Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.1 Attmt 3 PC Minutes 04-28-2009~~ jki ti ''~ ~ ~~` Plannin ~'ommissian Minutes ~` ~ ~ g ~~ I ~ Tuesday, April 28, x.009 CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the City o.f Dublin Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, Apri128, 2009, in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Plaza. Chair Wehrenberg called the meeting to order at 7:OOp.m. Present: Chair Wehrenberg; Vice Chair King; Commissioners Brown, Schaub and Swalwell; Jeri Ram, Community Development Director; Jeff Baker, Acting Planning Manager; Erica Fraser, Senior Planner; Martha Aja, Assistant Planner; Mike Porto, Consulting Planner; Kit Faubion, City Attorney; and Debra L.eCIair, Recording Secretary. Absent: NONE ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA -NONE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS - On a motion by Crn. Swalwell and seconded by Cm. Brown the minutes of the Apri114, 2009 meeting were approved with revisions. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS -NONE CONSENT CALENDAR -NONE WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS -NONE PUBLIC HEARINGS - 8.1 PA 07-028 Arroyo Vista (Legislative Action) -Environmental Impact Report, General Plan Amendment, Stage 1/Stage 2 Plaruled Development Rezone, Vesting Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Review. Erica Fraser, Senior Planner presented the project as outlined in the Staff Report. Chair Wehrenberg asked Ms. Fraser to point out where the br;~s stop will be located. Ms. Fraser stated the location had not been finalized as yet but they will continue to work with WHEELS to finalize the location. She stated it is anticipated to be located with close access to the center of the site. Cm. Schaub asked how many people will live in the project. Ms. Fraser answered they did not. know at this point. Chair Wehrenberg asked Ms. Fraser to point out, on the site plan, where access to the trails will be located. 2'lanning Commission 73 ApriC28, 2009 ~gular~feeting Attachment 3 Ms. Fraser pointed out the access points on the site plan. She continued that there are sidewalks, walkways and connections between the housing types throughout the site and connections to the community building which can be used by everyone. Chair Wehrenberg asked if a fence is installed will there be a grate for access to the trail. Ms. Fraser answered there will be a gate between the housing project and the trail. Cm. Schaub asked if there will be covered parking and stated he found no examples of what the covered parking will look like. ' Ms. Fraser stated there are drawings in the project package. Cm. Schaub agreed to continue to look in the project package for the drawing of the covered par.icing area. Cm. Schaub felt that Page 48 of the project plans did not giti~e him the information he wanted because it was a line drawing. He felt the buildings arE• attractive and that it would be unfortunate to have a metal shed type of carport and ruin the effect of the building design. Ms. Fraser suggested the Commission talk to the architect. Chair Wehrenberg pointed out that the materials for the covered parking are called out Page 48. Cm. Schaub asked Ms. Fraser to review parking in the project:. He stated that in his notes from the earlier Study Session, 74 on-street parking spaces were riot part of the parking count. He asked how many parking spaces are available on the site. Ms. Fraser answered that the on-street parking spaces are not counted towards the provision for parking- Cm. Schaub asked why on-street parking was added in for a previous commercial project (C1ubSport) but not this project. Jeff Baker, Acting Planning Manager, answered that typically, with a residential project, the City would only count off-street parking. He continued that ar-y on-street parking would be in addition to the off-street parking. Cm. Schaub felt the on-street parking was a significant amount which would make the project parking count above the requirement. Ms. Fraser added that Staff does not count the on-street parking because they are on a public street and the spaces do not belong to the project. Cm. Schaub was still concerned that the on-street parking was included in the Club6port project and is not being included with this project. Chair Wehrenberg pointed out that the C1ubSport project is not in a qualified residential area. 2'lanning Commission 74 ~priC28, 2009 ~gufar Meeting Cm. King felt that the on-street parking should be taken into consideration and asked if the parking will be adequate and should include the on-street parking. Ms. Fraser felt that on-street parking could be taken into consideration as provided on the site as a total. She stated that there is overflow parking. Chair Wehrenberg asked Ms. Fraser to explain the City's par~:ing ratios and asked if they are in line with other cities in the area. Ms. Fraser answered that according to the Dublin Municipal Mode (DMC), the required number of stalls is less than what is provided for the affordable family and senior apartments but as far as what Eden typically provides the parking total is higher. P~Is. Fraser stated that for example, Wicklow Square Apartments are senior, affordable units and the parking ratio is Lower than what is