Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7.1 Electronic Agenda System-Approp of FundsG~~,~ OF DU~~~2 19' _ -~' ,82 `~,~~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~LIFpR~~ STAFF REPORT C I T Y C L E R K DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL File # ^~00-~~ DATE: July 20, 2010 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Joni Pattillo, City Manager SUBJE • Appropriation of Funds And Establishment of A New Capital Improvement Project - Electronic Agenda System Prepared By: Caroline P. Soto, Services Director City Clerk and Paul S. Rankin, Administrative EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: At the City Council Meeting on June 22, 2010 an informational report was presented in response to the City Council's High Priority Objective for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 to "Investigate opportunities and implement solutions for paperless Council Meetings." The City Council directed Staff to return with more detailed information which would allow the City Council to consider the addition of a project to the Capital Improvement Program, including the appropriation of funds. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed costs for the implementation of this project are $117,600, which would be funded from three sources. It is proposed that $7,000 of the project be funded from Internal Service Funds included in the current Budget and $3,000 would be from a grant. The remaining $107,600 would be funded from reserves. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution Amending the Adopted 2010-2015 Five Year Capital Improvement Program To Add A New Project - Electronic Agenda System and Providing An Appropriation. G~ ~~~t~ ~.~~~ • Submitted By Reviewed By Rev ed By City Clerk Administrative Services Dir. Assistant City Manager DESCRIPTION: Based upon City Council direction provided at the June 22, 2010 City Council meeting, Staff have developed a Capital Improvement Project -"Electronic Agenda System," which is proposed to be added to the recently adopted 2010-2015 Five Year Capital Improvement Program. The goal of this project is to reduce the volume of paper generated as part of the Page 1 of 4 ITEM NO. 7~ agenda process and to effectively utilize technology to improve effectiveness and efficiency. The project is proposed to include two phases. Phase 1- Citv Council Aqenda Distribution As Electronic Files The initial phase will be focused on providing the final City Council Agenda Packet as digital computer files that can be read on a personal computer. There will not be the ability to annotate the documents, highlight sections, or to make individual notes directly on the electronic copy of Staff Reports. (These are features that may be possible following Phase 2.) The documents will be accessed from a Laserfiche Reader program that will be loaded on each machine. LaserFiche is software used by the City Clerk and other Departments to manage documents. You can print the item or export the image. Laserfiche is also currently the format used on the City website to download Agenda items. As part of Phase 1, the proposed Project Scope also includes the purchase of 8 lap-top computers that can be used for public agency business by the members of the City Council and three Staff Members (City Manager, City Attorney, and Assistant City Manager). In order to make efficient use of these units, Staff is proposing to install docking stations at each office location. The lap-top will serve a dual purpose as the primary desk-top unit and also a portable device. The docking station will allow the o~ce location to utilize a full screen monitor, keyboard, and mouse. Information Services Staff have determined a rotation of existing desk-tops which will make efficient use of the computers and avoid duplication. The City Attorney does not currently have a dedicated City desk-top location and the purchase of this lap-top will be 100% funded by the new Agenda System Capital Improvement Project. It is proposed that $7,000 of the remaining seven lap-top purchases, will be offset by Internal Service Funds originally budgeted for replacement computers in Fiscal Year 2010/2011. Out of the eight locations that will be converted to lap-tops, two of these locations were already scheduled for a desk-top replacement in Fiscal Year 2010/2011 and five would have been scheduled for replacement in Fiscal Year 2013/2014. The following Table describes how the new project would dovetail with the planned replacements. Scheduled Re lacement Year # Desk-Top City Office Locations Revised Proposed Replacement With Fiscal Year 2010/2011 A enda Pro'ect Fiscal Year 2010/2011 2 Replace with portable Lap-top and City Office Dockin Station Fiscal Year 2013/2014 5 Install portable Lap-top and City Office Docking Station and deploy the current systems purchased in 2009 at