HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 41-09 Revise TIF & Benefit FeeRESOLUTION N0.41-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RESOLUTION REVISING THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE AND
AREA OF BENEFIT FEE FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
WITHIN THE EASTERN DUBLIN AREA,
AS PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NO. 1-95
AND REVISED BY RESOLUTION N0.41-96, RESOLUTION N0.225-99,
AND RESOLUTION NO.111-04
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin has adopted Ordinance No. 14-94 which
creates and establishes the authority for imposing and charging a Transportation Impact Fee; and
WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment ("GPA") and Specific Plan were
adopted by the City in 1993; and
WHEREAS, the Specific Plan has been the subject of various amendments, and all references
herein to the "SP" are to the Specific Plan as amended to date; and
WHEREAS, the GPA outlined future land uses for lands within the City's eastern sphere of
influence, including approximately 13,906 dwelling units and 9.737 million square feet of commercial,
office, and industrial development; and
WHEREAS, the SP provides more specific detailed goals, policies, and action programs for -the
lands covered by it; and
WHEREAS, the GPA and SP areas ("Eastern Dublin") are included on the Land Use and
Boundary Map of the Eastern Dublin TIF Area, attached hereto as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, a Program Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was prepared for the GPA and SP
(SCH No. 91103604) and certified by the Council on May 10, 1993, by Resolution No. 51-93, and two
Addenda dated May 4, 1993, and August 22, 1994 ("Addenda"), were prepared and considered by the
Council; and
WHEREAS, the GPA and SP provided for, and the EIR and Addenda analyzed, future buildout of
Eastern Dublin and identified freeway, freeway interchange and road improvements, as well as transit
improvements, pedestrian trails and bicycle paths necessary to implement the SP; and
WHEREAS, the GPA, SP, EIR, and Addenda describe the impacts of contemplated future
development on existing public facilities in Eastern Dublin through the Year 2010, and contain an
analysis of the need for new public facilities and improvements required by future development within
Eastern Dublin; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted. a "Mitigation Monitoring Program: Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment" by Resolution No. 53-93 which requires development within
Eastern Dublin to pay its proportionate share of certain transportation improvements necessary to mitigate
impacts caused by development within Eastern Dublin; and
Page 1 of 10
WHEREAS, supplemental CEQA documents, including supplemental environmental impact
reports, mitigated negative declarations, negative declarations and addenda have been prepared for
Eastern Dublin development since the EIR was certified in 1993; and
WHEREAS, the SP, EIR, addenda and supplemental CEQA documents assumed that certain
traffic improvements would be made and that development within Eastern Dublin would pay its
proportionate share of such improvements; and
WHEREAS, a Program EIR ("the Transit Center EIR") was prepared for the Dublin Transit
Center project, and certified by the Council by Resolution 215-02; and
WHEREAS, the Dublin Transit Center project area was added to the SP area and the Transit
Center EIR identified new improvements beyond those identified in the EIR; and
WHEREAS, no new improvements or changes to the improvements described in the EIR and the
Transit Center EIR have been identified in any of the supplemental CEQA documents, except for the
CEQA documents or other documents referenced in the 2009 Study'Update, attached hereto as Exhibit B;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1-95 on January 9, 1995, establishing an
"Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee" for development within Eastern Dublin; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1-95 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared for the City of
Dublin by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., in a document dated November 1994 and entitled "Traffic
Impact Fee-Eastern Dublin" (hereafter "Study"), which was attached as Exhibit B to Resolution No. 1-95;
and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1-95 further relies upon a second report which was prepared for the
City of Dublin by Santina and Thompson in a document dated December 30, 1994, entitled, "Eastern
Dublin Traffic Impact. Fee Study/Roadway Costs, Initial Level" (hereinafter "Cost Report"), which was
attached as Exhibit C to Resolution No. 1-95; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 41-96 on April 9, 1996, revising the fee
established under Resolution No. 1-95; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 41-96 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared for the City by
TJKM ("1996 Study Update") and cost estimates prepared by Santina and Thompson ("1996 Cost
Estimate Update"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 225-99 on December 7, 1999, revising the
fee established under Resolution No. 41-96; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 225-99 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared by the
Department of Public Works ("1999 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update", hereinafter "1999 Study
Update"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 111-04 on June 15, 2004, revising the fee
established under Resolution No. 225-99; and
Page 2 of 10
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 111-04 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared by the
Department of Public Works ("2004 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update", hereinafter "2004 Study
Update"); and
WHEREAS, Section 8 of Resolution No. 111-04 provides that .the City will periodically review
the fee and make revisions as appropriate; and
WHEREAS, the City's Department of Public Works has prepared a revised report, dated January
12, 2009, entitled, "2009 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update" (hereafter "2009 Study Update")
which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the 2009 Update Study includes and incorporates Tables 1 and 2 and Attachments 1
to 10; and
WHEREAS, the 2009 Study Update demonstrates the appropriateness of modifying the Eastern
Dublin Traffic Impact Fee in certain respects; and
WHEREAS, the 2009 Study Update, which includes updated cost estimates, together with a copy
of the Agenda Statement and proposed Resolution were available for public inspection and review for ten
(10) days prior to this public hearing; and
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was provided as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows:
A. The purpose of the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee (hereafter "Fee") is to finance public
improvements and facilities needed to reduce the traffic-related impacts caused by future development in
Eastern Dublin. The public improvements and facilities are listed in the Study, the 1996 Study Update,
the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Study Update, and the 2009 Study Update under Sections I, II, and III
and are hereafter defined and referred to as "Improvements and Facilities." The Improvements and
Facilities listed under Section I refer to Improvements and Facilities within the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan Area, which are needed solely to accommodate new development projected within Eastern Dublin,
and such Improvements and Facilities are funded 100% through the Fee. The Improvements and
Facilities listed under Section II refer to Improvements and Facilities within or outside the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan Area, which are needed, in part, to support new development projected within Eastern
Dublin, and the Fee funds the proportionate fair share by Eastern Dublin development to construct such
Improvements and Facilities. The Improvements and Facilities listed under Section III ("Section III
Improvements") are all necessary to accommodate new development projected within the wider region,
including development within Eastern Dublin.
Although the City has adopted the Tri-Valley .Transportation Development Fee by
Resolution 89-98, as amended by Resolution 85-99, and Section 10 of Resolution 89-98 suspends Section
III fees, the portion of the Fee attributable to Section III improvements will be adjusted if and when
Section III portion of the Fee becomes effective again by any adjustments made to the cost of
improvements and/or right-of--way from the effective date of Resolution 89-98 to the date the Section III
portion of the Fee becomes effective.
B. The fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance the Improvements
and Facilities.
Page 3 of 10
C. After considering the Study, the 1996 Study Update, the Cost Estimate Report, the 1996
Cost Estimate Update, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Update Study, the 2009 Study Update,
Resolution No. 1-95, Resolution 41-96, Resolution 225-99, Resolution 111-04, the Agenda Statement, the
SP, the General Plan, the Environmental Documents, all correspondence received and the testimony
received at the noticed public hearing held on April 7, 2009, the Council reapproves and readopts the
Study, as revised by the 1996 Study Update, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Update Study, the 2009
Study Update and the Cost Estimate Report, as revised by the 1996 Cost Estimate, the 1999 Cost Study
Update the 2004 Study Update, and the 2009 Study Update, and incorporates each herein, and further
finds that future development in Eastern Dublin will generate the need for the Improvements and
Facilities and the Improvements and Facilities are consistent with the GPA, the SP, and the City's General
Plan.
D. The adoption of the Fee is within the scope of the EIR, Addenda, Transit Center EIR and
supplemental CEQA documents ("Environmental Documents").
E. The Improvements and Facilities were all identified in the Environmental Documents as
necessary to accommodate traffic from and/or to, to mitigate impacts of development in Eastern Dublin.
The impacts of such development, including the Improvements and Facilities, were adequately analyzed
at a Program level in the Environmental Documents. Since the certification of the Environmental
Documents, there have been no substantial changes in the projections of future development as identified
in the Environmental Documents, no substantial changes in the surrounding circumstances, and no other
new information of substantial importance so as to require important revisions in the Environmental
Documents' analysis of impacts, mitigation measures, and alternatives. Subsequent project-specific
environmental review under CEQA of the Specific Improvements and Facilities is not required at this
stage, as they will be implemented over at least a 20-year period and specific details as to their timing and
construction are not presently known.
E. The record establishes:
1. That there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the Improvements and
Facilities and the impacts of the types of development for which the corresponding fee is charged in that
new development in Eastern Dublin, both residential and non-residential, will generate traffic which
generates or contributes to the need for the Improvements and Facilities; and
2. That there is a reasonable relationship between the Fee's use (to pay for the construction of
the Improvements and Facilities) and the type of development for which the Fee is charged in that all
development in Eastern Dublin, both residential and non-residential, generates or contributes to the need
for the Improvements and Facilities; and
3. That there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the Fee and the cost of the
Improvements and Facilities or portion thereof attributable to development in Eastern Dublin in that the
Fee is calculated based on the number of trips generated by specific types of land uses, the total amount it
will cost to construct the Improvements and Facilities, and the percentage by which development within
Eastern Dublin contributes to the need for the Improvements and Facilities; and
4. That the cost estimates set forth in the Study, as revised by the 1996 Study Update, the
1999 Study Update, the 2004 Study Update, the 2009 Study Update, and the Cost Estimate Report, as
revised by the 1996 Cost Estimate, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Update Study, and the 2009 Study
Page 4 of 10
Update, are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the Improvements and Facilities, and the Fees
expected to be generated by future development will not exceed the projected costs of constructing the
Improvements and Facilities; and
5. The method of allocation of the Fee to a particular development, set forth in the Study,. as
revised in the 1996 Study Update, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Update Study, and the 2009 Study
Update bears a fair and reasonable relationship to each development's burden on, and benefit from, the
Improvements and Facilities to be funded by the Fee, in that the Fee is calculated based on the number of
automobile trips each particular development will generate.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin does RESOLVE as follows:
Definitions
a. "Development" shall mean the construction, alteration or addition of any building
or structure within Eastern Dublin.
b. "Eastern Dublin" shall mean all territory depicted within the Eastern Dublin TIF
Area on the Land Use and Boundary Map attached hereto as Exhibit A.
c. "Improvements and Facilities" shall include those transportation and transit
improvements and facilities as are described in Section I, II and III of the Study and as described in the
1996 Study Update, 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Update Study, the 2009 Study Update, the 1996 Cost
Estimate, SP, and the Environmental Documents. "Improvements and Facilities" shall also include
comparable alternative improvements and facilities should later changes in projections of development in
the region necessitate construction of such alternative improvements and facilities; provided that the City
Council later determines (1) that there is a reasonable relationship between development within Eastern
Dublin and the need for the alternative improvements. and facilities, (2) that the alternative improvements
and facilities are comparable to the improvements and facilities in the Study, 1996 Study Update, the
1999 Study Update, the 2004 Update Study, the 2009 Study Update, and (3) that the revenue from the Fee
will be used only to pay Eastern Dublin development's fair and proportionate share of the alternative
improvements and facilities.
d. "Low Density Dwelling Unit" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform
Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on property
designated by the SP and GPA for up to six units per acre.
e. "Medium Density Dwelling Unit" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the
Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on
property designated by the SP and GPA for over 6 to 14 units per acre.
f. "Medium/High Density Dwelling Unit" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the
Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on
property designated by the SP and GPA for over 14 to 25 units per acre.
g. "High Density Dwelling Unit" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform
Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on property
designated by the SP and GPA for over 25 units per acre.
Page5of10
h. "Second Unit" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building Code
(UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin that is issued a building permit as a second unit pursuant to
Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.80 (Second Unit Regulations) of the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance.
2. Traffic Impact Fee Imposed
a. A Traffic Impact Fee ("Fee") shall be charged and paid for each Low Density
Dwelling Unit, Medium Density Dwelling Unit, Medium/High Density Dwelling Unit, High Density
Dwelling Unit and Second Unit within Eastern Dublin no later than the date of final inspection for the
unit, provided that the Fee shall be payable by the date that the building permit is issued for any such Unit
from and after the date the City Council approves a Capital Improvement Program for the Improvements
and Facilities.
b. A Fee shall be charged and paid for non-residential buildings or structures within
Eastern Dublin at the time of issuance of the building permit for such building or structure, except where
the building or structure will require a later stage of discretionary approval by the City before it can be
occupied, in which case, with the approval of the Public Works Director, the Fee for that building or
structure may be deferred for payment to the date the City makes the last discretionary approval which is
required prior to occupancy.
c. The Fee includes the Section I Fee Section I Residential Fee; Section II Fee; and
Section II Residential BART Parking Fee. The Section II Residential BART Parking fee is a separate fee
but it, together with the Section I Fee, Section I Residential Fee and Section II Fee, are referred to as the
"Fee."
3. Amount of Fee
a. Low Density Dwelling Units (Outside Transit Center). The amount of the Fee for
each Low Density Dwelling Unit shall be $8,630 per unit.
b. Medium Density Dwelling Units (Outside Transit Center). The amount of the Fee
for each Medium Density Dwelling Unit shall be $8,630 per unit.
c. Medium/High Density Dwelling Units (Outside Transit Center). The amount of the
Fee for each Medium/High Density Dwelling Unit shall be $6,041 per unit.
d. High Density Dwelling Units (Outside Transit Center). The amount of the Fee for
each High Density Dwelling Unit shall be $5,178 per unit.
e. High Density Dwelling Units (Within Transit Center). The amount of the Fee for
each High Density Dwelling Unit shall be $4,716 per unit.
f. Second Units (Outside of Transit Center). The amount of the Fee for each Second
Unit shall be $5,178 per unit.
g. Non-Residential Buildings or Structures. The amount of the Fee for each Non-
Residential Building or Structure shall be $739 per average weekly trip. The amount of Traffic Impact
Fees for Residential and Non-Residential Uses are shown attached hereto as Exhibit C.
Page 6 of 10
4. Minimum Cash Payment
a. The minimum cash payment for Section I and Section II fees shall be in accordance
with the Administrative Guidelines. Developers may utilize credits for the remainder of the fee, if
authorized by the Administrative Guidelines.
Exemptions From Fee
a. Residential Alteration or Addition: Any alteration or addition to a residential
structure is exempt from payment of the Fee, except to the extent that a residential unit is added on a
parcel containing asingle-family residential unit or is added to an existing multi-family residential unit.
b. Residential R~lacement or Reconstruction: Any replacement or reconstruction of
an existing residential structure that has been destroyed or demolished is exempt from payment of the Fee,
provided that the building permit for the replacement or reconstruction is obtained within one year after
the building was destroyed or demolished.
c. Non-Residential Replacement or Reconstruction: Any replacement or
reconstruction of an existing non-residential structure that has been destroyed or demolished is exempt
from payment of the Fee, provided that the building permit for the replacement or reconstruction is
obtained within one year after the building was destroyed or demolished and the use of the new or
reconstructed building would not increase the trips over those from the existing non-residential structure,
calculated as provided in Exhibit C.
d. Non-Residential Replacement or Reconstruction Partial Exemption): Any
replacement or reconstruction of an existing non-residential structure that has been destroyed or
demolished is entitled to a partial exemption from the Fee i£ i).the building permit for the replacement or
reconstruction is obtained within one year after the building was destroyed or demolished; and ii) the use
of the new or reconstructed building would increase the trips over those from the existing non-residential
structure calculated as provided in Exhibit C. The partial exemption from the Fee shall be equal to the
square footage of the existing non-residential structure that was destroyed or demolished multiplied by the
number of trips shown on Exhibit C for its previous use, which total is then subtracted as a "Partial Fee
Exemption" from the fees owed based on the use and square footage of the new or reconstructed building
as provided in Exhibit C. The new development shall not accrue any credit or reimbursement rights in
the event that the fee for the new or reconstructed building is less than the "Partial Fee Exemption" as
calculated above.
e. Non-Residential Alterations: Any alteration to an existing non-residential building
or structure is exempt from payment of the Fee unless the alteration includes an addition of 500 square
feet or more.
f. Non-Residential Additions: Any addition to an existing non-residential building or
structure is exempt from payment of the Fee if the addition is less than 500 square feet.
g. Non-Residential Additions More Than 500 Square Feet (Partial Exemption): Any
addition of 500 square feet or more to an existing non-residential building or structure is entitled to a
partial exemption from payment of the Fee. The partial exemption from the Fee shall be equal to the
square footage of the existing non-residential building or structure calculated as provided in Exhibit C.
Page 7 of 10
h. Non-residential Uses within the Eastern Dublin Transit Center and the Groves
(Fairway Ranch) High-Density Residential Development: These uses are considered ancillary to the
adjoining residential uses and will not generate outside vehicle trips, and are exempt from the fee. The
locations are shown attached hereto as Exhibit D.
6. Use of Revenues
a. The revenues raised by payment of the Fee shall be placed in the Traffic Impact
Fee Fund. Separate and special accounts within the Traffic Impact Fee Fund shall be used to account for
such revenues, along with any interest earnings on each account. The revenues (and interest) shall be
used for the following purposes:
1) To pay for design, engineering, right-of--way acquisition and constructions
of the Improvements and Facilities and reasonable costs of outside consultant studies related thereto;
2) To reimburse the City for Improvements and Facilities constructed by the
City with funds from other sources including funds from other public entities, unless the City funds were
obtained from grants or gifts intended by the grantor to be used for traffic improvements.
3) To reimburse developers and/or public agencies who have constructed
Improvements and Facilities; and
4) To pay for and/or reimburse costs of program development and ongoing
administration of the Fee program.
b. Fees in these accounts shall be expended only for the Improvements and
Facilities and only for the purpose for which the Fee was collected.
7. Standards
The standards upon which the needs for the Improvements and Facilities are based are the
standards of the City of Dublin, including the standards contained in the General Plan, SP, and the
Environmental Documents.
8. No Existing Deficiencies
The City Council determines that there are no existing deficiencies within Eastern Dublin
and that the need for the Improvements and Facilities in Category I (Section I) of the Study, 1996 Study
Update, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Update Study, and the 2009 Study Update, is generated entirely
by new development within Eastern Dublin and, further, that the need for the Improvements and Facilities
in Category II and III (Section II and III) of the Study, 1996 Study Update, the 1999 Study Update, the
2004 Update Study, and the 2009 Study Update, is generated by new development within Eastern Dublin
and other new development and, therefore, the Study, as revised by the 1996 Study Update, the 1999
Study Update, and the 2004 Update Study, and the 2009 Study Update has determined the proportionate
share of the cost of the Improvements and Facilities for which development within Eastern Dublin is
responsible.
9. Periodic Review
a. During each fiscal year, the City Manager shall prepare a report for the City
Council, pursuant to Government Code Section 66006.
Page 8 of 10
b. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66002, the City Council shall also review, as
part of any adopted Capital Improvement Program each year, the approximate location, size, time of
availability and estimates of cost for all Improvements and Facilities to be financed with the Fee. The
estimated costs shall be adjusted in accordance with appropriate indices of inflation. The City Council
shall make findings identifying the purpose to which the existing Fee balances are to be put and
demonstrating a reasonable relationship between the Fee and the purpose for which it is charged.
10. Subsequent Analysis of the Fee
The Fee established herein is adopted and implemented by the City Council in reliance on
the record identified above. The City will continue to conduct further study and analysis to determine
whether the Fee should be revised. When additional information is available, the City Council shall
review the Fee to determine that the amounts are reasonably related to the impacts of development within
Eastern Dublin. The City Council may revise the Fee to incorporate the findings and conclusions of
further studies and any standards in the GPA, SP and General Plan, as well as increases due to
construction costs and land values. The City will evaluate land values through an appraisal approximately
every three (3) years.
11. Automatic Increase in Fee
The purpose of this section is to provide for an automatic annual adjustment to the Fee in
years when the City Council does not revise the Fee pursuant to Section 10 above.
The City Manager shall adjust the Fee automatically, effective July 1, 2010, and each July
l thereafter, as follows:
a. The costs of construction of the Facilities (as shown in the 2009 Study Update)
shall be increased/decreased each July 1St by the annual percentage increase/decrease in the Engineering
News Record's Construction Cost Index (20-city average) for the month of March over the same
Construction Cost Index for the month of March of the prior year. The City Manager may round the Fee
adjustment to whole dollars.
b. The Land Cost per acre for the Facilities shall be increased/decreased annually by
the percentage increase/decrease between the land cost per acre in the most recent land appraisal
(prepared for the City for purposes of adjusting the Fee) over the land cost per acre in the immediately
preceding appraisal (prepared for the City for purposes of adjusting the Fee and using the same
methodology), calculated as an annual increase/decrease. For example, if the appraised land value in
Year One is $10/acre and in Year Two is $11/acre, that is an annual increase of 10% which will result in a
yearly increase of 10%, until the Fee is revised by the Council pursuant to Section 10 above. The City
Manager may round the Fee adjustment to whole dollars.
The Section II Residential BART Parking Fee shall not be subject to the automatic fee
increase and shall remain at the amount shown in Exhibit B.
12. Area of Benefit Fee
A portion of the Fee shall also be deemed to be an Area of Benefit Fee adopted pursuant
to Ordinance No. 10-94. This is the portion of the Fee designated for the construction of those
improvements and facilities identified in Category I (Section I) of the Study that are major thoroughfares
Page9of10
and bridges. These improvements and the estimated cost of such improvements are listed on Exhibit E
attached hereto. The "Area of Benefit" is Eastern Dublin as defined herein. The fee shall be apportioned
over the Area of Benefit in the same manner set forth in Section 3 of this Resolution and in the Study,
1996 Study Update, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Study Update, and the 2009 Study Update, with the
amount to be assessed for residential and non-residential as shown on Exhibit E. The Area of Benefit
Fee shall be deposited into the City's Traffic Impact Fee Fund into separate accounts established for each
of the improvements identified in Exhibit E.
13. Administrative Guidelines
The City Council may adopt administrative guidelines for the fee program to provide
procedures for reimbursement, credit or other administrative aspects of the Fee. The amount of any
reimbursement or credit shall be determined by the Public Works Director using the costs of construction
and value of right-of--way used by the City in calculating and establishing the Fee. The amount of any
reimbursement or credit, once established, shall not be increased for inflation nor shall interest accrue on
such amount. No credit or reimbursement shall be given unless the improvements constructed are the
Improvements and Facilities described herein. Reimbursement shall only be ,from revenues raised by
Payment of the Fee.
14. Effective Date
This Resolution shall become effective immediately. The Fee provided in Sections 2 and 3
of this Resolution shall be effective 60 days from the effective date of the Resolution and shall supersede
the Fee established by Resolution No. 111-04 sixty (60) days from the effective date of the Resolution.
The Area of Benefit Fee established in Section 12 of this Resolution shall be effective only if the Fee
provided in Sections 2 and 3 hereof is declared invalid for any reason.
15. Severability
Each component of the Fee, including the Section I fee, Section I Residential, Section II, Section
II Residential Parking Garage Fees and each and every improvement financed by the Fee or any of the
component fees, and all portions of this Resolution are severable. Should any individual component fee of
the Fee or other provision of this Resolution be adjudged to be invalid and unenforceable, the remaining
provisions shall be and continue to be fully effective, and the Fee shall be fully effective except as to that
portion that has been judged to be invalid.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of April, 2009, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers, Biddle, Hillenbrand, Scholz, and Mayor Sbranti
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Hart
ABSTAIN: None
~~ .
