HomeMy WebLinkAbout99-015 Estab Right of Way LinesAGENDA STATEMENT
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: June 8,1999
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: PA 99-015, Establish Right of Way Lines for portions of
Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Parkway.
(Report prepared by: Kevin Van Katwyk, Senior Civil Engineer)
(1) Initiation of the Process to Establish Right of Way Lines for portions of Tassajaza
Road, Dublin Boulevazd, Gleason Drive and Central Pazkway
(2) Review of Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
(3) Review of plans for Adoption of Right of Way Lines for a portion of Tassajaza Road
within the City from north of Interstate 580 to the northerly City limit line that located at
the northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962-Neighborhood M-1, and for portions
of Dublin Boulevazd, Gleason Drive and Central Pazkway (from Tassajara Road to the
westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G & H)
(4) Determination of Conformity of Location, Purpose and Extent of said Right of Way
Lines with the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
L.s<.h~4. h;.-.ac
:
ATTACHMENTS
' i) Resolution Initiating Process to Establish Right of Way Lines for portions of
9 Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevazd, Gleason Drive and Central Parkway
I o 2) Resolution Recommending the City Council Approve the Finding of Conformity
of Location, Purpose and Extent of said Right of Way Lines with the Dublin
General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; the Negative Declaration and
approval of right of way lines
I z 3) Negative Declaration
~3 4) Environmental Initial Study
,50 5) Figure 2B of the General Plan, Land Use Map
g~ 6) Figure 4.1 of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, Land Use Map
s2 7) Figure 5.1 Proposed Road System from the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
S3 8) Tassajaza Road Typical Section
54 9) Reduced Plan Lines for portions of Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevazd, Gleason
Drive and Central Parkway prepared by MacKay & Somps
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1) Heaz Staff Presentation;
2) Take testimony from the public;
3) Question Staff and the public;
COPIES TO: Public Works Director
PA file
ITEM NO. ~ t
H;\pw\Tassajara Rd row alignmt\ags[ initiation
4) Deliberate;
5) Adopt Resolution initiating process to establish right of way lines for a portion of
Tassajaza Road from north of Interstate 580 to the northerly boundary of Dublin
Ranch Neighborhood M-1, and portions of Dublin Boulevazd, Gleason Drive and
Central Pazkway, from Tassajaza Road to the westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch
Areas F, G & H;
6) Adopt Resolution finding conformity of location, purpose and extent of said right
of way lines with the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan;
recommend to the City Council that they Approve and Adopt the Negative
Declazation for said portions of streets and recommend to the City Council that
they Adopt Right of Way Lines for said portions of streets.
DESCRIPTION:
One of the goals of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan is to establish a vehicle circulation system which provides
sufficient capacity for projected traffic and allows convenient access to land uses. It states that the arterial
streets in East Dublin aze to be designed to carry very high traffic volumes with a minimum of interference from
connecting traffic. Shown on the land use map (Attachment 5) are all arterial streets including Dublin
Boulevazd, as well as Tassajara Road, Gleason Road and Central Pazkway (shown as Transit Spine)
(Attachment 7). The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan states arterial streets are to be four, six and eight lanes wide
to carry' the community and sub-regional traffic through the specific plan azea. Traffic reports of specific
projects such as Dublin Ranch Phase I, Tassajaza Meadows I and II, Koll Center, Emerald Glen and Tool
Brothers require Tassajara Road be widened from two lanes to four, six and eight lanes in various locations.
With the proposed Development of Dublin Ranch Areas A-E and Area F, G and H (currently under staff
review), their respective traffic reports require widening of Tassajaza Road and the extension of Dublin
Boulevard, Gleason Road and Central Pazkway from Tassajara Road to Fallon Road. Recently the ultimate
road right of way alignments of each of these arterial streets were mapped, and provisions were made for the
study of specific precise right of way lines to be adopted by the City.
The City of Dublin Municipal Code (Sections 7.6830 to 7.68.100) outline the required process for adopting
specific right of way plan lines. Listed below are the necessary steps that must be taken to adopt specific right
of way precise plan lines:
7.68.30 Initiation of the process may be accomplished by (A) petition of one or more affected property
owners; (B) Resolution of the City Council; or (C) Resolution of the Planning Commission.
In this case, staff recommends that the process be initiated by Resolution of the Planning Commission
(Attachment 1). The Department of Public Works, under the direction of the City Engineer/Director of Public
Works, has studied the proposed right of way lines using the Eastem Dublin Specific Plan, City Standards, an
Environmental Initial Study (Attachment 4), traffic studies and have reviewed plans prepared by MacKay &
Somps to assure conformance with the City and CEQA requirements. The City's Municipal Code further directs
the following:
7.68.50 The Planning Commission shall hold at least one public hearing regarding the proposed right of
way lines. The heazing shall be noticed at least five days in advance of the hearing date by
publication and posting the riotice along the planned right of way.
This meeting has been noticed to the public tis required, and staff is now presenting the results of the studies to
the Planning Commission and public for revi ew and input so that the Planning Commission can make a
recommendation to the City Council concerning the proposed right of way lines. The City's Municipal Code
further directs the remaining process be the following:
7.68.60 Upon receipt of a report from the Planning Commission, the City Council shall adopt a
Resolution of Intention which designates the right of way lines to be established.
7.68.70 The Resolution of Intention is to be published or posted at least 10 days prior to the date
established for hearing objections to the proposal.
7.68.80 The time for hearing objections to the proposal shall be not less than fourteen (14) days or more
than thirty-five (35) days from the date of adoption of the Resolution of Intention.
7.68.90 Any person having interest in any land upon which the right of way lines are proposed to be
established may file a written objection at any time not later than the time set for hearing
objections.
7.68.100 At the time set for hearing, the City Council shall proceed to hear and pass on all protests or
objections to establishment of the right of way lines. The City Council's decision is final and
conclusive. Following the hearing of protests, the City Council may abandon the proceeding or
deny the protests and adopt an ordinance establishing the right of way lines.
At this time, staff is proposing that the City initiate the establishment of precise right of way plan lines for the
widening of Tassajara Road from I-580 to the northerly City limit line (Northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch),
and the extension of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Road and Central Pazkway (formally transit spine) from
Tassajaza Road to the boundary of Areas F, G & H of the Jennifer Lin/Dublin Ranch Development
(approximately 850 feet east of Tassajara Road). After the precise right of lines have been adopted by the City
Council, the City will acquire the additional needed right of way from the undeveloped landowners in order to
construct the first phase of street improvements and public utilities needed to serve the Eastern Dublin
developed areas.
BACKGROUND:
Over the past several yeazs, various portions of Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard and Central Parkway have
been required to be dedicated and improved. The Dublin Ranch Phase I Developments with the cooperation of
neighboring Tassajara Meadows I (Casterson) and II developments aze conditioned to widen and improve
Tassajara Road from Dublin Boulevazd to northerly limit of their project. Dublin Ranch Phase I is required to
dedicate, on their respective final maps, all the required right of way along the frontage of their project along
Tassajara Road to the configuration shown in the right of way precise plan lines attached hereto as (Attachment
~. Likewise Koll Center Development was conditioned to widen, dedicate and improve Tassajara Road along
their respective project frontage to the alignments shown on these right of way precise plan lines also. Alameda
County Surplus Authority was conditioned on Tentative Map 7355, to dedicate a large portion of right of way
along the west side of Tassajara Road from Dublin Boulevard to Gleason Road in accordance to these right of
way precise plan lines. The only remaining pieces of Tassajara Road right of way that have not been required to
be dedicated and improved aze approximately 3,6001inear feet of the easterly section of right way located on
the Dublin Land Company property (DiManto property frontage), approximately 3,050 linear fee of westerly
half section of right of way located on the Yarra-Yarra Property and approximately SOO linear feet of the
westerly half section of right located on Federal Property at the north west corner of Tassajaza Road and Dublin
Boulevard. The Yana-Yarra property and Federal property right of way will be granted with the approvals of
proposed development projects on their respective parcels. The City is expecting to condemn the needed east
side of Tassajara Road across the Dublin Land Company (DiManto property) since there has not recently been a
development project submitted for City approval requiring the needed dedications and improvements.
The needed right of way improvements will provide a connection for the projects to existing roadways and the
freeway and will include all of the needed necessary through-lanes and turn-lanes for the proposed level of
development as defined by the respective traffic reports for the specific projects. Staff has been working with
the Lins, MSSH / Shea Development (Dublin Ranch Phase I), and their engineering consultant, MacKay &
Somps, to determine the best alignment for these roadway segments. The general alignment of these roadways
is shown in the Dublin General Plan (see Attachment 5) and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (see Attachment
6). The right of way lines need to be further established for these portions of roadways that are being proposed
by the Jennifer Lin (Dublin Ranch Assessment District developer) and MSSH/ Shea Development so that the
Assessment District improvements can be designed with full connections from the Dublin Ranch Areas F, G &
H project sites to existing roadways and so that the Dublin Ranch Phase I projects are connected to existing
roadways as conditioned with their approvals.
The area, which makes up the proposed Tassajara Road right of way, varies from 66 feet to 101feet wide.
Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Parkway right of ways do not currently exist. The alignment of
Tassajaza Road is basically a straight line running north-south from north of Interstate 580 at the Tassajaza Road
interchange to the City limit line located on the northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Phase I (Neighborhood M-
1). The right of way width will vary from 128 feet at the northern end of the road to 187 feet wide at the
southern end (Attachment 9). From the Freeway interchange, the roadway will need to be 8 through lanes and a
large median to accommodate double and triple left turn lanes to Central Parkway. From Central Parkway the
road will accommodate 61anes of through traffic and one left turn lane in the median, to the northerly boundary
of Dublin Ranch Phase L A lazge-radius curve has been included in the alignment at the northerly end of the
road in order to pull the road away from an existing lazge building located next to the road 300 north of the
boundazy of Dublin Ranch Phase I (M-1 Neighborhood).
The alignments of Dublin Boulevazd, Gleason Drive and Central Parkway are also all basically straight lines
running east-west between Tassajara Road and the westerly boundazy of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G & H. The
roadways aze located perpendicular to Tassajara Road. On the northerly and southerly sides of each of the
streets, is Dublin Land Company (DiManto property). The Dublin Boulevazd right of way will vary from 140
feet to 161 feet wide and will accommodate 61anes of through traffic. The Gleason Drive right of way will vary
from 104 feet to 125 feet wide and will accommodate 4 through lanes of traffic. The Central Parkway right of
way will vary from 104 feet to 130 feet wide and will accommodate 4 through lanes of traffic. Attachment 8
delineates the actual lane requirements and Attachment 9 are the detailed specific right of way plan alignment
which are the focus of this review and approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Dublin
Environmental Guidelines, a Negative Declazation and Environmental Initial Study (see Attachment 3 & 4)
were prepared for the proposed project so that it could be evaluated to determine any significant environmental
impacts. The study concludes that there could not be any significant effects on the environment as the
necessary roadway improvements were considered as part of the EIR for the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and a
Negative Declazation was therefore, prepared (see Attachment 3). These documents are required to be approved
and certified by the City Council. They aze first reviewed by the Planning Commission and then forwazded to
the City Council with recommendations.
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY:
Government Code Section 65402(a) states, in part, that if a General Plan has been adopted, no real property
shall be acquired by dedication for street purposes until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition has
been reported upon by the planning agency (Planning Commission) as to conformity with the General Plan.
