hauled. If soil
must be imported or off-hauled, Applicant/Developer shall submit details as to how it will be
done and routes of travel for the Director of Public Work's approval.
64. All unsuitable material found at the site shall be removed from the site or stockpiled for later
use in landscape azeas.
65. In the 100-year Flood Hazard Zone, all residential units shall have their finished floor elevation
a minimum of one foot (1') above the 100-year flood level. Commercial buildings shall either
provide flood-proofing, or have their finished elevation above the 100-year flood level.
Applicant/Developer shall prove to the City that the proposed building pads are a minimum of
1 foot above a 100-year storm event prior to issuance of grading permits.
66. Applicant/Developer shall grade all lots to drain to the front of the public streets or private
streets according to City of Dublin Grading Ordinance and Standard Conditions of Approval.
If needed, Applicant/Developer shall construct retaining walls along the rear yard lot lines
and/or side yard lot lines so that each lot will drain directly to its respective front street. All
grading plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works prior to issuance
of grading permits.
67. Applicant/Developer shall not change the overall drainage patterns of the existing topography
by the grading construction of this project.
68. Each lot shall be graded so as not to drain on any other lot or adjoining property prior to being
deposited to an approved drainage system or adjacent landowner shall grant a drainage
easement.
69. No cut and fill slopes shall exceed 2:1 unless recommended by the project Soils Engineer and
approved by the Director of Public Works. Slopes shall be graded so that there is both
horizontal and vertical slope variation where visible from public azeas and the top and bottom
of slopes shall be rounded in order to create or maintain a natural appearance.
i0
G:\PA#\2000\00-034\pw std coa.doc
Public Works Conditions of Approval
TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION:
70. Applicant/Developer shall submit a Line and Striping Plan to the Director of Public Works for
review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The plan shall show include interim
lane and access configurations and transitions, as approved by the Director of Public Works.
71. Applicant/Developer shall consult with the Livermore-Amador Valley Transit Authority
(LAVTA) on the bus route and location and size of proposed bus stops and shelters within and
on the periphery of the proposed project. The location and configuration of all bus stops and
shelters shall be constructed by Applicant/Developer under the direction of the City's Director
of Public Works prior to occupancy of any building.
72. Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for payment of traffic impact fees (TIFs) adopted by
the City Council at the time of issuance of building permits including, but not limited to, the
Eastem Dublin TIF, Interchange TIF (reimbursements to the City of Pleasanton for freeway
interchanges), and Regional (Tri-Valley) TIF. Applicant/Developer shall receive TIF credit for
constructing any other Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Improvements in their ultimate locations.
73. All construction traffic and parking may be subject to specific requirements, as determined by
the Director of Public Works, in order to minimize construction interference with regional non-
project traffic movement. Construction traffic routing shall be approved by the Director of
Public Works prior to issuance of grading permit.
74. Traffic safety signs and "red-curbing" shall be provided in accordance with the standazds of the
City of Dublin subject to plan approval by the Director of Public Works.
75. A street sign/naming plan for the internal street system shall be submitted and shall be subject
to approval of the Community Development Director. No single street may intersect any other
street more than once. No continuous street may change direction by 90 degrees more than
once without change of street name for subsequent changes in direction. Street name signs shall
display the name of the street together with a City standard shamrock logo. Posts shall be
galvanized steel pipe.
NPDES (GENERAL):
76. For projects disturbing five (5) acres or more, Applicant/Developer shall submit a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for review and approval by the City prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permits. The SWPPP shall be implemented by the general contractor
and all subcontractors and suppliers of material and equipment. Construction site cleanup and
control of construction debris shall also be addressed in the SWPPP. Applicant/Developer is
responsible for complying with the SWPPP. Failure to do so will result in the issuance of
correction notices, citations or a project stop work order. A copy of the SWPPP shall be kept at
the construction site at all times. Fueling and maintenance of vehicles shall be done offsite
unless an approved fueling and maintenance azea has been approved as part of the SWPPP.
77. For projects disturbing less than five (5) acres, an erosion control plan shall be submitted with
the grading plan.
G:\PA#\2000\00-034\pw std coa.doc
Public Works Conditions of Approval
78. Prior to the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation resulting in a land
disturbance greater than five acres, the developer shall provide evidence that a Notice of Intent
(NOI) has been sent to the California State Water Resources Control Board.
79. Construction access routes shall be limited to those approved by the Director of Public Works
and shall be shown on the approved grading plan.
80. Applicant/Developer shall gather all construction debris daily and place it in a covered
dumpster or other container which is emptied or removed on a weekly basis. A secondary
containment berm shall be constructed around the dumpster. When appropriate, tarps shall be
used on the ground to collect fallen debris or splatters that could contribute to storm water
pollution.
81. All debris from the sidewalk, street pavement and storm drain system adjoining the project site
shall be removed by Applicant/Developer on a daily basis or as required by the City inspector.
During wet weather, avoid driving vehicles off paved areas.
82. Applicant/Develop shall broom-sweep the sidewalk and public street pavement adjoining the
project site on a daily basis. Caked-on mud or dirt shall be scraped from these areas before
sweeping.
83. Applicant/Developer shall install filter materials (e.g. gravel filters, filter fabric, etc.) at all
onsite storm drain inlets and existing inlets in the vicinity of the project site prior to:
a) Start of the rainy season (October 15)
b) Site de-watering activities,
c) Street washing activities,
d) Saw cutting asphalt or concrete
Filter materials shall be cleaned or replaced as necessary to maintain effectiveness and prevent
street flooding. Dispose of filter particles in an appropriate manner.
84. Applicant/Developer shall maintain a contained and covered area on the site for the storage of
bags of cement, paints, flammable, oils, fertilizers, pesticides or any other materials used at the
project site that have the potential for being discharged to the storm drain system. Machinery,
tools, brushes, containers, etc. shall not be cleaned and rinsed into a street, gutter, storm drain
or stream. See the "Building Maintenance/Remodeling" flyer for more information.
85. Concrete/gunite supply trucks or concrete/plasters or similar finishing operations shall not
dischazge wash water into street gutters or drains.
86. ApplicanUDeveloper shall minimize the removal of natural vegetation or groundcover from the
site in order to reduce the potential for erosion and sedimentation problems. All cut and fill
slopes shall be stabilized as soon as possible after completion of grading. No site grading shall
occur between October 15 and April 15 unless a detailed erosion control plan is reviewed by
the Director of Public Works and implemented by the contractor.
12
G:\PA#\2000\00-034\pw std coa.doc
Public Works Conditions of Approval
87. The project improvement plans shall include storm water pollution prevention measures for the
operation and maintenance of the project and shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of
Public Works. The project plan shall identify Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate
to the uses conducted onsite to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm water
runoff. The project plan shall also include erosion control measures to prevent soil, dirt and
debris from entering the storm drain system, in accordance with the practices outlined in the
ABAG Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, California Storm Water Best Management
Practice Handbooks, State Construction Best Management Practices Handbook and Regional
Water quality Control Board's Erosion and Sediment Control Field Manual.
88. Applicant/Developer is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are aware of, and
implement, all stone water pollution prevention measures. Failure to comply with the
approved construction BMPs will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations and/or a
project stop order.
89. All landscaping shall be properly maintained and shall be designed with efficient irrigation
practices to reduce runoff, promote surface filtration, and minimize the use of fertilizers and
pesticides which contribute to runoff pollution. Where feasible, landscaping should be designed
and operated to treat stonnwater runoff When and where possible, xeriscape and drought
tolerant plants shall be incorporated into new development plans.
90. All on-site storm drain inlets must be labeled "No Dumping-Drains to Bay" using a method
approved by the Department of Public Works.
91. All onsite storm drains must be cleaned at least twice a year; once immediately prior to the
rainy season (October 15) and once in January. Additional cleaning may be required as
deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works.