Mayor
AT ST: ~(
~~ ~ `~
City Clerk
Reso No. 41-09, Adopted 4-7-09, Item 6.2 Page 10 of 10
E~ OBIT A -~
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee -Land Use and Boundary Map
2008 Update
••,,..,~
ti^^^~ Eastern Dublin TIF Area •
•
••s ~ ^r~
~ 0
Parcels
.••••~••,
•^.•~
•
i _ ;Right of Way
..
+
^
Specific Plan LU .~
~'•. ^
Public/Semi-Public .~
'•,
~° Regional Park ~•.~
Parks/ Public Recreation ~,
`so:'
~
- Open Space ;~ :^n• ^.^.^n^^^n^^.
- Public/Semi-Public; PL
-Semi-Public ~. '
••
Residential . ~ ~
;~ t
_ ,~g,,,,,
~
Rural Residential/Agriculture (0.01 du/ac) ` ~
Single Family (0.9 - 6.0 du/ac) ~} r h'
RP ~~~ i -" /
Medium Density (6.1 - 14.0 du/ac) ~,:,
Med-Hi Density (14.1 - 25.0 du/ac) ~ IFl ~
~
~
-High Density (25.0 + du/ac) ~~il
~
r ~~ ~~
' ~~:
~ ~
Commercial/Industrial ;`
~ i,~+ ; `r` '
O ~®~
-General Commercial
::..
~11~' (i
~ i ,
-General Commercial/Campus Office t
J
_ ~~®
MD ~
+~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j;„• ~ x
~ i ( ~~l ! r•is /
~! Neighborhood Commercial W_ _, I x - ~~~~ ~ t I .
~~gg~~ .. .
'
~
"
•
J :,
.
~::~:::.•.
p
Cam us Office
s
"` ,
.
liHi ~1'mJ I
I E
~ dry„ rt~3~
®®
'
'
":: A
~~•'~'
~:~~.
..
.....
CP
•
~• ~ ~
Industrial Park ~ d , .
.
Q~~~ i~r~ _ ~ i - --- t ~'
1~ r +•
ii ~^^^^^^^^^^f^^^^^^^^^.^t^^^{r ~. ' j
~ ... a[^^^^^: 9s.^t~r^^q^^~^^^^t^^ U^^^^^^^^^~^^ a ^^ u u u
I ~ ~ w s.o
^ ^^^^^ ~^^^!^^^^^^t*t^^M
Miles
0.5 1 2 3
^
R
N
Exhibit B
City of Dublin
2009 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update
Prepared by Public Works Department
January 12, 2009
The following is the 2009 update ("the 2009 Study Update") for the Eastern Dublin
Traffic Impact Fee ("the TIF"). This memorandum explains the methodology used in
updating the previous reports prepared by TJKM Transportation Consultants and Santina
and Thompson for the 1996 fee update, and by the Department of Public Works for the
1999 and 2004 fee updates. The following documents are attached and are made a part of
this 2009 Study Update:
• Table 1, which summarizes the calculations of the revised per trip traffic impact
fee for Section I improvements, Section I residential improvements, Section II
improvements, and Section II residential BART parking improvement;
• Table 2, which provides detail of total (unadjusted) improvement costs by section
and prof ect segment:
• Attachments 1-5, which includes revised cost estimates for roadway
improvements that have not yet been constructed or guaranteed;
• Attachment 6, which provides a summary of outstanding loans, cash advances, or
credits to developers for construction of improvements or dedication ofright-of--way;
• Attachment 7, which provides a summary of unencumbered Section I, Section I
Residential, Section II, and Dougherty Valley traffic mitigation fees which are currently
on hand in reserve accounts;
• Attachment 8, which provided a summary of remaining Dougherty Valley Traffic
Impact Fees not yet received by the City;
• Attachments 9, which provides detailed information on the estimated number of
trips generated for each parcel in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area (including the
parcels within the Transit Center) that will be subject to the existing and proposed fee
rates; and
• • Attachment 10, which provides detailed information on the estimated number of
residential trips generated for each parcel in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area
(including the parcels within the Transit Center) that will be subject to the existing and
proposed fee rates.
Page 1 of 12 EXHIBIT ~
Tn the RPSnIi itinn
~~~~i~-
Summary
The following Summary Table identifies the changes on the per trip TIF for Section I and
Section II improvements for both residential and non-residential development projects.
All Residential property located in the Transit Center is designated in the Specific Plan as
High Density, and therefore only one rate is shown.
Proposed TIF Summary Table -Per Trip Factors
•
RESIDENTLAL NON-RESIDENTIAL
LAND USE Esistina
Proposed
% Change Etistina
~
Proposed
% Chanb
01112008) ~711~20t1
~ :
Section I $591 $579 -2% $591 $579 -2%
Section I Residential $62 $47 -24% N/A N/A N/A
Section II $172 $160 -7% $172 $160 =7%
Total Section I and II
(Development within $825 $786 -5% $763 $739 -3%
Transit Center
Section II Residential
BART Parkin Fee $140 $77 -45% N/A N/A N/A
Total Section I and II
(Development Outside
$965.
$863
-11%
$763
$739
-3°~
Transit Center
The revised fee results in the following fees per housing unit:
Proposed Per Unit Residential TIF Summary Table
L
d U Trips Per Fee Pcr Unit
Type an
sc
Designation Day Per Within Transit Outside of
Unit Center Transit Center
Low Density Up to 6 units/ 10 N/A $8,630
acre
Medium Density 6.1-14 units/ 10 N/A $8,630
acre
Medium/ High Density 14.1-25 7 N/A $6,041
units/ acre
High Density 25.1 or more 6 $4,716 $5,178
units/ acre
Sec. 8.80
Second Units Municipal 6 N/A $5,178
Code
Page 2 of 12
Section I fees pay for improvements within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area, which
are needed solely to accommodate new development projected within Eastern Dublin,
and these improvements are funded 100% through the TIF. Section II fees pay for
improvements within or outside the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area, which are needed,
in part, to support new development projected within Eastern Dublin, and the TIF funds
the proportionate fair share by Eastern Dublin development to construct these
improvements. .
Section I fees include a Residential Adjustment that is applied to all residential
development in Eastern Dublin to pay for two Park and Ride lots and the Tassajara Creek
Regional Trail. These improvements benefit only residential development.
Section II fees include a Residential BART Parking Fee that is applied to all residential
development outside of the Transit Center in Eastern Dublin to pay for a portion of the
BART parking structure within the Transit Center. Residential development within the
Transit Center is within walking distance of the -BART Station and would not utilize the
BART parking facility.
The Section III fee rate was not updated, as the collection of the Section III fee was
suspended with the adoption by the City (Resolution No. 89-98) of the Tri-Valley
Transportation Development (TVTD) Fee. The TVTD Fee, which is collected from new
development in addition to the Section I and II TIF, funds improvements formerly
covered by the Section III fee. In the event collection of the Section III fee becomes
necessary at some point in the future, the fee rate will be adjusted at that time for all
adjustments made to the Section III portion of the TIF since the effective date of the
TVTD Fee.
Background
The Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee was initially adopted in January of 1995, and
subsequently updated in 1996, 1999, and 2004. The 2004 Update included annexation of
the Eastern Dublin Transit Center. Since that time, some of the background data used in
determining the fee has changed, requiring that the fee be revised to reflect current
conditions. Background information that has changed includes more accurate projections
of land use, minor changes in the scope of infrastructure improvements to be funded by
the fee and substantial increases in the land value of right-of--way needed for the
construction of improvements. The revised fee also takes into account the current status
(as of July 1,•2008) of those improvements that are complete, under construction, or
guaranteed under an improvement agreement.
The boundaries of the properties proposed to be subject to the fee are shown on Exhibit A
to the Resolution. The boundaries include all properties currently within the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan (which includes the Transit Center) as well as remaining properties
within the City's Sphere of Influence that have been annexed to the City or are expected
• to be annexed to the City.
The 2009 Study Update
Page 3 of 12
Cost Revisions
The 2009 Study Update includes several refinements of improvements and improvement •
costs.
1. Dublin Boulevard) Dougherty Road Intersection Improvements (Section II) -The
cost estimate for this work has been adjusted to reflect right-of--way and design costs
to date, as well as the actual construction bid prices, based on an estimate prepared
by the Public Works Department on October 16, 2008. All right -of--way has been
obtained and construction is complete.
2. Scarlett Drive Extension, Dougherty Road to Dublin Boulevard (Section II) -The
City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on March 6, 2007 and aRight-of--Way
Line on July 7, 2007. The cost estimate has been adjusted to reflect the preliminary
design for the project, as well as the adopted CEQA document and precise plan line
for the road .
3. Storm Runoff Treatment (All Sections) -The cost of vegetative and/ or structural
storm runoff treatment measures has been added as determined to be appropriate by
the City for its Municipal Stormwater Permit issued by the San Francisco Bay
Regional Water Quality Control Board..
Improvements Identified Since 2004 •
The 2009 Study Update also includes several new projects that are necessitated by trips
generated by development in Eastern Dublin:
1. Tassajara Road Eastbound I-S80 Offramp (3'd Eastbound Left Turn Lane )
(Section. II) -The need fora 3rd eastbound left turn lane was identified in the Fallon
Village Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, August 2005 (Supplemental
Mitigation SM-TRA-2)
2. Amador Valley Boutevard/Brighton Drive Traffic Signat (Section II)- The Dublin
Unified School District certified an Environmental Impact Report for the Dublin
High School Facilities Master Plan ("Master Plan EIIZ") by its Resolution 2005-06-17
on February 14, 2006. The Master Plan EIR describes the "Project" as expansion of
existing Dublin High School to accommodate 2,500 students. It indicates the 2005
enrollment was 1,300 and historically the facilities have accommodated 2,000.
students (Master Plan EIR, Section S.1). The Eastern Dublin EIR indicated the March
1992 enrollment was 741 students and projected the Eastern Dublin development
would increase high school enrollment by 2,923 students. The EIR indicated one new
high school was needed (Chapter 3.4). The Specific Plan, as adopted in 1994, showed
a high school site in Eastern Dublin and included Policy 8-1 which provided that the
school sites shown on Figure 4.1 should be reserved. In 1994, a portion of the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment area was included in the
Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District. The Dublin Unified School District
has determined - in its 2004 Facilities Master Plan -that no high school is needed in
the Eastern Dublin Area (Specific Plan, Section 8.1.1) and the Specific Plan no longer
Page 4 of 12
designates a site for a high school in Eastern Dublin (Figure 4.1). The proposed
• enhancement of the high school facilities is needed to serve increased enrollment .
The Master Plan EIR used the level of service standard for the intersections in the
City of Dublin General Plan. Applying the standard, the Master Plan E1R found that
the Master Plan, plus year 2025 traffic and the development of Camp Parks would
• result in this intersection falling to LOS F, which is below the General Plan's
identified LOS D (Impact 3.1.1). The identified mitigation is installation of a traffic
signal. Resolution 2005-06-17 found that the Master Plan EIR included as a
mitigation measure the construction of a traffic signal at the Amador Valley
Boulevard and Brighton Drive intersection. It further found that implementation of
the mitigation measure was within the jurisdiction of the City of Dublin. The City has
determined that the need for the signal is generated by the increase in enrollment from
Eastern Dublin development and that the cost of the improvement should be spread
across all Eastern Dublin development.
3. Fallon Road/ Fallon Sports Park Pedestrian Overcrossing (Section I) -The cost of
constructing a pedestrian overcrossing across Fallon Road from the Fallon Sports
Park, located on the west side of Fallon Road, to the Fallon Village Open space and
trail system on the east side of Fallon Road is included. The Traffic and Circulation
chapter of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan "puts a strong emphasis on
accommodating alternative modes of transportation", including walking and bicycles,
noting that these modes of transportation will relieve future traffic congestion but also
help minimize air pollution, reduce noise pollution and. conserve energy. It also
includes an extensive trail system "designed to encourage walking and cycling"
(Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, Sec. 5.1). Sections 5.4 and 5.5 address pedestrian
circulation and bicycle circulation more specifically and Figure 5.3 shows the
approximate location of pedestrian paths and bicycle routes. Figure 6.1 shows the
• approximate location of trials, parks, and open space areas. The pedestrian
overcrossing across Fallon Road will epable residents and workers to walk or bicycle
from the Tassajara Creek bike path to the easternmost trails in the Fallon Village area,
shown on Figure 6.1, thus implementing the Specific Plan. The City identified the
need for this improvement during the planning of the Fallon Sports Park and. the
_ Fallon Village Development, which were planned with more specificity than the
Specific Plan.
Calculation of the Fee.
The following is a detailed description of the methodology used to calculate the new fee,
as shown on the attached Table 1, dated November 25, 2008.
Table 1, Line 1-Cost of Improvements/Ri t-of-Way Not Currently Guaranteed
The cost of remaining improvements and right-of--way to be funded by the TIF is
shown in Attachments 1 through 5. These costs are as of July 1, 2008 . The revised
• cost estimate (Attachment 1, Cost Estimate Summary) includes the following
changes:
Page 5 of 12
a) The costs of im~ovements that have already been completed or aze guaranteed
have been removed from the total estimate. •
b) The cost of right-of--way acquisition has been increased to reflect higher land
values in the Eastern Dublin azea. The revised right-of--way cost estimates were based
on the Appraisal Report, Citv of Dublin Facilitv Impact Fee Studv, East Dublin and
Schaefer Ranch, June, 2006, prepared by Associated Right-of--Way Services, Inc. The
appraisal is available for public review at the Department of Public Works
The cost of the improvements for the remaining street segments not guazanteed .under
existing improvement agreements has been modified to reflect the cost revisions and to
add the additional improvements listed above.
The costs for the remaining improvements have been summarized in four categories:
Section I Im rovements $ 100,571,219
Section I Residential Im rovements $2,422,183
Section II Im rovements $ 35,905,603
Section II Residential BART Parking $4,827,906
Total Costs $143,726,910
The Section I improvements are required solely to accommodate development of the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area. This report assigns 100% of the. cost of each
Section 1 improvement to the Section I TIF. An exception is the portion of the Dublin
Boulevazd extension from Fallon Road to Airway Boulevazd which is outside the City
of Dublin sphere of influence. The City of Dublin and the City of Livermore will each
contribute 50% of the cost of the 3,000 foot portion of the roadway. It is expected that
this segment will remain in unincorporated County of Alameda lands between the two
cities.
The Section I Residential Improvements category includes several improvements that
benefit only the residential development in Eastern Dublin. These improvements
include the Tassajaza Creek Regional Trail and one Park and Ride lot near Fallon
Road (a second Park and Ride Lot has been constructed by the Koll Corporate Center
on Tassajara Road). The costs associated with these improvements are allocated
solely to fees collected from residential units.
The Section II improvements aze needed to accommodate development of the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan Area, as well as serve traffic generated outside of the Specific
Plan Area. Therefore, it is appropriate that the Section II TIF fund only a share of the
improvement costs based on the proportion of traffic generated within the Specific
Plan Area. The Section II TIF is assigned 50% of the total cost of the Fallon Road/ I-
580 Interchange, with the remainder of the costs shared equally at 25% between the
Cities of Pleasanton and Livermore. (The interchange project will be completed in •
two phases. The City of Dublin has taken the lead in designing Phase I and is funding
this project largely with Section II TIF fees; the cost participation by the three Cities
Page 6 of 12
for the remaining Phase 2 work will be adjusted to account for Phase 1 contributions
• by the City of Dublin to maintain a 50:25:25 overall share between the Cities).
Scarlett Drive and portions of Dougherty Road and Dublin Boulevard are partially
funded by prior traffic mitigation fees paid by development in the Downtown area.
The costs for the remaining Section II improvements are assigned at 100% of the total
cost.
The Section II Residential BART Parking category includes that portion of the
Eastern Dublin BART Parking Garage that serves parking generated from residential
development in Eastern Dublin (this is approximately 500 spaces out of 1,680 total
spaces). This report assigns this cost to the Section II Residential BART Parking fee.
This fee will be paid only by residential development outside the Transit Center to a
maximum of $6 Million, as development within the Transit Center would not travel
by automobile to access the BART Station.
Table 1, Line 2 -Balance Due on Advances and TIF Credits
The City of Dublin received funding advances from County of Alameda, the City of
Pleasanton and the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) for construction of
certain improvements needed to serve Eastern Dublin development ("the funding
advances"). In addition, between 1995 and the present, several developers in the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area constructed or guaranteed various improvements
. funded by the TIF. Pursuant to the TIF, each such developer received TIF credits in
return.
Portions of the funding advances have been repaid. Further, developers have utilized
portions of their credits against TIF fees that would otherwise be due with building
permits, reducing the value of the remaining credits. A summary of balances
remaining as of July 1, 2008 for credits and advances by developer is shown on
Attachment 6..
The three advances made by the City of Pleasanton, County of Alameda, and BART
are subject to interest payments on the unpaid principal. The interest to be paid must
be added to the T1F. The Administrative Services Department has prepared an
estimated repayment schedule for these loans as part of the 2008-09 Fiscal Year
budget. These payments will occur over Fiscal Years 2008-09 thru 2011-12, and are
shown on Attachment 6.
The outstanding TIF credit balances as of June 30, 2008 are shown below:
•
Section L Im rovements $78,488,678
Section I Residential Im rovements $779,717
Section II Im rovements $19,053,854
Section II Residential BART Parkin N/A
Total Costs ~ $98,322,249
Page 7 of 12
The above costs must be included in the revenue to be raised under the revised TIF
Section I and Section II fees, in order that adequate funds are available to reimburse
the credit holders and agencies that advanced funding
Table 1, Line 3 -Total Cost of TIF Improvements Lines 1 and 2~
This line, which is the sum of Lines 1 and 2, shows the total cost of all improvements
remaining to be funded under the TIF. Total costs by category are as follows:
Section I Im rovements $179,059,897
Section I Residential Im rovements $3,201,900
Section II Im rovements $54,959,457
Section II Residential BART Parking $4,827,906
Total Costs $242,049,159
Table 1, Line 4 -Current TlF Fee Account Balance, Section I
Fees collected from the building permits issued to date that have not been allocated to
specific TIF improvements, remain in a reserve account and can be deducted from the
total revenue to be raised by the revised fees. The cash balance of Section I TIF fee
revenues as of July 1; 2008 has been provided by the Finance Division, as shown on •
Attachment 7. The current balance is $2,335,094.
Table 1, Line 5 -Current TIF Fee Account Balance Section II
The cash balance of Section II TIF fee revenues as of July 1, 2008 has been provided
. by the Finance Division. The current balance is $3,746,206, as shown on
Attachment 7.
Table 1, Line Sa -Current TIF Fee Account Balance, Section IINon-Residential BART
P
The cash balance of Section II TIF Non-Residential BART Parking fee revenues as of
July 1, 2008 has been provided by the Finance Division. The current balance is zero,
as shown on Attachment 7.
Table 1, Line 6 - Dou he Valley Traffic Mitigation Fee Account Balance
The cash balance of Dougherty Valley Traffic Mitigation Fees as of July 1, 2008 has
been provided by the Finance. Division. The current balance is zero, as shown on
Attachment 7.
Table 1, Line 7 -Adjusted Cost of Remaining Improvements (Line 3 -Lines 4-61 •
Page 8 of 12
The total cost of the TIF improvements and credits (Line 3) is decreased by the
• current balance of fees not encumbered for specific projects (Lines 4-6)
Table 1, Lines 8a and 8b -Estimated Section I and Section II Fees from Estimated
Remaining Trips 52,160) Collected at Current Rate
A list of remaining development projects in Eastern Dublin as of July 1, 2008 is shown
on Attachment 9.. Certain projects are shown as receiving building permits during the
2008-09 Fiscal Year, based on projections by the City's Building Division. These
projects account for 2,160 new trips. For the purpose of developing the revised EDTIF
fee, it is assumed that payment of the EDTIF will be made at the existing rate (actual
payment will be at the rate in effect at the time the permits are issued). The revenue
raised from fees applied to these trips can be deducted from the total revenue to be
raised by the revised fees. Estimated revenues from the remaining trips collected at the
old rate are $1,276,560 for Section I and $371,520 for Section II.
Table 1, Line 9a -Estimated Section I Residential Fees From Remaining Residential
Trips (2,160) Collected at Current Rate
A list of remaining residential development projects in Eastern Dublin as of July 1,
2008 is shown on Attachment 10. Certain projects are shown as receiving building
permits during the 2008-09 Fiscal Year, based on projections by the City's Building
• Division. These projects account for 2,160 new trips. For the purpose of developing
the revised EDTIF fee, it is assumed that payment of the EDTIF will be made at the
existing rate (actual payment will be at the rate in effect at the time the permits are
issued). The revenue raised from fees applied to these trips can be deducted from the
total revenue to be raised by the revised fees. Estimated revenues from the remaining
trips collected at the old rate are $133,920.
Table 1, Line 9b -Estimated Section II Residential BART Parking Fees From Remaining
Residential Trips (2,160) Collected at Current Rate
A list of remaining residential development projects in Eastern Dublin as of July 1,
2008 is shown on Attachment 10. Certain projects are shown as receiving building
permits during the 2008-09 Fiscal Year, based on projections by the City's Building
Division. These projects account for 2,160 new trips. For the purpose of developing
the revised EDTIF fee, it is assumed that payment of the EDTIF will be made at the
existing rate (actual payment will be at the rate in effect at the time the permits are
issued). The revenue raised from fees applied to these trips can be deducted from the
total revenue to be raised by the revised fees. Estimated revenues from the remaining
trips collected at the old rate are $302,400.
Table 1, Line 10 -Remaining Dou hert~ValleYTraffic Mitigation Fees
• The City of Dublin has negotiated an agreement with the County of Contra Costa for
the payment of funds to provide traffic improvements on City of Dublin streets
necessitated by development in the Dougherty Valley. The original estimated level of
contribution was $13,250,220. Under the terms of the agreement, these funds must be
Page 9 of 12
..
spent on selected roads impacted by Dougherty Valley traffic, specifically Dougherty
Road, Scarlett Drive, Tassajara Road, and Fallon Road. The fees are increased each
year based on current construction costs; therefore, the total amount of fees received
will exceed the above amount. The current fee effective 7/1/2008 is $2,012 per unit
for units in the Shapell Development and $1,663 for units in the Windermere
development.
A summary of payments from Contra Costa County for Dougherty Valley Impact Fees
has been provided by the Finance Division, as shown on Attachment 8. A total of
7533 residential units had received building permits in Dougherty Valley as of July 1,
2008, out of a total of 11,000 units. This leaves 3467 units to be permitted in the
future, for which fees in the amount of $6,751,197.00 are estimated to be paid. For the
purpose of the TIF update, the balance is split equally between Section' I and Section
II, or $3,375,598.50 for each account. Revenues are split equally between the two
Sections based on the agreement between the City and the County of Contra Costa,
which calls for the Dougherty Valley fees to be used for the improvement of
Dougherty Road, Scarlett Drive, Tassajara Road, and Fallon Road. The Section I
(Tassajara Road and Fallon Road) and Section II (Dougherty Road and Scarlett Drive)
costs are approximately equal for these four roadways, and revenues will be assigned
in equal amounts to each section.
Table 1, Line 11 -Remaining Costs to be Financed by Revised Fee (Line 7 - Lines 8, 9
and 10
The adjusted cost of the remaining improvements (Line 7) must be further adjusted to
subtract the estimated fees to be collected under the old rate as well as the estimated
remaining Dougherty Valley revenue (Lines 8, 9, and 10).
