Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4.01 Draft 05-24-1993&Adj06-01-1993Minutes t " 'i 'j ij ~ II; " . " ,,< ;"1It,~,\,,, . . REGULAR MEETING - Mav 24. 1993 A regular meeting of the city Council of the city of Dublin was held on Monday, May 24, 1993, in the council Chambers of the DUblin Civic Center. The meeting was called to order at 7:33 p.m., by Mayor Snyder. * * * * ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmembers Burton, Houston, Howard, Moffatt and Mayor Snyder. ABSENT: None. * * * * PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (610-20) Mayor Snyder led the Council, Staff and those present in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. * * * * PROCLAMATIONS (610-50) Mayor Snyder read and/or presented proclamations: Declaring May 24-28, 1993 as Operation Prom Night and requesting that all citizens acknowledge and support this valuable education program sponsored by the city of DUblin in cooperation with the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority, Dublin Police Services, Dublin Unified School District, Regional Ambulance Service, Cal-Star Medivac Helicopter Service, California Highway Patrol, Mothers Against Drunk Driving, and students Against Drunk Driving. Expressing appreciation to Valerie Barnes for her 9 years of service on the Planning Commission. A Quill pen with the City Seal on it was also to be presented to Ms. Barnes. Mayor Snyder announced that because Ms. Barnes was not present, the proclamation and pen would be properly presented to her in the future. Declaring the month of May 1993 as "Older Californians Month" and encouraging all residents to recognize and appreciate the seasoned wisdom and talents of our senior citizens. Mary Gibbert accepted the proclamation. Recognizing and congratulating the San Ramon/Dublin Alcosta Starburst Soccer Team for their third state cup title and wishing them the best of luck in the Western Regional Tournament in Albuquerque, New Mexico in June. Each of the 15 team members were presented with their own prOClamation. * * * * "" CUSTOMER SERVICE AWARD FOR JUNE (150-90) City Manager Ambrose presented the June Customer Service Award to ), Steve Loweree, Maintenance Superintendent with MCE Corporation. / " '1~ :" " ,. ", :, .--- /1 j ., :\ " ~, :, I"~ ;1.: " !~\ i, f, :(i, ::1 * * * * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 218 Regular Meeting Kay 24, 1993 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM ,NO. . _ , :~l\" .~, '~'c. ../j~ll;<.:~,'::.~,~ ~;!; COPIES TO: 11 . . APPOINTKENT TO PLANNING COMMISSION (110-30) Mayor Snyder announced that following interviews with the 7 interested people, he recommended the appointment of Dan Downey to the Planning commission to a term which will expire in December, 1996. On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Howard, and by unanimous vote, the council confirmed the appointment of Dan Downey to the Planning Commission. Because this creates a vacancy on the Park & Recreation Commission, the city Clerk was directed to schedule appointments for the subcommittee to interview those applicants who expressed an interest in serving on the Park & Recreation Commission in the event of future openings. * * . . PRESENTATION BY ZONE 7 (1000-20) Jim Dixon, General Manager advised that they are continuing to see an increase in water rates, and probably will in the foreseeable future. The EPA is constantly changing the rules to provide a higher quality of water. They add 10 or 15 tests each year. Of the 14 first rate nations, we are one up from the bottom in terms of our water. He referenced an article from Parade Magazine. They were asked what they will be doing to streamline their fixed costs. This year, they will be getting 100% of their water from the state. They experienced a great increase in costs this year. Their 1991 sales were cut by 38% and they had increased costs. Their costs don't go down when they deliver less water. Pleasanton has asked them to use their reserves until economic times get better. A chart was distributed and reviewed. $3.74 per acre foot is the real water rate. Cm. Burton asked and was informed that there are 43,560 cubic feet in an acre. Each family uses about ~ acre foot per year, or about $200 worth, wholesale. The balance is the mark up that DSRSD charges. Mr. Dixon explained that the average water bill will be about $20 to $30 per month. The rest is what the District charges to get the water to us. Cm. Moffatt asked if these costs were based on treated or raw water. Mr. Dixon stated treated and it is treated water that goes to the retailers. They sell agricultural water at 10% plus what the state charges them. It is about $50 to $60 per acre foot. A drought tolerant landscaping demonstration garden is being put in in "" Pleasanton. They are actively working with the State to have them fix the state Aqueduct. They are also actively negotiating with people in the Valley for water transfers. This is a new field. conservation, water reclamation and water transfers is how they anticipate meeting their needs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 219 Regular Meeting Kay 24, 1993 ~' " , ' . . , , Cm. Moffatt asked if his Board views water as a means for restricting land use. Mr. Dixon stated they are concerned about how to pay for the additional water supply. They will have to put a future water purchase together so that it doesn't add costs to them. Cm. Burton asked Mr. Dixon to elaborate on redistribution of agricultural water. Mr. Dixon discussed recent legislation which mandates that a certain amount of water could be transferred. Cm. Burton stated he had heard that 85% of the water in California goes to agriculture. Mr. Dixon stated this was correct. Everyone who gets water from the state pays what we pay. They are trying to do this in a way that they don't lose farm land. Cm. Burton felt the issue in the future will be possibly changing crops. Cm. Howard questioned if they anticipated future increases in that there has been more than a 60% increase in rates for park watering. Mr. Dixon stated they will be relooking at this in light of this years water needs. They may be looking at 5% to 10% increases in the next few years. He felt the state will be putting on a surcharge of $10 to $50 to fix the environmental problems in California. Mayor Snyder asked that Mr. Dixon discuss the situation of them looking for water south of the Delta. Mr. Dixon referenced this and advised that when an endangered species is found and identified, anyone of 5 different agencies can shut things down. The drought has caused severe problems. The Council thanked Mr. Dixon for the informative presentation of a very complicated subject. * * * * Budqet Deficit Concerns (330-80) Frank Ruskey stated he wanted to talk about the budget deficit. Also, it had recently been brought to his attention that a 3~% pay raise was given to the Fire Department. This was not brought to a full vote of "" the city Council. This was passed without a full vote of the Council. He therefore submitted that some of the people of the Valley were not represented on how the City's money is being spent. This is a problem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 220 Regular Meeting May 24, 1993 . . Regarding the city's budget problems, he got a report from Staff, and felt they did an excellent job. However, what has not been addressed is the Police Department. Business is business and he suggested that the city consider letting the San Joaquin County Sheriff's Department, who just laid off 33% of their personnel, submit a proposal to provide pOlice services to the city. He did not see anything wrong with having another agency in another county giving us a proposal. Our police Department responds to calls very fast and they are very efficient. We may, however, want to look at shifting to 2 patrolmen per vehicle instead of one with a separate backup vehicle. A lot of calls come from the low income housing up on Dougherty Road. The city should be looking at ways of reducing the number of cars. The next place he would look for cuts is the Planning Board. He strongly recommended that the city bring in an independent appraiser to look at all the different divisions of the city. Mayor Snyder advised that during the budget process, there will be a lot of identified areas that the city council will review. with regard to the Fire Department, 3 elected members from Dublin and 3 from San Ramon sit as the Fire Authority Board. The city of Dublin generates approximately 60% of the budget for DRFA and the dollars that are contributed toward fire service are put in through the budget process. Mr. Ambrose clarified that Fire Department personnel are not employees of the city. It is a separate legal entity. Their Board of Directors approve the labor contracts. Mayor Snyder advised that the DRFA public, but hardly anyone attends. past year here at the Dublin civic meetings will be in San Ramon. Board meetings are open to the They have been meeting for the Center. starting in July, the Mr. Ruskey thanked Mayor Snyder for clarifying the information. * * * * CONSENT CALENDAR On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Howard, and by unanimous vote, the council took the following actions: Approved Minutes of Adjourned Regular Meeting of April 27 and Regular Meeting of May 10, 1993; Authorized the Mayor to execute an agreement to add Tag's Towing to the rotational tow list for the removal of abandoned vehicles from "" city streets (600-30); Received the April 1993 Financial Report (330-50); . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 221 Regular Meeting Kay 24, 1993 . . j . l' I . , , , , , Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 55 - 93 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT FOR PERVIOUS CONCRETE AND SAND FILTER PILOT PROJECT (600-40 , 830-20) Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 56 - 93 APPROVING PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSKENT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 83-1 (360-50) and RESOLUTION NO. 57 - 93 APPOINTING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING PROTESTS IN RELATION TO PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS (July 26 , August 9, 1993) Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 58 - 93 AWARDING CONTRACT 93-07 SIDEWALK SAFETY GRINDING TO CENTRAL COAST SURFACE GRINDING ($9,215) 600-30 Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 59 - 93 AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND ALAMEDA COUNTY REGARDING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAMS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 (600-40) Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 60 - 93 AWARDING CONTRACT 93-06 ($70,192.65) ANNUAL STREET SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM TO AMERICAN ASPHALT REPAIR' RESURFACING CO., INC. (600-30) Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 61 - 93 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (ZONE 7) FOR REIMSURSEKENT FOR LANDSCAPING AND WATER SERVICE DOUGHERTY RESERVOIR ACCESS ROAD @ TOPAZ CIRCLE (600-40) Adopted "" RESOLUTION NO. 62 - 93 APPROVING PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT (TRACT 4719) FOR LANDSCAPING , LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 83-2 (360-20) (em. Burton abstained) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 222 Regular Meeting May 24, 1993 . . i r" ! . ~ and RESOLUTION NO. 63 - 93 APPOINTING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING PROTESTS IN RELATION TO PROPOSED ASSESSKENTS (July 26 , August 9, 1993) (em. Burton abstained) Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 64 - 93 APPROVING PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT (TRACT 5511) FOR LANDSCAPING , LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSKENT DISTRICT 86-1 (360-20) and RESOLUTION NO. 65 - 93 APPOINTING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING PROTESTS IN RELATION TO PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS (July 26 , August 9, 1993) Approv~d Warrant Register in the amount of $464,078.28 (300-40). * * * * INCREASE IN BUILDING PERMIT FEES DONALD WALLEN REOUEST FOR EXEMPTION (440-20) Chief Building Official Taugher advised that on April 1, 1993, Donald R. Wallen submitted an application for a building permit to alter the 3rd floor of a building located at 11501 Dublin Boulevard. The applicant was advised on April 12th that the permit was ready to be issued whenever the Owner-builder form, list of Subcontractors and Certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance were filed. The applicant was advised at that time that the fee would be $810. Mr. Taugher explained that the city council approved a new fee schedule on April 26, 1993, which applied to all permits issued after that date. At that time, there were 11 permit applications pending, which totalled $4,602 under the old and $8,856 under the new fee schedule. Four of the 11 permits have been issued thus far under the new fee schedule. Mr. Taugher stated the Council has the option of rev1s1ng the fee schedule to make it applicable to applications filed after April 26th, or another option would be to grant Variances to the fee schedule when an individual request is made. A third option would be for no action to be taken, in which case the higher fee would apply to Mr. Wallen. "" Mr. Taugher requested that the city council provide direction to staff. Cm. Moffatt asked if this situation had been raised as a result of a public hearing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 223 Reqular Meeting Kay 24, 1993 . . Mr. Taugher advised that a public hearing was noticed and the fee schedule was amended by resolution. Cm. Burton questioned if the Council voted to make the new schedule applicable after April 26th would the city have to refund the money. Mr. Taugher responded yes. Cm. Howard asked how many of the 4 who have been issued permits called in advance to find out the amount. Mr. Taugher advised of the process used; when permits are ready to be picked up, Staff calls the applicant and prices are quoted at that time. Cm. Houston felt that if people were notified and knew that the fee was going up, they would have gotten right down and picked it up. If a little goodwill and added support had been shown by Staff, the Council would not have even been talking about this tonight. Mr. Taugher stated the next time this comes up, they could set the effective date at some time beyond the hearing. Cm. Burton felt that this is a case of business relations, and the fair thing to do would be to refund the money. It is not worth the price to make enemies of our business community. Mayor Snyder questioned with regard to those that haven't applied for their permits, how long this could go on. It was shown that the city has higher operational costs. The council must recognize its fiscal responsibility to the community as well. Mr. Taugher advised that applications expire 6 months from the date they are checked. Mr. Wallen was not present at the meeting. On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by em. Houston, and by unanimous vote, the council agreed that all 11 members should be notified that the old permit fees will stand for 30 days from today, i.e., they have 30 days to get their permits. Those who have already paid should be given a refund. The new fee schedule will apply to new applications received after April 26th. * * * * LIBRARY PLANNING TASK FORCE REPORT (940-60) Recreation Director Lowart advised that the Staff Report summarized ~ the findings and recommendations of the Library Planning Task Force with regard to future library needs in the city of Dublin. The Task Force identified several options for addressing the current and future library needs and Ultimately agreed upon recommendations: 1) Take action as soon as possible to expand the current facility to its maximum capacity of 22,000 sq. ft.; and 2) When development occurs in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CK - VOL 12 - 224 Regular Meeting May 24, 1993 ~.' i . . Eastern Dublin and after population there exceeds 10,000, take action to construct an additional library facility in Eastern Dublin. Since the Task Force recognized that funding from both the city and the County was not presently available, they recommended that both projects be funded through General Obligation Bonds, Mello-Roos Districts or some similar mechanism. Ms. Lowart explained that while the Task Force has recommended that immediate action be taken to expand the current facility to its maximum capacity, Staff recommended that the city council defer any action on an expansion at this time. Currently, the Alameda County Library is anticipating an approximate 45% decrease in its budget for the upcoming fiscal year. If this decrease is implemented, County funded hours at the Dublin Library will be reduced from 40 hours per week to an average of 16.75 per week. similar reductions in city funded hours may also be considered during the City's budget hearings. In summary, Ms. Lowart stated the request was that the report be brought back before the Council when there is a clearer picture of library funding. Cm. Moffatt asked with regard to ownership of the library, if the building or the building and property is owned by the County. Cm. Burton advised that the County owns the property and the Library Association owns the building. The County pays for the upkeep of the library. Cm. Moffatt asked if the building will revert back to Dublin residents when it is paid off. Mr. Ambrose advised that staff had researched this and it is clear that it will revert back to the County. Cm. Burton asked since we have to cut back, what impact will this have if the hours are cut? Will there be more people which would complicate the issue? Mr. Ambrose stated the concern is the whole funding issue for libraries is in a state of fluctuation. It is premature to look at adopting a capital improvement plan for the library until we know what our funding situation is in the next year or two. He advised that Joy Cadone was prepared to discuss what will happen with the proposed cuts. Joy Cadone, Deputy County Librarian stated out of about a $16 million budget, they had to reduce down to $9.6 million. It was a dramatic decrease for them. Dedicated property tax funding is being taken away and will go to the State. Their special augmentation funding is also being taken away. They have a