Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout98-038 RiteAid/KinderCareCITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT FOR MARCH 9, 1999 PROJECT: PREPARED BY PA 98-038 Rite Aid/KinderCare Specific Plan Amendment, PD Rezone, Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review Carol R. Cirelli, Senior Planner ~~ DESCRIPTION: The Applicant is requesting a Specific Plan Amendment, Planned Development (PD) District Rezone, Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review approval to: amend the San Ramon Road Specific Plan to allow a drug store as a permitted use and to allow adrive-through pharmacy and day care facility as conditional uses; to rezone the project site to a PD District; to construct a 16,708 square foot retail drug store and a 9,841 square foot day care center; to establish a drive through pharmacy and day care facility for a maximum of 180 children; and to exempt parking requirements for the day care center. As part of the project, the Applicant will also be voluntarily contributing traffic improvement funds in the amount of S 129,880. RECOMMENDATION: FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation. 2) Take testimony from the Applicant and the public. 3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public. 4) Close public hearing and deliberate. 51 Adopt resolutions approving PA 98-038 Rite Aid/KinderCare Negative Declaration; Specific Plan Amendment; PD Rezone; and Conditional Use Permit/Site Development Review, or give Staff and Applicant direction and continue the matter. ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt: 1) Resolution Exhibit A recommending City Council adoption of a Negative Declaration; 2) Resolution Exhibit B recommending City Council adoption of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan Amendment; 3) Resolution Exhibit C recommending City Council adoption of the PD District Rezone and Development Plan (with ITEM NO~' COPIES TO: Applicant Owner Address File Development Plan attached as Exhibit C-1-; and Resolution Exhibit D recommending City Council adoption of the Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review. BACKGROUND: On July 21, 1998, the City Council initiated a General Plan Amendment Study at the request of Rite Aid Corporation to allow a Rite Aid drug store with a garden center as a permitted use within Area 3 of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan (the San Ramon Road Specific Plan currently prohibits drug stores within Area 3) and to include all the parcels behind the proposed Rite Aid parcel as one piece of property within the Study. On September 17, 1998, the Rite Aid Corporation submitted a Specific Plan Amendment; PD Rezone; Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review to construct an approximate 16,700 square foot drug store with a drive through pharmacy window. Shortly after Rite Aid submitted their application, KinderCare, a day care operator, became interested in developing a day care center on the parcels behind the Rite Aid parcel. On December 21, 1998, KinderCare submitted a Specific Plan Amendment, PD Rezone and Conditional Use Permit/Site Development Review application, which became part of the Rite Aid application. Rite Aid proposes to vacate their existing tenant space located at 7201 Regional Street and construct a new drug store on the northwest corner of Amador Valley Boulevard and San Ramon Road with adrive-through pharmacy. The garden center is no longer proposed. The new corner location will help Rite Aid remain competitive with other large stores that offer pharmaceuticals at low prices by offering the convenience of a corner site access and adrive-through pharmacy. KinderCare will be operating a new day care center in the City. KinderCare Learning Centers, Inc. is the largest provider of for-profit early education and child care services in the United States. KinderCare provides center-based preschool education and childcare services five days a week throughout the year for children between the ages of six weeks and twelve years. The proposed Dublin KinderCare will have a maximum capacity of 180 children but the expected enrollment is approximately 150 to 155 children. DISCUSSION: Project Description The proposed project consists of constructing a new 24-hour Rite Aid Pharmacy store and the KinderCare day care facility on four parcels, which will be consolidated into two parcels, totaling approximately 3 acres (see the site 2 plan included in the Development Plan, Exhibit C-1 of Exhibit C-. The majority of the project site is currently vacant. The existing bedroom furniture store will be demolished prior to constructing the project. The project proponents are also voluntarily contributing traffic improvement funds in the amount of $129,880 as part of their project. These fees will be used to mitigate any potential traffic impacts of the proposed project on surrounding roadways. The proposed Rite Aid/KinderCare project complies with the existing General Plan land use designation for the project site, which is Retail/Office. The project is located within Area 3 of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan and the existing zoning is C-1, Retail Commercial Zoning District. The project requires the following planning permit approvals: 1) an amendment to the San Ramon Road Specific Plan to allow: la) a drug store as a permitted use instead of a prohibited use; Ib1 adrive-through pharmacy as a conditional use; and (c) a day care facility as a conditional use; 2) a PD District rezone (as a requirement of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan) that includes a Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan; 3) a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 24-hour drive-through pharmacy, a day care center (15+ children), and an exemption from parking requirements for the day-care center; and 4) Site Development Review for the construction of a 16,708 square foot retail pharmacy and a 9,824 square foot day care center and the installation of parking and landscaping. Specific Plan Amendment The San Ramon Road Specific Plan geographic designation of the project site is "Area 3" (San Ramon properties. This designation allows for the development of retail shopper stores oriented to providing additional comparison shopping goods for both Dublin and nearby community residents. It is the intent of the Specific Plan that the principal uses within Area 3 be reserved for retail shopper stores. Under certain circumstances, a limited amount of development can be for other types of uses such as, personal service, financial institutions or office uses. The Specific Plan identifies drug stores as prohibited uses and day care centers and drive-through pharmacies are not specifically identified as conditional uses. According to the Plan, "drug stores" are prohibited uses because they are considered convenience store-type uses. A market study completed for the Plan indicated that there was not enough residential development to support more convenience stores in the downtown area. However, since the adoption of the Plan in 1983, the City has approved additional residential development throughout the City, in particular, the 174 multi-family unit residential project (Kildara) just west of the project site, which would now support convenience stores. Furthermore, it is the intent of the Plan that the principle use of Area 3 be reserved for retail shopper 3 stores. As a result, the Plan will be amended to allow drug stores as a permitted use which would result in no land use conflicts with the Plan. The City's Zoning Ordinance allows drive-through businesses as a conditional use within the C-N, Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District; C-1, Retail Commercial Zoning District and the C-2, General Commercial Zoning District. If a drug store will be allowed as a permitted use within Area 3, the drive-through pharmacy should be considered a conditional use because it is an ancillary use to the main drug store use and since this type of use is a conditional use within commercial districts. Amending the Specific Plan to allow adrive-through pharmacy as a conditional use would not result in land use conflicts with the Specific Plan, the City's Zoning Ordinance or General Plan because a Conditional Use Permit provides for the review of a development proposal by the Planning Commission and the application of conditions of approval will insure that the intent of the Zoning Ordinance is met. The City's Zoning Ordinance allows day care centers (with 15+ children) within commercial centers as a conditional use. The proposed day care center will be compatible with the proposed Rite Aid drug store use and the surrounding residential and commercial uses, especially the Montessori School (also an educational/day care facility) across the street within the Strouds shopping center. Both the drug store and day care center will be supportive of existing retail and residential uses in the area. Rite Aid will provide a commercial service and retail use consistent with the adjacent downtown uses, and both Rite Aid and KinderCare will offer goods and services which typically benefit residential uses. KinderCare will provide day care and education services for adjacent residents and children of workers in the surrounding commercial areas. Amending the Plan to allow day care centers as conditional uses would not result in land use conflicts with the Specific Plan, the City's Zoning Ordinance or General Plan. Planned Development District Rezone According to the "General Development Criteria -Zoning" section of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan, all new development proposals within the Specific Plan area requires a Planned Development Zoning approval. A Planned Development (PD) Zoning District and Development Plan (Stage 1 and 2) has been prepared for the project (see Exhibit C resolution). Except as specifically modified by the provisions of the PD District Rezone and Development Plan, the use, development ,improvement and maintenance of the project site are subject to the provisions of the C-1, Retail Commercial Zoning District of the Zoning Ordinance with regard to permitted/conditional uses, land use restrictions and minimum/maximum development criteria. 4 The Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan (see Exhibit C-1 of Exhibit C resolution) includes development standards, such as permitted and conditional uses, site area densities, development standards, etc., and the Rite Aid and KinderCare project plans. Development under the Planned Development Zoning District and Development Plan will be compatible with existing and future development in the surrounding areas due to site design/layout, architecture design, setback, parking and landscaping requirements of the Planned Development Zoning District and related Site Development Review. Application of these requirements will result in commercial development that will be compatible with the surrounding retail commercial and medium to high density residential uses. Conditional Use Permit The Conditional Use Permit for this project covers the establishment of a drive- through pharmacy, a day care facility for a maximum of 180 children, and an exemption of parking requirements for the day care facility. Rite Aid The drive-through pharmacy will provide adrive-up window. Similar to the main store operation, the drive-through pharmacy will be operated on a 24-hour basis. Potential concerns with the window speaker creating too much noise are addressed through a condition of approval of the Exhibit D resolution. The speakers for the drive through window must be at a noise level which reflects the minimum functional volume and speaker noise levels cannot be discernible beyond the property lines, in particular, the adjacent residential neighborhood. Regarding on- site traffic circulation, the proposed site layout for the project is designed to prevent vehicle stacking problems within the parking lot (see the "On- and Off-Site Circulation" section for further discussion-. The City had a concern with the potential land use and aesthetic impacts the proposed Rite Aid project would create by vacating their existing tenant space on Regional Street, which is within the Downtown Specific Plan area. The vacancy created by the proposed project would conflict with the following policies of the Downtown Specific Plan: 1) maintain downtown Dublin as a strong regional center; 2) increase the amount of retail development downtown; and 3) continue the current retailing and service commercial uses in the land use zone where the current existing store is located. The project would also conflict with the San Ramon Road Specific Plan policy which states that any new development shall be compatible with existing 5 residential or other commercial development located within or adjacent to the San Ramon Road Specific Plan. The existing Rite Aid site is located "adjacent" to the San Ramon Road Specific Plan area. If the new Rite Aid project causes the current Rite Aid site to become vacant, the vacancy will be incompatible with the existing commercial development around the existing Rite Aid site. In addition, the vacancy may cause arun-down appearance of the shopping center where Rite Aid currently exists that may result in a negative aesthetic effect. In order to mitigate the land use and aesthetic impacts specified above, a condition of approval has been added to the Exhibit D resolution which requires the existing Rite Aid site to be re-leased to a business whose use is consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan (i.e., retail and service commercial uses). Prior to issuance of a building permit the Rite Aid Corporation must provide the Planning Department verification that the existing Rite Aid site has been re-leased. KinderCare The KinderCare facility will be operating from 6:15 a.m. to 6:15 p.m., Monday through Friday. KinderCare is also conditioned to control all project related activities and noise in the parking lot, especially the playground, so as not to create a nuisance to the adjacent residential community (see Exhibit D resolution). The playground area will not be occupied until 8:00 a.m. under normal conditions and only individual age groups are allowed on the playground at any given time. The play facility will be set back approximately 60 feet from the nearest residential unit and between that unit and the play facility, there is a roadway, parking aisle, a 3 foot wide landscape area, and a 6 foot high concrete block wall, which would help mitigate any potential noise impacts. Additionally, KinderCare recently commissioned Bunton and Associates to conduct a noise study to determine noise levels for a typical KinderCare playground area. The study indicated that the decibel level was in anon-offensive range. KinderCare is also requesting an exemption from the parking requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for day care centers. According to the Zoning Ordinance, a total of fifty-three (53) parking spaces would be required for the KinderCare project, which based on the TJKM Transportation Consultants traffic study, dated January 25, 1999, is excessive. Twenty (20) parking spaces are adequate for the KinderCare project based on TJKM's research completed for two other KinderCare facilities in the Tri-Valley, in particular, the Pleasanton facility which has the same children capacity of 180 and the same number of staff persons as the proposed Dublin facility. The greatest demand for parking at these other facilities was at 5:05 p.m. when all nineteen (19) stalls were occupied. The proposed KinderCare facility will be required to provide a minimum of twenty (20) parking spaces. The KinderCare site plan currently shows a maximum of forty (40) parking spaces. s Site Development Review Design The "General Development Criteria" of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan addresses the compatibility of uses and require that special attention be placed on insuring compatibility of uses proposed in any new development with existing residential or other commercial development located within or adjacent to the Specific Plan area. The following factors are taken into consideration for determining compatibility of uses: height of proposed structures, design, landscaping, setbacks, street side design treatment, distance between buildings, loading areas, walls and fences and pedestrian/bicycle and service circulation. The main architectural theme of both the Rite Aid and KinderCare buildings is California Spanish architecture. This architecture is compatible with and compliments the architecture styles of the surrounding commercial development - Strouds Plaza and the Kildara residential community. Both buildings will have terra cotta the roofs and will utilize stucco/plaster siding. The Rite Aid building will have trellis structures along the south and east elevations (elevations most visible to the public) and all four elevations will incorporate pop-out columns and split face concrete masonry for reducing the blank wall effect. The building will incorporate warm neutral colors of creamy beige and tan with the accents along various parts of the building. The proposed triangular canopy will be blue. The KinderCare building will also be painted with earth colors and will utilize wood fascias and the accents. Both buildings are proposed as one-story buildings with a maximum building height of 27 feet for the Rite Aid building (32 feet for the corner entry element) and 21 .5 feet for the KinderCare building. Staff requested that Rite Aid orient the main building entrance towards San Ramon Road. The proposed project's main entry is a corner entry facing Amador Valley Boulevard and San Ramon Road. Staff also requested that Rite Aid utilize a tower element at the corner entry way to balance the architecture of a corner commercial building and to enhance this area as a pedestrian focal point. Landscaping Most of the proposed landscaping for both the Rite Aid and KinderCare sites is adequate and complies with the requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance. However, some additional landscaping will be required at Rite Aid's main entry corner and within the KinderCare parking lot, subject to the review and approval by the Community Development Director. The additional parking lot landscaping will enhance the aesthetic appearance of the project and provide the necessary shade relief for people and automobiles thereby reducing the heat and glare generated by the development. There are seven mature trees currently located on the site. Four of the trees will remain as part of the landscaping for the new development. However, a mature eucalyptus tree and two unhealthy oak trees measuring less than 24" in diameter, will require removal once the project is constructed. The Applicant will be required to install street trees in compliance with the Public Works Department standards and the Applicant is also required to submit a Final Landscape and Irrigation Plan with their building plans, which must include landscaping information for all proposed landscaping and documentation for compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. On-and Off-Site Circulation According to the Public Works Department and the traffic study conducted by TJKM Transportation Associates dated February 4, 1999 (see background Attachment 2), the on and off-site circulation patterns for the project are adequate. The drive through aisle with the pharmacy drive-up window has an adequate turning radii and sufficient space for vehicle stacking and the parking lot configuration for Rite Aid and KinderCare will facilitate on-site traffic movement. The Applicant will be responsible for widening Amador Valley Boulevard to 4 lanes at the intersection with San Ramon Road. This will facilitate traffic movement on and off San Ramon Road and the project site, thereby mitigating any potential traffic congestion that may result from the project. The applicant will be required to follow City, County and State design standards regarding roadway and access design. The applicant will also be required to comply with City and Fire department standards regarding access for emergency services. The project proponents will be voluntarily contributing traffic improvement funds in the amount of 5129,880 as part of their project. These funds will be used to mitigate any potential traffic impacts of the proposed project on surrounding roadways through street improvements. This project is not in conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation. A public pedestrian/bike trail is located east of the project site, between the project site and street curb along San Ramon Road. Bicycle and pedestrian, including handicap, access is adequate to both project sites. Bike racks are required as a standard condition of approval (see Exhibit D resolution-. In addition, the project proponents will be required to install a bus turn-out along the 8 project frontage, including a concrete pad, passenger bus shelter and trash receptacle. Regarding on-site pedestrian circulation, staff required that the project provide for a pedestrian connection between the KinderCare facility and the Rite Aid building. Signage for pedestrian safety are required as conditions of project approval. Calaveras Fault The Guiding Policy of the Seismic Safety Element of the Dublin General Plan indicates that geologic hazards shall be mitigated or development shall be located away from geologic hazards in order to preserve life, protect property, and reasonably limit the financial risks to the City of Dublin and other public agencies that would result from damage to poorly located public facilities. All structures shall be designed to the standards delineated in the Uniform Building Code and the Dublin Grading Ordinance. Standards intended for human occupancy shall be at least 50 feet from any active fault trace; freestanding garages and storage structures may be as close as 25 feet. These distances may be reduced based on adequate exploration to accurately locate the fault trace. Generally, facilities should not be built astride potential rupture zones, although certain low-risk facilities may be considered. The project site is located within the "Special Study Zone" at the south-central extent of the San Ramon Valley. The Calaveras Fault, an active fault, was mapped at the project site. The fault zone at the project site is 1,000 feet wide and the main trace of the Calaveras Fault may lie beneath San Ramon Road. The Rite Aid building is set back 170 feet from San Ramon Road. In order to mitigate any potential geologic impacts of the project to a less than significant level, the City will apply conditions of project approval requiring that a comprehensive geologic and soils report be prepared by a licensed geologist identifying any geologic or soil hazard zones, appropriate mitigation measures and other recommendations, prior to issuance of building permits for the project. The report shall be completed to the satisfaction of Public Works Director to assure that a reasonable safety factor is provided. The Applicant shall also be required to conduct subsurface soil condition testing and to design the proposed structures according to the Uniform Building Code, and to have a structural engineer check seismic design parameters. Signage The Applicant will be required to submit a Master Sign Program -Site Development Review application for the Rite Aid and KinderCare wall signs and freestanding signs. A Master Sign Program is required for a project that includes more than one 9 freestanding sign per parcel. Rite Aid is contemplating installing two freestanding signs on their parcel. Approval of a Master Sign Program for the project will contribute to the effective and attractive identification of the Rite Aid and KinderCare businesses and to the design quality of the site and surrounding area that will be superior to the quality that would have resulted under the City's standard sign regulations. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA-, State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines. The 20-day public review period began February 12, 1999 and ended March 3, 1999. A Negative Declaration has been prepared because the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Two letters were received on the Negative Declaration by the time this staff report was prepared (see background Attachments 3 and 4-. Both letters were from Kildara homeowners. As one major concern, 60 Kildara property owners feel that the project will exacerbate the existing drive-through traffic problem within the Kildara community. Property owners have stated that currently, individuals wanting to avoid the traffic congestion on San Ramon Road and Dublin Boulevard, use Kildara's private roads as a thoroughfare to access the western area of Dublin. Apparently there are vehicles currently using the Kildara development as a short-cut to get to Donlan Way, then to Dublin Boulevard heading west. Property owners feel that the proposed Rite Aid/KinderCare project would increase traffic through Kildara resulting in noise, safety, pollution and increased maintenance cost concerns. This same letter (Attachment 3) includes a list of conditions that the property owners feel should be applied to the project. Other major concerns include potential noise impacts from the 24 hour Rite Aid drive-through speakers and the day care playground; potential traffic congestion at the Amador Valley Boulevard and San Ramon Road intersection with traffic turning left on Amador Valley Boulevard to access the project and with traffic exiting the project backing up on Amador Valley Boulevard; and potential on-site traffic congestion of vehicles utilizing the drive-through pharmacy. Another resident commented that the project will result in increased air pollution, geologic problems, aesthetic impacts, and public service impacts (see Attachment 4). Staff will address these concerns at the public hearing. to CONCLUSION: All potential impacts associated with the project have been, or will be addressed, either through the re-design/reconfiguration of the project, and/or through conditions of project approval. The project, as conditioned, including the PD District Development Plan complies with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and the San Ramon Road Specific Plan and is compatible with other land uses (i.e. retail commercial and residentiap, transportation and service facilities, and commercial and residential structures in the vicinity. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of Rite Aid/KinderCare's Specific Plan Amendment, PD Rezone, Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review request, and adopt resolutions Exhibits A, B, C and D. EXHIBITS: Lases-i~i.~o P=,~ ~_ is Exhibit A: Resolution recommending City Council adoption of a Negative Declaration is Exhibit B: Resolution recommending City Council adoption of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan Amendment t ~ Exhibit C: Resolution recommending City Council adoption of the PD District Rezone and Development Plan (with Development Plan attached as Exhibit C-1) 3a- Exhibit D: Resolution recommending City Council adoption of the Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review. BACKGROUND ATTACHMENTS: So Attachment 1: Negative Declaration ~ r Attachment 2: TJKM Traffic Study dated February 4, 1999 It3 Attachment 3: Letter from Kildara Property Owners (signed by Nina Wixson) tzt Attachment 4: Letter from Kildara Property Owner T. E. Clark GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION: APPLICANTS: RITE AID: Peter Tobin, Tait and Associates, Inc., 1001 Galaxy Way, Suite 304, Concord, CA 94520 ; KINDERCARE: Joe Bledsoe, KinderCare Learning Centers, Lincoln Executive Center, 43276 Christy Street, Fremont, CA 94538 tt OWNERS: John Nichandros, 7360 San Ramon Road, Dublin, CA 94568 Michael Perkins, 2500 Bisso Lane, Concord, CA 94520 LOCATION: 7348 - 7372 San Ramon Road ASSESSOR PARCELS: 941-40-2-3; 941-40-2-7; 941-40-2-10; 941-40-3-2 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Retail/Office SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATION: San Ramon Road Specific Plan, Area 3 (retail shopper stores) EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE: C-1, Retail Commercial Zoning District; 3 parcels currently vacant, 1 parcel contains a retail store SURROUNDING GENERAL General Plan/Specific Plan PLAN, ZONING, AND Retail/Office LAND USE: Medium High Density Residential Downtown Specific Plan Zoning C-1, Retail Commercial Zoning District PD District (commercial) PD District (residentiap Land Use Retail commercial (shopping center; restaurant) Residential (townhomes) G:\pa98-038\pc staff report 12 RESOLUTION NO.99- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PA 98-038 RITE AID/KINDERCARE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT; PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT REZONE; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW WHEREAS, the Applicants, Peter Tobin of Tait and Associates, on behalf of Rite Aid Corporation, and Joe Bledsoe of KinderCaze Learning Centers, has requested approval of an amendment to the San Ramon Road Specific Plan, a Planned Development (PD) District Rezone, a Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review to construct an approximate 16,700 square foot retail drug store, a 9,824 squaze foot day caze center, and voluntarily contribute traffic improvement funds in the amount of $ 129,880, and to establish a 24-hour drive through pharmacy and a day care center and to exempt pazking requirements for the day care center located at 7348 - 7372 San Ramon Road, within the San Ramon Road Specific Plan and the C-I, Retail Commercial Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City Environmental Guidelines require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impact and that environmental documentation be prepared; and WHEREAS, an Initial Study was conducted finding that the project, as proposed, would not have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declazation has been prepazed for this project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review and consider the Negative Declazation at a public hearing on Mazch 9, 1999; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Negative Declazation was given in all aspects as required by State Law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE I'I' RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find: That the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Negative Declaration has been prepazed and processed in accordance with State and local environmental laws and guideline regulations. 