HomeMy WebLinkAbout7.2 AwardOfBid 89-8 CITY OF DUBLIN
89-8
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 30,
1989
SUBJECT
EXHIBITS ATTACHED
/Civic Center Courtyard Fountain
(Report Prepared by Paul Rankin, Assistant City Manager)
o Resolution Amending the Capital Improvement Program
and Approving a Supplemental Appropriation
o Resolution Awarding Bid
o Copy of Bidder's Certification of Experience
o Bid Results
RECOMMENDATION :
Determine whether to proceed with project. If the
fountain is to be constructed, adopt the Resolution
approving the Appropriation and Resolution awarding
the Bid.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: If the project is pursued, the recommended Budget
amount is $131,300 (see Project Cost below).
DESCRIPTION : The first major project undertaken by the Dublin Fine
Arts Foundation has been the selection of a recognized artist to complete a
-- work of art for the Dublin Civic Center. The Arts Foundation is raising
money to commission the sculpture and have offered the artwork to the City
of Dublin. The artist worked with the building and landscape architects to
develop a concept which would fit into the project. The location focused on
the courtyard fountain and the fountain was redesigned to accommodate the
art design.
Options
The cost of the fountain project is significantly more than the estimate
previously identified. Therefore, the City Council should consider the
options available in continuing to support the efforts of the Dublin Fine
Arts Foundation in locating a sculpture in the courtyard fountain area.
The concept of requesting that the Dublin Fine Arts Foundation attempt to
raise additional funds to construct the fountain has been discussed
previously. At the City Council meeting on August 14, 1989, Mr. Ron Nahas,
President of the Foundation, indicated that he did not feel that the
Foundation could raise the funds to modify the fountain, in addition to
their major effort to commission the artwork. As noted by Mr. Nahas, the
revised design is significantly different than the original fountain
included as part of the Civic Center project. The new design will feature
additional lighting and increase the sound of running water within the
courtyard. In addition, the fountain and the piece of artwork have been
designed to integrate with the public area.
The City Council could elect to delete the fountain in its entirety and
continue to allow the Arts Foundation to place the sculpture in the
courtyard with a different less expensive base. As discussed above, the two
elements were designed to work together. The fountain was considered as a
method of masking traffic noise and creating a "garden atmosphere". In
addition, the artist had incorporated certain imagery of the fountain pool
with his design concept. Therefore, this option would require further
discussion between the Foundation and the Artist to determine whether the
Artist would continue the project without the water element.
The Civic Center Advisory Committee consisting of Mayor Moffatt and
Councilmember Jeffery have supported the option of proceeding with the
fountain project. Staff has identified a method of financing the
construction in the,event that the City Council concurs.
COPIES TO:
Bidders
~ Ron Nahas, Dublin Fine Arts Foundation
ITEM NO. ·
BID RESULTS
At the regular City Council meeting on August 14, 1989, the City Council
authorized the City Engineer to advertise the project for competitive bid.
The design plans were completed by David Gates & Associates. The project
includes: excavation of the fountain bowl and equipment vault; installation
of mechanical and electrical equipment, placement of stone in pool basin,
and installation of the artwork support. The physical delivery and
installation of the sculpture will be the responsibility of the Dublin Fine
Arts Foundation.
The City received two bids by the September 20, 1989 bid deadline. The bids
received were as follows:
Ambo Engineering $111,290
Golden Bay Construction $113,770
Both bids were substantially greater than the Architect's estimate of
$61,700. However, given the closeness of the two bids, it would appear that
they are competitive. Also, given the costs and time lags associated with
rebidding the project, the City's Consultants do not believe substantial
savings could be obtained in rebidding the same design. The time of year
and difficult access to the area may have impacted the overall bid.
BID DISCREPANCY
In reviewing the two bids, Staff noted that Ambo Engineering had failed to
- respond to Section 00320 "Certification of Bidder's Experience and
Qualifications." This form was included upon the advise of the City's
Architect and Construction Manager. Given the complexity of a fountain, it
was their opinion that prior experience would be an appropriate
qualification. Copies of the documents submitted by both firms are
attached. Ambo did not complete the form and merely noted "See Attached" on
page one and completed the signature block on page two.
On October 4, 1989, City Staff had a telephone conversation with Mr. Sam
Sposeto of Ambo. City Staff attempted to ascertain whether any of the
projects on the referenced attachment involved the construction of a
fountain. The only project which the company could identify was the Murphy
Station project for the City of Sunnyvale. Mr. Sposeto verbally informed
City Staff that in his opinion whether the firm has worked on a completed
fountain before did not have any bearing on the award of the bid.
The City's legal counsel has reviewed the matter and believes that the bid
by AMBO Engineering is non-responsive. The City may legally reject a bid
for failing to submit required information which is intended to assist the
City in analyzing the bidder's qualifications. Furthermore, the City's
legal counsel is of the opinion that bidders must respond to the invitation
and that a bidder may not provide substituted information. Based on the
circumstances, it is Staff's recommendation that the City Council reject the
bid submitted by Ambo Engineering as being non-responsive.
References of Golden Bay
Staff has reviewed the references submitted by Golden Bay Construction. All
of the references were projects completed with a team consisting of Golden
Bay Construction and Baer Brothers. Baer Brothers is a firm which
specializes in the design and construction of fountains. Golden Bay has
listed Baer Brothers as the subcontractor for the mechanical and electrical
scope of work. Ail of the references were favorable. Based on the review,
Staff is recommending that if the project is pursued that the City Council
award the bid to Golden Bay Construction, Inc.