NPDES (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT):
92. All washing and/or steam cleaning must be done at an appropriately equipped facility which
drains to the sanitary sewer. Any outdoor washing or pressure washing must be managed in
such a way that there is no discharge of soaps or other pollutants to the storm drain system.
Wash waters should discharge to the sanitary sewer. Sanitary sewer connections are subject to
the review, approval, and the conditions of the Dublin-San Ramon Services District (DSRSD).
93. All loading dock areas must be designed to minimize "run-on" to or runoff from the area.
Accumulated waste water that may contribute to the pollution of storm water must be drained
to the sanitary sewer, or filtered for ultimate discharge to the storm drain system. BMPs should
be implemented to prevent potential storm water pollution. Applicant/Developer shall
implement appropriate BMPs such as, but not limited to, a regular program of sweeping, litter
control and spill clean-up.
94. All metal roofs and roof-mounted equipment (including galvanized), shall be coated with a
rust-inhibitive paint.
95. Trash enclosures and/or recycling area(s) must be completely covered; no other area shall drain
onto this area. Drains in any wash or process area shall not discharge to the storm drain
13
G:\PA#\2000\00-034\pw std coa.doc
Public Works Conditions of Approval
system. Drains should connect to the sanitary sewer. Sanitary sewer connections are subject to
the review, approval, and conditions of the DSRSD.
96. All paved outdoor storage areas must be designed to eliminate the potential for runoff to carry
pollutants to the storm drain system. Bulk materials stored outdoors may need to be covered
and contained as required by the Director of Public Works.
97. Sidewalks and parking lots must be swept weekly, at a minimum, to prevent the accumulation
of litter and debris. If pressure washed, debris must be trapped and collected to prevent entry to
the storm drain system. No cleaning agent may be discharged to the storm drain. If any
cleaning agent or degreaser is used, wash water shall not discharge to the storm drains; wash
waters should be collected and discharged to the sanitary sewer. Dischazges to the sanitary
sewer aze subject to the review, approval and conditions of the DSRSD.
98. A structural control, such as an oil/water separator, sand filter, or approved equal, may be
required to be installed, onsite, to intercept and pre-treat storm water prior to discharging to the
storm drain system. The design, location, and a maintenance schedule must be submitted to the
Director of Public Works for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits.
99. Restaurants must be designed with contained areas for cleaning mats, equipment and
containers. This wash area must be covered or designed to prevent "run-on" to, or runoff from,
the azea. The area shall not discharge to the storm drains; wash waters should drain to the
sanitary sewer, or collected for ultimate disposal to the sanitary sewer. Employees must be
instructed and signs posted indicating that all washing activities shall be conducted in this area.
Sanitary sewer connections aze subject to the review, approval, and conditions of the DSRSD.
100. Commercial car washes shall be designed so that no wash water shall discharge to the storm
drain systems. Wash waters should discharge to the sanitary sewer. Sanitary sewer
connections aze subject to the review, approval, and conditions of the DSRSD.
101. Vehicle/equipment washers shall be designed so that no vehicle or equipment washing activity
associated with this facility shall discharge to the storm drain system. Wash azeas should be
limited to azeas that drain to the sanitary sewer collection system, or the wash water collected
for ultimate disposal to the sanitary sewer. This wash area must be covered and designed to
prevent "run-on" to, and runoff from, the area. A sign must be posted indicating the designated
wash azea. Sanitary connections are subject to the review, approval and conditions of the
DSRSD.
102. Fuel dispensing areas must be paved with concrete extending a minimum of 8'-0" from the face
of the fuel dispenser and a minimum of 4'-0" from the nose of the pump island. Fuel
dispensing azeas must be degraded and constructed to prevent "run-on" to, or runoff from, the
area. Fuel dispensing facilities must have canopies; canopy roof downspouts must be routed to
prevent drainage flow through the fuel dispensing area. The facility must have a spill cleanup
plan. The fuel dispensing area must be dry swept routinely. Dispensing equipment must be
inspected routinely for proper functioning and leak prevention. The fuel dispensing area must
be covered, and the cover's minimum dimensions must be equal to or greater than the area
within the grade break or fuel dispensing area, as defined above. The cover must not drain onto
the fuel dispensing area.
14
G:\PA#\2000\00-034\pw s[d coa.doc
Public Works Conditions of Approval
103. Fuel dispensing areas must be paved with portland cement concrete (or, equivalent smooth
impervious surface), with a 2% to 4% slope to prevent ponding, and must be separated from the
rest of the site by a grade break that prevents run-on of storm water to the extent practicable.
The fuel dispensing area is defined as extending a minimum of 6.5 feet from the comer of each
fuel dispenser or the length at which the hose and nozzle assembly may be operated plus a
minimum of 1 foot, whichever is less.
104. Most washing and/or steam cleaning must be done at an appropriately equipped facility that
drains to the sanitary sewer. Any outdoor washing or pressure washing must be managed in
such a way that there is no dischazge of soaps or other pollutants to the storm drain. Sanitary
sewer connections are subject to the review, approval, and conditions of the sanitary district
with jurisdiction for receiving the discharge. These requirements shall be required for
automotive related businesses.
105. All loading dock areas must be designed to minimize "run-on" or runoff from the azea.
Accumulated waste water that may contribute to the pollution of stormwater must be drained to
the sanitary sewer, or diverted and collected for ultimate discharge to the sanitary sewer, or
intercepted and pretreated prior to discharge to the storm drain system. The property owner
shall ensure that BMPs are implemented to prevent potential stormwater pollution. These
BMPs shall include, but are not limited to, a regular program of sweeping, litter control and
spill clean-up.
106. The design, location, maintenance requirements, and maintenance schedule for any stormwater
quality treatment structural controls shall be submitted to the City or County Engineer for
review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit.
NPDES (RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/CONSTRUCTION):
107. A homeowners association shall be created and shall be responsible for maintaining all private
streets and private utilities and other privately owned common areas and facilities on the site
including landscaping. These maintenance responsibilities shall include implementing and
maintaining stormwater BMPs associated with improvements and landscaping. CC&R's
creating the homeowners association shall be reviewed and approved by the City or County
Attorney prior to the recordation of the Final/Pazcel Map and recorded prior to the sale of the
first residential unit. The CC&R's shall describe how the stormwater BMPs associated with
privately owned improvements and landscaping shall be maintained by the association.
15
G:\PAk\2000\00-034\pw std coa.doc
Dublin Ranch Area A
Tract 736 - Neighborhood A7
~,
._r , J
Tall CA ll, L.R
Submittal Application
Augusf 23, 200?
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Table of Contents
Dublin Ranch Area A
Neighborhood Al
Tract 7136
- Application Forms
Planning Application Form
Initial Study -Environmental Information Form, Part 1
Project Description
Site Development Review
Drawing Reductions
Index Sheet
- Site Development Review
Illustrative Site Plan
Fencing Plan
- Architectural Streetscape
Architecture Plans
The Atherton (Plan 1)
First Floor Plan
Second Floor Plan
_ "Federal" & "Provincial" Front Elevations
"Manor" & "New England" Front Elevations
"Federal" Roof Plans and Reaz & Side Elevations
_ "Provincial" Roof Plans and Rear & Side Elevations
"Manor" Roof Plans and Rear & Side Elevations
"New England" Roof Plans and Reaz & Side Elevations
_ The Carlsbad
Floor Plans
"Federal" & "Provincial" Front Elevations
_ "Manor" & "New England" Front Elevations
"Federal" Roof Plans and Rear & Side Elevations
"Provincial" Roof Plans and Reaz & Side Elevations
"Manor" Roof Plans and Rear & Side Elevations
"New England" Roof Plans and Rear & Side Elevations
The New Castle
- Main & Upper Floor Plan Plan A
Main & Upper Floor Plan Plan B
Main & Upper Floor Plan Plan C
- Main & Upper Floor Plan Plan D
Front Elevations Plan A-D
Side & Rear Elevations Plan A at~d B
- Side & Reaz Elevations Plan C and D
The Santa Barbara
First Floor Plan
- Second Floor Plan
"Federal" & "Provincial" Front Elevations
"Manor" & "New England" Front Elevations
"Federal" Roof Plans and Rear & Side Elevations
"Provincial" Roof Plans and Rear & Side Elevations
"Manor" Roof Plans and Reaz & Side Elevations
"New England" Roof Plans and Rear & Side Elevations
Atherton, Cazlsbad and Santa Bazbara Deck Option
CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING APPLICATION FORM
NOTE: Please discuss your proposal with Planning Staff prior to completing this form. All items on this form
related to your specific type of application must be completed. Some of the items listed might not apply to your
specific application. Please print or type legibly. Attach additional sheets, if necessary.