The proposed project is the establishment of right of way lines along a route provided and established within the
Dublin General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The right of ways are located within lands described
by the Dublin General Plan. The land along the right of ways will be developed for roadway purposes in
accordance with the requirements and purposes of the Dublin General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan. The proposed right of ways are within the physical scope of the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan and, therefore, the extent will be encompassed by, and consistent with, the General Plan and the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. As such, it is found that the establishment of the right of ways is consistent with
regazd to location, purpose and extent with the Dublin General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution initiating the process for the
establishment of right of way lines for said portions of Tassajaza Road, Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and
Central Parkway (Attachment 1) and adopt the attached resolution recommending City Council approval of
finding the location, purpose and extent of the establishment of right of way lines in conformity with the Dublin
General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (Attachment 21; and adopt the Negative Declaration (Attachment
for said portions of streets, and adopt the recommended Right of Way Lines for said portions of streets
(Attachment 9).
GENERAL INFORMATION:
General Plan Land Use Designations:
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
Land Use Designations:
Existing Land Use:
Existing Zoning:
General Commercial; High Density, Medium-High Density and
Medium Density Residential; and Public/Semi-Public Facility
(High School)
General Commercial; Neighborhood Commercial; High Density,
Medium-High Density and Medium Density Residential; and
Public/Semi-Public Facility (High School)
Vacant
Agricultural, General Commercial; Neighborhood Commercial;
High Density, Medium-High Density and Medium Density
Residential.
RESOLUTION NO. - 99
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
FINDING OF CONFORMITY OF LOCATION, PURPOSE AND EXTENT OF RIGHT OF WAY
LINES FOR A PORTION OF TASSAJARA ROAD (FROM NORTH OF INTERSTATE 580 TO
THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN RANCH TRACT 6962-NEIGHBORHOOD Ml),
AND FOR PORTIONS OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD, GLEASON DRIVE AND CENTRAL
PARKWAY (FROM TASSAJARA ROAD TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN
RANCH AREAS F, G & H) WITH THE DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AND
THE EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN
AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND RIGHT OF WAY LINES FOR SAID PORTIONS OF STREETS AND
ADOPT RIGHT OF WAY LINES FOR SAID PORTIONS OF STREETS
PA 99-015
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission pursuant to the Dublin Municipal Code (Sections 7.68.30
to 7.68.100) has initiated the process for the establishment of right of way lines for a portion of Tassajara
Road from north of Interstate 580 to the northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962-Neighborhood
M1, and for portions of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Drive (from Tassajara Road to the
westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G & H) on June 8, 1999 and;
WHEREAS, said right of ways will pass through lands designated General Commercial, High
Density Residential, Medium-High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Public/Semi-
Public Facility (High School) on the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65402(a) states, in part, that if a general plan has been
adopted, no real property shall be acquired by dedication for street purposes until the location, purpose
and extent of such acquisition has been reported upon by the planning agency (Planning Commission) as
to conformity with the adopted general plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin has adopted a General Plan and such Plan is applicable to the
properties through which the proposed right of ways pass; and
WHEREAS, the properties through which the proposed right of ways pass is located within an
area encompassed by the lands designated General Commercial, High Density Residential, Medium-High
Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Public/Semi-Public Facility (High School) on the
Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and developed for circulation purposes in a
manner consistent with those designations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and recommends that the City Council
approve and certify the Negative Declaration for right of way lines for said portions of streets; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find
that:
1. The properties through which the proposed right of ways pass is proposed to be developed
for circulation purposes aze in accordance with the requirements and purposes of the General Commercial,
High Density Residential, Medium-High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and
Public/Semi-Public Facility (High School) designations on the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and
therefore the establishment of a right of way across said land is consistent with regazd to purpose of the
Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. Said proposed right of ways aze consistant with
Government Code Section 65402(a).
2. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the negative declaration and adopt rights of
way lines for said portions of streets as identified in Attachments 8 and 9.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of June, 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Planning Commission Chairperson
Community Development Director
RESOLUTION NO. - 99
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
INITIATING PROCESS OF ESTABLISHING RIGHT OF WAY LINES
FOR A PORTION OF TASSAJARA ROAD (FROM NORTH OF INTERSTATE 580 TO THE
NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN RANCH TRACT 6962-NEIGHBORHOOD Ml),
AND FOR PORTIONS OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD, GLEASON DRIVE AND CENTRAL
PARKWAY (FROM TASSAJARA ROAD TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN
RANCH AREAS F, G & H)
PA 99-015
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Dublin Municipal Code Sections 7.68.30 to 7.68.100, the
adoption of specific right of way lines must first be initiated by either a petition of one or more affected
property owners, or resolution of the City Council or resolution of the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin Department of Public Works desires to initiate the process to
establish right of way lines for a portion of Tassajara Road from north of Interstate 580 to the northerly
boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962-Neighborhood Ml, and for portions of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason
Drive and Central Drive (from Tassajaza Road to the westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G & H);
and
WHEREAS, a study of the right of way lines has been completed by the City Engineer and is now
referred to the Planning Commission for review and recommendations prior to any City Council action.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider said study, recommendations and
testimony herein above set forth and is in support of initiating said right of way process.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission approves the initiation of
the process to establish right of way lines for said portions of Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard, Gleason
Drive and Central Drive;
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of June, 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Community Development Director
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTACHMENT
RESOLUTION NO. - 99
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
FINDING OF CONFORMITY OF LOCATION, PURPOSE AND EXTENT OF RIGHT OF WAY
LINES FOR A PORTION OF TASSAJARA ROAD (FROM NORTH OF INTERSTATE 580 TO
THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN RANCH TRACT 6962-NEIGHBORHOOD Ml),
AND FOR PORTIONS OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD, GLEASON DRIVE AND CENTRAL
PARKWAY (FROM TASSAJARA ROAD TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF DUBLIN
RANCH AREAS F, G & H) WITH THE DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AND
THE EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN
AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND RIGHT OF WAY LINES FOR SAID PORTIONS OF STREETS AND
ADOPT RIGHT OF WAY LINES FOR SAID PORTIONS OF STREETS
PA 99-015
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission pursuant to the Dublin Municipal Code (Sections 7.68.30
to 7.68.100) has initiated the process for the establishment of right of way lines for a portion of Tassajaza
Road from north of Interstate 580 to the northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962-Neighborhood
M1, and for portions of Dublin Boulevard, Gleason Drive and Central Drive (from Tassajaza Road to the
westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G & H) on June 8, 1999 and;
WHEREAS, said right of ways will pass through lands designated General Commercial, High
Density Residential, Medium-High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Public/Semi-
Public Facility (High School) on the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65402(a) states, in part, that if a general plan has been
adopted, no real property shall be acquired by dedication for street purposes until the location, purpose
and extent of such acquisition has been reported upon by the planning agency (Planning Commission) as
to conformity with the adopted general plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin has adopted a General Plan and such Plan is applicable to the
properties through which the proposed right of ways pass; and
WHEREAS, the properties through which the proposed right of ways pass is located within an
area encompassed by the lands designated General Commercial, High Density Residential, Medium-High
Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Public/Semi-Public Facility (High School) on the
Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and developed for circulation purposes in a
manner consistent with those designations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and recommends that the City Council
approve and certify the Negative Declaration for right of way lines for said portions of streets; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find
that:
"~".~HMENT
1. The properties through which the proposed right of ways pass is proposed to be developed
for circulation purposes are in accordance with the requirements and purposes of the General Commercial,
High Density Residential, Medium-High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and
Public/Semi-Public Facility (High School) designations on the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and
therefore the establishment of a right of way across said land is consistent with regard to purpose of the
Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. Said proposed right of ways are consistant with
Government Code Section 65402(a).
2. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the negative declaration and adopt rights of
way lines for said portions of streets as identified in Attachments 8 and 9.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of June, 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Planning Commission Chairperson
Community Development Director
G .7.~
//~ _ t ~1\1
~:•~l~i/
_:,,,,
~-
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
(Prepared pursuant to City of Dublin
Environmental Guidelines, Section 1.7(c), 5.5)
Description of Project: The project will establish official right-of-way fines for major
arterials in Eastern Dublin, as well as construct improvements to those streets.
Acquisition of lands, either by purchase or eminent domain, will be required for
construction of the roadways.
Project Location: Major arterials in Eastern Dublin, including Tassajara Road (north of
I-580 Interchange to northerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Tract 6962 -Neighborhood
M-1 ), Gleason Road, Central Parkway, and Dublin Boulevard (from Tassajara Road to
westerly boundary of Dublin Ranch Areas F, G, & H).
Name of Proponents: City of Dublin, Public Works Department; 100 Civic Plaza,
Dublin, CA 94568
I hereby find that the above project will not have a significant adverse effect on the
environment.
Attached is a copy of the Initial Study ("Environmental Information Form" and
"Environmental Checklist") documenting the reasons to support the above finding.
Mitigation Measures have been included-irsthis\project.
Dated: May 19, 1999 Lee S. Thompsonrf3irector of Public Works
Attachments
G:APA96043 W D
.rims a:on I ~. B„3 ^ oD i ~ ~~n it ~o.S c ~ ^5 ~ r'^af`~E ~ 5 F
„oo= °~ o..._-i_-: !S_o, ~..., oc ^ _~~Ia=_ i, ;o?S, 6~5 5°_3~ °a•t f"? r I. >~. ~+~ ~ .~.
E~~vo~n ¢, Ga: ~!oom~nn: :9^_51 c o-5c~i; °elira ico_, ~_-,~_. .~_ _
City of Dublin
Environmental Checklist Form
Initial Study
1. Project title: Eastern Dublin Arterial Street Improvements - A Portion of Capital Improvement
Project (CIP)_No 9640
2. Lead agency name and address:
Citv of Dublin Public Works DeQartment - 100 Civic Plaza. Dublin CA 94568
3. Contact person and phone number: Lee Thompson Director of Public Works: 925/833-6630
4. Project location: Maior arterials in Eastern Dublin includine Tass~ara Road (north of I-680
Interchanee to approximately 1 125 feet north of Gleason Road1 Gleason Road Central Parkway.
and Dublin Bou]evard (from Tass~aza Road to approximately 850 feet east of Tassaiara Road:
westerl~boundar~of Dublin Ranch Areas F G & i~
5. Assessors Parcel Number(s):
6. Project sponsor's name and address:
City of Dublin Public Works Department' 100 Civic Plaza Dublin. CA 94568
7. General Plan designation: N/A 8. Zoning:
9. Specific Plan designation: N/A
10. Description of project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later
phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its
implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
This proiect will establish official rieht-of--way lines for major arterials in Eastern Dublin. as well as
construct i~rovements to those streets Acquisition of lands either b~purchase or eminent domain, unll
be required for construction of the roadways Please also refer to~ase 18
11. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings:
Please refer to paee 18
12. Other public agencies whose approval is required: (e.g., pemuts, financing approval, or
participation agreement.)
None.
ENVIItONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics
Biological Resources
^ Agriculture Resources
Cultural Resources
^ Hazazds & Hazardous Materials ^ Hydrology /Water Quality
^ Mineral Resources
Noise
Public Services
Utilities / Sen~ce Systems
Recreation
Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
Air Quality
Geology /Soils
Land Use /Planning
^ Population /Housing
Transportation/Traffic
^X I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepazed.
^ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to
by the project proponent. A MTTIGATED A'EGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
^ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
EA'VII20NMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
2
^ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately
analyzed in an eazlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by
mitigation measures based on the eazlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain
to be addressed.
^ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIIt or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standazds, and (b) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that eazlier EII2 or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that Se imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Lee Thompson. Director of Public Works
Printed name
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
:S f~ qtr
Date
I) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the pazentheses following each question.
