HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 174-09 Dub Rch Mit Deg DecRESOLUTION NO. 174 - 09
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
****************
ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR
THE DUBLIN RANCH NORTH PROJECT
PA 08-045
WHEREAS, the Applicant, James Tong on behalf of the Lin family, proposes to develop 4
single family residential units on an approximately 157.7 gross acre parcel located at 6582
Tassajara Road. The project site consists of 2 parcels, which include a 157.2 acre parcel
owned by the Lin family and a 0.5 acre parcel owned by Dublin San Ramon Services District
("DSRSD"). The majority of the project site, approximately 127 acres, will be placed in a
permanent conservation easement for the protection of wildlife. The 0.5 acre parcel owned by
DSRSD is improved with a Zone 3 water tank and access road. No further development is
proposed on this parcel. The project site is located within the unincorporated area of Alameda
County within the City's Sphere of Influence near the northeasterly City Limits. The project also
includes related grading, roadway and utility improvements, and landscaping. The project
proposes annexation to the City of Dublin ("City") and DSRSD and apre-annexation agreement
with the City of Dublin. The project also proposes to amend the General Plan and the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan to change the land use designations on the site from Low Density
Residential and Rural Residential/Agricultural to Estate Residential and Open Space; and to
prezone the property to the PD, Planned Development, Zoning District and adopt a related
Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan. A Vesting Tentative Tract Map and Development
Agreement are also proposed. These proposed actions are collectively referred to as the
"Project"; and
WHEREAS, the Project site is located in Eastern Dublin, for which the City Council
adopted the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan, and certified a
program Environmental Impact Report pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
("CEQA") Guidelines section 15168 (SCH 91103064; City Council Resolution No. 51-93). The
certified EIR consisted of a Draft EIR and Responses to Comments bound volumes, as well as
an Addendum dated May 4, 1993. On August 22, 1994, the City Council adopted a second
Addendum updating wastewater disposal plans for Eastern Dublin. These documents are
collectively referred to as the "Eastern Dublin EIR", or "EDEIR". The Eastern Dublin EIR and
Resolution 51-93 are incorporated herein by reference and available for review at the Dublin
City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin EIR identified potentially significant environmental
impacts and related mitigation measures, which the City adopted together with mitigation
findings and a related Mitigation Monitoring Program (City Council Resolution No. 53-93,
incorporated herein by reference and available for review at the Dublin City Hall), which
mitigation measures and monitoring program continue to apply to development in Eastern
Dublin including the Project. The City also adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations
for significant impacts that could not be avoided; and..
Page 1 of 7
WHEREAS, the City prepared an Initial Study for the proposed Project consistent with
CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15163 and determined that a Mitigated Negative
Declaration was required in order to analyze the potential for new or additional significant
environmental impacts of the Project beyond those identified in the prior EIR; and
WHEREAS, based on the Initial Study, the City prepared a Mitigated Negative
Declaration dated October 2009, and incorporated herein by reference, which reflected the
City's independent judgment and analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the Project,
and which was circulated for public review from October 6, 2009 to November 5, 2009; and
WHEREAS, the City received a comment letter from Dublin San Ramon Services District
(DSRSD) dated October 26, 2009 advising that the District can serve the water and sewer
demand for the project and a comment letter from the Local Agency Formation Commission
(LAFCo) dated November 9, 2009 with comments on the draft MND. The letters are attached as
Exhibits B and C, respectively, and are incorporated herein by reference;
WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated November 10, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference, described and analyzed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Project for the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Staff Report and the Mitigated
Negative Declaration at a noticed public hearing on November 10, 2009 at which time all
interested parties had the opportunity to be heard. Following the public hearing, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution 09-45 recommending that the City Council adopt the Mitigated
Negative Declaration, which resolution is incorporated herein by reference and available for
review at the Dublin City Hall; and
WHEREAS, Staff prepared responses to the LAFCo comment letter, which responses
contain the City's good faith, reasoned analysis of the environmental issues raised in the
comments. The responses are attached as Exhibit D and are incorporated herein by reference;
and
WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated December 1, 2009, and incorporated herein by
reference, described and analyzed the Mitigated Negative Declaration together with the
comment letters and responses, and the Project for the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Staff Report, and the Mitigated Negative
Declaration together with the comment letters and responses, at a noticed public hearing on
December 1, 2009 at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin EIR identified significant unavoidable impacts that apply
to the Dublin Ranch North project, therefore a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be
adopted; and
WHEREAS, the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies new mitigation measures
applicable to the Project, therefore a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program must be
adopted; and
Page 2 of 7
WHEREAS, the Mitigated Negative Declaration dated October 2009 reflects the City's
independent judgment and analysis on the potential for environmental impacts from the Project.