Section I Im rovements $172,072,644
Section I Residential Im rovements $3,067,980
Section II Im rovements $47,466,132
Section II Residential BART Parkin $4,525,506
Total Costs $227,132,262
Table 1, Line 12 -Total Remaining Trips Subject to Fees
A list of pending and buildout projects subject to the Eastern Dublin TIF is shown on
Attachments 9 and 10. Trip generation is based on General Plan land use designations
and densities approved within the Eastern Dublin TIF area. Land uses for each
specific property and anticipated densities were determined by the Community
Development Department. For the purpose of estimating the revised fee, it is assumed
that these projects will all receive building permits after the revised fee has gone into
effect. The list has been revised to reflect the current status of land use entitlements.
The revised total number of trips subject to the TIF is 297,171. It should be noted that •
the purpose.of this list is to develop an estimate of trips for the purpose of calculating
the fee, and should not imRly approval of land uses or densities for specific properties
Page 10 of 12
beyond anv existing entitlements for those properties Also actual fees will be based
on the trip rates for land uses shown on Exhibit C and not the projections shown on
Attachment 10.
One commercial project is shown as creating no vehicle traffic. This is the retail use
within the Transit Center. The retail use will serve residents within the development
through pedestrian access, and will not generate vehicle trips from the outside. This
retail use will be exempt from paying the TIF.
There is a nominal amount of ancillary retail use within the Fairway Ranch high-
density residential project, which is not shown in Attachment.9. This retail use will
also be exempt from paying TIF fees, as it will not generate additional vehicle trips.
A list of residential-only projects is shown on Attachment 10. The total number of
residential trips is 64,845, with 58,557 trips generated outside the Transit Center.
It is noted that the total number of remaining trips (297,171) is slightly higher than the
estimate of total trips at the time of the 2004 Update (296,836). This is due to several
land use approvals since 2004 (particularly Fallon Village and Wallis Ranch) which
generated trip estimates higher than that used in the 2004 Update.
A "second unit" as defined in the Resolution, would pay a fee of $5,178 per unit,
which is equal to the rate for High Density Residential Units. The Community
Development Director estimates that approximately 50 "second units" could be
constructed within Eastern Dublin. Because second units can be no larger than 1,000
square feet (Dublin Municipal Code, Chapter 8.80), the Public Works Department
estimates that the number of vehicle trips per day will be similar to the trips generated
from dwelling units on property designated for over 25 units per acre, or six trips per
day per unit. The total trips from the "second units" is considered de minimus and
will not affect the amount of the fee.
Table 1, Line 13 -Revised Fee (Cost per Trip)(Line 11 divided by Line 12)
The revised fee for each section is determined by dividing the cost of improvements
(Line 11) by the number of trips subject to the fee (Line 12).
The Section I fee will decrease by approximately 2%.
There is a decrease in the Section I Residential fee of 24%. The scope of the
remaining improvements remained largely unchanged. A large portion of the credits
for this section have been utilized by the credit holders, reducing the overall costs that
need to be financed by the fee.
The Section II fee will decrease by 7%.
• The Section II Residential BART Parking fee will decrease by 45%. This is because
the amount of fees that may be reimbursed to the Alameda County Surplus Property
Authority (which is the sole recipient of the fees) are capped at $6,000,000, whereas
Page 11 of 12
'V
the fee rate has been increased each year since 2004 in accordance with the annual
EDTIF adjustment for construction and land acquisition costs. Since past payments
have been made at ahigher-than-average amount, the remaining payments -will be at a
lower than average amount. The amount to be recovered from this fee is also being
spread across more units in the 2009 Update. In future years, the fee will not be
automatically adjusted.
Payment Plan for Interest-Bearing Loans
The TIF program is liable for payments on certain loans /advances by third parties for
TIF infrastructure. As many developers pay the TIF with credits, very little cash is
available to repay these loans.
The 2004 Update used an projected eight-year payoff period in determining the
interest costs for the three interest-bearing loans. In order to generate adequate cash
flow to meet the eight-year payoff, the 2004 Update included the provision that the
minimum Section I cash payment be increased from 3% of the total fee to 11%, and
that the minimum Section II cash payment be increased from 12.4% to 25% of the
total fee. -The 2009 Update proposes to maintain the same minimum cash payment
requirements. The City will utilize the fee revenue for loan repayment, with the
remaining percentage of the fees retained for use on capital improvements funded by
the fee or for administrative costs associated with the fee program, or distribution to
holders of a right to reimbursement in accordance with the adopted Administrative
Guidelines. .
G:ITIFIEastern DublinlEDTIF Update 20091v 6StudyExB Accepted ehs ADDEDpsr.DOC
•
i
Page 12 of 12
C~
W
m
r~
C O
O O
V h
OI N
N r
r
av
LL_ ~
~" a
a`
~a
mm
a°
P
mo
w~
O o
C Iy0
O y
{~O 10
V
~ W
V
0D
N O
O 10
M O
N CO
O O
O O
O O
N O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
N
O OJ OJ eJ' Ilj O O 01 C C 0 0 t~ N - 000 W
tt IC1 OJ O to ICJ CO N N O OJ O C!j
• J CA N r O N O to O O ~
r N
Q
O CO
N N
N CA'
e} IO
M tO
V' t~
10 t0
h
I~ M
M N
O
ID N
M
h M O M ~ CA N M _ M I~ r
~ M ~ N ~ M ~ ~
V
' '
V M lfT ~ N
~ ~ ~ N W
~ O
C Y C 00 C O
O O
O O
O O
O ~
M
' ti
A O
~ o
0
O C N
~ CO t0 O CO O Cfl ll
) N r
Z U~ O
rn O
rn ER O O O O C/}
~ w v In In
I\
~
I` ~
~ N
M Il>
~
~ C d Q' OD
~ m ~ W N W
CA ~ ~ ~ O N O ~ N ~ ~
n ~
0 ~ C ~ P
~ ~
C CO 0
D •7 N N I
j ~ r 1
O
N
~ O O0J n N M M
~ 0) h ~ P ~ M ~
M
ER fR Y! l
0
p - fly
ONO O ~ ONO O ONO ~ of N o
lC N f~ Of CA O Of OD ~ ~ N
C C ~ f~ OOD OOD ~ O~J CEO '
~ 0)
U .~ N
N CA
1~ ~
r
O ~
r M h'
CV ~
fn ~ N ~ r! ~ tf} ~
Ef3 ~
~ ~ ~ N CD O O ID W
t0 O O r ~ h
O °
N
- OD !~ O0f ~ O COO ~ ~ n b
w to
N CO W O 00 tO tO t0 CA
N
~ If ~ b M h N M O
~ ~ N , M ti
O ti P E9 6
9
~ ~ ~ ~-
w r
u-
N ~ 0)
0)
~ ~ E9 ~
r y 0 ~ O t0
O)
C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
W
`
U 0 ~ 0 0 p p 0
ti f`
~ c °o °o O O y o
E ` 00 ~ N N ~O ~O .O ~
y U LO O' ~ LL L}L ~ .O H O)
"O'
d
O N
C
l .
l 0)
U O)
~
°~
~
Q
~ i
~
J 0 0
N
O) P
C
O LL M a0
~ N
U N
U 0
U 0
U G
m
J
C9 ~, ° ° m °+ a
i a
i c
i w
0
r
~ ~
C
O
O
~
~
' d m
C
. 0
C O
U
U y
C 0) OJ
C y ^ n m J
N
N LL LL 0)
~ ~X
LL CV
~ N ~ C
~ ~ ~
to
N '~" O d LL' ~
O
~
~ P ~ o r
C
N
N
.-
.- O
~
O N ~
H O
C
" H W O O ~ U 0J m .
Z C 0 O ¢ H H ~ ~ O
C
J .
.
l0 .
.
07 O
Z
0) OJ
)
.C
._ 07 W
.y-~ ~
~ P
P
N > U U °~
U_ o
L F. ~ c
N c
O ~
O ~
~ ~
O)
~ Q c c~ ~ ~ c c c ~ ° ~ ~ m c c
0 'G m C C ~ o
- ~ ~C
. ~C y ~ 03 ~ V d J
~ ~ N f0 f0 f6 O f0 d' ~ OD O N
L
w
d
~
m
m
m
m
m
.-
C
E
E
O
C
_ N
ao
_
Q-' ~ ~ C C C ~ C ~' ~ C C O ~ LL ~ ~ O
c
~
$
v ~
E
o ~l0 ~f0
~ ~ d1 N
~ U E
~ ~ a
i
~ o E E ° a
i o c ••
w r
E LL a v
a v
¢ a ~ ~ a~
~ a~
~ ~
~ r .. 5
~ ~ = H
~ ~ t= d d m w
o ~, y E ~ w
~ ~ ~ m
~ ~ O IL LL ' N L L 0 ~ 0'
y
LL
LL ~ N
~
O L L LL ~ .. V tL y m
r
+
U
O
V
c
t
a ~ O
~ t0
E
m c c ~ E E IJ_ tL v E > li ~
° w w ~ ~ a w ~
U m i
- U U v o° Q w w ~ c
CV M 'fit ~C/ lIj CL1 I~ ~ 000 m OOi Q ~ r ~ r U o
~m~
o s
m~~
~~~
awv
LL =
~a
ui
°
TABLE 1
Tn FxurRrr B.
Table 2
2008 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update
Detail of Total Costs (Prior to Adjustments) by Section and Project Segment
Segment
SECTION I IMPROVEMENTS
2004 Cost Estimate Credits or Advances Total
Balance at 3/10/04
8 Dublin Boulevard Extension -Southem Pacific RNV to East BART Access $ - $ -
8A Dublin Boulevard Extension -East BART Access to Hacienda Drive $ 682,297.20 $ 682,297.20
9 Dublin Boulevard -Hacienda to Tassajara Road $ 289,250.00 $ 289,250.00
10 Dublin Boulevard -Tassajara Road to Fallon Road $ 526,734.00 $ 526,734.00
11 Dublin Boulevard Extension -Fallon Road to Airway $ 26,708,151.43 $ 26,708,151.43
13 Hacienda - I-580 to Dublin Boulevard Extension (not incuding interchange) $ - $ -
14 Hacenda -Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Drive $ 978,691.00 $ 978,691.00
15 Freeway Interchange -Hacienda Road with I-580 $ 9,430,212.12 $ 9,430,212.12
16 Arnold Drive -Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason $ .5,137,177.32 $ 5,137,177.32
16A Central Parkway -Arnold to Hacienda $ 679,349.81 $ 679,349.81
17 Central Parkway -Hacienda to Tassajara $ 3,290,449.99 $ 3,290,449.99
18 Central Parkway -Tassajara Road to Keegan Street $ 264,810.00 $ 264,810.00
18A Central Parkway -Keegan Street to Fallon, 2,230 feet $ 172,120.00 $ 172,120.00
19 Gleason - Arnold Road to Hacienda $ 97,500.00 $ 97,500.00
19A Gleason -Hacienda to Tassajara $ - $ -
20 Gleason -Tassajara to Fallon $ 194,610.00 $ 194,610.00
22 Tassajara Road - 5,000 feet north of Gleason to Contra Costa County Line $ 24,529,720.11 $ 24,529,720.11
22A Tassajara Road -Gleason Road to 5,000 feet north of Gleason Road $ 7,776,770.17 $ 7,776,770.17
23 Tassajara Road -Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Road $ 1,304,023.01 $ 1,304,023.01
24 Tassajara Road -Dublin Boulevard Extension to I-580 (not including interchange) $ 261,046.52 $ 261,046.52
25 Tassajara Road -Freeway Interchange $ 2,812,216.94 $ 2,812,216.94
26 Fallon Road -Tassajara to Gleason $ 7,039,841.00 $ 7,039,841.00
26A Fallon Road -Gleason to Dublin Boulevard Extension $ 6,486,458.07 $ 6,486,458.07
27 Fallon Road -Dublin Boulevard Extension to North of 1-580 $ 1,461,509.87 $ 1,461,509.87
Report Update $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00
Other Costs $ 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00
Existing Credits $ - $ 78,488,678.30 $ 78,488,678.30
TOTAL SECTION I IMPROVEMENTS $ 100,472,938.56 $ 178,961,616.86
SECTION it IMPROVEMENTS
1 Dougherty Road -City Limits to Amador Valley Widening $ 7,162,101.79 $ 7,162,101.79
2 Dougherty Road - Amador Valley boulevard to Houston Place $ 5,976,042.27 $ 5,976,042.27
3 Dougherty Road -Houston Place to Dublin Boulevard $ 1,331,099.00 $ 1,331,099.00
4 Dougherty Road -Dublin Boulevard to North of I-580 Off Ramp $ 1,678,050.00 $ 1,678,050.00
5 Dublin Boulevard -East of Village Parkway to Sierra Court Widening $ - $ -
6 Dublin Boulevard -Sierra Court to Dougherty Road Widening $ 2,256,638.40 $ 2,256,638.40
7 Dublin Boulevard -Dougherty to Southem Pacific Right-of-Way $ - $ -
12 Freeway Interchange -Dublin Boulevard Extension with I-580 (Airway Blvd) $ - $ -
21 Scarlet Drive -Dougherty Road to Dublin Boulevard Extension $ 13,996,645.00 $ 13,996,645.00
28 Fallon and I-580 Freeway Interchange with Signals $ 509,986.44 $ 509,986.44
Other Costs $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00
Existing Credits $ 19,053,853.78 $ .19,053,853.78
TOTAL $ 33,410,562.90 $ 52,464,416.68
SECTION I RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS
29 Tassajara Creek Bike Path $ 903,864.00 $ 903,864.00
30 Park and Ride Lots $ 1,518,318.82 $ 1,518,318.82
Existing Credits $ 779,717.00 $ 779,717.00
TOTAL SECTION I RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS $ 2,422,182.82 $ 779,717.00 $ 3,201,899.82
TABLE 2
Tn F.XHIRTT R_
SECTION I I RESIDENTIAL BART PARKING IMPROVEMENT
•
•
•
Attachment 1 -Cost Estimate Summary
Dou he Road - Se ment 1
4,300 feet, 104 feet curb to curb
Ci Limits to Amador Valle idenin
Portion of Existin Im rovements to be Re-Used
Ci Ca ital Im rovement Pro'ect Number Not Assi ned
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
Eastern Portion, 4300 feet to be widened $ 4,923,753.69
Intersection Im rovements
$ 600,000.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
None $ -
Subtotal $ 5,523,753.69
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uisition, 20.0% $ 1,104,750.74
Contin enc Im rovement, Ri ht-of-Wa , 10.0% $ 552,375.37
Subtotal $ 7,180,879.79
Traffic Miti ation Contributions er Finance, Reserve Account as of 7/01/07 $ 425,730.00
$ 6,755,149.79
Zone 7 Fees $ 406,952.00
Total $ 7,162,101.79
Dou he Road - Se ment 2
4,150 feet, 104 feet curb to curb
Amador Valle Bouldevard to Houston Place
Portion of Existin Im rovements to be Re-Used
Ci Ca ital Im rovement Pro'ect Number 96850
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
3300 feet to be widened ~ $ 3,754,376.36
Intersection Im rovements
$ 704,200.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
None ~ $ -
Subtotal $ 4,458,576.36
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uisition, 20.0% $ 891,715.27
Contin enc Im rovement, Ri ht-of-Wa , 10.0% $ 445,857.64
Subtotal $ 5,796,149.27
Traffic Miti ation Contributions er Finance, Reserve Account as of 7/01/07 $ 190,204.00
$ 5,605,945.27
Zone 7 Fees $ 370,097.00
Total $ 5,976,042.27
Dou he Road - Se ment 3
Houston Place to Dublin Boulevard 900'
Dou he Road - Se ment 4 Portion
Dublin Boulevard to North of 1-580 Off-Ram 500'
Dublin Boulevard - Se ment 6
Dublin Court to Dou hert Road 700'
Dublin Boulevard Extension - Se ment 7
Dou hert to Southern Pacific Ri ht-of-Wa 1650'
Ci Ca ital Im rovement Pro'ect Number 96852
Widen Roadwa
Totals for TIF Share
Final Estimated Total Costs, October 18, 2008 $ 17,408,345.00
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 1-Cost Estimate Sum
ATTACffiV~NT / •
'rn Fxururr u
Prior Year Ex enses Thru FY 2007-08 $ 15,944,759.00
Remainin Costs, Jul 1, 2007 $ 1,463,586.00
Funded b Downtown TIF Fee Account, FY 2007-2008 $ _ 132,487.00
Total Cost to EDTIF Cate o II and Dou he Valle Fees $ .1,331,099.00
Dou he Road - Se ment 4 Portion
Dublin Boulevard to North of I-580 Off-Ram 500'
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
Westbound On-Ram Im rovements $ 1,500,000.00
Subtotal $ 1,500,000.00
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uisition, 12% $ 178,050.00
Contin en Im rovement, Ri ht-of-Wa 0% $ -
Subtotal $ 1,678,050.00
$ 1,678,050.00
Zone 7 Fees $ -
Total $ 1,678,050.00
Dou hert Road Subtotal Se ments 1, 2, and Portions of 4 $ 14,039,145.06
(Note that the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County are responsible for that portion of
Dou hert Road from the Cit Limits north to Old Ranch Road
Zone 7 Fees Se ments 1 & 2 $ 777,049.00
Subtotal $ 14,816,194.06
•
r
J
•
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 1-Cost Estimate Sum Page 2 of 16, 3/23/2009
•
•
t
Dublin Boulevard - Se ment 5
1,800 feet, 108 Ri ht-of-wa , 6 Lanes
East of Villa a Parkwa to Sierra Court Widenin
Under Construction Ci Ca ital Im rovement Pro'ect
Ci Ca ital Im rovement Pro'ect Number 96920
Com lete
Totals for TIF Share
Total $ -
Dublin Boulevard - Se ment 6
Sierra Court to Dublin Court 1300'
Ci Ca ital Im rovement Pro'ect Number 96930
' Totalsfior TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
Sierra Court to Dublin Court, er Ci .CIP $ 1,763,748.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
Sierra Court to Dublin Court, er Ci CIP Se ment 6 $ 556,511.00
Subtotal $ 2,320,259.00
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW Ac uisition $ 376,837.00
Contin en Im rovement, Ri ht-of-Wa 0% $ 57,858.00
Subtotal $ 2,754,954.00
Zone 7 Fees $ 181,035.40
Traffic Miti ation Contributions r Finance, Reserve Account as of 7/01/07 $ 679,351.00
Total $ 2,256,638.40
Dublin Boulevard Subtotal to Southern Pacific Ri ht-of-Wa Se ments 5 and 6 S 2,075,603.00
Zone 7 Fees Se ments 5 and 6 $ 181,035.40
Subtotal $ 2,256,638.40
Dublin Boulevard Extension - Se ment 8
1,950 feet, 6 Lanes
Southern Pacific Ri ht-of-Wa to East BART Access
Com lete
Totals for TIF Share
$ -
Subtotal $ -
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW Ac uistion, 20% $ -
Contin enc Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ -
Subtotal $ -
Zone 7 Fees N/A
Total $ -
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 1-Cost Estimate Sum Page 3 of 16, 3/23/2009
Dublin Boulevard Extension - Se ment 8A
2,650 feet, 6 Lanes
East BART Access Iron Horse Parkwa to Hacienda Drive
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
Path on north side no other roadwa im rovements $ 307,824.00
Intersection Im rovemnts w/o ri ht of wa
$ 172,500.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
none $
Subtotal $ 480,324.00
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 96,064.80
Contin enc Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 48,032.40
Subtotal $ 624,421.20
Zone 7 Fees $ 57,876.00
Total $ 682,297.20
Dublin Boulevard - Se ment 9
4,600 feet, 6 Lanes
Hacienda to Tassa'ara Road
Com lete Exce t as Noted
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
$ -
Intersection Im rovements w/o ri ht of wa
$ 222,500.00
Ri ht-of-Wa $
$ -
Subtotal $ 222,500.00
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW Ac uistition, 20% $ 44,500.00
Contin en Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 22,250.00
Total $ 289,250.00
Dublin Boulevard - Se ment 10
6,320 feet, 6 Lanes
Tassa'ara Road to Fallon
Com lete Exce t as Noted
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
Tassa'ara Road to Branni an Street: Overla 900 feet use $1.50/sf x 48' x 900' $ 64,800.00
Tassa'ara Road to Branni an Street: Stri in , Markin s 900 feet use $2/If x 6 x 900' $ 10,800.00
Tassa'ara Road to Branni an Street: Median Landsca in 900 feet use $4/sf x 30' x 900' $ 108,000.00
Lockhart Wa to Fallon Road: Median Landsca in 38,520s :use $4/sf x 38520sf $ 154,080.00
Intersection Im rovements $ 67,500.00
Subtotal $ 405,180.00
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uisition, 20% $ 81,036.00
Contin en Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 40,518.00
Subtotal $ 526,734.00
Zone 7 Fees $ -
Total $ 526,734.00
•
•
•
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 1-Cost Estimate Sum Page 4 of 16, 3/23/2009
•
•
•
Dublin Boulevard Extension - Se ment 11
8,000 feet, 6 Lanes
Fallon Road to Airwa
All New Roadwa Included
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
$1750/If; TIF =center 50% for 5,OOOIf w'/in Dublin; TIF = 100% for 3,000 If w/in Alameda Coun $ 9,625,000.00
Intersection Im rovements $ 725,160.00
Bride $ 2,400,000.00
Storm Runoff Treatment = $13,000/ acre x 11.57 acres $ 150,413.22
Habitat Miti ation $ 1,500,000.00
Ri ht-of-Wa $ 9,099,040.00
Subtotal $ 23,499,613.22
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW Ac uistition, 20% $ 4,699,922.64
Contin enc Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 2,349,961.32
Subtotal $ 30,549,497.19
Ci of Livermore Contribution
Civil Im rovements -Livermore Contibution for 3,000 w/in Alameda Coun
$1750/If, TIF = 100% for 3,000 If w/in Alameda Coun x 50% $ 2,625,000.00
Ri ht-of-Wa $ 1,344,000.00
Ci Administration and Contin enc 30% $ 787,500.00
Total Ci of Livermore Contribution $ 4,756,500.00
Subtotal $ 25,792,997.19
Zone 7 Fees $ 915,154.24
Total $ 26,708,151.43
Dublin Boulevard Extension SP RNV to Airwa Subtotal without Freewa Interchan e $ 27,233,402.39
Subtotal $ 27,233,402.39
Zone 7 Fees Se ments 8, 8A, 9, 10 and 11 $ 973,030.24
Subtotal $ 28,206,432.63
Freewa Interchan e - Se ment 12'
Dublin Boulevard Extension with I-580 Airwa Boulevard
Com lete
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
Na
Ri ht-of-Wa Na
Subtotal $ -
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% n/a
Contin en Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% n/a
Total $ -
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 1-Cost Estimate Sum Page 5 of 16, 3/23/2009
Hacienda - Se ment 13
'1,525 feet, 6 Lanes
1-580 Not includin Interchan a to Dublin Boulevard Extension
Com lete
Totals far TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
$ -
Intersection Im rovements
$ -
Ri ht-of-Wa
$ -
Subtotal $ -
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ -
Contin enc Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ -
Total $ -
Hacienda - Se ment 14
2,640 feet, 6 Lanes
Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Drive
