Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4.14 Dub Bl Wid/MK CentennSUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: November 16, 1999 Agreement with MK Centennial for Preliminary Engineering & Environmental Services for the Widening of Dublin Boulevard (Village Parkway to Sierra Court / Civic Plaza) Report Prepared by: Lee S. Thompson, Public Works Director EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) 2) Resolution approving agreement Consultant Agreement RECOMMENDATION: 1) Adopt Resolution approving agreement with MK Centennial Authorized the Director of Public Works To Execute Consulting Agreement when all Caltrans requirements, including pre-award audit, are met by MK Centennial. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: This contract will provide for the performance of preliminary engineering and environmental services on a time-and-materials basis to a maximum of $143,722.28 ($119,722 if certain Environmental Studies are not required). Monies are allocated in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) in the amount of $199,000 for Preliminary Engineering / Environmental Services and. Design Services categories. The total budget for the project is approximately $2.6 million, which includes environmental work, engineering design, right-of-way and construction, but does not include utility undergrounding. This project is a combined Federal/State Funded project managed by Caltrans and administered by the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency. In order to proceed with the final design, environmental certification must be obtained. This contract provides those services necessary for environmental certification. Once environmental certification is obtained, the final design and construction documents will be prepared by the same consultant under a separate contract, to be brought to the Council at a later date. g:\engr\mk100\agstmkl00 COPIES TO: Ben Wilson, MK100 ITEM NO. 4.14 DESCRIPTION: This project is Phase II of the widening of Dublin Boulevard between San Ramon Road and Dougherty Road. This phase will widen Dublin Boulevard to six through- lanes between Village Parkway and Sierra Court/Civic Plaza, reconstruct the existing bridge, and provide for public utilities to be placed underground. Staff requested engineering proposals from five firms with experience on similar Caltrans-funded projects. Three proposals were received. After interviewing those consultants, Staff determined that based on their knowledge of the project and their understanding of the scope of services, MK Centennial is the best engineering firm to provide preliminary engineering and environmental services. In order to meet Caltrans requirements for State-Funded projects, the consultant selected for this work must undergo an independent audit, called a pre-award audit, before any engineering and environmental services can be performed. A separate item on this agenda provides for auditing services to be provided by the City's auditing firm, Vavrinek Trine Day & Co. As a result of this requirement, the agreements with MK Centennial will be signed by the City's Director of Public Works upon successful completion of the pre-award audit. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the agreement and direct the City Engineer / Director of Public Works to execute the agreement when all Caltrans requirements, including the pre-award audit, are met by MK Centennial. Page 2. RESOLUTION NO. - 99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH MK CENTENNIAL FOR CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE WIDENING OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD FROM VILLAGE PARKWAY TO SIERRA COURT / CIVIC PLAZA WHEREAS, the need for future roadway improvements along Dublin Boulevard were identified by the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that Dublin Boulevard must be widened to six through-lanes between Village Parkway and Sierra Court / Civic Plaza; and WHEREAS, the City desires to utilize the services of MK Centennial provide preliminary engineering and environmental services; and WHEREAS, the cost of these design services will be paid through the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby approves the agreement with MK Centennial for consulting services. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Public Works is authorized to execute the agreement, when all Caltrans requirements are met by the consultant. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of November, 1999. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABST.~3N: ATTEST: City Clerk g: lengrCnkl O0iresomkl O0 Mayor STANDARD CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made at Dublin, California, as of November 16, 1999, by and between the CITY OF DUBLIN, a municipal corporation ("City"), and MK Centennial ("Consultant"), who agree as follows: 1. SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A. Consultant shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit A. 2. PAYMENT. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement at the time and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B. The payments specified in Exhibit B shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall submit all billings for said services to City in the manner specified in Exhibit B; or, if no manner be specified in Exhibit B, then according to the usual and customary procedures and practices which Consultant uses for billing clients similar to City. 3. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT. Except as set forth in Exhibit C, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall furnish to Consultant only the facilities and equipment listed in Exhibit C according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 4. GENERAL PROVISIONS. The general provisions set forth in Exhibit D are part of this Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency between said general provisions and any other terms or conditions of this Agreement, the other term or condition shall control insofar as it is inconsistent with the general provisions. 5. EXHIBITS. All exhibits referred to herein are attached hereto and are by this reference incorporated herein. 6. SUBCONTRACTING. The Consultant shall perform the work contemplated with resources available within its own organization and no portion of the work pertinent to this contract shall be subcontracted without written authorization by the City, except that which is expressly identified in the Consultant's proposal. 7. CHANGES. City may from time to time require changes in the scope of the services by Consultant to be performed under this Agreement. Such changes, including any change in the amount of Consultant's compensation which are mutually agreed upon by City and Consultant, shall be effective as amendments to this Agreement only when in writing. 8. RESPONSIBLE CHARGE. Consultant shall assign a project manager(s) to the project for the duration of the project. There shall be no change in the Project Manager or members of the project Agreement Page 1 of 2 11/10/99 team without prior written approval by the City. The Project Manager for Consultant shall be Etty Mercurio. 9. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered by LEE S. THOMPSON ("Administrator"). All correspondence shall be directed to or through the Administrator or his or designee. 10. NOTICES. Any written notice to Consultant shall be sent to: Erv Koenig, Vice President MK Centennial 5000 Hopyard Road, Suite 100 Pleasanton, CA 94588 Any written notice to City shall be sent to: Lee S. Thompson Director of Public Works/City Engineer P. O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 Executed as of the day first above stated: CITY OF DUBLIN, a municipal corporation By "City" Attest: City Clerk Approved as to form: By Erv Koenig, Vice Presijflent MK Centennials./ City Attorney Agreement Page 2 of 2 11/10/99 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES AND SCHEDULE PER PROPOSAL DATED November 10, 1999 FROM MK Centennial (ATTACHED). Exhibit A Page 1 of 1 11/10/99 EXHIBIT A Professional Services Agreement Between CITY OF DUBLIN (CITY) and MK CENTENNIAL (CONSULTANT) for the DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT SCOPE OF SERVICES TNDEX DESCRIPTION PAGE 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 200 210 220 230 300 310 320 330 340 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 500 510 520 530 540 GENERAL ........................................................... 3 Location .............................................................. 