Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 225-99 TIF/AreaBenefit EDuRESOLUTION NO. 225 - 99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF Tl~E CITY OF DUBLIN RESOLUTION REVISING THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE AND AREA OF BENEFIT FEE FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE EASTERN DUBLIN AREA, AS PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NO. 1-95 AND REVISED BY RESOLUTION NO. 41-96 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin has adopted Ordinance No. 14-94 which creates and establishes the authority for imposing and charging a Transportation Impact Fee; and WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment ("GPA") and Specific Plan ("SP") were adopted by the City in 1993; and WHEREAS, the SP was amended by Resolution No. 124-96; and WHEREAS, the GPA outlines future land uses for approximately 4,176 acres within the City's eastern sphere of influence including approximately 13,906 dwelling units and 9.737 million square fee of commercial, office, and industrial development; and WHEREAS, the SP provides more specific detailed goals, policies, and action programs for approximately 3,313 acres within the GPA area nearest to the City; and WHEREAS, the GPA and SP areas ("Eastern Dublin") are shown on the Land Use Map contained in the GPA (attached hereto as Exhibit A) and exclude the area shown on the Land Use Map as "Future Study Area/Agriculture"; and WHEREAS, a Program Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was prepared for the GPA and SP (SCH No..91103604) and certified by the Council on May 10, 1993 by Resolution No. 51-93, and two Addenda dated May 4, 1993, and August 22, 1994 "(Addenda") have been prepared and considered by the Council; and WHEREAS, the SP, EIR and Addenda describe the freeway, freeway interchange, and road improvements necessary for implementation of the SP, along with transit improvements, pedestrian trails, and bicycle paths; and ' WHEREAS, the EIR and Addenda assumed that certain traffic improvements would be made artd that development within Eastern Dublin would pay its proportionate share of such improvements; and "' ..... .., WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a "Mitigation Monitoring Program: Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment" by Resolution No. 53-93 which requires development within Eastern ~ Dublin to pay its proportionate share of certain transportation improvements.~necessary to mitigate impacts'`~ caused by development within Eastern Dublin; and : WHEREAS, the SP, EIR, and Addenda describe the impacts of contemplated future development on existing public facilities in Eastern Dubl~g [h~rough the Year 2010, and contain an analysis of the need for new public facilities and improvements.re4tgjred by future development within Eastern Dublin; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1-95 on January 9, 1995, establishing an "Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee" for development within Eastern Dublin; and WHEREAS, ResOlution No. 1-95 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared for the City of Dublin by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., in a document dated November 1994 and entitled "Traffic Impact Fee-Eastern Dublin" (hereafter "Study"), which is attached as Exhibit B to Resolution No. 1~95; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1-95 further relies upon a second report which was prepared for the City of Dublin by Santina & Thompson, Inc., in a document dated December 30, 1994, entitled "Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Study/Roadway Costs, Initial Level" (hereinafter "Report"), which was attached as Exhibit C to Resolution No. 1-95; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 41-96 on April 9, 1996, revising the fee established under Resolution No. 1-95, and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 41-96 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared for the City by TJKM ("1996 Study Update") and cost estimates prepared by Santina & Thompson, Inc. ("1996 Cost Estimate Update"); and WHEREAS, Section 8 of Resolution No. 1-95 provides that the City will periodically review the fee and make revisions as appropriate; and WHEREAS, the City of Dublin Department of Public Works has prepared a revised report dated November 8, 1999, entitled "1999 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update" (hereafter "1999 Study Update") which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the 1999 Study Update includes and incorporates the following items: Table 1, which summarizes the calculation of the revised per trip traffic impact fee for Section 1 improvements, Section 1 residential improvements and Section 2 improvements; · Table 2, which provides detail of total (unadjusted) improvement costs by section and project segment; · Attachment 1, entitled "Cost Analysis, 1999 Update Traffic Impact Fee Eastern Dublin Area," prepared by Santina & Thompson, Inc., and dated November 9, 1999, which includes revised cost estimates anticipated roadway improvements that have not yet been constructed or guaranteed; · Attachment 2, prepared by the Department of Public Works, which includes estimates of credits valued at the revised rates to be provided to developers for construction of TIF improvements and dedication of TIF right-of-way as specified in development agreements (Toll, Koll, Tassajara Meadows, General Motors and MSSH Dublin-Shea Homes), as well as an estimate of additional credits to be provided at current TIF rates for the Emerald Pointe development; · Attachment 3, entitled "Summary of Activity Under Existing Development Agreements as of June 30, 1999;" Attachment 4, entitled "Traffic Impact Fees - Trip Generation," which provides detailed. information regarding the assumed trip generation rates for each parcel in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area; and 2 WHEREAS, Resolution Nos. 1-95 and 41-96 set forth the relationship between future development in Eastern Dublin, the needed improvements and facilities, and the estimated costs of those improvements and facilities; and WHEREAS, the 1999 Study Update demonstrates the appropriateness of modifying the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee in certain respects; and WHEREAS, the 1999 Study Update was available for public inspection and review for ten (10) days prior to this public heating; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows: A. The purpose of the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee (hereafter "Fee") is to finance public improvements and facilities needed to reduce the traffic-related impacts caused by future development in Eastern Dublin. The public improvements and facilities are listed in the Study, 1996 Study Update and the 1999 Study Update under Sections I, II and III and are hereafter defined and referred to as "Improvements and Facilities". The Improvements and Facilities listed under Section I are needed solely to accommodate new development projected within Eastern Dublin. The Improvements and Facilities listed under Section II are needed to accgmmodate new development projected within Eastern Dublin and the nearby vicinity, and development within Eastern Dublin will pay its fair proportional share of such Improvements and Facilities with the implementation of this Fee. The Improvements and Facilities listed under Section III ("Section III Improvements") are all necessary to accommodate new development projected within the region by the Year 2010, including development within Eastern Dublin. Although the City has adopted the TVTD Fee by Resolution 89-98, and Section 10 of that resolution suspends Section III fees, the portion of the Fee attributable to Section III improvements will be adjusted if and when the Section III portion of the Fee becomes effective again by any adjustments made to the cost of improvements and/or right-of-way from the effective date of Resolution 89-98 to the date the Section III portion of the Fee becomes effective. Bo Facilities. The fees collected pursuant to this resolution shall be used to finance the Improvements and C. After considering the Study, the 1996 Study Update, the Cost Estimate Report, the 1996 Cost Estimate, the 1999 Study Update, Resolution No. 1-95, Resolution 41-96, the Agenda Statement, the GPA, the SP, the General Plan, the EIR and Addenda, all correspondence received and the testimony received at the noticed public heating held on December 7, 1999, the Council reapproves and readopts the Study and Cost Estimate, as revised by the 1996 Study Update and the 1996 Cost Estimate, and as further revised by the 1999 .Study Update, and incorporates each herein, and further finds that future development in Eastern Dublin will generate the need for the Improvements and Facilities and the Improvements and Facilities are consistent with the GPA, the SP, and the City's General Plan. D. The adoption of the Fee is within the scope of the EIR and Addenda~ The Improvements and Facilities were all identified in the EIR as necessary to accommodate traffic from and/or to, to mitigate impacts of development in Eastern Dublin. The impacts of such development, including the Improvements" and Facilities, were adequately analyzed at a Program level in the EIR. Since the certification of the EIR, there have been no substantial changes in the projections of future development as identified in the EIK no substantial changes in the surrounding circumstances, and no other new information of substantial importance so as to require important revisions in the EIR's analysis of impacts, mitigation measures, and alternatives. Subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA of the Specific Improvements and Facilities at this stage, as they will be implemented over at least a 20-year period and specific details as to their timing and construction, are not presently known. E. The record establishes: 1. That there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the Improvements and Facilities and the impacts of the types of development for which the corresponding fee is charged in that new development in Eastern Dublin - both residential and non-residential--will generate traffic which generates or contributes to the need for the Improvements and Facilities; and 2. That there is a reasonable relationship between the Fee's use (to pay for the construction of the Improvements and Facilities) and the type of development for which the Fee is charged in that all development in Eastern Dublin - both residential and non-residential - generates or contributes to the need for the Improvements and Facilities; and 3. That there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the Fee and the cost of the Improvements and Facilities or portion thereof attributable to development in Eastern Dublin in that the Fee is calculated based on the number of trips generated by specific types of land uses, the total amount it will cost to construct the Improvements and Facilities, and the percentage by which development within Eastern Dublin contributes to the need for the Improvements and Facilities; and 4. That the cost estimates set forth in the Study and the Cost Estimate Report, as revised by the 1996 Study Update and the 1996 Cost Estimate, and as further revised by the 1999 Study Update, are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the Improvements and Facilities, and the Fees expected to be generated by future development will not exceed the projected costs of constructing the Improvements and Facilities; and 5. The method of allocation of the Fee to a particular development, set forth in the Study, as revised in the 1996 Study Update and 1999 Study Update, bears a fair and reasonable relationship to each development's burden on, and benefit from, the Improvements and Facilities to be funded by the Fee, in that the Fee is calculated based on the number of automobile trips each particular development will generate. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin does RESOLVE as follows: 1. Definitions a. "Development" shall mean the construction, alteration or addition of any building or structure within Eastern Dublin. b. "Eastern Dublin" shall mean all property within the "General Plan Amendment Study Area" as shown on the Land Use Map (.Exhibit A hereto) excepting the property designated as '~Future Study Area/Agriculture." c. "Improvements and Facilities" shall include those transportation and transit improvements and facilities as are described in Section I, II and III of the Study and as described in the 4 Cost Estimate Report, 1996 Study Update, 1996 Cost Estimate Report, 1999 Study Update, SP, EIR and Addenda. "Improvements and Facilities" shall also include comparable alternative improvements and facilities should later changes in projections of development in the region necessitate construction of such alternative improvements and facilities; provided that the City Council later determines (1) that there is a reasonable relationship between development within Eastern Dublin and the need for the alternative improvements and facilities, (2) that the alternative improvements and facilities are comparable to the improvements and facilities in the Study, 1996 Study Update and 1999 Study Update, and (3) that the revenue from the Fee will be used only to pay Eastern Dublin development's fair and proportionate share of the alternative improvements and facilities. d. "Low Density Dwelling Unit" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on property designated by the SP and GPA for up to six units per acre. e. "Medium Density Dwelling Unit" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on property designated by the SP and GPA for over 6 to 14 units per acre. f. ''Medium/High Density Dwelling Unit" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on property designated by the SP and GPA for over 14 to 25 units per acre. g. "High Density Dwelling Unit" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin Constructed or to be constructed on property designated by the SP and GPA for over 25 units per acre. 2. Traffic Impact Fee Imposed a. A Traffic Impact Fee ("Fee") shall be charged and paid for each Low Density Dwelling Unit, Medium Density Dwelling Unit, Medium/High Density Dwelling Unit, and High Density Dwelling Unit within Eastern Dublin at the time of issuance of the building permit for such unit. b. A Fee shall be charged and paid for non-residential buildings or structures within Eastern Dublin at the time of issuance of the building permit for such building or structure, except where the building or structure will require a later stage of discretionary approval by the City before it can be occupied, in which case, with the approval of the Public Works Director, the Fee for that building or structure may be deferred for payment to the date the City makes the last discretionary approval which is required prior to occupancy. c. A Fee shall be charged and paid for additions to existing non-residential buildings or structures that result in an increase of 500 square feet or more to the building or structure. The Fee shall be paid at the time of issuance of the building permit for such additions. 3. Amount of Fee - Sections I and II a. Low Density Dwelling Units. The amount of the Fee for each Lo~v Density Dwelling Unit shall be $4,960 per unit. 5 b. Medium Density Dwelling Units. The amount of the Fee for each Medium Density Dwelling Unit §hall be $4,960 per unit. c. Medium/High Density Dwelling Units. The amount of the Fee for each Medium/High Density Dwelling Unit shall be $3,472 per unit. d. High Density Dwelling Units. The amount of the Fee for each High Density Dwelling Unit shall be $2,976 per unit. e. Non-Residential Buildings or Structures. The amount of the Fee for each Non- Residential Building or Structure shall be $452 per average weekly trip. The amount of Traffic Impact Fees for Residential and Non-Residential Uses is shown on Exhibit C. 4. Exemptions From Fee a. The Fee shall not be imposed on any of the following: 1) Any alteration or addition to a residential structure, except to the extent that a residential unit is added to a single-family residential unit or is added to an existing multi-family residential unit; 2) Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing residential structure that has been destroyed or demolished provided that the building permit for reconstruction is obtained within one year after the building was destroyed or demolished unless the replacement or reconstruction increases the square footage of the structure fifty percent or more. 3) Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing non-residential structure that has been destroyed or demolished provided that the building permit for new reconstruction is obtained within one year after the building was destroyed or demolished and the reconstructed building would not increase the destroyed or demolished building's trips based on Exhibit C. 4) Any non-residential building or structure constructed on property 6n which a building or structure was demolished for which the Fee has been paid within the prior ten year period, provided the exemption shall be in the amount of the previously-paid Fee only, and the applicant shall pay any additional amount based on the then-current Fee. 5. Use of Fee Revenues a. The revenues raised by payment of the Fee shall be placed in the Traffic Impact Fee Fund. Separate and special accounts within the Traffic Impact Fee Fund shall be used to account for such revenues, along with any interest earnings on each account. The revenues (and interest) shall be used for the following purposes: 1) To pay for design, engineering, right-of-way acquisition and construction of the Improvements and Facilities and reasonable costs of outside consultant studies related thereto; 2) To reimburse the City for Improvements and Facilkies constructed by the City with funds from other sources including funds from other public entities, unless the City funds were obtained from grants or gifts intended by the grantor to be used for traffic improvements. 3) To reimburse developers and/or public agencies who have constructed Improvements and Facilities; and 4) To pay for and/or reimburse costs of program development and ongoing administration of the Fee program. b. Fees in these accounts shall be expended only for the Improvements and Facilities and only for the purpose for which the Fee was collected. 6. Standards The standards upon which the needs for the Improvements and Facilities are based are the standards of the City of Dublin, including the standards contained in the General Plan, GPA, SP, EIR, and Addenda. 