HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.1 Attch 5 - City Council Stf Rept 07-17-2007 w/o attachments
CITY CLERK
File # D~[l]~-[3][(l]
/flo,56
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 17, 2007
SUBJECT:
ATTACHMENTS:
Initiation of a General Plan Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
Amendment Study for the Anderson prcoperty located at 3457 Croak Road.
Report Prepared by: Jeff Baker, Senior Planner
1) Resolution approving initiation of a General Plan and Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan Amendment Study.
2) Resolution denying initiation of a General Plan and Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan Amendment Study.
3) Vicinity Map.
4) Braddock & Logan Affordable Housing Proposal- October 18
2005.
5) City Council Staff Report (w/out Attachments) of October 18,2005.
6) City Council Meeting Minutes cfOctober 18,2005.
7) City Council Staff Report (w/out Attachments) of June 5,2007
8) City Council Meeting Minutes (of June 5, 2007
9) Project proposal and letter from the Applicant dated March 19,
2007.
10) Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Land Use Map.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
5)
Receive Staff presentation;
Receive presentation from Applicant;
Receive public comment; and
Adopt Resolution (Attachment 1) approving initiation of a General
Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment Study; or
Adopt Resolution (Attachment 2) denying initiation of a General
Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment Study.
The cost to prepare the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan Amendment shall be born(: by the affected property owner who
has requested this amendment.
COPIES TO:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------,-------------------------------------
Applicant
Property Owner
Page 1 of 4
ITEM NO. _~ .2
G:\PA#\2005\05-038 B&L Stage 2 Fallon Village\Anderson\ccsr 7.17.07 gpa spa request.doc
Attachment 5 (
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Background
The Anderson property is located north of Interstate 580 and east of Croak Road in Fallon Village
(formerly EDPO) and included within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plcm (Attachment 3).
In December 2005, a General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment (Resolution
No. 223-05), and Stage 1 Planned Development Rezone (Ordinance No. 32-05) was adopted by the City
Council for Fallon Village which includes the Anderson property The following General Plan and
Specific Plan land use designations were adopted at that time for the Anderson property:
Table 1
ecific Plan Land Use
us Office
AI:rea e
7 ac
34.2 ac
B.1 ac
50.3 ac
Positano Affordable Housing Obligation
Braddock & Logan's Positano development is located east of Fallon Road within the northern portion of
Fallon Village (Attachment 3) and consists of 1,043 single-farrily detached residential units. In
accordance with the Inclusionary Zoning Regulations (Zoning Ordinance Chapter 8.68), the Positano
development has a requirement to provide 130 affordable units.
~()tal
Units
1,043
Table 2
Inelusionary Inelusionary I
Requirement Units
12.5% 130
Braddock & Logan prepared an Affordable Housing Proposal (Attachment 4) to address the affordable
housing obligation for the Positano development which was reviewed by the City Council on October 18,
2005. This Affordable Housing Proposal included:
. 88 off-site affordable apartments located on the Anderson property;
. 26 on-site affordable integrated units within the Positano development;
. 26 on-site secondary units within the Positano development; and
. $1,000,000 Community Benefit Payment.
Please refer to Table 3 for a summary of the affordable units proposed for construction as part of the
Affordable Housing Proposal for the Positano development.
Table 3: A ordable HouslDe roposa dober ,
Unit Type Ownership Income Level Sizl~ of Units Affordability
/Rental Period
88 Apartments* 50% moderate All
Rental 20% low 2 hedrooml In perpetuity
30% very low 2 bath
26 Single-family For sale 50% moderate Same mix of In perpetuity
detached Units 20% low bedrl)om size as
u
P
10
18 2005
Page 2 of 4
Unit Type Ownership Income Level SizE of Units Affordability
/Rental Period
30% very low mark(:t rate units
50% moderate All
26 Secondary Units Rental 20% low I bedroom! In perpetuity
30% very low I bath
130 Total Units
* Ineludes 9 units to satisfy the Inelusionary Zoning requiremt:nts for the Anderson property & 1
manager's unit as defined in the Braddock & Logan's Affordable Housing Proposal.
Staff presented Braddock & Logan's Affordable Housing Proposal to the City Council on October 18,
2005, and requested direction from the City Council on how to pIOceed with the proposal. The City
Council reviewed the proposal and directed Staff to work with Braddock & Logan to refine the proposal
(Attachment 5) as follows:
1) Study the feasibility of integrating the 88 affordable apartml~nt units into a larger project on the
Anderson property;
2) Work on timing issues and obtain the necessary security to ensure completion of the project on the
Anderson property;
3) Inelude landscaping for the rear yards of the affordable units and use energy-efficient measures in
the homes to reduce the cost of housing; and
4) Incorporate green building principles, as practical.
