HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.01 NegDec RoW TassGleas CITY CLERK
File #
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING'DATE: August 17, 1999
SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Certification of Negative Declaration and
Establishment of Rights-of-Way Lines for portions of Tassajara
Road, Gleason Drive, Central Parkway and Dublin Boulevard
Report Prepared by: Lee S. Thompson, Public Works Director
ATTACI]2VIENTS: 1. ResOlution Certifying Negative Declaration
2a. Draft Ordinance Establishing Right of Way Lines indicating
protests received
2b. Draft Ordinance Establishing Right of Way Lines indicating
no protests received .........
3. Copy of Agenda Statement from Planning Commission
meeting of June 8, 1999
RECOMME~A~...~.ON; ................ 1) Open Public He ~aring
2) Receive Staff'Presentation and Public Comm~gt
~,X[/xt' 3) Question Staff and the Public
4) Close Public Hearing and Deliberate
5) Adopt Resolution which.cert~e~ th~_Negafive Declaration
6) Waive reading and introduce ordinance 2a or 2b establishing
right of way lines for portions of Tassajara Road, Gleason Drive,
Central Parkway and Dublin Boulevard, as appropriate
FIN~C~ STATEMENT: Th~.~cgs_t.;t0 g~quire the rights-of-way and build the roadways for the
Traffic ImPact Fee (TIF) and access will be borne by MSSH Dublin Development (Shea Homes) and the
Dublin Ranch Asse. ssmeg~ ~.i~.~ct, currently in the process of formation. The fr0nta~e owners along these
streets will be responsible to dedicate and improve 20 feet of pavement along the street frontage for curb
sidewalk and landscaping.
MSSH DublinDevelopment (Shea Homes) and the Assessment District ~xLe~!0per (the Lins) will each
receive a credit against payment of future Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees (TIF) in amounts equal to
funds advanced for the acquisition of rights-of-way and improvements for the TIF areas.... ,Use of thes_e
credits has been defined in th.~ respective Development Agreements for the Dublin Ranch projects and will
be used according to the established TIF policy at the time of development.
COPIES TO: Adjacent property owners
G:kI)EVELOPkDu~ ,~ ~'!jm R~an._ch~k,~,.~quisifion\tassajara rw ag strut, doc
DESCRIPTION: One of the goals of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan is to establish a~
vehicle circulation system which provides sufficient capacity for projected traffic and alloWs C°nvenient~
access to .land uses. It states that the arterial streets in Eastern Dublin are to be designed to carry very high
traffic volumes with a minimum of interference'from connecting traffic. Shown in the adopted Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan land use map (Subattachment 5 of Attachment 3: Pl~ng Commission Agenda
Statement) are all arterial or. Transit Spine streets including Dublin Boulevard, Tassajara Road, Gleason
Drive and Central Parkway (Shown as Transit Spine). The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan states arterial
streets are to be four, six and eight lanes wide to carry the community and sub-regional traffic through the
specific plan area. Traffic reports of specific projects such as Dublin Ranch Phase I, Tassajara Meadows I
and II, Koll Center, Emerald Glen and Toll Brothers require Ta~sajara Road be widened from two lanes to
four, six and eight lanes in from I:5802 With the proposed Development ofDublin ~ch Areas A-E and
Areas F, G 'and H (currently under staff review), their respective traffic reports require widening of
Tassajara Road and the extension of all east/west arterial streets such as Dublin B6ulevard, Gleason DiSV~
and Central Parkway from Tassajara ROad to easterly borders of the Dublin Ranch developed area.
Recently, the ultimate right of way alignments of each of these east/west arterial streets was mapped and
provisions were ~made for the establishment of specific precise right of way lines to be adopted bY the City~'
through property owned by the Dublin Land Company[ The acquisition of these portions of right of ways
and construction of the roadways is necessary to connect the proposed development of the DUblin Ranch
project areas F, G and H with Tassajara Road in accordance with the Ea~t~i-n' Diiblin Specific Plan and
Dublin General Plan.
Staffhas been working with the Lins, MSSH/Shea Development (]Dublin Ranch Phase I), and their ._.r~.:
engineering consukant, MacKay & Somps, to determine the best alignment 'for these roadway segments.
These needed right of ways will proVide a street connection for the Eastern Dublifi Areas F, G & H '
(Jennifer Lin property) projects to existing roadways and the freeway and will include all of the needed
necessary through-lanes and turn-lanes for the proposed level of development as defined by the respective
traffic reports for these specific projects. The general 'alignment of thcse roadways is shown in the Dublin
General Plan (see Attachment 5 of Attachment 3: Planning Commission Agenda statement) and the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (see Attachment 6 of Attachment 3: Planning Commission Agenda
Statement). The right of way lines need to be established for these portions of roadways so that negotiation
for the purchase and dedication of property from existing landowners can go forward and allow proposed
developments to meet their tra~c impact mitigation-requirements.
The proposed-alignment of Tassajara: Road is basically a straight line running north-south from north of
Interstate 580 to the City Limit line located on the northerly boundary of DublinRanch Phase I
(Neighborhood M-l). A large-radius curve has been included in the alignment at the northerly end of the
road at the City limit line in order to pull the roadway away from an existing building located next to the
road just north of the City limit line. The existing TaSsajara~'K6ad fight of way varies from i0i feet' wide
from 1-580 to 66 'feet wide along the existing road centerline north of DUblin Blvd. to the.City limit line.
The area, which makes up the proposed Tassajara Road ri~,tit' 6f~/y lines presently, C6htains both the
existing Tassajara ROad (two lanes) and existing right of way, and vacant land owned by The Dublin Land
Company (DiManto). Other property owners have already made fight of WaY dedications on the westerly
side of Tassajara Road from 1-580 to within 250 feet 0fihe interSe~fi0n'0f'S6uthDublin RahCh'DriVe.
remaining easterly fight of way still needs to be acquired by the City~0fDublin. The proPosed fight of way
for Tassajara Road Varies from 128' to 187' wide. 'The proposed roadway has four lanes in each direction
-2-
from Interstate 580 t° central Parkway, and three lanes in each direction frOm Centr~ P'~r~ay t°the
northerly City limits. Additional lef~-tum and. right-mm lanes are also proposed at intersections needed.
The right of way in front of the Dublin Ranch Neighborhoods M3, M2 and M1 that extend to the northerly
boundary of Dublin Ranch Phase I have been dedicated with the_~pproval of the first final map of the
Dublin Ranch Development.
Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive, and Central Parkway right of ways do not currently exist east of
Tassajara Road. These proposed right of ways for Gleason Drive (104' to 125' wide), Central Parkway
(104' to 125' wide) and Dublin Boulevard (140' to 161' wide) are ali currently vacant land owned by
Dublin Land Company (DiManto) and all need to be acquired by the City of Dublin. The proposed right of
way lines generally include the intersection transitions of each road at Tassajara Road with the associated
lei'c-mm and right-mm lanes.
This item was first introduced to the Planning Commission at its meeting on June 8, 1999. At that meeting
the Planning Commission voted to initiate the process to establish right of way lines for portions of
Tassajara Road, Gleason Drive, Central Parkway and Dublin Boulevard (Planning Commission Resolution
No. 99-21). After review and discussion, the Planning Commission also voted to recommend to the. City
Council that they certify the Negative Declaration and approve the establishment of said right of way lines.
This item was first introduced to the City Council at its meeting on July 20, 1999, where the Resolution of
Intention was adopted setting the public hearings for the August 3ra and the August 17th meetings. Due to
problems with notification for the August 3ra meeting, the original Resolution of Intention was repealed
and replaced with Resolution No. 154-99 which was adopted by the City Council at its August 3rd meeting
and set the public hearings for this item for this meeting and for the September 7t~ meeting.
Public testimony concerning the establishment of right of way lines was allowed at the August 3ra meeting
but no one spoke.
Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, deliberate andtake the foI!~wing action:
(1) Review the Environmental Initial Study and adopt the resolution which certifies the Negative
Declaration, and (2) introduce the ordinance for the establishment ofrjght of way lines for said portions of
Tassajara_ROad, Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Parkway.
-3-
RESOLUTION NO. - 99
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
CERTIFYING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE
CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF RIGHT OF WAY LINES
FOR A PORTION OF TASSAJARA ROAD (FROM NORTH OF INTERSTATE 580 TO THE
NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN RANCH TRACT 6962-NEIGI-IBORHOOD M1),
AND FOR PORTIONS OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD, GLEASON DRIVE AND CENTRAL
PARKWAY (FROM TASSAJARA ROAD TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN
RANCH AREAS F, G & H)
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended together with the
state's administrative guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act,
requires that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be
prepared; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. a Negative declaration of
Environmental Significance has been prepared by the Dublin Department of Public Works; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin Planning Commission determined that the (establishment of right
of way lines for portions of Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Drive) will not
result in the potential creation of any significant environmental impacts identified in the Initial Study of
Environmental Significance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT REsoLVED that the City Council finds that the Negative
Declaration of Environmental Significance has been prepared and processed in accordance with State and
Local Environmental Law and Guideline Regulations, and that it is adequate and complete and that the
City Council Hereby certifies the Negative Declaration.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of August, 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
ae
ORDINANCE NO. -99
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
ESTABLISHING RIGHT OF WAY LINES FOR A PORTION OF TASSAJARA ROAD
(FROM NORTH OF INTERSTATE 580 TO THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN
RANCH TRACT 6962—NEIGHBORHOOD M-1)AND FOR PORTIONS OF DUBLIN
BOULEVARD, GLEASON DRIVE,AND CENTRAL PARKWAY (FROM TASSAJARA
ROAD TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN RANCH AREAS F, G, AND H)
The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Resolution calling for a public hearing to consider
future right of way lines for a portion of Tassajara Road from north of Interstate 580 to the northerly
boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962—Neighborhood M-1 — and for portions of Dublin Boulevard,
Gleason Drive, and Central Parkway from Tassajara Road to the westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch
Areas F, G, and H(Resolution No. 154-99) and set a public hearing for August 17, 1999, at 7:00 p.m.
to hear objections to the establishment of said right of way; and
WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was duly given; and
WHEREAS, no protests were made either in writing or orally to the establishment of said right -
of way lines.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council finds and ordains that:
Section 1: Right of way lines are hereby established for a portion of Tassajara Road from
north of Interstate 580 to the northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962—Neighborhood M-2—
and for portions of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive, and Central Parkway from Tassajara Road to the
westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G, and H, within the City of Dublin, County of Alameda,
State of California, as described in Exhibit A and all as more particularly described in Exhibit A and
shown in Exhibit B on that certain set of plans entitled, "Precise Plan Line; Tassajara Road, Gleason
and Central, and Dublin Boulevard" prepared by MacKay and Somps and consisting of six (6) sheets,
and filed in the office of the Director of Public Works, which plans are hereby adopted as a precise
plan of said right of way lines.
Section 2: The effect of said right of way lines shall be governed by provisions of Dublin
Ordinance No. 44-87.
Section 3: This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its final passage and adoption
by the City Council. 'The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this ordinance to be posted in at
i
:e. L,1'. :
least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government
Code of the State of California.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. -99 '~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
ESTABLISHING RIGHT OF WAY LINES FOR A PORTION OF TASSAJARA ROAD
(FROM NORTH OF INTERSTATE 580 TO ~ NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN
RANCH TRACT 6962 - NEIGHBORHOOD M-l) AND FOR PORTIONS OF DUBLIN
BOULEVARD, GLEASON DRIVE, AND CENTRAL PARKWAY (FROM TASSAJARA
ROAD TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN RANCH AREAS F, G, AND H)
The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Resolution calling for a public hearing to consider
future right of way lines for a portion of Tassajara Road from north of Interstate 580 to the northerly
boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962 -Neighborhood M-1 - and for portions of Dublin Boulevard,
Gleason Drive, and Central Parkway from Tassajara Road to the westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch
Areas F, G, and H (Resolution No: 154-99) and set a public hearing for August 17, 1999, at 7:00 p.m.
to hear objections to the establishment of said right of way; and
WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was duly given; and
WHEREAS, __ protests were made either in writing or orally to the establishment of said
right of way lines, and said protests were overruled.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council finds and ordains that:
Section 1: Right of way lines are hereby established for a portion of Tassajara Road from
north of Interstate 580 to the northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962 -Neighborhood M-2 -
and for portions of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive, and Central Parkway from Tassajara Road to the
westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G, and H, within the City of Dublin, County of Alameda,
State of California, as described in Exhibit A and all as more particularly described in Exhibit A and
shown in Exhibit B on that certain set of plans entitled, "Precise Plan Line; Tassajara Road, Gleason
and Central, and Dublin Boulevard" prepared by MacKay and Somps and consisting of six (6) sheets,
and filed in the office of the Director of Public Works, which plans are hereby adopted as a precise
plan of said right of way lines.
Section 2: The effect of said right of way lines shall be governed by provisions of Dublin
Ordinance No. 44-87.
Section 3: This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its final passage and adoption
by the City Council. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this ordinance to be posted in at
least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government
Code of the State of California.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ,1999.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
Description of Precise Plan Lines for portions of Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard, Central
Parkway, and Gleason Drive, all within the Corporate Limits of the City of Dublin, all as more
precisely depicted on Exhibit B "Precise Plan Line."