A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the
impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault
rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific
factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants,
based on aproject-specific screening analysis). For the purposes of analysis for this document, a
"1Vo Impact" will signify that no new impacts (as analyzed in the Eastern Dublin General Plan
Amendment/Specific Plan EIR) have been identified.
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site,
cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particulaz physical impact may occur, then the checklist
answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with
mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is
3
substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially
Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies ~~here the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a
"Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section
XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process,
an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section
15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were
within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an eazlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporatedyor refined from
the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the
project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for
potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or
outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the
statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or
individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead
agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to project's
environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
4
Environmental Impacts. The source of determination is listed in parenthesis. See fisting of sources
used to determine each potential impact at the end of the checkist. A full discussion of each item is
found following the checklist
I. AESTHETICS -Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
(Source: 1, 2, 7)
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but no
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway? (Source: 1, 2, 7)
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?
(Source: 2, 7)
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
(Source: 2)
II..4GRICULTURE RESOURCES - In determining
whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept.
of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing
impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown
on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping
and Monitoring Program of the California Resources
Agency, to non-agricultural use? (Source: 2, 7)
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract? (Source: 2, 7)
Potentially
Significant
Impact Less Than
Significant
Huth
Mitigation
Inco oration Less Than
.Significant
Impact No New
Impacts
t
A
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment whicl
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion o
Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
(Source: 2, 7)
III. ATR QUALITY -- Where available, the significance
Criteria established by the applicable air quality
Management or air pollution control district may be
Relied upon to make the following determinations. Would
The project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?(Source: 2, 7)
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation? (Source: 2, 7)
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
(Source: 2, 7)
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?(Source: 2, 7)
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people?(Source: S)
Potentially
Significant
Impact Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Inco oration Less Than
Significant
Impact No New
Impacts
t'
f X
~i
X
X
X
6
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -Would the project
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service? (Source: 2, 7)
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service? (Source: 2, 7 )
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means? (Source: 2, 7)
d) Interfere substantial]y with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife comdors,
or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
(Source: 2, 7)
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance? (Source: 2, 7)
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, I~Tatural Community Conservation Plan
or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan? (Source: 2, 7)
Potentially
Significant
Impact Less Than
Significant
w~lh
Mitigation
Inco oration Less Than
Significant
Impact No New
Impacts
X
X
X
7
V. CULTUR4L RESOURCES -- Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
ofa historical resource as defined in §15064.5?
(Source: 2, 7)
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
ofan archaeologicalresource pursuant to §15064.5?
(Source: 2, 7)
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature? (Source: 2, 7)
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries? (Source: 2, 7)
«. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the
most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. (Source: 2, 7)
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (Source: 2, 7)
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
(Source: 2, 7)
iv) Landslides? (Source: 2, 7)
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
(Source: 2, 7)
Potentially
Significant
Impact Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Inco oration Less Than
Significant
Impact No New
Impacts
X
X
X
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
(Source: 2, 7)
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial
risks to life or property? (Source: 2, 7)
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste
water? (Source: 8)
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS --
Wouldthe project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal
of hazardous materials? (Source: 8)
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment? (Source: 8)
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
(Source: 8)
Potentially
Significant
Impact Less Than
Significant
w~[h
Mitigation
Inco oration Less Than
Significant
Impact No New
Impacts
x
X
X
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazazd to the public or the
environment? (Source: S)
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area? (Source: 8)
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project result in a safety hazazd for people
residing or working in the project area? (Source: 8)
g) Impair implementation of or ph}'sically interfere with
an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan? (Source: 8)
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands? (Source: 8)
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements? (Source: 8)
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production
rate ofpre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level
which would not support existing land uses or planned
uses for which permits have been granted)? (Source: 2, 7)
Potentially
Significant
Impact Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Inco oration Less Than
Significant
Impact No New
Impacts
X
X
x
X
X
10
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
(Source: 2, 7)
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the
rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or off-site? (Source: 2, 7)
e) Create or contribute runoffwater which would exceed
the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage
s}~stems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff? (Source: 2, 7)
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
(Source: 2, 7)
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
(Source: 8)
h) Place within a 100-yeaz flood hazazd azea structures
which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Source: 8)
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam? (Source: 8)
j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, in
involving inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
(Source: 8)
Potentially
Significant
Impact Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Into oration Less Than
Significant
Impact No New
Impacts
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
11
LY. LAN'D USE .4ND PLANNING -Would the projec
a) Physically divide an established community?
(Source: 8)
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an aeency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect? (Source: 2, 7)
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan
or natural community conservation plan? (Source: 2, 7)
X. MINER4L RESOURCES -Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state? (Source: 8)
b) Result in the loss of availability of alocally-important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
(Source: 8)
XI. NOISE -Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies? (Source: 2, 7)
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
(Source: 2, 7)
Potentially
Significant
Impact Less Than
Significant
w~[h
Mitigation
Inco oration Less Than
Sig~cant
Impact No New
Impacts
t:
X
X
X
X
12
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without
the project? (Source: 2, 7)
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project? (Source: 2, 7)
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels? (Source: S)
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise levels? (Source: 8)
XII. POPULATION AND IIOUSING -
Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area,
either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through eartension
of roads or other infrastructure)? (Source: 2, 7)
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere? (Source: 8)
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
(Source: 8)
Potentially
Significant
Impact Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Inco oration Less Than
Significant
Impact No New
Impacts
X
X
X
~i
X
X
X
13
XiII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for new
or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
Fire Protection? (Source: 8)
Police Protection? (Source: 8)
Schools? (Source: 8)
Parks? (Source: 8)
Other Public Facilities? (Source: 8)
XIV. RECREATION -
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of
the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Source: 8)
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment? (Source: 8)
Potentially
Significant
Impact Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Inco oration Less Than
Significant
Impact No New
Impacts
X
X
X
X
X
X
14
?~V. TRAN'SPORTATION/TR4FFIG-
Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either
the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio
on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (Source: 2, 7)
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
(Source: ~, 7)
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location
that results in substantial safety risks? (Source: 2, 7)
d) Substantially increase hazazds due to a design feature
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Source: 2, 7)
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Source: 2, 7)
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Source: S)
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? (Source: 2, 7)
JiVI. UTILTTIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS --
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact Less Than
Significant
Halt
Mitigation
Inco oration Less Than
Significant
Impact No New
Impacts
15
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
(Source: 8)
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects? (Source: 8)
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of ~~hich could cause
significant environmental effects? (Source: 2, 7)
d) Have sufficient water suppiies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed? (Source: 8)
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
pro~~der which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments? (Source: S)
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposal needs? (Source: S)
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste? (Source: S)
X~'lI. MANDATORY FIIx'DINGS OF S1G~'IFICANCE
Potentially
Significant
Impact Less Than
Significant
rti~th
Mitigation
Inco oration Less Than
Significant
Impact No New
Impacts
X
x
16
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to
drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory? (Source: 2, 7)
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects
of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the er'f°,.cts of probable future projects)? (Source: 2, 7)
c) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly? (Source: 2, 7)
Potentially Less Than Less Than No Neu'
Significant Significant Significant Impacts
Impact with Impact
Mitigation
Inco oration
t
Sources used to determine potential environmental impacts:
1. Determination based on location of project
2. Determination based on staff office review.
3. Determination based on tieltl review.
4. Determination based on the City of Dublin General Plan
5. Determination based on the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance.
6. Determination based on Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, June 6, 1998.
7. Determination based on Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Final EIIZ,
Administrative Record Volumes I-III.
8. Not applicable.
17
City of Dublin
Explanations for Checklist Form
Project Description
.4s provided for in Section 7.68.010 of the City's Municipal Code, `'A right-of-~n~ay line study
may be established... for the purpose of reserving areas for future widening, extension. or
creation of streets, highways, or space for future utilities, pedestrian ways. fire and police
emergency access, access to property, and all public rights-of-~'.•ay." This project will establish
official right-of--way lines for major arterials in Eastern Dublin, as well as construct
improvements to those streets for the portion being funded by the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact
Fee. It is anticipated that eminent domain may be initiated for acquisition of some of the
properties necessary for such construction.
The Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan were approved
on Ma}• 10, 1993 (Resolution No. ~1-93). Several antendments to the Specific Plan and General
Plan have been adopted since. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan provides the planning
framework to guide future land use and development decisions in Eastern Dublin, an area that
encompasses approximately 3,300 acres.
The Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific
Plan (SCH ~ 91103604) and .Addenda thereto dated May 4, 1993 and August 23. 1994 (`'FEIR")
analyzed the impact of the development approved by the General Plan Amendment and the
Specific Plan. The roadways included in Table I, attached hereto, facilitate the planned ]and uses.
This analysis looks at the site-specific impacts of the establishment of the right-of--way lines.
construction of the roadways and acquisition of property for such construction.
Major arterials included in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and this Capital Improvement
Project (CIP No. 9640) are shown in Table 1. It is anticipated that most of the actual roadway
construction work will be accomplished by developers who are required to pay Eastern Dublin
Traffic Impact Fees, with fee credits given for the work completed. The time frame for
establishment of right-of--way lines and completion of construction (for those roadway portions
funded) is 1998-?003.
The area of the future right-of--way includes property that is currently not owned by the City of
Dublin or for which the City has not obtained easements over said property. The City currently
anticipates that for certain properties involved, eminent domain (defined as the right of the
government [City of Dublin] to take private property for public use by virtue of superior
dominion of the government over all lands within its jurisdiction) may be initiated.
~ Project Description and Setting information was provided by the Public Works Department and the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan, June 6, 1995 (H'ollace Roberts & Todd).
Eastem Dublin Arterial Street Improvements, CIP No. 9640 Page 18
The actions covered by this environmental document include: 1) establishment of the richt-of-
~~•ay lines; 2) construction of roadways; and 3) acquisition of land (by purchase or eminent
domain) for purposes of constivctine the roadways.
Table I
CIP No. 9640
]1lajor Arterial Streets in Eastern Dublin
Roadway/Segment Existing Configuration ~ Proposed Configuration
Tassajara Road -north of 1-SSO Interchan_e to 2 lanes (1 each direction); S lanes (4 each direction. plus
Dublin Boulevard 100-foot right-of--way additional turn lanes at
intersection); 1S7-footri_ht-
of-way.
Tassajara Road -north of Dublin Boulevard 2 lanes (1 each direction); 66 S lanes (4 each direction. plus
intersection to Central Parkway intersection to S3-foot right-of-way additional tum lanes at
intersection): 166-foot rigltt-
of-way. plus additional rieht-
of-wav at intersection +cith
Dublin Boulevard.
Tassajara Road -north of Central Parkway 2 lanes (1 each direction): 66- 6 lanes (3 each direction, plus
intersection to Gleason Drive intersection foot right-of--way additional turn lanes at
intersection); ]41 to 150-foot
ri_ht-of--way.
Tassajara Road - nonh of Gleason Drive 2 lanes (I each direction); 66- 6 lanes (3 each direction, plus
intersection to northern boundary of Dublin foot right-of--way additional turn lanes at
Ranch Tract 6962 - Neighborhood Ml intersection); LS to 159-foot
right-of--way.
Dublin Boulevard -west of'fassajara Road None exists. 6 lanes (3 each direction. plus
intersection to westerly boundary of Dublin additional turn lanes at
Ranch Areas G R H intersection);140 to 161-foot
right-of--way.