appropriate locations originally scheduled for re lacement in Fiscal Year 2010/2011. There are now 21 paper agenda meeting packets produced for the City Council (5), Staff (12), media (2) and public (2). With Phase 1 in place, one paper packet would be produced for the public and City Councilmembers would have the option of continuing to receive a paper packet if they so choose. The remaining Staff and media would have the option to receive a CD or they could access the agenda and associated Staff Reports via the City's website. City Staff would have access to an internal network directory. Page 2 of 4 It is anticipated that Phase 1 including training and documentation of the process can be completed by October 31, 2010. Phase 2- Electronic Aaenda Preparation Soflware and Publishinq Svstem Phase 2 would include an examination of comprehensive solutions that can build off of what is implemented in Phase 1. Staff would propose to use a Request For Proposal (RFP) process with a multi-departmental Staff Review Team that would be assembled to evaluate RFPs of agenda management software, including features as well as costs. Having representation from throughout the organization will also allow the consideration of how best to use a system for additional commissions and committees. The purchase of a system designed for this purpose would have a goal to provide the following improvements: • Streamline the agenda packet preparation process; • Allow electronic composition, review, revision, tracking of status, and approval routing of Staff Reports; • Support simpler and more integrated electronic publication of the agenda packet; and • Further reduce the amount of paper used for approval routing as well as agendas for other Commissions and Committees. When examining a broader use of electronic agenda preparation, Staff would also need to consider potential fixed lap-tops or other computer connections at the dais. The number of Commissioners/Committee members can vary and Staff would suggest a fixed computer device at all locations at the dais. For budget purposes, the Phase 2 project equipment cost has been based on the cost of a lap-top configuration. However, with changes in technology, alternatives that may reduce the costs would also be explored. Because the lap-tops purchased in Phase 1 can be easily left in the Desk-Top Office docking stations there would be no duplication with Phase 2 and the City could efficiently deploy the use of the Agenda Management system to more than just the City Council. In addition to evaluating equipment alternatives, there are a variety of software models established by software vendors. They range from software and hardware that would be purchased and installed on City hardware supported by City Staff, to internet based systems, which allow users with security access to obtain the information from any desk-top that has an internet connection. Most of the systems on the market also support publishing a public version that can be posted to the website. As a separate project, the City will be improving network access capability from the City Council Chamber, which will provide additional infrastructure for a system selection that would be considered later in the year. In order to effectively manage Phase 2 of the Project, Staff would recommend that the City retain the services of a Project Management Consultant. Current staffing and assignments do not allow for Staff to prepare a Request For Proposal, solicit vendor responses, evaluate responses, schedule and coordinate scripted demonstrations, prepare a final recommendation and agreement, and oversee the implementation. Although the City Clerk would serve as the Lead Staff Member, additional resources would be required and the cost of the Consultant has been included in the proposed Project Budget. Page 3 of 4 Proiect Costs The following shows the total Project Cost which is recommended to be added as a new Capital Improvement Project: Phase 1- Ci Council A enda 8 Laptops for five City Councilmembers and three Staff $ 19,000 (Including necessary Office Software; docking stations; miscellaneous su ort connections Electrical Work in City Council Chambers including $ 3,600 contin enc . Phase No. 1 Total $ 22,600 Phase 2- Software System Procurement, Installation, and Ex ansion of Electronic A enda Agenda Management Software including set-up, $ 50,000 licenses, training and one year system mai ntenance lus contin enc Project Management Services to develop an accurate $ 20,000 business process map of proposed electronic agenda process and oversee selection of agenda manager software and im lementation E ui ment Allowance 10 locations at the Dais $ 25,000 Phase No. 2 Total $ 95,000 Grand Total CIP Pro osed Pro'ect $ 117,600 The project funding is proposed to come from the following sources: PHASE1 PHASE2 TOTAL Internal Service Funds Included in Ado ted 2010/11 Bud et $ 7,000 $ 7,000 Sto waste.or Grant $ 3,000 $ 3,000 General Fund Reserve - Desi nated For New O ortunities $ 15,600 $ 92,000 $107,600 TOTAL $ 22,600 $ 95,000 $117,600 This project would not fund the expansion of the use of lap-tops or other devices by the remaining members of the City Executive Team. It is anticipated that this can be considered as desk-top units are replaced and costs can be budgeted in the Internal Service Fund as part of the annual replacement process. The initial deployment of lap-tops as part of Phase 1 will serve as a pilot process to consider support issues and other impacts on resources before expanding the expansion to all members of the Executive Team. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution Amending the Adopted 2010-2015 Five Year Capital Improvement Program To Add A New Project - Electronic Agenda System and Providing An Appropriation. Page 4 of 4 RESOLUTION NO. XX -10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN *~******* AMENDING THE ADOPTED 2010-2015 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TO ADD A NEW PROJECT - ELECTRONIC AGENDA SYSTEM AND PROVIDING AN APPROPRIATION WHEREAS, the adopted 2010-2015 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) was adopted by the City Council on June 22, 2010; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 2010, the City Council received a report addressing options to reduce the use of paper consumed by the City in preparing and publishing the City Council Agenda; and WHEREAS, the adopted City of Dublin Ten Year Strategic Plan identifies one of the City Values in Governing as: "Embrace technology to improve effectiveness and efficiency"; and WHEREAS, the City Council requested that Staff prepare a new Capital Improvement Project that would provide potential phased implementation of the use of electronic files in lieu of paper agenda packets; and WHEREAS, a proposed project was presented to the City Council at the City Council meeting on July 20, 2010; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to establish a separate project in the Five Year Capital Improvement Program to account for implementation of an Electronic Agenda Preparation System. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Dublin approves the addition of a Project titled Electronic Agenda System to the adopted 2010-2015 Five Year Capital Improvement Program as described in the Staff Report presented July 20, 2010. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council also approves the Budget Change attached as Exhibit A of this Resolution, which appropriates funds to carry out this project. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of July, 2010, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CHANGE FORM FY 2010 / 2011 CHANGE FORM # New Appropriations (City Council Approval Required): Budget Transfers: X From Unappropriated Reserves (*) __ From Budgeted Contingent Reserve (1001.1901.81101) * General Fund - Designated New Opportunities Within Same Department Activity ~X From New Revenues** __ Between Departments (City Council Approval Required) icic C+nnWnc4u nrn f'r~n* ()thPr ~ ~~~~,.~A~~,~'3UDG~`C;A~COh`3U~17 ~~:: y ,AM4~~4T~ ;, .~~ 3 ~ ; ~~~CREAS~, B~QG~TrACCQU~IT ,; ~ ~ AMQUN'i'; , . ~"~~ : Name: Revenue - Measure D Recycling - Intergovernmental - County Grants - Measure D Mini-Grant Account #: 2302 .0000. 47301 $ 3,000 Name: EXPENSE - Capital Improvement Project -Electronic Agenda System - General Fund Name: EXPENSE - Internal Service Phase 1 Equipment- Gen Fund Fund - Non Departmental 930015.9600.9605.1001 $12,000 Replacement Computers Account #: 6301.1901.72102 $ 7,000 Phase1 Equipment-Internal Svc Fund 930015.9600.9605.6301 $7,000 Name: EXPENSE - Capital Improvement Project -Electronic Agenda System - General Fund Phase 2 Equipment 930015.9600.9605.1001 ~ $25,000 Phase 2- Proj Mngmt Contract Svcs 930015.9200.9201.1001 $20,000 Improvements - Not Bldg (electrical) 930015.9400.9401.1001 $ 3,600 Phase 2 Software / Implementation 930015.9600.9605.1001 $47,000 Name: EXPENSE - Capital Improvement Project -Electronic Agenda System - Meas D Fund Phase 2 Software / Implementation 930015.9600.9605.1001 $ 3,000 REASON FOR BUDGET CHANGE ENTRY: This Budget c;hange relates to tne atltlition ot a new Capital Improvement Project - Electronic Agenda System, presented at the City Council meeting on July 20, 2010. The Phase 1 equipment cost is $19,000 however, $7,000 of this expense is already included in the Internal Service Fund Budget. A mini-grant of $3,000 from StopWaste.org will partially fund the Software / Implementation costs. Fin Mgr/ASD: Sianature City Man~qer: ~-~, - Si~nature Date: ~ Q 2o I 0 Date: ~ ~Z- ~15 As Approved at the City Council Meeting,on: Date: 7/20/2010 : Mayor: Posted By: Signature Date: Date: G:~B+~dgetChmrgesl3_20l0_I/I3J 20_/0_CIP_Agenda_Syslem.doc EXHIBIT A