Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.2 Award of Bid 92-01 CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT City Council Meeting Date: February 24, 1992 92-01 SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District - Approval of Engineer's Report and Award of Construction Bid EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) 2) 3) 5) 6) 7) 8) Resolution Overruling Protests Amended Engineer's Report Resolution Approving Amended Engineer's Report and Assessment and Ordering Improvement Resolution Authorizing Change Orders Resolution Awarding Contract Construction Contract Spreadsheet of Bid Results Mr. Robert Brunsell, the District's Bond Counsel, and Mr. John Heindel, the Assessment District Engineer, will be available at the meeting to answer technical questions. RECOMMENDATION: 5) 6) 7) 8) Open public hearing Receive Staff presentation and public comment Question Staff and the public Close public hearing and deliberate Adopt Resolution Overruling Protests Adopt Resolution Approving Amended Engineer's Report and Assessment and Ordering Improvement Adopt Resolution Authorizing Change Orders Adopt Resolution Awarding Contract FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The assessment district will allow properties that will benefit from the improvements to be assessed a portion of the costs based on the benefit to those parcels. Miscellaneous costs such as legal, engineering, and bond discounts will be included in the assessments. The costs that are not directly benefiting properties in the District will be contributed by the City of Dublin through a loan from BART, with the expectation that these costs will be recovered through offsite fees and/or future assessment districts which include properties that benefit from the improvements. There are monies budgeted in the present Capital Improvement Program to pay for the City's contribution to the District. Expenses By Fund Estimates at the 1/21/92 Budgeted Funds Engr's Reoort (Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction) Estimates for this Engineer's Reoort Assessment District Gas Tax (SB140) Future District $1,534,400 $2,920,000 $2,350,000 223,655 343,658 358,264 2,584,345 2.785.827 2,503,562 $4~342,400 6,049,485 5,211,826 John Moore;--Michael Nohr; Kanaris Vangelatos, et.al.; Michael Nave; Les McDonald Construction The notable differences between the estimates of January 21st and this report are that the construction bid was approximately 35% below the Engineer's Estimate, and John Moore is dedicating the right-of-way on his Chabot Road parcel instead of including it in the District. The Assessment District includes John Moore's Tract 5900, the future Chevron parcel, the lower half of the Nohr parcel, and the old "U-Haul" parcel now owned by John Moore's Dublin Commercial II partnership. There will also be three small remainder parcels that Dublin will be able to resell to offset its right-of-way costs. The Assessment District spread, based on this Engineer's Report, is proposed to be as follows: 1) B.J. Dublin Commercial (Moore's Tract 5900) $1,898,672 2) Vangelatos, et. al. (Chevron parcels) 236~549 3) Nohr (Curtiss Dodge) 144,990 4) Dublin Commercial II (Old U-Haul parcel on Chabot Road) 69,789 5) City of Dublin Contribution 2,861,826 $5,211,826 DESCRIPTION: On December 23, 1991, the City Council accepted petitions and took other actions to begin the formation of an assessment district to partially finance the Dublin Boulevard Extension. This project will extend Dublin Boulevard from Dougherty Road easterly to the Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way, as well as provide widening on the east side of Dougherty Road and connect the existing cul-de- sac along the west side of the Chabot Channel to the new Dublin Boulevard Extension. On January 13, 1992, the City Council authorized Staff to solicit bids for the construction of the Dublin Boulevard Extension. This project will construct the easterly extension of Dublin Boulevard from Dougherty Road to the Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way. On January 21, 1992, the City Council accepted and filed the Engineer's Report and the Notice of Improvement and directed the City Clerk to publish and mail the Notice of Improvement to all property owners within the proposed Assessment District. A public hearing for the purpose of hearing protests to the proposed Assessment District was set for February 24, 1992. On February 13, 1992, bids were opened for construction of the project. The low bidder, Les McDonald Construction, submitted a bid in the amount of $1,084,925.60. A detailed summary of the 10 bids received is attached as Exhibit 7. Les McDonald has worked in the City of Dublin on previous Capital Improvement Projects and has met the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise goals for this project. Staff recommends that the construction bid be awarded to Les McDonald Construction Co. The proposed method of assessment s~read is to levy the cost of land and improvements to each parcel that would have been required for development of that parcel: Tract 4978 (Moore tract) will be assessed for the cost of the land and improvements within that Tract, as were required under Tentative Map 5900. The Moore parcel adjacent to the Chabot Channel will be assessed for the cost of improvements necessary to connect the existing cul-de-sac to Dublin Boulevard extended. The property owners have committed to dedicating the necessary right-of-way, and they will therefore not be assessed for the land. The Chevron parcel will be assessed for the cost of the land and improvements required under its approved use permit. Page 2 The remaining Nohr parcel south of the new roadway will be assessed for the cost of the land and improvements for one half of a 40-foot curb to curb street on a 60-foot right-of-way. In addition, the parcels to be assessed will be assessed their proportionate assessment district incidental costs such as engineering, inspection, legal, and bond costs. The City of Dublin will contribute the remaining unfunded project costs. The Engineer's Report includes the following documents: 1) A certification that John Heindel has prepared the report and a description of the improvements. 2) Plans and specifications for the construction work. 3) An estimate of the cost of improvements. 4) An assessment roll indicating the amounts to be assessed against each parcel. 5) A statement of the method of assessment. 6) A list of names and addresses of the owners of the real property within the District. 7) A diagram showing all parcels within the District. 8) A description of the rights-of-way to be acquired. This is the time and place for property owners within the District to protest their inclusion in the District or the method of assessment spread. If the protests are overruled and the District goes forward, the participants in the District will have thirty days in which to pay their assessments or dedicate their right-of-way. If the property owners choose to do this, their assessments would be reduced accordingly and they would save the cost of issuing and financing assessment bonds. Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, deliberate, and take the actions outlined in the "Recommendation" section of this agenda statement. Mr. Robert Brunsell, the City's Bond Counsel, and Mr. John Heindel, the Engineer of Work for the District, will be available at the meeting to answer questions. a:(dbx)\ad\agsCawrd Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OVERRULING PROTESTS DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 The city Council of the city of Dublin resolves: On February 24, 1992, the city Council opened a public hearing on the resolution of intention and the engineer's report on the proposed improvement in Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District 91-1. At or before the time set for hearing, certain interested persons made protests or objections to the proposed improvement, the extent of the assessment district or the proposed assessment. The city Council hereby overrules each of these protests, written or oral. The city Council finds that the protest against the proposed improvement (including all written protests not withdrawn in writing before the conclusion of the protest hearing) is made by the owners o~ less than one-half of the area of the land to be assessed for the improvement. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 24th day of February, 1992, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MAYOR ATTEST: city Clerk __ AMENDED ENGINEER'S REPORT DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 CITY OF DUBLIN The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed amended report as directed by the City council. DATED: February 24, 1992 JOHN HEINDEL, Engineerof Work I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Amended Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the 24th day of February, 1992. KAY KECK, City Clerk, City of Dublin, Alameda County, California By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Amended Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the city Council of the City of Dublin, Alameda County,~California, on the day of , 1992. KAY KECK, city clerk, City of Dublin, Alameda County, California By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the e~¢losed Amended Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was recorded in my office on the _. day of ...... , 1992. LEE THOMPSON, City Engineer, City'of Dublin, Alameda County, California AMENDED ENGINEER'S REPORT DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 JOHN H. HEINDEL, Engineer of Work for Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District 91-1, makes this amended report, as directed by the City Council of the City of Dublin, pursuant to Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code (Municipal Improvement Act of 1913). The improvements which are the subject of this amended report are briefly described as follows: Ail those proposed public improvements within Tract 4978 and the proposed Tract 5900. These include curbs, gutters, sidewalk, pavement, street monuments, drainage, street lights, street trees, signs, striping, irrigation, and related miscellaneous improvements on Dougherty Road and Dublin Boulevard extended. The construction of the westerly one-half cf the road which is to be on either side of the Chabot Channel. The limits of these improvements are from the end of the existing cul-de- sac north to the improvements of Dublin Boulevard extended, the reconfiguration of the cul-de-sac bulb to a through street, and changing Of the driveway entrance at Scarlett court to street curb returns. The construction of the Extension of Dublin Boulevard from Dougherty Road to Tract 4978, together with the necessary right-cf-way to construct these public improvements. The five-foot widening on the east side of Dougherty Road from Dublin Boulevard extended north to Tract 4978. The acquisition of right-of-way for the above improvements in Items 1 and 2. The miscellaneous costs involved in the engineering, legal process, and financing. Bonds representing unpaid assessments, and bearing interest at a rate not to exceed twelve percent (12%) per annum, shall be issued in the manner provided by the Improvement Bond Act Of 1915 (Division 10, Streets and HighwaYs Code), and the last installment of the bonds shall mature not to exceed twenty-four (24) years from the second day of September nex~ succeeding twelve (12) months from their date. This EXHIBIT A: EXHIBIT B: EXHIBIT C: EXHIBIT D: EXHIBIT E: EXHIBIT F: amended report includes the following attached exhibits: Plans and specifications for improvements to be constructed. Plans and specifications are a part of this amended report whether or not separately bound. An estimate of the cost of the improvements. An assessment roll, showing the amount proposed to be specially assessed against each parcel of real property within this assessment district. Each parcel is described by County ASSeSsor's parcel number or other designation, and each parcel is also assigned a separate "assessment number" for the purposes of this proceeding. A statement of the method by which the undersigned determined the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel, based on benefits to be derived by each parcel, respectively, from the improvements. A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this assessment district, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll for taxes, or as known to the Clerk. The list is keyed to Exhibit~c by assessment number. A diagram Showing all of the parcels of real property within this assessment district. The diagram is keyed to Exhibit C by assessment number. Respectfully submitted, JOHN H. HEINDEL, Engineer of Work EXHIBIT A PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS, THOUGH SEPARATELY BOUND, ARE A PART OF THIS REPORT. EXHIBIT B DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 CITY OF DUBLIN ESTIMATE OF COSTS Bid Schedule A Bid Schedule B Contingencies City Contribution Subtotal Construction City Contribution Subtotal Right of Way Incidental Expenses *Engineering Design *Construction Engineering *Soils Engineering *Plan Checking & Inspection *Contract Administration *Right of Way Engineering Reserve Fund (5%) Bond Discount (2%) Bond Counsel Assessment Engineering Bond Printing Paying Agent/Registrar Legal Publications, Auditor's Record, Recordings & Mailings Capitalized Interest Miscellaneous *city Contribution Subtotal Incidentals $ 586~605.00 $1,084,926.00 ~0~,493.00 $1t193~419.00 (414.939.00% $3,322,113.00 (2,326,450.0Q) 171,822.00 36,200.00 16,800.00 83,539.00 23~868.00 7~032.00 117,500.00 47~000.00 23~500.00 15,000.00 5,000.00 25,000.00 2,500.00 117,500.00 4,033.00 $ 696,294.00 Balance to Assessment $ 778,480.00 $ 995,663.00 ~7~.857.00 $2,350,000.00 EXHIBIT C ASSESSMENT ROLL 02/20/92 Page 1 CITY OF DUBLIN Dublin Blvd. Extension Assessment District 91-1 Assessment Assessment Parcel Number Amount Description 1 2 3 4 5 $ 448,270.00 334,708.00 340,685.00 264,977.00 195,247.00 941-0550-036-00 941-0550-040-00 941-0550-041-00 941-0550-042-00 941-0550-043-00 6 7 8 9 10 314,785.00 135,171.00 101,378.00 0.00 144,990.00 941-0550-044-00 941-0550-009-15 941-0550-010-13 941-0550-OlO-11(ptn) 941-05§O-012-07(ptn) 11 12 13 TOTAL: 69,789.00 0.00 0.00 2,350,000.00 941-0550-039-00 941-0550-010-11(ptn) 941-0550-012-07(ptn) EXHIBIT D DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 CITY OF DUBLIN ~ETHOD OF ASSESSMENT The amounts to be assessed against the parcels of property to pay the cost and