3. That the Negative Declaration is complete and adequate. BE fI' FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby recommend City Council adoption of the Negative Declaration for PA 98-038 Rite Aid/KinderCaze Specific Plan Amendment; Planned Development District Rezone; Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review. EXHIBIT A PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of March, 1999. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Community Development Director g:\pa98-038Weg Dec Reso - PC Planning Commission Chairperson 2 RESOLUTION NO.99- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C~ OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT PA 98-038 RITE AID/KINDERCARE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT TO AREA 3 (SAN RAMON PROPERTIES) OF THE SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, the Applicants, Peter Tobin of Tait and Associates, on behalf of Rite Aid Corporation, and Joe Bledsoe of KinderCaze Learning Centers, has requested a Specific Plan Amendment to the San Ramon Road Specific Plan to modify Area 3 of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan to allow a retail drug store as a permitted use; to allow a retail drng store with adrive-through pharmacy as a conditional use; and to allow a day care center as a conditional use. The Applicants aze also requesting approval of a Planned Development (PD) District Rezone and Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review to construct an approximate 16,700 square foot retail drug store, a 9,824 squaze foot day caze center, and voluntazily contribute traffic improvement funds in the amount of $ 129,880, and to establish a 24-hour drive through pharmacy and a day caze center and to exempt pazking requirements for the day care center located at 7348 - 7372 San Ramon Road; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution No. 122-98 initiating the Rite Aid Specific Plan Amendment Study on July 21, 1998; and WHEREAS, Area 3 of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan allows for the development of retail shopper stores oriented to providing additional compazison shopping goods for both Dublin and nearby residents; and WHEREAS, it is the intent that the principal uses within Area 3 be reserved for retail shopper stores; and WHEREAS, under certain circumstances, a limited amount of development can be for personal service uses, which includes services of a personal convenience nature, financial institutions or office uses; and WHEREAS, Area 3 regulations prohibit retail drug stores and drive-through restaurants and do not address drive-through pharmacies or day caze centers; and WHEREAS, the intent of prohibiting retail drug stores and drive-through restaurants was to prohibit convenience store-type uses based on an insufficient amount residential development to support more convenience stores within the downtown azea; and WHEREAS, since the adoption of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan in 1983, the City has approved additional residential development throughout the City, including the multi-family residential project just west of the project site, which would now support convenience store-type uses; and EXHIBIT B WHEREAS, the City's Zoning Ordinance allows day care centers (with 15+ children) within commercial centers as a conditional use and drive-through businesses as a conditional use within the C-N, C-1 and C-2 Zoning Districts; and WHEREAS, the day caze center and drive-through pharmacy would not result in land use conflicts with the San Ramon Road Specific Plan, the City's Zoning Ordinance or General Plan because a Conditional Use Permit provides for the review of a development proposal by the Planning Commission and the application of conditions of approval will insure that the intent of the Zoning Ordinance is met; and WHEREAS, the proposed drug store and day care use will be compatible with the existing and future development in the surrounding azea. The proposed retail drug store use will provide a commercial service and retail use consistent with the adjacent downtown uses and both the drug store and day caze uses will offer goods and services which typically benefit residential uses; and WHEREAS, the project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines and a Negative Declazation has been prepazed for this project and is on file with the Dublin Planning Department. The project, as proposed, will not have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on March 9, 1999; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted to the Planning Commission recommending approval of the project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and use their independent judgment and considered all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Dublin Planning Commission does hereby adopt a Resolution recommending City council adoption of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan amendment to allow a retail drug store as a permitted use, and to allow adrive-through pharmacy and day caze center with 15+ children, as conditional uses within Area 3. This Amendment is subject to the following: AMENDING AREA 3 USES AS FOLLOWS: Adding to Permitted Uses e. Drug Stores 2. Adding to Conditional Uses e. Drive-Through Pharmacy f. Day Caze Center (15+children) 3. Deleting from Prohibited Uses PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9`h day of March, 1999. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Community Development Director g:\98-038\Specific Plan Amendment Reso - PC RESOLUTION NO.99- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) REZONE /DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PA 98-038 RITE AID/KINDERCARE LOCATED AT 7348-7372 SAN RAMON ROAD (APNs 941-40-3-2; 94-40-2-3; 941-40-2-7 and 941-40-2-10) WHEREAS, the Applicants, Peter Tobin of Tait and Associates, on behalf of Rite Aid Corporation, and Joe Bledsoe of KinderCaze Learning Centers, has requested approval of an amendment to the San Ramon Specific Plan, a Planned Development (PD) District Rezone, a Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review to construct an approximate 16,700 squaze foot retail drug store, a 9,824 square foot day care center, and voluntarily contribute traffic improvement funds in the amount of $ 129,880, and to establish a 24-hour drive through pharmacy and a day caze center and to exempt pazking requirements for the day caze center located at 7348 - 7372 San Ramon Road, within the San Ramon Road Specific Plan and the C-1, Retail Commercial Zoning District; and WHEREAS, according to the "General Development Criteria" section of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan, all new development proposals within the Specific Plan area shall require a Planned Development Zoning; and WHEREAS, ApplicanUDeveloper has submitted a complete application for a Planned Development Rezone, including a Development Plan, (Stage 1 and 2, Exhibit C-1) as required by Section 8.32 of the Zoning Ordinance which meets the requirements of said section, which is available and on file in the Planning Department; and WHEREAS, the project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines and a Negative Declazation has been prepazed for this project and is on file with the Dublin Planning Department. The project, as proposed, will not have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on March 9, 1999; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required bylaw; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted to the Planning Commission recommending approval of the project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did heaz and use their independent judgment and considered all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth. EXHIBIT C NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Dublin Planning Commission does hereby make the following findings and determinations regazding said proposed Planned Development Rezone: 1. The Planned Development Zoning District and Development Plan (Stage 1 and 2) meet the purpose and intent of Chapter 8.32 of the Zoning Ordinance because they will provide retail commercial and day care uses that aze appropriate uses for the site, which is located within Area 3 of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan which promotes the development of retail shopper stores, and which is located neaz adjacent retail and medium to high density residential land uses. The comprehensive Development Plan will be sensitive to surrounding uses by virtue of site layout and design of the architecture and site plan; and 2. Development under the Planned Development Zoning District and Development Plan (Stage 1 and 2) would be harmonious and compatible with existing and future development in the surrounding areas due to site design layout, azchitecture design, setback, pazking and landscaping requirements of the Planned Development Zoning District, which are adequate and have been specially designed to fit into the existing neighborhood. Both uses are supportive of surrounding retail and residential uses through the provision of day caze and education services for adjacent residents and children of workers in the surrounding commercial azeas, and supportive of similar surrounding retail commercial uses; and 3. The Planned Development (PD) Rezone is consistent with the general provisions, intent, and purpose of the PD Zoning District of the Zoning Ordinance in that it contains all information required by Section 8.32 of the Zoning Ordinance for a Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan and accomplishes the objectives of Section 8.32.010, A through H, of the Zoning Ordinance; and 4. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the zoning district being proposed because it is located on relatively flat land within a developed downtown area adjacent to existing retail commercial uses and medium to high density residential uses, was previously developed, and because it is located adjacent to roadways which are designed to carry traffic that would be generated by the proposed types of uses; and 5. The Planned Development Rezone will not have a substantial adverse effect on health or safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or public improvement as all applicable laws and regulations will be satisfied; and 7. The Planned Development Rezone will not overburden public services as all agencies must commit to the availability of public services prior to the issuance of building permits as required by City laws and regulations; and 8. The Planned Development Rezone and accompanying Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review, will create an attractive, efficient, and safe environment; and 9. The Planned Development Rezone will benefit the public necessity, convenience, and general welfaze; and 10. The Planned Development Rezone and accompanying Site Development Review and Conditional Use Permit will be compatible with and enhance the general development of the area; and 11. The proposed amendment is consistent with the RetaiUOffice designation of the Dublin General Plan and the proposed use types are permitted by said designation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Dublin Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve a Planned Development Zoning District and Development Plan for PA 98-038 Rite Aid/KinderCare, (Exhibit C-1, attached to this resolution), which constitute regulations for the use, improvement, and maintenance of the property. Except as specifically identified otherwise in the approved Development Plan, development and operation of land use activities within this Rezone shall be subject to the current City of Dublin Zoning Code and to the approval of the related San Ramon Road Specific Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9`h day of March, 1999. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Community Development Director g:\98-038\PD Reso - PC DEVELOPMENT PLAN This is a Development Plan pursuant to Chapter 8.32 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance for PA 98-038 Rite Aid/KinderCare project, located on the northwest corner of Amador Valley Boulevard and San Ramon Road, at 7348 - 7372 San Ramon Road (APNs 941-40-3-2; 94-40-2-3; 941-40-2-7 and 941-40- 2-10). This Development Plan meets all the requirements for Stage 1 and Stage 2 review of the project. This Development Plan includes the Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Floor Plan and Elevations, sheets 1 through 9, dated received Mazch 1, 1999, labeled Exhibit C-1 to the Ordinance approving this Development Plan (City Council Ordinance No. 99- _), and on file with the Planning Department. The Planned Development District allows the flexibility needed to encourage innovative development while ensuring that the goals, policies, and action programs of the General Plan, San Ramon Road Specific Plan, and provisions of Section 8.32 of the Zoning Ordinance are satis5ed. Permitted Uses/Conditional Uses: Permitted Uses Drug Store Conditional Uses Drive Through Drug Store Pharmacy Day Care Center All other Permitted and Conditional Uses as established by the San Ramon Road Specific Plan. 2. Site Area/Densities: The maximum squaze footage of the proposed Rite Aid/KinderCaze development for the parcels covered under this Development Plan (as shown on the site plan contained in Exhibit C-1, Development Plan), aze as follows: Rite Aid site: ± 1.68 acres 16,708 square foot building KinderCaze: ±1.19 acres 9,841 square foot building 3. Dublin Zoning Ordinance -Applicable Requirements: Except as specifically modified by the provisions of this PD District Rezone/Development Plan, the use, development ,improvement and maintenance of property within this PD Zoning District shall be subject to the provisions of the C-1, Retail Commercial Zoning District of the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance with regazd to permitted/conditional uses, land use restrictions and minimum/maximum development criteria. EXHIBIT C-1 4. Site Plan and Architecture: See attached floor and elevation plans, sheets Z, 3, and 5 (Rite Aid) and 7 and 9 (KinderCaze) contained in Exhibit C-I, Development Plan. Any modifications to the project shall be substantially consistent with these plans and of equal or superior materials and design quality. Phasing Plan: The project shall be constructed in one phase of development. If the Developer/Applicant decides to construct the project in phases, a phasing plan shall be subrnitted for the review and approval of the Community Development Director. 6. Landscaping Plan: Refer to attached landscaping plans included in Exhibit C-1, Development Plan, sheets 4 and 8. Development Standards: Lot Size: Corner Lot (Rite Aid) - 6,000 sq. ft. minimum Interior Lot (I{inderCaze) - 5,000 sq. ft. minimum Lot Width and Fronta¢e: Corner Lot (Rite Aid) - 60 feet minimum Interior Lot (KinderCare) - 50 feet minimum Lot Denth: 100 feet minimum Front, Rear and Side Yard Setbacks: See the C-1, Retail Commercial Zoning District setback regulations, Chapter 8.36.030 of the Zoning Ordinance. Buildine Heieht: 45 feet maximum 35 feet maximum if principal structure is within 50 feet of an R zoning district Puking: Pazking shall be provided as shown on the site plan in Exhibit C-1, Development Plan, sheet 1, as approved through the related Site Development Review and Conditional Use Permit for PA 98-038. All drive aisles and fire lanes shall be kept cleaz at all times. 8. Public Facilities Fee: The Applicant/Developer shall be required to pay a Public Facilities Fee in the amounts and at the times set forth in the City of Dublin Resolution No. 32-96, adopted by the City Council on March 26, 1996, or in the amounts and at the times set forth in any resolution revising the amount of the Public Facilities Fee. 9. Compliance with Related Planning Approvals: The Applicant/Developer shall comply with all the related Site Development Review and Conditional use conditions of approval for PA 98-038. G:Apa98-038~Development Plan .~w..6 ^~~,,, ~.x axrw.aua 6es.xw,w Ntl1d 3113 >,ro 6xasxar a6 ff9i-l9L ccl~) sole rd oanesluare ~ ~ ..~ scat-ae6 sas ,~.7~NI9N3/51J3UN.NN ( ) uP~ W09-069 (SL6) ONI $31H'.I~$$r A!(rl v~'nnena eJx/e 1/ll JX6111VJ mr va 6ae IgIMI]GtI MY tliI , 991C X08 '0'd L R9UW~OLBN78'k70 a1[ue v + Zol ~ OL .6 YJ 'N^>u^J sac elves ~=M Mafia cool 'Ml9 A3lltlA 2104VYVtl/'OtJ NOYVtlN NtlS ~MN Mve >wuneraLxerna6w~ a NOLLVIdOaIHOO Ye ~ ~ ~~ 9£L X OZL ONIOllf18 ws4e ,x«auwiwaaw as . y ~(/) Curyugd Eun(eiun5 e 1 ' m v xarrJmo 49 am 6 a' ~II~ ~ b + wrv.6wvu3 mr~ ^ ON 3N01$ ZO'8E8S0 n/NO, 66uror wo 3n ~eaw rw • e ll. C-~ ~ pR °~ ~-- CD CO W tL N W O U Q w O S ~ N N lA W a r~ a II i w ~ d N y j U ~ N OI N Q N O S K U ~ d I^ Y II II II ~ w o ~ a a a a ~ ~ o a ~ W ~ ~ Z J Z Q Y Q Y 6 tl ~ N W VI U W Q U J N ~ N O a n J J U II II [ U ~ Q p U ~ O - w G! J ~' 6 U ~ N Z O y~ ~ Z U ~ 6 ¢ J N fn/1 a ] Q U' N j r ? v c '^ ~ x J ~ < w 3 a o c~ a 2a ~" J a J ~ ~ ~ i W ~ ~ ~ 3 u N ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ O O O O O O z O W J w 2 H w b ~~ GC a J ~' v o M ~ F., ~ O elf ~ ~ ~ ~' 3 ~- o-- C V~ ~:a?9 ~ v~3z'° :3 ~ S' S~ ~,~t "e~ E+ a. ~- - t~ O Q w J W H N Q W w c/'f b n. ~7 ~ f- a, U ~ W F ~`~ S gg ggg 2 ~,E& Q k~~ Z 0 E" Q Q G Z O`"O ~~~ ~ Q Q~U V W Z ~_ ~ m Q (/') Q W F" DG M e § yyy __ O da~~~u y ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ a 0 ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ N~~ ~g~~~~ °~~ ~~ ~k~ aoooo 00 ~~ ~l 1 al p = l l s - 0 Q W J W F" t/') W 3 W N O ? d la l l $~ V" F ~ ;~ u °~ ~::::~ 6 n ~~~ ~~ Q W W f"' Z 0 N b ~~ ~ ~~ -- a ~ U p W -~ H \~ < ~~~ Z O Q Q ~ O ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Q Z U U W z ~ O m Q u o W F" M e O ~~~~~~ vAw Are oJSJMxf MS~AMNiVxf~141WGW b4TYY~Wl10 MS~39'Ne0 NVId 3dVOSONV~ J.aVNIWll321d uw Sxwsv3x 'Ox 'fC9Z-IBL (ClL) sow ra •oNrresroemJ 6 ao~ eteL-ass (C2B77 `ll f7NlON3/$'1:)IIIII:JNV ______. ... _..._ ___-____- w/a/i iwnnmmnum ) S9 ti %OB '0'd ~ • -^I "d .aron opep-Ow (SZe) MINI o31VIJOSSV A 11V1 ~ Ye w •p,,,,,,~ tl0 'NfJ800 yUA Ld111m aN UUm i w3nlNVddo JN34WO13A30 auoLe • ~ ~ ~Or- wc nrs ~wA A.epp IWI 'OAlB A3T7tlA 2100tl%tl/'ON NOWtlN Ntl5 OMN wi/. ruilasxxroma~l f NoLLVaodaoo ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ONIOl1fl6 9£l X OZl M'0va +rentl01#~~ ~ ~ ~ / L' ~ ' ~ wi!Wd: ai ~.n ~ , ZO-9C6S0 'ON 32101S ~ 1.,.,~,..d y1~®I. w. . . QI V ~~IO ~ a+ •~;,~; a ~ a ~ a e i n i i ) r 'IV IU'I-iww/)~1 t- ~ z ~ U . ,-. y - ---.. 4 - g o - r - - - ~ - - a o .._ d - ,p ~ d Z 1 w tt. U ~' Jd_ W W. Q d d y,o ~. dtlOk1 NO{N 0'k! NVS~ vaa~y _ -moo c ~d 4~a wr _,f ,_JwQ j~_ _ y v ~m ~n xx 1- ~ ~N w o J] - v u D F e d v~ - y __~N N ~ ~At ~~_ ---w ~ .shy i J a 7 ~ i _ _ ..% FV I~ Vil 1 Ilil IV 'N I { ( ~' ~, ' - ~- _._ ~ lM a._ L M ~S IL N z W \G\\ ~I/1 _ ) ~ ,l I al 1 W O Ill n , I _ - \1 I c ~ .~ n ~ \I w I ~ N. ~ F 1 •.I! r. ) Y \ I I .1 ~+~ 1 • ~\ ~ l~\ ~ ~ AIN111NI IllII. L L u~~ ^~Z~B \ ~ I~:IYIN I.f II II& ~~ ~~f ~ ~`p~~V AA,~~`~ ,,, i~ I I o d d I ~y i ~ try °°.q ey I O W 1 e ~ t I ~~I O r' 0 x ___ ___ i ly ___ __ 1 ~___. I ; o - -- - ~---- - - -= w, - - I I I I I (IY I I n I _ _... _... 1 - .. ~.- iivJt f¢I I ~ \ ~/ II IVA G:I "xl ~ ~^ 9 I `1~ 1- i I ~~C~ '9'~ .rlw ~, '~. ~' _ Sy " ~ '~ / I ~ - ~~s~s iV ~~~' t~l - - ,.• H '' o ,.LO I °~ A 31 Q~ to ~ ~ Inr I < ~ _...__.._...___. tL~ eJ d ' ~ ~~ O LL ~ I ~ ~ I w W~ ___ _ _ tt ler~ I I __ -~-.._._ ___. __ 'fir IJ i '111 I I c 9 s ~ ~'. P P •. ~~ ~ . M ; f /- V "- I I I ~r ( ' a`. ~ g I i ~ i} 1v'S;ra ~ ~ I y .~in i.. _ / ~~: ; _ ~ I IV. .• ~ r II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' I ~ ~ I I ~ l ~- ? d ~ 0 ~` Y I .. ...y v ~. _ ~~ ' r t s ~ _ m ~ ~... _ _ _ II .aI s a ~ oW ~Y IO ~- I I I d ~I ~~ Q ~ (~ \ y ~ B > r ~ I ~ \ \ ~ I j ln- ~ ~ Iic S a ~ 7 I ••°' I I I ~ \ y l~\Y I I ~ - . u ~~ r l Llp.m y/yYq 1110 i ___ ~,~~r ~y ^ ^ 1 ~ °' e V c _ ??~ ~ 1 x ~ 1,1 - _ '' '~ i ~N ~. ~ ~ ::; -- - - -`° W 3 6b yy i;. ~~ .~~a E s ,~~. `.. y y y y Z O \ J Q 6 \~ y 6 9 0 ~~m 6\ '__ ~iS ~a __Mrrrr X ~NI~I 3 v7l U~SOd021dF-~ ~- .- '- '~ L\ t \i\i / \ \ lal J Y J O 11: I ~~-_ ~Aa. a. lJ ~ a v T'/1 o ~~ V1 IJ a U 1~/T,1 IN O~ ~~ ~ a a U ~ 41 N / a ° Z a , ,) N ~ S Z W ~ to m O N N N oo I() N ~ W y d U i-1 U F ~ N II II, W a 6 d Q / y y O p p U VI ~ N (r ~ W ¢ °n ¢ o n a °v'1 0 ~I Q U w °' o o ¢ a z ( p 'g O V Q ~ S V ° N N a s ~ 11 II II a ~ a a ! 1 L+ ( (f' vs co N iii) ~" ~ A o d Z ~, m Q Z Y O O ~ W p ~ p i Q Q Z Z Y Y F Z W ~ C [I. ~ 6 O Y 9 W ~ ~I Ilnl I N4 I _ i-~._. .+ i ~ t ~ t -ll bg ~II I 'lu zl~`~\~I. ( Im ~ I ~., I4~ I I W N U V Q Q N d d N O N VI ~ n Z x ~ W ~ N V Q O Q II II Q V p VI r q O U 0 K Z S Q IL W 4 ~ N Z vl ¢ a ~ W = p p N Z U ~? << p 6. 6 n J r ~ O Q C'J N ~ V ~ N U y W a C'J ~ W Y tii ~ z a p Q Q Q Y Q d w Z ia .~'- h a ~~ wNaoinr~'Nnena y ~~ a00VWV 9 NOWV71 NVS ~ a ~~ g Z 5 nN 3bO1S ~ § ~ M ~ F p tL lL li LL LL LL: LL: LL 4L O O O ^~ y~ yj yj vi J J J eJ~ J Q' RJ ~ ~ ~ O N r V' 01 4 1 O ~ L.s' G` O O ~ V' N ~ r W ~ ~~ L1 +"n f.T~ .'.s K O ~ } '~~'~ ai9 ~1 w N ,. O Q Q rn F } Q' m k`c _ ~' _ Q Og~jC ~ 4 ~ K ~ ~ O ¢ ~ ~ L y y ~n Cl p ~" v Z' Z N' ~ W N O N V Q Z o ?~.i~. ~ - t 13b Q ~z U W <Q~ <~ °z W W ~~~}} ~ o W oe ~ V1 ~ ~ w u ry J ~ W Z F W V ZQ O J~ Z ~F.., N ~,~ OC N N Q W J N W N= J Q} VIVI ~ O W~JJ H WOC GC ~~ OC W'Z QQ J"'G zz ~ ~ ~~33 ~ Ewa zli s-5u Iz Iofiel of l%(W .i Ilrv we VeLµyoun ~ ~. ~~OV1I9WdN"M V~q/')~•l• )/PI la O aa ...,d.. mni• ww+a. I..d.N ooci-uaf:osJ +~u k a ~ a y ++1~ ~ +M• ~Yb9 xµl p aw+Fc ae inl11~q.dPo a jj .J GMOT•o~~NYM NFWdud Wwia.a LfLLb uc6•-p' Pgind ~ ~ .„.a r„:.., G.N....d..' W w.N w. a„.~<.,.~. ~i' x a 3 = ~~` s ~ tt OOYI %NS' ia'+-05 ~POIIOH '3'N 059 ~'II I W # r ~ a ~ ~ ~ ` 9 ~ O I ~u~ 'spa}ua~ 6ulu.~ea'~ a~n~uapui~ '''~ ~ a ~ a #'- ~ °~ ,:~~ r~°~ ~~ Q FB ~~oj fiu~Pl~nB r+aN V U _ ~ r ~~ ~ ~:...~1', ~ ~~ ~ r5 d ® 0 0 ~ a ~ ~ O a ~ s ~ ~ u IX® << ~ ~8 ~ p~{~~1 a °°} ((~~ ~ U C W C? Z J i ~ ~ Q ~ + ~~~SS .~Y U O 3 ®®~ ~~°® N;<, ~~~ a ~~~~ g ~ k d ~ d d ~® ~0 ~® ~~ ~° Z Q Q w w. 0 F , ~^ (Y II_ 4 x O ® 0 0 ~O® a' ~ ~ a $ n ~ z ~ g < d ~ 3$ Y g N ~qq N C ~~ 4 a ~3a ~® Y ~ ~~ ky~ n d "~~ ~~ ~~ '~~::.-~ g ~ ;~ ® N O r t ~., q 4 ~ ~O ra ~ ~ bT'.P" ~- j r d 6 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~4 ~4 F F X.. L #.. ~.. y yy v y V 3 a 3 ~ 6 o '~ A~ t ~~ y O Y Y C' Q j~ z 16 ~ ~ O g 0 s , t ry ~ ~ 2~ ~~ ~ ~ - S Z N~ i ~ J X p a `Y j m • - O t~uW OUWO ~ j~ ~ ~ y N J ~ ~ y$ SS Q~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ $ ~ ~~ m ~ g 0 In ~ . . . `~ ~ ~ 5 -~ 'o ~6 ~o si ~a a v a t 0 ~ .__ _ ~ g 9 IX IX C ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~®®®®®0® ~ ~ ®0 Y' 0 Z 0 2 w J Wp ~ a Q II I'~ ~~ d~ ~~ 3 d ~ ~~ §~ 4 d ` Y ^I A a Y 0 ~' ~ ~ ~ 0 ~® ~u z O Q W J4 W- ~~ lL " ILI~ J ~ 'WpV ,'eygY4lp W~b~~~ . Z •wW uiMal w~W N MIS ~PM~ Iafotl ~Y yj Q +q W1.~M YPO «w~ p ~. .a w P061-L B-E05 a~~ ~ ~ S .yw~a...~~Ju.w r~.+re.~.~u L5ZL6 'WOIJ~d y~~+ a ODYI ours '+~!IB F~Ilgi 3N OG9 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ QyC6 ~~~ x~ V s w ;t:,, :.: ~~' ~~ 5 ~~~ ~~ r ~ Q {yO~{ R ~ - ~.:xi s --=~+"~~ ~ ~~ ~s k~~ ~ ~~5~~ $ ~~~~~t~~3~~~~ z i ~ ~ ~ i IQ, ,i III ~ y ,, I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ` I t ~II ~I I ~I I I ~" II ~ ~~ ® - zo- I I ~II~ ~~ ~ ~ = 4 ~ I ~II , I I y ~ y ~ _' ICI ~ ~ it ~` ~ _ ~ ~ ® ~ ~ T 11 ~ i ilb~~ ~ _,,., - II I '~ II i ~~ ~ 4 ~. yy ! i~~ ~ ~ r tl y ~I ~ ~ ~ 1 Iii 3 ~ # y~yy( ~ t __- ~ I ~ ~ y C I ~ a~ ~ ~.k ~ SSSEEE . ~^ I It ~ a r , n~l ~ a ~ ~ ~ ,~. ~ i ~I it ~W~I .. __. _;.._- t r I ~j 1 \ / ~i ~I~_. _. __ ~ ~ ~. ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ i:. ~ I ~ ~t o' all . ' -~ ,_ - - - ~~: ` 1 ,.o~ ~, ,,_,, --~.~.--~~. I I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ , ~, ~~ , +y I = ~ S C N \' ' /p~ ~ , F ~ F A 1 I ~ ~~~a II 9M(1Srb I I 9Np ll/iH --1 ~idt5pl3 1 ~~{~ W e6 ep YnIW OeGVF~ 1 {ad Yl ZV' GI-LLG(6CSI eudy~ ~ ~ 8 d al~W1 +eV1^~uw-0^M IO p+MnMagndvtl a CCC ' e ) GNnel e~mey p FYedo~ eyN'ne Z42Lb utfiep' pnli/d ~ _ M e< bleM Oew~eb~W~w e!I P~ {H•o-0 eew I ~ ~ ~ ~ { ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ yy OObI e11~5' 1ae~15 FavalloH 3N 059 ~ ij1il 9 6 a ~ _ ~ O J_ ° ~ - ~u~ 's.~a~ua~ 6uiu.~ea~ aun~.~apui~ '' ~~ ~ x ~ g ~ F = ~ o ~ Q ~ o ~ ~ Q B ~~o~ 6ulvllne Man d U .R ~ ~ °o ~ ~ 6 ~ " ~ S a Q~ C e s a q4 gF 3 s a t $ ~~ ?3; ~e~~ ~ rg~~ ~ ~ ~ t ~~~~ ~~ 6 ~ ~d 4 a~ e 9 J p~ ~ ' PpS e i f ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~~~~~"~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~9~ ~oooo 0 4 sR ~s ~ F ~ ~9 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ °~~ ~~~ 3 ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Eg ~f ~ ~~ ~0 0 00 z Q n. Oo Ola m J W ~ ~ RESOLUTION NO. 99 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF PA 98-038 RITE AID/KINDERCARE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 116,700 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL DRUG STORE, A 9,824 SQUARE FOOT DAY CARE CENTER, AND VOLUNTARILY CONTRIBUTE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $129,880; AND TO ESTABLISH A 24-HOUR DRIVE-THROUGH PHARMACY AND DAY CARE CENTER AND TO EXEMPT PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DAY CARE CENTER LOCATED AT 7348 - 7372 SAN RAMON ROAD WHEREAS, the Applicants, Peter Tobin of Tait and Associates, on behalf of Rite Aid Corporation, and Joe Bledsoe of KinderCare Learning Centers, have requested approval of an amendment to the San Ramon Road Specific Plan, a Planned Development (PD) District Rezone, a Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review to construct an approximate 16,700 square foot retail drug store, a 9,824 square foot day Gaze center, and voluntazily contribute traffic improvement funds in [he amount of $ 129,880, and to establish a 24-hour drive through pharmacy and a day caze center and to exempt pazking requirements for the day caze center located at 7348 - 7372 San Ramon Road, within the San Ramon Road Specific Plan and the C-1, Retail Commercial Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines and a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project and is on file with the Dublin Planning Department. The project, as proposed, will not have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public heazing on said application on March 9, 1999; and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the application be conditionally approved; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did heaz and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth and used their independent judgment to make a decision; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the proposed project is appropriate for the subject site. