HomeMy WebLinkAbout7.1 Attch 2 CIP 2010-2015 r .ti; y _
'cs
. 't , 3 ' ~ ~ ,~:.t"y~a
Ct M~ ~ ~ ~ .J .:x S . .~~1~~ ~ .
y.?~.,J~,'~a~, 2"1si`~ ~ ~F A~I 1
7~ F ~ P ~ ~
1iF; ` ~ ' ,
f3"`
i
, j t `
, ' _ ~ i ? i . .
t .
e, , . . L
.~14
,
- ~~"F'~-~ . -:i,
; ~ - 9~'i ~ ~
» , IE
~ l.~
±Y .
r~ ~
1
il l.
~
1 ~1
City of Dublin ~
C A L I F O R N I A
Proposed Five Year
Capital Imp~ovement Program
2o i o-ZO i 5
ATTACHMENT 2
I
I
I
li
I
DU~ .
. ~ 111
~
19 8'2
` 1
` ~ ~
~~LI
FOR
. .1
Pro osed Flve-Year Ca 1ta
p p
10-2015
Im rovement Pro ram 20
p g
,
june, 2010 _ .
Tim Sbranti, Mayor
Kasie Hildenbrand, Vice Mayor
Don Biddle, Councilmember SUBMITTED BY
Kevin Hart, Councilmember Joni Pattillo
Kate Ann Scholz, Councilmember ~ City Manager
I
i~l
CITY OF ~ DUBLIN
Proposed Five-Year
Capital Improvement Pro arn 2010 - 2015
~
~ TABLE OF CONTENTS
CITY MANAGER'S LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARIES
All Programs ..................................................................:..................................................................................1
General 2
Community Improvements 4
Pazlcs 6
Streets 8
Overview of 5 year Capital Improvement Plan Funded Projects ...........................................................10
GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS
Program Highlights ........................................................................................................................................11
........1
TV30 Studio Remodel (930001)
Network System Upgrade (930002) ............................................................................................................13
Combined Finance/Permit System (930003) ...............14
Geographic Information System (930004) ..15
Civic Center Library (930005) ...........................................................16
Civic Center Modification Design Services & Construction (930006) ....................................................17
Civic Center Generator (930008) ........................................18
Automated Document Storage & Retrieval System (930009) ..................................................................19
Maintenance Yard Facility Improvements (930010) 20
I'ublic Facili Fee Stud U date 930012
{3' Y P ~ ) 21
ADA Transition Plan (939102 - 939106) 22
~II
i
:
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
Program Highlights 23
San Ramon Road Landscape Renovation (940002) 24
'I Transit Center Art (940005) 25
Tree Plantin Pro'ect 94000 26
g ] ( ~
Sidewalk Safety Repair Program (949102 - 949106) 27
City Entrance Sign Modifications (Not Yet Assigned) 28
I
PARKS
Program Highlights 29
Dublin Heritage Park and Museums (950001) 31
Dublin Sports Grounds Renovation (950003) 32
Fallon Sports Park (950004) 33
Emerald Glen Park Recreation and Aquatic Complex (95000~ 34
Passatempo Park (950009) 35
~ ~ ) 36 '
Cultural Arts Center Not Yet Assi ed '
37 '
Dublin Ranch Area B Neighborhood Square (Not Yet Assigned) ~ '
Eastern Dublin Parks (Not Yet Assigned) 38
Emerald Glen Park ot Yet Assi ed 39
(N ~ ) . ,
Emerald Glen Park Community Center (Not Yet Assigned) 40 '
Schaefer Ranch Neighborhood Park (Not Yet Assigned) 41
Traxisit Center Park (Not Yet Assigned) 42
4
Wallis Ranch Neighborhood Parks (Not Yet Assigned)
Emerald Glen Activi Center Ac uisition New 4~
~ q ( )
Energy Block Grant Project (New) 45
Positano Neighborhood Park (New) 46
Shannon Community Center and Park Parking Lot Improvements (New) 47
STREETS
49
Program Highlights
Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee Regional Transportation Projects (960002) 51
Dublin Boulevard Improvements - Silvergate Drive to Hansen Drive (960003) 52
Eastern Dublin Arterial Street and Freeway Improvements (960004) 53
Downtown Dublin Roadway Improvements (960005) 54
Alamo Canal Trail Under I-580 (960008) 55
Villa e Parkwa - AVB Stormwater Treatment 960009 56
g Y . ~ )
Saint Patrick Way-Regional Street to Golden Gate Drive (960010) 57
East & West Dublin BART Station Corridor Enhancement- Dublin Boulevard from Hansen Drive
to Tassajara Road (960012) 58
P ~ )
San Ramon Road Trail Im rovements 960016 59
Citywide Street Storm Drain Condition Assessment (96001~ 60
Dublin Boulevard/Amador Plaza Road Intersection Improvements (960018) 61
Dougherty Road Irnprovements - Amador Valley Boulevard North to City Limits (960019) 62
(STREETS, Continued)
Citywide Signal Communications Upgrade (960020) 63
Annual Slurxy Seal Program (Annual) 64
Annual Street Overlay Program (Annual) 65
Dougherty Road Improvements - Amador Valley Boulevard to Houston
Place (Not Yet Assigned) 66
Dublin Boulevard Improvements - Sierra Court to Dublin Court (Not Yet Assigned) 67
Dublin Boulevard - Right Turn at Village Parkway (Not Yet Assigned) 68
Scarlett Drive Iron Horse Trail Extension (Not Yet Assigned) 69
Dublin Ranch Street Light Pole Painting Project (New) 70
Speed Feedback Demonstration Project (New) 71
Traffic Signal Improvements (New) 72
,
~
.
I
I
I
c~~ o~ D~B~ .
r~r ~ t1
19 ~ CITY OF DUBLIN ~
_ ~ 1
~1~~~~' 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, California 94568 Website: www. ci. dublin. ca. us
June 4, 2010
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City CounciL
I am pleased to present the Fiscal Year 2010 - 2011 Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) for the period covering Fiscal Year 2010-2011 through Fiscal Year 2014-2015. This CIP
includes forty-eight (48) projeets costing a total of approximately $187.4 million. The following
table provides a high-level summary of the Five Year Capital Project Plan.
Table 1: SUMMARY FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PROGRAM
Expenditures Proposed Remaining 4
Prior Years 2010/2011 Program Years TOTAL
2011 /12 -2014/15
General $ 21,621,376 $ 1,760,178 $ 2,482,472 $ 25,864,026
Community
Im rovements 25,393 339,797 708,040 1,073,230
Parks 39,089,236 2,759,903 26,737,012 68,586,151
Streets 69,747,010 9,538,540 12,581,130 91,866,680
TOTAL $ 130,483,015 $ 14,398,418 $ 42,508,654 $ 187,390,087
The total cost of projects during the Five-Year Plan is $56,907,072. As shown above,
approximately $14.4 million in projects are proposed in the upcoming Fiscal Year and this
represents approximately 25% of the $56.9 million in projects.
The CIP also identifies nineteen (19) projects wholly or partially unfunded during the five-year
time frame in the amount of $235,900,090. Of this unfunded / future amount, $14,504,539 in
restricted funds are projected to be available in 2015 from City Fees collected or projected to be
collected, and funds obligated by other agencies, leaving a projected net shortfall of
$221,395,551.
For the most part, the projects that are identified as unfunded will be funded beyond the scope
of this CIP through development impact fees or constructed directly by the development
community. Many of these projects are included in the CI~P to ensure that the City meets the
requirements of State Law necessary to collect development impact fees and to position the
City to actively compete for available grant funding.
It is important for readers to understand that the CIP is a planning document. The precise
timing of projects beyond the first year, are subject to change in future CIP Updates. Factors
that may impact the timing include: 1) availability of funds to construct the project; 2) the priority
for the improvement based on population and / or traffic conditions; and 3) the, impact on
ongoing City Operating expenditures as a result of the project.
.
The completion of Capital Improvement Projects often requires a variety of funding sources in
order to complete necessary improvements. The following Table summarizes the funding for
projects proposed during the Five-Year CIP.
Table 2: Source of Funding For Projects 2011 - 2015
SOURCE OF FUNDING $ AMOUNT 5 PERCENTAGE
YEAR CIP
General Fund $ 4,915,516 8.6%
S ecial Revenue-Trans ortation 10,256,926 18.0%
S ecial Revenue - Environmental 1,183,234 2.1 %
S ecial Revenue - Parks & Art Funds 1,630,339 2.9%
S ecial Revenue - Assessment District 419,950 0.7%
Public Facili Im act Fees 28,338,203 49.8%
Traffic Im act Fees 9,889,453 17.4%~
Internal Service Fund Contribution 273,451 0.5%
TOTAL PROJECTS 2011 - 2015 $ 56,907,072
The largest single source of funding is development impact fees totaling $38.3 million
(combined Public Facility Fees and Traffic Impact Fees). These revenues represent over two-
thirds of the funding for projects. Since the collection of impact fees is directly related to the
economy and development cycles, it will be important to monitor and update projections
throughout the Five-Year Capital Plan.
Projects Completed During Fiscal Year 2009-2010
During Fiscal Year 2009-2010, the City has completed or expects to closeout seven (7) CIP
projects. Due to the nature of capital projects, the exact #iming of the final payments may not
align with the close of the Fiscal Year on June 30, 2010. In the event this occurs, any
unexpended funds would be recommended as a carry-over appropriation to Fiscal Year 2010-
2011 when it would be likely that the project would be complete. These projects are listed in the
summary table that follows
Table 3: PROJECTS COMPLETED IN FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010 ~
. Ci Facili Ener Efficient Window Treatment
Park Pla Area Renovations Sta ecoach & Emerald Glen
Shannon Communit Center Reconstruction
Pool Heater Re air ~
I-580 & Fallon Road Interchan e
I-580 Westbound Auxilia Lane Im rovements
Bike Lane Amador Valle Boulevard
Annual - Sidewalk Safe Re airs
Annual - Americans With Disabilities Act Im rovements Curb Ram s
Annual - Street Slur Seal Pro ram
Annual - Street Pavement Overla Pro ram
ll
Projects Recommended for Fiscal Year 2010 - 2011
As in the past, the proposed CIP projects are presented in four categories (General Projects;
Community Improvements; Parks; and Streets). Detailed highlights of each category are
described at the beginning of each section in this document.
The proposed CIP includes recommended appropriations for Fiscal Year 2010-2011 in the
amount of $14,398,418. Of this amourit, $2,527,709 (18%) is proposed to be funded from the
General Fund. Of the amount from the General Fund $1,716,323 is from specific General Fund
Reserves previously committed towards projects. A total of 82 percent of the projects proposed
for Fiscal Year 2010-2011 are funded from restricted funds. The restrieted fund amount
includes development traffic impact fees, which are collected by the City to finance the
infrastructure needed to support growth. It is possible that the development community may
choose to build some of the needed projects directly rather than paying the fees. In that event,
the cost for developer built projects would not be reflected in the City's future financial reports.
Capital Improvement Issues
A significant number of projects in the CIP Update in later years are intended to address the
provision of facilities to accommodate growth. These improvements are funded largely through
development fees paid as permits are issued for new housing and commercial development.
As a planning document, it will be important to evaluate both the scope and timing of proposed
' projects as they may require creative adjustments in order to continue to provide important
improvements that the City can continue to maintain.
The City must examine long-term funding sources for infrastructure that may require significant
rehabilitation or maintenance in future years. It will also be important to balance current
operating expenditures in a manner that will allow the City to establish a program to finance
future replacements so that the City will continue to have first-class facilities for its residents.
Because of the economic downturn and the decreases in operating revenues and expenditures,
setting aside funds for these long-term needs has been difficult.
The City will need to continue to engage the community regarding our Capital Improvement
efforts and the issues that we are facing in order to find solutions that make sense for Dublin.
Process for Review and Adoption of the Five-Year CIP
The Proposed CIP Update will be considered by the City Council at its Budget Hearing on June
22, 2010.
On May 13, 2010, the Heritage and Cultural Arts Commiss"ion reviewed the proposal, to provide
input on heritage and cultural art related projects. The Planning Commission is scheduled to
review the CIP on June 15, 2010, to determine its conformity with the General Plan.
In addition, the Parks and Community Services Commission is scheduled to review the CIP on
June 21, 2010, for input regarding park and recreation facility related projects. The
recommendations of the City's commissions will be presented to the City Council at the Budget
Hearing.
iii
Conclusion
I want to thank the City Council for their continued leadership and engagement on capital
projects. You always strive to ensure that the City provides excellent community facilities that
enhance Dublin's quality of life and are enjoyed by all who live, work, or visit the community.
_ In addition, I wish to acknowledge the contribution to the capital planning process made by the
City's Advisory Committees and Commissions, residents, and Staff. This document represents
their collective input in helping the City achieve an even better Dublin in the future.
RespectFully Submitted, ~
Joni Pattillo
City Manager
iv
~ O O~ f~ ~ O O O O O 'Cr O I~ ~
p l~ ~ r' ~ 10 d' N ~CJ O O e-~ O N ?n
N CO O ~~i' eh f~ f~ O O I~ ~ O`~
~ ~`V' OD 'd' ~O C7 tt h O tD oD O CD 10
~ e- aO c0 O O ~ O it ch 1~ oO s- d~ O
~ I~ (O ~ r ~ M 1~ N ~
. N t0 Op • CO ~
4A IA 69 ~ .
~ O O( O 0 0 d' O O O O r- O~ ~
N t~stNO et t~ N ~O O ~O~t
oO c~ ~t M O~ N c'~ ~ O I~ c0 O O ~
' M tn ch 1~ Of t0 d' O CO ~ O C0 Q~
~ ~n
~ f0~ fh0 eN- (~O ~ ~tM ~ ~~t~ eN-
N r- ~ N 1"~ O M
~ ~ ~
ff~ fR b3 ~
~ ~ 00 f~tf) N a0 O 00 oD O 1~0~`d'O N
p ~ N~O ~ 01 O N ~ O e- O t0 O O ~`r ~
~ N a-- O~ N CI I~ M O O . CO f~ ~ O ~ 00 ~ O~
' N~(O N 01 c7 'd' t~ O oD ~O t0 ~ a- ~ 1~ OI
N ~ d' I~ d' 1~ O 'd' c~ 'd' I~ h~' OD O'V' 1~
Ue ~ N'd' ~ aO C~ rn O~ c'O tD tt ~ I~ N W
O N f~ c7 e- ~
~ ~ r
Q, EA U2 tf~ V?
J ~ NO ~O 1~ ~Cf 0000~'00 NO ~OCO00 ~ 1~
O W 01~ t0 00 NOtnLf~00~ f~0 OO~OOD ~~O
Q N GO~ O)O M O MO~I~(pOC7 (OI~ ~O~COCO
~ ' COrn COf~ N '~t '~t~-sttOstl~l~ rnt0 aDO~r-M ~ N
~ ~oD 4~N ~ N NN~f~ch~(O I~1~ tnoO~OM d' W
~ p t0 e- O OD 1~ (O r- N~ N'V' N ~~O ~ N f'~ r CD
N ch ~ 00 ch OD
~ ER 1/} fl> ~
~ COI~ lh0 00 ~ O '~t000 O Od' OOI~COONO~OOf~O O OD
a r f~~ Ost ~ O o0 aO~tnM O OM CO~O~D~OONOI~~A O ~ y
~1~ O~~A sf' C'7 N~Ost C~ f~~ O~t00)~t00 W OOCD O~cl^
0 O~~ CO 00 1~ OD ~t I~ 'ct C'7 N CO C~ t0 e~ d' ~f d~ tn O f~ O f~ N~ CO N
N cD M to th C~ N c'9 oD tp tt~ ~ N oD rn N ~ N tD ~n a0 I~ I~ t0 00 '~t O~ ~p^
Z p I~M f~~ M ~ d~~~~ ~t ~O~ ~~NM NO)~NO ~"f ~
~ N e- N O) e1' N r- ~ ch ~ N
~
; d~} d? t~? ~
Q ~ CO M f0 O tp f~ fD O CO N~ O N (O GO OO M t~7 d' ~ CO ~ O 1p ~
f~ O) C7 ~ ~ N~O '~t I~ '~t C~ e- 01 (D N~ O) f0 O~ N N ch O e- ~
` a ~Q Mch NO O o0N M~~NO~ 1~ ?Af01~ ~"~f~N~ O (O C~ O ~
!J r- tA Oi 1~ e'9 CO 1~ Oi M t0 N e- O~ O oi ~t tn f~ O N N N ~ e'~
~ N N CD `C' 00 (D ~ fD e- 00 ~O ~ V' (O O O. N'd' N r' M t~ ~1'~ OD
~ t0 O I~ d' st t~ Q~ (O N ~ aO O~ h r eh ~
J r' O M N ~ ~ON r' 0
Q ~ N c~ <O M r- d' ~O a
F- ~ r y
a ~ v~ ~ , u~ ~
a N ~ o ~ o t~ M CO O O O N O> O tt O O o0 N O O a0 O O' O CO sP a0 d' O~ O c7 t0 ~
" U NC7 tnCO o0 ~tOOO~t~'COr-O)OO~~~OONO)~AOtOd'N~c70~~ ~ OD N
~ ~ ONr-C~ O c'~NMM~CCchOtO00~CDl~f~e-(~d_O~O~NCOCOI~O1~o0 oD O >
r. O'crCh ~O~O O NhCD~tf~'V'ON`~t1~~00O1COl~~O~Otntn~~000]N O O ~
0 ~OI~ oDtO QI N~MtDC7tOe-f~che-o0~"'d'oDinO~~Lf~oOf`~~~t~NCO '~t' O) ~
N F- 00O ~oD r! M OOQ~N NaOCO e-O(O(O'd'Nf~~OO0f~N00 M
~ Ln e- CO P CO tf) e1' ~ ~ s- N C'7 r- tn ~ 'a' f~
O N CD rn o~o r- I~ c0 ~ c`0
O c
} ~ v~ ~ ~
~ ~ v
Q o
r" ^ ~ o c
N
~ ^ `i ~ n' M v C
ti 'D ~ ~ `cT 0 ~ .
(n . ~ N ~ O W O,.-N. v~ p~ C
N~~ ~m 'd't o00 N ~ 'N O
~O ~ N C V~ v~7 MMMIL
~ N Q ~ 0 Q ~ d'i ~'i O ~ N O
' ~ ' y~C C V ~N ~ C r-NM aj0 C a ~
r ~ ~V „i~ ~o0p ~o 0 0 ~~v~ ~ ui
p~~~ V C W M
C N O f0 N
N ' C1 N p ~ U N ~ r"'q ~ 0~: w..~. C m ~ N
E ^ C~.~ r' J N""' p N~ ~ij N~ IO ~p p v N t0 ~0 N f~0 0~ ~ ~
~ ~ oc~ 'oN~ ~ rn~~-W~ UUU~~.. c c a~
N c Z` m ~ ~ a~ er m a~ o>>~ v
a ~ ~~,~7N.NiN ~,~LL y.~~-~p > N'O 0 N CL1..LLILLL~ y~ N m V
~ F' v>~,~ ~~~m ~ c a~'i ~c~.~ c~~ o'm0 ~ c~o o ~ ~ S
N c~~..~ rn~"~ a~m ~ m m co~~V Z Z o
F- L' O Z ~ yQ ~pp mtL c~0 ~ y'~ aaac c
ti Q m ~C o c ~C m c fn cn
~ w co ~ ~n .U.i~ v~ mc~t7 ~Wtn ~ oaV ~ m aE E E E 3 a~ o_ _ y
~ m QtL--- o-. a~
~ y.... z~ c ~o~~j'j¢ ~ y~¢ 0 3~~ ~ am ai ~ o ~ ~ c~ m 1° c Q °
O c E'~ m t-Q- Z c~E~c°h ~~t- ~ m m rn~ m`o m v, v°~,.n.n 3> °'aEi ~ f" o
a c
~c°~ain ~ - c~ci ~c°r°inc¢n¢~i`c~i~=~¢ininw¢a'af`-~=t= oH~ ~
_1_ ~ ~
~ o 0 0 0
o • ~n ~ ~n ~n
N (O c0 C~ ID
~ ~ O> T Of
e- e~ r- a-
O
N
ER tA l~ di
N O N C~p_ 0~D~ C~O_ N o~D~
~ O V' O~ M f~ CO M
- p , ~ ~ ~ ~ Cq N c0
N ' ~ e- e= e~ ,
EA V~ EH tA
N ~ t~D ~ ~ ~
~
~ r ~ ~ eN- ~ ~
O r" N N N
N EA fA d3 fA
LlJ
`Z ~ O N O N 1~ tq N
~ N ~ ~ c~0 0~o N ~ 0~0
~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ .
~ '~t ~O d' r- t0
~ N • .
~ d~ Vi 4f} V}
O O O O oD O. C7 O O 00 N O O CO O GO
~ 1~ O O oD oD O c'7 1A tp ti p~ oD ~ tn O h
~ NN1~~ M O ~tO~D r N MCO000 ~
N tn f7 st ~t c'7 f~ ~ f0 Oi O 1~ a0 (O N~ O
0. ~(D 00 'a CC7D CV e- ^ iD c'7 N oD ~ ~
T . w ~ ~ . .
. Z N . e' _ ~ r .
(j~ ~ ili d~? 64 .
~ fn c'~ ch O c'~ N c'~ O c'~ ~t ~ t0 rn CO r- O~O
W ~ N V' O~t ~n a0 t~ CO CO c'~ h N(D o0 O 1~
~ ~Q f~~oD0000 1~~ a-O M ~N CO t`7 1"!
Q CO O Yp 0~ Q) GO C~ N r e= l0 I~ f~ O e=
` ~ r' N i~ ~ ~ c~ e7 ~ t'~ ~ N f~ e- f~ ~ N
~ t-- ~ CO C7 N d' e- ~ ~O 'd: W ~~O
~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ N
~ ~
J a ~ ~ u,
I'~' J Of~70chNr- Nc7 1~~0 t0 M(00C0(O~ c0 .
ostONl~l~. Nc0 ~a0~ N 1~(Oa0 tntn~ N
a a or~~o~ ~trn O(ON O ooNc'~I~coco O
a ~ o~~~~N ~~~oNO ~
~ oo ~n rn rn i. rn rn c~ co t~ rn m st ~ co ~r ao v to
V 1-- r O 1~ C'7 I~ 00 'V' ~ ~ OD ~ N th OD
r GO N ~ ~ 1n
T. . c- N ~ N
O _
N ~ il~ tr3 v~
~ .
O
~ T
~ p~
N
~ ~ a~i c
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ ~ts o ~
> ~ a~ o. c~u ~
N ~N
y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M
N €(n C O O~
W ~ N C O ~ tJ) •V 'p ' ~ v C
Z T~ O~. a N V LL fJ~ c ~ G E
~ N E C ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ N Q. . p ~ ~ ~O'
Q~~ C CJ~ U~ ~ } AO ~m W
p ~ N=_ a- LL i ~
~ ~ v,,~,~ O.N~ U y ~~~+'''O~
m"' Y~ Q' V N~' C LL ~ O(L 'O O. 7 7 Z
~ ~ `p~ ~UU ~U ~ ~ N 0 C LL'll
o F- r- ~ E U
~c°n.~Eo~~c~$N~.~Q F- ~:~'~-c°~ic°~i Z
Z a~ o a~ o ~ ~ ~ 0 v) ~ c ~ ~"Z 'Z Q
F, ~ZUU' UUUUQf4~a¢ Q. Z~ v,~'v Z
V V Q~ m tn tn ti
. W r- cV c~ st ~ cD ao 01 O N J V t0 V ~p ~p J
Q OOOOOO OO OO ~ ~.a„ Q~ C~= E aC. ~ _
~ c~ c~ c'~O c~ c~ ('~O M c'~7 c~ c~ C ~ Z N~~ j:~ ~
O. rnrnrnrnrnrn rnrn rnrnQ t- u.C7UF-~.55 F-
_2_ .
I
~ ~
~ W°W ~ ~
oZ~~ o a
W ~ ~ ~ .
c~~ Z~~
oy
• , LL ~o,w
~ ~
C~ ~
. oa o
a yW. ~
~W ;
w? ~ ~
. ~ L6 V
W W
> 2
O ~
aZ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~
H ~ o
_o
~
V Z ` W ~
a ~
~ u z
N ~ Z ~
a ~
o a,
c
N W ~ Cj JQ
~ ~ > > ~
~ ~ . I- V O
~ ,w~7 0 ~
~
N ~ ~ .
a rn .
_3_
N O O O O
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
O
N
V} d} l~? 6~?
• N N O M M M
M r CO 00 CO 00
F"' O
N
W H3 d~y d~} ~i? I
~ ~
W N N ~ O W O O O '
O ~
, ' O NC~OL~ ~ ~ ~
Q./ p N r ~ ~1' '
0. N ,
~ ~s ~ ~ ~ '
N •
~ N ~ O t~fJ^ ~ ~
Z ~ ~ C~D O~0 0~0 O~D
~ 0 •
~C N fA fR 4A
C
0 e- 00~ O~i ~O ~
O CO r O 1~ r- Cfl 1~
~ N .[r d' Q~ ~ ih O~
~ O NM~ c'M') ~N ~~'i '
N 69 6f) fH
~ o ~
~ ~ I
. ~ ~Q M M M M '
a ~ .
1' N N N N
f" ~ '
Z ~ .
W
~ a EA d~ fA iR
L1J N .
0 0 o O
~ J
O a N O C~O_~ ~ N N O N
. H
O NN~~~ O oNON O
~ ~ ~
fA fA ER d~Y
a
V o ~ .
u~ m
~ o
o ~
a~
o ~
~ ~ ~ a .
0 0. ~
N ~ ~ U ,
a w=
~ W c ` o .
~ Z-~ m0'~
-o~•o~ ~
~ Z o¢a
~ ~ . Q ~ a~ rn a~ .
C~ C t0 U ~
. W O ~+'N ~ ~G~p .
~U ~Y ~ o~ Z
m co a.. - m c o V
~ ~'~n°- 3w ~
~
Z~ c`~o a`°~ia~ N ~ ~u'.. a
U cq I- I- f~ U O Z ~ y Z '
t~ u.
~ 00o m J Z c~a g J
000 = a a a
~ o00 ~Q ~ Z ~
~ a rnrnrn¢z ~ u. c7a' ~
_4_ ,
This page irttentionally left blanl~
-5-
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r
0
c~ r- ~ ~n
~ ~ ~
~ N Cr0 a~0 ti ~ ti
T
N ~ N . t0 CD ~O
~ 69~ b~} EI~T
r' ~ ~O ~O ~O
N ~ ~ ~ ~ dN'_
~ ~ '~V' r ~-M- ~
O ~ ~ M CO
y N ~ rn oi o~
. Y arr ~ ~
. a ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
a
~ N ~ ti ti ti
~ ~t ~t d:
. Q N ti t~ I~ t~
a ~ ~
c~ . s
~o ~ ~ ~ o 0 0 ~
o v_ o~ rn o~ ~
E.. ~ v ~ ~ ~`r a~
Z o ~ r~ c~i cn ~
W cr s
~ ~ v~ ~ ~r ~
j rn ao o o~ o ch i. o 0 o co cn o
O r- (O ~ ~ O N O O O N O O ~p e- O `
O ~ M'V_ 1~ Cfl ~ c'~ W N i~ M C~ M O~
~ N M 1~ 'V' CO ~i' C7 ~ O1 tn CO ~ O OD OI
a O CO CO OD 1~ I` 00 tf~ O OD GO ~ M ~ O
p I~ O~ c- N V' I~ a~ ~ O~ ch P ~
~ ~ N N ~
N
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
~
~ f~ t'7 O CO O GO ~O CO N oD o0 N t0
Q Q NN~ a~0 ~rn N a~--~• tNOtio°pD. N
W GD~f~ r MN 01 lfJ W ~d'~ OI ~
~ f~ 1~ CO '~Y' f~7 1` • 00 tn s~ O O CO 00 V
~ 00 ch e- ~ O f~ (O N'd_ O
~ O 0 ~t 00 M ~ ~ M ~ ~
~ ~ N
o a ~ w ~ o
U
~ COr'e" t~ L~CDOOOtA O a~ c'7NOOODG00 ~
C
~ st M~ I~ r cr O~ N oD O tp O O~ O O N s- ~ tn ~
N ~ ao t0 u~ 00 ~ c'~ rn f~ rn c0 ch c'~ e^ '~t f~ 1~ c'~ t0 e- N r N
} Ja ~N~ s1' ~NCOO~~ ~ ~O O~(D~O>u7~fl ~D ~
a/ oD tA ~ O f~ aO 'cf' f~ s}' c0 OO CD ~t CO GO O~~ 00 ~
00 00 '[f ~ 1~ 'd_ e- C7 47 Lq e- CO r tf~ ~ fQ
~ O
a ~t N a0 N T c'~ s- ~ ~ N~ t~0 'O
a~
~ w ~ ~ ~
N
= 3
o Y
E c -a v, '9 rn ~ n-
7~ (CQ ~ V C v 0 .
N j C ~ ¢ ~ > O
~ C ("-'p '.'~~~d Ll.l N O
W '~[L' ~ N O~0'-~ V~ N L
~ N N ~ ~LE~Va Qr- rn
Z Y C~ ~ n- S] O-p . fA M f~ ~
. (~p 7 Y~C Y C'C ~ L C ' v Z
~ n' N X~ N N'~ V O~ C~' ~ y U
z a~C9a,a a~ ma~ZQ= ~ . ~o~o ~
a N N N C aa C Y L C~ C ~ E N~~ ~
_'C E O N V U~~N N ~ otS N v~ ~
W ~ oao°.~U o cca~ZU o Z`m ~n'" C~ y°i . .
~ m Z
~ ~ m_°°v~-° °c o a~ cQ ~ u~i ~
~ C C 0~~p y~~ y~.~+ C F. v f~ V~ C.0 LJ' Z ~
N ~ Ol
Z>>mEvc~'nEc~OEo.~9c~N C7 ~"°~u~m:~~' Q v~
v ?o~wQaww~wa.cn v z ,io~ ~ *
w .-r~~r. rn .J V ~~am ~ J *
~ o°o°OO°o °0 3 3 3 ~ a c m~~°~ N~ Fa-~
a rnrnrnrn rnzzzzzz ~ uZ. c~~Qinci~wa ~
_s_
00?~r-~COOdOd'O~ O O O
' W O W l~tiC~p_NM('~~ONO~~ON tMC~ O ~
p Z H 1- r~ ~~t ao ri 'ui m~n c~i ~r u~ o u~ ~
ZO ~N ~~OMttQ1~'~ONoD r O ~r
~ ~F~O NchCD~CD~aOC'70I~N ~ ~n o
Z~~(~ C~ r- CO C~ e- ~ tn ~ 00 1~ 00 e- 1~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ W ~ ~ W
a ~ a ~ ~ ~
~
~ ~
O~ .
~ Q t--
I-- ~ W ~
~
~ W; ~ ~U
W E ~ ~
W ' V ~ p
~ ~ o ~ z c~i~
a ~ ~ w=
~ Z ~ a~ L a W .
Q c~ " O ~
Q~ E o = °o U• w= .
~ m a
QW ~ ~OC ~ ~ ~
t~ ~ -a ~ ~ ~ V ~
'A Z c~o w ~ z o Z u. J
O LL W'~ ~ ~ ~mY V ~0 La1.
cV Z ~ ~p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y Y ~
Z ~(~da. c`a a~iQn-~n.a p .
oV~ G ~v~ycaV,~~cc~ W~ 2
N V Q~ o o~j c~C7C7 a~i N
~ W ~=~~-o ~Q~~-o~U v) z .
Q~ W c c c c~o c"''a ~ c~~~ N Q tnf' ~ ~
Q m__ o d N~=w a~ a~ c H Z
~~~~oEm>>mEE~ O W~ .Z7
=a Zoou.wat~owwwi- f- ~c~ u.
v~ t~-
c.~
W r-chvr~rn .
-~ooooo
pooooo
oooooQQQQQQ
arnrnrnrnrnzzzzzz
_7_
O N . O O O f~ O O O OOh ~ 1•
N~ O Of N ~ O OON Of
N '~t C7 O 1~ 'ef C9 O O f~ O st ~
N N ~(O . n t0 . 0I C7 ~ ~ O N f0 .
~ ~
~ W V!
~ W ~ O O O OD ~ O O O O O 07 CO
~ ~ ~ N~ O O aD N ~ O O O O
N O N C7 ~ t~ M (V [7 ~ O h O~7 1'9
~'9 ~ f`7 '~t d' t0 1~ CO V' O (O O OD 1~
r ~ CO tq OD f~ O ~ tD ~ O~ M h a- ~ O
N ~ ~ (D fD
N N
~ w v~ w
M
r ~ O t0 O O O N O 1[7 CD O O O oD O O tp O 1O
O O tD a0 I~ N tp I~ O Ip M~ N tq O e-~ O O O ~ r- {if ~
N ~ N N N ch O N h ~ N ~ t~7 O O ~D 1~ O~.- a0 ~ N
~y . CO . W M tD ~ h W ~O N ~ N ~t I~ O aD t0 tp ~ Oi h N
e- N aD tD aD ~ ~ N ~ h ~ tp O V' ~ `d' 1~ 7 a0 O'd'
N ~O , . a- W tD CD CO . aD- N ~ C9 tD ~l7 1~ N OD
Pi' ~"f
~ MF 6F? N
eN- t0 O N a0 O ~~00 O O O O c0 0000~00 NOOtD00 O
O tD f~ aD N O N O - O ~[f h a0 N O~ tp O O Of f~ O O ~ O cD h
N ~ QO (O N f0 (O f0 M O h ~p O N C? O 01 f~ tD O f7 CO I~ O~ CO (O O
~ ~ c7 O) (~D O c~~J O ~ n N CMO NNO~i~~a~n-Cn0 nn°manio~ N
~ ~
I" N ~ r N ~ tt . t0 O) O e- <O ~ N O) N V' N• tD ~ N f7 O.
W ~ r' ~ . 47 . t~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ O ~ N O~O'd'.- ~t O O 00 O 00 O O tt000 b '~tO00N0~0 W O
O I~ ~ cq 0C7 ~O O O N~ tp0 W a~ O a0tttqM O MO~InOONOh ~
O Ot0 ~ f~Nt~01 O O P7 fp ~ fpN 1f! O N~OV_ ~O NI~~"'0)~00~00 K7
~ ~ O f~ h c~1 t~ O Oi 'ct f0 M I~ CD O 'R h~ C~ N h tp c~ 6~ ~ O I~ O h 00
N u7 fD M ~ aO O CD ~ 'V' O~ s- e'~ oD ~ tt') N O a0 tn c0 f~ h fD c+~
~ O N O O~ O C9 ~O OD ~ Cq 1p a- 'cT tp a-- a- N 01 a- N O 1p
T
N M r a- O/ ~ C7 OI
0 ~ ' w ~ ~ y
. ~a f0 th CO t0 CO O a0 aD tp N a0 ~ 01 'st O N O CD N O) O t0 tt O~~ a0 ~t O
hN ~ OfONGD tqNl~r c9 (p ~ r NVf~stCO~ (D WfV N c'~ r
~ ~~~t7 'V' cD N st ~ fD N O O I~ f9 ~ ~ N W N~ O fD O
~ Z Oi N O Oi O ~ t!1 tp ~ N a0 O f~• h ~[j pj c+j tD C~j ~ O O fV N N f~
c'9 ~ a0 fD c0 ti I~ tp N f~ N ~ th fD ~ aD tD 01 f0 N ~ M fD
W O I~ I~ I~ N ~ ~ N h N 1~ O7 a0 O~ h t:
~ ~ ~ . N ~ N r ~
W ~
C. (9 ~ Y! f9 Y?
~ J O ~N CD aDOe-N a00 N W MOO ~ N~ 000 O ?~OON~O~OOa00NO~aDet W Ot+~ O
O tAr- `V' f~0e-01 O m(D~ ~'Oit f0 1~ W tD0 `d' 00 C~e!"~fCO~-~OO~~OI~~~tN~C70~ OD ~
a F O ON tp ~taDCO t+) a-O C?sF N(OON NO~~OaO t0 aDM~-tpcOOf00a7tOa0c7O1NtDtOhOh t0
~ 0 O I~t[~n CD hI~ ~ r tri OJ N' (7t-~~O ~ h011~c0 iD d~~~~ON~f~0107f~ln~ln0)~00~ 10
F t!7 cD c0 1~ CD f0 ~Y (O t0 c0 aD N '~t P O~ f~ ~ N e- tD aD t0 t[1 tD CO CD e- t~ M r- a0 CD f0 ~ 1~ h N ID ~
J N t~ N tt ~ a0 CD ~ tD tF N t~ ~ 1~ N~t 'd' aD ' a0 O O W N N a0 V' ~ O aD h N a0 OD
a a- C7 fD N e~ M' r M C9 e- lq ~ a- ~ a-- ln s- r- a-
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
a
v ~ w ~ r,
~ > ~ •
0 0 ~ "
o c ~ ~Z ~
e- c~ ' >E ~
o co c j~ o> ; ~
N , 2 m o. m m '
o E ~ E
~ o > ~ ~ ° ° .
Q > o m.~v om m
g ~ p°. ~~o `~im m ~
~ ~ m~ d w~ 01 m m `c
~ d ~ ~ 'o ~ ~ ~ > > ca
V~ ~i ~3~ E~jv,`m co` ~ `o m~~
~ m ~ d~ m~ p y~ ~~FF 01 ~ f~0 y C ' .
~ ~ l1 j ~ ~ V _ N ~ O a C C p ~ .
a ~ C O` O p~ ~ i N ~ +r a . N p '`f' t0
O
f0 ~ d ~N C f0 ~ O v
~ N m ~ W ~ r~ N ` ` N C ~ l~6 C - ` ~ ~ N . ~ .7 . 1~0 ~ v .~,~i
~ d~~~€oHpaaa~ ~~oE t~aOC c°~ v~o ~~N~ma ,
W °1v~rn~d-'c E°7v°> >rna> tyrno~ ~o~ Nmrornc°hc°nc°n~ia
~ ° o ~m~m w ~0 ~ ~ ° -°~o-~ E d ~ .~va oc~v~~~~~ o
Z'.~° d E ~ c E~ m°. ~ m> d ~ ~°"~~c~NC~ m drn
0 0- m~ ~ m~~~ E o ~ E d? o d c~ c~ v a> o
? Nav~c ~Q~.o2 ~p~~ Uy>~ ao~,~n. ~mU ~v..~~oooEOv
Z~cj c~ f-m~p~~°.E> o mrn0 ~~~=~~yE in~ d~m~e~ma~~im~c
a`-°m~~ m,~eYin° c o°~~,'3_ ~~°~~mm> c=iv~+ ~v°°~~d°~`my~ocom~~~
w d`~o°m°~ 3 f°a m~~ Em o~•E in~~,~•aoo o a~i o, oooo','a ~N~~~n-wUUC~~~~ C7
m C p U -N ~ Nm ~J G1 y cm ~LLp1 O~NN x 7 c!O N N N 0~ Z
~ l6 y C~ C O~ n' o~ G L~~ (0 l0 L~ C N C~ U ~ v ~ ~ ftl Y u- N 0~ ~p p y ll. ll.. LL C fq +j C~
Z F-1=0W0 aStNWmN~~O°~Q¢020~~~f~ O Z~~~J~mmtic~~~~aao.~~V Z
W c~ r~v~n aornoc~ mi.aorn o-- V C~~~tO~v~moaU~+~~EEEE3mo
~°o °o°o°o °oo°oo 0000 0>> Q Z a~°omWQyN~O3~m~O°~~~'`° a
~ m° c°o°mc°o ~°mc°oc°o °mc°o°mc°o c°oc~a Q¢a3i a~'ia3i p Za~im:°QUatOimgmrno~y~c~~omo>O7~
a rn o~rnrn wrnrnw wwa~w o~QQZ Z~ZZZZ F- u.C7c~tAtqQ~F-UF-S~w~F-HF-~F-~ t-
_ o _
0
ON~c~cO~CO O~ O ~ 'O
~y„ C4 Lf~ r- Cfl O O~ O~ CO M ~O •
W 0 W ao rn rn~n rn o cfl o0 0 ~ eh
CO o0 ~ N C~ ~ tC) e- f~ f~ 1~
~ ~ Z E" I~ O l1) Cfl t[) O 00 O 00 CO C7 I~
. ZQ Q fn th~tc')chrnrnrn ~t N f~ et
O O~uid'c~NO N Cp C~ ~
Z~F'(~ en~- ~
. ~ ~ ~aW
W W ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ Z
~ N
. N ~ ~U W O
~ = O
~ W ~ c6 . > N
•o n. o
a ~ .