required by the DMC. She continued that Eden Housing has many affordable projects in the Bay Area and the parking provided is usually less thin what is being provided in this project and they have not had parking issues. Cm. King asked for the definition of "acceptable level of service" and who determines it. Ms. Fraser answered that Chris Kinsel of TJKM, Inc. is at the .meeting and helped write the traffic study therefore he should be able to answer the question. Cm. Swalwell asked how many affordable units are at the Groves. Mr. Baker answered that there are approximately 300 units. Cm. Swalwell asked if there wExe any public safety concerns during scoping meeting for this project. Ms. Fraser stated that she had heard from some residents `vho stated they did want a safer community. A lot of the concer~is had been about the existing; complex. She continued that she had not heard any other concen~s. She stated that traffic was one safety concern but there will be a traffic light, and safe sidewalks. Cm. Swalwell asked if there had been an opinion from the architect or police services regarding whether a covered carport is safer than an enclosed garage as far as being a victim of a crime. Ms. Fraser answered that police had reviewed the project a1d made no reference other than their standard conditions of approval. She stated that the carport is open, and the project must meet a minimum lighting standard. She felt it depends ors ones own perception of safety whether a carport is safer than an enclosed garage. Chair Wehrenberg stated that the Police look for Lighting where reviewing a project. Planning commission 7$ ApriC28, 2009 9~gular 9Keeting Ms. Fraser added that the project must provide one foot candle of lighting for adequate lighting throughout the project. Mr. Baker added that both Police and Public Works reviewed the lighting and photometrics as part of the Building plan check process to ensure that it meets ~:afety standards. Cm. Brown asked what type of outside play areas will be included. Ms. Fraser answered there will be several tot Lots for the younger children and also passive, open recreation areas. Cm. King asked if the grassy areas are large enough to play ba:~eball. Ms. Fraser felt they are not wide enough for baseball but are long. She continued that at the community building there will also be activities and services for children and seniors. Mr. Brown asked if there will be a basketball court. Ms. Fraser answered there will be none on the site. Cm. Swalwell stated that at The Groves there is a police substation with an officer assigned to the area. He asked if there would be a similar situation at this project. Ms. Fraser answered that there would be no difference than any other residential project. She continued that the Police Services reviewed the project and felt that a substation is not needed. A substation was needed on the east due to the distance from the existing Police Station but not at this project because of its close proximity to City Hall and the Police Station. Cm. King asked Ms. Fraser to show where the intersection with Amador Valley Blvd. will be in relation to the Camp Parks entrance. Ms. Fraser stated that the City does not know, at this time, where the Camp Parks entrance will be relocated. Chair Wehrenberg asked Ms. Fraser to reconfirm that there are elevators in the senior housing. Ms. Fraser answered yes, and mentioned that the Applicant can confirm the elevators, their experience with parking and the different recreation programs they provide. Chair Wehrenberg asked if the day care and community building is open to everyone not just the residents. Ms. Fraser answered that the community building is for the nrsidents of the development, but the day care is open to everyone. Cm. Swalwell asked if the residents will have preference for placement. ~PCanning Commission 7b ,3priC213, 2009 ~gular 9Keeting Ms. Fraser stated there is a childcare center now and it woulcl be run by the same organization and she would allow the Applicant to answer the question. Chair Wehrenberg opened the public hearing: Linda Mandolini, Eden Housing representative, :spoke in s=avor of the project. She spoke regarding Eden Housing and their 40 years of experience, also their programs for their residents including: resident services company with on-site programs :;uch as: after school programs for children- and technology program for teens, transportation cJ_asses for seniors, etc. She stated that they also work with seniors on social and health issues. She stated that their parking ratio of .6 to 1 is all that is needed for the senior community and thf~y find that works. She stated that in the family areas the parking ratio is at 1.7 to 1 and that mast families can't afford more than one car. Cm. King asked how Eden Housing feels about how the numbers of cars per household increases as the young families grow and the teens also have cars. Ms. Mandolini stated that a Iot of families cannot afford more than one car. She stated the parking ratio is based on bedrooms per unit. She stated they police the parking very seriously. She felt .their parking ratios are very successful. She stated they have not had a problem with parking and also mentioned the close proximity to public trarusportation in this project. -She