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find that: A. The proposed operation of adrive-through phazmacy and day care facility within the San Ramon Road Specific Plan and the Planned Development Zoning District for PA 98-038 is compatible with other land uses (i.e. retail commercial and residential), transportation and service facilities in the vicinity because the proposed drug store use will provide a commercial service and retail establishment use consistent with the adjacent downtown uses and both the drug store and day caze EXHIBIT D uses will offer goods and services which typically benefit residential uses. The proposed uses will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare because all the potential environmental impacts associated with the project are less than significant. The uses will not be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood because the project is conditioned to comply with all Building and Fire Department requirements, and Public Works Department requirements regarding on and off-site traffic circulation, street improvements, and on and off-site drainage improvements. There are adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use and related structures would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. The subject site is physically suitable for the type, density and intensity of the use and related structures being proposed because the project is located on relatively flat land within an urbanized area adjacent to existing retail commercial uses and medium to high density residential uses and the Applicants have agreed to mitigate off-site traffic and cimulation impacts by the voluntary payment of $129,880 for street improvements. The Rite Aid Pharmacy drag store use and KinderCare day care center use is not contrary to the specific intent clauses, development regulations, and performance standards established for the Planned Development (PD) Zoning District for PA 98-038 because the conditions of approval are required to insure that both uses, which will be supportive of surrounding retail and residential uses through the provision of day care and education services for adjacent residents and children of workers in the surrounding commercial areas, and supportive of similar surrounding retail commercial uses, will be compatible with those uses. The approval of this application, as conditioned, complies with the Dublin General Plan, the related San Ramon Road Specific Plan Amendment and the PD Zoning District regulations, and the general requirements established in the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. The Rite Aid and KinderCare project is consistent with the intent and purpose of Chapter 8.104 Site Development Review of the Zoning Ordinance. The approval of this application, as conditioned, is in the best interest of the public health, safety and general welfare. The proposed site development, including site layout, structures, vehicular access, circulation and parking, setbacks, height, walls, public safety and similar elements has been designed to provide a desirable environment for the developments. Architectural considerations, including the character, scale and quality of the design, the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings, building materials and colors, screening of exterior appurtenances, exterior lighting and similar elements have been incorporated into the project in order to insure compatibility of this commercial development with the development's design concept or theme and the architectural character of the surrounding commercial and residential buildings and uses. Landscape considerations, including the location, type, size, color, texture and coverage of plant materials, provisions and similar elements have been considered to ensure visual relief and an attractive environment for the public. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby recommend City Council approval of PA 98-038 Rite Aid/KinderCare Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review request to construct an approximate 16,700 square foot retail drug store, a 9,824 square foot day care center, and to establish a 24-hour drive through pharmacy and a day care center and to exempt parking requirements for the day care center located at 7348 - 7372 San Ramon Road, as generally depicted by the plans, labeled Exhibit C-1 of the related Planned Development District Rezone Planning Commission Resolution (Exhibit C), consisting of nine sheets prepared by Tait and Associates, MCG Architects, Majors 2M Engineering, and CRHO Architects, dated received by the Planning Department on March 1, 1999. stamped approved and on file with the Dublin Planning Department, subject to the approval of the related San Ramon Road Specific Plan Amendment and Planned Development District Rezone and compliance with the following conditions: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits or establishment of use, and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. The following codes represent those departments/agencies responsible for monitoring compliance of the conditions of approval: [PL] Planning, [B] Building, [PO] Police, [PW] Public Works [ADM] Administration/City Attorney, [FIN] Finance, IF] Alameda County Fire Department, [DSR] Dublin San Ramon Services District, [LDD], Livermore Dublin Disposal, [CO] Alameda County Department of Environmental Health, [Zone 7], Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Zone 7, [LAVTA], Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority, [CHS], California Department of Health Services. NO CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN HOW IS AGENCY/ REQ.? CONDITION DEPART. SATISFIED? 1. Permit Expiration. Construction or use shall commence within one PL Ongoing year of permit approval, or the permit shall lapse and become null and void. 2. Annual review. On at least an annual basis, this Conditional Use PL Ongoing Permit shall be subject to Zoning Investigator Review and determination as to compliance with the conditions of approval. Any violation of the terms or conditions of this permit may be subject to enforcement action. 3. Revocation of permit. The permit shall be revocable for cause in PL Ongoing accordance with Chapter 8.96 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of the terms or conditions of this permit shall be subject to citation. 4. Clean-up. The Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for clean- PL Ongoing up and disposal of project related trash to maintain a clean, litter-free site. 5. Controllin~ Activities. Rite Aid and KinderCare shall control all PO, PL Ongoing NO CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN HOW IS AGENCY/ REQ.? CONDITION DEPART. SATISFIED? activities on the project site so as not to create a nuisance to the existin~ or surroundin~ businesses and residences. 6. Accessory Structures. The use of any accessory structures, such as PL, B, F Ongoing storage sheds or trailer/container units used for storage or for any other purpose, shall not be allowed on the site at any time. 7. Fees. Applicant/Developer shall pay all applicable fees in effect at Various Various the time of building permit issuance, including, but not limited to, times, but no Planning fees, Building fees, Dublin San Ramon Services District later than fees, Public Facilities fees, Dublin Unified School District School issuance of Impact fees, Alameda County Fire Services fees, Alameda County Building Flood and Water Conservation District (Zone 7) Drainage and Water Permits Connection fees; or any other fee that may be adopted. 8. Requirements and Standard Conditions. The Various Prior to Applicant/Developer shall comply with applicable Alameda County issuance of Fire, Dublin Public Works Department, Dublin Building Department, Building Dublin Police Service, Alameda County Flood Control District Zone Permits 7, Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority, Alameda County Public and Environmental Health, Dublin San Ramon Services District and the California Department of Health Services requirements and standard conditions. Prior to issuance of building permits or the installation of any improvements related to this project, the Developer shall supply written statements from each such agency or department to the Planning Department, indicating that all applicable conditions required have been or will be met. 9. Standard Public Works Conditions of Approval. PW Approval of Applicant/Developer shall comply with all applicable City of Dublin Improvement Standard Public Works Conditions of Approval, revised February 24, Plans 1999, Attachment D1 (obtain from Planning Department). In the through event of a conflict between the Standard Public Works Conditions of completion Approval and these Conditions, these conditions shall prevail. 10. Required Permits. Applicant/Developer shall obtain all necessary PW Various permits required by other agencies (e.g., Alameda County Flood times, but no Control District Zone 7, Alameda County Health Agency (if later than necessary), State Water Quality Control Board, etc.) and shall submit issuance of copies of thc permits to the Department of Public Works. Building Permits l 1. Building Permits, Codes and Ordinances. Thc B Through Applicant/Developer shall obtain all necessary permits from the completion Dublin Building Department. All project construction shall conform to all building codes and ordinances in effect at the time of building permits. 12. Fire Codes and Ordinances. All project construction shall conform B Through to all fire codes and ordinances in effect at the time of building completion permits. 13. Removal of Obstructions. Applicant/Developer shall remove all PW Prior to trees including major root systems and other obstructions from Issuance of building sites that are necessary for public improvements or for Occupancy : public safety as directed by the soils engineer and Director of Public Permits 4 NO CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN HOW IS AGENCY/ REQ.? CONDITION DEPART. SATISFIED? Works. 14. Phasing Plan. If the project is to be phased, Applicant/Developer PW Prior to shall submit a phasing plan to the Director of Public Works for Issuance of review and approval showing that each building being constructed Occupancy has adequate parking, access, traffic circulation, fire access and Permits drainage per the City Zoning and Grading Ordinances. The unimproved portions of the site shall be hydroseeded and graded to drain into appropriate drainage structures with adequate erosion control protection and shall be maintained by Applicant/Developer until such time that the improvements are constructed. 15. Traffic Control. Two-way traffic is to be maintained along Amador PW Prior to Valley Boulevard during all phases of construction. Issuance of Applicant/Developer shall submit a traffic control plan showing Building detouring and temporary striping for all interim or phased Permits improvements in the public street right of way for review and approval by the Director of Public Works. 16. Building Permit Application. To apply for building permits, the B Prior to Applicant/Developer shall submit twelve (12) sets of construction issuance of plans together with final site plan and landscape plans to the Building Building Department for plan check. Each set of plans shall have attached a : Permits copy of these conditions of approval with the "How is Condition Satisfied?" column filled out. The column shall clearly indicate how all conditions of approval will be, or have been complied with. Construction plans will not be accepted without the annotated conditions attached to each set of plans. The Applicant/Developer will be responsible for obtaining the approvals of all participating non-City agencies prior to the issuance of building permits. 17. Public Works Conditions of Approval. In submitting subsequent PW Prior to plans for review and approval, Applicant/Developer shall submit six issuance of (6) sets of plans to the Engineering Department for plan check. Each Building set of plans shall have attached a copy of these Conditions of Permits Approval with responses to conditions filled in indicating where on the plans and/or how the condition is satisfied. A copy of the Standard Public Works Conditions of Approval shall also be submitted which has been marked up to indicate where on the plans and/or how the condition is satisfied. The notations shall clearly indicate how all Conditions of Approval and Standard Public Works Conditions of Approval will be complied with. Improvement plans will not be accepted without the annotated conditions and standards attached to each set of plans. Applicant/Developer will be responsible for obtaining the approvals of all participating non-City agencies. 18. Conditions of Related Project Approvals. The PL, PW Ongoing Applicant/Developer shall comply with all conditions of approval of the related San Ramon Road Specific Plan Amendment and Planned . Development (PD) District Rezone for the PA 98-038 Rite Aid/KinderCare project. 5 NO CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN HOW IS AGENCY/ REQ.? CONDITION DEPART. SATISFIED? 19. Number of students. The day care center shall have a maximum PL, B Ongoing enrollment of 180 children. 20. Drop-off and pick-up of students. The KinderCare Applicant shall PL Ongoing be responsible for escorting each student from the drop-off and pick- up area to and from the school. 21. Hours of operation. Hours of operation for the school shall be from PL Ongoing 6:15 a.m. to 6:15 p.m. Monday through Friday. 22. Noise/Nuisances. The KinderCare Applicant shall control all project PL, PO Ongoing related activities and noise in the parking lot and playground so as not to create a nuisance to the adjacent residential community and the existing or surrounding businesses. No loudspeakers or amplified music shall be permitted to project or be placed outside of the building. 23. Maintenance. The KinderCare Applicant shall be responsible for PL Ongoing cleaning up and disposing of day care facility generated trash and litter on-site and off-site within the neighborhood. 24. Parking Requirement Exemption. The Kinde~Care Applicant shall PL, PW i Ongoing provide a minimum of twenty (20) parking spaces for the day care facility, which is a reduction in the number of required off-street parking spaces under the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed number of parking spaces is sufficient based on the traffic and parking study completed by TIKM Transportation Consultants dated January 25, 1999. Any overflow parking will not impact the adjacent Rite Aid drag store use, or any other adjacent uses. The Applicant shall dedicate parking spaces along the front of the day care facility for drop-off and pick-up of students. These parking spaces shall be identified by markings on the pavement and other signage subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director and Public Works Director. 25. Noise/Nuisances. Loudspeakers used for the drive through PL Ongoing pharmacy service window shall observe a noise level which reflects the minimum functional volume. The speaker noise level shall not be discernible beyond the property lines, in particular, the adjacent residential neighborhood. No amplified music shall be permitted outside the enclosed building. The Applicant shall control all other project related activities on the site so as not to create a nuisance to the adjacent residential community and the existing or surrounding businesses. 26. Re-Lease of Rite Aid Tenant Space. Prior to issuance of building PL Prior to permits for the Rite Aid project, the Rite Aid Corporation shall issuance of provide the Community Development Director verification that the Building existing Rite Aid tenant space located at 7201 Regional Street has Permits been re-leased to a business whose use is consistent with the 6 NO CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN HOW IS AGENCY/ REQ.? CONDITION DEPART. SATISFIED? Downtown S]~ecific Plan (i.e., retail and service commercial uses). ~7. Utility Siting Plan. The Applicant/Developer shall provide a Utility PW, PL Prior to Siting Plan showing that transformers and service boxes are placed issuance of outside of public view where possible and/or screened to the Grading satisfaction of the Community Development Director and Public Permits Works Director. 28. Roof equipment screening. All roof equipment shall be completely PL Prior to screened from view by a parapet. Equipment not screened by a issuance of parapet shall be screened by materials architecturally compatible Building with the building, as approved by the Community Development Permits Director. 29. Trash Enclosures. A trash bin enclosure shall be 10 feet by 12 feet PL, B, Prior to in size for a single bin and I0 feet by 18 feet in size for two bins. LDD issuance of Bins shall not be larger than 4 yards in capacity. A 10 foot deep Building concrete apron shall be installed in front of the entire width of the Permits enclosure. The enclosure shall have a 6 inch by 6 inch curb on the inside of the enclosure wall to protect the walls of the enclosure from the bins. The enclosure shall be built of concrete block or equivalent and shall have metal doors. Chain link doors are not permitted. The doors must be designed so that they can be locked closed and can also be held open with pin locks during loading. Trash bin enclosures shall be finished so that they are architecturally compatible with the related main structure. Trash bin enclosures shall be properly maintained and free of graffiti. All trash bins used for this site shall be maintained within the trash bin enclosure(s) at all times. Thc container shall be covered and shall meet the requirements of the County Health Code, the Dublin San Ramon Services District and the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System. The final location of the trash enclosures shall be determined prior to submittal of building plans subject to the review and approval of the City Planning Department, Public Works Department and the Livermore Dublin Disposal Service. 30. I State Title 24 Requirements/Sidewalk/Handicap Ramps. The PW Prior to Applicant/Developer shall construct a sidewalk access from Amador issuance of Building Valley Boulevard/San Ramon Road to the Rite Aid building in order Permits and tO comply with the current State Title 24 requirements. All handicap Completion of ramps shall comply with all current State Title 24 requirements and Improvements City of Dublin Standards. All concrete islands with direct access to the pedestrian walkway shall be constructed with handicap ramps. 31. State Title 24 Requirements for Playground Facility. The B, PL Prior to KinderCare Applicant shall construct the playground area and all ~ssuance of playground facilities in compliance with State Title 24 Requirements Building for handicapped accessibility. Permits 32. Easements, The Applicant/Developer shall record reciprocal PW Prior to easements for required common facilities, which ma), include, but not issuance of 7 NO CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN HOW IS AGENCY/ REQ.? CONDITION DEPART. SATISFIED? be limited to, parking, and trash enclosures, ingress/egress, common Grading driveway, storm drain, sanitary sewer, water and joint trench. Permks 33. Bus Stop Pullout and Shelter. The Applicant/Developer shall PW, Prior to construct a bus pullout, concrete pad, passenger bus shelter and trash LAVTA issuance of receptacle along San Ramon Road in front of the project site as Building required by the Livermore-Amador Valley Transit Authority Permits (LAVTA) and the City Department of Public Works. The bus stop and shelter shall be subject to the review and approval by LAVTA and the City of Dublin Public Works Director. 34. Bicycle Racks. The Applicant/Developer shall be required to install PL Prior to one bicycle rack for each 20 parking spaces. Bicycle racks shall be issuance of designed to provide a minimum of 4 bicycle spaces in each rack, and Building shall be designed so that a bicycle can be secured to the rack. The Permits location of the bicycle rack shall not encroach into the sidewalk which would reduce the unencumbered width of the sidewalk to less than 4 feet. Bicycle racks shall be placed in a location where they shall have adequate lighting and can be surveilled by the occupants. 35. Repair of Damages. Applicant/Developer shall repair all damaged PL Prior to existing street, curb, gutter and sidewalk along San Ramon Road and issuance of Amador Valley Boulevard as a result of construction activities to the Occupancy satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. permit 36. Parking. All parking shall conform to the plans shown on Exhibit C- PL Prior to 1. The handicapped parking stall located within the parking aisle Issuance of adjacent to, and west of, the Rite Aid building is not necessary and Building shall be eliminated. Public parking spaces shall be double-striped Permits with 4-inch wide stripes set approximately 2 feet apart as shown on the "Typical Parking Striping Detail" available in the Planning Department. Disabled accessible, visitor, employee and compact parking spaces shall be appropriately identified on the pavement and designated on the parking plan. The Applicant/Developer shall provide a minimum one foot wide raised curb or equivalent on landscape finl~ers and islands adjacent to parkin~ stalls. 37. Dedication and Improvement of Amador Valley Boulevard. PW Prior to Applicant/Developer shall dedicate to the City of Dublin the road issuance of labeled as Amador Valley Boulevard (from San Ramon Road to the Occupancy westerly end of the most westerly commercial driveway) for public Permit street purposes (61' wide right of way) and shall improve the street to commercial street standards with a width of 48' curb to curb, with a 5' wide sidewalk along the north side of the street. The dedication shall be in a manner as to allow for the 48' paved curb to curb section, plus a 5' sidewalk on both sides of the street and an additional 3' wide right of way on the north side. Applicant/Developer shall dedicate to the City of Dublin the road labeled as Amador Valley Boulevard (from the westerly end of the most westerly, commercial driveway to the westerly property line) for 8 NO CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN HOW IS AGENCY/ REQ.? CONDITION DEPART. SATISFIED? public street purposes (48' wide right of way) and shall improve the street to residential street standards with a width of 36' curb to curb, with a 5' wide sidewalk along the north side of the street. The dedication shall be in a manner as to allow for the 36' paved curb to curb section, plus a 5' sidewalk on both sides of the street and an additional 2' wide right of way on the north side. Parking shall not be permitted on either side of the street. Said dedications shall be to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 38. Construction of Off-Site Improvements. The Applicant/Developer PW Prior to shall construct improvements, which shall include, but are not limited Occupancy to, curbs, gutters, 5' wide sidewalks, striping and pavement within the new proposed Amador Valley Boulevard right-of-way to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. Applicant/Developer shall construct a slurry seal over entire width of Amador Valley Boulevard for the length of the project and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 39. Off-Site Improvement Plans. The Applicant/Developer's Engineer PW Prior to shall prepare and submit improvement plans for review and approval Issuance of by the Director of Public Works. Said Improvement plans shall Building include, but is not limited to, plan and profile, storm drainage, utility, Permits striping and details for the project to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The Applicant/Developer Engineer shall obtain the City of Dublin's Improvement Plan Checklist from the Public Works Department and shall address any and all items applicable to the project. Said checklist shall be a part of these conditions of approval. 40. Construction of On-site Improvements. The Applicant/Developer PW Prior to shall construct on-site improvements as shown on the site plan issuance of prepared by Tait & Associates, labeled Exhibit C-1, dated received Occupancy ~ by the Planning Department 3-1-99, sheet 1, and stamped approved Permits and on file with the Plannin~ Department. 41. On-Site Improvement Plans. The Applicant/Developer's Engineer PW Prior to shall prepare site improvement plans which shall be reviewed and Issuance of approved by the Director of Public Works. Said Improvement plans Building shall include, but are not limited to, plan and profile, storm drainage, Permits utility, striping, new pavement sections per the approved project soils report, and details for the project to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The Applicant/Developer's Engineer shall obtain the City of Dublin's Site Check List from the Public Works Department and shall address any and all items applicable to the project. Said Check List shall be part of these conditions of approval. 42. Abandonment of existing non-use easements. Applicant/Developer PW Prior to shall obtain the abandonment of all applicable existing easements Issuance of that are not currently being used on the proposed site to the Building satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Permits 43. Right-of-Way Abandonment. The Applicant/Developer shall PW Prior to purchase from the City of Dublin what the City has deemed surplus Issuance of Buildin~ 9 NO CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN HOW IS AGENCY/ REQ.? CONDITION DEPART. SATISFIED? property which is shown and depicted on the site plan prepared by Permits Tait & Associates, labeled Exhibit C-l, dated 3-1-99, sheet 1, and stamped approved and on file with the Planning Department. Said purchase shall be based on a comparable sale of right-of-way to the north of this project on San Ramon Road to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and City Manager. Applicant/Developer shall pay for all of the City's costs associated with the appraisal and vacation process. 44. Parcel Merger/Lot Line Adjustment. The Applicant/Developer PW Prior to shall merge the existing parcels identified on the current assessor plat Issuance of as Assessor Parcel Numbers 941-40-2-3; 941-40-2-7; 941-40-2-10 Building and 941-40-3-2 through a lot line adjustment to facilitate two Permits separate parcels to a configuration acceptable to the Community Development Director and the Director of Public Works. Applicants for said merger and adjustments shall be obtained from the Public Works Department. The Applicant/Developer shall adhere to all State, County, and City requirements for said merger and adjustments to Occur. 45. Public Service Easement Dedications. Applicant/Developer shall PW Prior to dedicate a 10 foot Public Service Easement (P.S.E.) along the existing Issuance of and proposed northerly right-of-way line of Amador Valley Boulevard Building to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Permits Applicant/Developer shall dedicate a minimum l 0 foot wide Public Service Easement over joint utility trench lines, storm drain lines to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Applicant/Developer shall also provide Public Utility Easements per the requirements of the Director of Public Works and/or public utility companies as necessary to serve this area with utility services and allow for vehicular and utility service access. 46. Emergency Vehicle Access Easement Dedications. PW, F Prior to Applicant/Developer shall dedicate all needed emergency vehicle Issuance of access easements from each adjacent public street to all fire access Building roads surrounding the site buildings as defined by Alameda County Permits Fire Department and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Applicant/Developer shall also dedicate reciprocal access, parking, common driveway, drainage, ingress and egress and other needed utility easements as defined and approved by the Director of Public Works and the ACFD. 47. Installation of STOP signs and other traffic signs. PW Prior to Applicant/Developer shall install a STOP sign and a DO NOT ENTER Issuance of sign at both sides of the immediate access where the drive-through Occupancy traffic will be exiting and shall install a STOP sign for the westbound Permits traffic from the south travel way of the Rite Aid parking lot approaching the travel way that leads directly to the driveway on Amador Valley Boulevard. Applicant/Developer shall also install all Caltrans standard lane drop signing and markings on the west leg of San Ramon Road/Amador Valley Boulevard facing westbound traffic l0 NO CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN HOW IS AGENCY/ REQ.? CONDITION DEPART. SATISFIED? approaching the Rite Aid/Kinder Care access. Said signs and markings and any other required signs and markings shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 48. Access, Circulation and Parking. Applicant/Developer shall revise PW Prior to the onsite improvement plans to show a minimum 25' comer radius for issuance of the raised median to the right of the access where the drive-through Building traffic will be exiting, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Permits Works. 49. Voluntary Contribution of Traffic Improvement Funds. As part PL, B, : Prior to of the project, the Applicant/Developer shall voluntarily contribute ADM issuance of traffic improvement funds in the amount of $129,880. Rite Aid's Building share of this fund is $ 72,216 and KinderCare's share is $ 57,664. Permits 50. Requirements. The ApplicanffDeveloper shall grade the project in PW Ongoing accordance with the Public Works Standard Conditions of Approval and State Regional Water Quality Control Board standards and details. 