Financing
In preparing the 1989-90 Fiscal Year Budget, Staff estimated the interest
earnings for the funds associated with the construction of the Civic Center.
The Civic Center is financed through a combination of General Fund
contributions and Certificate of Participation lease financing issued
through Dublin Information Inc. (DII).
In the past, any interest earnings on DII funds have been applied to the
project. This has resulted in a reduction of the General Fund contribution
required to complete the project.
Page 2
For example, the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) adopted in June of 1988
- showed the following Civic Center Project Financing:
DII
General Fund
Total
$16,906,129
2~582,283
$19,488,412
The CIP update adopted in June of 1989 showed the following financing:
DII
General Fund
Total
$16,925,524
2,562~888
$19,488,412
As shown above, the General Fund contribution decreased by $19,395 and DII's
contribution increased by a similar amount. This was due to the application
of estimated interest earnings on the DII fund for Fiscal Year 1988-89.
Staff has had an opportunity to review preliminary audit figures for the
fiscal year ending June 30, 1989 and to compare these figures to budget
estimates. The reports indicate that the DII fund will receive
approximately $254,113 in interest earnings. In preparing the 1989-90 CIP,
Staff had used interest earnings of $129,000 in calculating the General
Fund's contribution to the project. The higher interest earnings resulted
from delays in the construction payment schedule. Due to the fact that
interest earnings exceeded the CIP estimate by approximately $125,000, these
funds could be used to finance this project.
Project Cost
The total recommended budget to
complete this project is as follows:
Construction Cost
Construction Contingency
Architect's Construction Serv
City Inspection
Total Project
$113,770
10,000
3,000
4~500
$131,300
These costs exclude any monies expended to date. Approximately $10,000 was
incurred under the current Civic Center project to install underground
utilities and empty conduit to serve the future fountain. In addition, the
City expended approximately $4,440 to prepare plans and specifications.
If the City Council proceeds with the project, Staff recommends that the
Capital Improvement Program be amended to include the Civic Center Courtyard
Fountain as a new project. It is recommended that the City Council
appropriate a total of $131,300 for the project. A total of $125,000 would
be tranferred from the City's unallocated reserve for future projects. This
amount represents the unanticipated DII interest income. The City Council
should also approve a budget transfer in the amount of $6,300 from the Civic
Center project to the Courtyard Fountain Project.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council determine whether they wish to
proceed with the construction. If the City Council approves proceeding with
the project, it would be appropriate to adopt the attached resolutions.
Page 3
-- RESOLUTION NO. - 89 --
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
AMENDING THE 1989-90 UPDATE
TO THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND APPROVING A SUPPLEMENTAL
APPROPRIATION FOR THE DUBLIN CIVIC CENTER COURTYARD FOUNTAIN
WHEREAS, the Dublin Fine Arts Foundation has offered to commission a
sculpture for the Civic Center Courtyard; and
WHEREAS, the sculpture is designed to be placed within a sunken
fountain; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolution No. 84-89, which
adopted a Budget for Fiscal Year 1989-90; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolution No. 83-89, which
adopted the 1989-90 update to the Five Year Capital Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the Civic Center Courtyard Fountain was not identified as
funded project within either Resolution No. 84-89 or Resolution No. 83-89;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received bids for the construction of
the fountain; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to proceed with the fountain
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Dublin does hereby amend Resolution No. 83-89, updating the Five Year
Capital Improvement Program by including the Civic Center Courtyard Fountain
Project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council shall appropriate
$125,000 from Dublin Information, Inc., 1988-89 Interest Earnings, to the
funding of the Civic Center Courtyard Fountain. In addition, the City
Council shall authorize a transfer of $6,300 from the Civic Center project
to the Civic Center Courtyard Fountain Project.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 30th day of October, 1989.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. -89
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
AWARDING CONTRACT 89-8
CIVIC CENTER COURTYARD FOUNTAIN
TO GOLDEN BAY CONSTRUCTION, INC.
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin did, on September 20, 1989, publicly
open, examine, and declare all sealed bids for doing the work described in
the approved Plans, Specifications, and Modifications for Contract 89-8 Civic
Center Courtyard Fountain, authorized by the City Council on August 14, 1989,
which Plans, Specifications, and Modifications are hereby expressly referred
to for a description of said work and for all particulars relative to the
proceedings under the request for bids; and
WHEREAS, said bids were submitted to the City Engineer, who has
reviewed the bids to determine the lowest bidder which was responsive to the
requirements of the bid documents; and
WHEREAS, the bid hereinafter mentioned is responsive to the bid
documents, including, but not limited to, the completion of Section 00320
"Certification of Bidder's Experience and Qualifications";
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Dublin does hereby and award City of Dublin Contract 89-8 to the lowest
responsible bidder therefor, to wit Golden Bay Construction, Inc., at a bid
of One Hundred Thirteen Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy Dollars ($113,770),
the particulars of which bid are on file in the office of the City Engineer.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 30th day of October, 1989.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
AGREEMENT
CIVIC CENTER COURTYARD FOUNTAIN
CITY OF DUBLIN CONTRACT 89-8
THIS AGREEMENT, dated for identification as of October 31, 1989, between the
CITY OF DUBLIN, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter called "CITY"), and Golden Bay
Construction, Inc., (hereinafter called "CONTRACTOR").