V o ~ co
O ~ ° ~ N ~ LL
a ~ ~
~ ~ _
a~ Q Zo~ Q a .
C) y
va
W~ W W
~
WW oop ~ V
0 F' mm ~ ~ a
~ ~ ~ ~ a~ a~ ~ 0 ~
Z m a~,» ~ W
~ ~ • a~ c~ ~ ~ V ~
...~I~ .;i'a3ia~iv°v~o ~w ~
~ ~QQ~ m C9'~ I-
.UW ~~av~v~~W J
~ °'`.,r°~~~c- o-°- m
Z a~i a~ a~ cn Z
u» o~'mEE~I-- o~ ~
°~u~oo°~' ~Z Q J .
W m•c o Qnao W Q
~N ~ o.~~~~~c mX w tLL-
N V Z y Q.~avv p ~ W F- ~
c c-fl m co co = ~ J t~ O
~ z° ~~o~~ ~ ~ a.~ ~ v=,
a O ¢ ~ ~ c
~ ~ ~.~.Cm~ y W I- ~ C9.
~ c o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~w a ?
~ n' m ~ a`~ c~~,c m Q N tA ~ p
> > ;3~~nc~ F- v~~ cn z
y •~cuooo~~ O w0 w ~
Z 1- W ~ ~ ~ ~!n F- J 2 . J LL •
h-
t~ •
W N~t~nrn
p °o o° °o o ~ .
~ c°a°mc°oc°oQQQ
a rn~rnrnzzz
. _g~ .
CITY OF DUBLIN
OVERVIEW OF 5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
FUNDED PROJECTS ~
(In Millions of Dollars)
APPROPRIATtONS
~ . TOTAL $56.9 MILLION
Generai
7% Community
2%
Streets ~
~ 39%
Parks
~52%
_ CITY OF DUBLIN ,
OVERVIEW OF 5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
~ FUNDED PROJECTS
(In Percent by Funding Source) .
~ REVENUE SOURCES
. TOTAL $56.9 MILLION
Other City
Resources
17%
,
. xrr:~~: .
X~;~ -
°'~ak~evsG~~~xesu.
_T
Grants -
7%
- Private
. D~evelopment
Generai Fund 67%
9% ~ . -
_1~_ .
enera ~
. m rovemen s
~ .
CITY OF DUBLIN 201~0 - 2015
. CAPITAL (MPROVEMENT PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS
~ . . _
GENERAL PROJECTS
The Generai Project category includes a variety of projects which enhance or improve the
functioning of City facilities and/or technology in order to better serve the community.
Significant projects included in this category include the following:
Computer System & Technology Projects
Replacement of the City's Accounting and Building Permit System Hardware and Software,
was necessary to integrate systems and take advantage of efficiencies offered from new
technology. Due to the complexity of the systems, a phased implementation schedule was
used and the new system is anticipated to be fully implemented by June 2011. The CIP also
includes a project which addresses upgrades and enhancements to the City Computer _
Network, based on needs identified in the 2007 Information & Technology Master Plan.
The focus of Geographic Information Systems information will be on the procurement of.
updated aerial imagery. The updating of the imagery began with an aerial flight in Spring
2010 and will be completed in the Fall of 2011. The cost effectiveness of the project was .
, enhanced through a partnership with the cities of Pleasanton and Livermore who are
engaging in a similar project. ~
Civic Center Modification Desiqn Services & Construction
The process to expand and renovate the Civic Center needs to continue in ordec to prepare
for having adequate space when development resumes, as well as the efficient use of
existing space to best serve the community. With the slow-down in development activity, the
space needs to service the development process have been relieved. The proposed funding
addresses modifications to the existing building to accommodate essential public safety
services support needs, as well as replacement of the door access system, which is beyond
its useful life.
Library Expansion Pro1ect
The original Civic Center Library construction included 37,000 square feet. Of that amount, ~
30,000 square feet was used for Library and community rooms and 7,000 square feet was
reserved as future expansion areas. The Civic Center Library Expansion project is shown
currently in 2013-2014. The need for the space and impact on operating costs will be
. examined in future updates.
Maintenance Facilitv Improvements ~ ~ ~
In 2008, the City acquired the former 84 Lumber Yard as a location that can be used for a
much needed Maintenance Facility. The CIP identifies costs to improve the site. .
Public Facility Fee Study Update ~
Periodic review and updating of the study and assumptions for needs in the community is
appropriate. Ttiis also will be helpful in preparing the basis for futur~ updates to the CIP.
_11-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT D~SCRIPTION ~ ACTIVITY
930001 N30 Studio Remodei GENERAL
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
The Tri
Valley Community Television (TV30) Board, in cooperation with the cities of Dublin, Livermore, Pleasanton and
San Ramon, initiated a project in Fiscal Year 2001-2002 to relocate and expand the current N30 studio and upgrade
much of the existing equipment with new digital technologies. The studio expansion was pursued up through Fiscal
Year 2006-2007, with the project proceeding through the design phase. The estimated cost of the studio
relocation/expansion was $1.8 million, with an equal share of $450,000 being paid by each participating city.
Since Fiscal Year 2006-2007, N30 has undergone an organizational realignment that has rendered the
relocation/expansion of the studio unnecessary. Although the relocationlexpansion phase of the project is no.langer
necessary, TV30 has equipment and technology needs to be met as part of this project The total City contribution for
the remaining portion of the project plus the expenses previously incurred is $180,000. To date, the City has
contributed approximately $114,723 for its share of the project costs ($20,000 of which was previously accounted for
in the City's Community Cable Television Operating Budget) thereby, reducing the Fiscal Year 2010-2011 contribution
to $65,277.
COMMENTS
As part of the City's Cable Television Franchise Agreement, the City received a$200,000 capital grant from AT&T,
which can be used for the purchase of video production equipment and associated facility modifications for the City
and/or Tri-Valley Community Television (N30). The City used approximately $120,000 of this grant to purchase and
install video production equipment in the Council Chamber as part of a separate CIP. The remaining $80,000 was
used to partially offset the cost of the N30 Studio Remodel Project
~ FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2D10-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 20142015 Totals
Design / Inspedion 1001 $ 114,723 $ 65,277 ' $ 180,000
Other Contrect Services $ 180,000 ~ •
Land / Right of Way '
Improvements
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous ~
TOTAL ~ 180,000 S 114,723 ~ 65,2T7 S 780,000
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
-12-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
930002 Nefinrork System Upgrade GENERAL
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
This project provides for additions and upgrades to the City data processing nefinrork. This includes the basic
infrastructure necessary to access centralized computer servers as weil as the accompanying data storage and
support for changes in technology, which are consistent with the Strategic Technology Master Plan presented to
the City Council in 2007.
COMMENTS
During Fiscal Year 2007-2008 a Strategic Technology Master Plan (Master Plan) was completed. This was a~
High Priority City Council Goal, which has provided a context for the budgeting required in the future years for this
project. In Fiscal Year 2009-2010 projects included implementation of secure remote access to files on the City
network ($12,000); enhancements to improve network performance at tFie Senior Center ($20,000); initial stage of
server operating system upgrades ($5,000); and design and initial implementation stages of a Civic Center
wireless network ($60,000). Related projects funded by the Internal Service Fund for Fiscal Year 2009-2010
included improvements to data backup hardware and software, and replacement of the main Internet firewall.
These activities were funded from equipment replacement funds.
In Fiscal Year 2010-2011 funded projects will address remote access for City Staff to network software programs
($9,000); Disaster Recovery planning ($10,000); Citywide fiber .optic cable/conduit inventory ($25,000);
Secondary Intemet connection at the Civic Center for business continuity ($15,000); Reserve battery power for
nefinrork rooms ($3,000); Staff training on a new version of desktop software ($7,000); and implementation of new
server software for a virtual server environment ($29,200). Planned upgrade of the electronic mail server and
. software will be funded through the Internal Service Fund at a cost of $45,000.
Project plans for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 include the following: improvements to neiwork storage; evaluation of
opportunities for fiber optic connection of City facilities; and implementatiori of long term disaster recovery
improvements. Project plans for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 include the following: completion of additional
improvements to nefinrork storage; complete disaster recovery improvements; and improve network security
monitoring. .
A Master Plan updafe will be conducted in Fiscal Year 2013-2014. The Master Plan update will identify needs for
future years. Funding for future years is to be determined. ~
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE ~
ESTIMATEDCOSTS Fund PriorYears 2070-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection 1001 $ 506,677 $ 98,200 $ 137,5p0 $ 192,500 $ 60,000 $ 994,877
Other Contract Servlces $ 502,901 2101 17,266 17,266
Land / Right of Way 6301 45,000 45,000
Improvements 10,348 ,
Machinery! Equipment 540,503 •
Miscellaneous 3,391
TOTAL ~ 1,057,143 S 523,943 a 143,200 $ 13T,500 $ 192,500 S 60,000 $ 1,057,143
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT FTE CONTRACT
_1H_ _
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTNITY
930003 Combined Finance / Permit System GENERAL
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
The City~ currently operates several centralized accounting and payroll functions on an IBM AS/400. Permits and
Business License are on a separate system. The systems are outdated, and tFirough a comprehensive review
process it has been determined that efficiencies can be gained by implementing a solution from a single vendor which
focuses on govemment software solutions. This item would provide for replacement of the Finance IBM AS/400 and
all associated sofiware as well as servers and software currently used for licensing and permits.
COMMENTS
In Fiscal Year 2006-2007 the City selected a third party consultant to develop a Request for Proposal (RFP).
Responses to the RFP were evaluated along with extensive vendor demonstrations which were completed in August
2008. The City Council authorized an agreement with Eden Systems, a Tyler Technology Company, in November
2008. Project implementation began in December 2008 and is expected to be complete in multiple phases by June
2011.
In June of 2008, prior to selection of the software, the total cost of the replacement system was projected to be
$743,600 (consuftant assistance with the system acquisition, training, and implementation of the system). The project
cost included $150,300 provided from reserves established for replacement of these systems. Based on updated
project costs to provide assistance with additional reports and project management an additional $51,900 will be
required from the general fund beginning July 1, 2010. This results in a total project cost of $795,500 (funded with ~
$645,200 from the General Fund and $150,300 from the Intemal Service Fund).
The core modules for finance applicafions, licensing and permits will be complete by June 30, 2010. In Fiscal Year
2010/2011 the project will complete the following: On-Line / Intemet Systems (Licenses, Permits, and Remote Field
Reporting); Fixed Assets, Contract Management; Customized Reporting and other system enhancements. Among .
the benefits anticipated from this project are: ~
a. Improved integration of systems with real time reporting in a user friendly environment
b. Ability to streamline inspection data entry and support field inspectors with real-time information.
c. Regular updates to the software provided by the vendor, which allows the City to establish strong
intemal controls and safeguards. .
d. Streamlined 6usiness processes which draw upon best practices.
e. Improved reporting capabilities. ~
f. Improved customer service for both intemal and extemal customers including web based intertace.
This CIP would accomplish the following High Priority City Council Objectives:
2010-2011 OBJECTIVES
1. Implement combined finance / permit / licensing software.
2. Implement web-based business license applications and renewals.
3. Implement real-time electronic field inspection system.
4. Develop and implement program for on-line Building permit applications (over the counter permits only); and on-
_ line inspection scheduling. -
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund Prior Years 2010-2017 2011-2072 2012-2013 2073-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection 1001 $ 520,500 $ 124,700 $ 645,200
Other Contrect Services $ 457,021 6301 150,300 150,300
Land / Right of Way
Improvements
Machinery / Equipment 338,448
Miscellaneous 31
TOTAL S 795,500 ~ 670,800 a 724,700 S 795,500
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
,q,_
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT~DESCRIPTION ACTiVITY
930004 Geographic Information System GENERAL
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
This project provides for the implementation of an integrated Geographic Information System (GIS). This type of
system incorporates various data related to geographic locations and visually dispiays it on a map. The data includes
foundation layers of engineering and planning mapping, including aerial photographs of the City. The remaining
elements of this project build additional layers of information that are more function specific.
COMMENTS
Since 2002, the City has made progress in the development of an Geographic Information System. Initial phases
produced a system that has increased the productivity of City Staff, enhanced customer service and provided GIS
information through a public website. In Fiscal Year 2009-2010 the project completed. Phase 1 of digital aerial
photography acquisition. GIS project items funded through the Administrative Services Department Operating Budget
were updates to the storm drain data layer and functional enhancements to the Staff and Public GIS websites. .
In Fiscal Year 2010-2011, consultant services are proposed to assist with completion of the following enhancements
to the Geographic Information System: 1) Phase 2 of digital aerial photography acquisition ($16,000); ~nd 2)
completion of a GIS Needs Assessment ($30,000). Additionally, a gran# application has been submitted to fund the
acquisition of a GIS-Based Collision Tracking Software and Database System. The system includes software and
licenses, mapping modules, installation and training. It will also include one server compatible computer, including
attachments, accessories and auxiliary apparatus. If the, grant funding request of $38,380 is not approved, the
acquisition will not move forward.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATEDCOSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 20142015 Totals ,
Design / Inspection 1001 $ 315,043 $ 46,000 ' $ 361,043
Other Contrad Services $ 283,137 2106 38,380 38,380
Land / Right of Way
Improvements
Machinery/Equipment 111,177 ~
Miscellaneous ~ 5,109
TOTAL ~ 399,423 ~ 315,043 ~ 84,380 ~ 399,423
PROJECT STAFF ~
MANAGEMENT(FTE7 CONTRACT
. -15- . '
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
930005 Civic Center Library GENERAL
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e
` ~ M~ jwl~.~-
The • project provides for the design and NW C~ S
construction of a 37,000 square foot library. The .
new library is located adjacent to the Civic Center . ~
at 200 Civic Plaza
~ I~M . ~ ~
~ ~
~ PRFTA ~
a
= W
~
~ ~
a~e~~ $ i
~
~ eo
Civic Center
COMMENTS ~
In September 1998, the City Council approved the Library Planning Task Force Report which recommended that a
37,000 square foot library be built at the Civic Center. The 37,000 square foot building was completed in Fiscal Year
2002-2003 and 30,000 square feet was occupied. The Dublin Public Library opened to the public on April 12, 2003.
A breakdown of the project costs are shown as follows
Library Task Force Report $ ~ 20,860
Phase I Design & Construction 17,197,992 ~ ~
Phase II Design & Construction 1.554,220
TOTAL $ 18,773,072 ~
The new library was funded by Public Facility Fees ($12,327,226) and Private Development ($2,000,000); the balance
of $4,445,846 was funded from the General Fund.
Phase II is scheduled for Fiscal Year 2013-2014 at which time the City anticipates that it will be able to afford the
annual operating expense of a larger library. The project includes removal of two interior walls to open up the ~
expansion areas in the main library and children's area for use. Additionally, shelving will be relocated and augmented,
the existing computer area will be enlarged and additional maferials will be purchased.
. FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATEDCOSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2017 2011-2012 2072-2013 2018-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 267,977 1001 $ 6,127,851 $ 317,995 $ 6,445,846
OtherContractServices 1,760,196 4100 11,091,001 1,236,225 12,327,226
Land / Right of Way '
Improvements 13,788,075
Machinery/Equipment 690,935
Books 2,157,650
Miscellaneous 108,239
TOTAL $ 18,773,072 s 17 218,852 s 7,554,220 S ~ 8,773,072
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
-16-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
930006 Civic Center Modification GENERAL
Desi n Services 8 Construction
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION . e
, ` ,
This project provides for the completion of the Dublin ~ T•= '_~r-
Civic Center renovation in order to accommodate the
additional City Staff and police personnel required to
serve the community at build-out of the City. Design,
engineering and all consulting services needed for the ~ ~
modifications at the Civic Center are included in the W
CIP. ~ ~ ~ ~ J PRFTA o
. ~ ~ a
~
~
a~e o N e~w
LVD
'
• CIvIG Center Faeo
COMMENTS
As the City grows, it.has become necessary to increase personnel to adequately serve the community. During Fiscal
Year 1997-1998, the.City conducted a Civic Center Space Planning Sfudy, which identified the number o# personnel in
each City Department that would occupy space in the Civic Center in the Year 2002, and at build-out of the City's
General Plan.
The proposed modifications as a result of the Study were divided into phases. The first phase was completed in Fiscal
Year 2000-2001 at an approximate cost of $2.1 million. Improvements included the completion of 4,500 square feet of
unimproved space, expansion of the police parking lot, and construction of a 494 square foot evidence garage, a 470
square foot bike storage building and a 1,026 square foot maintenance building.
A Space Programming Study completed in Fiscal Year 2006-2007 recommended a 12,120 square foot renovation and
8,040 square foot addition to the Police wing (Phase II); and an 8,880 square foot renovation and 5,253 addition to the
City Hall wing (Phase III). The City Council has designated $1.2 miHion dollars from General Fund Reserves towards
this project.
Based on the slow down in development the proposed expansion has been put on hold. Currently work is being done
on replacement of the building security system and consultant services have been retained to confirm the space
programming study and perform an evaluation of the structural, electrical and mechanical systems in the building in
anticipation of the proposed expansion.
This CIP would accomplish the following High Priority City Council Objective:
2010-2011 OBJECTIVE ~ .
1. Implement recommendations from the Civic Center Workspace Programming Study.
FINANCINGfYFARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund Prior Years 2010-2011 2017-2012 ~ 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 2,081,096 1001 $ 603,238 $ 370,532 $ 973,770
. Other Contract Services 1,089,322 4100 1,835,845 1,835,845
Land / Right of Way 6201 82,856 82,856
Improvements 13,735,393
Machinery/Equipment 787,112
Miscellaneous . 102,109 Insufficient funding within CIP time frame 14,902,561
TOTAL ; 17,795,032 ~ 2,439,083 S 453,388 S 17,795,032
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT FTE) CONTRACT
-17-
~ 2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVIT~(
930008 Civic Center Generator GENERAL
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION , e
` ~
This project will replace the existing Civic Center T Y.
emergency generator with a larger unit capable of r,..--
Powering the entire building. The project includes ~
modification of the existing enclosure to accept the
larger generator and construction of a new trash - ~
enclosure.
. ~ n
~ ~ i~ S PRFTA o
O
fo ~
Z7 ~ W
O ~j
~ D LVD ~
~
.
