HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.1 Attch 2 CC Minutes 06-22-2010 36 3
DRAFT
Adoption of Resolution Rescinding Prior Tri Vailey Transportation
Development Fee Proaosed Increases (Resolution Nos.167-08 and 187-08)
s;z~
:~s
~m 7.2 {s~o-so~
Senior Civil Engineer (Traffic) Jaimee Bour~eois presented the Staff Report and
advised that in 2008, the Tri-Valley Transportation Council (MC) complefed a Fee
Nexus Study Update and developed nev~ Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee
amounts for member agency consideration. The Dublin City Council adopted two
resolutions in 2008 appraving the p~bposed new fees increases, which would have
gone into effect on Juiy 1, 2010, a~tiass all land wse categories. Because any change
to the fees required unanimous ,~ppraval and because one of the member agencies
did not approve the new fee s~r`ucture, the proposed fee increase was never formally
adopted by TVTC. As sucl~'; the City af Dublin adopted resolutions needed to be
rescinded at this #ime.
On motion of Vm. Hild~hbrand, secanded by Cm. Scholz and by unanimous vote, the
~ City Council adoptedj'~
RESOLUTION NO, 1 Q4 -10
RESCINDIIdG RESOLUTI4NS 167-08 AND 187-08 RELATING T4 THE TRI-
1~ALLEY TRANSPORTATiON DEVELOPMENT {TVTD) FEE
/
NEW BUSINESS
Request to initiate a
Planned Develoament Rexone for the Sierra/Trinitv Business Park
8:27;04 PM 8.1 (450-30)
Planning Manager Jeff Baker presented the Staff Report and advised that, at the
request of the City Council, Staff had been reviewing City regulations to determine if
any changes were necessary in order to provide assistance #o businesses and
property owners due to #he current economic cGmate. The Planned Develapment
Zoning District for the Sierra/Trinity Business Park was overly restrictive and fherefore
placed a burden on t~e current property owner by restric#ing the types of businesses
that could lacate on the site. In order to expand the allowable uses on the sife, the
City Council would pravide Staff with directio~ regarding a proposed amendment #o
the Planned Development Zoning District for the Sierra/Trinity Business Park.
DUBLIN CITY CUUNCIL MINUTES
V~LUME 29
ADJ4URNED REGULAR MEETING t9~~~,~~
JUNE 22, 2010 ~ ~ ~
1
Attachment 2
~ .3~~ 39
b
DRAFT
Dwane Berry, representative of the property owners (WCV Commercial Properties),
stated that this would allow more flexibility in the types of businesses currently zoned.
. Mr. Berry also stated fhat, over the last year, they had los# approximatefy fiv~ rental
leases due to the specific zoning currently in pEace. ~
Assistant City Manager Chris . Foss stated that the Ci#y would have turned down
additional businesses for leasing in this area as well due to zoning restrictions.
The City Council provided Staff with direction to work on amending the Planned
Development Rezone far the Sierra/Trinity Business Park. The City Council wished to ;
have Staff work on this, and assigned a priority of high priority. ~
PaperEess Aqenda Options
8:35:41 PM 8.2 (610=10)
City Clerk Caroline Soto presented the Staff Report and advised that one of the City
Council's High Priority Objectives for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 was to "Investigate
opportunities and implement solufians for paperiess Council Meetings.u This Staff
Report would present options to the City Council regarding the abjec#ive.
City Manager Pattil(o cEarified for City Couneii that if Phase 1 wais being considered
then Staff would present a draft Capital Improvement Project at the next City Cauncil
meeting, and impfement this phase as a test project that could later be implemented
with the other commissions. She further clarified that the purchase of laptops would
be to bring a universal approach to accessing #he agenda electronic ~les. In
recognition that the ultimate goal was to reduce the use af paper and understand the
amount of resources it would take to manage fhis project.
Vm. Hildenbrand asked if Staff cauld look into grant funding for the implementafion of
Phase 2 of this project.
City Manager Pattillo stated that Staff could look in#o this funding option. The first
option would be to seek availabilify from Stopwaste.org. The current proposal was to
fund fr
om the General Fund.
Mayor Sbrar~ti sfated fhat he would like to have more information presented on the
Phase 1 implementation at the next City Council meeting, and look at how we could
implement Phase 2 in the future.
DUBLIN CITY C4UNCIL lVIINUTES ~s
V4LUME 29 ~
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEET[NG ~q~~~,~
JUNE 22, 2010 ~ ~ ~
1