3 Description ............................................................ 3 Len=o-th of Services ...................................................... 3 Project Scheduling ...................................................... 3 Project Progress Meetings and Monthly Progress Reporting ..................... 3 Design Monitoring and Subconsultant Management ........................... 4 DESIGN REFERENCES ............................................... 4 Caltrans Publications .................................................... 4 AASHTO Publications .................................................. 4 Publications From Other Sources .......................................... 5 DESIGN WORK PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT ....................... 5 Coordination with the CITY and Other Parties ................................ 5 Data Collection and Field Reviews ......................................... 5 Site Mapping and Supplemental Field Surveys ................................ 5 Preliminary Right-of-way Maps ........................................... 6 Environmental Document ................................................ 6 Environmental Program Management ....................................... 6 Confirm Environmental Review Process .................................... 6 Technical Studies ....................................................... 7 Traffic Data and Safety Analysis ........................................... 9 Administrative Draft Initial Study / Environmental Assessment ................. 10 Draft Initial Study / Negative Declaration ................................... 11 Response to Comments / Final Negative Declaration and FONSI ................ 11 Preliminary Engineering ................................................ 11 Structure Type Selection Report ....... · ........................... . ........ 11 Construction Costs ..................................................... 12 Project Submittals ..................................................... 12 Design Reviews ......................................... 2 ............. 13 L:~PROJECTS'tDublin .SCOPE1 .WPD 1 DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT Scope of Services November 10, 1999 Page 2 6OO 610 62O 700 710 720 730 740 750 760 770 780 I~£ATERIALS FURNISHED BY The CITY ............................... 13 Record Documents ..................................................... 13 Base and Miscellaneous Information ...................................... 14 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION ...................................... 14 The CITY ............................................................ 14 CONSULTANT ....................................................... 14 Project Control ........................................................ 15 Subcontract Services ................................................... 15 Quality Control ....................................................... 15 CONSULTANT Personnel .............................................. 15 Acceptability of the Work ............................................... 15 Design Documentation ................................................. 15 2 L:~PR. OIECTSXDublh~S COPEI .WPD DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT Scope of Services November 10, 1999 Page 3 100 110 120 130 140 150 GENERAL Location The project is located in Dublin, California. The City of Dublin is proposing to widen Dublin Boulevard between Village Parkway and Sierra Lane from a four-lane facility to a six-lane facility. The existing street has been improved to a six-lane facility from Village Parkway westerly to San Ramon Road. Current City's Capital Improvement Project will provide for Dublin Boulevard to be six lanes from Dougherty Road to Tassajara Road by the end of next year's Construction Season. The proposed project will extend the six-lane facility to just east of the Sierra Court intersection. The widening of Dublin Boulevard is to both sides of the street to obtain additional roadway width. This will require both demolition and reconstruction of existing improvements on both sides of the street including widening of an existing bridge and repair of the creek slopes below the bridge. During the reconstruction, existing overhead utilities will be placed underground. Description The CONSULTANT will prepare an Environmental Document and preliminary engineering plans. The design of the project elements described herein, will be in accordance with the CITY, and Caltrans Standards in effect at the time this agreement is executed. The documents will be produced in metric units. The contract work will consist of the following basic features: Conduct an environmental field review · Prepare environmental technical studies · Prepare an Environmental Document (Negative Declaration / FONSI) · Attend project status meetings and City Council meetings · Conduct field reviews, research and data collection · Prepare topographic mapping and conduct supplemental surveys · Prepare preliminary engineering plans in support of the environmental document Length of Services The project will be initiated with a notice to proceed from the CITY. The environmental and preliminary engineering work would then proceed without delay for 8 months. A four- week review period is scheduled for each review of the draft and final environmental document packages. The CITY may wish to amend the scope of services to be provided by CONSULTANT. When this occurs the CITY and the CONSULTANT will agree on a revised scope and any adjustments to the project schedule and/or compensation due the CONSULTANT. Project Scheduling The project schedule wil.1 include all project activities and milestones. The schedule will identify all milestones, tasks and sub tasks, review periods, and coordination activities associated with engineering and design. Attachment A, "Design Schedule," shows the time phased tasks to be performed for the required work. Project Progress Meetings and Monthly Progress Reporting Monthly progress reports will be submitted to the CITY with each invoice for payment for L:x,PP. OJECTSkDubliaS, SCOPE 1 .WPD 3 DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT Scope of Services November 10, 1999 Page 4 160 200 210 220 engineering services. The report will indicate the tasks that were completed during the preceding period, work planned for the next period, identification of design issues or problems being encountered, and a comparison ofplanned and actual progress. The updated schedule will accompany this report. Monthly reports will be submitted throughout the project duration assumed above. Reports will not be submitted for any period where no work was performed. The CONSULTANT Project Manager will meet with the appointed CITY representatives on a monthly basis to discuss the status of the project design work. These meetings will focus on resolution of any design issues requiring the CITY involvement, the design progress, potential problems, and to address any particular detail of the work previously identified for resolution. Design Monitoring and Subconsultant Management The CONSULTANT Project Manager and each subconsultant principal will monitor the work underway to assure it complies with the criteria and standards established for the work, and to ensure that the design work is being accomplished in the most efficient manner possible, The CONSULTANT will establish effective and efficient project procedures to direct and monitor the subconsultants' work. Regular scheduled reviews of the subconsultant design will be performed to ensure compliance with the quality standards established, coordination among team members, and that design operations are being conducted in a timely and efficient manner. DESIGN REFERENCES Caltrans Publications 211 Standard Drawings Bridge Standard Details (Current Edition - Metric) Standard Plans (1999 Edition - Metric) 212 Specifications Standard Specifications (1999 Edition - Metric) 213 Manuals Highway Design Manual, 46 edition (English) Bridge Design Specifications (Current Edition - Metric) Bridge Design Practice (Current Edition) Bridge Memo to Designers (Current Edition) Bridge Design Aids (Current Edition) Bridge Design Details (Current Edition) AASHTO Publications A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 1994 (''Green Book") Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, with interim revisions through 1997 Manual on Foundation Investigations, 1978 Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, 1993 L:,~pp. oJ-ECTS~.Dublin~,SCOPF. 