I. TYPE OF APPLICATION:
Administrative Conditional Use Permit [ACUP]
Conditional Use Permit [CUP]
x Site Development Review [SDR]
Variance [VAR]
Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map [T MAP]
II. GENERAL DATA
Sign/Site Development Review [SIGN/SDR]
Master Sign Program [MSP/SDR]
Planned Development Rezone [PD REZ]
Rezone [REZ]
General/Specific Plan Amendment [GPA]
A. Address/Location of Property: East of Tassaj_ara Road adjacent to the future Fallon Road Extension
apvroximate_y 4 500 feet north of I-580 in Dublin, California
B. Assessor Parcel Number: Portions of the following~arcels: 985-2-3, 985-3-3-2, 985-6-7&8, 985-7-2-6,7,9&15
C. Site Area: 38± acres. D. Zoning: See attached E. General Plan Designation: See attached
F. Existing/Proposed Use of Property: See attached
G. Existing Use of Surrounding Properties: See attached
III. AUTHORIZATION OF PROPERTY OWNER AND APPLICANT
- A. PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as Property Owner, certify that I have full legal capacity
to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding. I agree to
be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal period. 1 further
- certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Note: Atl Property Owners must sign if property is jointly owned)
_ Name: Jon Pavnter Capacity: Asst. Vice President
Company: Toll CA II. L.P. Phone: (925)855-0220
Address: 100 Park Place. Ste 140 Fax: (925) 855-9927
_ San Ramon CA 94587
Signature: 9 Uate:
- B. APPLICANT (OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER): In signing this application, 1, as Applicant, certify that
I lurve obtained written authorization from the property owner and have attached separate documentation showing my
full legal capacity to file this application. I agree to be bound by the conditions of approval, subject only to the right to
_ object at the hearings or during the appeal period. I further cert~ that the information and exhibits submitted are true
and correct.
Name:
Company:
Address:
Signature:.
ATTACHMENT
Capacity:
Phone:
Fax:
Date:
PI-ANAPP-Al.doc
- City of Dublin Planning Application Form Continued
II.
B. Existing zoning district is PD Single Family Residential (PA 96-038).
E. Existing General Plan designation is Low Density Residential
- F. Existing property use is vacant land. The proposed use is single family residential
G. Existing uses of surrounding properties include single family residential (Phase 1 of
Dublin Ranch), rural residential, vacant land and cattle grazing.
PLANAPP-Ai.doc
Application Name: Dublin Ranch Area A, 7136 (Al)
Initial Study
_ (ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM -PART 1)
_ (To be completed by Applicant pursuant to City of Dublin
Environmental Guidelines Section 1.6)
Date Filed: Aari18, 2001
_ GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Name and address of authorized representative of property owner:
_ Jon Pavnter. Asst. Vice President
Toll CA II, L.P.
100 Park Place Suite 140, San Ramon CA 94587
2. Address of Project: East of Tassaiara Road adjacent to the future Fallon Road
Extension approximately 4500 feet north of I-580 in Dublin, California
3. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this
_ project:
Jon Pavnter, Asst. Vice President David Beauore
- 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for
this project, including those required for this project, including those required by
city, regional, state and federal agencies:
NPDES (construction) aermit: and Utility Service from DSRSD
5. Existing Zoning District: PD Single Family Residential and PD Ooen Space
(9251855-0260 (925)225-0690
- 6. Description of Project: (Include site area, uses, size and number of buildings,
parking, number of dwelling units, scheduling, and any other information
necessary or helpful to understand project. This attached description must be
_ complete and accurate. Exhibits or photographs should be identified and attached.)
The area within Dublin Ranch known as "Area A" is comprised of 369± acres
with a mix of single family residential neighborhoods and open space. The
open space is a combination of an 18 hole golf course which is comprised of
192.9 acres, and portions of a stream corridor that is planned to run
throughout the Dublin Ranch project. A recreation facility owned and
maintained by a home owners association is also included which consist of a
small building approximate)y 1,486 S.F. to support the swimming and tennis
facilities. The remainder of the land is residential neighborhoods which
contain varying lot sizes with a total of 562 single-family residential lots. Area
A consist of seven different neighborhoods including:
Tract 7136 (Al) with 110-10,000 S.F. lots on 38.4 acres;
Tract 7137 (A2) with 50-5,000 S.F. lots on 9.3 acres;
Tract 7138 (A3) with 84-5,000 S.F. lots on 15.0 acres;
Tract 7139 (A4) with 54-8,000 S.F. lots on 14.8 acres;
Tract 7140 (AS) with 62-6,000 S.F. lots on 14.1 acres;
Tract 7141 (A6) with 97-5,000 S.F. lots on 18.8 acres; and
_ Tract 7142 (A7) with 105-5,000 S.F. lots on 17.4 acres.
This Application is for the Al neighborhood within Dublin Ranch Area A.
7. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all
items checked (attach addtt~onal sheets as necessary).
All of the followine items are addressed _n the program EIR prepared for the
Eastern Dublin General Plan AmendmentJSaecific Plan.
Yes No
1. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands,
beaches, lakes or bills, or substantial alteration of
ground contours.
_ 2. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing
residential areas or public lands or roads.
3. Change in pattern, scale or character of general azea of
project.
4. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
5. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity.
6. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water
quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage
patterns.
7. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels
in the vicinity.
8. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent (10%) or
more.
9. Use of disposal of potentially hazazdous materials,
such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives.
10. Substantial change in demand for municipal services
(police, fire, water, sewage, etc.).
- 11. Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption
(electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
_ 12. Relationship to larger project or series of projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING:
8. Briefly describe the project site as it exists before the project, including
information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural,
- historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use
of the structures. If necessary, attach photographs of the site.
- See DEIR for Eastern Dublin GPA/Saecific Plan, pates 2-2 and 2-3 and Eastern
Dublin Saecific Plan oases 5 and 6.
9. Briefly describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants
and animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects and the type of land use.
See Eastern Dublin Sneci6c Plan, panes 5-7 and DEIR for Eastern Dublin
General Plan Amendment/Snecific Plan, 2-2.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the
_ attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation
to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements and information presented are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Dated:
Signal
Jon Paynter
Print Name
Asst. Vice PresidentToll CA II L.P
~ ompany
DUBLIN RANCH AREA A
TRACT7136
_ Site Development Review
For the Al Neighborhood Architecture
Project Description
The following findings relate directly to the specific questions listed under the written statement
section of the City's application submittal requirements for site development review.
_ A. What type of business, activity or use are you proposing?
In November 1997, the City of Dublin approved a P.D. Rezone for Area A (PA 96-038).
_ Area A encompasses 369± acres, the project contains a mixture of land uses including, Open
Space primarily in the form of a golf course, Low Density Residential and a private
community recreation facility.
