HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-22-2008 PC Minutes
Plal1ning Cornmissiof'l Min~utes
Tuesday, Jauuary 22, 2008
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the City of Dublin Planning Commissicn was held on Tuesday, January
22,2008, in the City Library, Program Room located at 200 Civic Plaza. Chair Schaub called the
meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
Present: Chair Schaub, Vice Chair Wehrenberg; Commissioners Tomlinson, King and Biddle;
Mary Jo Wilson, Planning Manager; and Taryn Gavagan, Recording Secretary.
Absent: None
ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA - NONE
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS - On a motion by Cm. King, the minutes of December
11, 2007 meeting were approved as modified.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
5.1 Election of Officers for Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson.
Chair Schaub opened the floor to nominations for Chairperson and Vice Chairperson.
Cm. Biddle nominated Chair Schaub for Chairperson, with a sEcond from Cm. King. Vice Chair
Wehrenberg nominated Cm. Tomlinson for Vice Chair, with a second from Chair Schaub.
By a vote of 5-0-0, the Planning Commission re-elected Chair Schaub as Chairperson and elected
Cm. Tomlinson as Vice Chairperson.
5.2 Planning Commission Goals and Objectives.
Chair Schaub asked Ms. Mary Jo Wilson, Planning Manager, if she would present the Staff
Report.
Ms. Wilson discussed the specifics of the Goals & Objectives process as outlined in the Staff
Report. She explained that the 2008-2009 Preliminary Goals & Objectives are the Community
Development Department's (CDD's) implementing strategies of the City's Ten Year Strategic
Plan Preliminary 2008-2009 Update. She further explained that input from the Housing
Committee was also included in CDD's Preliminary 2008-2009 Goals & Objectives and that one
item from the Building Department's Preliminary Goals & ObjE'Ctives would be discussed,
although the Planning Commission is not required to review tl1e Preliminary Goals &
Objectives for the Building Department.
Ms. Wilson stated that there are twelve CDD Preliminary Goals & Objectives recommended for
the 2008-2009 fiscal year.
CP[annt:ng (-ommiSS1(H!
1
:!0IJ8
Cm. Wehrenberg expressed confusion in regards to Goal #1, not understanding the meaning of,
"create a new village."
Ms. Wilson explained that although the village has already been planned and most of the land
has been entitled and zoned around the BART Transit Area, the Goal is being recommended as
a high priority to ensure that Staff is able to continue ensuring:he individual project
implementation.
Cm. Wehrenberg then expressed interest in Goal #2, stating that she understood the Military
was working on the Camp Parks Project at a slower pace and didn't understand why it was
ranked with high priority.
Ms. Wilson explained that the Camp Parks Project is dependent on the Military and has been
slow to move forward; however, after the Notice of Availability process is through, the Military
will then look at the potential developers and proposed plans far the Camp Parks area. She
explained that once a master developer has secured an agreement with the Military, the City
would begin the entitlement process.
Cm. King asked what the status of the City's plan was for the Camp Parks area.
Ms. Wilson explained that there isn't a plan in place but that th~ City Council did have a
community meeting with a consultant in which five alternative plans were discussed for the
area. She explained that there was a preferred design but City =:ouncil suggested several
changes. Ms. Wilson stated that no plans were adopted or approved and that this Goal is
recommended as a high priority to ensure Staff's ability to move forward on the project.
Chair Schaub stated that he would like to spend more time discussing the Transit Center and
what the Planning Commission would like to see for the overall look of the area. He stated that
he would like to discuss the Transit Center, conceptually, as a whole before looking at an
individual project.
Ms. Wilson explained that the Stage 1 PD and associated EIR for the Transit Center have land
use standards, but that the Planning Commission would continue to review architecture for
individual projects.
Vice Chair Tomlinson asked how much flexibility the Planning Commission has in regards to
approvals for the Transit Center projects. Ms. Wilson stated that the Commission reviews
individual project design.
Chair Schaub stated that he is concerned about how the Center will hold together from all four
street views. He suggested that the Transit Center be reviewed as a whole instead of one piece
at a time. Ms. Wilson stated that the purpose of the area being included as a part of the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP) Stage 1 PD was to implement the idea of the Transit Center as a
whole.
Cm. Biddle expressed interest in Goal #3, asking if Staff planne:l to complete the new
Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) by the end of 2008.