The parties hereto mutually agree to the terms and conditions set forth
herein.
1.01 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
Each of the items hereinafter referred to are incorporated herein by this
reference as if set forth in full herein.
Work called for in any one Contract Document and not mentioned in another is
to be performed and executed as if mentioned in all Contract Documents. The table
of contents, titles, and headings contained herein and in said documents are solely
to facilitate reference to various provisions of the Contract Documents and in no
way affect or limit the interpretations of the provisions to which they refer.
The Contract Documents, sometimes also referred to as "the Contract," consist
of the Notice to Contractors, the completed Proposal Form submitted by the
Contractor to whom the Contract is awarded, the Instructions to Bidders insofar as
they relate to events which will occur or actions to be taken after the submission
of the Proposal, this Agreement, the Standard Specifications, the Special
Provisions, Plans, Drawings, Detail Book, and Technical Specifications, the
Standard Drawings, Details, and other such data and all versions thereof prepared
by City pursuant to Contract, and any modifications of any of the foregoing in the
form of Addenda or executed Change Order or otherwise effected in accordance with
the terms of the Contract, the surety bonds, bid bond, and Contractor's list of
subcontractors.
1.02 DEFINITIONS.
Unless otherwise specifically provided herein, all words and phrases defined
in the Standard Specifications shall have the same meaning and intent in this
Agreement.
1.03 AGREEMENT CONTROLS.
In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions as set forth in
this Agreement and the terms and conditions set forth in other Contract Documents,
the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement shall prevail.
1.04 SCOPE OF CONTRACT.
Contractor agrees to furnish all tools, equipment, apparatus, facilities,
labor, and material and transportation necessary to perform and complete in a good
and workmanlike manner to the satisfaction of City, all the work called for, and in
Page 1
the manner designated in, and in strict conformity with the Contract Documents for
the project entitled: Civic Center Courtyard Fountain.
1.05 CONTRACT AMOUNT AND PAYMENTS.
City agrees to pay, and Contractor agrees to accept, in full payment for the
above work, the sum of ONE HUNDRED THIRTEEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED SEVENTY DOLLARS
($113,770), which sum is to be paid according to the schedule and in the manner set
forth herein and subject to additions, deductions, and withholding as provided in
the Contract Documents. When it is provided in the Notice to Bidders, Instructions
to Bidders, or Proposal Form that Contractor is to be paid on the basis of the unit
prices shown in his bid, instead of a lump sum price, the Contractor agrees to
accept, in full payment for the above work, the sum computed in accordance with the
actual amount of each item of work performed or material furnished, at the unit
price which Contractor bid for each such item in his Proposal Form, said unit price
to be determined as provided in the Standard Specifications and Special Provisions.
1.06 PROGRESS AND FINAL PAYMENTS.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Contract Documents, City shall
cause payments to be made upon demand of Contractor in the manner set forth in the
Standard Specifications.
1.07 RETENTION OF SUMS CHARGED AGAINST CONTRACTOR.
When, under the provisions of this Contract, City shall charge any sum of
money against Contractor, City shall deduct and retain the amount of such charge
from the amount of the next succeeding progress estimate, or from any other moneys
due or that may become due Contractor from City. If, on completion or termination
of the Contract, sums due Contractor are insufficient to pay City's charges against
him, City shall have the right to recover the balance from Contractor or his
sureties.
1.08 COMMENCEMENT AND PROSECUTION OF WORK.
Contractor shall commence the work on or before ten (10) calendar days from
and after receipt of written Notice to Proceed from City to Contractor and will
diligently prosecute the work to final completion. The phrase "commence the work"
means to engage in a continuous program on-site including, but not limited to, site
clearance, grading, dredging, land filling and the fabrication, erection, or
installation of the work. Said Notice to Proceed shall be issued following
execution of the Agreement and the filing by Contractor of the required bonds and
proof of insurance. The continuous prosecution of work by Contractor shall be
subject only to Excusable Delays as defined in this Agreement.
1.09 TIME OF COMPLETION.
The entire work shall be brought to completion in the manner provided for in
the Contract Documents on or before the 90th calendar day (hereinafter called the
"Completion Date") from and after the receipt by Contractor of the Notice to
Proceed unless extensions of time are granted in accordance with the Contract
Documents.
Page 2
1.10 PAYMENTS DO NOT IMPLY ACCEPTANCE OF WORK.
The payment of any progress payment, or the acceptance thereof by Contractor,
shall not constitute acceptance of the work or any portion thereof and shall in no
way reduce the liability of Contractor to replace unsatisfactory work or material,
though the unsatisfactory character of such work or material may not have been
apparent or detected at the time such payment was made.
1.11 ACCEPTANCE NOT RELEASE.
Contractor shall correct immediately any defective or imperfect work which
may be discovered before final acceptance of the entire work. Any unsatisfactory
materials shall be rejected, notwithstanding that they may have been overlooked by
the proper inspector. The inspection of the work, or any part thereof, shall not
relieve Contractor of any of his obligations to perform satisfactory work as herein
prescribed.