also addressed the security issue; she stated that there are 3 management units on-site with Eden staff people living there. She stated Eden works with residents to form neighborhood watch groups. She continued that they are very aggressive about rules and ensuring the quiet enjoyment for alI residents. Cm. Swalwell asked if there is an eviction process for people/ residents that commit crimes.. He stated that there are recent laws passed that allow eviction for domestic violence or dealing drugs on the premises allowing public and affordable housing agencies to evict residents for these offenses. Ms. Mandolino stated Eden has a zero tolerance for drug:;: and will evict with the proper evidence. She stated that if someone is caught dealing drugs on-site they will move with in the law to evict and work closely with the Police Dept. Ms. Swalwell stated that his questions are not because he associates crime with affordable housing. He felt there is a misperception that affordable hou:~ing brings problems and some of the residents have concerns about crime. He felt that Eden was doing a lot to address those concerns. Ms. Mandolini stated that they expect a lot of the Arroyo Vista residents to return to the community and they are already upstanding members of the community so there should be no problems. Cm. Brown asked if the senior housing is independent living or assisted living. 2'lanning Commission 77 ApriC28, 2009 ~gular Meeting Ms. Mandoline answered the senior housing is independent living with individual apartments. Cm. Brown asked if there are one and two bedroom units. Ms. Mandoline answered only one bedroom apartments are allowed due to public financing regulations. She continued that they provide common areas for the residents to enjoy a larger space. Cm. Swalwell asked if the residents have preference for the day care center. Ms. Mandoline answered that they like for the residents to hive preference and if all spots are not taken by the affordable and market rate units within the project then it is opened up to the broader community. She stated that usually approximately half of the child care slots go to residents. She stated that the .new day care center will be substantially nicer than the existing one. She continued that they have worked with Kidango in the past and feels it will be a good cen#er when completed. Cm. Swalwell asked, since Eden is anon-profit organization, where will the profits from the market rate units go. Ms. Mandoline answered that Eden will not own the markc~ rate units. She stated that the owner is Citation Homes and. they will sell the units for profit. The developments that Eden builds are 1IX}% affordable to families that are at or belong 50% of the .median income. She continued that the Citation Homes is acquiring the land acid that acquisition of the land is providing the subsidy to help build the affordable housing units. Cm. Swalwell asked if Citation would also be managing the wets as well as constructing them. Ms. Mandoline answered that C:itateon will hopefully sell thc~ units to homebuyers but would not manage them. Charles McKeag, Citation Homes, spoke in favor of the project. He gave a brief overview of Citation Homes and their experience. He stated he is here to answer questions about the market rate units of the project but wanted to stress that if there was any concern regarding the quality of construction or management expertise and quality of services of Eden Housing. He felt that the current residents of Arroyo Vista will be happy to return to a community owned and managed by Eden. Chair Wehrenberg asked if Citation has a timeline for starting the project. Mr. McKeag answered that it will depend on where they are in the market place, and with the market being severely depressed it will be difficult to say when the implementation would begin. He continued that there are many steps that need to be completed before implementation. 2'funnittg Commission 7$ Aprif28, 2009 4j~gu(nr Meeting Ms. Mandolini added that Eden is replacing existing affordable housing on the site and is committed to that and under HUD rules; the affordable housing must be built first. Mr. McKeag stated that in the design of the project the civil engineers and consultants were asked to craft a phasing plan that will enable the affordable h~~using component to move ahead and stand alone allowing the Citation project to catch up as thc~ market catches up. Cm. Schaub asked how Citation will phase the project so that the affordable homes can be built, the current project torn down and the infrastructure installed.. He asked what will trigger the next phase of the project. Mr. McKeag answered that when designing the site plan they focused on the combination of practical implementation and income integration concerns with respect to the varying income levels of the community. He stated that the affordable component that Eden will build, own and manage is in the center of the site. He continued that tl~e market rate component will be located on the southern end, and on the far north end is the second market rate component. He stated tha# the infrastructure has been designed to enable th.e Eden portion to be built in it's entirety without any of the market rate housing or any of thevzfrastructure that would