51. Geotechnical Investigation Report. Applicant/Developer shall PW Prior to prepare a Geotechnical Investigation report as required in the Public issuance of Works Standard Conditions of Approval. Grading Permit/ Improvement Plans and during construction 52. Undergrounding. The Developer shall underground all utilities to the PW Prior to project unless specifically approved by the Director of Public Works. issuance of Grading Permit The Developer shall remove all existing overhead utilities within the /Improvement project and construct them underground. Plans 53. Joint Utility Trenches/Undergrounding/Utility Plans. PW Prior to Applicant/Developer shall construct all joint utility trenches (such as Occupancy electric, telephone, cable TV, and gas) in accordance with the appropriate utility jurisdiction. All communication vaults, electric transformers, cable TV boxes, blow-off valves and any appurtenant utility items thereto shall be underground and located behind the proposed sidewalk within the public service easement, unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works and any applicable agency. All conduit shall be under the sidewalk within the public right of way to allow for street tree planting. Utility plans, showing the location of all proposed utilities (including electrical vaults and underground transformers) behind the sidewalk shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works. Location of these items shall be shown on the Final 54. Streetlights. Applicant/Developer shall install streetlights on PW Prior to Amador Valley Boulevard and San Ramon Road that are the City issuance of Standard cobra head luminaries with galvanized poles as required by Grading the Director of Public Works. A street lighting plan which Permits , demonstrates compliance with this condition shall be submitted prior NO CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN HOW IS AGENCY/ REQ.? CONDITION DEPART. SATISFIED? to issuance of grading perraJts and shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of Public Works. 55. Zone 7. The Applicant/Developer shall comply with all Alameda PW, Zone Prior to County Flood Control and Water Conservation District - Zone 7 Flood 7 approval of Control requirements and applicable drainage fees. Improvement Plans 56. Zone 7 Monitoring Well. Prior to issuance of grading permits for the Zone 7 Prior to project, the Applican~Developer shall either mark or preserve the issuance of existing Zone 7 monitoring well, or properly destroy the well in Grading accordance with a permit obtained from Zone 7 and replaced in kind at Permits a location approved b~ Zone 7. 57. Lighting Plan. The Applicant/Developer shall prepare a Lighting PW, PL, Prior to Plan and Isochart (Photometrics) to the satisfaction of Police PO issuance of Services, the Director of Public Works and Director of Community Building Development. Exterior lighting shall be provided within the parking Permits lot, around the entire perimeter of the building, and over exterior doors, and shall be of a design and placement so as not to cause glare onto adjoining properties, businesses or to vehicular traffic. Lighting used after daylight hours shall be adequate to provide for security needs (1 foot candle). Wall lighting around the perimeters of the building should be supplied to provide "wash" security lighting as 58. City of Dublin Non-Residential Security Requirements. All PO, B Prior to security hardware for Rite Aid and KinderCare must comply with the issuance of City of Dublin Non-Residential Security Requirements (obtained Building from the Planning Department). Security hardware must be provided Permits/ for all doors, windows, roof, vents, and skylights and any other areas Occupancy per Dublin Police Services recommendations and requirements. Permits 59. KinderCare Fencing. Fencing around the child care center shall be PO Prior to a minimum of 6' in height. The fence shall be constructed with issuance of materials that will deter individuals from climbing and scaling the Building fence. Permits 60. Robbery, Burglary, Theft Prevention and Security Program. PO Ongoing The Applicant shall work with Dublin Police Services on an ongoing basis to establish an effective robbery, burglary, theft prevention and security program for the business. 61. Graffiti. The owners of Rite Aid and Kinde~Care shall, at all times, PO, PL Ongoing keep the site and building clear of graffiti vandalism on a regular and continuous basis. Graffiti resistant paints for the structures and film for windows or glass should be used. 62. Emergency Response Card. Rite Aid and KinderCare tenants shall PO Prior to complete a "Business Site Emergency Response Care" and deliver it to issuance of Police Services prior to occupancy. Occupancy Permit approval NO CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN HOW IS AGENCY/ REQ.? CONDITION DEPART. SATISFIED? 63. ACFD Rules, Regulations and Standards. Applicant/Developer F Prior to shall comply with all Alameda County Fire Services (ACFD) rules, Issuance of regulations and standards, including minimum standards for Building emergency access roads and payment of all applicable fees, including ~ Permits a City of Dublin Fire Impact Fees. 64. Fire Conditions. Developer shall comply with all conditions of the F Prior to Alameda County Fire Department (ACFD) as listed in the letter from Issuance of ACFD dated DATE, including: Building Permits a. Access and Water Supply. An approved access and water supply shall be Prior to the in place and operational, stockpiling of any combustible materials or commencem ent of combustible construction on the site b. Wildfire Management Plan. Structures that are within the Wildfire Prior to Management Plan area shall meet the requirements for construction, roof Issuance of covering and fire sprinkler installation. Landscape design plan shall meet Occupancy the requirements of the Wildfire Management Plan. Permits c. Drive Aisles. Final detailed layout and design of internal drive aisles shall be subject to review and approval by the ACFD and the Director of Public Works. d. Plan Review. Plans may be subject to revision following review. e. ! Fire Sprinklers. Automatic fire sprinklers shall be designed, installed and Prior to maintained to the specifications of NFPA 13 & 25, 1996 edition. Plans and installation calculations shall be submitted to the fire prevention division for review and approval prior to installation. A permit for the system installation shall be completed and all fees paid prior to installation. f. Plans for Underground Sprinkler System. Plans shall be submitted for Prior to review and approval that include soils compaction, corrosivity and thrust installation block calculations. A Permit for the underground water supply for the fire sprinkler system shall be completed and all fees paid prior to installation. g. Fire Lane. A "Fire Lane" shall be designated and so marked along the north Prior to side of the properties and the main entry, issuance of Occupancy Permits h. Storage Area. The Applicant/Developer shall provide details for the Prior to configuration of the storage area, including any racks with their height and installation type of materials that will be stored within the storage area. i. Address. The addresses for both the Rite Aid and Kindeff2are buildings shall Prior to be visible from the street and the addresses must be placed on the rear doors issuance of of the buildings. Occupancy Permits j. Portable Fire Extinguishers. Portable fire extinguishers shall be installed in Prior to accordance with the Uniform Building Code and/or the State Fire Code for issuance of the specific occupancy. Occupancy Permits NO CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN HOW IS AGENCY/ REQ.? CONDITION DEPART. SATISFIED? k. Emergency Lighting. Emergency lighting shall be installed. Prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits 1. KNOX Box. To allow emergency access to the building, a KNOX box shall Prior to be installed at the main entries of the buildings, issuance of Occupancy Permits m. Existing Fire Hydrant. The existing fire hydrant shall be relocated to the Prior to east side of the Amador Valley Boulevard access, issuance of Occupancy Permits n. KinderCare Alarm System. KinderCare shall install an alarm system that Prior to meets all the requirements of the building code and fire code for an E-3 installation occupancy. 65. Environmental Assessment. The Applicant/Developer shall conduct F, AC Prior to further environmental assessment of the on-site structure(s) regarding issuance of asbestos containing materials and/or lead painted surfaces. The Building purpose of this environmental assessment is to determine whether any Permits abatement and/or remediation of subsurface conditions of the existing site needs to take place. 66. Prior to issuance of any building permit, complete improvement plans DSR Prior to shall be submitted to DSRSD that conform to the requirements of the issuance of Dublin San Ramon Services District Code, the DSRSD "Standard Building Procedures, Specifications and Drawings for Design and Installation of Permits Water and Wastewater Facilities", all applicable DSRSD Master Plans and all DSRSD policies. 67. Domestic and fire protection waterline systems for Tracts or DSR Prior to Commercial Developments shall be designed to be looped or approval of interconnected to avoid dead end sections in accordance with Improvement requirements of the DSRSD Standard Specifications and sound Plans en~ineerin~ practice. 68. Public water and sewer lines shall be located in public streets rather DSR Prior to than in off-street locations to the fullest extent possible. If approval of unavoidable, then public sewer or water easements must be Improvement established over the alignment of each public sewer or water line in Plans an off-street or private street location to provide access for future maintenance and/or replacement. 69. Prior to approval by the City of a Grading Permit, the locations and DSR Prior widths of all proposed easement dedications for water and sewer issuance of lines shall be submitted to DSRSD. Grading Permits 70. All easement dedications for DSRSD facilities shall be by separate DSR Prior to instrument irrevocably offered to DSRSD, or by offer of dedication issuance of on the Final Map. Grading Permits 71. Prior to issuance by the City of any Buildin~ Permit, all utility DSR Prior to 14 NO CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN HOW IS AGENCY/ REQ.? CONDITION DEPART. SATISFIED? connection fees, plan checking fees, inspection fees, permit fees and issuance of fees associated with a wastewater discharge permit shall be paid to Building DSRSD in accordance with the rates and schedules established in the Permits DSRSD Code. 72. Prior to issuance by the City of any Building Permit, all improvement DSR Prior to plans for DSRSD facilities shall be signed by the District Engineer. issuance of Each drawing of improvement plans shall contain a signature block Building for the District Engineer indicating approval of the sanitary sewer or Permits water facilities shown. Prior to approval by the District Engineer, the Applicant/Developer shall pay all required DSRSD fees, and provide an engineer's estimate of construction costs for the sewer and water systems, a performance bond, a one-year maintenance bond, and a comprehensive general liability insurance policy in the amounts and forms that are acceptable to DSRSD. The Applicant/Developer shall allow at least 15 working days for final improvement drawing review by DSRSD before signature by the District Engineer. 73. No sewer line or water line construction shall be permitted unless DSR Prior to the proper utility construction permit has been issued by DSRSD. A issuance of construction permit will only be issued after all of the items in Occupancy Condition No. 72 have been satisfied. Permits 74. The Applicant/Developer shall hold DSRSD, its Board of Directors, DSR Ongoing commissions, employees, and agents of DSRSD harmless and indemnify and defend the same from any litigation, claims, or fines resultin~ from the construction and completion of the project. 75. The project is located within the District Recycled Water Use Zone DSR Prior to (Ord. 280), which calls for installation of recycled water irrigation issuance of systems to allow for the future use of recycled water for approved Building landscape irrigation demands. Recycled water will be available in Permits the future, as described in the San Ramon Valley Recycled Water Facilities Plan, 1996. Unless specifically exempted by the District Engineer, compliance with Ordinance 280, as may be amended or superceded, is required. All irrigation facilities shall be subject to District review for compliance with District and California Dept. of Health Services Title 22 requirements for recycled water irrigation design. 76. Developer shall obtain a "will serve" letter prior to issuance of PW, DSR Prior to grading permit which states that the project can be served by issuance of DSRSD for water and sewer service prior to occupancy. Grading Permits 77. Construction Trash/Debris. Measures shall be taken to contain all PW, B Prior to construction related trash, debris, and materials on-site until disposal Constmction of-site can be arranged. The Applicant/Developer shall keep the adjoining public streets and properties free and clean of project dirt, mud, and materials during the construction period. The Developer shall be responsible for corrective measures at no expense to the City of Dublin. 78. Construction Fencing. The use of any temporary construction PW, B, PL Prior to Construction NO CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN HOW IS AGENCY/ REQ.? CONDITION DEPART. SATISFIED? fencing shall be subject to the review and approval of the Public Works Director and the Building Official. 79. Final Landscape and Irrigation Plan. A Final Landscape and PL, PW Prior to Irrigation Plan prepared and stamped by a State licensed landscape issuance of architect or registered engineer, generally consistent with the Building preliminary landscape plan by Ronald J. AllisonfFait and Associates Pem~ts (Rite Aid) and Majors 2M Engineering (KinderCarc), dated received March 1, 1999 (see Exhibit C-l), along with a cost estimate of the work and materials proposed, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director. Landscape and irrigation plans shall provide for a recycled water system. 80. KinderCare - Additional Landscaping. Additional landscaping PL Prior to shall be required within the KinderCare parking lot, subject to the issuance of review and approval by the Community Development Director. The Building KinderCare Applicant shall work with Planning staff prior to Permits building plan submittal for compliance with this condition. This additional parking lot landscaping shall be shown on the Final Landscape and Irrigation Plan. 81. Rite Aid Corner Entry Landscaping. The paved comer area at Rite PL Prior to Aid's main building entry as shown on sheet I of 9 on Exhibit C-I, issuance of shall be landscaped with plantings and possibly a seat wall. The Building additional comer landscaping shall be subject to the review and Permits approval of the Community l~evelopment Director and shall be shown on the Final Landscape and Irrigation Plan. 82. Parking Lot Medians/Islands. All parking lot medians/islands shall PL, PW Prior to be landscaped and the landscaping shall be set back at least two (2) issuance of feet from the edge of the parking stalls so that vehicles do not impact Building the landscaping. Permits 83. Landscaping of Trash Enclosures. The Applicant/Developer shall PL Prior to provide a two (2) foot wide landscape planter along the rear and sides issuance of of the trash enclosures and shall install vines that will grow against Building the walls of the enclosure for screening purposes. Permits 84. Standard Plant Material, Irrigation and Maintenance PL Prior to Agreement. The Applicant/Developer shall complete and submit to issuance of ' the Dublin Planning Department the Standard Plant Material, Building Irrigation and Maintenance Agreement. Permits 85. Landscaping at Street/Drive Aisle Intersections. Landscaping at PW Prior to street and drive aisle intersections shall be such that sight distance is ~ssuance of not obstructed. Except for trees, landscaping shall not be higher than Building 30 inches above the curb in these areas. Permits 86. Landscape Borders. All landscaped areas shall be bordered by a PL Prior to concrete curb that is at least 6 inches high and 6 inches wide. Curbs issuance of adjacent to parking spaces must be 12 inches wide. All landscaped Building areas shall be a minimum of 6 feet in width (curb to curb). Concrete Permits mow strips at least 6 inches deep and 4 inches wide shall be required to separate turf areas from shrub areas. 87. Maintenance of Landscape. All landscape areas on the site shall be PL Ongoing 16 NO CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN HOW IS AGENCY/ REQ.? CONDITION DEPART. SATISFIED? enhanced and properly maintained at all times. Any proposed or modified landscaping to the site, including the removal or replacement of trees, shall require prior review and written approval from the Community Development Director. 88. Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. The PL, PW Prior to Applicant/Developer shall submit written documentation to the issuance of ~ Public Works Department (in the form of a Landscape Building Documentation Package and other required documents) that the Permits development conforms to the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. 89. Landscaping and Street Trees. The Applicant/Developer shall PL, PW Completion of construct all landscaping within the site, along the project frontage Improvements from the face of curb to the site right-of-way, and all street trees proposed within the public service easements, to the design and specifications of the City of Dublin, and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and Director of Community Development. Street tree varieties of a minimum 15-gallon size shall be planted along all street frontages and shall be shown on the Landscaping plans. Exact tree locations and varieties shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works. The proposed variety of trees to be planted adjacent to sidewalks or curbs shall be submitted for review to and approval by the Director of Public Works. Root shields shall be required unless otherwise determined by the Director of Public Works and the Director of Community Development. 90. Retaining Walls. Where finish grade of this property is in excess of PL, PW Issuance of twenty-four (24) inches higher or lower than the abutting property or Occupancy adjacent lots within the project, a concrete or masonry block Permits retaining wall or other suitable solution acceptable to the Director of Public Works shall be required and shall be measured from the top of grade on the higher side of the retaining wall or slope. Landscaping shall be installed around all retaining walls in order to soften grade transitions to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and the Director of Community Development. 91. Master Sign Program. The Applicant/Developer shall apply for a PL Prior to Master Sign Program for the Rite Aid and KinderCare wall and issuance of freestanding signs, in compliance with the sign regulations of the Building Zoning Ordinance. Permits for signage installation PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of March, 1999. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: Planning Commission Chairperson Community Development Director G:\pa98-038\cup sdr reso - PC CITY OF DUBLIN PO Box 2340, Dublin, California 94568 City Offices, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California 94568 NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Prepared pursuant to City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines, Section 1.7(c), 5.5) Negative Declaration For: PA 98-038 Rite Aid/KinderCare Specific Plan Amendment, Planned Development (PD) 'District Rezone, Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Description of Project: The proposed project, located at the northwest corner of San Ramon Road and Amador Valley Boulevard, consists of constructing a new 24-hour Rite Aid Pharmacy store and KinderCare day care facility on four parcels, which will be consolidated into two parcels, totaling approximately 3 acres (see attached site plan). The majority of the project site is currently vacant. Rite Aid will be vacating their existing site located at 7201 Regional Street within the Albertson's/Mervyn's shopping center along Regional Street. KinderCare will be operating a new day care center within the City. The day care facility will have a maximum capacity of 180 children but the expected enrollment is approximately 150 to 155 children. Their hours of operation will be from 6:15 a.m. to 6:15 p.m. The project proponents are also voluntarily contributing traffic improvement funds in the amount of $129,880 as part of their project. These fees will be used to mitigate any potential traffic impacts of the proposed project on surrounding roadways. Project Location: Amador Valley Boulevard and San Ramon Road (APNs 941-40-3-2; 941-40-2-3; 941-40-2-7; and 941- 40-2-10) Name of Proponents: RITE AID: Peter Tobin, Tait and Associates, Inc., 1001' Galaxy Way, Suite 304, Concord, CA 94520; KINDERCARE: Joe Bledsoe, KinderCare Learning Centers, Lincoln Executive Center, 43276 Christy Street, Fremont, CA 94538 I hereby find that the above project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Attached is a copy of the Initial Study ("Environmental Information Form" and "Environmental Checklist Form") documenting the reasons to support the above finding. Mitigation Measures have not been included in this project. Dated: February 8, 1999 Carol R. Cirelli, Sen~oor Planner Attachments Date Published: February 12, 1999 Date Posted: February 10, 1999 Date Notice Mailed: February 10, 1999 Considered by: on: Action on Negative Declaration: Approved __ Disapproved Notice of Determination filed: Resolution No. g:~pa98-O38\negdec Administration (925)833-6650 · City Council (925)833-6605 · Finance (925)833-6640 · Building inspection (925)833-6620 Code Enforcement (925) 833-6620 · Engineering (925) 833-6630 · Parks & Community Services (925) 833-6646 Economic Development (925)833-6650 · Police (925)833-6670 · Public Works (925)833-6630 Community Development (925) 833-6610 · Fire Prevention Bureau (925) 833-6606 INITIAL STUDY ]For PA 98-038 Rite Aid/KinderCare Specific Plan Amendment/PD Rezone/Conditional Use Permit/Site Development Review INTRODUCTION The City of Dublin has prepared this initial stud~, to assess the potential environmental effects of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment; PD (Planned Development) District Rezone; Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review for the Rite Aid and KinderCare project (PA 98-038). This analysis is intended to satisfy the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and provide the City with adequate information for project review. This initial study includes a project description, environmental checklist and discussion focused upon issues identified in the checklist. In summary, this Initial Study concludes that the project will not pose any significant adverse environmental impacts. The Initial Study was prepared based upon the location of the project, staff office review, field review, comments from the City and local agencies, use of City Planning Documents, the CEQA Law and Guidelines, and the City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project, located at the northwest comer of San Ramon Road and Amador Valley Boulevard, consists of constructing a new 24-hour Rite Aid Pharmacy store and KinderCare day care facility on four parcels, which will be consolidated into two parcels, totaling approximately 3 acres (see attached site plan). The majority of the project site is currently vacant. Rite Aid will be vacating their existing site located at 7201 Regional Street within the Albertson's/Mervyn's shopping center along Regional Street. KinderCare will be operating a new day care center within the City. The day care facility will have a maximum capacity of 180 children but the expected enrollment is approximately 150 to 155 children. Their hours of operation will be from 6:15 a.m. to 6:15 p.m. The project proponents are also voluntarily contributing traffic improvement funds in the amount of $129,880 as part of their project. These fees will be used to mitigate any potential traffic impacts of the proposed project on surrounding roadways. The existing General Plan land use designation for the project site is Retail/Office and the proposed project complies with this land use designation. The project is located within Area 3 of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan. The existing zoning is C-l, Retail Commercial Zoning District. The project requires the following planning permit approvals: 1) an amendment to the San Ramon Road Specific Plan to allow: (a) a drug store as a permitted use instead of a prohibited use; (b) a drive- through pharmacy as a conditional use; and (c) a day care facility as a conditional use; 2) a PD District rezone that includes a Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan (as a requirement of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan); 3) a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 24-hour drive-through pharmacy, a day care center (15+ children), and an exemption from parking requirements for the day-care center; and 4) Site Development Review for the construction of a 16,700 square foot retail pharmacy and a 9,824 square foot day care center and the installation of parking, landscaping and signage. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Project title: PA 98-038 Rite Aid/KinderCare Specific Plan Amendment; PD District Rezone; Conditional Use Permit; Site Development Review Lead agency name and address: City of Dublin, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, CA 94566 Contact person and phone number: Carol Cirelli, Senior Planner, (510) 833-6610 Project location: Northwest comer of San Ramon Road and Amador Valley Boulevard (7348 - 7372 San Ramon Road) Project sponsor's name and address: RITE AID: Peter Tobin, Tait and Associates, Inc., 1001 Galaxy Way, Suite 304, Concord, CA 94520; KINDERCARE: Joe Bledsoe, KinderCare Learning Centers, Lincoln Executive Center, 43276 Christy Street, Fremont, CA 94538 General Plan designation: Retail/Office Specific Plan designation: San Ramon Road Specific Plan designation: Area 3 10. Zoning: C-I, Retail Commercial Zoning District Description of project: (See previous page) Surrounding land uses and setting: North: restaurant (Dublin Fishery) South: retail shopping center (Strouds shopping center) East: residential (Kildara Townhomes) West: retail commercial shopping centers; Downtown Specific Plan Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: There are no environmental factors below that would be potentially affected by this project. Land Use/Planning Transportation/Circulation Public Services Population/Housing Biological Resources Utilities/Service Systems Geotechnical Energy/Mineral Resources Aesthetics Water Hazards Cultural Resources Air Quality Noise Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: [] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described or, an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Printed Name: Carol R. Cirelli, Senior Planner For: PA 98-038 Rite Aid/KinderCare SPA; PD Rezone; CUP; SDR INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: Significant Potentialb' Unless Mitigation Incorpar~ted Significant a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source #: 1,2,4,) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? ( 1,2,6 ) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? ( 1,2,3,6,7 ) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? ( 1 ) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? (1) II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ( 8 ) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? ( 8 ) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? (1,8) III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( 1,2,4, 6 ) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( 1,2,4, 6 ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( 1,2,4, 6 ) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? ( 1,2,4 ) e) Landslides or mudflows? ( 1,2,4 ) f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( 1,2,4 ) g) Subsidence of land? ( 1,2,4 ) h) Expansive soils? ( 1,2,4 ) i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( 1,2,4 ) [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] X [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] X X [] X X X X X X X X X X X X X X IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff ( 1,2, 3,4, 6 ) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards ' such as flooding? ( 2 ) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ( 8 ) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ( 8 ) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ( 8 ) f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through intemeption of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? ( 8 ) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( 8 ) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( 8 ) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( 8 ) V. AIR QUALITY. WouM the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? ( 1, 2,4 ) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( 8 ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ( 8 ) d) Create objectionable odors? ( 8 ) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( 1,2,4, 6 ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( 8 ) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (1,3) d) Insufficient parking capacity onsite or offsite?