Failure or neglect on the part of the City or any of its authorized agents to
condemn or reject bad or inferior work or materials shall not be construed to imply
an acceptance of such work or materials if such becomes evident at any time prior
to final acceptance of the entire work or all materials, nor shall such failure be
construed as barring City at any subsequent time from recovering damages or of such
a sum of money as may be rquired to build anew all portions of the work in which
fraud was practiced or improper materials used whenever City may discover the same.
1.12 RELEASE UPON FINAL PAYMENT.
If requested to do so by City, at the time of final payment, as a condition
precedent to final payment, Contractor and each assignee under any assignment in
effect at the time of final payment shall execute and deliver a release in form and
substance satisfactory to the City and containing such exceptions as provided in
Section 7100 of the Public Contract Code which shall discharge City, its officers,
agents, and employees of and from all liability, obligations, and claims arising
under this contract.
1.13 CITY'S RIGHT TO TAKE POSSESSION OF THE WORK IN WHOLE OR IN PART.
Without limitation of Paragraph 1.19 whatsoever, the City of Dublin shall
have the right at any time to enter upon the work and perform work not covered by
this Contract, or to occupy and use a portion of the work, prior to the date of the
final acceptance of the work as a whole, without in any way relieving Contractor of
any obligations under this Contract.
Such use or occupation of the work shall not be construed as an acceptance of
any portion of the work under this Contract, nor shall it affect the dates and
times when payments shall become due nor prejudice City's rights, guarantees, or
sureties.
1.14 NO WAIVER OF REMEDIES.
Neither the inspection by City or its agents, nor any order or certificate
for the payment of money, nor any payment for, nor acceptance of the whole or any
Page 3
part of the work by City, nor any extensions of time, nor any position taken by
City or its agents shall operate as a waiver of any provision of this Agreement or
of any power herein reserved to City or any right to damages herein provided, nor
shall any waiver of any breach of this Agreement be held to be a waiver of any
other or subsequent breach. All remedies provided in this Agreement shall be taken
and construed as cumulative; that is, in addition to each and every other remedy
herein provided, and City shall have any and all equitable and legal remedies which
it would in any case have.
1.15 DETERMINATION OF DAMAGES.
The actual fact of the occurrence of damages and the actual amount of the
damages which City would suffer if the work were not completed within the specified
times set forth are dependent upon many circumstances and conditions which could
prevail in various combinations, and from the nature of the project, it is
impracticable and extremely difficult to fix the actual damages. Damages which
City would suffer in the event of delay include loss of the use of the Project, and
in addition expenses of prolonged employment of an architectural and engineering
staff; costs of administration, inspection, and supervision; and the loss suffered
by the public within the City of Dublin by reasons of the delay in the completion
of the project to serve the public at the earliest possible time. Accordingly, the
parties hereto agree, and by execution of this Agreement, Contractor acknowledges
that he understands, has ascertained and agrees, that the amounts set forth herein
as liquidated damages shall be presumed to be the amount of damages sustained by
the failure of Contractor to complete the entire work within the times specified~
1.16 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES.
The amount of the liquidated damages to be paid by Contractor to City for
failure to complete the entire work by the Completion Date (as extended, if
applicable) will be Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($250.00) for each calendar day,
continuing to the time at which the work is completed. Such amount is the actual
cash value agreed upon as the loss to City resulting from Contractor's default.
1.17 PAYMENT OF DAMAGES.
In the event Contractor shall become liable for liquidated damages, City, in
addition to all other remedies provided by law, shall have the right to withhold
any and all payments which would otherwise be or become due Contractor until the
liability of Contractor under this section is finally determined. City shall have
the right to use and apply such payments, in whole or in part, to reimburse City
for all liquidated damages due or to become due to City. Any remaining balance of
such payments shall be paid to Contractor only after discharge in full of all
liability incurred by Contractor under this section or otherwise. If the sum so
retained by City is not sufficient to discharge all such liabilities of Contractor,
Contractor and his sureties shall continue to remain liable to City until all such
liabilities are satisfied in full. No failure by City to withhold any payment as
hereinbefore specified shall in any manner be construed to constitute a waiver of
any right to liquidated damages or any right to any such sum.
Page 4
1.18 INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS.
Contractor shall assume the defense of, and indemnify and save harmless, the
City, its officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and
against all actions, damages, claims, losses or expenses of every type and
description to which they may be subjected or put, by reason of, or resulting from,
the performance of the work, provided that such action, damage, claim, loss, or
expense is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease or death, or injury to,
or destruction of property, whether upon or off the work, including the loss of use
thereof, and is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the
Contractor, and subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of
them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, whether or not it is
caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder.
1.19 CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME RISKS.
Until the completion and final acceptance by City of all work under this
Contract, the work shall be under Contractor's responsibility, care, and charge,
including any period of time work is suspended for any cause whatsoever.
Contractor shall rebuild, repair, restore, and make good all injuries, damages,
re-erections, and repairs occasioned or rendered necessary by accidental causes of
any nature, to all or any portions of the work, except as otherwise agreed. It is
specifically contemplated that the City, its officers, employees, and invitees,
will occupy and use portions of the work prior to final acceptance. Such occupancy
shall not relieve Contractor of responsibility provided herein nor exonerate any
surety or insurer of Contractor save and except for items of routine maintenance
and repair.
