HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4.03 Accept Work 93-01 CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
City Council Meeting Date: June 28, 1993
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of Work, Contract No. 93-01 Downtown Street
Lights
Report by: Public Works Director Lee Thompson
EXHIBITS ATTACHED:
None
RECOMMENDAT I ON:
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
Accept improvements constructed under Contract 93-01 and
authorize payment of retention in the amount of $2,689.03 to
steiny & Co. \~33 ~- ~'~ ~
Project Budqet
Actual Cost
Design/Inspection:
Printing/Legal/Misc.:
utility Fees:
Construction:
Totals:
$14,500.00 $ 3,040.54
350.00 716.17
1,757.19
52,500.00 53,780.67
$67,350.00 $59,294.57
This entire project was funded by Gas Tax monies.
DESCRIPTION: On March 22, 1993, the City Council awarded contract 93-01
to Steiny & Company. This project installed street lights on Golden Gate Drive and
the Village Parkway/Clark Avenue loop south of Dublin Blvd. These lights were
requested by businesses over the past several years and will improve safety for both
pedestrians and motorists at night.
Overhead utilities were undergrounded on many of Dublin's downtown streets prior to
incorporation; however, street lights were not installed during that process.
Several years ago as a first phase, Dublin began installing the missing lights with
a project to light Regional street and Amador Plaza. Street lights were also added
to Dublin Blvd. at the same time that city undergrounding projects took place.
other lights have been added with traffic signal projects. A future project is
proposed to add lights on Sierra Court/Sierra Lane and on Amador Valley Blvd. just
east of Village Parkway.
A change order incurred during the course of construction consisted of two parts:
(1) an upgrade in electrical equipment which was required by PG&E but was not part
of the original specification, and (2) repair of some sunken curb, gutter, and
sidewalk on the Village/Clark loop. The amount of this change order was partially
offset by the elimination of other sidewalk work which was not necessary.
The work performed by Steiny & Co. is complete and in accordance with approved plans
and specifications. The project was completed within overall funds budgeted. Staff
recommends that the City Council accept the improvements and authorize payment of
retention to Steiny & Co.
a:stlite~agstacpt
ITEM NO.
CITY CLERK !