1 .WpD 4 DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT November 10, 1999 Scope of Services Page 5 230 30O 310 320 330 Guide for Specifications and Standards Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaries and Traffic Signals, Edition of 1985 and Interim Specifications through 1991 Roadside Design Guide, 1996 An Information Guide for Roadway Lighting, 1984 AASHTO Drainage Guidelines, 1992 Publications From Other Sources City of Dublin Standard Plans Alameda County Standards Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation Zone 7 Standards & Hydrology & Hydroceed Design Criteria Dublin San Ramon Service District (DSRSD) Standards DESIGN WORK PERFORM]gD BY CONSULTANT Coordination with the CITY and Other Parties Design team members will attend the scheduled meetings. The coordination will be conducted during design review submittals, monthly meetings, and at such other times as specific issues need resolution. It will be necessary for the CONSULTANT to meet with representatives of the local agencies and The CITY for the purpose of discussing design details. The number of meetings budgeted for this work are as follows: Description Number of Meetings Monthly progress meetings 4 City Council[Public Meetings 2 Zone 7 Meeting 1 Underground Utility 2 Coordination Meeting (Trench design by others) The agency contacts anticipated are with Alameda County FC & WCD, Zone 7 and the CITY. Data Collection and Field Reviews The CONSULTANT will meet with the CITY and the local agencies to collect available information pertinent to the project. A review of available information and an on-site investigation will be conducted to further define site conditions and determine the need for additional investigation and data. The design team members and representatives of the CITY along with any interested parties will field review the work site two times. Site Mapping and Supplemental Field Surveys The CONSULTANT will prepare topographic base mapping at 1:500 with 0.5-meter continuous intervals based on 1983 NAD (horizontal control) and 1929 NGVD (vertical control). Mapping standards will be checked by the CONSULTANT and will conform to L:!PKOIECTS~)ubli~COPE 1 .WPD 5 DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT Scope of Services November 10, 1999 Page 6 340 400 410 420 the CITY's survey/mapping standards, as required for this project. The CONSULTANT will conduct field surveys. Work will include conform areas, pavement spot elevations, storm drainage inlets/outlets, selected utilities and potholed utilities. Potholing is not included in this scope of services. Preliminary Right-of-Way Plans The CONSULTANT will prepare preliminary right-of-way plans based on parcel maps available from the CITY and from Alameda County Public Works Agency. Preliminary right-of-way information will be for use in the environmental document. Environmental Document The project will require environmental review under both the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as well as, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA review is required because federal funds will be used to construct the project. When federal funds from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are used for project construction, Caltrans acts as the reviewing agency of all environmental documents on behalf of the FHWA to ensure that the documents and process comply with N-EPA. As a result, the environmental review process outlined below assumes coordination with Caltrans environmental staff throughout the project. Environmental Program Management The CONSULTANT will oversee and coordinate all aspects of the environmental process as described below: Technical Studies Oversee the preparation of all technical studies Coordinate with technical subconsultants as required Coordinate with The CITY during all phases of the environmental process Agency Coordination Conduct early consultation to explain the project and identify any agency concerns. Conduct consultation with agencies to facilitate processing of environmental permits if required. Coordination with Engineering Effort Provide input to preliminary engineering based on the technical reports Analyze design alternatives proposed in terms of environmental constraints and potential impacts. Agencies to be consulted will be the CITY, Alameda County FC & WCD, Zone 7, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and/or California Deparbnent of Fish & Game. Confirm Environmental Review Process The CONSULTANT will conduct a field review meeting with City Staff and Caltrans Project Development and Environmental stuff to review the proposed improvements to Dublin Boulevard, environmental technical studies that will need to be completed, and the appropriate environmental document(s) for the project. Based on our initial review of the proposed improvements, land uses, environmental issues, and CEQA/NEPA regulations, it appears that the project would not qualify for a Categorical Exemption/Exclusion. In general, Categorical Exemptions/Exclusions do not apply to L:!PP,.OJECTS'~Dublin~COPE 1 .WPD 6 DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT Scope of Services November lO, 1999 Page 7 430 projects that add capacity to an existing roadway. In addition, the project may affect biological resources and fill wetland or waters of the U.S. under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. However, the purpose of this task is to confirm our initial findings with Caltrans Environmental staff before beginning any technical work. Based on our initial review we believe that preparation of an Initial Study/Environmental Assessment, and approval of a Negative Declaration under CEQA and a Finding of No Significant Effect (FONSI) under NEPA, are appropriate for this project. Technical Studies The need for and scope of environmental technical studies will be confn-med with City Staff and Caltrans Environmental Staff. Based on our initial review of the project area it appears that a number of technical studies will be necessary to determine if the Dublin Boulevard Widening Project would result in significant impacts on the environment. Based on our initial review of the project area, technical studies appear to be required to address the following areas: Cultural Resources Hazardous Materials Noise Biology Before beginning the technical studies, the scope of each will be reviewed with City Staff and Caltrans environmental planning staff and a technical specialist to obtain their concurrence with the study approach and methodology. All technical studies will begin with review of all existing relevant data available from the City. Additional data collection, fieldwork, and analysis will be undertaken as required to prepare complete technical reports for the project. The technical studies conducted for this task will be used to prepare the environmental document. Cultural Resources Records/Literature Search A record search will be conducted at the Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State UniverSity to determine if there are any known cultural resources within the project area. APE Definition The Area of Potential Effect (APE) for the project must be defined and presented on a scaled map of the area, with individual structures shown within the area. The APE map must then be approved and signed by Caltrans and FHWA prior to conducting the work. A draft map will be prepared of the area, which will be plotted by the project engineers on an appropriate scaled map(s). Time for consultation with City Staff and Calms is included as part of the preparation of the APE map. Native American Consultation The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento will be contacted and provided with a map and description of the proposed project. NAHC will be asked to check their Sacred Lands database for evidence of any traditional use or cultural properties known to be located in or near the proposed project area. A listing of local Native American tribal entities or individuals will also be requested and these entities and individuals contacted if L:~PR. OJECTS~ubliff,.SCOP]~ I .WPD 7 DUBLIN BOULEVARD WTDENING PROJECT Scope of Services November 10, 1999 Page 8 appropriate. Field Evaluation If not recently examined, a field survey of the APE will be conducted to evaluate potential project impacts on cultural resources. The areas will be surveyed by qualified archeological and architectural field personnel, using a maximum survey transect interval not exceeding 25 meters. The surveys will be conducted under the supervision of an archeological Principal Investigator meeting federal qualification's criteria under 36 CFR 61 [Caltrans EnvironmentalHandbook, Appendix