expenses of the work and improvements are based upon the benefits to be derived by the properties within the assessment district. The total assessment to be levied against any parcel of land in the district shall be the sum of the amounts determined by the following formulas: Parcels owned or to be acquired by public agencies shall not be assessed. construction costs to be assessed against each parcel shall be equal to the estimated cost of the public improvements that have been or would be required by the city of Dublin as a condition of development of said parcels. In the case of a group of parcels that will be treated as a single development, the assessment computed for that development shall be spread to each parcel in proportion to parcel area. All construction costs in excess of those described above shall be contributed to the assessment district by the City of Dublin. Right of way acquisition costs to be assessed against each parCel shall be equal to the estimated value of rights of way that have been or would be required by the City of Dublin to be dedicated as a condition of development of said parcels. In the case of a group of parcels that will be treated as a single development, the assessment computed for that development shall be spread to each parcel in proportion to parcel area. All right of way acquisition costs in excess of those described above shall be contributed to the assessment district by the city of Dublin. Incidental expenses related to construction shall be spread to each parcel in the assessment district, and to the City of Dublin, in proportion to the total amounts assessed to said parcels and contributed by the City of Dublin, under 2 above. Incidental expenses related to the acquisition of right of way from parcels being assessed shall be spread to each parcel in the assessment district in proportion to the total amounts assessed to said parcels under 3 above. All right of wayincidental expenses in excess of those described above shall be contributed to the assessment district by the City of Dublin. Incidental expenses related to the assessment district proceedings shall be spread to each parcel in the assessment district in proportion to the total amounts assessed to said parcels for all other items. Dublin Blvd. ASSESSMENT NUMBER(S) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 EXHIBIT E PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST CITY OF DUBLIN Extension Assessment District 91-1 NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER B.J. Dublin Commercial c/o Patrick Land Co. 7901 Stoneridge Drive #403 Pleassnton CA 94566 B.J. Dublin Commercial c/o Patrick Land Co. 7901 Stoneridge Drive $403 Plsasanton CA 94566 B.J. Dublin Commercial c/o Patrick Land Co. 7901 Stoneridge Drive $403 Pleasanton CA 94566 B.J. Dublin Commercial c/o Patrick Land Co, 7901 Stoneridge Drive $403 Pleasanton CA 94566 B.J. Dublin Commercial c/o Patrick Land Co. 790'1 Stonsridge Drive $403 Pleasanton CA 94566 B.J. Dublin Commercial c/o Patrick Land Co. 7901 Stoneridge Drive $403 Pleasanton CA 94566 Kanaris & Maria Vangelatos, .Et A1 590 E. Willow Street Long Beach CA 90806 Kanaris & Maria Vangelatos, Et A1 590 E, Willow Street Long Beach CA 90806 John S. & Shirley P. Corallo, Trs. 8155 Brittany Dublin CA 94568 D.M. Nohr 800 East Airway Boulevard Livsrmore CA 94550 Dublin Commercial II c/o Patrick Land Co. 7901 Stoneridge Drive $403 Dublin CA 94566 Page Dublin Blvd. ASSESSMENT NUMBER(S) 12 13 *** END OF LIST *** EXHIBIT E PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST CITY OF DUBLIN Extension Assessment District 91-1 NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER John S. & Shirley P. Corallo, 8155 Brittany Dublin CA 94568 D.M. Nohr 800 East Airway Boulevard Livsrmors CA 94550 Page 2 Trs. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 CITY OF DUBLIN~ ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA XVI L,$EY & 1 lA'x, 1 JAN. lgg2 LOT 1 5' STRIP FOR DOUGHERT¥ ROAD WIDENING THAT REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A PORTION OF LOT 1 OF TRACT 4978 RECORDED JULY 5, 1984 IN BOOK 145 OF MAPS AT PAGES 3 THROUGH 5 IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 OF TRACT 4978 RECORDED JULY 5, 1984 IN BOOK 145 OF MAPS AT PAGES 3 THROUGH 5 IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, SAID CORNER BEING ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 745.07 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING TO THE RADIUS OF NORTH 76° 09' 46" EAST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14° 02' 43" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 182.64 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26° 51' 45" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 23.44 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01° 13' 02" WEST 21.14 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING TO THE RADIUS OF SOUTH 87° 55' 52" EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01° 51' 33" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1.46 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE HAVING A RADIAL BEARING TO THE RADIUS OF SOUTH 89° 47' 31" EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 740.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14° 08' 58" AN ARC LENGTH OF 182.76 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1 TRACT 4978; THENCE NORTH 88° 46' 58" WEST, ALONG TI~E SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1 TRACT 4978, 5.18 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 0.0228 ACRES MORE OR LESS. ~~U~~ EXPIRATION DATE 9/30/92 LoT I LOT 2 TRACT 4978 DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION THAT REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A PORTION OF LOT 2 OF TRACT 4978 RECORDED JULY 5, 1984 IN BOOK 145 MAPS AT PAGES 3 THROUGH 5 IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 OF THE AFOREMENTIONED TRACT 4978, THENCE SOUTH 88°46'58" EAST (SOUTH 88°46'58" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF TRACT 4978 BEING USED AS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS DESCRIPTION) ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 289.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER COMMON TO LOTS 1 & 2 PER TRACT 4978; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 88°46'58" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2, 248.19 FEET TO THE AC'rtu%L POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE TO RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1055.00 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING TO THE RADIUS OF SOUTH 21°01'29" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3~00'38" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 55.43 FEET TO THE LINE COMMON TO LOTS 2 AND 3 OF TRACT 4978; THENCE SOUTH 01°17'02" WEST ALONG SAID COMMON LINE TO LOTS 2 AND 3, 19.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 2 OF TRACT 4978; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2 NORTH 88046'58" WEST, 51.81 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING. ~ SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 0.0120 ACRES MORE OR LESS DONALD HO~-BS, LS 4807 EXPIRATION DATE 9/30/92 PLAT TO ACCOMPANY DE.SCRIFi'ION LOT. 2 T'Y,..,~.'T _.O~UTHE'AST£FII.y tc~:)RTION OF' LOT ~,TK.e~' ~q-/~ TO M DEDICATED TO 'THE CITY O~' SC~: JOB lqUMB~R: / " = ...~0 ' D&'r~: DEW. NO. ~94 Bishop Drive, Suite al0 ~ ~1) PL~m~e StanCES (5~0) ~75-9770 - ~"-~_-~ '. i ~ LOT 3 TRACT 4978 DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION THAT REAL PROPERT~ SITUATED IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A PORTION OF LOT 3 OF TRACT 4978 RECORDED JULY 5, 1984 IN BOOK 145 OF MAPS AT PAGES 3 THROUGH 5 IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 OF THE AFOREMENTIONED TRACT 4978; SAID POINT BEING ON THE EASTERLy RIGHT OF WAY OF DOUGHERTY ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 88°46'58" EAST (SOUTH 88°46'58" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT 4978 WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS DESCRIPTION) ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT 4978, A DISTANCE OF 589.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLy CORNER COMMON TO LOTS 2 AND 3 OF TRACT 4978 AND THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE NORTH 01'17'02" EAST ALONG THE LINE COMMON TO LOTS 2 AND 3, 19.63 FEET TO A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1055.00 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING TO THE RADIUS OF SOUTH 18°00'51'' EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°39'16" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 306.66 FEET TO THE LINE COMMON TO LOTS 3 AND 4; THENCE ALONG SAID COMMON LINE, SOUTH 01017'02'' WEST 77.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 3 NORTH 88o46'58" WEST 300.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 0.3863 ACRES MORE OR LESS ,~%~ LER~ , N- 4807) ONALD HOBBY, LS 4807 EXPIRATION DATE 9/30/92 PLAT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION LOT ~ TK.,~.~,'T "fl"al'"/~ ~H~'RLY PoRT~oN OF LOT 3TKAC,.T4.qT&_ TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITy o!: DU~LIN. SCAL~: JOB 1"=.5'o' /~-o£-o7' DAT~: DK'W. NO. ,~/~/w LOT 4 TRACT 4978 DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION THAT REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A PORTION OF LOT 4 OF TRACT 4978 RECORDED JULY 5, 1984 IN BOOK 145 OF MAPS AT PAGES 3 THROUGH 5 IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 OF THE AFOREMENTIONED TRACT 4978, SAID POINT BEING ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF DOUGHERTY ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 88°46'58" EAST (SOUTH 88°46'58" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT 4978 WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS DESCRIPTION) ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT 4978, 889.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER COMMON TO LOTS 3 AND 4 OF TRACT 4978 AND THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE LINE COMMON TO LOTS 3 AND 4, NORTH 01017'02'' EAST 77.43 FEET TO A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 550.00 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING TO THE RADIUS POINT OF SOUTH 1°21'34'' EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLy ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°34' 36" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 47.44 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88046'58'' EAST AND PARAT.T.EL TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 4, 252.48 FEET TO THE LINE COMMON TO LOTS 4 AND 5; THENCE ALONG SAID COMMON LINE SOUTH 01'13'02" WEST 78.50 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 4; THENCE NORTH 88046'58'' WEST 300.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE ACTIIAL POINT OF BEGINNING SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 0.5402 ACRES MORE OR LESS N-o 4807 DONALD HOBBS, LS 4807 EXPIRATION DATE 9/30/92 PLAT TO ACCOHPAIdY De. SCRIPTION LOT 4. "T'W,,,~-T "'t'"r'7E:, I-,, 4.7.44. I PROPOSED DUBLIN 0.54.02 A~. *- BLVD. J UAL POINT OF BEGINNING ~OO. OO .~UTI-IERL~ .PoRTIOn/ OF LOT 4-'t't~k(,.~'4cl"/~. TO ~ D~DICA~cD 'TO THE CITy oF DUB. LIN. W ILSEY &HAM SCALE: JOB NI,TMBER: DATF,: DEW. NO.- /~.,~/?/ 2894 Btmhop Drive, Suite 210 San Bemon, CaUfox,nia 9458~ LOT 5 TRACT 4978 DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION THAT REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A PORTION OF LOT 5 OF TRACT 4978 RECORDED JULY 5, 1984 IN BOOK 145 OF MAPS AT PAGES 3 THROUGH 5 IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 OF THE AFOREMENTIONED TRACT 4978; THENCE SOUTH 88°46'58" EAST (SOUTH 88o46'58.. EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT 4978 WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS DESCRIPTION) ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT 4978, 1189.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER COMMON TO LOTS 4 ARD 5 OF TRACT 4978 AND THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE LINE COMMON TO LOTS 4 AND 5, NORTH 01013'02'' EAST 78.50; THENCE LEAVING SAID COMMON LINE TO LOTS 4 AND 5 ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT 4978 SOUTH 88o46'58'' EAST 448.48 FEET; TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF TRACT 4978; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRACT 4978, SOUTH 46028'47'' EAST, 116.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 5 TRACT 4978; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 5 NORTH 88°46'58" WEST 534.74 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 0.8859 ACRES MORE OR LESS ~/~%~~ No 4807 DONALD HOBBS~ LS 4807 EXPIRATION DATE 9/30/92 LOT 5 TRACT 4978 CHABOT ROAD THAT REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A PORTION OF LOT 5 OF TRACT 4978 RECORDED JULY 5, 1984 IN BOOK 145 OF MAPS AT PAGES 3 THROUGH 5 IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 4978; THENCE NORTH 88°46'58" WEST PARALLEL TO THE 144.82 FEET TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 OF THE AFOREMENTIONED TRACT 4978; THENCE SOUTH 88°46'58" EAST (SOUTH 88°46'58'' EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT 4978 WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS DESCRIPTION) ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT 4978; 1189.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOTS 4 AND 5; THENCE NORTH 01013'02" EAST ALONG THE LINE COMMON TO LOT 4 AND 5, 78.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88046'58'' EAST AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT 4978, 303.66 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF DUBLIN BOULEVA/~D EXTENSION AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF CHABOT ROADAND THE ACTUALPOINTOF BEGII~NING; THENCE NORTH 46013'02'' EAST 45.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01013'02.' EAST 70.67 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF TRACT 4978; THENCE SOUTH 46028'47'' EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 5 TRACT 4978, 152.54 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION, SAID POINT BEING 78.50 FEET MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLE FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT SOUTHERLY LINE 4807 DONALD HOBBS, LS 4807 EXPIEATION D~TE 9/30/92 SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 0.1447 ACRES MORE OR LESS ACCESS & PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT EFFECTING PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 3000 AN ACCESS & PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT OVER THAT REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 3000 RECORDED NOVEMBER 3, 1981 IN BOOK 131 OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGES 22- 23 IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGI~G AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 3000; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3 NORTH 88° 46' 58" WEST (NORTH 88° 46' 58" WEST AS SHOWN ON TRACT 4978 RECORDED JULY 5, 1984 IN BOOK 145 OF MAPS AT PAGES 3 THROUGH 5 IN ALAMEDA COUNTY WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS OF THIS DESCRIPTION) 42.76 FEET; T'ITENCE SOUTH 14° 38' 36" EAST 36.