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
800 ft and 1800 ft len the $ 660,459.23
Intersection Im rovements
$ 37,500.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
none $ -
Subtotal $ 697,959.23
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 139,591.85
Contin enc Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 69,795.92
Subtotal $ 907,347.00
Zone 7 Fees $ 71,344.00
Total $ 978,691.00
Hacienda Road Subtotal ithout Freewa Interchan a Se ments 13 and 14 $ 907,347.00
Zone 7 Fees Se ments 13 and 14 $ 71,344.00
Subtotal $ 978,691.00
Freewa Interchan e - Se ment 15
Hacienda Road with 1-580
Widen Offram sand Overcrossin er EDPO EIR
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
E/B Offram Additional Lane $ 2,152,500.00
W/B Offram Additional Lane and N/B Overcrossin Additional Lane $ 6,397,500.00
Storm Runoff Treatment = $13,000/ acre x 3200' x 12' Lane lus 100% Contin en $ 22,920.11
Subtotal $ 8,572,920.11
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, Included in Above $ -
Contin en Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa Included in Above $ 857,292.01
Total $ 9,430,212.12
•
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 1-Cost Estimate Sum Page 6 of 16, 3/23/2009
•
•
•
Arnold Road - Se ment 16
2,640 feet, 4 Lanes
Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason
Cam Parks is on one side of Roadwa
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
$ 3,248,418.86
Intersection Im rovements
$ 573,000.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
$ -
Subtotal $ 3,821,418.86
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 764,283.77
Contin en Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 382,141.89
Subtotal $ 4,967,844.52
Zone 7 Fees $ 169,332.80
Total $ 5,137,177.32
Central Parkwa - Se ment 16A
1,400 feet, 4 Lanes
Arnold to Hacienda
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
one 12ft lane and 16 ft median $ 461,556.78
Intersection Im rovementsw/o ri ht of wa
$ 37,500.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
none $ -
Subtotal $ 499,056.78
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 99,811.36
Contin en Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 49,905.68
Subtotal $ 648,773.81
Zone 7 Fees $ 30,576.00
Total $ 679,349.81
_ Central Parkwa - Se ment 17
4,575 feet, 4 Lanes
Hacienda to Tassa'ara
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
2500 feet of remodeled median $ 542,936.03
2000 feet of median and #1 lane in each direction; no ark im rovements $ 994,404.28
Storm Runoff Treatment
2000' x 2 Lanes x 12' lane x $13,000/ acre $ 14,325.07
Intersection Im rovements $ -
$ 112,250.00
Brid e
$ 800,000.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
none, aid b ark fees $ -
Subtotal $ 2,463,915.38
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 492,783.08
Contin enc Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 246,391.54
Subtotal $ 3,203,089.99
Zone 7 Fees $ 87,360.00
Total $ 3,290,449.99
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 1-Cost Estimate Sum Page 7 of 16, 3/23/2009
Central Parkwa - Se ment 18
4 Lanes
Tassa'ara to Kee an Street, Western 3,640 feet
All New Roadwa
Com lete Exce t as Noted
Totals for TIF Share
Civil
Tassa'ara Road to Branni an Street: Overla 900 feet use $1.50/sf x 24' x 900' $ 32,400.00
Tassa'ara Road to Branni an Street: Stri in , Markin s 900 feet use $2/If x 6 x 900' $ 10,800.00
Tassa'ara Road to Branni an Street: Median Landsca in 900 feet use $4/sf x 30' x 900' $ 108,000.00
Intersection Im rovements
$ 52,500.00
Subtotal $ 203,700.00
Cit Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 40,740.00
Contin en Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 20,370.00
Total $ 264,810.00
Central Parkwa - Se ment 18A
4 Lanes
Kee an Street to Fallon, 2,230 feet
Com lete Exce t as Noted
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
Lockhart Wa to Fallon Road: Median Landsca in 1,600 feet :use $4/sf x 16' x 1600' $ 102,400.00
Intersection Im rovements
$ 30,000.00
S orts Park
$ -
Ri ht-of-Wa
$ -
Subtotal $ 132,400.00
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 26,480.00
Contin enc Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 13,240.00
Subtotal $ 172,120.00
Zone 7 Fees $ -
Total $ 172,120.00
Central Parkwa and Arnold Drive Subtotal Se ments 16, 16A, 17, 18 and 18A $ 9,256,638.32
Zone 7 Fees Se ments 16, 16A, 17, 18 and 18A $ 287 268.80
Subtotal . $ 9543 907.12
r~
•
•
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 1-Cost Estimate Sum Page 8 of 16, 3!23!2009
•
•
Gleason - Se ment 19
1,600 feet, 4 Lanes
Arnold Road to Hacienda
Roadwa Com lete, Future Traffic Si nal at Arnold Drive
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
none $ -
Intersection Im rovements
$ 75,000.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
none $ -
Subtotal $ 75,000.00
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 15,000.00
Contin enc Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 7,500.00
Total $ 97,500.00
Gleason - Se ment 19A
4,650 feet, 4 Lanes
Hacienda to Tassa'ara
Com lete
Totals for TIF Share
Total $0.00
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 1-Cost Estimate Sum Page 9 of 16, 3!23/2009
Gleason - Se ment 20
4,800 feet, 4 Lanes
Tassa'ara to Fallon
Com lete Exce t as Noted
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
Tassa'ara Road to Branni an Street: Overla 900 feet use $1.50/sf x 24' x 900' $ 32,400.00
Tassa'ara Road to Branni an Street: Stri in , Markin s 900 feet use $2/If x4 x 900' $ 7,200.00
Tassa'ara Road to Branni an Street: Median Landsca in 900 feet use $4lsf x 16' x 900' $ 57,600.00
Intersection Im rovements
$ 52,500.00
S orts Park $ -
$ -
Ri ht-of-Wa
$ -
Subtotal $ 149,700.00
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 29,940.00
Contin en Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 14,970.00
Subtotal $ 194,610.00
Zone 7 Fees $ -
Total $ 194,610.00
Gleason Drive Subtotal Se ments 19, 19A and 20 $ 292,110.00
Zone 7 Fees Se ments 19, 19A and 20 $ -
Subtotal $ 292,110.00
Scarlett Drive - Se ment 21
2,400 feet, 52 feet curb to curb, 80 ft R/W
Dou he Road to Dublin Boulevard Extension
All New Roadwa
` Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
r BKF En ineers Estimate, 6-15-06, $ 4,437,000.00
Estimate Ad'ustment, 2006-2008, 5% er ear $ 443,700.00
Intersection Im rovements
included in BKF En ineers estimate $ -
Miscellaneous Costs
$ 1,300,000.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
$ 4,916,220.00
Subtotal $ 11,096,920.00
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW Ac uistition, 15% $ 1,664,538.00
Contin en Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 1,109,692.00
Subtotal $ 13,871,150.00
Zone 7 Fees $ 232,960.00
Traffic Miti ation Contributions er Finance, Reserve Account as of 7/01!07 $ 107,465.00
Total $ 13,996,645.00
•
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 1-Cost Estimate Sum Page 10 of 16, 3/23/2009
•
•
•
Tassa'ara Road - Se ment 22
5,660 feet, 6 Lanes
5000 ft north of Gleason to Contra Costa Count Line
All New Roadwa
Totals for TIF Share
Civil lm rovements
median and 2 lanes, each direction $ 7,799,097.47
Intersection Im rovements
$ 446,563.00
Miscellaneous Im rovements
$ 1,237,563.00
Brid e
$ 4,072,000.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
$ 4,933,440.00
Subtotal $ 18,488,663.47
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 3,697,732.69
Contin en Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 1,848,866.35'
Subtotal $ 24,035,262.51
Zone 7 Fees $ 494,457.60
Total $ 24,529,720.11
Tassa'ara Road - Se ment 22A
5,000 feet, 6 Lanes
Gleason to 5,000 ft north of Gleason
All New Roadwa
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
1 lane, each direction, Gleason to North Dublin Ranch Drive (1300'); median and 2 lanes, each
direction, North Dublin Ranch Drive to north 3700'
$
4,441,261.90
Intersection Im rovements
$ 53,250.00
Miscellaneous Im rovements
$ 402,288.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
$ 868,611.00
Subtotal $ 5,765,410.90
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 1,153,082.18
Contin enc Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 576,541.09
Subtotal $ 7,495,034.17
Zone 7 Fees $ 380,016.00
Total $ 7,875,050.17
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 1-Cost Estimate Sum Page 11 of 16, 3/23/2009
Tassa'ara Road - Se ment 23
2,470 feet, 6 and 8 Lanes
Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Road
All New Roadwa
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
1 lane in each direction $ 760,352.62
$ -
Intersection Im rovements
$ 159,750.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
$ -
Subtotal $ 920,102.62
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 184,020.52
Contin enc Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 92,010.26
Subtotal $ 1,196,133.41
Zone 7 Fees $ 107,889.60
Total $ 1,304,023.01
Tassa'ara Road - Se ment 24
800 feet, 8 Lanes
Dublin Boulevard Extension to I-580 not includin Interchan e
All New Roadwa
Totals or TFF Share
Civil Im rovements
Add 1 12foot lane; $1750/ If x 12'/ 128' x 800 If $ 131,250.00
Intersection Im rovements
$ 53,250.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
Storm Runoff Treatment $ 2,865.01
800' x 12' Lane x $13,000/ acre
$ -
Subtotal $ 187,365.01
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uisition, 20°I° $ 37,473.00
Contin enc Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 18,736.50
Subtotal $ 243,574.52
Zone 7 Fees $ 17,472.00
Total $ 261,046.52
Tassa'ara Road Subtotal without Freewa Interchan a Se ments 22, 22A, 23 and 24 $ 32,970,004.61
Zone 7 Fees Se ments 22, 22A, 23 and 24 $ 999,835.20
Total $ 33,969,839.81
Tassa'ara Road - Se ment 25
at Freewa Intersection
Freewa Interchan e
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
E/B Offram Additional Lane $ 2,152,500.00
Storm Runoff Treatment = $13,000/ acre x 1500' x 12' Lane lus 100% Contin en $ 10,743.80
Subtotal $ 2,163,243.80
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 432,648.76
Contin en 10% $ 216,324.38
Total $ .2,812,216.94
•
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 1-Cost Estimate Sum Page 12 of 16, 3/23/2009
•
1r~
u
Fallon Road - Se merit 26
8,080 feet, 4 Lanes
Tassa'ara to Gleason
Road is Existin From Si nal Hill Drive to Gleason Drive, Remainder is New
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
Antone Wa to Gleason Drive: Median Landsca in , Stri in , Markin s $ 20,907.00
Lin Pro a 2000' , $1500 er LF x 38% $ 570,000'.00
Silveria Pro a 1700' , $1500 er LF x 38% $ 1,140,000.00
Storm Runoff Treatment = $13,000/ acre x 1700' x 12' Lane x 2 Lanes $ 12,176.31
Intersection Im rovements South Le at Tassa'ara Road
$ 84,500.00
Brid a Includes Storm Runoff Treatment for Lin Se merit
Estimate er MacKa and Som s $ 3,463,359.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
Subtotal $ 5,290,942.31
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Maria ement, ROW Ac uistition, 20% $ 1,058,188.46
Contin enc Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 529,094.23
Subtotal $ 6,878,225.00
Zone 7 Fees $ 161,616.00
Total $ 7,039,841.00
Fallon Road - Se merit 26A
4,840 feet, 6 Lanes, 128-140' RNV
Gleason to Dublin Boulevard Extension
Gleason to Bent Tree Drive: Street is Com lete Exce t for Median Island Landsca in Under Construction
Bent Tree Drive to 300' S/O Positano Parkwa Under Construction
300' S/0 Positano Parkwa to Central Parkwa :West 20' of Street is Com lete
Central Parkwa to Dublin Boulevard: West 34' of Street is Com lete,
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
Positano Parkway to Central Parkway: 128-140' RNV; Remaining TIF Portion = 64' (Center 64'); Use
64/128 x $1750/ If x 11001f
$
962,500.00
Central Parkway to Dublin Boulevard: 140' RNV; TIF Portion =Remaining TIF Portion = 62' (Center
76' - 14' existing pavement ;Use 62/76 x $900/ If x 1270 If
$
1,655,280.00
Intersection Im rovements
$ 105,060.00
Pedestrian Overcrossin at S rts Park era roved Sta e I PD Zonin Plan
$ 2,000,000.00
Storm Runoff Treatment = $13,000/ acre x 155,580sf
$ 46,431.13
Ri ht-of-Wa Jordan Pro e
$ 2,500.00
Subtotal $ 4,771,771.13
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Maria ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 954,354.23
Contin en Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 477,177.11
Subtotal $ 6,203,302.47
Zone 7 Fees $ 283,155.60
Total $ 6,486,458.07
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 1-Cost Estimate Sum Page 13 of 16, 3/23/2009
Fallon Road - Se ment 27
680 feet, 8 Lanes, 166' R/W
Dublin Boulevard Extension to North of I-580
Im rovements are Existin on Westside
Median island, Northbound Lanes and Fronta a Im rovments on Eastside do not Curren Exist
Totals for TIF Share
Civil Im rovements
166' RNV; TIF ortion = 100' 6 lanes lus 28' median ;TIF cost = $1150/ If
Stn. 18+02 to Stn. 30+91: Median (28') plus 3 N/B Lanes 36'): Use 64/100 x $1150/ If x 1289' $ 948,704.00
Intersection Im rovements
$ 96,720.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
$ -
Storm Runoff Treatment = $13,000/ acre x 1289' x 12' Lane x 3 Lanes $ 13,848.76
Subtotal $ 1,059,272.76
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 211,854.55
Contin en Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 105,927.28
Subtotal $ 1,377,054.59
Zone 7 Fees $ 84,455.28
Total $ 1,461,509.87
Fallon Road Subtotal without Freewa Interchan a Se ments 26, 26A and 27 $ 14,458,582.06
Zone 7 Fees Se ments 26, 26A and 27 $ 529,226.88
Total $ 14,987,808.94
Fallon 8~ 1-580 Freewa Interchan a with Si nals - Se ment 28
Totals for TIF Share
Freewa Interchan a includes ri ht-of-wa
new 6 In Br; Ph1=$16,134,825 er CIP & Ph2=$16,774,499 2004 U date Estimate lus 50% $ 32,909,324.00
Subtotal $ 32,909,324.00
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW Ac uistition, 20% included
Zone 7 Fees $ 380,298.88
Total $ 33,289,622.88
Dublin a s 50% of cost; Livermore and Pleasanton will contribute the remainin 50% $ 16,644,811.44
Dublin Phase 1 Contribution $ 16,134,825.00
Ci of PleasantoN DSRSD Phase 1 Contribution $ 2,294,963.00
Dublin Phase I Contriubtions $ 13,839,862.00
Remainin Phase 1 Construction Costs and/ or Credits Due Not Funded in Current CIP $ 200,077.00
Remainin Dublin EDTIF Costs $ 3,005,026.44
Tassajara Creek Bike Path - Se ment 29
6,000 feet
EBPRD Sta in Area to Contra Costa Coun Line
Totals for TIF Share
Bike Path
12ft $8/St 100% $ 576,000.00
Ri ht-of-Wa
none $ -
Subtotal $ 576,000.00
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 115,200.00
Contin enc Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% ~ $ 57,600.00
Subtotal $ 748,800.00
Zone 7 Fees $ 155,064.00
Total $ 903,864.00
•
•
•
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 1-Cost Estimate Sum Page 14 of 16, 3/23/2009
•
C7
Park & Ride
40,000 sf for 150 cars
Totals for?IF Share
Fallon Road Park and Ride
40,000 sf $10.00 im rovements $ 400,000.00
Storm Runoff Treatment = $13,000/ acre x 40000 sf $ 11,937.56
Ri ht-of-Wa
$ 700,000.00
Subtotal $ 1,111,937.56
Ci Administration, Desi n, Construction Mana ement, ROW A uistition, 20% $ 222,387.51
Contin en Im rovements, Ri ht-of-Wa 10% $ 111,193.76
Subtotal $ 1,445,518.82
Zone 7 Fees $ 72,800.00
Total •$ 1,518,318.82
Transit Center BART Parkin Structure Cost Allocation for 500 S aces
Totals for TIF Share
Parkin Structure 1680 S aces $ 20,000,000.00
Alameda Coun Contribution For Re lacement of Existin 1,180 Parkin S aces in BART Lot $ 14,000,000.00
EDTIF Cost Pro ortionate Share of Cost for Additional 500 S aces Used B Eastern Dublin $ 6,000,000.00
Fees Collected to Date $ 1,172,094.00
Remainin Cost $ 4,827,906.00
Re ort U date
Totals for TIF Share
Re rt U date
Total $ 50,000.00
Totals for TIF Share
OTHER COSTS
Section I
Ci Entrance Si ns at Hacienda Drive, Tassa'ara Road, Fallon Road $ 100,000.00
Eastern Dublin Travel Demand Model U date $ 200,000.00
$ -
Total of Other Section I Costs $ 300,000.00
Section II
Villa a Parkwa /Amador Valle Boulevard S/B left Turn Lane Modifications $ 150,000.00
Amador Valle Boulevard/ Bri hton Drive Traffic Si nal $ 350,000.00
$ -
Total of Other Section II Costs $ 500,000.00
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 FeeslAttachment 1-Cost Estimate Sum Page 15 of 16, 3/23/2009
Table 1; Cate o One Costs used to determine RESIDENTIAUCOMMERCIAL FEE
Dublin Boulevard Extension; SP r/w to Airvva Boulevard $ 28,206,432.63
Hacienda Drive; excludin I-580 Interchan e $ 978,691.00
Hacienda Drive I-580 Interchan e; 100% of cost, excludin $3.762M Alameda Coun Loan $ 9,430,212.12
Central Parkwa and Arnold Drive $ 9,543,907.12
Gleason Drive $ 292,110.00
Tassa ara Road $ 33,969,839.81
Tassa'ara Road I-580 Interchan e; 100% of cost $ 2,812,216.94
Fallon Road $ 14,987,808.94
PSR Re orts included in se ment take-o
Re ort U date $ 50,000.00
Other Costs $ 300,000.00
SUBTOTAL OF TABLE 1 $ 100,571,218.56
Table 2; Cate o Two Costs used to determine RESIDENTIAL FEE/COMMERCIAL FEE
Dublin Boulevard/ Dou he Road Widenin CIP Pro'ect 96852 $ 1,331,099.00
Dublin Boulevard; Villa a Parkwa to Southern Pacific Ri ht of Wa $ 2,256,638.40
Scarlet Drive; Dublin Bou-evard to Dou he Road $ 13,996,645.00
Dou he Road; I-580 to CCCo $ 14,816,194.06
I-580 Fallon/EI Charro Interchan a 50% of cost to reflect Dublin's share after PH. 1 construction $ 3,005,026.44
I-580/Airwa Boulevard Interchan a COMPLETE $ -
Other Costs $ 500,000.00
SUBTOTAL OF TABLE 2 $ 35,905,602.90
Table 3; Cate o One Ad'ustment Costs used to determine RESIDENTIAL SURCHARGE FEE
Tassa'ara Creek Bike Path $ 903,864.00
Park and Ride Lots $ 1,518,318.82
SUBTOTAL OF TABLE 3 $ 2,422,182.82
Table 4; Cate o Two Ad'ustment Costs used to determine RESIDENTIAL BART PARKING SURCHARGE FEE
Transit Center BART Parkin Structure 500 S ace Cost Allocation $ 4,827,906.00
$ -
SUBTOTAL OF TABLE 4 $ 4,827,906.00
Summation of Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4 $ 143,726,910.29
•
~J
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 1-Cost Estimate Sum Page 16 of 16, 3!23/2009
•
•
•
Attachment 2 -Cost Esti mate Detail
Doughe Dou he Dou he Dou he
Road Road Road Road
SEGMT 1 SEGMT 1 SEGMT 2 SEGMT 2
DESCRIPTION PRICES UNITS QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST
Saw Cut $ 2.00 LF 4,300 $8,604 9,900 $19,810
Grind $ 3.00 LF 17,200 $51,600 0 $0
Remove Ex Pvm'Usw $ 2.00 SF 30,100 $60.,200 46,200 $92,400
Full PavemY Section $ 8.00 SF 189,200 $1,513,600 108,900 $871,200
Curb & Gutter $ 25.00 LF 4,300 $107,500 3,300 $82,500
Sidewalk $ 6.00 SF 34,400 $206,400 26,400 $158,400
Median Curb. Std $ 20.00 LF 8,600 $172,000 6,600 $132,000
Median Curb. Glue $ 8.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0
Overla $ 2.00 SF 189,200 $378,400 184,800 $369,600.
Earthwork $ 40.00 CY 6,667 $266,680 5,452 $218,080
Dro Inlets & MH's 1 $ 4,000.00 EA 14 $56,000 11 $44,000
Storm Drain Pie $ 125.00 LF 4,500 $562,500 4,500 $562,500
Storm Runoff Treatment $ 13,000.00 AC 5.13 $66,731 3.11 $40,379
Stri in 2 $ 2.00 LF 32,000 $64,000 25,600 $51,200
Markin s $ 200.00 EA 32 $6,400 28 $5,600
Si ns 3 $ 100.00 EA 40 $4,000 32 $3,200
Electroliers 4) $ 6,000.00 EA 14 $84,000 11 $66,000
Si nal Interconnect $ 30.00 LF 4,000 $120,000 3,200 $96,000
New Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 0 $0
Existin Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 0 $0
Landsca e & Irri (5 $ 5.00 SF 103,200 $516,000 79,200 $396,000
Gradin De th 1 $0 1 $0
Si nal Legs 1 $0 0 $0
Si nal Price not included) 0 $0 0 $0
Brid es not included SF 0 $0 0 $0
Demolition
Building (not included EA 0 $0 0 $0
Median Gut $ 3.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0
Exist curb $ 7.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0
R/W Cost not included SF 0 $0 0 $0
Other
R/W CosUSF 0
Length 4,000 3,200
Curb-to-Curb Width 104 104
TIF width n/a
Subtotal $4,244,615 $3,208,869
Surve 1 % $42,446 $32,089
Mobilization 10% $424,462 $320,887
Traffic Control 3% $127,338 $96,266
Clear & Grub 2% $84,892 $96,266
Total, civil onl $4,923,754 $0.00 $3,754,376
COST/LF
Footnotes:
1) 200 ft. Intervals along len th of roadwa
2 er stri
3 @ 50 ft. intervals alon all lanes
4 Q 150 ft. intervals alon all lanes, including conduit
5 16'+4'+4' and/or area of fronts a restoration
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 2 -Cost Detail ATTACHMENT ~~
TO EXHIBIT B.