1) Tassajara Road between Interstate 580 northerly to the Dublin City Limit:
Plan lines are to be symmetrical about and parallel to the existing centerline except as
noted herein. Beginning at Interstate 580 northerly to the north side of Northside Drive:
91 ft. easterly of the centerline and 83 fi. westedy of the centerline.
Then northerly to the southerly side of Dublin Boulevard; 104 ft. easterly of the centeriine
and 83 ft. westerly of the centerline.
Then northerly along the east side of Tassajara Road tapering to a point which is 381.76
ft. north of the northerly line of Dublin Boulevard a width of 83 ft. and northerly along the
westerly side of Tassajara Road to a point 465.04 ft. noah of the centerline of Dublin
Boulevard a width of 104 ft. westerly of the Tassajara centerline then continuing
perpendicular to and toward the centerline a distance of 21 ft.
Then northerly 83 ft. on either side of the centerline to the south side of Central Parkwa'
on the east and to the centeriine of Central Parkway on the west. Then northerly taperin~
along the easterly line to the north side of Central Parkway a width of 71 ft. from the
Tassajara Centerline and on the westerly line perpendicular to and toward the centeriine
of Tassajara Road a distance of 4 feet.
Then northerly along the easterly line to a point 505.98 ff. northerly of the northerly line of
Central Parkway a distance of 71 ft. from the Tassajara Road centerline and on the west
a distance of 273.20 ft. northerly of the northern line of Central Parkway a width of 79 ft.
Then along the easterly line perpendicular to and away from the centertine of Tassajara
Road a distance of 9 ft. and along the westerly side perpendicular to and toward the
cer~terline of Tas~,ajara Road a distance of 9 ft.
Then northerly along the easterly line to a point 183.63 ft. noah of the northerly line of
Gleason Drive a width of 80 ft. from the centerline of Tassajara Rd. and along the
westerly line to the centeriine of Gleason Dr. a width of 70 ft.
Then along the easterly line tapering to a point 98.48 ff. northerly of the last point to a
width of 64 ft. from the centerline of Tassajara Road and along the westerly line
pe~-pendicutar to and away from the centedine of Tassajara Road a distance of 9 ft.
continuing northerly to a point 205.03 ft. noah of the centedine of Gleason Drive a width
of 79 ft. ~
Then northerly along the easterly line along the existing right of way line established
under Tract 6925.
Page 1 of 3
Then northerly along the westerly line tapering to a point 125.02 ft. from the last point to a
width of 64 ft. from the centerline of Tassajara Road.
Continuing along the westerly line to a point 372.86 ft. northerly of the last point a width of
64 ft. from the centerline of Tassajara Road, then perpendicular to and away from the
centerline of TasSajara Road a distance of 9 ft. to a width of 73 ft. from the centedine of
Tassajara Road.
Then along the westerly line to a point 257.80 ff.. from the last point a width of 73 ft. from
the centerline of Tassajara Road.
Then continuing along the westerly line perpendicular to and toward the centerline of
Tassajara Road a distance of 9 ft.
Then continuing northerly along the westerly line tapering to a point 127 ft. northerly of
the last point a distance of 127 ft. to a width of 64 ft. from the centerline of Tassajara Rd.
Then continuing along the westerly line perpendicular to and away from the centedine of
Tassajara Rd. a distance of 9 ft. to a width of 73 ft.
Then continuing northerly along the westerly line a distance of 327 ft. a width of 73 ft.
Then continuing along the westerly line perpendicular to and toward the centerline of
Tassajara Rdl a distance of 9 ft. to a width of 64 ft. from the centerline of TasSajara Rd.
Then continuing northerly along the westerly line a distance of 788.05 ft. a width of 64 ft.
from the centerline of Tassajara Rd.
Then continuing along the westerly line perpendicular to and away from the centerline of
Tassajara Rd. a distance of 9 ft. to a width of 73 ft. from the centerline of Tassajara Rd.
Then continuing northerly along the westerly line a distanCe of 327 ft. a width of 73 ft.
Then continuing along the westerly line perpendicular to and toward the centerline of
Tassajara Rd. a distance of 9 ft. to a width of 64 ft. from the centerline of Tassajara Rd.
Then continuing along the westerly line a distance of 1,658.25 ff. a width of 64 ft. from the
centerline of Tassajara Rd.
Then continuing along the westerly line through a tangent curve concave to the west a
radius of 3,936 ft. to the northerly City Limit line.
2) Dublin Boulevard between the easterly side of Tassajara Road, easterly to the esterly line
of the Dublin Land Company holdings.
Plan lines are to be parallel to the proposed centerline except as noted herein, the
centeriine of Dublin Boulevard to be perpendicular to the Tassajara Road centerline and
Page 2 of 3
F Q / c
an extension of the existing centerline of Dublin Boulevard on the west side of Tassajara
Road.
Beginning at the east side of the proposed Tassajara Road Plan Line, easterly 277.50 IL.,
92 ft. northerly of the centerline and 69 ft. southerly of the centerline. Then easterly
through a taper 598.51 ft. to the east side of the Dublin Land Company holdings; 70 ft.
northerly of the centerline and 70 ft. southerly of the centerline.
3) Central Parkway between the east side of Tassajara Rd. easterly to the easterly line of
the Dublin Land Company holdings.
Plan lines are to be symmetrical about and parallel to the proposed centerline except as
noted herein, the centerline being perpendicular to the centerline of Tassajara Rd. and an
• extension of the centerline of Central Parkway on the westerly side of Tassajara Rd.
Beginning at the east side of the proposed Tassajara Road Plan Line, easterly 259.93 ft.;
65 ft. northerly of the centerline and 60 ft. southerly of the centerline. Then easterly 420
ft. through a taper 52 ft. northerly of the centerline and 52 ft. southerly of the centerline;
then 205.75 ft. easterly to the east side of Dublin Land Company holdings, 52 ft. northerly
of the centerline and 52 ft. southerly of the centerline.
4) Gleason Drive between the east side of Tassajara Road and the easterly line of the
Dublin Land Company holdings.
Plan lines are to be symmetrical about and parallel to the proposed centerline except e _
noted herein, the centerline being perpendicular to the centerline of Tassajara Rd. and an
extension of the centerline of Gleason Drive on the westerly side of Tassajara Rd.
Beginning at the east side of Tassajara Road easterly 272.99 ft., 65 ft. northerly of the
centerline and 60 ft. southerly of the centerline. Then easterly 420.03 ft. through a taper,
52 ft. northerly and 52 ft. southerly of the centerline.
Then 195.34 ft. to the easterly line of Dublin Land Company holdings, 52 ft. northerly of
the centerline and 52 ft. southerly of the centerline.
Page3of3
,9d3 lam I Si
P.M.7250 q • I I I I I Y-.11\ •
• Parcel 4-Kol1 i'�- a -1-1511---1-1-I 11 I I _-4--_ u .
•. 243 PM 74 •• r---•a po I
7-4 11
111 Illlj .ril III
1 1 1 q„„alai SIA.75171.1111 A )1)11 1.1,� _ `�
• /JII.I I „RI425 iE„..911' NR11'ISSIw . 4--_ ( --_- --- - I _ ._-=- - 71' -
_____. ___. IIIItf 117111"f! 1!„!'17'51.6 'il�f-
,]299'----II- _
_ r
- --- �� • TelO _
- _-._- - _511' I-Ttft�-X111 �- __' 7!100 �� -
!!'J� -1710 _._I.4- •1 II' 1_ _- ` -
- 6919! 1u1G1 _ 1._ -- ]NO' I1 ••+ -
511n�6BlBV-- 1 1-
_ .-�----' -- .i-.4� --'� -Ile7.l/.117'--- 11�
1,".IJlfi ' ✓ CBI
I�1_71 7;011' 1,".".50 elt• ii. �►
11.9111]•17• .v-�-•
_ 1--17.11:- __ 1 1„r . 7.375.11.1-- _
-I Ha•]]'27.11
__ - li' ID.11n
7114,,5•29'G1117' X11----� 1 1 1 40 t tltI r
`• llni97'S1 E.191,!5 .�R=1 R1,a7' 1A55 1 StA_75 010.77 1 I I n 111 AOGW„n =U.1'/9110 I 1 •
47 03.„65165 i.=111911' I I-
cjI / -R=1711 • Dublin Land Co. I I1
.111.44 III •
/
•`9 1,5.10'
Ij / 11'20'117117 1• ll'12'11.1 21 rCh1l7 I7. .T.
pr I I I I. w•
�ryl n„III.ltI 111.011.SEE 1 SHEET No. 0
51320R1 I Li+_ •
INS _ Alameda Co. ∎
..I 1711.- I PM •
7355-Parcel 3 3 Imo'
11 50112•51•W 405.ni I 1105'16.5117
21 . _ /717-._____
501'12'5/•111 97].87•
_____TT --
.�-. I 'If' Illrl-._.._ '.-_�1111I'__- l.1• 1 . 'I���4 - -
yl-le I -5
- - eol0n ' -' - - ' - -'- I nJ pn n _ -aal0�
]I4_t 4.,110• lulu_ I� -1127 -I-=._]l0_ 611001 011n0_yll-_19,05 Iµf3 -ean 4- _ - I50 •
-1 r• - _ -
11' _ _.- - - _I9.1111,1- - - - '� 7
•--an 1'1• �• ' -- _� -- 1 _ 10
--7171 -�+r -\nn'r •r_! •-- ,..r 'r-
- - 501.17151•1! 917.]]'
110019•1910 301.76•
no515 or 0619111110
CE7IIEIIUNE Or IASSAIAUA ROAD •
•IASS I.70'1A55 3'IS 001'17'54.6
IIIIlNl1X:[/111NSn111y l'.. 1-. 11C SIGIIU III OIU/ U7 CII[CNCV •
VY SGIL nMLMEU UN
CITY OF DUBLIN no N0. •
C01lSI0VC110N 410000 :' 15.`11112''150• 119 CL/C6 N0 1101010112111 Pala' I • 711016 EdINl 011,1116431 11267-06
„row 101 .1..191 f.clp�PY1 011905 71157.1100 11N0C4 5„311005110 Or PRECISE PLAIT LINE
'. f7F ,. 7„0016 7,01115 0131c101/c 7 Cllcn„Ln 0u.la N0,
n36CCat 2557, IIInc�(11Y&somPS TASSAIIARA ROAD
MIC C0VI1L1[n NC tNl I�A NCn11C111 C.GO[n5011 11911„IV:;IL]IIw1113 a7..."., ••1'•�INt t/ _ w• + 1• 2212!- NO 0115111 • " .^^1 I"rx.9
I i1'': MIE • 111611111.7151! ....,15:1:".7i^.:...-,..,.:::7'16;.-.e. II •', •
1.,...,._......_, �..1 111 .I . c•1-1. .....I rat -..-_
• •
•
!OC (05
+.l1 Rl-oi 10.1∎1
L ]
xh
i
m
fl . -II - I - CITY 'ARIC u 1
• PM 7355
1
Parcel 4 1
snrlrs/•lv ma0'
-"" '° 121
II _0' 1101'12'51%601.79' •
♦� nn
I p 3• — - -1�— - 70 �: - - - - - - 1
n _—_-6Ot00 [—6 6��r� n 1w s1 I 1i=_I-ow,._1 x2o_r1� a_l loo_ '�I —IUn' 9s o6 _.IG_ 96 - - - selo9 t sslo - .
�__ _ �x6�1 �t-._ _ !-I__-Q_ I-_—.I I_-tr'_I 1� __ -�" —100- - Jl•N- -1aa 1 woo ---Q— , ] -„eor':=
�� —I 9 _
r •'f a l0n• l N
- 1 1,r ■►_ - --ilu• - --- . 611•-- lO0 _00*
r
65! 4
• Iiii2.0§•_4sy'— I� 1101'17'51 E 5115.911' it
\.,71-1-1 III, lelr17:fIti;1V.-9;/ 1101'1]•51-E 300.00'
fi.CENInAI PAIINWAY I 111J•1T110•C
sIA.901+ISO 1 I 11,.20• Dublin Land Co.