Central Parkway -west of Tassajara Road None exists. 4 lanes (2 each direction plus
intersection to westerly boundary of Dublin additional turn lanes at
Ranch Areas F R G intersection); 104 to 130-foot
right-of--way.
Gleason Drive -west of Tassajara Road None exists. 4 lanes (2 each direction plus
intersection to westerly boundary of Dublin additional turn lanes at
Ranch Area F intersection); 104 to 125-foot
right-of--way.
Source: UraJt Yrecrse Ytalt Ltnes rtmr, ury uJ uuauu rua[rc n'orns tiepanmrm, prcpurcu ur.••u~~•~ i u ~~,•,•~,~
Infrastructure Group, doled received May 7, 7999.
Eastern Dublin Arterial Street Improvements, CIP No. 9640 Page 19
The legal description and approved pats for the road~~a}~s indicated in Table 1 are included as
.Appendix A to this report.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area is surrounded primazily by open space, grazing and
agricultural ]ands, and developable vacant commercial property. The Pazks Reserve Forces
Training Area, known as Camp Pazks, and the Federal Correctional Institute are ]ocated to the
~+est. Lands in the jurisdiction of Contra Costa County are located to the north and are
predominantly open space consisting of hilly, grass-covered grazing land. The area east of the
Specific Plan Area is unincorporated land within Alameda County. consistin, of rura] open space
with limited a,ricu]tural and rural residential uses and very hilly terrain. Major land uses to the
south (south of I-~80) include Hacienda Business Pazk, car dealerships, and highway commercial
uses. The city of Pleasanton is located south of I-580.
Projects either under construction (UC), recently approved (A), or currently proposed (P) that are
in the project vicinity include the following:
\'.%est of Tassajaza Road, starting at northern end -
• Greenbriar - (P)
• Tassajara Meadows I & II - (UC)
• Emera]d Glen Park, Phase I - (UC)
• County Site 3 - (P)
• Koll Center - (A)
East of Tassajara Road, starting at northern end -
Dublin Ranch Phase I - (UC)
• Dublin Ranch Areas F, G, & H - (P)
Exhibits 1 indicates the Project Vicinity for the proposed project.
Eastern Dublin Arcerial Street Improvements, CIP No. 9640 Pare 20
1
i
ILLAGE PARKVAY
p UGHERTY ROAD
a
~v
ARNOLD ROAD vii
r b
HAC ND DRIVE
~ R ~ ~~
~ ey
-o
T ASSgJARA
yc ~RffK
AD
~~
~~
z d
m
r
v
a
A
D
-< b
AIRVAY BLVD
~'
~>C-N ~ ~UiII ~
Explanations
The following section provides narrative responses that correspond with the environmental
checklist form. Please note that for items checked "No New Impacts", this signifies that no new
impacts as indicated in the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Final EIR
(FEIR) (SCFI No. 91103604), have been identified. Where impacts would be similar to those
identified in the FEIIZ, applicable mitigation measures from that document aze referenced.
I. Aesthetics
a, b, c -The Alameda County General Plan Scenic Element (May 1966) designates Tassajara
Road as a scenic route. Planned and approved urban development in the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan area will significantly alter the visual experience of travelers on scenic routes in eastern
Dublin. Formerly quiet roads will be transformed into major suburban thoroughfares carrying
significant traffic Ioads.2 Mitigation measures 3.8/8.0 and 3.8/8.1 identified in the Eastern
Dublin SP/GPA FEIIt would apply. The proposed project would be in conformance with the
adopted Specific Plan, therefore no new impacts are anticipated
d -Project plans do not specify the installation of street lights. It can be assumed, however, that
portions of the roadways would be illuminated. The future installation of street lights would
create a new source of light and may affect nighttime views in the area. Inasmuch as the roadway
construction/widening would occur in azeas planned and approved for development, impacts ar•e
anticipated to be less than significant.
II Aericulture Resources
a-c -Portions of the proposed project area aze currently utilized for cattle grazing. As identified
in the Eastern Dublin SP/GPA Final EIR (Administrative Record Vol. 3, page 705), lands on
either side of Tassajaza Road, south of Dublin Boulevazd, aze considered prime agricultural land
based on criteria established by the Cortese/Knox Act (Section 56064). The Final EIR states that
loss of prime agricultural land is considered unavoidable, but for reasons stated in that document,
is not significant. s No new impacts are anticipated
III. Air Quality
a-e -Once built or widened, it is anticipated that traffic-generated air quality impacts on the
roadways included in this project would increase. The FEIR indicates that mobile source
emissions for ROG and NOx would be significant upon full buildout of the Specific Plan area.4
Implementation of mitigation measures 3.11/5.0 through 3.11/11.0 would not achieve the 98%
reduction in project-related traffic needed to reduce emissions below the ozone precursor
significance threshold. Residual air quality impacts would remain significant. Upon completion
of construction, no objectionable odors would be created. No new impacts are anticipated.
= Fastem Dublin Specific PladGeneral Plan Amendment, Administrative Record (from Alameda County Superior
Coutt Action No. V-006477-8 VO) Vol. 1, pp. 294-295.
Ibid. Voi. III, p. 706.
"Ibid. Vol. I, p. 328.
Factem Dublin Arterial Street Improvements, CIP No. 9640 Page 22
Earthwork typically involved in roadway construction would produce short-term increases in
particulate matter (PM-]0) and NOx (from diesel-powered equipment) concentrations. The FEIR
(Vol. I, P. 326) indicates that the project area is within anon-attainment air basin for PM-10.
Implementation of mitigation measure 3.11/1.0 would reduce project dust deposition (PM-10)
impacts to a level of insignificance. Under buildout conditions, implementation of mitigation
measures 3.11/2.0 through 3.11/4.0 would not reduce ozone precursor emissions (NOx) to less
than significant level. Even with mitigation, cumulative impacts related to construction dust
deposition, construction vehicle emissions, and mobile source emissions remain potentially
significant cumulative impacts, in part due to non-attainment status of the air basin. No grew
impacts are mrticipated
IV Bioloeical Resources
a-f- The FEIR (Vol. I, pp. 262-269) identifies sensitive habitat and animal species that exist or
potentially exist within the Specific Plan azea. Figures 3.7 A-C of the FEIR (Vol. I, pp. 283-Z85)
indicate that of the roadways included in CIP No. 9640, only the northern-most portion of
Tassajara Road has existing or suitable habitat and species present. These habitat and species
include, but are not limited to, Northern Riparian forest, San Joaquin kit fox habitat, golden
eagle, burrowing owl, and Northern harrier.
Implementation of mitigation measures 3.7/1.0 through 3.7/4.0 of the FEIR would reduce
impacts associates with loss of habitat to a level of insignificance. Implementation of mitigation
measure 3.7/5.0 (as revised, see Vol. II, p. 570) would reduce impacts associated with vegetation
removal to a level of insignificance. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.7/6.0 through
3.7/17.0 (measure 3.7/8.0 as revised, Vol. III, p. 882; measure 3.7/9.0 as revised, Voi. II, p. 584)
would reduce impacts associated with loss or degradation of sensitive habitat to a level of
insignificance. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.7/18.0, 3.7/19.0 and 3.7/18.1 (see Vol.
II, p. 697) would reduce impacts associated with loss of San Joaquin kit fox habitat/dens to a
level of insignificance. Implementation of mitigation measure 3.7/25.0 would reduce impacts
associated with loss of golden eagle habitat to a level of insignificance. Implementation of
mitigation measures 3.7/20.0, 3.7/25.0, and 3.7/27.0 (as revised, see Vol. II, p. 604) would
reduce impacts associated with burrowing owl and northern harrier habitat to a level of
insignificance. Cumulative impacts related to direct loss of habitat and golden eagle habitat aze
considered potentially significant. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.7/1.0 through
3.7/15.0, 3.7/23.0 and 3.7/25 would result in a level of insignificance. No new impacts are
anticipated
V. Cultural Resources
a-d - INTO known cultural, paleontological, or historical resources exist within the proposed
project area, which encompasses the existing and future roadways identified in CIP No. 9640.
Therefore, no impacts to known resources are anticipated
Previously unidentified pre-historic resources may exist in the project area and would be subject
to potential disruption or destruction during construction activities. Implementation of mitigation
Eastern Dublin Arterial Street Improvements, CIP No. 9640 Page 23
measures 3.9/5.0 and 3.9/6.0 would reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. No stew
impacts are anticipated
VI. Geology and Soils
a-e - No known earthquake faults or Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones traverse the project
area. For those portions of future roadways which are underlain by expansive soils and bedrock,
potential shrink swell impacts may occur. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.6/14.0
through 3.6/3.16.0 would reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. Construction-
related and long-term erosion and sedimentation impacts associated with construction of the
roadways are anticipated. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.6/27.0 and 3.6/28.0 would
reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. No new impacts are mTticipated
VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
a-h -The proposed project includes the establishment of right-of--way lines and future widening
existing and proposed roadways. The project does not involve the storage or use of hazardous
materials. No impacts are anticipated
VIII. Hvdroloev and Water Ouality ~
a, e, j -The proposed project includes establishment ofright-of--way lines and future widening of
roadways. These roadways aze not located within a floodplain and proposed modifications would
not expose people or structures to flooding. Violations of any water quality standard or waste
discharge requirement are not anticipated. No impacts are anticipated
b - f -Proposed roadway modifications would include installation and/or upgrade of the
drainage system. Although widening of the roadways represents an increase in impervious
surfaces in the immediate project vicinity, the project will be designed so as not to impact the
existing drainage system Implementation of mitigation measures 3.5/44.0 through 3.5/48.0 (Vol.
I, pp. 228-229) would reduce potential project-specific impacts associated with increased runoff
to a level of insignificance. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.5/49.0 and 3.5/50.0 (Vol. I,
p. 229) would reduce potential impacts associated with reduced groundwater recharge to a level
of insignificance. Implementation of mitigation measures 3.5/51.0 through 3.5/55 (refer to Vol. I,
p. 230 and Vol. II, p. 656) would reduce impacts associated with non-point source pollution to a
level of insignificance. Cumulative impacts related to an increase in impervious surfaces and the
resultant potential increase in flood hazazds, reduction in groundwater rechazge, and increase in
non-point pollution sources is a potentially significant cumulative impact. Implementation of
mitigation measures 3.5/44.0 through 3.5/52.0 (Vol. I, pp. 377-378) would result in a less than
significant cumulative impact. No new impacts are anticipated
IX. Land Use and Plannine
a-c -This proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project is in response to the adopted
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The entire CIP project is within the City's Sphere of Influence
and/or city limits and is therefore governed by the adopted General Plan and Zoning Ordinance,
Eastern Dublin Arterial Street Improvements, CIP No. 9640 Page 24
in addition to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The proposed right-of--way lines are in
conformance with ultimate roadway widths discussed in both the Specific Plan and the
Circulation Element of the General Plan. The project area is not included in any habitat
conservation plans or natural community conservation plans. No impacts are anticipated
X. Mineral Resources
a-b -According to information provided in the FEIR (Vol. I, p. 251), although proposed uses
would preclude any future recovery of aggregate resources, underlying soils are judged to be
inadequate for use as aggregate. No impacts are anticipated
XI. Noise
a - f -The FEIR identifies potentially significant noise impacts related to exposure of existing
and future residences to future roadway noise, and to construction noise. Implementation of
mitigation measures 3.10/1.0, 3.10/2.0, 3.10/4.0 and 3.10/5.0 (Vol. I, pp. 317-319) would reduce
project-specific impacts to a level of insignificance. Even with implementation of mitigation
measure 3.10/7.0, cumulative impacts related to exposure of existing residences to future
roadway noise would remain at a potentially significant level (Vol. I, p. 381). No new impacts
are anticipated
XII. Population and Housin
a-c -The proposed project includes the establishment of right-of--way lines and construction of
and/or modifications to portions of four roadways. Proposed roadway modifications were
planned for in the adopted Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. No population and housing impacts are
anticipated.