' . I~BU
Civic Center
COMMENTS
The existing generator is sized to power only certain elements of the Civic Center which were determined to be critical
functions at the time the building was originally constructed. However, it has been determined that there is a benefit to
both Staff and the public that the entire facility remain operational during a power failure or emergency situation. The
City is currently exempt from blackouts, but the exemption status could change.
A portion of this project will be funded by the Internal Service Fund.
;
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 • 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspecfion $ 10,927 1001 $ 38,770 $ 314,057 $ 352,827
Ottier Contract Services 48,577 6301 145,595 145,595
Land ! Right of Way
Improvements 287,974
Machinery / Equipment. 145,595
Miscellaneous 5,349
TOTAL $ 498,422 $ 38,T70 ~ 459,652 ~ 498,422
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT . '
-18- ~
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY ,
930009 Automated Document Storage GENERAL
8~ Retrieval S stem
DESCRIPTION - LOCkTION
This project provides for the purchase and phased implementation of an electronic automated document imaging
, storage system_ for all City Departments. This system provides an efficient method to index, store, and retrieve
~ ~ records in the City.
COMMENTS
The current system was purchased in 1999 and has allowed the City to establish electronic copies of documents that
can be easily retrieved. In Fiscal Year 2006-2007, system assessment and planning activities were conducted in
order to ensure that the version of the technology employed represents best practices and is capable of supporting
continued growth. The assessment helped Staff ascertain whether there would be benefits from implementing
additional modules such as an agenda management system.
A final updated Records Retention Schedule was adopted by the City Council in Fiscal Year 2009-2010. Using the
newly adopted retention schedule as a foundation for this project (Step 1), Step 2 included review of current
destruction policies and procedures, discussion of best p~actices as well as impacts and advantages/disadvantage~
of each choice, and development of all policies, procedures, forms , logistics and training schedule. Step 3 included
Electronic Document Management System policies to ensure efflcient and effective expansion of the system.
Phase 2 of the project provides funding to acquire a Records Management module which will integrate the tracking
of records within a single system. Step 4, standardization of naming and storing all electronic documents, and Step
5, Audit of Records Management P~ograms (Electronic & Paper) will be completed in Fiscal Year 2010-2011. ~
Additional elements of the Project for future years will be assessed and presented in future updaYes to this project
FINANCINGIYEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2074 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection 1001 $ 116,963 $ 7,000 $ 123,963
Other Contract Services $ 39,929
Land / Right of Way
Improvements ~ ~
Machinery / Equipment 84,034
Miscellaneous . _
TOTAL $ 123,963 $ 116,963 S 7,000 S 123,963
PROJECT STAFF • .
MANAGEMENT FTE) CONTRACT
_19_
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
930010 Maintenance Yard Facility Improvements - GENERAL
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e ~
1
_ MM . . _ . ` M ~ ~r~~
This project provides for the renovation of the acquired s.~ h` ~
Maintenance Facility at 5777 Scariett Court.
_ PRFTA
L
~
~
0
W `
6
nueuN e~v~.~ ~
~
. C3vic Ce
COMMENTS
During Fiscal Year 2008-2009, the former 84 Lumber site was acquired by the City. it was determined that the site
was suitabie for near term Maintenance Facility needs. The property included an existing warehouse building and
storage yard. Phase I improvements to the warehouse building include upgrades to the exterior cladding, electrical
systems and fire protection systems. In addition interior storage space would need to be built out to consolidate City
storage and eliminate the need for leased storage space.
Phase II improvements include additional office space for Public Works and Building staff, upgrades in code
requirements and site work. Funding for Phase II is beyond the timeframe of this CIP.
~ FINANCINGlYEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2070-2011 2017-2012 • 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 88,201 1001 $ 132,164 $ 835,933 $ 968,097
Other Contract 5ervices 102,736
Land / Right of Way ~ ~
Improvements 700,000
MachineFy / Equipment 35,610
Miscellaneous 41,550
TOTAL $ 968,097. ~ 132,164 ~ 835,933 ~ 968,097
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT ~
_20_
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
930012 Public Facility Fee Study Update GENERAL
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
This project finances the 2008 Update to the City's Pubiic Facility Fee. -
COMMENTS ~
The ~City Council adopted Resolution .No. 32-96 on March 26, 1996, establishing a Public Facilities Fee for
development within Dublin. The Public Facilities Fee was based on the Public Facilities Fee Justification Study
prepared by a independent consultant. The Purpose of the fee is to finance municipal public facilities to reduce ~he
impacts caused by future development in the City of Dublin. These facilities include: community an~ neighborhood
parks; community buildings; library; civic center modifications; and aquatic center. . .
The City Council directed Staff to update the Public Facilities Fee periodically. Two subsequent updates have been
done in 1999 and 2002.
The proposed update is needed to revise population projections based on recently approVed development proposals
and to conduct an appraisal of land values for parkland acquisition. Additionally, the update will include the revised
costs for the Civic Center modifications based on the 2006-2007 Workspace Programming Study and the costs
associated with new developmenYs share of a Maintenance Facility.
For Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Staff proposes that the Community Building Standards in the Parks and Recreation
Master Plan be reviewed in order to determine if the original assumptions for Community Building square footage are
still valid. Revisions to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan will result in the need for additional consultant services
to update the Public Facilities Fee. •
FINANCINGIYEARS SCHEDULE
- ESTIMATED COSTS Fund Prior Years 2010-2011 2071-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection 4100 $ 51,035 $ 26,650 $ 77,685
Other Contract Services $ 77,515
Land / Right of Way
Improvements .
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 170
TOTAL $ 77,685 a 51,035 S 26,650 ~ 77,685
PROJECT • STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
~ -21-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTNITY
939102 - 939106 ADA Transition Plan GENERAL
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
This project wiil implement recommended Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements of City streets and civic
buildings, as listed in the ADA~Transition Plan 2006 Update.
COMMENTS ~
In 1993, in response to the enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Dublin adopted a Title I
Compliance Plan, a Title II Transition Plan, and a complaint procedure. In Fiscal Year 2006-2007, the City completed
an update of the Title II Transition Plan. Since adopting the ADA Transition Plan (2006), the City has installed 75
curb ramps and is making every efFort to bring the City into compliance as quickly as possible. There are 1,452
ramps remaining for either full construction, or modification.
This project will implement the recommended improvements listed in the City's ADA Transition Plan 2006-2007
update. Improvements may include pedestrian curb ramps, park access, and public building access. The scope of
work will be determined on a year-by-year basis. .
This project is funded through the General Fund in Fiscal Year 2010-2011. It is proposed to construct approximately
eight pedestrian curb ramps in Fiscal Year 2010-2011.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS ~ Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2072 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 15,895 1001 Annual $ 19,650 $ 19,650 $ 19,650 $ 19,650 $ 19,650 $ 98,250
Other Contract Services
Land / Right of Way
Improvements 141,898
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 523
TOTAL a 98,250 ~ 19,650 $ 19,650 ~ 79,650 ~ 19,650 a 19,650 ~ 98,250
PROJECT STAFF 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
' -22"
¦
. ommuni
m rovemen s
CITY OF DUBLIN 2010 - 20'15
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS ~
~ -
COMMUNtTY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
The Community Improvement Project category includes those projects which enhance the
functionality and appearance of the City's streetscape.
Significant projects in this category include the following:
Sidewalk Safetv Repair Program .
Funding is included to replace damaged curbs, gutters and sidewalks at locations throughout
the City.
Transit Center Art Proiect
This project involves the placement of public art adjacent to the East Dublin Bay Area Rapid
Transit train station. In 2009, artist Cliff Garten .was selected based on conceptual designs.
The public art was a requirement of the "Transit Center' development and is funded by
contributions to the public. art fund. The project is expected to be complete in 2011.
Tree Planting Project
This project is partially funded from a State Grant and wi(I provide for the planting of 220 trees
throughout the City including adjacent to the Iron Horse Trail.
,
,
-23- ~
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY .
940002 San Ramon Road Landscape Renovation COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
This project would renovate the landscaping along e
the San Ramon Road bike path, from West Vomac ~ M+"' c~ T Y-- '
Road to Alcosta Boulevard.
~
- Z ~ ~ PRFTA o
<
g~ ° ~
~a~e~ o ~ ~u~ ~w ~
~
.
. ~a ~
CNic CeMer
COMMENTS
This project provides for the removal of the existing Baccharis and soil and instalfing new topsoil and plant material.
The irrigation system will be tested and upgraded as necessary, and the soil will be tested for needed amendments.
Most of the landscaping in this area was installed between 1*993-1995, and has reached the end of its life expectancy.
' This project was initially proposed for completion in Fiscal Year 2008-2009; however, due to an anticipated reduction
in General Fund revenues, the City Council found it necessary to delay proceeding as scheduled. The CIP proposes
to proceed in Fiscal Year 2012-2013. -
This project is proposed to be funded through the General Fund.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2074 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 19,160 1001 $ 207,220 $ 207,220
Other Contrac~ Services 3,000 ,
Land / Right of Way
Improvements 184,560
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 500
TOTAL S 207,220 ~ 207,220 y 207,220
PROJECT STAFF 0.12
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
~ -24- ~
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER . PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
940005 Transit eenter Art COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION . e ~ ~ -
~ C ` S i '~~r
This project provides for the piacement of pubiic art at o -
the Dublin Transit Center, at the iron Horse (BART) ~
Plaza
' ~
~ W
v ~ PRFTA
' S! i • "
x~ x
~
~uB~e~~ p~ DUBLI BLI I
~
,
J ' ~IVIC CCn 466p
COMMENTS , '
in 2003, the Alameda County Surplus Authority (ACSPA) agreed to contribute $250,000 for construction of pubiic art
at the Dublin Transit Center. In Fiscal Year 2004-2005, the City Council rated as a high priority objective: work with
the developer to locate significant works of art in two.key places of the Dublin Transit Center, the ~Ilage Green (now
called Campbell Green) and the Iron Horse Plaza. .
In Fiscal Year 2009-2010 an artist selection process commenced with the hiring of an Art Consultant to coordinate ~ .
the process of selecting artists to commission public art in the two identified locations. In 2009, artist ClifF Garten was
selected to provide a conceptual design for the BART entrance location only; Avalon Bay will provide a$50,OQ0
artwork in the #uture at the median strip adjacent to Campbell Green.
This CIP would accomplish the following High Priority City Council Objective:
2010-20110BJECTNE ~ ~
1. Work with the developer to locate significant works of art in two key places of the Dublin Transit Center, the
Campbell Green and the'9ron Horse" Plaza. . ~ .
FINANCINGlYEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2017-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection . 2801 $ 25,393 $ 224,607 $ 250,000
Other Contract Services 248,114 ,
Land / Right of Way ~
Improvements
Machinery / Equipment ~
Miscellaneous 1,886
TOTAL a 250,000 S 25,393 S 224,607 3 250,000
PROJECT STAFF .
MANAGEMENT(FT~ . CONTRACT
-25-
" 2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
940007 Tree Planting Project COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
This project provides for the planting of 220 trees throughout the City including adjacent to the Iron Horse Trail.
COMMENTS ~
Through the "Green Trees for the Golderi State Program", the State of California has awarded a grant in the
amount of $29,600 for the planting of 220 trees throughout the City. The City's 2003 arbor report identifies 160
trees are needed to fill-in the tcee canopy. Of the remaining 60 trees, 40 will be planted along the Iron Horse Trail
between Dub(in Boulevard and the DubliNPleasanton BART station and 20 at Dolan Park in conjunction with 2011
Dublin Pride Week. Planting will occur in Fall of 2010 and Spring of 2011.
The State program requires matching funds for the project in the amount of $11,000. The majority of matching
funds will provide for the watering of the trees along .the Iron Horse Trail until the trees become established.
Matching funds will also provide an educational component including information about the benefits of trees in the
City Newsletter, during 2011 Dublin Pride Week activities, and in the summer 2010 Parks and Community Services
Nature Day Camp program.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2070-2011 2011-2012 2072-2013 2013-2014 20142075 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 500 1001 $ 31,100 $ 5,500 $ 2,750 $ 1,250 $ 40,600
Other Contract Services 10,500
Land / Right of Way .
Improvements 29,600 ,
Machinery / Equipment .
Miscellaneous
TOTAL a 40,600 ~ 31,100 § 5,500 § Z,750 $ 1,250 ~ 40 600
PROJECT STAFF
MIWAGEMENT FTE) CONTRACT
-26-
. 2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
949102 - 949106 Sidewaik Safety Repair Program COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
This program provides for the replacement of damaged curbs, gutters and sidewalks at various locations. The-
sidewalk repairs are made by removing and replacing the damaged concrete.
COMMENTS -
State Law and the City Ordinance states that sidewalk repair is the responsibility of the properly owner, yet cities are
also held liable for hazards associated with sidewalks in need of repair. This program reduces liability exposure for
property owners, as well as for the City. Dublin's program is funded through the General Fund on a year-to-year
basis. ~ ~ ~
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2073-2014 20142015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 93,950 1001 Annual $ 84,090 $ 84,090 $ 84,090 $ B4,090 $ 84,090 $ 420,450
Other Contrect Services .
Land / Right of Way
lmprovements • 325,000
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 1,500
TOTAL ~ 420,450 S 84,090 a 84,090 S 84,090 S 84,090 S 84,09D S 420 450
PROJECT STAFF 0.14 ~ 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.1 T
MANAGEMENT(FTE CONTRACT
-27-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM •
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTNITY
Not Yet Assigned City Entrance Sign Modifications COMMUNiTY IMPROVEMENTS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e ~ ` ~c
~ T Y
This project would replace City entrance signs ~
located at the following entry points to the City: °
r~~~
1) Village Parkway at Kimball Avenue ~
2) Dougherty Road at Fall Creek Road ~
d yo
A new City entrance sign would be placed at: o
5-~j -~,p,Q:`~ ~ PRFTA
3) San Ramon Road at Alcosta Boulevard !o r~`~ ~W
'y.-~ x
g ~
~VB(•/~ye~~ p- DUBLI L
~ ~
L..
! ''I ~IVIC CEt$E 1-680
COMMENTS ~ ~
The City currently has existing concrete-facade entrance signs located at the north city limit on Village Parkway and
Dougherly Road, and a missing entrance sign at San Ramon Road. In order to be consistent with the new granite
monument design adopted in the City Streetscape Master Plan, this project will install a new granite-faced sign at
each of these three locations. '
For the purpose of this capital project, it is. assumed that City entrance signs at the remaining City entry points will be
constructed as part of the adjacent development improvements.
~ FINANCINGIYEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2071-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 6,960 1001 $ 154,960 $ 154,960
Other Contract Services .
Land / Right of Way ~
Improvements 147,000
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 1,000 .
' TOTAL 5 154,960 ~ 154,960 S 154,960
PROJECT STAFF . 0.06
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
-28-
~ CITY OF DUBLIN 2010 - 2015
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS
~ PARKS PROJECTS
The Parks category reflects the City's priorities with respect to creating and enhancing park,
recreation and cultural facilities for current and future residents as the City grows.
Significant projects in this category include the following:
Communitv Park Projects
The Dublin Historic Park, Phase I commenced in Fiscal Year 2007-2008 and is anticipated to
be complete in the Fall of 2011. Phase I includes the demolition of the existing Dublin
Square Shopping Center, relocation of the Kolb Ranch structures and landscape
improvements.
The Fallon Sports Park, Phase I began in Fiscal Year 2007-2008 and construction was
. authorized by the City Council on March 17, 2009. The park is expected to be complete in
the summer of 2010. Included in the Phase I improvements are construction of two synthetic
turF soccer fields, which are being funded from East Bay Regional Park District Measure VWV
local grant funds. The remainder of the park development is funded by Public Facilities Fees.
Due to the slow-down in development, there is an expected timing difference between when
the fees are collected and when they will be needed. The City Council approved the intemal
borrowing of funds to complete Phase I of Fallon Sports Park. The borrowed funds will be
repaid with interest as additional fees are collected.
On June 1, 2010 the City Council awarded an agreement for construction on Dublin Sports
Grounds Renovation. The project is funded from East Bay Regional Park District Measure
VWN local grant funds. ~
A project has been included which will refurbish the Shannon Center Parking lot using an
environmentally sensitive design to address urban run-off. Proceeding with the project is
dependent upon the award of a State of California grant. The selected grant applicants will
be notified in the Fall of 2010. If awarded the grant the project will be complete in Fiscal Year
2010-2011.
Facilities ~
The current schedute provides that design of the Emerald Glen Park Recreation and Aquatic
Complex will resume in Fiscal Year 2011-2012. The schedule is largely based on the
~ projected cash flow available from Public Facility Fees. Future updates. to the CIP will need .
to evaluate the availability of Impact Fees and the operating cost impacts once the facility
comes online. As currently conceived, the Emerald Glen Park Recreation and Aquatic
Complex provides for a two-phase project. Phase I includes a 35,895 square foot Recreation
Center and finro swimming pools including a 6,675 square foot leisure / instructional pool, and
a 25-meter by 25-yard deep water competition pool. Phase II includes a 12,140 square foot
natatorium building to enclose the leisure / instructional pool to make it a year-round indoor
. ~ -29-
~ CITY OF DUBLIN 2010 - 2015
~ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HtGHLIGHTS
y
aquatic facility. Construction of Phase ~II is beyond the time frame of this CIP and funding will
need to be identified from a source other than Public Facilities Fees.
PARKS PROJECTS
Facilities (Continued~
The CIP also includes the acquisition of the current leased modular building used as the ~
Emerald Glen Activity Center: The project is proposed to be funded from the General Fund
and it is expected to reduce the long-term operating costs associated with #he leasing of the
buildings. ~ .
Neiqhborhood Park Projects
Neighborhood Park projects included in the CIP are related to~ the following development ~
projects: Dublin Ranch, Schaefer Ranch, 1Nallis Ranch, and Fallon Villages (Eastern Dublin
Parks). ~ Schedules for projects have taken into consideration the expected timing of
residential development immediately adjacent to the park sites. .
~ The Schaefer Ranch project includes one Neighborhood Park that will be constructed by the
developer of Schaefer Ranch; therefore no construction costs have been included in this C1P.
It is anticipated that construction of the park by the developer will take place in Fiscal Year
2012-2013. ~
~ Design of Positano Neighborhood Park is proposed to begin in Fiscal Year 2010-2011 with
construction occurring the following year.
Lighting replacement is planned at Kolb Park and Dolan Park. This project is funded from a
Federal Energy Block Grant. The focus will be on replacement of the lighting with more
efficient lights that will also have a positive impact on reducing the energy costs associated
with these two parks.
_3p_ .
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
950001 Dublin Heritage Park and Museums PARKS '
_ DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e ` ~
~ j ~
T#~is project provides for development of the Dublin o - ,~c
Heritage Park and Museums (formerly called the Dubiin ~
Historic Park) located at the comer of Dubiin Boulevard .
and Donlon Way. '
4 -
~ w
PRFTA
Ql S~ ~ • :
77"~ O
O
°~evN~~ o ~ueuN e~l I
- ~ -r
~ Eseo
CNic
COMMENTS
The Dublin Historic Park Master Plan was adopted by the City Council in Fiscai Year 2006-2007. In Fiscal Year 2007
2008 the Dublin Historic Park Master Pian Addendum was received by the City Council which resulted in City Council
approvai of the relocation of five Kolb Ranch structures to the Historic Park. The park will be developed in phases as
funding becomes available. Phase I includes the demolition of the existing Dublin Square Shopping Center
(excluding the U.S. Bank Building), relocation of the Kolb Ranch . structures and landscape improvements.
Completion is estimated in fall 2010. The estimated cost for Phase I is $4,881,846 including the provision of $65,000
to purchase fumishings as well as sound and lighting equipment for the Sunday School Bam: During Fiscal Year
2007-2008 the City Council designated General Fund Reserves in the amount of $3.18 million for this project
The remaining four phases are outside of the time frame of this Capital Improvement Program.
