Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.03 Fallon I-580 Imp TY Lin AgmtG~~~ OF DU~~2 /// 1~~~~jz 04LIFOR~~ STAFF REPORT CITY C L E R K DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL File # ^®®©- 3^ DATE: March 2, 2010 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Joni Pattillo, City Manager SUBJE Amendment #7 to the Consulting Services Agreement with TYLin International for the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements Project Prepared By: Ferd Del Rosario, Senior Civil Engineer EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On May 16, 2000, the City Council approved an agreement with TY Lin International (formerly known as CCS Planning & Engineering) for the design of the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements. Subsequent amendments (Amendment 1 through 6) to TYLin's contract were approved over the course of project design to expand their scope of services. This amendment (Amendment #7) will modify the consultant's scope of work to increase the amount for construction support services and expand the scope to complete as-built plans and Record of Survey map work necessary to transfer right-of-way to Caltrans. Staff also recommends that the City Council approve a budget change of $14,590 for Amendment #7. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The scope of work required from TYLin International has resulted in the need for an amendment of totaling $80,000 for the additional services. The current amount budgeted for these services in CIP#960001 (I-580/Fallon Interchange Project) is adequate to cover all except $14,590. Therefore an additional appropriation of $ 14,590 is recommended as a project budget change. Adequate funds are available within the Traffic Impact Fee Fund 4307 to address this change. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving Amendment #7 to the Consulting Services Agreement with TYLin International for the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements Project and approve a budget change of $14,590 for this amendment. ;~ ~' ~~~ ~ ~. fitted By Reviewed By Senior Civil Engineer Admin. Services Director A Page 1 of 2 ITEM NO. ~'. l;U DESCRIPTION: On May 16, 2000, the City Council approved a Consulting Services Agreement with TYLin International (TYLin), to design the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements project. Subsequent contract amendments (Amendment 1 through 6) were approved over the course of project design to expand their scope of services. During construction of the project, several unanticipated work modifications were made due to Caltrans requirements and change in field conditions. These include replacement of drainage pipes along the auxiliary lane approaching the westbound Fallon Road off-ramp and revision of the bridge falsework traffic opening. These changes required redesign and submittal to Caltrans for their review and approval prior to implementation of the change orders. Also the City is required to furnish Caltrans an original electronic file of the As-built plans and Records of Survey Map necessary for completion of right-of-way transfer to Caltrans. These extra tasks require an increase of $80,000 to TYLin's overall construction support service budget to complete project closeout. The current amount budgeted for consulting services is adequate to cover all except $14,590. Adequate funds are available within the Traffic Impact Fee Fund 4307 to address this change and staff recommends an additional appropriation of $14,590 as a project budget change. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving Amendment #7 to the Consulting Services Agreement with TYLin International for the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements Project and approve a budget change of $14,590 for this amendment. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: Public Noticing is not required. Copy of the staff report was provided to TYLin International. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution amending the Agreement, together with Exhibit "A," Amendment #7 to the Agreement 2) Budget Change 3) Original Agreement dated May 16, 2000, and Amendments No. 1 through 6 G:\CONSULTANTS\ccs-TY LIN\Fallon\agst_Fallon Amendment #7.doc Page 2 of 2 /nh 8~ RESOLUTION NO. -10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING AMENDMENT N0.7 TO THE AGREEMENT WITH TY LIN INTERNATIONAL FOR CONSULTING SERVICES I-580/FALLON ROAD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT WHEREAS, on May 16, 2000, the City Council of the City of Dublin approved an agreement for design services with CCS Planning & Engineering, Inc., now known as TY Lin International/CCS, for the design of the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements; and WHEREAS, subsequent contract amendments (Amendment 1 through 6) were approved over the course of project design to expand their scope of services; and WHEREAS, TY Lin International/GCS's scope of work is now being expanded to increase TY Lin's overall construction support service budget to complete project closeout; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby approve Amendment No. 7 to the Agreement with TY Lin International/GCS, attached hereto as Exhibit "A." BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute the Amendment. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of March, 2010, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk ~~~~ -~ y , ~ 3(1I~o G:\CONSULTANTS\ccs-TY LIN\Fallon\reso_fallon Amendment #7.doc ATTA C H M E N T ~~d ~~ EXHIBIT "A" OF RESOLUTION -10 AMENDMENT NO.7 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF DUBLIN AND TY LIN INTERNATIONAL/CCS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WHEREAS, the City of Dublin (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and TY Lin InternationaUCCS (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"), entered into an agreement on May 16, 2000, to design the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin approved Amendments No. 1 through No. 6 to the Consultant Agreement to include additional services, and WHEREAS, the City desires to amend the Consultant Agreement to include additional services, and the not-to-exceed contract amount is proposed to be increased to cover the cost of the additional work; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Scope of Work The Scope of Work shall be extended to include the additional scope of work as described in Consultant's letter dated January 25, 2010, for the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements Project (attached). Extension of Fees The total cost for time-and-materials work under this amendment shall not exceed an additional $80,000. CITY OF DUBLIN Joni Pattillo, City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk TY LIN INTERNATIONAL/CCS ~~~ Thomas Wintch, Vice President Date: Zli'j ' ~o ~ o G:\CONSULTANTS\ccs-TY LIN\Fallon\Exhibit A- Amendment #7 .DOC EXHIBIT To the Resolution ~~ ~.~ E . ._,,~. TYLININTERNATIONA~~I`~C~ "~~°~ 2010 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 350 San Ramon, CA 94583 (925) 365-3960 • Fax (925) 275-0117 E-mail: sro@tylin.com TYLI ~ CCS 320048.00 (#98104) January 25, 201 D Mr. Ferd Del Rosario City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Subject: I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Request for Amendment No. 7 -Construction Support Service Ferd: As discussed at our meeting on February 20, 2009 regarding our project status, which we stated that we had depleted our Construction Support Service budget mainly due to the unforeseen change orders that we needed to prepare, we hereby are requesting for additional budget for completion of this project. As you recall, Amendment No. 6 was only to replenish the Construction Support Service budget that we had tapped into in order to complete our final design. Although Amendment No. 6 was approved in June 2008 for $120,000, $31,000 was invoiced against this amendment that were charged between October 13, 2007 and May 30, 2008. The work during this period was to finalize the project for advertisement, prepared addendum, responded to RFI's, and re-bid of project, which left us with less than $90,000 remaining for Construction Support Service. The Contractor was given the NTP sometime in May 2008. Between June and October, the period where most of the construction support services activities occurred, we handled the following: • Prepared CCO #1 -Revised Chain Link Railing from Type 7 to Type 6 on the Overcrossing structure • Gathered and submitted electronic files, and Electrical as-builts on Caltrans lighting to Top Grade • Checked top of retaining wall calculation, as requested by S&C • Calculated retaining walls weep holes location and elevation, as requested by S&C • Responded to Contractor's inquiry on unsuitable sub grade at FR3M Line due to excessive moisture below grade. Parikh Consultants recommended use of geofabric and process the soil and break it down as it dries • Prepared CCO #8 due to changes in DSRSD's supply line 4 a6 8r~ I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Responded to RFI's on Chromium found in soil, Petroleum Hydrocarbons found in soil, unsuitable subgrade, and lenton couplers not found on bottom slab of existing RCB Prepared CCO #7, 9, and 11 -the unforeseen change orders: In early July, during excavation for the WB auxiliary lane upstream of the Fallon Road off- ramp, the contractor discovered 2-48" parallel pipes underneath the proposed shoulder, which at some areas only have less than 1 foot cover. These pipes, along with junction boxes, had to be removed (CCO #7) and replaced (CCO #9) with a 42" RCP to the outside shoulder of the proposed ultimate widening of the upcoming WB HOV Lane Project. Due to the new alignment of the replacement pipe, overhead sign structures also needed to be shifted (CCO # 11) to different locations. AC dikes and MBGR also had to be added or revised as part of CCO #9. These existing pipes are identified on our Drainage Plans but are shown at the location much closer to the R/W fence that would not have any impact to our auxiliary lane construction. These "existing" locations were obtained from Caltrans' As-Builts drawings, which were checked at time of PS&E and again verified after the Contractor's discovery. The above effort, along with normal RFI's and correspondence with S&C Engineers basically depleted our budget for Construction Support Services. We, respectfully, are requesting consideration of an increase in the amount of $80,000 to our overall Construction Support Service budget and for closeout of this project. This increase is made up of the following: $43,500 to cover remaining construction support services between October 25, 2008 (last invoice billed to budget limit through Amendment 6) and completion of original project (thru January 2010, excluding ACTIA CCO 39 and ACCMA CCO 39b). This includes preparation of CCO's requested by you, such as addition of Type 6 Chain Link Railing on the west side of the overcrossing, fractured rib texture at the bridge railings, striping revision at Croak Road, revision of Traffic Handling at Stage 3A for bridge closure pour, and other minor coordination issues with S&C Engineers, etc. $13,500 to prepare As-Builts (estimated at %Z hour per sheet, including checking) $20,000 for completion of Right-of--Way work. This includes Record Right-of--Way Map, review pro forma title policy; prepare Corporation Grant Deed, and Record of Survey Map necessary for completion ofright-of--way transfer to Caltrans. $3,000 contingency -additional CCO, or additional R/W surveys, as authorized Timeline for producing the As-Builts should be no more than 2 to 3 weeks from when we received the mark-ups from S & C Engineers. These as-Builts will be done electronically. The Right-of--Way survey mapping work will include converting the current Hardcopy Maps to R/W Record Maps, preparing a Grant Deed, preparing two corner record(s), including survey crew time setting two corner monuments. This survey effort requires approximately 60 hours. Upon approval of the Fallon Road UC project by Caltrans, the R/W Record Maps as required for the R/W acquisition will be prepared. The review and acceptance process by Caltrans is anticipated to take 8 to 16 weeks. r~ ~~ I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Any additional R/W surveying efforts required to support further R/W transfer services is consider on a time and materials basis. Although we are requesting an increase of $60,000 (for capital improvement, and not counting the completion of R/W work), the total of $150,000 for Construction Support Services represents only 1.6% of Construction cost, which is much less than the averaged industry cost for similar magnitude and nature of project. Needless to say, construction support services for both the ACTIA projects (CCO 39 and 39b) for the eastbound and westbound auxiliary lanes, including preparation of As-Builts, are being handled under separate agreements with ACCMA. Please feel free to call Tom Wintch or me for any additional questions or clarifications that may arise. Sincerely, TYLin Internationyal / ~~ J mes T. Pun, PE ~O ~ ~~ CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CHANGE FORM FY 2009 / 2010 CHANGE FORM # New Appropriations (City Council Approval Required): _X~ From Unappropriated Reserves (Fund) From New Revenues DECREASE BUDGET ACCOUNT AMOUNT Budget Transfers: _ _ From Budgeted Contingent Reserve (1001.19.01.81101) Within Same Department Activity Between Departments (City Council Approval Required) Other INCREASE BUDGET ACCOUNT AMOUNT Name: EXPENSE -Fallon Interchange Advances -Fallon Interchange Project - Contract Services - 14,590 Project # 960001.9200.9201.4307 GL Account #: 3600.9601.64001 Fin Mgr/ASD: Signature Date: 2 /6 ~ ~ ZEASON FOR BUDGET CHANGE ENTRY: To fund amendment #7 to TYLin Contract for I580/Fallo~ nterchange project. City Manager: Signature Date: As Approved at the City Council Meeting on: Date: 3/2/2010 Mayor: Signature Posted By: Signature Date: Date: G:IBudgetChmrgesl2_1009_J0115_3_2_!0_TYLinAmendM7FallonlC.DOC ATTACHMENT 2. °b~ A- STANDARD CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made at Dublin, California, as of May 16, 2000, by and between the CITY OF DUBLIN, a municipal corporation ("City"), and CCS PLANNING AND ENGINEERING, INC. ("Consultant"), who agree as follows: 1. SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A. Consultant shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit A. 2. PAYMENT. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement at the time and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B. The payments specified in Exhibit B shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall submit all billings for said services to City in the manner specified in Exhibit B; or, if no manner be specified in Exhibit B, then according to the usual and customary procedures and practices which Consultant uses for billing clients similar to City. 3. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT. Except as set forth in Exhibit C, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall furnish to Consultant only the facilities and equipment listed in Exhibit C according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 4. GENERAL PROVISIONS. The general provisions set forth in Exhibit D are part of this Agreement. In the-event of any inconsistency between said general provisions and any other terms or conditions of this Agreement, the other term or condition shall control insofar as it is inconsistent with the general provisions. 5. EXHIBITS. All exhibits referred to herein are attached hereto and are by this reference incorporated herein. 6. SUBCONTRACTING. The Consultant shall perform the work contemplated with resources available within its own organization and no portion of the work pertinent to this contract shall be subcontracted without written authorization by the City, except that which is expressly identified in the Consultant's proposal. 7. CHANGES. City may from time to time require changes in the scope of the services by Consultant to be performed under this Agreement. Such changes, including any change in the amount of Consultant's compensation which are mutually agreed upon by City and Consultant, shall be effective as amendments to this Agreement only when in writing. 8. RESPONSIBLE CHARGE. Consultant shall assign a project manager(s) to the project for the duration of the project. There shall be no change in the Project Manager or members of the project Agreement Page 1 of 2 OS/09/00 ATTACHMENT 3. +t:> G~,~; ~~ ~- team without prior written approval by the City. The Project Manager for Consultant shall be THOMAS M. WINTCH. 9. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered by LEE S. THOMPSON ("Administrator"). All correspondence shall be directed to or through the Administrator or his or designee. 10. NOTICES. Any written notice to Consultant shall be sent to: Tom Wintch, Project Manager CCS Planning and Engineering, Inc. 6 Crow Canyon Court San Ramon CA 94583-1621 Any written notice to City shall be sent to: Lee S. Thompson Director of Public Works/City Engineer P. O: Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 Executed as of the day first above stated: Attest: Ci lerk Approved as to form: ../? 