Attachment 2 -Cost Est imate Detail
Hacienda Hacienda Amold Amold Amold Amold
Road Road Road Road Road Road
SEGMT 14 SEGMT 14 SEGMT 16 SEGMT 16 SEGMT 16A SEGMT 16A
DESCRIPTION PRICES UNITS QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST
Saw Cut $ 2.00 LF 2,600 $5,203 2,326 $4,654 0 0
Grind $ 3.00 LF 2,600 $7,800 0 $0 0 0
Remove Ex Pvm't/sw $ 2.00 SF 17,600 $35,200 32,564 $65,128 0 0
Full Pavem't Section $ 8.00 SF 39,200 $313,600 74,432 $595,456 16,800 134,400
Curb & Gutter $ 25.00 LF 800 $20,000 2,326 $58,150 0 0
Sidewalk $ 6.00 SF 0 $0 18,608 $111,648 0 0
Median Curb. Std $ 20.00 LF 1,800 $36,000 4,652 $93,040 1,400 28,000
Median Curb. Glue $ 8.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 0
Overla $ 2.00 SF 0 $0 see x-sect $43,000 0 0
Earthwork $ 40.00 CY 2,119 $84,760 0 $0 1,452 58,080
Dro Inlets & MH's (1) $ 4,000.00 EA 5 $20,000 8 $32,000 0 0
Storm Drain Pie $ 125.00 LF 100 $12,500 see x-sect $1,500,000 0 0
Storm Runoff Treatment $ 13,000.00 AC 0.90 $11,699 2.14 $27,767 0.39 5,014
Stri ing 2 $ 2.00 LF 6,600 $13,200 18,608 $37,216 2,800 5,600
Markings $ 200.00 EA 6 $1,200 14 $2,800 4 800
Signs (3 $ 100.00 EA 26 $2,600 24 $2,400 0 0
Electroliers 4 $ 6,000.00 EA 0 $0 8 $48,000 9 54,000
Signallnterconnect $ 30.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 0
New Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 0
Existing Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 0
Landscape & brig (5 $ 5.00 SF 0 $0 32,564 $162,820 22,400 112,000
Gradin De th 1 $0 0 $0 1 0
Signal Legs 0 $0 0 $0 0 0
Signal Price (not included 0 $0 0 $0 0 0
Brid es not included SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 0
Demolition 0
Building (not included EA 0 $0 0 $0 0 0
Median Gut $ 3.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 0
Exist curb $ 7.00 LF 800 $5,600 2,326 $16,282 0 0
R/W Cast not included) SF 0 n/a 74,432 n/a 0 n/a
Other
R/W CosUSF n/a 20
Len th 800 2,326 1,400
Curb-to-Curb Width n/a 104
TIF width 28
Subtotal $569,361.41 $2,800,361.08 $397,893.77
Surve 1 °k $5,693.61 $28,003.61 $3,978.94
Mobilization 10% $56,936 $280,036 $39,789
Traffic Control 3% $17,081 $84,011 $11,937
Clear & Grub 2% $11,387.23 $56,007.22 $7,957.88
Total, civil onl $660,459.23 $3,248,418.86 $461,556.78
COST/LF
Footnotes:
(1 @200 ft. Intervals alon length of roadwa
(2 er stri
(3) 50 ft. intervals alon all lanes
(4) 150 ft. intervals along all lanes, including co
5 16'+4'+4' and/or area of fronts a restoration
•
•
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 2 -Cost Detail. Page 2 of 6, 3/23/2009
•
•
Attachment 2 -Cost Esti mate Detail
Central P Central Pk Central P Central P Scarlet Scarlet
2250 2250 2000 ft 2000 ft Drive Drive
SEGMT 17A SEGMT 17A SEGMT 17B SEGMT 17B SEGMT 21 SEGMT 21
DESCRIPTION PRICES UNITS QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST
Saw Cut $ 2.00 LF 4,500 $9,005 0 $0 1,400 $2,801
Grind $ 3.00 LF 4,500 $13,500 0 $0 2,800 $8,400
Remove Ex Pvm'Usw $ 2.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Full Pavem't Section $ 8.00 SF 36,000 $288,000 48,000 $384,000 120,000 $960,00
Curb & Gutter $ 25.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 3,400 $85,000
Sidewalk $ 6.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 8,000 $48,000
Median Curb. Std $ 20.00 LF 0 $0 4,000 $80,000 .4;800 $96,00
Median Curb. Glue $ 8.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Overla $ 2.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 60,000 $120,000
Earthwork $ 40.00 CY 0 $0 1,778 $71,120 7,000 $280,000
Dro Inlets & MH's 1 $ 4,000.00 EA 0 $0 0 $0 20 $80,000
Storm Drain Pie $ 125.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 3,400 $425,00
Storm Runoff Treatment $ 13,000.00 AC 0.83 $10,744 1.10 $14,325 2.94 $38,200
Stri in (2) $ 2.00 LF 9,000 $18,000 8,000 $16,000 12,000 $24,000
Markin s $ 200.00 EA 6 $1,200 4 $800 10 $2,000
Si ns 3 $ 100.00 EA 11 $1,100 10 $1,000 40 $4,000
Electroliers 4) $ 6,000.00 EA 4 $24,000 15 $90,000 15 $90,000
Signallnterconnect $ 30.00 LF 0 $0 2,000 $60,000 1,000 $30,000
New Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Existing Utilities $ - LF 0 ~ $0 0 $0 0 $0
Landsca e & trri (5 $ 5.00 SF 10,500 $52,500 28,000 $140,000 40,000 $200,00
Grading Depth 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0
Si nal Les 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Si nal Price not included 0 $0 0 $0 $0
Brid es (not included SF $0 0 $0 n/a Na
Demolition 1 $50,000 $0 $0
Building not included EA 0 $0 $0 $0
Median Gut $ 3.00 SF 0 $0 $0 $0
Exist curb $ 7.00 LF 0 $0 $0 $0
R/W Cost not included SF 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Other trail $48,000
RNV Cost/SF p
Len th 2,250 2,000 2,400
Curb-to-Curb Width
TIF width
Subtotal $468,048.30 $857,245.07 $2,541,401.5
Surve 1 °k $4,680.48 $8,572.45 $ 25,414.02
Mobilization 10% $46,805 $85,725 $254,140
Traffic Control 3% $14,041 $25,717 $76,242
Clear & Grub 2% $9,360.97 $17,144.90 $50,828.03
Total, civil onl $542,936.03 $994,404.28 $2,948,025.84
COST/LF
Footnotes:
1 200 ft. Intervals alon len th of road wa
2 er stri
(3 50 ft. intervals alon all lanes
(4 150 ft. intervals along all lanes, inGuding w
5 16'+4'+4' and/or area of fronts a restoration
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 2 -Cost Detail
Page 3 of 6, 3/23/2009
~ ~ J
Attachment 2 -Cost Est imate Detail '
Tassajara Tassa'ara Tassa'ara Tassa'ara Tassa'ara Tassajara
Road Road Road Road Road Road
SEGMT 22 SEGMT 22 SEGMT 22A SEGMT 22A SEGMT 23 SEGMT 23
DESCRIPTION PRICES UNITS QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST
Saw Cut $ 2.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 4,940 $9,885
Grind $ 3.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 4,940 $14,820
Remove Ex Pvm't/sw $ 2.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Full Pavem't Section $ 8.00 SF 271,680 $2,173,440 208,800 $1,670,400 59,280 $474,24
Curb & Gutter $ 25.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Sidewalk $ 6.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Median Curb. Std $ 20.00 LF 11,320 $226,400 7,400 $148,000 0 $0
Median Curb. Glue $ 8.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Overla $ 2.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Earthwork $ 40.00 CY 80,498 $3,219,920 30,934 $1,237,360 2,927 $117,080
Dro Inlets 8 MH's (1 $ 4,000.00 EA 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Storm Drain Pie $ 125.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Storm Runoff Treatment $ 13,000.00 AC 6.24 $81,080 4.79 $62,314 1.36 $17,691
Stripin 2) $ 2.00 LF 33,960 $67,920 30,000 $60,000 9,880 $19,760
Markin s $ 200.00 EA 160 $32,000 18 $3,600 4 $800
Si ns 3 $ 100.00 EA 0 $0 0 $0 12 $1,200
Electroliers (4) $ 6,000.00 EA 50 $300,000 40 $240,000 0 $0
Si nal Interconnect $ 30.00 LF 5,660 $169,800 3,700 $111,000 0 $0
New Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Existing Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Landscape & Irri 5 $ 5.00 SF 90,560 $452,800 59,200 $296,000 0 $0
Grading De th 6 $0 1.0 $0 1 $0
Signal Legs 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Signal Price not included 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Brid es (not included SF 2 $0 1 $0 0 $0
Demolition
Building not included EA 2 houses $0
Median Gut ~ $ 3.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Exist curb $ 7.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
R/W Cost not included) SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Other
RNV Cost/SF
Length 5,660 5,000 2,470
Curb-to-Curb Width
TIF width
Subtotal $6,723,359.89 $3,828,674.05 $655,476.40
Survey 1 % $67,233.60 $38,286.74 $6,554.76
Mobilization 10% $672,336 $382,867 $65,548
Traffic Control 3% $201,701 $114,860 $19,664
Clear & Grub 2% $134,467.20 $76,573.48 $13,109.53
Total, civil onl $7,799,097.47 $4,441,261.90 $760,352.62
COST/LF
Footnotes:
1) Q200 ft. Intervals along len th of roadwa
Z er stri
3 50 ft. intervals alon all lanes
(4) @ 150 ft. intervals along all lanes, including co
5 16'+4'+4' and/or area of fronts a n:storation
•
•
•
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 2 -Cost Detail Page 4 of 6, 3/23/2009
•
.7
Attachment 2 -Cost Esti mate Detail
4 inside lanes 4 inside lanes
of ical of ical
4 Lane Rd 4 Lane Rd 6 Lane Rd 6 Lane R 6 Lane Rd 6 Lane Rd
T ical T ical T ical T ical w/28ft median w/28ft median
DESCRIPTION PRICES UNITS QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST
Saw Cut $ 2.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Grind $ 3.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Remove Ex Pvm't/sw $ 2.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
FuIlPavem'tSection $ 8.00 SF 128,000 $1,024,000 176,000 $1,408,000 96,000 $768,000
Curb & Gutter $ 25:00 LF 4,000 $100,000 4,000 $100,000 0 $0
Sidewalk $ 6.00 SF 32,000 $192,000 32,000 $192,000 0 $0
Median Curb. Std $ 20.00 LF 4,000 $80,000 4,000 $80,000 4,000 $80,00
Median Curb. Glue $ 8.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Overla $ 2.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Earthwork $ 40.00 CY 7,704 $308,160 9,481 $379,240 5,630 $225,200
Dro Inlets & MH's 1 $ 4,000.00 EA 10 $40,000 10 $40,000 0 $0
Stone Drain Pie $ 125.00 LF 4,000 $500,000 .4,000 $500,000 500 $62,500
Storm Runoff Treatment $ 13,000.00 AC 3.67 $47,750 4.78 $62,075 2.20 $28,650
Stri ing 2 $ 2.00 LF 12,000 $24,000 12,000 $24,000 12,000 $24,00
Markings ' $ 200.00 EA 80 $16,000 8 $1,600 6 $1,200
Si ns (3) $ 100.00 EA 40 $4,000 40 $4,000 20 $2,000
Electroliers 4 $ 6,000.00 EA 14 $84,000 14 $84,000 14 $84,000
Si nal Interconnect $ 30.00 LF 2,000 $60,000 2,000 $60,000 2,000 $60,00
New Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Existing Utilities $ - LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Landscape & Irri (5) $ 5.00 SF 48,000 $240,000 48,000 $240,000 56,000 $280,000
Grading De th 1 $p 1 $0 1 $0
Si nal Les 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Si nal Price (not included 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Bridges not included SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Demolition
Buildin not included EA 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Median Gut $ 3.00 SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Exist curb $ 7.00 LF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
R/W Cost not included SF 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Other
RNV Cost/SF
Len th 2,000 2,000 $0 2,000
Curb-to-Curb Width 104 128 140
TIF width 40 64 76
Subtotal $2,719,910.23 $3,174,915.30 $1,615,550.14
Surve 1 % $27,199.10 $31,749.15 $16,155.50
Mobilization 10% $271,991 $317,492 $161,555
Traffic Control 3% $81,597 $95,247 $48,467
Clear & Grub 2% $54,398.20 $63,498.31 $32,311.00
Total, civil oni $3,155,095.87 $3,682,901.75 $1,874,038.16
COST/LF $1,577.55 $1,841.45 $937.02
Footnotes: use $1600 use $1850 use $950
(1) 200 ft. Intervals aloe length of roadwa
2 per strip -
(3 50 ft. intervals aloe alt lanes
4) @ 150 ft. intervals along all lanes, including co
5 16'+4'+4' and/or area of fronts a restoration
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 2 -Cost Detail
Page 5 of 6, 3/23/2009
Attachment 2 -Cost Esti mate Detail
6 inside lanes 6 inside lanes
of ical of ical
8 Lane Rd 8 Lane Rd
w/28ft median w/28ft median
DESCRIPTION PRICES UNITS QUANTITY COST
Saw Cut $ 2.00 LF 0 $0
Grind $ 3.00 LF 0 $0
Remove Ex Pvm't/sw $ 2.00 SF 0 $0
Full Pavem't Section $ 8.00 SF 144,000 $1,152,00
Curb & Gutter $ 25.00 LF 0 $0
Sidewalk $ 6.00 SF 0 $0
Median Curb. Std $ 20.00 LF 4,000 $80,000
Median Curb. Glue $ 8.00 LF 0 $0
Overla $ 2.00 SF 0 $0
Earthwork $ 40.00 CY 7,407 $296,280
Dro Inlets & MH's (1) $ 4,000.00 EA 0 $0
Stone Drain Pipe - $ 125.00 LF 500 $62,500
Storm Runoff Treatment $ 13,000.00 AC 3.31 $42,975
Stripin (2 $ 2.00 LF 18,000 $36,000
Markin s $ 200.00 EA 6 $1,200
Signs 3) $ 100.00 EA 20 $2,000
Electroliers (4 $ 6,000.00 EA 14 $84,00
Signallnterconnect $ 30.00 LF 2,000 $60,000
New Utilities $ - LF 0 $0
Existin Utilities $ - LF 0 $0
Landsca e & Irrig 5 $ 5.00 SF 56,000 $280,000
Gradin De th 1 $0
Si nal Legs 0 $0
Si nal Price not included 0 $0
Brid es not included SF 0 $0
Demolition $0
Buildin not included) EA 0 $0
Median Gut $ 3.00 SF 0 $0
Exist curb $ 7.00 LF 0 $0
RM/ Cost not included SF 0 $0
Other
R/W Cost/SF
Length 2,000
Curb-to-Curb Width 140
TIF width 76
Subtotal $2,096,955.21
Surve 1 % $20,969.55
Mobilization 10°k $209,696
Traffic Control 3% $62,909
Clear ~ Grub 2% $41,939.10
Total, civil onl $2,432,468.04
COST/LF $1,216.23
Footnotes: use $1250
1 200 ft. Intervals aloe lee th of roadwa
2 er strip
(3 50 ft. intervals along all lanes
(4) @ 150 ft. intervals along all lanes, including co
5 16'+4'+4' and/or area of fronts a restoration
•
•
•
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fees/Attachment 2 -Cost Detail Page 6 of 6, 3/23/2009
Attachment 3 November 14, 2008
Page 1 of 14
• Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee, 2008 Update
Intersection, Bridge and Miscellaneous Costs
A. Intersection Costs:
Signal Costs: The 2004 Update used $250,000 per intersection or $62,500 per leg; add
20% (5%/ year); use $75,000 per leg or $300,000 per traffic signal
R/W Costs: The 2004 Update used $5,560 sf per leg; use adjoining R/W cost to
determine cost
CiviU Grading Costs: The 2004 Update used $22,000 per leg; add approximately 35%;
use $30,000 per leg; for retrofit projects, curb and gutter, drainage, landscaping, etc.,
needs to be replaced, use $60,000
B. Bridge Costs:
The 2004 Update used $135/sf for bridges; add approximately 50%; use $200/sf
C. Miscellaneous Costs
. Miscellaneous costs include all additional costs not included in TIF cost spreadsheet and
are detailed by each road segment
In some cases, an allowance has been provided in the TIF for construction of frontage
improvements that would normally be constructed by the abutting property owner upon
development of the property. In these cases, the abutting properties have limited
development potential and it maybe necessary for the City or other developers to install
some or all of the frontage improvements in order to provide for the safe and orderly
development of the roadway. Inclusion of these costs in the TIF does not relieve the
property owner of the responsibility for these costs or obligate the City to install them at
public cost, nor does it prohibit the City from recouping these costs at a later date.
Segment 1-Dougherty Road, City Limits to Amador Valley Boulevard
•
Traffic signals are existing at Amador Valley Boulevard and Willow Creek Drive (a traffic
signal exists at Willow Creek Drive); modification will be needed to accommodate street
widening from four to six lanes; allow 100% of full signal costs per leg at each
intersection for modification
Costs = 2 x $300,000 = $600,000
ATTACffiVJ~NT ~ •
TO EXFIIBIT B.
Attachment 3
Page 2 of 14
November 14, 2008
Segment 2 -Dougherty Road, Amador Valley Boulevard to Houston Place
Intersection improvements exist at Scarlett Drive and Houston Place. Intersection
modifications are needed at the Scarlett Drive intersection to accommodate a second
southbound left turn lane. The northbound approach will need to be modified to
accommodate the lane shifts; the existing northbound right turn lane will also need to be
modified. Both legs will require signal modifications. The 1999 Update used $24.20/sf for
right-of--way; add 40%; use $35/sf. The standard civil costs have been inflated to account
for traffic control on an existing street.
Cost:
21egs x $75,000 per leg for signals x 50% _ $75,000
21egs x 5,560 x $35.00 = $389,200
21egs x $30,000 for civil costs x 400% _ $240,000
$704,200
Segment 3 -Dougherty Road, Houston Place to Dublin Boulevard
Intersection costs are included in the City Project.
Segment 4 -Dougherty Road, Dublin Boulevard to North of I-580 Off-Ramp
Intersection costs are included in the City Project.
Segment 5 -Dublin Boulevard, Village Parkway to Sierra Court (Widening)
The project is complete.
Segment 6 -Dublin Boulevard, Sierra Court to Dougherty Road
Intersection and miscellaneous costs are included in the improvement costs for the City
CIP project.
Segment 7 -Dublin Boulevard, Dougherty Road to S/P Right-of--Way
Intersection costs are included in the City Project.
.7
•
Attachment 3 November 14, 2008
Page 3 of 14
•
C.
Segment 8 -Dublin Boulevard; S/P Right-of--Way to Iron Horse Parkway
Street improvements exist; no intersection improvements are necessary.
Segment 8A -Dublin Boulevard, Iron Horse Parkway to Hacienda Drive
Street improvements exist; no intersection improvements are necessary. A second
eastbound left turn lane is needed within the existing landscaped median at Arnold
Drive; work will require civil and signal modifications. Civil costs have been inflated to
account for traffic control on an existing street.
Cost:
1 leg x $75,000 per leg for signals x 50% _ $37,500
1 leg x $30,000 x 200% _ $60,000
Landscaping $75,000
$172,500
Segment 9 -Dublin Boulevard, Hacienda Drive to Tassajara Road
Street improvements exist. A right turn lane is needed westbound at Hacienda Drive.
Right-of--way for the turn lane exists. Signal modifications will be necessary.
Civil costs have been inflated to account for traffic control on an existing street.
Cost:
l leg x $75,000 per leg for signals x 50% _ $37,500
1 leg x $30,000 per leg x 200% _ $60,000
Landscaping $75,000
Demolition $50,000
$222,500
Segment 10 -Dublin Boulevard, Tassajara Road to Fallon Road
Partial improvements are needed on west leg of the Dublin Boulevard/ Fallon Road
intersection (civil and signal modification). Partial ,improvements are needed on the east
leg of the Dublin Boulevard/ Tassajara Road intersection (civil)
Cost: ~'
~t
Attachment 3
Page 4 of 14
1 leg x $75,000 per leg x 50% for modification = $37,500
2 legs x $30,000 per leg for civil work = $30,000
$67,500
Segment 11-Dublin Boulevard, Fallon Road to Airway Boulevard
Complete improvements are needed at Fallon Road (east leg), and Doolan Road (four
legs).
Cost = 5 legs x $75,000 per leg for signal = $375,000
1 leg x 5,560 x $12.00 = ~ $66,720
41egs x 5,560 x $6.00 = $133,440
5 legs x $30,000 = $150,000
$725,160
November 14, 2008
•
Abridge is needed at the Doolan Canyon Creek crossing. Bridge will be 100' long x 120'
wide.
Cost =100 x 120 x $200.00/sf =
$2,400,000
Mitigation will be required for loss of habitat at the bridge crossing. Mitigation is
presumed to be required on a 3:1 ratio. Additional r/w will. be required for mitigation.
Cost =100 x 120 x 3 x $12.00/sf = $432,000
Habitat Improvement Costs: _ $500,000
Habitat Design, Permitting, Monitoring $500,000
$1,432,000
Use $1,500,000 for mitigation.
Civil costs are based on construction of the TIF improvements (64') from Fallon Road to
the east edge of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area (5,000') and full street
improvements (128') easterly to the Livermore city limit (3,000'), to the current west end
of North Canyons Parkway. This presumes that no developer will be build the abutting
frontage improvements for the easterly portion, and this cost will be borne by the TIF.
Segment 12 -Airway Boulevard) I-580 Interchange
Interchange improvements exist; no additional improvements are necessary.
L'
•
C~
•
Attachment 3
Page 5 of 14
November 14, 2008
Segment 13 -Hacienda Drive, I-580 to Dublin Boulevard
Street improvements exist; no intersection improvements are necessary.
Segment 14 -Hacienda Drive, Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Drive
Street improvements exist except for interior traffic lanes. Signal modification is
needed on the south leg of the Gleason Drive intersection to conform to the added lane.
Cost: 1 leg x $75,000 per leg x 50% for modification = $37,500
Segment 15 -Hacienda Drive/ I-580 Interchange
Interchange improvements are complete. Per Eastern Dublin Property Owners' (EDPO)
EIR, further interchange improvements are needed to (1) widen the eastbound off-ramp
approach at Hacienda Drive to provide a third eastbound left turn lane, (2) widen the
northbound Hacienda Drive overcrossing from 3 lanes to 41anes, striped to provide three
through lanes and an exclusive auxiliary lane for the westbound on-ramp, (3) modify the
westbound loop on-ramp as needed, and (4) widen the westbound off ramp approach to
provide a third westbound left-turn lane. Costs used in the 2004 Update are as follows:
1) Widen EB Offramp: $1,435,000
2) Widen WB Offramp $1,245,000
3) Widen NB Overcrossing: $3,020,000
4) Modify WB Onramp Loop: (Costs included under overcrossing)
2004 Cost: $5,700,000
Escalation cost (2004-2008) @ 50% $2,280,000
$8,550,000
Segment 16 -Arnold Drive, Dublin Boulevard to Gleason Drive
Street will be widened to provide two additional lanes on west side; east side is existing;
widening will require replacement of signal on north and south legs of Central Parkway
and new signal on north and south legs of Gleason Drive. A separate southbound right
turn lane will need to be added at Dublin Boulevard, requiring right-of--way, civil, and
signal work.
Attachment 3
Page6of14
November 14, 2008
Cost: 41egs x $75,000 per .leg for signal x .100% for replacement = $300,000
Arnold Drive SB Right Turn Lane @ Dublin Blvd.(2004 Update) _
$195,000
Escalation cost for civil work(2004-2008) $78,000
$573,000
Segment 16A -Central Parkway, Arnold Drive to Hacienda Drive
Street improvements are existing except for inside lanes; intersections and signals are
existing; signal modifications will be needed on the east leg of the Arnold Drive/ Central
Parkway intersection.
Cost: 1 leg x $75,000 per leg x 50% _ $37,500
Segment 17 -Central Parkway, Hacienda Drive to Tassajara Road
Street improvements exist except for inside lanes; intersections and signals exist; signal
modifications will be needed on the west leg of the Tassajara Road intersection. A new
signal is needed at the entrance to the second phase of Emerald Glen Park (TIF pays for
north leg only).
Cost: 1 leg x $75,000 per leg x 50% _ $37,500
1 leg x $75,000 per leg x 100% _ $75,000
' $112,250
The Tassajara Creek bridge will need to be widened from two to four lanes. The bridge is
100' long; two 12' travel lanes and a 16' median will be required.
Cost: 100 x 40 x $200.00/sf = $800,000
Segment 18 -Central Parkway, Tassajara to Keegan Street
Intersection improvements exist at Tassajara Road. Partial improvements are needed on
the east leg of the Central Parkway/ Tassajara Road intersection (civil and signal
modification)
Cost = 1 le x $75,000 per leg x 50% for modification = $37,500
C,
•
•
•
•
•
Attachment 3
Page7of14
November 14, 2008
1 leg x $30,000 per leg for civil work = $15,000
$52,500
Segment 18A -Central Parkway, Keegan Street to Fallon Road
Street improvements exist. Partial intersection improvements (civil) are needed on the
west leg of the Fallon Road intersection.