B-1, Exhibit 4], at a minimum survey transect interval not exceeding 25 meters. Any newly discovered historic (more than 45 years of age) or prehistoric cultural resource sites will be recorded on appropriate Department of Parks and Recreation Primary Record forms (DPR 523). Previously recorded sites will be examined and an updated Site Record will be prepared if the original record is deemed to be out-of- date. It is assumed, for purposes of this proposal, that no prehistoric resources are located within the project area and a negative Archaeological Survey Report can be prepared. Report Preparation An Historic Properties Survey Report (HPSR), Archeological Survey Report (ASR), and Historic Architecture Survey Report (HASR) will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the CalTrans Environmental Handbook, in terms of document content and format. It is assumed for purposes of this cost estimate that the document will consist of a negatiVe ASR. Re_port Submittal Upon acceptance of the report(s), one or more copies (depending upon whether or not original Primary or Building-Structure-Object Records are appended) will be sent to the California Historical Resources Information System's Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University. Hazardous Materials A Hazardous Material Technical Report may be prepared for the project as directed by the City/Caltrans. The technical report will evaluate the potential for presence of any hazardous materials in the project corridor that could affect development of the project. The work scope for the technical report would include a regulatory agency record search to identify reported releases of hazardous materials at and near the project corridor, and a site reconnaissance and review of historic aerial photographs and topographic maps to identify past and present land uses associated with hazardous materials. The technical report will provide recommendations for further action, if warranted, and will evaluate soil management options for various scenarios, depending on whether excavated soils will or will not be contaminated. An Initial Site Assessment (ISA) checklist will be prepared in accordance with Appendix DD of the Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual, "Preparation Guidelines for Initial Site Assessment (ISA) Checklist for Hazardous Waste," and will be included as an appendix to the technical report. Noise Land uses along Dublin Boulevard are primarily commercial and office. However, there are some land uses that may be more sensitive to changes in noise levels such as the Civic L:~RO/F..CTS'~Dubli=~S COPE l .WPD 8 DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT November 10, 1999 Scope of Services Page 9 Center and the outdoor gardens at the Dublin San Ramon Service District (DSRSD) headquarters building. As a result, it may be necessary to determine if an increase in noise from additional traffic on Dublin Boulevard would adversely affect these areas. A Noise Impact Assessment may be prepared for the project. The noise assessment will include the performance of two continuous 24-hour measurements and up to four short-term 15-minute noise measurements to quantify existing noise levels at noise sensitive (residential) receivers. Future noise levels at adjacent noise sensitive receivers will be predicted. For this task, methods will be used that are compatible with those used by Caltrans. The predicted future noise levels will be compared with the existing ambient noise levels to determine if the project is likely to cause a significant increase in noise. The predicted noise levels will also be compared to applicable criteria contained in the City's General Plan and Noise Ordinance. If noise levels are predicted to exceed any of these standards, feasible noise control measures may be recommended. Biological Natural Environment Study and Biological Assessment The project area primarily consists of land developed with commercial uses and associated mature landscaping. However, Dublin Boulevard crosses Alamo Creek which contains potential biological res6urces and wetlands/waters of the U.S. that are regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. As a result, biological studies will focus on the habitat value of existing landscaping and the resources present in Alamo Creek that may be affected by the project. These studies will also be used to obtain any necessary permits from the California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District and Zone 7. The biological studies will include a Natural Environment Study prepared in accordance with Caltrans and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requirements as set forth in the Caltrans Environmental Handbook, Volume 1. This work will include the review of California Natural Diversity DataBase reports for the project area and a site visit by a qualified biologist to determine what biological resources might be affected by the project. 440 A wetland delineation will be prepared for Alamo Creek to determine the areas within the creek that is under the U.S. Army Corps or Engineers' jurisdiction. The wetland delineation will be reviewed by City Staff and Caltrans and verified by the Corps. The impacts of the project on wetland/waters of the U.S. will be calculated and a mitigation plan developed. The Natural Environment Study, wetland delineation and mitigation plan will form the basis for permit applications to both the California Department of Fish and Game for a 1601 Streambed Alteration Agreement and to the Corps or a Section 404 permit to fill wetlands/waters of the U.S. Traffic Data and Safety Analysis The CONSULTANT will prepare the transportation element for the environmental L:~PROJECTS~Dublin~.S COPE 1 .WPD 9 DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT Scope of Services November 10, '!9~9 Page fO document. The impact analysis will be completed with and without the Dublin Boulevard Widening project under both construction year and cumulative year conditions for each transportation mode including automobiles, bicycle, and pedestrian travel. The CONSULTANT will collect 24-hour traffic count data on Dublin Boulevard at one location within the project limits. The CONSULTANT will collect morning and evening peak period traffic counts at the Dublin Boulevard/Sierra Court and Dublin Boulevard/Clark Avenue intersections. The CONSULTANT will also obtain available accident data from Alameda County and the City within the project limits. The CONSULTANT will summarize the setting information including peak hour capacity analyses of the study section of Dublin Boulevard and the Sierra Court and Clark Avenue intersections. Available morning and evening peak hour traffic forecasts will be obtained for the study 'segment of Dublin Boulevard and the Sierra Court and Clark Avenue intersections under each scenario. Peak hour operations analyses will be conducted for each facility to establish a baseline oftraffc operations for the corridor. Impacts to bicycle and pedestrian travel will be qualitatively evaluated based on a review of the project's consistency with established policies and standards of adopted documents (i.e., General Plans, Specific Plans, design standards, etc.). Mitigation measures will be identified for significant adverse impacts. The CONSULTANT will prepare the administrative draft transportation section of the environmental document. The CONSULTANT has budgeted a total of 8 hours to respond to comments on the administrative draft and draft sections. The CONSULTANT anticipates attendance at up to one meeting during this effort. 450 Administrative Draft Initial Study/Environmental Assessment This task will involve preparation of an administrative draft Initial Study/Environmental Assessment (IS/EA) for review by the City and Caltrans. The administrative draft IS/EA will be based on the Caltrans "Environmental Significance Checklist". Information from the following sources will be used to complete the administrative draft IS/EA: · The technical studies prepared for the projects · Engineering plans and designs provided by the Project Engineer · City of Dublin General Plan · Site Visits If the IS/EA indicates that there will be no significant environmental impacts associated with the project, an administrative draft Negative Declaration will also be prepared and provided to the City and Caltrans for review and comment along with the IS/EA. The administrative draft Negative Declaration will include: · A brief description of the project The location of the project The proposed finding that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment ' A summary of the mitigation measures included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects L:~PROJECT$~DubIin~$COPE I .WPD 10 · DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT November 10, '1999 Scope of Services Page The administrative draft Negative Declaration and IS/EA will be reviewed by City Staffand Caltrans. The CONSULTANT will revised the Negative Declaration and IS/EA in response to these comments and attempt to resolve any outstanding issues and resubmit the draft Negative Declaration and IS/EA to Caltrans for FHWA pre-draft review. The CONSULTANT will revise the draft Negative Declaration and IS/EA per FHWA comments and attempt to resolve any remaining issues and submit the Draft Negative Declaration and IS/EA to the City, Caltrans and FHWA for sign-off. Once Caltrans and FHWA have si~ed the cover sheet, then the document can be distributed for public review. 