( 1,2,3, 4, 6 ) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( 8 ) Sign~cant [] [] [] [] [] .El [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] NI~ Impact X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Potentially Sigmficant Impact Significant Mitigation Significant f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts, bicycle racks)? ( 8 ) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? ( 8 ) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? ( 1, 2,3,4 ) b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)? ( 1,2,3 ) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? ( 1, 2,3) d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)? ( 1,2,3 ) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (1,2,3) VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans ? ( 8 ) b) Use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? ( 8 ) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? ( 8 ) IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? ( 1, 2,3, 4, 5 ) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( 1, 2, 3,4 ) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? ( 1,2, 3,4, 5 ) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? ( 1,2, 3,4, 5 ) [] [] [] X [] [] [] X [] [] [] X [] [] [] X [] [] [] X 'D [] [] X [] [] [] X [] [] [] X [] [] [] X [] [] [] X [] [] [] X [] [] [] X [] [] [] X Potentially Stgmficant Impact Net Impact e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brash, grass, or trees? ( 8 ) X. NOISE. Would the propos~tl result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( 2, 4 ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( 2, 4, 5 ) XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) b) c) d) e) Fire protection? ( 1,2,4, 5 ) Police protection? ( 1,2,4, 5 Schools? ( 8 ) Maintenance of public facilities, including Other government services ( 1,2 ) roads? ( 1,2 ) XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( 2 ) b) Communications systems? ( 2 ) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? (2) d) sewer or septic tanks? ( 2 ) e) Storm water drainage? ( 2 ) f) Solid waste disposal? ( 2 ) g) Local or regional water supplies? ( 2 ) XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or highway? ( 1,2, 3,4 ) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetics effect? ( 1, 2, 3, 4,6,7) c) Create light or glare? ( 1, 2,3 ) [] [] [] X [] [] [] X [] [] [] X [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: Potentially Significant Impact Potential(v Sign~cant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Sigmficant a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( 1,2, 3,4 ) b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( 1,2, 3,4 ) c) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural' values? ( 1, 2,3,4 ) d) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ( 1,2, 3,4 ) [] [] [] X [] [] [] X [] [] [] X [] [] [] X XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( 8 ) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( 8 ) [] [] [] X [] [] [] X SOURCES: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Determination based on location of project. Determination based on staff office review. Determination based on field review. Determination based on the City of Dublin General Plan. Determination based on the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Determination based on the San Ramon Road Specific Plan Determination based on the Dublin Downtown Specific Plan Not Applicable. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: Potentially Potentially Less Than No significant Significant Unless Significant Impact Impact Impact Mitigated a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- X sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or pmhistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? X c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when X viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or X indirectly,? EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: (Keyed to the Environmental Checklist) Explanation of Potentially Significant, Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated and Less Than Significant Impact Answers The following topics have been found to have potentially significant, potentially significant unless mitigation incorporated, and/or less than significant impacts as indicated in the preceding environmental checklist. I. Land Use and Planning Environmental Setting: The project site consists of approximately 3 acres of partially undeveloped land along a major roadway, San Ramon Road. One parcel contains a single story structure that will be removed prior to constructing the proposed project. The project site is .5 miles north of Interstate 580 and .75 miles west of Interstate 680, and is located within Dublin's downtown area. The General Plan land use designation for the site is Retail/Office and the zoning designation is C-l, Retail Commercial Zoning District. The project site is also located within Area 3 of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan and is adjacent to the Dublin Downtown Specific Plan. The Rite Aid project proponent will be vacating their existing 60,246 square foot tenant space within the Albertson's/Mervyn's shopping center along Regional Street within the City's downtown. Project Impacts: Items Ia., lb., Id. and Ie. There are no impacts associated with Items Ia., lb., Id., and Ie. The proposed project complies with the Retail/Office land use designation of the Dublin General Plan, which allows shopping centers and retail stores. The C-l, Retail Commercial Zoning District zoning allows retail stores as a permitted use, and a large day care center (15+ children) as a conditional use. The proposed drug store and day care use currently conflict with the Area 3 land use provisions of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan (Plan) to the extent that a drug store is a prohibited use and day care centers are not specifically identified as conditional uses. According to the Plan, "drug stores" are prohibited uses because they are considered convenience store-type uses. A market study completed for the Plan indicated that there was not enough residential development to support more convenience stores in the downtown area. However, since the adoption of the Plan in 1983, the City has approved additional residential development throughout the City, in particular, the 174 multi-family unit residential project (Kildara)just west of the project site, which would now support convenience stores. Furthermore, it is the intent of the Plan that the principle use of Area 3 be reserved for retail shopper stores. As a result, the Plan will be amended to allow drug stores as a permitted use which would result in no land use conflicts with the Plan. The C~ty s Zomn~, Ordinance allows day care centers with 15+ children within commercial centers as a conditional use. The proposed day care center is compatible with the proposed Rite Aid drug store use and the Montessori School across the street within the Strouds shopping center. Amending the Plan to allow day care centers as conditional uses would not result in land use conflicts with the Plan, the City's Zoning Ordinance or General Plan. The City of Dublin has adopted no other City-wide or specific environmental plans or policies that would affect this application: The site has no recent history of agricultural production and Alameda County adopted a zone change in 1962 from A, Agricultural District to C-l, Retail Business District. The proposed project will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established residential community, especially a low income or minority community. The proposed project is located along the eastern border of the Kildara residential community. The proposed project would be compatible with the adjacent residential use since day care and retail pharmacy uses offer goods and services which typically benefit a residential community. Item Ic. Rite Aid will be vacating a major tenant space within the City's downtown area if the proposed project is approved. The City has observed over time that businesses which leave major commercial properties typically result in vacant tenant spaces for extended periods of time. The proposed vacancy will result in land use incompatibilities with existing land uses within the project vicinity and inconsistencies with both the San Ramon Road and Dublin Downtown Specific Plans unless mitigation is incorporated into the project approval process. The City must find the Rite Aid project, which requires a conditional use permit for the drive-through pharmacy, consistent with all applicable specific plans. The closure of the existing Rite Aid store is a component of the proposed project. The existing Rite Aid store is within the Dublin Downtown Specific Plan area, so the project must be consistent with this plan. The project is inconsistent with the a policies of the Downtown Specific Plan because the vacancy that will be created by the proposed project would not: 1) maintain downtown Dublin as a strong regional center; 2) increase the amount of retail development downtown; and 3) continue the current retailing and service commercial uses in the land use zone where the current existing store is located. The proposed Rite Aid project would also conflict with the San Ramon Road Specific Plan policy which states that any new development shall be compatible with existing residential or other commercial development located within or adjacent to the Specific Plan area. The existing Rite Aid site is adjacent to the San Ramon Road Specific Plan area. If the proposed Rite Aid project causes the current Rite Aid site to become vacant for an extended period of time, the vacancy will be incompatible with the existing commercial development around the existing Rite Aid site. A vacant tenant space is not compatible with adjacent retail tenant spaces. For example, a vacant retail tenant space may negatively impact the image of the entire retail shopping center and cause the center to lose sales. 10 In order to mitigate these land use impacts to a less than significant level, the City will apply a condition of project approval requiring that the existing Rite Aid site at 7201 Regional Street be re- leased to a business whose use is consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan (i.e., retail and service commercial uses) prior to issuance of a building permit for the new Rite Aid project. II. Population and Housing Environmental Setting: The City of Dublin's population, as of January 1, 1998, was estimated by the State Department of Finance to be 27,750. Significant popula, tion growth is anticipated for the City based on planned residential growth in Eastern Dublin and Western Dublin (Schaefer Ranch). Project Impacts: There are no impacts associated with Items IIa. through IIc. Since the project involves the rezoning and construction of commercial property, the proposed project will not impact housing or population within the City or the Tri-Valley region. The project will result in increases in employment opportunities, but on a minor scale. As a result, the project will not alter the location, distribution, or growth rate of the population in Dublin, or in adjacent jurisdictions. III. Geologic Problems Environmental Setting: The general city of Dublin and the Th-Valley area lie on the east side of the Calaveras Fault within the San Ramon Valley basin. According to the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Act, the project site is located within the "Special Study Zone" at the south-central extent of the San Ramon Valley. The Calaveras Fault, an active fault, was mapped at the project site. The Calaveras fault zone is a seismically active member of a family of right-lateral strike-slip faults, including the San Andreas and Hayward faults. The fault zone at the project site is 1,000 feet wide and the main trace of the Calaveras Fault may lie beneath San Ramon Road. Subsurface soils in the area have been characterized as deposits of clay, silt and sand and gravel. Pro, iect Impacts: Items llId., file. mi. There are no impacts associated with Items md., me., and mi.. Due to the location of the project site, the project would not expose people to potential impacts involving seiche, tsunami or volcanic hazard, or landslides and mudflows. The project site is undeveloped and relatively flat with no unique geologic or physical features. Items ma. mb., mc., inf., mb. The Calaveras Fault is capable of generating a significant level of ground shaking in the event of a seismic occurrence. The probability of fault related seismic hazards, such as fault creep, surface 11 rupture, liquefaction, or differential displacement due to faulting, are considered moderate to high at the project site. In addition, the project site contains presence of near surface soft to medium stiff silty clay and clayey silt which exhibit low to moderate bearing capacity. In order to mitigate these land use impacts to a less than significant level, the City will apply conditions of project approval requiring that a comprehensive geologic and soils report be prepared by a licensed geologist identifying any geologic or soil hazard zones, appropriate mitigation measures and other recommendations, prior to building permit approval. The report shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Alameda County Geologist to assure that a reasonable safety factor is provided. The project proponent shall also be required to conduct subsurface soil condition testing and to design the proposed structures according to the Uniform Building Code, and to have a structural engineer check seismic design parameters. IV. Water Environmental Setting: The project site is located at an elevation of approximately 375 feet above mean sea level. The majority of the site is relatively flat, although the front or east portion of the site grades lightly to the east. Surface runoff and storm water on the site in the general vicinity drains into several catch basins located on the project site and surrounding thoroughfares. The catch basins are drained by the Alameda County Zone 7 Water Agency Canal and eventually to the San Francisco Bay. Local waterways or tributaries in the area are the Alamo Creek and Canal, San Ramon Creek and the Martin Canal (or Martin Canyon Creek). Groundwater conditions indicate a depth to the first groundwater table of approximately 8 to 9 feet below ground surface. Regional groundwater flow direction is assumed to be toward the south/southeast. The proposed project site is located within an area designated as Zone B on the FIRM (Flood Insurance Rate Map) Flood Map, which is an area between the identified 100 year and 500 year base flood elevations. Project Impacts: There are no impacts associated with Items IVa. through IVi. Because the project is located within Zone B of the FIRM Flood Map, the project will not expose people or property to flooding or other water related hazards. The project will not result in any changes to the quality, rate, or amount of surface water runoff. In addition, the project will not alter the quantity or rate of flow of ground or flood waters and it will not reduce public water supplies, or because of its location, change the amount of surface water in any local water body. The project proponents must comply with the City's Urban Runoff Program. Since the project will include parking lots for both the Rite Aid and KinderCare uses, implementation of this program will protect the drainage system from runoff that may contain hazardous pollutants, such as gasoline, oils, etc. 12 V. Air Quality Environmental Setting: The project site is located within what the Bay Area Air Quality Management District defines as the Livermore-Diablo Valley, a sheltered inland area surrounded by hills to the west, south and east. Most of the air flow into the southem portions of the Valley is accomplished through only two gaps in the hills: the Hayward and Niles canyons. Local wind data show the frequent occurrence of low wind speed and calm conditions (the latter approximately 23 pement of the time). These local limitations on the capacity for horizontal dispersion of air pollutants combined with the regional characteristic of restricted vertical dispersion give the area a high potential for regional air quality problems. Project Impacts: There are no significant impacts associated with Items Va. through Vd. Although the proposed project will generate some new traffic, the increase in air emissions as a result of this new traffic is not substantial, or significant enough to result in the deterioration of ambient air quality. These additional vehicles will generate quantities of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gasses, nitrous oxide, sulfur dioxide and particulate matter (PM10). However, the location of the proposed project would be in close proximity to the 1-580 Freeway and the proposed West Dublin BART station. The location of the project would limit the amount of travel to and from the highway ahd the proposed rapid transit station, thereby minimizing vehicle trips and associated air quality impacts in conformity with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's Guidebook "Improving Air Quality Through Local Plans and Programs". The proposed project will not alter local or regional climate temperatures or air movements, and it will not emit hazardous air emissions or create objectionable odors. In terms of construction related impacts, it is anticipated that the future construction of the site might generate temporary increases in dust and particulate matter caused by site excavation and grading activities. The City's standard grading ordinance requirements require measures to ensure that these types of short term construction impacts are minimized. VI. Transportation/Circulation Environmental Setting: The project is located along San Ramon Road, a north-south 4-lane arterial with a center median and 2 lanes in each direction, and Amador Valley Boulevard. The project will have its primary access off of Amador Valley Boulevard, and secondary access off of San Ramon Road. Currently, Amador Valley Boulevard from San Ramon Road westward, is a collector street which serves the Strouds shopping center and terminates at the residential community of Kildara. Project Impacts: There are no significant impacts associated with Items Via. through VIg. The proposed project will generate some additional traffic on Amador Valley Boulevard, especially since the majority of the site 13 has been vacant for some time. However, the project proponent will be responsible for widening Amador Valley Boulevard to 4 lanes at the intersection with San Ramon Road. This will facilitate traffic movement on and off San Ramon Road and the project site, thereby mitigating any potential traffic congestion that may result from the project. The project proponents are providing adequate on site parking for both the Rite Aid and KinderCare uses in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. Twenty (20) parking spaces are adequate for the KinderCare project based on research completed for two other KinderCare facilities in the Tri-Valley, in particular, the Pleasanton facility which has the same children capacity of 180 and the same number of staff persons as the proposed Dublin facility. The greatest demand for parking at these other facilities was at 5:05 p.m. when all nineteen (19) stalls were occupied. The proposed KinderCare facility will be providing more than twenty (20) parking spaces. The applicant will be required to follow City, County and State design standards regarding roadway and access design. The applicant will also be required to comply with City and Fire department standards regarding access for emergency services. The project proponents will be voluntarily contributing traffic improvement funds in the amount of $129,880 as part of their project. These funds will be used to mitigate any potential traffic impacts of the proposed project on surrounding roadways through street improvements. This project is not in conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation. A public pedestrian/bike trail is located east of the project site, between the project and street curb along San Ramon Road. Bicycle and pedestrian access is adequate to both project sites. Bike racks will be required as a standard conditions of approval. In addition, the project proponents will be required to install a bus turn-out along the project frontage, including a concrete pad, passenger bus shelter and trash receptacle. Due to the location and nature of the project, there will be no rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts. VII. Biological Resources Environmental Setting: The majority of the project site is a vacant lot with one single-story commercial building located on the northerly end of the site. The project site is located within an urbanized area. The site does not contain any endangered, threatened or rare species of plants or animals; nor does the site contain the following locally designated species: Bay, Cypress, Maple, Redwood and Sycamore, coastal or other natural habitat, including wetland habitat. The site does contain seven mature trees. Four of the trees will remain as part of the landscaping for the new development. The other three eucalyptus and oak trees, would require removal once the project is constructed. Pro. iect Impacts: As a result of the project's environmental setting, there are no significant impacts associated with Items Vlla. through VIIe. Construction of the proposed project will occur on a vacant lot in an urbanized 14 area and will result in the removal of three trees, one of which is a eucalyptus tree, and the other two trees are unhealthy oak trees measuring less than 24" in diameter. Field visits to the site have not identified any endangered, threatened or rare species of animals. VIII. Energy and Mineral Resources Environmental Setting: The majority of the project site is a vacant lot with one single-story commemial building located on the northerly end of the site. The project site is located within an urbanized area. Pro, iect Impacts: There are no significant impacts associated with Items Vma. Through VI]lc. The project will not conflict with any adopted energy conservation plan and will not result in the loss of availability of a known and valuable mineral resource. The project will promote efficient use of energy. Since the project is located adjacent to a residential area, residents of this area will be able to walk to the project site instead of driving their vehicles. IX. Hazards Environmental Setting: Although the project site has been vacant for some time (except for the existing single story structure currently existing at the site), one other building previously occupied the project site, which has since burnt down. Both buildings were constructed prior to 1970. Project Impacts: There are no significant impacts associated with Items IX a., IXb., IXc., and IXe. and conditions of project approval will mitigate the impact associated with Item IXd. to a less than significant level as follows. Preliminary environmental assessment of the project site recommends that consideration should be given to the further assessment of the on-site structure(s) regarding asbestos containing materials and/or lead painted surfaces. The applicant will be required, as a condition of project approval, to conduct further environmental assessments to determine whether any abatement and/or remediation of subsurface conditions need to take place. In addition, as part of the site development review process, proposals for new construction will be conditioned, as necessary, by the Fire, Police, and the Alameda County Health Department, Hazardous Materials Division for permits, emergency access requirements, and other concerns. As proposed, the PD land use and development plan does not show any possible interference with an emergency response plan or evacuation plan. 15 X. Noise Environmental Setting: The majority of the project site is a vacant lot with one single-story commercial building located on the northerly end of the site. The site is adjacent to San Ramon Road, a 4-lane arterial, and Amador Valley Boulevard, a 2-lane collector street. Project Impacts: There are no significant impacts associated with Items Xa. and Xb. The proposed retail pharmacy use and day care use will not result in significant increases in existing noise levels, or expose individuals to severe noise levels. It is anticipated that the speaker box for the 24-hour drive-through pharmacy will create noise impacts on adjacent businesses or residential neighborhood due to the short distance between the speaker and the driver. However, the project will be conditioned to require that the speakers observe a noise level which reflects the minimum functional volume and that noise levels shall not be discernible beyond property lines. Although KinderCare's playground areas are located along the north, south and west sides of the day care building and adjacent to the Kildara residential neighborhood, noise impacts will not occur for the following reasons. The playground area is not occupied until 8:00 a.m. under normal conditions and only individual age groups are allowed on the playground at any given time. The play facility will be set back approximately 60 feet from the nearest residential unit and between that unit and the play facility, there is a roadway, parking aisle, a 3 foot wide landscape area, and a 6 foot high concrete block wall, which would make potential noise impacts insignificant. Additionally, KinderCare recently commissioned Bunton and Associates to conduct a noise study to determine noise levels for a typical KinderCare playground area. The study indicated that the decibel level was in a non-offensive range. The day care project will be conditioned to require that noise in the parking lot and play ground areas be maintained in a manner which minimizes the impacts on the adjacent residential neighborhood. XI. Public Services Environmental Setting: The project site is served by the following service providers: Fire Protection. Fire protection is provided by the Alameda County Fire Department which provides structural fire suppression, rescue, hazardous materials control and public education services. · Police Protection. Police protection is provided by the Dublin Police Department which is headquartered in the Civic Center. The Department, which maintains a sworn staff of 31 officers, I6 performs a range of public safety services including patrol, investigation, traffic safety and public education. · Schools. Educational facilities are provided by the Dublin Unified School District which operates kindergarten through high school services within the community. · Maintenance. The City of Dublin provides public facility maintenance, including roads, parks, street trees and other public facilities. Dublin's Civic Center is located at i00 Civic Plaza. Other Governmental Services. Other governmental services are provided by the City of Dublin including community development and building services and related governmental services. Library service is provided by the Alameda County Library with supplemental funding by the City of Dublin. Pro, ject Impacts: Fire Protection. According to representatives of the Alameda County Fire Department, the proposed project lies within a one mile radius of a fire station located on Donahue Drive in Dublin. A typical response time of under 5 minutes is anticipated. As part of the Site Development Review process, specific fire protection requirements will be imposed on the development to ensure compliance with applicable provisions of the Uniform Fire Code. Police Protection. According to representatives of the Police Department, adequate resources presently exist to serve the proposed development. Schools. This project is for retail and day care center uses. School fees in accordance to State law would be charged at building permit issuance. Maintenance of public facilities including roads. The project has access from two existing streets, San Ramon Road and Amador Valley Boulevard. The project applicants will be voluntarily contributing a traffic improvements fund, which will assist in off-setting costs of public roadway maintenance. This fund will be collected at building permit issuance. Other governmental services. The City of Dublin charges a public facilities fee for all new development in the community for the purpose of financing new municipal public facilities needed by such development. Both applicants will be required to pay a public facilities fee prior to issuance of building permits. XII. Utilities and Services Systems Environmental Setting: The project site is serviced by the following service