114617'54'E -uI, -- I --
. 22.70' 1.I,.
v
CEll'1'iIAI.SBE SUM'no. 0 _
Tassajara Meadows II
I
r t
_Li_i__;11_111146._ Tract 7022 I I
J 4.----- l0Br2'm=w n'
i - .
t..a 0 n_mennunl.a�” ---_ i, I n la
=' 11,W 1)i -° ld Casterson/. i� =Ail,0
L.
s 5
DI II I Illt Tassajara Meadows I I n
N • ''l' Tract 6979 \ \
(D q/ ,ill 110+1 5:i.r,11' _ II1111'10'S11Y_U� — 111757.07•E c ,-1�„
11111 1.1117•[ •
_Tr IS'JJ C 12 ]57.00'
r n 0
____'1.1'07 �_..._. --. .. _— I —._ Ilnl'■S•.12'C BO 1.1]'07'[ _ -I —�� �
IT2�\100'+6_]IIV _, -__-I_ IEN �� I. 1'' 372.06' Ii / I �12V Ito' —� 04' -_ -
711
—I- 1 9' -- — �-4 `- 2 -- -
T-10' I �� _611'] 12` ` I_—_ -_ —_--___Sr.1,.a w. _ I.—_-- �1_-f-_-`fill
—- I—_5 _ �.nnom. _-i_._---_ 1�_ _— `411 11111 �_—S?—_ n I 4"Iaz
_ liar —IO.--11,,---.--.7.7,!--,---0 00 -/ � _ 1 -
4��o tnl co M _ �'� — 1 loo IoSIOa - 12' 111
9jiGl o - _�[--I _I —I—Q y `S - --- I ,--_P_ 1, I 52' _
— _ I 711' - 1
- -I 0' 1 ___,_r--I3
0 t I IL' '� I I / 1100'10']7'[ _ I 17 NG1i307•E 603.97
11I-----1i -1 IOG 31 7111 U5.1fi' ,..n.o.w-u
�_I—j. ~ -. — J. 11111'17'07•[ 7„...,-- I-9040� - ' '
17 rn -1111'13 0%•09.6fi• I' JJ.117r
�I41'111 I,II!? DiManto I I s DUI3LIN RANCH la f 11 I 114347'M%
,1-1,154-E I I 11' 111.]0'
leafi' e_.' .,;I'I.; aI-I M3 - M3
N"ti�1A56]51A 10017.1I OS
-fin'-
L 00- - E rrEASrn1�rA 7011/710 r Tract 6964 BASIS or 0EMn10
--I- E SSI_I-II-._.. MASS l•CENIETILINE
TO"1A55 r IS 00r12'54•E
IC LEA5011 SEE SHEET f10. 0 =
n151ol11n lit 01Uw0 of CIIICNxn UY sP11 707(800 WI
• CI'IIY OF DUBLIN °�"°
811X111[1/NIMSNMl9 1Fin I P O.1108,11 OCPMIUCnI 11267-06
COIRIMICIION 8I00I8 Jai 1,0 cl/C0 N0 1101111011011 1••10' OM o.
+51q;jY•t' PRECISE PIAN LINE ,,,,°„
C0000.010,1• �1,>:Se o)1,` rluls rnxrullG unnxn surnmsron or ,C n ROAD
MUM(tk SOIIIPS 811NIC wO1INS 01111C101/00 11101,81111 1C`lssnitnl\n D
1,rsr1c10a 2'r 2597]/ Ix=ii-a1 'I M[IIIICno C.Mo[eSNI It t�I ille.II113 14"Ill(:fl���i1�
MI[cOUn CI[0 0, t "'' n 1'88 .urre
..�:3L'::1+:-.r:'.L'.-.a�:..::::'11.'I:�:w WC MILLnI • VIIfdUM LIIC110r.6.
\E,n_0 - MIC 1 Fla 110:7551] _ - l
•
AGENDA STATEMENT
PL.iNNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: June 8, 1999
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: PA 99-015, Establish Right of Way Lines for portions of
Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Parkw~,ay.
(Report prepared by: Kevin Van Katwyk, Senior Civil Engineer)
(1) Initiation of the Process to Establish Right of Way Lines for portions of Tassajara
Road, Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Parkway
(2) Review of Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
(3) Review of plans for Adoption of Right of Way Lines for a portion of Tassajara Road
within the City from north of Interstate 580 to the northerly City limit line that located at
the northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962-Neighborhood M-l, and for portions
of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Parkway.(from Tassajara Road to the
westerly boundary of Dubtin Ranch Areas F, G & H)
(4) Determination of Conformity of Location, Purpose and Extent of said Right of Way
Lines w/th the Dublin General Plan and Eastem DUblin Specific Plan
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution Initiating Process to Establish Right of Way Lines for portions of
Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Parkway
2) Resolution Recommending the City COuncil ApprOVe the Finding of Confon-nity
of Location, Purpose and Extent of said Right of Way Lines w/th the Dublin
General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; the Negative Declaration and
approval of right of way lines
$) Negative Declaration
4) Environmental Initial Study
5) Fi~.m.u-e 2B of the General Plan, Land Use Map
6) Figure 4.1 of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, Land Use Map
7) Figure 5.1 Proposed Road System from the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
8) _ Tassajara Road Typical Section
9) Reduced Plan Lines for portions of Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard, Gleason
Drive and Central Parkw~-ay prepared by MacKay & Somps
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1) Hear Stuff Presentation;
2) Take testimony from the public; '
'3) Question Staff and the public;
?~' : COPIES TO: Public Works Director
PA file
H;\pw\Tassajm-a Rd row atignmtX.~gst initiation : ~ ~ ~" * ~'
4) Deliberate~
5) Adopt Resolution initiating process to esmblish right of way lines for a portion of
Tassajara Road from north of Interstate 580 to the northerly boundary, of Dublin
Ranch Neighborhood M- 1, and portions of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive a~
Central Parkway, from Tassajara Road to the westerly boundary ofDublin Rar~c~
Areas F, G & H;
6) Adopt Resolution finding conformity of location, purpose and extent of said fight
of way lines with the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan;
recommend to the City Council that they .Approve and Adopt the Negath, e
Declaration for said portions of sweets and recommend to the City Council that
they Adopt Right of Way Lines for said portions of streets.
DESCRIPTION:
One oft_he goMs of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan is to establish a vehicle circulation system which provides
su~cient capaci~ for projected traffic and allows convenient access to land ,uses. It states that the arterial
s~'ee~ in East Dublin are to be designed to carry very high traffic Volumes with a minimum of interference from
r. omne:ting tragic. Shown on the land use map (Attachment 5) are al1 arterial streets including Dublin
.Boulevard, as well as Tassajara Road,. Gleason Road and Central ?arkm'ay (shown as Transit Spine)
(Anac~hrnem 7). E-ne Eastern Dublin Specific Plan states arter/al streets are to be four, six and eight lanes wide
ro cm~-rF.' the com~-nurfi'O' and sub-regional traffic through the specific plan area Traffic reports of specific
?fcic:rs such as Dublin Ranch Phase I, Tassajara Meadows I and ti, KoI1 Center, Emerald Glen and Too/
Brothers require TaSsaiara Road be widened from two lanes to four, six and eight lanes in various locations.
With the proposed Development of Dublin Ranch Areas A-E and Area F, G and H (currently under staff
review), their respective traffic reports require w~&.mn, of Tassajara Road and the ex-tension o£DubLin '~'
Boulevard, Gteason Road and Central Parkw¥'ay from Tassajara Road to Fallon Road. Recently the uhimate
road fight o£way aiigra'nents o£each o£these arterial streets were mapped,, and provisions were made for the
study o£sCecific precise right o£way lines to be adopted by the City.
i--ne Cie' o£Dubiin Municipal Code (Sections 7.6830 m 7.68.100) outline the required process £or adopting
specific right o£way plan lines. Listed below are the necessary steps that must be taken to adopt specific right
of way precise piton lines: ,
- ~ ~ a~t~.d property.
/.08..-0 I~jriarion of the process may be accomplished by (A) petkion of one or more 'r~,. ~
o~ners; (B) Resolution of the City Council; or (C) Resolution of the Planning Commission.
tn Ti~s case, staff re:.ommends that the I~rocess be initiated by Resolution of the Planning Cormmission
(Anach_ment 1 ). 'Fne DeCanment of Pubtic Works, under the direction of the City En_m~.~r/D~r,.ctor of Public
Works, has studied rlne proposed right of way lines using the Eastern DubLin Specific Plan, City Standards, an
Environmental tn~rial Study (Attachment' 4_), trm=fic studies and have reviewed plans prepared by MacKay &
Scraps to assure con~%rmance with the City and CEQA requiremenm. The City's Municipal Code ~er directs
the following: ;
7.68.50 ~--ne Planning Commission shall hold at lkast one public hearLng regarding the proposed right of
way lines. E'ne hearing shall 'be noticed at least five days in advance of the hearing date by
~ub!ication and posting the riofice along the Manned right of way. '~
This meeun~_ has been noticed to the public ~ required, and staff is now pr~.s~ntm= th,. results o~ un~. studies to
the P1 ,~.ing Com,_mission and public for revi ew and input so that the Planning Commission can make a
further directs the remaining process be the following:
f"~ 7.68.60 Upon receipt of a report from the Planning Commission, the City Council shall adopt a
Resolution of Intention which designates the right of way lines to be established.
7.68.70 The Resolution of Intention is to be published or posted at least 10 days prior to the date
established for hearing objections to the proposal.
7.68.80 The time for hearing objections to the proposal shall be not less than fourteen (14) days or more
than thirty-five (35) days from the date of adoption of the Resolution of Intention.
7.68.90 Amy person having interest in any land upon which the right of way lines are proposed to be
established may file a wu-itten objection at any time not later than the time set for heating
objections.
7.68.100 At the time set for hearing, the City Council shall proceed to hear and pass on all protests or
objections to establishment of the right of way lines. The City Council's decision is final and
conclusive. Following the heating of protests, the City Council may abandon the proceeding or
deny the protests and adopt an ordinance establishing the right of way lines.
At this time. staff is proposing that the City initiate the establishment of precise right of way plan lines for the
widening of Tassajara Road from 1-580 to the northerly City limit line (Northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch),
and the extension of Dublin Boulevard, Gteason Road and Central Parkway (formally transit spine) from
/assajara Road to the boundary of Areas F, G & H of the Jennifer Lin/Dublin Ranch Development
(aPproximatelY 850 feet east of Tassajara Road). ~er the precise rif~t of tines have been adopted by the City
Council, the City. wiI1 acquire the additional needed right of way from the undeveloped landowners in order to
construct the fn-st phase of street improvements and public utilities needed to serve the Eastern Dublin
developed areas.
BACKGROIo_,~-D:
Over the past several years, various PortiOns of Tassajara Road, 'Dublin Boulevard and Central Parkway have
been required to be dedicated and improved. The Dublin Ranch Phase I Developments with the cooperation of
neighboring Tassajara Meadows I (Casterson) and II developments are conditioned to widen and improve
Tassajara Road from Dublin Boulevard to northerly limit of their project. Dublin Ranch Phase I is required to
dedicate, on their respective final maps, all the required right of way along the frontage of their project along
Tassajara Road to the configuration shown in the right of way precise plan lines attached hereto as (Attachment
8--). Likewise Koll Center Development was conditioned to widen, dedicate and improve Tassajara Road along
their respective project frontage to the aligznuents shown on these right of way precise plan lines also. Alameda
County Surplus Authority was conditioned on Tentative Map 7355, to dedicate a large portion of right of way
along the west side of Tassajara Road from Dublin Boulevard to Gleason Road in accordance to these right of
way precise plan lines. The only remaining pieces of Tassajara Road right of way that have not been required to
be dedicated and improved are approximately 3,600 Iinear feet of the easterly section of right way located on
the Dublin Land Company propert3,' CDiManto property frontage), approxamat,.ty .~,030 Iinear fee of westerly
half section of right of way located on the Yarra-Yarra prOperty and appro 'ximately 500 linear feet of the
~'¥esterly half section of right located On Federal property at the north west corner of Tassajara Road and Dublin
Boulevard. 'Fne Yarra-Yarra property and Federal property right of way will be granted with the approvals of
proposed development projects on their respective parcels. The Ci~ is expecting to condemn the needed east
/::
side of Tassajara Road across the Dublin Land Company (DiManto property) since there has not recently been
development project submitted for City approval requiring the needed dedications and improvements.
The needed right of way improvements will provide a connection for the projects to existing roadways and f
freeway and will include ail of the needed necessary through-lanes and mm-lanes for the proposed level of ~
development as defined by the respective traffic reports for the specific projects. Staff has been working with
the Lins, MSSH / Shea Development (Dublin Ranch Phase I), and their engineering consultant, MacKaY &
Somps, to determine the best alignment for these roadway segments. The genera/alignment of these roadways
is shown in the Dublin General Plan (see Attachment 5) and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (see Attachment
_6). The right of way lines need to be further established for these portions of roadways that are being proposed
by the Jennifer Lin (Dublin Ranch Assessment District developer) and MSSH/Shea Development so that the
Assessment District improvements can be designed, with full connections from the Dublin Ranch Areas F, G &
H project sites to existing roadways and so that the Dublin Ranch Phase I projects are connected to existing
ro.adways as conditioned with their approvals.
'Fne area,, which makes up me gmpose~ Tassajara Road right of way, varies from 66 feet to 101 feet wide.
Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Parkway right of ways do not currently exist. The alignment of
Tassajara Road is basically a straight line running north-South from north of Interstate 580 at the Tassajara Road
interchange to the City limit line located on the northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Phase I (Neighborhood M-
I). The right of way width will vary from 128 feet at the northern end of the road to 187 feet wide at the
southern end (Attachment 9). From the Freeway interchange, the roadway will need to be 8 through lanes and a
large median to accommodate double and triple left mm lanes to Central Parkway. From Central Parkwav the
road will accommodate 6 lanes of through traffic and one left mm lane in the median, to the northerly boundary
of Dublin Ranch Phase I. A large-radius curve has been included in the aliment at the northerly end of the
road in order to pull the road away'from an existing large building located next to the road 300 north of the
boundary of Dublin Ranch Phase I (M'I Neighborhood).