460 Draft Initial Study/Negative Declaration This task includes making any final revisions to the Draft Negative Declaration and IS/EA and providing the City with copies of the document for public distribution. It is assumed that the City wiIl be responsible for distribution of the Draft Negative Declaration and IS/EA. The City will also be responsible for preparing all notices of the Draft Negative Declaration. The City may wish to hold a public hearing on the Draft Negative Declaration and IS/EA, however one is not required. If the City does hold a public hearing, the CONSULTANT staffwill attend the meeting and make a presentation if requested by the City. 470 Response to Comments/Final Negative Declaration and FONSI This task involves preparing responses to substantive comments received on the Draft Negative Declaration and IS/EA from the public and agencies during the public review period. At this time, any additional analysis or changes to Negative Declaration and IS/EA will also be made as needed to respond to comments from the public and agencies. An administrative Final Negative Declaration will be prepared and provided to the City and Caltrans for review. The CONSULTANT will revise the Final Negative Declaration and IS/EA as necessary to respond to City and Caltrans comments. The Final Negative Declaration and IS/EA will then be provided to the City for approval of the Negative Declaration. Once the Negative Declaration has been approved by the City, the Negative Declaration along with the Final IS/EA will be sent to Caltrans. Caltrans will transmit the approved Negative Declaration and Final IS/EA to FHWA with a request for approval of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). FHWA will then issue a FONSI completing the environmental review process for the project. As part of this task the CONSULTANT will also prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Pro,am as required under CEQA. This pro,am will allow the City to monitor and document the implementation and success of mitigation measures during construction of the project. 5OO Preliminary Engineering The design objective is to provide plans and construction cost estimates in support of the environmental document. CADD digital drawings will be prepared in Microstation format and a format acceptable to the City. The documents will be produced in metric units and annotated Imperial units. 510 Structure Type Selection Report The CONSULTANT will prepare a structure type selection report. The report will evaluate structural types, advantages of each type, and preliminary cost estimates and will contain L :,ff, ROJECT$,0DublinX$COPE 1 .WPD 1 1 November 10, 1999 Page 12 DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT Scope of Services a recommended alternative. 520 Construction Costs The CONSULTANT will prepare a construction cost estimate of the probable construction costs using the CITY and Caltrans unit prices. The estimate will include construction costs for roadway, structures, drainage, utility facilities and other structure or facilities for this project. 530 Project Submittals The design objective is to provide an environmental document and obtain the environmental clearance for the construction of the project. The following environmental documents, if required, will be submitted to the CITY: · Minutes of Field Review meeting with Caltrans and City staff. A maximum of 10 copies of each Environmental Technical Studies for the CITY and Caltrans review: Historic Properties Survey Report (HPSR) Archeological Survey Report (ASR) Historic Architecture Survey Report (HASR) Administrative Hazardous Materials Technical Report Administrative Noise Assessment Administrative NES · A maximum of 10 copies of each Environmental Technical Studies for the CITY, Caltrans and FHWA files: Historic Properties Survey Report (HPSR) Archeological Survey Report (ASR) Historic Architecture Survey Report (HASR) Final Hazardous Materials Technical Report Final Noise Assessment Final NES · A maximum of 10 copies of the administrative draft IS/EA for City and Caltrans initial review · A maximum of 10 copies of the administrative draft Negative Declaration and IS/EA for City, Caltrans and FHWA pre-draft review A maximum of 10 copies of the Draft Negative Declaration and IS/EA for Caltrans and FHWA approval to circulate A maximum of 10 copies of the Draft Negative Declaration and IS/EA and one reproducible original. · A maximum of 10 copies of the administrative Final Negative Declaration and IS/EA for City and Caltrans review A maximum of 10 copies of the approved Negative Declaration and Final IS/EA to Caltrans for transmittal to FHWA with request for issuance of a FONSI 12 L:~PROJECTb-'IDublin',SCOPE1 .WPD 'DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT November 10, 1999 Scope of Services Page 13 A maximum of 5 copies of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to the City In conjunction with the environmental document, the CONSULTANT will prepare preliminary engineering documents for the project. CADD digital drawings will be prepared in Microstation format, or a format acceptable to the CITY in accordance with the CITY procedures. Drawings will be in metric, and annotated Imperial units as established by the CITY. The CONSULTANT will submit a maximum of 5 copies of the preliminary engineering plans consisting of: Typical Cross Sections Strip maps with right-of-way and geometrics defined Utility Plan (existing only) · Preliminary Bridge general plan Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate 540 Design Reviews At milestone points, the CONSULTANT will submit materials to the CITY and participating local agencies for review and comment. Review periods will be four weeks for all milestones. Each reviewing agency will submit a single set &coordinated review comments to the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will compile review comments from the reviewing agencies and schedule a meeting with the CITY and the other reviewing agencies to discuss any conflicting comments and to reach a consensus on resolution of any conflicts. Minutes of the resolution meeting will be distributed within five working days of the meeting. The CONSULTANT will incorporate agreed upon resolutions into the reviewed documents. Should future reviews generate comments which require changes to previously agreed upon elements of the documents and such changes result in additional work on the part of the CONSULTANT, such changes will be performed as Additional Services. 