serve the market rate housing needing to be built. Cm. Schaub asked if that included the streets. Mr. McKeag answered that it would include the portion of ttie street that is necessary to serve the Eden component. He stated the project was designed to make sure it was phased in this way. Ms. Fraser stated that this is not a normal development where they get approvals from the City and then start building. This project requires many steps before the project can be built. HUD still has to approve disposition of the site for the City to sell the property to Eden and Citation. She continued that until that happens the project cannot move forward. She stated that Eden needs to secure their funding sources and for that they must ]lave approval from the City. She stated that there are residents still living on-site and there is nc: relocation plan in effect. Cm. Swalwell asked if the residents will be given 180 day noti~:e to vacate. Ms. Fraser answered that any rc~Iocation will be done as a part of an approved relocation plan by the Dublin Housing Authority. Mr. McKeag mentioned that the Dublin Housing Authority is solely responsible for the relocation plan for the residents. Chair Wehrenberg asked the ta~affic consultant to come to the podium to answer questions regarding the traffic study. Chris 1Cinzel, TJKM Transportation Consultants, who was retained by the City to do the traffic study for Arroyo Vista came to the podium to answer questiors. ~Pfanning Commisseott 79 April28, 2009 Rj~gular Meeting Cm. King stated that Page 5 of the Staff Report indicates there are major intersections that will be left with an unacceptable level of service and the mitigation measures cannot reduce them to a less than significant level. Mr. Kinzel stated that at build-out conditions there are two intersections that were found to have unacceptable levels of service. He stated that "unaccE~ptable' is defined by the City of Dublin General Plan. Cm. King asked if these would be temporary traffic impacts or permanent. Mr. Kinzel stated that each intersection is different. The int~~rsection of Amador Valley Blvd. and Dougherty Road is unacceptable primarily because of future traffic. It is assumed that the Camp Parks gate will. be located at that position and that the City will be unable to require all the mitigation that would be needed to achieve acceptable levels of service. Cm. King asked where the Camp Parks entrance will be located. Mr. Kinzel answered he thought it would be at the fourth leg of Amador Valley Blvd and Dougherty Rvad intersection to the east, but that was still to bE~ determined. Cm. King asked if it is correct that the impacts indentified in the Staff Report will be permanent not temporary. Mr. Kinzei answered that the City cannot require the Federal government to install the mitigation measures. Cm. King asked if the traffic impacts at the intersections of I}ublin Blvd and Dougherty Road and Amador Valley Blvd and Lougherty Road will be permanent traffic impacts because the Staff Report indicates that they cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level of service. Kit Faubion, City Attorney stated that the information in the Staff Report is taken from the Draft EIR. The Draft EIR tells the City what is a significant imp~ict or not and in order to do that establishes a standard that would be applied to what is acceptable and what is not. She continued that "acceptable' is what the City says it is in the Draft EIR. She stated that acceptable performance is based on the general plan standard. In other instances there are no identifiable standards and the City has to identify what is acceptable. She continued that the City uses the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) standard that will be the measure of what is acceptable or not. She mentioned the two intersections are temporary impacts because the improvement to mitigate that impact will not be in place by 2015. The other two impacts are considered permanent impacts and the EIR explains why they can't be mitigated further. Cm. King asked if those intersections will be at an accepti~ble level of service by anyone s definition. 4?lanning Commission $~ ApriC28, 2009 9~guCar Meeting Ms. Fraser stated that Dublin and Dougherty has continuE~d to operate at LOS-F which is unacceptable to the City and there has been significant and overriding considerations adopted in many projects because of that intersection. She stated the intersection cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level of service anti to mitigate it would cause safety problems. Cm. King asked if the Planning Commission decides the overriding considerations. Ms. Fraser stated that the City Council makes the final de•=ision; the Planning Commission makes a recommendation only. She stated that if the City CotinciI certifies the EIR they are also adopting the significant and overriding considerations if feel that the project had merit and reasons to continue. Cm. King asked whose definition is the City using for acceptable levels of service. Ms. Faubion stated that in the Draft EIR (on page 99 and 100) there are standards of significance which establishes what is and is not acceptable, the stand~~rds of significance in the traffic section will indicate what is the acceptable level of