4/, - / ~` ~ Gam, ~O~- City Attorney CITY OF DUBLIN, a m ' i co 'on B "City" Y "consultant" Agreement Page 2 of 2 OS/09/00 9~,~~~ EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES AND SCHEDULE PER PROPOSAL DATED APRIL 25, 1999, FROM CCS PLANNING AND ENGINEERING, INC. (ATTACHED). Exhibit A Page 1 of 1 nsm4mn ~~ ~ S~ I-580/Fallon Road Interchange - PS&E Scope of Work Page 1 of 16 I-~8O/Fallon Road Interchange Modification Project Final Design (PS&E) Scope of Work CCS Planning and Engineering, Inc. (Consultant) shall provide the following Scope of Work to the City of Dublin: General Description of Work This scope of work shall provide for preparing construction bid documents including; plans, general provisions, standard special provisions (SSP's), and estimates for the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Modification ProjeM (Project). Also included in this Scope of Work are various construction support activities. The Project is generally defined as modifications to the existing interchange including, widening the existing bridge over I-580, widening and reconstructing existing ramps, and widening and reconstructing portions of Fallon Road-EI Charro Road, as defined and approved in the combined Project Study Report (PSR~Project Report (PR). In addition, a Plan Line will be developed for the ultimate "BART + Buildout" alternative. All work will be administered under contract with the City of Dublin. However, the Construction • Documents (PS&E) will be generally developed per the requirements of the State Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) for all work within the State right-of-way. All work shall conform to the design standards and, requirements and be subject to the oversight and approval of the appropriate Qovernmental entities. This scope of work assumes that the construction of the Project will be administered by the City of Dublin, with an Encroachment Permit from Calirans for all work within the State right-of-way. Final design and the development of the bid documents shalt be performed simultaneously with the development of the combined PSR/PR. It is assumed that the final alignment and configuration of the various elements of the Project will have been established prior to beginning final design. Once final design has started, any changes to roadway alignments or configurations that result in significant lost work or rework shall be considered as Extra Work, for which a contract budget amendment will be required. The proposed interchange modifications include: • Widenins the existing Fallon Road/El Charro Road overcrossing (by modifying the existing bridge) to provide two 3.6 m wide lanes in each direction, a 1.2 m wide painted median, 1.2 m right shoulders, and a ] .8 m wide sidewalk. • Widening the eastbound off-ramp to provide a second left turn lane at the ramp terminii at the intersection of El Charro Road. • Constructing the eastboundtwo-lane (one mixed flow lane with an HOV bypass lane) loop on-ramp. • Widening Fallon Road north of the overcrossing to provide additional left turn storage at the intersection with the westbound ramps. /~}~ vr~ I-580/Fallon Road Interchange - PS&E Scope of Work Page 2 of 16 • Widening the westbound off-ramp to provide four-lanes (two left and two right turn lanes) at the ramp intersection with Fallon Road. • Widening Fallon Road north of the intersection with the westbound ramps. • Installing traffic signal systems at the ramp intersections with Fallon Road and EI Charro Road. • Widening the westbound on-ramp to accommodate two-lanes near the intersection . with Fallon Road. Work Included in this Final Design Shall Be: • Development of the final layouts and concepts for the improvements and modifications as defined for the project and approved in the combined Project Study Report/Project Report (PSR/PR). • Development of a Plan Line for the ultimate "BART + Buildout" alternative. These will generally be developed per Caltrans guidelines for Geometric Base Maps at 1:1000 scale. • Construction of the westerly (southbound Fallon bridge over I-580 with a new two span, two lane structure.. This new southbound structure will tie to the existing westerly (northbound) bridge with a closure pour to provide the required four lanes plus shoulders and a sidewalk along the easterly side of the existing structure. The existing toe of the southerly abutment slope may be set back by the construction of a tie-back retaining wall. The resulting bridge structure will span a 10-lane I-580 with a widened median that will accommodate BART in the future. • Other than the conform of the eastbound loop on-ramp to the I-580 mainline, no other impacts to the I-580 mainline are assumed in this scope-of--work. • The Project limit to the north is the existing Iimit of Caltrans access control/right-of--way crossing Fallon Road (approximately 90 meters northerly of the WB I-580 ramps intersection) and the southerly limit is the conform to the Friesman Road intersection. • Coordination with the staffs of the City of Dublin, City of Pleasanton, Caltrans, utility companies, regulatory agencies and with others as required. • Preparation of applications for Caltrans Encroachment Permits for City signature. • Preparation of Design Exception Fact Sheets as required and as appropriate. • Project Plans wit) be developed utilizins Microstation format. • Project specifications and special provisions will generally conform to the Caltrans format and as approved by the City. • Right-of-way activities wilt be limited to establishing the existing rights-of-way and preparing the descriptions and corresponding plats for temporary construction easements (TCE's). • Aerial topographic mapping to be used for the base plans was prepared in the PSR phase of this Project. No new aerial topographic mapping is included or provided for in this scope of work. • Site (ground) surveys will be conducted as necessary to accurately tie down topographic features, to provide for design cross-sections throughout the Project, at conforms, and to supplement the existing aerial topographic mapping. Design cross-sections will be developed at generally twenty (20) meter spacing. Design cross-sections~will not be part of the contract plans, but wilt be made available at time of bidding. • A Materials Report will provide recommendations for pavement design, embankment placement and other appropriate issues. • A Geotechnical Design Report will provide recommendations for any required retaining walls and the signal pole foundations. • A Foundation Report for the new bridge foundation design will be prepared. • A Site Investigation Report for aerially deposited lead will be prepared. • A Site Investigation Report for potential pesticides and herbicides will be prepared. I-580/Fallon Road Interchange - PS&E Scope of Work Page 3 of 16 • Retaining walls may be required in this project, specifically at the existing southerly bridge abutment. It is assumed in this Scope of Work that these will be "tie-back" retaining walls or other types, as appropriate. • Design of City owned utilities (storm drainage, sanitary sewer, lighting and water) is included in this scope of work. However, the Consultant shall only review non-City owned utilities (gas, electric, telephone, cable, etc) and show them on the project utility plans for reference and coordination only. This scope of work does not~include or provide for the design of non-City owned utilities. • Utilities will be potholed in accordance with the Caltrans "Manual on High & Low Risk Underground Facilities within Highway Rights-of-Way". The utilities at potholed locations will be field surveyed to determine the horizontal and vertical location of the utility. For purposes of budgeting, I S pothole locations will be assumed. • A box culvert may be required in this project, specifically under Fallon Road. It is assumed in this Scope of Work that this will be standard Caltrans box culvert, requiring no special design. • Traffic signal designs shall be included at the intersections of Fallon Road and EI Charro Road with the I-580 lamp termini (total of two. locations). Note that this scope-of--work and corresponding estimated fees include and provide for two distinct traffic signal designs at each of the two locations. Designs are included for initial signals with the existing roadways (prior to these proposed interchange improvements) and for the signal design corresponding to the interchange improvements. This scope-of--work provides for an independent and stand-alone design and preparation of Bid Documents for the Initial Traffic Signal Installation. This includes all necessary minor roadway widening and modifications required for the initial traffic signal. If the. initial signal design is determine to not be required, the related work and design fees will be deducted from this scope-of- work .and fees, as appropriate. • . Ramp metering-and TOS facilities will be.included. Ramp meters are to be designed for only the eastbound loop on-ramp that is being constructed. TOS facilities shall be limited to that which is required within the interchange. Facilities outside the interchange are not provided for in this scope- of-work. • Street/roadway Iighting shall be included at the intersections and for the ramp gore areas within the Project limits. • Replacement }andscape and irrigation shall be included within the interchange area where the existing landscaping will be disturbed by the construction. • Guidelines and requirements for a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be included in the Bid Documents. The construction contractor will be required to develop and gain approval for a Project specific SWPPP. Work Not Included in this Final Design (PS&E) Scope of Work • No additional hazardous material investigations will be performed beyond the Aerial Deposited Lead Investigations and PesticidelHerbicideInvestigations. • Additional Traffic Counts or Traffic Operational Studies. • Engineering or design associated with non-City or non-Caltrans owned utilities. • Design of sound walls, wetlands and other environmental mitigations. • The landscaping and irrigation plans are part of the roadway plans and will not be a separate construction contract. • Improvements to downstream (outside Project limits) drainage facilities. • Submittal to or review by Caltrans Headquarters. • Submittal of electronic (CADD) files to Caltrans for review. • Right-of--way appraisals, negotiations, acquisition deeds, or Caltrans appraisal maps. 13 a/ ~~ I-S80/Fallon Road Interchange - PS&E Scope of Work Page 4 of 16 • Preparation of construction slope stake notes/information. • Engineering Services During Construction (ESDC). Specific Description of Work The construction Bid Documents shall be prepared in accordance with the Caltrans' Guide for the Submittal of Plans. SQecifications, and Estimates, except as provided for in this scope of work. The milestones which are described in detail in this section of the Scope of Work for Final PS&E are as follows: Milestone 1: Project Management Milestone 2: Preliminary PS&E (35% Submittal) Milestone 3: Interim PSBtE (65% Submittal) Milestone 4: Draft PS&E (95% Submittal) Milestone 5: Final PSBcE (100% Submittal) Milestone 1: Project Management Project Management involves setting up operations of the project- team, internal and external coordination, supervision of the team, progress monitoring. and reporting. The anticipated elements of this task are the following: 1.1 Project Control 1.1.1 Team Supervision. Consultant will supervise the team, coordinating and monitoring design for conformance with City of Dublin and Caltrans standards and policies. 1.1.2 Maintain Project Files. Project files will be set up and maintained throughout the design period 1.1.3 Prepare and Update Design Schedule/Work Plan. Consultant will provide a design schedule and update as necessary. 1.1.4 Prepare Monthly Progress Reports. IvlonthIy progress reports will be prepared in a form acceptable to the City of Dublin. l.l..i Perform QA/QC. All major project deliverables will be checked by project staff, and will receive quality reviews before being released to persons outside the team. Subconsultant Team Members are required to perform similar reviews before submittal of documents to Consultant for further processing. The budget for QA/QC tasks.is included in the individual milestones. lye% 8~ 1-580/Fallon Road Interchange - PS&E Scope of Work Page 5 of 16 1.1 Meetings The following meetings are anticipated for this project: • Monthly Progress Meetings/Minutes -Eight Monthly Progress Meetings are anticipated and provided for in this scope-of--work. • Project Development Team (PDT) Meetings/Minutes -The Project Development Team (PDT) was formed during the combined PSR/PR preparation phase of this project to act as a steering group during the course of the work. This same PDT will continue through the PS&E phase of this project. The Consultant will coordinate, participate and support the PDT efforts, providing agendas, study information, minutes, etc. Eight Monthly PDT Meetings aze anticipated. • Project Meetings -Technical meetings will be held among the Consultant Team, City of Dublin, City of Pleasanton, City of Livermore and Caltrans staff as often as necessary to discuss issues and other items needing resolution. Meetings with other agencies and property owners will also be held as needed. Meeting minutes will be provided for City review and approval. • Utility Coordination Meetings -The Consultant will conduct and attend meetings with utility owners (including both private and city-owned} to determine existing utility locations, potential conflicts and possible relocations. If utility relocation is necessary, then further discussions will also include who will perform the engineering, compensation if any for the engineering of the relocation design, and funding arrangements for the actual relocation. • Dublin City Council Meetings -The Consultant will assist City staff in presenting this project to the Dublin City Council including preparation of exhibits. 1.3 Modify PSR/PR The PSR/PR will be modified to include the westbound I-580 auxiliary lane. 1.4 Initial Traffic Signallnstallation The Initial Traffic Signal Installation shall be designed for the two existing ramp tenninii intersection locations with the existing roadways, prior to the proposed interchange improvements. The Initial Traffic Signal Installation shall be a separate and independent set of construction Bid Documents, including all roadway and civil improvements required to provide a complete and approved installation. It is assumed that the roadway widening improvements associated with this initial traffic signal installation will be the minimum required. Included in the design shall be signal interconnects between the nvo locations. This sub-task incorporates and provides for the complete final design and construction Bid Document preparation for the stand-alone Initial Traffic Signal Installation. Included shall be the preparation of a Caltrans Encroachment Permit, including a PEER, Design Exception fact sheets, Riaht-of--Way Certification, and Utility Certification. ~~ bd g~ I-580/Fallon Road Interchange - PS&E Scope of Work Page 6 of 16 Milestone 2: Preliminary PS&E and Geometric Base Maps Z.1 Collect Additional Data Preliminary investigations will involve the accumulation and review of alt additional existing data ,,and detailed field investigations to verify existing site conditions. Additional data that may be collected include: • Existing Geotechnical Reports and Soil Logs • Available hydrology and hydraulic information • As-bunts 2.2 Review Preliminary Geometrics Using information developed in the combined PSR/PR, and the results and findings of the other preliminary investigations, the Consuhant will review the proposed alignment alternative and develop revisions as appropriate. 2.3 Perform Field Surveys The field surveys will consist of the following: • Topographic features (areas under tree coverage, trees greater than O.15m in diameter, fire hydrants, light standards, location of driveways and curb ramps, etc.). • Surface utility facilities (including inverts for accessible sanitary sewer manholes/inletsand valves for utilities) • Existing storm drainage systems (including inverts for accessible storm drain manholes and inlets) • Potholed utilities (in conformance with Caltrans "Manual on High and Lotiv Risk Underground Facilities within Highway Rights of Way") • Conform areas at local streets and driveways • Cross sections at 20 m intervals 2.4 Prepare Preliminary Drainage Report The Consultant will review and refine existing hydrology and hydraulic data/studies. After study of local drainage and overland flow conditions, the Consultant will conduct drainage and hydrological analysis, and document such studies in the appropriate reports. The drainage areas of the project will be developed, inlet placement wilt be determined and pipe size will be designed. The drainage design will be developed to the point where impacts on geometric features, right-of--way, and bridge foundations can be ascertained. A preliminary Drainage Report will be prepared summarizing the above studies and preliminary plans. 2.5 Determine .Utility Locations and Potential Relocations Existing utility facilities will be identified by field review, through discussion with affected utility companies and potholing, where necessary (potholing will be done in conformance with Caltrans "Manual on High and Low Risk Underground Facilities Within Highway Rights of Way"). The location of existing utilities will be delineated on / ~ ~~~~ ~~ J i-580/Fallon Road Interchange - PS&E _ Scope of Work Page 7 of 16 skeleton layouts with conflicts and necessary relocations identified. The plans will be forwarded to the City of Dublin and Caltrans for their review and comment. Note that potholing may or may not be done at this stage of design. Where feasible, potholing may be delayed until Milestone 3 (Interim PS&E). 2.b .Draft Geotechnical Design Report, Draft Materials Report, and Draft Foundation Report The Geotechnical Design Report, Materials Report and Foundation Report will require a field exploration and laboratory testing program. The City of Dublin and Caltrans will be consulted on the number and method of test borings required. Following the field investigations, the Draft Geotechnical Design Report, Draft Materials Report and Draft Foundation Report will be prepared in accordance with Caltrans requirements including Test Method 130 and the Caltrans Bridge Design Aid. A Log of Test Borings (LOTH) will be prepared in the required DOS format for inclusion into the contract plans. The key geologic and geotechnical issues affecting the design of the highway improvements are: • Embankment earthwork including the need for keyways and underdrainage • Groundwater • Subgrade support for the new embankments • .Embankment settlement (construction period, surcharge or preload and lag time) • Embankment and cut slope stability • Stability of adjacent existing slopes • Foundation support of the new bridge structures, retaining walls and box culverts • Impact and appropriate mitigation to the adjacent bridge foundation . The Materials Report will address the following: • Description of Terrain,and Geology • Existing Facilities • Structural Sections (Pavement Design) • .Materials Available • Recommended Materials Specifications The Geotechnical Design Report will address the following: • Existing Facilities • Cuts and Excavations • Embankments • Earthwork Factors • Corrosion Investigation • Culvert, Retaining Wall and Embankment Foundations ~~k~ I-580/Fallon Road Interchange - PS&E Scope of Work Page 8 of 16 The Foundation Report will address the following: Existing Facilities Bridge Foundation Requirements Seismic Conditions 2.7 Aerial Lead Investigation &Pesticide/Herbicidelnvestigations 2.7.1 Aerial Lead Investigation. Prepare a Letter Report on the investigation and findings concerning aerially deposited lead in the surface soil within the Project area. The test results will be used to develop the necessary procedures and program far identifying the extent of the contaminated soil and removal (if any). The results may further be utilized to determine the applicability of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) variance prepared for the reuse of aerial lead impacted soil within the State highway right-of--way. Z.7.2 Pesticide/Herbicide Imestigatiorrs. Prepare a Letter Report on the investigation and findings concerning pesticides and/or herbicides that may exist in the soil within the Project area. The test results will be used to develop the procedures and program for identifying and removing contaminated soil (if any) and for the proper method of disposing of the material. 2.8 Prepare Geometric Base Maps 2.8.1 Prepare Georrretric Base Maps (3J% Roadway Plans). The preliminary horizontal and vertical alignments developed in the PSR/PR will be refined and the Project Geometric Base Maps will be developed. All control lines will be calculated and edges of pavement, curb returns, tapers, and other Geometric features will be accurately delineated on the Base Maps. The format of the Geometric Base Map shall be plans developed at a scale of 1:1000 and shall be on one over-sized e.