Costal leg x $30,000 = $30,000
$30,000
Segment 19 -Gleason Drive, Arnold Drive to Hacienda Drive
Street improvements exist. A future signal is needed at Gleason Drive and Arnold Drive;
right-of--way and civil improvements are existing
Cost: 1 leg x $75,000 per signal leg x 100% _ $75,000
Segment 19A -Gleason Drive, Hacienda Drive to Tassajara Road
Street improvements are existing
Segment 20 -Gleason Drive, Tassajara Road to Fallon Road
Improvements are existing. Partial improvements are needed on the east leg of the
Gleason Drive/ Tassajara Road intersection (civil and signal modification)
Cost = 1 leg x $75,000 per leg x 50% for modification = $37,500
1 leg x $30,000 per leg for civil work = $15,000
$52,500
Segment 21- Scarlett Drive, Dougherty Road to Dublin Boulevard
Miscellaneous Costs
The construction of a box culvert construction will result in the loss of an existing open
channel. If the channel is determined to be a jurisdictional wetland, construction of
replacement wetlands maybe re uired. An estimate of $300,000 is allowed for permitting
Attachment 3 November 14, 2008
Page8of14
and construction.
Cost: $300,000
An existing oil pipeline, fiber optics line, and recycled water line are located in the
raikoad right-of--way. Relocation of these utilities may be needed at the new culvert
crossing, and/ or additional protection maybe needed if the lines are to remain as
longitudinal encroachments under the new road. In addition, an existing pole on an
overhead 60kv transmission line is in conflict with the road extension. Portions of an
overhead distribution line may need to be relocated. A number of existing pole line guy
wires are located in the right-of--way. These utilities have prior rights and any relocation
costs will be the cost of the project. A cost of $1,000,000 is allowed for the various
utilities.
Total Miscellaneous Costs:
Wetland Mitigation: $300,000
Utilities: $1,000,000
$1,300,000
Segment 22 - Tassajara Road, 5000' North of Gleason Drive to CC County Line
Ultimate street improvements do not currently exist. Full intersection improvements are
needed on the south and north legs of the Fallon Road intersection. Right-of--way costs for
the intersection are included in the total right-of--way quantity. The fourth (eastern) leg of
the intersection is a local road into the Mission Peak property and will be the
responsibility of that developer.
Intersection improvements include afree-right turn lane southbound on Tassajara Road
through the intersection. The lanes are 34' in width and 400' long. Cost of street
improvements is $1850/ if for the 128' wide street. -
Cost: 400 x (34/128) x $1850 = $196,563
A pedestrian/ bicycle bridge is needed to carry pedestrians and bicycles over the free-right
turn lane. The bridge is 8' wide by 60' long. -
Cost: $250,000
Total intersection costs: $196,563
$44 6,563
Several ro ,ernes have limited develo went otential and may not develo . An allowance
.7
U
•
Attachment 3 November 14, 2008
Page9of14
•
.7
•
is needed in the TIF to pay for the cost of frontage improvements that may be necessary
for the orderly construction of the road.
Bragg-Silva Property: 11001f
Tipper Property: 6001f
Kobold Property: 3001f
Nielsen Property: 6001f
26001f
Frontage improvements include curb and gutter, a 12' travel lane, an 8' shoulder and a 6'
sidewalk. Cost of improvements is $1850/ if for a typical 128' wide six-lane street.
Sidewalk cost is $6.00/sf, or $36/lf fora 6' sidewalk.
Total Frontage Costs: 2600 x ((1850 x .20/128) + 36) _ $845,163
A Class Ibicycle/ pedestrian trail is needed along the Bragg-Silva frontage. The trail is 8'
wide by 1100' long. Cost is $8.00/sf (consistent with the Tassajara Creek trail, Segment
29).
Cost: 1100 x 8 x $8.00 = $70,400
Sidewalk is needed along the Tipper, Kobold, and Nielsen frontages. Sidewalk width is
6'; total length is 2000. Cost is $6.00. sf (consistent with detailed cost estimate)
Cost: 2000 x 6 x $6.00 = $72,000
A retaining wall is needed along the west side of the road at the border of the Lin and
Bragg-Silva properties, with a second wall needed at the south end of the Tipper property.
The walls are needed to avoid placing fill within the creek setback zone. The approximate
length of the walls is 500', with an average height of 10'.
Cost: 500' x 10' x $50/ sf = $250,000
Total Miscellaneous Costs: $845,163
$70,400
$72,000
$250,000
$1,237,563 .
A bridge is needed at the Moller Drainage (Moller property). The bridge is 128' wide and
120' long. Cost is $200/sf
Cost: 120 x 128 x $200 = $3,072,000
Attachment 3
Page 10 of 14
November 14, 2008
Streambed stabilization work (drop structures or other provisions) is needed at the
northern bridge to prevent upward channel bed downcutting after the existing culvert is
removed. An allowance is needed for stabilization work and possible habitat mitigation.
Right-of--way needed for the stabilization downstream of the Tassajara Road right-of--way
is located within the Vargas-Fredrich properties; an allowance is included under right-of-
way costs in the event this land needs to be purchased instead of being dedicated.
Cost: $1,000,000
Total bridge costs: $4,072,000
Segment 22A - Tassajara Road, Gleason Drive to 5000' North of Gleason Drive
Existing improvements include one TIF travel lane and a landscaped median in each
direction from Gleason Drive to a point 1300' north; full frontage improvements on the
east side of the street, and full frontage improvements along the west side of the street
from Gleason Drive to a point 1300' north. Future improvements include the construction
of one TIF travel lane in each direction from Gleason Drive to a point 1300' north and full
TIF improvements from this point to a point 5000' north of Gleason Drive (the
Northern Drainage creek crossing). It is anticipated that frontage improvements will be
obtained along the Adams property (west side) as a result of future development.
Intersection improvements at Gleason Drive will include modification of the traffic signal
and installation of a second left turn lane on the north leg; right-of--way is existing.
Cost:
l .leg x $62,500 per leg x 50% for modification = $31,250
1 leg x $22,000 for civil work = $22,000
Total Intersection Costs: $53,250
Several properties on the west. side have limited development and/or are publicly owned;
an allowance is needed in the TIF to pay for frontage improvements that may be needed
for the orderly development of the road.
EBRPD Property: 1701f
Goodwin Property: 215 if
United States of America (Camp Parks): 100 if
Spferflage: 5201f
Total: 1,005 if
Frontage improvements include curb and gutter, a 12' travel lane, an 8' shoulder and a 6'
sidewalk. Cost of improvements is $1850/ if for a typical 128' wide six-lane street.
Sidewalk cost is $6.00/sf, or $36/lf fora 6' sidewalk.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Attachment 3
Page 11 of 14
November 14, 2008
Total Frontage Costs: 1005 x ((1850 x 20/128) + 36) _ $326,688
Repair of the existing pavement along the east side of the road is needed. In addition, a
asphalt conform and overlay is needed to provide an interim lane in the ultimate median
pending widening of the road from four lanes to six lanes.
Cost: 1400' x 27' x $2.00 = $75,600 .
Total: $402,288
Segment 23 -Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard to Gleason Drive
The north leg of Gleason Drive intersection will require signal and civil modification to
accommodate second left turn lane. Both legs of Central Parkway intersection will require
signal and civil modifications for second left turn lanes.
Cost:
3 legs x $62,500 per leg for signals x 50% for modification = $93,750
31egs x $22,000 per leg for civil work = $66,000
$159,750
Segment 24 -Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard to I-580
A northbound right turn lane is needed at Dublin Boulevard (existing right turn lane will
become #3 travel lane).
Cost:
1 leg x $62,500 per leg for signal x 50% for modification = $31,250
1 leg x $22,000 per leg for civil work = $22,000
$53,250
Segment 25 -Tassajara Road/ I-580 Interchange
Interchange improvements are complete. Per the Fallon Village EIR, further interchange
improvements are needed to widen the eastbound off-ramp approach at Tassajara Road to
provide a 5th lane. Costs used in the 2004 Update for similar work at the Hacienda Drive
interchange are as follows:
Widen EB Offram : $1,435,000
Attachment 3 November 14, 2008
Page 12 of 14
2004 Cost: $1,435,000
Escalation cost (2004-2008) @ 50% $717,500
$2,152,500
Segment 26 -Fallon Road, Tassajara Road to Gleason Drive
Street is existing from Signal Hill Drive to Gleason Drive. Intersection improvements are
needed on south leg of the Tassajara Road intersection.
Cost:
1 legs x $62,500 per leg. for signal x 100% _ $62,500
1 leg x $22,000 per leg for civil improvements = $22,000
$84,500
Abridge is needed at the Northern Drainage crossing. Per plans and estimates prepared by
MacKay and Somps, the bridge is 83' wide by 125' long. Grading for the approach fill
and the slide repair to the north of the bridge requires 120,000 cy of material. MacKay and
Somps has estimated the cost of the bridge and grading as follows:
Bridge Structure: $2,424,828
Stitch Piers: $591,531
Bioswale $219,000
Habitat Mitigation: $231,000
Cost: $3,463,359
Segment 26A -Fallon Road, Gleason Drive to Dublin Boulevard Extension
Street improvements exist on the east side of the street from Gleason Drive to Bent Tree.
Frontage improvements are existing on the west side of the street from Bent Tree Drive to
the Upper Loop Road (700'); the existing improvements on the east side of the street need
to be reconstructed per the new alignment. Frontage improvements are existing on the
west side of the road from the Upper Loop Road to Central Parkway (1350'). Frontage
improvements plus 14' of the outside SB TIF lane are existing between Central Parkway
and Dublin Boulevard (1270').
A traffic signal is existing at Central Parkway (31egs) along with a SB right turn lane.
The SB right turn lane is existing at Dublin Boulevard.
C7
•
.7
•
Attachment 3
Page 13 of 14
November 14, 2008
Partial intersection improvements (civil, R/W) are needed for the south leg of Central
Parkway .
Area BSb (south leg Central) _ $3,000/acre (use $13.50/ sf)
Cost:
1 leg x 5,560 x $13.50 = $75,060
1 leg x $30,000 per leg for civil costs x 100% _ $30,000
$105,060
Segment 27 -Fallon Road, Dublin Boulevard to I-580
Street improvements are existing on the westside. Improvements are needed for the
median island, northbound TIF lanes (three) and frontage improvements on the westside.
Partial intersection improvements (civil and right-of--way) are needed on the south leg of
the Dublin Boulevard intersection.
Area A-4 (south of Dublin Boulevard) _ $12.00
Cost:
1 leg x 5,560 x $12 = $66,720
1 leg x $30,000 for civil costs = $30,000
$96,720
Segment 28 -Fallon Road/ I-580 Interchange
Interchange costs are based on the CIP cost of $11,694,458 for Phase 1 and the 2004
Update estimate of $11,182,999 plus 50% for Phase 2
Under a current agreement between the Cities of Dublin, Pleasanton, and Livermore,
Dublin will pay 50% of the cost and Pleasanton and Livermore will each pay 25% of the
cost.
Segment 29 - Tassajara Creek Bike Path
There are no miscellaneous costs.
Park and Ride Facili
.1
Attachment 3
Page 14 of 14
November 14, 2008
The Hacienda Drive and Tassajara Road lots are existing. Cost of the Fallon Road lots is
estimated at $10.00/ sf.
Cost:
40,000 x $10.00/ s~ $400,000
Other Costs
A cost of $6,000,000 is allowed for construction of a new parking structure at the BART
station to replace the existing parking lot, which will be developed as part of the Transit
Center. The structure will provide a total of 1,680 parking spaces and will cost
$20,000,000. The Alameda County Surplus Property Authority will pay for replacement
of the existing 1,180 spaces on the surface lot, at a cost of $14,000,000. The.TIF fee will
pay for an additiona1500 spaces, intended to serve new growth in Eastern Dublin, at a cost
of $6,000,000. A new fee section, the Section II Residential BART Parking Surcharge
Fee, will pay this cost to be paid only by residential development.
An allowance of $50,000 is provided for the fee update. This will be a Section I cost.
These costs include staff time (salaries, benefits and overhead), legal review, and
consultant costs for traffic studies or other technical work.
A cost of $100,000 is allowed for three City entry signs at the I-580 interchanges on
Hacienda Drive, Tassajara Road, and Fallon Road. These will be a Section I cost.
A cost of $100,000 is allowed for miscellaneous traffic and alignment studies associated
with T1F improvements. These are Section I costs.
Traffic studies indicate that the existing southbound left turn lane at the intersection of
Village Parkway and Amador Valley Boulevard will need to be~lengthened to provide
210' of storage (plus a 90' taper) to accommodate increased left turns utilizing Amador
Valley Boulevard to reach Eastern Dublin. Cost is estimated at $150,000. This will be a
Section II cost.
Traffic studies indicate that a traffic signal is will be warranted at the intersection of
Amador Valley Boulevard and Brighton Drive to accommodate additional traffic between
Eastern Dublin and Dublin High School. Cost is estimated at $350,000. This will be a
Section II cost.
•
•
•
Attachment 4
Page 1 of 8
• Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee, 2008 U date
p
Right-of--Way Costs
•
"" v
November 25, 2008
Note: All right-of--way costs are for planning and estimating purposes only, and are not a
commitment to reimburse°property owners or provide TIF credits in the amounts shown
in the estimates. Reimbursements or credits will be based on actual square footages of
R/W, which are acquired or dedicated.
Segment 1-Dougherty Road, City Limits to Amador Valley Boulevard
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 2 -Dougherty Road, Amador Valley Boulevard to Houston Place
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 3 -Dougherty Road, Houston Place to Dublin Boulevard
Right-of-way has been acquired.
Segment 4 -Dougherty Road to North of I-580 Off-Ramp
Right-of--way has been acquired.
Segment 5 -Dublin Boulevard, Village Parkway to Sierra Court (Widening)
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 6 -Dublin Boulevard, Sierra Court to Dougherty Road
Right-of--way costs of $549,477 are used from Sierra Court to Dublin Court per the City
CIP. Right-of--way has been acquired from Dublin Court to Dougherty Road.
Cost: $556,511
r
ATTACHII~NT _ ' •
TO EXHIBIT B.
Attachment 4
Page 2 of 8
November 25, 2008
Segment 7 -Dublin Boulevard, Dougherty Road to S/P R/W
Right-of--way has been acquired.
Segment 8 -Dublin Boulevard, S/P R/W to Iron Horse Parkway
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 8A -Dublin Boulevard, Iron Horse Parkway to Hacienda Drive
Right-of--Way is existing '
Segment 9 -Dublin Boulevard, Hacienda Drive to Tassajara Road
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 10 -Dublin Boulevard, Tassajara Road to Fallon Road
Right-of--Way is existing.
Segment 11-Dublin Boulevard, Fallon Road to Airway Boulevard
Costs per ARWS Impact Fee Study (June 2006) unless otherwise noted
Southside, Fallon Road to 4300' east R/W = $25.00/sf
Southside, 4300' e/o Fallon Road to City limits, 740' R/W = $12.00/sf
Northside, Fallon Road to 900' east R/W = $0.25/sf
Northside, 900' e/o to 3520' e/o Fallon Road, 2620' R/W = $25.00/ sf
Northside, 3520' e/o Fallon Road to City limits, 1520' R/W = $12.00 / sf
City Limits to Airway Boulevard (3000'):
use $7.00/sf per ARWS Study
TIF =16' median plus four 12' lanes =128' (64' each side) (six lane roadway, City of
Livermore will contribute 50% of cost)
Right-of--Way Costs =
4300' x 32' x $25.00 = $3,440,000
740' x 32' x $12.00 = $284,160
900' x 32' x $0.25 = $7,200
C,
•
•
. _i
C.
•
L'
Attachment 4
Page 3 of 8
November 25, 2008
2620' x 32' x $25.00 = $2,096,000
1520' x 32' x $12.00 = $583,680-
3000' x 128' x $7.00 $2,688,000
$9,099,040
Segment 12 -Airway Boulevard/ I-580 Interchange
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 13 -Hacienda Drive, I-580 to Dublin Boulevard
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 14 -Hacienda Drive, Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Drive
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 15 -Hacienda Drivel I-580 Interchange
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 16 -Arnold Drive, Dublin Boulevard to Gleason Drive
Right-of--way is needed along the west side of Arnold Drive. It is anticipated that Camp
Parks will dedicate the needed right-of--way at no cost to the City as a condition of
redeveloping the southerly portion of the property.
Segment 16A -Central Parkway, Arnold Drive to Hacienda Drive
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 17 -Central Parkway, Hacienda Drive to Tassajara Road
Right-of--Way is existing
,:~
~. ,= :=-
>.~
Attachment 4
Page 4 of 8
November 25, 2008
Segment 18 -Central Parkway, Tassajara to Keegan Street
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 18A -Central Parkway, Keegan Street to Fallon Road
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 19 -Gleason Drive, Arnold Drive to Hacienda Drive
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 19A -Gleason Drive, Hacienda Drive to Tassajara Road
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 20 -Gleason Drive, Tassajara Road to Fallon Road
Right-of--Way is existing.
Segment 21-Scarlett Drive, Dougherty Road to Dublin Boulevard
BKF Engineers, working for the City's Scarlett Drive Capital Improvement Project, has
estimated the needed right-of--way for the project as follows:
Camp Parks: 43,341 sf
County of Alameda: 138,829 sf
Scarlett Homes, LLC and SP Transportation Company: 10,495 sf
Scarlett Place LLC: ~ 53,146 sf
Total: 245,811 sf
The 2004 Update used $20.00/sf, based on recent acquisitions along Dublin Boulevard. .
Right-of--way cost: 245,811 sf x $20.00/sf = $4,916,220
r~
U
r~
Attachment 4
Page 5 of 8
•
•
•
November 25, 2008
Segment 22 - Tassajara Road, 5000' North of Gleason Drive to CC County Line
The ARWS Impact Fee Study (May, 2003) was used as the basis for costs in the 2004
Update. The 2007 Update uses the 2004 Update costs, with an escalation of 23.00% as of
July 1, 2005 and 17.61% as of July 1, 2007, or a total escalation of 45% over the 2004
prices.
Area F-1 (westside, 5000' n/o Gleason to CC County Line, 5660') R/W = $17.00/sf
x 145% _ $24.65; use $25.00/ sf
1999 Update (eastside, 5000' n/o Gleason to Silveria, 2500') R/W = $11.00/sf + 10% _
$12.10/sf x 145 % _ $17.54; use $18.00/ sf
Area F-2 (eastside, Silveria and Mission Peak frontage, 1500') R/W = $6.00/sf
x 145% _ $8.70; use $9.00/ sf
1999 Update (eastside, Mission Peak to CC County Line, 1660') R/W = $11.00/sf + 10%
_ $12.10/sf x 145 % _ $17.54; use $18.00/ sf
TIF R/W is existing (TIF width = 64', existing R/W = 66'); TIF R/W needed for portions
of road which shift from existing centerline; non-TlF R/W will need to be acquired along
frontages of property without development poteritial (six lanes total)
Wallis Ranch Frontage:Total /W needed 132,376 sf (per RJA Precise Plan Alignment)
Non-TIF : 32' x 2300' (73,600 sf)
Net TIF R/W 58,776 sf x $25.00/sf = $1,469,400
Bragg/ Silva Frontage: Net TIF R/W (per sales agreement)
Fredrich Frontage: Total R/W needed 13,039 sf (Parcel 1 per RJA)
10,614 sf (Parcel 2 per RJA)
Non-TIF : 32' x 685' (21,920 sf)
Net TIF R/W 1,733 sf x $25.00/sf =
Vargas Frontage: Total R/W needed
Non-TIF : 32' x 325'
32' x 600 x %Z
Net TIF R/W
Tipper Frontage: Total R/W needed
Non-TIF: N/A, will need to acquire
21,488 sf (per RJA)
(10,400 sf)
(9,600 sf)
1,488 sf x $25.00/sf =
18,995 sf (per RJA)
$402,312
$43,325
$37,200
,n„~~;
Attachment 4
Page 6 of 8
November 25, 2008
Net TIF R/W
18,995 sf x $25.00/sf = $474,875
Mission Peak Frontage: Total R/W needed 21,680 sf (per RJA)
Non-TIF R/W 32' x 400' (12,800 sf)
Net T1F R/W
Moller Frontage: Total R/W needed
Non-TIF R/W 32' x 1200'
8,880 sf x $9.00/sf = $79,920
78,756 sf (per RJA)
(38,400 sf)
Net TIF R/W 40,356 sf x $18.00/sf = $726,408
Right-of--Way Contingency (to be used in the event $800,000
property needs to acquired in the absence of or in advance
of dedication through development)
Right-of--Way Contingency for Creek Stabilization:
36,000sf x $25.00/ sf
Total R/W Costs
_ $900,000
_ $4,933,440
Segment 22A - Tassajara Road, Gleason Drive to 5000' North of Gleason Drive
TIF R/W is existing (TIF width = 64', existing R/W = 66'.); non-T1F R/W will need to be
acquired from parcels without development potential (six lanes total)
The ARWS Impact Fee Study (May, 2003) was used as the basis for costs in the 2004
Update. The 2007 Update uses the 2004 Update costs, with an escalation of 23.00% as of
July 1, 2005 and 17.61% as of July 1, 2007, or a total escalation of 45% over the 2004
prices.
1999 Update used $18.00/ sf on east side of road; add 10%; use $19.80/sf
x 145% _ $38.71, use $29.00/ sf
EBRPD Frontage: 31' x 170' 5,270 sf x $29.00 = $152,830
Goodwin Frontage 31' x 215'
USA (Camp Parks) 31' x 100'
Sperfslage: per RJA
2006 Acquisition for Bridge
Net
6,665 sf x $29..00. _ $193,285
3,100 sf x $29.00 = $89,990
17,114 sf
(2,200 sf j
14,914 sf x $29.00 = $432,506
•
C7
C~
C,
Attachment 4
Page 7 of 8
November 25, 200
Total R/W Costs $868,611
Segment 23 -Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard to Gleason Drive
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 24 -Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard to I-580
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 25 -Tassajara Road/ I-580 Interchange
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 26 -Fallon Road, Tassajara Road to Gleason Drive
Right-of--Way is existing
Segment 26A -Fallon Road, Gleason Drive to Dublin Boulevard Extension
Right-of--Way is existing from Gleason Drive to the Upper Loop Road, and from Central
Parkway to Dublin Boulevard. Right-of--way is needed along the Jordan property frontage
between the Upper Loop Road and Central Parkway. The majority of the needed right-of
way falls within the existing 30' roadway easement and/ or the 32 `frontage
improvements, and is not eligible for T1F credit. There is a portion of the right-of--way
opposite Central Parkway that will be eligible. The right-of--way is approximately
6,000 sf in area; an allowance of 10,000 sf is provided in the TIF.
Costs per ARWS Impact Fee Study (June 2006)
eastside, Old Fallon Road to 2000' south) R/W = $0.25/ sf
Right-of--Way Costs:
10,000 sf x $0.250 = ~ $2,500
$2,500
Attachment 4
Page 8 of 8
November 25, 2008
Segment 27 -Fallon Road, Dublin Boulevard to I-580
Right-of--Way is existing on the westside. Additional right-of--way needed along the east
side; this right-of--way is located within the existing 30' roadway easement and/or within
the 32' frontage improvements, no TIF credit will be given for the dedication.
Segment 28 -Fallon Road/ I-580 Interchange
Right -of--Way costs are included in the overall project cost estimate.