The alignments of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Parkway are also all basically su-aight lines
running east-west between Tassajara Road and the westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch A.re~ F, G & H. The
roadways are located perpendicular to Tassajara Road. On the northerly and southerly sides of each of the
streets, is Dublin Land Company (DiManto property). The Dublin Boulevard right of way will vary from 140
feet to 161 feet wide and will accommodate 6 lanes of through traffic. The Gleason Drive ri_oht of way will vary
from 104 feet to 125 feet wide and will accommodate 4 throuah lanes oftmffic..The Centr~Parkwav riaht of
way will vary from 104 feet to 130 feet wide and will accommodate 4 through lanes of traffic. Artac'hrn;nt 8
delineates the actual lane requirements and Attachment 9 are the detailed specific right of way plan alignment
which are the focus of ti'tis review and approval._
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Dublin
Environmental Guidelines, a Negative Declaration and Environmental Initial Study (see Attachment 3 & 4)
were prepared for the proposed project so that it could be evaluated to determine any significant environmental
impacts. The study concludes that there could not be any si_m-fificant effects on the environment as the
necessary roadway improvements were considered as part of the EIR for the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and a
Negative Declaration was therefore, prepared (see Attachment 3). These documents are required to be approved
and certified by -due City Council. They are first reviewed by thePtanning Commission and then forwarded to
the City Council with recommendations. ,~,~
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY:
Government Code Section 65402(a) states, in part, that ifa General Plan has been adopted, no real property.
Shall be acquired by dedication for street purposes until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition has
been reported upon by the planning agency (Planning Conmaission) as to conformity with the General Plan.
The proposed project is the establishment of right of way lines along a route provided and established within the
Dublin General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The right of ways are located within lands described
by the Dublin General Plan. The land along the right of ways will be developed for roadway purposes in
accordance with the requirements and purposes of the Dublin General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan. The proposed right of ways are within the physical scope of the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan and, therefore, the extent will be encompassed by, and consistent with, the General Plan and the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. As such, it is found that the establishment of the fight of ways is consistent with
regard to location, purpose and extent with the Dublin General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staffrecommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution initiating the process for the
establishment of right of way lines for said portions of Tassajara Road,. Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and
Central Parkway (Attachment 1) and adopt the attached resolution recommending City Council approval of
finding the location, purpose and extent of the establishment of right of way lines in conformity with the Dublin
General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (Attachment 2): and adopt the Negative Declaration (Attachment
3_)) for said portions of streets, and adopt the recommended Right of Way Lines for said portions of streets
(Attachment 9).
GENERAL INFORMATION:
General Plan Land Use Designations: General COmmercial; High Density, Medium-High DenSity and~
Medium Density Residential; and Public/Semi-Public Facility
(High School)
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
Land Use Designations: General Commercial; Neighborhood Commercial; High Density,
Medium-High Density and Medium Density Residential; and
Public/Semi-Public Facility (High School)
E~sting Land Use: Vacant'
Existing Zoning: Agricultural, General Commercial; Neighborhood Commercial;
High Density, Medium-High Density and Medium Density
Residential.
RESOLUTION NO. - 99 ~ / ~'~ g 5'
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COM2VIISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
INITL&TING PROCESS OF ESTABLISHING RIGHT OF WAY LIiN~ES
FOR A PORTION OF TASSAJARA ROAD (FROM NORTH OF INTERSTATE 580 TO THE
NORTI-IERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN RANCH TRACT 6962-NEIGHBORItOOD MI),
A.N3) FOR PORTIONS OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD, GLEASON DRIVE AND CENTtLiL
PARKWAY (FROM TASSAJARA ROAD TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN
RANCH. AS F, & n)
PA 99-015
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Dublin Municipal Code Sections 7.68.30 to 7.68.100, the
adoption of specific fight of way lines must first be initiated by either a petition of one or more affected
property owners, or resolution of the City Council or resolution of the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City oflSublin Department of Public Works desires to initiate the process to
establish right of way lines for a portion of Tassajara Road from north oflmterstate 580 to the northerly
boundary, of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962-Neighborhood M1, and for portions of Dubtin Boulevard, Gleason
Drive and Central Drive (from Tassajara Road to the westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G & t-l);
and
WHEREAS, a study of the right of way lines has been completed by the City Engineer and is now
referred ro the Planning Commission for review and recommendations prior to any City Council action.
Vv%IEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider said study, recommendations and
Testimony herein above set forth and is in support of initiating said right of way process.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission approves the initiation of
the process to esrablish fight of way lines for said portions of Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard, Gteason
Drive and Cent-al Drive;
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of June, 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAEq:
~'~ Planning Co~SSi0n Chai~e?s°n
ATTEST:
Community Development Director ATTACHMENT
RESOLUTION NO. - 99
A RESOLUTION OF THE PL.&NNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
FINDING OF CONFORMITY OF LOCATION, PURPOSE AND EXTENT OF RIGHT OF WAY
LINES FOR A PORTION OF TASSAJARA ROXD (FROM NORTH OF INTERSTATE 580 TO
THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN RANCH TRACT 6962-NEIGHBORHOOD M1),
AND FOR PORTIONS OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD, GLEASON DRIVE AND CENTRAJ.~
PARKWAY (FROM TASSAJARA ROAD TO THE VCESTERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN
R.42~CH AREAS F, G & Iff) WITH TIlE DUBLIN GENER_&L PLAN A_N~D
THE EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN
_MD RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE NEGATIVE
DECLAR_4TION AND RIGHT OF WAY LINES FOR SAID PORTIONS OF STREETS AND
.~DOPT RIGHT OF WAY LINES FOR SAID PORTIONS OF STREETS
PA 99-015
~?I-IER.EAS, the Planning Commission pursuant to the Dublin Municipal Code (Sections 7.68.30
to 7.68.100) has initiated the process for the establishment of right of way lines for a portion of Tassajara
Road from norda of Interstate 580 to the northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962-Neighborhood
MI, and for portions of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Dfive (from Tassajara Road to the
westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch A.reas F, G & H) on June 8, 1999 and;
WHEREAS, said right of ways will pass through lands designated General Commercial, High
'Density. Residential, Medium-High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Public/Semi-
Public Facitiry (High School) on the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin SPecific Plan; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65402(a) states, in part, that ifa genera/plan has been
adopted, no real property, shall be acquired by dedication for street purposes until the location, purpose
and extent of such acquisition has been reported upon by the planning agency (Planning Commission) as
to conformity with the adopted general plan; and :
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin has adopted a General Plan and such Plan is applicable to the
properties through which the proposed fight of ways pass; and
WHEREAS, the properties th.rough which the proposed fight of ways pass is located within an
area encompassed by the lands desig~nated General Comrne~;c/al, High Density Residential, Medium-High
Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Public/Semi-Public Facility (High SchooI) on the
Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and developed for circulation purposes in a
manner consistent with those designations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and recommends that the City Council
approve and certify the Negative Declaration for fight of way lines for said portions of streets; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE tT RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find
that:
'?'-r' CHMENT -.
1. The properties through which the proposed fight of ways pass is proposed to be developed
for circulation purposes are in accordance with the requirements and purposes of the General Commercial,
High Density Residential, Medium-High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and
Pub!ic/Semi-Public Facility (High School) designations on the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and
therefore the establishment ora fight of way across said land is consistent with regard to purpose of the
Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. Said proposed fight of ways are consistant with
Government Code Section 65402(a).
2. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the negative declaration and adopt fights of
way lines for said portions of streets as identified in Attachments 8 and 9.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of June, 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
.~d3SENT:
ABSTAIN:
Planning CommisSion Chairperson
ATTEST:
Community. Development Director
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
(Prepared purs.uant to City of Dublin
Environmental Guidelines, Section 1.7(c), 5.5)
Dascription of Project: The project will establish official right-of-way lines for major
a~erials in Eastern Dublin, as well as construct improvements to those streets.
Acquisition of lands, either by purchase or eminent domain, will be required for
construction of the roadways.
Project%oc~tion: Major arterials in Eastern Dublin, including Tassajara Road (no~h of
I-5S0 Interchange to northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962 - Neighborhood
M-I), Gfeason Road, Central Parkway, and Dublin Boulevard (from Tassajara Road to
westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G, & H).
N~-,me of Proponent: Ci~ of Dublin, Public Works Department; 100 Civic Plaza,
Dublin, CA 94568
I hereby find that the above project will not have a significant adverse effect on the
environment.
Attached is a copy of the Initial Study ("Environmental Information Form" and
"Environmental Checklist") documenting the reasons to suppo~ t;me above finding.
Mitioation Measures have been inctuded-i~project. , / .
Dated: May 19, 1999 ' -_Le& S. Thompse .p~Director ~f Public Yv'orks
Attachments
--::n:..--.,~: Z:e-.,ei:p.--.,-:.-,'.."g25) g22-£5£D o Poiu-:.e ~_=2_=)
City of Dublin
Environmental Checklist Form
Initial Study
1. Project title: Eastern Dublin ArtefiaJ Street Improvements - A Portion of CavkaI Imvrovement
Proje~ (CIP)No. 9640
2. Lead agency name and address:
Cite of Dublin_ Public Works Devartment - ] 00 CMo Plaza, Dublin_ CA 94568
3. Contact person and phone number:. Lee Thomvson, Director of Public Works: 925/833-6630
4. Project location: Maior arterials in Eastern Dublin including Tassa~ara Road (north of LSgO
Interchan_~e to avvrox]m~te]v 1.125 feet north of Oleason Road). Gleason Road. Central Park-~vav.
and Dublin Boulevard (from Tassaiara Road to aoorox~matelv 850 feet east of Tassaiara Road:
westerly bounda~ of Dublin Ranch .Areas F. O & ~.
Assessors Parcel Number(s): N/A
Project sponsor's name and address:
'Ciw of Dubiin- Public Works Devartment: 100 Civic Pt~7~ Dublin_ CA 94568
7. General Plan designation: N/A 8. Zoning: N/A
9. Specific Plan designation: N/A
10. Description of project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not tirrfited ro laser
phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessm-y for irs
implementation_ Attach additional sheets ir'necessary.)
Th~s vroie= will establish or~cial rieht-of-wav lines for maior arterials in Eastern Dublin. as well as
construct irnvrovements to those streets. Acouisition of lands, either bv vurchase or ern/nent domain. ~xqll
be reauired for construction of the roadways. Please also refer to vaee ] 8.
I1. Surrounding land rises and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings:
Please refer To va_~e 18.
12. Other.Dublic agencies whose approvaI is required: (e~.=., permits, financing approval, or
participation a=mreement.)
None.
EN'~rfR 0 N/%IENT.&L FA CTO RS PO TENT/4.LLY A3'FECTED: ~
The en,&ronmentaI factors checked below would be poter~tially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact''. as indicated by the checklist on the fo/lowing pages.
[---] Aesthetics ~-~ A=~culrure Resources ~] .4Jr Quatiry
DEI~R~-'~ATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the bas~.s of this initial evaluation:
~ I find that the proposed project COIJW~D NOT have a si__m~cant effect on the environment, and a
h-EGATI-'v'E DECLA. RATION Mil be prepm-ed.
} ] I find that although the proposed projea could h~ive a si_m,.ificmnt effect on the env/ronmeng there
will not be a significant effect in this c~se because revisions in the project have been made by or agre,d to
by the proje~ proponent. A !~flGATED NEGATIVE DECT,~4~TION will be prepm-ed.
find that the proposed project ]',£4~Y have a si_~cant effect on the enviror, ment, and an
E.N-~qiRON_MiENT_4.L IMI'ACT P. EPORT is required.
[ ~]
Ifind that the proposed project MAY have a' "potentially si?Jficant impact" or "potentialIy
significant un~ess rrfitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect ]) has been adequately
analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to appIicable Iegal standards, an'd 2) has been addressed by
mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. .An
EN~RON312ENTAL I3~ACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain
to be addressed.
'"] I find that although the proposed project could have a si~cant effect on the enviromment,
because ail potentially siDaificant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an eartier EIR or
/~-EGATiVE DECLA_KATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that eartier EIR or I~-EGATIVE DECLARA. TION, including revisions or
mitigation measures thatffre.../reposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
..~_S~gnamre ~' Date"
Lee Thomvson. Director of Public Works
EVA_LUAilON OF ENMtRON-k, CENrL4L
l) A brief explanation is required for ail answers except "No LmPact" answers that are adequately
supported by the info**-nation sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question.
A "No Lmpact" answer is adequately supported if the r~erenced infdrrnation sources show that the
impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault
rapture zonQ. A "No Impact" answer should be expI~'~ed where it is based on project-specific
factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will hot expose sensitive receptors to pollutants,.
based on a project-specific s~eening analysis). For the purposes of analysis for this document, a
"No Impact" wilI signify that no new impacts. (as .analyzed in the Eastern Dublin GeneraI Plan
AmendmenffSpecific Plan EIR) have been identified.
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-Site,
cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direc't, and construction as well as operational
impa~s.
f....,,:3) Once th~ lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist
answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially sigrfificant, less than si=mfificant with
miti_~afion, or tess than sigTtificant " ',, ' _
_ Po~nualty Sim-fificmnt Impact" is appropriate if there is
substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more Po~,.nnalIy
Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Simaificant With Mitiaation Incorporated" applies u,here the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "PotentiallY Significant Impact" to a
"Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section
XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pu.rsu .ant to the tiering pro__or, am EIR, or other CEQA process,
an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative recta-orion. Section
I5063(c)(3)CD). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the folloMng:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) L-npacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist u'ere
within the scope of and adequately anal)Ted in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
teg-_l standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier anat),sis~ -
~fitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less nan Si_~znificant with A~iti~azion Measures
Lncorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined flor-
the cartier domament and the ex-tent to which they address site-specific condkions for
project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for
potential impacts. (e=.__., _-~eneral plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously pre~ared, or
outsidg document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pzg_es where the
statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Lnformation Sources: A source list should be atrachid, and other sources used or
individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is o~y a suggested form, and lead ageficies are free to use different formats; I~owever, Icad
a_.n..~_s should normally address the questions from this checkhst that are relevant to project's
enviror,,'n~ntal eft'ems in whatever format is selected.