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01° 18' 32" WEST AND PARALLEL TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3, 198.76 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE ACCESS & PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 3000; THENCE SOUTH 88° 41' 28" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID ACCESS & PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 32.76 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 3000; THENCE NORTH 01° 18' 32" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3, 233.81 FEET TO '£~U~ POINT OF BEG~FING. SAID EASEMENT CONTAINS 0.1798 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 48O7/ DONALD HOBBS, LS 4807 EXPIRATION DATE 9~30/92 ?L..AT TO ,~,,.¢01.-4' [::::'AMY o % l.., OT l~ WILSEY&HAM ,..,~::. ~.,,,o~. SCALE: JOB NUMBER: ,563 DATE: DRW. NO. ~./~ ~/~ 2~94 Bishop Drive, Suite ENGIN~ZRING. AND PLANNING SERVICES (510) 275-9770 SCAL~.:.~ lOB NUM~Im: 210 DATE: D~. NO. ~-~-~ WILSEY&HAM-'-.'-, '"-,. B~q*gEmlqG Am) l,l,ih'mNG -q'n~'ICn' (~10) PLA T FOR DEDICATION DUBLIN AL~Mb'DA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 3L4RCI~' f$9! SCALE 'i"=40' JdY CALIFORNL4 LAN'D SURVEYING P.O. BOX PLEASANT HILL, CA. 9452~' LOT I TRACT 4~78 139.40 ~7ff2.7, S~' ~: :26,746 SO.. FT. 0.844 AC. 4334 O.R. 266 PARCEL TWO p.=224,02' CA-~L< .10' 2g' L=3~.96' R=50, O0' C.4=$~6' 02' L=76.OY' 224.58' 80.00' PARCEL D P),£ ! 04.9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR DEDICATION ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPER'fY SITUATE IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL ONE A PORTION OF pARCEL B AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 1043 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1973 IN BOOK 80 OF pARCEL MAPS AT PAGE 29, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECOKDS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOEI.OWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASIERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL B ALSO BEING ON TIlE NORTIIERLY LINE OF SCARLE~l- COURT AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP 1043; THENCE ALONG SAiD NORTHERLY LINE O1: SCARLE-ZI' COURT WESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT FROM A RADIAL BEARING SOUTH 3° 04' i4' WEST WITH A i~,~DIUS OF 128.01 FEET THROUGH A CENTR-~L ANGLE OF 29a 59' 05' AN ARC LENGTH OF 66,99 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LiNE OF SCARLETT COURT ALONG A TANGENT REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT FROM A RADIAL tM~ARING NORTH 26°54' 5I' WEST WITH A RADIUS OF 34.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27° 14' 36' AN ARC LENGTH OF 16.1V FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL B; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF PARCEL NORTH 1°219' 02' EAST 25.35 FEET; THENCE ALONG A NON-TANGENT CUKYE '10 'rliE LEFT FROM A RADIAL BEARING NORTH ICP 28' Off' WEST WITH ,\ RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22° 25' 00" AN ARC LENGTH OF 1956 FEE'I; THENCE NORTH 57" 12' 00" EAST 5'4.90 PEEr TO THE EAST LINT OF SAID PARCEL B; THENCE ALONG SAiD I/AST LiNE OF SAID PARCEL B SOUTH ia 13' 02' WEST 55.?5 FEET TO THE POINI OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 2896 SQ. FT, OR 0,0665 ACRE MORE OR LESS. PARCEL TWO A PORTION OF THE pROPERTY DESCRIBED AS PARCEL TWO IN THE DEED TO KANARIS VANGELATOS, bIARIA YANGELATOS AND NIKOLAOS S'IANI'[SAS RECORDED APRIL 20, 1976 IN REEL 4334 AT IMAGE 265 & 266 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL B ALSO BEING ON THE NORTtLERLYLINE OF SCARI.ETI COUNt ASSHOWN ON SAiD PARCEL MAP 10-'3;THENCE ALONG SAiD NORTHERLY LINE OF SCARLETT COURT WESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT FROM A RADIAL BEARING SOUTH 3a 04' 14" WEST g/ITH A RADIUS OF 128.01 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29° 59' 05" AN ARC LENGTH OF 66.99 FEET; THENCE CONTINULNG ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SCARLETT COUNI' ALONG A TANGENT REVERSE CURVE TO 'tHE RIGHT FROM A RADIAL BEARING NORTH 26° 54' 51" WEST WITH A RADIUS OF 34,00 FEET 'I'klROUGH ,\ CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27"' 14' 36" AN ARC LENGTH O1-' 16.17 PEET 'I'0 THE ',','EST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 13 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CON'IINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LIN~ OF SCARLETT COURT AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF DOUGHERTY ROAD ALONG LAST MENTIONED 34.00 FOOl R. ADIUS CURVE FROM A RADIAL BEARING NORTH 0° 19' 45' EAST THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41t' 46' 24" AN ARC LENGTH OF 24.?9 PEET; THENCE CONIINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF DOUGHERTY ROAD ALONG A TANGEN'I' COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT FROM A RADIAL BEARING NORTIf 4~06' 09' EAST WITH A RADIUS OF 229.02 FELT 'I'IiROUG!i A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 190 18' 49" AN ARC LENG IH O1:77.20 i-'BET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE OFDOUGHERTY ROAD ALONG A TANGEN'I COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT FROM A RADIAL BEARING NORTH 61' 24' 55" EAST W1TH A RADIUS OF 745.07 ?'EET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF la"' 44' 51" AN ARC LENGTH OF 19I.~8 FEET TO 'I'ttE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP 4978 RECORDED JUNE 5, 1984 IN BOOK 145 OF MAPS AT PAGES S THROUGH 5, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS; IHENCL ALONG SAiD SOUTItERLY LINE OF LOT I SOUTH 8~046' 53" EAST 5.I~ FEET; THENCE ALONG A LINE ~.00 PEET EASTERLY .AND CONCENTRIC ~,t, ITH THE EAST=RL"/ LINE O DOUGHERTY ROAD ALONG A NON-TANGENT CURVE TOTiiE LEFT FROM A R.~.DLAL BE;AgING NONIH 76° 03' 34" EAST WITH A RADIUS OF 740.07 FEET THROUGH A CENTR-\L ANGLE OF 14° 38' 35" AN ARC LENGTH OF 189.14 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CONCENTRIC LINE ALONG A TANGENT COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT FROM A RADIAI. BEARING NORTH 61° 25' 01' EAST W1Tit A RADIUS OF 224.02 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE 8° 10' 28" AN ARC LENGTH OF 31.96 FEET; THENCE LEAVhN'G SAID CONCENTRIC LINE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT FROM A RADIAL BEARING NORTH 53~ 14' 30' EAST WITH A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 63° 3T 30" AN ARC LENGTH OF 55.52 FEE'[- TO SAID WES'rERL't LINE OF pARCEL E (PM 1043); THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 1° 13' 02" WEST 25.58 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 1944 SQ. FT. OR 0.0446 ACRE bIORE OR LESS PARCEL A- 1, LANDS OF COR.AT,T,O REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, A PORTION OF THE LANDS OF CORALLO AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 19, 1990 UNDER SERIES NUMBER 90-260125 IN TBE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 OF TRACT 4978, RECORDED IN BOOK 145 OF MAPS AT PAGE 3 IN THE RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE S. 88° 46' 45" E. ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 229.72 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LANDS OF COIR. ALLO AND THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE THROUGH THE FOLLOWING NUMBERED COURSES: 1) S. 88° 46' 45" E., CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT, 131.31 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS OF CORALLO 2) S. O1° 12' 28" W., ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 81.69 FEET TO A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 1067.00 FEET 3) FROM A TANGENT THAT BEARS S. 58° 12' 56" W. ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01° 01' 10" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 18.98 FEET 4) S. 57° 11' 46" W. 139.31 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS OF CORALLO 5) N. 01° 12' 28" E., ALONG SAID LINE, 170.13 FEET TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING THIS PARCEL CONTAINS 0.3793 ACRES MORE OR LESS. DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY: EXP 9/30/92 ~ No. 4~318 T~ -(~T "!ig 7ct LO ~I~ETZlt~L t2011¢T' OF t~GINN//YG ?.~£CEL A-/ ~n/Surv. I ~,. ~ ~;~proved: WILSEY & HAM 355 LAKESIDE DRIVE, SUITE 200. FOSTER CITY, CA. 94404 (415) 349-2151 PARCEL A- I LA/VD$ oF CORALLO T 2 DWG. HO. ~ 1~4,-01-0~_ SCAL£: /''= ,,~-.-0' o^'r[: 7/_5'/9/ PARCEL A-2, LANDS OF CORAT.LO REAL PROPERTY IN TBE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, A PORTION OF TEE LANDS OF CORALLO AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 19, 1990 UNDER SERIES NUMBER 90-260125 IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT TEE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 OF TRACT 4978, RECORDED IN BOOK 145 OF MAPS AT PAGE 3 IN THE RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE S. 88° 46' 45" E. A.LONG THE SOUTHElq.LY LINE OF SAID TRACT 361.03 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS OF CORALLO; TBENCE S. 01° 12' 28" W. ALONG SAID LINE 81.69 FEET TO TBE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE THROUGH TBE FOLLOWING NUMBERED COURSES: 1) S. 01° 12' 28" W., CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE, 151.80 FEET 2) S. 57° 11' 46" W. 1.46 FEET TO A CURVE TO TEE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET 3) SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TBROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° TO TBE NORTHERLY LINE OF SCARLETT COURT AS DESCRIBED IN TBE DEED TO TBE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECORDED IN REEL 1327 AT IMAGE 66 IN THE RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY 4) N. 32° 48' 14" W. 26.06 FEET TO A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITB A RADIUS OF 128.01 FEET 5) WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTR/%.L ANGLE OF 54° 10' 13" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 121.03 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LkNDS OF CORALLO 6) N. 01° 12' 28" E., ALONG SAID LINE, 55.68 FEET 7) N. 57° 11' 46" E. 139.31 FEET TO A CURVE TO TEE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 1067.00 FEET 8) NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01° 01' 10" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 18.98 FEET TO TBE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING THIS PARCEL CONTAINS 0.3617 ACRES MORE OR LESS. DESCRIPTION PREPANED BY: WILLIAM B. MASTERSON, LS 4818 EXP 9/30/92 No. ~818 LOT CO?N£R ZO T .~cTdAL ,Oo/,~T OF Q WILSEY & HAM 3~:$ LAKESIOE ORIVE, SUITE 200. FOSTER CITY, CA. g4404 (415) 34go2151 PARCEL ~- ~ DWG. NO SCALE I"' I PARCEL A-3, LANDS OF CORALT.O REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, A PORTION OF THE LANDS OF CORALLO AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 19, 1990 UNDER SERIES NUMBER 90-260125 IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 OF TRACT 4978, RECORDED IN BOOK 145 OF MAPS AT PAGE 3 IN THE RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE S. 88° 46' 45" E. ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 361.03 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS OF CORALLO; THENCE S. 01° 12' 28" W. ALONG SAID LINE 233.49 FEET TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE THROUGH THE FOLLOWING NUMBERED COURSES: 1) S. 57° t1' 46" W. 1.46 FEET TO A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET 2) SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° AN ARC DISTANCE OF 78.54 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SCARLETT COURT AS' DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECORD- ED IN REEL 1327 AT IMAGE 66 IN THE RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY 3) S. 32° 48' 14" E. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 26.25 FEET TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE LANDS OF CORAT.¥.O 4) N. 01° 12' 28" E., ALONG SAID LINE, 91.99 FEET TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING THIS PARCEL CONTAINS 1425 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. WILLIAM B. EXP 9/30/92 LOTI i©T ~ T?i ACT 4976 WILSEY & HAM 325 LAKESIOE ORIVE, SUITE 200. FOSTER CITY, CA. g4404 (415) 34g-21S1 /A^~D£ oF COR. ALLO OF ~CEL L~,-o -0~ |scxc£ /" PARCEL B-i, LANDS OF NOBR REAL PROPERTY IN TBE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF A/~AF~EDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, A PORTION OF THE LANDS OF NOHR AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 9, 1984 UNDER SERIES NUMBER 84-026125 IN THE OFFICIi~L RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 OF TRACT 4978, RECORDED IN BOOK 145 OF MAPS AT PAGE 3 IN TBE RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE S. 88° 46' 45" E. ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 361.03 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LANDS OF NOHR AND THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE THROUGH TBE FOL- LOWING NUMBERED COURSES: 1) S. 88° 46' 45" E., CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT, 151.19 FEET TO A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 1067.00 FEET 2) FROM A TANGENT TEAT BEARS S. 67° 27' 09" W. ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09° 14' 13" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 172.02 FEET.TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS OF NOHR 3) N. 01° 12'.28" E., ALONG SAID LINE, 81.69 FEET TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING THIS PARCEL CONTAINS 0.1327 ACRES MORE OR LESS. DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY: WILLIAM B. MASTERSON, L~ EXP 9/30/92 "~ No. 4818 TF~ACT LOT q.~ //,44//,4/C- 5OU THh/E-STE'~4 y LoT I 4976 LOT 2 l~ll:~ n/'Su r v' n. ? 1~"41 WILSEY & HAM DWG. NO 355 LAKESIDE DRIVE, SUITE 200, FOSTER CITY, CA. 94404 (415) 349-2151 ~.4 NbS o~ /FOHF~ SCALE. PARCEL B-2, LANDS OF NOHR REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, A PORTION OF THE LANDS OF NOHR AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 9, 1984 UNDER SERIES NUMBER 84-026125 IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 OF TRACT 4978, RECORDED IN BOOK 145 OF MAPS AT PAGE 3 IN THE RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE S. 88° 46' 45" E. ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 560.93 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS OF NOHR AND THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE THROUGH THE FOLLOWING NUMBERED COURSES: 1) S. 01° 12' 28" W., ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 111.84 FEET TO A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 697.42 FEET 2) FROM A TANGENT THAT BEARS S. 67° 23' 36" W. THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10° 11' 50" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 124.12 FEET 3) S. 57° 11' 46" W. 110.25 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS OF'NOHR 4) N. 01° 12' 28" E., ALONG SAID LINE, 151.80 THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 1067.00 FEET 5) FROM A TANGENT THAT BEARS N. 58° 12' 56" E. ANGLE OF 09° 14' 13" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 172.02 OF SAID TRACT 6) S. 88° 46' 45" POINT OF BEGINNING FEET TO A CURVE TO THROUGH A CENTRAL FEET TO SAID LINE E., ALONG SAID LINE, 48.71 FEET TO THE ACTUAL THIS PARCEL CONTAINS 0.6406 ACRES MORE OR LESS. DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY: WILLIAM B. MASTERSON, LS 4818l~ EXP 9/30/92 No. 4818 1 LoT 2 ]_ T?~, ACT LoT 1 Sou THk/EST~(/_ ~' TRACT i~ln/Su r v. i~prov~d: WILSEY & HAM "*55 LAKESIDE DRIVE, SUITE 200, FOSTER CITY, CA. 94404 (415) 349-2151 DWG. NO. 1~,-01o02.. SCALE PARCEL B-3, LANDS OF NOHR ILEAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, A PORTION OF THE LANDS OF NOBR AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 9, 1984 UNDER SERIES NUMBER 84-026125 IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 OF TRACT 4978, RECORDED IN BOOK 145 OF MAPS AT PAGE 3 IN THE RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE S. 88° 46' 45" E. ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 560.93 FEET TO TEE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS OF NOBR; THENCE S. 01° 12' 28" W., ALONG SAID LINE, 111.84 FEET TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE TBROUGH TEE FOLLOWING NUMBERED COURSES: 1) FROM A TANGENT THAT BEARS S. 67° 23' 36" W. ALONG A CURVE WITH A RADIUS OF 697.42 FEET TBROUG~ A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10° 11' 50" AN ARC DISTkNCE OF 124.12 FEET 3) S. 57° 11' 46" W. 110.25 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS OF NOiR 4) S. 01° 12' 28" W., ALONG SAID LINE, 91.99 FEET TO THE NORTH- ERLY LINE OF SCAP~LETT COURT AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECORDED IN REEL 1566 AT IMAGE 620 IN THE RECORDS OF SAID COIINTY 5) S. 32° 48' 14" E., ALONG SAID LINE, 357.37 FEET TO TBE EAST- ERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS OF NOiR 6) N. 01° 12' 28" E., ALONG SAID LINE, 509.83 FEET TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING THIS PARCEL CONTAINS 1.4001 ACRES MORE OR LESS. DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY: EXP 9/30/92 NO. 4~18 TRACT 4978 LOT 2 P/f £CEL B- ~ LOT $ ~J~ycTLJZL ,00//¢T OF WILSEY & HAM OWG. NO 355 LAKESIDE DRIVE. SUITE 200. FOSTER CITY, CA. 94404 (415) 349-2151 /2~o-01-0~_ PARCEL SCALE / ~,.'~ '7'151ql ~ ~D F DOLAN ~ PARCEL C-i, REAL PROPERTY IN TNE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, A PORTION OF THE LANDS OF DOLAN AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 4, 1976 IN REEL 4549 AT IMAGE 171 IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 OF TRACT 4978, RECORDED IN BOOK 145 OF MAPS AT PAGE 3 IN THE RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE S. 88° 46' 45" E. ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 560.93 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS OF DOLAN; THENCE THROUGH THE FOLLOWING NUMBERED COURSES: 1) S. 88° 46' 45" E., CONTINUING ALONG SAID TRACT LINE, 190.14 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS OF DOLAN 2) S. 01° 12' 28" W., ALONG SAID LINE, 51.04 FEET TO A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 945.00 FEET 3) FROM A TANGENT THAT BEARS S. 79° 32' 56" W. THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12° 02' 22" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 198.57 FEET 4) S. 67° 27' 05" W. 1.41 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS 5) N. 01° 12' 28" E., ALONG SAID LINE, 111.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING THIS PARCEL CONTAINS 0.3393 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 1 Approved: WILSEY & HAM LAKESIDE OFIIVE, SUITE 200, FOSTER CITY, C:A. ~14aO~ (41~) :34g-2151 ,°ARc~4 C- / £AND$ oF: DOLAAI DWG, NO. PARCEL D-i, LANDS OF ROSS, ET AL REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, A PORTION OF THE LANDS OF ROSS, ET AL DESCRIBED IN THE GRANT DEED RECORDED ON APRIL 29, 1977 IN HEEL 4835 AT IMAGE 93 IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT ALAMEDA COUNTY SURVEYOR'S MONUMENT " DOU-DUB 1975," LOCATED IN THE INTERSECTION OF DOUGHERTY ROAD AND DUBLIN BOULE- VARD AND LYING S. 32° 48' 14" E. 350.24 FEET FROM ALAMEDA COUNTY SURVEYOR'S MONUMENT "DOU'A 1976;" THENCE S. 32° 48' 14" E. 70.94 FEET, AND N. 57° 11' 46" E. 56.08 FEET TO TEE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE DEED CONVEYING THE PARCEL OF LAND TO THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA DESCRIBED IN REEL 2402 AT IMAGE 255 IN THE RECORDS OF SAID COUN- TY; THENCE S. 32° 48' 14" E. 14.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL AND THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE GENERAL SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL THROUGH THE FOLLOWING NUMBERED' COURSES: 1) FROM A TANGENT THAT BEARS N. 32° 48' 14" W. ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 164.02 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16° 27' 40" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 47.12 FEET TO A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 34.00 FEET 2) ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 87° 44' 57" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 52.08 FEET TO A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 72.01 FEET 3) ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 75° 47'.23" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 95.25 FEET THENCE T.RAVING SAID GENERAL SOUTHERLY LINE THROUGH THE FOLLOWING COURSES: 1) S. 32° 48' 14" E. 1.70 FEET TO A POINT OF CUSP WITH A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 40.00 FEET 2) ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 00' 00" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 62.83 FEET 3) S. 57° 11' 46" W. 22.01 FEET TO A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 40.00 FEET 4) ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 00' 00" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 62.83 FEET TO A POINT OF CUSP 5) N. 32° 48'14~':W. 1.70 FEET TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING 1 ¥ WILSEY & HAM 355 LAKESIDE DRIVE, SUITE 200, FOSTER CITY. CA. 94404 (415) 349-2151 DWG. NO I I;~ ~, -Ol-O2.. SCALE /"= ~O.~_._.j DATE: '7'/,.~'/~/.~ . . . T~IS PARCEL CONTAINS 0.0572 ACRES MORE OR LESS RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDED REPORT AND ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENT DUBLIN ~OULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 The city Council of the City of Dublin resolves: This City Council has taken a series of actions preliminary to ordering the improvement in Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District 91-1, City of Dublin, Alameda County, California, and now makes the following findings and orders: 1. The City Council adopted a map showing the boundaries of the land benefited by the proposed improvement. A copy of the boundary map was filed in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Alameda in the Book of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts. 2. The city Council adopted its Resolution of Intention to order the improvement described therein under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, and directed the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, as the Engineer of Work for the assessment district, to prepare the report required by Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. The improvement is generally described as follows: Ail those proposed public improvements within Tract 4978 and the proposed Tract 5900. These include curbs, gutters, sidewalk, pavement, street monuments, drainage, street lights, street trees, signs, striping, irrigation, and related miscellaneous improvements on Dougherty Road and Dublin Boulevard extended. The construction of the westerly one-half of the road which is to be on either side of the Chabot Channel. The limits of these improvements are from the end of the existing cul-de- sac north to the improvements of Dublin Boulevard extended, the reconfiguration of the cul-de-sac bulb to a through street, and changing o~ the driveway entrance at Scarlett Court to street curb returns. The construction of the Extension of Dublin Boulevard from Dougherty Road to Tract 4978, together with the necessary right-of-way to construct these public improvements. The five-foot widening on the east side of Dougherty Road from Dublin Boulevard extended north to Tract 4978. The acquisition of right-of-way for the above improvements in Items 1 and 2. The miscellaneous costs involved in the engineering, legal process, and financing. 3. The Engineer of Work filed the report as directed, and the City Council called a hearing on the report as required by Section 10301 of the Streets and Highways Code. Notice of the hearing was given by publication, by street posting and by mailing to affected property owners, all according to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. Affidavits of publication, posting and mailing were filed with the City Clerk. 4. At the time and place for which notice was given, the city Council conducted a public hearing and gave every interested person an opportunity to object to the proposed improvement, the extent of the assessment district, or the proposed assessment. Following the hearing, at the direction of the City Council the Engineer of Work filed an amended report. 5. The City Council finds that written protests against the proposed improvement have not been made by owners representing more than one-half of the area of the land to be assessed for the improvement. 6. The documents and events described in paragraphs 1 to 4, inclusive, are stated here in tabular form, with their dates and, where appropriate, their numbers. All documents are now on file with the city Clerk. Document or Event Date Number a. Resolution approving boundary map b. Boundary map filed with County Recorder c. Resolution of Intention d. Filing of Engineer's Report e. Resolution accepting Report f. Certificate of Mailing Notice of Improvement g. Affidavit of publication of Notice of Improvement h. Certificate of posting Notice of Improvement i. Public hearing conducted 12/23/91 133-91 02/19/92 Filed 12/23/91 135-91 01/21/92 Filed 01/21/92 5-92 01/23/92 Filed 01/25/92 Filed 01/24/92 Filed 02/24/92 7. The City Council approves the Amended Engineer's Report and each component part of it, including each exhibit incorporated by reference in the report. 8. The City Council finds that the Engineer of Work in the Amended Engineer's Report has fairly and properly apportioned the cost of the improvement to each parcel of land in the assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received, by each parcel, respectively, from the improvement. The City Council -- hereby confirms and levies each individual assessment as stated in the Amended Engineer's Report. 9. This City Council orders the improvement described in paragraph 2 and as detailed in the Amended Engineer's Report. 10. Bonds representing unpaid assessments, and bearing interest at a rate not to exceed twelve percent (12%) per annum, will be issued in the manner provided by the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Division 10, Streets and Highways Code), and the last installment of the bonds shall mature not to exceed twenty-four (24) years from the second day of September next succeeding twelve (12) months from their date. 11. According to Section 10603 of the Streets and Highways Code, the City designates the City Treasurer to collect and receive payment of the assessments. The property owners who elect to pay their assessments in cash before the issuance of improvement bonds will not be required to pay their pro rata share of the allowance for special reserve fund, allowance for bond discount and allowance for capitalized interest. PASSED, APPROVED, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AND ADOPTED this 24th day of February, 1992, ATTEST: MAYOR City Clerk 3 -- RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CHANGE ORDERS DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 The City Council of the city of Dublin resolves: The City Council hereby authorizes the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to issue change orders for the work in Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District 91-1, under the following conditions: To correct clerical and technical errors in the plans and specifications. To modify the design of the improvement to accord with better engineering practice or to achieve economy of construction. To adjust the design of the improvement to utility locations, soil conditions, or other conditions unknown or uncertain when plans were drawn. Cost increases in change orders issued under this authority shall not aggregate more than the amount set aside for construction contingencies in the cost estimate approved by the city Council. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 24th day of February, 1992, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: MAYOR city Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 The City Council of the City of Dublin resolves: The city of Dublin has received public bids for the construction of improvements in Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District 91-1. The Engineer of Work has reviewed the bids and now recommends award of the construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder, LES MCDONALD CONSTRUCTION, whose bid price is $1,084,925.60. The city Council therefore awards the contract to that bidder. All other bids are rejected. The city Council directs the City Clerk to publish a notice of award of contract. The city Council authorizes and directs the Director of Public Works/City Engineer and the city Clerk to sign the written contract for this construction when it is presented to them for signature, along with the surety bonds and insurance certificates required by the construction specifications. Said written contract will provide that the contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of Section 1770 of the Labor Code of the State of California, and particularly with Sections 1776 and 1777.5 thereof. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 24th day of February, 1992, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: MAYOR city Clerk AGREEMENT CITY OF DUBLIN CONTRACT NO. 92-01 DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION - TRACT 5900 THIS AGREEMENT, dated for identification as of February 24, 1992, between the CITY OF DUBLIN, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter called "CITY"), and LES MC DONALD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (hereinafter called "CONTRACTOR"). The parties hereto mutually agree to the terms and conditions set forth herein. 1.01 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. Each of the items hereinafter referred to are incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full herein. Work called for in any one Contract Document and not mentioned in another is to be performed and executed as if mentioned in all Contract Documents. The table of contents, titles, and headings contained herein and in said documents are solely to facilitate reference to various provisions of the Contract Documents and in no way affect or limit the interpretations of the provisions to which they refer. The Contract Documents, sometimes also referred to as "the Contract," consists of the Notice to Contractors, the completed Proposal Form submitted by the Contractor to whom the Contract is awarded, the Instructions to Bidders insofar as they relate to events which will occur or actions to be taken after the submission of the Proposal, this Agreement, the Standard Specifications, the Special Provisions, Plans, Drawings, Detail Book, and Technical Specifica-tions, the Standard Drawings, Details, and other such data and all versions thereof prepared by City pursuant to Contract, and any modifications of any of the foregoing in the form of Addenda or executed Change Order or otherwise effected in accordance with the terms of the Contract, the surety bonds, bid bond, and Contractor's list of subcontractors. 1.02 DEFINITIONS. Unless otherwise specifically provided herein, all words and phrases defined in the Standard Specifications shall have the same meaning and intent in this Agreement. 1.03 AGREEMENT CONTROLS. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions as set forth in this Agreement and the terms and conditions set forth in other Contract Documents, the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement shall prevail. A - 1 1.04 SCOPE OF CONTRACT. Contractor agrees to furnish all tools, equipment, apparatus, facilities, labor, and material and transportation necessary to perform and complete in a good and workmanlike manner to the satis-faction of the City, all the work called for, and in the manner designated in, and in strict conformity with the Contract Documents for the project entitled: 1.05 CONTRACT AMOUNT AND PAYMENTS. City agrees to pay, and Contractor agrees to accept, in full payment for the above work, the sum of ONE MILLION EIGHTY-FOUR THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS AND SIXTY CENTS ($1,084,925.60), which sum is to be paid according to the schedule and in the manner set forth herein and subject to additions, deductions, and withholding as provided in the Contract Documents. When it is provided in the Notice to Bidders, Instructions to Bidders, or Proposal Form that Contractor is to be paid on the basis of the unit prices shown in his bid, instead of a lump sum price, the Contractor agrees to accept, in full payment for the above work, the sum computed in accordance with the actual amount of each item of work performed or material furnished, at the unit price which Contractor bid for each such item in his Proposal Form, said unit price to be determined as provided in the Standard Specifications and Special Provisions. 1.06 PROGRESS AND FINAL PAYMENTS. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Contract Documents, City shall cause payments to be made upon demand of Contractor in the manner set forth in the Standard Specifications. 1.07 RETENTION OF SUMS CHARGED AGAINST CONTRACTOR. When, under the provisions of this Contract, City shall charge any sum of money against Contractor, City shall deduct and retain the amount of such charge from the amount of the next succeeding progress estimate, or from any other moneys due or that may become due Con-tractor from City. If, on completion or termination of the Contract, sums due Contractor are insufficient to pay City's charges against him, City shall have the right to recover the balance from Contractor or his sureties. 1.08 COMMENCEMENT AND PROSECUTION OF WORK. The Contractor shall begin work within fifteen (15) days after approval of the contract by the City Council of the City of Dublin and shall diligently prosecute the same to completion before the expiration of 120 WORKING DAYS after the date of Notice to Proceed. The phrase "commence the work" means to engage in a continuous program on-site including, but not limited to, site clearance, grading, dredging, land filling and the fabrication, erection, or installation of the work. Said Notice to Proceed shall be issued following execution of the Agreement and the filing by Contractor of the required bonds and proof of insurance. The continuous prosecution of work by Contractor shall be subject only to Excusable Delays as defined in this Agreement. A - 2 1.09 TIME OF COMPLETION. The entire work shall be brought to completion in the manner provided for in the Contract Documents on or before the forty-fifth (45th) working day (hereinafter called the ("Completion Date") from and after the receipt by Contractor of the Notice to Proceed unless extensions of time are granted in accordance with the Contract Documents. 1.10 PAYMENTS DO NOT IMPLY ACCEPTANCE OF WORK. The payment of any progress payment, or the acceptance thereof by Contractor, shall not constitute acceptance of the work or any portion thereof and shall in no way reduce the liability of Contractor to replace unsatisfactory work or material, though the unsatisfactory character of such work or material may not have been apparent or detected at the time such payment was made. 1.11 ACCEPTANCE NOT RELEASE. Contractor shall correct immediately any defective or imperfect work which may be discovered before final acceptance of the entire work. Any unsatisfactory materials shall be rejected, notwithstanding that they may have been overlooked by the proper inspector. The inspection of the work, or any part thereof, shall not relieve Contractor of any of his obligations to perform satisfactory work as herein prescribed. Failure or neglect on the part of the City or any of its authorized agents to condemn or reject bad or inferior work or materials shall not be construed to imply an acceptance of such work or materials if such becomes evident at any time prior to final acceptance of the entire work or all materials, nor shall such failure be construed as barring City at any subsequent time from recovering damages or of such a sum of money as may be required to build anew all portions of the work in which fraud was practiced or improper materials used whenever City may discover the same. 1.12 RELEASE UPON FINAL PAYMENT. If requested to do so by City, at the time of final payment, as a condition precedent to final payment, Contractor and each assignee under any assignment in effect at the time of final payment shall execute and deliver a release in form and substance satisfactory to the City and containing such exceptions as provided in Section 7100 of the Public Contract Code which shall discharge City, its officers, agents, and employees of and from all liability, obligations, and claims arising under this contract. A - 3 1.13 CITY'S RIGHT TO TAKE POSSESSION OF THE WORK IN WHOLE OR IN PART. Without limitation of Paragraph 1.19 whatsoever, the City of Dublin shall have the right at any time to enter upon the work and perform work not covered by this Contract, or to occupy and use a portion of the work, prior to the date of the final acceptance of the work as a whole, without in any way relieving Contractor of any obligations under this Contract. Such use or occupation of the work shall not be construed as an acceptance of any portion of the work under this Contract, nor shall it affect the dates and times when payments shall become due nor prejudice City's right, guarantees, or sureties. 1.14 NO WAIVER OF REMEDIES. Neither the inspection by City or its agents, nor any order or certificate for the payment of money, nor any payment for, nor accept- ance of the whole or any part of the work by City, nor any extensions of time, nor any position taken by City or its agents shall operate as a waiver of any provision of this Agreement or of any power herein reserved to City or any right to damages herein provided, nor shall any waiver of any breach of this Agreement be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach. All remedies provided in this Agree-ment shall be taken and construed as cumulative; that is, in addition to each and every other remedy herein provided, and City shall have any and all equitable and legal remedies which it would in any case have. 1.15 DETERMINATION OF DAMAGES. The actual fact of the occurrence of damages and the actual amount of the damages which City would suffer if the work were not completed within the specified times set forth are dependent upon many circumstances and conditions which could prevail in various combinations, and from the nature of the project, it is impracticable and extremely difficult to fix the actual damages. Damages which City would suffer in the event of delay include loss of the use of the Project, and in addition expenses of prolonged employment of an archi-tectural and engineering staff; costs of administration, inspection, and supervision; and the loss suffered by the public within the City of Dublin by reasons of the delay in the completion of the project to serve the public at the earliest possible time. Accordingly, the parties hereto agree, and by execution of this Agreement, Contractor acknowledges that he understands, has ascertained and agrees, that the amounts set forth herein as liquidated damages shall be presumed to be the amount of damages sustained by the failure of Contractor to complete the entire work within the times specified. 1.16 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. The amount of the liquidated damages to be paid by Contractor to City for failure to complete the entire work by the Completion Date (as extended, if applicable) will be TWO HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($250.00) for each calendar day, continuing to the time at which the work is completed. Such amount is the actual cash value agreed upon as the loss to City resulting from Contractor's default. A - 4 1.17 PAYMENT OF DAMAGES. In the event Contractor shall become liable for liquidated damages, City, in addition to all other remedies provided by law, shall have the right to withhold any and all payments which would otherwise be or become due Contractor until the liability of Contractor under this section is finally determined. City shall have the right to use and apply such payments, in whole or in part, to reimburse City for all liquidated damages due or to become due to City. Any remaining balance of such payments shall be paid to Contractor only after discharge in full of all liability incurred by Contractor under this section or otherwise. If the sum so retained by City is not sufficient to discharge all such liabilities of Contractor, Contractor and his sureties shall continue to remain liable to City until all such liabilities are satisfied in full. No failure by City to withhold any payment as hereinbefore specified shall in any manner be construed to constitute a waiver of any right to liquidated damages or any right to any such sum. 1.18 INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS. Contractor shall assume the defense of, and indemnify and save harmless, the City, its officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, claims, losses or expenses of every type and description to which they may be subjected or put, by reason of, or resulting from, the performance of the work, provided that such action, damage, claim, loss, or expense is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease or death, or injury to, or destruction of property, whether upon or off the work, including the loss of use thereof, and is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Contractor, and subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder. 1.19 CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME RISKS. Until the completion and final acceptance by City of all work under this Contract, the work shall be under Contractor's responsi-bility, care, and charge, including any period of time work is suspended for any cause whatsoever. Contractor shall rebuild, repair, restore, and make good all injuries, damages, re-erections, and repairs occasioned or rendered necessary by accidental causes of any nature, to all or any portions of the work, except as otherwise agreed. It is specifically contemplated that the City, its officers, employees, and invitees, will occupy and use portions of the work prior to final acceptance. Such occupancy shall not relieve Contractor of responsibility provided herein nor exonerate any surety or insurer of Contractor save and except for items of routine maintenance and repair. 1.20 GENERAL LIABILITY OF CONTRACTOR. Except as otherwise herein expressly agreed, Contractor shall do all the work and furnish all the labor, materials, tools, power and light, and appliances, necessary or proper for performing and completing the work herein required in the manner within the time herein specified. The mention of any specific duty or liability of Contractor shall not be construed as limitation or restriction of any general liability or duty A - 5 of Contractor, and any reference to any specific duty or liability shall be construed to be for the purpose of explanation. 