The Mitigated Negative Declaration and related. project and environmental documents, including
the prior Eastern Dublin EIR and all of the documents incorporated herein by reference, are
available for review in the City Planning Division at the Dublin City Hall, file PA 08-045, during
normal business hours. The custodian of the documents and other materials which constitute
the record of proceedings for the Dublin Ranch North Project is the City of Dublin Community
Development Department, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin CA 94568, attn: Martha Aja.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the foregoing recitals are true and correct
and made a part of this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Mitigated Negative Declaration together with the
previously certified Eastern Dublin EIR adequately describes the impacts of the Project. There
is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City Council, including but not
limited to the Mitigated Negative Declaration together with the related comment letters and
responses, that the Dublin Ranch North Project as mitigated will have a significant effect on the
environment beyond the significant effects identified in the prior EIR.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Dublin City Council reviewed and considered
the Mitigated Negative Declaration, including comment letters and responses, before approving
the Dublin Ranch North Project and hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration as
complete, adequate and in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines and the City of
Dublin Environmental Guidelines.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the City Council hereby adopts the following
Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant unavoidable impacts from the Eastern
Dublin EIR that apply to the Project.
Statement of Overriding Considerations
1. General. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15093, the City Council of the City of Dublin
adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for those impacts identified in the Eastern
Dublin EIR as significant and unavoidable. (Resolution 53-93, May 10, 1993.} The City Council
carefully considered each impact in its decision to approve urbanization of Eastern Dublin
through approval of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan project.
The City Council is currently considering the Dublin Ranch North project, PA 08-045. Although
the City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with the original land use
approvals for urbanization of Eastern Dublin, pursuant to a 2002 court decision, the City Council
hereby adopts specific overriding considerations for the Project.'
The City Council believes that many of the unavoidable environmental effects identified in the
Eastern Dublin EIR that are applicable to the Project wilt be substantially lessened by mitigation
measures adopted with the original approval and by mitigation measures adopted through the
Project. Even with mitigation, the City Council recognizes that the implementation of the project
carries with it unavoidable adverse environmental effects as identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR.
The City Council specifically finds that to the extent that the identified adverse or potentially
~ "...public officials must still go an the record and explain specifically why they. are approving:theaaterprojea despite its significant
unavadab4e.iunPacts:°.(emphasis.or~giraal:).Cor~xrwnifiesfoF,a Better,Environment.v~Califomia.Resonrees,.Ager~c~~:1.t~3.CaI:Appr.~~+98,_ ~ .
(2002). Page 3 of 7
adverse impacts for the Project have not been mitigated to acceptable levels, there are specific
economic, social, environmental, land use, and other considerations that support approval of the
Project.
2. Unavoidable Significant Adverse Impacts. The following unavoidable significant
environmental impacts identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR for future development of Eastern
Dublin apply to the Dublin Ranch North project.
^ Land Use Impact 3.1/F. Cumulative Loss of Agricultural and Open Space Lands; Visual
Impacts 3.8/B, Alteration of Rural/Open Space Character. Future development of the
vacant Project site will contribute to the cumulative loss of open space land.
^ Traffic and Circulation Impacts 3.3/B, 3.3/E. I-580 Freeway, Cumulative Freeway
Impacts: Future development of the Project will contribute to the unavoidable freeway
impacts identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR.
^ Community Services and Facilities Impact 3.4/S. Consumption of Non-Renewable
Natural Resources and Sewer, Water; and Storm Drainage Impact 3.5/F, H, U.
Increases in Energy Usage through Increased Water Treatment, Disposal and Operation
of Water Distribution System: Future development of the Project will contribute to
increased energy consumption.
^ Soils, Geology, and Seismicity Impact 3.6/B. Earthquake Ground Shaking, Primary
Effects: Even with seismic design, future development on the Project site could be
subject to damage from large earthquakes.
^ Air Qualit Im acts 3.11/A B C E: Future development of the Project will contribute to
cumulative dust deposition, construction equipment emissions, mobile and stationary
source emissions.
3. Overriding Considerations. The City Council previously balanced the benefits of the
Eastern Dublin project approvals against the significant and potentially significant adverse
impacts identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR. The City Council now balances those unavoidable
impacts that apply to future development on the Project site against its benefits, and hereby
determines that such unavoidable impacts are outweighed by the benefits of the Project as
further set forth below.
The project provides four estate lots designed to provide a country estate character which will
contribute the diversity of housing types in the area and will provide construction jobs. The
residential portion of the project is adjacent to approved residential development; a road
extension from the adjacent property will provide access and utilities to the project, minimizing
the grading that would otherwise be required for a separate access road. Locating the
residential portion of the project on the west side of the property adjacent to other residential
development also ensures that City and urban level services are efficiently provided to the
residences. The open space conservation area retains approximately 80% of the project site in
open space and permanently protects sensitive topographic and biological resources on the
site.