(om-mIssion
2
January 22,2008
~Af{'t'finll
Ms. Wilson stated that the DSP is a multi-year project that will be completed during the 2008-
2009 fiscal year.
Cm. King stated that there are currently two Planning processes taking place and neither is in
sync with one another. He explained that between the comprehensive Plan update and the
West Dublin BART Specific Plan, it is difficult to have directior. on approval.when individual
projects are brought to the Planning Commission for review. He stated that he is concerned
that the City is eliminating options for Planning approval. Cm King asked if it would be
feasible to do a partial moratorium on approvals for certain projects, if they plan to occupy
critical areas.
Ms. Wilson stated that City Council has decided not to put a moratorium in place for the
Downtown Planning Area.
Chair Schaub proposed speaking with City Council, first, if any further projects come in that are
looking to occupy a part of the Downtown Area. He proposed the idea of slowing down any
final building being done in the Downtown Area.
After much discussion, the Planning Commission agreed that until the DSP is complete, it
would be beneficial to hold a briefing on any projects coming in that are looking to occupy a
part of the Downtown Area.
Ms. Wilson suggested adding a new CDD Preliminary Goal & Objective stating, "Briefings to
the Planning Commission regarding significant redevelopment projects within the Downtown
Planning Area." After discussing the meaning of significant, the Planning Commission agreed
that significant would refer to significant changes of land use or site layout changes.
Ms. Wilson confirmed the verbiage for the new CDD Preliminary Goal & Objective stating that
it would read, "Briefings to the Planning Commission regarding significant redevelopment,
which would include site and/ or land uses, within the Downtc.wn Planning Area, as
necessary. "
Planning Commission agreed that the following CDD Prelimin:lry Goals & Objectives would be
considered high priority:
#1- Implement residential planned development and investigate opportunities to
create a new village in Eastern Dublin Transit Center.
#2- Complete Parks Reserve Forces Training Area (Camp Parks) general Plan and
Specific Plan Amendments.
#3- Prepare Community Design Element of General Plan.
#4- Update Downtown, West Dublin BART and San Ramon Specific Plans into one
comprehensive Plan that addresses the entire Downtown Area.
#5- Complete Scarlett Court Specific Plan.
('ommls.n>n
3
January 22J zoos
#6- Create Multi-Modal general Plan Circulation Map.
#7- Participate in 2010 Census.
#8- Complete General Plan Amendment on Nielsen property.
#9- Complete Grafton Plaza General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment.
Cm. Wehrenberg expressed concern with Goal #10, explaining that she has found fallacies in
the current General Plan and believes it is important to have it updated quickly in order to
connect with other plans.
Ms. Wilson explained that the cost to update the General Plan is extremely high and the City
does not anticipate updating it at this time. She further explained that there are several Specific
Plans in place that are used in conjunction with the General Plan.
Cm. Wehrenberg suggested using some of the money collected from developers to help pay for
the cost of updating the General Plan. She then suggested that the Goal be moved up to
medium priority.
Ms. Wilson stated that she would provide training on General Plans for the Planning
Commission to inform them of document updates.
After discussing changes to the General Plan, the Planning Commission agreed that the update
for the City's General Plan would be moved to medium priorit:,r.
Vice Chair Tomlinson expressed concern in having Goal #11 as low priority.. He explained that
many new development projects lack useable backyards and believes it would be beneficial to
have small parks within easy walking distance.
Chair Schaub suggested moving the Goal up to medium priority.
Cm. Biddle clarified that the Planning Commission is not referring to City Parks but small
neighborhood parks that would be maintained by the local Homeowner's Association.
After much discussion, the Planning Commission agreed that c.eveloping a policy requiring
play areas in walking distance of new homes in new subdivisions should be moved to medium
priority .
Chair Schaub asked why Staff was recommending the deletion of completing the General Plan
Amendment on the DiManto Property.
Ms. Wilson explained that the Goal has been on the CDD's Goals & Objectives list for several
years and no/very minimal activity has taken place. She explalned that Staff felt other projects
held higher priority. Vice Chair Tomlinson suggested leaving the Goal as a low priority so if
activity does happen, Staff is able to work on it.
After a brief discussion, the Planning Commission agreed to change the priority to low.
{olrHmss-h,n 4 :JaNuary 22, 20U8
Ms. Wilson discussed the Housing Committee's Preliminary GJals & Objectives and stated that
the Committee wished to change the goal number of First Time Homebuyer Loans from ten to
fifteen.