providers: · Electrical and natural gas power: Pacific, Gas and Electric · Communications: Pacific Bell 17 · Water supply and sewage treatment: Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) · Storm Drainage: Alameda County Flood Control District, Zone 7 (Zone 7) · Solid Waste Disposal: Dublin-Livermore Disposal Company Project Impacts: There are no impacts associated with Items Xlla. through XIIg. Utility providers have reviewed the project and have determined that either the infrastructure exists or a method to fund the infrastructure has been provided for. DSRSD and Zone 7 will charge standard impact fees. XIII. Aesthetics Environmental Setting: The proposed project is located adjacent to a retail shopping center, a residential neighborhood, and general commercial uses. The design and architecture theme proposed for the project site will be compatible with the architecture of these surrounding uses. In addition, as mentioned previously, the project will result in the existing Rite Aid tenant space to become vacant. Project Impacts: According to the City's Zoning Ordinance, all new construction projects are required to go through the Site Development Review permit process. The project proponents are applying for a Site Development Review planning permit. As part of that process, architectural compatibility and aesthetic e!ements are considered. The project proponents will be required to incorporate architectural design and elements that are compatible with the architecture of surrounding uses, and the project will be conditioned to screen all unattractive uses, such as roof-top air conditioning equipment, from public view. The vacancy that would be created at the Albertson's/Mervyn's shopping center if the proposed project is approved may cause a mn-down appearance of the shopping center that would constitute a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. In order to mitigate this impact to a less than significant level, the City will apply a condition of project approval requiring that the existing site be re-leased to a business whose use is consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan (i.e., retail and service commercial uses) prior to issuance of a building permit for the new Rite Aid project. The proposed project will not result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public from the adjacent roadways, in particular, the 1-680 Freeway. XIV. Cultural Resources Environmental Setting: The majority of the project site is a vacant lot with one single-story commercial building located on the northerly end of the site. The project site is also located within an urbanized area. 18 Project Impacts: There are no impacts associated with Items XIVa. through XIVd. Although currently vacant, a large portion of the site had been previously developed. There are no known cultural resources existing at the site. XV. Recreation Environmental Setting: The project is located within Dublin's downtown and is adjacent to a residential area. The KinderCare portion of the project will be providing much needed day care services within the City. The day care facility will also provide recreational facilities for the children. Project Impacts: There are no impacts associated with Items XVa. or XVb. The project will not have a significant effect on the existing recreational facilities nor will it create a demand for additional recreational opportunities since the day care facility will be providing their own recreational facilities and the Rite Aid project is a retail commercial project that will not create a demand for additional recreational facilities. In addition, the City implements a public facilities fee pr6gram for all new development in the City. The fee pays for improvements to parks and other public fac.ilities in the City. g:\pa98-038~initial~5 teaidkindercare 19 FINAL A Traffic Study Of The Proposed Rite Aid Development In The City of Dublin Februm3~ 4, I999 PLEASANTON SANTA ROSA FINAI~ A Traffic Study Of The Proposed Rite Aid Development In City of Dublin February 4, 1999 Prepared by: TJKM Transportation Consultants 4234 Hacienda Drive, Suite 101 Pleasanton, CA 94588-2721 (925) 463-0611 PLEASANTON SANTA ROSA Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Existing Conditions ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Existing Transportatign Network ............................................................................................................. 3 Level of. Service Analysis Methodology .................................................................................................. 4 Impact Criteria ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Results of Level of Service Analysis ....................................................................................................... 4 IMPACTS OF APPROVED PROJECTS ..................................................................................................... 6 Hansen Hill Ranch ................................................................................................................................... 6 Schaefer Ranch ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Proposed Furore Transportation Improvements ....................................................................................... 6 Existing plus Approved Projects Traffic Impacts .................................................................................... 7 IMPACTS OF PROPOSED PROJECT ........................ ~ ............................................................................... 9 Project Description ................................................................................................................................... 9 Trip Generation ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Trip Assignment ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Level of Service Analysis (Existing plus Approved plus Project) ........................................................... 9 PROJECT ACCESS AND INTERNAL CIRCULATION ......................................................................... 14 Project Access ........................................................................................................................................ 14 Internal Circulation ................................................................................................................................ 14 Pedestrian and Bicycle Access ............................................................................................................... 15 Impact on Adjacent Community and Businesses ................................................................................... 15 RECOMMENDATIONS .................. ~ ......................................................................................................... 16 Intersection Mitigation...: ....................................................................................................................... 16 Access, Circulation and Par'king ............................................................................................................ 16 STUDY PARTICIPANTS AND REFERENCES ...................................................................................... 17 TJKM Personnel .................................................................................................................................... 17 Persons/Agencies Consulted .................................................................................................................. 17 References .............................................................................................................................................. 17 TABLES I Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service - Existing Condition.: ........................................................ 4 II Hansen Hill Projected Trip Generation ............................................................................................... 6 III Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service - Existing plus Approved Condition ................................. 7 IV Project Trip Generation ....................................................................................................................... 9 V Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service - Existing plus Approved plus Project Condition ........... 10 FIGURES 1 Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................................................ 2 2 Existing Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes .............................................................................. 5 3 Existing plus Approved Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes ...................................................... 8 4 Site Plan ............................................................................................................................................. i 1 5 Trip Distribution ................................................................................................................................ 12 6 Existing plus Approved plus Project Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes ................................ 13 APPENDICES. A Description of the Level of Service Methodology B Results of the Inte?section Capacity Analysis - Existing Condition C Results of the Intersection Capacity Analysis - Existing plus Approved Condition D Results of the Intersection Capacity Analysis - Existing plus Approved plus Project Condition INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Introduction This report presents the results of TJKM's traffic impact analysis of the proposed Rite Aid Development in the City of Dublin. The proposed project consists of a retail dru~general variety store with drive through windows for prescription drop off and pick-up service. A childcare center will be located adjacent to the drug store. There am 71 parking spaces provided for the drug store and 36 spaces for the childcare center. The site is located on the northwest corner at the intersection of San Ramon Road and Amador Valley Boulevard. The study area is showr; in Figure 1. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed development on the nearby street system. The study approach was to determine if any nearby intersections are projected to operate at worse than Level of Service (LOS) D and to determine what mitigation would be necessary if LOS standards are exceeded. Five intersections were analyzed for this study. These intersections are listed below and shown in Figure 1. I. San'Ramon Road/Silvergate Drive 2. San Ramon Road/Amador Valley Boulevard 3. Regional Street/Amador Valley Boulevard/Shamrock Center 4. Donohue Drive/Amador Valley Boulevard/Target Center 5. San Ramon Road/Dublin Boulevard Three near-term scenarios were addressed in the study. The near-term scenarios include approved projects that may be built and fully occupied within the next 10 y6ars. The lane geometry evaluated and recommended for this study is for the near term. The following near-term scenarios were addressed in the study: 1. Existing Conditions - Current traffic volumes and roadway conditions. Existing plus Approved (Background) - Existing land use conditions plus future traffic from approved but unbuilt or not fully utilized developments near the project in the City of Dublin. These developments include Hansen Hill Ranch and Schaefer Ranch. 3. Existing plus Approved plus Project - Identical to the Existing plus Approved scenario but with traffic added from the development of the proposed project. Summary Non-Project Requirements Intersections that operate (or are projected to operate) at LOS D or worse (volume-to-capacity ratio exceeds 0.90) are deemed in n~ed of mitigati0n. All five intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service. Project Requirements Internal circulation, project access and pedestrian pathways proposals should be subject to the evaluation criteria described in this report. Traffic Study for the Proposed Rite Aid Development Page 1 · . ~ EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing Transportation Network The proposed project and the surrounding area are illustrated in Figure i. Important roadways serving the project area are discussed below. Interstate 580 (1-580) is a six-lane east-west freeway that connects Dublin with local cities such as Livermore and Pleasanton as well as regional origins and destinations such as Oakland, Hayward and Tracy. In the vicinity of the proposed project,.I-580 carries approximately 177,000 vehicles per day (Caltrans' 1997 Traffic Volumes on California State Highways) with interchanges at San Ramon Road/Foothill Road, Interstate 680, Dougherty Road/Hopyard Road, Hacienda Drive, and Tassajara Road/Santa Rita Road. Interstate 680 is a six-lane, north-south freeway that connects Dublin with local cities such as Sunol and Walnut Creek as well as regional origins and destinations to the south, such as Fremont and San Jose. To the North, it terminates at its interchange with Interstate 80 near the City of Fairfield. In the vicinity of the proposed project, 1-680 carries approximately 136,000 vehicle per day (Caltrans' 1997 Traffic volumes on California State Highways) with interchanges at Alcosta Boulevard, Interstate 580, and Stoneridge Drive. Amador Valley Boulevard is a major east-west arterial with four travel lanes between San Ramon Road and Village Parkway with retail and commercial businesses on both sides of the street. The segment west of San Ramon Road is a two-lane road that provides access to retail uses and the Kildara condominium complex. Amador Valley Boulevard east of Village Parkway is a two-lane street with residential housing fronting on both sides. Average daily traffic (ADT) on Amador Valley Boulevard varies from 23,000 vehicle per day (vpd) between San Ramon Road and Village Parkway and 11,500 vpd east of Village Parkway. Dublin Boulevard is a major east-west arterial with six travel lanes through retail areas between the 1-680 undercrossing and San Ramon Road. Between San Ramon Road and Hansen Drive there are four travel Ianes with commemial uses fronting both sides. West of Hansen Drive, Dublin Boulevard is a two-lane road that connects with Inspiration Drive. Dublin Boulevard provides access to downtown Dublin and the various commercial uses between San Ramon Road and Dougherty Road. ADT west of Silvergate Drive is approximately 2,000 vpd, 7,000 vpd between Silvergate and San Ramon Road, and 21,000 vpd east of San Ramon Road. San Ramon Road is a major north-south arterial with four travel lanes through residential area bet~veen Alcosta Boulevard and Amador Valley Boulevard. There are six travel lanes south of Amador Valley Boulevard with commercial and retail uses on both sides of the street. San Ramon Road provides the primary access for residents of western Dublin to 1-580 and the City of Pleasanton to the south, and to the City of San Ramon to the north. San Ramon Road also provides indirect access to 1-680 via the 1-580/I- 680 interchange or via the 1-680/Alcosta Boulevard interchange in San Ramon. ADT on San Ramon Road north of Dublin Boulevard is 28,000 vpd, and 51,000 vpd south of Dublin Boulevard. Silvergate Drive is a major residential collector street between Dublin Boulevard and San Ramon Road. It runs north-south between Dublin Boulevard and Creekside Drive then east-west to San Ramon Road. The north-south segment is a two-lane road with a two-way left turn lane whereas the east-west segment has four travel lanes. ADT on Silvergate Drive south of Creekside Drive is 3,500 vpd, and 5,500 vpd east of Creekside Drive. Traffic Study for the Proposed Rite Aid Development Page 3 TlKMTran~nortat~on ~'~nq~l~tlr~n - Feh~mrv4 1999 Regional Street is a north-south access road with two travel lanes and a 2~way left turn lane that serves the commercial driveways on both sides of the street. The ADT on Regional Street is approximately I0,000 vpd. Donohue Drive is a 2-lane minor residential collector street, with an ADT of approximately 1,600 vpd. Level of Service Analysis Methodology Peak hour intersection conditions are reported as volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios with corresponding levels of service. Level of service ratings are qualitative descriptions of intersection operations and are reported using an A through F letter rating system to describe travel delay and congestion. Level of Service (LOS) A indicates free flow conditions with little or no delay, while LOS F indicates jammed conditions with excessive delays and long back-ups. The operating conditions at all study intersections were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology adopted by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA). This method provides an overall intersection level of service. Appendix A contains a detailed description of the methodology. Impact Criteria The City of Dublin policy is to have its roadways and intersections operate at a minimum of LOS D. The policy requires that corrective action be taken to improve conditions so that no roadway segment or intersection fall below this threshold due to proposed development. Therefore, in terms of traffic impacts in this study, any roadway or intersection that is shown to drop below the LOS D minimum standard will need to have mitigation measures identified as a part of the approval process for the project. Results of Level of Service Analysis Turning movement counts for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours for all existing study intersections were conducted by TJKM in October 1998. Figure 2 summarizes the existing peak hour tuming movements for all the study intersections. Table I summarizes the results of the intersection analysis for existing conditions. The detailed calculations of the level of service analysis are contained in Appendix B. Under Existing Conditions, ali study intersections operate at acceptable levels of service. The intersection of San Ramon Road/Dublin Boulevard operates with the highest volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C) of 0.72 (LOS C) during the p.m. peak hour. Table I Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service - Existing Conditions No. Intersection Control A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Pea3: Hour VIC LOS WC LOS 1 San Ramon Road/Silvergate Drive Signal 0.6I B 0.50 A 2 San Ramon Road/Amador Valley Boulevard Signal 0.48 A 0.67 B 3 Regional Street/Amador Valley Boulevard Sisal 0.30 A 0.56 A 4 Donohue Drive/Amador Valley Boulevard Signal' 0.37 A 0.40 A 5 San Ramon Road/Dublin Boulevard Signal 0.70 B 0.72 C Note: wC = Volume-to-capacity ratio Traffic Study for the Proposed Rite Aid Development Page 4 TJKMTrans ' ~ t' 'c~, ,~ ~ ~ooo ~ IMPACTS OF APPROVED PROJECTS The following projects are included in the Existing plus Approved Scenario: 1) Hansen Hill Ranch, 2) Schaefer Ranch. Approved projects consist of developments that are either under construction, are built but not fully occupied, or that have not been built but have final development plan approval. Hansen Hill Ranch The partially occupied Hansen Hill Ranch project consists of 250 single-family detached homes on 147 acres. Currently, 88 of the homes are occi~pied, leaving 162 (=250-88) units still be built and occupied. The site is located just west of Silvergate Drive and north of Hansen Drive. Two new access roads (Bay Laurel Street and Inspiration Drive) have been built as part of this development. Bay Laurel Street is an east-west residential collector that connects Silvergate Drive with Inspiration Circle. Inspiration Drive is a north-south collector that terminates at Dublin Boulevard and provides access to Valley Christian Center and School, as well as Hansen Hill. The yet to be built and occupied portion of Hansen Hill Ranch is expected to generate 1,550 daily trips, 122 during the a.m. peak hour and 164 during the p.m. peak hour. The trip generation is shown below. Table II Hansen Hill Projected Trip Generation Use Size Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Rate Trips Rate In:Out In Out .Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Single Family Residential 162' 9.57 1550 0.75 25:75 31 91 122 1.01 64:36 105 59 164 Rate Source: Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Sixth Edition, 1997. ksf= thousand square feet * Entire development consists of 250 units with 88 units currently occupied. Trip distribution and assignment for the development are taken from Environmental bnpact Report (EIR) on the Hansen Hill Ranch Project, finalized by El? Associates in May 1988. Schaefer Ranch The Schaefer Ranch development consists of 400 single-family detached homes and 74 town-home units. 10.7 acre of the site will be divided equally for retail and office space development. The site is located at the west end of Dublin Boulevard. The proposed development is expected to generate 8,267 daily trips, 569 during the a.m. peak hour and 902 during the p.m. peak hour. The trip generation and distribution calculations for Schaefer Ranch are taken from EIRfor Schaefer Ranch project/General Plan Amendment, finalized by WPM Incorporated in April 1996. Proposed Future Transportation ImproVements Planning efforts for west Dublin are currently dynamic. Known long-term transportation improvements planned for the area are listed below: Dublin Boulevard/Hansen Drive: The signal for this all-way stop is being designed. Dublin Boulevard/Silvergate Drive: This 3-Iegged all-way stop intersection will be signalized. Traffic Study for the Proposed Rite Aid Development Page 6 TJKM Transportation Consolation February 4, 1999 Dublin Boulevard: Dublin Boulevard will be widened from 2 to 4 travel lanes between Hansen Drive and Silvergate Drive. Existing Plus Approved Projects Traffic Impacts The sum total of Existing plus Approved traffic volumes at the study intersections are shown in Figure 3. This scenario is considered to be the "Background" scenario. To allow for comparison with the project scenario, the level of service analysis for all of the study intersections were conducted using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. The results of the level of service analysis for the Existing plus Approved Scenario are shown in Table 113[. Under this scenario, all intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service. The detailed calculations of the level of service analysis are contained in Appendix C. Table III Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service - Existin; plus Approved No. Intersection Control A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour V/C LOS V/C LOS 1 San Ramon Road/Silvergate Drive Signal 0.62 B 0.52 A 2 San Ramon Road/Arnador Valley Boulevard Si~al 0.49 A 0.68 B 3 Regional Street/Amador Valley Boulevard Signal. 0.30 A 0.57 A 4 Donohue DriveJAmador Valley Boulevard Si~*nal 0.37 A 0.41 A 5 San Ramon Road/Dublin Boulevard Si~al 0.76 C 0.77 C During the a.m. peak hour, the volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C) for the intersection of San Ramon Road/Dublin Boulevard increases from 0.70 (LOS B) for the Existing Scenario to 0.76 (LOS 'C) for the Existing plus Approved Scenario. The same intersection operates with the highest V/C ratio of 0.77 (LOS C) during [he p.m. peak hour. Traffic Study for the Proposed Rite Aid Development Page 7 TJKM Transportation Consolation February 4, 1999 IMPACTS OF PROPOSED PROJECT Project Des~:ription The proposed project consists of a retail druffgeneral variety store with drive through windows for prescription drop offand pick-up service. A childcare center will be located adjacent to the drag store. There are 71 parking spaces provided for the drag store and 36 spaces for the kindergarten. Figure 4 illustrates the preliminary site plan for the proposed project. The site is located on the northwest comer. at the intersection of San Ramon Road/Amador Valley Boulevard. Access to the proposed development will be provided by a right turn in/right turn out driveway on San Ramon Road and a full access driveway on Amador Valley Boulevard. Trip Generation The proposed development is expected to generate 2,320 daily trips, 180 during the a.m. peak hour and 315 during the p.m. peak hour. The trip generation assumptions for the project are based on information contained in Trip Generation, Sixth Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Table IV illustrates the estimated trip generation for the proposed project. Table IV Project Trip Generation Use Size Dally A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Rate Trips Rate In:Out In Out Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Drug Store w/Drive- 16.7 Ksf 88.16 1,472 2.66 57:43 25 I9 44 10.40 49:51 85 89 174 Through Window Kinder Care 10.7 Ksf 79.26 848 12.7153:47 72 64 1~6 13.20 47:53 66 75 141 rotat 27.4I~f 2,320 97 [ 83 180 151 1631315 Rate Source: Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Sixth Edition, 1997. ksf = thousand square feet Trip Assignment Project trip distribution assumptions were developed based on the existing travel patterns, and knowledge of the area. The primary access for the proposed project will be the driveway on Amador Valley Boulevard. Figure 5 illustrates the trip distribution assumptions for the proposed project. The project trips were assigned to the study intersections using the trip distribution assumptions to forecast traffic volumes. Level of Service Analysis (Existing plus Approved plus Project) Total volumes at the study intersections are shown in Figure 6 and the detailed calculations of the level of service analysis are contained in Appendix C. The results of the level of service analysis for the Existing plus Approved Scenario are shown in Table V. Under this scenario, all intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service. Traffic Study for the Proposed Rite Aid Development Page 9 TJKM Transportation Consolation February 4, 1999. Table V Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service - Existing plu; Approved plus Project No. Intersection Control A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour VIC LOS V/C LOS I San Ramon Road/Silvergate Drive Signal 0.63 B 0.54 A 2 San Ramon RoaddAmador Valley Boulevard Signal 0.53 A 0.72 C 3 Regional Street/Amador Valley Boulevard Signal 0.31 A 0.59 A 4 Donohue DriveJAmador Valley Boulevard Signal 0.38 A 0.42 A 5 San Ramon Road/Dublin Boulevard Siva/ 0.77 C 0.77 C During the a.m. peak hour, the volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C) for the intersection of San Ramon Road/Amador Valley Boulevard increases from 0.68 (LOS B) for the Existing plus Approved Scenario to 0.72 (LOS C) with the project trips added. The intersection of Sam Ramon Road/Dublin Boulevard operates with the highest V/C ratio of 0.77 (LOS C) during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour. Traffic Study for the Proposed Rite Aid Development Page I0 TJKM Transportation Consolation February 4, 1999 PROJECT ACCESS AND INTERNAL CIRCULATION Project Access Access to the project site will be provided from both San Ramon Road and Amador Valley Boulevard. There will be a right turn in/fight turn out driveway on San Ramon Road approximately 200 feet north of the San Ramon Road/Amador Valley Boulevard intersection. Full-access driveway will be located on Amador Valley Boulevard approximately 350 feet west of the intersection. Internal Circulation The drive-through traffic for prescription drop-off and pick-up will be separated with a three foot raised concrete median from the Kinder Care parking lot. STOP signs and appropriate pavement markings as well as R-I 1 (DO NOT ENTER) sig~s should be installed at both sides of the immediate access where the drive-through traffic will be exiting. The comer radius of the raised median to the right of this access should be 25 feet minimum to accommodate prescription traffic exiting right. Westbound traffic from the south travel way of the Rite Aid parking lot approaching the travel way that leads directly to the driveway on Amador Valley Boulevard should be stop-controlled. The proposed location for the trash enclosure will cause a sight distant problem between drivers approaching the enclosure from the west and the south. Based on the parking requirement of one space per 300 square feet, there will be a shortage of 12 parking spaces for Kinder Care. To account for this shortfall, the develop.er proposes to use 15 of Rite Aid's "excess" par'king spaces. The use of Rite Aid parking spaces by Kinder Care will result in pedestrian crossing prescription traffic and the travel way that leads directly to the driveway on Amador Valley Boulevard. The three handicapped parking spaces that are located adjacent to the pedestrian walkway between Rite Aid and Kinder Care should be relocated. There will be potential conflict between the handicapped access and pedestrians. Pedestrians crossing at the proposed walkway location will be subjected to up to 4 lanes of traffic: I) southbound travel way, 2) northbound travel way, 3) southbound prescription drop-off, and 4) southbound prescription pick-up. Of special concern is the southbound prescription traffic, since westbound pedestrians headed towards Kinder Care may not expect a vehicle to approach from their