1.20 GENERAL LIABILITY OF CONTRACTOR.
Except as otherwise herein expressly agreed, Contractor shall do all the work
and furnish all the labor, materials, tools, power and light, and appliances,
necessary or proper for performing and completing the work herein required in the
manner within the time herein specified. The mention of any specific duty or
liability of Contractor shall not be construed as limitation or restriction of any
general liability or duty of Contractor and, any reference to any specific duty or
liability shall be construed to be for the purpose of explanation.
1.21 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN INSURANCE.
During the term of this Agreement, and until final completion and acceptance
of the work by the City, the Contractor shall maintain in full force and effect
insurance coverage in the forms and amounts specified in the Standard
Specifications. If, at any time during the performance of this Contract,
Contractor fails to maintain any item of required insurance in full force and
effect, Contractor shall immediately discontinue all work under the Contract and
City will withhold all Contract Payments due or that become due until notice is
received by City that such insurance has been restored in full force and effect and
that the premiums therefor have been paid for a period satisfactory to the City
Manager.
Page 5
1.22 EXTENSIONS OF TIME.
In the event City deems it necessary, in its sole discretion, to extend the
time of completion of work to be done under this Contract beyond the required
Completion Date herein specified, such extensions shall in no way release any
guarantee given by Contractor pursuant to the provisions of the Contract Documents,
nor shall such extension of time relieve or release the sureties on the bonds
executed pursuant to said provisions. By executing such bonds, the sureties shall
be deemed to have expressly agreed to any such extension of time. The amount of
time allowed in any extension of time shall be limited to the period of excusable
delay as defined herein giving rise to the same as determined by City Engineer.
1.23 EXCUSABLE DELAYS.
For the purpose of these Contract Documents, the term "Excusable Delays"
shall mean, and is limited to, delays caused directly by acts of God, acts of the
public enemy, fires, riots, insurrections, epidemics, quarantine restrictions,
strikes, lockouts, sitdowns, acts of a governmental agency, priorities or
privileges established for the manufacture, assembly, or allotment of materials
necessary in the work by order, decree, or otherwise of the United States or by any
department, bureau, commission, committee, agent, or administrator of any legally
constituted public authority; changes in the work ordered by City insofar as they
necessarily require additional time in which to complete the work; the prevention
by City of Contractor from commencing or prosecuting the work because of the acts
of others, excepting Contractor's subcontractors; or the prevention of Contractor
from commencing or prosecuting the work because of a city-wide failure of public
utility service.
Inclement weather shall not be a reason for granting an extension of time.
City may, however, grant an extension of time for unavoidable delay as a result of
extraordinary inclement weather which shall then be classified Excusable Delay.
The term "Excusable Delay" shall specifically not include: (1) any delay
which could have been avoided by the exercise of case, prudence, foresight, and
diligence on the part of Contractor; (2) any delay in the prosecution of parts of
the work, which may in itself be unavoidable but which does not necessarily prevent
or delay the prosecution of other parts of the work, nor the completion of the
whole work within the time specified; (3) any reasonable delay resulting from time
required by City for review of plans and submittals required of Contractor and for
the making of surveys, measurements and inspections; (4) any delay arising from an
interruption in the prosecution of the work on account of the reasonable
interference from other Contractors employed by City, which does not necessarily
prevent the completion of the work within the time specified; and (5) any delay
resulting from ordinary inclement weather. Excusable Delays, if any, shall operate
only to extend the Completion Date (not in excess of the period of such delay as
determined by the City) but shall not under any circumstances increase the sum City
is to pay Contractor as provided in these Contract Documents.
1.24 CONTRACTOR TO SERVE NOTICE OF DELAYS.
Whenever Contractor foresees any delay in the prosecution of the work, and in
any event immediately upon the occurrence of any delay which Contractor regards as
Page 6
an excusable delay, he shall notify the City Engineer in writing of the probability
of such delay and its cause, in order that the City Engineer may take immediate
steps to prevent if possible the occurrence or continuance of the delay, or if this
cannot be done, may determine whether the delay is to be considered excusable, how
long it continues, and to what extent the prosecution and completion of the work
are delayed thereby. Said notice shall constitute an application for an extension
of time only if the notice requests such an extension and sets forth Contractor's
estimate of the additional time required together with a full description of the
cause of the delay relied upon.
After the completion of any part or whole of the work, the City Engineer, in
estimating the amount due Contractor, will assume that any and all delays which may
have occurred in its prosecution and completion have been avoidable delays, except
such delays as shall have been called to the attention of the City Engineer at the
time of their occurrence and found by him to have been excusable. Contractor shall
make no claim that any delay not called to the attention of the City Engineer at
the time of its occurrence has been an excusable delay.
1.25 EXTENSION OF TIME - EXCUSABLE DELAY.
Should any delays occur which the City Engineer may consider excusable, as
herein defined, Contractor shall, pursuant to his application, be allowed an
extension of time beyond the time herein set forth proportional to said delay or
delays in which to complete this Contract; and, during an extension which may have
been granted because of an excusable delay or delays, City shall not charge
liquidated damages against Contractor for such delay.
1.26 EXTENSION OF TIME DOES NOT WAIVE CITY'S RIGHTS.
The granting of any extension of time on account of delays which in the
judgment of the City Engineer are excusable delays shall in no way operate as a
waiver on the part of City of its rights under this Contract excepting only the
extension of the Completion Date.
