HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 128-84 Barratt SDRRESOLUTION NO. 128-84
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PA 84-075 BARRATT (HIGGINS)
WHEREAS, Barratt San Jose and J.M.H. Inc., have
submitted detailed Site Development Review plans for the multiple
family residential project located on the 7.1+ acre parcel (APN
941-101-4-7 and 941-101-4-13) at the southwest corner of
Silvergate Drive and San Ramon Road, for 40 condominium and 44
townhouses; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered and reviewed the
submittal information at their regularly scheduled meeting on
December 10, 1984; and
WHEREAS, property owners in the vicinity of the
subject property and other individuals who have previously
expressed an interest in the project covering the site were
notified of the subject proposal; and
WHEREAS, the City has previously adopted a Negative
Declaration with Mitigation for the project coverering the
subject property (Resolution No. 26-84); and
WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending
that the Site Development Review be approved subject to
conditions prepared by Staff; and
WHEREAS, The City Council did hear and consider all
said reports and recommendations as herein above set forth;
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Dublin City
Council does hereby find:
1. The Site Development Review request is substantially
consistent with the intent and requirements set forth within the
conditions of approval for the Planned Development (PD) Rezoning
covering this property, as set forth in Resolution No. 27-84
2. The City of Dublin is in the process of preparing and
adopting a general plan, and that there is reasonable probability
that the proposed Site Development Review request will be
consistent with the future general plan
3. There is little or no probability that the proposed Site
Development Review request will be a detriment to, or interefere
with the future general plan, should the proposed Site
Development ultimately be inconsistent with the future general
plan
4. The proposed Site Development Review request will not have a
significant environmental impact
5. The Site Development Review request is appropriate for the
subject property in terms of being compatible to existing land
uses in the area, will be visually attractive, will not
overburden public services, and will provide housing of a type
and cost that is desired, yet not readily available in the City
of Dublin
6. The proposed Site Development Review request will not have
substantial adverse effects on health or safety or be
substantially detrimental to the public welfare, or be injurious
to property or public improvements
-1-
7. General site considerations, including site layout, open
spave topography, orientation and the location of buildings,
vehicular access, circulation and parking, setbacks, height,
walls, fences, public safety and similar elements have been
designed to provide a desirable environment for the development.
8. General architectural considerations including the
character, scale and quality of the design, the architectural
relationship, with the site and other buildings, building
materials, colors, screening of exterior appurtenances, exterior
lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated
in order to insure compatibility of this development with its
design concept and the character of adjacent buildings and uses.
9. General landscape and considerations including the
locations, type, size, color, texture and coverage of plant
materials, provisions for irrigation, maintenance and protection
of landscaped areas and similar elements have been considered to
insure visual relief to complement buildings and structures and
to provide an attractive environment for the public.
10.. The site is physically suitable for the proposed development
in that the site is indicated to be geologically satisfactory for
the type of development proposed in locations as shown, provided
geological consultants' recommendations are followed; and the
site is in a good location regarding public services and
facilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that Site Development
Review PA 84-075 is an integral part of the Planned Development
zoning of the subject property; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council and
Planning Director approves Site Development Review PA 84-075
subject to the conditions listed below:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Unless otherwise specified the following conditions shall be
~qmplied with prior to issuance of the building permits. Each
item is subject to review and approval by the Planning Department
6h'iess otherwise specified.
1. Except as specifically modified or elaborated upon by the
conditions listed below, site development for the subject property
shall conform with the conditions of approval established for the
Planned Development (PD) Rezoning (Resolution No. 27-84) and
Tentative Map (Resolution No. 69-84) covering the subject
property.
2. Development shall generally conform with the following Site
Development Review submittals;
Site Development Plan for the Arbor Creek Project,
prepared by The Environmental Center and dated February
27, 1984
Sheet 1, 4 and 5 of the Improvement Plans for Arbor
Creek Project, prepared by MacKay and Somps and dated
October, 1984
Sheets 1 - 6 of the Preliminary Landscaping Plans and
Details for the Arbor Creek project prepared by The
Environmental Center and dated October 16, 1984
Townhouse/Condominium Building floor plans and
elevations for the Arbor Creek Project, prepared by Red
Moltz & Associates, Inc., and dated October 8, 1984.
-2-
Detailed Townhouse/Condominium-Unit floor plans and
elevations for the Arbor Creek Project, prepared by Red
Moltz & Associates, Inc., and identified as job
No. 1084-1.
Collectively these submittals shall constitute Exhibit "A" on file
with the Dublin Planning Department (PA 84-075).
3. The fault zone established for the earthquake fault that
traverses the property shall be surveyed and staked during the
construction phase of this project to assure a minimum fault zone
setback of 25 feet for all habitable buildings and a minimum fault
zone setback of 6 feet for garage structures.