Phase 2- Orchard Garden ($3,903,490) Phase 4- Cemetery Expansion ($2,434,300)
Phase 3- Freshwater Comer ($1,848,460) Phase 5- Cemetery Improvements ($1,061,300)
,$1.5 million in funding for future phases of the project will be contributed by the developer of the Schaefer Ranch
project but the tirning of the contribution is undetermined at this time due to a slowdown in the project
This CIP would accomplish the following High Priority City Council Objective:
2010-2011 OBJECTNE
1. Upon re-location of the Kolb properties to the Dublin Historic Park, complete fumishing of the buildings and
catalogue/accessioning of the collections of the Kolb family.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2072 2012-2013 2013-2014 ' 20142015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 2,176,608 1001 $4,178,277 $ 703,569 $ 4,881,846
Other Contract Services 871,334
Land / Right of Way . '
Improvements 10,778,986 ~
Machinery/Equipment 103,950 •
Miscellaneous 198 518 Insufficient Fundin within CIP Time Frame 9 247 550
TOTAL ~ 14,129,396 54,178,277 S 703,569 S 74,129,396
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
-31-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ~
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
950003 . Dublin Sports Grounds Renovation PARKS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e ~
r. c~TY ~
This project provides for the renovation of the Dublin
Sports Grounds, which is located at Dublin Boulevard
and Civic Plaza. '
. ~ q
S PRFTA ~
~
x
. 7 W
w ~
~SL?y
•
J ~ao
Civie Centx
COMMENTS ~
The Dublin Sports Grounds Master Plan was adopted in May of 1990. The recommended improvements were
divided into phases: Phase I included construction of a new 60' baseball field, installation of bleachers at Fields 2
through 7 and installation of drinking foun~ains at Fields 4, 5 and 6. .Phase l was completed in Fiscal Year 1995-1996;
the total cost was $215,454. ~
Phase II included renovation of the drainage and irrigation system for Soccer Field #3; drainage improvements to
Baseball Fields #3, #4 and #6; underground conduit .for future lighting of Soccer Field #3 and Baseball Field #3;
drainage and tree replacement along the freeway, and play area renovation. Phase II was completed in Fiscal Year
2002-2003; the total cost was $979,833. ~
Phase III provided for the installation of lighting on Soccer Field #3 and Baseball Field #3, and was completed during .
Fiscal Year 2004-2005; the total cost~was $310,167. Also during Fiscal Year 2004-2005, softball field safety netting
was installed ($25,126). The Dublin Boulevard Parking Lot Renovation was completed in Fiscal Year 2005-2006
($140,182).
Remodeling of the restrooms and snack bar was completed in Fiscal Year 2009-2010; the total cost was $111,653.
Two field turf renovation projects have been identified which include installation of a sand channel drainage system,
imgation upgrades and new turf. Area 1(approximately 247,500sf, east of Soccer Field #3) is beyond the time frame
of the CIP with an estimated cost of $1,3331,770. Area 2(approximately 180,OOOsf, west of Soccer Field #3) began
in Fiscal Year 2009-2010 and will be complete in Fiscal Year 2010-2011 at a total estimated cost of $1,059,204. This
project will be funded primarily with Measure 1NW grant funds through the East Bay Regional Park District Local
Grant Program.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS ~ Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2071-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2075 Totals ~
. Design / Inspection $ 369,610 1001 $ 498,462 $ 27,038 $ 525,500
Other Contract Services 121,208 2401 609,628 609,628
Land / Right of Way 2302 23,796 23,796
Improvemerrts 3,631,548 4100 662,199 662,19~
Machinery/Equipment 2402 81,148 940,360 1,021,508
Miscellaneous 52,035 Insufficient Funding within CIP Time Frame 1,331,770
TOTAL s 4,774,401 S 7,875,233 S 967,398 S 4,174,401
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
_32_
~ 2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
950004 • Fallon Sports Park PARKS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION ~ e r~ ~
;
This project provides for the design and construction of a ~ ~'I_ . ~
60-acre Sports Park in the Dublin Ranch Development. ;
The park is bordered by Fallon Road, Central Parkway, '
Lockhart Street and Gleason Drive. ~ ~
_
~
~ LL
~
PRFTA ` •
d ~
0
. n ~w ~
~
, Civie Center
F6l0
COMMENTS
The Fallon Sports Park will accommodate the majoriiy of the competition ballfields in the City along with a children's play
area, picnic facilities, basketball, volleyball and bocce ball courts, fennis courts, BMX track, a jogging or walking loop and
permanent restroom structures integrated into concessioNscorebooth areas.
The project costs to date include a biological assessment of the Jordan property ($5,995), as well as an analysis of sports
park alternatives on the Lin property ($9,15~. Both were completed in Fiscal Year 2002-2003. In Fiscal Year 2004-2005
the City Council approved the Fallon Sports Park Master Rlan. ~
The developer of Dublin Ranch dedicated 52 of the 60 acres to the City; the balance of 8 acres was purchased in Fiscal
Year 2005-2006. In Fiscal Year 2006-2007, monies were allocated for improvements related to water meters and
transformers. ~
Design of Phase I began in Fiscal Year 2007-2008 and construction will be complete in summer 2010 at a total estimated
cost of $12,853,577. Phase I improvements include: 2 little league fields with associated plaza, picnic, and
restroom/concession building; 2 lighted softball fields with associated plaza, picnic, and restroom/concession building; 4
lighted tennis courts; 4 lighted basketball courts; 2 lighted soccer fields with synthetic turf surfacing; a parking lot; and a
walking trail. The synthetic turf soccer fields will be funded with Measure W1N grant funds through the East Bay
Regional Park District Local Grant Program in the amount of $1,123,610.~ Two additional phases of development ~are
planned, but it is anticipated that design and construction will occur beyond the CIP time frame.
• FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
~ ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2074 2014-2075 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 3,065,663 2402 $ 1,123,610 $ 1,123,610 .
Other Contract Senrices 1,797,186 4100 17,263,520 64,411 17,327,931
Land / Right of Way 5,421,800
Improvements 22,506,067 .
Machinery / Equipment ~
Miscellaneous 2,266,472 Insufficient funding within CIP time frame 16,605,647
TOTAL s 35,057,188 S 18,387,130 ; 64,411 S 35,057,188
PROJECT STAFF '
MANAGEMENT(FTE). CONTRACT
-33- .
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPR01/EMENT PROGRAM ~
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTMTY
950007 Emerald Glen Park . PARKS
Recreation and A uatic Complex
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e !
:
This project provides for construction of a Recreation ~ -~a- r :
and Aquatic Complex at Emerald Glen Park, located 2 Y. M; ~
on Tassajara Road befinreen Central Parkway and ' ~
Gleason Road.
~
0
~
LL
COMMENTS P R F T A o ~
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identifies the o ~ g~E"''~+cp
need for a Recreation Center and an Aquatic Center 'g o~ ~w ~ ~
to serve the needs of the growing City. During Fiscal
- Year 2004-2005, a Feasibility Study was conducted to Civic Center
~aeo
assess communitv needs. demoara~hic analvsis.
space components, construction and project costs. A full financial analysis of the operational costs and funding options
for a larger, state-of-the-art, Recreation and Aquatic Complex was completed in Fiscal Year 2005-2006. Based on this
information, at the June 2007 budget hearing the Council selected the preferred program for Recreation and Aquatic
Complex, which is planned for fwo phases.
Phase I includes a 35,895 square foot (S~ facility with a gymnasium, fitness center, game room/teen center, group
exercise/dance studio, special events room, juice bar, locker rooms, administrative offices and the spaces needed to
support the swimming pools. The facitity will have finro swimming pools including a 6,675 SF leisur~nstructional pool,
and a 25-meter by 25=yard (6,150 S~ competition pool.
Phase II includes a 12,140 SF natatorium building to enclose the leisure~nstructional pool constructed in Phase I to
make it a year-round aquatic facility. Construction of this phase will occur beyond the CIP time frame and funding will
need to be identified from a source other than Public Facility Fees.
Design of Phase I began during Fiscal Year 2008-2009 but was suspended by the City Council in March 2009 due to a
decrease in the collection of Public Facility Fees due to the slowdown in new developmen~ As proposed, design would .
resume in July 2011, with construction commencing in October 2012 and completion in September 2014. However,
based on the current cash flow analysis for the Public Facility Fee, there is a$2.8 shortfall within the CIP time frame.
The cash flow will be updated prior to July 2011 to determine if adequate Public Facility Fees will be available to resume
design as currently shown. _ -
Funding of this project would complete the City Council's strategic goal of developing a state-of.-the-art Recreation and
Aquatic Complex and would accomplish the following City Council Objectives.
2010-2011 OBJECTIVES
1. Undertake de~elopment of design and construction documents for Emerald Glen Recreation and Aquatic Complex.
2. Continue to look for locations in City public facilities that will allow teens to gather in a welcoming environment.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 3,009,793 4100 $141,808 $1,487,425 $7,476,567 $8,867,931 $3,221,144 $21,194,875
Other Contract Services 350,260
Land / Right of Way
Improvements 22,991,570 . '
Machinery/Equipment 1,311,000
Miscellaneous 467,133 Insufficient funding within CIP time frame 6,934,281
TOTAL ~ 28,129,156 ~ 141,808 S 7,487,425 S 7,476,567 S 8,867,931 ; 3,221,144 ; 28,729156
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
. -34-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
950009 Passatempo Park PARKS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e
. i
This project provides for the design and construction of ~
a 5.1 acre neighborhood park in.the Sorrento at Dublin ' ~
Ranch Development. The park is bordered by Araldi
Place, Palermo Way and Capoterra Way.
i
i
n ~
i
i
m i
• ~
_ ~ i
~ •
i
..•i ~
~aeo ~ .
COMMENTS ~ .
Design of Passatempo Park, a 5.1 acre neighborhood park, started in Fiscat Year 2007-2008 and was subsequently
deferred when construction of the adjacent housing and elementary school were deferred. The park will be designed
in accordance with the Neighborhood Park Standards contained in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. These
standards identify~ the following amenities: tot lot and apparatus play area; picnic tables and secluded space for
informal family picnics; open space meadow for informal sports, games and passive activities; and sports facilities
such as practice ball flelds, tennis courts, volleyball courts and basketball courts. It is anticipated that design will
resume in Fiscal Year 20142015 and construction. will be complete in Fiscal Year 2015-2016 which will occur
beyond the CIP time frame. ~ ~ .
This project assumes that the land for the parks will be dedicated by the developer in exchange for credit against
Public Facility Fees for Neighborhood Park land.
. FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-201~5 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 260,470 4100 $ 33,840 , ~ $ 671,475 $ 7D5,315
Other Contract Services 182,701 •
Land / Right of Way ~
Improvements 1,810,120 ~
Machinery / Equipment •
Miscellaneous 100,399 Insufficient Funding within CIP Time Frame 1,648,375
TOTAL S 2,353 690 S 33,840 S 677,475 S 2,353,690
PROJECT STAFF .
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
_S5_ .
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
Not Yet Assigned Culturai Arts Center PARKS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
This project is identified as a desirable facility as part of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The long term plan
suggests that the facility may consist of construction of a 16,000 square foot Cultural Arts Center at a location yet to
be determined.
COMMENTS
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan as adopted identified the need for a 16,000 square foot Cultural Arts Center
that would serve as a multi-use facility that affords cultural, educational and social opportunities for the community.
A location for the facility has not yet been determined.. -
It is recommended that this project be re-evaluated during Fiscal Year 2010-2011 once the structures from the Kolb
Ranch are in use at the Dublin Heritage Park. These include: the 7,350 square foot Sunday School Bam to serve as
a multi-use classroom and black box theater, the 2,500 square foot Main House to serve as a museum, gallery and
classroom; and the 300 square foot Old House to serve as a restroom and ceramic studia
• FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2Q13-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 825,322
Other Contract Services 98,740
Land / Right of Way
Improvements 7,998,785
Machinery / Equipment 416,937
Miscellaneous 153,562 ' Insufficient funding within CIP time frame $ 9,493,346
TOTAL $ 9,493,346 ~ 9,493,346
RROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
-36-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTNITY ~
Not Yet Assigned Dublin Ranch Area B Neighborhood Square PARKS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e
. i
This project provides for the design and ; ~
construction of a finro-acre neighborhood square s,,, ~ °
located in the Dubfin Ranch Development " '
t_._._.~
~
~
~
~ ; ~
i
i
~ i
~ ~
z j
W
yS ~ 1
1
- ~
I~SCO • .
COMMENTS
Area B of the Dublin Ranch Development identifies a finraacre neighborhood square. ~ Based on development
projections, it is anticipated that design and construction will occur beyond the CIP time frame. ~
The neighborhood square will be designed in accordance with the standards contained in the Parks and Recreation
' Master Plan. These standards identify the following amenities: small scale, high quality play structures; parents
seating, area; tennis court, volleyball court or basketball court; tables and benches with Fimited open space for
individual use; and seatwalls for informal picnicking. ~
This project assumes that the land for the neighborhood square will be dedicated by the developer in exchange for
credit against Public Facility Fees for Neighborhood Park land. . ~
FINANCINGlYEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2074 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 84,582
Other Contract Services ~
Land / Right of Way
Improvements 744,322
Machinery / Equipment •
Miscellaneous 16,916 Insufficient Funding within CIP'fime Frame $ 845,820
TOTAL $ 845,820 ' S 845,820
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT '
-37- .
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
- PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ~ ACTIVITY
Not Yet Assigned Eastern Dublin Parks PARKS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
This project provides for the design and construction of e ~
20.24 acres of neighborhood parks and 13.8 acres of o !
community parks to serve new development in eastern ~
Dublin, excluding the Dublin Ranch Development. M`~`--~ ~
t + `-=--r '
p 5 1
~
1
• ~-•--9
r, 1
1
, 1
PRFTA o j
~ ~ ~
4y ~ ` ~ i
~
COMMENTS ~
The parks will be designed in accordance with the Neighborhood and Community Park Standards contained in the
Parks and Recreation Master Plan. ~
This project assumes that the land for the parks will be dedicated by the developer in exchange for credit against
Public Facility Fees for Neighborhood and Community Park land. ~ ~
Based ~on development projections it is anticipated that design and construction will occur beyond the CIP timeframe.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE •
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 20142015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 1,539,690 ' ~
Other Contract Services
Land / Right of Way
Improvements 13,549,280
Machinery / Equipment ~ .
Miscellaneous 307,938 Insuffiaent funding within CIP time frame $15,396,908
- TOTAL a 15,396,908 ~ 95,396,908
RROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
~ -38-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIV(TY
Not Yet Assigned Emeraid Glen Park • PARKS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e ~
.
;
This project provides for the design and construction of ~
the 48.2 acre Emeraid Glen Park located on Tassajara i i
Road between Central Parkway and Gleason Drive. ~ !
p \ t 1
s
COMMENTS - ~
Phase i encompassed approximately 26.1 acres of the y
site and included: 2- 60' ba11 fields; 1- 90' ball field; 2 ,
regulation soccer fields; 2 lighted basketball courts; 4~
lighted tennis courts; a skate park; a play area; picnic P R F T A o j~
areas; a plaza and promenade; a restroom/concession = ~
building; parking; and street frontage improvements. ~ ~~E"'~~~p
Phase I was completed in Fiscal Year 2000-2001 at a S ~n+ ~w ~ ~
total cost of $7,389,306, which included $2,066,400 to
purchase 4.92. acres. ,.~o
Phase ll included improvements at Tassajara Road and Central Parkway included a water feature and arbor structure,
maintenance storage, temporary play area parking and restroom building, landscaping and park fumiture. Phase II was
completed in Fiscal Year 2004-2005 at a total cost of $2,664,918. ~
" Phase III improvements included two regulation soccer fields with cricket overlays, a restroom building, a group picnic
area, a children's play area, mini arboretum, and parking and street frontage improvements. Phase III was completed in ~
~ late spring of Fiscal Year 2005-2006 at a total cost of $4,418,724.
Although the Recreation and Aquatic Complex and Community Center will be located at Emerald Glen Park, separate
CIPs have been prepared for those projects which include the building costs as well as the landsc~pe costs associated
with the buildings.
One additional phase of the park remains which will occur beyond the CIP time frame. This includes the landscape
improvements associated with the future Community Center, including a lake and an outdoor amphitheater.
As part of the Transit Center Development Agreement, the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority conveyed the
remaining park acreage to the City (18.173 acres). The City reimbursed the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority
for 4.584 acres of the land in the amount of $2,876,575 in Fiscal Year 2004-2005.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
~ ' ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 20742015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 521,834 1001 $ 78,437 $ 78,437
Other Contract Senrices 838,661 2302 25,996 25,996
Land / Right of Way 4,942,975 4100 14,OZ7,615 , 14,077,615 ~
Improveme~ts 8,789,575 4300 290,900 290,900
Machinery/ Equipment •
Miscellaneous 385,537 Insufficient funding within CIP time frame 1,005,634
TOTAL ; 15,478,582 S 14,472,948 S 15,478,582
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT ~
-39-
- ~ 2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
Not Yet Assigned Emerald Glen Park PARKS
Community Center
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION ' e i
- i
a.. ~
This project provides for construction of a 14,700 ' i
square foot Cornmunity Center at Emerald Glen Park, ~
located on Tassajara Road between Central Parkway ~~~c - ~
and Gleason Road. .r ,
• ~
0
• y
~
PRFTA o
. t
. ° <
• s w ~CENT~ P
' LM LVD SS ~
Civic Center
4aeo
COMMENTS ~ .
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identifies the need for 36,200 square feet of Community Center space to
serve the ultimate build-out of the City. The reconstruction of the Shannon Community Center is for 19,760 square
• feet, leaving a balance of 16,440 square feet for Emerald Glen Park; of which 14,700 will be allocated to the Emerald
Glen Community Center, and 1,740 square feet will be allocated to the.Game Room/Teen Center at the Emerald Glen
Recreation and Aquatic Complex.
The goal of the Community Center is to provide a comprehensive multi-purpose center which responds to the
recreational, cultural and social needs of all residents of Dublin. The Community Center may include the following
program elements: Lobby/Reception/Office Area; Classrooms/Meeting Rooms; Community HalUAssembly Facility;
Caterer's Kitchen; and Preschool Room.
It is anticipated that design and construction of the Community Centerwill occur beyond the CIP time frame.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund Prior Years 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2Q14-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 759,307 ~ •
Other Contract Services 90,956 . ~
• Land / Right of Way • .
Improvements 7,347,186 •
Machinery/Equipment 383,796 '
Miscellaneous 140,765 Insufficient Funding within CIP Time Frame ~ $ 8,722,010 •
TOTAL ~ 8,722,010 S 8,722,010
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT FfE) CONTRACT
-40-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY ,
Not Yet Assigned Schaefer Ranch Neighborhood Park PARKS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e
This project provides for the design and construction of . .
the neighborhood park in the Schaefer Ranch t
Development. ~ ~
ti C~SY~1
' ~ ~
~ .
`
.`.N
~cW
a 7'
S! t •i
o ~
z~
~
• ~e~e .
GVp
. `
`r~'"' Civic Center
COMMENTS
The Schaefer Ranch project provides three contiguous parcels to be used for a neighborhood park. The parcels total
10.6 gross acres with 6.3 acres of flat usable park land.
in Fiscal Year 2006-2007 the conceptual design for the park improvements was approved by the City Council. An
Improvement Developer Agreement was also approved whereby the Developer is required to construct the park and
dedicate the park improvements to the City upon completion. The park improvements must be completed prior to
issuance of the 201st building permit .
The Developer will receive credit for 6.3 acres of the park land which can be used as a credit against Public Facility
Fees for Community Park and Neighborhood Park land for the Schaefer Ranch project. The Developer will also be
entitled to a credit for design and construction~of the park improvements to be used against payment of Public Facility
Fees for Community Park and Neighborhood Park improvements for the project ~
It is anticipated that construction of the park by the developer will take place in Fiscal Year 2012-2013.
. ' FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATEDCOSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2072 •2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
~ .
Design / Inspection
Qther Contract Services ~
Land / Right of Way .
Improvements
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous , This project will be constructed by the Developer.
TOTAL '
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
_q, ~ _ ~
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ~
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
Not Yet Assigned Transit Center Park PARKS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e , T I~-~'
` ~ l~.--
This project provides for the acquisition, design and t'~.
construction of an 8.7~ acre community park on the ~
Transit Center property.
'~_r . ~
s ~°J ~e
' Z s-~j ~ ' , PRFTA
~p " <
Z ~ W
7
v
~/B~eC g D M L ~
~
•
1-680
• CNie Cerrter
COMMENTS •
This project provides for the acquisition, design and construction of a community park on the Transit Center property.
The park will be designed in accordance with the Community Park Standards contained in the Parks and Recreation
~ Master Plan. These standards identify the following amenities: high quality and innovative play structures; separate
facilities for tots from those for older children; parents seating area; sports facilities including spectator amenities;
shaded and secluded picnic areas as well as group picnic facilities; open meadow zones that provide soft, green use
areas for picnics, informal sports and passive group and individual uses.
Depending upon the outcome of the Camp Parks land exchange process, it is possible that the location of this park
could change in the future.
It is anticipated that acquisition, design and construction will occur beyond the CIP time frame.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE _
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2017-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2075 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 431,041 • •
Other Contract Services
Land / Right of Way 12,973,875
Improvements 3,793,165 .
Machinery / Equipment , '
Miscellaneous 86,208 Insufficient funding within CIP 6me frame $17,284,289
TOTAL . s 17,284,289 S 17,284,289
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
_42_
~ 2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTNITY
Not Yet Assigned Wallis Ranch Neighborhood Parks PARKS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e
This project provides for the design and construction Mw
of 7.9 acres of neighborhood parks in the Wallis
Ranch Development. ~ Y,.r ~
~
. ~
P R F T A ,_.Q _
~
x
W
~ uN s~w
~ ~
?a
~
_M_~_
. iaeo ~
COMMENTS
The Wallis Ranch project provides two neighborhood parks totaling 7.9 acres. ~
The parks will be designed in accordance with the Neighborhood Park Standards contained in the Parks and
Recreation Master Plan. These standards identify the following amenities: tot lot and apparatus play area; picnic
tables and secluded space for informal family picnics; open space meadow for informal sports, games and passive
activities; and sports facilities such as practice ball fields, tennis courts, volleyball courts and basketball courts. It is
anticipated that design will begin in Fiscal Year 2013-2014 and construction will be complete in Fiscal Year 2014
2015.
This project assumes that the land for the parks will be dedicated by the developer in exchange for credit. against
Public Facifity Fees for Neighborhood Park land.
' FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 Z011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 20142015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 438,690 4100 . $ 445,495 $ 2,895,495 $ 3,340,990
Other Contract Services 250,655
Land / Right of Way ~
Improvements 2,444,145
Machinery / Equipment .
Miscellaneous 207,500 . ~
TOTAL s 3,340,990 S 445,495 $ 2,895,495 $ 3,340,990
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
-43-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTNITY
New Emerald Glen Activity Center Acquisition PARKS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION •
This project would provide funding to purchase the e .
Emerald Glen Activity Center located at 4201 Central ~ '
Parkway in Emerald Glen Park. ° Mj=~~~~
~ z Y ~
. ,
, • ~
~
PRFTA
~ ~
L~.r~
~ LL
, Q
C ~
w Q •F
W LP~
BqN ouB N ~ ~
B B
COMMENTS ~
The City currently leases the Emerald Glen Activity Center, which is a modular building that was installed as an
interim preschool facility while the Shannori Community Center was re-constructed. Following the opening of the
Shannon. Community Center the City Council directed Staff to keep the preschool building as the demand for the
program is significant. With the program at capacity and lengthy waiting lists for classes it appears the building will
be needed for years to come.
This project provides funding to purchase the building, replace the flooring and install awnings to provide more
shade for students. Purchasing the building will reduce operational costs by over $26,000 per year, resulting in a
payback period of three years for the acquistion and upgrade costs. The Activity Center will be needed for classes
and programs until sufficient funding is available to construct the Emerald Glen Recreation and Aquatic Complex,
the timing of which is currently beyond the three year payback period.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE •
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-20t5 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 1,000 1001 $ 74,620 . $ 74,620
Other Contract Services
Land ! Right of Way
Improvements 73,620
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous
TOTAL S 74,620 S 74,620 - ~ a 74,620
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
-44-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY ~
New Energy Block Grant Project PARKS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION ~
This project provides for the replacement of park
lighting at Kolb and Dolan Parks.
. COMMENTS .
The City of Dublin received an Energy Efficient and Conservation Block Grant through the American Reinvestment and
Recovery Act for light replacement at various neighborhood parks in the City: The existing park lights will be replaced
with Light Emitting Diodes (LED) which are more energy effcient then the existing lights. The lighting at Kolb and Dolan
Parks will be replaced and, if funds permit, the lights at Mape Park will be replaced as well.
FINANCING/1'EARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund Prior Years 2Q10-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 20142015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 13,667 2311 $ 186,700 $ 186,700
Other Contract Senrices 2,660
: Land / Right of Way •
Improvements 168,373
Machinery / Equipment ~ .
Miscellaneous 2,000
TOTAL S 186,700 ' S 186,700 S 186,700
PROJECT STAFF ~
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT ' • '
-45-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
New Positano Neighborhood Park. PARKS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e
r•~~ • ~ 1
This project provides for the design and construction of
a 4.6 acre neighborhood park in the Positano o ~
Development The park is bordered by Brandini Drive, s Y ~
La Strada Drive and Valentano Drive. c~~ ~ ~
\
~ o
• y
PRFTA ~
~ ~
o ~
c~
W LP
, DUB N BL ~ v
B
COMMENTS
The park will be designed in accordance with the Neighborhood Park Standards contained in the Parks and
Recreation Master Plan. These standards identify the, following amenities: tot lot and apparatus play area; picnic
tables and secluded space for informal family picnics; open space meadow for informal sports, games and passive
activities; and sports facilities such as practice ball fields, tennis courts, volleyball eourts and basketball courts. It is
anticipated that design will begin in Fiscal Year 2010-2011 and construction will be complete in Fiscal Year 2011-
2012.
This project assumes that the land for the parks will be dedicated by the developer in exchange for credit against
Public Facility Fees for Neighborhood Park land.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2077-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 20142015 Totals
Design / Inspection . $ 254,920 4100 $ 273,905 $1,671,480 $ 1,945,385
Other Contrad Services 146,405
Land / Right of Way
Imprpvements 1,417,960
Machinery l Equipment ~
Miscellaneous 126,100 . • .
• TOTAL $ 1,945,385 $ 273,905 $1,671,480 S 1,945,385
• PROJECT STAFF •
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
-46- .
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 'i
i
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY II
New Shannon Center and Park Parking Lot PARKS '
Improvements
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
This project provides for the reconstruction of the e . M~~
parking lot at the Shannorr Community Center and Park ~ t~!
located at 11600 Shannon Avenue. ~
.
PRFTA
~
. •wi'r• ~
~
~ O '
t
C
W
N uueuN B~ ~ ~
t3vic ~
COMMENTS
The project entails the removal of 16,000 square feet of impervious asphalt paving in the parking spaces at the Shannon
Community Center and Park. The asphalt will be replaced with pervious interlocking pavers. Additionally 25 trees will be
installed and an existing planter will be converted to a bio-swale. . ~
The City has submitted a grant apptication to the State of California seeking funding through the Urban Greening Grant
Program. If the project is selected for funding the City will be notified in 8eptember/October 2010. Staff submitted the
funding request as a means to address the need to replace asphalt paving at the Shannon Community Center and Park.
The project will proceed in Fiscal Year 2010-2011 if funding is awarded.
FlNANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund Prior Years 2010-2011 2011-2012 ' 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection 2321 $ 489,300 ' $ 489,300
Other Contrad Sewices
• Land 1 Right of Way
Improvements 489,300 '
Machinery / Equipment ~
Miscellaneous
TOTAL S 489,300 S 489,300 S 489,300
~ PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT .
-47- ~ .
~
.
This page intentionally left blanl~ ~
.
.
.
. ~
. -4g- .
,
.
~ CITY OF DUBLIN 2010 - 2015
19~~}'' ~ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS
\ ~~l ~ .
STREETS PROJECTS
The Streets project category inciudes a variety of projects which maintain local roads and
trails, expands intersections, roadways and freeway interchanges to accommodate growth
from within the City and neighboring communities. The Streets project category also
provides new bike and pedestrian trails to promote healthy lifestyles and positively impact the
environment. ~
~ Significant projects in this category include the following:
Reqional Proiect~ Tri-VaIIeYTransportation Development Reqional Proiects
This project and fee program facilitates regional, as well as local traffic improvements. The
fees collected contain a local component and a regional component. The City of Dublin local
share is programmed to meet the focal share of funding towards the . West Dublin BART
Station. This payment is expected to occur in Fiscal Year 2010-2011 when the BART Station
is expected to begin passenger service. ~
Eastem Dublin Street and Freeway Improvements ~
The Eastem Dublin Annual Street and Freeway Improvement projects provide for the
construction of the backbone infrastructure for eastern Dublin over the nex# five years. This
project also provides for the repayment of loans outstanding to Alameda County related to
the construction of various segments of Dublin Boulevard between Dougherty Road and
Tassajara Road. ~
. ,
Dublin Boulevard Corridor Enhancement Projects
The City has received grant funds to enhance the Dublin Boulevard corridor adjacent to the
finro BART Stations (East and West). A construction agreement was awarded~in May 2009
and the project is nearing completion in the Summer of 2010. These improvements will
improve the walkability and appearance of Dublin Boulevard.
~ Dublin Boulevard Improvements (Silvergate Drive to Hansen Drive) -
This project will be constructed by the developer of Schaefer Ranch. It includes widening the
existing two travel lanes to four travel lanes and the installation of a traffic signal at Dublin
Boulevard and Silvergate Drive. It is projected to be underway in Fiscal Year 2010-2011.
Dublin Boulevard / Amador Plaza Improvements ~
The CIP includes funding to conduct an engineering study, design, and construct
improvements which will assist with traffic flow at this intersection. The timing of the study is
scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 2010-2011 to make use of data from a larger powntown
Specific Plan traffic model that is being developed as part of a grant funded project.
-49- ~ ~
CITY OF DUBLIN 2010 - 2015
~ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS
~ STREETS PROJECTS
Bike Lane / Trail Imqrovements
The Alamo Canal Trail under I-580 is a complex project involving several jurisdictions. The
City has already participated in contributing funds towards the design. Grant funding has .
been secured to construct ~ the improvements. The project will require additional
environmental approvals that are anticipated. to be complete in 2010, allowing for construction
to begin in Spring of 2011.
Traffic Signal Improvements ~ ~
Traffic signal improvements are planned at finro locations with design beginning in Fiscal Year
2010 and completion of construction in 2011. A new signal at Amador Valley Boulevard and
Brighton Drive is planned based on traffic studies conducted. This location serves traffic in
the general neighborhood as well as to local schools. The project is funded by Traffic Impact
Fees. An upgrade is proposed for the signal at San Ramon Road and Shannon Avenue.
The project will improve pedestrian safety by providing a change in the left-turn movements.
This is a common crossing for some students attending Dublin Elementary School and St.
Raymond's School. Measure B Bicycle and Pedestrian funding will be used for this project.
Speed Feedback Demonstration Proiect
This project will fund six fixed signs that advise the motorist of their speed. The selection of
the locations will be presented to the City Council based on additional analysis. Once the
signs are in place additional studies will also be conducted to determine the effectiveness of
the demonstration project.
Citvwide Maintenance and Reconstruction Projects
The City annually performs preventative maintenance on streets to prolong the life of the
streets. Periodically it becomes necessary to apply a%2 inch asphalt overlay. . The CIP
Update includes both an annual Slurry Seal project as well as an annual Overlay project.
The locations of these improvements are based upon assessment of the actual roadway ~
conditions and they occur throughout the City.
Storrn Drain Projects .
The CIP also includes_a phased project to assess the condition of the storm drain system
throughout the City. The plan was to halt the phased schedule for two years due to a lack of
funding. However, repair work is planned for Fiscal Year 2010-2011 to address a known pipe
failure along the Alamo Canal in the vicinity of Poplar Way and Hickory Lane. The resuming .
of additional condition assessment activities will need to be assessed in future CIP updates
based on available funding. Future Capital lmprovertient Programs will also need to
incorporate projects to correct any deficiencies identified in the assessment. .
Included in Fiscal Year 2010-2011 is the installation of two underground storm water filters at
locations along a Zone 7 flood control channel adjacent to Village Parkway. The project
would be funded with Caltrans mitigation funds.
-50- -
2008-2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTNITY
960002 Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee STREETS
~ Re ional Trans ortation Pro'ects
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
This project would contribute to the construction of the following Regional Transportation projects:
1) I-580/I-680 Interchange Improvements (Complete)
2) Improvements - 8R 84 befinreen I-580 and 1-680
3) I-680 Auxiliary Lanes from Bol(inger Canyon Road to Diablo Road
4) West DubliNPleasanton BART Station ' ~
a) $4 milfion MDF obfigation - fulfilled using 80% funds
b) $2.5 million advance to BART -$1.25 million in FY 2005-2006 (using TIF Category 3 and I-580/I-680
Reimbursement funds) and $1.25 million in FY 2010-2011 (using 20% MDF funds)
5) I-580 HOV Lanes between Santa Rita Road and Greenville Road
6) I-680 HOV Lanes between SR84 and Sunol Grade (Complete)
7) Improvements to the I-580/San Ramon Road Interchange (Dublin portion of project complete)
8) I-680IAIcosta Blvd Interchange Improvements (Complete)
9) Crow Canyon Road Safety Improvements west of Bolfinger Canyon Road
10). Vasco Road Safety Improvement North of I-580
11) Express Bus Service in the Tri Valley Area / Bus Rapid Transit
COMMENTS -
The seven Tri
Valley jurisdictions (Dubfin, Pleasanton, Livermore, Alameda County, San Ramon, Danville and Contra
Costa County) are collecting Tn-Valley Transportation Development Fees (7VTD~ from developers as a mitigation for new
developments in the Tri
Valley area. These fees are to be collected and used to construct projects on the above project list
An expanded list of projects was developed as part of the Fee Nexus Study Update 2008; however, a new fee structure has
not yet been adopted so the expanded list is not shown here.
The local match for the I-580/I-680 Interchange Project, completed in June 2002, was funded first, and the remaining
projects were prioritized based on the adopted Strategic Expenditure Plan 2004 Update through the development of a
fur~ding prionty list. Development of a new fee structure and a Strategic Expenditure Plan is underway., Based on the
previously approved fee structure, t~he MDF is projected to generate $93.9 million over the lifetime of the program, of
~ which approximately $21.978 million is expected to be collected in Dubfin. Each jurisdiction submits 80% of the fees ~
collected to the Tri-Valley Transportation Council (MC) Treasurer and retains 20% of the fees collected to fund projects
from the list above. Approximately $10,395,250 has been disbursed to the MC Treasurer by the City of Dublin. Dublin
designated the I-580/San Ramon Road Interchange and the West Dublin BART Station as its two top priority projects for
the 20% set-aside monies. In 2003, the MC appropriated $800,000 in 80% MDF funds for the I-580/San Ramon Road
Interchange project, which was expended in conjunction with Dublin's 20% set-aside funds for construction of this project.
Additionally, the City received $4,000,000 in Fiscal Year.2003-2004 from the 80% MDF for the West Dublin BART
Station project, and passed these funds through to BART for use on this project.
The City of Dublin advanced $1.25 million to the West Dublin BART Station project in Fiscal Year 2005-2006 using the
Local MDF share. The City also plans to advance an additional $1.25 million t~ this project in Fiscal Year 2010-2011
using 20% Local MDF and Traffic Impact Fee funds. This payment is required when public BART service starts at the
new station, which is expected to occur during Fiscal Year 2010-2011.
FINANCINGlYEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2017-2012 ~2012-2013 2013-2014 20742075 Totals
Design / Inspection 4306 $ 270,000 $ 270,000
Other Contract Services 4303 980,000 980,000
Land / Right of Way
Improvements $ 10,306,860 ~ ,
Machinery / Equipment '
Miscellaneous 1,250,000 Insufficient funding within CIP time frame ' $10,306,860
TOTAL $ 71,556,860 S 1,250,000 S 11,556,860
PROJECT STAFF ~
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
-51- .
2010-2075 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ~ ACTIVITY
960003 Dublin Boulevard Improvements - STREETS.
~ Silvergate Drive to Hansen Drive
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e . T
~ ~ ~ +-~~~I'
This project would widen Dublin Boulevard befinreen Y.-
Silvergate Drive and Hansen Drive from finro to three '
lanes and realign the Dublin Boulevard/Silvergate
intersection into a standard 'T' intersection with access
to the adjacent offce building complex. This widening ~
would take place on the south side of the street where ~
there is sufficient right-of-way to make these ~ ~
improvements. In addition, the project would repair the P R F r A Q
existing roadway section, which is creeping due to soil W
instabifity. A traffic signal would be installed at the ~/@~ g D M ~w ~
intersection of Dublin Boulevard and Silvergate Drive. ~rn
Eaeo
Civic Center
COMMENTS ~
The~ addition of new residential projects and previous expansion of the Valley Christian Church/School require the
widening of Dublin Boulevard from two to four lanes between Silvergate Drive and Hansen Drive. In 1992, an initial
phase of the work realigned the Dublin Boulevard/Silvergate Drive intersection through restriping and pavement
modifications.
The developers of the Valfey Christian Center, Hansen Hill, Califomia Highland and Schaefer Ranch projects are ~
obligated to share the costs of this project, based on their proportionate generation of traffic. To date, developer fees in
the amount of approximately $720,000 have been expended to construct portions of the project, including the
installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Dublin Boulevard and Hansen Drive, the widening of Dublin Boulevard
just west of Hansen Drive and the modification of a private driveway south of the intersection to align with Hansen Drive
due to the signalization of the intersection.
The final phase of the project would widen Dublin Boulevard from Hansen Drive to Silvergate Drive. For fhe purposes
of this CIP, the estimated cost of this phase is approximately $3,067,079; however, the Schaefer Ranch development
will perform the actual construction of the final phase of the project as a condition of the project's Development
Agreement. The unspent development fees #hat have been collected by the City will be contributed toward the project's
construction. The unspent balance of development fees remaining at the end of Fiscal Year 2008-2009 was $53,222
and will be paid to the developer once the project has been constructed. ~
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2017-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design % Inspection $ 525,434 4309 $ 719,976 $ 3,067,079 , $ 3,787,055
Other Contract Services 234,632 ~
Land / Right of Way ~
Improvements 3,010,643
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 16,346
TOTAL $ 3,787,055 S 719,976 ; 3,067,0T9 S 3,787,055
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT '
_52_
2010-2075 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTiVITY ~
960004 Eastem Dublin STREETS
Arterial Street and Freewa Im rovements
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e ~.'.~~~.r ;
This project estabfishes official Plan Lines for major ~
arterials in eastern Dub(in, and constructs.improvements to s ~
those streets for the portion being funded by the Eastem Y~~r--~° ;
Dublin Traffic Impact Fee (i'IF). This project also includes c~'~.•-
studies to update tra~c impact fees as development
occurs, repayment of loans from Pleasanton for the initial 2 =
tane construction of Dub(in Boulevard and Freeway ~
Interchange; and from Alameda County and BART for
roadway access to the eastem Dublin BART station. Also
included are obligations to Alameda County for a BART ~ P R F T A o
Parking Garage expansion. ~
`W z eeMr
W PRIM~
COMMENTS ~ ~ w
Required improvements are currently estimated at. Clvie Center `~'0
approximately $170 million. This includes improvements
aiready completed by Developers as well as future work
required. The amounts shown as "prior years" reflect the
work done by the City to date on engineering and fee
studies. ~ ~
Projected expenditures for Fiscai Years 2010-2011 through 2014-2015 include improvements anticipated to be constructed
by developers in retum for Eastem Dublin TIF credits during each of these years; however, since these projects are not yet
bonded, it is assumed for the purposes of this CIP that the City will pay for the work out of the Eastem Dublin TIF. The
insufficien# funds estimate of approximately $95 million reflects projects forecasted to be constructed after the five-year time
frame of the CIP. This CIP does not include Eastem Dublin TIF projects that have become individual Capital Projects I
identified elsewhere in this document. ~ ' ,
. i
Projects completed or guaranteed during Fiscal Year 2009-2010 included: final payment to Pleasanton for the Dublin I,
Boulevard Roadway Advance {$185,000) and the BART advance ($2;482,284); and completion of Fallon Road from Moller ,
Creek to Signal Hill Drive. Future projects include: ,
2010-2011: Alameda County repayment for Dublin Boulevard extension. , .
