Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.1 Attch 2 Reso Approving SDR RESOLUTION NO. 11-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TO ADD A RAISED TOWER ELEMENT TO THE REAR OF THE NEW RETAIL BUILDING APPROVED FOR THE PROJECT SITE AT 7099 AMADOR PLAZA ROAD AND DIRECTING STAFF TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT ON A MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE PROJECT SIGNAGE (APN 941-0305-026-00) PLPA-2010-00062 WHEREAS, Michael Carey of Laconia Development (Applicant and Property Owner), submitted a Site Development Review (SDR) application to add a new, raised tower element to the rear of a new retail building approved for the project site at 7099 Amador Plaza Road. The application also includes a conceptual design for a freeway-oriented wall sign for the future tenant (Recreational Equipment, Inc. - REI) on the 40' tower element (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Project site is located in the Planned Development (Downtown Core Specific Plan) Zoning District, which permits retail uses, and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Retail/Office; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with State Guidelines and City Environmental Regulations require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts; and WHEREAS, Staff recommends that the project be found exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Section 15301 (Minor alterations to existing facilities involving little or no expansion); and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted to the City of Dublin Planning Commission recommending Site Development Review approval of the project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on January 24, 2011; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all reports, recommendations and testimony herein above set forth and used its independent judgment to evaluate the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Dublin Planning Commission does hereby make the following findings and determinations regarding the Site Development Review: A. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 8.104, with the General Plan and with any applicable Specific Plans and design guidelines in that 1) the proposed tower element is well designed in relation to surrounding properties and ATTACHMENT 2 incorporates architectural metal panels on the feature that are consistent with the rest of the building. B. The proposal is consistent with the provisions of Title 8, Zoning Ordinance in that. 1) the proposed tower element is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 8.104 (Site Development Review) as described above; and 2) the Project complies with Chapter 8.36 (Development Regulations) and does not exceed the maximum building height allowance. C. The design of the project is appropriate to the City, the vicinity, surrounding properties and the lot in which the project is proposed in that the proposed tower element is consistent with the rest of building and the Project continues the incorporation of colors and details on all sides/elevations of the building providing an attractive environment to the public. D. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the approved development in that the proposed tower element does not include additional building square footage or increase the development intensity of the site. E. Impacts to existing slopes and topographic features are addressed in that the proposed tower element will be located on a fully developed site that is relatively flat and will not alter the existing grade or topography. F. Architectural considerations including the character, scale and quality of the design, site layout, the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings, screening of unsightly uses, lighting, building materials and colors and similar elements result in a project that is harmonious with its surroundings and compatible with other development in the vicinity in that the proposed tower element is consistent with the rest of building and the Project continues the incorporation of colors and details on all sides/elevations of the building providing an attractive environment to the public and the Project's architectural elements will provide an interesting variation to other development in the vicinity. G. Landscape considerations, including the location, type, size, color, texture and coverage of plant materials, and similar elements have been incorporated into the project to ensure visual relief, adequate screening and an attractive environment for the public in that while no additional landscaping is proposed with the project, the proposed tower element will aid in the screening of rooftop equipment from vehicles travelling on 1-580. H. The site has been adequately designed to ensure proper circulation for bicyclists, pedestrians and automobiles in that the proposed tower element does not contain any modifications to the site that may impact circulation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Site Development Review modifications to the new retail building to allow a new tower element at 7099 Amador Plaza Road as shown on the Project Plans date-stamped "Received by Dublin Planning on December 10, 2010" and included as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: 2 of 5 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits or establishment of use, and shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval. The following codes represent those departments/agencies responsible for monitoring compliance of the conditions of approval: [PL] Planning; [B] Building; [PO] Police; [PW] Public Works; [ADM] Administration/City Attorney; [FIN] Finance; [PCS] Parks and Community Services; [F] Dublin Fire Prevention; [DSR] Dublin San Ramon Services District; [LDD] Livermore Dublin Disposal; [CO] Alameda County Department of Environmental Health; [Zone 7] Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Zone 7; [LAVTA] Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority; and [CHS] California Department of Health Services. NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency When Required, Source Prior to: GENERAL 1. Approval. The following Conditions of Approval PL On-going Planning apply to PLPA-2010-00062, modification to the Site Development Review approval for a retail building at 7099 Amador Plaza Road (the "Project") as originally approved by the Community Development Director on January 7, 2011. The changes from the original SDR approval include the addition of a tower element to the west and north facing elevations, as illustrated in Sheets A6, A7, and A8 (the Project Plan set). This approval for PLPA-2010-00062 shall generally conform to Sheets A6, A7, and A8 (the Project Plan set) prepared and submitted by Architectural Network, Inc. dated received by the Dublin Planning Division on December 10, 2010 stamped approved and on file in the Community Development Department, Planning Division and other plans, text, and diagrams relating to this approval, unless modified by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. Except as modified by this approval, all other sheets of the Project Plan set approved by the Community Development Director on January 7, 2011 shall remain in effect, and the Conditions of Approval approved by the Community Development Director on January 7, 2011 shall remain in effect. This SDR approval is for the addition of the tower element and the concept of the freeway-oriented si na a only. 2. Permit Expiration. Construction or use shall PL Two years from DMC commence within two (2) years of the Site Permit Approval 8.96.020.D Development Review approval or the permit(s) shall lapse and become null and void. Commencement of construction or use means the actual construction or use pursuant to the permit 3 of 5 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Agency When Required, Source Prior to: approval or demonstrating substantial progress toward commencing such construction or use. 3. Time Extension. The original approving decision- PL Two years from DMC maker may grant a time extension of permit Permit Approval 8.96.020.E approval for a period not to exceed six (6) months provided that: 1) the Applicant submits a written request for an extension prior to expiration of the permit approval; and 2) a determination can be made that all Conditions of Approval remain adequate to assure that the applicable findings of approval will continue to be met. All time extension requests shall be noticed and a public hearing or public meeting shall be held as required b the articular permit. 4. Revocation. The Site Development Review PL On-going DMC approval shall be revocable for cause in 8.96.020.1 accordance with Section 8.96.020.1, Revocation of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of the terms and conditions of this approval may be subject to the issuance of a citation. PLANNING - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 5. Permit Validity. The Site Development Review PL On-going DMC approval shall be valid for the remaining life of the 8.96.020.F approved structure so long as the operators of the subject property comply with the project's Conditions of A royal. 6. Exterior Building Colors. All exterior colors and PL Occupancy Planning finishes shall be consistent with the approved Project Plans and the color and materials boards. 7. Occupancy Permits. Final inspection and final PL, B Occupancy Planning & occupancy permits will not be granted until all Building construction and landscaping is complete in accordance with approved plans and the conditions required by the City. During inclement weather, bonding for landscaping may be permitted. 8. Signs. No signage is approved as part of this PL Installation of Planning Site Development Review approval. The signage signage shown on the Project Plan Set is conceptual only. All signs shall be reviewed and approved separately by the Zoning Administrator through a Zoning Clearance and/or Master Sign Program as necessary. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of January 2011 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: 4of5 ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: Planning Manager G:IPA#120101PLPA-2010-00062 New retail building at 7099 APRIPC 1.24.20111PC Reso SDR.doc 5of5