1.27 NO PAYMENT FOR DELAYS.
No damages or compensation of any kind shall be paid to Contractor or any
subcontractor because of delays in the progress of the work whether such delays
qualify for extension of time under this Agreement or not.
Contractor waives all claims against City, its officials and employees, for
any loss or damage sustained by reason of delays beyond the Completion Date arising
out of modifications of this Agreement, including modifications deemed necessary or
desirable by City for the correction of errors or omissions in the Contract
Documents.
1.28 CHANGES IN THE WORK.
Changes in the work made pursuant to changes issued in accordance with the
Standard Specifications and extensions of time of completion made necessary by
reason thereof (beyond the Completion Date) shall not in any way release any
guarantee given by Contractor pursuant to the provisions of the Contract Documents,
Page 7
or the Contract let hereunder, nor shall such changes in the work relieve or
release the sureties on bonds executed pursuant to the said provisions. By
executing such bonds, the sureties shall be deemed to have expressly agreed to any
such change in the work and to any extension of time made by reason thereof.
1.29 TERMINATION AFTER COMPLETION DATE.
In addition to any other rights it may have, City may terminate this Contract
at any time after the Completion Date as adjusted by any extensions of time for
excusable delays that may have been granted. Upon such termination Contractor
shall not be entitled to receive any compensation for services rendered by him
before or after such termination, and he shall be liable to City for liquidated
damages for all periods of time beyond such termination date until the work is
completed.
1.30 CONTRACTOR BANKRUPT.
If Contractor should commence any proceeding under the Bankruptcy Act, or if
Contractor be adjudged a bankrupt, or if Contractor should make any assignment for
the benefit of creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed on account of
Contractor's insolvency, then the City Council may, without prejudice to any other
right or remedy, terminate the Contract and complete the work by giving notice to
Contractor and his surety according to the provisions of Section 1.31.
Contractor's Surety shall have the right to complete the work by commencing thirty
(30) days as specified in Section 1.31; and, in the event Contractor's Surety fails
to commence work within thirty (30) days, City shall have the right to complete, or
cause completion of the work, all as specified in Section 1.31.
1.31 TERMINATION FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT.
If Contractor should abandon the work under this Contract, or if the Contract
or any portion of the Contract should be sublet or assigned without the consent of
the City Council, or if the City Engineer should be of the opinion that the
conditions of the Contract in respect to the rate of progress of the work are not
being fulfilled or any part thereof is unnecessarily delayed, or if Contractor
should wilfully violate or breach, or fail to execute in good faith, any of the
terms or conditions of the Contract, or if Contract should persistently refuse or
fail to supply enough properly skilled labor or materials, or fail to make prompt
payment to subcontractors for material or labor, or persistently disregard laws,
ordinances, or proper instruction or orders of the Engineer, then, notwithstanding
any provision to the contrary herein, the City Council may give Contractor and his
Surety written notification to immediately correct the situation or the Contract
shall be terminated.
In the event that such notice is given, and, in the event such situation is
not corrected, or satisfactory arrangement for correction is not made, within ten
(10) calendar days from the date of such notice, the Contract shall upon expiration
of said ten (10) calendar days cease and terminate. In the event of any such
termination, City shall immediately serve notice therof upon the Surety and
Contractor; and the Surety shall have the right to take over and perform the
Contract, provided, however, that if the Surety does not commence performance
thereof within thirty (30) days from the date of the mailing to such Surety of
Page 8
netice of termination, City may take over the work and prosecute the same to
completion by Contract, or otherwise, for the account and at the expense of
Contractor, and his Surety shall be liable to City for any excess cost occasioned
City thereby, as hereinafter set forth.
In the event City completes the work, or causes the work to be completed, as
aforesaid, no payment of any sum shall be made to Contractor until the work is
complete. The cost of completing the we~k, including but not limited to, extra
contract costs, the costs of City forces, extra costs of administration and
management incurred by City, either direct or indirect, shall be deducted from any
sum then due, or which becomes due, to Contractor from City. If no sum sufficient
to pay the difference between sums due to Contractor from City and the cost of
completing work, and there is a sum remaining due to Contractor after City deducts
the aforementioned costs of completing the work, then City shall thereupon pay such
sum to Contractor and his Surety.
No act by City before the work is finally accepted including, but not limited
to, exercise of other rights under the Contract, actions at law or in equity,
extensions of time, payments, claims of liquidated damages, occupation or
acceptance of any part of the work, waiver of any prior breach of the Contract or
failure to take action pursuant to this section upon the happening of any prior
default or breach by Contractor shall be construed to be a waiver, or to estop,
City from acting pursuant to this paragraph upon any subsequent event, occurrence
or failure by Contractor to fulfill the terms and conditions of the Contract. The
rights of City pursuant to this paragraph are cumulative and in addition to all
other rights of City pursuant to this Agreement and at law or in equity.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this Agreement on the date
set forth opposite their names.