2011-2012: Installation of improvements on Tassajara Road along the Fallon Crossings development between Fallon Road
and Moller Creek; widening of Tassajara Road from North Dublin Ranch Drive to Shadowhill Drive from two to four lanes as
part of the Fallon Crossings development; restriping, the Tassajara Road Park and Ride Lot to provide additional parking; and
Alameda County repayment fo~ Dublin Boulevard extension. ~
2011-2012: Alameda County repayment for Dublin Boulevard extension.
2012-2013: Alameda County repayment for Dublin Boulevard extension. TIF update anticipated.
~ FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATEDCOSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2D13 2D73-2014 201b-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 264,453 300 $ 59,097,376 3 59,D97,376
Other Contract Services 650,174 4301 1,722,91B $ 9,950 $ 680,000 $ 45,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 2,477,868
Land /RigM of Way 403,505 4302 2,912,529 27,742 434,118 581,105 508,049 246,427 4,709,968
Improvemerrts 151,056,449
Machinery / Equipment ~
Miscellaneous 8,369,583 Insufficient funding within CIP time frame 94,458,952
TOTAL S 160,744,164 S b'3~732~823 S 37,692 S 1,114,116 ; 626,105 ; 518,049 S 256,427 S 160,744,164
PROJECT STAFF O.D3 0.04 0.26 0.04 0.04
MANAGEMENT FTE CONTRACT
~ -53- ~
2010-2075 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
960005 Downtown Dubiin Roadway Improvements STREETS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION '
i
The City Council established a Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) e ` '
for future developments within the downtown area of '
Dublin. The Downtown TIF Program identifies six N+` c~~: I
roadway improvement projects as listed below. These
projects will be required to mitigate future traffic impacts
generated by new development in Downtown Dublin. ~
, - ~
1) St Patrick Way Extension „ Q g I
2) Golden Gate Drive Widening ' 3' ' ~
3) Dublin Boulevard/Golden Gate Drive Intersection ~ s' ~~ap ~ o P R F T A Q
Improvements ~
4) Dublin Boulevard/Amador Plaza Road Intersection g ~?e~NeL ur, e~w ~
Improvements ~
5) Dublin Boulevard/Dougherty Road Intersection -
Improvements (includes widening of Dublin .c~c~~~ `~°o _
Boulevard between Dougherty Road & Sierra
court)
6) San Ramon Road/Dublin Boulevard Intersection
Improvements
The total cost for these improvements was estimated to be $8,711,298 in 2004 when the TIF Program was adopted,
~ including the cost of developing and updating the Program.
COMMENTS
SeParate CIP projects have been established for projects 1, 4 and 5 listed above. As a result, expenditures using
funds collected from the Downtown TIF or other sources associated with these improvements are not reflected in the
schedule below to avoid double-counting of expenditures. The estimated cost for the remaining three improvements
is $5,569,915.
The City has accumulated fees and traffic mitigation contributions from a number of development projects; the current
fund balance of $208,721 will be allocated to the St Patrick Way Extension project. Thus, there are currently no
available funds for projects 2, 3 and 6, which are the only improvements included in the expenditure schedule below.
An update to the TIF fee program is expected to take place during Fiscal Years 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 pending
completion of the Downtown Specific Plan and associated environmental reports.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE .
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2D73 2013-2014 20142015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 35,099 4304 30,556 $ 13,130 $ 33,860 $ 77,546
Other Contract Services • 38,883
Land / Right of Way
Improvements 5,569,915 ~
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 3,564 Insufficient Funding within CIP Time Frame 5,569,915
TOTAL ~.5,647,461 ~ 30,556 $ 13,130 $ 33,860 S 5,647,461
PROJECT STAFF 0.04 0.09
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
~ _54,_ ~
~ 2010-2015 CAPITAL.IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTMTY
960008 Alamo Canal Trail Under 1-580 STREETS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e
~
This project provides for construction of a trail M~ G` t•~
undemeath I-580 that will connect the Alamo Canai
~ Trail north of the freeway (adjacent to the City Library)
with the Pleasanton trail south of the freeway to
transform it to a regional trail.
The City of Dublin is working jointly with the East Bay " ~ ~
Regional Park District, the City of Pleasanton, Caltrans ~ i ~ P R F T A o
and Zone 7 on the projec~ The City of Dublin will v
manage construction of the trail project and apply for ~
construction funding. ~gc~'ec~ s`w
_
~ ' Civic Center
. ed Locatlon
COMMENTS
Based on the results of a study condu~ted in Fiscal Year 2006-2007 which concluded that a trail undemeath the
freeway is feasible, the City joined together with the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) and the City of
Pleasanton to apply for Alameda County Transportation lmprovement Authority (ACTIA) funds to design the project
ACTIA approved $235,000 for the design phase which is anticipated to cost $330,000. Dublin and Pleasanton
agreed to contribute $47,500 each to complete the design plans.
Construction is now fully funded with monies coming from the following grant programs: .
EBRPD's Measure 1NW Program: $630,000
ACTIA's Measure B Bike and Ped Program: $891,000 ~
SAFETEA-LU Federal funds: $1,021,000
Dublin will manage construction of the project and acquire an encroachment permit from Caltrans as the trail will go
under the I-580 freeway. Because the project is now receiving federal funds, it requires National Environmental
Policy Act environmental approval which is anticipated in late 2010. Construction is scheduled to start in spring
2011 and be completed in fall 2011.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE .
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2070-2011 2011-2012 ~ 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 255,488 22~2 $ 900,000 $ 121,000 $ 1,021,OOQ
Other Contract Services ~ 79,866 2205 $~89,106 891,000 980,106
Land / Right of Way 2402 185,700 279,672 465,372
" Improvements 2,080,992
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 50,132
TOTAL S 2,466,478 S 89,106 51,085,700 57,291,672 S 2,466,478
PROJECT STAFF 0.05 0.92 •
MANAGEMENT(FT~ CONTRACT
-55-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
960009 Village Parkway AVB Stormwater Treatment STREETS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e
This project would install finro underground w~ z_,
hydrodynamic separator storm runoff filters on ° s;,
existing storm drain lines. The first unit is located on
Maple Drive, just west of York Drive, at the outfall of a
48" storm drain into the Zone 7 F-4 Flood. Control
Channel. The second unit is located on Amador
Valley Boulevard, east of Village Parkway, at the ~
outFall of a 30" storm drain into the Zone 7 F-4 Flood , P R F T a ~
Control Channel. A third component of the project is ~ ~
construction of a bioswale at the northbound on-ramp ~ ~ ~
to I-680 from ~Ilage Parkway. ~
- - ~
'c~, M~ •
COMMENTS
The finro treatment units will treat r~noff from a combined tributary area of approximately 60 acres. The tributary area
encompasses the commercial and residential areas between I-580 and the F-4 channel, from a point just north of
Dublin Boulevard to a point 500 feet north of Amador Valley Boulevard. This includes the commercial areas along
both sides of. Vllage Parkway between Dubfin Boulevard and Amador Valley Boulevard. This area has been
identified as a likely high priority zone for trash abatement under the proposed Municipal Regional Permit (MRP) for
stormwater.
The San Francisco- Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board has approved this project as partial mitigation for
water quality impacts for the I-680 HOV lane project from I-580 to SR237. The State Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) will fund 100% of ~the design and construction costs, and will also provide the estimated cost of
maintenance funds for the finro filter units for a iwenty year period following construction. The bio swale is located
within Caltrans right-of-way and will be maintained by Caltrans. The Regional Board has also indicated that the City
of Dublin may utilize the project in meeting its trash-abatement requirements under the MRP. Due to State budget .
issues, the cooperative agreement needed to secure reimbursement of costs by the City from Caltrans was not
executed until March 2010 resulting in a delay in construction of the project to Fiscal Year 2010-2011.
FINANCINGIYEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2017-2012 2Q72-2073 2013-2014 20142015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 87,923 2321 $ 60,566 $ 507,234 $ 567,800
Other Contract Services 5,000 •
Land / Right of Way
Improvements 473,077 .
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 1,800 ~
TOTAL $ 567,800 $ 60,566 507,234 ~ 567,800
PROJECT STAFF 0.18
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
-56-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
960010 Saint Patrick Way - STREETS
Re ional Street to Golden Gate Drive ~
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e
` , µ i i~~.r
This project would construct ~a 2-lane roadway ~ T'~.-
befinreen Golden Gate Drive and Regional Street, ,Nr--
south of and paraliel to Dubiin Boulevard.
~
W
> ~
Z PRFTA d~
p ~ ~11~. ~ c
Z `W W
. ~ue~~ ~
~ O ~
?a
~so
CNfc Center
COMMENTS
The need for a connector road ~for three long commercial cul-de-sacs was first identified in the City's originai Downtown
Study. This need is becoming more apparent as this portion of the Central Business District develops further and the
proposed BART parking lot is constructed along Golden Gate Drive. The section of Saint Patrick Way between Amador
Plaza Road and Golden Gate Drive was constructed by the Alameda County Transportation Authority (ACTA) as part of
the I-580/I-680 Interchange Improvements. It is anticipated that the City's project, between Golden Gate Drive and
Regional Street, will be funded through private contributions in the form of the Downtown Traffic Fee, BART mitigation ~
funds, and developer-built mitigation improvements.
For the purpose of this CIP, the cost estimate is based only on the portion of Saint Patrick Way that is anticipated to be
built using City funds, which is physically the easterly one-third of the roadway segment between Golden Gate Drive and
Regional Street It was anticipated that the City of Dublin would acquire this right-of-way in Fiscal Year 2008-2009, and
the developer of the residential property fronting the BART property ~ndstar) would construct the improvements in Fiscal
Year 2009-2010.
The recent downtum in the economy has delayed the developer of the adjacent property to the south. This deferment
has, in tum, delayed the~City's acquisition of a portion of~the right-of-way, as well as the developer's construction of the
proposed improvements. It is now anticipated that the City will acquire the needed right-of-way in Fiscal Year 2009-201 D
and the improvements will be constructed in Fiscal Year 2010-2011. .
.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATEDCOSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2072 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 33,594 4309 $ 781,520 $ 781,520
Other Contract Services 144,109 ~
Land / Right of Way 603,746 4304 $ 1,065,791 1,065,791
Improvements 1,065,791
Machinery / Equipment ~ ~
Miscellaneous 71 .
TOTAL ; 1,847,311 ; 781,520 ; 1,065,791 ~ S 1,847,371
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT '
_5~_
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ~
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRfPTION ACTMTY
960012 East 8~ West Dublin BART Station STREETS
Corridor Enhancement - Dubtin Boulevard
from Hansen Drive to Tassa'ara Road
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
This project would improve a variety of transportation e
modes by improving pedestrian, transit and bicycle
facilities leading to the East and West Dublin BART ~
Stations. The enhancements will primarily be on Dublin °
Boulevarda the arterial directly serving the two transit M~ z., '
~
stations. The main features of the project are: a~ t: ~
1) Dublin Boulevard streetscape enhancement, -
including replacement of sidewalk tree grates and ~ 4
installation of identity markers, bridge railing ~
treatment, wa~nding signs, City entrance signs P R F T" `
<
and newsracks; ~
2) Improvements at the vicinity of Dublin Boulevard
and Donlon Way including raised landscaped _
median, pedestrian lighting, sidewalk bulbouts and r"" ~
angled parking;
3) Widen sidewalks along Dublin Boulevard to 8 feet
between the I-680 freeway overpass and ~Ilage
Parkway;
4) Install and/or replace bus shelters along Dublin
Boulevard;
5) Gateway feature and landscaping at the
intersection of Dublin Boulevard and bougherty Road;
6) Widening of the Iron Horse -taTassajara Creek
Bikeway to 10 feet along the north side of Dublin .
Boulevard.
COMMENTS ~
In 2005, the City applied for and was granted $3,000,000 of Housing Incentives Program (HIP) funds through the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), in conjunction with the high density housing component of the
Dublin Transit Center project. In addition, $297,000 of Federal Transportation Earmark funds and $76,000 of
Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funds have been allocated for the project
It is anticipated that the project will be completed in summer 2010.
" FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2070-2011 2011-2012 2072-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 377,380 2201 $ 574,390 $ 302,364 . $ 876,754
Other Contract Services 454,051 2202 $2,701,098 57,540 2,758,638
Land / Right of Way
Improvements 2,800,878
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 3,083
TOTAL S 3,635,392 53,275,488 ~ 359,904 ~ 3,635,392
PROJECT ' STAFF 0.54
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT '
-5 .
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTNITY
960016 San Ramon Road Trail Improvements STREETS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e
This pr.oject would design and construct ~ . M;:
improvements to repair the traii adjacent to San ° t;
Ramon Road from Alcosta Boulevard to Dublin ~
Boulevard. The improvements include placing tree .
root barriers, reconstruction of heaved asphalt areas,
and sealing the asphalt concrete trail.
Replacement of trail lighting fixtures is proposed to be , P R F T A o
undertaken in Fiscal Year 2012-2013, and will extend o W
from Alcosta Boulevard to Silvergate Drive (subject to B~
review of available funding). ~ I
wo ,
These improvements will create greater comfort.and
safety for those who will utilize the traiL
COMMENTS
The existing trail has many areas where tree ro~ts have heaved the trail paving to such an extent that Staff received
comments that the trail is difficult to traverse. This project included inyestigation of existing conditions and design in
Fiscal Year 2007-2008. Because the project required three different types of work, it was phased. In Fiscal Year
2008-2009 root barrier installation and repair/sealing of the asphalt was completed.
The remaining phase is planned to include lighting fixture replacements. For planning purposes these costs have
been shown in Fscal Year 2012-2013, however, future updates to the Capital Improvement Plan will need to assess
available funding. ~ _
' FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2074-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 25,999 1001 $ 71,858 89,250 $ 161,108
Other Contract Services
Land / Right of Way . "
Improvements 134,409
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 700 ~
TOTAL S 161,108 S 77,858 ; 89,250 5 161,108
PROJECT STAFF 0.05
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
-59-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ~ ACTNITY
960017 Citywide Street Storm Drain Condition STREETS
Assessment
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
This project would clean and assess the condition of the storm
drain system within the City limits. ~
COMMENTS '
The City's storrn drain system is currently valued at approximately $82 milfion. Several older sections of the storm
drain system are known to have problems and should be repaired. The project is envisioned as a five year phased
project. The project started with the older sections of Dubfin and moved toward the eastem area of the City in
subsequent years. .
During Fiscal Year 2007-2008 and Fiscal Year 2008-2009 cleaning of sections of the storm drain system was
completed along with a video recording of the existing pipe condition, and an assessment report of the storm drain
system. The assessment report proposed local repairs to the storm drain system.
For Fiscal Year 2010-2011, funding will be suspended for further assessment work; instead, funding will be .
provided for repair and replacement work. This will allow Staff time to evaluate the conditions identified and begin
to address corrective or replacement work. Repair work will be funded in the amount of $40,000. This will provide
funding to correct a known storm drain pipe and outfall failure along the Alamo Canal at Poplar Way / Hickory Lane,
and also complete high priority repairs identified in the 1st Year Assessment. It is expected that the outfall repair
will be completed by the Zone 7 Water Agency; Zone 7 is expected to contribute a portion of the repair costs (this
contribution is not shown in repair budget, which reflects only the City's share of the work). Funding for further
assessment work will resume in Fiscal Year 2011-2012 and continue through the next two years.
~ FINANCINGlYEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 64,272 1001 $ 155,225 $ 40,000 $ 163,288 $ 163,288 $ 163,289 $ 685,090
Other Contract Services 582,409 . •
Land / Right of Way .
Improvements 37,000
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 1,409 ~ .
TOTAL b 685,090 a 155,225 a 40,000 $ 163,288 ~ 163,288 ~ 163,289 ~ 685,090
PROJECT STAFF 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.04
MANAGEMENT (FT~ CONTRACT 0.14 0.44 0.14
. -s~- -
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
960098 Dubiin Boulevard/Amador Plaza Road STREETS
Intersection Im rovements
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e
S
p y , ~
Over the ast few ears, the-infersection of Dublin ~ Y`~ M~--'
Boulevard and Amador Plaza Road has experienced a °
significant increase in congestion due to traffic
generated by the I-680 hook. ramps and the
development of commerciai businesses near the ~
intersection. This project would perForm a detailed
engineering study to determine the precise plan of the ~ ~
proposed improvements and to identify the right~ of way S/ : P R F T A Q
needed to improve the intersection. It is anticipated Z ~ ~ W
that the improvements will include the addition of left ° ~
and right tum lanes to facilitate traffic movement ~BVNe~~ uueu ~I _
through the intersection. ; _
\ , Ea~o
COMMENTS ~ ~ ~
The intersection improvement project is included in the Downtown Traffic Impact Fee Program Iist of improvement
projects. In Fiscal Year 2010-2011, it is proposed that preliminary engineering work be undertaken after completion
of the comprehensive Downtown Dublin Specific Plan. Design and right-of-way acquisition will be performed in
Fiscal Year 2011-2012, and construction will be undertaken in Fiscal Year 2012-2013.
The project will be funded with I-580/I-680 reimbursement funds (now at $1,454,297), Downtown Traffic Impact Fees ~
and Proposition 1 B funds. _ ~ ~
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund Prior Years 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 115,172 4304 $ 1,472 99,000 $ 299,820 247,110 $ 647,402
Other Contract Services 267,820 4303 101,800 90,542 192,342
Land / Right of Way 218,800 2210 648,618 648,618
Improvements 886,270
Machinery / Equipment
Misceflaneous 300
TOTAL S 1,488,362 S 1,472 $ 99,000 $ 401,620 S 986,270 $ 1,488,362
PROJECT STAFF 0.07 0.13 0,78
' MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
~ -61- .
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM •
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
960019 Dougherty Road Improvements - STREETS
Amador Valley Boulevard North to City Limits
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION ~ e
, µ `
1.
This project would construct the ultimate northbound t'~.. ~
lanes for pougherty Road from Amador Valiey
Boulevard north to the Dublin City Limits. This would
make Dougherty Road a six-lane facility.
~
~
. . ~ PRFTA o
t
. _ ~ u~
~
~
' ~a~~~ $ ~w ~S .
. . ~
~ Civic Center
COMMENTS .
The present configuration of Dougherty Road is four lanes; however, the easterly lane is in the future median. This
project will widen Dougherty Road to a six-lane divided roadway with landscaped medians within the limits of the project.