immediate right. To improve sight distance, the proposed walkway should be relocated approximately 16 feet south relative to the location as shown on the site plan. The two far-left parking spaces adjacent to the southwestern corner of the Rite Aid building should also be converted to a raised concrete island to accommodate pedestrians crossing the walkway. A raised concrete island should be constructed at the western end of the walkway. All raised concrete islands joining the pedestrian walkway should have handicapped accessible ramps installed. Standard 30-inch W54 (Pedesirian Crossing Symbol) signs should be installed at the proposed walkway facing prescription traffic. The curb on the eastern side of Amador Valley Boulevard driveway should be extended approximately 9 feet to the west so that it lines up with the concrete median separating prescription traffic and Kinder Care parking area. The mouth at the access should remain the same width as shown on the proposed site plan. Caltrans' standard lane drop signing and markings (199 Traffic Manual, page 6-39) should be installed Traffic Study for the Proposed Rite Aid Development Page 14 TJKM Transportation Consolation February 4, 1999 on the v,,est leg of San Ramon Road/Amador Valley Boulevard facing westbound traffic approaching the Rite Aid/Kinder Care access. However, separation between the R-18 and W-74 signs can be 200 feet. Pedestrian and Bicycle Access Existing pedestrian and bicycle access to the proposed project is adequate. The west side of San Ramon Road has a designated pedestrian and bicycle trail between Alcosta Boulevard and Dublin Boulevard. This trail passes adjacent to the proposed project site. Both sides of Amador Valley Boulevard have designated bicycle lanes extending from San Ramon Road to Donohue Drive. The site plans calls for a 4-feet wide sidewalk along the north side of Amador Valley Boulevard which should be adequate to serve Rite Aid, Kinder Cam, and the condominium complex. Impact on Adjacent Community and Businesses The developer will widen Amador Valley Boulevard east of the project driveway from 26 feet curb-to- curb to 48 feet, which will allow for a right turn only lane into the driveway. West of the project driveway, Amador Valley Boulevard will be widened to 36 feet curb-to-curb, which is wide enough to accommodate on-street parking along the Kinder Care frontage. Access into and out of the condominiums as well as the retail businesses on the south side of Amador Valley Boulevard will experience minimal impact from the proposed project. One travel lane in each direction will be added to this section of Amador Valley Boulevard from San Ramon Road to the project driveway. The new travel lanes will essentially absorbed the traffic generated by the proposed development. The Dublin Fishery is located to the north of the proposed project. One of its two driveways from San Ramon Road is shared with the project. Them are no significant changes proposed to alter this driveway and the access to Dublin Fishery should be unaffected. Traffic Study for the Proposed Rite Aid Development Page 15 TJKM Transportation Consolation February 4, 1999 RECOM2VIENDATIONS Intersection Mitigation No mitigation is necessary for the study intersections since they are projected to operate at LOS C or better. A~cess, Circulation and Parking · STOP sig-as, and R- 11 (DO NOT ENTER) signs should be installed at both sides of the immediate access where the drive-through traffic will be exiting. · The corner radius of the raised median to the right of access where the drive-through traffic will be exiting should be 25 feet minimum. · STOP sign should be installed for westbound traffic from the south travel way of the Rite Aid parking lot approaching the travel way that leads directly to the driveway on Amador Valley Boulevard. · Relocate the three handicapped parking spaces that are located adjacent to the pedestrian walkway between Rite Aid and Kinder Care. · Standard 30-inch W54 (Pedestrian Cro?sing Symbol) signs should be installed by the proposed walkway facing prescription traffic. · Relocate pedestrian walkway to 16 feet south relative to the location as shown on the site plan. · Construct raised concrete island at the western end of the walkway. · All concrete islands with direct access to the walkway should have handicapped access ramps. · Replace the two far-lefi parking spaces adjacent to the southwestern corner of the Rite Aid building with a raised concrete island to accommodate pedestrians crossing the walkway. · Extend curb on the eastern side of Amador Valley Boulevard driveway approximately 9 feet to the west so that it lines up with the concrete median separating prescription traffic and Kinder Care parking area. The mouth at the access should remain the same width as shown on the proposed site plan. · Install Caltrans' standard lane drop sig-ning and marldngs on the west leg of San Ramon Road/Amador Valley Boulevard facing westbound traffic approaching the Rite Aid/Kinder Care access. Traffic Study for the Proposed Rite Aid Development Page 16 TJKM Transportation Consolation February 4, 1999 TJKM Personnel: Chris D. Kinzel Gordon Luna Nayan S. Amin Jeffrey Lee Ged Foley STUDY PARTICIPANTS AND REFERENCES Principal in Charge Project Manager Project Engineer Project Engineer Graphics Designer Mr. Kevin Van Katwyck Mr. Floyd Davis Persons/Agencies Consulted: Public Works Department, City of Dublin Public Works Department, City of Dublin References: Trip Generation, Sixth Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1997 Environmental bnpact Report (EIR) on the Hansen Hill Ranch Project, EIP Associates, May 1988 EIR for Schaefer Ranch project/General Plan Amendment, WPM Inc., April 1996 Traffic Study for the Proposed Rite Aid Development Page 17 TJKM Transportation Consolation February 4, 1999 APPENDIX A Description of the Level of Service Methodology Traffic Study for the Proposed Rite Aid Development Page 18 TJKM Transportation Consolation February 4, 1999 .60 DESCRIPTION OF INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS CCTA SIGNALIZED METHODOLOGY Background The CC-FA intersection capacity analysis methodolog-y is described in detail in thc Technical Procedures Manual of the CC'FA, January, 1991. It is identical to the Cimular 212 Planning methodology except that the lane capacity has been increased from 1500 vph to between 1650 to t800 vph based on saturation :[low measurements taken at four intersections in contra Costa County. (See roi/owing Table 9 from the Technical Procedures Manual.) On average, saturation flow rates for lef~-tum lanes were over ten percent lower than for tlarough lanes. However, insufficient data was collected to provide statistical.., accuracy for the averages. Thus, saturation flow rotes for through lanes are'equal to thosi f0r mm lanes. This methodology determines the critical movement for each phase of traffic. It then sums the critical volume-to-capacity ratio by phase to determine the intersection volume-to-capacity ratio. Circular 212, on the other hand, sums the critical movement volumes themselves and compares them to the total capacity of the intersection to determine, in effect, theS, olume-to-capacity ratio of the intersection as a whole. Level of Service The volume-to-capacity ratio is related to level of service (LOS). The following level of service for Sig-nalized Intersections depicts the relationship between the volume-to-capacity ratio and level of service. An intersection operating at capacity would operate at LOS E. Level of Service F is not possible for existing conditions, but can be forecasted for future conditions when volume projections exceed existing capacities. Input Data The intersection capacity work sheets use a code to identify different lane configurations. This nomenclature is described on the following Description of Lane Configurations. l~ght mm on red adjustments are accounted for as well as unequal distribution of mm volumes in double turn lanes. For more information, see Circular 212 and the CCTA Technical Procedures Manual. LEVEL OF SERVICE RANGES VOLUME TO MAXIMUM SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES LOS CAPACITY RATIO 2-Phase .3-Phase 4+-Phase A < 0.60 1,080 1,030 990 B. 0.61 - 0.70 1,260 1,200 1,160 C 0.71 - 0.80 1,440 1,380 1,320 D 0.81 - 030 1,620 1,550 1,490 ii 0.91 - 1.00 1,800 1,'~20 1,650 F ............ Not Applicable ......... Source: Contr~ Costa Coumy Grow~ M~magement Progra."n. Tecknlcal Procedua'e~, Table 9. cc tav¢.~_?p Level of' Service for Signalized Intersections Level or' Type or' Delay Mananverability Service Flow Ratio A Stable Very. slight or no delay. If Turning movements arc easily 0.00-0.60 Flow signalized, conditions are such made, and nearly all drivers that no approach phase is fully Iind freedom of operation. utilized by traffic and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication. B Stable Slight delay. If signalized, an Vehicle platoons ~ formed. 0.61-0.70 Flow occasional approach phase is Many drivers begin to feel fully utilized, somewhat restricted within groups o~' vehicles. C Stable Acceptable delay, ff signz!/zed, Back-ups may develop behind 0.71-0.80 Flow a few drivers arriving at the end turning vehicles. Most of a queue may occ?~ionally drivers feel somewhat have to wait through one signal restricted. cycle. D Approaching Tolerable delay. Delays ma~' be Maneuverability is severely 0.81-0.90 Unstable substantial during short periods, lknited during shor~ periods Flow but excessive back ups do not due to tem~rary back ups/ OCCtlr. E Unstable Intolerable delay. Delay may be There are typically long 0.91-1.00 Flow great---up to several sign'al queues of vehicles waiting cycles, upstream of the intersection. F Forced Flow Excessive delay Jammed conditions. Back Variest ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement. Volumes may vary widely, depending principally on the downstream back-up conditions. Highway Capachy b/an,aa/, g$:~cr,,l Report No. 209, Tnza'pomaS. on Rcs'~.mh Board, 1985. Highway C~pachy Manual, $t>edat. Report No. 87, Highway Res~r~a Board, 1965. TJKIVl. lo~_&sc.tab APPENDIX B Results of the Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Conditions Traffic Study for the Proposed Rite Aid Development Page 19 TJKM Transportation Consolation February 4, 1999 LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: AM PEAK - EXISTING ....................... .................. 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 1 SAN RAMOH/SILVERGATE - DUBliN ....... Count Date 10/21/98 Time 7:30-8:30 Peak Hour AM CCTA METHOD RIGIIT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL ........... 241 1350 0 LEFT 167---I 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) U+E 15 56 0 i Split? N STREET NAME: 0.0<--- 0 TIIRU SILVERGATE 0.0 --- 0 LEFT V SIG WARRANTS: Urb=Y, Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RIGHT Sprit? N STREET NAME: SAN RAMON ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/g NB THRU (TI 516 516 3300 0.1564 LEFT (L) 159 159 1650 0.0964 0.0964 SG RIGHT (RI 241 74 * 1650 0.0448 THRU (TI 1350 1350 3300 0.4091 0.4091 EB RIGHT (RI 335 176 * 1650 0.1067 . 0.1067 LEFT (L) 167 167 1650 0.1012 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACiTY RATIO: 0.61 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: B · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN OH RED INT=RITEEXT.INT,VOL=RITEEXT.AMV, CAP=LOSCAP.TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: PM PEAK - EXISTING 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 1 SAN RAMON/SILVERGATE DUBLIN Count Gate 10/21/98 Time 4:00-5:00 Peak Hour PM CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT ........... 125 874 0 LEFT 106 ---I 1.01.02.0 0.0 TIIRU0 ---> 0.0(NO. OF LANES)O.O<'-- W+E 20 11 0 0 S LEFT THRU RIGHT sprit? N STREET NAME: SAN RAMON 6-PHASE SIGNAL I Split? H 0.0 --- 0 RIGHT STREET NAME: 0 THRU S1LVERGATE 0 LEFT SIG WARRANTS: Urb=Y~ Rur=Y ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB THRU (TI 1100 1100 3300 0.3333 LEFT (L) 289 289 1650 0.1752 0.1752 SB RIGHT (RI 125 19 * 1650 0.0115 THRU (TI 874 874 3300 0.2648 0.2648 EB RIGNT (RI 178 0 * 1650 0.0000 LEFT (L) 106 106 1650 0.0642 0.0642 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITy RATIO: 0.50 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT )URN ON RED INT=RITEEXT.INT~VOL=RITEEXT.PMV, CAP=LOSCAP.TA8 . LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Cor~Jition: AM PEAK - EXISTING 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 2 SAN RAMON/AMAOOR VALLEY DUBLIN .Count Date 10/21/98 Time 7:30-8:30 Peak Hour AM CCTA METHO0 RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL ........... 20 1369 409 I <--- v ---> I Sprit? Y LEFT 25 ~-- 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 --- 223 RIGIIT STREET HAME: THHU 25 ---> 1.0 (NO. OF LAHES) 1.1<--- 10 TIIRU AMADOR VALLEY RIGHT 29 --- 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.1 --- 469 LEFT N BIG WARRANTS: g + E 4 4 9 65 Urb=Y~ Rur=Y S LEFT TIIRU RIGHT Sprit? H STREET NAME: SAN RAMON ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (R) 265 7 * 1650 0.0042 THRU (T) 449 449 3300 0.1361 LEFT (L) 46 46 1650 0.0279 0.0279 SB RIGHT (R) 28 3 * 1650 0.0018 THRU (T) 1369 1369 4950 0.2766 0.2766 LEFT (L) 409 409 3000 0.1363 ED RIGHT (R) 29 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 25 25 1650 0.0152 0.0152 LEFT el) 25 25 1650 0.0152 ~B RIGHT (R) 223 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 10 10 1650 0.0061 LEFT (L) 469 469 3000 0.1563 T + L 479 3000 0.1597 0.1597 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.48 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN OH RED IHT=RITEEXT.INT,VOL=RITEEXT.AMV~CAP=IOSCAP.TAB ; LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: PM PEAK - EXISTING 12/01/90 iNTERSECTION 2 SAN RAMON/AMADOR VALLEY DUBLIN Count Date 10/21/98 Time 5:15-6:15 Peak Hour PM CCTA METIIOD RIGltT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL ........... 42 826 485 I <--- v ---> I Sprit? Y LEFT 56 --- 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 --- 533 RIGHT STREET NAME: TliRU 40 --~> 1.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 58 THRU AMADOR VALLEY RIGHT 29 --- 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.1 --- 365 LEFT N SIG WARRANTS: ~ + E 14 10 5 32 Urb=Y, Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: BAH RAMON ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (R) 532 331 * 1650 0.2006 TIIRU (T) 1025 1025 3300 0.3106 0.3106 LEFT (L) 140 140 1650 0.0840 SB RIGXT (R) 42 0 * 1650 0.0000 TIIRU (T) 826 826 4950 0.1669 LEFT (L) 485 485 3000 0.1617 0.1617 EH RIGIIT (R) 29 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 40 40 1650 .0.0242 LEFT (L) 56 56 1650 0.0339 0.0339 ~B RIGHT (R) 533 266 * 1650 0.1612 0.1612 THRU (T) 58 58 1650 0.0352 LEFT (L) 365 365 3000 0.1217 T + L 423 3000 0.1410 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACiTY RATIO: 0.67 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: B · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN OH RED [NT=RITEEXT.INT,VOL=RITEEXT,PMV,CAP=LOSCAP,TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: AM PEAK - EXISTING 12/01/98 ~NTERSECTION 3 AMADOR VALLEY/REGIONAL DUHLIN Count Date 10/22/98 Time 7:30-8:30 Peak Hour AM GCTA METHO0 RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL ........... 23 11 10 Ill I <--- v ---> I sprit? N LEFT 38 --- 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 --- 7 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 547 '--> 2.1 (NO. OF LARES) 2.1<--- 660 THRU REGIONAL RIGHT 81 --- 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 "- 110 LEFT N SIG WARRANTS: ~ + E 6 7 49 Urb=N, Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? y STREET NAME: AMADOR VALLEY OR[G]RAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (RI 49 0 * 1800 0.0000 THRU (TI 7 7 1800 0.0039 LEFT (L) 68 68 1800 0.0378 0.0378 SB RIGHT (RI 23 23 1800 0.0128 THRU (TI 11 11 1800 0.0061 LEFT (L) 10 10 1800 0.0056 T + R 34 1800 0.0189 T + L 21 1800 0.0117 T + R + L 44 1800 0.0244 0.0244 ED RIGHT (RI 81 81 1800 0,0450 TrlRU (TI 547 547 3600 0.1519 LEFT (L) 38 38 1800 0.0211 T + R 628 3600 0.1744 0.1744 UD RIGHT (RI ? 7 1800 0.0039 THRU (TI 660 660 3600 0,1833 LEFT (L) 110 110 1800 0.0611 0.0611 T + R 667 3600 0.1853 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.30 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A ........................................ IRT=RITEEXT.INT,VOL=RITEEXT.AMV~EAP=LOSCAP.TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consuttants Condition: PM PEAK - EXISTING 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 3 AMADOR VALLEY/REGIORAL DUBLIN Count Date 10/22/98 Tine 4:45-5:45 Peak Hour PM CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL ........... 121 33 230 I <--- v ---> I sprit? N LEFT 115 --- 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 --- 126 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 5?0 ---> 2.1 (NO. OF LANES) 2.1(--- 827 THRU REGIONAL RIGHT 29 --- 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.O --- 116 LEFT N SIG ~JARRANTS: t4 + E 3 1 37 Urb=Y, Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? Y STREET NAME: AMADOR VALLEY ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (RI 37 0 * 1800 0.0000 THRU (TI 31 31 1800 0.0172 LEFT (L) 33 33 1800 0.0183 0.0183 SB RIGNT (RI 121 121 1800 0.0672 THRU (TI 33 33 1800 0.0183 LEFT (L) 230 230 1800 0.1278 T + R 154 1800 0.0856 T + L 263 1800 0.1461 T + R + L 384 1800 0.2133 0.2133 E8 RIGHT (R) 29 29 1800 0.0161 THRU (TI 570 570 3600 0.1583 LEFT (L) 115 115 1800 0.0639 0.0639 T + R 599 3600 0.1664 WB RIGHT (RI 126 126 1800 0.0700 THRU (TI 827 827 3600 0.229? LEFT (L) 116 116 1800 0.0644 T + R 953 3600 0.2647 0.2647 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.56 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED I NT=R l TEEXT. INT,VOL=R l TEEXT .PMV, CAP=LOSCAP. TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation ConsuJtants Condition: AM PEAK - EX[STING 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 4 ANADOR VALLEY/DONANUE DUNLIN Count Date 10/20/98 Time 7:30-8:30 Peak Hour AM CCTA METHO0 RIGHT THRU LEFT ........... 61 3 112 LEFT 21 --- 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 THRU 580 ---> 2.1 (HO, OF LANES) U+E 1 2 S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: AHADON VALLEY 4-PHASE SIGNAL I sprit? N 1.1 --- 80 RIGIIT STREET NAME: 2.1<--- 722 THRU DONAHUE 1.0 --- 9 LEFT v BIG gARRANTS: Urb=Y, Rur=Y ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGNT (RI 2 2 1650 0.0012 THRU (TI 1 1 1650 0.0006 LEFT (L) 7 7 1650 0.0042 0.0042 T + R 3 1650 0.0010 SB RIGHT (RI 61 61 1650 0.0370 THRU (TI 3 3 1650 0.0018 LEFT (L) 112 112 1650 0.0679 T + R · 64 1650 0.0388 T + L 115 1650 0.0697 T + R + I 176 1650 0.1067 0.1067 EB RIGHT (RI 13 13 1650 0.0079 THRU (TI 580 580 3300 0.1758 LEFT (l) 21 21 1650 0.0127 0.0127 T + R 593 3300 0.1797 ~B RIGHT (RI 00 80 1650 0.0485 THRU (TI 722 722 3300 0.2188 LEFT (L) 9 9 1650 0.0055 T + R 802 3300 0.2430 0.2430 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.37 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED IHT=R]TEEXT.[NT~VOL=R[TEEXT.AMV~CAP=iOSCAP.TA8 LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: PM PEAK - EXISTING 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 4 AMADOR VALLEY/DONARUE DUBLIN Count Oate 10/19/98 Time 5:00-6:00 Peak Hour PM CCTA METHO0, RIGHT THRU LEFT ........... 52 11 65 LEFT 71 --- 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 TItRU 884 ---> 2.1 (NO. OF LA'ES) 2.I<--- RIGHT 57 :-- 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 --- ~+E 4 6 18 S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: AMADOR VALLEY 4-PHASE SIGNAL I Split? N 1.1 --- 88 RIGHT STREET NAME: 726 THRU DORAHUE 21 LEFT NIG UARRAHTS: Urb=Y~ RuF=Y ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (RI 18 18 1650 0.0109 THRU (TI 6 6 1650 0.0036 LEFT (L) 44 44 1650 0.0267 0.0267 T + R 24 1650 0.0145 SB RIGHT (RI 52 52 1650 0.0315 THRU (TI 11 11 1650 0.0067 LEFT (L) 65 65 1650 0.0394 T + R 63 1650 0.0382 T + L 76 1650 0.0461 T + R + I 128 1650 0.0776 0.0776 EB RIGHT (RI 57 57 1650 0.0345 TIIRU (TI 884 884 3300 0.2679 LEFT (L) 71 71 1650 0.0430 T + R 941 3300 0.2852 0.2852 ~B RIGNT (RI 88 88 1650 0.0533 THRU (TI 726 726 3300 0.2200 LEFT (L) 21 21 1650 0.0127 0.0127 T + R 814 3300 0.2467 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.40 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT=RITEEXT.INT,VOL=RITEEXT.PMV#CAP=LOSCAP.TAS LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: AM PEAK - EXISTING - 12101190 INTERSECTION 5 SAN RAMON/DUBLIN DUBLIN Count Date ? Time ? Peak Hour AM CCTA HETNOD RIGHT THRU LEFT ........... 248 1734 373 LEFT 83 --- 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 TItRU 113 --'> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.0<''' RIGHT 308 --- 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 --- g + E 30 4 7 03 S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: SAN RAMON 5-PHASE SIGNAL J Split? R 3.0 --- 33 RIGHT STREET NAME: 87 THRU DUBLIN 684 LEFT GIG ~ARRANTS: Urb=Y, Rur=Y ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (RI 803 541 * 3000 0.1803 THRU (TI 467 467 4950 0.0943 LEFT (L) 389 389 3000 0.1297 0.1297 SB RIGIIT (RI 248 202 * 1650 0.1224 TltRU (TI 1~34 1734 4950 0.3503 0.3503 LEFT (L) 373 373 3000 0.1243 EB RIGHT (RI 300 174 * 3000 0.0580 0.0580 THRU (TI 113 113 3300 0.0342 LEFT (L) 83 03 3000 0.0277 NB RIGHT (RI 33 0 * 4304 0.0000 THRU (TI 87 87 1650 0.0527 LEFT (1) 684 684 4304 0.1589 0.1589 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.70 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: B · ADJu ED FOF IG.t ....................................... INT:RITEEXT.INT,VOL=R1TEEXT.AMV,CAP=LOSCAP.TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: PM PEAK - EXISTING 12/01/90 INTERSECTION 5 SAN RAMON/DUBLIN DUBLIN Count Date 10/15/98 Tilt~ 4:00-6:00 Peak Hour PM CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 5-PHASE SIGNAL ........... 247 832 141 I <---v ---> I sprit? N LEFT 235 --- 2,0 1.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 --- 250 RIGNT STREET NAME: THRU 258 ---~ 2,0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.0~--- 224 THRU DUBLIN RIGHT 352 -~- 2.0 2.0 3.0 2,0 3.0 --- 1146 LEFT N GIG NARRANTS: ~J + E 47 16 2 1 04 Urb=Y~ rur=Y S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: SAN RAMON ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NS RIGIIT (RI 1404 965 * 3000 0.3217 THRU (TI 1612 1612 4950 0.3257 0.3257 LEFT (L) 478 478 3000 0.1593 SB RIGIIT (RI 247 118 * 1650 0.0715 THRU (TI 832 832 4950 0.1681 LEFT (L) 141 141 3000 0.0470 0.0470 EB RIGHT (RI 352 89 * 3000 0.0297 THRU (TI 258 258 3300 0.0782 0.0782 LEFT (L) 235 235 3000 0,0783 ~B RIGIIT (RI 250 172 * 4304 0.0400 THRU (TI 224 224 1650 0.1358 LEFT (L) 1146 1146 4304 0.2663 0.2663 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.72 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: C · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN OR RED I NT=N 1TEEXT. INT, VOL=R I TEEXT. PMV, CAP-- LOSCAP. TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: AM PEAK - EXISFING + APPROVED + PROJECT 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 1 SAN RAMON/SILVERGATE DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak Hour AM CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL ........... 245 1399 0 LEFT 179 ---J 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) RIGHT 345 --- 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 W+E 16 55 0 S J Split? N 0.0 --- O RIGHT STREET NAME: O.O<--- 0 THRU SILVERGATE 0.0 --- 0 LEFT ¥ SIC ~ARRAMTS: Urb=Y, Rur=Y LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: SAN RAMOM ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB THRU (T) 565 565 3300 0.1712 LEFT (L) 168 168 1650 0.1018 0.1018 SB RIGHT (R) 245 66 * 1650 0.0400 THRU (T) 1399 1399 3300 0.4239 0.4239 EB RIGHT (R) 345 177 * 1650 0.1073 LEFT (L) 179 '179 1650 0.1085 0.1005 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.63 INFERSEC110N LEVEL OF SERVICE: B · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT FURN ON RED INT:RITEEXT.IHT~VOL:RITEEXT.AMV+APPROV.AMV+PROJECT.AMV~CAP:LOSCAP.TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: EM PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED + PROJECT 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 1 SAN RAMOB/SILVERGATE DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak Hour PM ............................................... r ........................ CCTA METHOO RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL ........... 139 952 0 <--- ---, ! .sp it , LEFT 114---I,.0 ,.0 2.° 0.0 0.0- RIGltT STREET NAME: TIIRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU SILVERGATE RIGRT 193 --- 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 --- 0 LEFT N S,G WARRANTS: N + E 30 11 6 0 Urb=Y, Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RIGHT Sp{it? R STREET NAME: SAN RAMON ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB THRU (T) 1176 1176 3300 0.3564 LEFT (L) 305 305 1650 0.1848 0.1848 SB RIGHT (R) 139 25 * 1650 0.0152 THRU (T) 952 952 3300 0.2885 0°2885 EB RIGHT (R) 193 0 * 1650 0.0000 LEFT (L) 114 114 1650 0.0691 0.0691 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.54 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT=RITEEXT-IHT,VOL=RITEEXT.PMV+APPROV.PMV+PROJECT.PMV, CAP=LOSCAP.TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: AM PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED + PROJECT 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 2 SAN RAMON/AMADOR VALLEY DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak Hour AM CDTA METBOD RIGHT TBRU LEFT 6-PIIASE SIGNAl ........... 72 1383 410 I <-" v ---> I Split? Y LEFT 62 --~ 1.0 1.0 3,0 2.0 1.0 --- 224 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 52 ---> 1.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 41 THRU AMADOR VALLEY RIGHT 48 --- 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.1 --- 483 LEFT R SIG ~ARRANIS: ~ + E 6 4 9 73 Urb=Y~ Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: SAR RAMON ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAl MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (R) 273 7 * 1650 0.0042 THRU (T) 469 469 3300 0.1421 LEFT (L) 68 68 1650 0.0412 0.0412 SB RIGHT (R) 72 10 * 1650 0.0061 THRU (F) 1383 1383 4950 0.2794 0.2794 LEFT (L) 410 410 3000 0.1367 EB RIGHT (R) 48 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 52 52 1650 0.0315 LEFT (L) 62 62 1650 0,0376 0.0376 ~B RIGRF (R) 224 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 41 41 1650 0.0248 LEFT (L) 483 483 3000 0,1610 T + L 524 3000 0,1747 0,1747 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACiTY RATIO: 0.53 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF,SERVICE: A · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED ]NT=R[TEEXT.[NT~VOL=RITEEXT.AMV+APPROV,AMV+PROJECT.AMV~CAP=LOSCAP.TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants CorxJition: PM PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED + PROJECT 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 2 SAN RAMOR/AMADOR VALLEY DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak Hour PM CCTA METROD RIGHT TIIRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL ........... 110 850 486 I <--- v ---> [ Split? Y LEFT 129 --- 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 --- 534 RIGET STREET NAME: THRU 92 ---> 1.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 106 THRU AMADOR VALLEY RIGHT 66 --- 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.1 --- 309 LEFT R SIG ~ARRANTS: ~4 + E 17 10 7 55 Urb=Y, Rur=Y ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (R) 555 341 * 1650 0.2067 THRU (T) 1047 1047 3300 0.3173 0.3173 LEFT (L) 175 175 1650 0,1061 SB RIGHT (R) 110 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 850 850 4950 0.1717 LEFT (l) 486 486 3000 0.1620 0.1620 EB RIGHT (R) 66 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 92 92 1650 0.0558 LEFT (1) 129 129 1650 0.0782 0.0702 ~B RIGHT (R) 534 267 * 1650 0.1618 THRU (T) 106 106 1650 0,0642 LEFT (L) 389 389 3000 0.1297 T + L 495 3000 0.1650 0.1650 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACiTY RATIO: 0.72 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: C · ADJUSTED FOR RIGBT TURN ON RED INT=RITEEXT.INT,VOL=RITEEXT.PMV+APPROV.PMV+PROJECT.PMVfCAP=LOSCAP.TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation ConsuLtants Condition: AR PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED + PROJECT 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 3 AMADOR VALLEY/REGIONAL DUBLIN Count Date Tir~ Peak Hour AM CCTA NETHO0 RIGHT THRU LEFT ........... 28 11 10 LEFT 42 --- 1.0 1,1 1.1 1.1 THRU 577' ---> 2.1 (NO, OF LANES) RIGHT 82 --- 1.1 1,0 1.0 1.0 W+E 6 7 49 S LEFT THRU RIGHT SpLit? Y STREET HAME: AMADOR VALLEY 2-PHASE SIGNAL SpLit? N STREET NAME: 2.1<--~ 700 THRU REG]OHAL SIG WARRANTS: Urb=H, Rur=Y. ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITy RATIO v/c NB RIGHT (R) 49 0 * 1800 0.0000 THRU (T) 7 ? 