~chibit (not on individual standard plan sheets). The topographic base mapping shall be that developed during the PSR preparation, per Caltrans requirements. , As practical, additional information such as typical sections, traffic volume information, etc. will also be shown on the plan e:~hibit. Additional information that is not practical to be placed on the plan exhibit, shall be included on individual exhibit sheets. Information to be included in the Geometric Base Iv1ap submittal includes: • Calculated Roadway Control Lines • .Accurately plotted edges of lanes, roadways, curb returns, and tapers • Profiles and Superelevation Diagrams for proposed work • Text Call-outs for taper lengths and rates • Traffic Volume information l~ ~~6 8~ I-580/Fallon Road Interchange - PS&E Scope of Work Page 9 of 16 • Typical Roadway Sections • Typical Bridge Sections • Existing Utility Plans and Preliminary Relocations It is the intent that the Geometric Base Map submittal, including supplemental information, will be inclusive of the 35% submittal. This scope-of--work does not include nor provide for a separate 35% submittal. 2.8.2 Prepare Plan Line - `'BART Plus Buildout " Alternative. In addition to the Geometric Base Maps (GBM) developed for the Build Alternative in Task 2.8.1, a Plan Line shall also be developed for the ultimate "BART plus Buildout" alternative. The format and information included in the "BART plus Buildout" Plan Line shall be similar to that for the Build Alternative defined in Task 2.8.1. The base used to define the existing condition for the development of the "BART plus Buildout" alternative, shall be the proposed Build Alternative. a) Submit Draft "BART plus Buildout" Plan Line for Review: The "BART plus Buildout" Plan Line shall be submitted to the City of Dublin, Caltrans, BART, and other reviewing agencies. b) Resolve Comments and Revise Plan: This. scope-of--work provides for two rounds of review by the Ciry, Caltrans, and other agencies and the corresponding Plan Line revisions to be done by the Consultant. c) Submit Final "BART plus Buildout" Plan Line: The Final "BART plus Buildout" Plan Line incorporating all the resolved review comments will be issued to the City, Caltrans, and other appropriate agencies. The Final "BART plus Buildout" Plan Line wilt not be submitted to Caltrans for formal approval. 2.9 Bridge Genera! Plan and Type Selection Memo and Meeting 2.9.1 Bridge General Plan. Bridge General Plans will be prepared for each structure in accordance with Bridge Design Details Section 3 and Bridge Design Aids Section 10. ?.9.2 Preliminary Quantities and Estimates. General Plan quantity take-offs and construction cost estimates will be prepared. 2.9.3 Smrctt~re Type Selection lblemo. The Consultant Team will prepare a Caltrans Structure Type Selection Memo and vicinity map for each structure. Upon completion of this task, copies of the proposed General Plan, General Plan Estimate, Type Selection Memo and Vicinity Map will be submitted for review prior to the Structure Type Selection meeting. 2.9.-1 Structure Type Selection Nfeeting. Upon completion of initial review by Caltrans DOS, a Type Selection Review meeting will be held in which the Consultant %a/, 8~ I-580/Fallon Road Interchange - PS&E Scope of Work Page 10 of 16 Team will be prepared to discuss and provide information on foundation requirements, seismic considerations, construction cost and other pertinent information that is needed to determine the proper structure type. 2.9.5 L/pdate and Finalize General Plan. Comments from the Type Selection Meeting will be incorporated into the Structure Type Selection Memo and it will then be resubmitted to Caltrans DOS for approval. ,... 2.1 D Review Right-of-Way Information 2.10.1 Obtain Existing Right-of--Way Mapping. Existing Right-of--Way mapping will be reviewed for current conditions and to provide a basis for development of updated right-of-way requirements. 2.10.2 Review Right-of--Way wish A„~ected Agencies. The current project proposal and associated right-of--way requirements will be reviewed with affected agencies for applicability and to ascertain if any revisions, additions and/or deletions are required. - 2.I1 Perform Value Analysis. Value engineering techniques will be employed during this phase of-the project to investigate potential cost saving options. Traffic control issues, pavement structural section, and bridge/retaining wall type selection are among items for value analysis consideration. A letter report summarizing the Value Engineering effort will be prepared. 2.12 Prepare Requests for Additional Exceptions to Design Standards. An exception request, including fact sheets, will be prepared and processed through Caltrans as appropriate for any additional design exceptions from mandatory or advisory standards that were not identified in the combined PSR/PR. 2.13 Determine Required Permits A list of potential permit requirements wilt be updated from the combined PSR/PR. Some potential permitting and/or approving agencies that may be involved are: • State Water Resources Control Board NPDES • Regional Water Quality Control Board NPDES • PUC Utility Relocation • Zone 7 Existing Facilities 2.14 Prepare Preliminary Construction Estimate A preliminary construction estimate will be prepared consistent with the level of plan development. 2.1 S Perform Quality Assurance/Quality Contro! Prior to the release of this submittal, all submittal documents will undergo the Consultant's internal Quality Assurance/Quality Control review. 1a~/ ~'~ 1-580/Fallon Road Interchange - PS&E Scope of Work Page 11 of 16 Z.16 Submit for City of Dublin, Caltrans and Agency Reviews The Geometric Base Maps, Plan Line, and accompanying information will be submitted to all reviewing agencies. Milestone 3 Interim PS&E (65% Submittal) 3.l Preliminary Design Review Comment Resolution Review comments received from the City, Caltrans and other review agencies will be reviewed by the Consultant and incorporated in the plans, if appropriate and as directed by the City. If necessary, a meeting to clarify or resolve the' comments will be held and will result in a listing of those comments to be included in the plans, those comments that will not be included and those comments requiring further investigation. 3.2 Prepare Draft Drainage Report The Preliminary Drainage Report will be expanded to incorporate the 3~% submittal comments and include backwater calculations, inlet capacity calculations, and other detailed hydraulic calculations in accordance with Caltrans standard practices and procedures. 3.3 Prepare Utility Relocation Plans The Consultant wilt prepare the Utility Relocation Plans based upon discussions with the City on City-owned utilities and utility relocation plans provided by private uiitity companies. For non-City owned utilities, the Consultant wil! show information provided by others on the plans for coordination purposes only. 3.4 Prepare Final Ceoteclsnica! Design Report, Materials Report and Foundation Report The Consultant ~viil resolve review comments from the City and Caltrans review and prepare the final reports. 3.5 Prepare Final Aerial Lead Investigation Report The Consultant will resolve review comments from the City and Caltrans review and prepare the final report. /~GP~ I-580/Fallon Road Interchange - PS&E Scope of Work Page 12 of 16 3.6 Interim Submittal 3.6.1 Prepare Interim Submittal: Roadway Plans (65%). The typical list of design drawings may include the following: Title Sheet Typical. Cross Sections Key Map and Line Index Layouts Profiles and Superelevation Diagrams Construction Details Pavement Elevations Contour Grading Drainage Plans, Profiles, and Details Box Culvert Plans Utility Relocation Plans and Details Construction Area Signs Pavement Delineation Traffc SignaUInterconnect Plan Ramp Metering/TOS Retaining Wall Plans and Details Bridge General Plans Bridge Plans and Details Landscape/IrrigationPtans and Details Electrical and Roadway Lighting Plans and Details Traffic Handling Plans Sign Plans and Details Stage Construction Plans 3.6.2 Traj~c Signal Design. Traffic signal designs shall be included at the intersections of Fallon Road and El Charro Road with the I-580 ramp termini (total of two locations). This scope-of--work provides for two independent designs at each of the two locations as follows: a) Initial Traffic Signal Design: Traffic signal systems shall be designed at the two locations for the existing roadways, prior to these proposed interchange improvements as defined and provided for in sub-task l.4 of this scape-of--work. b) Interchange Modifications Traffic Signal Design: Traffic signal systems shall be designed at the two locations corresponding to the .interchange improvements defined in this scope-of--work. Included shall be signal interconnects beriveen the two locations and provisions to extend the interconnections in the future. The existing condition to be used as the basis of design shall be either the existing unsignalized ramp termini intersections or the initial signals defined in Task 1.4, as will be determined prior to beginning the signal design tasks. 3.6.3 Develop Design Cross-Sections. Preliminary Design Cross-Sections will be developed typically on twenty (20) meter spacing for the Project roadways. The primary function for developing cross-sections will be to allow an accurate estimation of contract earthwork and paving quantities. 3.7 Prepare Unchecked Bride Plans Unchecked Bridge Plans will be prepared for the new Fallon Road Overcrossing (westerly bridge) and existing bridge modifications. I-580/FaAon Road Interchange - PS&E Scope of Work Page 13 of 16 3.8 Prepare Right-of-Way Maps 3.8.1 Prepare Right-of-Way Requirements Maps. The right-of-way requirements, if any, will be delineated and submitted. for review and approval by the City of Dublin and Caltrans. 3.8.2 Prepare Temporary Construction Easement (TCE) Exhibits. Based on the results of Milestone 3.6, TCE exhibits will be prepared. Review comments will be incorporated into the exhibits for final approval. This Scope of Work assumes that no new right-of--way will be required for this project, other than the TCEs. 3.8.3 Prepare Record of Survey. A Record of Survey will be prepared and submitted for review and approved by the City of Dublin, Caltrans, and Alameda County. 3.9 Finalize RequestsforAdditional Exceptions to Design Standards Exception requests, including fact sheets, prepared under Task 2.i2 will be finalized based upon Caltrans comments. 3.10 Prepare Draft PermitApplieations Permit Applications will be completed for review by the City of Dublin. 3.11 Prepare Preliminary Quantities and Estimates The quantities and estimates for the proposed work will be updated to reflect the improved level of design completion. No quantity tables will be prepared at this time. 3.12 Outline ofSpeeial Provisions An outline of the unedited draft of the Standard Special Provisions will be prepared and submitted for review. 3.13 Perform Quality Assurance/Quality Control Prior to the release of this submittal, all submittal documents will underso the Consultant's internal Quality Assurance/Quality Control review. y 3.14 Perform Safety Review A safety review of the Project and plans will be performed in association with the City and Caltrans. Notes of the safety review will be prepared by the Consultant. 3.1 S Submit for City of Dublin, Caltrans and Agency Review Accompanying this submittal will be our responses to the review comments received on the previous submittal. Quality assurance/quality control will be 1-580/Failon Road Interchange - PS&E - ~ j ~1~,` Scope of Work Page 14 of 16 performed on all deliverables before submittal to the City of Dublin, Caltrans, or local agencies for review. Milestone 4: Draft PS&E ~ 95% Submittal) 4.1 Resolve Milestone 3 Review Comments Review comments received from the City, Caltrans and other review agencies will be reviewed by the Consultant and incorporated into the plans, if appropriate and as directed by the City. If necessary, a meeting to clarify or resolve the comments will 'be held and will result in a listing of those comments to be included in the plans, those comments that will not be included. and those comments requiring further investigation. 4.l Finalize Technical Reports All technical reports will be updated and finalized. All report review comments will be resolved and included as appropriate and all new or revised information developed during the design will be incorporated. 4.3 Independent Structures Check Independent design, details and quantity checks of the bridge plans will be prepared in accordance with Caltrans requirements. 4.4 Incorporate Comments and Finalize Plans All resolved and agreed upon comments from Milestone 3 reviews will be incorporated. All roadway and bridge plans and details will be brought to a 100% level of completion. Compatibility between the roadway and structure plans will be verified. 4. S Finalize Permits All permit applications required by the design will be updated and finalized. AlI review comments will be resolved and included as appropriate and new or revised information developed during the design will be incorporated. The permit applications will be submitted to the City of Dublin for signature as the project sponsor. 4.6 Prepare Project SWPPP Guidelines and Requirements The guidelines and requirements for the Project SWPPP will be developed and included in the Project Special Provisions. It will be the construction contractor's responsibility to develop, submit to the Ensineer, and obtain an approval for the Project Specific SWPPP per the guidelines and requirements. a~~.~ gc~ I-580/Fallon Road Interchange -1'S&E Scope of Work Page 15 of 16 4.7 Finalize Quantities and Estimates The quantities and construction cost estimates will be updated. The Caltrans marginal estimate will be prepared for the bridge. Included in this task will be the updating and finalization of the Project contract quantities and corresponding construction estimate (BEES format) and the development of an estimated working days of construction. 4.8 Prepare Draft Special Provisions The Consultant, will complete the Draft Special Provisions. Draft Special Provisions will be prepared for all items, by incorporating all agreed upon comments and additional specifications that may be necessary. All contract bid items will be covered by measurement and pay clauses. This will also include the lane closure charts and the estimated working days of construction. 4.9 Finalize the Right-of-T~Yay Documents All review comments will be resolved and included, as appropriate and approved by the City, and all new or revised information developed during design will be incorporated. ?he Draft Right-of--Way Certification and Utility Certification will be prepared. 4.10 Perform Quality Assurance/Quality Control A quality assurance/quality control check will be madc prior to release for . submittal. 4.I1 Submit for City of Dublin, Caltrans and Ad~ency Review The complete set of plans, special provisions, quantities, construction cost estimate, and appropriate final technical reports will be submitted to the City of Dublin and Caltrans and other reviewing agencies for their review and comment. Milestone 5: Final PS&E (100% Submittal) S.I Resolve Milestone 4 Review Comments Review comments received from the City, Caltrans and other review agencies will be reviewed by the Consultant and incorporated in the plans, if appropriate and as directed by the City. If necessary, a meeting to clarify or resolve the comments be held. S.l Incorporate Milestone 4 Comments and Finalise PS&E All resolved and agreed upon review comments as directed by the City of Dublin will be incorporated into the plans and special provisions, and design documents will be updated as necessary. The final roadway and structure plans, specifications, and Engineer's estimate will be combined into a set of bid documents. a~ ~ ~~ I-580/Fallon Road Interchange - PS&E ~ Scope of Work Page 16 of 16 S.3 Finalize Design Cross-Sections Design cross-sections shall not be a part of the bid documents, but shall be available at the time of bidding to assist prospective bidders in determining construction quantities. Preparation of construction survey notes (slope staking, grid grade, etc.) are not included in this scope-of--work. S.4 Perform Quality Assurance~Quality Control A quality assurance/quality control check will be made prior to release for submittal. S.S Submit PS&E to City of Dublin, Caltrans and Agency Review The Final PS&E will be submitted to the City of Dublin, Caltrans and the appropriate agencies for review. The Final PS&E submittal is considered to be a verification of responses to previous comments. Any comments, other than minor editing, that result in new or rework will be considered as Extra Work. 5.6 Submit Encroachment Permit Application The Consultant will incorporate all the City of Dublin, Caltrans and impacted agencies' review comments. The Consultant shall prepare the Caltrans Encroachment Permit Application, including alt required attachments, for signature by the City of Dublin. S. 7 Submit Construction Bid Documents After al! appropriate review comments from the 100% verification check (Task 5.5) have been incorporated into the plans, specifications, and estimates, the Consultant shall submit the final Construction Bid Documents to the City. This submittal shall include: • Reproducibles of all contract drawings • Camera ready special provisions and specifications • Final Estimate of Probable Construction Cost Milestone 6: Bidding Assistance and Engineering Services During Construction Engineering Services during Construction are not included nor provided for in this scope-of- work. Any services to be provided by the Consultant, shall be defined and negotiated at a later date. ~6 a~ ~ PROJECT TIMING Attached is a Project Schedule dated April 25, 2000. CCS will make every effort to keep to this schedule. However, it is assumed that there may be delays in timing caused by other agencies, which are beyond CCS's control. These delays may extend the proposed project Final PS&E approval past the estimated date of January 23, 2009. .~ ~ 4 i-580/Fallon Road Interchange Project Schedule . tees -- i O Task Name Duration Start FWsh Jul Ott PROJECT STUDY REPORT (PSR~PROJECT REPORT(PR~ED S56 days Fri 4116198 Tw ti/28100 ,Y1a f projaq IOdr-(xf Mestlrl8 (pp7~ 0 days Fri 4118189 Fri 4/18/98 yti f Data Cotkietion ~ Rwbw 40 days Fri 4/18/99 Thu 6!10/98 100% f Propara Tragic Studbs BO days Fri 8/11199 Thu 902/89 tooK f prepare Gsornekk Ctmoepb 80 days Fri 6M 1!99 Thu 9/2199 100% f CaliranttA.ocalAg~ncy Review/Approvai 25 days Fri 913189 Thu 1017198 100% ~ f Prepare Advents Plwninp Sttrd{ea S0 chin Fri 9/3199 Mon 1128!88 ~ 10 0% f Propars Emriraurrantal Technical Studies 25 days Fri 10/9199 Tlw 12!2/99 ' 100% f Proparo Drell EIR Aridmrdun 4S days Fri 1018189 Thu 1218198 .. 