XIII. Public Services
a -The proposed project includes establishment of right-of--way lines and future widening and
other modifications to existing/future roadways. No impacts to fire protection, police protection,
schools, or parks are anticipated. Due to the fact that the proposed project is a CIP project, any
future required roadway maintenance would be accounted for in the City's yearly budget. No
impacts are mrticipated
XIV. Recreation
a-b -The proposed project includes establishment ofright-of--way lines and future widening and
other modifications to existing/future roadways. No impacts are anticipated
XV. Transportation/Traffic
a-g -The proposed project includes establishment of right-of--way lines and future widening
and/or construction on roadway segments identified in Table 1. The CIP established for this
work is in response to approved land uses included in the adopted Easter Dublin Specific Plan.
Eastern Dublin Arterial Street Improvements, CIP No. 9640 Page 25
The following transportation impacts, identified in Vol. III of the FEIR (pp. 1000 - 1001), would
be applicable to the proposed project:
• Cumulative impacts on Dublin Boulevard at the Tassajaza Road intersection.
Implementation of mitigation measure 3.3/13.0 would reduce the impact, but the impact
would remain significant.
• Cumulative buildout would cause level of service F operations at the intersections of
Tassajara Road with Gleason Road and Central Parkway. Implementation of mitigation
measure 3.3/14.0 would reduce the impact to a level of insignificance.
The FEIR (Vol. I, p. 165) identifies potential impacts related to safety of pedestrian and bicycle
traffic when crossing major streets such as Dublin Boulevard and Tassajara Road.
Implementation of mitigation measures 3.3/16.0 and 3.3/16.1 would result in a level of
insignificance.
No new impacts are a~7ticipated
XVI Utilities and Service Systems
a - g -The proposed project includes establishment of right-of--way lines and future widening
and other modifications to existing/future roadways. No impacts to utilities acid service systems
are anticipated
Factem Dublin Arterial Street Improvements, CIP No. 9640 Page 26
APPENDIX A
Lesal Description and Plats
(1,267-02
Mazch 2, 1999
RRB
Page I of 4
EXHIBIT "A"
Right of way acquisition for the purposes of_ widening Tassajara Road-and-the-construction of Dublin
Boulevard, Central Parkway and Gleason Drive in the City of Dublin, Alameda County, California, along
and through the lands of Dublin Land Company, a deed for which was recorded September 30, 1983,
Series 83-182776, Alameda County Records. Parcels A through E are drainage and utility easements
which correspond to the various street right-of--ways as shown on the current plan lines. The easements
are granted for purposes of grading and installing utilities in the ultimate location and paving the TIF
portion of the streets (Parcels F, G, H, J & K). The existing poles on Tassajara Road will be relocated.
The drainage and utility easements and TIF right-of-ways are described as follows:
PARCEL A, Tassajara Road Drainage and Utility Easement
BEGINNING at the most northwesterly corner of above said land, said corner being on [he easterly line
of Tassajan Road, 66.00 feet in width and the southerly line of Tract 6925, Dublin Ranch, the map of
which was filed in Book 241 of Maps at Page 39, Alameda County Records; Thence leaving said Point of
Beginning along the easterly line of Tassajara Road SI°13'07"W 172.80 feet; thence S]°12'54"W
2207.39 feet; thence S88°44'32"E 1839 feet; thence SI°15'28"W 234.16 feet to a point hereafter known
as POINT A; thence leaving the easterly line of Tassajara Road SSS°47'06"E 43.13 feet; thence
N00°29'19"W 381.76 feet; thence N1°12'54"E 947.03 feet to a point hereafter known as POINT B;
thence N88°47'06"W 29.00 feet; thence N02°56'41"W 165.44 feet; thence 588°47'06"E 29.00 feet;
thence NO1°12'54"E 505.98 feet; thence S88°47'06"E 9.00 feet; thence NOI°12'S4"E 360.00 feet to a
point hereafter known as POINT C; thence N88°47'06"W 26.00 feet; thence NO1°12'54"E 165.00 feet;
thence 588°46'53"E 25.01 fee[; thence N1°13'07"E 89.66 feet to the southerly line of above said Tract
6925; thence along said southerly line N88°39'20"W 46.00 feet to the POINT' OF BEGINNING.
Containing 2.537 acres, more or less.
PARCEL B, Dublin Boulevard Drainage and Utility Easement
COMMENCING at the above described POINT A on the easterly line of Tassajara Road; thence
S88°47'06"E 10.12 feet to the TRUE POINT' OF BEGINNING; thence S00°07'07"E 200.46 feet; thence
S88°47'06"E 38.00 feet; thence N46°12'S4"E 2828 feet; thence S8S°47'06"E 275.84 feet; thence
S88°29'55"E 200.00 feet; thence S88°47'06"E 368.67 feet to the easterly line of Dublin Land Co., Series
83-182776; thence along said easterly line N]°08'49"E 140.00 feet; thence leaving said easterly line
N88°47'06"W 68.51 feet; thence N86°55'25"W 400.21 feet; thence N88°47'06"W 130.00 feet; thence
N1°12'54"E 9.00 feet; thence N88°47'06"W 255.50 feet; thence N44°38'13"W 27.56 feet; thence
AT88°47'06"W 33.01 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 3.192 acres, more or less.
PARCEL C, Central Parkway Drainage and Utility Easement
BEGINNING a[ the above described POINT B on the easterly line of Tassajara Road; thence
N46°12'54"E 2828 feet; thence S88°47'06"E 237.93 feet; thence S89°52'35"E 420.08 feet; thence
588°47'06"E 205.75 feet to the easterly fine of Dublin Land Co., Series 83-182776; thence along said
easterly line N1°08'49"E 104.00 feet; thence leaving said easterly line N88°47'06"W 205:63 feet; thence
N88°01'16"W 300.03 feet; thence N88°47'06"W 120.00 feet; thence Nl°12'54"E 9.00 feet; thence
Iv~88°47'06"W 249.93 feet; thence N43°47'06"W 28.28 feet; thence N88°47'06"W 29.00 feet; thence
S02°56'41"E 165.44 feet; thence 588°47'06"E 29.00 feet to the POINT' OF BEGINNING.
Containing 2.434 acres, more or less.
11,267-02
March 2, 1999
RRB
Paoe 2 of 4
PARCEL D, Gleason Drive Drainage and Utility Easement
BEGINNING a[ the above described POINT C on the easterly line of Tassajara Road; thence
N46°12'54"E 28.28 feet; thence S88°47'06"E 250.00 feet; thence S89°52'35"E 420.08 feet; thence
888°47'06"E 195.46 feet to the easterly line of Dublin Land Co., Series 83-182776; thence along said
easterly line Nl°08'49"E 104.00 feet; thence leaving said easterly line N88°47'06"W 195.34 feet; thence
I~'88°O1"]6"W 300.03 feet; thence N 88°47'06"W 120.00 feet; thence N1°12'54"E 9.00 feet; [hence
N88°47'06"W 250.99 feet; thence N43°47'00"W 28.28 feet; thence NS8°46'53"W 25.01 feet; thence
SO1°12'54"W 165.00 feet; thence 888°47'06"E 26.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 2.415 acres, more or less.
PARCEL E, Tassajara Road Drainage and Utility Easement
BEGINNING at the above described POINT A on the easterly line of Tassajara Road; thence along said
easterly line SO1°15'28"W 503.97 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 234.02
feet through a central angle of 16°03'36" for an arc length of 65.60 feet to a point of compound curvature;
thence along a curve to the left having a tadius of 29.00 feet through a central angle of 64°03'42" for an
azc length of 32.43 feet to a point of compound curvature; thence along a curve to the left having a radius
of 164.02 feet through a central angle of OS°34'29" for an arc length of 15.96 feet to a point of reverse
curvature; thence along a curve to the right having a radius of 178.02 feet through a central angle of
01 °44' ] 0" for an arc length of 5.39 feet; thence leaving said easterly line of Tassajara Road NO l ° 13'4"E
391.35 feet; thence N88°47'06"W 38.00 feet; thence N00°07'07"W 200.46 feet; thence N88°47'06"W
10.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 0.520 acres, more or less.
The portions of the above described parcels that are subject to credit against the City of Dublin's Traffic
Impact Fee (TIF) are described as follows:
PARCEL F, Tassajara Road (TTF)
BEGINNING at the first hereinabove referenced POINT OF BEGINNING for PARCEL A; thence
leaving said POINT OF BEGINNING along the easterly line of Tassajara Road S1°13'07"W 172.80 feet;
thence S1°12'54"W 2207.39 feet; thence S88°44'32"E 1839 feet; thence Sl°15'28"W 234.16 feet;
thence leaving said easterly line S88°47'06"E 10.12 feet; thence N00°29'19"W 381.27 feet; thence
NO1°12'54"E 647.52 feet; thence 888°47'06"E 4.00 feet; thence NO1°12'54"E 300.00 feet; thence
N02°56'41"W 165.44 feet thence NO1°12'54"E 505.98 feet; thence 888°47'06"E 12.00 feet; thence
NO1°12'54"E 614.72 feet to the southerly line of Tract 6925; thence along said southerly line
IQ88°39'20"W 20.99 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 0.955 acres, more or less.
11,267-02
March 2, 1999
RRB
Page 3 of 4
PARCEL G, Tassajara Road (TIF)
BEGINNING at the above described POIIVT A on the easterly line of Tassajara Road; [hence along said
easterly line SOI°15'28"W 503.97 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the lefr having a radius of 234.02
feet through a central angle of ]6°03'36" for an azc length of 65.60 feet to a point of compound curvature;
thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 29.00 feet through a central angle of 25°15'33" for an
arc length of 12.79 feet thence leaving said easterly line of Tassajara Road NOI°12'54"E 379.44 feet;
thence N00°07'07"W 200.46 feet; thence N88°47'06"W 10.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 0.182 acres, more or less.
PARCEL H, Dublin Boulevard (TIF)
COMMENCING at the above described POINT A on the easterly line of Tassajaza Road; thence
SS8°47'06"E 10.12 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S00°07'07"E 200.46 feet; thence
588°47'06"E 38.00 feet; thence N46°12'54"E 28.28 feet; thence N02°13'07"W 32.06 feet; thence
S88°47'06"E 277.84 feet; thence S88°29'55"E 200.00 feet; thence SS8°47'06"E 368.56 feet to the
easterly line of Dublin Land Co., Series 83-182776; thence along said easterly line NO1°08'49"E 76.00
feet thence leaving said easterly line N88°47'06"W 69.06 feet; thence N86°55'26"«' 40021 feet; thence
N88°47'06"W 129.48 feet; thence NO1°12'54"E 9.00 feet; thence N88°47'05"W 253.58 feet; thence
N02°13'07"W 32.06 feet; thence N44°38' 13"W 27.86 feet; thence N88°47'06"W 33.01 feet to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 1.944 acres, more or less.