7. No Existing Deficiencies The City Council determines that there are no existing deficiencies 'within Eastern Dublin and that the need for the Improvements and Facilities in Category I (Section I) of the Study, 1996 Study Update and 1999 Study Update, is generated entirely by new development within Eastern Dublin and, further, that the need for the Improvements and Facilities in Category II and III (Section II and IH) of the Study, 1996 Study Update and 1999 Study Update, is generated by new development within Eastern Dublin and other new development and, therefore, the Study, as revised by the 1996 Study Update and 1999 Study Update, has determined the proportionate share of the cost of the Improvements and Facilities for which development within Eastern Dublin is responsible. 8. Periodic Review a. During each fiscal year, the City Manager shall prepare a report for the City Council, pursuant to Government Code Section 66006, identifying the balance of fees in each account. b. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66002, the City Council shall also review, as part of any adopted Capital Improvement Program each year, the approximate location, size, time of availability and estimates of cost for all Improvements and Facilities to be financed with the Fee. The estimated costs shall be adjusted in accordance with appropriate indices of inflation. The City Council shall make findings identifying the purpose to which the existing Fee balances are to be put and demonstrating a reasonable relationship between the Fee and the purpose for which it is charged. 9. Subsequent Analysis of the Fee The Fee established herein is adopted and implemented by the Council in reliance on the record identified above. The City will continue to conduct further study and analysis to determine whether the Fee should be revised. When additional information is available, the City Council shall review the Fee to determine that the amounts are reasonably related to the impacts of development within Eastern Dublin. The City Council may revise the Fee to incorporate the findings and conclusions of ftlrther studies and any standards in the GPA, SP and General Plan, as well as increases/decreases due to construction costs and land values. The City will evaluate land values through an appraisal at least every three (3) years. 10. Automatic Increase in Fee The purpose of this section is to provide for an automatic annual adjustment to the Fee in years when the City Council does not revise the Fee pursuant to Section 9 above. The City Manager shall adjust the Fee automatically, effective July 1, 2000 and each July 1 thereafter, according to the following formula: The Fee shall be adjusted based on the change in construction costs and land costs using the percentage increase/decrease in the two indicators described in Items (a) and (b), below. These percentage changes shall be applied to the Fee rate based on the relative allocation between the cost estimate for construction of improvements and acquisition of land for certain improvements included the 1999 Study Update. The calculation of this relative allocation is detailed on Exhibit D, which is attached to this resolution. Based on the improvements that have not yet been constructed or guaranteed (detailed in Attachment 1 of the 1999 Study Update) and the improvements to be constructed by developers under development agreements at the new TIF rate (detailed in Attachment 2 of the 1999 Study Update, pages 2- 6), 62% of the cost estimate is attributable to the construction of improvements, and 38% of the cost estimate is attributable to the acquisition of land. Accordingly, the construction cost indicator (Item a) shall be weighted 62% and land cost indicator (Item b) shall be weighted 38%. a. The construction cost indicator shall be calculated as the annual percentage increase/decrease in the Engineering News Record's Construction Cost Index (20-city average) for the month of April over the same Construction Cost Index for the month of April of the prior year. The City Manager may round the Fee adjustment to whole dollars. b. The land cost indicator shall be: calculated as the percentage increase/decrease between the land cost per acre in the most recent land appraisal (prepared for the City for purpose of adjusting the Fee) over the land cost per acre in the immediately preceding appraisal (prepared for the City for purposes of adjusting the Fee and using the same methodology), calculated as an annual increase/decrease. The City Manager may round the Fee adjustment to whole dollars. 11. Area of Benefit Fee A portion of the Fee shall also be deemed to be an Area of Benefit Fee adopted pursuant to Ordinance No. 10-94. This is the portion of the Fee designated for the construction of those improvements and facilities identified in Category I (Section I) of the Study which are major thoroughfares and bridges. These improvements and the estimated cost of such improvements are listed on Exhibit E attached hereto. The "Area of Benefit" is Eastern Dublin as defined herein. The' fee shall be apportioned over the Area of Benefit in the same manner set forth in Section 3 of this resolution and in the Study, 1996 Study Update and 1999 Study Update, with the amount to be assessed for residential and non-residential as shown on Exhibit E. The Area of Benefit Fee shall be deposited into the City's Traffic Impact Fee Fund into separate accounts established for each of the improvements identified in Exhibit E. 12. Administrative Guidelines The Council may, by resolution, adopt administrative guidelines to provide procedures for reimbursement, credit or other administrative aspects of the Fee. The amount of any reimbursement or credit shall be determined by the Public Works Director using the costs of construction and value of right- of-way used by the City in calculating and establishing the Fee. The amount of any reimbursement or credit, once established, shall not be increased for inflation nor shall interest accrue on such amount. No credit or reimbursement shall be given unless the improvements constructed are the Improvements and Facilities described herein. Reimbursement shall only be from revenues raised by Payment of the Fee. 13. Effective Date This resolution shall become effective immediately. The Fee provided in Sections 2 and 3 of this resolution shall be effective 60 days from the effective date of the resolution and shall supersede the Fee established by Resolution No. 41-96 sixty (60) days from the effective date of the resolution. The Area of Benefit Fee established in Section 11 of this resolution shall be effective only if the Fee provided in Sections 2 and 3 hereof is declared invalid for any reason. 14. Severability Each component of the Fee and all portions of this resolution are severable. Should any individual component of the Fee or other provision of this resolution be adjudged to be invalid and unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall be and continue to be fully effective, and the Fee shall be fully effective except as to that portion that has been judged to be invalid. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of December, 1999. AYES: Councilmembers Howard, Lockhart, McCormick Zika, and Mayor Houston NOES: None AB SENT: None ABSTAIN: None cA_ 2 K/G/12- 7-99/reso-ti f. doc I 2743.9 Acres FUTURE STUDY AREA AGIqlCULTUREi' I · "~"~"~. i~'/'" -;~,'"" ,2 ~ IX,.. ..... ~_~.~ ..... I--~ ..... ~ /:.. I I -~, . : ~ m .. ,"u . .~. ,';" .... ~," I-,,-~,(~.~'. ']I..:".'~:':.,L"~ ~,.~ ~ ~-...~."'~ ........ l ...... '::: ...... :: --~-J ..... ......... . m. -~ u %: ............... . I ~ ";; i ' . ;; "' ~%"i. ~-' · -.' ~ t.~ · m-: ~, ~ , ,,t.-. : :., , . ~. .. · , ', . 'i~'~ .:::~ . ~,~14 m ~ ~--~-~ = ~ · I ' '. ' ~'~ :~ - ' ~ ~ "- I ~ }~.~:' ' ' . , ...,-.-,..,,: ; . --,: ........~ .... . ......~'2 ...... -: I-- - ' ~ ' ' : I-~ ..... ~ **11 ' I ~ l: '- ' ~; · I-- -- - ' · j - I ':':':':':':':':':':':':;'.: ............ l I - ,.~' I-: --' ' :' I'i I~" Z J ~- - :':':':':':':':':':':':'.'/':;:':':':':',':'X:' t I ......... !~-:.: .... ...E. ......... m.-:-...::-..: .............. ~ .... ;~.~;~,' '-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: General C ~e~i:ial amy be permilled by a Planned Developmenl Zo~nq Process (see 10xl lot complete discussion ) General Plan -Eastern Extended Planning Area LAND USE MAP Legend COMMERCI^L Nei¢~t.v~hood Col~cial Can~s Off'ce hduslrial Park RES~NTIAL J-i~ tli¢~ Dens~y 25' [--i~ Med~n Oensily 6-14 ~J Low Densily O6 dVac [-~ R~al Residenllat'A~icullure I ~ I00 ac PUBLC/SEMI.PUBLCIOPEtl ~ Pubr~/Se~-Pub~ Fac~ly Junior High SChool Hi¢~ School Pub./Send-Pubic Parks & Recreal~ City Park Com~ity Pa[k ~lelgllborhood Park CIRCOLATION .... Coleelor ~-~ SOl Boundary .... Oener~ ~an Amen~ent Sludy .... SDecilic Flan $1ud~ A~ea EASTERN ,.,,,,o. DUBLIN City of Dublin 1999 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update Prepared by Department of Public Works November 8, 1999 The £olloxadng ,is the 1999 update for tlne Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee (TIF). 'Fnis memorandum explains the methodoloffy used in updating the previous reports prepared in 1996 by TJKM Transportation Consultants and Santina and Thompson for the 1996 fee update. The £ollox~ing Summm-y Table identifies the changes on the per ~ip TIF for Section I and Section !t improvements for both residential and non-residential develOpment Projects: Land Use I Residemial t Non-Residential I Existing I ProposeclI % Existing ProposedI % Increase Increase Section I I 230I I 24051 35%1 2--§ 2361 I 46% SecfionII I 2821 291 I I1%1 274 291 t 23% $383 $322 40% and Section II $452 The rexSsed fee results in the follo~dng fees per housing unit: Ts?e Density Trips per Day Fee per Unit per Unit Low Density Up to 6 units/acre l 0 [ $4,960 Meciium Density .I 7-!4 unim/acre 10 I $4,960 Medimm/High Density I 15-25 unks/acre 7 I $3,472 High Density I 26 or more units/acre 6 I $2,976 Section 1 fees pay for ~;n/c.h are needed solely to accommodate development of Eastern Dublin- Section II fees pay for Eastern Dubtin's share of improvements located within the City of Dublin but outside of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan .Area ~;nich are needed, in part,, io support development in Eastern Dublin. Page 1 of 9 Section I fees include a Residential Adjustment that is applied to all residential development in Eastern Dublin to pay for two Park and Ride lots and the Tassajara Creek Regional Trail. These improvements benefit only residential development. The Section III fee rate was not updated, as the collection of the Section III fee was suspended with the adoption by the City (Resolution No. 89-98) of the Tri-Valley Transportation Development (TVTD) fee. The TVTD fee, which is collected from new development in addition to the Section I and II TIF, funds improvements formerly covered by the Section III fee. In the event collection of the Section III fee becomes necessm'37 at some point in the future, the fee rate v~411 be adjusted at that time for all adjustments made to the TIF since the effective date of TVTD fee. BackgTound The Eastern Dublin Tra~fic Impact Fee was last updated in 1996. Since that time, some of the back~ound data used in determining the fee has changed, requiring that the fee be revised to reflect current conditions. Back~ound information that has changed includes more ac. curare projections of land use, minor changes in the scope of infrastructure improvements to be funded by the fee and substantial increases in the land value of right- of-way needed for the construction of improvements. The revised fee also takes into account the current status (aS of June 30, 1999) o£those improvements that are complete, under conSWaction, or =,guaranteed Under a development or improvement a~eement. The boundaries of the properties subject to the fee are sho~xm on Exhibit A. The bound~..'-ies include all properties ~4thin the General Plan Amendment Study A.rea, except the property designated Furore Study Area Agriculture. The 1999 Fee Update The folIov,4ng is a detailed description of the methodology used to calculate the new fee, as shown on the attached Table 1. Line 1 - Cost oflmr)rovements/Pd~ht-of-Wav NOt Currentlv Guaranteed The cost of remaining improvemems to be funded by the TIF is sho~m in the attached report from Santina and Thompson, Inc (Attainment 1). This firm proxdded the cost estLmates for the 1996 update of the TIF. The revised cost estimate includes the follov~4ng changes: a) 'Fne cost of improvements that have been completed or are currently being conswucted by private developers under existing development a~eements has been removed from the total estimate completed by Santina and Thompson. The cost of these improvements is included in Lines 3 and 4 below. Page 2 of 9 b) The cost of right-of-way acquisition has been increased to reflect higher land values resulting from development in the Eastern Dublin area. The revised fight-of- way costs were obtained from the appraisal prepared by Associated Right-of-Way Se~,ices, Inc., dated September, 1999. The total fight-of-way costs include a contingency of $1,000,000 to cover acquisition services or land cost in the event that right-of-way must be obtained through condemnation and the value of the land is greater than the appraisal value. c) The cost of the improvements for the remaining street se~m~nents not guaranteed under existing or pending development or improvement agreements has been increased to cover minor changes in the scope of improvements on these streets. Changes are summarized as ~%llows: The cost of the :Community Park frontage improvements located in the eastern portion of Dublin Ranch is included in the TIF, as these improvements benefit ail of Eastern Dublin. This includes frontage improvements on Tassajara Road, Gleason Drive, Fallon Road and Central Park~,vay. ~ne cost estimate for Scarlett Drive (between Doughert~ Road and Dublin Boulevard) is amended based on a new cross-section for the street. The 1996 update assumed a 140' right-of-way to allow separate bus lanes, a pedestrian/ bicycle trail and a two-lane street. The revised cross-section reduces the right-of- way to 80' and eliminates the bus lanes. The right-of-way width for Tassajara Road between Dublin Boulevard and Central Parkway has been increased to allow eight travel lanes instead of six ~-avel lanes; in conformance with the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (Figure 5. I). · .The minimum median width is increased from 14' to 16', so that the width of left rum pockets can be increased from 10' to 12'. The right-of-way Mdth for a number of streets is increased to allow for a wider center median, which in mm is necessary to accommodate double-left mm lanes at intersections, as warranted by ~raffic studies for adjoining land use. The costs for the remaining improvements have been summarized in three categories: a) Section i Improvements b) Section I Residential Improvements c) Section II Improvements $ 85,755,480 $ 1,947,335 $ 38,148,755 Page 3 of 9 5 ,zf //'7 The Seclion 1 improvements are required solely to accommodate development of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area. The Santina and Thompson report assigns 100% of the cost of each Section 1 improvement to the Section t TIF. The Section I Residential Improvements categories include several improvements that benefit only the residential deve!opment in Eastern Dublin. These improvements include the Tassajara Creek Regiov. al Trail and one Park and Ride lot near Fallon Road (a second Park and Ride Lot will be constructed by the Koi-i Corporate Center on Tassajara Road, the cost of which is included in Line 4). The Santina and Thompson report assigns 100% of the cost of the improvements to the Section I Residential TIF. The Section II improvements are needed to accomrnodate development of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan .Area,. as well as serve traffic generated outside of the Specific Plan ,Area. Therefore, it is appropriate that the Sectioz, II TIF fund only a sl~are of the improvement costs based on the proportion of traffic generated within the Specific Plan .Area. Under the Santina and Thompson report, the Section II TIF is assigned 45% of the toFa] cost of the Fallon Road/1-580 Interchange and 16% of the Aira:ay Boulevard/1-580 Interchange, with the remainder of the costs assigned to the Cities of Pleasanton and Livermore. The costs for the remaining Section II improvements are shown 5'~ the Sanfina and Thompson report at 100% of the total cost; the $19.5 Million contribution by Contra Costa County to the TIF (as sho-am on Line 9) will reduce the Section II TIF by the amount of the costs which should be assigned to Contra Costa Count5,. Line 2 - Balance On Prior Fundin_~ Advances The City of Dublin received funding advances from Alameda County, the City of Pleasanton and the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) for construction of certain improvements needed to serve Eastern Dublin development. These funding advances are subject to cash reimbursement and credit ag-reements with these agencies, with the cost of reimbursement funded by the TIF Section I and II fees. These reimbursements and credits are subject to accrual of interest. To date, the Alameda County Surplus Properz), Authority (ACSPA) has used a portion of the credits to offset traffic impact fees due on development in the Santa Rita propero', which reduces the balance owed on the advance. The outstanding balances as of June 30, 1999, as provided by the Finance Department, are shown below: Page 4 of 9 Section I a) Cash Reimbursements (City of Pleasanton Advance): b) Interest-Bearing Credits (ACSPA Freeway Interchange Work): c) Estimated Three-Year Interest: $2,839,597 $2,791,765 $927.848 Total: $6,559,210 Section II a) Cash Reimbursements (BART/ACSPA Advances): b) Estimated Three-Year Interest: $3,509,640 $603.789 Total: $4,113,429 The above costs must be included in the revenue to be raised under the revised Section I and Section II fees. Line 3 - Balance Due on TIF Credits (Existin¢'TIF) Between 1995 and 1998, the City of Dublin entered into a number of development agreements with the ACSPA and one development a~eement ~dth Mission Peak for projects in Eastern Dublin. Under these development a~eements, the developer consrrucmd or guaranteed TIF infrastructure improvements needed to serve the projects, and received TtF credits in return. To date, a portion of the credits have been used to offset TIF fees due for projects constructed or underway. The outstanding balances of credits as of June 30, t999, as Provided by the Finance Department, total $10,880,956. In addition, the Emerald Pointe development has been granted additional credits (not included in the Finance Department total) for additional improvements on Dublin Boulevard and Hacienda Drive which were not included in the original credit total. The additional credits are shown on Attachment 2, page 1, provided by the City Public Works Department staff. These balances are identified below: Project Credit Balance (as of Jun~ .,0, t999) Hacienda