1.21 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN INSURANCE. During the term of this Agreement, and until final completion and acceptance of the work by the City, the Contractor shall maintain in full force and effect insurance coverage in the forms and amounts specified in the Standard Specifications. If, at any time during the performance of this Contract, Contractor fails to maintain any item of required insurance in full force and effect, Contractor shall immedi-ately discontinue all work under the Contract and City will withhold all Contract Payments due or that become due until notice is received by City that such insurance has been restored in full force and effect and that the premiums therefor have been paid for a period satisfactory to the City Manager. 1.22 EXTENSIONS OF TIME. In the event City deems it necessary, in its sole discretion, to extend the time of completion of work to be done under this Contract beyond the required Completion Date herein specified, such extensions shall in no way release any guarantee given by Contractor pursuant to the provisions of the Contract Documents, nor shall such extension of time relieve or release the sureties on the bonds executed pursuant to said provisions. By executing such bonds, the sureties shall be deemed to have expressly agreed to any such extension of time. The amount of time allowed in any extension of time shall be limited to the period of excusable delay as defined herein giving rise to the same as determined by City Engineer. 1.23 EXCUSABLE DELAYS. For the purpose of these Contract Documents, the term "Excusable Delays" shall mean, and is limited to, delays caused directly by acts of God, acts of the public enemy, fires, riots, insurrections, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, lockouts, sitdowns, acts of a governmental agency, priorities or privileges established for the manufacture, assembly, or allotment of materials necessary in the work by order, decree, or otherwise of the United States or by any depart-ment, bureau, commission, committee, agent, or administrator of any legally constituted public authority; changes in the work ordered by City insofar as they necessarily require additional time in which to complete the work; the prevention by City of Contractor from commencing or prosecuting the work because of the acts of others, excepting Contractor's subcontractors; or the prevention of Contractor from commencing or prosecuting the work because of a city-wide failure of public utility service. The term "Excusable Delay" shall specifically not include: (1) any delay which could have been avoided by the exercise of case, prudence, foresight, and diligence on the part of Contractor; (2) any delay in the prosecution of parts of the work, which may in itself be unavoidable but which does not necessarily prevent or delay the prose- cution of other parts of the work, nor the completion of the whole work within the time specified; (3) any reasonable delay resulting from time required by City for review of plans and submittals required of A - 6 Contractor and for the making of surveys, measurements and inspections; and (4) any delay arising from an interruption in the prosecution of the work on account of the reasonable interference from other Contractors employed by City, which does not necessarily prevent the completion of the work within the time specified. Excusable Delays, if any, shall operate only to extend the Completion Date (not in excess of the period of such delay as determined by the City) but shall not under any circumstances increase the sum City is to pay Contractor as provided in these Contract Documents. 1.24 CONTRACTOR TO SERVE NOTICE OF DELAYS. Whenever Contractor foresees any delay in the prosecution of the work, and in any event immediately upon the occurrence of any delay which Contractor regards as an excusable delay, he shall notify the City Engineer in writing of the probability of such delay and its cause, in order that the City Engineer may take immediate steps to prevent if possible the occurrence or continuance of the delay, or if this cannot be done, may determine whether the delay is to be considered excusable, how long it continues, and to what extent the prosecution and completion of the work are delayed thereby. Said notice shall constitute an application for an extension of time only if the notice requests such an extension and sets forth Contractor's estimate of the additional time required together with a full description of the cause of the delay relied upon. After the completion of any part or whole of the work, the City Engineer, in estimating the amount due Contractor, will assume that any and all delays which may have occurred in its prosecution and completion have been avoidable delays, except such delays as shall have been called to the attention of the City Engineer at the time of their occurrence and found by him to have been excusable. Contractor shall make no claim that any delay not called to the attention of the City Engineer at the time of its occurrence has been an excusable delay. 1.25 EXTENSION OF TIME - EXCUSABLE DELAY. Should any delays occur which the City Engineer may consider excusable, as herein defined, Contractor shall, pursuant to his appli- cation, be allowed an extension of time beyond the time herein set forth proportional to said delay or delays in which to complete this Contract; and, during an extension which may have been granted because of an excusable delay or delays, City shall not charge liquidated damages against Contractor for such delay. 1.26 EXTENSION OF TIME DOES NOT WAIVE CITY'S RIGHTS. The granting of any extension of time on account of delays which in the judgment of the City Engineer are excusable delays shall in no way operate as a waiver on the part of City of its rights under this Contract excepting only the extension of the Completion Date. 1.27 NO PAYMENT FOR DELAYS. No damages or compensation of any kind shall be paid to Contractor or any subcontractor because of delays in the progress of the work A - 7 whether such delays qualify for extension of time under this Agreement or not. Contractor waives all claims against City, its officials and employees, for any loss or damage sustained by reason of delays beyond the Completion Date arising out of modifications of this Agreement, including modifications deemed necessary or desirable by City for the correction of errors or omissions in the Contract Documents. 1.28 CHANGES IN THE WORK. Changes in the work made pursuant to changes issued in accord-ance with the Standard Specifications and extensions of time of completion made necessary by reason thereof (beyond the Completion Date) shall not in any way release any guarantee given by Contractor pursuant to the provisions of the Contract Documents, or the Contract let hereunder, nor shall such changes in the work relieve or release the sureties on bonds executed pursuant to the said provisions. By executing such bonds, the sureties shall be deemed to have expressly agreed to any such change in the work and to any extension of time made by reason thereof. 1.29 TERMINATION AFTER COMPLETION DATE. In addition to any other rights it may have, City may terminate this Contract at any time after the Completion Date as adjusted by any extensions of time for excusable delays that may have been granted. Upon such termination Contractor shall not be entitled to receive any compensation for services rendered by him before or after such termi- nation, and he shall be liable to City for liquidated damages for all periods of time beyond such termination date until the work is completed. 1.30 CONTRACTOR BANKRUPT. If Contractor should commence any proceeding under the Bank-ruptcy Act, or if Contractor be adjudged a bankrupt, or if Contractor should make any assignment for the benefit of creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed on account of Contractor's insolvency, then the City Council may, without prejudice to any other right or remedy, terminate the Contract and complete the work by giving notice to Contractor and his surety according to the provisions of Section 1.31. Contractor's Surety shall have the right to complete the work by commencing thirty (30) days as specified in Section 1.31; and, in the event Contractor's Surety fails to commence work within thirty (30) days, City shall have the right to complete, or cause completion of the work, all as specified in Section 1.31. 1.31 TERMINATION FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT. If Contractor should abandon the work under this Contract, or if the Contract or any portion of the Contract should be sublet or assigned without the consent of the City Council, or if the City Engineer should be of the opinion that the conditions of the Contract in respect to the rate of progress of the work are not being fulfilled or any part thereof is unnecessarily delayed, or if Contractor should willfully violate or breach, or fail to execute in good faith, any of the terms or conditions of the Contract, or if Contractor should persistently refuse or fail to supply enough properly skilled labor or materials, or fail to make A - 8 prompt payment to subcontractors for material or labor, or persistently disregard laws, ordinances, or proper instruction or orders of the Engineer, then, notwithstanding any provision to the contrary herein, the City Council may give Contractor and his Surety written notification to immediately correct the situation or the Contract shall be terminated. In the event that such notice is given, and, in the event such situation is not corrected, or satisfactory arrangement for correction is not made within ten (10) calendar days from the date of such notice, the Contract shall upon expiration of said ten (10) calendar days cease and terminate. In the event of any such termination, City shall immediately serve notice thereof upon the Surety and Contractor; and the Surety shall have the right to take over and perform the Contract, provided, however, that if the Surety does not commence performance thereof within thirty (30) days from the date of the mailing to such Surety of notice of termination, City may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by Contract, or other- wise, for the account and at the expense of Contractor, and his Surety shall be liable to City for any excess cost occasioned City thereby, as hereinafter set forth. In the event City completes the work, or causes the work to be completed, as aforesaid, no payment of any sum shall be made to Con- tractor until the work is complete. The cost of completing the work, including but not limited to, extra contract costs, the costs of City forces, extra costs of administration and management incurred by City, either direct or indirect, shall be deducted from any sum then due, or which becomes due, to Contractor from City. If no sum sufficient to pay the difference between sums due to Contractor and the cost of completing the work, and there is a sum remaining due to Contractor after City deducts the aforementioned costs of completing the work, then City shall thereupon pay such sum to Contractor and his Surety. No act by City before the work is finally accepted, including but not limited to, exercise of other rights under the Contract, actions at law or in equity, extensions of time, payments, claims of liquidated damages, occupation or acceptance of any part of the work, waiver of any prior breach of the Contract or failure to take action pursuant to this section upon the happening of any prior default or breach by Contractor shall be construed to be a waiver, or to estop, City from acting pursuant to this paragraph upon any subsequent event, occurrence or failure by Contractor to fulfill the terms and conditions of the Contract. The rights of City pursuant to this paragraph are cumulative and in addition to all other rights of City pursuant to this Agreement and at law or in equity. 1.32 RESOLUTION OF CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS 1. For any claim of $375,000 or less which arises between the Contractor and the City, the following procedure shall apply: (a) The claim shall be in writing and include the documents necessary to substantiate the claim. Claims must be filed on or before the date of final payment. Nothing in this subdivision is intended to extend the time limit or supersede notice requirements otherwise provided by contract for the filing of claims. A - 9 (b) (c) (d) (e) (~) (2) (3) For claims of less than $50,000 the City shall respond in writing to the written claim within 45 days of receipt, or may request, in writing, within 30 days of receipt, any additional documentation supporting the claim or relating to defenses for claims the City may have against the Contractor. If additional information is required, it shall be requested and provided pursuant to the subdivision upon mutual agreement of the City and the Contractor (hereafter "claimant"). The City's written response to the claim, as further documented shall be submitted to the claimant within 15 days after receipt of the furth documentation or within a period of time no greater than that taken by the claimant in producing additional information, which- ever is greater. (1) (2) For claims over $50,000 and less than or equal to $375,000 the City shall respond in writing to all written claims within 60 days of receipt, or may request, in writing, within 30 days of receipt, any additional documentation supporting the claim or relating to defenses of claims the City may have against the claimant. If additional information is thereafter required, it shall be requested and provided pursuant to the subdivision upon mutual agreement of the City and the claimant. (3) The City's written response to the claim, as further documented, shall be submitted to the claimant within 30 days after receipt of the further documentation, or within a period of time no greater than that taken by the claimant in producing additional information or requested documentation, which is greater. If the claimant disputes the City's written response, or the City fails to respond within the time described, the claimant may so notify the City inw riting, either within 15 days of receipt of the City's response or within 15 days of the City's failure to respond within the time prescribed, respectively, and demand an informal conference to meet and confer for settlement of the issues in dispute. Upon a demand, the City shall schedule a meet and confer conference within 30 days for settlement of a dispute. If following the meet and confer conference the claim or any portion remains in dispute, the claimants may file a claim pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 900) and Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 910) of Part 3 of Division 3.6 of Title I of the Government Code. For purposes of those provisions, the running of the period of time within which a claim must be filed shall be tolled fromt he time the claimant submits his or her written claim pursuant to A - 10 subdivision (a) until the tim the claim is denied, including any period of time utilized by the meet and confer conference. 