The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The si_mnificance criteria or threshold, if'any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) ~ne alii_cation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
4
Environmental Impacts, The source of determination is Iisted in parenthesis. See Iisting of sources
used to determine each p0tential impact at the end of the checklist. A Full discussion of each item is
found folIowing the checldist
Potentially Less Than
Si_m~ZficantSi__~Mfimnt Signi.fi~__nI Irnp.~z~
Irnpa~ ~5th impact
Mitigation
Insomoration
I. AESTHETICS - Would the project:
-- a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scerfc vista?
(Source: 1, 2, 7)
b) Subsz~.,'az~zlly damage scenic resources, inctudin~ but notI
iimited to, trees, rock outcro]~pin_% and historic buildin_~s / X
wirb2n a s.:a','e scenic highway7 (Source: 1, 2, 7)
'~f '- the exzsnng visual cam-deter or
c) Substantially e__raa,. ' ' ' '
quaiiry of the~,..-;,~ and irs su~oundin~sT_
(Source: 2, 7)
d) Crsxt~ a new source ofsubst~fiM ~ght or gl~e wMch
would adversely ~ect day or ~hn~e ~ews in the ~ea?
(Sour:,: 2)
2 AG~%~7~ ~SOU~CES - En d:te~Nng
whe:har hmpa~s Io a~culmr~ resources ~e si~cant
em~o~entM effects, lead agencies may refer to ~e
C~a A~cutmr~ Land Evaluation ~d Sits
3zssssmsnt Modal (1997) prepped by the C~a Dept.
of Cons~n'arion as ~ option~ model to use ~ ~s~ssing
hmpacts on a~culmre ~d f~and. Would thc prQect:
a) Convex Prime Fm,-ntand, Unique Fmwnland, or
Fm~-ni~d of Storewide Importance (Farmland), as shown
on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping
and Monito:-[ng Pro~arn of the California [Resources
Agenzy, to non-a~cuttural use? (Source: 2, 7)
b) ConffLi~ -~,5zh e:dsrin~ zoning for agricultural use, or a
~ WiHimmson ~ ~'
.-,.~.t contract? (Source: 2, 7) X
5
Potentially Less Than L~ss Than No N-
Sigaa/.ficant Si=~cant Signfl'icam Impa~
Impa~ ~Sth Impact
Mitigation
Incomoration
c) Im, olve other changes in the ex/sting environment which,
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of X
Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
(Source: 2, 7)
III. AIR OUALITY -- Where available, the si=m,2ficance
Criteria established by the applicable air quatiW
Management or air pollution conrroI district may be
Relied upon to make the following determinations. Would
The project:
a) Co.ici with or obstruct implementation o£rhe
ap~iicable air qualiw planT(Source: 2, 7)
· X j
b) Violate an5, air quatiW standard or conrz/bute t
substantiatJy to an existing or projected air quality X
-~5olarion? (Source: 2, 7)
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net incre~e of
an5, criteria pollutant for which the proje~ regSon is non- X
azainment under an appticable federal or state ambient
air qu~iry ~mndard (including releasing emissions which
exceed qumn*.itative thresholds for ozone prea. ursors)?
(Source: 2, 7)
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial poltutmnt
concentrations?(Source: 2, 7) X
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number o£people?(Source: 8) X
6
pot~-ntiaIb,.Less Than L¢s$ Than No New
Impact -Mth Irnpa:t
Mitigation
· ' Incoraoration
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOI,'RCES -Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effem, either dire~ty or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a X
candidate, sensitive, or spedal status species in local or
re~onal plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department offish mud Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Sendce? (Source: 2, 7)
b) Have a substanri=_l adverse effe~ on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural commnrJty identified in local or
re~on~ plzns, policies, regulations or by the Calh~ornia
Department of~sh and Game or US irish and '¢?fldlife
£e~Sce? (Source: 2, 7 )
c) Have a substantial adverse effea on federally protected X
weuanas as dennea by Seaion 404 or th~. Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pooI, coastal,
etc.) through dire:.t removal, fitlin~ hydrolog'lczl
Lnrenmprioa or other means? (Source: 2, 7)
d) Interfere subst.~nfialty with the movement of any native
resident or mi=m-atory fish or witdiiz~ ssecies or wkh
established native resident or rrfigratory wildih~ condors,
or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites7
(Sour:e: 2, 7)
e) Conflict v. fith any local poticies or ordinances protecting
biological resourcgs, such es a tree preservation policy or
orciinznce? (Source: 2, 7)
f) Conflict with the provisions of ma adopted H£oitat
Conse~'ztion Plarg .Nam, al Cormmuniry Conse~'ation Plan
or other approved local, re_~onzI, or state habitat
consen'ation plan? (Source: 2, 7)
Pomnfia/ly Less Than Less Than No ?
Si=mfi.ficxnt Si_m,ificant Sig~nificant Imp~
Impa~ with Impact
Mitigation
· Incorooration
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5 ?
(Source: 2, 7)
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the si_znificance
of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15054.5?
(Source: 2, 7)
c) Dd-eztly or indirectly destroy a Unique paleontological
resour~.e or site or unique geolo~c feature? (Source: 2, 7)
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside o££o~al cemeteries? (Source: 2, 7)
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project:
a) Expose people or swucmres to potential s',~bstantial
adverse eff'e~s, including the risk ofloss, injury, or death
invoMnz:
i) Rupture ofa 'tknowm emxhquzke ~ault, as delineated on the
most recent .~quist-?riolo Em--rhquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial ~ v~d,.nc, of a k. nown fault? Refer to Division of
.~nes and Geolo=oy Special Publication 42. (Source: 2, 7)
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (Source: 2, 7)
iii) Seismic-related ~ound failure, including liquefaction?
(Source: 2, 7)
iv) Landslides? (Source: 2, 7)
b) Result kn substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
(Source: 2, 7)
?otenfiai]y ~ Than Less Than No New
Si_m~ficant Si_~tmnt S ignifi c,~nt Impa:~
Impact with Impact
Miti~tion
, " Incomomtion
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project, and X
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreadin~ subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
(Source: 2, 7)
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table l 8-1-B
of the U~o~ ~--n Building Code (1994), creating substantial X
risks to Iir~ or property? (Source: 2, 7)
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tm~Jcs or alternative waste water disposal systems X
where sewers are not ava/laNe for the disposal o£waste
water? (Source: $)
V'fL HAZARDS A.¥D F[ALARDOUS MATERIALS -
Would the project.
a) Create z s~gnificant h~,,~ard to the public or the
envh-onment -~n-ough the routine transport, use, or disposal X
ofh~z~rdous materials? (Source: 8)
b) Create z sign'fificant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and ~ X
accident canikions invotv/ng the release of hazardous
materials into the environment? (Source: 8)
c) Emit h-=-- ' emissions or
.--. ~ aous handle hazardous or acutely X
h~- .-z. ardous materials, substances, or waste witkin one-
qum"ter ~vfii_~ (>fan ex~sfing or proposed school?
(Source: 8)
Potentially Lexs Than Less Than No
Si=maificantSi=m,.ifi cantSfgw2fi cam
Irnpa~ with Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
d) Be located on a site wMch is included on a list of
h .azm-dous materials sites compiled pursuant to X
Government Code Section 659~52.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hmzzrd to the public or the
en'~4ronmenz? (Source: S)
e) ZFor a project located within an ai~ort land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two X
miles ora public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety h~r_~rd for people residing or
working in the project area? (Source: 8)
5) For a project '~5nSin the vicini~ ora pr/yarc airsnSp,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or -.vorking in the project area? (Source: 8)
g) Lmp--ir Lnxptemenration of or pnymcally interfere with
an adopted emergency response plan or eme~ency
evacuation plan? (Source: 8)
h) Expose people or structures ~:o a significant risk of loss,
L~ury or dea-_h involving wildtand fires, including where
wildtands m-e adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences z:e intermixed with wildlands? (Source: 8)
VIII. i~-DROLOGY AND ~VATER OUALITY-
Would the -- '~- -
a) 'violate v_.ny water quality standards or waste discharze
requirements7 (Source: 8) - X
b) Substmn.:~y deplete groundwaer supplies or interfere
sub~antiaiiy with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquk~r volume or a lowering of
the local _m-oundwzter ,abL level (~.=., the prooucnon
rate ofpre-e>4sring nearby wells would drop to a level
whicln would not support existing land uses or planned
uses for w?Szh perrnits have been ~anted)? (Source: 2, 7)
10
c) Substantialty alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or m-ga, including through the alteration of the X
course ora stream or fiver, in a manner which would
result in sub~antial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
(Source: 2, 7)
d) Substanzi~y alter the ex. isfing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration oft. he X
course of a stream or fiver, or substantially increase the
rate or amount ofsu~ace mnoffin a manner which would
result in r']ooding on- or off-site? (Source: 2, 7)
e) Create or contfibute runoffwaer which would exceed
the capaciq¢ of e~sring or planned stormwater draina_~e X
svsrgms or pro~Scte substantial addkional sources of
poltur~d runoff? (Source: 2, 7)
z") OrherMse substanrialty de~ade water quaii~?
(Source: 2, 7) X
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood h~_zard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Haza-d Boundary or Flood X
Lnsurance ~,2_-ze Map or other flood h~zard delineation map?
(Sourc¢: 8) :
h) Place wkkLn a 100-year flood hazard area r, mctures
wkich would knpede or redke~ flood flows? (Source: 8) X
i) Expose people or structures to a si~m~ificant ~sk of loss, /
X
/nju~' or death involving floodin~ including flooding as a
result of the fJlm-e ora levee or dam? (Source: 8)
j) Expose people or structures to a si_m-fificmnt fisk of loss, in
invoMng hnundation by seizhe, tsunami, or mudflow? X
(S°urc~: S)
11
LX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established communiry?'
(Source: 8)
.. X
b) Con.fii~ wfth any applicable land use plan, policy, or
re=o~tarion of ~.n agency v~dth jurisdiction over the proje=t
(inctudin~ but not limited to the general plan, specific
pian, local coastal pro,am, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the pu~ose o£avoiding or rnitigaring an
envirommcnta/effect? (Source: 2, 7)
c) Co~i~ -afzh an).' applicable habitat consen'ation plan
or natural commu~ consol-orion plan7 (Source: 2, 7)
X. M'L-Nn-ZR_-~L RESOURCES - WoUld the proje~:
a) Result in the loss of availability ora -t-t-tmown mineral
resource that would be of value to the re, on and the
residents o£rhe sra,:e? (Source: 8)
b) Result in the loss of avaHabiiiry of a locally-important
mineral resource recove~ site delineated on a local X
general plan, specifc plan or other land use plan?
(Source: 8)
X!. NOISE - Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of st?.-adarr% established in the local general plan
or noise ordhxance, or applicable standards of other X
agencies? (Source: 2,7)
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
~oundbomc '~-ibrarion or ~oundbome noise levels?
(Source: 2, 7)
t2
Potentially Less Than L~s Than No N:w
Signifk:ant Significant Signific:mt Impacts
Impact with Impact
Mitigation
Incoraoration
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing w/thout X
the project? (Source: 2, 7)
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in the proje~ vicinity above levels X
ex/sting wkhout the project? (Source: 2, 7)
e) For a project located within an g-pon land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, ~5rhin two X
miles of a public ai~ort or public use ai¢ort, would the
project expose people residing or working hq the project
area to excessive noise L~Is. (Source: 8)
r") For a project ~4thin the viciniW ora private airstrip, X
would the project expose people residing or working in
the proje~ area to excessive noise levelS? (Source: 8)
XII. POPL,-L:ATIO.N AND i:IOUSING-
Would the project:
a) iLnau~.~ substantial population ~ow-rh in an m-ca,
ekher directly (for example, by proposing new homes and X
businesses) or indirectly (for example, t2trouf_z_h ex-tension ..
of roads or other infrastructure)? (Source: 2, 7)
b) Displace substantial numbers of ex/sting housing, X
necessita~ng the construction of replacement housing
· ~ .... "~ '~? (Source: 8)
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating
the constr~.~ion of replacement housing -~.s~wn" ' ~re.? X
(Sour:e: 8)
13
X1TL PUBLIC SER~rICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse.
physical impacts associated w/th the provision of new or
physically altered governmental £acilities, need for new
or physically altered goverr~mental facilities, the
conch-action of which could cause sigr~ificant
envh-ommental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
scndce ratios, response rimes or other pe~o.'-mance
objectives for any of the public sendces:
Fire?rotezrion? (Source: 8) X
Police Protection? (Source: 8)
Schools? (Source: 8) X
(Source: 8) X
Other Public Facilities? (Source: 8) X
xIv. R_ECR_EATION -
a) Would the project increase the use of ex/sting
neighborhood and reg-ional pm-ks or other recreational
faciliti~s such that substantial physical deterioration of X
the facility v,,ould occur or b~ accelerated? (Source: 8)
b) Does thc project Lnctude recreational facitkies or
require the construction or expansion o£re~eational X
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on
thc envirommcnt7 (Source: g)
14
,~"~ Potentially L~ss Than Lass Than No New
'~ Sight Sight Si~:ant tmpa~
Impa~ x~ Impa~t
In¢o~omfion
XV. TR:~NSPORTATIONfI'RAFFtC -
Would the project:
a) Cause an incre~e in tra~c which is substanti~l in
relation to the e~sting trat~c load and capaci~ of~e
-. s~re~ ~'stem ~.e., result in a subst~ti~ inhere in either
the number of re, cie trips, th~ volume to capaci~ ratio
on roads, or congestion at interseaions)? (Source: 2, 7)
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of'
sen'ice szandm-d es:abtished by nhe county congestion -~
mznzaement a=.n~, for designated roads or highways?