Crossings $67,127 Creekside Business Park $3,581,961 Summer Glen Homes $3 76,881 Emerald Pointe Business Park $6,758,917 I Mission Peak (Tassajara Meadows I) $96,070 Finance Department Balance $10,850,956 Emerald Pointe Adjustment $687,851 Total Due on TIE Credits (Existing TIE) $11,568,807 Page 5 of 9 Credits for these development ~reements are based on the current (1996) TIF. Fees for these projects will be paid at the TIF rate in eft%ct at the time that building permits are issued. Line 4 - Balance of Credits Due on TIF Credits (New TIF) The City of Dublin has entered into development agreements with the ACSPA for four additional projects: the Tassajara Meadows and Toll Brothers residential projects, the General Motors commercial project and the Koll Corporate Center office project. Under these a~eements, the ACSPA MI1 be responsible for construction of cer~ain improvements and the dedication of TIF right-of-way on Gleason Drive, Central Parkway and Dublin Boulevard. The Koi1 Corporate Center is also required to provide the right-of-way for and construct a Park and Ride Lot within its properr3,. The cost of the right-of-way and improvements v~511 be credited against the fees due from these developments. The improvement cost includes fi-ontage improvements and 505~ of the cost of traffic signals at the park entrances on both Gleason Drive and Central Parkway. In addition, the City of Dublin has negotiated a development a~eement with MSSH Dublin (Shea Homes) for Dublin Ranch Units L1-5 and MI-3. Under this a~eement, MS SH Dublin (Shea Homes) will be responsible for construction of improvements to Tassajara Road from Dublin Boulevard to North Dublin Ranch Drive. These credits, which are all for Section I improvements, are shown in Attachment 2, Pages 2-6, provided by City Public Works Department staff. Credits are as follows: Development Total Credits General Residential Improvements Improvements Koll Corporate Center $2,529,460 $0 I $2,529,460 Tassajara Meadows 2 $4,136,521 $4,071,001 [ $65,520 Toll Brothers $12,378,535 $12,171,055 I $207,480 MSSH Dublin (Shea $4,135,329 $4,135,329 [ $0 Homes) Total $23,179,8z[5 $20,377..385 [ $2,802,460 The credits for the general improvements must be added to the revenue to be raised under the revised TIF Section I fees. The credits for the residential improvements (wkich includes the Park and Ride lot at the Koi1 Corporate Center and segments of the Tassajara Creek Regional Trail) must be added to the revenue to be raised under the TIF Section I Residential Adjustment. Under these five development a~eements, credits and fees will be based on the updated TIF. The agreements require the retroactive payment of fee increases for any permits issued prior to adoption of the new fee. Therefore, fees and credits for these Page 6 of 9 a .... m~nts must be segregated from fees and credits for the other development a_r,.em,.nts identified in Line 3. Line 5 - Total Cost of TIF Imr~rovements This' tine shows the total cost of ali improvements remaining to be funded under the TIF. Table 2 provides the detail of these costs by fee section and roadway segment. Line 6 - Estimated Fees from Remaining Trir~s Collected at Current Fee Rate ~'i-2a~ e eight projects listed in Line 3 are expected to generate a total of 44,375 trips, as sho~m on Attachment 3. As of June 30, 1999 building permits issued for these projects have generated an estimated 30,255 trips. It is expected that the remaining portions of these projects xaStl receive building permits generating an additional 14,120 nips. For the purpose of calculating the revised TIF, it is assumed that building permits for these developments ~511 be issued prior to the revised TIF taking effect and that payment of the TIF will be made at the existing rate (actual payment w/Il be at the rate in eft%ct at the time the permits are issued). The revenue raised from fees applied to these nips can be deducted fi:om the total revenue to be raised by the revised fees. Estimated revenues from the remaining trips collected at the old rate are $3,60!,400 for Section I and $1,059,920 for Section II. Line 7 - Fees Collected To Date Fees collected from the building pe~wnits issued to date, which have not been allocated to specific TIF improvements, remain in a reserve account and can be deducted from -the total revenue to be raised by the revised fees. The cash balances of Section I and II TIF fee revenues as of June 30, 1999 have been provided by the Finance Department. The balance of Section I fees is currently negative in the mount of $774,001, which results in an increase in the needed Section I revenue. The negative balance of Section I fees is a result of two prior development a~eementS (Hacienda Crossings and California Creekside/Broo -kside). These agreements, which were entered into prior to the implementation of the Eastern Dublin TIF, allowed developers to use Section I credits to offset Section II and III fees. Since the implementation of the Eastern Dublin TIF, credits can only be used to offset fees in the same category. The balance of Section II fees is cm-rently $2,463,235. However, this amount must be adjusted to exclude $39,360 in fees collected at the existing TIF rate from Shea Homes and Centex in Dublin Ranch Phase 1, as their development a~eements require retroactive payment of the TIF at the new rate (The nips generated by these de'~,elopments are included in the total trips paying the revised fee on Line 11). The appropriate balance for Section II TIF fees for this update is $2,423,875. Page 7 of 9 - Line § - Section I Residential Fee Collected at Old Rate Under the existing fee schedule, the cost of the Section I Residential Improvements is included under the Section I fee, in the amount of $26 per trip. There are an estimated 44,375 trips which will be generated under existing development agreements; of these trips, there are 11,775 residential trips. For the purpose of calculating the revised TIF, it is assumed that permits for these developments will be' issued prior to the new fee taking e~%ct, and that payment of the TIF will be at the existing rate (actual payment will be at the rate in effect at the time the permits are issued). This will generate Section I Residential Improvement revenue in the amount of $306,150. THis amount must be deducted from the existing Section I fee balance (resulting in an increase in the needed Section I revenues under the revised fee) and deducted from the needed Section I Residential fees to be raised under the revised fee. Line 9 - Estimated Contra Costa County Contribution The City of Dublin is currendy negotiating with the County of Contra Costa for the payment of funds to provide traffic mitigation improvements on City of Dublin streets as a result of development in the Dougherty Valley. The current proposed level of conffibution is approximately $19,450,000, which can be used to offset the needed revenue fi.om the TIF. For the pm-pose of calculating th~ revised TIF, a total of $9,150,000 of the Contra Costa County funds is assig-ned to Section I projects, and the remaining $10,300,000 is assigned to Section II projects. This allocation between Section I and Section II projects is based on the proportionate share of traffic generated by Contra Costa County development on each improvement within these two TIF categories. In the event that the contribution from the County of Contra Costa is less than the estimated $19,450,000, the City of Dublin may need to delete selected improvements to off%et the revenue reduction. Line 10 - Adiusted Costs to be Financed by Revised Fee Th/s tine shows the total amount of revenue that must be raised under the revised fee to cover the cost of improvements not funded through another source. Line l 1 - Estimated Remainin_o Trios Pavina Re;fiscal Fee A total of 344,078 new vehicle trips were assumed to be subject to the fee under the 1996 TJKM report. This fi=mare was based on the land use projections in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. At the present time, individual development proposals have been approved on the majority of the ASPCA Santa Rim property, the Casterson Page 8 of 9 prope~Wy and portions of the Dublin Ranch (Lin) property. It is therefore possible to revise the trip generation figures based on more accurate projections. The revised total trips to be generated within the fee area are shown in Attachment 4. The table lists trip generations by each property, with the basis of the estimate shown. The total includes an estimate of trips from those properties located to the east of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area, which are included within the boundaries of the current General Plan. The revised trip generation totals 356,369 trips, of which 113,890 are generated from residential uses and 242,479 are generated from non-residential uses. For the purpose of the revised fee calculation, it is assumed that the 44,375 trips within Eastern Dublin will pay the fee at the existing rate and that all remaining trips generated from other projects will be subject to the revised fee. This results in an estimated 311,994 trips subject to the new ~e,~, of which 102,115 are ~en~rat,.d from residential development and 209,879 are generated by non-residential development. Line 12 - Revised Fee (Cost r)er Trite) The revised fee for each section is determined by dividing the cost of improvements (Line 1'0) by the number of trips subject to the fee (Line 11). Page 9 of 9 City of Dublin ATTACHMENT 1 Cost Analysis, 1999 Update Traffic Impact Fee Eastern Dublin' Area File: 0231.02 rg4ph Cons'u/t~g November 9, ] 999 Munidpal Engineering Survcging Raikoad Engineering Planning Lee Thompson Public Works Director City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Eastern Dublin Area Traffic Impact Fee Cost A_nalysis, 1999 Update Dear Br-Lr. Thompson: Please find attached our cost analysis for the roadway network of existing and proposed roads associated with new development in the eastern Dublin area. We provided the initial cost analysis I%r these roadways in 1996. At that time, the geomeh'-y for many of the roadways was approximate. We based the 1996 analysis on a typical roadway section throughout t.he roadway lengc, h. The cost to build the improved roadway network is shared by the frontage developers and the City of Dublin. TYPically, the outside lai~es and sidewalk improvements along with any necessm-y underlying right of way are built and/or paid for by the frontage developers. The construction and other costs associated with the inside lanes and median are typically borne by the City using revenue generated by the Traffic Impact Fee. In 1999, many of the roadways have either been built or a detailed ptanline.ofthe proposed improvements is available. The information available is thus much better than the infon'nation available in 1996. Addkionally, many of the roadways are currently covered by an existing or pending development, agreement Through .'.the develop.m_en, t _a~.e._ement, th_e__front_ag_e_ develo_p_er-.' may a~ee to construct and pay fo_r po_nions of the_roadway that th.e__City ?_ould typica_tly pay for; or, the frontage developer may build portions of the roadway that the City would Lypically build, but receive credits from the City for the traffic impact fees. For the 1999 analysis, if existing development ag-reements or pending development a=m-eemenrs provide for the frontage developer to pay for portions of the roadway that are typically the responsibility of the CID', then those roadway portions were not included in our 1999 cost analysis. 1355 'Willow Way, Suite 280 Concord, CA 94520-5728 Telephone 925-827-3200 Fax 925-687-1011 Also, if the frontage developer, through the development agreement, agreed to construct improvements that are typically the responsibility of the City in return for credits, then those roadway portions were not included in our 1999 cost analysis. We acknowledged credits during our 1999 Traffic Impact Fee study. However, the credit values are described as development a~eement entries throughout the financial reports prepared by others for the Traffic Impact Fee. Those 5nancial repoms are not contained in our exhibits. By necessity, the accounting for the various portions of the work is complex. We have worked closely with City staff to insure that costs of the various classifications were segregated so that City staff could correctly calculate the traffic impact fees. We have presented the result of our cost analysis in tables 1, 2 and 3. These tables are located at the end of this section of our report. We have included supporting documents with this cost analysis. The supporting documents are described in the "Supporting Documents Table of Contents". We believe the summary sheets for the individual roadway segments along with these supporting documents explain the formulation of the costs presented in tables 1, 2 and 3. Sincerely, Santina & Thompson, Inc. Project Manager Attachments THO iPSON. N . 99Nrw ~ Dougherty Road - Segment 1 / l 4000 feet, 104 feet Curb to curb t City Limits to Amador Valley (Widening) I_ Portion of Existing Improvements to be Re-Used Totals for TIF Share Civil improvements, eastern podion S2.068,514 ntersection Improvements w/right of way @ $22/sf Amador (modification) & Willow Ck (new) signals, incl'ing minor r/w and civil costs. 3 legs ea. $695,047 Right-of-Way None t $0 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% S552,712 FotaI with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $3.592,629 Dougherty Road- Segment 2 4,350 feet, 104 feet curb to curb Amador Valley Boulevard to Houston Place Portion of Existing improvements to be Re-Used Totals for TIF Share CMl Improvements; 3200 fi.to be widened and 1150 ft to be re-built @ $750/1f $2,166,238 Intersection ImproVements w/right of way Two Legs at Scarlet Drive, including civil and dw costs S396,698 Right-of-Way @ 100% at Southern Pacific Right-of-Way $0 500 x 38 x $22,-near Houston Place - - $418,000 "~ \dministration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $596,187 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $3,875,217 Dougherty Road - Segment 3 Houston Place to Dublin Boulevard (900') Totals for TIF Share !Oivil Improvmts, 300' of new median, 485' of re-model median & 200 ff of rt turn pocket $50,933 t Right-of-Way @ $22, none $0 lnt~,s~..tion lmprowm~n~s, modify 1 i~g a~ Dublin Boulevard $50,000 1City Administration, Desi(~n, Construction Manaoement, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $20,187 ITotal with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $131,213 0231h; 1118199, 5:28 PM Page I 99Nrw 99Nrw DoughertY. Road - Segment 4 550 feet Dublin Boulevard to North of 1-580 Off-Ramp Widen Roadway Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements @ 100%' $237~699 ]intersection Improvements, modify 1 leg at Dublin Boulevard S50,000 !Right-of-Way on east side only, (23,000'$22)+$50'9000sf for demo+$100k relocation S1,076,000 Building demo and remodel on south east side of segment (400sf*$300/sf) S120,000 , City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $296,740 Total with 10% Contin.clency (0 on Admin.) Sl,928,809 Dougher[y Road Subtotal (without Freeway interchange) $9,527,868 (Note that the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County are responsible for that portion of Dougherty Road from the City Limits north to Old Ranch Road) Dublin Boulevard- Segment 5 1,800 feet, 108 Right-of-Way, 6 Lanes East of Village. Parkway to Sierra Court (Widening) As Submitted to Caltrans (FUNDED) Civil Improvements at 330.50 per Linear Foot @ 100% intersection improvements w/right of way Clark Modification Sierra Ct Modification Bridge Widening Totals for TIF Share.. Right-of-Way and Demo; have 100, need 108, $22 @ 100% City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) ISTEA Funded Net Total for this Segment $0 $0 S0 S0 $0 $0 S0 $0 0231h; 11/8/99, 5:28 PM Page 2 99Nrw 99Nrw Dublin Boulevard, Segment 6 2,030 feet, 108 Right-of-Way, 6 Lanes Sierra Court to Dougherty Road (Widening) Future Improvements Will Be. Similar to Segment 5 . I Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements at 330 per Linear Foot @ 100% S669,900 intersection Improvements w/right of way I Sierra Ct, Civic - Modification $130,000 $130,0O0 Dublin Court- Modification I Dougherty, signal modification and civil work, no r/w costs; 1 leg $100,000 [Right-of-Way, 8* $22+100K demo @ 100% $457,280 tCity Administration, Desion, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $297,436 ITotal with 10% Contin?ncy (0 on Admin.) $I,933,334 Dublin Boulevard Extension, Segment 7 1,650 feet, 6 Lanes Dougherty to Southern Pacific Right-of-Way Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements, south side remodel $235,539 intersection Improvements Dougherty, completed $0 Scarlet; signals only, 1 leg $56,250 , Existing building ,on south side; purchase, demo, and remodel portion thereof $1,100,000 Right-of-Way, $22@19,465 SF (3 parcels on south side) $428,230 BART Loan of $2.938M, to be repaid with TIF funds, not included $0 ?-" Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0%; 0% on Loan $364,004 Total with 10% Contingency, including loan ('0 on Admin.) $2,366,025 Dublin Boulevard Subtotal (to Southern Pacific Right-of-Way) $4,299,359 Dublin Boulevard Extension, Segment 8 1950 feet, 6 Lanes From Southern Pacific Right-of-Way to East BART Access Tota!s for TIF Share Civil Improvements, path and path right of way on north side, all in DA. $0 Intersection Improvements, no associated flw or dvil costs; I leg at Scarlet $56,250 Right-of-Way $0 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $11,250 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $73,125 0231h; 11/8/99, 5:28 PM Page 3 99Nrw 99Nr-w' Dublin Boulevard Extension, Segment 8A 2650 feet, 6 Lanes East BART Access (iron Horse Parkway) to Hacienda Drive Totals for TIF Share~ Civil Improvements, path on north side, no other roadway improvements $279,840 Intersection Improvements w/right of way $0 C~ 30-12=18 ft for path from Arnold to Hacienda at $22/sf; in DA $0 ity A~t~-7, ~)~g~,, ~--ons~ruct~-n' ~m~-~, P-~W--A-~-uisition, 20.0% $55,968 ITotal with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $363,792 Dublin Boulevard - Segment 9 4,600 feet, 6 Lanes Hacienda to Tassajara Road Totals for TIF Share 'Civil Improvements, path on noah side to Creek (2600fi) $0 Intersection Improvements w/right of way Tassajara Road, 1leg; including signals, civil & RAN (@$20) SO JBridge $0 $0 $0 ,:~JW, 30-12=18 ft for path from Hacienda to creek, 2600ff at $20/sf; none for rdway JCitv Administration, Des;g;, Construction.