Segment 29 -Tassajara Creek Bike Path
Path is located within Tassajara Creek setback open space parcels; no TIF credit will be
given
Park and Ride Facility
Hacienda Drive and Tassajara Road lots are existing; Right-of--way is needed for Fallon
Road lot (east side of road); per 1999 Update, lot is 40,000 sf
The ARWS Impact Fee Study (May, 2003) was used as the basis for costs in the 2004
Update. The 2007 Update uses the 2004 Update costs, with an escalation of 23.00% as of
July 1, 2005 and 17.61% as of July 1, 2007, or a total escalation of 45% over the 2004
prices.
Area A-4 (eastside) R/W = $12.00'sf x 145% _ $17.40; use 17.50/ sf
R/W costs = 40,000 x $17.50 = $700,000
•
r~
•
ZONE 7 FEES
TIF AREA
•
L`
•
Attachment 5 -Zone 7 Fees
Road Segment
Price
per ftZ
Length
in ft TIF
width in
ft
Quantity
in ft2
Cost:
Zone 7 Fee
Dou he Road - Se ment 1 $1.820 4,300 , 49 223,600 $406,952.00
Dou he Road - Se ment 2 $1.820 4,150 49 203,350 $370,097.00
Dou he Road - Se ment 3 $1.820 900 49 0 ~ $0.00
Dou hert Road - Se ment 4 $1.820 550 49 0 $0.00
Dublin Boulevard - Se ment 5 $1.820 Com lete
Dublin Boulevard - Se ment 6 $1.820 .2,030 49 99,470 $181,035.40
Dublin Boulevard - Se ment 7 $1.820 0 $0.00
Dublin Boulevard Extension- Se ment 8 $1.820 1,950 0 $0.00
Dublin Boulevard Extension- Se ment 8A $1.820 2,650 12 31,800 $57,876.00
Dublin Boulevard - Se ment 9 $1.820 4,600 0 Com lete
Dublin Boulevard - Se ment 10 $1.820 1,975 49 0 $0.00
Dublin Boulevard - Se ment 11 $1.820 .9,500 49 502,832 $915,154.24
Freewa Interchan e - Se ment 12 $1.820 0 $0.00
Hacienda - Se ment 13 $1.820 0 Com lete
Hacienda - Se ment 14 $1.820 2640 12 39,200 $71,344.00
Freewa Interchan e - Se ment 15 $1.820 0 Com lete
Arnold Drive - Se ment 16 all TIF $1.820 2640 28 93,040 $169,332.80
Central Parkwa - Se ment 16A $1.820 1400 25 16,800 $30,576.00
Central Parkwa - Se ment 17 $1.820 4575 25 48,000 $87,360.00
Central Parkwa - Se ment 18 $1.820 3640. 0 Com lete
Central Parkwa - Se ment 18A $1.820 1430 25 0 $0.00
Gleason - Se ment 19 $1.820 1600 0 Com lete
Gleason - Se ment 19A ~ $1.820 4650 0 Com lete
Gleason - Se ment 20 $1.820 4650 0 Com lete
Scarlet Drive - Se ment 21 $1.820 - - 128,000 $232,960.00
Tassa'ara Road - Se ment 22 $1.820 5660 49 271,680 $494,457.60
Tassa'ara Road - Se ment 22A $1.820 5000 49 208,800 $380,016.00
Tassa'ara Road - Se ment 23 $1.820 2470 25 59,280 $107,889.60
Tassa'ara Road - Se ment 24 $1.820 800 12 9,600 $17,472.00
Tassa'ara Road - Se ment 25 $1.820 0 18,000 $32,760.00
Fallon Road - Se ment 26 $1.820 8080 25 88,800 $161,616.00
Fallon Road - Se ment 26A $1.820 4840 49 155,580 $283,155.60
Fallon Road - Se ment 27 $1.820 680 49 46,404 $84,455.28
Fallon Road & I-580 Freeway Interch. W/
Si nals - Se ment 28
$1.820
-
-
208,955
$380,298.88
Tassa'ara Creek Bike Path - Se ment 29 $1.820 7100 12 85,200 $155,064.00
Park & Ride $1.820 - ~ - 40,000 $72,800.00
Total 2,578,391 $ 4,692,672.40
ATTACffi1~NT
TO EXFIIBIT B.
3/23/2009
Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Zone 7 Fe
Attachment 6
20-Nov-OS
Summary of Outstanding Credits and Advances
Existing Credits as June 30, 2008
Pending Credits as November 20, 2008
~-
Developer Section 1 Section II
ACSPA $ 20,486,279.46 $ 1,604,592.93
DR Acquisitions I, Fallon Road $ 2,736,612.00
DR A uisitions II, Dublin Ranch Area G RNV $ 4,402,221.77
DR Acquisitions III, Fire Stn. 18 $ 82,448.00
Lin Family $ 6,270,321.99 $ 10,704,056.14
MSSH Development $ 1,615,547.50
Toll CA II $ 49,806.90 $ 91,290.00
Toll Dublin LLC $ 456,477.52
Triad Dublin $ 336,663.01
Braddock and Logan $ 1,046,941.98 $ 272,309.75
Standard Pacific $ 463,986.37
Dr. Sabri Arac, Tassajara Road Interchange $ 135,098.75
General Motors, Tassajara Meadows $ 284,059.29
Pfeiffer Ranch Investors $ 473,799.54
Regent Land investment, LLC $ 2,878,877.66
Sorrento at Dublin Ranch $ 359,242.37 $ 227,353.50
Subtotal Miscellaneous $ 42,078,384.11 $ 12,899,602.32
Interest Bearing Advances
ACSPA Advance $ 2,546,712.43
Future Interest $ 613,705.00
BART Advance $ 2,781,727.03
Future Interest $ . 212,107.00
City of Pleasanton Advance (7.75% $ 1,636,853.21
Future Interest $ 81,535.00
Subtotal Loans $ 1,718,388.21 $ 6,154,251.46
Subtotal Existing Credits/ Advances $ 43,796,772.32 $ 19,053,853.78
Pending Credits (Work Is Guaranteed Under An Improvement Agreement And
The Credit For The Work Has Been Determined; A Credit Agreement Is Not Yet
In Place But Will Be Processed Upon Adoption Of The 2008 EDTIF Update
Kobold, Tassajara Road R/V11, S ment 22 $ 62,455.02
Lin Family, Gleason Drive, Segment 20 (" ") $ 4,804,441.00
Lin Family, Fallon Road, Segment 26 (" ") $ 172,081.00
Lin Famil ,Fallon Road, Segment 26A (" ") $ 369,777.00
Lin Family, Central Pkwy., Fairway Ranch, Segment 18A (" " $ 1,009,226.00
Lin Family, Dublin Blvd., Fairway Ranch, Segment 10 " ") $ 1,369,155.00
Avalon Bay, Dublin Blvd., Median landscaping, Segment 8 $ 194,875.20
Toll Bros., Central Parkwa , Overla /Striping, Segment 18 $ 81,322.20
Toll Bros., Central Parkwa ,Overlay/ Striping, Segment 18A $ 22,334.10
Lin Famil ,Central Parkwa , Lockhart to Fallon, Se ment 18A $ 6,250,149.48
Lin Famil ,Dublin Blvd., Lockhart to Fallon, Segment 10 $ 8,055,206.19
Lin Famil ,Dublin Blvd., Southern Frontage, Segment 10 $ 191,871.48
Lin Family, Fallon Road, I-580 to Dublin Blvd., Segment 27 $ 4,971,503.37
Lin Famil ,Fallon Road, Dublin Blvd to Central, Segment 26A $ 4,610,880.70
Lin Family, Fallon Road, Central to Bent Tree, Segment 26A $ 2,327,723.92
Pulte, Gleason Drive, Median LS, Segment 20 $ 166,400.00
Braddock and Logan, Fallon Road, Segment 26A $ 812,221.32
ATTACffiV~NT ~ .
TO EXHIBIT B.
r~
•
• ~ ~ o[a~ ~.rea~i
Grand Total
$ 98,322,249.08
•
C,
Attachment 7
Eastern Dublin TIF
November 24, 2008
Credit/ Fee Balance Summary
TIF Category Account Source
Balance
7/01/08)
Section 1 Fee Administrative Services
$2,335,094.20 De artment
Section 2 Fee Administrative Services
$3,746,205.96 De artment
Section 2Non-Transit Center $1,172,094.00 Administrative Services
Residential BART Parkin De artment
Dougherty Valley Traffic $0.00 Administrative Services
Mitigation Fee Department
C.
L'
ATTACHMENT
TO EXHIBIT B.
...
.7
•
~
~LL ~
U
Q
U
t6
Q
~
U ~
~
~ H
H ~
N
00
N
~ C
~
7
~
`
~
~
~
~
~
0
~
A
~
~
~
Q W N ~
O
O
Z
N
O
r
O
ti
v~
N
N
LL
C
.~
.~
°o ° ~°n
rn rn rn
LL ~ M ~
(
~
~R„ CO C7 M
o ~ ea vs
° ~ o ~
o
o c c
o
m ~
"' c
o
~
~-
0
H
0
0
of
a~ roi
m
w of
~
o
~ ifs
0
~- } o
ri
~
l o co
a~
iy o ug
y o n ~ c~
€ ~ ~ ~ m
v
m
v
c_
0
0
d ~
a~
LL
~
O CD
F ~
f9
w
LL O
N
O
~ O
N
~
LL O u>
~ f~D N
~ o N
. ap ~ o aD
N ~ ~ ~ co N
f0
L
N
v
c
0 0
o r~
~ }
i LL
~ t
;.. L
E- L
H
~
rn
o 0
0
0
0
~., _ _
~ ~ LLQ LL ~ ~ o 0
Q Q
N ~ ..., p~ p L C r N
O O
~ Q ~ ~C~ ~ F~-~ d' ~ fn
ATTACffiV~NT $ .
TO EXHIBIT B.
w 'O
au'' m
1~- ~ d LL'
7 ~
N
O ~
+~ LL
y ~
Q d p d
f.,a°~LL
~ O
N ~°•~
a
~ w
J+ ~
A
O
~_
~C
di ~
C r C C
C '~
'° E ? c
~aLL~
O)
~ w W
C ~ O
AEo`m
maa`N
M.awm
" m o
•~ y .O-` O
a="a~
N
N
m
y
e
J
m
E
Z
C
m
O
m
O
O
I~ O
t~ f~
N tn
aD
O 0
M ~
O ~
N 00
N
O 0
~ 0
M 0
1O 0
0 0
~ 0 0
~ 0
11~ 0
~' 0
aD 0
1~ 0
O O
0 O N
O O
OD M
N O *-
- O
00 O
0 fD
M O
O OO
10 O
M O
O N N
Q CO
I!')
0
00 ~17
0 00
~ 1~
N 0
M N
e- O~
~ h
tO M M ~ N f~ O ~ ~"
~ CO
N M ~ M
O M
d' N
I~ IU N
fD I~
~ O O
N d'
N ~O
r- I~
C~ M
~ I~
N M
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~O ~ 0 ~ O 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N 0
~ ~ ~
N ~
O
N O
N h M
M t0
N 0
~ 1~ (p M
M 0
N 0
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0O
d' M
M M
M O
N O
~ O f~ 0
N fO f0 C0 0
N ~
M f~
M
~-
y
N
~ w
y
N
>
>
> w
y w
y
~ w
y
7
7
7
7
7
>
>
7
7
7
7
7 w
y w
y w
y w
y w
y
7
7
7 w
y
7
7
7 ~
y
~
7
Y Y ~p Y Y ~ V 'O Y Y 'O Y O ~ V 'O 'O V 'O 'O ~ 'O 'O 'O Y Y Y Y Y ~ 'O 'O Y 'C ~ 'C Y U V
O
In O
to O
O fO
In N
~ 0
0 0
0 0
0 7
~ t0
10 0
O
f0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
O 0
O 0
N O
O O
O O
O M
lO O
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
M CO N OO C") N 7 00 0 e- f~ l0 Oi ~7 0 ~ ln ~ 00 f~ 0 0 0 0 0 O O a0 0 0D O M ~ O In M OD
M
~ N
~ t0
N 0
O M
M h
r- O
M N
(L7 O
aD M M c- N P 0 V' r
r- O
N M N M
N M
~ (0
OD 1n N
O 'R
N O
I~ <t
M O
tt O
M M
~ .- O
0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O O
O 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ t0 0 fO et 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
~ N ~ ~ N ~
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N W W O 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
l[) to t{ 'C V R N ~ M
t~
~
i~
M
N
~ o
tCf
~
O
~
O
~
O
O
~
M
~
O
0
N 0
O 0
O o
O M
IO
M
O
CO 00
~
M
tn
O 0
O
M
OD
M
M DO
N CO
N (y
O am
M
M F
r O
M OD
N Oj
O
~
f~ 1~ ~ t0 fO 0 f~ O V'
~ O
N ~
r N
~
O
N 0
M 01
f~ 0
M 0
ID 0 N
(O ~
N 0
^ ~
M 0
St' 0
M 1[j
M ~ 0
et V 0 f0 O M N ~ r- CO d'
f6 f0 lC f0
~ l0
c ~ _
f6 _
f° f0
c t0
c m
c m
c t0
c N
c N
c N
c f6
c m
c c0
•- /G
- ~
•
m ~
~~ m
`
°
f
°
~0 m
v
y
N
f0
m :o
N
C
m
C
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
C
C ~
~p
~p
m v
•tl1 -
C -
C
C v
y
U V Qom' m m y ~ ~ m 'D
' a m y y y y y y y y y L ,a ~ E ~ V .0 y ~ U 'a a O m Q'
`~
~
0
•
E
E m
ms
,.. y
m m
E U
~ y
m ~
a m
~ m
~ m
~ m
~ m
~ m
~ m
~ m
~ m
~ m
~ m
m
~ y
m
o! 7
a E
o m
f m
E
~
y m
~
=
~ y
m y
m y
m C
l
'
0 N
c E E y
C ~ E 0 o! .s
•
••
•
•
' .s
E U E E O M y 0 ~ ~ ~ m
V ~ m
y
O m
^ O
U O
U ._
C
^ _
•y O
U y
7 E ._
C =
C ;
C
C =
C _
c
[:
L: -
C =
C >,
E
E
~ .6
O O
U O
U y
O
•y
.C c
~ y
'y
y
y
O ~
p C
^
E E
O L ~ ~
N m
^ L c
m -
~°
E E
m
LL ~
~
= m
^ m
^ m
^ m
^ m
^ m
^ m
^ m
^ m
^ m
^ m
LL m
LL ~
= O
-E ~
~ ~
~ E
m c
m m
^ L E
m c
m c
m c
m -
m L
m
U
U
2
m
c
c
E
2
^
m
c
N
U
m
~
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
m
m
-
~
a
c
c
U
^
E
=
U
^
^
^
2 _
=
E m
C~ m
C7 ~
c
E L m
C7 - LL > > >
- > >
~o >
v >
v >
v >
v >
v ~
c
c LL L m
C7 m
C7 3 ~
-
E L L L
E
3 m ? ._
2 c_
~ v
m ~
m c
m v
m m m m m m m ._
~ ._
~ m O
~ O
m ~ 2 2 2
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ •° N
~ ~ a
i
~ ~
a s c c U U y
~ ~ t0 O m m [O m U C.) D LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL ~ N (, 0 2 2 2 !~
{p !!+
~p !~
tp a
~ Q
m U
,m., UI ~ ~ m
LL LL ~ ~ ~ Q _
fA ln ~ W W
Q Q p ^ a
M U O m
y r N M ~ In t0 I~ O ~ ~ ~! O m V
N Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z m .O1 y gy U N
L
L
L d
L
L 0
c $
c 0
c 0
c 0
c 0
c 0
c 0
c 0
c 0
C
L
L
L C
m N
c d
3 m
m in
m w
m .
m.
c
m ~
c
m m
c
m ..m.
c
m C
m O
~
U U U f0 U U L
U L
V ~ N m m
~ m m m ~ y
~
C
C
C () O
~ O
J t
U ~ ~ >
> U U U U E O m
Q
Q
O
C
O
C C
O
~ C
m
~ C
m
~
~
•fO c
0
Q' C
0
~ C
0
d'
c
~
0
~
0
~
0
U) `
-
0
V~
0
~
0
V1
0
fn
0
V)
0
C/)
(f~
~
~
~ C
O
~
t [:
~
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
~y
._
m
.
y ~,
._
y `
m -
m f0
_
-
O O
~-. ~p
~ ~p
~
C
C
C LL
c
C
C
C
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
t
t
C
C
c
~ (7 V
C
c c
N C
f0 C
N C
t`0 G
W C
N C
N >
O 2
C
~ ~ a a a L
~ a a a ~ c c c c c c c c c ~
c .o a .o L
c~ cLi ~ a ~
c ~
c ~
c H H 1= H 0 c
>
O >
^ >
^
c ~
^ ~
^ ~
^ 7
^ m
~ f0
~ t0
~ N
~ t0
~ m
~ f6
~ N
~ f0
~
~ ~
^ >
^ >
^
c C
m
c 7
^
_
a
_
a
_
a C
_ c
- C
_ C
_
c 7
o N
LL
m
~
c
~
~
c
c
c
c
c
c ~
c ~
R
y
a
>
^
>
^
>
^ a
> a
> a
> a
>
>
c
U
5 a a
~ a a a a a a a c ~ ~ ^ ^ O ^ j m
.n
~ ~
^
^ >
^ >
^ >
O >
^ >
^ >
^ ~
^ ~
^ ,a
> a
> w
m W
^ ^ ^ W
y
m ~
as
'd •
O
O.
O.
Q
0
C
m
E
L
U
N
Q
•
a~
v
m
~o
a`
O
n
Q
C
O
C
m
C7
a
F=
ai.
c
m
E
L
U
m
ATTACffi1~NT /•
mn ~vuTDrr ~
•
r~
•
p
a+•p N
M M
O O
et f0
l~ 0
f~ 0
0 0
~' N
0 ~
d' O
W O O
O O
et ~
0 fO
1~ O
N M
M h
0 0
a0 0
N 0 0D
O M O O
0 r tO
fO et
O
I" O
eF O
r O
f~ O
tp O
O ln
tCS 0 0 0
c0
N++~
p,~
~ d'
M l[)
N O
N O
N fp CO
d' O
r M N tO
h M
N M
N 1~
M ~0 1O r 0 OD O
N In
eY W et O
N N
t~ M
r OD fp
r M N r
r 0
Cp ~ 0
N
D
~ = aLL r
~
N
w LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O' O O O O O O O O O O O O 10 O
ag 0
o M
o ®
1=~epLL.
~o
N N
p.
•y 10
7 0
N 0
r 00 0 0 0 0 f0
N O
N O
r O O f~ tD t0
N t0
N OD f0
N 0
N 0
r 00 0
N 1~ 0 M
M t0
st 0
N f0
N 0
r 0 0
r 0
N N
r M
M M
M 0
r 0
H am+
T ~
R
w
N w
N
3 w
N
>
>
> w
N v-•
N r
v7
>
7
7
7
7 w
tl) w
W w
N w
W
N
p V-
N w
N
~ w
y w
N .~
N w
N ~.-
N
>
>
? q..
N H
'O ~.-
N .~-
W
>
Y Y ~ Y ~ • O • p Y Y Y - p - p • p ~ ~ Y Y Y Y Y ~ Y Y -O Y Y Y Y Y y • p ~ Y ~ Y Y y • p
O
C N D) 0
~ ~ 0
0 0
0 0
0 O
0 O
0 tO
0 0
M N
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 f0
10 M
et N
et t0
et 0
O M
N eF
O 0
O 10
eF I~
r 1f1
O 0
O 0
p 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
++ C ~
~
0 O
N eY
0 N
1~ f~
(0 ~
f0 ~}'
0 M
~ 0 e}
(O O
M ~
M N
sP (D
O O
N M
eY f'7
r M r
O N
fO 10
N 0
M er
LL7 1f)
0D I~
10 f~
c0 M
M et
(O r l~
M M O
O tn
M O
h
1~ 00
0
10 E a r
O N r N M eY r I~ N N !n N N r f~ r r N N
M
d
~
LL
C to p 0~ O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
O 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
++ ~.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E `o ~ ~
- N
aEiad~
n:
om
v 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
'E~`c
O 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o 0 ao
N o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ N
O
n
d ~
d
m
N ~ a~-
~
0 O
N
^
c00
0 (0
0 0
M N
O
c07
M
~
a
0 O
0 0
N ~
~ N
~ fD
~ N
CV f~O
1l
» 10
~
1fj 0
ri 0
0 0
O
f~O
r
m O
O
0 0
0 0
0
0
m
fq N N N M (O V r ~ O) e1' OD N N t0 0 N ,d, ~ M O N N `"' ~j a
D O O M r ~rj r ~ N r N
~
N
O .m•
N
f0
• N
'C
~ l0
C
l9 t0 C
m
f0 ~
. f0 ~ l0 Ri t0 ~ _
N f0
C
~ C m m f0
• C ~
e m
' v1 C ~'
m ~
• m
' N N
- ~ _~ m m m m
' C m
L
m m
U m
'~
•
~ ~
0 m
'_ ~
N U
~
m
m
U m
'p
•
m
y p
'q m
~ m
~
E
` `
m
m
U O
•N
'~
m
U m
~
U ~ ~
m m
U E
m .O
Oi v_
a v
V1 R ~m .p
' N
m
E `'G N
m m
LL m
~ m m
x u
a E _
`'C N
m y m
x .y
m E
o U
a m
LL E 1,G m
~ p
a _
1,c .o m
E E ~ E m
~ m
~ m
~ ~ > C
® N
m ~
E O M - ~ ~ E O ~ m
~ ._
m ~ U ~ - E O O 'y ~ E E 0 E m = o U ~
o
U m
7 m
•.C„ ._
rn
N a
.i o
(,) y
7
r
.
•
•N c
m
...
.
~
O n.
_ ~
_C
(~ ~
7 =
N ~
'' v,
7 c
m a
.S o
(~ o
U ~,
7 o
U ._
1f1 ._
fq =
N ~
~
W E
O
C
•-
~
y
C
m E y)
~ C
m '-
N C
m E
m -
~
E E
t0 .
'y
C C
m D y
c o
L E
m to
~ ~
E C
m 07
~
E ~
L E
m -
~ -
~
E ~u C
m C
m C
m O O
x l- E m
~ N l9 LL ~ ~ m 0
U
LL A L m
O
~ .p o .O
N ~ 0 0 0 L O LL ~
C U
m C
-
E O
E C U
d ~
E
_ 0
~ C C V
E G
- V --
x C C V C
E
E
E
= L
m
m
E
~ ~
c ~
• 3 ~ ~ 3 ~
E L L ~ ~
' ~ ~ ~ ~ > >
v >
v c
c ~
'v
m
J ~ v
m o
J v
m c
~ o
J v
m ? •-
2 N v
m
r ? v
m m
~ m
r ~ N ~
~ ~ ~ ~ Z 2 ~ ~ L 2 0
~ ~
07
J _
7
p
N
t0
t0 ~
~
m
N
f0
l0
N
t0
f0
~
C '~'
C U
E
m
m
m
C
L
C
L
C
L
m °~
m C C O O O p C V 'C 'O 'O 'O -O m N C L L L U U U
fL N
m U U U m C ' 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d~ j ~ ~ ~
m
W o
- g a c
- H F- F-
r N
m L
a L
s
_
z ~ m m m m m m ~ m m m m m m m m ~, m m m ~ m mo ~ ~ aci m aci c ~
~ ~ m m m m m ~ m m m m m co m m m m m m m m m ca ~ a ._ ~ U U °' a
~ O O C O
c C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 C
0 o 'C
a (~ m U U ~ '~ ~
~
LL m
LL m
LL m
LL m
LL m
LL ~
LL m
LL °a
LL m
LL m
LL m
LL m
LL m
LL m
LL m
LL m
LL m
LL m
LL m
LL m
LL m
LL m
LL v c
m m c
a c
s m
~
~
p LL C7 x 0 ~
O
Y O
Y
H N
U m
m O
S m
as
m
Q
O.