PARCEL J, Central Parkway (TIF)
BEGINNING at the above described POINT B; thence N46°12'54"E 28.28 feet; thence N04°16'07"W
32.15 feet; thence SS8°47'06"E 240.70 feet; thence S89°52'35"E 420.08 feet; thence S88°47'06"E
206.02feet to the easterly line of Dublin Land Co., Series 83-182776; thence along said easterly line
NOl°08'49"E 40.00 feet; thence leaving said easterly line N88°47'06"W 205.88 feet; thence
I~r88°01'16"W 300.03 feet; thence N88°47'06"W 119.79 feet; thence N01°12'54"E 9.00 feet; thence
N88°47'06"W 246.86 feet thence N04°16'07"W 32.15 feet; thence N43°47'06"W 28.28 feet; thence
N88°47'06"W 29.00 feet; thence 502°56'41"E ]65.44 feet; thence S88°47'06"E 29.00 feet to the POINT'
OF BEGINNING.
Containing 1.156 acres, more or less.
PARCEL K, Gleason Drive (TIF)
BEGINNING at the above described POINT C; thence N46°12'54"E 28.28 feet; thence N00°45'32"E
32.00 feet; thence S88°47'06"E 249.95 feet; thence S89°52'35"E 420.08 feet; thence S88°47'06"E
195.73 feet to the easterly line of Dublin Land Co., Series 83-182776; thence along said easterly line
N1°08'49"E 40.00 feet; thence leaving said easterly line N88°47'06"W 195.59 feet; thence
IQ88°01'16"W 300.03 feet; thence N88°47'06"W 119.79 feet; thence NO1°12'54"E 9.00 feet; thence
Ivr88°47'06"W 250.74 feet thence N00°45'32"E 32.00 feet; thence N43°47'00"W 28.28 feet; thence
N88°46'53"W 25.01 feet; thence SO1°12'54"W 165.00 feet; thence S88°47'06"E 26.00 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 1.142 acres, more or less.
11,267-02
March ?, 1999
RRB
Page 4 of 4
TEMPORARY SLOPE AND CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
A temporary slope and construction easement is hereby gamed over the lands of Dublin Land Company
described as follows:
A strip of land ten (10) feet in width, contiguous [o the perimeter of the above described Pazce]s A, B, C,
D, and E.
Said temporary easement shall expire 30 days from the date of completion and acceptance of the last
utility installed in the respective utility easement
This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the
P..*ofessional Land Surveyors Act.
5~~99
Date
i~o. 23573
- r(~pit•3r-ol
ill. ~ ~
-. ~.!~i~
Prepared by the firm of
MACKAY & SOMPS
Infrastructure Group
San Ramon, California
i
SheeflZ
s
0
0
Q
Q
Q
~~ Q
NBS°aa'3z'w
18.39'
I
t0
r
N
~
_
~ ~
n
i 3
o ~
Q w a - °'
~ N N
b N
Z 0. Z °
O z
~ 10.12'
N44°38' 13" W
27.86'
1 11 I
. N68°47'06" W
' 33.01' 255.50'
.
NS 4 '06"W.
0 32.06'
253.58'
h
n
1^
w
w ~
c <`+
v3 ~ v3
n ,~
m o
o z
z
N88°
~;
0
~,
J
W
U
a
n
in
v
V ~^^''
W
IZn
VJ
N01°12'54"E
- 9.00'
N86°4T05 W
130.00'
129.48'
~ 1
? PARCEL B PARCEL H
0
;.~ •- 277.84'
- 200.00'
0 32.06'
275.84' ~ 200.00'
N88°47'06' W N88°29'S5" W
N46°12'S4"E
28.26' D U B B I N
~,
M
B~vD.
~ 0
Ww 100 200
N w SCALE: 1"=100'
U
G_
Z a
Sheef / of ~
S-4 -99
N ~
ONE
< p~
a
~e~ o° PLAT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
J ~
~e ~ DUBLIN LAND COMPANY
~a~ DUBLIN CALIFORNIA
~
a, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALJFORNW
MARCH,1999
~~
IiIA~KAY 8c ~O~IPS
~ n p INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP
',QJ\ CNb EHGNEFRINC°IAND PIANiNG°W1G SURVEYING
SW R410N. G D15E3 (@5) 901-1190
Sheef 13
CEN TR,
Z
Q
c~
L I^`
I
O N
U o0
o I
z ~
Q ~
z w
~ ~
m w
~~
0 100 200
SCALE:1 " =100'
Sheef 2 of G
s-~-s9
o
b
N
N ~n
N
N
W
c
,~ O O
Z O
~
o
n
N
O
Z
W
<
N
N
~~
C~
Z e
o
Z
_
4~
W
m
~-
~
0 NBB°47'O6
4.00'
_~
N a
o'
v
N
v~ /
n
a
O
w
a
n ,~ /
fL_IL~_
N
O
Z
W
Y
o
z ~
~ ~
x
W ( /~
v/
Q
a
J L
t-
W
U
D'
Q
a
IYOOY/ VO W
'72'54"E
28.28'
~--POINT B
~a~~
Sheef ¢
D
Q
O
Q
Q
Q
(/~
U~
Q
I--
6 1 \N4 zais4P01NT C ~ L E A S O N D R
-3
~ W
x
W "
N
o
M
W
o `a
z .n
fV
°
La. Z
N86°47'05 W
9.00'
Q
rn
0
m in
O1 w
¢i
~ ~
N
W
< z
IZ
N43°47'06" W
28.26'
N684993~W
32.15' 246.86'
PARCEL C-~
"a
° ~ 240.70'
't2.15'
'z
Lime
0 100 200
SCALE:1"=100'
V
v ~ Shee f ,3 0~ 6
3-~-99
~~
~ N
N 01° 12'54' E
9.00'N88° 47'OG W
120.00' -~
119.79' ~~ %~ -
PARCEL J
237.93'
Nas°a7'o6'w
12'54 E
X8.28'
N8E
420.08'
N89°52'35
A~ F
p U.n•_ •o
. "Tp,SS ~' . ~ ~ ~
NOt°t3'OYE 172- c.+a~
WW
-
A RD A~ •1S'07E 172-80'
rno 0 1045 06
~SS A J AR
j ~
NO t
Zrn -- 254.72' o u
2
,
EX R~W ~ N01°T2 4 E 89i
_ ~
4 E 360.00
' .
N ~.. 16500 ~ -L _ o+
5
N01°12
CEL F
C E E
A rn '32 E '~ p N01°13'OYE
NoU'
W Z
66'
9
ppR
pA R ~
O
N N .
8
00'
E 360. ~3 NI b~J N~
a N ~,
N01 12'54 ~ ~ ~
~cao
o
~ o
~
~ ~
°
J
.~ Na: v za f
O~ 'A N~ {~'
//.
(~~
`~+ ~ ~ > Z fn ~ O v
r
~ Z
' (~ U OO -
~ ~
N A
Q ~ (T ~D ~ A ~ dL Cp 1
~
Z J O cT ~ W
'
~~ .{ ~o -
~ N ~
° cfl
Z.
~~ ~ ~
I
1 1 ~ ~o
~ QN
~ I
_ Z a
(D N ~ f'1
~ O~
O
O O
- a+_
I ~
1
W
O ~
- ~
N W
N
~ O O
Z
O ~
cD
N O
W
W
W O
O ~
~i V O O
~ ~ O O ~
V ~
u
~
~ ~
~
O
1T1
1
1 '
0 100 200
SCALE: 1" =100'
Sheef ~ ~~' 6
s-~-99
Z I
O
~~
ZW ~p ~ N >1
~~ N
~ Y -J tD ~
O ~ ~ ~
~ -- - t
I ~~ 120.66. _
1. 1' 40 °_. N01' Og' 49~~ E
' NOt°12'54"E 2556.08'
(BASIS OF BEARING)
'.52'
947.03'
m
A~~
A A
O V
O 0
• ps
NO1°72'54"E 300.00'
TASSAJARA ROAD
Z
1
N01'12'S4'E
_ _ _ z p4 ~ •o7•w ` = ~ Nor
Z
Z
~
(~
N
~ W
N
~ A
U
N A
A U ~ V
N~O
C0 U D 00
~
N
~ ~ .Z7
~ ~
A
=
m
z
~
z
~ ~ u A c~ ~ ~ `8
-~-rZ ~
Z V V O ~V
~ I ~ ~ u of °~ u
°!
CO ~ F
Match zi
nc
~h eet 3
o
TT
~ 1 ~
I I
/
1
O N
O ~
~ O A
Z
z ~ _. m m
N
V
~ O A
O
! '
~
D
~_
0 100 200
SCALE:1 " =100'
Sheef S o7c 6
s--~-99
t0 A
N A
N
N O O
m
T N
a - w Z
U
~ O
0
D 0
D o b '=
n
m u ~ °L
r ~
D l 1 I l
-~ i i 1 'i
z
~° o o ~~
V U
~ V
V
~ U O
N_ Oo
CD_ ~•' W
~ f
ioaloo•
{
~TASSAJARA ROAD N01°'2'54"E
=234.02°
90'
OINT A
=16°03'36" 85.
= 65.60'
NOt°15'28"E
738.13'
z
'
z
PARCEL G ~
~ w 234.16
i
~
,~ 503.9 7 yi
A
w
N00°29'19"W 381.27'
NOt'12'S4'E ~
379.44' ~
~ N00°07'0 200.46' o
W rn ~
~,
o
7
381
"
~~ NO7°12'S4'E --~ o - - ~ .
W
~ N00°29'19
160.91'
" °-
35' N02°13'0"r
391 NOZ°13'OY ~ o
E
R=164.02' N01'12'S4 .
.1
~'' N 1 A ~?
PARCEL E
p=5°34'29"
'
^'
° o
o,
N ;
~'
L=15.96
Z m u
QI Oo
' =178.02'
"
' A
^'O:
pD ~
D O~~
w
'
10
p=1°44
L=5.39' ~
N
~, ~ z
°o g
_
A Z r U tr J
-~
a..~~rZ m
~ ~ N v
Ip
N
w
0 O
- °1
J N ~
O ~ ~ ~
Y A
~ Ma'fch L/~
Sheet ~
D
0 " ` '
~ ~ Z o
C
' = w~ ~.
~ ~A ~N
1rn` '
~
~
~
OJ
A
'~
W
z
00 _ ~
£ m
°
° / 1
o
~ ,
o
u; o °o. , 1
rn
W 1 ~
\
-~
~ O m
a
~
r
~ ~
-
I
CD A
O
U
~' ° N
,.. civw ~a`P t~P
~= GF CA~~F~ x'31"O~
0 100 200 z ~'
m
~w rn
SCALE:1" =100' ~~
Sheef 6 of 6
S-¢-99 1 ,1 z
m
- ~ rn ~
" ~__ -
~
p ~ ~
~, o
~
' ~ f ~
76 0
140.00'
a
C
.C
C
A
a
.0
W
~° a
C Q
C .~, ~
K
c w w
C ~
G1 N ~
C ~ Z
d
C7 LL1 J
~
a' 0
N
a
U
U ~
D j
U
m
~
U
m
U
~ g
N
Q
O
a
~ 3
~
N
N C ~ ~ ~
N ~ (O b -
U J
(n
t0
d
•
J
.~
a~
Z T
.m
L
r ~
~
N
1
a
~
~
C
d
D
E
A
N
4
E
E
U m
_~
~ N
c
Q
T
~
~
w
O
~
j U U J
~ cn a
T~ OO ~E C
o
~
a
J
o
o
'a o
(n 9
W
r Q
~
a
j
~ f..~
9
E m y N c
U c r _ °'
c x x e
J o o °'
o _
d ~' `n
o
~ Z o
o f .~ m ~. m a ~. ?
a y N
' ~ m
E a o c,
U °' rig m
m
~~
a ~ F.