~anagement, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% jTolal with 10% Contilg~n y (0 on Admin ), all in DA DubIin Boulevard - Segment 10 6,320 feet, 6 Lanes Tassajara Road to Falion Ail New Roadway included Totals for TIF Share Civil lmprovmts at S750/1f and 50%, (cl to cl), (1 ft grading inct'd) $2,370,000 Intersection Improvements I leg each at Tassajara and Fallon (r/w (50% at Tassajara), signals, civil & gradng) $280,828 Box culver[; 10 ftx8 f-t, 140 ft long (@ $450/cy)+84inch x t40 ft pipe ($95/I0+4 wingwal!s $106,900 Right-of-Way, 64 ft @ $15.44 + Ok demo $6,245,171 City Administration, Design, Construction Manaqement, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $1,800,580 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $11,703,768 0231h; 11/8/99, 5:28 PM Page 4 99Nrw 99Nrw 17,¢/1 ? Dublin Boulevard Extension - Segment 11 9500 feet, 6 Lanes Fallon Road to Airway Ail New Roadway Included Totals for TIF Share iCivil Improvements at $750 per lineal foot @ 50%, (cl to cl), (1 ft grading) S3,562,500 !intersection Improvements 1 leg at Fallon, 4 at Airway & 4 At Doolan (r/w, signals, civil &gradng) $1,284,741 Bridge, $110'120W'100L $1,320,000 Right-of-Way, 64'$12 + Ok demo $7,296,000 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $2,692,648 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $I7,502,213 )ublin Blvd. E×t.(SP PJW to Airway) Subtotal (without Freeway interchange) $29,642,899 (The City of Dublin received S573,000 from State of California (SB300 funds) and $400,000 from the City of Pieasanton for roadway improvements from the Southern Pacific R of W to T~-ssajara Rd.) -973,000 (The City of Dublin borrowed $2,408,955 from the City of Pleasanton to build the 40 ff. width of Dublin Blvd Extension from SPRW to Tassajara Road; This loan must be repaid but is not included.) 0 Subtotal is therefore ' $28,669,899 1 Freeway Interchange - Segment 12 Dublin Boulevard E×tension with 1-580 - (Airway Boulevard) - · Tota!s for TIF Share Civil lmprovm'ts, Demo ext'g & build new 6 lane bridc~e wi Ramps, signals; (Dublin's share) n/a Right-of-Way n/a City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20% n/a Dublin ~)ays 16% of total S13.000.000 cost; (note that Livermore will pay addit'l percentage) $2,080,000 Hacienda - Segment 13 1525 feet, 6 Lanes 1-580 (Not including interchange) to Dublin Boulevard Extension Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements $0 · $100,000 [inteectionImprovements w/right of way (Rt turn lane at Dublin Blvd.) Right-of-Way . . $0 ICity Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $20,000 tTotal with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $130,000 0231h; 1118!99, 5:28 PM Page 5 99Nrw 99Nrw Hacienda - Segment I4 2,640 feet, 6 Lanes Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Drive Totats for TIF Share Civil Improvements, $00 ft and I800 ft lengths $454,239 Intersection Improvements w/right of way 1 leg at Gleason,~ signals only $56,250 development agreement exists $0 Right-of-Way $0 City Administration, Design, Construction Manaoement, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $102,098 Total with 10% Contineenc¥ (0 on Admin.) $663,636 Hacienda Road Subtotal (Without Freeway Interchange) j $793,636 Freeway Interchange - Segment 15 Hacienda Road with !-580 Widen Offramp and Modify Signal (Loan amount built prior) I Tota!s for TIF Share Civil Improvements, Ramps, including signal modification I $1,000,000 Alameda County $3.762 M Loan (including interest); not included f $6 .~-~' City Administration, Design, CM, ROW Acquisition, 20.0%; (0% on Loan) ! $200,000'~ ! $1,300,000I Total with 10% Contineency (.0 on Admin.) I Arnold Drive - Segment I6 ' 2,640 feet, 4 Lanes Dubiin Boulevard Extension to Gleason (Camp Parks is on one side of Roadway) Tota!s for TIF Share Civil Improvements, including new pipe for existing open channel $1,742,660 :Intersection improvements: 2 legs at Central and I leg NB leg at Gleason, signais only; SB leg @ Gleason, sig+civil+RAN costs $271,948 Right-of-Way @ $22/sf (will come from Camp Parks, 74,432 SF) $0 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $402,922 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $2,618,990 0231h; 11/8/99, 5:28 PM Page 6 99Nrw 99Nrw Central Parkway Segment 16A 1,400 feet, 4 Lanes Arnold to Hacienda I t Totals for TfF Shar( 1 Civil Improvements (credit for one 12 lane and 16 fl median) . I $195.702 l lntersection Improvements wi right of Way I I I leg at Arnold, sional cost only, no civil or dw costS t $56,250 l Right-of-Way. · I $0 City Administ, ation, D~sign,~ Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% Il $50,390 ITotal with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) I $327,538 Central Parkway - Segment 17 4,575 feet, 4 Lanes Hacienda to Tassajara - Totals for TIF Share Oivil Improvements 2250 fl of remodeled median S277,011 --2000 fi of median and #1 lane in each direction; (no park improvements) S428,575 Intersection improvements Tassajara; signals, civil and no right of way, I leg $0 Hibernia Drive; signa!s only, 4 legs $225,000 Future Park Entrance at 50%; signals only, 4 leas $112,500 -?~"dge, in development agreement '" .,ght-of-Way; none, paid by park fet,.s* -iCity Administration, Design, Constru,.tion Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $0 $0 $208,617 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $1,356,012 Central Parkway - Segment 18 4 Lanes Tassajara to Fallon, Western 3,640 Ft. Ail New Roadway I Totals for TIF Share Civil improvements at 650+38 (addl grading) per lineal foot @ 38%, (ci to cl), (3 ft grading) $951,642 intersection improvements w/right of way I leg at Tassajara; r/w 50%, signals, civil & gradng) $121,066 Sports Park, 1500 ~ of frontage, 20 ft. of pavement and c&g, (incl in 18A) $0 Right-of-Way, 104 If. @ $15.46+100k demo, all at 38% $2,261,964 Cit-y Administration, Design, Construction Manaaement, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $666,934 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admire) $4,335,073 0231h; 11/8!99, 5:28 PM Page 7 99Nrw 99Nrw Central Parkway - Segment 18A 4 Lanes Tassajara to Falion, Eastern 2,830 Ft. All New Roadway Civil Improvements at 650+76 (6 fi. grading) per iinear foot @ 38% intersection improvements; I leg at Fallon, signals, dw and civil ht-of-Way, 104 If. @ $15.46+100k demo, all at 38% Sports Park, 1500 ft. of frontage, 20 fi.. of pavement and c&g Cty Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% t Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.); Central Parkway and Arnold Drive Subtotal Gleason - Segment 19 1,600 feet, 4 Lanes Arnold Rd. to Hacienda Civil improvements Hacienda and Arnold Intersection Improvements; signets only, 2 Jegs tRight-of-Way, none City Administration, Design, COnstruction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% Totals for TIF Share $780,740 $167,132 $1,767,071 $292,343 $601,457 $3,909,472 $12,547,085 Totals for TIF Share S0 $112,500 $0 $22,500 iTotat with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $146.25~:',r.~~ 0231h; 1118/99, 5:28 PIvl Page 8 99Nrw 99Nrw Gleason - Segment I9A 4,650 feet, 4 Lanes Hacienda to Tassajara Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements 'Cross-over work, S0 Median and #1 lanes for 1750 ft $0 Park work $0 Intersection Improvements Hacienda Signals; signals only $0 Tassajara Meadows; 4 signal legs and 2 R/W legs, all at50% $0 Tassajara Road; I teg with signal and civil work (no RA&0 I $0 Bridge. S110'55W*100L (1/2) $0 Right-of-Way, 1750 ft at 102ft*$18 @ 38% SO City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $0 Total with 10% Continee~cy (0 on Admin.) $0 Gleason - Segment 20 4800 feet, 4 Lanes Tassajara to Fation Ali New Roadway Totals for TIF Share :. :'---'I Improvements at 650+133 (addl arading) per L.F. @ 38%, (cl to dw), (8 ft grading) ~ ..... s~on Improvements w/right of way $1,428,192 ISports Park, 250 ft. of frontage, 20 ft. of pavement and c&g iRight-of-Way, 104 If. @ $13.90 at 38% City Administration, Design, Construction Manaqement, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% I leg each at Tassaiara (civil and grading only) & F. allon (dw, signals, civil & arading) $243,748 $49,050 ITotal with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $2,636,774 $871,553 $5,665,094 0231h; 11/8!99, 5:28 Ply1 Page 9 99Nrw 99Nrw Gleason Roadway Subtotal $5,811,344 (Note the portion of Gteason Road from Falion Road to Doolan Road is not included because no development is proposed for Doolan Canyon as part of the Dublin General Plan Amendment) Scarlet Drive - Segment 21 2,400 feet, 52 ft curb to curb, 80 ft RAN Dougherty Road to Dublin Boulevard Extension Ail New Roadway Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements, $526/1f @ 100% $1,262,400 intersection Improvements w/right of way $0 Dougherty, Major; signals, civil and RJW, 1leg ,$164,989 Dublin Boulevard, Major; signals, civil and RAN, 2 legs $329,978 Railroad Utilities, demo and/or relocation $1,000,000 Bridge, $110*80W'65L ' $572,000 Right-of-Way, 80 ~'S 15 $3,072,000 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $1,280.273 iTotal with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $8,321,777 Tassajara Road - Segment 22 5,660 feet, 6 Lanes 5000 ft north of Gieason to Contra Costa Co. tine All New Roadway . Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements, median and number 1 and 2 lanes, each direction $2,255,766 Intersection Improvements w/right of way Fallon; signals, civil and PJW @ $11, 2 legs $284,668 Two Bridoes, 120W'100L*$110 *2 $2,640,000 RAN 600 ft * 40 ft shift to miss school; Demolition = $500,000 for relocation of 2 houses $764,000 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $1,188,887 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $7,727,764 0231h; 11/8!99, 5:28 PM Page10 99Nrw 99Nrw Tassajara Road - Segment 22A 5,000 feet, 6 Lanes Gleason to 5000 ft. north of Gleason All New Roadway Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements, median and number 1 and 2 lanes, each direction $1,790,845 Intersection Improvements Gleason signal, 50% of civil costs only, 1 leg $9,890 Right-of-Way, TIF portion exists. $0 _~.~ ,Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $360,147 iTotal w---~~t~ ~'~n ~.~ S2.340,955 Tassajara Road - Segment 23 2,470 feet, 6 and 8 Lanes Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Road Ail New Roadway Tota!s for TIF Share Civil Improvements, 1 lane in each direction and medin curb $427,347 Civil Park Improvements, development agreement exists $0 intersection Improvements $0 Gleason signal, 50% of civil costs only, 1 leg Central Parkway signal, 50% of signal costs, no civil or r/w, I leg Pdght-of-Way, TIF portion exists. ICity Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ITotal with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $9,890 $28,125 $0 $93,072 $604,970 Tassajara Road - Segment 24 800 feet, 8 Lanes Dubiin Boulevard Extension to 1580; (not including Interchange) All New Roadway Totals for TIF Share i Civil Improvements, add I 12 foot lane . $48,000 intersection improvements w/right of way, I leg at Dublin Boulevard $0 Right-of-Way, TIF portion exists $0 Ci~ Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $9,600 ITotal with 10% Contingency f0 on Admin.) $62,400 Tassa.iara Road Subtotal (without Freeway Interchange) $I0,736,089 0231h; 11/8/99, 5:28 PM Page 11 99Nrw I ,2~ ~//2 Tassajara Road - Segment 25 at Freeway Intersection Freeway Interchange 1/2 of Interchange Exists Totals for TIF Share tCivil Improvements, Including new 4 lane Bridge $11,315,008 ISignalized intersection incl Right-of-Way n/a Ci~ Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 23.0% incl ITotal, (Contineenc¥ included with basic price); (includes 100% of interchanee costs) $11,315,008 Falion Road - Segment 28 8,080 feet, 4 Lanes Tassajara to Gleason All New Roadway I Tota!s for TIF Share Civil Jmpv'ts at 650+(8'! 9) (some addl, gdng) per LF@38%, (CCCo listed separately}, (r/w to cl), (8 ft gding) I $2,238,352 intersection Improvements w/right of way I leg at Tassajara and 1 leg at Gieason (r/w, signa!s, civil & gradng) j $266,544 Right-of-Way, 104 ft, S9.00 @ 38% I $2,873,894 City. Ad.ministration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% I J $1,075,758 ,Total with 10% Contineency (0 on Admin.) Falion Road - Segment 26A 4840 feet, 4 Lanes Gieason to Dublin Boulevard Extension Ail New Roadway Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements at 650+95 (addl gdng) per LF @ 38%, (CCCo separately), (cl to r/w), (6 ft gding) $1,370,204 intersection Improvements leg at Dublin Ext (dw, signals, civil & gradng) $500,837 I atGleason, 2 at Central and 1 Sports Park, 3100 ft. of frontaae, 20 ft. of pavement and c&g, no r/w $672,488 Ri=ht-of-Way, 104 If. ~, $7.92 at 38~ $1,514,912 City Administration, D_sign, Constru,.tion Management, ROVV Acquisition, 20.0% $811,688 Total with 10% Continoency (0 on Admin.) $5,275,973 0231h; 11/8/99, 5:28 PM Page 12 99Nr~' 99Nrw ,~ ~//~ Fallon Road - Segment 27 680 feet,' 6 lanes Dublin Boulevard Extension to North of 1-580 All New Roadway Totals for TIF Share !Civil Improvmts at S400/lf for 2 inside lanes & 28 ft median, (r/w to r/w), (1' grading) $272,000 ntersection Improvements w/right of way 1 leg at Dublin Blvd Extension (r/w, signa!s, civil & gradng) ,$159,429 Right-of-Way, (76-60)ft. @ ,$15 $163,200 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ,$118,926 ITotal with 10% Contin,aency (0 on Admin.) $773.018 IFalion Road Subtotal Interchange) $13,041,4t9 (without Freeway Fallon & t~580 Freeway Interchange with SignaLs - Segment 28 t Totals for TIF Share Freeway lntercnge, new 6 In Bt; Phl =,$17,649,782 & Ph2=$11,182,999 ,$28,832,78I Right of Way (3.2 acres, Phase 2 only) ,$2,100,000 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition incl If iv=rmom and Pleasanton will contribute, see table 2-3 .?k~-~/a. tblin pays 45% of cost; Livermore and Pleasanton will contribute $13.919,751 Tassajara Creek Bike Path - Segment 29 8,900 feet Casterson Property Line to Contra Costa County Line Totals for TIF Share Bike path, 12 ft. @ ,$7/sf @ 100% (+7ftx150ff~$134(~50% for Bridge at Tassaiara Ck) $817,950 Right of Way, none; included with Tassajara of Creek Improvements Cib' Administration, Design, Construction lvlanagement, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% $163,590 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) $1,063,335 0231h; 1118/99, 5:28 PM Page 13 99Nrw 99Nrw Park & Ride 40,000 s.f. for 150 cars I Totals for TIF Sha~ East of Tassajara, 40,000 s.f. @ ($4 lmprov. & $7 fight of way) I $0TM tEastof Hacienda, 40,000 @ ($4 & $7 I Improv. right of way) $0 East of.Fallon, 40,000 @ ($4 Improv. & $13 for rightof way) I S680,000 City Administration, Design, Construction Manaqem~nt,~'~ ROW Acquisition, 20.0% i $136,000 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) I $884,000 Precise Plan Line Costs Tota!s for TIF Share Total Cost $451,000 OTHER COSTS Town Square, civil only at $83k ea.; 7 town squares, no right of way (not included) $0 Neighborhood Parks, civil only at $202k ea.; 10 parks, no right of way (not included) $0 ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY TAKE COSTS Tassajara eastern frontage, I68,398 SF at ($19+$15+$15+$14)/4 (not included) $0 i Dublin Blvd, 126W'880L*$18*50%, not included; (126W*880L*$15*50% in seg 10) SO Central Pkwy: 102W*880L*$15'38%, not included; (126W*880L*$14*38% in seg 18) $0 Gteason Road: 102W*880L*$14*38%, not included; (126W'880L*$10.35'38% in seg 20) $0 OTHER Fallon Road: 1800 ft at no, th end: 102'1800'11.50-102'1800'11.50 SO $1,000,000.: Right of Way Condemnation Contingency, (for north end of Tassajara) OTHER COST~ 115 and 16 $1,000,000'~~ 0231h; 11/8/99, 5:28 PM Page 14 99Nrw. Table t; Category One Costs used to determine RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL FEE :)ubIin Blvd. Ext., SP dw to Airway Boulevard, adj. for -$973,000 $28,669,899 J, acienda Drive, excluding 1-580 Interchange $793,636 -lacienda Drive 1-580 Interchange, 100% of cost, excluding $3.762M Alameda County Loan $1,300,000 Central Parkway and Arnold Drive $12,547,085 -Gleason Drive $5,811,344 Tassajara Road $10,736,089 Tassajara Road t-580 Interchange, 100% of cost $11,315,008 =allon Road $13,041,419 PSR Reports, ('included in segment take-off) $0 F.~ Study, (not in segment take-off) $90,000 A~'~-n~S~7 $45 1,000 tOther Costs $1,000,000 I SUBTOTAL OF TABLE 1 $85,755,479 check sum $85,755,479 ]Table 2; Category Two'Costs used to determine RESIDENTIAL FEE/COMMERCIAL FEE ~r~-- - ' - --" - S o~ r-'~P~ ~ ~)f ~'~ S4,299,359 IScarlet Dr~lin Boulevard to Dougherty Road $8,321,777 Dougherty Road, 1-580 to CCCo $9,527,868 1-580 Fallon/El Charro Interchange, with RAN at $13 per S.F. (45% of cost to reflect Dublin's share) $13,919,751 1-580/Airway Boulevard Interchange (Dublin's portion of cost only) $2,080,000 SUBTOTAL OF TABLE 2 $38,148,765 check sum $38,148,755 Table 3; Category One Adjustment Costs used to determine RESIDENTIAL SU ~CHARGE FEE Tassajara Creek Bike Path $1,063,335 Park and Ride Lots $884,000 SUBTOTAL OF TABLE 3 $1,947,335 tSummation of Tables 1, 2, and 3 $125,851,569 0231h; 11/8/99, 5:33 PM Page 1 newtb!s CITY OF DUBLIN ROJ_DYAYS TO BE IMPROVED SHEET ! OF 2' ! ! CONTRA COSTA COUNTY R0.~DWAYS TO BE IMPBOVED SHEET 2 OF 2 z~ r~ TABLE 2 EASTERN DUBLIN TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE o 1999 UPDATE Detail of Total Costs (Prior to Adjustments) by Section and Project Segment Segment 1999 Cost Estimate J Credits orAdvances I Total S&T BaJance at 6,30199 SECTION 8A IMPROVEMENTS IDublin - SP row to East BART Access !Dublin - East BART Access to Hacienda !Dublin - Hacienda to Tassajara 10 Dublin - Tassajara to Fallon 11 Dublin - Fallon to Airway 25A Dublin Bivd. Adjustment $73,1251 $01 $73.125 $363,792! $Oj $363,792 $01 $5,118,4~0t $$,118,464 $11,703,768 $11,703,768! $I7,502.2141 $0j $17,502,214 -$973,000t $0l -$973,000 8-11 13 Hacienda - 15BO to Dubtin $130,0D01 $01 $130,00D 14 Hacienda - Gleason to Dublin $563,6351 SOt $$53,636 15 interchange at Hacienda $1,300,000l SOl $1,300,009 16 Arnold - Dublin to Gleason $2,618,9901 $01 $2,618,999 15A Central Parkway ~ Hacienda to Arnold $327,5351 $01 $327,538 17 Central Parkway - Hacienda to Tassajara $1.356,012l $5,325,0501 $6,681,062 16 Central Parkway - Tassajara to Fallon (West) $4,335,0731 $01 $4,335,073 18A tCentral Parkway-Tassajara to Falion (East) $3,909,472l $0l $3,909,472 !9 iGleason - Amotd to Hacienda $146,2501 S01 $145,259 19A /Gleason - Hacienda to Tassajara $0, $3.820,4451 $3,820,445 20 JGleason - Tassajara to Falfon $5,665,094t $Dj $5,665,094 22 JTassajara - North of Gleason to COCounty Line $7,727,764j $OJ $7,727,764 22A JTassajara - Gteason to North of Gleason S2,340,955J $1,5/-7,5751 $3,918.539 23 JTassajara - Gieason to Dublin $SEN,970j $3.340,8511 $3,945,821 24 jTassajara - Dublin to 1580 $=32,400J $195,000J $257,400 25 jlnterchange at Tassajara $11.315,0081 S01 $11,315.008 26 IFallon - Tassajara to Dublin (Gleason) $0l $6,992,428 $5,275,973 IFation - Gieason to Dublin $5,992;4281 $5.275,973l SO 27 iFallon - Du~iin to North of I580 $773,0181 $773,018 31 IPrecise PJan Line Costs $451,0001 SOl $451,090 NA ITIF Ubdate $9D.ODDJ $90,OOO NA IROW Contingency NA IBalance on Prior Funding Advances NA iBalance on Credits Existing TIF $1,0D0.0001 $0 $1 .ODD,ODD ITOTAL SECTION I IMPROVEMENTS $01 S6,559,2101 $6,559,210i soI s11,568,8071 $11,568,807, SSS,505,402J $124,250,882j $85,755,4801 ;ECTION II IMPROVEMENTS 1 IDougherty - City Limits to AVB I $3,592,629t $01 $3,592,629 2 !Dougherty - AVB to Houston I $3,575,217t S01 $3,875,217 3 IDougheriy - Right Turn, Houston to Dublin I $131,2131 $01 $131,213 J $1,928,809I SOl 4 IDougherty - Dublin to North of 1-580 $1,928,809 12 Ilnterchan~e at Airway $2,08O,0Ooj SOl $2,080,000 5 J Dubiin - E of VP to Sierra Court j SD SD 6 IDublin - Sierra to Dougherty I $1'933'334t $0j $1,933,334 7 lDublin - Dougherty to SP row J S2,356.025J S01 $2,366,025 21 IScariett - Doughe,"ty to Dublin I $5.321,7771 $0l $8,321,777 28 ilnterchange at Falton j $13,919,751t $0J $13,919,751 NA jBalance on Prior Funding Advances J $Oj .