7 00% f Propan Draft PSRIPRIED 86 days Fri 1 D/8189 Fri 2IUOD 100% I ~/' Propara Adrrtlrt Draft InNial Study 41 days Fd 1?N0199 Fri 2MI00 100% t f CalfrattsA.ocsJ Aparky Review 36 days Mon 217/00 Fri 3/24100 1r l Perform Spedal Status P1eM Surveys 24 days Tw 414/00 Fri S/b/00 I ,Proparo Ffnal kdllai Study 2 days Mon SI8/00 Tw 5/9!00 I Pubic ClrurlotionlCorrurlsnt ' 22 days Wed 5N0100 Thu 6/8100 I C8y Ctwnci MeeOnp Approval 0 days Tw 8/20100 Tw 8120100 Cairarts Dlahld ApprovM ~ 10 days Wed 8121!00 Tus 7/M00 i FHWAApprovel 10 days Wed 7!5/00 Tw 7/18/00 r Frosway Ayroamsnt Modiiadona 30 days Wed TN9/00 ' Tw 8129100 I CTC Freeway /lpreanwnt Approval 0 days Tw 8/29/00 Tue 8/28!00 I COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT (DESIGNS 148 days FH 12H7189 7tw 716100 11117 = f Cairan Prepares Drag /10roemeM 85 days Fri 1?117199 Thu 4113!00 i City Rat 20 days Fri 4/i4/00 Thu 5/11/00 ' t CatUattslCily Ezstxds Agreement 4D days Fri 5/121D0 Thu 7/8/00 S RIGHT-OF WAY CERTIFIC/1TION '178 days Wed 6HOiD0 Tu• 119!01 y10 s COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CONSTRUCTION) 138 trays Fri 11!17189 Thu 8122100 , 11H7 I f Cairene Prepares Dreg AproemaM 85 day: Fd 12/17/89 Thu 4N3100 z Gty Revieur/Corttrtwnt 20 days Frl 4114/00 Thu 5N 1100 ' ~ CairenrlCity Exeade Aproement 30 days Fri 5/12100 Tiw 8122/00 ~ GEOTECHWCAL ENGINEERING 101 days Frl 12H7i98 Frl 518/00 11H7 i ~/ SoBc ExpbratloR 20 days Fri 12117198 Thu U13100 700% e ADllPestkide TestinO 81 days Fri 1!14/00 Ftl 515100 Task ® CrNical Tosk ProOreas ~ Roled UP Tssk Rdlad UD PreOrtna ~ Iscl:1-680FaIlOn Tuk Proysss ~ Mibatane • Rdkd Up Crienl Tack ® Splk ~... a: Tw 4r1'.V00 Crltlcal Task ~ ® Surmary ^ Rolled Up Miletxtxw Q E~dmW Tasb ~Faaon3 ~S ~ -~ ~'~ I-580/Fafion Road Interchange ~~' Project Schedule 1a» ID O oak t1anM Ounnon Start Flnish er Jcd lkl 17 ForuWaUon RepoA 81 days Fri 1114100 Fd 515!00 /e Ldaterlais Repot ~ 81 days Frl 1/14IOD Frl 6/6/00 N STRUCTURAL. DESIGN 1T9 days Fd 2f2NQ0 Wad 1111100 60 ~ Selsrrdc Aruwfysk ti Strotepy Report 30 days Fri 3/31!00 Thtr W11/00 01 Strudurs Typs Selection (GP) 25 days Ftf 2!25/00 Thu 3/30/00 tit Type SelecBort Review 2D days Fri 3131/00 Thu 4127/00 a3 Type Sekdion MesUnp 0 days Thu 4/27100 Thu 4127!00 yy K Bridpa 85% Design 44 days Fri 4!28100 Wed 8!28100 ~ d Check 20 days Thu 8/29!00 Wed 7128100 6! DOS Review 30 days Thu 8!29/00 Wed 8/9700 07 95% Struclrrn Design 20 days Thu 8/t01D0 Wed 9!6/00 ~ DOS Finaf Rsvlsw . 3odays rhu 8/7/00 wed t0/1tU00 69 Fhrei Ravbions 10 days Thu 10/19/00 Wed 1 t/1/00 10 PLANS, SPECIFiCAT10NS i tcSTWATE (PStiE) 268 days Fri 1H4/00 Tue 1/23!01 1N4 t1 Preparo (iaornatric Approval Drowlnps (GAD) 80 days Fri 1/14!00 Thu 514100 a2 CaMnr-s Revklw/Apprqual 21 days Fri 1/16100 Fri 612100 6.1 Propane 65% PS6E 82 days Mtxi 8/5100 Tue 889/00 t4 CaUrons Review 30 days Wad 8130/00 Tus 10110100 es .Prepare 100% PStLE 30 days Wed 10/11/00 Tue 11121!00 ~ CsBro~s Reylew 90 days Wad 11/22/00 Tue 1/2!01 q Final PS~E Proparotlon 10 days Wad 1/3101 Tue 1118101 88 Final PBdE Approval b days Wed 1H7101 Tw 1/23/01 s0 FINAL, PROCteSSIN(i 166 days Wad 8/3010D Tue 4M7101 70 CaOratu kiues Er-croaclanert< Permit 5 days Wed 1124101 Tus 1/30/01 71 Revhe MainWwnce Apreerrant 40 days Wed 8/30100 Tue 10/24/00 7z AdverUN Profed 2D dsya Wed 1124/01 Tue 2120101 n Bid OpeNnp t4 Evaluation 15 days tilled ?121!01 Tue 311310t 74 AwaM Contract 15 days Wed 31'14/01 Tue 4/3!01 76 Cordractor NTPlStart 10 days Wed 4/4!01 Tue 4117/01 Tads Crllk:al Tads Propnu ~ Ra1sd UP Tnk ReBsd UP Pmprass ~ 'roHd: F680Faaon Tark Proptsss ~ MOastone ~ RaOsd UP Critical Tank ® SPIM '. )Wa: Tua 4!25100 ~r~r-s~ GkiW Talc [C!1lll.L!!.!!.lld BwrnwY ~ Rollsd UP MBastorr Q 6dsrnal TsNn ISeOFabn3 ~' ~ ~i'`~ EXHIBIT B PAYMENT SCHEDULE City shall pay Consultant on a time and material bases not to exceed the total sum of FIVE HUNDRED NINITY THREE THOUSAND ONE HiJND1tED EIGHTY DOLLARS ($593,180) for services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall submit invoices monthly based on the cost for services performed in accordance with the Exhibit "A" cost estimate. The total sum stated above shall be the total which City shall pay for the services to be rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. City shall not pay any additional sum for any expense or cost whatsoever incurred by Consultant in rendering servicespursuant to this Agreement City shall make no payment for any extra, further or additional service pursuant to this Agreement unless such extra service and the price therefor is agreed to in writing executed by the City Manager or other designated official of City authorized to obligate City thereto prior to the time such extra service is rendered and in no event shall such change order exceed twenty- five percent (25%) of the initial contract price. The services to be provided under this Agreement may be terminated without cause at any point in time in the sole and exclusive discretion of City. If the Agreement is terminated by City, Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials to the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other materials shall, at the option of the City, become City's sole and exclusive property. Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate logs and timesheets in order to verify costs incurred to date. The Consultant is not authorized to .perform any services or incur any costs whatsoever under the terms of this Agreement until receipt of a fully executed Purchase Order from the Finance Department of the City of Dublin. Exhibit B Page 1 of 1 05/09/00 ~~ ~~ c. ~' EX~IIBIT C City shall furnish physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space, as may be reasonably necessary for Contractor's use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and the information in possession of City. The location, quantity, and tune of furnishing said physical facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be obligated to furnish any facility which may involve incurring any direct expense, including, but not limiting the generality of this exclusion, long-distance telephone or other communication charges, vehicles, and reproduction facilities. Exhibit C Page 1 of 1 05/09/00 ~~~ EXHIBIT D GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the right to contml Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant's engineering services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, City shall not have the right to control the means by which Consultant accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. 2. LICENSES: PERMITS: ETC. Consultant represents and warrants to City that he has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Consultant to practice his profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at his sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to practice his profession. 3. TIl~1E. Consultant shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for satisfactory performance of Consultant's obligations pursuant to this Agreement. 4. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. The cost of such insurance shall be included in the Consultant's bid. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (Ed. 1/?3) covering comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage ("occurrence" form CG 0001). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025. (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability Insurance. Exhibit D Page 1 of 5 05/09/00 B. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence lieut. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Workers Compensation and Employers Liability: Workers Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. C. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. D. Other Insurance Provisions. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages. (a) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant, premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of the protection afforded to the City; its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (b) The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees ar~d volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (c) Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. Exhibit D Page 2 of 5 05/09/00 r~~ ~ x~i O~ ~~ ~' ,(,,,, CiJS (d) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (2) Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Consultant for the City. (3) Professional Liability. Consultant shall carry professional liability insurance in an amount deemed by the City to adequately protect the City against liability caused by negligent acts, errors or omissions on the part of the Consultant in the course of performance of the services specified in this Agreement. (4) All Coverages. Each insurance policy required by~this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. E. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Bests' rating of no less than A:VIII. F. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. H. The Risk Manager of City may approve a variation of those insurance requirements upon . a determination that the coverages, scope, limits and forms of such insurance are either not commercially available or that the City's interests are otherwise fully protected. 5. CONSULTANT NO AGENT. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind City to any obligation whatsoever. Exhibit D Page 3 of 5 05/09/00 r,~ ,, U ~ ~,j 6. ASSIGNMENT PROHIBITED. No party to this Agreement may assign any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement. Any attempted or purported assignment of any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement shall be void and of no effect. 7. PERSONNEL. Consultant shall assign only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires the removal of any such persons, Consultant shall, immediately upon receiving notice from City. of such desire of City, cause the removal of such person or .persons. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Agreement in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which Consultant is engaged in the geographical area in which Consultant practices his profession. All instruments of service of whatsoever nature which Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Agreement shall be prepared in a substantial, fast class and workmanlike manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing in Consultant's profession. 9. HOLD HARMLESS AND RESPONSIBILITY OF CONSULTANTS. Consultant shall take all responsibility for the work, shall beaz all losses and damages directly or indirectly resulting to him, to any subconsultant, to the City, to City officers and employees, or to parties designated by the City, on account of the negligent performance or character of the work, unforeseen difficulties, accidents, occurrences or other causes predicated on active or passive negligence of the Consultant or of his subconsultant. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, directors, employees and agents from and against any or all loss, liability, expense, claim, costs (including costs of defense), suits, and damages of every kind, nature and description directly or indirectly arising from the negligent performance of the work. This paragraph shall not be construed to exempt the City, its employees and officers from its own fraud, willful injury or violation of law whether willful or negligent. For purposes of Section 2782 of the Civil Code the parties hereto recognize and agree that this Agreement is not a construction contract. By execution of this Agreement Consultant acknowledges and agrees that he has read and understands the provisions hereof and that this paragraph is a material element of consideration. Approval of the insurance contracts does not relieve the Consultant or subconsultants from liability under this paragraph. 10. GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS. To the extent that this Agreement may be funded by fiscal assistance from another governmental entity, Consultant shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations to which City is bound by the terms of such fiscal assistance program. 11. DOCiJMENTS. All reports, data, maps, models, charts, designs, plans, studies, surveys, photographs, memoranda or other written documents or materials prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property of City upon completion of the work to be performed hereunder or upon termination of the Agreement. No such materials or properties Exhibit D Page 4 of 5 05/09/00 ~~ ~~ produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights, or patent rights by Consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (as maybe limited by the provisions of the California Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties produced under this Agreement. Exhibit D Page 5 of 5 05/09/00 3G fr~ gc~ EXIiIBIT. "A" OF RESOLUTION ~-Ol AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF DUBLIN AND CCS PLANNING AND ENGINEERING, INC. FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WHEREAS; the City of Dublin (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and CCS .Planning and Engirteering, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"), entered into an agreement on May 16, 2000 to design the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements; and .WHEREAS; the Scope of Work to be performed is proposed to be extended; and WHEREAS, the not-to-exceed contract amount is proposed to be increased to cover the cost of the additional work; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Scone of Work , The Scope of Work shall be extended to. include additional scope of work as described in Consultant's letter dated March' 16, 2001 for the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements Project (attached). - -Extension of Term The total cost for time-and-materials work under this amendment shall not exceed an additional $56,284. CITY OF DUBLIN ~~~ ayor ATTEST: Ci k CCS PLANNING AND ENGINEERING, INC. /.-~ ~-- Tom Wintch Date: ~(~° /° r •,. •. CCS Proiect #98104 March 16, 2001 IV1r: Kevin Van Katwyk , Mr. Ferd Del Rosario / City of Dublin City of Dublin 100, Civic Plaza 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Dublin, CA 94568 Subject: I-580/F'allon Road Interchange Additional Scope of WorWDesign Costs Gentlemen: ,~,/~ `f~ .-JL. CGS ~ °~ - ~~ PLANNING }lND ENGINEERING I N C O R P '0 R A t E D 6 Crow Canyon Chart San Ramon, California 94583-1621 9ZS/314-IZZO • Fax 925/314-17.29 tmail: SROC4~ctso~fue.com Ivir. Eric Cordoba Cordoba Consulting, Inc. 5368 Laurel Drive Concord, CA 94521 As requested; the CCS Design Team has summarized the significant additional preliminary engineering, environmental and design activities identified at ~ the 65% design level for the I-580/Fallon Road interchange project. These additional activities represent engineering and environmental level .of effort that was.not included in the original contract scope of work for this project In presenting this information, we have associated this increased level of effort with either the Prroject Study Report/Project Report . (PSR/PR) or the . Plans, Specifications and Estimates {PS8iE}, as appropriate. Each additional engineering or environzne»tal activity is described and a corresponding cost identified within the text of the "Additional Scope of Work" attachment A cost breakdown by activity and team firm is presented on the accompanying spreadsheet. • The. majority. of these additional tasks and activities have. not yet been. completed and. it is hoped that the team will be able to absorb a porkion of these out-of--scope efforts. . We will continue to discuss a number of these requirements with C~ltrans and strive to eliminate or reduce additional costs .wherever possible. However, at this time we have attempted to present what is hopefully a "worst.case" scenario, Please note that CCS has utilized 1999 hourly rates for our work and has. excluded any subconsultant mark-up. . After you have had an opportunity to review this information, we vKould Iike to meet and discuss the process to amend our contract fee for the I-580/Fallon Road interchange improvements. Sincerely, CCS Planning and Engineering, nG ~~ Thomas M. Wintch, PE, TE. TMW:ts Attachment A19BtOttAd~aia-FdWaPSRISmpia;-FwWaign oow.0I30.Ol.doc T A • N S P O p T A 7 1 O N • C ~ v ~ t• 1 T c ~`' ~ ~ ~~ ~. I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Modification Project City of Dublin Additional Scope of Work PROJECT STUDYREPORT/PROJECT REPORT (PSR/PR) 1. Ramp.Meteriag/TOStCCTY) Coordination =This activity included coordination efforts, the preparation of a cost analysis, drafting of correspondence for the City, and meeting attendance. Caltrans, is requiring design and installation of all equipment to make both westbound and eastbound on-ramp meters operational. The original contract scope-of- work included underground conduits/foundations only. Cost Increase $4,500. 2. Revisions Resulting ,from Quarry Coordination -This activity included coordination efforts, preparation of geometric alternatives, preparation of traffic analysis, construction cost ~ estimates updates and meetings attendance associated with the development of conceptual intersection geometries to satisfy Quarry concerns. " - Cost Increase $7,100. 3. Revise Cost Estimates -Several iterations of revising PSR/PR cost estimates have been required as a result of .ramp metering, CCTV, median drainage, ditch paving and . miscellaneous additions. Cost Increase $2,860. 4. ~ Conklin Tar Plant Study -This activity includes field activities and environmental documentation regarding the collection of Conklin Tar Plant seeds. The effort to prepare this study has been discussed previously and received verbal approval. Cost Increase $3,520. 5. Historic Properties Survey Report, (HPSR) -This activity includes the preparation of a . Historic Properties Survey Report.(HSPR) to satisfy NEPA. This report will be required to secure federal funding. The effort to prepare this report has been discussed previously and received verbal approval. Cost Increase $12,520. PLANS, SPECIFICATION & ESTIMATES (PS&E) A. Caltrans Required Additions: 1. Ramp Metering. -This activity includes the design of all equipment to make both eastbound and westbound on-ramp meters operational. The original contract scope- of-work included underground conduits/foundations only. Cost Increase $6,0.40. P:19! 1041Admio-FalbaPSRlscopiag-Fasldesi~n mat^.0130.Ol.doe .~ ~5~ ~~ I-580/Fallon Road Interchange ' . 2. TOS (CC"T"V) - Caltrans has required the installation of aclosed-circuit television camera (CCTV as part of the interchange modifications. This design element was not included in the original scope-of--work. Cost Increase $3,380. 3. Reconstruct Median Drainage - It is highly likely that Caltrans will require the design of a "Slotted-Drain" system within the median, similar to what has been required at the I-580/Tassajara Road Interchange. . ~ Cost Increase $8,884. 4. Expanded SWPPP - Caltrans has expanded their requirement for the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). It is our understanding that the . requirements are still being modified, however we have attempted to estimate the required level of effort.. Our original scope-of--work included only a minor t;ffort. Cost Increase $7,480. TOTAL ADDITIONAL DESIGN COSTS -'$56,284. P:19t10441dmio-PalbnPSRlSooping-Fm~daign eau.01.30.Ol.doe I -580 / Fagoa Road L Cu ADDTITONAL SCOPE OF ~ CCS STAFF CCS . ~ Y ~~ •a a`G~ ~~ pz ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ UU O~ ~Z ~ ~€ S ~~ ~~ m~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' Race (S/ hr) 5150.00 5140.00 5130.00 S110.00 580:OD 570.00 580.00 SS0.00 - ! ' ADDITIONAL ENGII~EERINC SERVICES PROJECT ST[1DY REPORT/PROJHCT REPORT R b 1. ' S Coard'mation 4 16 26 46 ! 2 Ravisiom from Coordi~mtioa 6 4 20 ! 6 24 70 ! 3. R~Cos<~ 8 8 10 6 32 2 4. Conidin Tsr Pleat 4 4 S. Hialotic S rt SR) 4 4 20 28 7 • 0 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS dk ESfIhIATSS E) 0 A. Gltraas aired Additions 0 1; R~ 4 iZ - 28 ?A 68 • i 2 TOS 4 6 20 8 38 ! 3. Reconstroct Median Dnim 2 4 l0 t0 8 34 S 4. SWPPP 2 6 1Q 6 40. 16 , 6 86 ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total - - Additional Sta[f Hours 1 ~ 18 40 6 8 170 520 511,700 5660, 5640 511,90 ' Total Additional Labor 537,900 Total Additional Direct E es 1~-~ Sub-ConsultantAdmin Costs ~a sn.soosn..solo:. CCS 'S8,E Add Fees.xls Nl $x ~ Ange Moditicat[on Project Dubtin K !DESIGN COST SUlYII4IARY 11=9/2001. CCS TEAM - SUBCONSULTANTS Sutxansaltaats CIVIL GEOTECH DRAIIVAGE LANDSCAPE .SURVEY ENVIR.