(Source: 2, 7)
c) Kesuk in a chmnge in air trzz~c patterns, inciud:mg
_,~,,_, an mcrezs~ Ln tr~c ieve!s or a ch~ae Ln location
zhzz resuks in subsz~zi~ s~e~ risks? (Source: 2, 7)
d) Subszanzi~v''mcr~e h~-ds due to a de~ feature
-
(e.g., sha~ ~a~es or d=gerous interseaions) or
incam~atib!e us~s (e.g., f~ equipment)7 (Source: 2, 7)
e) Kesuit in Lnadequzte eme~enc)' access? (Source: 2, 7)
n,,..d_~u_~ pm-ldng capacity? (Source: 8) X
f) Result b
g) Co2ia vdth adopted policies, pt~s, or pro.ams ~
suooonina alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,.
bicvc]e racl~)? (Source: 2, 7)
XVI. DTTLITTES AND SERYqCE SYSTEMS -
Wouid the projea:
15
Pomntial]y ~ Than I~ss 'i-nan No ¥
Si._m~cant Si=mzifics.n~ Significant Imm2~'
Impa~ with impac!
Mitigation
Incomorafion
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quali~ Control Board?
(Source: g)
b) Kequke or result in the construction of new water or
-- wastewater treatment facilities or exp~sion of existing
facilities, the constr-u~ion of which could cause
signiScant envirommental effects? (Source: 8)
c) RequS-e or result in
water dr~nzge facitkies or exp~sion of existing
rX:.iikies, the construction ofwNch could cause
sigr:~qcanr emdrommental effects? (source: 2, 7)
.~.:x.~ sufficient water supplies available to se~'e the
~roje~ from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new' or e×=~nded entitlements needed? (Source: 8)
e) .Result Lq a determination by the wasrewatar treatment
provider w?,Jr.h sen,es or may se~e the proje= that it has
zdeouzte czpaciry to se~,e the project's projez:ed
demand in a:idirion to the pro'~Sder's existing
conmmkmen:s? (Source: 8)
~ Be served by a landfill with su~cient pern-fi2ed
czfaciry to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposzl ne_=ds? (Source: g)
g) Comply wkh federal, state, and local sram*.es and '
reg:izrions related to solid waste? (Source: 8)
XVII. 3'[AN-DATORY FIN'DU',,'GS OF StGNWFICANCE ~,~,~
16
Pot-nfiaIly I~ss Than L:ss 't-nan
Si~-n~ific~mt Signific~mt S~=muificant impaq-ns
Impact with Impact
Mitigation
· In~omoratJon
z) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wilcllife species, cause a fish or Mldtife population to
drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal cornmunity, reduce the number or restrict
th. ran_,, of a rare or '
o ~ endangered plant or animal or
eliminate 5tape,ant exarnples of the major periods of
Catifmmia h/story or Prehistory? (Source: 2, 7)
b) Does the proje~ have irr/pacrs that are individually
ti,-,Jted, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
consm.raoI, me~s that the incremental effems o£a project
are .considerable when Gew,ed in connection v, frh the effects
of past projects, the en-ects of other current projects, and
the effe:s of probable ~ture projects)? (Source: 2, 7)
i
c) Does th~ project have envirommental effems
which will ca=se substantial adverse effe~s on
h'.-maan being, s, either directly or indirectly? (Source: 2, 7)
Sources need to determine potential environmental impacts:
I. De.:e,,--nination based on location of project.
2. Det,~--nination based on sr~o~se rex%w.
3. Dete~,'xn/nation based on field review.
~ Determination based on the City of Dubtin General Plan -
5. De.:~-mination based on the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance.
6. Dat~--rnination based on Ezrrern Dublin Specific Plan, june 6, 1998.
7. D~t~, ~-a-tination based on Eastern Dublin General Plan .4.mendm~nt and Specific Plan Final E'~.
Administrative Record ¥otumes
8. Not applicable.
17
City of Dublin
Explanations for Checklist Form
Proiect Descrir~tion!
As provided for in Section 7.68.010 of the City's Municipal Code, "A fight-of-way line study
may be established.., for the purpose of reserving areas for furore '~Sdening, extension, or
creation of streets, l'fighways, or space for future utilities, pedestrian ways. /ire and police
emergency access, access to propeR,, and all public r/ghts-of-way." This project ~'iIl establish
-. of~ciaI right-o£-way lines for major arter/als in Eastern Dublin., as well as construct
improvements to those streets for the portion being funded by the Eastern Dublin Traf~c Impact
Fee. k is anticipated that eminent domain may be initiated for acquisition of some of the
proper-des necessary for such construction.
The Eastern Dublin General Plan .Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan were approve5
on M~-y 10, 1993 (Resolution No. 51-93). Several amendments ro the Specific Plan mhd General
Plan h,_x.'e been adopted since. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan provides the ptamning
,,mm~ ~,o,~ ro gume furare land ,use and development decisions in Eastern Dublin. mn m-ca that
encore:asses approximately 3.300 acres.
The Enxrironmenral Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan .Amendment mhd Spesii]c
Plan (SCH # 9'1103604) and Addenda thereto dated May 4, t993 and August 22. t 994 ("FEIR")
analyzed the impact of the development approved by the General Plan A_mendment and the
Specific Plan. The roadways included in Table I, attached hereto, facilkate the planned land uses.
This mnalysis looks at The site-specific impacts of the establishment of the r/gh~,-of-way lines,
cons~--ucrion of the roadways and acquiskion of property for such consn'uction.
lvfajor arterials included in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and fffis Capkal tm.~rovement
Project (CIP No. 9640) ~.-e shov, m in Table 1. It is anticipated that most of the actual roadway
con~-ucfion work w.-ilt be accomplished by developers who m-e required to pay Easrer-n Dublin
Tr~c Impact Fees, v, fth fee credits given for the work completed, i'he time .C-a-ne for
estabtisi~_ment of right-of-way lines and completion of cons~--uction (for those roadv,;ay portions
landed) is t998-2003.
/ne are~_ of the future right-of-way includes pr0per3y that is currently not or, reed by the CiD' of
Dublin or for wkich the City has not obtained easements over said property. The CiD' cta-rently
anticipates that for ce.,-min properties involved, eminent domain (defined as the fight of the
governmgnt [City of Dublin] to take private prope,Wy for public use by vL-me of superior
dominion of The government over ail lands v,4thin its jurisdiction) ma3' be initiared.
~ Project Description and Setting info,marion was provided by the Public Wof~ Depmxrngnt and the Eas?_:-n Dublin
S?-cific ?izn, June 6, 1998 (Wall~,ze Roberzx & Todd).
Dublin An:rial Street Improv=m-~nm, CIP No. 9640 P?.g: 1 g
/'ne actions covered by this environmentaI document include: ]) establishment of the right-of-
way lines; 2) construction of roadways; and 3) acquisition of I~d (by purchase or eminent
domain) for purposes of consumcting the roadways.
Table 1
CIP No. 9640
Major Arterial Streets in Eastern Dublin
Roadway/Segment Eristing Configuration Proposed Configur-~tion
Tassajara Road - north ofi-580 Interchange to 2 lanes (1 each direction): $ lanes (4 each direction, plus
· ' Dublin Boulevard 100-foot right-of-way additional mm lanes at
in:ersection): ] 87-foot right-
of-way.
Tassajara Road- nor-da of Dublin Boulevard 2 lanes (l each direction); 66 8 lanes (4 each direct/on, plus
inTerse~i~n to Cen~al Parkway intersection to 83-foot right-of-way additional turn lanes at
intersection): 166-foot right-
of-way, plus additional ri_*'ht-
of-way at intersesrion with
Dublin Boulevard.
Yzssaja;-2 Road - north of Cent-al Parkway 2 lanes (I each direction); 66- 6 lanes (3 each direction, plus
inTerse:rion to Gle~on Drive intersection foot right-of-way additional mm lanes m
intersection): 141 to 150-foot
right-of-way.
Tassajarz Road - no~w.h of Gle-.son Dhve 2 lanes (l each direction); 66- 6 lanes (3 each direction, plus
inte.'-sezzfon to nor-~em boundao, of Dubtin foot right-of-way additional mm lanes at
Ranch Tra~ 6962- Neighborhood MI intersection); I28 ~o 15e-foot
right-of-way.
Dublin Boulevard - west of Tazsajam Road None exism. 6 lanes (3 each direction, plus
interse~i~n to westerly boundary of Dublin additional mm lanes at
Ranch Are~ G & H intersection);140 to 161-foot
right-of-way.
Central Parkway- west of Tzssajara Road None exists. 4 lanes (2 ~ch direction plus
intersection to westerly bounfiao.' of Dublin additional mm lanes at
Ranch .A~-e~ F & G intersection); 104 to 130-foot
right-of-way.
Gl_-ason Drive - west of Tassajara Road None exists. 4 lanes (2 each direction plus
in:.~rsection to wes:erty boundmo' of Dubiin additional mm lanes at
Ranch .zu-__.a F ~ntersection); 104 to 125-foot
right-of-way.
Source: Draft Pre".ise Plan Lin~s Plan, CiO, of Dublin Public I4"or~:s Department, prepared bi' MacK~_r & Somps
Infrastru~ure Group, dated recei,,ed /[fa), 7, ] 999.
Dublin .-M,~.arial Sa-::.: improvzm.-nm, CIP No. 964.0 Pag: 19
The legal description and approved plats for the roadways indicated in Table ] are included as
Appendix A to this report.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area is surrounded primarily by open space, grazing and
agricultural lands, and developable vacant commercial property.' The Parks Reserve Forces
Training A.rea. knovm as Camp Parks, and the Federal Correctional Institute are located to the
west. Lands in the jurisdiction of Contra Costa County are located to the north and are
predominantly open space consisting of h/Ity, g-rass-covered grazing land. The area east of the
Specific Plan .4.rea is unincorporated land x~'irkin A. larneda CounD', consisting of rural open space
with limited agricultural and n.~ residential uses and very h/IIy Ierrain. Major land uses to the
south (south ofi-580) include Hacienda Business Park, car dealersh/r~s, and h/ghway commerci~
uses. l-]ne ciD' of Ple~anton is located south of!-580.
Projects either under co..nswacrion (UC), recently approved (A), or currently proposed (P) that are
in the project viciniD, include the following:
West of Tassajara Road, staring at nor~hem end -
· Greenbriar- (P)
· Tassajm-a Meadows I & ii- (ur)
· Emerald Glen Park, Phase I - (UC)
· Co,~n~ Site 3 - (P)
· KoI1 Center- (A)
East of Tassajara Road,. sta-J~ng at northern end -
· Dubiki Ranch Phase i- (UC)
· Dubiin Ranch A.reas F, G, & H - ('P)
Exhibi~ t indicates the Proje:t Vicinity for the proposed project.
Dublin An:rial S=::~ ImDrov:m:nrs, CIP No. 9640 ~--o 20
~ PARK~WAY
&
DD~HERT¥ RDAD
:
ARNDLD RDAD ~'a
JAIRVAy BLVD.
ExpIanations
I
The following section provides narrative respons.es that correspond with the environmentaI~
checklist form. Please note that for items checked 'nqo New Impacts", this signifies that no new
impacts as indicated in the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Final
(FEll>,) (SCH No. 91103604), have been identified. Where impacts would be similar to those
identified in the FEIX, applicable mitigation measures from that document are referenced.
I. Aesthetics '
a, b, c - The Alameda County General '~lan Scenic ~.lement (May I966) designates Tassajara
Road as a scenic route. Plarmed and approved urban development in the Eastern Dub/in Specific
Plan a-ed w/Il significantly alter the visual experience of travelers on scenic routes in eastern
Dublin. Formerly quiet roads will be transformed into major suburban thoroughfares carrying
significant traffic loads.2 /vlkigation measures 3.8/8.0 and 3.8/8.1 identified in the Eastern
Dubtin SP/GPA FEIR would apply. The proposed project would be in conformance with the
adopted Specific Plan, therefore no new impacts are anticipated
d -Project plans do not specify the installation of street Iights. It can be assumed, however, that
porfio~-z5 of the roadways would be illuminated. The future installation of Street lights would
create a new source oflight and may arTe~ nighttime views in the area. Inasmuch as the roadway
consWucrion/widening would occur in areas planned and approved for development, impacts are
anticiz~afed to be foss than siom~i, ficce~t.