~,113,4291 S¢,,113,429 ITOTAL SECTION II IMPROVEMENTS j $$8,148,755 J $4,113,429 J $42,262.,18,4 SECTION 1 RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS lB !Dublin - SP row to East BART Access I S01 S01 $0I 29 jTassajara Creek Bike Path j $1,063,335j $273,000j $1,336,335 $3,413,46bJ $4,749,7~1 ..,..-' ' 30 IPark and Ride Lots J SB84,0001 $2,529.460 ITOTAL SECTION 1 RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS I $1,947,3351 $2,802,460 GRAND TOTAL, ALL IMPROVEMENTS (TABLE 1, LINE 5) J $I25,851,57ol $45,421,291J i ATTACHMENT City of Dublin Cost Analysis, ~999 Update Traffic Impact Fee Eastern Dublin Area 0231.02 ~r~ph ~ & T~o~o~ thc_.. o,~ _mXH ~ ~ t"r' '~ Development Section Public Works ~epartment City of Dublin Emerald Pointe New Traffic Impact Fee Calculation ATTACHMENT 2 1119/99 Hacienda Drive (Segment 14) 840 lineal feet Additional widening due to double left turns on Dublin Bird and Central Civil Improvements 840' x $650/1f × 38% Right of W. ay 38' x 840' x $4.55/sf $207,480 $145.236 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW, 20% $7O.543 Total with 10% Continoencv I $458.531 Dublin Bird Bike Path (SP ROW to iron Horse Drive) 2100 iineal feet, t2' [Civil Improvements I $0 I Right of Way 12'x 2100'x $7/sf I $176,400 !City Administration, Design, Constru~ion Management, ROW, 20% I $35.280 t I tTotal w~h 10% Continoencv I $229.320 I SRAND TOTAL t $687,g51 j TIF New Format 1 I-9-99 Emerald Pointe Page 1 Development Section Pubiic Works Department City of Dublin Koll New Traffic Impact,=~,,,, Calculation 11/9/99 Park-n-Ride Lots Civil Improvements, 74,836 sf x $7.00/sf I' $523,853 I Right of Way 74,836 sf x $19/sf $1,421,886 City Administration, Design, Construction Mana~oement, ROW, 20% $389,148 ,Total with 10% Continoencv i $2.529.461 TIF New Format 11-9-99 Koll Page 2 Development Section Pubiic Works DepaC. ment City of Dublin Tassajara Meadows 2 New Traffic Impact Fee Calculation 11/9/99 Gieason Drive - Segment 19A 1,908 linear feet; 88 feet curb to curb ICivil improvements, $425/1.f. x 61% I $492,332 Park Entrances I $25,000 Intersection Improvements Park Access Drivewa), (2 le~) @ 50% I $183,360 ~ddge $134/sf x 80' x 55' x 100% I $589,600 :Right of Wa)' 48' x $18 sf x 100% City Administration, Design, Construction Mana~oement, ROW, 20% $1,648,512 $587,761 Total with 10% Continoenc¥ I $3.820.445 Tassajara Road (Segment 22A) 250 lineal feet, 5' wide CiVil improvements 5'x 250' x $15.00/sf x 100% !Right of Way 5' x 250' x $15.0d/sf x 100% x .5 I $9,375 t lntersection Improvements I $183.360 iCity Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW, 20% $38,547 tTotal with 10% Continoency $250.555 Tassajara Creek Bike Path (29) 600 lineal feet, 12' wide Civil Improvements 12' x 600' x $87/sf x 100% $5O,40O $10,080 ,City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW, 20% ITotal with 10% Continoencv t $S5.520 I GP. AND TOTAL I $4,136,521 j Tlr New Format 11-9-99 Toss Meadows Page 3 Development Section Public Works Department City of Dublin Toll 1119/99 New Traffic Impact Fee Calculation -¢~ ~¢' //~ Central Parkway (Segment 17) 2,330 lineal feet, Tassajara Creek to Tassajara Road Civil Improvements, $655/If (j~ 40% J $604,701 Intersection Improvements Park Ddve t'Signa!s 0nly, 4 legs) (~ 50% Tassaiara Rd (r/w, signals, civil & grdg 1 leg) @ 50% Bddge $134 x 65'x 165'x 100% Right of Way 106' x 2330 If x $20/!f x 36% $112,500 $168,360 $1,439.831 $1,770,800i $819,238.40 t City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW, 20% tTotal with 10% Continaencv I $5.325.050 Tassajara Creek Bike Path 29 900 lineal feet, Central Parkway North to Park Path I000 lineal feet, Dublin Bird to Central Parkway Civil Improvements $7.00 x 1900 lfx 12'× 100% I $159,600 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW, 20% $31,920 i Total with 10% Cantinoencv I $207.480 Dublin Bird (Segment 9) 2095 iineal feet, Tassajara Creek to Tassajara Road Civil Improvements 2095 If x $150Ilf x 54% Inte~ection tmDrovements (Tassaiara Road) Toss f2 leg) 50% x 442,058 $575,902 $221,029 $S84,400 $3,025,180 $941,302 iBridge 120 Ifx 55'x $134 JRight of Wa)/141'x 2095' x $19/sf × 54% !City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW, 20% ITota] with 10% Continoency $6.118.454 Tassajara Road (24) 1000 lineal feet, 8 lanes I Civil Improvements 1000 If × $150/sf x 100% intersection Improvements Right of Wa)/ ' - iCit¥ Administration. Design, Construction Management, ROW, 20% tTotat with 10% Continoencv $150.000 S0 $0 $30.000 $195.000 TIF New Format 1 I-9-99 Toll Page 4 Development Section Public Works Department City of Dub[in Toll 11/9/99 New Traffic Impact Fee ~ ¢ ~" //~ Calculation Tassajara Road (23) Gleason to Central Parkway Civil Improvements i $0 JRight of Way 609 If x 5' x $15/sf j $45,675 J Right of Wa)/514 If x 5'x $18/sf J $46,260 Rigl~it of Way 701 If x 17'x $18/sf I $214,506 $226,100 iRight of Way 700 lfx 17'x $19/sf j I Total with 10% Continoencv I I~532.541 ! ~ i::~-.~N D TOTAL TIF New Format 11-9-99 Toll Page 5 Development Se~i2n Pubis Wo,d-.s Department City of Dublin Tassajara Road Cast Analysis for Shea Development New TIF Cods 10/1 $I99 I I [Tassaja~ Road - Segment 22A [ t I I IGleason to 500Oft. North of Gleason t i fAIl New Roadway Civil Improvements, $750/sf, 50% I I t $1,103,625l I i I I $91,$s01 I lnterse~ion improvements I Gleason Signal' Civil & ROW (1 Leg) .R:?ht of Way, TIF portion -~x:i~s i I I I $23,679 City Administration, Design, Constr. Managmnt.,ROW, 20% J I $239,051 Total with 0% Contingency J J I J $1,577,575 ITassajara Road -Segment 23 12600 feet, 6 and 8 Lanes J iDublin Boulevard -E.~:tension to Gieason Road All New Roadway Civil Improvements I $1,175,0D0 ~afl; lmprovem=-.nts I $232,D1 Ilnte~e~ion Im.2rovements t Cent,-al Partcw~y (1 leg) I $91,$SDI tRight of Way, TJF Potion Exits ! · --~ 9D,2~9 I' IC~y AdministrafJ~n, Design, Con=tr. Managmnt. 20% S.318,D75J ITotal with 1D% Oontingen=y $Z,557,7541 J Grand Total CredP~ (22a+ZZ) $4,125,3291 I I ~ ~ new book sheaTa-.%Road 1~o~@9 pa=ce 6 /_//~ ,,/9 ATTACHMENT 4 City of Dublin Traffic Impact Fees - Trip Generation Property Santa Rita Property RESIDENTIAL Category Family i Residential Trip Rate Trips/ Unit Totals Residential ] Commercial Total Units or Square Footage 154 Units 123 Units 324 Units 347 Units 368 Units 95 Units 143 Uni~ !52 Units 8D0,0OD $.F. 40D,0DO S.F. 5gD.0OD S .F. 63.300. S.F. '[ 2.360 S.F. 595.000 S.F. Source 10 1,540 Built i Medium High Density Trips/ Residential 7 Unit 861 Built Medium High Density Trips/ Under The Villas Residential 7 Unit 2.268 Constru~ion Single Family Trips/ Under ;ummer Gten Res dentiai 10 Unit 3.470 Constru~ion Medium High Density Trips/ Under Jefferson Resident a 7 Unit 2.576 Constru:tion ISingle Family Tdps/ Approved Tassaiara Meado~ IResidential 10 Unit 95D Tentative Ma:~ Medium Density Trips/ Pending Tentative Toll Brothers Resident al 10 Unit 1,430 Medium Density Trips/ ! Pending Tentative Toll Brothers Residenfia 10 Unit 1.520 Ma~ SUBTOTAL RESIDEN~'I,AL 14,515 COMMERCIAL General Commercial Under Hacienda Crossin:s 22 TriDs/ksf 17.600 Constru~ion Under IO~us Industrial ILioht indust~ia, 8 Tri~s/ksfl 3.20D Construction I I Under Emerald Pointe Campus Office 20 TriDs/ksf i I .SOD Constru~ion Tri~s/ksf j ;General Motors Auto Dealership Approved Use Permit 4S General Motors JAut~ Servi=e 29 Koll Coroorate J Campus J Hotel 3.038 Approved Use 358 Permit Approved Use Permit 20 11 .gOo J ksf Approved Use Koll Comorate 1.55 Rooms 10 Trips/ 1.55D Permit Approved Use Koli Comorate iRestaurant 14.009 I S.F. 133 Tfi~S/k~rj 1.sm Permit Pending Use J j Trips/ksf 32.000 Permit PeooJesoft JcamDus Office : '1,500.000 J $.F. 20 500.000 j S.F. 10.000 J Campus or, ce 100.208 114,g23 Site 15 20 J Nei.ghbornood J Commercial 15O,0O0 S.F. 46 SUBTOTAL COMMERCIAL J J J Tri,~s/ksfI Site 3 Sut~total Santa Rita Property Fastem Dublin Soe=ific Ptan Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Pag~- 1 of 6 Tiftab-1, Attectlm 4 Trip Generatiori Printe:: 11/08/1999 ATTACHMENT 4 City of Dublin Traffic lrnpa~ Fees - Trip Generation Property Category Single Family Residential Units or Square Footage Trip Rate Trips/ Unit Totals Reslclentia~ I Cornmercial I Total 1060 Source Approved Tentative Map Casterson Property 106 Units 10 1,060 Greenbrier/¥arra-Yarra Property, Tract Medium Density Trips/ Pending 7075 Residential 126 Units 10 Unit ;1,260 1260 Tentative Map Dublin Rancid, Phase I I Single Family Trips/ Approved ;Units LI-6 Residential 588 Units 10 Unit 5.650 Tentative Map Medium Dens}ty Trips/ Approved Units M1-3 Residential 279 Un~ 1D Unit 2.780 Tentative MaD Subtotal Duo, lin Ranch, Phase I 8,470 Trips/ Unit i rips/ Unit 319 Units 3190 Medium Density Residential fSmgle Family I Residential 10 Greenbrier/Yarra-Yarra Property, Parceis A-E bu~ui,n Pan=n, Area A 573 Units 10 5730 5730 Dublin Ran=h, Area B Medium Density Trips/ Approved PD Unrcs MI-B Residential -058 Units 10 Unit .0.580 Zonino Unit MH Medium High Density Trips/ Approved PD Residential 172 Units 7 Unit ! .204 Zonino High Density Trips/ Approved PD Units HI-2 Resident a 7z-.4 Units 6 Unit 4,4-34 Zonino J Approved PD GO JGeneral Commercial 163.350 S.F. 33 Trios/ksf 5.391 Zonino Dublin Ranch, GC General Commercial 625.088 S.F. 33 ! Trios! ksf 20.628 Zonino 971.388 Ig,428 JCamDus Off]ce Trios/ksrJ 2O Pending Tentative Map Approved PD Zoning Approved PD Zonin,o Subtotal, Area C 40,056 J ' Dunlin Ranch, Rural Residential 3 0 ~-astern DuO'Jla J Area D I Unit Trips/Unit 10 10 Specific Plan DublinArea Ran=h,F J ISingie Family Trips/ Pending PD SFR IResidential 91 Un~ 10 Unit 910 Zonin,u Medium Density Trips/ . . Pending PD M Resident al 681 Units 10 Unit 6.81 {3 Zonin,o Medium High Density Trips/ Pending PD MH Residential 0 Units 7 Unit D Zonino H High Density Trios/ Pending PD Res dentia 0 Units 6 U~it 0 Zonino tVit,aoe Center Trios/ksf 0 Neighborhood ~ Commercia 0 S.F. 33 · - Page 2 of 6 T~ab--l, A~ls~n.m 4 Trip Generation P. ntec~: 11/08/1999 ATTACHMENT 4 City of Dublin Traffic Impa~ Fees -Trip Generation Proper~y Category DublinAreaRanch'G Medium High Density MH Res dential I High Density H Res dentJa Neighborhood Villaae Center I Commercial Subtotal, Area DublinArea RanCh,H General Commercial Units or Square Footage 621 854 17S,S25 Units Units Trip Rate 33 Trips/ Unit Tdps/ Unit Trips/ksf[ Trips Residential 4.347 5.I24 Totals Commer':lal t 5.938 Total 15,409 Source Pending PD Zoni~ Pending PD Zonino Pending PD Zonino GC 2S2.269 S.F. 33 9.3!5 Campus Office J J Pending PD CO 559.528 S.F. 20 Tri.~s! ksf 16.514 Zonino General Commercial/ Trips/ksf Pending PD CC/CO C. amDus Office 182.952 S.F. 26.5 4,$48 Zonino Subtotal Area ~ J j ~0,s77 Lin Proper%', West of Tassajara Road J J Neighborhood j' 3.~.590 S.F. 33 NC Commercial J Tri~slk~J 1207 Medium High Density J Tri~s/ MH Residential 300 Units 7 U~it 2.10g Medium Density I Trips/ ]M Residential 500 Units 10 Unit 5.000 J Single Family j Tdps/ L Residential 1 OD Units 10 Unit 1 .OD:) Subto=a[, Lin Property iVledlum [)ens~ty Residential J ~ rips/ Unit 9,307 M Uoura PrOperty S2 Units 10 820 1~20 Vargas Pro=)erty j UnP. s Medium Density Residential j Trips/ 10 Unit J Trips/ 7 Unit 140 5D4 Medium High Density Residential 14 MH 72 Units SUDtO~i, I Vargas Property J 644 Herrera Property. j 58.806 476 294 Neighborhood Commercia Medium High Density MH Res dentia :33 J THDs/ksf 1,941 7 j Trips/ Unit SUDT, O~I, J Hen'era Property Medium High ~ensi~y Haight Property Residential 42 Pending PD Zonino Units I j ~ npsl Unit Units Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Eastern Dublin S~ecific Plan Eastern Dublin S=)ecific Ptan Eastern Dublin SI3ecific Plan E:asterrl DUDiIn Specific Plan Eastern Dublin Specific Plan =_as~em Dublin SPecie= Plan Eastern Dublin Specific Plan :.astern Dublin 2,417 j j =-astern J~UDiln 294 Specific Plan Ps~e 3 of 6 T~ ~,~'-I, Atta~chm 4 Tl~p Genembon Print e~: 11/08P1999 ATTACHMEIVT 4 City of Dublin Tra~c Impa:t Fees - Trip Generation Property Mission Peak Homes Property Category Neighborhood NC Commercial Medium High Density MH Residential Units or Square Footaoe Trip Rate Totals Residential j Commercial j Total JSingie Family Residential Trips/ Eastern Dublin 33 Unit 5{~1 S:)ecific Plan 154 g70 Eastern Dublin Sl~ecific Pian Trips/ 7 Unit Trips/ 1 D U nit Trips/ 10 Unit Trips/ 1E.BBS S.F. 2.2 Units · 97 Units I Unit 67 Units 1 Unit J S0 Units J 210 Units I 35 Units J I Unit Eastern Dublin Specific. Pian SFR j Eastern Dublin R Rural Residential 1 O Soecific Plan Mission Peak Homes Property 1 Redgwi?k Pro~erty JSingle Family Eastern Dublin SFR I Residential 10 Unit 670 S~e=ific Plan J Trips/ ~astem Dublin R Rural 10 Unit 10 See=iff= Plan SuDto-'=l, Redgwick Prope,-ty $ilvera Pro.:~-rty J Trips/ 7 Unit Medium High Density MH Residentia Eastern DuPlin 5~0 SDe=ific Plan Medium Density J Trips/ Eastern Dublin M Res dential 10 I Unit 2.10D E, Decific Plan Single Family SFR Residential JR JRuml Residential Subtotat, Silvera Property t J J Trips/ Unit Trips/ Unit 'i rips/ Unit 3 rips/ Unit 3r~psl Unit '[rips/ Unit 33 [ Trios/kef 33 J Tri=s/ksfJ Dublin Land Company Property J J 350 10 3,020 10 10 650 650 200 200 100 27.S23 100 General Commercial t r:~46.153 t GC Neiohborhood Cor~mercial J 5s.41o J S.F. Eastern Dublin Soe¢ific Plan F-astern Dublin Soecific Plan ;-.astern Du~)iin Specific Plan ;-astern Duoim Specific Plan ~astern Duniin Specific Plan Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Eastern Dublin Soecifi= Plan Eastern Dublin SDec~: Plan NC 1.862 J High Density j j J Trips/ Eastern Dublin H Residential 1 ~ 2 Un~ 6 Unit 672 S~ecifi= Plan j Medium High Density I J J Trips/ --astem Dubiin MH Residential 108 UnF:s 7 Unit 742 ~;~ecific Plan M Medium Density Eastern Dublin Unit 43{3 Soech~c Plan J Dublin Land Company J j j 3'J,l;29 Page 4 of 6 Ttftab-'[. Atta.=t*~l~ 4 Trip Ger~emlion P~nte~": 11JOSf1999 ATTACHMENT 4 City of Dubiin Traffic Impact Fees - Trip Generation Property Jordan Property Category { Neighborhood ICommercial Medium High Density 1ResidenfJal Units or Square Footage 148.975 Trip Rate 33 Totals Residential I Commercial I Total I Trins/ksf Unit 4.916 Source Eastern Dublin S Dech'i: Plan F-astern Dublin S:~ecific Plan MH 628 Units 7 4,396 Medium Density I Trips/ t Eastern Dublin M Residenfia 96 Un~ 10 Unit 960 SDe=iflc Plan Single Family I Tri~s/ ~ Eastern Dublin SFR Residen~al 353 Un~ 10 U~ 3.530 S~e=~c Plan Jordan Prope~ ~ ~ TM, Prope~ I t Tri:~s/ksf I Trios/ksf GC JGeneral commer=ial 14.734 446.490 33 Jindustrial Park Eastern Dublin Soe=h~c Plan 219.542 8 1.756 J JMedium High Density Trips/ F_astem Dublin IMH IResidential 254 Units 7 Unit 1.778 Soer. ifl~ Plan M IMedium Density Trips/ Eastern Dublin JResidentiat 185 Units 10 Unit 1,850 S~ecifi~. Plan Subtotal, TMI Property J I 20'111~ Anderson Property J Trips/ Eastern Dublin industrial Park 247.595 S.F. 8 Unit 1.981 S~ecific Plan Medium Density Trips/ Eastern Dublin M Residential 57 Units 1D Unit, 570 Specific Plan Single Family Trips/ ::astern Dublin SFR Residential 55 - Units 10 Unit 550 Specific. Pian Suoto:al, J Anderson Property $,101 610 990 JM sFR Righet'd Pro~)ert7 J Trips/ industrial Park 217.103 S.F. 8 Unit Medium Density J Trips/ Residential 61 Units 10 J Unit 1.737 j Singte Family J Trips/ Residential 99 Unfts 1D Unit j SUOtotal, Righetti Proper-D/ I J E, ranaugh Prooe~ j J j Tri~s/ksfJ Eastern Dublin Soeciflc Ptan Eastern Dublin S~cific Plan Eastern Dublin S~ecific Plan JM j SFR JSingle Family I Residential Eastern Dublin S~ecific Plan Branaugh Property =astern Dublin St~ecifi: Plan 91.476 S.F. 8 732 Medium Density I J T dps/ j Bastem Dublin Residential 60 Units 10 Unit 600 Soecific Plan J Trips/ 1D Unit 2,382 1,050 105 J Units =_astern Dublin SI3e:ific Plan ATTACHMENT 4 Oity of Dublin Traffic Impact Fees - Trip Generation Property Category Units or Square Footage Trip Rate Totals Source Reslctential f Commemial I Tota! Trips/ . Eastern Dublin Campbell Property Industrial Park 107,352 S.F. 8 ksf ~59 B59 Specific Plan Residential Areas w/in General Plan Area, East and North of Specific Plan Area (Excluding Future Study Area) [Single Family Trips/ SFR tResidential 1.2zL4 Units 10 Unit 12/--40 General Ptan R Rural Trips/ Residential 2 Unit~ 1 O Unit 20 General Plan SubtotaI, Remaining General Plan I '~ 2,460 P~e 6 el6 Tfftsb-1, A=schm 4 '~rip Generation EASTERN DUBLIN TR_a_FFIC IMPACT FEE FEE SCtIEDULE Residential Low Density Dwelling (up to 6 units per acre) Medium Density Dwelling (7-14 units per acre) Medium/High Density Dwelling (15-25 units per acre) High Density Dwelling (more than 25 un/ts per acre) Non-Resident/al Development Other 'Fnma Residential $4,960/unit $4,960/tmit $3,472/unit $2,976/unit $ 452/rr/p LA.ND USE _~on-Residential) ESTTMATED V~EKDAY \rEHICLE TPd-P GE.N~KATION KATE* HOTEL/MOTEL OR OTHER LODGING: lO~oom OFFICE: Standard Commercial Office Med/calrDental 20/1,000 sf 34/1,000 sf RECREATION: Recreation CommurfiD' Center Heal.ga Club Bowling Center Golf Course Tennis Cou_rts Theaters: Movie Live Video Arcade 26/1,000 sf 40/1,000 sf 33/1,000 sf g/acre 33/acre 0.2/seat 96/1,000 sf EDUCATION CPrivate Schools): 1.5/student HOSPITAL: General Convalesentqqursing Clinic I2£oed 3£oed 24/1,000 sf ENrDUSTRLkL: indnsr~-/al (~4th remi/) hadusrrial (withom remiI) 9/1,000 sf 6/1,000 sf 8/1,000 sf ll/09/199911:07A-M Page 1 of 2 04 L .