On July 25, 2000 a Vesting Tentative Map (PA99_060) and Community/Neighborhood
_ Landscaping SDR was approved for the Al neighborhood within Area A of Dublin Ranch.
The Vesting Tentative Map included 110 units within 38.4 acres with a minimum lot size of
10,000 square feet. The Plan was revised to allow for a wider variety of units and now has an
- average lo[ size of greater than 10,000 square feet with a 110 units.
B. How many employees will you have or propose to have?
Not applicable.
C. What are the proposed hours and days of operation?
Not applicable
D. Are there any ways in which your business, activity or use have a negative effect on the
health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be detrimental to the
public health, safety or general welfare.
_ The design of this project and its improvements are not expected to cause serious public
health problems as no land uses requiring the use or manufacturing of toxic materials are
planned to occur on site.
Page 1 of 7 • Site Development Review -Project Description
Dublin Ranch Area A. Tract 7136 - Neiehborhood Al • Aueust, 2001
E. Describe how the design of the project including site layout, structures, vehicular access,
circulation and parking etc will provide a desirable environment for the future
development.
Area A within Dublin Ranch is a golf course residential community with seven distinct
neighborhoods. The layout of the golf course and residential neighborhoods takes advantage
of distant views of the Tri-Valley area, while the neighborhoods are designed to take
_ advantage of golf course views. The golf course is designed to take advantage of the rolling
topography within which it is situated.
_ Access to the Project Area will ultimately be provided primarily from Fallon Road, an
existing two lane paved road that currently terminates approximately 5700 feet (1.1 miles)
north of I-580. Fallon Road is the principal north/south arterial roadway in the Project Area
_ and those portions of Fallon Road within the limits of Area A are scheduled to be afour-lane
divided arterial according to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan recommendations. It is
anticipated that initially atwo-lane section of the future Fallon Road will be constructed from
- the southerly neighborhood entrance in Area A to link with the existing terminus of Fallon
Road. Between the southerly neighborhood entrance and the northerly neighborhood
entrance a1141anes and the median will be built. Eventually as other azeas of Dublin Ranch
- are built out, the remainder of the Fallon Road lanes will be constructed. Ultimately the
lower portion of the existing Fallon Road will be abandoned and a new Fallon Road arterial
constructed in the proposed Specific Plan location at some point following build out ofArea
A. The A 1 Neighborhood will be accessed directly from Fallon Road with two entrances to
the neighborhood, the primary entry being the northern one. The streets within the A-1
neighborhood will be private streets with limited access, with un-manned gates at the entry.
The recreation building is located at the intersection of Fallon Road and Signal Hill Drive.
The siting of the clubhouse facility takes advantage of views of the surrounding valley and of
the golf course.
F. Is the site physically suitable for the type and intensity of development proposed ?
- This site is physically suitable to accommodate the type of single-family low-density
residential development and golf course open space as proposed.
Page 2 of 7 • Si[e Development Review -Project Description
Dublin Ranch Area A. Tract 7136 - Neiehborhood AI • Aueust. 21101
- G. Describe how the proposed development may impact views.
Area A is not within [he Tassajara Road scenic corridor as defined in the Eastern Dublin
- Scenic Corridor Policies and Standards. However, this area falls under Specific Plan policies
protecting visually sensitive ridgelands within Eastern Dublin. Exhibits produced as part of
the Tentative Map process accurately show what a viewer would see along specific sight
- lines and at several viewpoints. Proposed grading areas and limits of development are also
identified. These exhibits show what portions of the development area will be visible from
each viewpoint, what azeas will be hidden by existing land forms to be retained and what
- portions of the visually sensitive ridgelands aze visible under proposed conditions. It was
determined from these exhibits that the sensitive ridgelands have been protected.
H. Describe the physical characteristics ofthe site including existing slopes and topographic
features.
The Project Area is open grassland and is comprised of two distinct topographic areas. The
azeas that are suited for development aze separated from each other by a north-south valley
within which the Fallon Road will be located. The first portion of the Project Area is a "T-
shaped" knoll area of 30-35 acres that borders the westerly limits of the valley. Elevation
change between the crest of the knoll area and the lowest limit of the proposed development
area is approximately 80 feet. Average existing slope across this portion of the Project Area
is typically five to seven percent.
- The second distinct area contains approximately 100 acres and is comprised of a series of
minor ridges and valleys located east of the proposed extension of Fallon Road. Much of this
azea is not visible from large portions of I-580 as well as the lower reaches of Fallon Road.
- Average existing slope across this azea is approximately six to eight percent. This area drains
from north to south through two intermittent drainage courses that are fed by sub-drainage
areas from the east and west.
I. Describe the architectural design/theme of the development including character, scale and
quality of the design, and explain how the project will relate to and be compatible with the
existing site and the character of adjacent buildings, neighborhoods and uses.
Architectural Design Concept
The Atherton:
The Atherton plan in the A-1 neighborhood of Dublin Ranch incorporates several unique
architectural styles. Four distinct elevation styles compliment each other with variations in
- roof types and slopes, materials, massing and setbacks; creating a varied streetscape with the
Page 3 of 7 • Si[e Development Review -Project Description
Dublin Ranch Area A, Tract 7136 - Neighborhood Al • August. 2001
- other plans in this azea. The detailing of these various elevations are true the their
azchitectural style and are expressed on all four sides of [he house. The variety created
through different styles of building massing, exterior colors, landscaping, lot and plan
- layout, will result in a diverse and visually pleasing neighborhood.
The Atherton architectural styles include the American Federal, New England, Provincial
and Manor. The American Federal style incorporates the use of brick masonry, lap siding
on all four sides, wood shutters, formal entry columns and a flat concrete tiled roof as the
primary materials. The New England style incorporates traditional East Coast features such
as lap siding on all four sides, square entry columns, arched top windows, decorative wood
shutters, dormer windows, and "turned" gable roofs. The Manor style is characterized by
stone and plaster exterior walls, shaped plaster trim, azched top windows and a raised
_ concrete the roof to accent the elevations. The final architectural style is the Provincial.
This style is reminiscent of the French and Italian Mediterranean styles; low pitch hipped
roofs with earth-toned 'S' shaped concrete tiles, plaster walls with horizontal reveals and
trim accents, azched windows, and an elegant entry surround with second story classical
columns.
Exterior colors and styles aze selected [o compliment the azchitectural style. Warmer earth
tones of beige, tan, taupes and browns would be used on the Manor and Provincial styles.
- Cooler colors of gray and beige would be used on the Federal and New England styles. All
color schemes include accent colors for the azchitectural features of the elevations.
The Carlsbad:
The Carlsbad plan in the A-1 neighborhood of Dublin Ranch incorporates several unique
- architectural styles. Four distinct elevation styles compliment each other with variations in
roof types and slopes, materials, massing and setbacks; creating a varied streetscape with the
other plans in this area. The detailing of these various elevations aze true the their
- azchitectural style and aze expressed on all four sides of the house. The variety created
through different styles of building massing, exterior colors, landscaping, lot and plan
layout, will result in a diverse and visually pleasing neighborhood.
The Carlsbad architectural styles include theAmerican Federal, New England, Provincial
_ and Manor. The American Federal style incorporates the use of brick masonry, lap siding
on all four sides, wood shutters, formal entry columns and a flat concrete tiled roof as the
primary materials. The New England style incorporates traditional East Coast features such
_ as lap siding on all four sides, square entry columns, arched top windows, decorative wood
shutters, and dormer windows. The Manor style is characterized by stone and plaster
exterior walls, recessed plaster accents, a covered front second floor deck, and a raised
concrete [ile roof to accent the elevations. The final architectural style is the Provincial.