Page 4~af..7:,. ,. , .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council adopts the following Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program:
Dublin Ranch North Annexation Area
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
PA 08-045
October 2009
Mitigation Measure Implementing
Res onsibilit Monitoring
Res onsibilit Monitoring
Schedule Verification
Mitigation Measure 1: If work is to Project Dublin Prior to
occur between February 1 and Developers Planning Issuance of a
August 31 (general bird breeding Division Building
season), apre-construction breeding Permit or
bird survey shall be conducted by a Grading
qualified biologist no more than 10 Permit
days prior to the initiation of work
activities. The surveys shall be
conducted within all suitable nesting
habitats within and adjacent to the
development area. All active non-
status passerine nests identified
shall be protected by a minimum 25-
foot radius exclusion zone. Active
raptor or special status species
nests shall be protected by a
minimum 50-foot radius exclusion
zone. Each exclusion zone shall be
established with appropriate
construction fencing. Work outside
of exclusionary buffers may
continue; however, ground
disturbance activities shall be
prohibited in these areas until the
nest has fledged successfully, been
predated or abandoned as a result
of natural causes as determined by
a ualified biolo ist.
Mitigation Measure 2: The Project Dublin Prior to
Applicant shall perform either two Developers ~ Planning Issuance of a
years of protocol-level California Division Building
tiger salamander (CTS) trapping Permit or
surveys to confirm absence of this .Grading
species on the site or assume the i Permit
presence of this species aestivating
on the site and purchase CTS
mitigation credits. The focused
trapping shall occur on the 5-10 acre
portion of the project site where
grading will occur. Permission for
these surveys would be obtained
from USFWS and final results would
..
be
ro
id
d t
~USFWS
ll
lf o
.
p
v
e
o
no,
•as::we
e ...
.. ~
Page 5 of 7
CTS are found during two years of
trapping, protective silt fencing shall
be installed prior to Project grading.
If CTS are found on site, the
Applicant shall purchase CTS
mitigation credits in a nearby
approved conservation bank,
consistent with USFWS a royal.
Mitigation Measure 3: A Pre- Project Dublin Prior to
construction American badger Developers Planning Issuance of a
burrow/den survey shall be Division Building
conducted by a qualified biologist Permit or
within and immediately adjacent to Grading
the development area no more than Permit
10 days prior to the initiation of
ground disturbance. If the survey
results indicate that the American
Badger is present during the
general breeding period (roughly
spring through summer), the
biologist should assess if young are
present in any identified dents. If
young are deemed present, an
exclusionary buffer shall be placed
around each occupied den until all
young are independent. Once
young are independent or if
badgers are found to be present
during non-breeding period, use of
the site should be discouraged
using passive relocation techniques
to remove badgers from areas to be
impacted prior to the initiation of
round disturbance.
Mitigation Measure 4: A pre- Project Dublin Prior to
construction Burrowing Owl survey Developers Planning Issuance of a
per protocol approved by CDFG shall Division Building
be conducted no more than 14 days Permit or
prior to initiation of ground Grading
disturbance within the development Permit
area. If surveys are conducted during
the breeding season (February 1 -
August 31) and owls are found to be
breeding within the development
area, a suitable exclusionary buffer
shall be placed around the nest site
until all offspring have fledged. Once
all offspring have fledged passive
relocation techniques shall be
employed and all owls shall be
removed prior to initiation of ground
disturbances. If a Burrowing Owl is
found to be breeding within the
development area, Burrowing - Owl
~ mitigatit~n credits-slidlt'be pu~cFiased. ,
Page 6 of 7
in a nearby, approved conservation
bank. If owls are found during the
non-breeding season, passive
relocation techniques shall be
employed and all owls removed from
areas having ground disturbances on
~ site.
Mitigation Measure 5: To ensure Project Dublin Prior to
that disturbance of the California red- Developers Planning Issuance of a
legged frog (CRLF) does not occur Division Building
as a result of this project, work Permit or
activities should be limited to the non- Grading
rainy season (roughly May 16 Permit.
through October 15). If work is to
occur during the rainy season, the
Applicant shall install an exclusion
fence (e.g. silt fence) around all work
areas to prevent CRLF from entering
work areas. The fencing shall be one-
way funnels to allow animals inside
the fenced area to escape.
Mitigation Measure 6: An Project Dublin Grading
engineering geologist shall inspect all I Developers Planning Permit Stage
cut slopes exposures for evidence of Division &
potential instability during the Department
Grading Permit Stage. of Public
Works
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1St day of December, 2009, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Biddle, Hart, Hildenbrand, Scholz, and Mayor Sbranti
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTE T:
.
City Clerk
/ v
Mayor
Reso No. 174-09, Adopted 12-1-09, Item 6.1 Page 7 of 7