number of buildings to support and have fixed costs which cannot be decreased. The majority of the operation costs are in personnel. They planned to try to take the county libraries that are in close proximity with each other and try to couple them with base hours. They will be coupling castro Valley with San Lorenzo, as an example, and Dublin with Pleasanton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eM - VOL 12 - 225 "" Regular Meeting May 24, 1993 . . Cm. Houston referenced something he had heard about the Governor taking more from the special assessment districts. Ms. Cadone stated they originally put together their budget based on the state taking 40% of their funding. It is very painful as they have spent years building only to have their efforts killed in a couple of months. Five cities offer additional hours. Pleasanton funds the most, with Dublin second. Union city, Newark and Fremont also fund additional hours. Cm. Moffatt questioned how Dublin's match would be handled and if the County would be able to staff the extra hours the city would ask them to be open. Ms. Cadone advised that the funds would purchase staffing. It would not be in the same configuration as the current service. They would no longer have the core 40 hours to work up from. Cm. Moffatt questioned if we would be able to pick the hours we would like to have the library open. Ms. Cadone felt it would be very important to identify the hours together. Mr. Ambrose stated he would be meeting with the other city Managers this Friday regarding library services. The amount of funds that we used to purchase 19 additional hours might only pay for about 13 hours in the future. Cm. Moffatt questioned the possibility of utilizing volunteers to run the library. Ms. Cad one stated they already use a number of volunteers. There are, however, jobs that you cannot train volunteers to do. They can provide support, but they could not take the place of trained staff. ;.' , . ; Dr. Jung stated he hoped the city Council would take into considera- tion the Task Force's recommendations. Things have a way of changing rather quickly and you can't tell what will happen in the future. Keep their recommendations close at hand and if some funding mechanisms come along, they would be ready to go. Cm. Moffatt stated he appreciated all the hard work the committee has done and he felt remorse that we have funding limitations. Cm. Burton stated he thought they were excellent in their process. Funding might be found to build it, but you also need staff to operate it. You can't fund operating costs with a bond. "" Staff corrected that you can, but only with a Mello-Roos District, not with a general Obligation bond. Frank Ruskey asked if the city could negotiate the property from the County and then take it to a 30 year financing and draw the capital. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eM - VOL 12 - 226 Regular Keeting Kay 24, 1993 . . r' Mayor Snyder stated he would rather negotiate a free transfer since we have already paid for it, or will have by 1999. Linda Ferris stated one of the things that is vitally important is to keep up with the funding measures that are winding their way through the legislature. She requested that the Council not defer this so far that it cannot be easily retrieved. with regard to East DUblin, it seems appropriate that the issue needs to stay alive in order that an appropriate library spot is set aside. Mayor Snyder stated he hopes that future city Councils will be reminded in the future of all the hard work that has been done on this. . * * * PUBLIC HEARING-ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PROCEDURE FOR DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY (670-80) Mayor Snyder opened the pUblic hearing. Public Works Director Thompson advised that this is the second reading of an Ordinance which would establish procedures whereby the City could dispose of surplus real property. The City has received inquiries and letters of interest from several parties related to the sale of 3 remnant parcels from the Dublin Boulevard Extension property acquisitions. Mr. Thompson gave a recap of the specific details of the proposed procedures and advised that they are in conformance with general provisions of the Government Code. (/ No comments were made by members of the pUblic relative to this issue. Mayor Snyder closed the pUblic hearing. On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by em. Moffatt, and by unanimous vote, the Council waived the reading and adopted ORDINANCE NO. 3 - 93 AMENDING TITLE 2 OF THE KUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO PROCEDURE FOR DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY * * . . I' , PUBLIC HEARING - REVISION TO FEES CHARGED FOR MINIMUM GARBAGE SERVICE AND ESTABLISHMENT OF PROCESS TO COLLECT GARBAGE SERVICE FEES ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILL (810-30/600-30) ~ "" I..~~ ~ " . Mayor Snyder opened the pUblic hearing. Assistant city Manager Rankin advised that at the April 26, 1993 City Council meeting, Staff was directed to prepare documents which would provide for the collection of basic garbage collection on the property . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 227 Regular Meeting Kay 24, 1993 . . tax bill. Assessments will be levied only on properties which are offered individual garbage collection. Apartments and condominiums serviced by central bins are not affected. The minimum service will include weekly collection of one 32 gallon container, curbside recycling, and 4 quarterly clean-ups. The proposed annual assessment for a single-family residence is $110.22. Mr. Rankin discussed the process proposed for the property tax assessment, and the method used to calculate the amount of the annual assessment. Mr. Rankin explained the various legislative actions required by the council to implement the program. This included adoption of: 1) an urgency Ordinance amending the Solid Waste Management Ordinance to provide for the city to collect fees for minimum garbage service as part of the property tax bill; 2) a Resolution establishing a minimum garbage service fee to be collected on the property tax; 3) a Resolution approving the fourth amendment to the agreement between the city of Dublin and Oakland Scavenger Company regarding waste collection and disposal; 4) a Resolution approving the second amendment to the agreement for single-family recycling services; and 5) a Resolution amending the schedule of service rates for solid waste collection to reflect the collection of minimum service fees by the city on the property tax bill. Our rates are still 15% less than any other city serviced by OSC. Cm. Moffatt discussed costs and stated he felt people in Dublin are getting excellent service for the amount they have to pay. He questioned if this is a tax-deductible item. Mr. Rankin advised that he is not authorized to answer this question. Mayor Snyder stated the common reply is this is on a tax bill and people should have a tax attorney look at it. Ms. Silver stated while she is not a tax attorney, she felt it is not deductible. People should, however, ask their tax attorney or accountant. Cm. Moffatt questioned why Staff had set this up as an emergency ordinance. Mr. Rankin explained that if they went through 2 readings, the second would be on June 14th, and then it would not become effective for 30 days. They had hoped to have the ordinance become effective on July 1st, however, this is at the Council's discretion. The problem is that LDD sends out bills the end of June and Staff was trying to make "" sure the ordinance is in place to coordinate with the billings. Cm. Moffatt felt the Council should give 30 days notice, as has been done with the Building Department fee increases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CK - VOL 12 - 228 Regular Meeting May 24, 1993 . ; . . V I " ;: (.: ~~ 1 Mr. Rankin advised that an option would be for the Council to conduct a second hearing on June 14th and then adopt the ordinance as an urgency ordinance at that time. Mr. Ambrose pointed out the risk that if the Council makes substantial changes and modifications on June 14th, the City council may not be able to adopt the ordinance at that time. Cm. Moffatt stated he had a problem in that we have not really notified individuals that this is in the works. , , Mr. Rankin stated part of the purpose in coming to the Council at the April 26th meeting was to set this pUblic hearing and to set the amount. Cm. Houston questioned what LDD would do or say to the customers since they will be notified in that way. Dan Borges, LDD General Manager advised that there was a model insert contained in the Staff Report. They will go out to all customers so that everyone will know. The bills will go out around the end of June. Cm. Houston stated he felt this would be the most effective form of notifying people. Cm. Burton ad valorem property. people pay clarified that the 5% delinquency charge is a fee, not an tax. The 5% could be collected through a lien on the We are paying the garbage company regardless of whether their taxes or not. Cm. Moffatt stated senior citizens in California have some sort of an option whereby they can defer their taxes until their demise and then the taxes are passed on. He asked how this would fit in. Cm. Houston said he thought Cm. Moffatt was talking about the reverse mortgage process. A financial institution takes care of this. They would still have to pay their taxes though, as this applies only to their mortgage. Ms. Silver said she didn't think the state allows you to defer your taxes. No members of the public gave testimony relative to this issue. Mayor Snyder closed the pUblic hearing. Cm. Moffatt urged that this not be adopted as an urgency ordinance, "" but stated since he was obviously in the minority, he just wanted to voice his concerns. Mayor Snyder reminded everyone that the council and Staff had been discussing this for 6 months. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eM - VOL 12 - 229 Regular Meeting May 24, 1993 . . r" , 1" On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by em. Howard, and by unanimous vote, the council waived the reading and on an urgency basis to become effective July 1, 1993, adopted ORDINANCE NO. 4 - 93 AMENDING THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE (CHAPTER 5.32 OF THE KUNICIPAL CODE) TO PROVIDE FOR THE COLLECTION OF THE KINIKUM RESIDENTIAL BASIC GARBAGE FEE ON PROPERTY TAX BILL AND PAYMENT FOR SAID SERVICES BY THE CITY and RESOLUTION NO. 66 - 93 APPROVING AND ESTABLISHING THE COLLECTION OF MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL GARBAGE AND RECYCLING SERVICE FEES BY THE CITY OF DUBLIN ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILL and RESOLUTION NO. 67 - 93 APPROVING A FOURTH AMENDMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND OAKLAND SCAVENGER COMPANY REGARDING DISPOSAL AND COLLECTION SERVICES PROVIDED BY LIVERMORE-DUBLIN DISPOSAL and RESOLUTION NO. 68 - 93 APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND OAKLAND SCAVENGER COMPANY REGARDING THE DUBLIN RECYCLE AMERICA PROGRAM and RESOLUTION NO. 69 - 93 AMENDING THE SCHEDULE OF SERVICE RATES FOR SOLID WASTE COLLECTION TO ADDRESS COLLECTION OF XINIKUM RESIDENTIAL SERVICE FEES BY THE CITY ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILL . . * * OTHER BUSINESS Alameda County supervisor steele - Budget Press Conference (330-80) Mr. Ambrose referenced a letter that had been received from Supervisor Gail Steele proposing an idea for an event "Hands and Ribbons Across Alameda County". A press conference will be held at 5:45 p.m., at Bayfair Mallon June 3rd, with the focus being to discuss the importance of the cuts being proposed as a result of the Governor's budget. Cars would then form caravans and leave at 6:15 p.m. "" Cm. Burton questioned if there was general Board of Supervisors support for this event. He questioned how effective this would be. Mr. Ambrose stated Supervisor Steele brought it up at the Mayors' conference. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 230 Regular Meeting May 24, 1993 . . ~, I . ," The Council expressed no interest in participating in this event, but thanked the city Manager for informing them. * * * * SB 1250 (660-40) Cm. Moffatt informed the Council that he was the lone voice at the East Bay Division meeting in seeking support for SB 1250, the Boatwright legislation dealing with special districts being required to provide water to new annexations. * * * * Tri-Vallev Transportation Council (1060-40) Cm. Moffatt advised that at the Tri-Valley Transportation Council meeting there will be a discussion of the Tri-Valley's land use issues and options. It should prove very interesting. Mr. Ambrose stated the County's Planning Director has expressed some major concerns regarding the TVTC. He will provide copies of a letter received. Mayor Snyder stated the TVTC seems to have assumed a level of responsibility that was never given to them. * * * * CLOSED SESSION At 9:40 p.m., the Council recessed to a closed executive session to discuss Potential Litigation (640-30), in accordance with Government Code Section 54956.9(b). * * * * ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. * * * * Mayor "" ATTEST: city Clerk * * * * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eM - VOL 12 - 231 Regular Keeting May 24, 1993 . . ~j ~., f' !: I ' ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - June 1. 1993 An adjourned regular was held on Tuesday, DUblin civic Center. Mayor Snyder. meeting of the city Council of the city of Dublin June 1, 1993, in the Council Chambers of the The meeting was called to order at 7:33 p.m., by I:' I ~. . . * . ROLL CALL PRESENT: councilmembers Burton, Houston, Howard, Moffatt and Mayor Snyder. . ABSENT: None. * . * . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (610-20) Mayor Snyder led the Council, Staff and those present in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. . * * * CLOSED SESSION ADDED TO END OF MEETING (640-30) On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous vote, the Council agreed to add a closed session to the end of the meeting related to potential litigation, in accordance with Government Code Section 54956.9(b). * * . * city Manager Ambrose explained that the first part of the meeting would be related to reviewing the various contract services. We review our contracts regularly based on the terms of the individual contract. Because Staff could not sort out the implications of the state funding cuts to county Libraries, the Library agreement will be dealt with in the future. Also, because the scope of work for the MCE Corporation agreement cannot be developed until the budget process is completed, their contract will be brought back to a subsequent Council meeting after the budget decisions are made. r.. CONTRACT REVIEW - TJKM TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES (590-10/600-30) Public Works Director Thompson advised that TJKM Transportation Consultants has provided Traffic Engineering Services to the city since 1983 in the areas of general traffic studies, private development review and Capital Improvement Project design and construction review. The Council reviewed the performance, including: 1) Specific 1992-93 Traffic Engineering Projects; 2) Cost of Services Provided including a Historical Cost Comparison; 3) utilization by Employee Classification; 4) Cost-Effectiveness of Contract vs. In-House; 5) 1993-94 General Engineering; 6) 1993-94 Private Development; 7) 1993-94 Capital Projects. "" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 232 Adjourned Regular Keeting June 1, 1993 . e ~ I . ! \ f In summary, the contract with TJKM provides the city with the opportunity to utilize a variety of contract employees, depending on the skill level required. The estimated total hours of service projected for FY 1993-94 is approximately 250 hours. TJKM did not increase their rates from 1991-92 to 1992-93, and is not proposing any increases in rates for FY 1993-94. staff proposes that the contract amendment provide for a two-year extension rather than one year. TJKM could still request a rate increase for FY 1994-94 and the city Council would have the opportunity to review any proposed increases. Cm. Burton stated when you review the historical cost comparison chart, it is pretty remarkable. In FY 1990-91 they provided services which cost $110,126, and we've budgeted only $16,000 for the upcoming fiscal year. Cm. Moffatt stated he wanted to confirm that there is a GO-day clause whereby the city could eliminate their services. Mr. Thompson stated this was correct. On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous vote, the council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 70 - 93 APPROVING AMENDKENT TO AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES WITH TJKM TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS * * . * CONTRACT REVIEW - PROPOSED NEW AGREEMENT WITH ALAMEDA COUNTY FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AND CROSSING GUARD SERVICES (590-50/600-40) Public Works Director Thompson advised that Traffic Signal Maintenance Services are estimated'to cost $48,000 for FY 1993-94. The estimated cost of Crossing Guard services for 4 locations is $36,022, or $18,011 for 2 locations. Based upon previous City Council direction, Staff evaluated the cost of reducing these services. Currently, the city provides crossing guards at: San Ramon Road/Shannon Avenue; Amador Valley Boulevard/Burton street; silvergate Drive/Amarillo Road; and Amarillo Road/Alegre Drive. The Staff Report was reviewed which included: An Overview of Traffic 'signal Maintenance Services; Current Signal Maintenance Service Level; Alternative Means of Providing Signal Maintenance Services; Evaluation of Alameda County Services; and Emergency Callouts and Response to Service Requests. "" Cm. Moffatt asked if there was any chance that we could combine the county'~ efforts with other cities for a reduced price. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 233 Adjourned Regular Meeting June 1, 1993 I: - - ;' Mr. Thompson advised that the County currently provides services to Castro Valley and San Lorenzo. They staff for this amount of signals and we pay on an hourly basis for our service. Assistant to the city Manager Texeira stated that for Crossing Guard Services, staff reviewed the Historical Background; Establishment of city Warrants for Placement of crossing Guards; city Council Placement of Crossing Guards Since 1986; Current Crossing Guard Services; Cost Effectiveness of Alameda County Services; Ability to Eliminate the Services; and options Under the Proposed Agreement. staff explained that two different schedules were presented for Crossing Guard Services in the event that the council wished to consider a reduced level of service from 4 to 2 locations. Ms. Texeira advised that Crossing Guard Services were included among those services which were recommended to be eliminated by the Council at their meeting of February 8, 1993. Although there is no requirement for the city to provide Crossing Guard Services, the Education Code contains provisions which allow the School District to be reimbursed. They would be reimbursed from Vehicle Code fines (traffic safety fines) the City collects. The City anticipates receiving $26,500 in both the current and following year. staff also proposed that the new agreement with Alameda County specify a 5-year term rather than 3 years. No other significant changes in language are proposed. The agreement would allow for amendments to the scope of work, such as additional signalized intersections or crossing guard locations, which would be presented to the city Council for approval at such time that amendments become necessary. As with the present agreement, cost increases would occur at the time that the County processes pay rate or equipment rate increases or incurs material cost increases. The County provides upcoming rate increase information to the city at the time the budget is developed each year. The City has the ability to terminate this agreement upon 90 days written notice. Cm. Moffatt questioned if we would only have to reimburse the School District for locations which meet warrants. Mr. Rankin stated the only locations that the city would be required to fund would be those that meet warrants. There has been no recent study done at the other 2 locations. Ms. Texeira pointed out that if we shift this responsibility to the School District we give up a certain amount of control. Cm. Moffatt said there are some volunteer folks that we might be able "" to call upon to provide services up at Nielsen School. Ms. Texeira advised that this has been suggested in the past. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 234 Adjourned Regular Meeting June 1, 1993 . . Mr. Rankin stated this was done by volunteers in the past and they felt it was difficult. They came before the city council and the Council determined to provide service there. Cm. Burton questioned who is responsible in a legal sense if we back off from providing services at certain intersections. city Attorney Silver stated if the city terminates the provision of crossing guards, we should not have liability. The fact that we change this should not affect this as long as the intersection is safe. Cm. Burton asked if there is a warrant that says a guard is necessary and nothing is done, are we responsible if we don't provide service? Ms. Silver advised that if an injury were to occur and the location warranted a crossing guard and neither the city nor the School District provides a guard, neither would have more responsibility than the other. The city has the discretion to provide the service. Cm. Houston questioned if the Vehicle Code fines of $26,500 we anticipate receiving are for 2 years or if this is the per year amount. Mr. Ambrose stated $26,500 is the total estimated amount for 1 year. staff only proposes to utilize $9,600 in expenditures in 1993-94. Cm. Houston questioned if the School District could just find out how much our traffic safety fines are and then say we should have to give them that much. Mr. Ambrose discussed the options and advised that if we provide the service, we maintain control. There are pros and cons each way. Mayor Snyder stated he felt from an administrative standpoint, it makes sense to let the School District handle this program. They could then apply to the city for funds. Mr. Rankin pointed out that it may change if they are able to show that 3 intersections are warranted. They can only get so much money, however. There is administrative time involved in handling the contract. Ms. Texeira estimated that there is maybe an hour per month devoted to this, plus the contract review time. We have had some calls that require fOllow-up. Cm. Moffatt asked if the maximum exposure that the city would have "" from the traffic safety fund would be the approximate $26,500 amount. Ms. Texeira stated reimbursement is limited to only those funds. Cm. Moffatt questioned if there could be carryover from year to year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eM - VOL 12 - 235 Adjourned Regular Keating June 1, 1993 - e Mr. Ambrose stated it applies only to current year revenues. Mayor Snyder said he felt if revenues continue to drop, this puts the load where the load belongs. Budget transfers were discussed. Cm. Burton made a motion, which was seconded by Cm. Moffatt to turn the crossing guard services over to the school District and for the city to get out of it. Mr. Ambrose suggested that perhaps it would be possible to approve the agreement with -0- locations. This would be an indication that the School District would become responsible. Mr. Rankin stated the Council could eliminate all locations for FY 1993-94, but still adopt the agreement. Cm. Houston stated he would like to keep the amount of money in General Fund revenue and review this in a year. Cm. Burton withdrew his motion, and Cm. Moffatt withdrew his second to the motion. On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous vote, the council agreed to adopt the 5 year agreement, but to not commit to providing crossing guards at any locations this fiscal year. On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Houston, and by unanimous vote, the council approved the traffic signal maintenance agreement and adopted RESOLUTION NO. 71 - 93 APPROVING NEW AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AND CROSSING GUARD SERVICES WITH ALAMEDA COUNTY * * * * CONTRACT REVIEW - SANTINA , THOMPSON ENGINEERING SERVICES (830-10/600-30) Public Works Director Thompson advised that santina & Thompson, Inc., has provided general professional engineering services under contract to the city since 1983. Major Engineering design projects have been competitively bid. Work is primarily performed on an as-needed basis, in accordance with a specified rate schedule. No change in rates is proposed for FY 1993-94. The agreement precludes S&T from undertaking private work within the City or the City'S Sphere of Influence. The "" estimated cost of services in 1993-94 is $32,000. staff reviewed the report which included: General Engineering; Development Review; Projected Private Development Needs in FY 1993-94; Capital Improvement Projects; Projected Needs for 1993-94 Capital Projects; staffing; Costs; and the Agreement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eM - VOL 12 - 236 Adjourned Regular Meetinq June 1, 1993 e e A new agreement was prepared in FY 1992-93 which reflected a reduced scope of work and which defined a new errors and omissions insurance limit. For FY 1993-94, Staff proposed that the agreement be extended for an additional 2-year period. S&T is not proposing any rate increases for FY 1993-94, and the amendment to the agreement would allow S&T to propose a rate increase for the city Council's approval for FY 1994-95. S&T charges the city of Dublin 75% of the rates shown on the rate schedule for General Engineering or Capital Improvement work performed from the City offices, or for work performed from the city offices on permits or applications for which a fixed fee is charged. Cm. Moffatt questioned on private development if the developer pays the costs plus the city's overhead costs. Mr. Thompson stated it comes out of the city's budget, but it is offset by revenue. On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Houston, and by unanimous vote, the Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 72 - 93 APPROVING AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WITH SANTINA & THOMPSON, INC. * * * . CONTRACT REVIEW - TAUGHER & ASSOCIATES BUILDING LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES (440-30/600-30) Assistant city Manager Rankin stated the city has contracted with Taugher & Associates for Building Inspection, Plan Checking and Code Enforcement services since 1983. The Staff Report was reviewed which provided detailed information on: staffing Levels; Availability to Public; Business License Activity; Public Education; Proposed Service Levels; Cost Per Inspection; Cost of Services; Financial Comparison of In-House Building & Safety Department; and Request for Amendment to Rate Schedule. Mr. Rankin advised that Taugher & Associates have requested rate increases of 3.5% and 3.7% for the Building Official and Building Inspector, respectively, for FY 1993-94. The current rates have been in place since August 1, 1991. Cm. Burton asked what justification Mr. Taugher had for the requested increases. "" Mr. Taugher stated the cost of living has gone up about 6% since his last increase in rates. He was requesting less than this amount. Mr. Rankin