2. For any civil action filed to resolve less which arises between Contractor "claimant") procedures are established: (a) a claim of $375,000 or and City, the following Within 60 days, but no earlier than 30 days, following the filing of responsive pleadings, the court shall submit the matter to non-binding mediation unless waived by mutual stipulation of both parties. Mediation process shall provide for the selection within 15 days by both parties of a disinterested third person as mediator, shall be commenced within 30 days of the submittal, and shall be concluded within 15 days from the commencement of the mediation unless a time requirement is extended upon a good cause showing to the court. (b) (i) (2) If the matter remains in dispute the case shall be submitted to judicial arbitration. The Civil Discovery Act of 1986 shall apply to any proceeding brought under this subdivision consistent with the rules pertaining to judicial arbitration. Arbitrators shall, when possible, be experienced in construction law, and any party appealing an arbi- tration award who does not obtain a more favorable judgment shall, in addition to payment of costs and fees, also pay the attorneys fees on appeal of the other party. (3) The City shall pay interest at the legal rate on any arbitration award or judgment. The interest shall begin to accrue on the date the suit is filed in a court of law. 3. The procedures set forth above shall have no effect on the City's obligation to pay money as to any portion of the claim which is undisputed except as otherwise provided in the contract. A- 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this Agreement on the date set forth opposite their names. Date: CONTRACTOR: By Date: Title CITY OF DUBLIN, A Municipal Corporation ATTEST: By Mayor ORIGINAL APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney A- 12 GUARANTY To the CITY OF DUBLIN, FOR CONTRACT NO. 92-01, DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION - TRACT 5900. The undersigned guarantees the construction and installation of the work included in this project. Should any of the work prove defective, due to faulty workmanship, materials furnished or methods of installation, or should the work or any part thereof fail to operate properly as originally intended and in accordance with the plans and specifications, due to any of the above causes, all within one year after date on which this contract is accepted by the City or after relief from maintenance, whichever, the undersigned agrees to reimburse the City, upon demand, for its expenses incurred in restoring said project, including the cost of any such equipment or materials replaced and repair said work completely without cost to the City so that said work will function successfully as originally contemplated. The City shall have the unqualified option to make any needed replace- ments or repairs done by the undersigned. In the event the City elects to have said work performed by the undersigned, the undersigned agrees that the repairs shall be made and such materials as are necessary shall be furnished and installed within a reasonable time after the receipt of demand from the City. If the undersigned shall fail or refuse to comply with his obligations under this guaranty, the City shall be entitled to all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees. Signature of Bidder A- 13 BID RESULTS, CONTRACT 92-01, DUBLIN BOULEVIhgD EXTENSION page 1 BI0 SCUEDULE A (TRACT 5900 PLANS, ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ITEM UNIT ONIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION MEASURE QUANTITY pRICE PRICE 1, MOBILIZATION LS 1 78,000.00 78,000.00 11,200.00 11,200.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 62,300.00 62,300.00 65,000.00 TOTAL UNIT TOTAL PRICE pRICE PRICE 65,000.00 39,292,00 39,292.00 LS 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 LS 1 20,000.00 20,000.00 21,000.00 21,000.00 CY 2,250 5.50 12,375.00 10.00 22,500.00 LF O 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 530 10.00 5,300.00 .10 53.00 0 5,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 1 500.00 500.00 800.00 800.00 1 300.00 300.00 400.00 400.00 550 6.00 3,300.00 2.40 1,320.00 60,500 3.30 199,650.00 1.93 116,765.00 0 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,200 1.00 4,200.00 .30 1,260.00 1,400 32.00 44,800.00 16.22 22,708.00 1,600 11,50 18,400.00 9.10 14,560.00 0 14.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 355 25.00 8,875.00 18.00 1,530.00 49 100.00 4,900.00 50.00 2,450.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 7,232.00 7,232.00 47,500.00 47,500.00 20.00 45,000.00 8.50 19,125.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.61 2,443.30* 2.00 1,060,00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 360.00 360.00 500.00 500.00 4.00 2~200.00 6.00 3,300.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,400.00 1,400.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 5,236.00 5,236.00 10.00 22,500.00 9.75 21,937.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1,060,00 2.20 1,166.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,700.00 1,700.00 825.00 825.00 250.00 250.00 27.50 27.50 4.00 2,200.00 5.00 2,750.00 2.65 160,325.00 2.59 156,695.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 6,300.00 .35 1,470.00 30.00 42,000.00 18.85 26,390.00 i1.00 17,600.00 11.00 17,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 1,700.00 24.00 2,040.00 50.00 2,450.00 100.00 4,900.00 4.00 240.00 7.25 435.00 250.00 500.00 253.08 506.00 150.00 150.00 187.00 187.00 25.50 1,275.00 28.00 1,400.00 400.00 120,000,00 534.00 160,200.00 40.00 4,000.00 47.00 4,700.00 75.00 7,500.00 77.00 7,700.00 4,500.00 9,000.00 2~640.00 5,280.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 1,980.00 1,980,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 O.O0 1,500.00 6,000.00 1,265.00 5,060.00 1,000.00 4,000.00 1,210.00 4,840.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.00 800.00 30.00 750.00 35.00 2,450.00 38.00 2,660.00 43.00 2,365.00 53.00 2,915.00 48.00 2,640.00 60.80 3,344.00 99.00 1,089.00 81.25 893.75 84.00 21,000.00 82.00 20,500.00 90.00 24,300.00 98.00 26,460.00 150.00 6,750.00 125.00 5,625.00 2.20 133,100.00' 2.50 151,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.09 29,526.00* 20.00 28,000.00 10,34 16,544.00' ll. OO 17,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 2,450.00 200.00 9,800.00 15.78 946.80 5.00 300.00 124.00 38,440.00 90.00 27,900.00 85.00 26,350.00 124.00 38,440.00 5.80 .35 .70 2,00 3.00 .25 3.00 2.00 27,000.00 12,000.00 28.00 6,960.00 4.00 4,800.00 3.50 490.00 .50 700.00 .30 49.00 1.00 70.00 .50 40.00 2.00 40.00 2.00 450.00 3.00 450.00 3.00 37.50 1.00 70.00 .25 285.00 3.00 285.00 3.00 280.00 2.00 280.00 2.00 27,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 20,000.00 12,000.00 lO,O00.O0 lO,O00.OO 10,000.00 14,000.00 40.00 20,000.00 40.00 4,200.00 5.80 6,960.00 420.00 t.10 1,540.00 35.00 1.10 77.00 40.00 2.75 55.00 450.00 3.85 577.50 17.50 2.20 154.00 285.00' 5.50 522.50 280.00 2.75 385,00 20,000.00 16,211.00 16,211.00 10,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 28.00 14,000.00 UNIT TOTAL UNiT TOTAL PRICE PRICE PRICE pRICE 1,500.00 3,000.00 2,500.00 5,000.00 2,500.00 5,000.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 324.00 32,400.00 250.00 25,000.00 240.00 24,000.00 324.00 32~400.00 14.50 3,335.00 15.00 3,450.00 13.00 2,990.00 14.30 3,289.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.O0 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,100.00 1,100.00 0. O0 0. O0 O. O0 0. OD O. 00 0. O0 0 · O0 0. O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 $671,273.35 $680,580.00 * Co~ected amounts afte~ ve£ificat~on $669,211.50 $694,025.75 UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE pRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE 1. MOBILIZATION L$ 1 72,000.00 72,000.00 11,700.00 11,700.00 2. TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM LS 1 15,000.00 15,000.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 3. CLEARING & GRUBBING LS 1 50,000.00 50,000.00 40,000.00 40,000.00 4. ROADWAY EXCAVATION (F) CY 4,300 5.50 23,650.00 10,00 43,000.00 5. REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LF 1,340 3.00 4,020.00 1.00 1,340.O0 26,000.00 26,000.00 62,300.00 62,300.00 57,000.00 57,000.00 8,176~00 8,176.00 9,900.00 9,900.00 1,OO0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,O00.O0 2,495.00 2,495.00 28,616,00 28,616.00 67,500.00 67,500.00 35,000.00 35,000.00 17,600.00 17,600.00 8.30 35,690.00* 8.50 36,550.O0 6.00 25,800.00 8.10 34,830,00 5.24 13,886.00" 2.00 5,300.00 2.00 5,300.00 Si00 13,250.00 4,33 2,598.00" 3.00 1,800.00 3.00 1,800.00 2.50 1,500.00 1,600.00 1,600.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,375.00 1,375.00 220.00 220.00 500.00 500.00 220.00 220.00 275.00 275.00 4.00 1,200.00 6.00 1,800.00 4.00 1,200.00 5.00 1,500.00 2.37 158,790.00" 2.50 167,500.00 1.79 24,165.00" 2.00 27,000.00 .57 2,679.00* 1.00 4,700.00 21.09 29,10~.00' 20.00 27,600.00 10.34 5,584.00* 11.00 5,940.00 9.00 5,490.00* 10.00 6,100.00 18.00 3,420.00 20.00 3,800.00 0,00 O.OO 0.00 O.OO 15.78 5,365.00* 5.00 1,700.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 150.00 600.00 200.00 800.00 14.50 5,800.00 10.00 4,000,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.O0 0.00 0.00 0,00 O,O0 0.00 600.00 600.00 500.00 500.00 1,150.00 2,300.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 3.00 201,000.00 2.57 172,190.00 2.20 29,700.00 2.40 32,400.00 .50 2,350*00 .40 1,880.00 22.00 30,360.00 21.75 30~O15.O0 11.00 5,940.00 11.10 5,994.00 11.00 6,710.00 10.10 6,161.00 20.00 3,800.00 24.00 4,560.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1,360.00 6.95 2,363.00 250.00 250.00 253.00 253.00 150.00 600.00 187.00 748.00 9.00 3,600.00 10.25 4,100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,800.00 1,800.00 660.00 660.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 1,265.00 2,530.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 60.00 14~700.00 25.00 6,125.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OO 0.O0 O.00 0.00 ISCHEDULE B CONT'D.) - Page 3. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE LES MC DONALD REDGWICK CONSTRUCTION OLIVER DE SILVA RGW CONSTRUCTION BAY CITIE~ 36. 48"RE]NF CONCRETE pIPE (III) LF 0 37. 54" REINF CONC PiP~ (III) LF 0 38. 54" REINF CONC pIPE (V) LF 0 39. 43" X 26" REINF CONCRET£Q. OVAL PIPE (CLASS V) LF 0 40. 54" X 36" REINF CONCRETE OVAL PIPE (CLASS V) LF 0 85.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OO 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 O.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OO O,OO 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 O,OO O.OO O,O0 0,00 O.O0 0,00 O.O0 .35 1,050.00 .50 1,500.00 .30 900.00 .55 1,650.00 .70 1,540.00 1.00 2,200.00 .50 1,100.00 .90 1,980.00 2.00 1,160.00 2.00 1,160.O0 2.00 1,160.00 2.75 1,595.O0 3.00 2,220.O0 3.00 2,220.00 3.00 2,220.00 3.85 2,849.00 .25 575.00 i*00 2,300.00 .25 575.00 1.10 2,530.00 3.00 720.00 3.00 720.00 3.00 720.00 5.50 1,320.00 2.00 1~000.00 2.00 1,0OO.00 2.00 1,000.00 2.75 1,375.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 11,500.00 11,500.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 6,250.00 6,250.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O. O0 0.00 0.00 0. O0 0. O0 0. O0 0, O0 0. O0 0. O0 0. O0 0. O0 0. O0 0. O0 0. O0 0. O0 0. O0 0. O0 0. O0 0. O0 0. O0 0. O0 0. O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,0OO.00 13.O00.GD 7,500.00 7,500.00 10,000.00 lO,000.O0 14,300J00 14,300.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 21,505.00 21,505.00 130,000,00 130,000.00 81,700.00 81,700.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 137,193.00 137,193.00 30.00 6,000.00 25.00 5,000.00 10.00 2,000.00 26.45 5,290.00 ~790,140.00 $498,320.60 $558,011.00 $566,100.00 $579f385.00 $565,007.00 $1,660,035.00 $1,084,925.60 $I,229,294.35 $1,246,680.00 $1,248,596.50 $1,259,032.75 · Corrected amount after verification ~10 ~ESULTS, CONTRACT 92 O1, DgBLZN BOULEVARD EXTENSION Page 4. 1. MOBILIZATION 2. TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM LS 1 8,800.00 8,800.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 3. CLEARING & GRUBBING L$ I 8,900.00 8,900.00 7,840-00 7,840.00 4. ROADWAY EXCAVATION (F) CY 2,250 4.30 9,675.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 O,OO 5. REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LF 0 0.00 1,325.00 6.50 3,445-00 6. REMOVE PAVEMENT & BASE SY 530 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 7. REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK SY 0 O.O0 8. REMOVE STRIPES/~[ARKiNGS LS I 790.00 790.00 500.00 500.00 9. RELOCATE ROADSIDE SIGNS LS 1 280.00 280.00 500.00 500.00 10. PLANE AC pAVEMENT SY 550 6.70 3,685.00 7.00 3,850.00 11. ROADWAY STRUCT. SECTION #1 SF 60,500 2.70 163,350-00 3.00 181,500.00 0.00 0.00 12. ROADWAY STRUCT. SECTION 32 SF 0 0.00 0.00 13. ROADWAY STRUCT. SECTION #3 SF 4~200 .86 3,612.00 .40 1,680.00 14. MONOLITHIC pCC CURB, G/S LF 1,400 25.00 35,000-00 30.00 42,000.00 15. pCC CURB (TYPE 8 VERTICAL) LF 1,600 11.00 17,600.00 12.00 19,200.00 16. pCC CURB & GUTTER LF 0 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 17. TIMBER BARRICADE LF 355 23.00 1,955.00 21.00 1,785.00 80.00 3,920.00 18. TYPE III BARRICADE EA 49 53.00 2,597.00 19. ASPHALT CONCRETE DIKE LF 60 10.OD 600.00 6.00 360.00 20. SURVEY MONUMENT EA 2 240.00 4B0.00 300.00 600.00 21. ROADSIDE SIGN EA 1 180.00 180.00 150.00 150.00 22. 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE/GATE LF 50 27.00 1,350.00 10.OD 500.00 23. CONCRETE BOX CULVERT CY 300 480.00 144,000-00 500-00 150,000.00 24. CHAIN LINK RAILING-TYPE 7 LF 100 45.00 4,500.00 50.00 5,000.00 25. RIP RAP (LIGHT CLASS) CY 100 130.O0 13,000.00 80.00 8,000.00 26. Type 1 MANHOLE (STORM ORN) EA 2 2,500.00 5,000.00 4,100.00 8,200.00 27. TYPE C MANHOLE (STORM DRN) EA 1 1,900.00 1,900.O0 4,100.00 4,100.O0 0.00 0.00 28. MODIFY CATCH BASIN EA 0 O.O0 O.00 29. DROP INLET (CATCH BASIN) EA 4 1,200.00 4,800.00 1,450.00 5,800-00 1,200.00 4,800-00 1,150.00 4,600.00 30. FIELD INLET EA 4 0.00 31. 18" REINF CONCRETE pIPE (V) LF 0 0'00 0'00 0'00 32. 18" REINF CONC PIPE (III) LF 25 70.00 1~750-00 50.00 1,250.00 33. 24" REINF CONC pIpE (IV) LF 70 73.00 5,110.00 65.00 4,550.00 34. 36" REINF CONC PIPE (III) LF 55 78.00 4,290.00 80.00 4,400.00 35. 36" REINE CONC pIPE (IV) LF 55 82.00 4,510-00 84.00 4,620.00 36. 