~N-D USE (Non-ResidenfiaB RESTALTRA~N-i': Quali~y (leisure) Sit-do,m, high turnover (usually chain other than fast food) Fast Food (with or ,aSthout drive through) Bar/Tavern ESTLMATED WEEKDAY VEHICLE TRIP GEN-EIL~.TION RATE ('~qTH PASS-BYS) 63/1,000 sf I33/1,000 sf 511/1,000 sf 100/1,000 sf AU~t'OMOBILE: Car Wash: Automatic Self-Serve Gas Station x~dth or ,afthout food mart Tire Store/Oil Change Store Auto Sales~ar~ Store Auto Repair Track Terminal 585/site 70/wash stall 97/pump 28/service bay (no pass-bys) 48/1,000 sf (no pass-bys) 20/1,000 sf (no pass-bys) 80/acre FL-NANCL~L: Bani: (Walk-Tm Only) Sax"ings and Loau CWalk-in Only) Drive-Through/ATM (Add to Bank or Savings & Loan) 91/1,000 sf 40/1,000 sf 65/lane or machine C OM/vEERCLq_LrlLET.gJL: Super Regional Shopping Cent=r (More than 600,000 SF; ,usually more than 60 a~es, with usually 3 + major stores) 22/I,000 sf Regional Shopping Center (300,000 - 600,000 SF; usually 30 - 60 acres, w/usually 2 + major stores) 33/1,000 sf Commtmity or Neighborhood Shopping Center (Less than 300,000 sf; less than 30 acres w/usually 1 major store or ~ocery store and detached restaurant ancl/or drug store) 46/1,000 sf Commercial Sho~s: Retail/S~'ip Co ..... ercial Comm~cial w/th nnl~own tenant Supermarket Convenienr. e Market Discount Store Lmb~ Store.rBuilding Material Garden Nu.,-s~ery Cemetery 26/1,000 sf 33/1,000 sf 98/1,000 sf 325/1,000 sf 46/1,000 sf 20/1,000 sf 23/1,000 sf (no pass bys) 4/acre =Source of ira%rmarion for Trip Generation Rates: Base on Institute of Trarmportafion Engineers and San Diego Assoc. Government Trip Generation Rates. These trip genex-ation rates are based on averages. Retail commercial has been ~ven a 35% pass-by reduction. 111091199911:07 A_M Page 2 of 2 G:/impacffe/Tff schedule 1.xls 1999 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update Allocation Between Land Acquisition and Construction Costs Cantina & Thompson Cost Estimate (Study Update Attachment 1) Segment 2 IDougherty - Ci~ Limits to AVB !Dougherty - AVB to Houston Land Base Cost tDublin - East BART Access to Hacienda $0 Land Including Overhead $0 $543,400 Total | Proje~ Cost ;'~' $3,592,6 $3,875,217 $418,000 3 tDougherty - Right Turn, Houston to Dublin $0 $0 $131,213 4 j Dougherty- Dublin to North of 1-580 $1,1 98,000 $1,554,800 $1,928,809 5 tDublin-- E of VP to Sierra Court $0~ $0 $0 6 IDublin o Sierra to Dougherty $457,280i $594,464 $1,933,334 7 I Dublin - Dougherty to SP row $1,528,230J $1,985.699 $2,355,025 8 t Dubtin - SP row to East BART Access SO $0 $73,125 8A S0 I Dublin - Hacienda to Tassajara $363,792 $0 $0 S0 10 IDublin - Tassajara to Fallon $5.245,171 $8,118,722 $11,703,76.8 11 $7,296,000 $9,484,800 $17,502.213 $0 $0 SO So 12 i lnterchange at Airway IDublin - Fallon to Airway J Dublin Boulevard Adjustment 13 iHacienda - 15B0 to Dublin 14 IHacienda - Gleason to Dubiin $0 15 l lnterchange at Hacienda -$973,000 S0 24 ITassajara - Dublin to 1580 $2,080,00C $0J $130,000 $0 $553,535 $0 $1,300,000 18 IArnoid - Dublin to Gleason $01 S0 $2,618,990 1-3A ITransit Spine- ,.Hacienda to Amotd $0t $0 $327,538 17 ITransit S~ine - Hacienda to Tassaiara S01 S0 $1,355.012 18 ITransit Spine - Tassa~ara to Fallon (West) $2,261,964. t $2,940,553 $4,335,073 18A ITransit Sr~in~- Tassajara to Fallon (East) $1,757.0711 $2,297,192 $3,909,472 19 IGleason - Arnold to Hacienda $01 $0 $146.250 19A tGleason- Hacienda to Tassajara $01 $0 $0 20 iGleason - Tassajara to Fallon $2,636,7741 $3,427,806 $5,665,094, 21 IScartet- Dougherty to Dubtin $3,072,0001 $3,993,600 $8,321.777. 22 ITassajara - North of Gleason to CCCounty Line $764,0001 $993,200 $7,727,7' 22A ITassajara- Gleason to North of Gleason $01 $0 $2,340,95~ 23 ITassa.iara - Gleason to Dublin $01 $0 $604,970 $62,400 25 t lnterchange at Tassajara 25 t Fallon - Tassajara to Dubiin (Gleason) ,°I ,°1 $0 $0 $11,315,008 $2,873,8941 $3,735,082J $5,992,428 2BA IFallon- Gleasonto Dublin $1,514,912j $1.959,386J $5,275,973 27 IFalton - Dublin to North of !580 $163.200l $212,160l $773,018 28 Ilnterchange at Falion $13,919,751 29 ITassajara Creek Bike Path 30 IPark and Ride Lots IPredse Plan Line Costs ITIF Update $2,1o0,oool $2,1oo,oool $0t $0j $1,053,335 $520,000 $576,000t $884,000 $01 $0t $451,000 $0 $01 $90,00O $ot $1,ooo,oool $1,ooo,ooo I $45,628,845l $125,851,569 IROW Contingen=y ITOTAL 31 Dep~rtment of PuBlic Works Estimates of New Credits (Study Update Attachment 2) $12,378,53.5.J $23,179.8451 IKoll I $1,421,8861 $1,848,4521 ITassajara Meadows $1,657,887l $2,155,253t I Toll $4,795,980 j $$,234,7741 IToll no mark-u2 t $532,5411 $532.541 I IShea I $513,948t $658,1321 I TOTAL I I $11,439,1 TOTAL % Right of Way % Improvements $57,057,997 38% 62% $149'031'4I!1. -. .4~R.EA OF BENEFIT .~£&JOR THOROUGHFAP, ES A_NI) BRIDGES WlTHLN EASTERLY DUBLEW SPECIFIC PL.~N A.R.EA Dublin Blvd.. Extend and widen to 6 lanes from the Southern Pacific. P, Jght-of-way to Aim,ay Blvd. (from the EIR future road improvement assumptions on pages 1 and 2 of the DKS revised report from December 15, !992 and m/rigation measure 3.3/10) Hacienda Drive. W/den and extend as 4 lanes from Dublin Blvd. to Gleason Drive and to 6 lanes from 1-580 to Dublin Blvd. (from the EIR future road improvement assuptions on page 1 of the DKS revised report) Central Park-way. Construct four-lane road from Dublin Blvd. West of Hacienda Drive to Fallon road (from the EIR future road irnprovement assumptions on page 1 of the DKS revised report) Gleason Drive. Consumct new 4-tane road from west of Hacienda Drive to Fallon road (from the EIR future road imporvement assumptions on page 1 of the DKS revised report) (The Project does not require extension of Gteason Drive to Dootan Road due to no development proposed in the furore study area) Tassajam road. W/den to 4 lanes over a 6-1ane right-of-way from Dublin Blvd. To the Conu-a Costa County Line, and to 6 lanes over an 8-lane ..-Serf-of-way from Dublin Blvd. To 1-580 from the EIR future road improvement assunkvrions on page 1 of the DKS revised report and mitigation measure 3.3/14.0) Fallon Road. Extend to Tassajara road, widen to 4 lanes over a 6-lane right-of-way from 1-580 to Tassajara road (from the EIR future road improvement assumptions on page 1 of the DKS revised report) Su-eet Atigmnent Study. A stud5, is required to specify the exact street aiiguaments in the Eastern Dublin area. P, Jght of way contingency. Funds are required to acquire land in the event that right of way must be obtained through condemnation and value of land is ~eater than the appraised value. *Cost of Roadway Improvements $26,953,898 $793,636 $t* q47.085 $5,811,344 $7,304,089 $I3,041,419 $451,000 $1.000.000 *Cost of Bridge Improvements $1,716,000 53,432,000 0 $67,902,471 $5,148,000 0 TOTAL IIViPRO\rEMEN~irS: $73,050,471 2-ne A.rea of Benefit Fee for roadway improvements based on 102,115 related u-ips for residential and 209,879 wips for non-residential is $2,180/unit for Low Density (1-6 un/ts ps acre) and Med/um Density Residential (7-14 un/ts per acre), $1,526 for Medium/High Density residential (15-25 units per acre), and $1,308 for High Density Residential (more than 25 ,,.nits.); and $218/u-ip for non-residential. 'i-ne Area of Benefiz Fee for bridge improvements for Low and Medium Density residential is $160/unit, for Mediumff-iigh Density Residential is $t 12/unit, and for High Density Residential is $96/urdt; and non- residential is S 16/~ip. 'i-ne Eastern Dublin Specffic Plan area has 3,916 Low Density units; 4,863 Medium Density units; 2,680 Medium/High Density units; and 2,.447 High Density units. *'I'nese cost estimates do not include credits due for construction of portions of these major thoroughfares and bridges. In the event that the Area of Benefit fee becomes effective, the appriate credit amounts will be calculated and the .~rea of Benefrt fee will be adjusted accordingly._ 11/09/!99911:03 .A2Vi ~.~ --~ CITY OF DUBLIN 1999 TRAFFIC !MPA CT FEES E~SrE~.5~ DUBLIN ROAD VgA ~F oOTUD ~' DOCUMENTS Table of Contents Cross Sections of Selected Segments · Non-typiCal Roadway S¢_m~aents Typical Roadway Seg'ments · Typical Bridge Section Cost Estimates, Detail · Non-typical Roadway Se~mnents ' · Spoxs Parks Improvements · Typical Four-Lane Roadway with 16-foot Median · Typical Six-Lane Roadway With 16-foot Median · Typical Six-Lane Roadway with 2g-foot Median · Hacienda Drive Freeway Interchange · Tassajara Road Freeway Interchange · Falton Drive Freeway Interchange · Airway Boulevard (Dublin Boulevard Ex"tension) Freeway Interchange · C~ntral Freeway Bridge Crossing · Tassajara Creek and Typical Unit Cost Calculation with Drawing · Si_maalized Intersection, Typical Unit Co~s with Drawing · P,_ig_ht-of-Way Weig2ated Average Unit Costs wi*da selected pages from right-of-way appraisal of the area east of Tassajara Road signa£ized Intersecffons, Cost Allocations- 2O EXISTING ROAD1YAY GIUND.-. 14'I~ 12 12 ' {SA~CUT '1 SEGI4ENT ~ DOUGHERTY ROAD ROADWAY E~'IMATI~ CITY OF DUBLIN ¢, ~o4' ]R/.' 72'E EXISTING ROAD~'AY 14%' /I 20 12 16 :32' ~O~T ~ .DO'UGHERTY ROAD ROADI~AY IgSTIMATE CITY OF DUBLIN DOUGHEI~TY I~OAD IIOUSTON P~CI~ TO DUBLIN BLYD, I~EDIAN ~OllK ONLY IIO^D~AY ESTIM^TE ii.~' {..,:.: Cll~/' OF DUBLIN no' R/~ N~' I~NDS~PINO & IRRIO, TO IU~AIH DOUGHEBTY I~OAD 5F. CTION ~-~ ~ 8F.G~NT ~ I{IGIIT TURN PO(;KF.,'T ONLY AND LANDSCAPING & IRRIG. ROADWAY ESTIMATE CITY OF DUBLIN DOUGHERTY. ROAD DUI]LIN I]LVD. TO NORTII 1-580 OFF-RAMP ROADIIAY ESTIMATlg CITY OF DUI~LIN ,0' 4' I I ,. !I/X/////~ IgXIS'I'IN(] EXISTING 1'0 REMAIN NEt SEGMENT DOUGHERTY ROAD DUBLIN BI,VD, TO NORTII I-,~O0 OFF-RAMP ROAD~fAY ESTIMATE CITY OF DUBLIN 12' F.,XISTING TO RI.~MAIN IU~MODEL DOUGHEI~TY I~OAD DUBLIN BgYD, 'ro NORTII I-~BO OYF-I{AMP ROADWAY I~STIMA~ CITY OF DUBLIN IiIKIb-q'ING R/~ -- I00' 11' 11' TO RI!;g^IN 11' ,, 17' ,[ O' '4' Add'l R/~ DUBLIN BLVD. VILLAGE PARI~AY TO SIERRA CT. ]UDEHING ROADWAY ESTIMA~ CITY OF DUBLIN DUBLIN BLVD, ROADWAY I!;STII~'I~i ClT¥ OF DUIJLIN ~o~' ~/c ?o ~/c ~o' { SEGMENT DUBLIN BLVD. ROADWAY CITY OF DUBLIN 7~' it/. 4' ---______dm 44' EXIST, TO REMAIN ARNOLD RD. ROADWAY ESTII~IATE CITY OF I)IJBLI. oo' i~/w ALL s~:t:~:.~. (~ SCARLETT DRIVE ROADW^Y ESTIMATE CITY OF DUBLIN 00' TIF TYPICAL 4 LANE I~OAD I{OAD~AY ES~flMATB CITY OF DUBLIN , 12' O' 4 104' 20' TIF TYPICAL t3 LANE I~OAD WITH 16 FT. MEDIAN 4' 8' I ROADWAY ESTIMATE CITY OF DUBLIN 14' ~,, 14'~ I .... I I · 3~' ~ FllONTAGE IMPI~OYEMi~NT ALL Ng~ TIF FRONTAGI~ IMPI~OVI~MF, NT TYPICAL 6 LANE I~OAD wrrH 28 li']' ME'DIAN ROADWAY ]~b"TIMATE crrY OF DUBLIN 96' BI~.II)~I~ TYPICAL 4 LANE BRIDGE I~OAD~AY Eb"TIMATI~ CFI'¥ OF DUIJLIN I1~' [gRIDGE 104' TYPICAL 6 LANE BRIDGE ROADWAY ESTIMATE CITY OF DUBLIN IEastem DuDiin Traffic Impact Fees for 1999 I I Doughe,'lYl Dougherty I Doughertyt DougherlyI Doughertyl Dougherty t Road [ Road Road j Road Road Road 1999 UNIT Units l S=GMq' 11 SEGM'T 1 SEGMq' 21 SEGM'T 2 SEGM'T 3 SEGM'T 3 1DESCRIPTION PRICES I QUANTWI COST QUANTIYI COST QUANT[Y COST ~ 3% EAI 11 $62,055 11 $39,112 1 $1,528 ~~ 2% :-Al 11 $41,370 11 $26,075 1 $1,019 [Clear & Grub 2% EAI 1 j $41,370 1 t $26,075 1 $1,019 ~Cut S 1.00 LFI 40001 $4,OO0 96001 S9,600 800 $800 tGrind $ 1.50 LFt 16OOO1 $24,000 01 S0 800: $1,200 I Remove Ex Pvm't/sw $ 1.00 SFf 280001 $28,000 448001 $44,800 8330 S8,330 ~ctian $ 3.80 SFI 196000i $744,800 105600 ! s401,280 1360 $5,168 tCurb & Gutter S t2.00 LFI 40001 $48,000 32001 $38,400 200 $2,400 ISidewalk $ 3.10 SFI 01 $0 256001 $79,360 1600 $4,960 Curb, Std $ 10.00 LFI 40DOl $40,000 01 $0 600 $6,000 IMedian Curb, Glue S 7.00 LFt 40001 $28,000 64001 $44,800 $0 IOveday $ 1.40 SFt 1760001 $246,400 01 $0 $0 I Eadhwork $ 5.00 CYt 66671 $33,333 5452 i $27,259 $0 lDrop Inlets & MH's(I) $ 2,000.00 =Al 14t $28,000 111 $22,000 S0 tStorm Drain Pipe(2) $ 45.00 LFi 450ol $202,500 450ol $202,500 S0 Striping(3) $ 1.50 LFt 32000! $48,000 256001 S38,400 7200 $10.800 Markings $ 100.00 EAI 32 ! $3,200 281 S2,800 18 $1,800 !Signs(4) $ 100.00 EAI 401 $4,000 32j $3,200 6j $600 l=IectroIiers(5) S 2,000.00 =.F-Al 14 j S28,000 11 j $22,000 11 $2,000 ;Signal Interconnect $ 15.00 LFI 40001 S60,000 3200J S48,000 I SD New Utilities $ - LFI 0J S0 01 $0 J S0 Existing Utilities S - LF 01 S0 0 t $0 t SD 1040001 $332.800 3.20 672001 $215,040 $0 SF /~JLandscaDe & l~g(6) S 0.01 LS 11 $20,685 lj $!3,037 1! S509 1t 3urvey '".~.. Grading Depth ISignal Legs . ot $o o! so ol so ISignal Price (not included) O] SO OI S0 Oj $0 iBridges (not included) SF O[ $0 Demolition I I O j Building (not included) =-Al 01 $0 0 t $0 O t $0 Median Gut $ 3.00 SFJ 01 $0 0t SD OI $0 Exist curb $ 7.00 LFI 0 S0 0i S0 400 $2,800 R,NV Cost (not included) SFI 0 n/a 0t n/a nla Other ,RAN cost/SF 0 Length 4000 3200 900 PJW width 104 104 TIF width Total civil only $2,068,514 Sl,303,738 $50,933 COST/LF jFootnotes: (1) (~200 ft. Intervals along length of roadway (2) one pipe, each side of roadway, total = $90ILF (3) per strip ! I 1(4) @ 50 Ft interva!s along all lanes 1(5) @150 ft. Intervals along all lanes, including conduit (6) 16'+4'+4' and/or area of front'age restoration Ioriainal rite for base information is 981030; sheet 990331 I 11/8/99, 5:50 PM Page 1 0231h =-astern Dublin 'Traffic im )act Fees for 1999 J J ! J Doughe,'ty'. f Doughertyt Dubtinl Dublin DubIinl Du~lin t Road t Road Boulevard I Boulevard Boulevard t Boulevard 1999 UNIT t Units SEGM~'41 S=,GM'T4 S=_GM, q- 61 S=GM"T'6 SEGMq'71 S=,GMq'7 iD--SCRtPTION PRIC=,S I QUANTIYJ COST QUANTIYI COST QUANTIYI COST :Mobilization 3%1 =,A 11 $7,131 11 $20,132 11 $7,066 Traffic Control 2% FA 1 t $4,754 1 ] $13,422 1 ] $4,711 Clear & Grub 2% EA 1 ! `$4,754 i f $13,422 1 ! ,$4,711 Saw Cut $ 1.00 LFI 1100j $1,100 40601 ,$4,060 Grind $ 1.50 LF[ 1100l $1,650 0t SO 6401 $960 Remove =,x Pvm't/sw ,$ 1.00 SFI 132001 $13,200 121801 $12,180 0! $0 Full Pavm't Section $ 3.80 SFI 172001 $65,360 28420t $107,996 25210I S95,795 tCurb & Gutter $ 12.00 LFI 11001 $13,200 4060l $48,720 790i S9,480 I Sidewalk ,$ 3.10 SFI $800[ ,$27,280 324801 $100,688, 63201 $! 9,592 ~Std ,$ ' 10.00 LFI 0l S0 2030i ,$20,300 01 S0 IMedian Curb, Glue $ 7.00 LFI 0] S0 0i ,$0 1300! S9,100 IOveday . $ 1.40 SFt 01 S0 0t `$0 0t SO tEarthwork S 5.OO CYt 1467t $7,333 2256t $11,278 1143i $5,716 iDrop Inlets & MH's(1) $ 2,000.00 =-.Al 41 $8,000 10t $20.300 21 $4,00O IStorm Drain Pipe(2) $ 45.00 LFI 2001 S9,000 40501 ,$182,700 790[ S35.550 1Striping(3) $ 1.50 LFI 5500j `$$8,250 162401 $24,360 9600t S14,400 IMarkings $ 100.00 EAI 16i $1,600 28I $2,800 10t Sl.000 Signs(4) $ 100.00 EAI 10t $1,000 41 t $4,060 10! el,000 =_ectroli.rs(5)" $ 2,000.00 F_AI 01 ,$0 01 S0 21 $4,000 I Signal interconnect $ 15.00 LF i 5501 `$8,250 01 SO 01 S0 INew Utilities ' S LFI 01 $0 S0 0! S0 t =,xisting Utilities S LFt 01 S0 ,$0 01 S0 ILandscape & trrig(6) S 3.20 'SFI 143001 $45,760 24360 $77,952 32501 $10,400 I Survey ' ,$ 0.01 LSI 1 t S2,377 1 $6,711 i t $2,355 tGrading Depth t I 11 ~ I iSignal Legs I 0i . SO SD 1Signal Price (not included) I 0i S0 tBddges (not included) I SFI 0i SO S0 01 S0 Demolition t I t Building (not included)! =-.At 0] SO S0 1 I SO Median Gut I $ 3.00 SFI 01 $0 $0 1760 `$5,280 =,xist curb t $ 7.00 LFf 11001 $7,700 S0 60 $420 PJW Cost (not included) SF O l n/a n/a 19465 n/a Other t 01 S0 RAN cost'SF I Length ! 550 2030 R/W width I n/a ITIF width I Total, civil only I $237,699 $571,080 S235,539 COSTILF ! S33I I Footnotes: ! use $330 (1) ~200 ft. Intervals aion~ length of roadway t t(2) one pipe, each side of roadway, total = $90/LF 1(3) per strip t ! I(4) @ 50 Ft intervals aion~ all lanes ! 1(5) @150 ft. Intervals along all lanes, inciuding conduit t(6) 16'+4'+4' and/or area of frontage restoration t I I I 11/8/99, 5:50 PM Page 2 0231h I Eastem Dubiin Tra,ff~c Im ;act Fees for 1999 J 1 J J !Existing UtiIities /.--~JLandssaoe & lrrig(6) i $ 3.20 I I I I I Hacienda j Hacienda Arnold t Amc)Id Arnotdl Arnold t I I Road l Road Road l Road Road Road 1999 UNiT I Unitsl SEGM'T 141 SEGM'T 14 SEGM'T 161 SEGM'T 16 SEGM'T 16A SEGM'T 16A DESCRIPTION PRICES I I QUANTIYt COST QUANTI¥I COST QUANTIY. COST ~'~": 3%1 EAt 11 S4,175 11 $52.280 1 $5,871 lTraff~c Control 2%1 EAi 11 $2,783 11 $34,853 1 $3,914 [Clear & Grub 2%1 EAI 11 $2,783 1 $34,853 1 S3,914 Saw Cut S 1.00 I LFI 800J S800 2326 $2,326 0 S0 $ 1.501 LF! 8001 $1,200 0 S0 0 S0 Ex Pvm't/sw $ 1.00 I SFi 17600l 817,600 32564 $32,564 0 S0 {Full Pavm't Section $ 3.80 { SFI 176001 $68,880 74432 $282,842 16800 $83,840 Curb & Gutter S 12.00 I LFI 800t S9,600 2326 $27,912 0{ S0 Sidewalk S 3.10 SFI 0j $0 18608 $57,685 0t $0 Median Curb, Std S 10.00 LFI 0J S0 46,52 846,520 14001 $14,000 Median Cur~, Glue S 7.00 LFt 01 S0 0t S0 01 S0 iOveday S 1.40 SFI 0t S0 see x-sect t $38,800 0¢ S0 Earthwork' $ 5.OO CYI 652l $3,259 01 S0 1452[ 87,259 Drop lniets& MH's(1) $ 2,000.00 EAt 51 $10,000 8f 816,000 01 S0 Storm Drain Pipe(2) S 45.00 LF! 1001 $4,500 !see x-sect [ $930,400 0t S0 ,Striping(3) S 1.50 LFI 4800] 87,200 I8898j $27,912 2800! $4.200 Markings S 10O.00 -.EA1 61 S600 14i $1,400 4 J S400 Signs(4) S 100.00 EAI 8l 8800 24l $2,400 01 S0 EJectroIiers(5} $ 2,000.00 EA1 01 SO 81 $16,000 9J $I8,667 Signal lnterconne= $ 15.00 LFI 01 S0 0I' SO 0j SO New Utiiities , S LFI 0 i $0 0 ¢ SO 01 S0 t$ - LFI 0! so ol so ol so :. ~urvey I $ 0.01 SFt 01 S0 LSl 1 t I $1,392 32564 J 8104,205 ~- IGrading Depth i! $17.427 224001 87!,680 11 81,957 11 :Signal Legs I i 0 $0 0i S0 01 S0 :Signal Price (not included) I 0 S0 I S0 01 $0 Bridges (not included) ! SFI 0 $0 0f S0 01 $0 Demolition I Building (not included} ! EAI 0 S0 O i SO Of SO Median Gut S 3.00 SFI 0 S0 01 SO 01 S0 Exist curb S 7.00 LFI SOO S5,600 2326 $16,282 01 S0 PJW Cost (not included SF[ 01 nla 74-432 nla 0[ nta Other RNV cost/SF i nla 20 Length I 800 2326 1400 ~JW width J n/a 104 TiF width $139,173 28 Tokai, civil only $139,173 81,742,660 $!95,702 COST/LF Footnotes: I(1) ~200 ft. Intervals aion~3 length of i-oadway !(2) one pipe, each side of roadway, total = $90/LF Ir3) ~r strip I I 1(4) @ 50 Ft intervals along all lanes !(5) @150 ft. Intervals along all lanes, in~.luding conduit 1('6) 16'+4'+4' and/or area of frontage restoration 11/8/99, 5:50 PM Page 3 0231h Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees for 1999 t I I i t I Central Pk~5'l Central Pkwyt Central Pk~5'l Central Pkwyl Scadetl Scarlet I 2250J 2250 2000 ~1 2000 ltl Drivel Drive 1999 UNIT Unitsl SEGM'T17al SEGMq' 17a SEGMq-17bl SEGM'T 17b SEGMq'211 SEGMq'21 DESCRIPTION PRICES I QUANTIYI COST QUANTIYJ COST QUANTIYI COST Mobilization 3% EAJ 1t S8,310 1t $12,857 I t 837,900 Traffic Control 2% mEAl 11 $5,540 11 S8,571 11 $25,267 Clear & Grub 2% :--Al 11 S5,540 11 S8,571 1 ! $25.267 Saw Cut S 1.00 LFI 45001 S4,500 01 S0 01 S0 Grind $ 1.50 LFI 45001 S6,750 01 S0 01 S0 Remove Ex Pvm't/sw S 1.00 SFI 0t S0 01 S0 0i SO Full Pavm't Section $ 3.80 SFJ 36000j $136,800 48000l $182,400 960001 $364,800 Curb & Gutter S 12.00 LFt 0t $0 01 $0 4800! $57,600 Sidewalk S 3.10 SFI 0j S0 01 S0 19200! 859,520 lvledian Curb, Std S 10.00 LFI 01 S0 40001 $40,000 48001 Median Curb, Glue S 7.00 LFt 01 S0 01 S0 0t S0 IOvefiay S 1.40 SFI 01 S0 0i S0 01 S0 IEarthwork S 5.00 CYI 01 S0 17761 $8,889 7111i $35,556 iDrop inlets & MH's(1) $ 2,000.00 EAt 01 $0 0j S0 121 $24,000 :Storm Drain Pipe{2) $ 45.00 LFI Ol $0 01 S0 48001 $216,000 iStriping(3) S 1.50 LFi 9000) S13,500 8DOOl S12,000 9600! S14,400 Markings S 100,00 EAt 61 SSOO 4l S400 6; SS00 Signs(4) S 100.00 EAI 11[ S1,100 10! S1,000 481 $4,800 ,.