600 MATERIALS FURNISHED BY The CITY 610 Record Documents The CITY will provide the following items: · Current standard Drawings, Manuals, Guides, and Procedures that pertain to the project · Available CITY "as-built" plans and specifications of existing conditions including roadways, utilities, drainage improvements, and structures · Available CITY right-of-way plans · Surveying and mapping information including existing monument locations · Sample plans and reports to be used as guidelines for format, organization and content · Access to all records available at the CITY L:~ROJECTSXDublinISCOPE 1 .WPD 13 DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT November 10, 1999 * Scope of Services Page 14 620 Base and Miscellaneous Information · Entry permission on private parcels 700 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION 710 The CITY The CITY will: · Conduct ongoing reviews of the CONSULTANT's pro~ess in performing the work and furnish technical comments in a timely manner on all submissions · Review and approve the CONSULTANT's billings in a timely manner · Review, evaluate and may approve CONSULTANT's requests for extension of time and amendments to the agreement Attend all progress meetings with the CONSULTANT Attend meetings with the CONSULTANT and others as requested Conduct public outreach and public relations tasks 720 Consultant CONSULTANT will: · Establish, furnish and maintain suitable office facilities to serve as the project office for the duration of the project · Maintain an adequate staff of qualified support personnel to perform the work necessary to complete the project · Establish internal accounting methods and procedures for documenting and monitoring project costs acceptable to Caltrans Standards · Establish and maintain contract administration procedures which will include amendments, time extensions and subcontracts · Maintain a project workbook with all the pertinent information relating to the project to be given to the CITY at the close of the project · Attend meetings with other agencies as requested by the CITY. However, if number of meetings exceed those indicated in this scope of services, then those meetings will be performed as Additional Services The CONSULTANT is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the contract documents and related design prepared under this project and prior to submittals will check all material accordingly. The plans will be reviewed by the CITY for conformity with the CITY procedures and the terms of the contract. 14 L:~PROJECT$~)ublin'.SCOPEI.WPD · DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT Scope of Services November 10, 1999 Page 15 730 Project Control The CONSULTANT will provide and maintain a Management Information System to monitor costs and manpower and to report progress with the following: · Identify progress against the schedule for each major work item · Forecast completion dates from current pro~ess · Advise the CITY of any work not in this scope or in any area which is out of the required sequence · Provide updated estimates of time, manpower and dollars required for major work elements 740 Subcontract Services Due to the nature and scope of the required services, the CONSULTANT will subcontract portions of the work. The CONSULTANT will review and coordinate the work of all subconsultants and they will abide by the terms and conditions of this scope as applicable to them. 75O Quality Control The CONSULTANT and subconsultants have total responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the plans and related design prepared under this project and will check ali such material accordingly. The CONSULTANT will prepare and have a quality control plan in effect during the entire time work is being performed under this contract. The quality control plan will establish a process whereby plans, calculations, and documents that the CONSULTANT submits for review will be clearly marked as fully checked prior to submittals by a qualified individual other than the originator. 760 CONSULTANT Personnel The CONSULTANT's work will be performed and/or directed by the key personnel identified in the CONSULTANT's proposal. Any changes in the indicated key personnel will be subject to review and approval by The CITY. 770 Acceptability of the Work The plans, designs, calculations, reports and other documents furnished under this scope of work will conform to the CITY's standard of quality. The criteria for acceptance will be a product of neat appearance, well organized, accurate and complete, technically and ~ammatically correct, checked and dated in accordance with the Quality Control Plan, and having the originator and checker identified. The minimum standards of appearance, organization, and content of drawing will are similar to the type produced by the CITY. 780 Design Documentation The CONSULTANT will submit all design notes, sketches, worksheets and computations to document the design conclusions. The design notes and computations will be recorded on 8 ½ "x 11" computation sheets, appropriately ritled, numbered, dated, indexed, and signed by the designer and checker. The data will be bound in a hardback folder or a three- L:~PI~.OmCTS',Dubliax, SCOPE 1 .WPD 15 DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT November 10, 1999. Scope of Services Page ~6 ring binder for submittals to the CITY. Computer output forms and other oversized sheets will be bound or placed in a binder. Design notes and computations will include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following data: · Design criteria used for the project · Geometric design calculations for horizontal and vertical alignment · Quantity calculations · Documentation of decisions reached from meetings, telephone conversations or site visits L:~PROJECTS'~Dublin~SCOPEI .WPD 16 Dublin Boulevard Widening ;sultant Selection -- Nofi~e ¥~ Project Management PrOject Schedule, QA Plan Kicko[f Meeting Progress Meeling~ and Repoils (4) Environmental Complele ~E~'f0rm' an~ c~nsul{ ~i Cai{rahs Conduct technical studies Review/Revise technical studies Pre~a~'~i~ br~f~ is~A f0~ ~i~y and Callrans review R~i~ ~' b~af~ i~lEA'b~'c~t~' and caltrans Prepare Admin Draft Nag Declaralion and IS/EA Review Dra[t Nag Dec by City, Cal~rans and FHWA Prepare Draft Neg Dec and ISIEA for public review Public Review Period Prepare Admin Final Nag Dec and ISIEA Review Admln Final Nag Dec and tS/EA by Cily and Cat[tans Prepare Final Neg Dec and ISIEA for City approval City approval of Nag Dec Transmit approved Nag Dec and Final tS/EA to FHWA for approval of FONSI FItWA approves FONSI Data Collection, Ulility & ~ research Utility resear~ Mapping Supplemental Surveys ~ reSear~ & title repo~s Design crileria Structure Type Selection Prelimina~ Ulility Plans ~exJsfing only) Preliminary ~ plans Prelimina~ roadway design (plans & {ypical secti0ns~ ' 'QNQC ~eView"~d Consl[uc~abilily Review Quan[ities and Estimates Prellmina~ Roadway Plans, Structure General Plan & ~ Plans Ready Review by Cily ' 'lags Parkway to Sierra Court 2OO0 I I i ........ ~ ................................ [ .......... ~ ................. ~, , ..... ~ .......................... Projecl: DUBLIN1 ,MPP Task I I Crilical Task ~.~~'~ Progress Milestone ~, Summary Date: 11110199 1:18 PM File: y:~e[ly~scope~DUBLIN 1 .MPP EXHIBIT B PAYMENT SCHEDULE City shall pay Consultant an amount not to exceed the total sum of ONE HUNDRED FORTY THREE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO DOLLARS AND TWENTY-EIGHT CENTS ($143,722.28) for services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall submit invoices at the end of project based on the cost for services performed in accordance with the cost estimate included in the MK Centennial proposal dated November 10, 1999. The total sum stated above shall be the total which City shall pay for the services to be rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. City shall not pay any additional sum for any expense or cost whatsoever incurred by Consultant in rendering services pursuant to this Agreement City shall make no payment for any extra, further or additional service pursuant to this Agreement unless such extra service and the price therefor is agreed to in writing executed by the City Manager or other designated official of City authorized to obligate City thereto prior to the time such extra service is rendered and in no event shall such change order exceed twenty- five percent (25%) of the initial contract price. The services to be provided under this Agreement may be terminated without cause at any point in time in the sole and exclusive discretion of City. If the Agreement is terminated by City, Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials to the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other materials shall, at the option of the City, become City's sole and exclusive property. Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate logs and timesheets in order to verify costs incurred to date. The Consultant is not authorized to perform any services or incur any costs whatsoever under the terms of this Agreement until receipt of a fully executed Purchase Order from the Finance Department of the City of Dublin. Exhibit B Page 1 of 1 11/10/99 Dublin Boulevard Widening Project COST PROPOSAL MK CENTENNIAL LABOR: Classification Proj Pdn Proj Mgr Sr Eng Engineer CADD Cledcal TOTAL DIRECT LABOR MKC DIRECT COSTS: DIRECT COSTS: Hours Rate Total 2 $ 54.00 $ 108.00 158 $ 45.00 $ 7,110.00 144 $ 34.00 $ 4,896.00 76 $ 24.00 $ 1,824.00 48 $ 23.00 $ 1,104.00 30 $ t6.00 $ 480.00 458 $ 15,522.00 OVERHEAD @ 1.5593 $ 24.203.45 SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 39,72S.4S Mailing, Telephone, Suppiie~, Photos, ... Reprodu~ion & Presentation Materials CADD Computer Transportation SUBTOTAL MKC DIRECT COSTS FEE/based on 10% profit of labor) SUBTOTAL MKC $ 250.00 $ 500.00 $ $ $ 750.00 $ 3,972.55 $ 44,44s.oo J31% Page y:~.,~dublin~scope'tEngcs~.xls Labor + ODCs Revised: 11/10/99 1:37 PM Dublin Boulevard Widening Project COST PROPOSAL PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGEMENT LABOR: Classification Hours Rate Principal - Env 42 $ 50.16 Proj Mgr - Env 108 $ 29.57 Associate - Env 226 $ 18.59 Clerical 88 $ 20.38 DIRECT LABOR 464 OVERHEAD ~ 1.44 SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD DIRECT COSTS: Printing, Mailing, Telephone & Supplies Transportation Graphic Support Miscellaneous Biology Subcontractor Cultural Resources Subcontractor Hazardous Waste Subcontractor Noise Subcontractor Total $ 2,106.72 $ 3,193.34 $ 4,200.35 $ 1.793.51 11,293.92 16,263.24 $ 27,557.16 $ 3,275.00 $ 650.00 $ 1,450.00 $ 500.00 $ 8.000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 6, 000. O0 $ 8. 000. O0 Field review w/th agencie will determine ff these are required and extent of studies. SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS FEE (based on 10% prof'~ of labor) SUBTOTAL PAM 37,875.00 2.755.72 I;8,'187.88 47% 44.187. 88 without studies 31%J Page 2 y:~etty~dublin~scopeYEngcstl .xJs Labor + ODCs Revised: 11110/99 1 ;37 PM Dublin Boulevard Widening Project COST PROPOSAL Chaudhary & Associates LABOR: Pdn Mngr Proj Surveyor Office Surveyor 2-man Field Crew Eng 1 CADD DIRECT LABOR DIRECT COSTS: Hours Rate Total 4 $ 49.09 $ 196.36 12 $ 49.09 $ 589.09 0 $ 38.18 $ 56 $ 67.27 $ 3,767.27 8 $ 32.73 $ 261.82 80 $ 4,814.55 OVERHEAD (~ 1.5 $ 7.221.82 SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 12,036.36 Mileage Reproduction & Materials Photogrametrist 77tie Repoit's at cost (assume 12 total) SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS FEE fbased on 10% profit of labor} L SUBTOTAL CHAUDHARY 3,700.00 6.000. 00 9,700.00 1.203.64 22.S40.00 J16% Page 3 y:\etty~dublin~scope~Engcstl.)ds Labor + ODCs Revised: 11/10/99 1:37 PM Dublin Boulevard Widening Project COST PROPOSAL FEHR & PEERS ASSOCIATES LABOR: Proj Prin Sr Engineer Engineer Technical DIRECT LAB, C,R DIRECT COSTS: Hours Rate Total 14 $ 54.81 $ 767.34 27 $ 28.85 $ 778.95 52 $ 21.64 $ 1,125.28 14 $ 19.00 $ 266.00 107 $ 2,937.57 OVERHEAD ~ 1.4437 $ 4,240.97 SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 7,178.54 Travel Mileage P~-Cdng, Mailing, Telephone& Supplies SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS FEE(basedonlO% profitoflabor) SUBTOTAL FEER & PEERS $ 250.00 250.00 717.85 $ 8.146.39 Page 4 y:~ett~ublin~scope~Engcstl.xJs Labor + ODCs Revised: 11/10/99 1:37 PM Dublin Boulevard Widening Project COST PROPOSAL TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 143,722.28 w~thout studies $ 119,722 I Page 5 y:~etty~ciublin~s¢ope~,~n~=stl .)ds Labor + ODCs Revised: 11/10/99 1:37 PM ......................... Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Revised: 11/10/99 1:37 PM ~ -- ~K Centennial ProJ Prln ProJ Mgr Sr Eng Engineer CADD Cleflcal MKC Task ~ ! ... .'. LaborRalo> $ 54.00 $ 45.00 $ 34.00 $ 24,00 $ 23.00 $ 16.00 No Description - Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Project Management & Adntiltistratioo Cost AlllT1ifllSJf 9lion I htvoices (4) 12 540 Monthly Progress Rel)Crls I Sched,."o [4) 16 720 8 128 20 668.00 8 128 24 848.00 StibColiSl. lJJSllt Coo:dinar!on 40 1,800 4 64 44 1,864.00 Kick-off lueelin!l 8 360 8 272 2 32 18 664.00 Meetipgs I Agency Coord n.:lliolt (4) 2 108 12 540 12 408 J 12 288 8 128 46 1,472.00 SUBTOTAL 2 108 88 3,960 20 680 12 288 0 =-nvlronmental 30 480 152 5,516.00 COIl§rln ~ftvifollnlelltaJ DogJ. llll~ld 2 go Technicql S!ud~os 8 360 24 816 2 90.00 ^dm~nistrative ISIEA 6 360 24 816 32 1,176.00 Draft ISiEA 8 360 8 272 32 1,176.00 Final t,iDiFONSi 8 360 8 272 16 632.00 16 632.00 SUBIOTAL 0 34 1,530 64 2,176 0 0 0 Prelimhiary Right.of. Way Engineering & Surveys 98 3,706.00 Ex~sling ut,hly plans A chord:halloa 8 360 8 272 8 192 8 184 32 1,008.00 St.'Fplen'mntal Surveys 8 272 8 272.00 Mnppi~,g 8 272 8 272.00 SUB IOTAL 0 8 360 24 816 8 192 8 184 0 Prelhohlary Englneedoy 48 1,552 Data colleclion m~d he'd rev,ews 4 136 8 192 ' 12 328.00 Gaomel,~c layoul 2 go 12 408 24 576 24 552 62 1,626.00 1ypo Seleclion Roped 2 go 8 272 12 288 16 368 38 1,018.00 Respco~o Io coll,loellts 4 180 4 135 4 g6 12 412.00 QNQC 16 720 16 720.00 Ccnshuction COSl eshmal.~s 4 180 8 272 8 192 20 644.00 SUI3 IOTAL 0 28 1,260 36 1,224 56 1,344 40 920 0 160 4,748.00 '**"GRAND TOTAL"*** J 2 108 158 7,1~0 t44 4,896 76 1,824 48 1,t04 30 480 468 15,622 y:~etty~ubli~-~pi~Engcsll.xls Labor uuullli DUUIUV~IIU YVl(J(~lllll~ ~'roject Hevised; 111101~ 't;31 PM ' ~" ' :' ' ' ' ~'.;'~q~:~.:;~s~-~:~;-'"' ,,:~,~;~./~;.-:;-.,~,: ,: ~T~'~?~*~%~T~ ~:'-~2.~'~;-.~-%;i,.X;-:~'-' · Talk ::.ss ,~:~,~;f~.~;j.;}.; :;~;:~?~.~=:~;~.)~;~;.?.: a . D -'..,,: ::~..~;:,..~~ Ho Description '-:Houi~: :~ :),'Cb~t' .~ ~ H~u~s':: ~F*':~'~[~ ~ *'s Hours '.~:"-' ,'Cost ;; ;~$H~ur~L:*'[ ~*~C~slR~ Project Maoagement & Administration Ad~inistrfltion I Invoices Montllly Progress Reports I Schedu;e (4) 0 0.0( ~ubCOnSUll~n[ Coordhlal;oll 0 0.0( Kick-oil meetirlg 0 0.0( 0 0.~ Meet~;~gs I Age,icy Coord,~aticn (4) 0 0.0( SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0.0( Environmental Co;lflmt Envimnme;tlal Document 4 201 4 118 8 149 16 467.6( ~ echnicol Studies ~ 401 24 710 40 743 16 326 88 2180.4~ Adm;~islrnfive ISIEA lB 803 40 1,1~3 90 1.673 32 652 178 4310.1~ Draft ISlEA 4 201 10 473 40 743 16 32G 76 1743.2z Final NI~FONS~ 19 502 24 710 48 8~2 24 489 1~ 2592.4E SUBTOTAL 42 2,10~ 108 3,193 225 4,200 88 1.794 464 11293.9: ~relintina~ Rlgbt-of-Way E;~gineerlng & Su~eys Exis!mg uhlily plan; & coo;d ;~atic~l 0 SuppleltteitlRI S[~rveys 0 0.0C Moppiltg 0 0.0~ SUBIOIAL 0 0 O 0 0 0.0( Prelhnh~ary Eftglneodftg Goonlotrlc iayoul 0 1 ype Selection Report 0 0. RoSpollse IQ COITIIII~IIIS 0 0.~ UNQC 0 0.~ Conshuchort cell estlr~atos 0 0.0[ 0 0.~ SUBTOTAl 0 0 0 0 0 0.~ ..... GRANDTOTAL ....... . 42 ' 2,107 108 '3,~93' ' 226 4 200 '' 88 1,794 4~ y;~elly~dublin~scope\Engcstl.xls Labor Page 7 UUi)IIII Uoulevard VVidellillg Project Revised: 11/10/99 1:37 PM · . ' ' ' '-"'-"" = "~'- ~ , ' ~ ~ · == '-CHAUDHARY = - =..=..? =:- .~ .,.__ :.~;,.=.. ~rolecl M;,a;emenl & Admlnlllration Mo,lhly PIogress Ropo;Is I Sclledule (4) ~ O.eO Subconsullant Coordinalion 0 O O0 K~ck-o!f meelmg 0 0.00 Me.tings /Agency Ccord=naSon (4) 0 0.00 SUBTOTAL 0 0 U 0 0 0.0O Envlroltme~dal 0 0 '1 echnlcal Sludies 0 00o Admi,li~rnbve ISIEA (J O D~aft IR/EA 0 0 00 Finnl NDfl:ONSI 0 0 00 O 0.00 ~rellml,a~y Right-of-Way Engl,~erlng & S,rveys ~UBIOr~[ 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing uHily plans & coordinalico 0 0 O0 S~pFlemental Su~eys 2 98; 4 1~6 32 2.153 8 252 46 2.?09 09 Mnpp.~g 2 ~8~ 8 393~ 24 1,615 34 2,105.45 SUBIO1AL 4 t9O 12 589 O 5G 3,767 0 2G2 =relimhtar y E.gh~eerlng ~0 4.815 Data collecl,on e'ld fle'd reviews [~oome!l~c I.yout U Type Seleclion Repod 0 00U Response lo ~llllllelllS 0 0 O0 Q'~QC 0 O oo CG.Stff/ction COSl oslinla~as 0 0.00 0 0.00 SUBIOTAL 0 0 0 ~FFP ~1 0 0 ..... GRAND TOTAL* .... 4 ~96 12 589 ............. ;:~ .............................. ' .... ' ...... 56 ..... 3[~67 ..' 8 262 80 4,815 y;~lly/dublinls( _ngcsll.xls Labor uuuuu ,~oulevar~l ~V.~clen ng Hroject Revised: !,1J1~9 1:37 PM PreJ Prln Sr Engineer Enghmer Teclmlcal Fehr & Peers Total '.. Labor Rate >$ 54.81 $ 28.05 $ 21.64 $ lt.00 ' Task No Descripllon Hours Cost IIouls Cost I Iours CostHours Cost HouIs Cost ProJecl, Management & Admhllslrstioll Admioishalion I Invoices (4) 0 0 (.10 Mo~lhly Progress Reports / Schedule (4) 0 0.00 Subcolfsu~lanl CcoldiHatiol! o 0.00 Kick-off moelin;:J 3 87 .~ 06 55 Meal[rigs I Agency Coo~dmnlion (4) [1 0.00 SUB TOTAl. 0 3 87 [1 0 3 86.55 Envlror~mental Collr=rm Erlvilonlllefllal ~,ocLiroerl[ [I 0 011 Technical Studies 6 329 12 346 24 5 t g [I 1.52 50 1.346.42 AdmiuisIrnlive ISIEA 4 219 4 11.5 15 345 6 114 30 794.8~ [)fall ISIEA 2 110 4 11§ 6 1311 12 3.54.86 Final NDIFONSI 2 11 [1 4 115 6 130 12 354.86 SUBTOTAL 14 76/' 24 892 52 1.125 14 266 104 2,851 02 Preliminary Rlghl-ol'-Way E[lgi~teerhlg & Surveys Ex~s!ing utility plans & cooldinalion 0 O [1U Sul:plomenlnl Surveys 0 0 O0 Meppiug 0 0.00 SUBTOTAL [1 0 0 0 0 Preliminary Efrglrleerbtg Da,a co;Ioction aftd lie. diP. vrew$ 0 U.[111 Goomehic layout 0 0 O0 Type Selection Repod 0 0.00 Response to COlllmellfs 0 0 O0 QAIQC O 0.00 Coostrtlcflofl cost esl[mates 0 0.00 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 [1 0 "'**GRAND TOTAL*'*'* ' .... ' · ~ 14 767 27 779 52 1,126 14 266 107 2,938 I y:~elty~dublln\scope~Engcstt.xls Labor Page g Revised: 11110199 1:37 PM IJUUIIII rmUlevaru Vviuelllllg ProJect Revised: 111FJI~ 1:3/' PM ' = ' . mTOTAL : Labor Rate ~ Task No Description FLOURS COST Project Management & Admbfistra{Io, Adminis!rafion/hwoices (4) 20 $ 668.00 Mo.