17. Am'culture Resources
a-c - Portions of the proposed project area are currently utilized for carrie _m-acing. As identified
in the Eastern Dublin SP/GPA Final EIR (Administrative Record Vol. 3, page 705), lands on
either side of Tassajara Road, south of Dubtin Boulevard, are considered prime agricultural land
based on criter/a established by the Cortes~_~.nox Act (Section 56064). The Final EtR states that
loss of prime a_mScuttural land is considered unavoidable, but for reasons stated in that document,
is not s~__~-nificant. 3 .No new in,acts are an~icifiatert
17I..~dr q)uatiw
a-e - Once built or ~Sdened, it is anticipated that wa~c-generated air quality impacts on the
roadways included in this project would increase. The FEiR indicates that mobile source
emissions for ROG and NOx would be significant upon full buildout of the Specific Plan area.
Implementation of mitigation measures 3.11/5.0 through 3.I1/11.0 would not ach/eve the 98%
reduction in project-related trar~c needed to reduce emissions below the ozone precursor
significance.threshold. Residual air quality impacts would remain significant. Upon completion
of cor,_~ ,-,action, no'objectionable odors would be created..No new impacts are cmticipa~ecZ
Ea~-t~-n Dubliz Sp=ifi¢ PlmffGenzral Plan Amendment, idminis-a-ative R=ord (from AJam~ County Supzr/or
Court i~-fion No. V-006477-g VO) VoL I, pp. 294-295.
Ibid. VoL ]IL p. 706.
frei& VoL I, p..328.
~_ex~_,.m D-~,biLrt.~:,~l Strut ~maprm,em.~an, CI? No. 9640 P~e 22
EarthWOrk tYPically involved in roadway construction would produce short-term increases in
particulate matter (PM-10) and NOx (from diesel-powered equipment) concentrations. The FEIX
(Vol. I, P. 326) indicates that the project area is wlthin a non-attainment air basin for PM-10.
Implementation of mitigation measure 3.11/I..0 would reduce project dust deposition (PM-10)
impacts to a level of insignificance. Under buildout conditions, implementation of mitigation
measures 3.1I/2.0 through 3.11/4.0 would not reduce ozone precursor emissions (2,~Ox) to less
than significant level. Even with mitigation, cumulative impacts related to construction dust
deposition, construction vehicle emissions, and mobile source emissions remain potentially
significant cumulative impacts, in part .due to non-attainment status of the air basin. No ~ew
im~pac!s are anticij~a~ed.
IV. Biolozieal Resources
a-f- The FEIR (Vol. I, pp. 262-269) identifies sensitive habitat and animal species that exist or
potentiMIy exist within .the Specific ?lan ar~a. Fi_mares 3.7 A-C of the FEIaR. (Vol. I, pp. 283-285)
indicate that of the roadways included in CB No. 9640, only the northern-most portion of
Tassajara Road has existing or suitable habitat and species present. These habitat and species
include, but are not limited to, Northern Riparian forest, San Joaquin kit fox habitat, golden
· ,~,,I,, burrowing owl, and Northern harrier.
Implementation of mitigation measures 3.7/1.0 throuzh 3.7/4.0 of the FE/~ would reduce
~mpacts associates with loss of habitat to a level of insignificance. Implementation of mitigation
'measure 3.7/5.0 (as revised, see Vol./I, p. 570) would reduce impacts associated with vegetation
removal to a level of insignificance. Implementation of mitigation m~zsures 3.7/6.0 through
· 3.7/17.0 (measure 3.7/8.0 as revised, Vol. ~ p. 882; reinsure 3.7/9.0 as revised, Vol. ]J., p. 584)
would reduce impacts associated with loss or de~adation of sensitive habitat to a level of
insignificance. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.7/18.0, 3.7/19.0 and 3.7/18.1 (see Vol.'
~, p. 697) would reduce impacts associated with loss of San Joaquin kit fox habitat/dens to a
level of insignificance. Implementation of mitigation measure 3.7/25.0 would reduce impacts
associated with loss of golden eagle habitat to a level of insigzfificance. Implementation of
mitigation measures 3.7/20.0, 3'.7/25.0, mad 3.7/27.0 (as revised, see Vol. ]J., p. _604) would
reduce impacts associated with burrowing owl and northern harrier habitat to a level of
insignificance. Cumulative impacts related to dkect loss of habitat and golden eagle habitat are
considered potentially significant. Implementation of' mitigation measures 3.7/1.0 through
3.7/15.0, 3.7/23.0 and 3.7/25 would result in a level of insignificance. No ~ew impacts are
w~ticiJ~z~er7
V. Cultural Resources
a~d -No known cultural, paleontolo~cal, or historical resources exist within the proposed
project v. rea, wkich encompasses the existing and future roadways identified in CIP Nc>. 9640.
7'nerefore, no impacts to lmo~,n resources are'antici~aterl
?reviously unidentified pre'historic resources may exist in the project area and would be subject
to potenr:,aI disruption or derauction during construction activities. Implementation of n-~itigation
~t_'mx ,D,'-bl.in A_r~Sal S~-~t ].mprove:memt~, C~ No. 9640 ?age 23
measures 3.9/5.0 and 3.9/6.0 would reduce potential impacts to a level ofinsigniJcance. -No new
impacts are oa~ticipated .~
VI. Geoloev and Soils
a-e - No -known earthquake faults or AJquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones traverse the project
area. For those portions of future roadways which are underlain by expansive soils and bedrock,
potential shrink/swell impacts may occur, tmplementation of mitization measures 3.6/14.0
through 3.6/3.16.0 Would reduce potential impacts to a level of insi-znificance. Construction-
related and long-term erosion and sedimentation impacts associated with construction of the
roadways are anticipated. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.6/27.0 and 3.~;/28.0 would
.. reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. No new impacts are anticipatecZ
YTI. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
a-h -The proposed project includes the establishment of right-of-way lines and future wJdeninz
existing and proposed roadways. The project does not involve the storage or use of hazardou~
materials. No in,acts are oa~ticipa~ed
VIII. Hvdrolo_~v and Water 0uatitv ('
a, g, j - The proposed project includes establishment of right-of-way lines and future w/dening of
roadways. TheSe roadways are not located within a floodplain and proposed modifications would
not expose people or struc'mres to flooding. Violations of any water quality standard or waste
discharg~e requirement are not anticipated..No impacts are anticipated
b - f- Proposed roadway modifications would include installation and/or up__grade of the
drainage system. Although widening of the roadways represents an increase in impervious
surfaces in the immediate project vicinity, the project will be designed so as not to impact the
ex/sting drainage_ system Implementation of mitigation measures _~.>/44.0" ' throu?,h _~.>/48.0~ ' ' (Vol.
I, pp. 228-229) would reduce potential project-sl~'ecific impacts associated with'~ncreased runoff
to a level of insignificance. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.5/49.0 and 3~5/50.0 (VoL I,
p. 229) would reduce potential impacts associated ~'ith reduced m-oundwater recharge to a level
ofinsigx-£ificance. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.5/51.6'through 3.5/55 (re~er to Vol. I,
p. 230 and Vol. II, p. 656) would reduce impacts associated with non-point source polIution to a
Ievel of insignificance. Cumulative impacts related to an increase in impervious surfaces and the
resultant potential increase in flood hazards, reduction in m-oundwater recharge, and increase in
non-po'iht pollution sources is a potentially significant c~mulative impact. Implementation of
mitigation measures 3.5/44.0 through 3.5/52.0 (Vol. I, pp. 377-378) would result in a/ess than
significant cumulative impact..No new impacts are anffcipa~ed.
IX. Land Use and Plannin~
a-c - T'rfis proposed Capital Improvement Prom-am (CtP) project is in response to the adopted
E,,stern Dublin Specific Plan. The entire CIP-projezt is within the City's' Sphere of Influence
and/or d,-y limits and is therefore governed by the adopted General ?lan and Zoning Ordinance,
· =_as'_'-m Dub~:.n o4.rt_.~al Str--..~t improvzmznts, C]~ No. 9640 Pace 24
in addition to the EaStern Dublin Specific Plan. The proposed fight-of-way lines are in
conformance with ultimate roadway widths discussed in both the Specific Plan and the
Circulation Element of the General Plan. The project area is not included in any habitat
conservation plans or natural community conservafio~ plans. 2¢o impacts are anticipated
X. Mineral Resources
a-b - According to information provided in the FEIR OZol. I, p. 251), although proposed uses
would preclude any future recovery of ag_m-~ate resources, underlying soils are judged to be
inadequate for use as agg-r~ate. No impac, ts ar. e ca~ticipated
XT Noise
a - f- The FEIR identifies potentially sigauificant noise impacts related to exposure of existing
and future residences to future roadway noise, and to construction noise. Implementation of
mitigation measures 3.10../1.0, 3.10/2.0, 3.10/4.0 and 3.10/5.0 (Vol. I, pp. 317-319) would reduce
project-specific impacts to a level of' insi_m'fificance. Even with. implementation of mitigation
measure 3.10/7.0, cumulative impacts related to exposure of existing residences to future
roadway noise would remain at a potentialIy significant level (Vol. I, p. 381)..No n~v impacts
.'M-fi. Por~uladon and Housin~
a-c- T'n, proposed project includes the establishment of right-of-way lines and consu--uction of
and/or modifications to portions of four roadways. Proposed roadway modifications were
planned for in the adopted Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. .NopoImia~ion aeTdhousirTg impacts are
X_VII. Public Services
a -The proposed project includes establishment of right-oLway lines and future widening and
other modifications to existin~fature roadways. No 'impacts to fire protection, police prote~ion,
schools, or parks are anticipate& Due to Cue fa~ that the proposed project is a CIP project, any
future required roadway rn_aintenance would be accounted for in the City's yearly budget. 2go
intj:acts are cmticipate~f
XTV'. R,creation
a-b - The proposed project includes establishment of right-of-way lines and future widening and
other modifications to existin~future roadways..No irapac~ are anticipated
XV. Transr~ortation/Tra~ c
a-g - Tn, proposed project includes establishment of right-of-way lines and future widening
and/or coP, A~-u~--~on on roadway segTnents identified in Table 1. The CIP established for this
work is in response to approved land uses included in the adopted Easter Dublin Specific Plan.
East-,'u'n Dubiim A_rt~a! Str~_t im.m-ovmm~*~, CI? No. 9640 Peg: 25
The following transportation impacts, identified in Vol. III of the FEIK (pp. 1000 - 1 O0 l), would
be applicable to the proposed project:
· Cumulative impacts on Dublin Boulevard at the Tassajara Road intersection.
Implementation of mitigation measure 3.3/13.0 would reduce the impact, but the impact
would remain significant.
· Cumulative buildout would cause level of service F operations at the intersections of
Tassajara Road with Gleason Road and Central Parkway. Implementation of mitigation
measure 3.3/14.0 would reduce the impact to a leveI of insignificance.
The FEI/~. (Vol. I, p. 165) identifies potential impacts related to safety of pedestrian and bicycle
traffic When crossing major streets such as Dublin Boulevard and Tassajara Road.
Implementafion of miti.gation measures 3.3/16.0 and 3.3/I6.1 would result in a level of
insignificance.
No new impacU are anti"c~aled~
X-VI. Utilities and Service Systems
a - g - The proposed project includes establishment of ri.~ht-of-way lines and ~rure widening
and other modiScations to existing/future roadways. No impacts to utilities and service
Eas~,..,~-a D~zbiirt Art~'~ial Slr~t Impmvemaent~, CIP No. 9640 Page 26
APPENDIX A
... Legal Description and Plats
I 1,267--02
Pc.g-_ I of 4
EXHIBIT "A"
Right of way acquisition for the purposes of_ widening Tassajara Road-and-the-construction of DubIin
Boulevard, Central Parkway and Gleason Drive in the City of Dublin, Alam:da County, California, alang~
and through the lands of Dublin Land Company, a deed for which was retarded September 30, 1983,
Series 83-182776, Alameda County RecordS. Parcels A through E are drainage and utility ecs:re:ms
which correspond to the various street fight-of-ways as showm on the current plan lines. Tn: easements
are =m-w_mad for purposes of =m-ading and installing utilities in the ultimate location and paving th¢ TW
pardon of th: streets ('ParceIs F, G, H, J & K). The existing poles on Tassajara Road will b: relocated.
Th: d,'~nage and utility easements and TI~ right-of-ways are describM as follows:
PARCEL ,4., Tzssajara Road Drainage and Utility Easement
-- BEGLN-NENG at the most northwesterly comer of above said land, said comer being on t,h= =asterty tin:
of Tassajm--a Road, 66.00 feet in widr_h and the southerly tine of Tract 6!P25, Dublin Ransh, th: map of
which w~ fiI-.xt in Book 241 of Maps at Page 39, Alameda County R~ords; k--nense leaving said Point of
Beginning along the easterly lin= of Tzssajara Road SI°13'07"W 172.80 feet; th:nc= S1°I2'54"W
2207.39 fa=t; th:nee $88°f..~.4'32"E 18.39 fa=t;, th:nc= S I °15'28"W 234.18 feet to a point hereafter known
as Po_r'tw'W A; th=nc: leaving the easterty Iine of Tassajara Road S88°47'06"E 43. I3 feet; th:nc=
N00°29'tg"W 381.76 f~t; thence NI°12'54"E 947.03 feet to a point hereafter known as PO~"T B:
th:nc= NgS°47'06"W 29.00 feet; thence N02°56'4I"W I65.44 f~t; thence S88°47'0S"E 29.00 fee.:;
thence NOI°12'54"E 505.98 feet; thence S88°47'0~5"E 9.00 feet; thence N01°12'54"E 360.00 feet to a
paint hereto'ear tmo~m as POIN'T C; thence NgS°47'06"W 26.00 feet; thenze N01°I2'54"E 165.00 fa:t;
th:nee $88°4C53"E 25.01 feet; thence Nl°I3'07"E 89.66 feet to the southerly Iin: of above said T,--ar.r
6925; thence along said southerly tine N88°39'20"W 46.00 feet to the POLNT OF BEGIN'"N ,_'D~G.