service. Cm. Schaub felt that the projf*ct dcesn t have much effect on the Dublin and Dougherty intersection and that most of the traffic is controlled by San R~unon. He stated that even though the intersection is in the EIR the project doesn't affect it. Cm. Fraser stated that it is significant but this assumes build out at Camp Parks and everything else that's been planned for. Arroyo Vista represents a very small portion of the overall trips that go through Dublin and Dougherty. Cm. Schaub felt that this intersection will be the same in every project. Cm. King asked if the traffic calculations anticipate additional traffic from San Ramon and areas north. Mr. Kinzel answered yes. Ms. Faubion commented that this EIR did not use the new methodology. Chair Wehrenberg agreed that any change to the analysis could cause confusion. Paula Krugmeier, B.A.R. Architects, spoke in favor of the pr~~ject. B.A.R. Architects served as the master planners for the entire site. She stated they tried to integrate the market rate and affordable housing in the project and placed the unique eements in the center of the site creating a village center. They linked the elements together v~rith tree lined streets with mature redwood trees. -She stated that each of the family units have their own front door entrance with no common stairs which minimizes security issues. Ms. Krugmeier continued that the parking in the family affordable housing is on grade and the market rate housing parking is in garages. She stated if the}~ create a simple horizontal plane <Plattttittg Commission $1 t7pnC28, 2009 ~gufar 9bteetittg for the carport with two posts this type of structure can be hidden with landscaping. She felt that in the drawing it is not very attractive but when the lan~fscaping grows. up the line of the CaI'pOrt iS minirni~ed, Cm. Schaub asked if the roofs will be nicely articulated or flat ;asphalt. Ms. Krugmeier answered they responded to the City's design comment with a 50 year shingle roof. Cm. Brown asked Ms. Krugmeier to point out which street`• have on-street parking and also asked if they can accommodate pazking on both sides of the street. Ms. Krugmeier pointed out the on-street parking spaces and stated that they tried to make it look Iike a neighborhood with two lanes of traffic in either direction with parallel parking on either side. Rhenea Keyes, resident of Arroyo Vista and president of the Arroyo Vista Tenants Association and also one of the plaintiffs in a pending lawsuit involvinf; the disposition of Arroyo Vista, urged the Planning Commission to reject Staff's recommend~-tion and to postpone any further action on the project in the absence of HUD approval of DHA: s application for disposition and full compliance with CEQA requirements. WRITTEN STATEMENT ATTACHED TO THE MINUTES. Cm. King felt that Ms. Keyes' concerns were mostly procedural issues and asked if she had any substantive objections to the project. Ms. Keyes answered that personally she felt there was "Ion; tenancy' and design problems. She mentioned that there was $36$,000 of stimulus money offered to the Dublin Housing Authority for modifications to Arroyo Vista which was tuxnE~d down due to the fact that they said there were no "shovel ready' projects. She disagreed with this statement. She felt that the DHA was premature in rejecting the stimulus funds. She felt i:hat if the DHA began working on some capital projects it would be a good start in redeveloping Arroyo Vista as opposed to prematurely demolishing it. Chair Wehrenberg stated that there were extensive studies do~1e on the Arroyo Vista project and felt that spending money on a housing project with continual problems was addressed by the City in these studies and that is the reason the City is moving i'orwazd with this project. Ms. Faubion responded to Ms. Keyes comment that there w~~,s a reference in her statement to agenda materials not being available on the City's website. She stated that the public hearing notice specifically mentions that materials may be available later but that they would be available at City hall on Fridav before the meeting. Sloe stated that tonight`s meeting was properly posted, the agenda was posted and the materials were available at Dublin City hall on Friday. 2'fatttting Commission $2 April28, 2009 ~gular 9Keetittg Ms. Faubion continued to respond to Ms. Keyes comments re larding her recommendation that the EIR not be certified; she stated that the City provided a Draft EIR that provides an analysis of the project consistent with CEQA's intent that when a .decision maker makes decisions they know the environmental consequences of a project and that the public knows the same. She continued that the City believes that the EIR has done that ar~d the responses to the comments adequately identify what the CEQA issues were and respondf~d in an appropriate manner. The speakers comments addressed social issues and CEQ~~ is concerned with physical, environmental issues. She continued that the project is more than replacing the affordable housing that would be lost when the project is developed. Ms. Faubion continued to respond to Ms. Keyes comments regarding the other approvals not being made until the HUD approval; it is very common for Dublin projects to require approvals from other