~hly Progress ReFcds I Schedule (4) 24 $ 848.00 StJl')co~tsuItenl Coo;d,r;al.orl 44 $ 1,964.00 Kick'°f~' ftT-~elillg 21 $ 7~r0.66 Meatil]gs IAg--.f~cy Coorrbnalioft (4) 46 $ 1,472.00 SUB IOTAL 168 $ 6,603 EnvlrOllllteltlal Ccr ~ '1 E v on ne 1!~1 Docun:e~lt 18 $ 557.60 'l~.cl'l,cal Studies 170 $ 4,702.89 Adrninistralive IS/EA 240 S 6,281.09 I')rail IS/EA 104 $ 2,730.10 Final NDIFONSI 134 $ 3,979.34 SUBTOTAL 666 $ 17,651 Prellmblary Right.of. Way En(ih~eel g & S~ rveys Exisl,lLq t]tility plates & coordifla~on 32 $ 1,008.00 Supplon]o~dal Surveys 54 $ 2,981.09 Mai;Ping 42 $ 2,377.45 SUD1OTAI. 128 $ 6,366.55 Prelhnhtsry Engbteerlng Dais co!lectien and he;d reviews 12 $ 328.00 Geomehic layotJI 62 $ 1,626.00 Type Se=ocbo~l{op:)rt 38 $ 1,018.00 Respa,Isa to cofnfllerlts 12 $ 412.00 rJA/OC 16 S 720.00 Constrtmlimt cos[esbmales 20 $ 844.00 SUBTOTAL 160 $ 4,748 ..... GRAND TOTAL ..... ) 1,109 34;56~ y:~elty~dublin~'. ,9ngcstl.xls Labor PaNe 10 EXHIBIT C City shall furnish physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space, as may be reasonably necessary for Contractor's use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and the information in possession of City. The location, quantity, and time of fiauishlng said physical facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be obligated to furnish any facility which may involve incurring any direct expense, including, but not limiting the generality of this exclusion, long-distance telephone or other communication charges, vehicles, and reproduction facilities. Exhibit C Page 1 of 1 10/25/99 EXHIBIT D GENERAL PROVISIONS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the right to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant's engineering services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, City shall not have the right to control the means by which Consultant accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. LICENSES; PERMITS: ETC. Consultant represents and warrants to City that he has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Consultant to practice his profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at his sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and ~approvals which are legally required for Consultant to practice his profession. o TIME.. Consultant shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant io this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for satisfactory performance of Consultant's obligations pursuant to this Agreement. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. The cost of such insurance shall be included in the Consultant's bid. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage ("occurrence" form CG 0001). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025. (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability Insurance. B. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: Exhibit D Page 1 of 5 10/25/99 Co (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) · Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Workers Compensation and Employers Liability: Workers Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of Califomia and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. Other Insurance Provisions. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages. The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant, premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of the protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (b) The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (c) Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. Exhibit D Page 2 of 5 10/25/99 (d) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (2) Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Consultant for the City. (3) Professional Liability. Consultant shall carry professional liability insurance in an amount deemed by the City to adequately protect the City against liability caused by negligent acts, errors or omissions on the part of the Consultant in the course of performance of the services specified in this Agreement. (4) All Coverages. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mall, remm receipt requested, has been given to the City. Acceptabilits' of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Bests' rating of no less than A:VIII. Fo Verification of Coy,race. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and with original endorsements ,fleeting coverage required by this clause. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. Ho The Risk Manager of City may approve a variation of those insurance requirements upon a determination that the coverages, scope, limits and forms of such insurance are either not commercially available or that the City's interests are otherwise fully protected. CONSULTANT NO AGENT. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to acton behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind City to any obligation whatsoever. Exhibit D Page 3 of 5 10/25/99 o ASSIGNMENT PROHIBITED. No party to this Agreement may assign any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement. Any attempted or purported assignment of any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement shall be void and of no effect. o PERSONNEL. Consultant shall assign only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires the removal of any such persons, Consultant shall, immediately upon receiving notice from City of such desire of City, cause the removal of such person or persons. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Agreement in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which Consultant is engaged in the geographical area in which Consultant practices his profession. All instruments of service of whatsoever nature which Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Agreement shall be prepared in a substantial, first class and workmanlike manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing in Consultant's profession. HOLD I-L~CMLESS AND RESPONSIBILITY OF CONSULTANTS. Consultant shall take all responsibility for the work, shall bear all losses and damages directly or indirectly resulting to him, to any subconsultant, to the City, to City officers and employees, or to parties designated by the City, on account of the negligent performance or character of the work, unforeseen difficulties, accidents, occurrences or other causes predicated on active or passive negligence of the Consultant or of his subconsultant. Consultant shall indemifify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, directors, employees and agents from and against any or all loss, liability, expense, claim, costs (including costs of defense), suits, and damages of every kind, nature and description directly or indirectly arising from the negligent performance of the work. This paragraph shall not be construed to exempt the City, its employees and officers from its own fraud, willful injury or violation of law whether willful or negligent. For purposes of Section 2782 of the Civil Code the parties hereto recognize and agree that this Agreement is not a construction contract. By execution of this Agreement Consultant acknowledges and agrees that he has read and understands the provisions hereof and that this paragraph is a material element of consideration. Approval of the insurance contracts does not relieve the Consultant or subconsultants from liability under this paragraph. 10. GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS. To the extent that this Agreement may be funded by fiscal assistance from another governmental entity, Consultant shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations to which City is bound by the terms of such fiscal assistance program. 11. DOCUMENTS. All reports, data, maps, models, charts, designs, plans, studies, surveys, photographs, memoranda or other written documents or materials prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property of City upon completion of the work to be performed hereunder or upon termination of the Agreement. No such materials or properties Exhibit D Page 4 of 5 10/25/99 produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights, or patent rights by Consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (as may be limited by the provisions of the California Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties produced under this Agreement. Exhibit D Page 5 of 5 10/25/99