Page 4 of 7 • Site Development Review -Project Description
Dublin Ranch Area A Tract 7136 - Nei¢hborhood Al • Au¢ust, 2001
_ This style is reminiscent of the French and Italian Mediterranean styles; low pitch hipped
roofs with earth-toned 'S' shaped concrete tiles, plaster walls with accent colors, and an
elegant entry with tall story classical columns.
Exterior colors and styles are selected to compliment the architectural style. Watmer earth
tones of beige, tan, taupes and browns would be used on the Manor and Provincial styles.
Cooler colors of gray and beige would be used on the Federal and New England styles. All
color schemes include accent colors for the azchitectural features of the elevations.
The New Castle
_ The New Castle plan in the A-1 neighborhood of Dublin Ranch incorporates several unique
azchitectural styles. The elevations compliment each other with different roof pitches,
massing and setbacks, creating a varied streetscape. The forms and details are simple and
_ elegant, true to the architectural style and expressed on all four sides of the house. The
variety created through the different styles of building massing, exterior colors, landscaping,
lot and plan layout, will result in a diverse and visually pleasing neighborhood.
New Castle architectural styles include American Colonial, American Traditional, Manor
and Mediterranean. The American Traditional style incorporates the use of brick masonry,
plaster and a flat concrete file as the primary materials. Wood shutters, decorative window
boxes, and shaped plaster trim compliment the step pitched gable roof forms. Arched
accent windows with window boxes, steeper pitched roof forms with flat concrete tile, lap
siding, brick masonry and wood shutters, chazacterize the American Colonial style of
azchitecture. The Manor is a more formal style characterized by azched windows, masonry
and plaster walls, shaped plaster trim and window boxes with raised concrete file [o accent
the elevations. The last architectural style incorporated is Mediterranean. Low-pitched
hipped roofs with raised file concrete and a shaped plaster cornice characterize this style.
Arched windows, columns and shaped plaster trim accent the predominately plaster walls.
Exterior colors and materials are selected to complement the azchitectural style and consist
_ of both the warmer earth tones of beiges, tans, taupes and browns and the cooler grays. The
warmer tones would be used on the Mediterranean, French Country and American
Traditional styles while the cooler hues would compliment the French Provincial style. All
color schemes include accent colors for the architectural features of the elevations .
The Santa Barbara:
The Santa Bazbaza plan in the A-1 neighborhood of Dublin Ranch incorporates several
unique architectural styles. Four distinct elevation styles compliment each other with
variations in roof types and slopes, materials, massing and setbacks; creating a varied
Page 5 of 7 • Site Development Keview - Yro~ect Uescnpnoo
Dublin Ranch Area A. Tract 7136 - Neiehborhaod Al • Aueust. 2001
_ streetscape with the other plans in this area. The detailing of these various elevations are true
the their architectural style and are expressed on all four sides of the house. The variety
created through different styles of building massing, exterior colors, landscaping, lot and plan
- layout, will result in a diverse and visually pleasing neighborhood.
The Santa Bazbaza azchitectural styles include the American Federal, New England,
- Provincial and Manor. The American Federal style incorporates the use of brick masonry,
lap siding on all four sides, "butterfly" shaped wood shutters, formal entry columns and a flat
concrete tiled roof as the primary materials. The New England style incorporates traditional
East Coast features such as lap siding on all four sides, squaze entry columns, decorative
wood shutters, dormer windows, and "turned" gable roofs. The Manor style is characterized
by stone and plaster exterior walls, pre-cast trim, transom windows and a raised concrete file
roof to accent the elevations. The final azchitectural style is the Provincial. This style is
reminiscent of the French and Italian Mediterranean styles; low pitch hipped roofs with earth-
_ toned 'S'shaped concrete tiles, plaster walls with horizontal reveals and trim accents, azched
windows, and an elegant, azched entry.
_ Exterior colors and styles are selected to compliment the azchitectural style. Warmer earth
tones of beige, tan, taupes and browns would be used on the Manor and Provincial styles.
Cooler colors of gray and beige would be used on the Federal and New England styles. All
_ color schemes include accent colors for the architectural features of the elevations .
J. Describe how the landscape features have been designed so as to insure visual relief and
an attractive environment for the pubic.
The beauty of the existing rolling topography and natural countryside is the basis for the
Dublin Ranch landscape concept and planting themes. Rows of trees delineating entries and
streets depict the historical image of orchards and create a sense of community.
Patterns and textures within Dublin Ranch have been chosen to complement the proposed
azchitectural styles and "upscale" rural theme. Pilasters, walls and fences aze part of the
common elements that compose the consistent and recurring community theme. Open rail
fences are the predominate fence type and are provided to maintain vistas to the natural and
man-made landscape while providing visual relief along traffic corridors and open spaces.
Stone and stucco are repetitive materials used throughout Dublin Ranch, which reinforce the
design continuity of [he community. Whether they are in the form of the stucco community
- wall or rail fences with stone pilasters or identity gateway pilaster, these materials provide a
Page 6 of 7 • Site Development Review -Project Description
Dublin Ranch Area A. Tract 7136 - Nei¢hborhood Al • Aueust. 2001
unified appeazance while creating a classic and livable community.
The design of signage defines a hierarchy within Dublin Ranch. Stone monument sign walls
- identifying the community will be located within select medians of the community entries
located along Fallon Road. The subtle simplicity of neighborhood entries repeat key
elements from the community entries such as open rail fences and stone gateway pilasters.
- Ornamental plaques on stone pilasters will display the Dublin Ranch or neighborhood logo.
Indigenous and horticulturally adaptive plant materials serve as unifying elements throughout
Dublin Ranch. Trees will define a hierarchy of entries, streets, and neighborhoods providing
individuality and distinctiveness. A double row of shade trees will be planted on each side of
the walk along the collector streets to provide a pedestrian friendly environment and sense of
community. Each neighborhood will use a single species of street tree with no two
neighborhoods having the same tree.
Planting adjacent to rail fences abutting open space will act as a transition to the natural
landscape, intermittent stream corridor, and golf course. Special attention has been paid to
- the golf course planting which will consist primarily of native oaks and trees indigenous to
the area. Transition areas within the course incorporate native/ornamental grasses and
California native and other ornamental plants, which are horticulturally adaptive to the
- natural characteristics ofthe site to create an oak grassland chazacter. Oak trees native to the
Tassajaza Hills have been incorporated into the plant palette to reflect the historical landscape
of the Tri-Valley azea.
K. Is the proposed project located on a hazardous waste and substances site? (A list is of
these sites is available in the Planning Department).
- A Phase 2 site assessment of the Project Area has been conducted by Berlogaz Geotechnical
Consultants to determine the presence of any on-site hazazdous waste and substance sites.
_ The findings of this study indicate that no problem sites were found (See Appendix). In
addition, Berlogaz Geotechnical Consultants previously conducted an environmental records
search for the Dublin Ranch - Phase I project site to determine if the site was included on a
list of hazardous waste and substance areas. The results of this search indicated that no
_ property within atwo-mile radius of Phase I Dublin Ranch (which includes lands within the
Project Area) are listed as a hazardous site, hazardous material generator or transporter, or
known to have underground storage tank leaks.