48"REiNF CONCRETE PIPE (III) LF 11 88.00 968.00 120.O0 1.320-00 37. 54" REINF COliC pIpE (IIi) LF 250 93.00 23,250.00 124.00 31,000.00 38. 54" REINF CONCRETE PIPE (V) LF 270 110.00 29,700.00 140.00 37,800.00 39. 43" X 26" REINF CONCRETE LF 45 93.00 4,185.00 135.00 6,075-00 OVAL pIpE (CLASS V) 40. 54" X 36" REINF CONCRETE LF 310 100.00 31,000.00 200.00 62,000-00 OVAL pIPE (CLASS V) 41. 18" SUBDRAIN LF 1~200 9.10 10,920.00 20.00 24,000.00 42. 4" TI{ERHO TRFC STRIPES LF 1~400 1.10 1,540.00 .80 1,120.00 43. 8" THERMO TRFC STRIPES LF 70 1.10 77.00 1.00 70.00 44. 12" THEFd40 TRFC STRIPES LF 20 2.60 52.00 1.50 30.00 45. THERMO pVMT MARKINGS SF 300 3.60 540.00 3.00 450.00 2.00 140.00 .50 35.00 46. pAINT TRAFFIC STRIPE LF 70 380,00 47. REFLECTIVE pVMT MARKERS EA 95 5.30 503.50 4.00 48. NON REFLECT PVMT MARKERS EA 140 2.60 364.00 3.00 420.00 49. LANDSCAPING LS 1 30,000.00 30,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 50. IRRIGATION SYSTEM LS 1 14.000.00 14,000-00 10,000.00 10,000.00 51. 8" VITRIFIED CLAY pipe [,F 500 55.00 27,500.O0 42.00 21,000-00 2,900.00 2,900.00 23,000.00 23,000.B0 5.40 12,150.00 0,00 0.00 14.85 7,870.50 0.00 O.O0 275.00 275.00 275.00 275.00 4.70 2,585.00 2.25 136,125.00 0.00 0.00 3.70 15,540.00 18.45 25,830.00 10.40 16,640.00 0.00 0.00 35.20 2,992.00 100.00 4,900.00 lO.O0 600.00 250.00 500.00 286.00 286.00 28.00 1,400.00 423.00 126,900.00 47.30 4,730.00 50.00 5,000.00 2,640.00 5,280.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.O0 0.00 1,265.00 5,060.00 1,210.00 4,840.00 0.00 0,00 35.20 880.00 38.50 2,695.00 47.30 2,601.50 52.80 2,904.00 108.90 1,197.90 92.40 23,100.00 99.00 26,730.00 165.00 7,425.00 93.50 28,985.00 6.70 8,040.00 .94 1,316.00 3.00 210.00 2.75 55,00 3.20 480.OO 1.10 77.00 3.60 342.00 2.45 343.00 21,340.00 21,340.00 9,800.00 9,800.00 44,00 22,000.00 4,800.00 4,800.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 lO,O00.OO lO,OOO.O0 13.50 30,375.00 5.50 12,375.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 .75 397.50 4.00 2,120.00 0.00 0.00 O.OO O.O0 1,400.00 1,400.00 1~200.00 1,200,00 450.00 450.00 360.00 360.00 4.50 2,475.00 5.60 3,080.00 2.57 155,485.00 2.50 151,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .83 3,486.00 .50 2,100.00 20.20 28,280.00 20.22 28,308.00 11.00 17,600.00 11.80 18,880.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 20.00 1,700.00 18.00 1,530.00 65.00 3,185.00 125.00 6,125.00 8.35 501.O0 6.50 390.00 250.00 500.00 200.00 400.00 225.00 225.00 150.00 150.00 48.00 2,400.00 25.50 1,275.00 525.00 157,500.00 537.00 161,100.00 53.00 5,300.00 43.00 4,300.00 70.00 7,000.00 136.00 13,600.00 3,000.00 6,000.00 4,500.00 9,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1~225.00 4,900.00 1,300.00 5,200.00 1,200.00 4,800.00 1,300.00 5,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.00 450.00 32.00 800.00 47.00 3,290.00 35.00 2,450.00 66.00 3,630.00 43.00 2,365.00 61.00 3,355.00 48.00 2,640.00 108.00 1,188.00 99.00 1,089.00 105.00 26,250.00 84.00 21,000.00 120.00 32,400.00 90.00 24,300.00 104.00 4,680.00 150.00 6,750.00 145.00 44,950.00 85.00 26,350.00 13,00 15,600.00 3.50 4,200.00 .45 630.00 .35 490.00 1.70 119.00 .70 49.00 5.30 106.00 2.00 40.00 3.75 562.50 3.00 450.00 .30 21.00 .25 17.50 4.00 380.00 3.00 285.00 2.60 364.00 2.00 280.00 32,500.00 32,500.00 18,020.00 18,020.00 14,500.00 14,500.00 11,422.00 11,422.00 60.00 30,000.00 40.00 20,000.00 ( {SCHEDULE A CONT'D.) Page 5. TEICHgRT CONST. GRANITE CONST. GALLAGHER & BURK H & K GRADING O~C. JONES 52. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE gA 2 1,500.00 53. REPLACE 24" WATER LINE LF 100 230.00 54. RELOCATE CHAIN LINK FENCE LF 230 14.00 55. MODIFY SANI SEWER MANHOLE EA 1 510.00 56. HWY LIGHTING SSM (DUBLIN) LS 1 16,000.00 SUBTOTAL, SCHEDULE A: 3,000.OO 1,400.00 2,800.(10 2,750.00 23,0OD.OO 250.00 25,OD0.O0 264.O0 3,220.00 6.00 1,380.00 14.30 510.00 500.00 500.00 300.00 16,OOO.00 21,000.O0 21,000.O0 16,720.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 $728,308.50" $743,730.00 Adjusted amount after verification iTEM UNIT UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION MEASURE QUANTITY PRICE pRICE pRICE pRICE PRICE 5,5OO.OO 3,200.00 6,400.00 2,500.00 5,000.00 26,400.00 335.00 33,500.00 240.00 24,000.00 3,289.00 15.50 3,565.00 13.00 2,990.00 300.00 600.00 600.00 500,00 500.00 16,720.00 19,OO0.00 19,OOO.00 16,SOO.OD 16,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 716,908.90' 759,800.00 770,430.50 TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL PRICE PRICE pRICE pRICE PRICE 1. MOBILIZATION LS 1 30,000.00 30,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 25,000.00 2. T~AFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM LS 1 8,700.00 8,700.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 2,900.00 3. CLEARING & GRUBBING LS 1 33,000.00 33,000.00 36,000.00 36,000.00 18,600.00 4. ROADWAy EXCAVATION (F) CY 4,300 4.20 18,O60.00 4.50 19,350.00 5.40 B* REMOVE CUR8 & GUTTER LF 1,340 1.70 2,278.00 3.00 4,020.D0 2.00 6. REMOVE pAVEMENT & BASE SY 2,650 2.70 7,155.00 6.50 17,225.00 14.85 7. REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK SY 600 3.80 2,280.00 5.00 3,000.00 2.00 8. REMOVE STRIPES/MARKINGS LS 1 1,300.00 1,300.00 1,000.00 1,O0O.OO 880.00 9. RELOCATE ROADSIDE SIGNS LS 1 1,100.00 1,100.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 275.00 10. PLANE AC pAVEMENT Sy 300 6.70 2,010.00 7.00 2,100.00 4.70 11. ROADWAY STRUC SECTION ~1 SF 67,000 2.50 167,500.00 3.00 201,000.00 2.25 12. ROADWAY STRUC SECTION ~2 SF 13,5OO 1.90 25,650.00 2.30 31,050.00 2.60 13. ROADWAy STRUC SECTION #3 SF 4,700 .86 4,042.00 2.00 9,4OD*OD 3.70 14. MONOLITHIC PCC C/G,SDWLK LF 1,380 25.00 34,500.00 30.00 41,400.00 18.45 15. PCC CURB (TYPE B VERT) LF 540 11.00 5,940.00 12.00 6,480.00 10.40 I6. TYPE A2-6 PCC CUR8 LF 320 13.00 7,930.00 24.00 14,640.00 9.30 17. TIMBER BARRICADE LF 190 23.00 4,370.00 21.00 3,990.00 35.20 18. TyPE III BARRICADE EA 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19. ASPHALT CONCRETE DIKE LF 340 ll.0O 3,740.00 6.00 2,040.00 8.80 20. SURVEY MONUMENT EA 1 240.00 240.00 300.00 300.00 250.00 21+ ROADSIDE SIGN EA 4 180.00 720.00 150.00 600.00 285.00 22. 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE/GATE LF 400 9.70 3,880.00 10.00 4,000.00 10.20 23. CONCRETE-BOX CULVERT CY 0 0.00 0.O0 0.O0 0.00 0.00 24. CHAIN LINK RAILING-TyPE 7 LF 0 O.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25. RIP RAP (LIGHT CLASS) CY 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26. TYPE 1 MANHOLE (STORM DRN) EA 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27. Type C MANHOLE (STORM DRN) EA 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28. MODIFY CATCM BASIN EA 1 660.00 660.00 800.00 800.00 660.00 29. DROP INLET (CATCH BASIN) EA 2 1,200.00 2,400.00 1,450.00 2,900.00 1,265.00 30. FIELD INLET EA 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 O.00 31. 18" REINF CONCRETE PIPE (V) LF 245 98.00 24,010.00 50.00 12,250.00 66.00 32. 18" REINF CONC PIPE (III) LF 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33. 24" REINF CONC PIPE (IV) LF 0 O.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34. 36" REINF CONC PIPE (/II) LF 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35. 36" REINF CONC PIPE (IV) LF 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 32,000.00 32,000.00 2,900.00 18,000.00 18,OO0.00 18,600.00 37,000.00 37,000.00 124,000.00 124,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 24,000.00 24,000.00 5.50 23,650.00 1.50 2,010.OO 4.00 10,600.00 2.50 1,500.00 1,600.00 1,600.00 220.00 220.00 8.50 2,550.00 2.50 167,500.00 1.95 26,325.00 1,00 4,700.00 20.22 27,903.60 11.80 6,372.00 12.20 7,442.00 18.00 3,420.00 0.00 0.00 6.50 2,210.00 200.00 200.00 150.00 600.00 9.25 3,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 600.00 600.00 1,400.00 2,800.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 14,700.00 o.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 {SU}IEDULE B CONT'D.) Page 6. TE[CI~ERT CONST. GRANITE CONST. GALLAGIIER & mURK H & K GRADING O.C. JONES ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL 36. 48"REINF CONCRETE pIPE (III) LF 37. 54" REINF CONC pIPE (III) LF 38. 54" REINF CONC pIpE (V} LF 39. 43' X 26" REINF CONCRETE OVAL PIPE (CLASS V) LF 40. 54" X 36' REINF CONCRETE GRAND TOTAL, SCHEDULES A & B~ 0 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 3,000 .53 1,590.00 .80 2,400.O0 .94 2,820.00 2,200 .83 1,8~6.OO 1.00 2,200.00 1.76 3,872.00 580 2.60 1,508.OO 1.50 870.00 2.75 1,595.00 850 3.50 2,590.00 3.00 2,220.00 3.20 2,368.00 2,300 1.10 2,530.00 .25 575.00 .33 759.00 240 5.30 1,272.O0 4.00 960.00 3.57 856.80 500 2.60 1,300.00 3.00 1,500.00 1.98 990.00 1 8,300.00 8,300.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 1 7,700.00 7,700.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O 0.00 0.00 0.O0 0.00 O.00 0.00 O O.OO 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0 0.00 O.O0 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O,OO 0.00 1 9,700.00 9,700.00 21,000.00 21,000.00 10,275.00 10,275.00 1 160,000.00 160,000.00 105,000.00 105,000.00 160,000.00 160,000.00 200 25.00 5,000.00 25.00 5,000.00 27.20 5,440.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 .40 1,200.00 .35 1,050.00 .80 1,760.O0 .70 1,540.00 2.25 1,305.00 2.00 1,160.00 3.30 2,442.00 3.00 2,220.00 .30 690.00 .25 575.00 3.50 840.00 3.00 720.00 2.30 1,150.00 2.00 1,000.O0 8,600.00 8,600.00 9,489.00 9,489.00 8,100.00 8,100.00 4,390.00 4,390.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,000.00 16,000.00 13,000.O0 13,000.00 31,000.00 31,000.00 19,500.O0 19,500.00 132,000.00 132,000.00 124,800.O0 124,800.00 25.50 5,100.00 29.05 5,810.00 $611~781.00" $592,270.00 621,743.30 616,947.00 648,856.60 $1,340,089.50' $1,336,000.00 1,338,652.20* 1,376,747.00 1,419,287.10 * Corrected totals after verification EUGENE K. STURGIS (1892-1976) EDWIN N, NESS ROBERT BRUNSELL SAMUELA, SPERRY DANIEL C. BORT PHILIP D, ASSAF Valley Times P.O. Box 607 Pleasanton, CA 94566 Law Offices of STURGIS, NESS, BRUNSELL & SPERRY a professional corporation 2000 Powell Street, Suite 1690 Post Office Box 8808 Emeryvflle, California 94608-1804 January 14, 1992 RICIIVED JAN 1 5 '1992 ' .IBLI .WORKS (800) 543-6500 (510) 652-7588 F,~x: (510) 652-0190 Attention: Judy Beninger, Legal Publications Department Re: Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District 91-1, City of Dublin To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of the city of Dublin, document accordingly: please publish the following e Notice Inviting Sealed Bids to be published twice, once a week for two successive weeks beqinninq not later than January 20, 1992. Kindly provide our office with an affidavit of publication in triplicate for this notice, together with your statement for publications costs. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Very truly yours, STURGIS, NESS, BRUNSELL & SPERRY a professional corporation Olivia Elflerts Project Assistant /OUE Enclosure cc: Kay Keck, City Clerk Lee Thompson, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Elizabeth Silver, Meyers, Nave, Riback & West NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 The City Council of the City of Dublin invites sealed bids for the construction of public imprqvements in Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District 91-1. The improvements are generally described as follows: Ail those proposed public improvements within Tract 4978 and the proposed Tract 5900. These include curbs, gutters, sidewalk, pavement, street monuments, drainage, street lights, street trees, signs, striping, irrigation, and related miscellaneous improvements on Dougherty Road and Dublin Boulevard extended. The construction of the westerly one-half of the road which is to be on either side of the Chabot Channel. The limits of these improvements are from the end of the existing cul-de-sac north to the improvements of Dublin Boulevard extended, the reconfiguration of the cul-de-sac bulb to a through street, and changing of the driveway entrance at $carlett Court to street curb returns. The construction of the Extension of Dublin Boulevard from Dougherty Road to Tract 4978. The five-foot widening on the east side of Dougherty Road from Dublin Boulevard extended north to Tract 4978. Plans Department per set if and specifications for the work may be obtained at the of Public Works upon deposit of $35.00 per set ($40.00 mailed first-class postage) which is non-refundable. The contractor for the work will be required to pay the general prevailing rates of wages as determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California. A copy of these rates is on file with the City Clerk, and is available on request. Bids must be accompanied by cash, a cashier's check or a certified check amounting to ten percent (10%) of the bid, payable to the order of the city Clerk, or by a bond for that amount signed by the bidder and two sureties (who shall justify before any officer competent to administer an oath, in double that amount, and over~and above all statutory exemptions) or by a corporate surety bond to the satisfaction and approval of the Director of Public Works. The city reserves the right to reject all bids in its discretion, and to reject the bid of any bidder who has been delinquent or unfaithful in any former contract with the City of Dublin. The contract, if let, will be awarded under the authority of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 of the State of California and the Local Agency Public Construction Act. The contractor will be paid in cash in accordance with the specifications, but only from the improvement fund for Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District 91-1. Sealed bids must be delivered to the office of the city Engineer of the City of Dublin at 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California 94568 before 2:00 P.M. on February 13, 1992. At that time, all bids will be publicly opened, examined and declared. The contract, if let, will be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder by the city Council at a subsequent time, within the time set forth in the specifications. but The contractor may elect to receive 100% of payments due under the contract from time to time, without retention of any portion of the payment by the city, by depositing securities of equivalent value with the City in accordance with the provisions of Section 22300 of the Public Contract Code. Such securities, if deposited by the contractor, shall be valued by the City's Finance Director, whose decision on valuation of the securities shall be final. DATED: January 13, 1992 KAY KECK, City Clerk, City of Dublin, Alameda County, California