4. The design specifications for the open fence along Martin
Canyon Creek shall be altered to call for the use of a vinyl-clad
(black or green in color) six foot high chain link fence with
appropriate toprail member. A heavy timber wood fence with "2x"
minimum wood members shall be installed as the rear fencing for
the five dwelling units along Martin Canyon Creek, except for the
open fencing portion and the extension of the sound wall. Each
townhouse unit backing up to Martin Canyon Creek shall be provided
a locking gate access to the creek area along the wood fence. The
sound wall along San Ramon Road shall be carried along the south
side of townhouse Lot #8 for a minimum distance of 15 feet.
5. Exterior siding shall be T-i-ii type grooved plywood siding,
or equivalent, as determined aceptable by the Planning Director.
Use of masonite or composition board, may be used ~f found by the
Planning Director to be equivalent in quality to T-i-ll type
grooved plywood siding.
6. The 8 foot wide landscape easement called for in condition #8
of the Planned Development (PD) Rezoning shall be recorded prior
to the issuance of building permits and shall be reflected on the
individual title reports of the respective townhouse lots. The
document establishing the easement shall be subject to review and
approval by the Planning Director.
7. The location and means of identifying guest parking spaces
shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director.
8. The questionaire utilized by the developer to provide
occupancy characteristics of the development to the City Planning
Department shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning
Director.
9. The plans submitted for the 6-foot high architectural masonary
wall along the easterly property line (sheet 6 of the preliminary
landscape details prepared by The Environmental Group) are
specifically disapproved. Modified design specifications for this
wall shall be submitted for review and approval. The design
specifications of the wall shall be generally consistent with one
of the four wall designs depicted in Exhibit "B" of these
conditions of an equivalent design subject to review and approval
by the Planning Director. The height of this wall may be
increased to comply with the conclusions and recommendations of
the acoustical report prepared for this project, but shall not
exceed a maximum height of seven feet. If additional height is
necessary to provide the necessary sound attenuation measures, the
additional height shall be provided by mounding at the base of the
wall.
10. The number of par course stations shall be increased to a
minimum of three stations, with the location, type and design
specficiations subject to review and approval by the Planning
Director.
-3-
11. The "Decorative Fence" design specifications depicted on sheet
6 of the preliminary landscape details prepared by the
Environmental Group shall be utilized as the design specifications
for fences identified on sheets 3, 4 and 7 of the
Condominium/Townhouse Building floor plans and elevations prepared
by Red Moltz & Associates, Inc. The fencing installed along the
Silvergate Drive frontage shall be upgraded to match and connect
with the architectural masonry wall approved along San Ramon Road.
12. The handicap parking space located in the vicinity of the
southwest corner of condominimum lot 948 shall be modified in
design to include a five foot duo purpose ramp/sidewalk area to
allow continuity of the pedestrian walkway system proposed in this
area. The sidewalk area in vicinity of the northwest corner of
the pool area shall be modified to provide for a continuous
walkway surface.
13. Prior to construction of the solar trellis and adjoining the
pool/spa facility, documentation shall be submitted to the City
Planning Department that the number/size/design of the solar
panels will provide adequate pool heating for a reasonable length
of time in each calender year.
14. The developer shall confer with local postal authorities to
determine the type of centralized mail receptacles necessary and
provide a letter stating their satisfaction with the type of mail
service to be provided. The final design shall show provisions
for the placement of centralized mail delivery units. Specific
locations for such unit shall be to the satisfaction of the Postal
Service and the Dublin Planning Department. If centralized mail
units are not required, provide a letter from the Postmaster
stating the exemption.
15. Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, a
detailed phasing plan shall be submitted indicating phasing of
construction and installation of project structures, roads,
drainage improvements, common facilities and landscaping and
irrigation improvements.
16. There may be one sign established for project identification
purposes. The location, copy and design of the sign shall be
subject to review and approval by the Planning Director prior to
installation. The sign may be incorporated into the masonary
sound wall along San Ramon Road and shall not exceed a maximum
area of twenty-four square feet.
17. The design of waste dispenser enclosures shall be modified to
provide a minimum gated opening of 8'0" (two 4'0"self-closing
gates). A concrete apron in front of the enclosures of a minimum
dimension of 10' x 12' shall be provided to keep the street area
adjoining the enclosure from long term deterioration due to
repeated truck parking during garbage pickups.
18. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall
submit a letter documenting that the ordinance requirements of the
DSRSD-Fire Department have been satisfied.
19. The design, height and materials used for the retaining wall
proposed along Martin Canyon Creek shall be subject to review and
approval by the Planning Director.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of
December, 1984.
AYES:
Councilmembers Hegarty, Jeffery, Moffatt,
Vonheeder and Mayor Snyder
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
City Clerk
/City Council