Page 7 of 7 • Site Development Review -Project Description
~~
d~
w
~ ~
o ~ m
a F Z p~~~~ ~~~ vv~<~ -~~G ~~~
U ~e ~
~-+ z~ a ~a
O _ a~ ~ ~F
' ~ ~ f~sl LL~1
p3. -
~ ~ V ~ `
V~ W oa u~ U
(y I!ii
~ F~ A
M ~
0
U
w
J
O
V
~ ~ o
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ 'z u ~ .n 'u .t
w c- (s
o W u~ W ~ o
o m W v W~ 'F °'n W ~` .W v 9 y m~
~ ~y~q ~ Oj W V1~9 a~a 9'O V W V)~ y Y~
W h yyrn NC ~ ~ W eAI a
J°v W CAI JA~y p F.~~~V QU G W v~ .~ .S ,`S
'~ S ~ ~ ~ '° ~ '~'~ 9 ~ ~ °' w a s a d o o .m m ~ ~ °r~ a, v
W ~~ -. p~~~ ~ g ~'~c`3 9S X0.8, g p8~ g qo ~'n°~a°m ~.9 t~4w ~0.0°/~
Z :?9 ~a9a•rg zw,~w~d &z 8a ~' 0. 5. ~'. 3'a ~W °9a c.z 8aWO~
H h g~~"'ti g- g ~ ~~~-?','m 0.°' m~°.]7~'j m0.°'C a o°` g~yy C'~0.g' ~ o
~-' ~. ~ AI ~ O: v'a C: m
E.I a 9.y ~~w_ o- v: m~-~ e~ u`~U CAI Al AI w,y ,qm 4 ~~ ~ ~.s ~ ~ °
g a °
W ~~~ ~° v~ti ~'S~35 `o .s ~$o~3 5.Sm .9 .9m du °Bi E 3~i
LTa S~E~`-5`~mr_3=.~$c~~~c°w~.~g,~FzZ~~~~wy~'nhw~'y~~wa~zQ
W ~,' 'v~ w c~ i+. n v
~ ° ~N~~yyd '~'^^:°~y°°` 010 ~v ~i a ~o eeCC Sao °: o.-:~ nim
~Ne+1~~N~O I~CGU h. ~NNNN NNNh NNN t~l fn h1
.-
ie o3xa3ua
~~e a3uars3v
oew-cae -Reel n'~no•o•a
uvxns axn.vxuvme v,m.o„wn.ion ,wa nwwrrva 'xnenv
96IL ,L~tl2S1, - l-y QOOH2I09H`JiBN
u8}s 58uLO ft a
.
T
~
'"~ "'"H10
~rnas ~~~nnMMW
SdW V^ .xa[na~ ~vacvdo~anad a'yig ~u
~a~Qr~ ~0~
~a~w .y. easy gavel vi[QnQ
\5 PARCEL 'p~
I
~y1
` ° \4 PARCEL ,C,
\6 US
~' ~
g
9g P~ n 1 I
8
azaa~
~ q C
~~ ~ S z
A
N N N O
~
'.~
•/O V
I Wry 5 \
a 0 W W ,0 A O W ( V ~ pvN a
i \Z P~ ~ PU.N
e~^ 0 0 0 N N N N ti •
~,~NN
p`rv,~ a
,
~
W P
Y g `
VN _
O O O O E" \8 Gn p~pN 1 10 4 a
P~ I P
4
appxxxx c \\
E' I
~ ~TERRA~E
~ ~ ~
~ KI
yy._ SS
Y~i 6
m
U
G
1
20
0
\\ g ;
~ g0
_
_g
_g
$
°e 33 ~~ k `d (~" F PAN` 6Z Pte'` 4
8g
l.S a.aa wF
h ~^Nmv~ Pia
~ 2\ P~2 PNN3 4
P~`~
5\ ~`
~ 2 P
22 PvT'' a
PVN
63 Pte` a 10g 92 P~ `
\ ~~ 0 88
~C ~ ~~'
P~`~ ~ 3
vV 5g 5
R ~
~
}
Gj w
4 108 a
g4 ~'
a Z4 pVN ~ ~~
5a PNN~
.~,1
`~' ~ 86
¢
h 25 .`
S•
VN ~ ~
a .~ g~ .
.~ P~
P~ a P 8 4 ~
~ 1 \O
~C'~'
6 P`AN 5
V ~
' P~ ` N
5~ S
P
~4, ~ 3 g5 ~ ~+ `
2
pv>J `C P
85
VN x 6~ puw ~ \06 Pv+ t ¢
18 ( 58 pU`N 98
( ~N+ 1
PARCn ,A,
uJ`' 68
,,eN~ _ 105
~~
__ I
8a
2~
a 55 g8
I P~ a \04 PNN
° 9g ~ ~
`r" 3 83
P\N, 54
Pv3' " 89
~
PVC ` PVN 2 10 \00 ~ ~ Pvs' "
28 53
P~+ ~
~0 vN
P~ \02 82
~
52 Pte`
Zg PV`N \ ~ \
P~ 1 5
~Cy P 8\
P~ 5 ~ i ~Yi'` 1
~ a
m
za z
m
i d
~ N m
W
ee N k
~
~ Z 8 U
5 5~ w.
~ z.
w
~ cv o
~
zs m ~
Q ~
J ~
v~
J I
I
U
z !
o<a o v
Z8 ~
~~ C
3
P~
53
35 P`p" ' -
36 P~
~ ~+y ~v o 5~ P 2
z ~ 3a'xR'~~ 38
2~ ~~3~~~ Pte`
a ~i `~ ~ 'fit s ~` ~ .0
z„ i~P~S~~ 3g ~Gt~y
b
~~i s~go~~ QQ <
a8~8~~3
e \ 11~ I
I ~ ~ P~ a ~\
~~
4ti
'V vv" ` A4 ~
PW' 3 R3
42 s
puw 2
4\ $
~~
~'
Q3MJ3HJ
Q3N'J1530
~H NMtl}q
\~
g~~°" N~~a ~NI~N~~
f, _ .
15 a ~ ~~PARCEL •p•
,~ ~wz _.
1C7 P~i`, ' ,
~4 .._
~ 4
N
~ ~ 4 p BqJ q
. PP ~,'. ~
.. \r H P~ e a
'i11 P~qp, ~• • fi4B ,3 P(~fi
,2 P ~+h
~~~\ P~~Be ~ ~6NB P
r 9
`~, 18
6JB, +~ Pp bq5.\
• N ~ `
\9 P 6JB9 ~ ~
r'20
•, Pte' ~ ....
P 613:1 V2 •.
'~x4w. pe 6 ~iC • ~ Y \
\~,,2~
. 23
~' 24 e~'16
"25
PP fi~BB
1.i
z
~14. ~
X26
PARCEL q'
' 2~
`. a
f Pp 6y)
'~ ~
p5115
28
'1.9 v~q q
'.. J~+ P~.yas
'.......
32 33 Pp s,i
4
U
w
I
~~
X05 '
104 98
PLAN i
~P~qh P B~
,P 4 ..
~,;ggACE
~NGSMIIZ
-i 1~~ 9~ ~ .~'
P fib34 91
g3
~p8
g4
9~ C
95
3
P~~q?
96 P
2
,....4
P~p ~
T 99
a
~js
....,
~ ~
P~y~ 3
3 ~ Ii
usw
~ 4, 66
~ Pp~gB
z~
o ciao
• ,
65 ,,
NN 2
I P 6183
,~ 64
• P 1,,
'~ 4
PP 61Bt
82 ~ ,
PNNq.•'~
P 6z
8~
5
~~
r,~ /
1
35 PP B" ~ 45
P o PN~1 ~
0 36 P~'g1x ~`;~ ~' P
~~ ® - • ~ P~Ba `~`
5 ~ ~g ~ ~5 ~ ~ ~ P~ a 43
W M ~ o ~ - PN6 qo p eoe~ ;
l iti
a i ff ~ ~°s~ 39 ~ 42
c ~ Q~ ~` 3
..•
~ ~ 40
.._..._. P 6(q 0 ~~
z ~ r
4~
%N~~l
Po fi0h1
usuaQ ftg saw.oy Rlgi'~8 1~
•orr,~ •srar~ar~ ~o~ ~
IPgRCF.~ •C•
I 6
P~ 2
P ~^` 3
Pp ~B° 5
~--
.-
,.~
m
~
o ~
'
~
~,
--
°~
7
~I
,
.~'oi7l 'I-
.~ ;~- _
,
-- -
~iy
W
Q
Q U
= Z
U ~
z
~ ~
0
z
m
m, _ I.I -
- o
~~~~ ~
~~x
a
-
- i
a .