1800 0.0039 LEFT (L) 69 69 1800 0.0383 0.0383 SB RIGHT (R) 28 28 1800 0.0156 THRU (T) 11 11 1800 0.0061 LEFT (L) 10 10 1800 0.0056 T + R 39 1800 0.0217 T + L 21 1800 0.0117 T + R + L 49 1800 0.0272 0.0272 EB RIGIIT (R) 02 82 1000 0.0456 THRU (T) 577 577 3600 0.1603 LEFT (L) 42 42 1800 0.0233 T + R 659 3600 0.1831 0.1831 NB RIGHT (R) 7 7 1800 0.0039 THRU (T) 700 700 3600 0.1944 LEFT (L) 110 110 1800 0.0611 0.0611 T + R 707 3600 0.1964 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.31 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT=R]TEEXT.INT,VOL=RITEEXT.AMV+APPROV.AMV+PROJECT.AMV,CAP=LOSCAP.TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consuttants Condition: PM PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED + PROJECT 12/01/98 IHTERSECTION 3 ANADOR VALLEY/REGIONAL DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak Hour PM CCTA METHOD RIGHT TltRU LEFT ........... 129 33 230 Ill LEFT 123---1 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 TNRU 635 --o> 2.1 (NO. OF LANES) 2.1<--- RIGItT 31 --- 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 --- W+ E 3 1 37 S LEFT THRU RIGNT Sprit? Y STREET HAME: AMADOR VALLEY 2-PIIASE SIGNAL {Sptit? N 1.1 --- 126 RIGHT STREET NAME: 890 THRU REGIONAL 116 LEFT SIG WARRANTS: Urb=Y, Rur=Y ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (R) 37 0 * 1800 0.0000 THRU CT) 31 31 1800 0,0172 LEFT (L) 35 35 1800 0.0194 0.0194 SB RIGHT (R) 129 129 1800 0.0717' TNRU (T) 33 33 1800 0.0183 LEFT (L) 230 230 1800 0.1278 T + R 162 1800 0.0900 T + L 263 1800 0.1461 T + R + L 392 1800 0.2178 0.2178 EG RIGHT (R) 31 31 1800 0.0172 TNRU (T) 635 635 3600 0.1764 LEFT (L) 123 123 1800 0.0683 0.0683 T + R 666 3600 0.1850 WB RIGHT (g) 126 126 1800 0.0700 THRU (T) 890 890 3600 0.2472 LEFT (L) 116 116 1800 0.0644 T + R 1016 3600 0.2822 0.2822 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.59 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT=RITEEXT.INT,VOL=RITEEXT.PMV+APPROV.PMV+PROJECT.PMV,CAP=LOSCAP.TAS LOS Software by TJKH Transportation ConsuLtants Condition: AM PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED + PROJECT 12/01/90 INTERSECTION 4 AMADOR VALLEY/DONAHUE DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak IIour AM CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT ........... 64 3 112 THRU 606 ---> 2.1 (NO. OF LANES) RIGHT 14 --- 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 N+E 1 2 S LEFT THRU RIGHT SpLit? N STREET NAME: AMADOR VALLEY 4-PHASE SIGNAL 1.1 RIGHT STREET NAME: 2.1<--- 757 THRU DONAHUE V GIG gARRAHTS: Urb=Y~ Rur=Y ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (RI 2 2 1650 0.0012 THRU IT) 1 1 1650 0.0006 LEFT (L) 9 9 1650 0.0055 0.0055 T + R 3 1650 0.0018 SB RIGHT (R) 64 64 1650 0.0388 THRU (TI 3 3 1650 0.0018 LEFT IL) 112 112 1650 0.0679 T + R 67 1650 0.0406 T + L 115 1650 0.0697 T + R + L 179 1650 0.1085 0.1085 EB RIGHT (R) 14 14 1650 0.0085 THRU (TI 606 606 3300 0.1836 LEFT (L) 23 23 1650 0.0139 0.0139 T + R 620 3300 0.1879 ~B RIGHT (RI 80 80 1650 0.0485 THRU (TI 757 757 3300 0.2294 LEFT (1) 9 9 1650 0.0055 T + R 837 3300 0.2536 0.2536 TOTAL VOLUME'TO'CAPACITY RATIO: 0.38 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN OR RED INT=RITEEXT.INT~VOL=RITEEXT.AMV+APPROV.AMV+PROJECT.AMV~CAP=LOSCAP.TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consuttants Condition: PM PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED + PROJECT 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 4 AMADOR VALLEY/DONAHUE DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak Hour PM CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT ........... 56 11 65 LEFT 74 ---J 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 THRU 940 ---> 2.1 (NO. OF LANES) RIGHT 60 --- 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 5 LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET RAME: AMADOR VALLEY 4-PHAGE SIGNAL 1.1 RIGHT STREET HAME: 2.1<*-- 782 THRU GONAHUE 1.0 --- 21 LEFT ¥ GIG WARRANTS: Urb=Y, Rur=Y ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (RI 18 18 1650 0,0109 THRU (T) 6 6 1650 0.0036 LEFT IL) 46 46 1650 0.0279 0,0279 T + R 24 1650 0.0145 SB RIGHT (RI 56 56 1650 0.0339 THRU (TI 11 11 1650 0.0067 LEFT IL) 65 65 1650 0.0594 T + R 67 1650 0.0406 T + L 76 1650 0.0461 T + R + L 132 1650 0.0800 0.0800 EB RIGHT IR) 60 60 1650 0.0364 THRU (TI 940 940 3300 0.2848 LEFT IL) 74 74 1650 0.0448 T + R 1000 3300 0.3030 0.3030 ~B RIGNT (RI 88 88 1650 0.0533 THRU IT) 782 782 3300 0.2370 LEFT Il) 21 21 1650 0.0127 0.0127 T + R 870 3300 0.2636 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0,42 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED IRT=RITEEXT.INT,VOL=RITEEXT.PMV+APPROV.PMV+PROJECT.PMV,CAP=LOSCAP.TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: AM PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED + PROJECT 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 5 SAN RAMON/DUBLiH DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak Itour AM CCTA 8ETHO0 RIGIIT TNRU LEFT S-PHASE SIGNAL ........... 281 1752 376 I <--- v ---> [ split? N LEFT 115 --- 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 --- 36 RIGHT STREET HAME: THRU 169 ---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.0<--- 137 THRU DUNLIN RIGHT 541 --- 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 --- 684 LEFT N SIG WARRANTS: W + E 40 4 2 03 Urb=Y, Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RIGItT SpLit? N STREET NAME: SAN RAMOH ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT IR) 803 541 * 3000 0.1803 THRU (TI 482 482 4950 0.0974 LEFT IL) 480 480 3000 0.1600 0,1600 SB RIGHT (RI 281 210 * 1650 0.1321 TIIRU (TI 1752 1752 4950 0.3539 0.3539 LEFT IL) 376 376 3000 0.1253 EB RIGHT (RI 541 27? * 3000 0.0923 0.0923 THRU (TI 169 169 3300 0.0512 LEFT (L) 115 115 3000 0.0383 wB RIGHT (RI 36 0 * 4304 D.O000 TIIRU (TI 137 137 1650 0.0830 LEFT IL) 684 684 4304 0.1589 0.1589 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RAT)O: 0.77 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: C · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED, - INT=RITEEXT-INT~VOL=RITEEXF.AMV+APPROV.AMV+PROJECT.AMV~CAP=LOSCAP.TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: PM PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED + PROJECT 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 5 SAN RAMON/DUBLIN DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak Hour PM CCTA METIIOD RIGIIT THRU LEFT ........... 305 867 147 LEFT 207 --- 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 TRRU 340 ---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) RIGHT 506 --- 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: SAN RAMON 5'PItASE SIGNAL { Split? N 3.0 --- 254 RIGIIT STREET NAME: 1,0<--- 316 TIIRU DUBLIN 3.0 --- 1146 LEFT ¥ SIG WARRANTS: UFb=Y, Rur=Y ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (R) 1404 965 * 3000 0.3217 THRU (TI 1636 1636 4950 0.3305 LEFT (L) 690 690 3000 0.2300 0.2300 SB RIGHT (R) 305 147 * 1650 0.0891 THRU CT) 867 867 4950 0.1752 0.1752 LEFT IL) 147 147 3000 0.0490 EH RIGHT (RI 506 127 * 3000 0.0423 TIIRU (TI 340 340 3300 0,1030 0.1030 LEFT (L) 287 287 3000 0.0957 WB RIGHT (RI 254 173 * 4304 0.0402 THRU (TI 316 316 1650 0.1915 LEFT IL) 1146 1146 4304 0.2663 0.2663 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITy RATIO: 0.77 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: C · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT=RITEEXT-INT~VOL=RITEEXT.PMV*APPROV.PMV{PROJECT.PMV~CAP=LOSCAP.TAN LOS Software by TJXM Transportation Consultants 12/01/98 INTERSECTIOR 1 SAR RAMON/SILVEHGATE DUGLIN Count Date Time Peak Hour AM CCTA METHOD RIGHT FRRU LEFF 6-PHASE SIGNAL ........... 245 1364 0 III LEFT 179---I 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) RIGHT 336 --- 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 ~+E 16 56 0 S [ Spilt? N 0.0 --- 0 RIGHT STREET NAME: 0 TIIRU SILVERGATE 0 LEFT SIG NARRANTS: Urb=Y, Rur=Y LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? R STREET HAME: SAN RAMON ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB THRU (T) 536 536 3300 0.1624 LEFT (L) 160 160 1650 0.0970 0.0970 S0 RIGHT (R) 245 66 * 1650 0.0400 THRU (T) 1364 1364 3300 0.4133 0.4133 EB RIGHT (R) 336 176 * 1650 0.1067 LEFT (L) 179 179 1650 0.1085 0.1085 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.62 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: B · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED .INT=RITEEXT.IRT,VOL=RITEEXT.AMV+APPROV.AMV,CAP=LOSCAP.TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consuttants Condition: PM PEAK - EX[STING + APPROVED ............ 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 1 SAN RAMON/SILVERGATE DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak Hour PM CCTA METHOD RIGRT THRU LEFT 6-PIIASE SIGNAL ........... 139 898 0 <--- v '--> I Split? N LEFT 114'--I 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 "- 0 RIGHT STREET NAME: TItRU 0 "-> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<''- 0 TIIRU SILVERGATE RIGIIT 179 '-' 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 '-- 0 LEFT H SIG ~JARRANTS: ~ + E 29 11 8 0 Urb=Y, Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RIGNT Sprit? R STREET HAME: SAN RAMON ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/G NB THRU (T) 1118 1118 3300 0.3388 LEFT (L) 290 290 1650 0.1758 0.1758 SB RIGHT (R) 139 25 * 1650 0.0152 THRU (T) 898 898 3300 0.2721 0.2721 EB RIGIIT (R) 179 0 * 1650 0.0000 LEFT (L) 114 114 1650 O. 0691 0.0691 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.52 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED ..... ]NT =R [ T EEXT. INT ~ VOL=R ] T E EXT. PMV+APPROV. PMV ~ CAP=LOSCAP. TAD LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: AM PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 2 SAN RAMON/AMADOR VALLEY DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak Hour AM CCTA HETNOD RIGNT THRU LEFT 6'PltASE SIGNAL ........... 28 1383 410 III I <-~- V ---> [ Split? y LEFT 25 --- 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 --- 224 RIGIIT STREET HAME: THRU 25 ---> 1.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 10 THRU AMADOR VALLEY RIGHT 29 --- 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.1 --- 483 LEFT N SIG WARRANTS: U + E 4 4 9 73 Urb=Y~ Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: SAN RAMON ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (RI 273 7 * 1650 0.0042 TRRU (T) 469 469 3300 0.1421 LEFT (L) 46 46 1650 0.0279 0.0279 SB RIGHT (R) 28 3 * 1650 0.0018 THRU (TI 1383 1383 4950 0.2794 0.2794 LEFT (L) 410 410 3000 0.1367 EB RIGHT (RI 29 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (TI 25 25 1650 0.0152 0.0152 LEFT (L) 25 25 1650 0.0152 ~G RIGHT CA) 224 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 10 .10 1650 0.0061 LEFT (L) * 483 483 3000 0.1610 T + L 493 3000 0.1643 0.1643 TOTAL VOLUME-TO'CAPACITY RATIO: 0.49 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF ~ERVICE: A · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT=RITEEXT-INT,VOL=RITEEXT.AMV+APPROV.AMV,CAP=LOSCAP.TAS LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: PM PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 2 SAN RAMON/AMADOR VALLEY DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak Hour PM CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT ........... 42 850 486 LEFT 56 ---[ 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 THRU 40 ---> 1.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- ~J + E 14 10 7 55 S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? FI STREET NAME: SAN RAMON 6-PIIASE SIGNAL I Split? Y 1.0 --- 534 RIGHT STREET NAME: 58 THRU AMADOR VALLEY 389 LEFT SIG WARRANTS: Urb=Yt Rur=Y ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (RI 555 341 * 1650 0.2067 THRU (T) 1047 1047 3300 0.3173 0.3175 LEFT (L) 140 140 1650 0.0848 SB RIGHT (R) 42 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (TI 850 850 4950 0.1717 LEFT (L) 486 486 3000 0,1620 0.1620 ED RIGHT (RI 29 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (TI 40 40 1650 0.0242 LEFT (L) 56 56 1650 0.0339 0.0359 VD RIGHT (RI 534 267 * 1650 0.1618 0.1618 THRU (TI 58 58 1650 0.0352 LEFT (L) 389 389 3000 0.1297 T + L 447 3000 0.1490 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.68 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: B · ADJUSTED FOR RIGNT TURN ON RED INT=RITEEXT.INT,VOL=RITEEXT.PMV+APPROV.PMV,CAP=LOSCAP.TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: AM PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 3 AMADOR VALLEY/REGIONAL DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak Ilour AM CCTA METHO0 RIGHT THRU LEFT ........... 23 11 10 LEFT 38---{ 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 TIIRU 555 -~-) 2.1 (NO. OF LANES) U+E 6 ? 49 S LEFT TBRU RIGDT Split? Y STREET NAME: AMADOR VALLEY 2-PHASE SIGRAL [ Split? N STREET NAME: 2.1<--- 675 TIIRU REGIONAL V SIG gARRANTS: Urb=N, Rur=Y ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT IR) 49 0 * 1800 0.0000 THRU (T) 7 7 1800 0.0039 lEFT IL) 68 68 1800 0.0378 0.0370 SB RIGIIT IR) 23 23 1800 0.0128 TtIRU (T) 11 11 1800 0.0061 LEFT (L) 10 10 1800 0.0056 T + R 34 1800 0.0189 T + L 21 1800 0.0117 T + R + L 44 1800 0.0244 0.0244 ER RIGHT IR) 81 81 1800 0.0450 THRU IT) 555 555 3600 0.1542 LEFT IL) 38 38 1800 0.0211 T + R 636 3600 0.1767 0.1767 !JR RIGIIT IR) 7 7 1800 0.0039 THRU IT) 675 675 3600 0.1875 1EFT IL) 110 110 1800 0.0611 0.0611 T + R 682 3600 0.1894 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.30 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF, SERVICE: A ;-~3~J~E~ ~Z-~;[[~'- ~[,~-~-~[{~ ........................................ 1NT=R l TEEXT. I NY ,VOL=R ] TEEXT. AMV+APPROV.AMV, CAP=LOSCAP. TAR LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: PM PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 3 AMADOR VALLEY/REGIONAL DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak Hour PM CCTA METIIOD RIGIIT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL ........... 121 33 230 <'-- v ---> { Split? N LEFT 115---{ 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1,1 --- 126 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 593 ---> 2.1 (NO. OF LANES) 2.1<"- 852 THRU REGIONAL RIGIIT 29 --- 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 --- 116 LEFT N SIG ~ARRANTS: U + E 3 I 37 Urb=Y, Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? Y STREET NAME: AMADOR VALLEY ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGNT (R) 37 0 * 1800 0.0000 TRRU (T) 31 31 1800 0.0172 LEFT IL) 33 33 1800 0.0183 0.0103 SB RIGNT (R) 121 121 1800 0.0672 THRU (T) 33 33 1800 0.0183 LEFT IL) 230 230 1800 0.1278 T + R 154 1800 0.0856 T + L 263 1800 0.1461 T + R + L 384 1800 0.2133 0.2133 EB RIGIIT IR) 29 29 1800 0.0161 TIIRU IT) 593 593 3600 0.1647 LEFT IL) 115 115 1800 0.0639 0.0639 T + R 622 3600 0.1728 UB RIGHT IR) 126 126 1800 0.0700 TNRU IT) 852 852 3600 0.2367 LEFT Il) 116 116 1800 0.0644 T + R 978 3600 0.2717 0.2717 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.57 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT=RITEEXT.INT,VOL=RITEEXT.PMV+APPROV.PMV,CAP=LOSCAP.TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: AM PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 4 AMADOR VALLEY/DONAHUE DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak Hour AM ........... 62 3 112 I <--- v ---> I Sprit? N v LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consuttants Condition: PM PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 4 AMADOR VALLEY/DONAHUE DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak Nour PM CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 4-PHASE SIGNAL ........... 53 11 65 LEFT 71---I 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1; - 88- RIGNT STREET NAME: TNRU 903 ---> 2.1 (NO. OF LANES) 2.1<--- 749 THRU DONAHUE RIGHT 57 --- 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 --- 21 LEFT N SIG WARRANTS: W · E 4 6 18 Urb=Y, Rur=Y S LEFT TNRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: AMAOOR VALLEY ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (RI 18 18 1650 0.0109 TNRU (TI 6 6 1650 0.0036 LEFT (L) 44 44 1650 0.0267 0.0267 T + R 24 1650 0.0145 SB RIGHT (RI 53 53 1650 0.0321 TNRU (TI 11 11 1650 0.0067 LEFT (L) 65 65 1650 0.0394 T + R 64 1650 0.0388 T + L 76 1650 0.0461 T + R + L 129 1650 0.0782 0,0782 EB R[GNT (RI 57 57 1650 0.0345 THRU (TI 903 903 3300 0.2736 LEFT (L) 71 71 1650 0.0430 T + R 960 3300 0.2909 0.2909 WB RIGHT (RI 88 88 . 1650 0.0533 THRU (T) 749 749 3300 0.2270 LEFT (L) 21 21 1650 0.0127 0.0127 T + R 837 3300 0.2536 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.41 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT=RITEEXT.INT,VOL=RITEEXT.PMV+APPROV.PMV,CAP=LOSCAP.TAB LOB Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: AM PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED 12/01/98 INTERSECTION 5 SAR RAMON/DUBLIN DUBLIN Count Date Time Peak Hour AM CCTA METHOD RIGHT TBRU LEFT ........... 276 1734 373 LEFT 111 --- 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 THRU 169 '''> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.0<'-- RIGHT 541 --- 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 --- W + E 40 4 7 03 S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: SAN RAMON 5-PHASE SIGNAL J Split? N 3.0 --- 33 RIGtIT STREET NAME: 137 FHRU DUBLIN 684 1EFT WARRANTS: Urb=Y, Rur=Y ORIGIHAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (RI 803 541 * 3000 0.1803 THRU (TI 467 467 4950 0.0943 LEFT (L) 480 480 · 3000 0.1600 0.1600 SB RIGBT (RI 276 215 * 1650 0.1303 TIIRU (TI 1734 1734 4950 0.3503 0.3503 LEFT (L) 373 373 3000 0.1243 EB RIGHT (RI 541 277 * 3000 0.0923 0.0923 THRU (TI 169 169 3300 0.0512 LEFT (L) 111 111 3000 0.0370 WB RIGIIT (RI 33 0 * 4304 0.0000 TNRU (TI 137 137 1650 0.0830 LEFT (L) 684 684 4304 0.1589 0.1589 TOTAl VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.76 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: C · ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT=RITEEXT.INT,VOL=RITEEXT.AMV+APPROV.AMV~CAP=LOSCAP.TAB LOS Software by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: PM PEAK - EXISTING + APPROVED 12/01/98 IHTERSECTION 5 SAN RAMON/DUBL{N DUBLIH Count Date Time Peak Hour PM CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 5-PNASE SIGNAL ........... 295 832 141 I <--- v ---> { Spti.t? N LEFT 280 --- 2.0 1,0 3.0 2.0 3.0 --- 250 RIGIIT STREET NAME: THRU 340 ---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.0<--- 316 TIIRU DUNLIN RIGNT 506 --- 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 --- 1146 LEFT N SIG WARRANTS: U + E 69 16 2 1 04 Urb=Y, Rur=Y S LEFT TIIRU RIGHT SpLit? N STREET NAME: SAN RAMON ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (R) 1404 965 * 3000 0.3217 TNRU (TI 1612 1612 4950 0.3257 LEFT (L) 690 690 3000 0.2300 0.2300 SB RIGHT (RI 295 141 * 1650 0.0855 TIIRU (TI 832 832 4950 0.1681 O. 1681 LEFT (L) 141 141 3000 0.0470 EB RIGHT (RI 506 127 * 3000 0.0423 THRU (TI 340 340 3300 O. 1030 O. 1030 LEFT (L) 280 280 3000 0.0933 WB R]GiIT (RI 250 172 * 4304 0.0400 TBRU (TI 316 316 1650 0.1915 LEFT (L) 1146 1146 4304 0.2663 0.2663 TOTAl VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.77 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: C · ADJUSTED FOR HIGHT TURN ON RED ~NT =H ]TE EXT. I N T, VOL =R 1TEEXT. PMV+APPROV. PMV, CAP=LOS£AP. TAB February 24, 1999 City of Dublin Planning Commission Carol R. Cirelli, Senior Planner 100 Civic Plaza PO Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 Dear Ms Cirelli, I reside at 7403 Cronin Circle in the the Kildara Community. I reviewed plans for the proposed Rite Ald/KinderCare Project with you on February 12, 1999. The overall benefits to the community at large in providing essential services are recognized. However, at this time I oppose the project as it stands for reasons which I will outline in this letter. The high volume of car traffic and congestion will negatively impact our community with increased use of Kildara's private roads as a thoroughfare to access the western area of Dublin. It is expected that drivers will drive through Kildara property to avoid increased traffic congestion at San Rarnon Valley Road and Dublin Boulevard. This will lead to increased maintenance costs and noise levels from car traffic as well as security and safety concerns for homeowners. We anticipate that increased car traffic through our property could result in unsafe dangerous situations for the children in our community. Noise will result from the four outdoor playgrounds which I understand will serve 150 children daily and in addition to that created by delivery trucks providing service to Rite Aid on a 24 hr basis. The noise will significantly affect the quality of life for Kildara homeowners. The existing landscaping on the north side of Amador Valley Boulevard which consists of lawn and oleander bushes for a distance of approximately 200 ft has been maintained by the Kildara Homeowners Association. It appears this landscaping will be removed with the widening of Amador Valley Boulevard. There are possible alternatives to resolve these important issues. The following conditions must be met by the City of Dublin and Rite Aid to make this project acceptable for the Kildara homeowners: * Installment of four 12 fi wide x 6 t~ high traffic security swing gates and two 3 ft wide x 6 ft high man gates located at Cronin Circle and Amador Valley Boulevard cul-de-sac including approx. 80 L.F. 6 ft high fencing. All materials should be same as existing fencing at pool area. These swing gates will require extensive electrical and electronic systems to facilitate access in and out of the Kildara property. General maintenance of these gates by Rite Aid is requested. * Installment of one 24 ~ wide x 6 f~ high traffic security sliding gate and one 3 ft wide x 6 f~ high man gate located at Cronin Circle and Donlon Way cul-de-sac including approx. 50 L.F. 6 ft high fencing. Materials used same as stated above. This sliding gate will require extensive electrical and electronic systems to facilitate access in and out of the Kildara property. General maintenance of these gates by Rite Aid is requested. * Relocation of existing landscaping on north side of Amador Valley Boulevard within Kildara property at locations designated by homeowners. * Increase height of existing concrete wall an additional 2 fr to decrease noise level. * Placement of large trees such as evergreens along east side of existing concrete wall in 10 f~ dead space between playground and wall to buffer noise. Thank you for your help in maintaining the quality of life for Kildara homeowners. We look forward to further discussion at the upcoming planning commission meeting on March 9, 1999. We are attaching a signature list of homeowners who support the concerns outlined in this letter. Nina Wixson RITE AID/K~NDERCARI~ SIGNATURE LIST The undersigned are in agreement with the concerns outlined in the letter written by Nina Wixson Kildara homeowner dated February 24, 1999 to Dublin City Planning Commission NAME ADDRESS DATE. RUFI~ AID/IONDI~RCARE SIGNATURE LIST The undersigned are in agreement with the concerns outlined in the letter written by Nina Wixson Kiidara homeowner dated February ?4, 1999 to Dublin City Planning Commission NAME ADDRi~SS DATE il ? '50 ~ AID/KINDERCARE SIGNATURE LIST The undersigned are in agreement with the concerns outlined in the letter written by Nina Wixson Kildara homeowner dated February 24, 1999 to Dublin City Planning Commission NAME ADDRESS DATE z/zs/qe 'Z/ZT/fiq RITE AID/KINDERCARE SIGNATURE LIST The undersigned are in agreement with the concerns outlined in the letter written by Nina Wixson Kiidara homeowner dated February 24, 1999 to Dublin City Planning Commission ADDRESS 725'9 RITE AID/KINDERCARE SIGNATURE LIST The undersigned are in agreement with the concerns outlined in the letter written by Nina Wixson Kildara homeowner dated February 24, 1999 to Dublin City Planning Commission NAME · ADDRESS DA'lr~ Carol R. Cirelli Senior Planner City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, Ca 94568 February 24, 1999 Re: Negative Declaration Rite Aid/Kinder Care PA 98-038 Dear Ms. Cirelli, As a homeowner in Kildara I have concerns about some important issues in reference to the Initial Study for PA 98-038 Rite Aid/KinderCare Special Plan Amendment/PD Rezone/Conditional Use PenmtYSite Development Review. The Negative Declaration makes for interesting reading. In general, I am of the opinion not nearly enough attention has been paid to the impact of this project on our community and our property values. The following are some highlights culled for the report and some comments. PAGE 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The report states, "There are no environmental factors that would be potentially affected by this project." None of the boxes are checked. Shouldn't the boxes indicating "PopulatioM-Iousing, Air Quality, Transportation Circulation, Noise and Aesthetics" be checked? From our point of view at Kildara all of these issues am of concern. PAGE 4 LAND USE AND PLANNING - ITEM E The report asks, "Would the proposal disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community?" The report indicates no impact. This ignores the potential impact on the following: Road surfaces and attendant expenses for homeowners of Kildare due to increased traffic. Noise -kids in playground from 6:15 a.m. to 6:15 p.mand more traffic. Air pollution from increased traffic. Traffic safety PAGE 4 GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS Will there be grading elevation issues that could cause flooding or erosion?. 26,500 square feet of building and or nearly 3 acres of surface covered by buildings and parking lots. This is likely to change in an exaggerated way: a) absorption rates b) drainage patterns c) rate and amount of surface runoff All of these are subject to exposing people and property to water hazards such as flooding. PAGE 5 AIR QUALITY The report states there would be "no impact" on Air Quality. Narrow streets within the Kildara complex will experience increased traffic and with it increased air pollution including known carcinogens such as MTBE, and carbon monoxide. PAGE 5 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION The report states, 1 ) Item a) "No impact" on "increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion" 2) Item b) "No impact" on "hazards to safety...(eg sharp curves or dangerous intersections)" Kildare is full of sharp curves and dangerous intersections. PAGE 7 NOISE Report states the proposal will have "no impact" on increases in existing noise levels or exposure of people to severe noise levels. What about 180 children at Kinder Care playgrounds and 24 hours of Rite Aide traffic and delivery trucks? PAGE 7 PUBLIC SERVICES - PROJECT IMPACTS The report states there would be "no impact" on the need for new or altered services in Fire Protection, Police Protection Schools, Maintenance of public facilities including roads, Other governmental services. Will not increased traffic force altered services of police, maintenance of roads etc. PAGE 7 AESTHETICS In item c, the report states there would be "no impact" on the aesthetics of light or glare. What about parking lot lights and store signs? How will they not change the aesthetics? 03/03/1999 0?:39 925-§56-0327 TECLARK PAGE 03 PAGE 8 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE The report states there w/ll be "no impact" on item d). "Does the project have environmental effects which Will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?" It is our contention the project, without concessions will have both a direct and indirect adverse effect on human beings by increased traffic, safety noise, and expenses. PAGE 10 PARAGRAPH 4 This paragraph does not address the disruption caused by increased traffic through the complex, safety consideration, road maintenance, air pollution, increased noise, light and sign aesthetics and ~orm water drainage. PAGE 13 PROJECT IMPACTS Whle the report recognizes the project will generic "some new traffic" it does address the new traffic Kildara will experience_ In paragraph 3 the report addresses construction issues. Will there be any special consideration made during constmction to minimize "dust and particulate matter" in vivw of the close proximity of our homes7 In para4graph 4 the report states, "Amador Valley Blvd. from San Ramon Rd Westward is a collector street ......... terminates at the residential community of Kildara." If only this were true. It does not "term/hate'. The streets of oar residential community have been and will increasingly be used to enter at this so called termination point, travel our streets and exit on Donlon way in order to avoid the busy intersection of San Ramon Road and Dublin Blvd. The reverse is also true. Increasing traffic will enter on Donlon Way and exit at Amador Valley Road. PAGE 16 Ln. paragraph 5 reference is made to the effect that "the day care project will be conditioned to require that noise in the parking lot and play ground areas be maintained in a manner which minimizes the impact on the residential neighborhood". (Kildara) What will these conditions be? How will they be implemented? Who will be responsible? I, and other home owners of Kildaxe look forward to your comments and answers to our questions ot the meeting scheduled for March 9th. T. E. Clark 7255 Croton Circle Dublin, Ca 94568