agencies and for changes to the initial project be made in order to satisfy those agencies. Chair Wehrenberg closed the public hearing. Cm. Schaub stated he likes the project and felt it was extremeh~ complex but a land use issue not a social issue. He felt it is a good project and that a lot of people will want to live there. He agreed that the parking will be adequate with the on-street parking. He felt that the circulation issues are the same ones that the City has dealt with previou ply. He stated he is in support of the project. Cm. King felt the project by itself is a nicely designed neight~orhood; he likes the architecture, the recreational facilities and senior housing. However, from a land use point of view he has concerns regarding traffic flow. He reviewed the material in the EIR but was still not satisfied that he understood what an acceptable level of service is. He felt he could overlook some vagueness in the EIR but the actual traffic flow. and impacts he was not satisfied with. He stated he would like additional information regarding future development in San Ramon and how will that affect the traffic in Dublin. He found the net affect <m the two key intersections to be problematic. Cm. Brown stated he also likes the project and the way the various lifestyles have been incorporated with senior living, affordable and market rate h~~using. He was in support of the project. Cm. Swalwell stated that people expect, with affordable housing, the project will be livable and safe and esthetically pleasing. He felt the project had all those things. He liked that the developers worked together to create a good project that e~-eryone benefits from. He had a technical concern with the resolutions; he asked that: the words "Applicant" and "Applicant/Developer' be made plural to indicate there is more than one Applicant.. He felt that it could be a problem in the future. Ms. Fraser agreed to change to the resolution to "Applicants/Developers" in the resolution and the Conditions of Approval. 2'(anning Commission $3 ApriC28, 2009 ~gularMeeting Ms_ Fraser also stated that Staff would like to add a Condition of Approval that says the effective date of the approval will not be until the City Council approves the GPA and PD Rezoning and certifies the Environmental Impact Report. Chair Wehrenberg was also in agreement that this is a gaud project and likes the parking management plan, the design and the fact that it is part of the housing element as far as meeting the future goals for the City. She liked the Eden program and their excellent life skills programs for teens and the elderly. She also stated she is in support oi~ the parking and likes that fewer cars required as well as off-situ improvements and access ~~oints. She is in support of the project. On a motion by Cm. Schaub and seconded by Cm. Swalwell, on a vote of 4-1-0, Morgan King opposed, with changes to the resolution and an addition to the Condition of Approval, the Planning Commission approved RESOLUTION NO. 09 -12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C~JMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL CERTIFICATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE ARROYO V][STA PROJECT LOCATED AT 6700 DOUGHERTY ROAD (APN 941-0007-001-0'n PA 07-028 RESOLUTION N0.09 -13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C~~MMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF THE ~~RROYO VISTA PROJECT SITE =~:t~ °it;t,~ ~:-L~vSI'I'~' RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM/IQGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC ~~ND ALLOW FOR ATTACHI~~D AND DETACHED HOUSING UNITS IN THE MEDIUMlH[GH-DENSiT°r' R SsD -~'~=.si= :~~sir i~SE DiS=G=r~~Tii~j~i (APN 941-0007-001-07) PA 07-028 ~Plattttittg Commission $~} ~priI28, 2009 ~ggufas Meeting RESOLUTION NO.09-14 A RESOLU'T'ION OF THE PLANNING C~~MMISSTON OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT Alv ORDINANCE APPROVING A PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE AND A RELATED STAGE 1/STAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE ARROYO VISTA PROJECT LOCATED AT 6700 DOUGHERTY ROAD (APN 941-0007-001-07) PA 07-028 RESOLUTION NO. 09 -15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C~JMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 7943 FOR THE ARROYO VISTA PROJECT LOCATED AT 6700 DOUGHERTY ROADD (APN 941-0007-001-07) PA 07-028 RESOLUTION N0.09 -16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C~~MMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR THE ARROYO VISTA PROJECT WITH 378 RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS, COMMUNITY BUILDING AND DAYCARE LOCATED AT 6700 DOUGHERTY ROAD (APN 941-0007-ti01-07) PA 07-028 8.2 PA 08-034 -Fallon Gateway Commercial Center -Amendment to the Planned Development District of the General Commercial portion of Area C and a Site Development Review for a retail commercial development located at the southwest corner of Fallon Road and Dublin Boulevard. Mike Porto, Consulting Planner presented the project as stated in the Staff Report. Cm. Schaub asked if the reason the square footage is called out in the Staff Report is because the City expects so many dollars per square foot and now we cool d expect less revenue. ~P(annittgCommission $5 Aprif28, 2009 ~gular ibteeting