~ IIQE , Pariidt WRECO AAht ~ M&S David Pawner . z ~ °~°~ ~ '~'~ ~ a < ~ a O z < ~ _ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Tam Total H Team Taal A r~ -" ~ ~ Z _ Z n c= z ~ x o~ oz ~c, ~ a~ ~ S~ ~ ours . mowu p ~ ~ a ~ ~~ ~~ ° z $ $ stZ6.oo r%oo Sloooo s~oo ' rsoo Sas.oo stiaoti •5~6.0o st~z.oo Sioooo - S - S o sa o __.. so '~' n m 4s S4 s00 o m ~o S7 too . u m 3z Sz,s6o • 30 30 53,000 34 S3 520 too ioo aib,ooo t2s Si 20 o m o 50 o m o So o m o So 0 m 68 56,040 0 m ' 38 53,380 6 30 8 4 4 6 58 55,384 42 S8 8S4 o m ss n a8o . o m o So o m o So - o w o w o m o So o m o so o m o ao • o so o SD o m o So b m o SO 0 m 0 S0 0 m 0 S0 0 m 0 50 is i:ats Subcoasultwt Tefm SI8,38~ S36,Z8A SO SO _~ SO. ss6~a+ TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST' -FINAL •DESIGN : 356,284 j ~ R {~ ~' n ~' ~ ~ ~ EXHIBIT "A" OF RESOLUTION ~-O1 AMENDMENT #2 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF DUBLIN AND CCS PLANNING AND ENGINEERING, INC. FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WHEREAS, the City of Dublin (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and CCS Planning and Engineering, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"), entered into an agreement on May 16, 2000 to design the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin approved Amendment #1 to the Consultant agreement to include additional services, and WHEREAS, the City desires to amend the consultant contract to include additional services, and the not-to-exceed contract amount is proposed to be increased to cover the cost of the additional work; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Scope of Work The Scope of Work shall be extended to include additional scope of work as described in Consultant's letter dated November 27, 2001 for the I-5801Fallon Road Interchange Improvements Project (attached). Extension of Fees The total cost for time-and-materials work under this amendment shall not exceed an additional $94,700. ATTE ~~, ~~jj ~C~-- lerk C OF DUBLIN Mayor CCS PL G A,ND ,ENGINE G, INC. ~ 'w Tom Wintch Date: /r.~ld lJ l ~f3 sd 8~ SCOPE OF WORK FOR I-580/FALLON. ROAD INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION PROJECT • City of Dublin TRAFFIC FORECAST UPDATE This is the scope of work of CCS Planning and Engineering, Inc. to provide traffic engineering services related to the updating of the traffic portion of the Project Study Report /Project Report for the I-580 / Fallon Road Interchange, and to redefine the~interchange conceptual geometries based on the Year 2015 traffic forecast for the Phase I, initial project. CCS Planning and Engineering, Inc:, in conjunction with TJKM; Dowling Associates, Inc. (Dowling), and David J. Powers and Associates (Powers) will perform the following items of work: PSR TIrAFFIC ANALYSIS UPDATE Task 1. Coordination meetings (CCS, TJKNI) -Attend coordination meetings with City of Dublin, City of Pleasanton, Alameda County, and Caltrans. Task 2. Review Traffic Forecasts and Previous Traffic Analysis - Task 2a -Compile and re~triew data from previous traffic analysis (TJICM) . Task 2b - Prepaze updated traffic forecasts (Dowling) -Produce AM and PM peak hour turning movement forecasts for two intersections: I-580 westbound of~ramp and Fallon, and I-580 .eastbound off--ramp and Fallon. Plots of AM and PM peak~hour-link flows will be provided for the freeway and surface street approaches to the interchange and for the interchange itself. This data will be delivered to TJICM Associates for their operations analysis. Task 2c -Prepare updated traffic forecasts with Jack London Extension (Dowling} - A second set of model runs will be prepared to include the West Jack London Extension, to EI Charm Road. The same AM and PM peak hour plots and turning movement outputs will be produced and delivered to TJKM Associates. Task 3. Review and update assumptions (TJKM) -Prepare yeaz 201 S traffic forecasts based on Dowling Associates' yeaz 2000 validation runs, existing counts, and City's traffic growth patterns. Update assumptions based on the latest available counts. (no new counts will be conducted), land-use information, .street network, and other issues such as cut-through traffic. Task 4. Perform and Update Operation Analyses for Years 2015 and 2025 Scenarios (TJKM) - Update the Traffic Operations Analysis for the Fallon Road/I 580 laterehange prepazed by TJKM in 1999. Use the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual or 2001 CORSIM to perform the freeway and ramp junctions traffic operations; modified Circular 212 method as adopted by Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA} or method normally used in each City for intersection level of service analysis; Poisson Ratio method (Caltrans approved) to estimate the queue length for the turning lanes at ramp-end intersections; and SYNCHRO to evaluate the queue length and levels 11/27/01 4'/ bl 8l0 of service for all intersections. Coordinate this traffic analysis with Caltrans to ensure that the above work elements are acceptable to them and to the City. Task 4a -Analyze freeway mainline merge/diverge, or weaving level of service to evaluate alternative lane configuration on freeway mainline and ramp junctions. ' Task 4b -Perform ramp-end intersection level of service. analysis to determine the intersection lane configuration at Fallon Road and El Charm Road Task 4c -Perform signal warrant analysis Task 4d -Perform queuing analysis to determine the storage lengths for the fuming movements at intersections Task 4e -Address ramp metering, HOV lane~consideration, and mainline operations Task 5. Prepare Draft Traffic Operation Report (TJICM) -Prepare and submit to the cities and Caltrans, a Draft Traffic Operations Analysis Report for review. Task 6. Validation of Traffic Analysis (CCS) -Review Draft Traffic Operation Report, validates assumptions and traffic operations analyses. . Task 7. Select Link Analyses for Cost Sharing (Dowling) -For each of the two sets of model runs (with and without Jack London Extension), a select link analysis will be prepared for the AM and PM peak hours that will identify the city of origin and city of destination for the traffic using the I= 580/Fallon Interchange on-ramps, off-ramps, and the bridge over the freeway (7 links). Any vehicle trip using one or more of these links will be added to the city-by-city OD table for the ' entire interchange. The single table will then lie used to' compute the percentage of trips ~by city for each peak hour. The -city by-city OD table will include Livermore, Pleasanton, Dublin, Unincorporated Alameda County, and others. Task 8. Prepare Final Traffic Operation Report (TJKM) -Upon receiving comments from the cities and Caltrans, prepare and submit a Final Traffic Operations Analysis Report to the cities and Caltrans. PREPARE GEOMETRIC APPROVAL DRAWINGS (GAD) AND ENVIRONMENTAL RE- EVALUATION Task 1. Prepare Draft Revised GAD including Proposed R!W (CCS) - Based on the Draft Traffic . Operation Report on lane assignments, fuming movements, queue lengths, etc., the, GAD as submitted to Caltrans in May, 2000 will be updated. The updated GAD will include additional alignments, if any; revised typical cross sections, profiles, and layouts. Any necessary revision to the existing R!W will also be investigated. In addition, revisions to the 2025 traffic volume will . be checked against the "plan line for ultimate geometry". Task 2. Environmental Re-evaluation (Powers, CCS) -The revised Year 2015 geometries will be re- evacuated against the existing environmental document: Any issue that is not consistent with the existing findings or requires additional studies will be identified. Task 3. Evaluate Construction Phasing (CCS) -The proposed Year 2015 geometries will be compared with the "plan line for ultimate geometry" for determination of feasibility and cost effectiveness 2 11/27!01 ~m~ FL of any ultimate geometry.improvcments that should be incorporated in the Year 2015 project. The evaluation will include right-of-way, drainage, utility relocation, and traffic impacts etc. for construction phasing of the "ultimate" project. Task 4. Update Construction Cost Estimate and Design Schedule (CCS) -Construction cost estimate and design schedule will be updated based on the revised geometries prepared under Tasks 1 and 3. Task 5. Prepare Final GAD (CCS) -Final GAD will be prepared and submitted to Caltrans upon receiving comments on the draft GAD.- ' 3 1 U27/O1 4G ~ Q~ 1-580 / Fallon Road Interchange Modification Project City of Dublin ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF WORK /DESIGN COST SUMMARY TRAFFIC FORECASTS UPDATE ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES TJKM Dow PSR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS UPDATE Task 1 Coordination Meetings ~ $ 2,360. Task 2 Review Traffic Forecasts and Previous Traffic Analysis . 2a Compile and Review Previous Traffic Analysis $ 345 2b Prepare Updated Traffic Forecasts $ f 2c Prepare Updated Traffic Forecasts (with Jack London F~ctension) ~ $ , Task 3 Review and Update Assumptions $ 4,055 Task 4 Perform and Update Operation Analyses for Years 2006 and 2025 Scenarios 4a Analyze freeway mainline merge%diverge, weaving LOS $ 1,220 4b Perform ramp-end intersection LOS . ~ $ . 990 4c Perform signal warrant analysis $ 380 . 4d Perform queuing analysis at intersections ~ $ 990 4eAddress ramp metering, HOV lane consideration, and other issues ~ $ 1,220 Task 5 Prepare Draft Traffic Operations Report $ 6,040 Task 6 Validation of Traffic Analysis Task 7 Select Link Analyses for Cost Sharing $ 1 Task 8 Prepare Final Traffic Operations Report ~ $ 3,400 PREPARE GEOMETRIC APPROVAL DRAWINGS (GAD) AND ENVIRONMENTAL RE- EVALUATION • Task 1 Prepare Draft Revised GAD inGuding Proposed RNV Task 2 Environmental Re-Evaluation Task 3 Evaluate Construction Phasing ~ • Task 4 Update Construction Cost Estimate and Design Schedule Task 5 Prepare Final GAD Subtotal ~ ~ $ 21,000 $ 11: 10°~ Marku on Subconsultants Proposal Tota y9~ B(~ EXHIBIT "A" OF RESOLUTION I Oho -Q3 AMENDMENT #3 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF DUBLIN AND CCS PLANNING AND ENGINEERING, INC.. FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WHEREAS, the City of Dublin (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and CCS Planning and Engineering, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"), entered into an agreement on May I6, 2000 to design the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin approved Amendment #1 and #2 to the Consultant agreement to include additional services, and WHEREAS, the City desires to amend the consultant contract to include additional services, and the not-to-exceed contract amount is proposed to be increased to cover the cast of the additional work; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Scope of Work The Scope of Work shall be extended to include additional scope of work as described in Consultant's letter dated March 6, 2003 for the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements Project (attached). Extension of Fees The total cost for time-and-materials work under this amendment shall not exceed an additional $383,849. ATT T: l City Clerk C OF DUBLIN ' ~~-t11 Mayor CCS PLANNING AND ENGINEE ,INC. r---------- / r f -l '~-./ Tom Wintch Date: ~( Z3 /d3 JlL err CCS Project #98104 March 6, 2003 Mr. Ferd DeI Rosario Mr. Eric Cordoba City of Dublin Cordoba Consulting, Inc. 100 Civic Plaza 5368 Laurel Drive Dublin, CA 94568 Concord, CA 94521 Subject I-S80/Fallon Road Interchange Additional Scope of Work/Design Costs Request ~Vo. 3 Gentlemen: /) bl f1~ ~c~ PLANNING AND ENGINEERING I N C 0 R P 0 R A T E D 6 Crow Canyon Court San Ramon, California 945 83-1 62 1 925/314-IZZO • Fax 925/314-1229 email: SRO@ccsoffue.com As requested at our status meeting on October 17, 2002; the CCS Design Team has summari~~l the significant additional design, geotechnical and management activities required to complete the contract plans for the I-580/Fallon Road interchange project. These additional activities represent engineering and geotechnical effort that was not included in the original contract scope of work and Amendments No. 1 and No. 2 for this project. In addition, at our PDT meeting with Caltrans on December 13, 2002, Caltrans had raised the issue of processing this project through federal requirements since this project will introduce two additional access points onto I-580. We are also requesting Engineering Services during Construction which was requested previously but has not received confirmation. Each additional management, engineering, geotechnical, environmental, traffic, and construction support service activity is described and a corresponding cost identified within the text of the "Additional Scope of Work No. 3" attachment. A cost breakdown by activity and team firm is presented on the accompanying spreadsheet. Part of these cost increases for the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Project are related to the additional northbound to westbound loop as requested by City of Pleasanton, and the design schedule delay associated with the additional loop. As you know, the additional traffic study, Geometries Approval Drawings, environmental updates, and revision to the PSR/PR due to the addition of this NB/WB loop are covered in our Amendment No. 2 request, this amendment is for design effort to complete the contract plans. The fee proposal prepared in April 2000 anticipated that final design would be completed by early 2001. Due to the extension of the design phase, this request is to update the hourly rates to the current 2003 rates. The new rates to begin in January 2003. We are also requesting to include Engineering Services during Construction into this amendment. In March 2001, City of Dublin had requested CCS to prepare scope and budget for this activity since Construction Support Services is not included in the original scope of work. CCS prepared and submitted the information to City on March 23, 2001 but has not been submitted as an amendment. Since this project now includes City of Pleasanton funding portion of design and construction, the attached spreadsheets include segregated City of Dublin's share and City of Pleasanton's share. The P:~98104PSE1Adrnvi-FallonPS&E1Seoping-F«s1P 5 & E1Anwndme•a No_3-03D603.doe T R A N S P O R T A T i O N • C I V I L • I 7 S ~..r ~~~ ~~/ March 6, 2003 ~'" CCS Jab #98104 Page 2 percentage allocation to each city far our additional services was discussed at our meetings on December 19, 2002, and February 20, 2003. Please feel free to call Jim Pun or me for any additional questions or clarifications that may arise. Sincerely, CCS Planning and Engineerdng, InG Thomas M. t~Vintch, PE, TE TMW:ts Attachment ~~' I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Modification Project City of Dublin Additional Scope of Work No. 3 A. Northbound to Westbound loop -This activity will begin with the approval of the Geometric Approval Drawings (GAD) to completion of the contract plans. This effort includes additional Layout for the loop, Typical Cross Sections, contour grading, drainage, signing, striping, electrical including ramp metering, landscaping, erosion control, and quantities. (100% allocated to City of Pleasanton) Cost Increase $53,230. B. Pavement Rehabilitatlon of the Interchange -This activity includes providing geotechnical engineering services leading to recommendation and design for pavement rehabilitation of the existing I-580/Fallon Road/Bl Charm Road Interchange, and incorporating the recommendation to completion of the contract plans. The original contract scope-of--work did not include any geotechnical or design work on existing pavement or ramps that are only being widened and not receiving new pavement. As in the I-580lTassajara Road Interchange Modification project, Caltrans mandated the existing pavement to be resurfaced due to safety reasons. (90% allocated to City of Dublin, 10% to City of Pleasanton) Cost Increase $15,996. C. Incorporation of DSRSD 30" Welded Steel Pipe Casing -Dublin San Ramon Sanitary District requested a 30" Welded Steel Pipe casing to be installed into the proposed Fallon Road Overcrossing. This 30" WSP will accommodate a future 24" water line. At the time of the DSRSD request, the design of the Fallon Road Overcrossing was completed to a 65% level awaiting for independent check. This activity included re-designing the structure to accommodate the additional dead weight from the WSP and the 24" pipe running full. The notice to incorporate the pipeline into the I-580lFallon Road project was given to us on February 2002. An agreement will be needed between City of Dublin and DSRSD for DSRSD to fully reimburse the City to cover both design and construction costs. (100% allocated to City of Dublin) Cost Increase $16,2'70. D. Additional Traffic Study in conjunction with the Northbound to Westbound loop - This activity includes the additional traffic study requested by City of Pleasanton beyond the level of effort estimated under Amendment No. 1. This additional effort has been discussed with City of Pleasanton and received verbal approval. (100% allocated to City of Pleasanton) Cost Increase $16,044. P:~96] °4PSE4~dnon.FaibnPS&E~Sropmg-Fees~P S & EUmend~oent No.3-030603.doc 5l ~~ 8~a I-580/Fallon Road InterchatiQe E. Possible Additional Studies and Reports (From 12/13/02 PDT Meeting) - At our PDT Meeting with Caltrans on Decernber 13, 2002, Caltrans raised the issue the possibility of processing this project through federal requirements, since this project will introduce two additional access points onto I-580 by way of the new eastbound and westbound loops. Additional federal action could be triggered since a "Modified Access Report" will need to be prepared with approval from FHWA. This additional effort anticipates environmental re-evaluation of the project, revision of traffic volume to current year, additional meetings with Caltrans and FHWA, and other miscellaneous studies and reports. (50% allocated to City of Dublin, 50% to City of Pleasanton) Cost Increase $87,286. F & G Schedule Adjustment and Rate Adjustment - As a result of the decision to study the need to include the northbound to westbound loop into the project, the overall design schedule has increased by 19 months (from Jan. 02 Final PS&E submittal to Aug. 03). This request is to capture additional coordination and meetings. (50% allocated to City of Dublin, 50% to City of Pleasanton) Cost Increase $33,212. The fee proposal prepared in Aprii 2000 anticipated that final design would be completed by early 2001. Due to the extension of the design phase, this request is to update the hourly rates to the current 2003 rates. The cost increases is obtained by taking the differences between the years 2003 and 2001 rates; and multiply by the hours for 65%, 95%, and I00% submittal as shown in the original 4/00 proposal. The rates adjustment is to begin in January 2003 through the end of the contract. (50% allocated to City of Dublin, 50% to City of Pleasanton) Cost Increase $66,291. H. Construction Support Service -The original contract scope-of--work did not include any engineering services during construction. As in the I-580/Tassajara Road Interchange project, CCS is involve in providing assistance