_
~_.
I
_ II I
~::~s
`~1
oa
__ .4 Q~
I
~
I I I ~ /yw0~
V
F
A
tl
Y
!~
r
~ tC ttp CCoG ~
N N IIOI N N N N
Y M! M m Y n ~
IW..~ p MN
NN V
`~ q
LL o u v
°s 33
~o _
J ~
~ W f V U~ U
1~ VI ~ ~- N LL O
Imo/
O O I
I
b I
® I
I pp I
® ~F ® I~F
~ F I `' i I
i
I i
1
~~ ® I
I
I
O ,~ I
~ ~ ~ r-__
I •`\ `~`
~`
~ ~ I
I I
I
I 1
~i I I ~ ~ ~ I
F 1 I
I 1
I I
I I` 1 ® O
b
I Q ~
I
I
___~ Y / ~/
1 /
I
~ L_ ,
I I ~
OO ® OO II I 11 I
7 i II ~
_ f II I a
® I B, I J
L__~ - 1 ______ r I I I
I
Ir I I I
~~~{ i~ L I
-r I
yn ~ i~~ ~>CI idi I i d
e
O ~~ ~ r-, ~ I 4 I I
I I ~ I
/C\~/(j\j//J~ ! ` I I
LL
I __ __
.B-.OL
,Qr
~ W
V
O M~
W
~I ~ a ~ v
0
~t
~~
~'
Y
~Y
e
r
O
~ ~~^~ r
~ ~ ~
a
0
o ~,~ -
^ -----
~ O Nµ141F 0 ~ ZZ
i ; ~ n ~
n Ab } j
i ~ 4 ~ i ~ ~ a
. 0 0 = ~ ~
o o ~_______ z
o ^ ~ o
o0 0 ' ~ 0 0 0000
C ~
~~ Oi Os
t ~ C
r d d
n °n
} n h
o 0
<° 3
qr
. W
Z Q ~
V J
O
~" m
~`+ a Z °
0
~\
T
MT
W
~~ f
~~
2 ~~ ~
~~ ~
. .
S
z
0
W
S
a
c
r
V Z
m
z o
J
m
7
0
~~
~~O
. C~
~2 ~
~4
.Cry
~~
~a
.~
~k~
~5~
~~~;k
r~S"__c•
~i7
Ll y _
v 33 Cis
~ ,f
~~' k ~~` ~
~~
~~
yW~
GF
~~
~F
~~ !
7' a~
a
W
J
W
LL
W
J
..5 -, t }:
~. ~
C''~r~~
~~~k
n r~
.~~M1, ~
i~~
S~a~
a
W
J
W
W
Z
a
. o II
' p..
_ _II
~ I s
f~
I l I
I 10 0 I I
B0 D _ '
I
--I L sJ`
I ° r~
I ~ -- I
I -- I
I 1 4 11 I
I II
I o D I I I
18'~ ~
I e _-_- I
I ~ I e ~
------- g --Y--------------- ----
0
r
Z
a`
~z
0
W W
O =
W ~
Z Q
Q~
Z
W
T
Q
a
~
Z
W Z J
~
LL ~
_ Z O
J
m
ti
~ ~
r~
~~O
~_
o~
~ ~~~~
~.
~~~4
~,
~ ~~ ~ ~~c
rytC 9
i
~~
W
J
W
J
>H
W
J
W
a~
Q
r
ODD
r~'
~` ~
.~
r-------
I
I
I
I O
a
4 ~:
Y y
Y
~`
s
~ r
a
c
c _
a z Z
~ a ~
W W V
W
_ Z J
_ ~ '
- 3 ~ ~
t~ a a z z °
~
Z = m
W ~
0
~~~
r-------- ---------- ----
i Y
i °~i 4 ii d
p~~ ti
~y d ~ ~ C
---- p
ro _oi O
~d_ Q e~ j
I
I
1 ~~ o ~~
~~ e ~~
O
~~
~ R
Y
~.0-~9L t
,/
® ®O t
L}" o ~
Q ~ ~ m O e I ~~ I ~ O
~~~ ^ I II O
~ I N
~~ ~ I I
~\ I I
y ^
I I
® O I I
I
o ® ;fir
~ ~
,~. ___
~ . ~
i 1 1 1 / I ~ r` r` G r`
~~ I 1 I I ~
I rT I / ~+ ~ ~ I I Ol VII h N I/Ol VO1
1¢ I I 11 M e n
i t m o ~n o
l\ I11 ,\ I I NN nm~
\ III ~ W
~ I I I ~~ ' I I a
~ O
~ I ~ ~~ K 4 Z ~ S
I Q ® ~ ~ I ~ __ -2 p I O ~W ¢6u
YY !E z
I I V1 4 m Q t7
I
>5 f I r
O ~JII'~~~~ III ® Q I ~ . W
Q 'I.-Ir'I.--ItiJlll I I LL Q
5--~ rc Q Q V
L1____ LL
~ Z J
.~ -, V ~ ~
~ J ~
m
D
n* O I y
' O
!J 1
O Y O ~ ~ § II ~.~_
t ~ ``
F
^ ^ § ~ L ~ 1
` m= ~ I
,,._ ~ _- I
~~ I It~ I
\ / I \\ /
6 \ I
L \• ~~II~y~~~~I I \\
~IIAI!>tA~III~IIINPi
0
w \
~* r' ~
®~~
0
J
I ~
i
I ~ I ~ ~) I
I I ' -~ I ~ ~~ yF
I I 5 I Z f
S I CJQ
~ \ ~ * I I i
~~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ i
s I Z
~ o ~ ~ ~ I \\
0000 `; ~
._J
I ~_____~ L_____J
~____ __~
~~ { ~
.,
~i
sT:x`
.` STf" C
~~ ~~~~
~~~~ ~k
~~
:~ ..
~~~~
~.~ ~ 7-i'k ~'
~s ~,
.N ~. ~~
~~~ ~~~,
~ ~~F ~~
~Nt
.~
~~~
-=q
~ ~ i ~ I
I ~ I ~ r
i ~ $ i S d~ ~ ~_ Q
I I
A \ f' e W
la B ~~ ~ -o ---- ~ \y W m ~ = U
,-- _
--- r O o~ o Z z
o $ .g ii ~ O W Q W ~ m
~ a ~~ ~ '~ ~ Z V ~ Z ~
o ', 8 ~ 2 m
W ~
z
0
a
W
0
r
``
~J LT J-lL .5~`
. ~~
2 ~~` ~ a
~-j'k ' ~~.~'..
u~~
f
A
~ ~zk
J 1~ ~
j{
C
{{1~~ ~7~
l~ ~ ~~
.N ~~ `F ~1 +~y
C
fi.: ~ ~ a'
. _ ~ V! 1~
a I rj~ O Q
~ ~/~~ Q
s_ I ~ Q ~ - W
-- ~ ~ ~ - ~ Q
J m ~ U
O Z
~ of z z
Z U ~ ~ ~
V~ Q - _z o
a ~ = J
00
o w p 0
~ ~
ao
~-
\~~
~'~
~~
C
J
~~ f
(((~~~iii (((~~~iii 4
~~. ~~ .
i~ ~i ,
:~
-' `'r,
wU-.
g
e
Z
O
~~
,~l
~~ Y•
~1(v~ ~~~
/`~ `.