Q
W
c
m
E
L
U
f0
Q
~0.. , O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
im 0 0
-'
M
m V
' M ^ r
t=a a" '' N
>>
H
~
O
LL O O O O O 0 0 0 ; ~
a
.
O. U ~ dl
d Q d ~
1- .O ~ LL '
' N
~ O
N .
.
N
o, o
r 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0
` ~
~.
0
~
ew°i 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
.._=o
`e • 3 ~ o o o
~.
~ o
~
~ .
is ~ O c
oM
a
i
~
~
c~w 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
o 0
~a E `o~
~ N_
d
d d N
aH.. B O O
~ 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
~-
E 7 ~
O O O O CO') N V O O O
~ ~
~
`~
a~
a
N
`' UY
cn OD
N to
a ~
v N
° C7
c+~ ~.
'
N
m
m m m m c m
v aci v m ~ v m y
~
d' N Q' y
N d' Q' H
Gf ~.
~ ~ ~ ~t9
N
~ _
~N
-
~N
~N
~ C
N
~fq
m y E m E m d E ~
= m
~ O iy O li O ~ LL ^
E a~ E P E E m = E
~
c
m ~
~o -
c ~
'v
~ >
=o >
v
c
E
'o
m
dt ~ N ~ ch
z ~ 'o a a a a a
C
E
~ c
N
N a
O
Y t
U
m t
Q
m ,c
U
m
t
c
=
c y
~p
c
o Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ,
~ m m m m
m o
~ ~
~
>
>
> m m
> >
O fn fn fn fn fn
, ~
0
LNL
'r
V
W
7
a
E-
z
Z
W
'F'^-
V/
Q
W
O
O
N
r
_~
0
Q
\i
N ~
d ~
.O ~
as
v
0
d
d
Q
m
C
m
E
L
U
Q
m
v
m
'o
a
v
m
o.
Q
c
0
.~
c
m
C7
n
I-
m
°~ i
E
Q
«•O 1~
N 0
M V~
O a
N O
r O
tfl 0
0 0
et 0 0 0
In 0
of 0
aD 0
IS 0
O O
O O O
O O
Of tD
M E0
N 0
M 0
O cO
In 0
`7 0
f~ 0
0) 0
d' 0 0
O 0
tt e1'
O f0
n 0 0 0
~ 0
r 0
l~ 0 0
op 0
r 0 0 0 0 0 0
•~ 0
O. tw7 ad+ d 0
r _
M N
r a0 M r ^ O el r
r (p
N M Ln N
fO I~
r O
N a
N OD
r h O
N fO O
V' O
r fO
1~ M
N M
N I~
M l0 OD O1 CO M ~ D7
N d'
F d aLL
a
o ~
N
~~ o o o o o co ~ oo ~ o~ o o o o o 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 o o o o o co o o o o 0 0 0 0
yw0 ''` N r ~•- N et' 10 M
O. y O y
~aoLL
~ O
N
N
o. ~ o n m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
r 0
r 0
r 0 0 ~ m m m ~ o o a o 0 0 o n m o i. o 0 0
r 0
r 0
r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
~ d
w
~. ~
A
O
~ v v v v v v v v ~ v v ~d v v v v ti v v v •o •c v v v v v v v v v v •o v •o v v v v v v v v •o v v v v
~
cmm o
o 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
C O
•
C M N d' r ~ m d' O O ln sr OC 1~ 0 Q1 0 00 0 a0 C7 iA O EO of f~ O V O ~ N fO 0 7 ~ f~ aD .- r 0 0 0 et
' 0
3 C
E
{p ` 00 N N7 ~ ~ M r n p » ~ N M O N
(O tt
N a
M 0
V' 0
M 0
r 0
N O O
C' O
r tO
f~ M
N M
N si'
tO O CO M
r fO
r M f~ O
N d
d
. QOM
~6
O O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 O
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O
C. ~d.. r Q O O O O O t O f O O f O V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O O O O O O O O
R E C D r N r r N ~ l0 M
i E N ~ M
d d d N
w
w 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
•p
p
E
y C~ 0 0 0 0 0 O
t[) N
~f) N
~1' W
~ N
~ 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M 00 10
~ O N
O
`
O 7 N N N
d d `
a-ate
d
!'~
c0 M N
f~ `d
O
r O
^ ~
~ t0
O ~
O O
O O
n 7
O O
~ n
r 0
tp 0)
r
N M
O D7
N N
~l M
aT H
0 0
0 00
0 .7
0 r
0 Q1
tO eT
O Of
M O
C7 V
M N
~i O
O
~ O
M ~
tO
r n
M f0
O 00
Q1
r
r X17
M ED
N lf)
~ s{
et N
O
yj N M r M r N r fO N M a M r N ~ r aD N N tn r N
f0 fC t0
• f6 fo f0
• N
•
C
d jp C
m
~p
jp c0
C m
C IO
C N
C c0
C fC
C f0
C t0
C c6 fp
-
l4
l0
f0 C
m
A
l0
l0 C
m
~
f0
_
f0
l9
_
c0 C
d
~p
N
' C
m
f0
'
f0
t9
:O
f0 N
_
f0
m
N
-
t0
f0
l0
f0 C
m
:O
m G
m :O
y
C
C
m
•
m
'
m
'
m
•
m
m
'
m
m C
m C
m -
C
C c6
'
C
m
~
y
C
C
C
~
y
'
C
C
m f0
-
C
m
'
C fo
C
d
;~
N
-
C
C
m
~
y
C
m
C
m
C
m
'
C
C
m
C
m
-
C
C
m
C
C
m
C
m
'
C
w
m v
.N m
~' m
.O m
~ O
.-
N O
.-
N O
.-
N O
.-
y ~
.-
N O
._
N 'O
.-
fq •O
.-
N V
.-
fq 'O
.-
N m
V m
~ C
~ v
'y m
~ d
9 d
~O d
•O m
~ m
C •o
'N ~
- v
M m
.~ ~
'O ;o
N m
~ m
~ v
N m
Q' v
N v
N v
m m
~ :4
N v
•N m
.~ v
fN m
9 v
N v
N d
~ m
Q'
m
~ N y m
4' m
a' m
d' m
Q: m
~ m
d' m
Q' m
d' m
0' m
~.' N
~ m
~ --
~
m
~
N
d
N
d
M
d
M
m
m
~ p
'-
m
m
om'
N
m
•-
m
m
om
N
m
m
0_'
m
~
m
Q'
m
Q'
N
m m
R'
d
2'
f0
m
m
d'
y
m
m
R~
m
Q.
y
m
ftl y ~' LL' .
m N m
. -
' N H) N f/J N M fd V) N N T - •N d m -
'- •N •N - N m •N m •N .y tlf = N .H ~ •M ~ ~N N = m
y p
L c
m p
L y
c E
m c
m c
m c
m c
m c
m c
m c
m c
m c
m c
m E
N E
N -
m
C c
m ^ •-
m
C •-
cn
C -
n
C p
E
m c
m •-
rn
c c
m
E
m
'en
c c
m p
L 'm
C c
m p
L c
m c
m c
m
E
m c
m c
m
E
m c
m
E.
t0 c
m c
m E
N p
L
~
y
'x p
E
2 O LL
a~ p
E p
E p
E p
E p
E p
E p
E p
E O
E p
E LL
m LL
m m
p p
E L
= m
p m
o m
C L
= lL
d p
E m
p p
E LL
d m
p ^
E
= m
p p
E
= p
E p
E p
E LL
m p
E p
E LL
d p
E LL
m p
E p
E LL
m _
2
c
E ~
'-
E L
._
c ~
'v >
v ?
"v >
'v >
~o ?
'v >
'v >
'v >
'v >
=o ~
c
•
c 3 ~
~
j t t L
j
C ~
'O ;
O ~
'O -
C 3
O ~
Q
E L
.- >
~
E >
°O >
'O >
'O -
C ~
•O ~
-O -
C >
'O
c
.- >
'-
'O >
•-
•O
c
.-
7
J 7
v d
~ ~
v 2 '-
~ m
~ m
~ m
~ m
~ m
~ m
~ m
~ m
~ m
~ m
~ -
~ .-
~ J m
~ .-
= '-
S S •- tq m
r J m
~ ~ -+ m
~ ? 2 m
r ? m
T m
~ m
~ ~ m
~ m
~ y m
~ (q m
~ m
~ tq ;o
~ ~ m
~ N
~ C ~
~ 2 m
~ 2 m
~
O
C
N
N
M
Q
(~
r
IL
C
y
J
L
7
m
m y
~'
m
f0
f0
f0
m
N
C
L
~ m m m p LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL t6 N W .r-d. w ~ m °ZS
m C O O C 'O 'O ~ •O L U
~ ~ ~i ~i N (n N c ~ V U c ~ ~ ~ ~ Q: ~
Q m O F-
M
y
~
N
M
I
O
t4
~
0
0
~
~ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
d
d
O
~
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 Z
0
y
y
y d
w d
w d
w
~
m
=
r
r
N
~
M
? L
C L
C
co L
c C
E
t C
~ C
~ C
~ C
~ C
d C
m C
~
c
c m
~ m
3 m
~ d
V d
v d
V
~
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
L
~
~ L
m
o
a
a
a L
a L
a
c
d o
C m
0' m
Q' ~
•lC m
Q' o
~ 0
~ 0
f~ 0
[n 0
fn 0
fn 0`
N o
fn o
Cn
O m
~ m
~ L
O L
O L
V =
M r
N =
N _
- co
- m
- m
- m
- m
- m
- m
- ns
- m
- m
- co
- x - 'o
~ a
d
•-
' c
d a
O .c
D .c
U L
O L
U L
V
D t0
A
C
C LL
C
U
V
U
U
V
U
U
U
U ~
L
C
c C
' C
' C C
d C
~
d C
~
d >
p >
C >
C >
C >
C >
C >
C >
C ~
C >
C >
C .~
C
N
'~
C~ LL
° C
O c
O
~ t
lp H
m Y C
t6
~ C
m
~ C
m
Q' C C
.
O
_
p
L
7
L
7
L
0
d
7
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
V
_
a
L a
0 d
0 Q:
0
~
F'
1-
H
-
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
d
C
c~
N `
O
Z
m
0
l ~ ~
d
p
^
C
p f6
p_' N
Q' N
Q' l0
Q' l9
Q' N
Q' f6
~ f6
Q' N
R' C
~ 7
p 7
p N
LL t6
LL f6
LL c6
LL f0
LL m
LL m
LL !C
LL f0
LL f6
LL m
LL N
LL
d m
N ._
~ O
'2 N
d' ~
7 ~
> `
> ~ ~
Q
~
C
C
~
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C 7
p 7
p 7
p a
7 d
0 ~
3
U
=
(n
(n
N >
~ >
~
S a ~ a a a a a a a =
a G O O
Q O p ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~
O
V
.i~
Q
~r
U m
m rn
•O N
~a
m
a
Q
01
C
m
E
L
v
Q
M
V
m
~O
a
m
O
O.
~.
Q
l4
•C
m
V
•fp
c
0
.~
C
m
U
O.
(...
0
c
m
E
z
ATTACffiV~NT ~.
ern ~YUrurr u
a~ ~ m m .', ~ ~ . ~
t- ~ a LL
N~
$ LL 0 0
o
y
Oa
a y o d
o
co
H a o LL N
o
N
N
a
.` ~
H .r
T~
N
;
>
m ~,
~~~~ o
~;
c- 3o
10 ~ ch
~ o
~aLL~
of 0
o
0
c ~ w ~ °
m E °
r~
m
aaN
wv«c
• o0
o
£
~, udi O
o
mw~
a'ar-
N ~+
~ „
'
N
m
. ,.'
`
C
m
v
.N
m
m .y
d
.
O
9
~ E
~
a
J m ;
~
I
I
m
d
~
U
Z
~ ~ m m .=
' c
H
E m ' ._ H :':
a
1 > ~
~ ._
~ v
.N
~ ~ ~
p ~ ~ _ O
d N
1 N U '
~ ._
~' N :~
- .
~
i - l0 C ' t0
~ f" ~.
~'
~
~"'
V
W
"~
a
0
w
00
O
O
N
r
7
4-
O
N
a
z
J
m
Z
V
W
"~
O/y
IL
a
N N
V N
m ~
O ~
as
v •
0
a
n
Q
rn
c
m
V
N
V
d
~O
a
a~°i
0
a
a
.~
c
0
.~
c
d
C7
n
F-
O~
C
m
U
Y+
Q
1~
u
•
•
1 Exhibit C
EASTERN DUBLIN TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
Effect(ve May 3, 2009 '
3/23/2009
Residential (Within Transit Center)
High Density Dwelling (more than 25 units per acre) $4,662/unit
Residential (Outside of Transit Center)
Low Density Dwelling (up to 6 units per acre) $8,470lunit
Medium Density Dwelling (6.1-14 units per acre) $8,470/unit
Medium/High Density Dwelling (14.1-25 units per acre) $5,929/unit
High Density Dwelling (25.1 or more units per acre) $5,082/unit
Second Units per Sec. 8.80 of the Municipal Code $5,082/unit
Non-Residential
Development Other Than Residential $ 730/trip
LAND USE ESTIMATED WEEKDAY VEHICLE
(Non-Residential) TRIP GENERATION RATE*
HOTEL/MOTEL OR OTHER LODGING: 10/room
OFFICE:
Standard Commercial Office 20!1,000 sf
RECREATION:
Recreation Community Center 26/1,000 sf
Health Club 40/1,000sf
Bowling Center 33/1,000 sf
Golf Course 8/acre
Tennis Courts 33/court
Theaters:
Movie 220/screen
Live 0.2/seat
Video Arcade 96/1,000 sf
EDUCATION
Private Schools 1.5/student
Daycare/ Pre-school 2.4/student
HOSPITAL:
General 12/bed
Convalescent/Nursing 3/bed
Clinic 24/1,000 sf
CHURCH: 9/1,000 sf
INDUSTRIAL:
Industrial (with retail) 16/1,000sf
Industrial (without retail) 8/1,000 sf
* Sources of information for Trip Generation Rates: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)
and San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAL). These trip generation rates are based
on averages. Most retail uses are given a 35% pass-by reduction.
1 J
•~^°EXHIBIT C.
Tn fhc I?ccn ~ ~+inn
Page 1 of 2
LAND USE
(Non-Residential)
RESTAURANT:
ESTIMATED WEEKDAY VEHICLE
TRIP GENERATION RATE
1WITH PASS-BY)
Quality (leisure) See appropriate Shopping Center Rate
Sit-down, high turnover (usually chain other than fast food) See appropriate Shopping Center Rate
Bar(favern See appropriate Shopping Center Rate
:...............
...............:::::::::~::::::::::.::.::xlnth.~.nu~:.:fhrc~w ~h ::.:::.:.;;:.;:.;::.;:.;:.:;.;:.;;:.;:.>.:;;:.;:.::.;:.;:.;:.::.::.:::::::::::~~v1~.,4i)U:.:~#:.;::::.::.::::.::::::::::::.
AUTOMOTIVE:
FINANCIAL:
Bank/Savings and Loan
COMMERCIAL/RETAIL:
Super Regional Shopping Center
(More than 600,000 SF; usually more than 60 acres;
with usually 3+ major stores)
and not biscted by a public arterial street
See appropriate Shopping Center Rate
22/1,000 sf
Regional Shopping Center 33/1,000 sf
(300,000 - 600,000 SF; usually 30-60 acres;
w/usually 2+ major stores) and not bisected by a public arterial street
Community or Neighborhood Shopping Center 46/1,000 sf
(Less than 300,000 sf; less than 30 acres; w/usually
1 major store or grocery store and detached restaurant and detached
restaurant and/or drug store) and not bisected by a public arterial street
Commercial Shops:
Retail/Strip Commercial (no major store) 26/1,000 sf
Supermarket 98/1,000 sf
.....'~..!`~t*,:tli~........ •:.:;:;.:3~Zjsf't ODft ~f:.:.;:.:_:~;;;;:-:
.............................................................................................................................
Discount Store 46/1,000 sf
Land uses that are shaded will always pay at the individual trip rate as these uses tend to generate
destination trips. Commercial/retail and certain recreation uses will pay at the individual trip rate if
the site is a stand-alone land use; if the land use is part of a larger shopping center, the appropriate
shopping center trip rate will apply.
Exhibit C
EASTERN DUBLIN TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
Effective May 3, 2009
•
•
•
st2~2oos Page 2 of 2
g:IEDTlF UPDATPExhibit C -Fee Rates 2009 Update
~ E~ obit D
Non-Residential Uses On Properties Designated Residential
(Exempt From Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee)
Exem'ted Parcels
Parcels
~. Right of Way
•....~
~~~~~ Eastern Dublin TIF Area
...•
'•'~ s~~~
. .•'``'
~: ~ i
/ \
/
~ `
~~~.~
••
•
•
,.
,' . ~
=`,':, 555 '" i..n.nnu...u.ti
~ \~~ NN
= -- y I
~' ~ / ~ ~ /yN~ `V
1 ~
4 i'
~ _ ~,
~,~-ti
~
...._~y ~,, ~~
~ ~ sly ~'~r a ,~L~ 4>*~ ~ ,sue ti...........r.....ti
'; '' ~ ;~ ;~~,
~~ Y ?t
\ ~~I - ~
~1`"y~ ~s~ s" ~>2 ~`` ~~;?
-
~>~~ 7 ~ r'-' J~-:.
/!` l / t~ r t~ ~
~> ~E'' ~1 ~~I~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ by ~I ~N~1J ~'L' ^hl-+_~~ "7.
lc` 1 ,~ ? U ~ X~lh.tT,1 ( t LJ 1 -N 1rJ
-'t ,
f f ~
??~~ ~ ~~a, -- ~_
- ~~ u ,,
l
I
1 fl'c~ l
~
``
fi A. ~i4 ~jJ
4
Y1 /
~-J
!F
F nr ~
~
' .
~ ?s..i I i ' ^r.. ~ ~Z
~ ~'~. ~
~ L
'1 1~ `,~eC
11~
.
'S
~
s
_ I4 ~
~,
~ 1 t
.~
~
!
~?l~"
~
~'
.~...
, L..-
~tS .
~-
~
7
^ -- J 7 L j ~ I ~~ ~~Yi y
~
e
X
~G r ~~~~~ ~ S 3~
i
/ E
Z
1 ~ - __-
~
Y,,
r
~
I~~~,.i II 11 ~
i
~.~lr
~ ~ L~ n rtf ~
tis ~ ~.
i \' .~ _
~
.~j y
`
.
-
L~
''
~-r~~~ ~--r..rmst~-T-~ ~-~". ~!i{ "3
'
i~-^ ~
~
~ h+r,-; 2-
y , q\
~ I ~Q
16
• _ i,'~1~
I
~
- py
~
ry
r
-
{ ttY'.-I1(~1~?v _..
~~-. ~~~;~; ,~~ ~ ,, ~
f
Tl1 J' ~1 ~ '.lam' 7
~
~
, ~_ iii
lx
~ 1
~ ~-~ rf ~ ~ JI ~ ~ i ~
( ~ ~ ,
1~ !; ~
~ ~_
j~J
F ~ i -rzI~~' i~1 `~
' L~ f 9
-~ ._ r ~~4 y
~~
~~'
•
,.
•
: U
~
I ~
~
r
~ i T
r.
~ _
~ ~l'~~ I.~i I ~ __ r ' y .
i ~ ,`gyp
-~
~
~ _
_ - -~_
_.._
_ --
q~ ~ -~, , i
~ ~
`
r ~
~
_, d
~
~
,~
! ~ ~
~ -~ _ ~.
:
~
~
~ ~ J~ ~ ~
rn ~~ r~
(\
_~';~
- /~
~_
s,. o-
id
Miles March 2009
0.5 1 2 3
Exhibit E
AREA OF BENEFIT
MAJOR THOROUGHFARES AND BRIDGES-
WITHIN EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
*Cost of Roadway *Cost of Bridge
Improvements Improvements
Dublin'Boulevard Extend and widen to 6 lanes from the Southern Pacific
Right-of-Way to Airway Boulevard (from the EIR future
road improvement assumptions on pages 1 and 2 of the $ 23,136,432.63 $ 5,070,000.00
DKS revised report form December 15, 1992 and
mitigation measure 3.3/10).
Hacienda Drive Widen and extend as 4 lanes from Dublin Boulevard to
Gleason Drive and to 6 lanes from 1-580 to Dublin
691
00 $
$ 978
Boulevard (from the EIR future road improvement ,
.
-
assumptions on page 1 of the DKS revised report).
Central Parkway Construct four-lane road from Dublin Boulevard west of
Hacienda Drive to Fallon Road (from the EIR future road $ 8
12 $ 1,040
000
503
907
00
improvement assumptions on page 1 of the DKS revised ,
,
,
.
.
report).
Gleason Drive Construct new 4-lane road from west of Hacienda Drive
to Fallon road (from the ElR future road improvement
assumptions on page 1 of the DKS revised report). (The $ 282
110.00 $ -
project does not require extension of Gleason Drive to ,
Doolan Road due to no development proposed. in the..
future study area.)
Tassajara Road Widen to 4 lanes over a 6-lane right-of--way from Dublin
Boulevard to the Contra Costa County Line, and to 6
lanes over an 8-lane right-of-way from Dublin Boulevard $ 28
293
600.00
577
959
81 $ 5
to I-580 from the EIR future road improvement ,
,
,
.
,
assumptions on page 1 of the DKS revised report and '
mitigation measure 3.3/1.4.0
Fallon Road Extend to Tassajara Road, widen to 4 lanes over a 6-
lane right-of-way from I-580_to Tassajara road (from the $ 12
502;367.00
018
272.24 $ 4
EIR future road improvement assumptions on page 1 of ,
,
,
the DKS revised report).
Street Alignment Study A study is required to specify the exact street alignments
0
000
00
$ 1
in the Eastern Dublin area. 0
,
.
Right-of--Way Contingency Funds are required to acquire land in the event that right-
of-way must be obtained through condemnation and 0
value of land is greater than the appraised value.
Total $ 73,607,372.80 $ 15,905,967.00
The Area of Benefit Fee for roadway improvements based on 66,865 related trips for residential and 232,086 trips for non-
residential is $2,460/unit for Low Density (1-6 units per acre) and Medium Density Residential (7-14 units per acre), $1,723
for Medium/High Density Residential (15-25 units per acre), and $1,477 for High Density Residential (more than 25 units);
and $246/trip for non-residential
The Area of Benefit Fee for bridge improvements for Low and Medium Density Residential is $530/unit, for Medium/High
Density Residential is $372/unit, and for High Density Residential is $319lunit, and non-residential is $53/trip.
The eastern Dublin Specific Plan area has 3,916 Low Density units; 4,863 Medium Density units; 2,680 Medium/High
-'ansity units;and 3,952 High Density units.
* These cost estimates do not include credits due for construction of portions of these major thoroughfares and bridges. In
the event that the Area of Benefit Fee becomes effective, the appropriate credit amounts will be calculated and the Area of
Benefit Fee will be adjusted~accordingly.
EXHIBIT