Date: CONTRACTOR
By
Date:
ATTEST:
Title
CITY OF DUBLIN, A Municipal Corporation
By
Mayor
City Clerk
ORIGINAL APPROVED AS TO FORM
City Attorney
- 9 -
00320
~TIFICATION OF BIDDER'S
EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
Page 1
SECTION 00320
CERTIFICATION OF BIDDER'S
EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
The undersigned Bidder certifies that he is, at the time of bidding, end shall be,
throughout the period of the contract, licensed under the provisions of Chapter 9,
Division 8, of the Business and Professions Code of the State of California, to do the
type of work contemplated in the Contract Documents. Bidder shall further certify that
he is skilled end regularly engaged in the general class end type of work called for in
the Contract Documents.
The Bidder represents that he is competent, knowledgeable, and has special skills on the
nature, extent and inherent conditions of the work to be performed. Bidder further
acknowledges that there are certain peculiar and inherent conditions existent in the
construction of the particular facilities which may create, during the construction
program, unusual or peculiar unsafe conditions hazardous to persons and property.
Bidder expressly acknowledges that he is aware of such peculiar risks and that he has
the skill end experience to foresee and to adopt protective measures to adequately and
safely perform the construction work with respect to such hazards.
The Contractor shall have the following qualifications:
Ao
Have successfully completed not less than six (6) fountain projects, each of a
scope equal to or greater than this project, within the last three (3) years.
Submit with his formal bid, a llst of at least three (3) projects complete with
names, addresses and telephone numbers of the Lendscape Architect and the Owner's
Representative and a brief description of the fountain facilities including size,
scope of the mechanical system.
Project Name:
Owner:
Construction Cost: $
Construction Time:
Calendar Days
Owner's Representative:
Owner's Telephone No.: (__)
Date of Substential Completion:
Brief Description:
00320
CERTIFICATION OF BIDDF~'S
~PERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
Page 2
Project Name:
Owner:
Construction Cost: $
Construction Time:
Owner's ~epresentative:'
Owner's Telephone NO.:
Date of substantial Completion:
Brief Description:
Calendar Days
Project Name:
Owner:
Construction Cost: $
Construction Time:
Owner's Representative:
Owner's Telephone No.:
Date of Substantial Completion:
Brief Description:
Calendar Days
Signed this
~O~day of
, 1989.
~---"Signa t~ -6f' Bidder
Title of Signator
END OF SECTION
Byron WI: Liams
87&-9414
Univ~ Cmlif
Car Leon
Berkeley
Vic l'ay lot
&42-048~
Univ. Calif
(same as above)
Kaiser Co~struc.tion
i?80-.2nd
Berkekey, CA
Ron Mello
428.-6475
City of Union Ci.ty
Alvarado Niles Rd
Union Ci.ty, CA
Jim Ghemet.ti
4'?i-J2~2
Por.t of Oakland
66 Jack London
Oakland, Ca
Rufino Olay
'444-3i88
Safeway S'tore~
Madison Ave.
Oakland, CA
Inland Container
Z?tl~3---Ced a r BLvd
Newark, Ca
Fred Landsber~
797--2021
$.;:'. In.tnL Airpor.t $ l'?O,O00.O0
Loading Dock Modif.
Havi land Hall
I.tandicm~ Modifications
S i.te Improvemen~
50,000.00
iZO,O00.O0
L.I.D. 20
Im;u-ovemen't s of
Deco'to Di~tr ic.t
700,000.00
Air-BART Bum SheL.ters
Oakland In.t' [ Airpor.t
450,000.00
Hoffman Freeway Dev.
Richmond Dis'h"ibution
Ce;]ter
t,300,000,00
Various Contraci'-~
Site grading, engineer-
ing, a.spha [ t ~ concl-st8
800,000.00
480,000.00
275,000.00
34151 ZWISSIG WAY ' UNION CITY, CA 94587 ' (415) 487-2424 · LICENSE NO. 310292
Bmyhi LL Drive
San Bruno, CA
Byron WILtimm~
8"76 -94 J. 4
City of' Sunnyva Le
456 We~t OLive Ave
5'unnyva Le, CA
Erni e Yo~h i
(408) 730-7429
Co. of Santa CLara
l'r an~spor t m t i on
1555 Berger Drive
~'mn Jo_se, CA
Hugh Hancock
(408) 299.-.'259i
City of' 5'uT~nyva Le
456 We.st OLive Ave
Sur, nyva re, CA
Roger Jenkin.s~,
(408) '7:30--'7429
Washington I..lo~p i t a:
2000 Mowry Ave
Fremont, CA
Vern Gu~'t a f.son
7?7-iiii
L. i4. uid Air Corp.
2i2i N. [:mtifornim
Walnut [;reek, Ca
Geerge NubLe
977-'652 i
Santa CLara Co;~nty
'l'rmn~portation Agency
1555 Berger Drive
San Jo.se, CA
Hugh Hancock
408/299-...2591
City of Watnul Creek
i666 North Main Zt
Wa[nu~ Creek, CA
Vic ~'t'ei t
94~--5800
Ci~-' of' Wa [nu~ Creek
(~ame a~ abeve)
City of Waknut Creek
,vehie'n t $ tO
Evans Ave. Mai t
Fac i t i ty
286,000.00
Ma~hi tda Ave
Median I~land
400,000.00
Var iou-~ Cor, tract-~'