L U p a
~
~ N x
D o i= ~
~ m
N °
o^"
J
S a
w ¢ ,.
~
U o+
~ t n
~ in
~ a
~
~`
~ ~
~ ,q
H
J
G ~
-~ ° ~
U H
CJ
~ ~
J ~
~ O~ N ~
~
~ ~
+y O
O C .,
J -
i
/G~ ^^ N /?
~1
~ U
Y
fJ
O
~
~ ~ c
O~ N N
~ _
N ~ ~
ry
C C
O C ~
d U
'D _
U
-~ 10
(J U C
f- S 2
.-
J C W
N
C
VEL `~
W
C O N
Z L Q U 7
~ ~
C
~
~
w
['1
w
cv
I
~~ <
~ 1
~
1
~ I
I
Q
~
L`J' -~ 1
c I I I i W 3
i
~~...,~
--
~~
r^'~
C
j L
i
{ d
1 j
~ U
1 ~
Q
N
C
~ a
',o
J
3 N
] j
j IL. '
O
J
o p`
j U
3
s
v c0 ~ p
~. ~ ~ m
~ ~
O ~ O ~ c9
7 O ~ N ~ ~
a ~ ~ '- d ~
rn ~ '" E _ `-
v `n ~ m
O. O (D r- N J - E U O O O ~
Q ¢ U ~ r L w U a
C T C N ~ Z O O "" Q. U ~ T L O ~ O O 5,. U
'O E 01 N 'N O U ~ U m d tD O L Z L '- C ~ a
y~ co ~ p c ? o N •`-° ~ ID = v w o o ~ ca to
~ o^ LL o ~ ``° L a H a v aci o~ aO t L E d c
~• O F- ~ O> ~ O Q (~ Z U ~ (n d W ~ 2 ¢ Z Z U U O
.a-~ ~Z~¢~~~= W
[L J ~ ~ ~• w ~ x ¢d
~ ~ ~ ~®®~ ~ DDOQ ~ X00
J
m
~ 'p
/
\y
O
~
F-'
z ~- ~
41 ~
s" 8
W • ~~
~+~- Q
o m LL O
•~
// ++ M
LL R ,N
E <
~
°p
''^^
V/ ^V^+
W 4I
V ss
o
wo~4
a Q ~ g~~e
~
W
~
3 ~
LL
s«~s
-~=
$r A
oC
•_
/Y
t?r
~.r
6^~,.
~_
O C
d~
y O_
N N ~
C
of = vi p
C d y O7
~ d >
7 ~.
C N QI t`
L ~ ~ ~
h _
1
~ 01
Z N
N
C d
p ~
~ a
~ E
O O
N_ p
~ ~
N O
d
a "
E ~'
o a~
U d
V1
~ ~._.
O ¢
d
x ¢
O
d
O O,
N E
N
N >
N J
N
U L_
O
~ 3
~ c
c y
c N
o ~~,
N C
C O
U
N C
E a
c ~
o c
> ~E
~ ~
a ~
d ~
c d
c ~
~ L
~ 3
C d
T ~
L
~ U
.a
'p -
'~ Q
(0
p O
a
~ ¢
~ >
a
T ~
CJ ~
E
d
m ~
U ~
N' lL
E .c
E
0
U a
~ c
c
~ c
c
m
~ 3
~~
_....: ~
i
..
o a
- m
_ =~
_ •-
-
= _ ~ ~
j 0 7~ c
; ~
~
~ ~-
~ _
a ~
CA o o - o
T a O m O m C D
~ o - a ~= ~_ ..~. v
`7 J ~ ~ ~ iJJ ___
m ~ ~
~ ~ \
,aC
. _' 1 i
_~
n
z ~-
U
~.
U
(1J C~
-Q .^_
1:.1 Cn
a
z
0
N
A
N
N 0
O
N (..~
E
J~
/
io
~
~
N ~
a V
,
1 W
U
~ a
~ U
N ~ "a
~ ~~
N 'w
~ N
r^u
l
O
N
O
f1'
. .-,,. f
F '~a f .¢~
1 q ~; ,y ,t
O
1
I I !N'I ~ w ~ ~
05+9L 'tl15 3NIl HO1tlW -m rl I I I q~ ~ ~/
III ~ ~ _
~ lllllll 5a~ ~~
rv m 3n
~i I ~ _ ~ - t7" a
_~ _ _ ~
~ ~ ~ -y--.~ I I'I III °~ or Z tl
zo' r ~n - - r _
~_ r I I I I I m ~° ~ Q Y
- m ,~-.~ _ _ _ _ ~, I ._
, ~~ 2n ¢I Iw No~ N m IlllYl III ~wN ~~~ a `
_I :, ~ _ f -f- Z 133H5 335
,r -toss,- N„ ~ r ~~- ~ ~LwTl+~vis I A~ °' C {
_-+- -"' rln --_-_3 IIII III 0~.~
m „ _ "" ~ _ ~ I III I III E ` d
--_. z-
,~ ' ~ titytlrj r ~ -N- I III III II ~
•anag Nizana ~ IIII III ~
I I I s I I I ~ I I I III ;,
m Illlllll= I ` I I I I I I I I c
". I I I I. I I < I III ~ III I
n~ a ~ I III I I I
N W_ m4~}ml~l~ ~ ~ -t= n+~~~ ^_ - I I I s III I ~
n I INI I I y I I ~ I I I I I
a s IIII o~ I I I I III m III I ~
= I I I a I y I I III I I I I c
-N- w l I I I I III n I III III I a
rv~ l I I ~ IIII ;, , s. I N
o~ III I I I R I I I ~.w.a.l I I
I it IyII' ~ III 5~ III ~ ~ w
I I ~ III I ~ o ST.6H.0. ~ a
III I I y I I - I III I I I ~
III I '~ IIII m ~„~„I„ j~~„ .
I I I I I I -- I"Iil~ ~ -I I"rm ~ 6
IIII IIII I I I III
I I I m~ I I IIII III gs~
'I I I I I mi III I y~€
I ~~ I n°- -~ I III I I i ~9~€
omm o.- q}
I I IN $ aaN I moo ^oai ; I I ~~~ p°
gn I 111~'a'g I 11 ~aS °a5 rv I j I I ~ ~ ~~~!
-b o II + r I~ y I I;I I I Iq~ I f g~ ,676?; _§
(I I ~ I Ipl I I I pl I o sS~Se
= III II II ~ I I I Ic I III I ~ ~ C-'~~9
IIII
"o; I I `\~ I III m I I I ~ 8
I i II I I s °'I I I aem I
111'° III III _ II
_ _ _ I L~ I ~~~ \ I III I III I e
I III III III „
----~ iii \~ lili#il m tiliflt =,s
I I I } I~I I ~ ~
t6fi
III IIII "' Ill 1 III rya
I I I ~~ II 17 ~~a ~
I I I I IIII ~m I '''" III I
I III III I I III m III i om~ ~ a
III
III I IIII ~ ~ m7~T~T_ I„ ~ I I I ~ fim ~ ~ a a
I I I I I I .I I I I } III I .:.A
I I I I I =1~ I I I I I ~ ~0'~5~~ ~~
I I I s ~° ~0,f3
I I I IIII I IIII im IIII I e ~ ~'= ` b
~ II II I ~ II II I I I ~ II ~ ~ O~s3~ •;>
I I I III I I ~ ~ I~ I I I
I I I I I I a ~ I III I s
I I I I I I I I III I>,i
I I I III I I sl I l l"^"^„
I I I I I I I ~ I I ~ I I ~m
~ lilii,~ 'ili \ Il lil ~ ~
III II „ I II r ~
I I I I I \ I I I III ~ a
III I I I ~, I I III ;, ~
I I I I I a. I l m I III g s
III I II ~ III III =
I I I I I I I ~ I Ill g
I iii , ii o ~ Iii titiit
III I I L L I n „1„j' I ;
_ II `
I I I I l II I ~
j
/ ~ OS+9L V15 3NIl HOl W r ~_~ ~
~$~a ~
6~
.1
1 1 I b
f11+65.94 I 11. I ~ i b
C 133HS 335 - 1 u ry ~ N ry
OS+LLI 'tl15
I
3NIl Hp1tlW ~ I
~ c
A
,,,+zazfi m I I I =
. I
' I I ~"
I I + I I -
~"
fl ,0 0. • 110+81.07 + I I I I ?
~
01+66 V1S 3NI1 H~1tlW
I
I
[
1
I o
g LL y
/--,
I I 1 I I m o
~ a Q
I I I ~ ° I. I o w_ pa = o
l III " "
~ I"j I A~ _ ~
I I
I I ~ g +
I ~ ~~ ~
I I o
o I +
~ ~ I I
l
l
~
~ a cx
d
• III e I n " _ I_vTH o
w
rv
" " ~
' O U d
+ 109+60.67 11
•
~• I ~
Ii I n I ~ ~ S
a I t l ~ E-' E-
m III I I I ` ~ I I ~ U
I II z
I I I I
I - - I I IW a
~ III
- I
I I
n W
_
Q4' I ' ~
~'
~ III III
Im m 108+54.78 +
t
t
tl i Q
I
I I '° tl
j
I
I I
ml ~
~ I I l
I 4
~ III I z I ~
/
-L \ I I
~ I c
III s III
~T I I °' I P O .o.~. o
1
h ~
~ I I
,: ,a
,
~ . ~, F
p ,6 .r
o I
~ I I
I ~ I I
W ~ -N-
I I
"
't~ . I. I .
"T T-~ _ I
1
~
D
I I ~ ~ ~ a
~ I w I+ I I a
I o m
I
III
l III = ~ ~ ~ I I
s
I I a II o n I II I
0
-N- III
~ I "I "
m
I I I
I I~
I ~>:
~
.
III6
III
n
o ^
'°
~
Y
(
~ sl I I I tl
~
m i i i i ~ I 1~ I I ~w
i
I
I
~
o
~ ~
'i
~
I c + ~ ~ ~ I
N
3
ppp
p3 CI
~
I
I w _CASTEB$ON BOUNOARV
rv 105+48.72
, I I
, 05+34
50 si L
3
~~
333
~~
III ./
y III f 105+34.58 , I ~ I I ~ . ~ ~~1~
ii
III III I g I I I ~
, I
I I I _ w I
f I I I nm
„
;;
r
^
" I
I I } III ,
I I
~° zI
I I I ~°'
I I I I ~- I I I e
6• I I
mi m
~
~
I 104+39.0} ~ n
~ Y ~
I I ~
If ~ ~
I I X11
t l~ t
III ^' V
104+09.47 i I I I
I Q ~
V
I
I 1 ~ ~
3 I
a l l I I n I ~ ~ I I I r: ~
r I I I I
1 o 103+79.47 ,pa ~ I I I e m ~~ a
III
1
1 ~,. I I I ~ ~"~ g
o T i I
`a e ~ I °
~ 103+49.47 II ~ e 3
_~}_}= ~ _TkT-m ~
N "
~~ I I I I I ~ s
~
I ~ ~
J 11 11 III I
I
1no I I II~
I I"I olm a~ a
~ a a
' =~ III - a
t
t
t
r
b
,, I I =~
~
l
l
I
la~ ~~
~~ n + n is
~ u
~ N
_ 16' _ \ - ~ +~ 12' Q
w m ~
~H
-Y
1L._~ ~ I
I
•
~~ 3I ;
~ N
'~ N
_ w
~ n
a ~
I O r ~
"
?
n 5
3M
S~J3tl
C
-
-~ Y rc
m • ~ y~ ~' mm .