At that meeting, the City Council described that the integration of the 88 affordable apartments units
proposed for the Anderson parcel should be developed as a mixed-income project with market-rate units.
Since the October 18,2005 City Council meeting, Staff and Braddock & Logan have worked to refine the
proposal in accordance with the direction from the City Council. Due to uncertainties about the off-site
affordable units on the Anderson property, Braddock & Logan proposed a phased approach to the
affordable obligation to allow the initial phases ofPositano to move fOlWard.
On June 5, 2007, the City Council approved an Affordable Housing Agreement (Attachments 7 and 8) for
the first phase of Positano which consists of 247 lots. The agreement requires Braddock & Logan to
provide 31 on-site affordable units in this first phase. The Affordable Housing obligation for the 31
affordable housing units will be satisfied with a combination of both integrated units, secondary units and
the payment of in-lieu fees.
In order to address the affordable obligation for subsequent phases (If Positano, Braddock and Logan has
submitted a request to initiate a General Plan and Eastern Dublin Sp,~cific Plan Amendment Study for the
Anderson property (Attachment 9). The Applicant proposes to amerd the General Plan and Specific Plan
land use designation of the Anderson property from Medium Density to Medium-High Density in order to
address the direction from the City Council to integrate market rate units with the proposed affordable
units.
ANALYSIS:
General Plan and Specific Plan Amendment
Braddock & Logan's Affordable Housing Proposal includes 88 units (87 affordable units and 1 manager's
unit) to be constructed on the Anderson property to satisfy the remaining affordable housing obligation
for the Positano development. As noted above, the City Council directed Staff to work with the Applicant
Page 3 of4
to study the feasibility of incorporating market rate units into the proposed project on the Anderson
property.
The current General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Land Use Designation for the Anderson
property is Medium Density. The Medium Density land use designation permits a maximum of 98
residential units on the Anderson property as shown in Table 4 below.
General Plan/Specific Plan Land Use Acreage I)ensity Range Min-Max
Density
Medium Density (current designation) 7 ac E.1-14.0 units/ac 42-98 units
Medium-High Density (proposed designation) 7ac 14.1-25.0 units/ac 99-175 units
Table 4
Braddock & Logan proposes to study the feasibility of a 108-unit apartment project on the Anderson
property to address the direction of the City Council to incorporate market rate units with the 88
affordable units. However, the 108 residential units exceed the allowable maximum density for the site.
Therefore, Braddock & Logan is requesting Initiation of a General Plan and Specific Plan Amendment
Study to change the land use designation from Medium Density to Medium-High Density (Table 4) to
allow 108 residential units on the Anderson property (Attachment 9).
The request to initiate General Plan and Specific Plan Amendment Study includes a conceptual Site Plan
and Building Elevations (Attachment 9). If the City Council initiates the General Plan and Specific Plan
Amendment Study, the conceptual Site Plan and Building Elevations would be subject to a Planned
Development Rezone with Stage 1 and 2 Development Plan and Site Development Review. The Planned
Development Rezone and Site D{:velopment Review Permit wc,uld be reviewed by the Planning
Commission and the City Council at a later date. Therefore, no acti,)n by the City Council regarding the
conceptual Site Plan and Elevations is required at this time.
CONCLUSION:
The City Council directed Staff to work with the Applicant to study the feasibility of incorporating market
rate units into the proposed 88 unit affordable project on the Anderson property. The existing General
Plan and Specific Plan land use designation allows a maximum of 98 units on the Anderson property.
The proposed GPNSPA Study would allow Staff and the Applicant to explore the feasibility of
incorporating additional units on the Anderson property.
If the City Council authorizes a General Plan and Eastern Dublin Sp(~cific Plan Amendment Study for the
Anderson property, Staffwill:
. Determine the appropriate environmental review;
. Examine the proposed alternative density and determine if the density is appropriate based
on City policies and standards; and
. Prepare a Planned Development Rezone with Stage 1 and 2 Development Plan and Site
Development Review for the proposed residential development on the Anderson property.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council: 1) Receive Staff presentation; 2) Receive presentation from
Applicant; 3) Receive public comment; and 4) Adopt Resolution (Attachment 1) approving the request to
Initiate a General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment Study; or 5) Adopt Resolution
(Attachment 2) denying initiation of a General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment Study.
Page 4 of 4