Bu.s :.~'to~ Pavemen',~
360,000.00
Murphy 5'tat ion
885,000.00
Parking Lot/
Box Culvert Construction
603,000.00
I..leLi~m *l'ran~fiLt
Depot
265,000~00
Eastridge Transit
Cerd'er'-'Dr J vets
Bui Lding/Pa-~$e~;ger
~th e L 'l' e',- ~
984~900~00
North Main Street
]l~p r ovehlei'i t N
205,500.00
Ca t i 'lorn i a/Newe L t/
5'or;th Main Street
· Creek Beaut i ficat ic.n
i92,100.00
48~,650.00
34151 ZWISSIG, WAY · UNION CITY, CA 94587 · (415) 487-2424 · LICENSE NO. 310292 .
_ 00320
ERTIFICATION OF BIDDER'S
EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
Page 1
SECTION 00320
CERTIFICATION OF BIDDER'S
EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
The undersigned Bidder certifies that he is, at the time of bidding, and shall be,
throughout the period of the contract, licensed under the provisions of Chapter 9,
Division 8, of the Business and Professions Code of the State of California, to do the
type of work contemplated in the Contract Documents. Bidder shall further certify that
he is skilled and regularly engaged in the general class and type of work called for in
the Contract Documents.
The Bidder represents that he is competent, knowledgeable, and has special skills on the
nature, extent and inherent conditions of the work to be performed. Bidder further
acknowledges that there are certain peculiar and inherent conditions existent in the
construction of the particular facilities which may create, during the construction
program, unusual or peculiar unsafe conditions hazardous to persons and property.
Bidder expressly acknowledges that he is aware of such peculiar risks and that he has
the skill and experience to foresee and to adopt protective measures to adequately and
safely perform the construction work with respect to such hazards.
The Contractor shall have the following qualifications:
Have successfully completed not less than six (6) fountain projects, each of a
scope equal to or greater than this project, within the last three (3) years.
Submit with his formal bid, a list of at least three (3) projects complete with
names, addresses and telephone numbers of the Landscape Architect and the Owner's
Representative and a brief description of the fountain facilities including size,
scope of the mechanical system.
Project Name: Fn~n~n 0 ¥~rbs R~n~
Owner: M~rrott C~r?~rat ~ ~n
Construction Cost: $ 128,550.00
Construction Time: ( 90 ) Ninety
Owner's Representative:
Owner's Telephone No.:
Date of Substantial Completion: May 1989
Brief Description: Constructed Fountain
Marriott Corporation
(415.) 957-1555
Calendar Days
(Concrete)
" 00~20
CERTIFICATION oF BIDDER'S
EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
Page 2
Project Name:
Owner:
Construction Cost:
Construction Time:
Owner's Representative:
Owner's Telephone No.:
Date of Substantial Completion:
Brief Description:
Fountain @, Business Park, San Ramon Valley
public Storaae Inc.
$ 42.350.00
(~20)
Public Storage Inc.
(~ 828-4805
4-89
Calendar Days
Constructed Fountain (Concrete)
Project Name:
Owner:
Construction Cost:
Construction Time:
Owner's Representative:
Owner's Telephone No.:
Date Of Substantial Completion:
Brief Description:
Bramalea Pacific. I~c.
$ 18.933.00
(4Q) Forty
Bramalea Pacific
(415) 464-8200
Calendar Days
9-88
Constructed Fountain
(Concrete)
Signed this 20th day of September
, 1989.
Golden Bay Construction, Inc.
Name of Bidder
45] 403 California
Signature~f Bidder
Title of Signator
END OF SECTION
CONTRACT 89-8 CIVIC CENTER COURTYARD FOUNTAIN
ITEMIZATION OF WORK ENGINa'~W ' S ESTIMATE A~4BO ENGINEERING GOLDEN BAY CONSTR.
BID ITEM UNIT UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION MEAS. QTY. PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE
1 DEMOLITION OF CONC PAVING LS 1 300.00 300.00 6,350.00 6,350.00 2,200.00 2,200.00
2 LS I 2,000.00 2,000.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 10,081.00 10,081.00
3 LS I 8,000.00 8,000.00 5,200.00 5,200.00 7,600.00 7,600.00
4 LS I 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,100.00 2,100.00
5 LS 1 12,000.00 12,000.00 21,400.00 21,400.00 24,600.00 24,600.00
6 LS 1 4,900.00 4,900.00 9,050.00 9,050.00 7,150.00 7,150.00
7 LS 1 15,000.00 15,000.00 31,320.00 31,320.00 33,449.00 33,449.00
8 LS 1 14,250.00 14,250.00 17,150.00 17,150.00 17,233.00 17,233.00
9 LS 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,300.00 1,300.00 2,807.00 2,807.00
10 LS 1 950.00 950.00 3,800.00 3,800.00 1,800.00 1,800.00
11
12
EXCAVATION & DISPOSAL
CONC PUMP VAULT & ~4DDER
SIDEWALK DOOR
CONCRETE FOUNTAIN
STONEWORK
FOUNTAIN MECHANICAL
FOUNTAIN ELECTRICAL
WATERPROOFING
CONCRETE PAVING
INCID IMPVMTS: INSTALL
TRENCH DRAIN; STAIR RAIL;
GLOBE SUPPORT
REPAIRS TO EXIS IMPVMTS
TOTAL:
LS 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,020.00 2,020.00 4,250.00 4,250.00
LS 1 800.00 800.00 5,700.00 5,700.00 500.00 500.00
61,700.00
111,290.00
113,770.00