to the Resident Engineer in shop drawing reviews, responding to contractor's }ZFI's, preparing as-needed CCO's, and respond to questions from the RE. (90% allocated to City of Dublin, 10% to City of Pleasanton) Cost Increase $93,520. I. Additional Direct Expenses -Additional direct expenses due to these additional Engineering Services. (30% allocated to City of Dublin, ?0% to City of Pleasanton) Cost Increase $2,000. Total Additional ScoAe of Work #3• $383.849 City of Dublin - $208,829 City of Pleasanton - $175,020 57 b1 Rya EXHIBIT "A" OF RESOLUTION ~-04 AMENDMENT #4 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF DUBLIN AND TY LIN INTERNATIONAL/CCS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WHEREAS, the City of Dublin (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and TY Lin IntemationaUCGS (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"), entered into an agreement on May 16, 2000 to design the I- SSO/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin approved Amendment #1, #2, and #3 to the Consultant agreement to include additional services, and WHEREAS, the City desires to amend the consultant contract to include additional services, and the not-to-exceed contract amount is proposed to be increased to cover the cost of the additional work; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Scope of Work The Scope of Work shall be extended to include additional scope of work as described in Consultant's letter dated August 23, 2004 for the I-S80/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements Project (attached). Extension of Fees The total cost for time-and,materials work under this amendment shall not exceed an additional $389,509. A EST: City C erk C F DUBLIN or TY LIN INTERNATIONAL/CCS L~ om Wintch Date: 9uS ~ 7,~ ~ ~ ~ 53 b~ Sm TY L.1 N I NTER NATI O NAL /CG~S 6 Crow Canyon Court • San Ramon, CA 94583-1621 (925) 314-1220 . Fax (925) 314-1229 E-mail: sro(a~ylin.com.com CCS Proiect X98104 August 23, 2004 Mr. Ferd Del Rosario Mr. Eric Cordoba City of Dublin Cordoba Consulting, Inc. I00 Civic Plaza 5368 Laurel Drive Dublin, CA 94568 Concord, CA 94521 Subject: I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Additional Scope of WorWDesign Costs Request No. 4 Gentlemen: As discussed at our previous status meetings, the TYLin /CCS Design Team has finalized the request for additional design, traffic studies, Right-of--Way Mapping, and field survey activities necessary to complete the contract plans for the I-580/Fallon Road interchange project. These additional activities represent changes from Caltrans, including changes since our Amendment No. 3, additional design and Right-of--Way effort that were not included in the original contract scope of work, and a new water line requested from DSRSD. Each additional management, engineering, traffic, and construction support service activity is described and a corresponding cost identified within the text of the "Additional Scope of Work No. 4" attachment. A cost breakdown by activity and team firm is presented on the accompanying spreadsheet. As in our Amendment No. 3, the accompanying spreadsheets include segregated City of Dublin's share and City of Pleasanton's share since this project includes City of Pleasanton funding portion of design and construction cost. The percentage allocation to each city for these additional services were discussed and agreed at our meeting on February 19, 2004. Please feel free to call Tom Wintch or me for any additional questions or clarifications that may arise. Sincerely, TYLin International /CCS G L'~l~l~,~•r Y ~!.~ / es T. Pun, PE s~~a g~ I-580/Fallon Road Interchan~k I~580/Fallon Road Interchange Modification Project City of Dublin Additional Scope of Work No. 4 August 23, 2004 A. Right-of Way Mapping -Dublin Dedicatio~a to Caltrans - Caltrans had indicated that although City of Dublin had initially acquired a piece of property at the northwest quadrant of the interchange for this project, and that the property will be dedicated to the State, standard Caltrans right-of--way mapping would still be required for property transactions affecting their right-of--way lines. This activity includes a Hard Copy map showing the surveyed existing R/W, an Appraisal Map for new acquisition appraisal purposes, a Record Map showing the evidence of the change in the R/W, and a Record of Survey monumentation map showing the location and description of newly set monuments marking the new R/W. (100 % allocated to City of Dublin) Cost Increase $36,252. B. Revisions to Phase 1< and Ultimate Interchange Concept -The project was initially defined as Phase 1 (Year 2015), and Ultimate Interchange (Year 2025). However, the year 2015 scenario includes the anticipated improvements. south of the interchange that were not depicted in the geometry for the Phase 1 project. After Caltrans' review of the July 15, 2003 Traffic Operation Analysis report, they were made aware of the future improvements, and accepted that additional work within the State's R/W would be required when these .improvements become reality. In~order to move forward with completion of the GAD and Fact Sheets, the Phase 1 project was then separated into Phase lA and Phase 1B. Phase lA would be the initial project with all improvements within the State's right-of--way (including single lane on-ramps at WB diagonal, WB loop, and EB diagonal). Phase 1B would be implemented by either the City of Pleasanton or City of Livermore when Stoneridge Drive in Pleasanton is extended to El Charm Road, when El Charm Road is extended to either Busch Road or Stanley Blvd., or when Jack London Blvd. Is extended westerly to El Charro Road from the City of Livermore. In November 2003, the revised GAD (for Phase lA, Phase 1B, and the Ultimate Interchange), revised Fact Sheets, and a new Request for Exception to Ramp Metering Policy were submitted to Caltrans for review and approval. In response to the Request for Exception to Ramp Metering Policy, Caltrans denied the Request and insisted that all on-ramps in the initial project need to be at least two-lanes wide. The Phase 1 project is being repackaged to include not only the Phase 1B widening within the State's R/W, but widening of all single lane on-ramps to two lanes. This additional engineering service includes additional coordination meetings, additional studies, cost estimates, delay to the 65% PS&E submittal, and additional design at the 65% level. (24.6 % allocated to City of Dublin, 75.4 % to City of Pleasanton) Cost Increase $95,386. 55~d 86 I-580/Fallon Road Tntercti C. Additional Field Survey -Due to the revised Phase 1 project, additional field survey is weeded for widening of the ramps, pavement conform azeas, and side slopes. (100 % allocated to City of Pleasanton) Cost Increase $20,178. D. Slope Paving under Fallon Road Overcrossing - At Caltrans review of the 65% Structures plans, they requested that the slopes under the overcrossing be paved. This is similar and consistent with the Tassajara Road pmject when Caltrans requested (during construction) that the slopes under the overcrossing be paved. (100 % allocated to City of Dublin) Cost Increase $12,390. E. Update Traffic Operatlons Analysis Report -This Update Traffic Operations Analysis report item includes revisiom to the traffic calculations and the traffic operations report to reflect the use of 2025 traffic forecasts to evaluate the Phase 1 project, which had previously only been evaluated with 2015 forecasts, along with additional coordination meetings with Caltrans, TJKM, update of the report /incorporate Caltrans comments. (100 % allocated to City ofDublin) Cost Increase $30,132. F. Prepare Storm Water Data Report -The Storm Water Data Report (SWDR) is a new report that Caltrans is now requiring for aiI projects in PID phase, PANED phase, and PS&E phase. This new requirement is based on the "Storm Water Quality Handbook Project Planning and Design Guide" dated September 2002. Our original Scope for Storm Water Pollution Preparation Plan (SWPPP) and Amendment No. 1 dated January 2001 were based on the then practice, which was for prepazation of a Conceptual SWPPP, and basically put the responsibility for temporary erosion control and preparation of the Final SWPPP on the Contractor. A Conceptual SWPPP was prepared and approved for the Tassajara Road Interchange project. We have estimated that the new requirement will require no less than nine (9) Temporary Water Pollution Plans and Details sheets, five (5) Erosion Control Plans and Details sheets, and afull-blown Stoirn Water Data Report, which will need to be submitted for all three phases of the project. This request is for the additional hours necessary to complete this task, since the requirement for Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and erosion control have changed so frequently over the last few years. (100 % allocated to City of Dublin) Cost Increase $20,698. G. Prepare Request for Exception from Federal ADA Standards - DlB #82 -The requirement for this Request for Exception stem from Caltrans Design Information Bulletin 82, "Pedestrian Accessibility Guidelines fox Highway Projects", dated September 18, 2001. This item was not included in our original Scope of Work. (100 % allocated to City of Dublin) Cost Increase $7,609. 5~'d 8~ I-580/~'allon Road Interchan~/ H. Design of DSRSD 20" Potable Water Line on Fallon Road -Dublin San Ramon Sanitary District recently requested a 20" water line to be designed and installed in the eastern portion of Fallon Road / El Charro Road. 'T'his 20" waterline to be installed inside the proposed 30" Welded Steel Pipe Casing previously requested to be included. in the Fallon Road Overcrossing, and to be connected to a new 20" water line to be placed by DSRSD later this year under a Caltrans Encroachment Permit. (100 % allocated to City of Dublin) Cost Increase $14,286. I. Inclusion of 400 m Westbound Auziliary Lane and Modify Westbound Off-ramp to Two Lanes -Due to the high traffic projection for the westbound off-ramp, and the projected poor Level of Service (LOS F) for both AM and PM period, Caltrans requested that the westbound off-ramp be widened to two lanes as a mitigation measure to reduce traffic impact on freeway mainline. 1'n addition to widening the off-ramp to twalanes, Caltrans standard also requires an auxiliary lane 400 m long in advance of the 2-lane exit. The inclusion of the auxiliary lane will require additional plan sheets and revision to the 65% plans; updates of environmental documents, Geotechnical and Materials Report, Site Investigation Report, Drainage Report, and update of the Combined Project Study Report / Project Report. Both the westbound auxiliary Lane and widening the off-ramp to two-lanes were not included in our original scope of work. (100 % allocated to City of Dublin) Cost Increase $152,578. Total Additional Scone of Work No. 4: $389 S09 City of Dutblin - $297,414 City of Pleasanton - $92,095 s.'` ~~_ }~.~~`\I ~A^\\ J ~~ o ~ . sQa _wn><co- ,: ~ ~o ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ```~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~. z ~ a< ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Obi ~ W~ b ' y~ ° n ~ u ~ Itaee(S/hr) -2004 nks 5195.00 5165.00 515200 S1ri.00 (120.00 St09.00 599.00 3117.00 587.00 - f SI40.00 5120.00 5130.00 560.00 359 A. FW _ M..---Da6tla l)edkadaob CT 1. Cao~s4oa. wah Caloram 4 6 12 16 38 35,634 2 Reaearck-Calhmaad Cwmry e a 5960 7. CakvLt z a u u 53,610 4. t5eMWwk-lie ~ Moaoonml>dw 4 6 12 22 53.630 S. • 7 anlwoo4tak 5 16 64 u S9A16 6. A M- 2 sebnrilYla 2 6 12 20 52,232 7. ~ Of•W Reeonl -2auboi4lala 3 l4 24 41 54,512 8. piel'gmtiucum Accord of 2 8 32 42 34,432 9. COmaucdm 3mey Conlyd 1 4 16 11 52,216 TrkATaW 311 Sib B. RsvWen b PYne L ad U116aate Inge C I.Addiuomlemrttiaaum and 20 25 10 55 39,6I5 2 IePkan 1 i0e Pkne IA ad tB GAD, 12 40 52 56380 3. CoatFal• Pkue 1B-si and qfp aidewa~ 4 2 24 30 53396 0. d3-1>neffi (blftmc) 2 l2 1< fi,67a S. Rcviraboih 2015 sod 2025 GADa for all Z-laoe 0 ~ 6. Revise Cor1 E+en~ far 2013 aa82075 0 SD 7. Revisor Desi SrMatdabry sad Adri 0 f0 t Revise Draft 0 f0 9. Bevies 65XPIas-Rodwa Phna 0 ~ pyn 0 ~ewical P4m- MetaiO 0 ~ TaakBTaul 131 f21 C. AMI9ead IMdd 1. AddiEwnl field dm b mvifleaa i Ink CTeit 0 ~ 0 S< D. Ps abler Railsa Rod Overeranta I.Iaelsem of i93%atmc~ea lane 50 10 60 f10.430 2 Caltraea coav0e0d, 'fiolisnt R eatl[oa4n 4 10 14 (1,940 7aaic D T 7/ (12398 AdditlorW Scope of Worki4 wmbined-082304xk ~~' CGS STAFF ~ - CCS 1 ~ O ~ ,~^( V\.1 11f~~ 7 a ~ ~ ~S fp~~yy?~ ~Z o ~~ t~ KK P5f ~ as OL+~~& ~ ~~ V < f-a~ ~ ~ F g~ 3 Yi !3 Y. s ~ ~i -2004 CCS T Far CIVIL DItAINACB xQ$ wlleco I- I 5 I I slw.oo I sl2aoo I sllaao I sto.oo I ss e StS2o M 57,612 52 59132 F, rc9torm Waler DNa 1. Coadimlim wlPoCaltram - Wale Pollution Cmuo! mil 4 6 2 12 51,870 L SWDlla tar pII3,PNED, aad PS&E luau 2 50 24 16 92 SI;170 3. uurinv ea®eab 2 6 4 12 f1,T18 4. Additional Waur Palh~Om Cmlml andliroaimCoaod 1 ZA 16 N 54.940 Phn Skxb 7aakFTeW 1(A fZaa98 G. far troth Federa ADA Staad.rdr 1. Coudmatim Wilk Caltraoa ]3if0iat4and - OIB ir82 4 4 f710 L Dra6R ~ 3 32 16 51 55,627 3. Renew Cottmenb 2 8 10 51,212 Teak G To ~ ~+~ d RLDN/w I. Dau CoVenian/Coa~an L I)[al! pyAg ice(,) 10 S 8 32 12 It 49 52,722 55,601 >.AaFina19'SdS t 6 2 t6 f2,332 4. Final PS&P 100% 1 2 3 5307 5, ~~ won ~ 2 4 2 8 51,004 Task R TMaI „ ~ 1 Allditiorel Soope dwaloT4 oombined-0323W.xls ~~ ccs srAFR ccs cCS 17 CIVB. DRAINAGE Exl . ~ ' ~p y~ N RQE WRECO m ~ y~ 3p R< O V ~ W ~ij~ v WG~ ~ j 5 Jy ..'.ZZ W o~~eU y~ ~C7 ~U ~ ~ m 5s~ - ~`r/i z~ a~W ~ aC y ~~j qOq~ 6iU c~ y ~ .'£ F ~~ ~ S -~~ ta- v ~ o F U S~1 W~ gc2 v~ fi3d :J <~ (~~iul rO,%b p U .U_] 7 Q~ U $ O 0 O Rate(S/kr) -2004 ta1ea 5195.00 S18S.00 SIS2.00 5173.00 5120.00 5109.00 599.00 tt13.00 587.00 - S 5140.00 3120.00 5130.00 580.00 f5! E Adtlltbaal TratGc 9tndle 1. Recvahuta db - Yar 2025 3}affie Faesast 4 2, Tn$c / LZ' 8 Taak$Tatal 4 ZH - 8 8 SS,52D 44 57,612 52 59 i32 F. Sfors WaOerDm 1. Commmatian wiG Call'm - Watr PoBmim Comol vmt 4 6 2 12 11,870 2. SWDRa forPlD.PA/BD, aad PS&E 2 50 24 16 92 S12,t70 7. ~~e0y 2 6 4 12 (1,718 1. Additlaeal WaoerPblhmaa Control and &osioa Cwttd 4 24 16 M 51,940 Ptah Sheen Tnk R Total 1611 ~ G. far fias Fallen ADA SLIdaade-D0 Mt2 1. Coontimtim ~eilb Celtraoa UYetict 4 and 4 4 5740 2 IkaR Ar 3 72 16 51 55.627 3 ReviearConaamn 2 8 t0 S1,242 7skCTW1 r3 37685 a of D9RSD 20" Palaklt Water IJae a Rafkn Road 1.11W Collaaio•/Coad'mtdmM l0 8 IB 52,72'! i 1kaRPSdoH 65% 5 72 12 49 55.601 7. peaFkd PS38 S% i 6 2 16 2 4. F1W PSkH (100% 1 2 7 5307 5. 3eavius B' toll Caeenta:tion 2 4 2 t 51,004 TnkHToW 34 nl Adtlitlonal Stops d Waldo tnm0'vied~82304.xk 'V~ ~~~v ^.~ 4 tip`/ e5rwrx ai:s ~w •` elrv CIVIL DRARYAG6 ~ ~ oa HQE WRECO D E~ i2 RNt(S/Lr1 - 2004 rtes CL ~W< z 5795.00 y EC s~. ~~ SIB5.00 µz 1, y W ~i r~~ ~6i 3152.00 ~r~j+ ~6 00 2133.00 C<~ ~a7 ~.Oii m~ O~ v~~ 5120.00 ~ W <~~ wi 5109.00 gV Orr ~C! 599.00 i ~ ~ 2217.00 f ~ia ~`~ v ~ 567.00 7 F U - 3 1" `3 U 5 ~~4y+ F:p Od 51/0.00 CW~+ t7p `~ C2 3120A0 ~ ,~ ~~~ >. SI30.00 r<~- y~ K~ 580.00 q q~ < 559 1. Mditlr of 400 m WssWwad A lar ®d 8Ld1 W B q 7bo-i. aaa 1. CooediaatierA, amO Caltram and al6email4n4 2.U Fmvu9amm41l)oeoo>mh APE 3Aa 2 2 16 a 4 8 2 24 14 53960 32,002 3. ~~~ 4 2 6 5958 4. SOS Io 5. U DeaieaLe 2 1 1 ] 3 2 f479 5294 15 33 6. Stasm WaterDm 2 4 6 5806 7. Caabmed PS11/PR ~ a e a 16 sz,ooe B. C>teelc and b Fut SASrb foe Deli items 2 6 2 10 31,222 9. Addiuamal Fidd !Gems Socdam 1 4 8 12 6 3l 54,339 10. P4m Sheet ee9iuom -C:iril ~~ ~~ ayK4 6 16 SB 32 112 515,998 ~~Camma:Nod aed lYa~ 4 2 40 16 62 26,950 Additieral Fsa"lieea 2 4 6 2806 26 91 Il. Plms Sheeltevi4oes-F]ahieal g IDo®a tion 1 12 6 20 39 54,181 12. Additi9oal sad Coett~aW .. 1 12 16 SI,048 PSBH and bCae®ra4 13. 100%PSdcE- 8 4 1 12 4 29 53.836 'I'n1c I Tefa1 106 550187 sew,w 26 91 IS 35 I~'~ 516f,703 53,610 510,920 51,950 52,800 f5'. ~~ Total Addilfoullabor 5169703 TWaIAddltkrlDlncl ~•J SOACoraMaatAdmiaCaab(0% ~~ Atfdi0alal stove or wOrk14 cOmbined-082304.x1s \~ ~`~ ',, ~„} 1 ~~ ~`Y p (;1VW AQL 1l1WfYAl:L WItLCO sa >^ ~ a ~~ ~ ~ Z & - = 3 ~ ~ 0 ~~ .. ~~ C y ~ ~~ ~o ~~ ~O _~ o~ ~a ~ H ~? o ~ c2 a o ~ ~o. ~ _ ~ cJU adz "c2 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a m ~ ~~ y ~ p ~ y a.~m U < Rat(S/la) -2009 rats 5195.00 1195.00 1152.00 5133.00 5120.00 5709.00 599.00 5213.00 587.00 - S 5140.00 5120.00 5730.00 580.00 159 A. 1-o(•Wa -_ - -Dablm l)edltatMom CT 1. Caard'matioo. mee0e wish Ca11nm 0 SU 2Heaearal-Calhas and 0 SO 3. G1w0ate 0 SO 4. Pield Work-Tie ' ' Moaanmhuon 0 ~ S. flat! -3 sb0utsM 0 fo 6 -2wbeiWL 0 f0 7. Wa Rxpd -2avr>®Oala 0 SO 8. Pre~CoshoaYS Record of Survey 0 t0 9. CosmcEOO Cored 0 m TakAToul 0 SO IL He+MiOna m Phnre 1 aM iRtlmae Co 1. AddiEOmleondinatis and 2. Phase 1 ial0 Phafa U nd iB (CIAO, P5RfPR) 20 25 70 55 0 59,615 Stl 3. CatBR-Phse lH-wl and wlo aidsvaR 0 f0 4. o[3-lore PS Camas 0 SO S. Itevis lavt62015 aadZ023 (iADa !asap 2_)me Q ltsvis Cars F~imtea for 2013 ad20251ntaehaa 3 10 4 16 8 40 36 36 12 63 82 37,031 570,030 7 Revise Bxapcana tar ad Rcq 2 20 22 52,330 & Ravee Iha11 2 3 5 Sf97 12 24 q, ~,~~p~- 1'!as 12 60 7A 96 511.176 Pyy g{ah~p~- 2 4 40 40 8 H 10 108 51,242 513,236 24 W 8 16 Trk B Total Ml C. Addltleul ^ild 1, AdmOood fold ds b sviviom ID TaekCT 2 20 40 16 48 126 520.178 126 178 D. ender Falbe Rwd 1. [nelsien of ~ in 935L a0uemes lav 0 50 2 t C+laaea ea~enn, tios. $ eavirmtra 0 SD TskD Total 0 ~ AddBOnal Scope of Wbrkll4 cOmbined-082304.xk `'^-e f "~., ~ °'+ `~"a,.' ~,.. X11 way ua rxtmauavua uuuo CCS ST'APF ccs CCS T clva ullwlrrwas • ~ p4 y HQE wR>rC0 G 3 7 ~~ ~ ~ ~ o G ~ ~ to ~ h ~ ~ j^ ~ ~~ ~ - ~ U {c y~' { ~ y1~ u 5 `1C ~< ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~~ U V y ~o ` ~ ~C7 ~ 0 7 C+ < Rale(5/tr) -2001 Mm 5195.00 5185.00 515200 SL33.00 5120.00 5309.00 599.00 ST13.00 587.00 -- S SI10.00 5120.OD 5130A0 (10.00 SS! & AddWoaY Tnlec liWke I. Rt.evYDeta the ~ Yec2025 Traffic Paeurt 0 SO 2 Teeffie 'mAwl3sis / CI'Cmlmtab 0 24 TrhETWI p Sp A. Storm Watrr Dan 1. Coadmatian with lSltram - Wua Polhaice (:ostlal mat 0 50 Z. SWDRs ItrPm,PNFD,eodP58H p cp 3. review totr®eda 0 SD +. eadi0oo.1 worm Ponocca Coutroi aDdEmaioa conhot 0 >D PLo ShW TrkFT 0 SO a. br 6 1Fam Fedora ADA Sntlerda 1. COmd;mtim with Caltraca DistriG4md 1 IhaQ Eor 3. Itsrinv Cammema Tmk a Ton - DD] db2 D 50 p 0 f0 o >o 8. dDSRI~ b' Pohhk alder I.W w PaDoe Reed I. I.Ab Colleeden/Coudiuooa 0 50 2II~tPSe:B 1KSS 0 SO 3. PeaFinalYSkE 0 f0 1. Fiml PSkE 100% 0 m 5 ~ Stfvieta ~ B' ~ ind C9oitecti0e D 50 Tsk H 1Wd p SO AddilFDnal ScoOe d NtOrkA1 OOrObined-082304.x1s `.^C`.1 \~~ V l.W JeAr! a.~s ..w g Gv13. DRAIi1AGE ~ ~ HQE WrteCO ~ > z ~ ~? ~o K~ ~~~ ~~ o eY ~` ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ as O a° ~ ~~ ~ ~o ~~ ~ gg ~ ' on ~ `° o d d ° ~ ~ ~ 5 c 3 ~ ~~° ~~ Rate (S /hr) -?009 eaten 5195.00 f 185.00 515200 5133.00 5120.00 5309.00 599.00 SZ13.00 ~ 587.00 - S 3140.00 5120.00 5130.00 580.00 ! L AddWen ol4ooa WeaebwMA Lace and WB Off- fo ltio-Laaee 1. CaorSmatioa kith Uelannf aed enboomelnrb 0 50 2 FsvkO®esW Dewmemh ier ~ APE 1Map 3 (3e te h i l d M i l 0 SO . r e ea o an aoer s a 0 ~ 4. Siee Inv 0 ~ 5. peaioage 0 SO 6. Stem Wager Dula 0 SD 7. C4mbmed PSR?R 0 SO 8. neck end tc Pad Sheet fer itew 0 39 9. Additional Field /CSoaa Segiore 0 SO 10. PLm Sheetmvitioa - 41'nl AdbGOml Sherb ~ eheteli ' 0 SO Adeltimal CoaetruoGOn and 1 eaftie H 0 SO Additimal Pae$tira 0 ~ 11. Plw Sheri eeeviooa-Hecstiral @ Illtmnati w 0 SO 12. Addititnsl and CLet l3stimaea 0 SO 13. 