=ler. troliers(5) $ 2,000.00 =-Al 4 t SS,000 15j $30,000 16 j $32,000 Signal interconne~ S 15.00 LFI 0 j S0 20001 $30,000 24001 836,000 New Utilities S - LF] 0t S0 01 ,SO 0t S0 IExisting Utilities $ - LF I 0i S0 01 S0 D ! S0 !Lands'cape & lrrig(6) S 3.20 SFi 105001 $33,600 280001 $89,600 480001 S!53,600 ISurvey . S 0.01 LSl 1l S2.770 11 $4,286 II $12,633 tGrading Depth t 11 I I lSignal Legs I 0 $0 01 S0 0i S0 !Signal Price (not in~.tuded) I 0 S0 S0 S0 tBridges (not included) t SFI S0 S0 n/a iDemolition t I 1 S5O,000 Building (not included)l =-Al $0 S0 S0 Median Gut i S 3.00 SFI .gO S0 S0 i Exist curb i S 7.00 LFJ S0 S0 S0 IR.NV Cost (not included) SFt 0 n/a n/a 208000 S0 Other I t trail $115,200 R/W cos¢SF t I 0 Length i i 2250 2000 2400 fPJW width I iTIF width I ITotal, civil only I t $277,011 $428,575 S1.263,343 ! I $526 COST/~L~ Footnotes: t J I(1) @200 ft. lnterva!s aiong length of roadway J (2) one pipe, each side of roadway, total = $eO/LF l(3) per strip i J j(4) @ 50 Ft intervais aiong all Janes J 1(5) @150 ft. intervals along all lanes, including o~nduit (6) 16'+4'+4' and/or area of frontage restorationl I 11/8/99, 5:50 Plvl Page 4 0231h IEastem Dublin Traffic Impact Fees for 1999 IEa~hwork Drop Inlets & MH's(1 ) Storm Drain Pipe(2) Strioing(3) I Tassajaraj 226401 533,960 240001 Tassajaral Tassajaral Tassaiara Tassajara I Tassajara RoadI Road Rood Road Rood I Road 1999 UNIT Units SEGM'T221 SEGM'T22 SEGM'T22a SEGM'T22a SEGMq'231SEGM'T23a DESCRIPTION PRICES QUANTW't COST QUANTIY COST QUANTIYI COST MobiIL,-ation 3% EA 1 i S45.359 1 $36,375 11 $12,820 Traffic Control 2% EAI 1 t S30.239 I $24,250 11 $8,547 Clear & Grub 2% EAt 11 $30,239 I $24,250 11 $8,547 !Saw Cut $ 1.00 LFI 01 $0 0] $0 49401 ,64,940 IGrind $ 1.50 LFI 01 $0 0t $0 4940i $7,410 ~Ex Pvm'tYsw $ 1.00 ~'~"~ $ 3.80 SFJ 135840J £516,192 120000j ,6456,000 79040j $300,352 & Gu~er $ 12.00 LFI ~al"~-- $ 3.10 SFI 0J $0 0J SO 01 S0 !Median Curb, etd $ 10.00 LFJ 113201 $113,200 100001 $100,000 4940l $49,400 !Median Curb, Glue S 7.00 LFt 0j $0 DJ S0 0J $0 IOverl, ay S 1.40 SFt Oi $0 OI $0 Oi SO $ 5.00 CYi 503111 $251,556 22222 j $111,111 29271 $14.637 S 2,000.00 EAr f $0 I SO 0! S0 $ 45.00 LFI ! $0 t S0 0i SO $ 1.50 IMarkings 100.00 141 S1,400 14! $36.000 $1,400 9880) $14.820 4t ~oo )Signs(4) S 100.00 EAi 0i S0 0) S0 12t S1,200 ! Etectroiiers(5) S 2,000.00 =-Al 501 $100,000 401 $SO,0OO Ol SO )Signal interconnect $ 15.00 LFI 56601 S84,900 5OOOt $75.000 01 SO tNew Utilities ~ S - LFI ! S0 i S0 0i S0 IExisting Utilities Landscape & lrrig(6) S. 3.20 SFi 90560l $289,792 800OD] $256,000 0J SD LSI 11 $15,120 1 t `64,273 11 $12,125 $ 0.01 Survey !Grading Depth ! 6i "if 11 ! Signal Legs i OI SO DJ SD OI SD )Signal Price (not included) I 0! SD 01 SO 0! S0 !Bridges (not included) i SFI 2t $0 11 $0 0t S0 !Demolition j t I I I 1 Building {not inciuded)j EA! 2 housesl $0 t .SO 01 $0 t Median Gut I s 3.oo SFi 01 $0 0l S0 0f S0 Exist curb ! $ 7.00 LFI 0! S0 0t $0 0l S0 t,::~BN Cost (not included) SF ! 0i $0 01 SD 01 ,SO I Other ) t $0 SO O[ SO !Lengt~ I I 5660 5000 2470t PJ"W width J TtF width l Total civil only i Si ,511,956 S1,212,512 5;427,347 COST/LF )Footnotes: ){1) ~200 ft. Intervais ai~ng length of roadway I (2) one pipe, each side of roadway, total = $90/LF 1(3) per strip I 1(4) @ 5o Ft intervals along all lanes (5) @150 ft Intervals along all lanes, including conduit (6) 16'+4'+4' and/or area of frontaoe restoration I I I '1 11/8/99, 5:50 PIvl Page 5 0231h I Eastem Dublin Traffic lmpam Fees for 1999 I ! I l I Sports l Sports I Sports l S~o,~s Sports l Sports I Parkj Parkt Park] Parkt Parkt Par~ 1999UNIT Unitsl atSeg181 atSeg181 atSeg201 atSeg20 atSeg26AI atSeg26A iDESCRIPTION PRICES I QUANTIY COST QUANTIY COST QUANTIYI COST i MobiIization 3% EAI i $8,770 1 $1,471 1 t $20,175 Traffic Control 2% EAI I $5,847 1 $981 1 I $13,450 Clear & Grub 2% EA.I 1 $5,847 1 $9S1 1 I $13,450 Saw Cut $ 1.00 LFI $0 S0 $0 Grind $ 1.50 LFI $0 $0 SO Remove Ex Pvm'tJsw $ 1.00 SFI S0 $0 S0 Full Pavm't Section $ 3.80 SFI 30000 $114,000 5000 slg,ooo 62000 $235,600 JCurb & Gutter $ 12.00 LFt 1500 $18,000 250 $3,000 3100 S37,200 [Sidewalk $ 3.10 SFI S0 S0 S0 !Median Curb, Std $ 10.00 LFI $0 S0 S0 .Median Curb. Glue $ 7,00 LFf $0 SO S0 Oveday $ 1.40 SFt $0 $0 $0 I Ea,"thwork $ 5.00 CYI 1111 $5,556 185t $926 13778 $68,889 IDrop Inlets & MH's(1) $ 2,000.00 EAt 14! $28,000 2f $4.000 31 I $62,000 Storm Drain $ 45.00 LFI $11.250 31001 $139,500 Pipe(2) 15001 $67,500 2501 ) $ 1.50 LFJ 3000j S4,500 5O0j $750 6200j $9,300 J Markings $ 100.00 EAI i $0 t SO J S0 JSigns(4) $ lOC.CO EA! 141 $1,400 2t S200 621 $6.200 Electroliers(5) $ 2,000.00 EAI specialj S30,000 s;)eciatt $6,000 special l Signal Interconnect $ 15.00 LFt I $0 t S0 I SO New Utilities $ LF! J $0 t SO I $0 E×isting Utilities S LFI t SO t SO I SO Landscape & lrrig(6) S 3.20 CFI ! $0 t SO I Survey S 0.01 LSl 1 ! $2,923 1 t S490 11 $6,725 Grading Depth ! 1 ! li I Signal Legs t 0 i. S0 0i SO O[ S0 iSignal Price (not included) t 0[ $0 Ot, S0 01 S0 Bridges (not included) SF! 0i $0 0[ SO Ol $0 Demolition t O i O! D Building (not included) EAI Of $0 Of SO 0 SO Median Gut $ 3.00 SFt 01 S0 0i SO 0 $0 Exist curb $ 7.00 LF I 01 $0 0 i SO 0 S0 R/W Cost (not included) SFI 0! $0 0 t $0 0 S0 )thor I $0 I SO PAN cost'CF 01 01 0 Length 1500t 250 3100 PJW width 0 t 0 0 T1F width Oj 0 OJ Total, oivii only $292,343 $4g,050 $-372,488 I COST/LF Footnotes: I!1 ) (~200 ft. lntervais atong length of roadway (~32)) one pipe, each side of roadway, total: S90/LF per s~p j J j(4) @ 50 Ft intervals aJong all lanes J 1(5) (~!150 fL intervals along all lanes, including conduit 1(6) 16'+4'4-4' and/or area of frontage restoration 11/8199, 5:50 PM Page 6 0231h tEastem Du~iin Trahi= Impact Fees for 1999 I I i I 2 inside lanes ofl 2 inside lanes of I [ typical t typical DESCRIPTION 4 Lane Rdwyl 4 Lane RdwyI 6 Lane Rdwyl 6 Lane RdwyI 6 Lane Rdwyl 6 Lane Rdwy 1999 UNIT Units ! Typicall Typical[ Typical t Typicall w/28 fl medianl w/28 ft median PRICES I QUANTIYI COST QUANTIY COST QUANTIYI COST Mobilization 35;, =-Al 1i $37,778 1 ~,z.4,015 1l $23,649 iTra,~c Control 2% EAt 11 $25,185 1 $29,344 1t S15.766 i C ear & Grub 2% CE. Al 11 $25,185 1 .$29,344 I t $15,766 !Saw Cut $ 1.00 LFi I $0 SO j SO ~Grind $ 1.50 LFi ] $0 ,$0 I :Remove Ex Pvm'~isw $ 1.00 SFI j S0 S0 I S0 Full Pavm't Section ,$ 3.80 SFi 128000j `$486,400 176000 `$588,800 95000j S364.800 Curb & Gu~er ,$ 12.00 LFt 40D0j ,$48,000 4OOO S49,000 01 SO Sidewalk $ 3.10 SFI 320001 $99.200 32000 `$$99,200 01 .SO i'¢~edian Curb, Std 4000! $40,000 4000 S40,000 4O001 $40,000 Median Curb, Glue 0 t ,$0 0 ! ,$0 D] S0 Oveday 0l $0 01 S0 01 SO Earthwork 77041 S38,5!9 94811 $47,407 56301 S28,148 Drop inle~ & M~'s(1) 10t S20,000 101 820,000 0i SO Storm Drain Pip.(2) 40001 $180,000 40001 $180,000 5001 S22,500 tStrioing(3) 12000! $18,000 120001 S18,000 12000! Markings 81 `$$800 81 $800 6! Signs(4) 40[ $4,000 401 ,$4,000 20i 82,000 Etectroiiers(5) 20t `$40,000 20 [ $40,000 20i $40.000 Signal interconnect 20001 `$30.000 2000 $30,000 2000 ! S30.000 New Utilities 01 ,$0 01 ,$0 01 SO Existing Utilities Dt ,$0 0 $0 Of Landscape & lrrig(6) 480001 $153,600 48900 ,$153,600 56000j $179,200 3urvey 11 $12,593 I $14,672 11 $7,883 Grading Depth 1 I I 1 i Signal Legs 0i . ,$0 0 S0 O l Signal Pdce (not included) ! 0[ SO 0 ,$0 O j SO Bridges (not included) J SFI 0t ,$0 0 $0 0l S0 Demoiition I I Of 0 01 Building (not inctuded)[ =-Al 0l $0 0! ,$0 01 S0 Median Gut j $ 3.00 SFI 01 ,$0 0j ,$0 0J S0 Exist curb j ,$ 7.00 LFI O j ,$0 0 t ,$0 0 ] SO PJW Cost (not included) SFI 0I SO 0I $0 0l RAN cost.~SF t I 0! 0l 01 Length I I 20001 2oooi 2000 R/C,' width i I 1041 1281 140 TIF width j I 40t 64i 76 ITotal, civil only i J I S1.259,259 S291,564 ,$1,467,182 $788,313 COSTILF ! I j S630 `$734 $394 Footnotes: t.= t J use S650/1f use `$750 use S400 (I) @200 fL Intervals along I~ngth of roadway j l(2) one pipe, each side of roadway, total = ,$90/LF 10.00 LF! 7.00 LF! 1.4o 5.00 CYI 2,000.0O_ EAI 45.00 LFI 1.50 LFI 100.00 EA! 100.00 2,000.00 =-Ai 15.00 LF1 'LFI 3.20 SFI O.Ol LSi (3) per strip t I t (4) @ 50 Ft interva!s aian~ ali lanes t i (5) 5150 ff. lntervais aiong all lanes, including conduit (8) 16'*-4'+4' and/or area of frontage restoration 11/8/99, 5:50 PM Page 7 0231h 2115 N. Main Street, Suite K Walnut Creek, CA 94596 TEL: 925-934-6932 FAX: 925-934--6933 E-Mait: hqet~paebell.net Scptambar 17, 1998 Mr. Kevin Van Karwyk City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza P.O. Box 3240 Dublin, CA 94568- ' Subj-.ct: Har. ienda Driv~!-5 S0 improvm'r,.mts ?roject Encroachment Permiff'PS&E Scope of Work Dean Kevin: =n~lr,~ d_ pe~ vour r=m~e_~t i&.~ ,m,m,m,m,m,smmm~-T o.f the s:cm: of wor_k for th.: £bove project. We have also attached our tett=r of August 26, 1998 which c-ontain:d the £e= proposal for your reference. call me if you hsve any questions.o,- need additional information. Sincerely, Heidi M. Our:n. P.E. Principal/Owner C: G=orge Homolka Enclosure CIITY OF DUBLIN HACIENDA DRIVE/'I-Sg0 INTERCH.4dNGE IMPROVEbIENTS PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK SUMMARY P_rojec! Dest'riDtion The pu~ose of this project is to provide access for development cc:un'lng in the East Dublin area, specifically for the People So~ development located in the northwest quadrant of thc interchange. In order to accommodate the anticipated traffic demand, the following improvements will be required (sec attached plan for graphical reference): · Widen Hacienda Drive to provide three Iefl tm'n lanes into the proposed People Soft development. - Add one through lane on southbound Hacienda DAve. · Widen the westbound 1-580 on ramp for use by High Occupancy Vehicles (HO'v), provide a Calfornia Highway Patrol (CHP) enforcement area, and install :-zmp metering signal syslem. · Widen the eastbo ,u. nd !-580 off r~..mp to provide mn additional left turn D. ne. Scope of Engineering High Quality Engineering (HQE) will 'provide engineering sera, ices to complete the Pla.ns, Specifications & Estimate (PS&E) in accordance with Caltrans metric standards. .An Eneroac!,..ment Permit application and Permit Engineer's Evaluation Report ("PEER) will be processed with the completed PS&E to obtain Cattra.ns approval to construct the improvements within the State right-of-way. The specific sm'ices to be provided include: Preparation of'metric PS&E for construction. Coordination with the City of Dubtin, Caltrans, zff:ct=d Utility Companies, and other consu!t~nts working within the project area. Management of subconsultants required for geo~eCtmi:al, su,we~,s, and cicctrical services. Preparation of a signal maintenance agreement b:.:w'een the City and Caltrans. Schedule and budget prepa.ration and monito:'ing. TRIPLE,. LEFT TURN POCKET AN ADDIT;IONAL SOUTHBOUND LAN?',, WIDEN WESTBOUND ON EAt4~' ',2 TO PROY'IDE HO¥ BYPASS LA~E'-~" AND CHP ENFORCEMENT AREA ~ CONSTRUC~T ~ ~.% RETAI~I  WALL : $ i ; I WIDEN EASTE~OU:ND OFF RA~P TO~ ............. ~ PROYIDE ~DD~TIONAL LEFT TURN LKN~ j HACIENDA DRtVE/I-580 INTERCHANGE tECPROVEMENT$ PROJECT, Easlem Dublin Traffic Impact Fee for 1999 ~y..b ~f~ //? Segment 15 Hacienda Drive,ri-580 Freeway Interchange Modifications ConstrUction Cost Estimate 5'om HQE: Right of Entry/Permitting/Rev/ew Process: Administration, Desi~m, CM, ROW Acquisition: TOTAL WITH CONTLNGENCY 820,000 180,000 200,000 $1,300,000 ccs 6 Crow Carz2'on Court. Sun Rarnon, CA 94583-]62f DATE: TO: October 9, t998 K¢vin Van Ka~Tk TOTAfL PAGES: 5 (Including this m.zvmmitml sh~t) FAX: 925-833-6628 COPY TO: FA3(: FRO.M~: Jane Alden~-k/ Concevmal'.,Constmction Cost Estimates tfyo- ha. we "ny problem, re:,i .ving this fax please ~.,I (925) .31441220 PROJECT: I-ss0 ?l'msajara/£a!Iov, Rd PROJ, NO.: CCS98055 P._E/vL~RZ,,SS: Kevin: Per G~orge Homolka'$ re, ques% 2[ am ~%rwarding a copy of.k2ne conceptual cost e$zkrnates for the proposed improvemen~ at~e t-580,~alI~n.R..oad.L~t~rc&~ge -in~be.I-5~0/T~s=jara Rcad.Lnt~zch~.,~e: JPl~e noze the izem~ that h~e bee~ exch~ded are Iisted al the boftom of each estimate and that bo~h qf these est. imates are pretimb'm~. [n ~atura Let me know if you need ~my additional info,n-nation. Thmnks - J?ne ,tk9 g 0.q ~ ~"~bv2n~f-~es\d'u b Ii n fax 14 //7 $17,649,782 Revision, 10/14/99 Cordoba Consuttin~ Inc. · ,.) 009 $t1,18_,..., 7 Revision, 10/14/99 Cordoba Consulting, thc q~,0,93~781 3.2 A~res $I 1~ IS,00g Revision, 10/14/99 CCS ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROUP Civil Eng_ineerin~rProject Management //2 2680 Bishop Drive;Suite 157 · San Rzmon, CaIilomia 94583 Tel. {~25) 830-5016 Fax (~25) 830-5023 (925) 830-5023 ZUM~LCLT ENGrN'EERING GROUP Civil EnSin==ring/Project M~_nagernent 2680 Bishop D,--iv,, Suite !50' San l~on, CA 94583 CONFIDENTIAL Facsimile TransmiSsion Sh~t PLEASE DELD, r~K THE FOLLOWrNG PAGES TO: TOT.~I...N-roqv~EP.. OF PAGES ;~c . iNCLUDLNG TFr~S PAGE. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL T'r~ PAGES, PLEASE CALL (925) 830-50t6 MESSAGE ,,.nt By: CO,~DOBA CO,NSULT,__.NG~ ,,...,.~ ,.,'""~ iNC.; ~25 67I 5472; Oct- -== 11 Page 1 To: KEVIN VANKA~K Voice E-=o~o !~'umb~: ~925) 833-6630 FAX (925) 83~6628 E~om: E~IC CO~DO~A Co~y: O~DQBA CONSULTIN G, INC. F~ l~m%~ ¢~25) 571-~72 Voice ~=mber: (925) 671-5458 ~¢-,=-v'iN, AS VV~ DISCUSSED, PREVIOUS ~OSt-~TtM,E,'~P--S FOR. F/,&LON ROAD INTERCHANGE. TO rv~Y ~ECOLLECTION STAGE t IS FOR THE "/=-AR 2025. STAGE 2 IS ADD[TIME TO ACCOMODATE BUILDOUT OF THE WORLD SO TO SP=_A,~ CALL IF ANY QUESTIONS; T:HANKS.tl Date: 10/~ 3199 ?a_~c,es:. 2 of 3 ,,~RDOB,~-~ ~ C.ONSULTiN~ INC.; .a25 671 5472; FaDe 2/3 1-580/Falion Road Interchange -Stage I ~odifications Cost Summary , Total Roadway/B,fidge Costs Minor items (5%) Subtotal MabF,~¢ian (10%) Work (5%) Subto~[ 5455,585 $95=~,728 $478,354' 52,391.821 $3o5.122 $400,000 ,607,304 SZ,313,~2S $401 ,S28 $200,913 $1,339.420 TOTAL = $f7,$.49,782 NOTE: N~ ~ight~f-w~y is Page ~ of 1 ~2~ 87I'5472; '0ct.1 1-580/Fallon Road Interchange - Stage 2 Modifications Cost Summary · T-· LOonstru_c~[on Costs Tota~ Roadwa¥/B,-idge Costs Subto[aJ 56,314,511 Roadway Mabi~afion (I0%). ~31,451 Supplemental Work (E%) ~315,72~ Confingen~ (25%) .. $1,578,628 SuS[otal D~ign (12%) ESDC (1 ;5%) 5132~5 RiDh'I~f-W~Y · G~ND TOTAL = $~3,282,9~9 P:~sl D4V~dm~n~lli~_~\CastSumw~,~, Stage 2._9810.4.~s Isabel Ave.!$R 54 E.~en$ion. Ah'way./1-580 Interchange ~9503ud;.xis Revision IAIRWAY; 580 INTERCHANGE. j l'.-.m F..ncumbarer~ Budget Fund Pa,el BaJanoe Amount Amount Nms. to d~te tm Gnish 1. Gons:ru~J,'~r~' ' AIRWAY1580: Ai."waytZB0 Total: N. CANYONS PKV%~': ' incJud--s 10% conting:nci-'.s. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION: 5,008,500.00 57 75,000.00 -03 2-~0,000.00 23 234,400.00 09 ' (Triad Comm. Fao. Dis',) 2,000,000.00 2.~.400.00 '0' B,607,300.00 $5,3~9,050.17 $ 3,218,Z3..c.~;3 253.000.00 TR $240~887.28 S 12.112.72 ~,8~0.300.00 2. Construction t~an=g,'men:: . inspection, tes~ng - TrJmd: · 2m C~nstru~on Sg=po~' S:akin~ (~Co +2%): 2D. In-ho~s~ (from Finan~ gepL figures) 905,500.00 57 $410.245.07 5,000.00 TR NJA 340,000.00 S7 $ lS2.805.73 150,000.00 57 $57,500.00 S 1.401.500.00 3. Design C=ns:~Jtsnt oosts: Mark Thomas & Ca. (gene=l): W, ark Thomas & Co. (water): Ma~ Th:m~s & C=. ~riad): Total Consu~tant~: $ S57,000.00 S925,000.00 87 gs2,~57.f~ $40,000.00 23 ~!5,000.00 TR 1~.~29.60. 6. Ut[Ii,5, Cnarg-~s: T. City F~es ~50.000.00 57 5~,~4.29 ~5.315.7t .':: .. 8. OtnerAg~n~ P~i~/Fe~s S0.00 (Caltmns en~=a~hmen[) Sl0,0O0.O0 S7 (Zone 7 ~n~mi~r, 5..&~Js~lmnc~s costs: 510,000.00 (.printing, UPS. arc) AIRWATlESO BUDGET TOT~S: . S 11 .ZBT,5DO.0D CITY oF Lz aMo .E 3589 ~ific Ay:. ' Livermor:, CA .~5~-7017 ~'~_5) 375-5249 · FAX (~/-5) .~73-5267 · TDD (~'_5) 373-5052 1p :boy,~.s.-,an ~ Eastern Dublin Traf~c Impact Fee for I999 Se_oment 12 Dublin Boulevard t~xiension/I-580 Freeway Interchange Modifications (Airway) Budget Amount: $11,596,500 Projected amount using construction pro~ess payments: $13,000,000 ' (per information fi.om Livermore City Engineer, includes all ~ontingencies) Dublin's share estimated at 16% 22,080,000 TASSAJARA CREEK CROSSING AT CENTRAL PARKWAY CITY OF DUBLIN BRIDGE FEASIBILITY STUDY PRESENTED TO: BRL-~N KANGAS FOULK OCTOBER 24, 1997 AS S 0 CIAT-----S II%IC October 23. 941 I-'-.. t 1997 Brian Kangas Foulk 540 Price Avenue Redwood City, CA 94063-1411 Tassajara Creek Central Transit Spine Santa RJta Property Anen:ion: Ed Boscacci Dear Ed: Biggs Cardosa Associates is pleased to provide the results of the Planning Study for the subject project. Our evaIuanons or tn~ channel have been based u~on prelimina~ layouts and concept meetings with Roland Haga of your firm and Stuart Cook of'Alameda County. GENERAL: Bridge configurations w'ere based upon two srat_,es of development. The first stage consists of !-t4 foot vehizu!ar lane, a 6 foot bicycle lane, and a 6 foot sidewalk in each direction, separated bye. 14 foot "~i~"~ median barrier. The final, staL-,e of development involves widening the roadway inbotl~" " _ " airezaons to provide ?-12 foot vemcular lanes in lieu ora single lane. In addition, the channel crossings need to accommodate the installation ora 14 inch and 8 inch water lines through or attached to the side of the bridge structures. GEOz~IETRY: Because one side of Tassajara Creek is already developed, approach roadway a!ignments and profiles are well established in terms of conforming the b,ddge to the existing conditions, in order to minimize im,~acrs to existing properties it is .h~ oes:gn team's _~oal to match the existing roadway profiles as closely aS practioable for the bridge profile and conforms.. Coupled with the desire to match approach roadway alignments is the County's clearance requirements for the · -- . .... m,,..,,"m_~ the bndc, e sorer hydraulic r%eeboard..~ternate span confiaurations were considered to depth ofstn~cture and eliminate bridge pier placement in the low flow channel· Using the profile grade and the freeboard criteria provided by Brian Kangas Foulk, it was deterrnined that maximum s.zr-~:ture depth of 30 inches could be provided and still maintain 2 feet of freeboard at me mgnest point of the soffit above the 100 year design sto,,'-m capacity. Because there is a vertical curve in the bridge'profile, this means that there will be slightly less than 2 feet of freeboard at the edges of the channel. The maximum allowable structure depths dete,u'mined by the profile ~ =~om.~,y mandate a structure with spans in the 50-70 foot range. Z Tassaiara Creak Crossings Bi~zs Cardosa Associates SUPERSTRUCTURE: The final structure evaluations are based upon two parallel bridge structures that utilize a precast, p, ~=t, ~.=..d voided slab su,aerstmcture. The precast, p, ~s,, ,_.>.d voided s,at~ superstructure .-tt,.,,,~w~,. was selected for economy, ,..s,. of construction, minimum ' " facilitate a widening anticipated in the near ~ture. This system a!s~ eliminates the need for fa!sework in the channel and can accommodate the installation of larger utility casings than a sn,_.Ilo~`, conventional cast-in-place box g' =~ra.r structure. A closed median was initially considered ;`,,,,tn one contiguous structure for both directions of travel. How,.v~r, since meman utilization for trazr"'ic is not anzizipated in the Fature, the additional costs associated with'lbo additional superstructure, substructure and piling elements warrant the use of two separate structures. Our initial proposal was-based u~on a 195 foot long s.:ruc,:ure, however :hat option ,.','as abandoned early in the planning.