~~
Y
e
~~
.~J ~` L
~~ ~~ ~'
9z ~. Z
~~ ~ O
w Q
J m
O W ~
Z U
O ^ J
Q
W
Q
gam
W Z Z
?~ m
W Z ~
z ~
~ J
z
O
Q
w
J
W
0
r
r
v ~ n.I~
Q'q r. Ci~~
l0 M Ci-
r
r
I'i ~
~ C1
ss) ~ Y~`
_~ \ t;
gyp- ---
p I
I
J
o
jjj[d
{[,
9
z
~I
W
~~
--~----~ u u ~ ---
LJ
s g ~
I
I
-- I
/ \ --- J
~ ~ r-
k ~ ~ ~, ~i i
~ ~ ~
i ~ ~1
F ,~ i ~~ `~jx ~
i y: ~h
~~ ;\\ I
i
~~'Y
i ~~®
~ ~~~
Q-
0
0
-I
~_
ff
~2
I
I
I
I
I! r
I ?
i
~i
a~
n
u
Q
I
1
~--i
p~
F
A
~'''
i
i
I
I
i' i
n
,y~yf(~}J e~
V U = I
~ w a ~ ~
~F ~~ 1+
~ W
i
hhyy11 r
a ~ ~
M~y U
Jy ~
r
~ u~
x
~o
~P_L_
2
O ~/
;~ n i
F- ~ /
I /
i /
0
II
v II
I.
I~
II
L IyL
I
I
f
I
I
\ -__ I
\\\ 'l
~ `~iv I
~ v
ATV
k
\~ __
_~
---
i n
a'~ I
`~ ie
~
!
i
I
I
I
L~
t ~ I
l _-~-I~
I
I
I
I
I
I
7
(~
V
0
~~
IY-
Q
J
J
z
t
~~
~~
~YG
s-,zi - 'I I
i
I
z
n
u
I~~ 0
I
.-ti
V i
i
U
,~
A I
I m 4~
" ~' ~
~~;
wwarr ~ ~ ~_
W <
3 ~~
x
(~~O
F
r
~~J
m
F
i
i~ ~ /
~ v_ ~
i
~~
r~~
III
II 11
LJ
1
O
L
I
____~ I
~ ------
I
i I
I
I I
I
~ r~
i
~ I
I
I
2 Y / EY ~
I "' - ~.~-
\ ~` I
~ ~
\ I
I
I
a
~-
'~ i
~ ~I
~ ~ ~_
Ix
h
\ - _ - .
U
I
I
I
I
r-J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- -~ II
u
I'
t _ ~
~ ~~ ~
~ 4 I
® r I I
___-_ I I
I I
i. I I I
-_ ~ I I
I I
rl ____J i!s
` i i. ~ '~i
_-- -- I~
iv_ ' ~ t
x I I y x
a~ I I ~"-
Id
(u
Z
Q_
°o
0
lU
Z
~Q_
u-
a
~~.
j
e
~~
~~
~~
~i€
Y
1 '
1 ~
~I
p
YI
O.
.--i
!, 1
i l `
i ~lV
F~ ~
l
l
!' A
Y
Mu st
m ~
" ~n 3~
''~~'~
ri ~~
~a
~<
i
i
I ~ ~
I ~ h
Y I
i ~-
I~
r
i n
--- -- --JI
~ , ~ I
"''b
~~'
H I
I
I
IV I
< ~
I
I
~
~
9 I
I
~
I e r ~
S
n ~ _I ~
~_ ,~
-
_
, ~
I ~, ~
i
i
__ i
r~'~ +
-' Illl 2
---r--- II II
LJ ~ ----
(ZI,
~ gg~ ~izzO
F
tl I I
_
\
~; r IY_
;., ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
, ,
~'
i ~~
~
0
.~
. .
~Ix
arty i I
I~
L~
N
z
Q
v
0
>i
z
~~
~~
U
~~
~~
A
~° ~~~
`~;~~p
~~
x~
5
J
4 -~
» S~
'Y
]'~ F
~~>rgaa
R4y'±%_%
~~Fiiisia
a`
~~~yyytiii~ i
(J i Y ~z
`9E^ -$
i
~~~~1
_;
a66%>6;.
2~»
°~`
. .. .. .. ..._.... i
{ ; . .....~ .~~....e.~
_..~
f
9
1
~
i ~
3 V_
Y~
[I
~
e z~
•i
u
of
k .... _.:..._..~..,...,~ ...~....~...
S'
J
Q
-p
~Yf~F
R.v '1•., ter,
nv`~35
j/WaW'~ ,.'i
a7i
ac
~S
U
4
x,~
r 5~~~
3S
'` .'.
$c'.s=
fr~
aao
_. __~,
I~
Y~~
Y~ I I
i
='i
.~
•
o
I
---
it ry
i
~ ~ 1{`~~
i
1~
A
4
~ V
~y
w a 9 iii
~~ dI
~m
~;
<'
I`° (I~"1
M
I I
Y~~
tl, Y~
~~
Y
A
0
r~
~'
~ /~~
A
b
F
tip Y
~~'~_~
x5 ~~ ,
a
U a~~!
Y~
~~
o-
V
A
V
.`r
-/
b °t
~ o ~i d 'J'YQ Ot d
(`y`J ry
~ n
~ N
~ ~ N
~ ~ ~ VI
Q
j~ N n N Y1
V
LL n II
yqq[pgpgpqrcpq
~
Y n n
~ E Y n
~ a
~~
II
Q G
~ =
~ u
,a-,tc
w
0 ® O
J
y
@: W
o ~~ ~ ~ ~ 0
W
S
T
Q
~a
V
~ J
~m
Z
J
0
-,
V
Y
e
r
I
i
I
~ ~
~° ® ~°
t tt ® ~ ~ of pt p~pt tWf pt pt pt
'e ~T ~ ` NN N N N ¢N N N
y~ g_
--------
.... 9 '"n n R
I $C ~ ~ nn ~ 3 ~ xo S w
LL nRn n n ~II n
0 ~ R ~ ;=8
~~
~~ li g~ ~ ~'~ n
~~d~$g ~~51~
I ~
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I'~_____ __~1 I I
1 I
I I
I
Q ^^ ~ € ~ O I
o "~ ^ ~ ~ I
I
o s ~ '
e~ O N~ Q I
_ 0 ~y~y~y~ ~p¢ O . 1 T
_______________~~____1 I
•~~~~ I I~HOWII~ I w I
Y/ ~J
II
II
II
I
d ~
I
v I
~~ ~~ I
I
I
I ~ uWu
~I
i ~ ~ !
0
~ 4 s ---------------------~ -~
~ ~
r~ ~~~ I i ~
~~~ ~ I
~ I ~ ~
® , n
~ ~
o
OO~O ° ~
®a ~
I I
I I
,~ ~ ~ o
L__________________________.l
~~~
O ~ ~ a
~ ~# J ~ ~ ~ a
°®~ ~ ~ a = z
~ o~ m z_
®I_; O
Z
~+ ~ ~ °
m
0
0
in
yI ~Vi
(~
C1~~_L~j1Zr.~ l<•` ~~
(.
1 s Q
S ® ~ F~ ~k ~~ k ~ od'
k zj . 02 c
_N ~ ~x .N ~ -~x s~.x .
'!
~ ~~
Z ,~
W o
W o
Z ~
d-
• t
{
(~~~}~t
y
F'~~i~~C (~~~~
a~ ~ ~,
3k ' ~,k" ~ ~~,ki
r' .~ .
..~ ` C `.~
~` ~.k' f~ ~ ~ sk
,~ o. ~~ 'stk.
~~~.:
s
~ ~
f~~ ~ f~ ~~
SrE ky ~ ky
W •N ~~ ~k ~r ~k
~~~ ~~ .
r~~-~ _~
i1
a
LL
8
~~ ~
~.
~~
~~ W ~
W m
O~ °w~
U Z
~7 2 ~
Z
r W ~ L
.~~/~
~~~` ~~,
'~f (~
~~ ~- UWllWW
~.k i 7j'k.. r~ ~ ,
0
z
0
a
r-
Q
U
Z U Z
W Z m
W ~ ~
Z J
m
O
4~
.~
~{