10076 PSdrE-lJpdk PSdiS and mCoOmrnu 0 7aak I Teal 0 Sfl ]6"1 Se5,73T SYb-Tatft - AddlfballS4~Ho0n 20 Q 2l1 60 88 l93 76 4S 0 Si7 24 s0 p 4p SabTahl ' Aeldltbaal labor Cost S) 53,900 511,470 53,010 S7y80 510,560 521,037 57,524 510,27.4 f0 St$7S3 53}60 37,200 32,500 S3,2W CCS Told AddltlandLnbor S75TlS TottlAeiditloidD4act ~ ~~~ Snb-CouultutAdmiuCmb % ~~ AddAonal 3mpe d Wt3rkll 2304xk ~a. V \~ V V p ~' CSVII. HQE DAAII'1A(:e WRRCO ~ U of T O ~ ~ Y ~ om. ~!S ~ p G~ Oc7 0 O y ya ~ ~ ~ N l O V yC7 ri O ~ O ~ _ , o<Z ~ ~ Z 5 4 7 V S W ~y Rast(S/Lr)-2004 noes 5795.00 5185.00 5152.00 St33.00 SIm.00 5109.00 599-00 5213.00 587.00 - S 5140-00 5320.00 5130.00 SB0.00 "`~ S9 A. •,••p' • M ••,•• Y•DuMa Dedluriea N Cf ~~ ._ 1. CoessiinCioe, vrim Caltram 2 Ream-Callum and 4 6 12 16 B 38 8 55,631 5960 3. Calakte ]loandvy 2 8 24 34 53,640 4. Pidd Wosk-Tis MwumeeLLUOa 5. He7Y -3 wh®dak S 4 I6 6 64 12 22 85 53.630 59,016 ~ - 2 sob¢othU Z 6 12 20 52,272 7. -Wt Record -2 sebmittak 7 14 24 41 11,511 !, ~~ d 2 d 32 42 14,432 y. Cmstrucfioa Comol 1 4 16 21 52,216 Task A Total 311 1 a ltevisioas as Phase I and Dltlmlt lataek Co t 1. Addidoasl aoosdmadw ad 40 50 m 110 119.30 2 Plisse 1 imo Phass 1A and Ili GAD, PSR/P 12 40 51 16350 3. CoslPat-Phase lB-wd sad vu/o tideavaLc 4 2 24 30 53,596 4. ~ of3-VasIDm Calham 2 12 14 f1,678 S. Revile ba62015 sad 2021 GADa br a4 2•hme 6. Revise CaRBdmaYa farml5 and 2023 7 10 4 16 8 40 36 16 12 m 82 57,031 SIOA50 7. Revifa mrM .ad 2 m u Sz,55o S. Revise Daft 2 3 S 5697 IZ u 9, Ravine 6570 Phan-RoadwryPlam 12 60 21 % 511,136 pyaa 2 B 10 51,242 24 60 8 16 Hlecbiul Pkm_ 4 40 b 24 108 513,756 Tak a re 592 m a26 c. A/dltMael rrla I, Addifoeal5eld due m mviaiom m Tuk C T 2 m 40 16 48 126 l26 520.178 R „ D. .edee Fallen Aesd 1, krLaias d ID 95X ahaehae3 2. Cdham ooe~enb, '6stioos. d esCmaki SO 4 10 ]0 60 14 110,450 51940 Tsak D ioLl ~ 74 Sl 90 Addl0olual Snipe d WwktF4 Opts~kled.0(12304xk ~~ ~~ !,~ r,~.a r, ...~.. v. ey v. uuvnu ~rau a..ay w a .w.uwu ..na. w CCs sTAFF ccs ccs n ter, CIVIL. DRAINAGE g p~ p HQS WRECO ~ !"i z a w -~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ pp~~(7(7 ~ ~ (C ~~ ~ 9 a4 cWa~ ~ m ~ p@( v ( ; N H Ilate(f/hr)-2004nw 5195.00 f185.00 5152.00 S13I.00 317.0.00 5109.00 f99.OD 3213.00 SB7.00 - S 3140.00 5120.00 5130.00 580.00 551 L Admtlod 7}dSc Skrdka La *~ 8u 'ed Yev20257nffic Forecast 4 4 8 51,520 2. Traf~a: ~ A~ris I CT 6 28 f M 57,612 TaNcSToW ~ ~~ R. Storm WatrrDau t. COOrdiaatioa w~id, Caltraaa-Ware POiktioa Caatrd omt 4 6 2 12 SI,B70 2 PlepateSWDW farPID, PAfED, aadPSAli 2 50 7A 16 92 312,170 3. ~~ mils 2 6 4 12 St.718 4. Addidmal WYaPolladaa Control aad EroaiOO Coated 4 24 l6 44 54,940 Plan Sheet TaakFTOUI IfA ~ ~ G. Bar Gem Faders ADA SUadarda 1. Coo~dmaeoa aeh Caltam D'shiet 4 and Z Ika3 ~ 3. k RlvieM Cam Tank C Tout -D18 iri2 4 3 2 31 8 16 4 37 51 55,627 10 51,242 ~ 57 ~ & ofD91L4D 20'FOtahle Wafer i3aa ee FaOeaRsW I. Dab Cdlatim/COOrdmatiaa 10 8 - IS 5;722 1 DnRPSdB 6534 S 32 t2 49 55,601 3.1haFialPSRE 6 6 2 16 52.332 4.Rmi PSdH(100% 1 2 3 5307 S. DeaiBC Snvion sad Coaemaaea 2 4 2 8 SI,001 Trt R Tool 94 ft1966 AAdifional stove a w«ww OOma~ed~Dazao4.laa ..a ~~. ~.l.J JlM! lw ~•••• -• FJ'7~ CIViL DRAINAGE C HQE WRECO >c aee(S/hr)-2001 nhz ~~ o°c 5193.00 ~ 5~ ~z 5183.00 ~~ ~oss ~W m m 513200 ~~ °c7 3133.00 ~S ~~~ °&c<~ 3120.00 ~K %~ H~ 5109.00 U o.. ~ 599.00 ~ ii ~ 5213.00 r ~~ w~ 787.00 ~ ~ v - ~ F ~ S ~~ a 514000 ~ _~~ ~b S12D.OD -as qga~~ 1=i ~ 5130.00 ~a `d~ rU 580.00 ~ S! L AdUeYe of 400 r WMheaed A Leee ane INsd119 WB MFRup m Ttrrl.aer 1, Oq wdd1 Ca16aes aedm~mul7ett 2 FaruOameaol Dau®eob' APE 3 (imleeheiad and Malviab K 2 2 16 4 4 4 6 2 2 2A 14 6 SJ,960 57,002 5938 4 Siee 2 1 3 3479 5. ~ ~, 1 1 2 (294 13 33 6. S1aen Wslc I)ab Repoe 2 ~ 6 5806 7 CombioedP9tlPR 4 a s Ib 32,008 8. metJt led Fact Sheeb far ihan 2 6 2 10 71,222 9. Addldmal field ! (]oo Section 1 4 8 12 6 31 3<939 l0. Plme SYnlnvitiom • Gnl Additioeal Im ahaala end aAeale b 16 88 32 112 (15,998 AdiidOd Comhectim rd TnBic iLudtmB 4 2 40 16 62 56,930 Addiai0nl Fao7ilin 2 4 6 5806 26 91 71. P1ar 51celmitloee-IDeeeied ~ A. Z~tim ]2. Adiitioml nd Cou llslimtn .. I 4 12 b 12 ZO 39 16 HAeI 52,048 PSdE and mCmmemo 17. 100X PS3E- i 4 1 12 4 29 (3.836 Teak 1 T 40L 1S7 50 131 3S 75 s7,aoo s1a,12o s4,sw saooo x ccs Told AddiWlul I.allsr tH'S,tif Tofal AddiLLo~si Llrert 3500 Sa4Ceeslllhet Adrie Cells 'A L~~.__7 Adr81i0nal Snipe d Wo1MH mmbFneo-0E23W7.x18 ~~~ S~ EXIiIBIT "A" OF RESOLUTION -05 AMF.NDMF.NT #5 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF DUBI,)<N AND TY LIN INTERNATIONALlCCS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WHEREAS, the City of Dublin (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"} and TY Lin International/CCS (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"), entered into an agreement on May 16, 2000 to design the I- 580/Fallon Road interchange Improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin approved Amendment #1 through #4 to the Consultant agreement to include additional services, and WHEREAS, the City desires to amend the cansultani contract to include additional services, and the not-to-exceed contract amount is proposed to he increased to cover the cost of the additional work; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Scone of Work The Scope of Work shall be extended to include additional scope of work as described in Consultant's letter dated April 25, 2045 for the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements Project {attached). Extension of Fees The total cost far time-and-materials work under this amendment shall not exceed an additional $264,b27. CITY OF DUBLIN ayvr ATTEST: ~--~' City C erk TY LIN INTERNATIONAL/ S ~'~^lr ~~., Tom Wintch Date: /1T,~- /~G,sr~ z~0~ l..' ~~~~~ a 4d °'"" TYLINI(VTERNATIaNAL I ACS x010 Cruw Canyon Place, Sane 354 San Ramon, CA 94583 (915} 365-3960 • Fax (925} 275-OII7 E mail: sro a(~ylin.cam ~'rLira _ccs 32ooas.oo c#981 oar Apri! 25, ZOQS Mr. nerd Del Rosario Mr. Eric Cordoba City of Dublin Cordoba Consulting, Inc. 100 Civic Plaza 5368 Laurel Drive Dublin, CA 94568 Concord, CA 94521 Subject: I-584/FaUon Raad Interchange Addltlar~al Scope of WnrklDeslgn Casts Request No. 5 Gentlemen: As requested at our meeting on October 15, 2404, TYLin ~ CCS investigated the feasibility of realigning both the westbound off-ramp, and westbound loop on-ramp to avoid impacts to the seasonal wetland habitat just north of the Interstate 580/Fallon Road Interchange. At meetings with Caltrans on October 20, 2004 and November 10, 2004, TYGin I CCS was given the go-ahead to prepare and submit documentations such as revised Geometric Approval Drawings (GAD), and updated Fact Sheets for Exceptions to Mandatory and Advisory Design Standards for Caltrans approval of the realignments, along with updated Natural Environment Study (NlrS) and Biological Assessment ($A). The NES and BA were submitted on January 12, and both the GAD and Fact Sheets were approved in early January. The Team is also contemplating on installation of the wildlife exclusion fencing in advance of the project if construction activity cannot begin unti12006. A separate, early contract could install these fencings by Hall of this year, which would allow construction initiation to begin sooner. Otherwise, construction activities will be limited to the period May 15 to October 15, and only when all ditches north of the freeway are dry. The rest of this amendment is for updates of other documents such as Drainage Report, Storm Water Data Report, and the Combined PSR/PR; update of plan sheets (over 60 sheets) and cost estimate for the 95% PS&E; assistance in City of Dublin's Public Service Easement; Retaining Walls design at both loop on-ramps; Revision to pavement structural sections; Prepare Biological Opinion (if needed); additional construction details ibr ADA requirement, and Incorporation of PG&E's future gas line and casing. The work for PG&E is to be funded by PG&1J. As noted above and discussed at our previous status meetings, most of these work (with the exception for PGBcE's gas line, and the anticipated Biological Opinion) have been completed or on-going to be completed at the 95% PS&E subrnittal within the next few weeks. "Chic amendment covers all additional work up to the 95% PS&E submittal, and completion of the Environmental Documents. ~! r'"`~ ~ •~ . t, , 1-SSQ/Fallon Road Intefchan~e Each additional management, preliminary engineering, final design, right-of--way, and environmental activity is described and a corresponding cost identified within the text of the "Additional Scope of Work No. 5" attachrr~ent. A cost breakdown by activity and team firm is presented on the accompanying spreadsheet- As in our previous amendments, the accompanying spreadsheets include scgrc~atcd City oC Dublin's share and City of Pleasanton's share since this project includes City of Pleasanton funding portion of desi~,tt and construction cast. Please feel free to call Tom Wintch or me for any additional questions or clarifications that may arise. Sincerely, TYGin International ~ ~'CS~ mes T. Pun, PL ~~ ~ ~ ~~ I-S80/Falion Road Interotf~nae I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Modification Project City of Dublin Additional Scope of Work No. 5 February 10, 2005 Updated April 14, 2005 to include items G, H, 1, and J A. Realign Westbound Uff--ramp and Westbound Loop On-ramp - At our meeting on October 15, 2004 with David J. Powers and Associates, H. T. Harvey and Associates, and City of Dublin, it was brought up that the existence of both the Califomia Red-Legged Frogs and California Tiger Salamanders in the northeast quadrant of the interchange could substantially delay the environmental approval of this project, due to potential involvement with U. S. Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS). Although no recent record or habitat have been found within the project limits, it was felt that there is a remote possibility that dispersing juvenile frogs and tiger salamanders could potentially access the project site. It was also felt that if the existing ditch between the westbound off-ramp and the right-of- way fence is not impacted during construction, the project might not need to go through approval from USFWS. TYLI~CCS was first asked to look into the feasibility of realigning the ramps at the NE quadrant to not touch the existing ditch. At the regular Caitrans PDT meeting on October ZU, Z004, 'fYLI~CCS stated that both the westbound loop on-ramp and the westbound off-ramp can be realigned to avoid the ditch, however, an approval of one additional Advisory Design Exception fvr maintaining the non-standard existing 1:1.5 side slope would be required. At the meeting with Caltratts Environmental on November 10, 2004, Caltrans acknowledged that since the project is taking the initiative of redesigning to avoid /lesson the environmental impact, Coltrane may be able tv convince USFWS to go with an informal consultation rather than afull- blown consultation which could delay the project by iwo years. Updated Natural Environment Study (NES) along with the Biological Assessment (BA) were submitted to Coltrane on January ! 2, 2005. In order to incorporate the re-alignments into the project, a revised Geometric Approval Drawing (GAD) along with revisions to the Fact Sheets (Design Exceptions for both Mandatory and Advisory requirements) had to be approved by Coltrane prior to resuming final design. Other previously prepared documents such as Draft Drainage Report, Storm Water Data Repan, PSRIPR would also require revisions. Coltrane approved the revised GAD and Fact Sheets in early January 2005. Since the project was nearing the 95% 1'S8c)r submittal when the project was halted in mid-October 2004, numerous plan sheets will have to be revised to incorporate ar reflect this change. Plan sheets revision include: • Key Map (1} • Typical Cross Sections (4} + Layout (2) • Profile (2) + Construction Details (addition of ESA I'eneing} (1} + Water Pollution Control Plan (2) + l~rosion Control Plan (2) + Contour Grading and Pavement Elevation Plan (2) ~~ ~ ~ ~K~ T-580/Fallon Road Interch~t~tt:e • Drainage Plan, Profile, and Quantities (9) • Utility Plan (2) • Stage Construction and Traffic liandling flan {16) + Pavement Delineation Plan (2) + Sign Plan {2) • Retaining Wall Plan { 1) (City of Pleasanton) • Planting and lrrigation Plan (2) • Signal and Lighting Plan (8) • Summary of Quantities (4) Plan sheet revision amounts io average of 8 hours per sheet. (97.5 % allocated to City of Dublin, 2.5% allocated to City of Pleasanton) Cost Increase 5111,SOS. B. City of Dublin's Public Service Easement -Due to the necessity of utility relocation along the west side of gallon Road north of the interchange, a Public Service Easement was established to accommodate these relocated utilities. The scope of work includes numerous meetings with City of Dublin, utility companies (PG&E, Comcast, Sprint, and SBC}, assisted in preparation of "Notice to Owners", and additional Right-of--Way work such as preparation of Legal Description and Exhibit for Grant Ueed, and inclusion of the Public Service Easement into the Caltrans Right-of--Way Hard Capy Map. (l00 % allocated to City of Dublin) Cost Increase 57,968. C. Retaining Wall Design at both Loop Dn-Ramps -Design of retaining walls, other than the required walls at the proposed overcrossing structure, is not included in our original Scope of Work, nor is it included in Amendment No. 3 for Addition of the Northbound to Westbound I,aop. At both loop on-ramps, it was earlier anticipated that standard concrete homer ('t'ype 60C) (which can retain up to 3' vertically) would be sufficient to separate the loop on-ramp with the opposite off-ramp. However, at the b5% PS&)r, it was then determined that retaining walls would be required since the elevation differences between the ramps are much more than the allowable 3'. The Scope of Work includes design of two retaining walls, independent check, quantity takC-offs, and specifications. At the monthly status meeting on January 25, 2005, City of Dublin requested a Fractured Fin aesthetic treatment on the face of the retaining walls, to deter graffiti (50 % allocated to City of Dublin, 50% allocated to City of Pleasanton) Cost Increase $20,578. D. Incorporation of PG&E 10" Casing and 6" Gas Line (if needed) -PG&E requested that this project include a 10" casing and a 6" gas line on the overcrossing structure for a I'uturc gas line connection on Fallon Road. Our structural engineer determined that the only viable location to accommodate this 10" casing is underneath the future closure pour between the existing and the proposed overcrossings, due to other cells have already been reserved by other utilities and the skew of the structure. The Scope of Work include design modification to the existing bridge abutments, independent check, coordination ~~~ ~~ ~~ I-5$O/Fallon Road ~Intcrc~ge ` with f;altrans Structures review, inclusion of the 6" gas line with stub-outs at each ends, construction details (to be furnished by PG&E), and specifications. As of February 09, 2005, PG&E has not given the approval to proceed on this task. This work will not proceed without PG&E's concurrence- (To be funded 100 % by I'G&E} Cost IncreASe $46,456. E. ~ Revision to Pavement Structural Seetlons - Caltrans Highway Design Manual update of July 1, 2004 calls for 20-year pavement design far new construction and reconstruction (Topic 602-Pavement Service Life and "Traffic Data, lndex 602.2 Pavement Service Lifc). The Supplement Geotechnical Design and Materials Report prepared by Parikh Consultants dated November 2004 updated the report to include the additional NB/W13 loop on-ramp, and the westbound auxiliary lane; and also increased the pavement structural sections. This Supplement Report has been reviewed by Caltrans with miner comments. The Scope of Work include revisions to Typical Cmss Sections sheets, revisions to pavement quantities, and earthwork quantities (by HQE, Inc.). (100 % allocated to City of Dublin} Cost Increase S7,Z79. F. Prepare Biological Opinion (if needed) - if deemed necessary to expedite the envirpnmental approval process, especially through US Fish and Wildlife Services {USFWS}, our Team will prepare the Biological dpinion for Caltrans and USFWS. This effort will consist of consultations with Caltrans and then the [JSFWS to negotiate our draping the BO and the content of the B0, drafting the BO document, review by Caltrans, revisions, and consultations and revisions with USFWS for the final document. (l00 % allocated to City of Dublin) Cost Increase $15,115. G. Prepare Early Contrs;ct for Installation of Exclusion Fencing (if needed) - If deemed appropriate to install the wildlife exclusion fencing one winter season ahead of the interchange construction, in order to allow construction activities to begin earlier than May 15. Otherwise, construction initiation will be limited to the period May 1 S to October 15, and only when all the ditches north of the freeway are dry. (100 % allocated to City of Dublin) Cost Increase $11,180. H. Additional Effort for City of Pleasanton's Cost Segregation - At our regular monthly meeting on March 17, 2005, the segregated construction cost estimate was presented to both City of Dublin and City of Pleasanton for their respective share of the project. Since the overall project cost has got up substantially over the past months, City of Pleasanton asked that we provide additional effort to separate their share of the work for east of I-580/Fallon Road Interch e understanding and acceptance of their portion of the project, and for ease of keeping track of changes during remaining design phase and the construction phase. (50 % allocated to City of Dublin, 50% allocated to City of Pleasanton) Coat Increase 58,650. I. Additional Details for ADA Requirements -- TYLin ~ CCS prepared and submitted a Request for Exception from rederal AIaA Standard, per DIB 82 (Design Information Bulletin) in October 2004. The Exception was for the steeper than S% grade at the overcrossing. Previous requests for this type of exception has been severally accepted since the new overcrossins structure is to be widened from the existing structure, and both approaching grades have to match the existing profile. In March 2005, we resubmitted the Request for Exception based on the revised 171B $2-01 requirement, which DSA is now the approving agency rather than Caltrans, This additional work request is to provide additional construction details for conslruction of level landings on the sidewalk to satisfy the ADA requirement, in lieu of requesting for the exception. (100 % allocated to Ciry of Dublin) Cost Increase $S,Q00. J. Cpntingency for Project Delay (if needed) - It is anticipated that this project to be advertised by OctoberlNvvember of this year. If the project gets further delayed due to environmental or other issues, this additional scope of work is to cover additional meetings, administration, response to Calirans (and others) comments beyond the Final PS&E, and necessary updates of plans and specifications, etc. (100 % allocated to Ciry of Dublin} Cost increase 529,896. Total Additional Scooe of Work No. 5 (inc. additional direct ex»ense): ~ 264,627 City of Dublin - $ 200,663 City of Pleasanton - ~ y7,St}8 PG&E - ~ 46,456 ~~ udi } c <z v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° txs ~ a ~ " z t oc t' " < to ~ ~ < a !