advised that increased slightly as a was approved last year. . . . . . . . . . . . . the Workers' Compensation premium had also result of the new form of the contract which There were some added insurance costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CK - VOL 12 - 237 Adjourned Reqular Meeting June 1, 1993 e e em. Houston asked for more detail related to the surcharge for insurance. Mr. Taugher explained that he paid about $2,700 when he first started providing services to the city. It then went up to $27,000 and has now gone up to about $54,000. He requested that the city assist with these costs. Rates have now come down somewhat. Mr. Rankin advised that the current structure caps the city's liability at $9,000, and this is a cumulative figure. Cm. Moffatt questioned if this was inclusive of the potential increase in the salaries. He asked if this program was more or less self- sufficient based on the new rates. Mr. Taugher said it is very close. Mayor Snyder asked if this comes out of revenue generated which is sufficient to cover the cost of the contract. Cm. Burton stated he personally felt that everyone should hold rates this year. A lot of cuts will have to be made and he felt it important that we commit to this across the board. He was not arguing that the fees don't cover the service. By giving this raise, it appears that the Council is not keeping their priorities right. He stood by the principle that no one gets a raise this year. Mayor Snyder stated he could agree with this except that they did not get an increase last year. The Department generates the revenues to cover the service. Cm. Houston pointed out that some of the other contractors have not requested an increase in their rates for 2 years. He felt the City should hold it at the current rate. Cm. Burton stated he was not opposed to looking at this agreement in a year. Mr. Ambrose stated it should be recognized that independent contractor and not a city employee. brief consultation, Mr. Taugher stated he would city Council's decision. Mr. Taugher is an FOllowing a very opt to go with the Cm. Moffatt made a motion, which was seconded by Mayor Snyder to adopt the resolution and approve the increase requested. Cm. Burton stated he would like to make a substitute motion. "" On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Houston, and by unanimous vote, the Council approved the agreement, but with no increase in rates. The Council will review this next year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CK - VOL 12 - 238 Adjourned Regular Meeting June 1, 1993 - - ~, , . , L , ' r, . c 1'0" l , staff clarified that no Resolution was necessary, as the Resolution was prepared in order to amend the agreement due to the rate change. , , Cm. Moffatt asked about the reduced service. Mayor Snyder stated this was a separate issue which would be discussed during the budget. . . * * CONTRACT REVIEW - MCE CORPORATION PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE SERVICES (830-60/600-30) Public Works Director Thompson advised that since 1984, MCE Corporation has provided maintenance services to the city which include: Bike Path Maintenance; Building Management & Maintenance; curb, Gutter and sidewalk; Drainage Maintenance; Guardrail Repair; Park Maintenance; Sign Installation, Repair & Maintenance; spill Cleanup; storm Patrol/Cleanup; Street Landscaping Maintenance; street Repair;, Street Tree Maintenance; striping & Marking; and Weed Abatement. MCE's current 3-year contract expires in June, 1993. f' I. . staff reviewed the report which analyzed: Review of Services Provided; Service Requests; Cost Effectiveness of Contract Services; Other options for street, Park and Building Maintenance services; proposed Services for FY 1993-94; Staffing; Proposed Rates for FY 1993-94; and Performance. i ' ~ j"': MCE Management has indicated to Staff that if the City Council adopts a salary freeze, they would impose the same condition on all rates charged for Dublin crews. The estimated savings to the city is $14,600. After the City council takes action on the 1993-94 Budget, Staff will work with MCE to prepare a 1993-94 rate schedule in accordance with City Council policy. It is anticipated that a 3-year agreement will be prepared, with provision to review and revise rates on an annual basis. Consistent with previous agreements, the contract could be terminated upon 90 days' notice. Cm. Burton pointed out on the rate sheet it showed they are requesting a 3% raise. Mr. Thompson advised that if the city freezes wages, MCE has agreed that they will also. Cm. Burton again stated his principle that nobody should get wage increases until we get through this budget crisis. Discussion was held related to whether this could apply to MCE workers who are not permanently assigned to work in the City of DUblin, but "" who work here on an occasional basis. Mr. Ambrose advised that MCE may need to address this issue. Cm. Burton stated he felt MCE had done an excellent job and they are very conscientious. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 239 Adjourned Regular Meeting June 1, 1993 e e staff and MCE will prepare a new 3-year agreement incorporating those things discussed. The agreement will be presented to the Council at a future Council meeting. * * . . PUBLIC HEARING - 1993-94 UPDATE TO 1992-97 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (330-40) Mayor Snyder opened the pUblic hearing. Mr. Ambrose presented the Staff Report and advised that updated costs for the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program total $23,948,607. Projected costs for the remaining four years of the CIP total $6,805,410 for those projects which are funded, and $10,132,325 for those projects which are unfunded or underfunded. The recommended project costs for FY 1993-94 total $3,263,629. Funded Unfunded/ Underfunded Total General Community Improvements Parks streets TOTAL $ 0 232,600 1,545,109 5.027.701 $ 6,805,410 $ 0 390,000 2,598,796 7.143.529 $10,132,325 $ 0 622,600 4,143,905 12.171.230 $16,937,735 On May 25, 1993, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed CIP Update and determined that it was in conformance with the city's adopted General Plan. The Park & Recreation Commission reviewed those projects included in the Parks program of the CIP and determined that the projects were in accordance with the Park & Recreation Commission's recommended priorities. The eighteen projects in Commission priority order are: Dublin Sports Grounds Renovation (Phase I), Dublin High School Athletic Field Renovation, Iron Horse Trail, Mape Park Renovation, Dublin Sports Grounds Renovation (Phase II), Nielsen School Athletic Field Renovation, Murray School Athletic Field Renovation, Dublin Sports Grounds Renovation (Phase III), Dublin High School Tennis Courts Renovation, Dublin High School Outdoor Lighting, Dublin swim Center Boiler Replacement, Wells-Cronin Athletic Field Renovation, Frederiksen School Athletic Field Renovation, Dublin School Athletic Field and Play Area Renovation, Heritage Center Renovation (Phase II), Dougherty Hills Park Design Study, Dougherty Hills Park Construction, and Shannon Center Social Hall Floor Replacement. Cm. Burton asked if the referendum succeeds will the Park Master Plan have to be postponed. Mr. Ambrose responded that it would be wise to defer its completion pending the outcome. "" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 240 Adjourned Regular Meeting June 1, 1993 " e e An unidentified person spoke from the audience and stated she was unclear on the action the Council had taken regarding crossing guards. Mayor Snyder explained that it was felt that School Districts know better than the cities what happens in this regard, so the city of Dublin will let the School District administer the program. The unidentified person asked about private schools. They generate most of the traffic problems and create them. Mayor Snyder advised that private schools basically have to fend for themselves; they do not get public funds to operate. Cm. Moffatt stated if the private schools went to the voucher system, they might. Mayor Snyder pointed out that the Council was in a public hearing situation related to the Update to the 5-Year Capital Improvement Program and this was not the appropriate time to be discussing other topics. No comments were made by members of the public relative to the CIP. Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing. Cm. Howard asked what happens if the School District Bond Issue passes on the June ballot. Mr. Ambrose advised that staff will sit down with the school District and go through the list of projects. On motion of Cm. Houston, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by unanimous vote, the Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 73 - 93 ADOPTING THE 1993-94 UPDATE TO THE 1992-97 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM * * . . PUBLIC HEARING ADOPTION OF 1993-94 ANNUAL BUDGET AND FINANCIAL PLAN (330-20) Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing. Mr. Ambrose presented the staff Report and advised that the total recommended appropriations for FY 1993-94 are $20,292,087. Total "" anticipated net expenditures are $17,841,403 (which can be reduced by $124,687 as a result of the city's recently completed refinancing of the 1988 civic Center Certificates of Participation). A total of $438,575 in recommended reductions is proposed to balance the 1993-94 Budget. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eM - VOL 12 - 241 Adjourned Regular Meeting June 1, 1993 ~, r e e Mr. Ambrose stated he recommended that the savings realized from the refinancing be used in lieu of burdening the city's residents and businesses with additional assessments associated with a Citywide Landscaping Assessment District. The city has received funding requests from 2 non-profit groups. Emergency Services Network of Alameda County has requested financial support in the amount of $750. The Dublin Fine Arts Foundation is requesting that the city contribute $8,000 toward their programs, as it has done in previous years. Mr. Ambrose advised that the 1993-94 Budget, as recommended by Staff, is a balanced budget which not only includes the anticipated property tax shift to the State, but which also does not rely upon General Fund Reserves. Although the amount and impact of the state Property Tax Shift is not final, sufficient options for Council consideration were included in the document "1993-94 Proposed/Possible Budget options to Address state Property Tax Shift" (Pages iii - vi of the Preliminary Budget) to address a greater impact should this occur after the Council's adoption of the Budget. With regard to staffing, the FY 1993-94 current service Level budget provides for a total of 82.75 positions (36 city employees and 46.75 Contract positions). However, the FY 1993-94 Recommended Reduced Service Level budget provides for a total of 77.73 positions (32.5 City employees and 45.23 Contract positions). This represents a 9.75% decrease in staff when compared to the FY 1992-93 budget. Mr. Ambrose displayed and discussed charts giving an overview of the impacts of the state's budget on Dublin. We are impacted by a number of factors which affect our local economy, including: the recession, the savings & loan problems, unemployment, job migration to other states and countries, excessive regulation as well as high cost of housing, federal and state governments unwillingness to control their costs, continuous federal and state mandates on local government without corresponding funding, restrictions on how we use revenue, etc. Locally, we have increased retail competition from centers in neighboring communities. Also, Alameda county cuts will impact us. We don't know yet how all this will play out. Cm. Burton asked if any agreements had been made in the event we get more money from some source. Mr. Ambrose advised that no commitments had been made to employees nor with Department Heads regarding filling empty positions. Linda Wood, County Librarian addressed the Council and thanked the City for its past support. This support has enhanced service to "" Dublin residents tremendously. People have improved their lives and improved their education. Young people have been helped to develop good habits of library use. She appreciated the city Manager's recommendation to provide the same amount of funding next year as was provided this year. They appreciate this recommendation very much. This will mean Dublin's library will be able to stay open 5 days a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eM - VOL 12 - 242 Adjourned Regular Meeting June 1, 1993 e e ~~ p, ~, " ' G~ ~.. ).... week, plus alternate Saturdays. This would provide a decent service level. They are 88% dependent on property tax revenue. They will receive many complaints when their hours are reduced. They will make sure that users understand that this is as a result of the state property tax shift. Cm. Burton asked if other cities were coming up with any unique ideas. Ms. Wood advised that they are all working hard to convince the State not to shift the property tax. They are also pursuing trying to get enabling legislation for additional revenue, and they are seeking benefit assessment financing authority from the state. No cities are planning a tax at this time. Cm. Burton stated he suspects that it will come to this at some point. Cm. Houston discussed the 19 hours that the city funds now and the fact that this would translate to only about 12~ hours after adoption of the budget. Why? Ms. Wood explained that the City funds the incremental costs to a base. When the base is no longer there, or cut in half, it no longer works. They are recalculating staffing plans to reach a workable agreement or understanding on how the new staffing patterns will work. Cm. Houston asked Ms. Wood to discuss the potential partnership with Pleasanton. Ms. Wood explained how this will work; staff will move between the 2 libraries. Mayor Snyder questioned the Saturday situation and what happens if there is a fifth Saturday in a month. He asked if it was going to work on an absolute rotation. Ms. Wood advised that each library would be open a half day on alternate Saturdays. Dublin would be open 4 hours in the morning and Pleasanton would be open in the afternoon. 1 the next Saturday, both facilities would be , osed. Mayor Snyder inquired as to which was their busiest day of the week. Ms. Wood stated it would be Sunday on a per hour open basis, but they are busiest on Mondays. Friday is their slowest day. Lynne Baer, Executive Director of the Dublin Fine Arts Foundation thanked the Council for their past support. She realized that the city Council is faced with an extremely difficult task. Art is one of "" those peripheral things that adds to a city's vitality and life. DFA tries to provide art space for all ages. They use the city's funding to parlay the amount to other groups. The $8,000 is about 1/5 of their budget. Without this amount, it would be very difficult for them. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 243 Adjourned Regular Meeting June 1, 1993 e - Mayor Snyder advised that he would disqualify himself from discussion on this topic as he is a member of the Board of DFA. vice Mayor Burton asked for discussion. em. Moffatt asked if the funding were to be decreased by half if this would put them out of business. Ms. Baer responded that they hoped not; it would just make it more difficult to get other funding. Cm. Moffatt complimented DFA on their programs, particularly those with the kids in the community. They have a great program. Mayor Snyder pointed out that the budget that is being presented is a balanced budget. Cm. Burton indicated that the budget is so well documented, it might not be necessary to go through each page and suggested that they just review those areas where questions arise. Cm. Houston indicated that we say we have a salary freeze, yet there is a dollar difference between last year and this year. He asked for an explanation. Mr. Ambrose advised that several factors impact this figure. The PERS system was required to provide a rebate during 1992-93, so if you look at true retirement costs without this, they would have been higher. Our rate was reduced in 1992-93, and it has increased in 1993-94. With regard to salaries, the city does not provide COLAs (cost of living adjustments) to employees, and we don't have a bargaining unit. We are on a Pay-for-Performance System. Everyone is evaluated on their anniversary date, which vary. In the Recreation Department, there are some programs that are included which have part-time salaries based on the programs. The programs are revenue generating. There was a slight medical premium increase which was funded for only 3 months this year, but which next year would impact the entire 12 month period. Cm. Houston asked if different positions have different PERS contributions. Mr. Ambrose advised that the employee's share is 7%; and the DRFA employee's share is 9%. For every city employee covered by PERS, the city pays the same retirement rate. Cm. Houston stated in the next fiscal year, the figures should match. "" Mr. Ambrose advised that there could be some differences. The PERS rate could go up or down and if someone leaves and we refill the position, this will impact the figures. The figures should be close, however. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CK - VOL 12 - 244 Adjourned Regular Meeting June 1, 1993 " e e ) Cm. Houston suggested that the city Council's travel, conferences and meetings budget be reduced. Mr. Ambrose advised that money was included in this budget for the city Council to attend a couple of the League of California Cities meetings. This past year, no one has gone anywhere. The council does need to be in touch with the outside world. Sometimes you miss out on real opportunities that could end up saving the City a lot of money. Mr. Rankin advised that the figure included a lot of the regional type meetings such as the Mayors' Conference, the Tri-Valley council, and ABAG meetings. It also included 3 attendees at the League's Executive Forum, and 5 attendees at the League's annual conference in San Francisco. Also, one Councilmember is an appointee to a League committee and funding is included for those meetings. An amount was also included for local mileage and parking reimbursements. ; . ' Cm. Houston stated he would propose to reduce the $8,650 figure by 50%. Cm. Moffatt stated he felt some of these meetings such as ABAG and the East Bay Division of LOCC are important to go to in order to gain knowledge and experience regarding what other cities are doing. By eliminating these, we would be isolating ourselves and this would be like shooting ourselves in the foot. You might as well eliminate the whole amount. Mayor Snyder pointed out that a lot of the funds weren't utilized last year. with the LOCC conference being in San Francisco this year, it affords the council an opportunity to attend without incurring unreasonable expense. It allows for interaction with peers, and for the Council to understand what's happening in the world at large. He felt the funds would be used prudently. Cm. Burton stated he was not sure he agreed that they are always worthwhile. Cm. Houston stated he thought it was important that the city Council contribute toward holding the line. The entire amount could be reinstated if funds are available next year. Cm. Burton asked if the Council used the same discretionary methods used this past year, for next years budget, how much this would allow. Cm. Houston stated $10,250 was budgeted and $8,700 was spent. Mr. Ambrose advised that if the amount were to be cut in half, the Council could not attend all those things that they need in order to "" regionally participate and have a voice at ABAG and the Mayors' Conference, etc. If the Council wished to reimburse themselves for mileage and parking and for Cm. Moffatt to fulfill his responsibil- ities on the League Committee, the amount necessary would be about $5,240. This would cut out all attendance at the League Conference, but leave the other items discussed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eM - VOL 12 - 245 Adjourned Regular Meeting June 1, 1993 e e Mayor Snyder stated he felt it was difficult to speculate on this until the program is available for review. He actually felt that a lot would be eliminated anyway. He didn't think the interest would be there for full participation. By a consensus, the Council determined to leave the budget as is, and ask that everyone be prudent in its use. with regard to the Level II $5,000 funding, Mayor Snyder asked if it would be possible to put this amount into a contingency fund and the council could vote on its use as situations came up. Mr. Ambrose asked if this would apply to all travel. Mayor Snyder clarified that his intention was just for the $5,000. Rather than have it as a line item, it could be put into a discretionary fund that the Council has to come back and address. The council voiced understanding and acceptance of this. Under the Public Safety section of the budget, Mr. Ambrose advised that we don't have any control over what happens with the County collective bargaining. The DR FA agreement expires this year and we have not put in any additional funds in the budget for any salary increases. Cm. Burton asked how much maneuvering room we will have. Mr. Ambrose stated the Fire employees are members of the JPA, governed by the Board of Directors. Three Councilmembers from Dublin and three from San Ramon make up this Board. Mr. Rankin reported that there were a couple of outstanding costs have not been resolved with regard to Police; parking citations and the adjudication process. Mr. Ambrose advised that we have been put on notice that the County doesn't plan to provide Animal Control services. em. Houston questioned how the Police Services contract was structured with the Alameda County Sheriff's Department. He asked if the reductions would ever translate into savings for us. Mr. Ambrose stated we pay actual costs, plus overhead. If someone is hurt and unable to work, the County must replace them in 10 days, so that we are fully staffed. Our contract calls for a certain number of staff, and we are billed in accordance with that number. "" Under the Transportation budget, Cm. Moffatt asked if we could get out of mowing grass in the median strips by putting something else in there. Mr. Ambrose stated we could, but there would be a fairly expensive capital expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 246 Adjourned Regular Meeting June 1, 1993 e e t Cm. Moffatt stated he was thinking we could convert it gradually as it needs replacement. Mr. Thompson stated usually with accidents which cause a need for replacement, we really don't get damage to the whole median. staff could look at what it would cost to convert to another system should the Council so direct. Cm. Moffatt stated he just brought it up as a possibility. Cm. Burton questioned the status of the Heritage center. Ms. Lowart advised that within the next week, she expected to have all the necessary documentation completed and to get all the agreements back signed. Cm. Moffatt asked about the possibility of having the School District share in the funding for the Dublin Fine Arts Foundation. Ms. Baer advised that she did not think the School District had any funding available for this kind of thing. Linda Jeffery advised that DFA does a lot more than just in the schools. Cm. Burton congratulated Staff on Closing the refinancing of the Civic Center. Mr. Rankin pointed out the savings that could be realized by increasing the City'S liability insurance deductible from $25,000 to $50,000. Ron Koutz, 8172 Vomac Road stated he had been a Dublin resident for about 26 years. He questioned the amount of space in the Civic Center building that is not being utilized. He asked what was going on with this. He thought the water district was going in there, but instead they built a new building. Mr. Ambrose explained that when we planned this facility, the possibility that someday we would assume sewer and water services was considered, plus the projected growth in Dublin to the east and west. The extra space that we currently have is unfinished, and is about 4,900 sq. ft. This represents less than 10% of the building space. We do have throughout the building empty open areas or offices that we will be able to grow into in the future. Mr. Koutz referenced the one tenant that we lease space to; Congressman Baker. "" Mr. Ambrose pointed out that we currently maintain 5 buildings within the City. Mr. Koutz laughingly advised that the wind had been taken out of his sails. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eM - VOL 12 - 247 Adjourned Regular Meeting June 1, 1993 e 1. .' - Mr. Rankin advised that staff had been working with Tax Counsel regarding what can be best and how much of the extra space we can actually rent out. There are certain restrictions. Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing. The Council discussed Item 7.c. of the Staff recommendation. "Determine course of action to be taken if state property tax shift and subsequent County Budget impacts are greater than or less than anticipated in Preliminary 1993-94 Budget. options include: 1) Prioritize services to be reduced or restored; 2) Raise additional revenues; 3) Use of 1992-93 anticipated Fund Balance; and 4) Defer action until final impact is determined." By consensus, the Council agreed to defer this and bring it back when we know what happens in the future. Mr. Ambrose stated it was felt that the most recent state proposal would hurt counties more than cities. Cm. Burton congratulated Staff for all their hard work in putting the Budget together. On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by em. Howard, and by unanimous vote, the Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 74 - 93 ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF DUBLIN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 In light of the fact that the City realized savings from the refinancing, these funds will be used in lieu of implementing the assessment district and burdening Dublin's residents with this additional amount. Therefore, the item on the agenda related to this landscaping and lighting district will no longer need to be discussed. * * * * 1993-94 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT (330-20) Mr. Ambrose advised that State Law requires that each year the City calculate the proposed expenditures which are sUbject to the Appropriations Limit. The Council approved use of Dublin's popUlation increase and increase in non-residential construction valuation in calculations of 1993-94 Appropriations Limit. "" On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by em. Houston, and by unanimous vote, the council adopted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CM - VOL 12 - 248 Adjourned Regular Keeting June 1, 1993 I' e - i RESOLUTION NO. 75 - 93 ADOPTING THE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS LIKIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 ($20,975,686) * * * * CLOSED SESSION At 11:07 p.m., the council recessed to a closed executive session to discuss Potential Litigation (640-30), in accordance with Government Code section 54956.9(b). * * . . ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the council, the meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. * * * . Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk * * * * "" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . CK - VOL 12 - 249 Adjourned Regular Meeting June 1, 1993