~rocess in lieu o,~,',.vatu=..n=' ,-r; o two sevarate, channel configurations: 1)a short span (i65,5.), and 2) a long span (220 ~.) config=rafion. The long span confiauration_ was also abandoned due to cost and ,,-~-==:-~=,~'~.~==,, _ considerations. The .... ~-= ,:= result ora greater ' =-'- wer~ longer a viable option wkh = area ofszmczure, as well as the tact that pretest pi..,~s no - three span bridge unless an additional pier was added within tine channel to reduce the spans. SUBSTRUCTURE: .-.?,asea upon the a_>._na=~d superstructure tvae and a bridae confiauration of 3-55 foot spans, three substructure types were considered. .~ternative l' A!ternatk'e 1 W: Pier wail '-- ~-r -~ ' ' suv=[m~.u, ~ on stone, ara class 70 piles7 Widening in kind ,~'&ernzrive 2: Cylindrical columns on Pile ca2s and standard class 70 piles Widening in kind .-,*Jr creative 3' .Aiternar_!ve -.. Cylindrical columns on pile shaft extensions Widening in kind. z,o~n suestrucrure conS. gurations can .>er'~orm well nyorzuucahy with the pier wall having a s..':an,.,y ~etter 2erTormance. Cost comparisons between alternatives 1 and "; show a ye,'5' small difference in construction cost. However, it appears that a drilled sna,, substructure altemative could result in some cost savings if this is a feasible substructure from a geotechnical engineering v_.==-=p..~`,~,--' ,'~,.. It should be noted mat construction ora large a~ameter cast-m-anltea hole concrete .Nie (CIDH) in an area with h:,2n around water can be provlemanc in terms of construction P :,.2e 3 Tassajara Creek Crossings Bi:~s Cardosa ^ ~'~'~- techniques, inspection and approval. A cast-in-steel shell pile (ClSS) can eliminate some of'the conslmctionc~,.v.-_~.rln. '~ ":'~ ' ~ issues and provide a more controlled environment for concrete p:acemenL A review of the materials r~por~ prepared by CH2M Hill in 1992 indica,,ed that nearby borings to the projec~ sile encoumered groundwater at depths ofapproximately 30 feel The project site is on a creek bed and k is very likely ~hat groundwa~.er is present. Prior to pursuing a large diameter pile sha~ foundation, k is imperative tha~ ~eoiechnical input be provided re~ardina ~he abilky of me pile sha~s to suppo~ se~,ice loads on me order of 600-?00 kips as well as evaluating d~veabilky ofkhe s~eel shells. CONCLUSION: I recommended ' "'~'~ _ -ine r>, m_. confi.guration for the Tassajara Creek cressing is '~ separae stru:rures approximately 165 feet tong, consisting of 3 equal spans of pretest, prestressed voided slab and a 6 inch to,pine slab. Substructures shall consist of cast-in-place concrete pier walls on standard pre:asr concrete 70 ton piles. AddirionaI georechnical invesr, i~a:ion is warranted prior ro ,-~-','"-~,,,m_n~,n_-' ~; 5 a l:r,,'~_ __~ a:amerer .pile sha,.'x aI~.., ,,_m~ .. · . ' tn, ,~,. ahemarives described Please refer to ,'.ne attached typical sections and cost esnmares for the * -'~" above. Sh.~uld you have an5, questions or comments, please do nor. hesitate ro call. Si ~:e].',', .~ ' B!GGS C.~RDO S..-~ AS ~LiT£S t tn (I) -I o8 P.~.ELhV, INARY ESTIMATE - ALTERNATE CREEK .'J~, ur,:. TAS$;.JAF. A CREEK BRI':')GE(ALTERNATIVE 1) 'T~.'PE: PRECEPT PRESTRESSED VOIDED SLAD (PIER WALL1 LENGTH '55,, x W!DTM _~,,~' = AREA DESIGN SECTION .=ROJECT INCLUDES STRUCTURE (S) AND $ ROADWORK ;D~ST. 0.4 RCVD · CO: ALAMEDA .RTE. fPM: CONTRACT ,'Jo: QUANTiTiES BY: V. SALVADOR QUANTiTiES CHECKED BY: S. YUAN CHARGE UNiT AND EA : DATE: 5/DD_.,~7 ESTIM. A. TE NO ~_~1~ DATE: 1D'24."9 PRICED BY: m~' COST INDEX,, ! CODE I CONTRACT ITEMS UNIT OUANTITYI CHECK USE' ! PRICE J AM©UNT I i _:2DC3 tSTRUCTURE-_,-,..AV,~- ...., !~N' CBRI~E~ CY --,~-21-- ' .5,-301 $50,00 I ! 1~3003 !STRUCTURE BACKFILL f~RIDGE') CY ~21 3,.,-,o t ! 4D37';3 ~FLJRN~SH PILING fCL;.SS 70) LF 5.72D J 5.7201 225.D01 5143.000 !~ 4.=,2714 jDR~.'EPI~_'= (~,.-,-,~S~" '~' 70) EA SSi 88 1 ~ ' S_.D20.DD !510_"5t JSTRUCTUP.&L CONCP. ETE. BRIDGE FOOTINS CY 1S3J 180! ' :lDDS3 ISTRLJCTURAL CONCRETE. BRIDGE CY 27Bi 2S0J $450.001 2125.023 i 5:2350 :FU,.-,.N,SH .-'-,~.:CAS, PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SL.A..q SF _c..57D J 9.57DI ! 512510 !EREC. T PREC..ST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DECK UNiT E.A 4,5 J 48 J $760.00 J 23..3.500 I ,, , : 520102 iSA.R REINFORCING STEEL (-2RID. SE~ LB 1 I~.710 t 114.000 j s0.s01 R,C,U~N~ 1. DESIGN SECTION 2. DESIGN A SU.=--RV'..SOR 3. DESIGN B SUPERVISOR 4. PL.ANNINC. !SUBTOTAL ~;S25.070 JM O-"~ILr"--ATION t10%} s I D2.7&~ !SUBTOTAL STRUC. TURE ITEMS 5t .~7.~ JCO~INGENC~ES ~5%) :2~.~ JWORK BY ~LRO~ OR ~IL~ F~CES iG~ND TOTAL s~a~.s~ ~ J~oR BU~T PuRPosEs - sAY -;~255 .~o ,' DATE DATE SUBJECT ,.,.-,, 1 SHEET NO. __ ~RELI,..;INARYESTIMATE-ALT~RNATECRE~K (AmD{TIONAL COST DUE TO WiDENINm) ~ ~ // ~ 'LENSTH ~65~ ~ W)DTH 2~ = AREA D~D0 SO ~ ~ DESIGN SECTION PROJECT INCLUDES STRUCTURE(S) A~D $ ROADWORK QUANTiTiES BY: V. SALVADOR QUANTiTiES CHECKED BY: S. YUA.N CHARGE UNIT AND EA: DATE: E.~'09,'~7 ESTI,'C.A. TE NO DATE.' 1D;24.'9 PRICED BY: FCA COST INDEX I CODE J CONTRACT ITEMS UNIT OUANTi,';'Y' CHECK USE J PRICE I AMOUNT i ',575'50 !=~RIDGE REMOVAL fPORTION) LS 1 1 J ~.5.DDD.00J 5~ D~I ~STRUCTUP~ CONCRETE. BRI~2E F~TING OY ~ J ~ J S4~.~j SZ2.~ ]512510 ~ERECT FREC~T PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DECK UNiT EA iS~ IS J 2~0.~ J SI~.B20~ 520102 ~B~ REINFORCING STEEL ~RI~E) LB 15.~0i 1S.7~ j S0.~J 511 $3~iTUBULAR ~NDP~LING · LF ZSD J $~ 227.~J 5~.91 ! i- l I t I I ROUTING 1. DESIGN SECTION 2. DESIGN A SUPERVISOR 4. PLANNINS !SUBTOTAL JSUBTOT~ STRUCTURE ~EMS 5~2.~11 ~BR~E TOT~ ( $ / ~ ~) f2152.52 $~32~ J ~WORK BY ~O~ OR ~ FORCES t JG~ND TOTAL I JFOR BU~ PUR~SES - SAY COMMENTS '-T. CT _ SHEET ,',cO JOB NO ASSOCIATES INF---.. S~'. AT~. ~F CA~/FC)r.~;:A. D~PAF.."XlE.'C7 OF ~'¢~NSPOF. TA ,~iON CONTRACT == .... // ..... ~ ...... A~. ESTIMATE - ALTERNATE CREEK ~CTURE: T~AP~ CREEK BR~D$E ~ALT~RNATIVE 2~ ~R. NO: ~RC~. ~Y: j ~. ; j :~: PREO~T PRESTAEgSED VOIDED S~.B (OOLUMNS) ~D~ST: ~ ~O: ~AME~A~T~: ;PM: ~ ~ j ~LENGTH S~5~ ~ ~MIDTH ~ = AREA ~70 ~ ~ rR,.,.:~ I IN,...U-_S STRUCTURE(S) AND $ ROADWORK QUANTIT!ES DY: V. SALVADOR QUANTITIES CHECKED BY ' S. YUAN CHARGE UNIT AND EA : DATE:C~2,~,'~7 EST;M, ATE NO: 2,~: DATE: 1D,~4,'"9 PRICED SY: BCA COST INDEX _, COD-- J CONTRACT ITEMS UNIT QUANTITY! CHECK USE j PRICE j AMOUNT 1-=2~ !STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (BRI~E) CY ~: 2 J ~ 10 J ~ ~.~ ~ ~,~ 1D~:~ ~STRUCTURE BACKFILL (~RI~E) CY ~ J 310 J S~.~ J $12,4~ ~ 4DD7:4 [DRWE PILE [OL~S 70) ~ ~ ~j S2.W~.~I S~7~.~ 51~1 [STRUCTUPAL CONORETE. BRIDGE FDDTING CY lgTJ 51 ~3 ~STRUCTUP~ CONCRETE. B~ID3E CY 225 J Z~ J $4~.~ j S 103.~ 5122~ j~RNISH PRECEPT PRESTRESSED CONGRETE SLaB 512510 iE~ECT ~REC~T PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DECK UNiT Sm$~mS [CONCRETE BARRIER ~PE 25~ - LF ! ROUTING 1.. DESIGN SECTION 2. DESIGNA SUFER~SOR 3. DESIGN B SUPERV:,SOR 4. PL~N~NG SUBTOTAL 591 .%270 }MOBIL ,EATION (10%} $102.141 !SUBTOTAL STRUCTURE iTEMS 51.021.41 JCONTINGENCIE~ ~5%) tSRI~GE TOT~ ( S / ~ ~) G I=3:~1 51.276.7~ ~iORK BY ~LRO~ OR ~IL~ FORCES ~OJ ~G ~N D TOTAL JFOR BURET PUR~SES . SAY COMMENTS E'~'T't M A.TI ~O - L~.!~' S. ~ECT ti L L_ I PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE Y ALTERNATE CREEK (ADDITIONAL COST DUE TO WIDENING) CC)NTF,.ACT NO: JCTURE: TA~S~J~RA CREEK ERI~GE (ALTERNATiV= 2W1 JBR, NO; JRCVD. :T, PE: ~RECAJT ~RESTRESSED VOIDED S~B ~IDEN. COLUMNS~ ~D~ST: 0~ ~CO: ALAMEDA ;RTE: DESIGN SECTION r.,,.-J:C, IN,...UD_S STRUCTURE(S) ;¢4D $ ROADWORK CODE I CONTRACT ITEMS 15732 iBRI)GE REMOVAL. ("PORTION) !STRUCTURE EXCAVATION . =.3.323 .S ~ RUC ~ U,".: "'..'-,~ ~'-I=. (BRIDGE) 4~2713 ;FURNISH PILING I'OL~S 70) 4_=0714 ;DRrV5 PILE 519051 !STRUCTURAL CONCRETE. BRIDGE FC>~TING QUANTITIES BY: V. SALVADOR QUANTiTiES CHECKED BY: S. YUAN CHARGE UNIT AND -Z;,: UNIT QUANTITY LS 1 CY 248 CY i LF 2 CY ~2 1 CHECK DATE: S/C39.'S7 ESTIMATE NO: 2 DATE:I ~. 4,~7 PRICED BY: E, CA USE t PRICE I AMOUNT , ..,_>.L~J ~ 5£5.0:)01 ! 51DC'E3 !STRUCTU,%-~L CONCRETE. BR~:>SE CY ~ l ~l 2S22.~f ~.~ 5:23~ ~FURNISH FRE~T PRESTRESSED CONCRETE S~B SF 2.~ ~ 3,~ J 2~.~J S~.~ J 52D~2 ~ REINFORCING STEEL (BRI~E~ LB 2s.o~s ~ 2~.~J s~.~ ROUTING 1. DESIGN SECTION 2. DESIGN A 3. DESIGN-m SUPER~,".SOR 4. P!..A.N NIN ~ :SU$TOTAL MOBIL~.ATION (10%) $/,-~ 315 SUBTOT~ STRUCTURE ;TEMS t~RI~E REMOV~ (~nL incl.} ~ORK BY ~LRO~ OR ~L~ FORCES SO JGRAND TOTAL BUDGET PURF:OSES - SAY D,,~ TE JOSNO PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE -ALTERNATE CREEK TRLJCTURE: TA.E.$,~JAm,.A CREEK BRIDGE fALTERNATIVE ,3) JER. NO: jRCV'D. BY: , ¢= - c .... ~-- c - - ' ' ' iCC): A',,.~,N~.EDA tRTE: }PM: . ._; ."Y. PE: . . ,ECAE. ~ P~.~S, .... S=.D VOIO'-D S:_A= ¢COLUMNS. CIDH) ID:ST: ~ DES;GN SECTI;DN AND S ROADWORK QUANTFIES BY: V. SALVADOR QUANTITIES CHECKED BY: S. YUAN CHARGE UNit AND EA : DATE: ~D9,~7 ESTIMATE NO'..~ DATE: 10~3.~ PRICED BY: ~CA COST INDEX !CODE t CONTRACT ITEMS UNIT OUANTITY J ! ~2CC3 !STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (BRIDGE) CY 4~ ~' C~%IN-D~ILLE~HOLE CONCRETE PILING LF z~D¢ 4~ S4DD.DO ~ $!E2.DS-2~ ~5;23~ JFURN!SH PREC~T PRESTRESSED CONCRETE S~B SF ~.570 ~ 5:2510 JERECT PREC~T PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DECK UNIT EA ~C3D~ ~UBULAR ~NDP~LING LF ROUTING 1. L'-2$tGN SECTION 2. DESiGNA SUPERV:S.~R DES;GN B S'JPER~SC"R. 4. PLANNING SUBTOTAL $752.$70 ,',~,OBIL?ZATION flD%) $S3.708 ~SUBTOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS $ ~37.07S t 5RIDGE REMOVAL (=mnt. in:L) 'wORK BY RAILROAD OR UTILITY. FORCES PAN D TOTAL ~ iFOR BUD,SET PUR.::~OSE$ - SAY C, OMMENTS 51.D4E.3~7 j $1 .D-CT.ODD] .%' ~.T~ D;,TE ~U~JECT SHEET N©. __ JOB r4'"'" . : OF PRELIM;NAF,¥ EST;MATE - ALTERNATE CREEK (ADDITIONAL COST DUE TO WIDENING) CONTP~,~T DESIGN SECTION PROJECT INCLUDES STRUCTURE(S) AND $ ROADWORK QUA.~T~TIES ~Y: V. SALVA_"OR QUANTITIES CHECKED BY :S. YUM~ CHARGE UNITAND =_A: DATE: ~"29.~7 ESTIM. ATE NO: 2 DATE:I D,~4,~7 PRICED KY: BCA COST INDE~ -- CODE [ CONTRACT ITEMS 1575~8 tSRI:)GE REMOVAL (PORTION) :~:X~3 ISTRUCTURE EXCAVATION (BRI2X~E) .. CAST-IN-DRILLED-HOLE CONCRETE PILING 51D~..,3 !STRUCTURAL CONCRETE. BRIDGE ____50 t. URNoS.. PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SLAB , ~12~10 I:,%:C I PREC;-,ST ~,%:-~ FRESSED CONCRETE DECK UNiT UNIT tQUANTITYI ' CHECK LS ~J CY 92 J CY £2 ! LF 240 J CY 2--4 t CY ECl EA LF .~D I LF 330 USE J PRICE I AMOUNT ROU'TING 1. DESIGN SECTION 2. DESIGN A SUPER~,~,SOR ~. DESi~*N B SUPERVI. SOR 4. PLA.NNIN~. COMMENTS :sUBTOTAL MOBIL~.ATION (10%) ISUBTOTAL STRUCTURE ~EMS ~371.~j !~Ri~E REMOV& (con'.. mci.) E~'TI MA"~.~G - LA.~T Eastern Dublin Traffic impact Fee for 1999 Typical bhdge cost, per square foot. From Briggs Cardosa Associates, Inc. 10/23/97 study Construction costs for six scenarios range from $87 to $ t36 per square foot. Use $120/sf 7 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee for 1999 Sig-nalized Intersection Costs: Per signal leg costs: 1 si~m'ml leg = Right of Way area per leg = Grading costs for 1 foot of ~ading par leg: = Civil improvements for I signal leg: = $56,250 5~560 sf $ 1,029 $18,750 RIGHT OF WAY CALCULATIONS I t EASTERN DUBLIN TRAFFIC IMPACT FEESI I 0/5/98; revised 10/8/99 ight of way calculations: Section 10, Dublin from Tassajara to Fallon: I =(0.5'(17.5+19)'1 +0.5'(12+16)'1 +0.5'(13+14)'I +0.5'(13+19)'1 )/4 =$15.44 per sq foot Section 11, Dublin Boulevard from Fallon to Airway I ] t =(0.5'(7+7)'30+0.5'(13+18)'10+0.5'(13+18)'10+0.5'(13+14)'10)/601 =$11 per sq foot; but increase to $12 for October, 1999 I I I f I Section 18, Central Parkway from Tassajara to Falton :18'0.15+19'0.4+16'0.2+(12+7.5)'0.5'0.15+5'0.1 =$15.46 per sq foot i I I ~ection 20, Gleason Road from Tassajara to Fallon =0.5'(18+15) 0.2.0.o (10 18) 0.2 0.~ (10+16) 0.6 =$13.90 persq foot I I Section 26A, Fallon Road from Gleason to Dublin 1 -. -+ .- -.- + * .., . + =(0.~ (7.~ 8) ~0-,~ ~0 5 20-. 3 20 19 10)/150 I I =$7.92 per sq foot I I I I I I I I I iSection 26B, Fallon Road from Dublin Boulevard to Freeway Ramp =$13 per sq foot; Revised to $15 for October, 1999 I I I t I. I t I 1 I ~ ~ I I I Footnotes: I I I I Segment 10:1/4 of roadway length is bounded by $17.50/sf ROW on one side and $19/sf on the other side. Segment 11:30/60 of roadway length is bounded by $71sf ROW on both sides. Segment 18: 15% of roadway length is bounded by $18/sf ROW on both sides. I ,Segment 20: 20% of roadway length is bounded by $18/sf ROW on one side and $15/sf on the other 0231g; 10/14/99, 1:38 PM I RWcalcs _] Cky Of Dubiin Po=io~ of Du?q[:'. ....... ,. ~e'.'ei:,pmcn; a~:,] l..,iiur:i..', t i:.". ",'-.,v .': ,,f ,' ... ..... . E D 'B A GC NC H O0 t [! -.._ Cky or Dublin Dublin impa..:I Fe~. Study D'abii~ P.a~h Develop. mmv: a_,nd Pon. km~ of Emerald Summary Date of Valuation - September ]0, ]PP9 Pleaxant ~ CA g/gL E~-dmated Vatue 1 Rar~e .4a-ea [ Planned Us~ No. A-I C-C A-2 OC A-3 GC A4 C'C B-I C~-" B-2 MD Res - N'P B-3 MD Res - NP B-4 GC 17,-5 NC/MD Res B-6 MH-MD-SF Res C4 C,C C-2 NC - HD Res - P/S-P C-3 HD - MD R~ C.-4 OS - MD Res C-5 MN (ouzxide City) C-6 CP D-2 MD Res - NP D-3 MD Res - OS D-4 CP D-5 CP (outxide City) E-I MD Res - OS - RR - CP E-2 SF - MD R~ - OS - CP F-,-3 Si= Res - OS E-3A RR/AG EM MD Res Highest & Best Use I Low I High t $'s/SL Blended Value Conmmreial $16.00 S20.00 $17.50 Co,',u. uereial $12.00 S16.00 $14.00 Comam't'ial $11.00 $15.00 $!3.00 Comair:iai $ i $. 00 S20.00 S! 9.'00"> C omz,u,.'-r'ci~ S16.00 S20.00 S! 9.00 Resid~-mtial $14.00 S18.00 SI&0D Residential $13.00 $i 6.00 S! 4.00 Comn~ial $I2.00 $!5.00 S!3.00 Con~-ercial / Residential $1g.00 $21.00 $!9.00 Residential S ! 9.00 $22.00 S20.00 Corrm~.reial S16.00 $19.00 Slg.00 Co~'~n;~r¢ial / Residential / Pa'-k $t4.00 S2!.00 S!9.00 R-'si d.-mfial ' $ t 4.00 $19.00 S 16. Resi&ential / Open Space SS.OD $!5.00 $t2.00 Medium Dcmsity Resi&ential S4.00 S7.00 S5.00 Medim D~'msiry Residential S15.00 $22.00 $20.00 ' Cc,~reial $t4.00 $16.00 $I5.00 Residemial; Park $16.00 S22.00 Residential / Op~ Spa~e $14.00 S20.00 S16.00 Residential $6.00 SP.00 $7.50 Mcdim'n D~-msity Residential ,9,4.00 S7.00 S5.00 Residemial / Park I Opm Space $16.00 $!9.00 $1g.00 Resid~tial / Park / Op~ Spa~ $.00 $12.00 $10.00 Residential / Park / Open Spage 87.00 $10.00 Rural Residential/. A_m-icultm'-dI $1,000/Acre $6,0001Acre Resid=ntial $14.00 $!7.00 $16.00 NC CP OS RR/AG Sin~e-f~mily R~id:ntial M~,~dium-demiry R_~id=ntial M e. ctium-hi~-&m.siry R~idmtia! HigJa--denzity Rexidemtial Cowry Park op~ !~m-al Resid,,:nfial; A_m-i=ukm-a] Inter /1~, ,~ /1'7 INTERSECTION AT ARNOLD ROAD AND CENTRAL PARKWAY, 3 LEGS. I ~egment 16', Arnold Road, Southbound costs Civil costs ~ignal costs I t I I TIFt Otherl I Share t Share l I o%1 oo% o%1 0% . o%1 lOO% o%I o%i lOO%1 o%1 o%1 oas I I I I Segment 16A, Central Parkway, Westbound t TIF Other t I Share I~costs I 0% CNil costs I 0% Share 100% 100% o%1 0% o%1 o% I I I '~ tSegment IR/W costs Civil costs tSignal costs 16, Arnold Road TIF Share O% NoAhbound Other [Signal costs .~.',~==RSECTION AT 100% 0%, o%1 o%: I I ARNOLD ROAD AND DUBLIN BOULEVARD, 4 LEGS I~gr:nent I I I I 16, Arnold Road, Southbound I TIFt Otherl I I Share l Share l I I o%t lOO%1 o%1 t o%1 loo%t o%1 CP-JW costs Civil costs Signal cos~ o%1 O% o%t 1oo%1 o%1 t I I I I I Segment 8A, Dublin Boulevard, Westbound I t T1F Otherl Share Share l PJW costs 0% 100%1 0%1 100%1 Civil costs 0% 0%I ..Signal costs 0% 100%t 0%1 Share 100% O% 0% 100% 0% 100% O% :Segment 16, Arnold Road, NoAhbound O% Civil costs t 0%1 O% O% O% t I I T~FI Other I I Share l Share I PJW costs I 0%1 n/a 0%1 0% n/a 0% Signal costs I 0%l n/a o%1 I I' o%1 oas o%I lOO% iSegment SA, Dublin Boulevard, Eastbound · t TIFI Other Share f Share 0% I PJW costs 0%1 lCivil costs 0%I ISignal costs I o%1 lOO% o%1 oas I o%1 lOO% o%1 0% 4!9/99, 6:29 PM inter .981030.XLS ALLOCATION OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION COSTS FOR EASTERN DUBLIN IMPACT FEES, 1999 INTERSECTION AT GLEASON DRIVE AND TASSAJARA ROAD, 4 LEGS t I I Segment 22A, Tassajara Road, Southbound I I I t Tassajaral t TIFI Shael Meadowsl Other I Share t Share l Share l Share costs I 0%1 0%1 100%t 0% Civil costs I 5o%I 50%1 o%I o% Signal Costs i 0%1 0%l 100%1 0% I I I I I I I Segment 19A, Glsason Drive, Eastbound I t Tassajaral I ' TIF Shael Meadowsl Other t S,,ar~ Sharel Sharel Share~ I =bW costs 0% o%f lOO%1 o%1 o%t lOO%1 o%1 t Segment 23, Tassajara Road, Northbound I I I I Tassajara I I TIFI Shael Meadowst Other I Share l Share l Share l Share t RA~ costs I 0%1 0%t 100%1 0% Civil costs I 50%1 50%l 0%1 0% Signal costs I 0%1 0%1 100%! 0% I I i I Segment 20, Gleason Road, Westbound I I Tassajarat TIF Lynn I Meadows l Other Share Share R/W costs 0% 0% 1 OO% 100% Civil costs 0%1 100%1 0%1 ISignal costs Civil costs Signal costs O% O% INTERSECTION AT CENTRAL PARKWAY AND TASSAJARA ROAD, 4 LEGS ISegment 23, Toss,ara Road, Southbound I Toll Shael Park! I Sh relt 50%1 t R/W,costs 50%t lCivil costs 0%t !Signal costs t I Share Sharel 100% 0% O% O% O% O% I 23, Tassa.iara Road, Norghbound I I TIF o%1 lOO%1 O% 0/o I i TIFI Shae I Toll Other Share j Share! Share Share 0%1 0%1 50% 50% 0% 0% o%1 o%t loo% t I I Share Share Share J :RNV costs I 0% 0% 50%I Civil costs I 0% 0% 50% I Signal costs i 50% 50% 0%I :Segment I7, Central Parkway, Eastbound t Otherl Civil costs Otherlt 'iSegment 18, Central Parkway, Westbound ShareI 0% Other Other Share Share O% O% TIF Lynn Share Share 50% 50% 100% O% 100% 0% 0% IR/VV costs 0% Civil costs 0% ISignal costs O% I TIFi Toll I Share l Share Share t RNV costs I 0%1 100% 0%1 O% O% O% 0%: 0%t_ 100% Signal costs I 0% 100% O% 4/9199, 6:29 PM Inter 981030.XLS IN, ~-RSECTION AT DUBLIN BOULEVARD AND TASSAJA.RA ROAD, 4 LEGS Segment 23, Tassajara Road, Southbound t TIFI Kolel Shael Other I Share l Share l Share l Share! FL&&/costs I 0%1 50%1 50% 0%1 Civil costs I 50%1 0%1 50% O% Signal costs ] 0%[ 100%[ t I I I Segment 9, Dublin Boulevard, Eastbound I I TIFI Kolel Other Share RNV costs Share l Share l o%1 lOO%1 O% o%1 0%1 tSignal costs I 0%I 100% I Otherl Share~ 0%I Civil costs 0%1 100%1 0% 0%1 Signal costs 0%1 100%1 0% 0%1 ' I I I iSegment 24, Tassajara Road, Norghbound 1 I TIFI Kale J Share J Share Share l Share R/W costs J 0%1 50% 50%J 0% Civil costs t 50%1 50% 0%1 0% O% I Lynnl R/W costs Civil costs tSignal costs 0%1 Other :Segment 10, Dublin Boulevard, Westbound I I TIF Kale Lynn l Shae Share Share Share Share 5O% O% 5O% O% INTERSECTION AT ARNOLD ROAD AND GLEASON DRIVE, 3 LEGS ".. ~ ~nt 16, Arnold Road. Southbound TIF Other Share Share R~Wcosts 100% 0% 0% i Civil costs 100% 0% 0% 0%! Signal costs 100% 0% 0%] 0%l Segment 19, Gleason Drive, Westbound' TIF Otherj Share Share l ~JW costs 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% ~' 0 ~o 0% Segment 16, Arnold Road Northbound 0%1 0% 3ivil costs Signal costs O% 100%. 100% IR/MC costs O% TIF Other Share Share 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 0% O% O% Civil costs 0% Signal costs 0% 0% O% 1 t 0%~ O% 4/9/99, 6:29 PM inter 981030.XLS