Chair Schaub and Vice Chair Tomlinson stated that they believed it would be beneficial to
evaluate how we make proactive decisions when giving developers the option to pay in lieu
fees for their Inclusionary obligation. They stated that this would contribute more funds to the
current In-Lieu Fee account, therefore enabling more funds to be allocated for the First Time
Homebuyer Loan Program.
Chair Schaub and Vice Chair Tomlinson further stated that they were concerned that the
homeowners occupying Inclusionary units were owners that hold the usual upkeep for a single-
family home, plus the Homeowner's Association Dues, and GHAD fees that they may not
always be able to afford in some remote locations such as the proposed Moller Ranch area.
Chair Schaub expressed concern about the high number of Inclusionary units that have yet to be
constructed. He explained that the current housing market, he believes the City's need for
Affordable Housing vs. adding money to the Housing Fund should be discussed.
Chair Schaub then stated that he would like to evaluate the Housing Committee, which was set
up as a two-year pilot program.
After much discussion, the Planning Commission agreed to create a new CDD Preliminary Goal
& Objective to, "Evaluate the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance with respect to all potential
opportunities". Chair Schaub; Vice Chair Tomlinson; Cm. Biddle and King agreed that the Goal
would be created with high priority. Cm. Wehrenberg stated t::lat she believes it is of medium
priority.
Planning Commission then agreed that the existing Housing Committee Preliminary Goals &
Objectives are of high priority.
Chair Schaub requested a way for the Planning Commission to stay current on environmentally
sustainable building practices. Ms. Wilson stated that one of tre high priority Goals &
Objectives for the Building Department is to implement a self-certification program for Green
Building practices.
Cm. King expressed concern in regards to educating the community on water conservation. Ms.
Wilson stated that air quality and water issues are discussed as a part of CEQA documents.
Chair Schaub suggested the General Plan including an environmental element. He expressed
concern for solar power and the fact that not many developers ;;eem to be incorporating the use
of solar power. Ms. Wilson informed the Planning Commission that Lennar Homes has
installed solar powered roofs for a current development under construction in the City.
Chair Schaub stated that he would like to make sure that' the Cty is doing everything possible
to make sure that developments are environmentally sustainable. He stated that it might be a
good idea for the City to have a goal of reducing energy consumption by 20%.
{ '(,ll?;,mlsY{:n 5 ,jO!HWt)' 20U8
'llee! mq
Ms. Wilson recapped the CDD's Preliminary Goals and Objectives with the Planning
Commission votes. The Planning Commission agreed that the Housing Committee's
recommendation to process ten First Time Homebuyer Loans should be changed to fifteen First
Time Homebuyer Loans.
Chair Schaub opened the floor to Public Comment, hearing no comment closed the public
comment.
CONSENT CALENDAR - NONE
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - NONE
PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE
NEW OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS - NONE
Ms. Mary Jo Wilson, Planning Manager, invited the Planning Commissioners to attend the
Downtown Specific Plan Walking Tour and Community Meeting on February 7th.
Chair Schaub asked what the turn out was for the Downtown Specific Plan Online Survey. Ms.
Wilson stated that she was unsure of the exact number of responses but indicated it was very
successful.
Cm. Wehrenberg asked if anyone had looked at the details br this year's Planner's Institute.
After a brief discussion, it was agreed that it might be a better idea for the Commissioners and
Planning Staff to have dinner together for team building, as oppose to having the
Commissioners attend the Planner's Institute this year, due to the limited number of sessions of
interest to the Commissioners.
Ms. Wilson stated that the Commissioners could attend the Planner's Institute for a day if there
was a specific class they wanted to take.
Ms. Wilson asked if the Planning Commission could bring their Historic District Plans to the
next Planning Commission meeting for updates. She state:! that Staff anticipates a Study
Session in March to discuss the Blake Hunt project.
OTHER BUSINESS
10.1 Brief INFORMATION ONLY reports from the Planning Commission and/or Staff,
including Committee Reports and Reports by the Planning Commission related to meetings
attended at City Expense (AB 1234).
ADJOURNMENT - The meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
{ (1fzmtsnon
6
.1a tluory ..22;- ,?OU8
G: \ MINUTES \ 200B \ PLANNING COMMISSION \ lol2.0B.doc
Respectfully submitted,
J~
Bill Schaub
Planning Commission Chair
Jauuary 22} 2008
7