~~ < 5y wct; ~ c 1 ~ i'~~'z Fy dz 'w uz 3 ° 0 X ~ i:7 d z c tip, .. , v c v: Z C= c U$ F . F a i N~ c K z :.. y Y 6 !., VN~1 ,7 ~ 1 ~ ii Y {i y U h e ., Il ai s ~ ce V Ra4e(Slhr) -2004rwcs S200.00 5185.00 Si52.00 5133.00 5120.00 E109.00 599.00 5213.00 S87.00 -- 5 I[]IYat. P.NeiNai'FRIN[: CFta4`t!'FC A. Rn0 Wet6owd ORRaa aed WptOoand LO.~ _Oa-Ras 1. Coardinatirat, with Caltrant and snbmttsultatas 2 20 l0 32 SS.190 2. Additional Envittaueental ComdipNoe, Meek , eec_ 2 8 4 14 5216 3. Revise GeoateQit A val Ikawi 16 76 18 110 513 026 4. L`pdate IKSnds and Ad ' Fael Sheelc 32 36 12 80 Sl ],032 S.C R 1 1 SI85 6. G pdak Soar Water Data 4 2 6 5634 7.ilpdateCombimdPSR/PR 4 8 2 l4 51,010 B,S~SY.PIamSheetRerisioro-Civil 9.9595 Plans Slxet Revisiaoa -Retaining Wall Isasantoe) 38 Z 4 16 278 56 4 376 22 543,408 52,894 l0.95%I'latts Sheet Rwisions - iandsca l 2 3 5403 11.9395 Plant Sheet Revisiura-1leetical 1 32 d 20 i? 56,857 Tpk A 7ou1 4 123 0 32 0 422 11 { 0 • 715 587,755 )t, Cltlr sf DuLlin's Palsl'ie Servke Eaaetnat i_ Additional Camdutatitat, wilt C' and Utility Co_ 2. Additi0ml R:"9Y xrotlt, fttld curve Hard C tNa s, APE 20 4 IZ 8 4 4 26 24 54,572 53,396 Tank B Tstal 0 24 12 D 0 t2 4 0 0 52 S7 960 C. Walls Deal at beck L Oe-Ramps RetaittittE Walb Ik ' (2 wa11s).1 t Check and 36 78 20 t 34 SL9,014 S ea, sad Quantities. AesthctielYcamtrnt-Ftaciuredl'mdesign, and m. 3 6 4 l2 Sl„564 Tank C Tetsi 0 38 0 S< 0 0 24 0 D 14L 52D,iT8 D. Les tntlMa of PGkE 30" Cn and f" Gan Lkse (il aeedel) Coordination xith PGA:E, and C'iry 12 12 52,220 Stttuture Nadifiatiorrs - Plata, , ind Estimates l2D 120 I 240 530.160 Induction of 6"Gas liner -Plans, Spots, and Estima[es 8 24 20 52 56,076 Task D 70 0 140 0 120 0 24 20 • 0 304 456 HQE x ;,, m cc:, z= Z jn -. c. S11,00D 56,440 Adttional Smile of Wprldt6-042505.x1s ~'^9i 1 ~. Pre an ttiw i o if weeds Addi6anai camulhtioa and Prcpan: Biolopcal dPinion 4 4 5740 Taaa F Tetrl 0 • D 0 0 0 D 0 D ~ 5740 • 0 r G. a Earl Contract for Inslallafloa of Ezetrslon Aewei arats Control plans, ifxations, and Cast Fstima[e 2 20 40 2D 82 $10,140 Encroachment Permit Process 4 4 5740 Talk G 7atr1 2 24 0 0 0 44 2• D 0 ea sl 1 lao D • H. AddiYenai Effort for Clty of Pkssawaan's Csst 5 n Additional bfibrt forCosl Segregation 16 10 40 66 Sg,G50 7uk H Talak • ti 0 10 0 N • 0 • 66 ~,iS• 0 D L Addltkaral Detalla fir ADA tsmeatr Additional Cmutruclioa DetriLs Shat 4 30 10 44 SS,DDO Task i Total 0 ~ • 0 B 3• 10 D 0 41 36 [4• 0 0 J. Coati for Res me is Addkional Gsmn[ah and 10094 PSZE Contitt)deaay far Pro" t Decay - Additional Meetin s. Add'1 10 60 B 8 100 ZO 20 226 529,896 Reisimis to Caltnris Prooesa etc. task J Top! 10 6• B 0 B l0D Zt 0 2D J26 529,1!96 • o SrD-Tofa1 - AdditiomlStaff$oan 16 434 20 266 B 674 2f2 p 20 166/ 1 ] St~Totai - Additl•aaQI.abor Cest (5) 53,200 SBD,290 $3,040 f35.378 5960 571.466 520,9RR SO St,746 $219A62 SIl,00D 56,440 CCS Total Additloaal i.aD•r SE79,1162 Total Additloaal Direct Expe•aea 51,000 Soh-Com~ltaat Admin Costa (D% s0 Addltional Scope of WarkAtrr042505.x1s ~ z s Y ~ O ~`~ ~ yz > 3 ~ 8 c; <c ~ y t: r V W< a" 0 ~ 4Z W .Tl ~ <"' 4' i= :ca c ]t Z aC S ~ J G7 " i n a l -J C ~ ' r ff O oVaJ ZV Z'v Z ~ ~: ~ ~' u• ~ ` - r q Vl O . r 0. ~ ti G C] ., W J /S ' : ~ V Rate (S; kr) - 2004 ra 5200.00 5185.00 5152.00 5133.00 5120.00 5109.00 899.00 5213.00 567.00 - S AI)alrTi[4TiA1. FIN(:INTi.TiQ1N(. s1RAViCF_C A. RglliaR'estlaawdOfF aadWesWouadl~apOa-Ra 1. Coordination, main will Cattrans and subeanaultants 2 ZO 10 32 55.190 2_Additionall:nvkmm~entslCoadinatlon,Meetin~s,eb. 2 B 4 i{ 52.316 3. Revise t3eometric ral Ilnwi 16 76 lE 1 l0 513A26 4. U Mande and Advisory Feet Sheets 32 3b 12 BO 511032 5. da¢ Dninaie l 1 5185 6. Stmn wtter Data 4 2 6 563{ 7. dneCombioedPSR/PR 4 B 2 14 81,810 8.95% Flom Sleet Revisions - Ci~~l 38 4 278 56 376 543,408 9. 959L %am Shat Revisiom - Retainin8 Wall (Pkafanton) D 50 10.955: Plans Sleet Revisions -Land 1 2 3 5403 t 1.95X P1am Sheet Revisions -Electrical 1 32 4 20 37 56,837 Task A T 4 121 0 36 • 422 110 D 0 b~3 Lt B. Cltp o[Dablla'r Ynblte Serrhe Easomsnl 1. Adaitionsl coordination, mee ~ ~ k;m c;ty ana tmliq, c0. 20 e v tss7a 2. Additiatal R/w wwk, fields ,Hard Cop M . APIi { 12 { 4 24 83,1% TukllTotal 0 24 12 i 0 12 { i • S2 57 i C.llebini Web albotD Oa-lianpt ' walk Desi (2 walEs), t Chedt and 18 39 10 b7 59,507 5 and titiea. Aeatlsetic Treatnseett - Ftaclured Fin deli and tan. 1 3 2 6 578.'' Task C T 0 19 D 42 • D 12 0 i 73 Sl D. [x oratiert o[?I,dcE 10" Coin sad b" Gas Line (if oeedod) Coordination with PGIkE, and Ci 0 50 Strucnue ~todi&atiam - P1am, S cs, and Estimaks 0 SO Inclusion of 6" Gas Line -Plain, and Fstimtta 0 80 Tuk B Total 0 0 • 0 0 • 0 • 0 • SO HQE x ~, 3F Z h ~~ ~~ 511,000 86,110 AddEUonal Snipe of Warkk5-1M25t15.xla ~~ ~,. ~4 ^~ w F. Pr Bla al orlon [aeed Additional conaaltaUon and Prcpare Hio 'cal imon d a 5746 Task F Tohl 0 4 • 0 O • • • 0 4 ST40 G. n Eul • Coetrad ix Inatallatisw of Eaelasloa Feadn Soprale Contract Pltma, ificatioro, and Cost Estirrwte 2 20 40 20 82 510,440 Fneraaclanent Permit Prtweas d d S7d0 Task G I'otd 2 >4 D 0 0 ~• 20 0 0 8f TI1 180 li. Adritions7 F.1Gct 6or CI of Pleauttro's Cost ion Additi oral 13fort for Cast gatioo S 5 20 33 Sa,325 7uk R Tool 4 i 0 5 0 20 • 0 • 33 S4 2S I. Addifloaall)etalb [ar ADA Iremeats Additiawal Cmstntakon pcW7s Shat d 30 10 44 SS,006 Task) TwW 0 4 0 B 0 3B 10 B 0 44 53,0.8 CeaB w fir ase t• A~ditonal Comneads nd 10•X PS&E Conti for 'erx Ue - Addilianal Meetir~s, Addl l0 60 8 8 100 20 20 226 529,896 Revicielw m Caluans Pnaxs etc. TukJTot 10 N 0 0 0 100 2• 0 ZO 226 529 SuBHoora 16 2ti5 20 83 8 630 k76 0 20 1211 oe CM (5) 53,200 549,025 53,040 511,039 S96D 568.670 117,424 SO 51,740 CC9 Total Addltlonl Labor i]i5,098 Total Additlwal 1lircai E: S'1 000 Sub-Coasnlfaat Adxntn Cwfs N/. SO AddlOatat Scope of Work1R5-042505x1s 1 1 511,000 56,440 ~.,... '.so K O HQIE _y,._ ~ _Z ~ 3 .. 3 ,~ Ut ~~ p ~z w8~ ~a O~ . ~ z~ ~ ~ 7 z k V~ ' t+ V=i L .) Val v: 0. Z 0. a S z N tV '~ A V J T~ ^1 a ' Rat(f!kr) - 20D4rates 5200.OD SL8$.DD S152dp f133.00 5120-00 5109.00 599.00 5213.00 587.00 --- S 511,000 56,440 aasua ^ ave~ew nlwu. ss....... ~~..~, ......, d~ tad wntbora~lwa}4)a-Raul' R li W tb ~ a wa n vim Cafa:u Gild sabcaswlltant+ 1 C ai 0 50 aauon, . ow 2. Additiarlal &lY-ronmsatil Coardlmllm. McCtin a ~~- D SO 3. Revisa Geottktrie Draw' D 50 4. Update Mandatory snd Advisory Pest Siwett 0 50 5. U Dtaim 0 ~ b. Update Swan Water Dena R 0 50 7. U date Combined YSR,PR 0 50 8.95% P1am Shoet Revisions -Civil 0 SO 9.95% Plena Skit Revisions - Retaini LVall {plassman) 2 16 4 22 52,894 10.95% Plans Shea Revisitals - I.an e 0 SO 11.95%Plula Shea Revisiatu -E]ectrinl 0 50 7askATasa1 0 2 0 16 • 0 ~ 0 0 22 B!4 0 • & City ai Dublin's Aek6e Servla Easealellt l-Additional Coorainatioa. with CKy' ud LtLiliry C0. 0 SO 2. wdditioml RAV crack, saa surreys, liana eovr Ma , APE tta< o so TaskBTotal 0 0 0 • 0 • 0 0 0 0 SO D 0 C.Reta wall. atkotl On-Ram Repining Wags Doi (2 xalk Indcpeadent Cbeck and 16 39 10 b7 59,507 and i2lwrtitiea AptMtle Tteatmeas - Fraclrtd Em aesi ,and 1 3 2 6 5763 Task C Total 0 ]! • 12 • • 12 • • 73 510,269 0 0 D IaoarpasaIIoa dFGdr[ Ip Cad aad b" Gas IJae (6'needed) Cootdimti~ wi lh PG&E and Cil • 0 50 Structure Modifications -Plans, Spar, aad Estimotcs D 50 Inckssioa of 6' Gas Line - Plain, Spees, and Estimate D 50 7aakDTsta1 1 • • • 0 D 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 Additional Scope of Work#5041505.x1s r. rre are Bla cat .. tf aaedad AdditionN consulUtion and 9io 'cal t')pi~n 0 50 Task F Tsdl • 0 0 • D 0 0 0 D 0 S0 D D G. Pr re Ex Coatrae for IastaWtloa of Eaeluaioi Fereln Se to Contract Thus, ecifn:atlons, and Cost Eslimak: 0 50 Encroachment Permit Process 0 SO Tnk G To[ • 0 0 • 0 • 0 0 • D 90 0 0 K Additional Effort tar of PleasaaNw'a Cast re kn Additioral &tfort for Cost adan 8 S 20 33 54,325 Task N 7adl 0 8 0 S 0 20 • 0 0 33 S 0 • 1. Addittooa11iY7ar7sfor ADA iremeets Add'iriaul Cmstructio0 DediLs Shret 0 SO Task 1 Tat • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 SO • 0 J_ Cootln for Am Dose to Addltloaal C~mnrmh and 100X PS& E Cosfin for Pro' Oela -AdditiomlMeetings,Add7 0 50 Revisions W Caitrans Processes. etc_ Task) Totat • • D 0 0 0 • 0 • 0 yp • 0 Coat ( S CCS Togl ArdkModLabsr Tots! Adlitloia] DFaY fi 51908 ~ St>aCornsltaatAdniaCoks 0•b) 50 0 0 t0 50 Additional Scope of Worldf,5-042505x15 ~~ ~~, '~ ~~ o a~ w C ;~ <z Z + ~ ~ a z ~ a ~° ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ezt K °A <7y.1 ZpC S v . . Y ~ ~ ~ Cv V ~ w~ ¢i y ~ a <W <s ~ j j{ U Rate (S / hr) -2001 tree S20D.00 S1 BS.OD S ] 52.00 5133.00 5120.00 S 109A0 599.00 5213.00 587.00 -- S ADUM'170NAL EIYGRYEER'PiC SERVI['F.C g~ w z v 3 ~ ` ~~ 511,000 56,440 A. RwU¢ WeRboaad OfERm~ aad WptlYaaad l.aa Oa-Ram 1. COordination, ttseetm •ith Cahtant and aObCOnaultrNS 0 SO 2. Addition) ErnironmeAal Coordination, Mahn etc. 0 SO 3. Revise Geometric APptoval Dta~ 0 SO 4. Matdatory and Advisory Froct Skeels D SD S. date e 0 SO 6. SrntnrWaterIhaa 0 SO 7. U Catnbined PSRlPR 0 SO B. 95X Plain Sheet Rnisions -Civil 9.95?: Plans Sheet Revisions • Retainissg Wall (Pkasanton 0 0 SO SO 10.9Sti Plana Sheet Revisions - landse p ~ ll. 9596 Platu Skoct Reviaions-Electrical p Ta+k A Tolal D • 0 D • D 0 p 0 0 SO D D S Ci of DahRn4 Pa4tYe Serriee 8asanent 1. Additional Comdinatiaa, smetin pith Ci • and l;tillty Co. 0 SO 2 Additional RW ptxk field Hard Maps, APE 0 50 Task Z Tetal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 SO 0 0 C.ReWain Walb at both i. Op-Ramps ReraMt~ Walls Design vralb lndepeedent Check and p ~ S es, attd antitiea. Atathric7n~tmatt-ErachxedFm specs, and tu+a 0 SO Task C TNaI • 0 • 0 • • 0 • 0 0 SD 0 D D. I antiost of PG&810" Cali aid ti^ Gas Line (if needed) CaordimtionwithPGdtE,rtdCily l2 l2 52,220 Sttucttae Modificalitrnt - Pta>K, Sflecs, and Estimates !20 120 ,tp ~ 538,160 h>Cksion of b' Gas Lane - Phns, and Erirrnta 8 24 20 52 Sb,07b TaskDTotal D Il0 0 17A 0 24 20 • 0 3N S9f,r.S6 0 0 Ad018onal Scope d WakO'5-042505_xls ~" ~v F. Fxoan TAOledeal OadoMa Of seededt Additional coravilation and Prepare 33idoaical Opinion 0 ED Task F Tatil 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • SO G. Earl Contrtct far Iaatalhtbn of Ezclrsloo Feacio Separate Contract Plana, Spetitcatioru, and Cosl Estimate 6 Encroachment Perrrut Process 6 ~ Task G Tolil 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 SD H. Additionil Etforl fer Ci a{ Pkasaabn'a Cat a 'w Additional Effort for Cost Se on 0 ~ Task H T O • 0 0 • B 0 0 • 0 •0 I. Addltional Deri0a Ar ADA tr4emsmts Additional Canstnlctim Deta>75 Shat 0 SO hslllTotil • 0 0 0 0 D e e 0 0 sa J. Ceatin for Rea aae b Addtionil Camtaeoh and 10656 PS&£ Conlin y for PmjeIX Relay - Additioral Mecti , Add? 6 ~ Revisions to Ciltrans Proe~ssea, et. TaskJTot D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SO Suh-Totsl - Labor c.at cs> I So I szs,9oo I so I s1s,96o { s6 J sx,6ie I siaao I so I s6 ccs ToW Addkbaal Labor 546.456 Total AdtAlbaal Dir[ct E SO Sul-Comulhit Adsin Coats o SO Addtonal Scope of Work#t5.642505x1s 0 0 w w ~a a~ g~ EXHIBIT "A" OF RESOLUTION x-08 AMENDMENT N0.6 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF DUBLIN AND TY LIN INTERNATIONAL/CCS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WHEREAS, the City of Dublin (hereinafter refereed to as "CITY") and TY Lin International/CCS (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"), entered into an agreement on May 16, 2000 to design the I- 580/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin approved Amendment # 1 through #5 to the Consultant agreement to include additional services, and WHEREAS, the City desires to amend the consultant contract to include additional services, and the not-to-exceed contract amount is proposed to be increased to cover the cost of the additional work; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Scope of Work The Scope of Work shall be extended to include additional scope of work as described in Consultant's letter dated May 6, 2008 for the I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Improvements Project (attached). Extension of Fees The total cost for time-and-materials work under this amendment shall not exceed an additional $120,000. ATT T: l ~ L~~~J City Clerk 1 C OF DUBLIN Mayor TY LIN INTERNATIONAL/CCS .1~ Thomas Wintch, Vice President Date: /1~l/+Y ~, Za°~' -~ G:\CONSULTANTS\ccs\Fallon\Exhibit A- Amendment #6 .DOC fr3 ~ 86 TYLININTERNATIONAL ~ CCS 2010 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 350 San Ramon, CA 94583 (9Z5) 365-3960 • Fax (925) 275-0117 E-mail: sro~atylin.com TYLI ~ CCS 320048.00 (#98104) May 06, 2008 Mr. Ferd Del Rosario City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Subject: I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Request for Amendment No. 6 -Construction Support Service Ferd: F. - y~'c Although this request is titled for Construction Support Service, this request is basically for replenishment of our Construction Support Service budget which was utilized to finish final design and environmental approvals, and project advertisement. Brief History: The budget for Construction Support Service was requested and approved for $93,520 in .Tune 2003 as part of Amendment No. 3. At that time, construction was anticipated to begin in 2004. By late 2006, we had exhausted our Final Design budget, and with City approval, we began to bill our effort against the Construction Support Service budget, with the understanding that final design approva[ was forthcoming, especially required approval from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services. Since our last Amendment (Amendment No. S -dated April 2005), our additional out-of--scope work beyond those covered in Amendment 5 include: Y Additional Environmental Work Revised Biological Assessment -The original scope did not include consultation with US Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS). However, USFWS reviewed the initial Biological Assessment in May 2006, and raised many issues and concerns (e.g. kit fox and fairy shrimp. mitigation). The Team responded to the comments and prepared a Revised Biological Assessment and re-submitted to Caltrans in July 2006. Respond to Caltrans Comments -Caltrans review of the Revised BA asked for additional revisions and a change in approach on some technical issues. The Team responded and incorporated Caltrans comments and re-submitted the Revised BA to Caltrans in mid October 2006. g4 ~ &'lo I-580/Fallon Road Interchange • Additional MeetinQS -Additional meetings, field visits, phone and email correspondence with City of Dublin, Caltrans Environmental, our Environmental Consultants (David J. Powers, and H.T. Harvey), and with USFWS. • Biolo ical Opinion -USFWS review insisted that consultation would be required, which led to preparation of a Biological Opinion. The amount previously budgeted within Amendment 5 ($15,115) to address USFWS comments and requirements were insufficient to cover the work that was being requested. • Respond to USFWS Comments -The Team responded to USFWS extensive comments, request for additional detail /follow-up information, and concerns on the initial Biological Opinion, which also requested additional mapping, additional area of impact calculations, construction equipment and vehicles to be used during construction, etc. USFWS also proposed a rather severe mitigation ratios (3:1 for habitat within interchange area), which the Team, including Caltrans, did not agree. • Incorporated Mitigation Measures into Project Plans and Specs -The Draft Biological Opinion included language required to be included in the project specifications, including definition of "dry season" and do's and don't for the contractor's operation; and also requested that temporary wildlife exclusion fencing and ESA fencing and details be included into the project plans. • Assisted Caltrans and Citv of Dublin in Negotiation for a lesser Mitigation Ratio -For purchase of land from the Ohlone Bank • Amendment to the Biolo ical Opinion -Upon acceptance of our responses, USFWS issued an Amendment BO. The Teain reviewed and provided recommendations to City of Dublin: • Caltrans Workshop -Attended Caltrans workshop for preparation of Environmental Specifications, and procedure for request for Non-Standard Special Provisions approval. Additional Caltrans Requirements • Signal Warrants -Performed additional traffic counts and speed survey on Fallon /El Chan-o Road to justify to Caltrans that signals at both ramp intersections are indeed warranted. This task had to be repeated a second time due to Caltrans concerns, • Utility Fact Sheet -Prepared and submitted for Caltrans approval the "Encroachment Policy Variance Request" for maintaining the existing PG&E overhead line along the east side of El Chan-o Road within the existing State R/W. The approval necessitated revisions to plans for additional metal beam guard railings, • Update Plans and Specifications -Since the PS&E had been completed and shelved for on- hold an extended period of time, Caltrans requested an updated, interim submittal For their review. This involves updating all standard special provisions and standard plans lists to the current edition, and also updating the engineer's estimate, • Additional Comments -Changes in Caltrans personnel, which led to additional new comments that we had to address, • Additional Meetings -Additional PDT meetings, and separate meetings with Design Oversight, and Caltrans Functional Units. Additional Right-of--Way /Surveying • Right-of--Way Hard Copy Map -Prepared Right-of--Way Hard Copy Maps for the parcel to be transferred to the State, ~~ ~~; I-580/Fallon Road Interchange • Surveying -Surveyed and staked the 20' Public Service Easement (PSE) for meetings between City of Dublin and utility companies, for their relocation into the PSE. Additional Construction Support Services • Prepared Addendums -Two addendums were prepared for the initial bid (bid opened February 28, 2008), • Re-bid of Project -Addendums prepared for the initial bid were incorporated into the final bid package (bid opened April 7, 2008). We, respectfully, are requesting consideration of an increase in the amount of $120,000 to our overall budget to reinstate our Construction Support Service budget. The increase from the previously approved $43,520 is a result of rate schedule difference between 2003 and 2008. Please feel free to call Tom Wintch or me for any additional questions or clarifications that may arise. Sincerely, TYLin International ~GU-.-- mes T. Pun, PE S6 a~ 8h I-580/Fadoa Road Intachan8e ModlRudOe Protect Cby eI DubIW s~ Rate (f I M) - 2008 rate ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF WORK F6 COST SUMMARY vwtaw T.V. IJp STAFF TYLIN 7.Y. I.4 TEAM - SUeCONSULTANTS Submnaubanb CIVIL GEOTEC H LANDSCAPE TRAFFlC O e t V= ~ ~ U Parikb WRECO AAM ~z ~~~ C q W O ~~ C O u~ ~ < uqu I"u W z~ °~ ~ 1.2 ~G ~ U~ ~ ~ m G 1p 2 o< ZZ ~ a G uv; '~ ~~ ~Ti u ~ ~ Z U "~u' 5 3pp ~ i 8 ~ Team Tool Teen 7qd Amount ~ ^° w > b~ ~ ~ O~ v V~ u 5S O~ b W Z -+9 2 ~x aD u ~ ~uZ p ~° Y L tS 5 ~= 3 5 Y Hqus e e ~ 7 u~ e < 3 5240.00 5205.00 3180.00 5160.00 SI/3.00 3175.00 3133.00 511000 5 5110.00 5760.00 3550.00 590.00 5 S T.Y. Lb Totd Addllb0al Labor 5100,950 7afal Additional DkvnL eaxe S1d00 Sub-Conaullavt Admin Caab OK SO SuDmnsdtant Team sn,44d sllea9o 5710 SI 610 39 SiA UU~ TOTAL ADDITIONAL C057 -AMENDMENT No.6 : SIZ0,1100 ConsDUgion SUppOrl50rvites-Artiendmenl NO.6 D50603x1s Seb-Total - Addltlvpal Stag HOUrr 180 JO 180 80 20 ZO 0 40 SJO p 0 16 50 24 40 0 IJO 660 SvD-Total - Addltlpnal LDOr Cort S 54J,2p0 56,150 576,800 512,800 E2900 52,700 SO N,d00 5100,950 EO SO 52,240 SB,000 SJ,600 57,600 SO 517 MO 5118.790