Containing 2.5_37 acres, more or less.
PA.RCm--L B, Dublin Boulevard Drainage and Utili~ Easement
CO~CENG at the above described POIN-f A on th= ~-zsterly Iine of Tassajara Road; th:nc:
S88°47'05"E 10.!2 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S00°07'0T'E 200.46 fa=t; th:nc:
S88°47'06"E 38.00 fat; thence N46°I2'54"E 28.28 feat; thence S88~7'06"E 275.84 fa=t; thence
S88°29'55"E 200.00 fa:t; th:nee S88°47'06"E 368.67 f~t to the easterly Iin: of Dublin Land Co., Sin"its
83-182776; thenr, e along said easterly Iine NI°08'49"E 140.00 f~t; thence l~ving said easterly lin:
N88°47'06"W 68.51 feet; th:nc= N86°55'2.5"W 400.2I feet; thence NgS°47'06"W 130.00 fa=t; th:nc:
Nl°12'54"E 9.00 fat; thence N88°47'06"W ~5.50 f~t; thence N~.-~%8'I3'W¢ 27.86 feet; thence
/si 88 -,7 0, 'W' ..,~.01 feet to the TRUE POENT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 3.192 acres, more or less.
P.-~RC_~_ C, Central Parkway Drainage and Utility F2.sement
BE?~,EN~_'_~_--~.,,~G at the above descNbed PO]3NwI' B on the easterly line o,f..T,,as~,ajam Road; thence
N46 lz >4 E'~8'>8- _ f~t; thence S88°47'05"E 237.93 feet; thence S89°52 35'E 420.08 feet; th:naa
S88~7'0S"E 205.75 f~t to the easterly Iin= of Dubiin Land Co., Series 83-182776; th:nc= along said
easmrly tLne NI°08'4~'E 104.00 fat; thence D-eying said ~terty tine N88°47'06"W 205.'63 feet; thence
Ngg°01'lf"W 300.03 fat; th=nc= N88°47'06"W 120.00 feet; thence NlO12'54"E 9.00 fe:~t; thence
N88°47'08"W 249.93 fe~t; thence N43°47'06"W 28.28 feat; thence NSg°47'06"W 29.00 fa=t; thence
S02°56'41"E 165.44 fat; thane: S88°47'06"E 29.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGENN~G.
Containing 2.434 acres, more or less.
- 5 11,267-02
S3'o� h March 2, 1999
RRB
Page 2 of 4 '
PARCEL D,Gleason Drive Drainage and Utility Easement
BEGINNING at the above described POINT C on the easterly Iine of Tassajara Road; thence
N46°12'54"E 28.28 feet; thence S88°47106"E.250.00 feet; thence S89°52'35"E 420.08 feet; thence
S88°47'06"E 195.46 feet to the easterly Iine of Dublin Land Co., Series 83-182776; thence along said
easterly Iine N1°08'49"E I04.00 feet; thence leaving said easterly Iine N88°47'06"W 195.34 feet; thence
N88°01"16"W 300.03 feet; thence N 88°47106"W 120.00 feet; thence NI°12'54"E 9.00 feet; thence
N88°47'06"W 250.99 feet; thence N43°47'00"W 28.28 feet; thence N88°46'53"W 25.01 feet; thence
S0I°12'54"W 165.00 feet; thence S88°47'06"E 26.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 2.415 acres, more or Iess.
PARCEL E,Tassajara Road Drainage and Utility Easement.
BEGINNING at the above described POINT A on the easterly Iine of Tassajara Road; thence along said
easterly Iine S01°15'28"W 503.97 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 234.02
feet through a central angle of 16°03'36"for an arc length of 65.60 feet to a point of compound curvature;
thence along a curve to the Ieft having a radius of 29.00 feet through a central angle of 64°03'42" for an
arc Iength of 32.43 feet to a point of compound curvature; thence along a curve to the left having a radius
of 164.02 feet through a central angle of 05°34'29" for an arc length of 15.96 feet to a point of reverse
curvature; thence along a curve to the right having a radius of 178.02 feet through a central angle of
01°44'10"for an arc length of 5.39 feet;thence Ieaving said easterly Iine of Tassajara Road N01°12'54-E
391.35 feet; thence N88°47'06"W 38.00 feet; thence N00°07'07"W 200.46 feet; thence N88°47'06,"W
10.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 0.520 acres,more or less.
The portions of the above described parcels that are subject to credit against the City of Dublin's Traffic
Impact Fee(lir) are described as follows:
PARCEL F,Tassajara Road (11r)
BEGLNNB'JG at the first hereinabove referenced POINT OF BEGINNING for.PARCEL A; thence
leaving said POINT OF BEGINNING along the easterly line of Tassajara Road Sl°13'07"W 172.80 feet;
thence S1°12'54"W 2207.39 feet;._thence S88°44'32"E 18.39 feet; thence S1°15'28"W 234.16 feet;
thence Ieaving said easterly Iine S88°47'06"E 10.12 feet; thence N00°29'19"W 381.27 feet; thence
N01°12'54"E 647.52 feet; thence S88°47'06"E 4.00 feeet; thence N01°12'54"E 300.00 feet; thence
NO2°56'41"W 165.44 feet; thence N01°12'54"E 505.98 feet; thence S88°47'06"E 12.00 feet; thence
N01°12'54"E 614.72 feet to the southerly line•of Tract 6925; thence along said southerly Iine
N88°39'20"W 20.99 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Conrairing 0.955 acres,more or Iess.
•
•
I 1,257-02
Pas= .3 of 4
PARCEL G, Tats:jar: Road ('I'iF)
BEGL~-NING at the above described POLNT A on the easterly line of Tassajara Road; th:nc: along said
eastzrty line S01 ° 15'28"W 503.97 feet; th=nee along a tang:at curve to the left having a radius of 234.02
feet through a central angle of 16003'36" for an arc lcn~h of 65.60 feet to a point of compound c.u,~_.atur=;
th=nc: along a curve to the left having a radius of 29.00 f~t through a central angle of 25=I5'33, for an
m'c ]:ng?.h of 12.79 feet; th:nc: l~ving said :ast=rly lin: of Tats:jam Road N01°12'54"E 379.44 fe=t;
th:nc: N00°07'07"W 200.46 feet; th:nee Ngg°47'06"W ] 0.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGL-N-/'qTNG.
Containing 0.182 acres, more or less.
PARCEL H, Dublin Boulevard ~
CO~CLNO at the above described POINT A on th: east:dy Iine of Tassajm'-a Road; than::
S88°47'05"E 10.12 feet to the TRUE PO~,,rI' OF BEGINNING; th=nc= S00=07'07"E 200.46 feet; thenc=
S88°47'06"E 38.00 f=et; thence N46°I2'54"E 28.28 fee.~t; then:: N0?13'07"W 32.05 feet;
S88~7'05"E 277.84 f:m; th:nc: ...q88"29'55"E 200.00 feet; then:: $88°47'06"E 368.56 f::t to the
=~txriy tin: of Dublin Land Co., S:ri:s 83-182776; thenc.: along said o-zsterly tine N01 0g -,9 = 76.00
f=:t; th:nc: t--~ in= said easterly line Ngg°47'06"W 69.06 f~t; thence N86055'~"W 400,2I f:et; th=nc=
Ngg°47'06"W 129.48 feet; th:nee NOI°I2'54"E 9.00 feet; then:: Ngg°47'06'EV 253.58 feet; th=nc=
N02°I3'07"W 32.06 feet; th=nc= N44°38' 13"W 27.86 feet; th:nee Nhg°47'06"W 33.0I feet to th= TRUE
POINT OF BEGE~-NrlNG.
Contzining 1.9'.-4' acres, more or ]=ss.
P.~-~C'=~ .T, Cenn-aI Parkway ~
BEGEN.-N'ING at the above described POINT B; th=nc= N46°I2'54"E 28.28 feet; th=nee N04°I6'07"W
32. I5 f~.e~t; thence S88°47'05"E 240.70 feet; th:nc: S89°52'35"E 420.08 feet; then:= $88047'0C'E
206.02fe:t to the east=rly tine of Dublin Land Co., Series 83-182776; thence along said e~terty Iine
N01°08'49"E 40.00 feet; th:nee Is:vine said easterly tine Ngg°47'06"W 205.88 feet; th:nc:
Ngg=0I'16"W 300.03 f~t; th=nee Ngg°47'06"W 119.79 feet; then:e N01°!2'54"E 9.00 feet; thence
Ngg°47'06"W 246.86 f~t; thence N04°I6'07"W 32.15 f~.~t; thence N43°47'06"W 28_28 fee:; th:nee
Ngg°47'06"W 29.00 f~t; th:nee S02°56'41"E_165.44 f~t; then:.: S88°47'06"E 29.00 f=gt to the POLN'i'
Cont. zining 1.I56 acres, more or l=ss.
PA.RCE_L K, Glzzson Drive ~
B.5,G_rN_-N-LNG at the above d:sc'rib:d POINT C; th:n:= N46°12'54"E 28.28 feet; thence N00°45'32"E
32.00 f=e.-t; th:nc= S88°47'06"E 249.95 feet; thence S89°52'35"E 420.08 feet; th=nc: S88°47'06"E
195.73 f=:t to th: easterly iin: of Dublin Land Co., S:ri~ 83-182776; th=nc: along said :asterly line
Nl°08'49"E· 40.00 f~t; thence Is:vine said "~sterty line N88°47'06"W !95.59 feet; thence
NgS°01'16"W 300.03 f~t; th=ns: N88°47'06"W I19.79 feet; then:e N01°12'54"E 9.00 feet; th:n:=
N88°47'0S"W 250.74 feet; th:nc= N00°45'32"E 32.00 feet: th=nc: N43°47'00"W 28.28 fer.-t; th=ns=
Ng8°46'53"W 25.01 feet; thence SOI°12'54"W 165.00 feet; th=n:= S88°47'06"E 26.0~) feet to th,=
POINT OF BEGL-NNING.
Conmi,'~ng 1.142 acres, mot= or less.
i -
55 co' March 2, 1999
RRB
•
Page 4 of 4
•
TEMPORARY SLOPE AND CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
A temporary slope and construction easement is hereby ganted over the lands of Dublin Land Company
described as follows:
A strip of land ten (10) feet in width, contiguous to the perimeter of the above described Parcels A, 3, C,
D,andE.
Said temporary easement shall expire 30 days from the date of completion and acceptance of the last
utility installed in the respective utility easement.
This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the
Professional Land Surveyors Act.
/'j �•`� \ - GA V?/ 9
! `&enne.�h�L. •DZS Date
a ^
No. 25573
•
Prepared by the firm of
MACKAY&SOMPS
Infrastructure Group .
San Ramon, California
•
~._.m
NB~47'D~W J / ]
J I ~-~ la_.~' ~-~ .-~
/,.,i
275.54' ~'~ "~ 20~.~'
NS~7'C,~W N5~29'55'
L
0 ~ O0 20C
SCALE: 1"
=100'
~-4 -99
PLAT TO ACCOMP~ DESCRIP~O
DUBUN L~D CO~P~~
DUBUN ~FORN~A
~CH,1D~9
1 O0 200
SCALE: 1" = 100'
/JJJ .L��� ,. POINT C
GLE /3\ uNi 11
i
Sheep 0 5 �S
\ w o
▪ C)
X N `a
• W
O = . ,
Z Lo
tV
p —N---
.J
u
U •
Q
. 'C—
ED 1 .K.
\ Nss479sW
/453'47'05'W
12..000'
Q
J _
N
C
L, ?T)
Q _. in LD
0 100 200
U
Li
= V SCALE:1"=100'
< Z■I
C
° v ShAe i J 0-£
j .�-g-99
43°47'0&W N
N
28�S' N01°12'54 E
n
i' N8B°47'0�W 9.DONgB°47'06 W
129• 249.93' 120.00'
NBB°4"05 n 1 J
'I F 32.1 S'
245.85' < 119.79' i
;� ° PARCEL C J PARCEL -
Ln a 420.0'5
Sao
I 240.70'
f
32.15' T I 42D-0.9
,S? NS5'47Iog W ...- 237.93' NSg°52'3
1 NS8°47'0-5 W
0 ' 100- 200
'
SCALE: 1" = 100' ~ ~, ,.,~
A=1'44'10' > '
-... ~.~! I~ \ /
o ~oo =oo ~J ~= I I !
- - ~.~1 /~-I I !·
tl 40.00'