The need for this project is being driven by development in the Dougherty Valley. It is anticipated that developers'
Traffic Impact Fees, including Contra Costa County's Dougherty Valley fees, will fund the project. In Fiscal Year 2002-
2003, Dougherty Valley impact fees funded the trafFc signal at the intersection of Dougherty Road and Willow Creek
Drive. . Through the end of Fiscal Year 2008-2009, the Traffic Impact Fees collected specifically for this project is
approximately $429,593.
The City of San Ramon widen~d Dougherty Road from four to six lanes to the City Limit and extend Dublin's existing
Class I bike path from its northerly end to Old Ranch Road. The extension of the bike path up to the City Limit required
funding participation from Dubfin in the amount of $22,419. A combination of Measure B Bike Program funds ($2,805)
and project specific Traffc Impact Fees ($19,614) were expended in Fiscal Year 2008-2009 to fund Dublin's share of the
improvements.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 461,874 4302 $ 2,804 $ 2,804
Other Contract Services 175,118
Land /'Right of Way ~ -
Improvements 3,610,322 4309 19,614 19,614
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 127,667 Insufficient funding within CIP time frame $ 4,352,563
TOTAL S 4,374,981 S 22,418 4,374,981
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT =
-62- '
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTNITY
960020 Citywide Signal Communications Upgrade STREETS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
The City's Traffic Management System is comprised of a Traffic Operations Center (TOC), located in the Civic .
Center, from which video from Closed Circuit Television (CCT1/) cameras located at various intersections can be
viewed and signal controllers can ~be accessed and reprogrammed to modify signal timings and coordination plans.
This project would expand the system by replacing traffic signal controllers with state-of-the-art controllers, upgrading
communications equipment, and incorporating additional CCN cameras. These upgrades will allow City staff to
remotely, from the TOC, monitor and update signal timing and coordination plans, as well as view traffic operations
and incidents in the field. ~
COMMENTS ~
During Fiscal Year 2007-2008, the Dublin Boulevard/Hibemia Drive intersection was upgraded and incorporated into
the TOC. The signal controllers currently requiring an upgrade include (1) Dublin Boulevard/Myrtle Drive; (2) Dublin
Boulevard/John Monego Court; (3) Dublin BoulevardlGlynnis Rose Drive; (4) Dublin Boulevard/Tassajara Road; (5)
Tassajara Road/Koll Center, (6) Tassajara Road/South Dublin Ranch Drive; (7) Hacienda Drive/Central Parkway; (8)
Hacienda Drive/Summerglen Drive; (9) Dublin Boulevard/Hansen Drive; (10) Gleason Drive/Creekview Drive; (11)
Amador Valley Boulevard/Dougherty Road; (12) Amador Valley Boulevard/lron Horse Trail; and (13) Amador Valley
Boulevard/Stagecoach Road. Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority is planning to replace the controllers for
Intersections 1 through 4 as part of their Bus Rapid Transit project during Fiscal Year 2009-2010. Intersections 5
through 13 would remain the only signal controllers requiring upgrade, with Intersections 4 and 5 along Tassajara
Road being highest in priority so that a coordinated signal timing plan may be developed for the corridor in the future.
At this time, the CIP includes finro signal controller upgrades and communication equipment for six intersections
along Tassajara Road. It is anticipated that Transportation Funds for Clean Air (TFCA) will be secured during Fiscal
Year 2010-2011 for use in Fiscal Year 2011-2012.
A Communications Masterplan was completed in 2008 that established future CCN camera monitoring locations
and identified infrastructure needs to link to the TOC the new camera locations and all signal controllers Citywide not
already part of the system. The total cost would be beiween $550,000 and $650,000, depending on the type of
equipment installed. These costs are not included in this CIP at this time. Opportunities to install some of the
equipment concurrent with land development and to fund the improvements through grants will be examined.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
EST~IMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2017 2011-2012 2072-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspecti~n $ 3,780 1001 $ 8,639 $ 8,639
Other Contract Services 2207 $ 34,604 34,604
Land / Right of Way • • ~
Improvements 39,463
Machinery 1 Equipment
Miscellaneous
TOTAL S 43,243 S 8,639 3 34,604 ~ 43,243
PROJECT STAFF 0.02 ' ~
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT •
-63-
2010-2015 CAP(TAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
969202 - 969206 Annual Slurry Seal Program STREETS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION ,
This program would slurry seal existing street surfaces as a preventive maintenance technique used to prolong the life
of asphalt concrete pavement. ~
COMMENTS
As streets begin showing some wear and stress cracking, it is important to seal the cracks to keep water from getting
into the roadway subgrade, and to prolong the life of the asphalt concrete pavement. Slurry seal consists of a
sand/oil mixture which seals cracks and provides a new uniform wearing surface:
The City's Pavement Management Program provides the funding guidetines and the priorities for properly maintaining
the City streets. ~ _
This program will protect the substantial investment the City has in its street system.
The 2010 Slurry Seal Program includes additional funds from the Alameda County Transportation Improvement
~ Authority (ACTIA) Measure B Bicycle & Pedestrian fund (Fund 2205) to add bicycle lanes on various City streets.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
' Design / Inspection $ 268,600 2201 Annual $ 624,32D $ 624,320 624,320 $ 624,320 $ 624,320 $ 3,121,600
Other Contract Services
Land / Right of Way 2205 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000
Improvemer~ts 3,OD0,000
Machinery / Equipment • .
Miscellaneous 3,000 .
TOTAL S 3,2T1,600 S 654,320 S 654,320 ; 654,320 ; 654,320 ; 654,320 ; 3,271,600
PROJECT • STAFF 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
MANAGEMENT FTE CONTRACT
-64- ~
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM '
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
969102 - 969106 Annual Street Overlay Program , STREETS
DESCR(PTION - LOCATION
This project provides for the placement of a 1-1i2 inch asphalt overlay on streets that are pres~ntiy in a
deteriorated condition at various locations.
COMMENTS ~
As streets begin showing structural failures, it is important to reinforce these streets with pavement repairs and
overlay to reduce the need for more costly pavement reconstruc6on in the future. The City's Pavement
Management Program has provided the City with funding guidelines and priorities for maintaining the City streets.
The scope of work in this annual program includes removing and replacing failed pavement, placing 1-1/2 inches
of asphalt concrete overlay, and restriping the street ~ ~ ~
This annual program is primarily funded by Alameda ~County Transportation Improvement Authority (ACTIA)
Measure B funds (Fund 2204). Proposition 42 funds (Fund 2209) are available for this program in Fiscal Year
2010 2011 and Fiscal Year 2011-2012. Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (CMA) TIP funds
(Fund 2208) will be available in Fiscal Year 2011-2012 for improvements on arterial/collector streets.
This program will protect the substantial investment the City has in the street system.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund Prior Years 2010-2017 2011-2012 2072-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 393,300 2201 Mnual $ 280,000 $ 280,OD0 $ 280,000 $ 840,OD0
Other Contract Services 50,000 2204 Annual $ 454,050 $ 294,950 $ 347,050 404,950 347,050 1,848,050
Land / Right of Way 2208 Annual 217,000 217,000 ~
Improvements 3,343,990 2209 422,600 . 467,390 889,990 •
Machinery / Equipment •
Mscellaneous 7,750 ~
TOTAL S 3,795,040 ; 876,650 S 979,340 S 627,050 ; 684,950 S. 627,050 ; 3,795,040
PROJECT STAFF 0.34 0.46 0.35 0.46 0.35
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT ' ~
-65-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
Not Yet Assigned Dougherty Road Improvements - STREETS
~ Amador.Valley Boulevard to Houston Place
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e
~
This project consists of two phases. The first t~_- ~
phase widened the travel lanes by removing
existing dirt medians on Dougherty Road and -'"r
replacing them with new pavement. This
completed. the ultimate pavement improvements ~
for southbound trafFc for this segment of ~
Dougherty Road. A second phase~ of this project Z 3~ ~^i-" ~ ~ p R F T A o
would widen Dougherty Road from four to six ~ s' ~ o
lanes and would include landscaped medians from i, ~ W
Amador Valley Boulevard to north of Houston ~ S D LVD ~
Place. ~ ~"'ec?a
. ~eo
Civic Center
COMMENTS -
The first phase of this project allowed the two southbound lanes to move away from the westerly curb, thus improving
intersection sight distance and providing an area along the curb for bus stops, emergency parking and on-street
bicyclists. The City received an Intermodal Surface Transportation EfFciency Act (ISTEA) Grant to fund the bulk of the
first phase of the project. The City also overlaid this segment of Dougherty Road, including a portion of Dougherty ~
Road north of Amador Valley Boulevard. The second phase of this project is anticipated to be funded by Traffic Impact
Fees, including contributions from the Dougherty Valley (Contra Costa County) projects and eastem Dublin. To date,
~ approximately $201,199 of project mitigation contributions have been collected and are available for this ptoject.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2072 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design/Inspection $ 479,149 2201 $ 139,186 $ 139,786
Other Contract Senrices 157,841 2202 285,044 285,044
Land / Right of Way ~ 2204 62,269 62,269
Improvements 3,674,542 2200 69,340 ~ 69,340
Machinery! Equipment 4309 14,430 14,430
Miscellaneous 162,645 Insufficient funding within CIP time frame _ 3,903,908
TOTAL s 4,474,177 ~ 570,269 $ 4,474,177
PROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT{FTE) CONTRACT ~ ~
-66- ~
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
• PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
Not Yet Assigned Dublin Boulevard Improvements - STREETS
Sierra Court to Dublin Court
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e
~ ~ r~
This project would widen Dublin Boulevard from i;.- °
Sierra Court to Dublin Court and underground
ewsting overhead utilities. This project would
increase the roadway capacity from four to six
lanes.
_ W ~ ~v
j
~ ~ i. ' PRFTA _o
0
~ ~
~ ~
IN L ~
'
~ Id80
~ Civic Center
COMMENTS
This is the third phase of, the Dublin Boulevard widening. The widening of this segment of Dublin Boulevard would
complete the improvements on Dublin Boulevard from San Ramon Road to Dougherty Road. Recent traffic studies ~
have shown that six lanes of traffic would be needed as Dublin continues to expand to the east.
It is anticipated that this project would be funded through Traffic Impact Fees (TI~ and outside grants. Through the
end of Fiscal Year 2008-2009, $718,623 of project mitigation contributions have been col(ected and are available for
this project. In addition, the project may be funded from Category 2 Eastern Dublin TIF fees.
Existing ovefiead utilities would also need to be relocated along Dublin Boulevard prior to the road improvements being
constructed. ~
fINANCINGlYEARS SCHEDULE
ES77MATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2017-2072 2012-2013 2013-2014 20142015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 274,165
Other Contrad Services 180,766
Land / Right of Way 590,304
Improvements 1,876,614
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 62,156 Insufficient Funding within CIP Time Frame $ 2,984,005
TOTAL S 2,984,005 ' S 2,984,005
PROJECT. STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT '
-67-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION AGTIVITY
Not Yet Assigned Dublin Boulevard - STREETS
Right Turn at Village Parkway
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e
` ` M+
This project would construct an eastbound right- t;.-
tum lane on Dublin Boulevard at ~Ilage Parkway. r.--
r
•/I ~
a ,1 ~
~
~ ~~-J PRFTA o
~ . c
Z W ~
~ v
' ~/B~& N LVD ~
~
, ~o
CIVIC CCfltC~
COMMENTS -
The I-580/I-680 Direct Connector Project identified the need to construct an eastbound right-turn lane on Dublin
Boulevard at vllage Parkway. This project would accommodate additiona) traffic from downtown Dublin attracted to
the I-680 northbound on-ramp at Vllage Parkway and would improve the level o# service at the intersection of Dublin ~
Boulevard and Vllage Parkway by alfowing a third easfbound lane on Dublin Boulevard across the Vllage Parkway
intersection. This project would be funded from available Traffic Impact Fee Fund - Category 3. ~
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2072-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 75,265
Other Contract Services 13,016 4303 $ 100,000 $ 619,272 $ 719,272
Land / Right of Way 155,949
Improvements 473,179
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 1,863
TOTAL $ 719,2T2 $ 100,000 S 619,272 s 719,272
PROJECT STAFF 0.22
MANAGEMENT FTE) CONTRACT
-68-
2070-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ~
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITY
Not Yet Assigned Scarlett Drive , STREETS
Iron Horse Trail Extension
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
This ro'ect would rovide an extension of Scarlett Drive e M-`-'"~~~.
P 1 P ~r
and relocate and enhance a portion of the Iron Horse ~ j--~'
Trail. The roadway element is a connection befinreen
Dougherty Road and Dublin Boulevard (within the ~
~
forme~ Southem Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way). ~
COMMENTS o ~ .0~
1
ti
m
The extension of Scarlett Drive, which. is included in the S ~ ~ : P R F T A ~
~ Dublin General Plan, would relieve trafFic congestion at `a ~
the Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard intersection, vr, p ~vo ~
especially for BART Station-bound traffic. The project e''"'~?a -
costs would need to be funded by developer ,
contributions, Coun -~de half-cent trans ortation sales '~B0
ty P CNic Center ,
tax, Eastem Dublin Traffic dmpact Fees (Category 2), and
Contra Costa County contributions. ~
This project is included in the voter-approved Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan funded by the half-cent
sales tax. The sales tax funding p~ogrammed for this project is presently $6.267 million, and is subject to approval by the
Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority (ACTIA). Although these funds provide for a sign~cant portion of
the total project budget, additional funding would be required to complete the project.
A portion of Scarlett Drive from Dougherty Road to Houston Place was constructed by a private developer as part of tMe
Scarlett Place housing development, located next to Scarlett Drive. The value of the dedicated street right-of-way and
street improvements was estimated at $2,386,360. The total cost of the project has been reduced by this amount to
reflect this improvement. A future developme~t that could impact this project is the City General Plan Amendment being
proposed by a private developer working with Camp Parks. This development would be located on the southem part of
the Camp Parks property generally bounded by Dublin Boulevard, Dougherty Road, Amold Road, and 5th Street. Any
proposed streets within this area could impact the extension of Scarlett Drive. ~
Project development, including preliminary engineering and environmental work, was performed in Fiscal Years 2005-
2006, 2006-2007 and 2007-2008, using traffic mitigation fees specifically collected for this project:
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund Prior Years 2010-2011 2017-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2074-2015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 809,706 ~7~0~
Other Contract Services 846,780 4309 $ 227,094 $
Land / Right of Way . 5,170,000
Improvements 4,280,814 ~
Machinery / Equipment •
Miscellaneous . 25,490 Insufficient Funding within CIP Time Frame 10,905,696
TOTAL S 11,132;790 S 227,094 311,132,790
RROJECT STAFF
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT •
-69-
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTMTY ~
New Dublin Ranch Street Light Pole STREETS
Paintin Pro'ect
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION ~
This project would consist of painting the decorative street light poles in the Dublin Ranch Street Lighting
Assessment District (99-1). ~
COMMENTS
The Dublin Ranch Street Lighting Assessment District was established to accommodate the installation and
maintenance of decorative street li~hts. When the Dublin Ranch Street Lighting Assessment District was
established, it was determined that once the decorative street light poles were installed that the lifespan of the paint
would last for approximately 10 years, at which time, revenue collected through assessment district fees would be
utilized to fund a street light pole painting'project
Due to the fluctuating installation timeframe of ~the decorative street lights in each development, the street light pole
painting project will be completed in phases and will become a multiple-year CIP. ~
FINANCINGIYEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2073-2014 2014-2015 Totals ~
Design / Inspection $ 35,~000 2705 ~ $ 113,150 $ 76,700 $ 76,700 $ 76,700 $ 76,700 $ 419,950
Other Contract Services 383,950 ~ ~
Land / Right of Way
Improvements
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 1,000
TOTAL ~ 419,950 S 113,150 ~ 76,700 S 76,700 ~ 76,700 ~ 76,700 ~ 419,950
PROJECT STAFF 0.71 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
~ -
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTNtTY
New Speed Feedback Demonstration Project STREETS
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION
This project would procure one or more speed feedback signs for Citywide use for the purpose of lowering vehicle
travel speeds. An analysis would be conducted to determine whether fixed or portable signs would be most
appropriate. If fixed signs are selected, then locations in eastern, central and westem Dublin would be identified for
installation. Before and after speed data would be collected to assess the efFectiveness of the signs at reducing
vehicle speeds. ~
COMMENTS
At the December 15, 2009, Cify Council meeting, the City Council reviewed the current process which Staff
undergoes to respond to residents' requests regarding traffic safety and compared it to the processes employed at
various neighboring agencies. It was determined that StafF would continue with the current process. A specific
enhancement to the existing program identified by Staff was the implementation of a speed feedback sign pilot
program that would test the effectiveness of speed feedback signs as a means of reducing vehicle speeds. The City
Council supported StafPs recommendation and directed Staff to create a new CIP. Police Services currently deploys -
a portable speed feedback sign on a periodic basis throughout the City. The City Council requested that in addition
to fixed signs, procurement of additional portable signs be considered. ~
This CIP includes an analysis of fuced versus portable signs, the findings of which would be presented to the City
Council for approval, along with the locations for deployment if fixed signs are selected. This CIP also includes the
procurement and installation of the selected equipment For budget purposes, it is assumed that a total of six fixed
signs will be acquired. Before and after studies will be conducted to determine whether the equipment was
successful at reducing vehicle.speeds.
~ FINANCINGIYEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2073-2014 20142015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 5,940 2201 $ 57,600 $ 57,600
Other Contrad Services 660 •
Land /Right of Way •
Improvements . 51,000
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous
TOTAL S 57,600 S 57,600 ~ S 57,600
PROJECT STAFF 0.06
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
_71_
2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTNITY
New Traffic Signal Improvements STREETS
1
DESCRIPTION - LOCATION e ~ `
~ 1
This project consists of several traffic signal ° c!: ~ h~ -
improvements that would increase traffic safety at the
following intersections: P R F T A
~ ~
L
1. Installation of a new trafFc signal at the intersection ew
of Amador Valley Boulevard and Brighton Drive. ~ .~r ~
2. Upgrade of exis6ng traffic signal at the intersection - o
of San Ramon Road and Shannon Avenue. ~
3. Installation of a new traffic signal at the intersection ~ e o pUgUNBL ~
of Central Parkway and Sybase Drive.
Civic
COMMENTS '
The installation of a traffic signal at Amador Valley Boulevard/Brighton Drive was added as a new project in the most
recent June 2009 Eastern Dublin Traffic,lmpact Fee Update. An amount of $350,000 (Fund 4302) was programmed
. for the installation of a new traffic signal at said intersection. ~
The existing traffic signal at the intersection of San Ramon Road and Shannon Avenue would be upgraded to include
a separate phase to allow protected left tum movements from Shannon Avenue. This would provide a safer ~
pedestrian environment for school children crossing San Ramon Road towards Dublin Elementary School. ACTIA's
Measure B Bike/Pedestrian Safety Program funds (Fund 2205) would be used to upgrade the signal.
The intersection of Central Parkway and Sybase Drive would require a new traffic signal as traffic volume increases
in the area. A traffic mitigation contribution of $60,003 (as of July 1, 2009) has been collected and would be used for
. its future installation.
FINANCING/YEARS SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED COSTS Fund PriorYears 2010.2011 2011-2012 2Q12-2013 2013-2014 20142015 Totals
Design / Inspection $ 53,490 4302 $ 227,860 $ 121,800 • . $ 349,660
Other Contract Services 73,500 2205 83,430 55,750 ' 139,180 .
Land / Right of Way ~ . •
Improvements 358,600 ~ '
Machinery / Equipment
Miscellaneous 3,250
TOTAL ~ 488,840 5 311,290 ~ 177,550 S 488,840 '
PROJECT STAFF 0.18 0.15
MANAGEMENT(FTE) CONTRACT
_72_ .