Ym
N
_• b 30' P OP fl . W. Z r
~ a Z N:-
Z a
AYIY~J~QY[y ~ \ N06 I N:
~dxslv~~
iii
~
titit
'~
I ~~
Iz•~
~ N
a
I III _ _
'
•- ~
~I a Io _
«-
e
~
III ~ ~ ~ m -
, ~
I III ~
I
6 m
~t- ~-
- _
m _
2 m Zi «. 1z
~ - 2 i ~,
n S
I I I .
I III Y N ~
_
~o - ,--
.r
~ :'
_ p
I III I I W m a m _
_~~ ~~ I ~ I ~~ ~ W ~'
f m ~
~
I III III
9'
~ I "• ~
~ Ne ~
III II ~
I ~AI2IQ
t
t r ~
l I lI ~I ;
I Nosv~z~ I
I
I
T
I
L 133H5 335
~l
i{
i
:'
" v~12
iv "
~
v
sL+L9 'tlls I I I " " - ~
I I '
m
I I
3NIl NJ1tlW I
I I °m 'Om
I
, 0' i"
I I I III OL+66 'tl15 1 fl ~~ •
I r 3NIl HJ1tlW
I
I °~
I a
I I
I I III I ~
sill III
a
~
OS+fZI 'tl15 3NIl
9 133H5 3 5 t+ i. I I I
OS+9{L 'tlLS 3NIl H~1tlW ~ I I
I I I I I
1 I ~II.I I
RI~III
I I III
I I I I I
I I I I I
I III I I
I I
II~IiI
+IF}III
+11111
I I Itl I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
-N- I I ~ I I I
11111
R I If I I I
I III I I
l I I I.I
~^ I"
I I I I I
I
I ~_ I I
I X11.1.1
n ~ I ~ el d l ~~; ~' r ;1; t l
~ m I I I ~ I I ~~ I I I
~ ~ °t1 I I I IdI~ I F I I I
118+74.09 "' ~ _ m I I I 1^ ~ I j 1
I 1 to I I I I I I I
~ 118+44.42 $ I I I I ~ ~ I I I I I
~ I III I I
~ 1 1 I I ~ ~ I ~I I I
I I I I I I
~ I ~ ~ IW. ~ J I t l l ~~
- - ~I I I I
~In I INI I sl I I I Nlm
I 1I I I ~"
n n l I o I I I 129+ae ]5 I I I I
~N ~ I- ~ INS ° ~ 1 Irv I I
~~, ~ _ ~, _, n _1 , 29+59.4, i I r
I, I I ~ 1 1 I I `
I I I 129+29.08 ~ I I I
I tltlt
116+14.09 J +l I $
116+14.09 m
_ ~ I _I I I
ry~ l a I I
t AHZI~~ ;, I I I
of as' .o •QA`IH H~NV2I ~ ~ I s I I
. NI'IHf1Q 'S +{.. "~
~tta+an n4 ~, 1114+80.09 _ _ _~_t~ ~ ~I~1 ~
112+8].12
CASt E650N
n h'o
K~I~ Oh Oa
N
II II tl
zd ~
~~nsn
os+czl 'vls 3Nn-
l!l~~~t!t!1
3 w
~ t a"
ao.
2~ o n
~ k
Iw ~~
l l~l ; t~t~t r ~"
~I II
~I II
I I I Im
I II
1- 1g ~Inl~ ~~e
al I to
a ~
w
~I I I
13'
I I I I -r - ~"-'
I II
I I I ~ 1:
~~ I ~I 1 1
b
v"i
b
• n
°om~
aa~. r
N
~Z
Y 0
I
n
~
i
'~
H
~N
Z
~ z
o
~
w ° a d
_
~~ ~- z o
'" w ~ ~ 3 ~
~~ ~
Q Z d
a
~
~ d
0
~ ='''
C
j
@ U ~
~
K
F E-~
r
l
V
~~
4
s
G
5
0
~
~ a
4
,a
~~Yy,y~
Ifs W-$`
CII ~ e;
~'~t
~~~~
x ~
Y
w V ~ ~
u ~
9 a
u
am W
~aa a a
A'IH H~NF~2~ ~0,~~"w '~
HI1Q 'N ~~ a~~,
12]+29.00 ~ S n ~v ~ b
S ~ _
J
~3N S'
S~~ry
0
w ~ ~ ~ ~
suf S N
ON
sa
<Z
CN
S
n
~~ z ~
0
~ o a d
_-
° ~~ W- z O
w7 ~~ 3 G~
~r rA Ypel = d
FYa N Q
O 33~
~ a ~
F d
~ F
U
III~~II ~
OS+SbL 'tl15 3NIl HJ1tlW ~ I W
I I I I I ~
I I III ~ s
I ~ I I I
~~ I ~I I I I I°
I I I I I ~
I III I I ~ y
li ~ ~ a
W~ I I I I I ~
~~I III I I
I~-~ I I I g
I~B' €
I ~°~ g~_~
j j jl Itltl t ~ ~ w. ~
I III I I ~ e°J ~ di~ ~~
1 1 la I I I I !! I I III bg~~° ~_
I h I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,%~,a'`~ N s 7i '~
1 1 I~ I I I I ~ I I III ~e.`~ ?~ ~5:
I I I I I I Ili I I ° a x#1
I I}I I I I + I I~I I I ~ ~
I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 ~
I I I I I I + I rll I I
I~ I 1 1 I I I I I
1 I ~' I I I I ++ I I+ I I I ~
I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I ~' ~
I III I I I ~ + I I~ I I I ~ ~ Q ~
I I I I I ,~i -N ~ ~ II F I I I s~~
I lo~ I I I ~ I r°
1 ~ I CI I I I elh Q ~ 11Y I I I _ TY~I ~.L ~ g
I ! I I I u
I I III r~m ~ 1 1 6 1 1 1 .I2I,LN~ Z ~~ ~
I I I I I I ~I _Z ~ I EII I I ~ ~aa a
I I$I I I I I -~ I I I I I ~ ~
I Q~ ~ „~.a
L4+99t 7B I I I ~~ m~S~N ~~
i b I s NON wk
V I I I I I I + I III I I I Q
I I~I I I __ I+L~ I a
I h I I OS+S4l 'tl1S 3N1~ HB1tlW I
I I I I I I I~I I I
I
~ry ~ ~ ~}I ~ ~ I a~ I ~Ii I I ~¢
- I I I I
I
~m I I I I I I~I I I IW
~~ I I°-I I I ~ W(I I III ~
I~ I I-1111 ~
I I I I I ~' I Iaa I I f I I ~
I I I I I I I I rv~"+!~,' i ry~^~n ryi ~
I I I I I I 14 ,.1 I I ( ~ a
I I I I I #
I~ I I I ~ ~~I I I~1 ~
~i i i i ~ j ~llll 11111 f ~
I I I I I I II I I I I ~
f 133HS 33S ,~-~ L~ I ~# i i I o `
OS+9fL 'tl15 3NIl H71VW T a
2
~ c
°~a
a
N lON
°z
F
w .
m .
w
w
D
C
N _
6
E
~Z~..~~
I
I
,oo roe
W
r~
Q
Q
W
a
-~~-Z~~~
' 'I I
N
O
M
o I ,II
~~
m I
I I
II
,z ,az ~z~ I y,zy,oz
I ~~
I I
I~
O
~ I I
~ I
0
i.Z .OZ I,Z' ZtI,OZ
III
III
irv ° p m °n
Y O
°zm m' 8
I $~
i I ~ I
I
m i I
m
I~
Io
° I~ I
II I
o _ S1,_I_ IL
^ I '',09
zrv I
Y"
,!l ~ti
,9ti 591 M}9,99.ZON
= 'M'0 N '13~ ~/
N N~
- °z °z
-f f--
_m m-
_ _ ~ _
T' m v`i -
d
~m ~-
~ N y t9~it
a_~ O_
-a z__
~ ~;
-~ .<._
N ~
V)
6 y
-F f
hi6
-- M O'y
1'liit
.-l. ~t~a
:s o ~ ~
I i,I
Ili
0
$ i
~
~
$
a
z ~
- ~--~
a E-~
z
r a~ 3 U
~
a Ae 3
p
a
KN ~
~n O ~
y
~H ~ ~
2 F ~
~ °o d
°
w~ ""
~ w
a
~7 ~
m ~r
B
S
G
O
1~1 ~yy a
1~ a
CL, 9
~E
a gay
~ ~~.
z ~ ~ ~ ~!
~,
W b ~' ~5~
~~~~
I o u n
a
/~ ~
~
` i '6
u
fl g
R
'~
t3 x
a
~ ?
~ ~ ~i
rv 8 u
g °
~ ~
a
~ _ ~ ; a
n
a <
~
6 N ~NCEP
~
~
N ry
r
~ y,
'~ OM
y
Yu C
irv t
° >~
~ vi ~~
m
U _
u
rvd bd
~~ ~~3M S`~
Si~~
N
Z a
~~ F
_
~~
•~ -x
w
`' m
m
'frl i- h
O
m 1,
g
/~
N
~
N ,
F ~
8
g
~~a
a
{
I
JI
~ .:
' ~ 11111
II 11111
I I III 11 I
II °~II I
zl .oz a z1 I I
I ~ z I,zaz J,zl .oz
o II III
II hall l
I I ~1 I
z
II ~ II
11 I
ml
i I ~~
b
lm
J~ I
_;
o ~i II
W
w g II
°11111
_~ m "I 1 1 1 ~1
y VIII I
111 II
IIi~'~ II
1; I I , ,MI
11 1 I ~I I
I n,191
o X11 1Z81 I I I s
'^ 11 1 I I«C I I
zl.zd 1.~.z11.z:1,z11,n1 ~ z11.n1 .oz .z
1 1 1 1 1
II1111 II
I I I I I
` ~;!1;1111~~~, t t t
~ .OL - -
Z '~ ~ _ - ._Maa_x
Z:
-F-- d'
_ 1
~--
y ,LI
V1 ,f~
~ .Z:
1- ~~-
N ,i100a< - 0 a9[
O ,Ct ~~
a-~-- -
il I _ - ~~ ~I
<:{- -
<:i{~ ~ t6 y
Q .LI ,901 ~y 'M"0'y '%3
N .El
E' ~~ ~ - K ~
NQ~y
F+-I
r~
a
0
z
M~
W
Q
t ..
L 1
- ~ -~-_-_ O
t Li 2
_
7 zi w
~- ~
~
~-
F .40 1
~l
,
_
- _ T
~~ ,Z! %
ll ~
W
11 OOL N
WaK OO~C ~'
~- z1 ~
----
z
,-. _~
l
~--__ a
_ ~~ CB ,Zl
_ rn
m
)~
_~ ~ 1
` - _ f
It't~ti~i ~ ~
11I1 11111 m
„~~lr ~_ ~ 1 I I
I~~ -=t=t~+= -
-M1B I6
III ~~1111
0
~~ X11111
__-
0
w
~
~
~~
s
~
n
yi
U
H
_ F
g Or
~ /~
N
m o F~1 V-~
~
o W~ ~~
Z ~
w
~ ~~ a
~ ~ ~
A
3
f=. ~ `' ~
y
~
z
~ a
~ j
F Q
r3
G
~ a
Q
a Y
J
~tt~[[
y¢3~5.
W F~ ~~99,`,,''~
~,
'~_
~6
~~~~
4
°~ ~
g a
a $ a
~~ NER
'~yy~0i"e"50 `~
Jiy N~n i3
-~ _~~
m~3~ ~ z~
Si0]y
a
B